The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCT 97-22; Poinsettia Properties PA8; Tentative Map (CT) (3)'01 TTohearlomes 3 March 1, 2001 San DiegO oKCITY OF CARLSBAD ^ ' \ A^- 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attn: Dee Landers Re: Hanover Beach Colotfy (CT-97-22) Phase 1 Improvements and Interior Street Lights Dear Dee: I am writing you this letter in reference to the above-mentioned community. As you know, there are a number of items that are preferably, by both the City of Carlsbad and Shea Homes, completed prior to the first close of escrow. A list of the challenges and solution requests are as follows: 1. Pool Area: The pool area and all its facilities were required to be completed with the closing of the first unit in the first phase. Due to internal and weather challenges we do not feel that we will have this work complete until the closing of the first unit in the second phase. The difference in timing between these two phases is March 23r and May 15th. I am requesting relief from the Phase 1 requirement for the pool building and a revised deadline to be at the completion of the first unit in Phase 2. A response to this request needs to be shared with Mike and/or Larry Black. 2. Carlsbad Boulevard Frontage Improvements: These improvements have also been challenged with weather and coordination with the offsite road conditions. Approximately 80% of the improvements have been complete to date and could probably have the remainder complete in the next couple of weeks. However, I would like to wait on the completion of the remaining frontage improvements until the end of the community due to future homeowner safety as it relates to construction access. As I demonstrated to during our tour of the site, the future emergency entrance is an ideal location for us to continue using for a construction entrance. This will help to ensure a traffic separation between the future homeowners and construction. / am requesting relief from the requirement to have all frontage improvements complete by the first phase, and acceptance of the work completed to date as substantially meeting Shea Homes obligation. The remainder of the work will be completed with the completion of the last phase. A response to this request needs to be shared with Mike and/or Larry Black and Tim Finnessy. 10721 Treena Street, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92131, tel: 858-549-3156 fax: 858-549-0112 3. Volleyball Court Improvements: These improvements are very close to completion but are continually being delayed due to weather and the proximity to house construction relating to safety issues. I feel comfortable that the improvements will be complete in time. However, I would rather be safe than sorry. I am requesting a 30-day relief from the requirement that this improvement be complete by the first dosing in the first phase. This would set a completion date of April 23rd. A response to this request needs to be shared with Mike and/or Larry Black. 4. Interior Private Street Lights: It has been brought to my attention that the City of Carlsbad has typically not permitted any streets lights that deviate from the typical. We have put forth every effort to ensure the character and details of this community are unparalleled and something that Shea Homes and the City of Carlsbad can be proud of when completed. One of these very features is the private street lights. The private street lights that we have chosen are a "gas lamp" style that are elevated to a height of approximately 15 feet. A tradition light is approximately 22 feet. The lights that we have ordered and are ready to install emulate the quaint village type atmosphere that we all have pushed for since inception. In addition, I have spoken with our utility consultant and it is his impression that with private streets and with the tightness of this community, the proposed lights are sufficient enough for any light or safety concerns. / am requesting that the private street lights that we have selected be permitted in this private community. 1 have attached a design sheet for your review. A response to this request needs to be shared with Mike and/or Larry Black and Tim Finnessy. As you already know I have ensured that every possible feature has been scrutinized to the highest level to ensure a phenomenal community character. I hope that the requests above are not overwhelming and can be seen as needs, not desires. Again, I have to ask you to please review this in a very timely manner due to our final inspections. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, SHEA HOMES Ryan E. Green Community Development Manager Cc: Susan Trimingham, Shea Homes Greg Ponce, Shea Homes John Owen, Shea Homes Mark Canfield, Shea Homes SheaHomes San Diego City of Carlsbad July 28, 1999 Jordan Kass Hofman Planning Associates 5900 Pasteur Court, Suite 1 50 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Planning Department SUBJECT: STREET NAME APPROVALS FOR CT 97-22, AREA 8 The following street names have been approved for use in the above-listed subdivision, however, the items listed below must be submitted prior to Planning Department approval of the final map. These names should be included on the final map and all improvement plans. Polydora Road Martima Drive Ruppia Drive In addition, please submit the following items to this office: 1. Street name list; 2. 400 scale mylar delineating street locations and hydrant locations with at least two existing streets and/or intersections shown on the map; and 3. Vicinity map. Please call me at (760) 438-1161, extension 4329, if you have any questions. Sincerely, PAUL GODWIN Planning Technician PG:eh c:File 2O75 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92O09-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-0894 POMSETHA PUmNGAFEA 8 i 1 PaNSETJlA PLANNING AREA 8 PACIFIC OCEAN VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE T: \EMSt\MW\DaBrAMCM7YMC City of Carlsbad Planning Department February 2, 1999 Mike Bingham UDC Homes 11512 El Camino Real, Suite 110 San Diego, CA 92130 SUBJECT: CT 97-22/CP 98-09 /CDP 97-55 - Poinsettia Properties - Planning Area 8 Your application has been tentatively scheduled for a hearing by the Planning Commission on April 7, 1999. However, for this to occur, you must submit the additional items listed below. If the required items are not received by March 19, 1999, your project will be rescheduled for a later hearing. In the event the scheduled hearing date is the last available date for the City to comply with the Permit Streamlining Act, and the required items listed below have not been submitted, the project will be scheduled for denial. 1. Please submit the following plans: A) 1 5 copies of your (site plans, landscape plans, building elevation plans, floor plans) on 24" x 36" sheets of paper, stapled in complete sets folded into 8/2' x 11" size. B) One 81/a" x 11" copy of your reduced site plan, building elevation and floor plans. These copies must be of a quality which is photographically reproducible. ONLY ESSENTIAL DATA SHOULD BE INCLUDED ON PLANS. 2. As required by Section 65091 of the California Government Code, please submit the following information needed for noticing and sign the enclosed form: A) 600' Owners List - a typewritten list of names and addresses of all property owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest equalized assessment rolls. B) 100' Occupant List - (Coastal Development Permits Only) a typewritten list of names and addresses of all occupants within a 100 2O75 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 CT 97-22/CP 98-09/CQP 97-55 - POINSETTIA PROPERTIES -TA 8 February 3, 1999 Page 2 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. C) Mailing Labels - two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the Property owners and occupants within a 600 foot radius of the subject property. The list must be typed in all CAPITAL LETTERS, left justified, void of any punctuation. For any address other than a single family residence, an apartment or suite number must be included but the Apartment, Suite and/or Building Number must NOT appear in the street address line. DO NOT type assessor's parcel number on labels. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes - PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Arial 11 pt, Arial Rounded MT Bold 9 pt, Courier 14 pt, Courier New 11 pt, and MS Line Draw 11 pt. Sample labels are as follows: UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Mrs. Jane Smith Mrs. Jane Smith MRS JANE SMITH 1 23 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3 1 23 Magnolia Ave. APT 3 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Apt. #3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE Carlsbad, CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 D) Radius Map - a map to scale, not less than 1" = 200', showing all lots entirely and partially within 600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots should be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owner's list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical. E) Fee - a fee shall be paid for covering the cost of mailing notices. Such fee shall equal the current postage rate times the total number of labels. Cash check (payable to the City of Carlsbad) and credit cards are accepted. Sincerely, f)\M^JL^ ADRIENNE LANDERS Principal Planner AMLmh Attachment I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES. APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER APPLICANT OR APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE BY:_ DATE: RECEIVED BY DATE: SheaHome# February 4, 1999 San Diego, Inc. Dee Landers City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Subject: Dear Dee: Pacific Shores South (CT 97-22) Request for a 90-day Processing Extension It is our understanding that we are facing State Permit Streamlining Act time constraints for the processing of Pacific Shores South (CT 97-22). We are therefore requesting a 90-day extension due to unexpected processing delays. It is our understanding that a 90-day extension will not require additional fees or processing time. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at (619) 549-3156. Paul Barnes Project Manager - Acquisitions 10721 Treena Street, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92131, tel: 619-549-3156 fax: 619-549-0112 • *City of Carlsbad Aprils, 1999 Public Works — Engineering MIKE HOWES HOFMAN PLANNING ASSOCIATES 5900 PASTEUR COURT, SUITE 150 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 CT 97-22 - POINSETTIA PROPERTIES PLANNING AREA 8 I would like to thank you and especially your client for working ~Vftft^us""bn the Carlsbad Boulevard condition of approval. We feel that we made good progress at our meeting of Monday, April 5, 1999 and we foresee continued cooperation to resolve all the issues. As part of our Monday meeting, we had discussed modifications to conditions of approval for the reimbursement agreement and also an addition to Condition No. 51B allowing for the bonding for design and construction of the improvements to Carlsbad Boulevard. Along with that discussion, I had also agreed to prepare a letter for you and your client's use regarding pre-map grading and processing of plans and final maps prior to City Council approval, as well as allowance for the construction of storm drain in the railroad right-of-way prior to grading or final map approval. The following, therefore, is a statement of our agreement to cooperate, as follows. Because of winter grading time restrictions and the beneficial improvements to Carlsbad Boulevard, the Engineering Department will cooperate in obtaining approval for the pre-map grading of the project. We will also allow for the processing of grading, improvement, and final map plans to begin after Planning Commission approval, but before City Council approval. In order to submit those plans for processing, you should attach a copy of this letter to your submittal. Also in your submittal should be copies of the approved tentative map from the Planning Commission hearing, as well as the signed conditions of approval from the Planning Commission. The Engineering Department will allow you to construct the major storm drain in the railroad right-of-way prior to grading plan approval or final map approval. The plans for the storm drain construction will have to be completed, approved and bonded for, as well as fees paid prior to beginning of that work. Again, we appreciate your cooperation and we look forward to a successful project with you. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Sincerely, ROBERT J. WOJCIK, P.E. Principal Civil Engineer RJW:jb Public Works Director Associate Engineer, Ken Quon Associate Engineer, Frank Jimeno Principal Planner, Dee Landers Engineering Technician II, David Rick 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 431-5769 Hofman Planning Associates Planning Project Management Fiscal Analysis DATE: April 6,1999 TO: Lloyd Hubbs FROM: Bill Hofinan S U B J ECT: Carlsbad Boulevard Improvements Memorandum We understand that the following is the condition to be placed on Planning Area 8 of the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan (CT 97-22) regarding Carlsbad Boulevard improvements: The City will enter into a reimbursement agreement for its share of the realignment of the northbound lanes of Carlsbad Boulevard frontage improvements. The agreement will allow for progress payments from the City for its share of any costs for the improvements beyond the developers obligation specified in the Specific Plan. Such improvements shall include transitions back to the existing lanes of Carlsbad Boulevard north and south of the project frontage. This condition is not intended to supercede the conditions or requirements contained hit the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan. This memo is written to inform you of our clients concurrence to this condition. As you know, the amount of Shea Homes obligation pursuant to the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plans needs to be resolved with the City prior to entering into the agreement. We appreciate the City's willingness in working with Shea Homes to a mutually satisfactory resolution of this issue. Sincerely, (j Bill Hofman cc.Paul Barnes Bob Wojcik Ken Quon Dee Landers 5900 Pasteur Court • Ste 150 Carlsbad CA 92008 760-438-1465 Fax 760-438-2443 City of Carlsbad ' ••••^^•^•HI^^^^^P^^B^^^^^B^B^^^^IHIB^Planning Department March 16, 1998 Shea Homes Ltd. 10721 Treena St, Ste. 200 San Diego, CA 92131 SUBJECT:CT 97-22 - POINSETTIA PROPERTIES PA8 The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project will be mailed to you on Friday, March 19, 1999. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) meeting which will be held on March 29, 1999. A twenty (20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 9:00 a.m. If you have any questions concerning your project you should attend the DCC meeting. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact your Planner, Adrienne Landers at (760) 438-11 61, extension 4451. CITY JOF CARLSBAD GARYE. WAYNE Assistant Planning Director GEW:AL:eh File Copy 2075 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-O894 POINSETTIA PROPERTIES Hofman Planning Associates Corporate Office: 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA. 92008 Tel: (760) 438-1465 Fax: (760) 438-2443 Letter of Transmittal Date: July 30, 1998 Project: BP/PSSP Delivered By: HPA For Your: review Attention: Dee Landers Message: I am in the process of making the revisions to the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan which were recommended by the Coastal Commission. I have copied Coastal's text exactly as they had written it in the revisions they sent to you. John Gamlin and Brian Murphy have reviewed the revisions and Brian requested that we add text to the table on page 40, under the design standards for trail/parkway facilities. I have underlined the text that has been added per Brian's request on the attached copy of the table on page 40. Although Coastal's text does not specifically say to add this text to the table, the attached text from the Coastal Commission does require references to the setback to include the underlined text. Please review and give me your comments on this section. A complete copy of the revisions will be prepared as soon as I get your input on this issue. From: Stuart Fisk Trail/Parkway Facility Avenida Encinas Pedestrian Open Space Parkway Railroad Pedestrian/Open Space Corridor i^^.<$ Mixed-Use Pedestrian Link Corridors Public Access Parkway a. Public Access Parkway (PA 4) b. Private Community Trail (PA 2) Parkway at Carlsbad Boulevard Public Pedestrian Trail to the west of Poinsettia Transit Station loading area Internal Parkways/ Trails/Sidewalks Design Standard A 20 foot landscaped parkway along the western right-of-way of Avenida Encinas fronting Parcel A. Within this parkway, a five foot meandering sidewalk shall be constructed. * An r ,. i ' ' « nn * X .11. i i ^iAn avciagc 40 toot A minimum 100 toot setback along the western boundary of Parcel A from all wetland areas located on site or within and the railroad right-of-way unless a reduced buffer is endorsed by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. An open space setback from the railrod right-of-way of lesser width, but not less than 40 feet, shall be permitted in areas where wetlands are not present within the railroad right-of-way or on the subject site, subject to approval by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This setback area shall be landscaped pursuant to Exhibit 15, page 53, and shall include a 8-10 foot natural public trail constructed on decomposed granite and stabilized with concrete (or other construction type as may be approved by the City). The public trail shall be located in the eastern half of the setback. An average 10 foot sidewalk and landscaped canopy area along both sides of the public street in Planning Area 6. Sidewalks shall be 5 feet wide. A north/south spine corridor within Parcel A providing public access between Avenida Encinas and the mixed-use pedestrian link/corridors. This area shall be an average of 15 feet in width, including landscaping and a 5-foot sidewalk. The Public Access Parkway is divided into two segments. The segment within Planning Area 4 is known as the Public Access Parkway, which allows for public access. The segment within Planning Area 2 is known as the Private Community Trail which does not provide for public access. A 40 foot wide landscape setback, including a 8-10 foot wide natural trail of decomposed granite with stabilizing concrete (or other construction as may be approved by the City). A 5-10 foot wide natural trail (decomposed granite or other acceptable material) on the northern boundary of Parcel B and within the SDN right-of-way, if approved by NCTD. Other internal parkways/trails and sidewalks within each planning area are designed to link and connect with main parkways and trails. -l3-lS3e MON 11:58 COMMISSION :619521 SSTZ STATE Of r»n»ntNIA-TMe RtSOUKCa AGENCT fETE WILSON, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO COAST AREA 3111 CAMINO DEI RIO NO«TH, SUITE 100 SAN DKOO, CA W108-1723 (619) 52t-«03« CJVRLSBAD LCP AMENDMENT 1-?BA 8, B (POINSETTIA PROPERTIES SPECIFIC PLAN/AVIARA MASTER PLAN REVISIONS) COASTAL COMMISSION ADOPTED SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS ADOPTED JUNE 9, 1998 (Page 1 of 7) PQINSETTIA PROPERTIES SPECIFIC PLAN - Land USB Plan Revisions 1. On Page 10, under "Purpose and Authority", the following language should be added to the end of the section: The Polnsettia Properties Specific Plan as adopted by the City of Carlsbad and certified by the California Coastal Commission is approved as both a land use and Implementation element of the City's LCP. The Specific Plan V will establish land use, zoning and development standards applicable to the project as a whole with consideration to Individual planning areas, defining the permissible type and Intensity of development. PQINSETTIA PROPERTIES SPECIFIC PLAN - Implenmntatlon Plan Revisions 2. Commencing on Page 38 and within the entire section "Open Space and Resource Preservation", all exhibits and references to the Railroad Pedestrian/Open Space Corridor being constructed within "the average 40 foot setback" at the eastern railroad right-of-way and Parcel A's western boundary shall be revised to Include a requirement for a 100-foot setback from all wetlands In or along the railroad right-of-way unless a reduced buffer 1s endorsed by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Also, all references Indicating the public trail shall be constructed "1n the --""-«•• arm" rhnulf1 *•- -v-n-"4 *" "n14-h4" •""• -rtnrn mif nr iin n iiimii area." JTIme references to the setback shall also acknowledge that, an open space setback from the railroad right-of-way of lesser width, but not less than 40 feet, shall be permitted in areas where wetlands are not present within the right-of-way or on the subject site, subject to approval by the United States F1sh and Wildlife Service. 3. On Page 39, under "Pedestrian Parkways and Trails - Introduction", the following language shall be added as a new paragraph: Each planning area containing a segment of the public trail system shall be conditioned to construct Its trail segment prior to Issuance of any building permits for that planning area. Such accessways shall be preserved for public use by requiring Irrevocable offers of dedication of / those areas as a condition of development and, prior to the issuance of any building permits for those planning areas, the trail dedications shall be accepted by the City of Carlsbad 1f the City agrees and it adopts a Cltywlde Trails Program that Includes provisions for maintenance and liability. Otherwise, prior to Issuance of any building permits, the City of Carlsbad Planning Department January 15, 1999 Mike Bingham UDC Homes 11512 El Camino Real, Suite 110 San Diego, CA 92130 SUBJECT: CT 97-22/PUD 97-18/CDP 97-55 Issues Letter, Poinsettia Properties - Planning Area 8, Enclosed in this letter are Engineering and Water responses to your December 2nd submittal. In addition to these comments, I would like to include two additional items I neglected to mention in my 12/21/98 letter to you. Engineering 1. I believe Ken transmitted his comments to you via phone. Water Department 1. Area 8 shall place an 8" sewer in Private Street B and project the line across the railroad right-of-way easement and intercept the 27" interceptor sewer perpendicular. The 8" line shall be in a steel casing pipe and connect to the 27" at invert. 2. Install a 24" casing pipe parallel to the 27" sewer perpendicular to and across Poinsettia Lane right-of-way at an elevation that will allow a future extension of the 8" sewer north to the proposed lift station on Area 2. 3. Extend the 8" sewer in private street B westerly to the centerline of Carlsbad Boulevard. This will be a future tie-in point for Area 7. 4. Eliminate all sewer easements between homes and place the 8" sewer lines in future streets. 5. Extend an 8" sewer in private street A or B southerly to the future commercial lot. This sewer shall be at sufficient depth to gravity flow to the commercial lot. This depth will be approximately 7" below the street finished grade. 6. Applicant will be required to build an 8" recycled water line on the frontage of Carlsbad Boulevard for the length of the frontage. 2O75 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 Planning Department 1. The walls on this project are of an unusually long length on both Poinsettia Lane and Carlsbad Boulevard, but especially Carlsbad Boulevard. The wall design established for PA 8 will also set the design standard for PA 7, therefore, the proposed design should be improved somewhat because Carlsbad Boulevard is a designated scenic corridor. As I mentioned in my earlier letter, the proposed pad elevations and mounding do not mitigate the appearance of the wall as requested by Councilman Hall. You should consider upgrading the wall materials to more than slump block with a decorative pilaster. Additional materials such as river rock, stone, or brick could be incorporated into the design. The wall should also include landscaped insets from time to time to break the fence into smaller visual segments. 2. Of course, the proposed wall is a function again of the grading proposed on the site. I may be wrong, but it appears to me that one of the reasons for the proposed pad elevations on PA 8 is to reduce the amount of export. The City considers all of the planning areas within the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan Area as related sites which should balance grading on each parcel as much as possible but also among the three parcels. Planning Area 8 needs to remove dirt from their site to achieve the minimum grades the City Council is requesting; Parcel A needs dirt. PA 5 is currently requesting a temporary stockpile permit to store excess dirt brought in from another location. The City is again requesting that the two property owners reach agreement to transfer some of the dirt from PA 8 to Parcel A. The City is reconsidering PA 5's request to stockpile dirt because this action may preclude receiving dirt from PA 8. Please initiate further discussion to resolve this issue with the PA 5 property owners. Thank you for your prompt response. This project must be heard by the City Council by April 20, 1999 to comply with mandated timelines. Please call me at 438-1 161, extension 4451 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ADRIENNE LANDERS, Principal Planner AL:eh GO (§ "D1 March 23, 1998 Ms. Adrienne Landers Planning Department City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan — Planning Area 7 & 8 Dear Ms. Landers: Thank you for providing North County Transit District (NCTD) the opportunity to meet with you and UDC on Tuesday, February 17, 1998, to discuss pedestrian connections to the Poinsettia Station. As you know, NCTD is supportive of this transit-oriented development and wants to work with the developer and the city to create the best possible project. The draft Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan dated April 28, 1997, was reviewed by NCTD. Exhibit 13, Master Public and Community Trails Concept, showed private community trails in Areas 7 & 8. The exhibit also showed a public pedestrian trail to the west platform of the Poinsettia Station. At that time, NCTD did not provide comment on the trail concept. The adopted specific plan dated January 20, 1998, shows revised private community trails in areas 7 & 8. Of specific concern is the new pedestrian path segment shown in the NCTD right-of-way directly under the Poinsettia Avenue bridge. In order for NCTD to consider allowing such use in the right-of-way, NCTD would need to receive a formal request for the path from the developer. Prior to permitting any use in the right-of-way, NCTD must be assured that the project could be built to NCTD's satisfaction. For a pedestrian path in the right-of-way, of specific concern would be liability issues, ownership and maintenance of the path, and safety issues pertaining to the physical separation of the railroad tracks and the pedestrian path. Exhibit 13 still shows a pedestrian path from Area 7 to the west platform of the Poinsettia Station. This path was in the draft specific plan and conceptually reviewed by NCTD. The path would allow residents direct access to the station and the local commercial development planned into the project. Again prior to permitting the path in the railroad right-of-way, NCTD would need to receive a formal request, and be assured that the path could be build to NCTD's satisfaction. NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT 810 Mission Avenue, Oceanside, CA 92054 760-967-2828 Adrienne Landers March 23, 1998 Page 2 Thank you for the opportunity to collaborate on this project. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns at (760) 967-2859. Sincerely, Chris Schmidt Assistant Planner cc: Stuart Fisk, Hofman Planning poin_sp5.doc City of Carlsbad Planning Department December 21,1998 Mike Bingham UDC Homes 11512 El Camino Real, Suite 110 San Diego, CA 92130 SUBJECT: CT 97-22/CP 98-17/CDP 97-55 - Issues Letter, Poinsettia Properties Planning AreaS I have reviewed your latest submittal and have found a few remaining issues that need to be addressed prior to scheduling. As I see it the major issues are 1) location of the sewer connection; 2) subsequent pad elevations; and, 3) grading in the railroad right-of-way. Unfortunately, I have not yet received comments from the other City departments but will forward those as soon as I receive them. 1. Balcony and patio trellis exhibit must abide by standards of the master plan which refer to the zoning ordinance and the planned development ordinance. Your trellis guidelines stipulate that the most restrictive standard shall apply. Since the patios, etc. appear to be attached to the homes, a standard rear yard setback must be provided. In this case the rear yard is twice the side yard or 10'. Please revise the exhibit accordingly. The revised presentation is far superior than the previous submittal. 2. The disclosure statement is incomplete because it does not "include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares". As noted, if none of the partners owns more than 10% then NA should be indicated on the form. Please correct—a quick phone call could be adequate. 3. Verify 50% maximum "lot" coverage 4. Pad elevations along Carlsbad Boulevard have increased to 4.5' which is not consistent with either our earlier discussions or Council direction to lower pad elevations as much as possible. Tat Wai said pads could be lowered to about 1.5' above Carlsbad Boulevard. Why is that not possible now? Reviewing the cross-sections, with the addition of the walls and berms, reveals that the higher pad elevations create a poor visual interface along Carlsbad Boulevard. The mounding that was requested to screen the walls does not screen the wall at all. Instead it only softens and screens the new pad elevations. Grade elevations have continued to remain as an issue. This project cannot be supported by staff with the present pad elevations. Staff has not received an acceptable 2075 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 response to their question of why the pad elevations have to be 4.5' higher than Carlsbad Boulevard. 5. The appearance of the crib wall detracts from the overall quality of the project. I really suggest that this matter be resolved prior to hearing. Can you get a conceptual approval letter from NCTD? If it turns out that you cannot get a letter from NCTD prior to the Planning Commission meeting, I think it would be a good idea if you created a new wall exhibit similar to the one prepared by Tamara demonstrating the mitigated wall appearance. If you are able to received NCTD approval, this exhibit would not be necessary. 6. Please remove the term Site Development Plan from the Condominium Permit exhibits (lower right hand corners). 7. A 12/18/98 conversation with Bill Plummer indicated that he would complete his sewer line analysis by about 1/6/99. This analysis should determine whether or not the PA 8 sewer line could be placed beneath the railroad line, tie into the existing gravity sewer line in the railroad ROW and then tie into the lift station on Parcel A. 8. Please indicate the "lot" dimensions on the condominium plan 9. Engineering staff has indicated that agreement has been reached on the individual "lot" drainage issue. The last submittal received by staff prior to the December 1st submittal occurred in late July or early August. Staff was unable, therefore, to accurately determine whether or not all issues had been resolved. From the December packet, it is apparent that a number of concerns have not been adequately addressed. To keep this project moving forward, it is necessary to be more prompt with your responses, so the project can be scheduled for Planning Commission as soon as possible. As always, staff requests that your resubmittals occur as one comprehensive package rather than individual drop-offs. Staff is looking forward to concluding this project soon. Happy Holidays!! Sincerely, Adrienne Landers Principal Planner AML:eh Ken Quon Mike Smith Bill Plummer Hofman Planning Associates Planning Project Management Fiscal Analysis MEMORANDUM DATE: September 16, 1998 TO: Dee Landers FROM: Stuart Fisk SUBJECT: Pacific Shores South & Parkside - CC&Rs Enclosed are the CC&Rs we would like to use for Pacific Shores South and for Parkside. These CC&Rs were prepared by Hecht, Solberg, Robinson & Goldberg for Hampton Place at Stonecrest Village. Please review the CC&Rs and let me know if these are acceptable to you. If necessary we are willing to meet with you and the City Attorney's office to review the CC&R's. 5900 Pasteur Court -Suite 150 • Carlsbad • CA • 92008 • 1-760-438-1465 • Fax 1-760-438-2443 UDC HOMES t§619 509 6200 09/14/98 14:260 :02/18 N0:059 HECHT r.,p.,, _, SOLBERG u -'v-'-' •u b' ROBINSON GOLDBERG .'•'•!- ! 1996 LLP A.JOHNHBCHT Hi P p ul J Vf C jT-i ATTORNEY AT LAWLTu.wi.lv v L-iy Septembers, 1998 Mr. Mike Bingham *Via Telecopier and U.S. Mail* Shea Homes, Inc. 11512 El Camino Real, Suite 110 San Diego, California 92130 Re: Parkside and Pacific Shores Dear Mike: I have written this letter to briefly summarize the ownership and phasing structure we discussed for these two multi-phase detached condominium projects located in the City of Carlsbad. Condominium Elements. The elements of each condominium would consist of: Residential Units. Each condominium would include a separate interest in a "Residential Unit". The Residential Units will be shown on the condominium plans (typically, there is a separate condominium plan for each Phase). Lateral Boundaries. Each Residential Unit would have lateral boundaries which include all individually maintained areas. For example, a back yard would be within the boundaries of a Residential Unit as would the residence itself. If the front yards are to be individually maintained, they would be included within the Residential Unit. If the front yards are to be commonly maintained by the home owners association, they could be excluded from the boundaries of the Residential Units, and thereby become a part of the "Association Property" to be owned by the home owners association. Alternatively, front yards which are commonly maintained could be included within the Residential Units but be covered by a maintenance easement in favor of the home owners association. Vertical Boundaries The Residential Units would extend indefinitely downwards and extend upwards to an arbitrary plane which is fifty feet (50') above the ground elevation. ATTORNEYS AT L\* 6<W^wrB«o/.DVAYEi<.'hTnFuxiR SAM Diboa CALIFORNIA v2iui TELEPHUNI; 619.239.3444 rAcsiMii.r 619.232.6828 UDC HOMES U619 509 6200 09/14/98 14:26 0 :03/18 N0:059 Mr. Mike Bingham September 8, 1998 Page 2 No Exclusive Use Areas The approach we recommend for the Residential Units avoids the need to establish exclusive use easements over common area for back yards or similar areas. Common Area (Undivided Interest). In order to comply with the requirements of our condominium enabling statutes, a condominium must include an undivided interest in some area. Current practice is to minimize the area in order to minimize liability which might he attribuahle to individual owners by reason of accidents. Therefore, the so-called "cloud condominium" concept would be utili/ed which results in the undivided interest in a Phase being in air space above the fifty foot vertical limit of the Residential Units in the Phase. Appurtenant Easements. Each condominium would include appurtenant easements appropriate for the Project. The following are examples of easements which are typically established for detached condominium projects: • Access easements over the private roadways. Private utility easements (if there will be any privately maintained storm drains, sewers, etc.). • Side yard maintenance easements for so-called "zero set back" homes. These allow an owner access over a strip of the yard of the adjoining Residential Unil for purposes of maintaining, repairing and, if applicable, re-building the easement holder's residence. Association Property All areas not within a Residential Unit or the Common Area would be deeded to the home owners association for the common use of all the owners. These areas would include any pocket parks, open space, (possibly front yards - see above) and private streets, etc. The SUBDIVISION MAP ACT was revised a few years ago to specifically allow these areus to be conveyed to a home owners association regardless of whether they are shown as separate lots on a subdivision map. UDC HOMES W 619 509 6200 09/14/98 14:26 Q :04/18 N0:059 Mr. Mike Bingham September 8, 1998 Page 3 Phasing The traditional approach to phasing has been to have each Phase of a project consist of one or more lots shown on a subdivision map. However, over the last lew years, most home builders have replaced that approach with so-called single lot phasing. With single lot phasing, there is a single subdivided lot for the residential portion of whole project (pocket parks and streets may be shown as separate lots). The boundaries of each Phase are shown as "Phase Modules" on the condominium plans with a separate plan recorded for each Phase. Establishing Phase Modules within a single residential lot reduces the possibility of conflicts between a zero set back housing concept and the sel back requirements (to lot lines) set forth in the UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. Subdivision Map Statements We strongly recommend that the subdivision maps approved for these projects include the following or similar language: This is a subdivision map of a project approved for condominium ownership of separate condominium units which may be developed and sold in separate phases pursuant to GOVERNMENT CODE Section 66427.1. Enclosed is a condominium plan for another project we worked on not too long ago which follows the approach outlined above. 1 hope this letter and the enclosure will assist your engineer and I have therefore set Mr, Wong a copy of this letter and the enclosure. It would also be helpful for you to send a copy of this letter (and enclosure) to the person at the City Planning Department in charge of each project to help avoid any inconsistencies between the approach outlined above and condominium permits which will hopefully be issued by the City for these two projects. Should the City have any concerns about the approach set forth above, I suggest a meeting be held with the appropriate persons at the City, yourself and myself as .won as possible. Very truly yours, AJH/ew Enclosure cc: Mr. Steve Wong (w/ene.) Mr. Russ Haley (w/enc.) oLBERt;, ROBINSON & GOLDBERG u.r UDC HONES 619 509 6200 09/14/98 14:26 0 :05/18 N0:059 nii 8 1997-018973403nz Pit RECORDING REQUESTED BY: WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: HECHT. SOLBERG, ROBINSON & GOLDBERG Mr. John Hecht 600 West Broadway, Eighth Floor San Diego. California 92101 •»H 3IE& :oyHiv CT5EH OFFIC•jSEaO?Y cri:n. COUNTV RECOVER 177 T- .V*,: •. 'A HAMPTON PLACE AT STONECREST VILLAGE PHASE 1 CONDOMINIUM PLAN STONECREST VILLAGE COMPANY LLC, a California limited liability company, being the record owner of: The Phase 1 Module described on the condominium plan ("Condominium Plan"! to which this certificate of consent is attached, being a portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 17823, in the City of San Diego, County of San Diego, State of California, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, California, on February 7, 1997 as Document No. 1997-0056227; and SANWA BANK CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, the beneficiary under the deed of trust encumbering such land, each hereby consent to the recordation of the Condominium Plan. This consent is given pursuant to California CIVIL CODE Section 1351, with the understanding that the above described properly may be divided into condominiums, as defined in California CIVIL CODE Section 783. Reference in the attached Condominium Plan to the "Declaration" refers to the Declaration of Restrictions For Hampton Place At Stonecrest Village, reference to the "Association" means HAMPTON PLACE AT STONECREST VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation, and any reference to the "Master Association" means STONECREST VILLAGE MASTER ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation. DATED: WM.LW I. . 19'// STONECREST VILLAGE COMPANY LLC, a California limited liability company By: CALIFORNIA PACIFIC HOMES, INC., a Califonfipa^cprporatin, Managing Member By:. Titlur Title: Mttnpnn P/K» 4/8/97 •1- UDC HOMES 619 509 6200 09/14/98 14:26 Q : 06/18 N0:059 178 SANWA BANK CALIFORNIA, a California corporation By: Title: By: Title: Himpron 4/9/97 -2- UDC HOMES 619 509 6200 09/14/98 14:26 Ql :07/18 N0:059 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO On V//7/27 personally appeared oersonallv known to me ) ) S3. ) . before me. LtiZA t> HW (»*- proved to mo. - . „ JUt'i t? /-f&/$£%L. . Notarv Public. '•AJft'U*> $ MifotA&.t /^ CXtf/MAlM on the basic of iatiafactow-evidanca) to be the person(s) whose nameis) is/unsubscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/8he{tfjey executed the same in his/her^elr authorized capacity(ies). and that by his/her^tfiefr signature(s) on the instrument, the personls), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (7 JULIE HEYSER \ Csmm. #1045644 ?'NOTARY PUBLIC CAMFORNIAISAM DIEGO COUNTY ^. it. '999 ? (Seal) STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE Us. On APRIL 21. 1997 before me, MICHELLE ORTEGA personally appeared RUSS WAKEHAM Notary Public, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose nameis) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity (ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the personls), or the entity upon behalf of which the personls) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my trand and official seal. Signature (Seal) 4/9/97 -3- MlCHfUE CI7rfGA COMM. * 9984^3 UDC HOMES W619 509 6200 09/14/98 14:26 Q :08/18 N0:059 CONDOMINIUM PLA| SHEET 1 OF 11 SHEETS 180 OVERALL BOUNDARY - PHASE 1 LOCATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL I Or PARCEL MAP NO. 17823, IN THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, FEBRUARY 7. 1997. TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL NOTES RESIDENTIAL UNITS HORIZONTAL 80UNOARY PLAN EASEMENT LOCATION PLAN SIDE VIEW OF PHASE 1 MODULE PAGE 1 2-3 4-7 8-10 11 BASIS OF BEARINGS THE 8ASIS OF 3EARINUS TOR THIS PLAN IS CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM NAQ '83, ZONE 6, BASED UPON THC C*>0 BEARING STATION SOCPS 98* ANO STATION SOCPS 298C. AS DESCRIBED IN RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 14492 i. BASIS OF ELEVATIONS THE BASIS OF ELEVATIONS FOR THIS PLAN IS CITY OF SAN DIEGO BRASS PLUG AT THE SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF MISSION VILLAGE DRIVE AND RONDA AVENUE. ELEVATION » 323.91 M.S.L SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OF THE STATEOF CALIFORNIA, AND THAT THIS PLAN CONSISTING OF n SHEETS CORRECTLY SHOWS THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND, AND THE RELATION THERETO OF THE UNITS SHOWN HEREON. JOHWW. HILL, JR.. EXPIRES 9/30/99 L.S. 5669 DATE HAMPTON PLACE AT STONECREST VILLAGE PHASE 1 INC. iTHtrr • fin cicco. c* mn\- ft* <"»> «»»-'«'« !\SHT~1.DWC UDC HOMES W 619 509 6200 CONDOMINIUM 09/14/98 14:32 0 :09/18 NO:059 NOTES SHEET 2 OF 11 SHEETS 181 1 THIS PHASE IS COMPOSED OF COMMON AREA , ASSOCIATION PROPERTY AND 19 R.U.'s EACH R.U. BEINGSHOWN AND IDENTIFIED HEREIN BY AN R.U. NUMBER 2. THIS CONDOMINIUM PLAN AND THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREIN ARE INTENDED TO CONFORM TO CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 1351 (E). WHICH REQUIRES. IN PART, WITH RESPECT TO THE LAND AND REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE ABOVE REFERENCED SUBDIVISION, THE INCLUSION HEREIN OF DIAGRAMMATIC PLANS IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO IDENTIFY EACH R.U, ITS RELATIVE LOCATION AND APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS, DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREIN ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE SUFFICIENTLY ACCURATE ENOUGH TO USE FOR COMPUTATION OF AREA IN ALL OR ANY OF THE R.U.'s . THE DIAGRAMMATIC PLANS CONTAINED HEREIN INTENTIONALLY OMIT INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO ANY CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE R,U LIKEWISE. SUCH DETAILS PS PROTRUSIONS OF VENTS,OUCTS, BEAM COLUMNS. WINDOW CASINGS AND OTHER SUCH FEATURES WITH THE AIRSPACE ENCOMPASSED BY THE R U.'s AS SHOWN ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE REFLECTED IN THIS CONDOMINIUM PLAN. 3. ALL HORIZONTAL ANGLES BETWEEN BOUNDARY PLANES ARE 90« UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 4. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ON THESE DRAWINGS SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. DEFINITIONS 1 RESIDENTIAL UNIT (R.U.). £ACH R.U. IS A SEPARATE INTEREST IN SPACE ON THIS PLAN. INCLUDED WITHIN EACH R.U. ARE ALL PORTIONS OF THE RESIDENCE, YARD AND YARD IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED IN THE R.U. FOR EXAMPLE, INCLUDED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF EACH R.U. ARE THE EXTERIOR SURFACES OF THE WALLS, FOUNDATION. ROOF. WINDOWS AND DOORS OF THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BUILT WITHIN THE R.U. TOGETHER WITH ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF SUCH BUILDING AND ALL OTHER REAL PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS CONDOMINIUM PLAN AS BEING 'WITHIN THE R.U. BUT OUTSIDE OF THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. EACH R.U, INCLUDES THE SPACE SO ENCOMPASSED. THE FOLLOWING ARE ALSO PART OF A R.U.: BEARING WALLS. COLUMNS, FLOORS, ROOFS. FOUNDATIONS, HEATING, AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT (IF ANY), AND OTHER SERVICES. PIPES. OUCTS. FLUES. CHUTES, CONDUITS, WIRES AND OTHER UTILITY INSTALLATIONS. WHEREVER LOCATED. EXCEPT ANY SUCH PIPES, WIRES OR OTHER UTILITY INSTALLATIONS WHICH SERVE MORE THAN ONE R.U. OR ANOTHER RESIDENTIAL UNIT ANY PIPES, WIRES OR OTHER UTILITY INSTALLATION WHICH SERVE MORE THAN ONE RESIDENTIAL UNIT BUT WHICH ARE NOT OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OR A PUBLIC UTILITY ARE ASSOCIATION PROPERTY (E.G., THERE ARE PRIVATE WATER, STORM DRAIN AND SEWER SYSTEMS WITHIN THE PROJECT). THE VERTICAL DIMENSIONS OF EACH R.U. SHALL EXTEND UPWARDS TO AN ELEVATION OF 315 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL AND EXTEND INDEFINITELY DOWNWARDS. IN INTERPRETING DEEDS AND THE CONDOMINIUM PLAN, IF THIS CONDOMINIUM PLAN SHOWS THE HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS OF A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TO BE COTERMINOUS WITH A RESIDENTIAL UNIT BOUNDARY, THE THEN EXISTING PHYSICAL BOUNDARIES OF THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. WHETHER IN ITS ORIGINAL STATE OR RECONSTRUCTED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORIGINAL PLANS AND LOCATIONS THEREOF, SHALL BE CONCLUSIVELY PRESUMED TO BE ITS BOUNDARIES RATHER THAN THE BOUNDARIES EXPRESSED IN THE DEED OR THIS CONDOMINIUM PLAN, REGARDLESS OF SETTLING OR LATERAL MOVEMENT OF THE BUILDING AND REGARDLESS OF MINOR VARIANCE BETWEEN BOUNDARIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN OR DEED AND THOSE OF THE BUILDING. 2, ASSOCIATION PROPERTY. THE ASSOCIATION PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS PLAN REFERS ~0 THE REMAINDER OF THE PHASE COVERED BY THIS PLAN AFTER EXCLUDING THE R.U.S AND THE COMMON AREA IN SUCH PHASE. HAMPTON PLACE ATSTONECREST VILLAGE PHASE I HUHSAKSK * ASSOCUTtS 54ft DISCO, INC, PUHNINC ' XlffilHtlUHC -inter - st* eitcc. en*K tut) ttt'tit* UDC HOMES 619 509 6200 CONDOMINIUM PUBST 09/14/98 14:32 0 :10/18 N0:059 lag SHEET 3 OF 11 SHEETS 3 COMMON AREA. THE COMMON AREA OF THE PHASE COVERED BY THIS PLAN HAS THOSE LATERAL BOUNDARIES AS ARE DESIGNATED ON THIS CONDOMINIUM PLAN. THE LOWER VERTICAL BOUNDARY OF THE COMMON AREA SHALL BE THE UPPER VERTICAL BOUNDARY OF THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. THE UPPER VERTICAL BOUNDARY OF THE COMMON AREA SHALL EXTEND 80.00 FEET FROM THE LOWER VERTICAL BOUNDARY. THE OWNERS OF THE CONDOMINIUMS WITHIN A PHASE SHALL RECEIVE AN UNDIVIDED OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREA OF THAT PHASE ONLY, WITH THE UNDIVIDED INTEREST OF EACH SUCH OWNER BEING EQUAL TO THE RECIPROCAL OF THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHIN THE PHASE. 4. FRONT YARD MAINTENANCE AREA. EACH FRONT YARD MAINTENANCE AREA IS THAT PORTION OF A RESIDENTIAL UNIT (WHICH MAY INCLUDE SIDE YARDS AND OTHER AREAS IN ADDITION TO THE FRONT YARD) SO DESCRIBED ON THIS CONDOMINIUM PLAN, EACH FRONT YARD MAINTENANCE AREA ADJOINS THE ASSOCIATION PROPERTY (I.E., THE PRIVATE STREET OR DRIVE) AND EXTENDS TO (BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE) THE EXTERIOR SURFACES OF THE (i) RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AND (II) ANY PRIVACY FENCE OR OATE IN THE LOCATIONS WHERE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL UNIT. 5 SIDE YARD MAINTENANCE AREA. SIDE YARD ACCESS AREAS SHALL MEAN SIDE YARD AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE CONDOMINIUM PLAN OVER WHICH EASEMENTS HAVE BEEN GRANTED OR RESERVED AS DESCRIBED IN THE DECLARATION. 5. PERIMETER FENCING EASEMENT. PERIMETER FENCING EASEMENT AREAS SHALL MEAN THE EASEMENT AREAS DESIGNATED ON THIS CONDOMINIUM PLAN IN FAVOR OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR MAINTENANCE AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE DECLARATION. 7 MODULES. THIS PLAN SHOWS AND DESCRIBES (I) A PHASE MODULE FOR THE PHASE COVERED BY THIS PLAN (THE PHASE MODULE HAS THE SAME NUMBER AS THE PHASE COVERED BY THIS PLAN) AND (II) A MODULE FOR FUTURE PHASES. EACH MODULE IS A THREE-DIMENSIONAL PORTION OR PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY AND IS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AS A SEPARATE PORTION OR PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 85427, EACH MODULE HAS THE LATERAL BOUNDARIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. THE UPPER BOUNDARY OF EACH MODULE EXTEND UPWARDS INDEFINITELY AND THE LOWER BOUNDARY OF EACH MODULE EXTEND DOWNWARDS INDEFINITELY. THE PHASE MODULE IS SOMETIMES REFERRED TO AS "PHASE". 8. EXCLUSIVE USE AREA. AN EXCLUSIVE USE AREA (IF ANY ARS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN) REFERS TO THOSE PORTIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION PROPERTY SHOWN AS AN EXCLUSIVE USE AREA. THE OWNER OF AN EXCLUSIVE USE AREA SHALL HAVE AN EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE THE EXCLUSIVE USE AREA APPURTENANT TO THE OWNER'S RESIDENTIAL UNIT. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THIS PLAN, AN EXCLUSIVE USE AREA IS APPURTENANT TO THE RESIDENTIAL UNIT WHICH BEARS THE SAME NUMBER AS THE EXCLUSIVE USE AREA AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. HAMPTON PLACE ATSTONECREST VILLAGE PHASE I T*:»« m<wortt<nAt«<M«loUl<»-lieMtt<1fto-1.«oc •« OMI-M 2/IWtT 1 i i ' 'i sHVNSAffR * 4SSOCUTSS SAN DISCO, INC. PUNHINC - tUCIHtgMNO - SUMSY1NCwrt HutmttKtia TTHttr - SAH oitee. CA »»rrnit) Mt-'<«9 - ft* rirw ««-•<« UDC HOMES 619 509 6200 09/14/98 14:32 ft :11/18 N0:059rLAr SHJU5T 4 OF*H3sHEETSi ' §3J W_R U N 42MB'Og'H 57 \, 1 N 47*4fSfE 8.38'-^ 93' 42L-3S.32' H-699' L-82.48' R-B48' N 80*16'30'E RAO^ (D H ^"^DATA /•» .. .»T« 6 DELTA/BEARING 90'CO'OO" 90°00'00" N 75°27'03"E RADIUS 2.50 10.00 LEN./DIST, 3.93 15.71 10.84 1.23 W INDICATES RESIDENTIAL NUMBER (R.U.) PHASE BOUNDARY PLAN HAMPTON PLACE AT STONE CREST VILLAGE PHASE I * ASSOCUTfS SA# DISCO INC. gucwaiUHf - SURVEYINGior?» HvrnKtxtta STUIIT - SAM at sec. CA ttttt UDC HOMES o 619 509 6200 09/14/98 14:32 0 :12/18 N0:059 b'HKKT 5 QF1&4 SHEETS DATA DELTA/BEARING 0'13*40* 0»46'17" gO'00'00* N 14'21'43'W 75§27'03"E N 75'3B'17"E RADIUS 699.00 946.00 10.00 LEN./DIST. 2.78 11. as 15.71 10.00 17.56 17.44 INDICATES RESIDENTIAL UNIT NUMBER (R.U.) RESIDENTIAL UNIT HORIZONTAL BOUNDARIES HAMPTON PLACE AT STONECREST VILLAGE PHASE I itUNSAXSR * ASSOCIATZS SlfCO, INC. - suxvint/etarn wiMtaia STHffT - stx ticco. CA(t!») Stt—tWH - UX <»19) UDC HOMES 619 509 6200 09/14/98 14:32 0 :13/18 N0:059 SHEET 6 OF 11 SHEETS I DELTA/BEARING LEN./OIST N 80«21'03°£ N 09'38"57" N 09°36'57"« N 79'00'00 E 20,84N 34400'00"E 9.90 18.00 79"00'00"E20.68 N 34°59'18 W 16.45 13.73 14421'43"W 5.36'. INBICATBS RESIDENTIAL _ b'7SV^ UNIT NUMBER (R.U.) 0/J RESIDENTIAL UNIT HORIZONTAL BOUNDARIES HAMPTON PLACE AT STONE CREST VILLAGE PHASE I XVNSAXIX it ASSDCJATIS $AN SJlfCO, - SMCINISMHC - SURYgYWCtout HVtmtms STMIT - su* UKO. c*- FAX UDC HOMES S619 509 6200 09/14/98 14:32 0 :14/18 N0:059 SHEET 7 OF 11 SHEETS N N 89'00'04"W 16.05' 18$ N 40"40* 12*W BAD, Vv DATAo <5 C2) ® (^" (5) (1) (B) OELTA/BEAHINB 14'56'24" 2" H'31" 18° 27 '06" I7e07'55" N 42°18'09"W 90" 00 '00" 3«03'58" N 47»4l'3rE N 42« 18'09-W RADIUS 61.00 61.00 39.00 61.00 10.00 82.00 LEN./OIST. 15.91 2.33 12.56 18.24 17.50 15.71 4.39 3.00 13.00 INDICATES RESIDENTIAL UNIT NUMBER (R.U.) RESIDENTIAL UNIT HQRJ ZONTAL BOUNDARIES HAMPTON PLACE AT STONE CREST VILLAGE PHASE I aVffS4Xff(_ * ASSOC1ATXS SAff D/gCO. INC. PUNNING - MCMltJUNG - SOKVIYJUStont «i9Mn*Mxia tnur - s*# 01*00. c* »ttt>ttt-iteo UDC HOMES 619 509 6200 NlJOMINIUM 09/14/98 14:32 0 :15/18 N0:059 PLA64 SHEET 8 OF 11 SHEETS Ii I INOICA TES RESIDENTIAL UNIT NUMBER _ INQICA TES APPROXIMA TE BUILDING LINE INOICA rES SIOEYARD ACCESS AREATHE BENEriT or THE ADJACENT R.U. INDtCA JtS FltONT YARD MAINTENANCE . CASEU&tr (EXCLUDING HAflOSCAPE it. DRIVEWAYS AND WALKWAYS) INDICATES PERIMETER FENCING MAINTAINED BY HAMPTON PLACE AT STONCCREST ULLAGE ASSOCIATION, EXCEPTINTERIOR SURFACES, TO BE MAINTAINED BYADJACENT R.U. I INDICATES PARKING SPACE R.U. OHNER EASEMENT LOCATIONS HAMPTON PLACE AT STONECREST VILLAGE PHASE 1 ASSQCUTIS DlfGQ, IKC. turnnai ft - nn 04100. at tiut- mint) IH-HM - \osay\ec i\sHT-e.owc •• oj/u/9? •• JOB UDC HOMES S619 509 6200 tmiNLKJMINIUM 09/14/98 14:32 9 :17/18 N0:059 SHEET 10 OF 11 SHEETS 189 FOR SIOEYARD ACCESS AREA BENEFIT OF THE ADJACENT R.U. I INOtCA TES FRONT YARD MAINTENANCE I EASEMENT (EXCLUDING HARDSCAPE i.t. DRIVEWAYS AND WALKWAYS) | INDICATES PERIMETER EASEMENT MAINTAINED BY \ STONECREST VILLAGE MASTER ASSOCIATION. INTERIOR SURFACES, TO BE MAINTAINED BY ADJACENT R.U. 3 INDICATES PARKING SPACE t FOR R.U. OWNER ] INDICATES PERIMETER FENCING EASEMENT ! MAINTAINED BY HAMPTON PLACE AT STONECRfST VILLAGE ASSOCIATION. EXCEPT INTERIOR SURFACES. TO BE MAINTAINED BY ADJACENT R.U. INOICA TES RESIDENTIAL UNIT NUMBER INDICA TES APPROXIMA TE BUILDING LINE EASEMENT LOCATIONS HAMPTON PLACE AT STONECREST VILLAGE PHASE 1 HVNUKXH * 4SS6CIATIS SAN PISCO. Iff. f: \OJ8t\30 STONECftEST J-A\PHAS£ t\SHr-!0.0*K " 04/G6/S7 •• JOB /J62-SO UDC HOMES in CL QE ooo f COMMON AREA 619 509 6200•IN inviHN l U M 09/1 A/98 14:32 Q : 18/1 8 NO: 059 \ ASSOCIATION PROPERTY ASSOCIATION PROPERTY SHEET 11 OF 11 SHEETS 190 COMMON AREA 1 J -/ RESIDENTIAL *- UNIT oin ELEV.-315' SIDE VIEW OF PHASE 1 NO SCALE HAMPTON PLACE AT STONECREST VILLAGE PHASE I BVNSAXtX * ASSOCJATtS SAff DISCO, - swmenttc- SAM UBOO, ct matorn m>in*tftN3(tit) TRELLIS/PATIO CO\ Post-it9 Fax Note To The following are Design Guidelines/Standards for trellis and patio covers within (name of project) , The purpose of the Design Guidelines is to permit the construction of trellis and patio covers that are aesthetically pleasing and unobtrusive. The Design Guidelines are accompanied by a Trellis/Patio Cover exhibit that identifies which units may have a trellis/patio cover, and the limits of the area of coverage for trellis and patio covers on a unit by unit basis. BASIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. All trellis and patio covers shall comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a trellis or patio cover, proof should be shown that the trellis/patio cover has been approved by the Homeowners' Association. Approval by the Homeowners' Association is discretionary as outlined in the CC&Rs (HOA letter and/or HOA stamp on plans). 3. A trellis/patio cover must be of color and design that is compatible with the dwelling unit. 4. Roofing materials for a patio cover must be the same or near the same style and color as the dwelling unit. 5. A trellis/patio cover must maintain all setback requirements as specified in the (name applicable discretionary action) Planned Development Ordinance or the Trellis/Patio Cover Design Guidelines, which ever is most restrictive. 6. Trellis/patio covers are permitted only on the units specifically identified as allowing for trellis/patio covers per the trellis/patio cover exhibit. 7. Trellis/patio covers located on lots adjacent to permanent open space must be constructed of materials approved by the Fire Department. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: A trellis/patio cover which meets the definition of "building" per Section 21.04.060 (has a roof and enclosed on all sides) must maintain a minimum distance of 10 feet from any adjoining dwelling unit or other trellis/patio cover post. A maximum of 2 feet overhang is allowed past the post. A trellis/patio cover must maintain a minimum of 5 feet from a fence, sound wall or community wall. A trellis/patio cover must maintain a minimum of 10 feet from the back of any sidewalk or private driveway. No trellis/patio cover post or overhang may be located outside the identified coverage area. A trellis/patio cover cannot be greater in height than 12 feet. A trellis/patio cover cannot be greater in depth than 10 feet. A trellis/patio cover cannot be greater than 16 feet in length, as measured from outside of post to outside of post. A maximum of 2 feet overhang is allowed past the post, (see trellis/patio cover detail). A maximum length of 20 feet of trellis/patio cover is permitted on the same side of the dwelling unit. 3 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. G:\LIBRARY\PLANNING\WORD\Trellis-Patio Guidelines.doc Revised 5/21/98 Hofman Planning Associates Planning Project Management Fiscal Analysis June 15,1998 Bob Wojcik Engineering Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Subject: Parcel Split for Parcel C of the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan Dear Bob: Per our discussion, you and Dee Landers have reviewed our request for a lot split on Parcel C of the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan and have no objections to the proposed lot split for financial purposes only. As explained in our letter dated June 3,1998, Parcel C contains both Planning Area 1 and Planning Area 8. Planning Area 1 is designated for commercial land use and Planning Area 8 is designated for residential land use. We understand that the lot split would be for financial purposes only (so that Planning Area 1 can be sold) and that it would not give any development rights for Planning Area 1. Any development within Planning Area 1 will require the processing of a Site Development Plan. Given your concurrence to the lot split for financial purposes only, we will begin to prepare the map and applications for this lot split. Therefore, if you concur please sign below and fax a copy of this letter back to HP A at 438-2443. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 438-1465. Sincerely, Bob Wojcik Stuart Fisk cc. Dee Landers John Gamlin 2386 Faraday Avenue « Suite 120 « Carlsbad • CA 92008 • (619)438-1465 • Fax: (619)438-2443 Hofman Planning Associates Planning Project Management Fiscal Analysis June 3, 1998 Bob Wojcik Engineering Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Subject: Parcel Split for Parcel C of the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan Per our discussion on May 19, 1998, we would like to do a parcel split for Parcel C of the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan. Per the specific plan, Parcel C will contain Planning Areas 1 and Planning Area 8. Planning Area 1 is designated for commercial land use and Planning Area 8 is designated for residential land use. A Tentative Map and Planned Development Permit have been submitted by UDC for the development of Planning Area 8. However, at this tune we do not know what type of commercial use will be developed within Planning Area 1 or when the site will be developed. Placement of driveway cuts and similar issues cannot be decided until a detailed Site Development Plan is prepared for the site. The lot split would therefore be for financial purposes only so that Planning Area 1 can be sold. Since we do not currently know what will be developed on the commercial site, we would like the lot to be split without placement of conditions on the commercial site. Conditions for the commercial site can be tied to the future detailed Site Development Plan. The attached exhibit shows the locations of Planning Areas 1 and 8 in the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (760) 438-1465. Sincerely, ^^Mike Howes cc. Dee Landers John Gamlin 2386 Faraday Avenue • Suite 120 • Carlsbaa • CA =2CIE • (619)438-1465 • Fax: (619)438-2443 City, of Carlsbad Planning Department April 14, 1998 Mike Bingham UDC Homes 11512 El Camino Real, Suite 110 San Diego, CA 92130 Issues Letter, Poinsettia Properties - Planning Area 8, CT 97-22/PUD 97-18/CDP 97-55 Ycsicrda\. I sciii you a IcUcr address in u issues related to Planning Area X. Upon lurtlicr review of tlic arehnecun.ii and landscape drawings. I discovered that Issues #5 and #6 of my previous letter had already been provided. However, other issues have become evident which I wish to outline in this letter. For future easy reference, I am going to continue with the numbering I used in my earlier letter. 19. Demonstrate how the 1 5 foot average front yard setback will'be provided. 20. Front porch areas are permitted to be located 10 feet from the front property line; however, this area may not be utilized to support either a second story deck or livable space. No livable space, including foyers, are permitted to extend to the 10 foot line. It appears that Plan 1 and 4 do not comply with this requirement. 21. Demonstrate where a minimum 15 feet by 15 feet private rear or side yard will be provided on each lot. This should take the form of a shaded area on the separate site plan. 22. Provide the building height of each unit. 23. Per page 153, each building facade must incorporate a minimum of four design elements to create character and interest to the home. Please list the elements that have been selected for each design and list on the appropriate plan elevations. 24. Please provide maximum lot coverage of each lot. Maximum permitted is 50%. 25. Please provide the average distance between structures at the street frontage. The minimum is 10' with a 15' average. Although that figure is exceeded, it would be beneficial to know what the average distance is. 26. Provide other examples of developments in Carlsbad utilizing either a zero lot line project, exclusive use, or Z lots. Thank you for providing information on the Knolls. 27. Provide details of all proposed walls and fencing. Please feel free to call me at 438-1161, extension 4451, if you have any questions. I apologize for sending these issues in a two-letter format. It would be very helpful to me if all the needed information is provided at the same time with the corresponding above number notated. Sincerel, ADRIENNE LANDERS Principal Planner AMI.. -inh 2075 La Palrnas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (7 GO) 438-1101 - FAX (760) 438-0894 (j) ^^ City of Carlsbad Planning Department April 13, 1998 Mike Bingham UDC Homes 11512 El Camino Real, Suite 110 San Diego, CA 92130 SUBJECT: CT 97-22/PUD 97-18/CDP 97-55 - POINSETTIA PROPERTIES - PLANNING AREA 8 Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. As noted in the City's incomplete letter of March 13, 1998, this application must remain incomplete until the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan and all associated discretionary applications have been approved by the California Coastal Commission in June, 1998. Since this is a technicality, staff would like to continue processing your application and resolve all remaining issues so that the project could potentially be heard by the Planning Commission as soon as possible after Coastal approval. To accomplish processing the project, staff would like to resolve the attached list of issues prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the City may request, in the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise, supplement the basic information required for the application. Please contact me at (760) 438-1161, extension 4451, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, ADRIENNE M. LANDERS Principal Planner AMLkc attachment c: Gary Wayne Ken Quon Bobbie Hoder File Copy Data Entry Planning Aide 2O75 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-O894 story element to the unit ( this is not intended to preclude long shed-type roofs falling to a single-story element)." e) Guideline #3 - Use sampled format. Indicate single story element (at least 3 feet in depth). Provide perimeter length and single story length as noted. ,• yThe explanation for not meeting this requirement is not clear. When the Jy proposed porches will be used needs to be clearly stated (rather than j/jf" "occasionally") so the degree of compliance can be clearly evaluated. The ^ present proposal seems weak at this time. / \ fl 9. 10. Guideline #4 - Agpin, provide dimensions on the site plans. Without going to -4he-targe plans, rt cannot be determined whether or not there is a distance of l/ A/ h) 10 feet from the forward-most plan and the rear plane on the front elevation. Fireplaces are not acceptable as a building plane. On Plan 4A, it is not possible to determine if there is an 18" offset or not between Planes 1 and 2. Note: as indicated in the guideline, the garage is part of the rear plane, not the front plane, and therefore cannot be counted on plans 1-3. Guideline #5 (rear elevations)- The layout of the rear elevations does not match the order of the front elevations. For instance, the first rear elevation is for Plan 4 but is in the same order at Plan 1A. They should be in the same order. This guideline cannot be evaluated because no dimensions are provided. Plan 1 - Planes 1 and 3 are the same; Plane 4 is a fireplace and cannot be counted. Plan 2 (which is really 1) appears to have only two plane changes (1 and 3). The second story balcony does not appear to change planes. The fireplace does not count, nor does the balcony overhang. Plan 3 (which is really 2) has only 2 plane changes. On Plan 4 (which is really 1) the graphic does not match the rear elevation. ^Jo^uic^dji •<*> /rv-JL^ Guideline #8 - Recessed windows on 50% of the units are required. Providing white vinyl windows does not meet the requirement. Windows must be recessed either 2" of have a 2" thick wood or stucco trim. i) Guideline #9 is met. j) Overall, compliance with the guidelines is very poor and exhibits supposed to be illustrating compliance are even poorer. These exhibits are not acceptable. Note: submittals of this type on all future projects, regardless of location, should be prepared as illustrated in the attached sample. Prepare trellis/patio/balcony design guidelines appropriate to this development using the attached sample as a guide. Determine if southerly intersection on Street A will be adequate location to also serve the commercial site. 11. Provide details of how RV site can be utilized by residents, i.e., striping. 4.14.1998 6:07 P. 1 Hofman Planning Associates Corporate Office: 2386 Faraday Avenue, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA. 92008 Tel: (760) 438-1465 Fax; (760) 438-2443 Date: Project: FAX: No. Pages: Attention: FAX Transmittal April 14,1998 BP/PSSP 438-0894 7 Dee Landers If all pages are not received, please call (760) 438-1465. Message: RE: Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan; Unit Height for Planning Area 8 From: Mike Howes; (SF) 4.14.1998 6: 07 P. 2 Hofmon Planning Associates Planning Project Management Fiscal Analysis MEMORANDUM DATE: April 14, 1998 TO: Dee Landers FROM: Mike Howes; (SF) SUBJECT: Poinsettia Properties; Unit Height for Planning Area 8 Per your request, we have reviewed the conditions for the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan regarding height limitations for Planning Area 8. It appears that we copied the text exactly as approved from the latest conditions regarding height as provided in City Council Resolution No. 98-10 (attached) which states in item 4.c (page 3) that: No building shall exceed a height of 30 feet and two stories if a minimum roof pitch of three to twelve (3:12) is provided, or 24 feet and two stories if less than a three twelve (3:12) roof pitch is provided, however, the City Council would be inclined to review favorably proposals for structures having a maximum height of 28 feet on parcels B and C, The January 20,1998 Specific Plan text for Planning Area 8 (page 148) states that: Structures shall have a maximum height of 30 feet. No building shall exceed a height of30 feet and two stories if a minimum roof pitch of three to twelve (3:12) is provided, or 24 feet and two stories if less than a three to twelve (3:12) roof pitch is provided, however, the City Council would be inclined to review favorably proposals for structures having a maximum height of 28 feet on parcels B and C. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 438-1465. attachments 2386 Faraday Avenue • Suire ICC • Carlsbad • CA 32008 :6 ' o-. ±2i,- \ J65 4.14.1998 6:08 p- 3 d. Lot Size: 3,500 square feet e. Development Standards: 1. Setbacks • All structures shall be setback a minimum of 40 feet from the Poinsettia Lane right-of-way. This setback shall not include any private yard. • All structures shall maintain the following setbacks from Ponto Road: Front yard - 20 feet Side yard-10 feet Rear yard-10 feet • A 40 foot public trail/open space corridor shall be established along Carlsbad Boulevard. No homes shall be allowed within this setback, however, utilities and drainage facilities, landscaping, a public trail and associated uses are permitted. This 40' setback shall not include any private yard, but shall be between the Carlsbad Boulevard Right-of- Way and the rear yards within this planning area. Sound walls and/or rear yard fences can be placed at the eastern boundary of this setback. The public trail in this area shall provide access to existing sidewalks at Poinsettia Lane and the existing/proposed intersections on Carlsbad Boulevard and shall be designed to facilitate and encourage public pedestrian usage. 2. Building Height s • Structures shall have a maximum height of 30 feet. No building shall exceed a height of 30 feet and two stories if a minimum roof pitch of three to twelve (3:12) is provided, or 24 feet and two stories if less than a three to twelve (3:12) roof pitch is provided, however, the City Council would be inclined to review favorably proposals for structures having a maximum height of 28 feet on parcels B and C. Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan 148 January 20, 1998 4.14. 1998 6= 09 P. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 98-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, APPROVING CANDIDATE FINDINGS OF FACT, THE STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT, ZONE CHANGE, SPECIFIC PLAN AND A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE POINSETTIA PROPERTIES SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT ON 91.9 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF AVENIDA ENCINAS, EAST OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD, NORTH OF LAKESHORE GARDENS MOBILEHOME PARK AND THE PONTO ROAD AREA, AND SOUTH OF THE NCTD POINSETTIA TRANSIT STATION AND LANIKAI LANE MOBILEHOME PARK. CASE NAME: POINSETTIA PROPERTIES SPECIFIC PLAN CASE NO: EIR 96-01/GPA 95-08/LCPA 96-03/SP 210/ZC 95-06/LFMP 87-22fA>. WHEREAS, on November 5,1997, November 19,1997 and December 3, 1997, the Carlsbad Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings to consider a proposed Environmental Impact Report (EIR 96-01), General Plan Amendment (GPA 95-06), Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA 96-03), Specific Plan (SP 210), Zone Change (ZC 95-06), and Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment (LFMP 87-22(A)) for project development on 91.9 acres of land and adopted Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4157,4158,4159,4161, and 4162, respectively, recommending to the City Council that they be approved; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on January 6,1998 and January 13,1998, held public hearings to consider the recommendations and heard all persons interested in or opposed to EIR 96-01/GP95-06/LCPA 96-03/SP 210/ZC 95-06/LFMP 87-22(a); and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report was prepared and submitted to the State Clearinghouse and a Notice of Completion filed, published, and mailed to responsible agencies and interested parties providing a 45 day review period. All 4.14.1998 6=10 P. 5 *r iB; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 comments received from the review period are fully incorporated into the conditions of approval for the project and these conditions will be reviewed through a mitigation monitoring and reporting program set up for this project, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the Environmental Impact Report (EIR 96-01) on the above referenced project is certified and that the Candidate Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program are approved, and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4157, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council. 3. That the City Council finds that the EIR, including areas of concern such as biology, air quality, traffic, noise, views, water, schools and land use compatibility, is adequate, and that public notification was in compliance with the CEQA, Planning and Zoning Law and Carlsbad Municipal Code, and is adequate. 4. That the General Plan Amendment (GPA 95-06), Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA 96-03), Specific Plan (SP 210) and Zone Change (ZC 95- 06), and Local Facilities Management Plan Amendment (LFMP 87-22(A)) for this project are approved and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4158, 4159, 4161 and 4162, respectively, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council with the following new conditions: 4.14.1998 6:11 P. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a. 923 units are specifically not allowed and instead there will be allowed a total of 823 units. The reduction in the number of units shad come from the areas more distant from the existing transit station and densities near the transit station shall be preserved whenever possible in keeping with the transit oriented development concepts. Affordable housing obligations shall be reduced accordingly. b. 75% of the trees in the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan (SP 210) shall be canopy trees and eucalyptus trees are specifically prohibited. c. The final graded elevations of parcels B and C of the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan shall be as close as possible to the elevation of the northbound lanes of Carlsbad Boulevard while still permitting both sites to gravity drain and sewer to existing facilities. The elevations of parcels B and C shall not be raised in order to improve views within the Specific Plan. Structures shall have a maximum height of 30 feet. No building shall exceed a height of 30 feet and two stories if a minimum roof pitch of three to twelve (3:12) is provided, or 24 feet and two stories if less than a three to twelve (3:12) roof pitch is provided, however, the City Council would be inclined to review favorably proposals for structures having a maximum height of 28 feet on parcels B and C. 5. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. The provision of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, Time Limits for Judicial Review" shall apply: "NOTICE TO APPLICANT" The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in 4.14.1998 6: 12 P. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth 'day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008." EFFECTIVE DATE: This resolution shall be effective upon its adoption, except as to the General Plan Amendment, which shall be effective thirty (30) days following its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad held on the 20 th day of January 1998 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Nygaard, Kulchin, Hall NOES: None ABSENT: None Attest: ^. \l<asZteJu~~-^ ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk) (SEAL) ***EHD*** Hofman Planning Associates o o o Planning Project Management Fiscal Analysis MEMORANDUM DATE: February 10, 1998 TO: Dee Landers FROM: Mike Howes; (SF) SUBJECT: UDC Planning Area 8; Example of Easement for Zero Lot Line As we discussed at our meeting on February 5th, I live in a zero lot line project (The Knolls of Calavera Hills; CT 83-21). Attached is a legal description for my lot and a copy of the portion of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions which deal with the Wall Maintenance Easement. Within the legal description, parcel 1 is my lot and parcel 2 is the easement over the adjacent lot for the purpose of maintaining the easement area. This legal description refers to Article X of the CC&Rs. Article X of the CC&Rs deals with the specific purpose and intent of the easement. This project has been in existence since 1987 and I am not aware of any problems. Hopefully this information addresses your concerns about zero lot lines. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 438-1465. cc. Mike Bingham 2386 Faraday Avenue ° Suite 120 ° Carlsbad ° CA 92008 - (619)438-1465 ° Fax: (619)438-2443 Instrument is certified to "be a true ar.1 asset copy of that certain instrument reco. - d Recording Requested By and When Recorded Return To: MCDONALD, HECHT & SOLBERG Mr. Alex C. McDonald 1100 Financial Square 600 "B" Street San Diego, California 92101 Oft Office Of the County 7EBST luthorlaec Signature DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR THE KNOLLS OF CALAVERA HILLS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ARTICLE X WALL MAINTENANCE EASEMENT Declarant intends to cause to be built on certain Lots a residential structure one side of which will be located at or near the boundary line between the Lot and an adjoining Lot. The side of the structure at or near the Lot boundary line is referred to as the "blank wall". The Owner of each Lot on which a blank wall is located shall have and is granted a non-exclusive easement appurtenant to his Lot five feet in width on, over and across the adjoining Lot nearest the blank wall, measured perpen- dicularly from the Lot boundary line for the entire length of the Lot ("easement"). The easement is for purposes of: (a) Access to and maintenance and repair of the blank wall, footings, foundations, drains, roofs and eaves of the structure on which the blank wall is located; and (b) The installation, maintenance and accommodation of: (i) Roof and eave overhangs, retaining walls, footings, foundations and drains as constructed by Declarant or reconstructed in substantial conformance therewith or as approved by the Owner of the adjacent Lot; (ii) Encroachments due to design, construction or engineering errors, settlement or shifting of the structure on the Lot on which the blank wall is located; and (iii) Drainage of water from the structure on the Lot on which the blank wall is located. No permanent structure, other than irrigation systems, shall be constructed within the easement nor shall the grade or drainage characteristics of the easement as established by Declarant be altered. The grade of the easement shall be maintained to drain away from the blank wall. No trees, shrubs or bushes shall be planted or maintained within the easement which may damage or interfere with the foun- dations, footings or structures on the Lot on which the blank wall is located, and all limbs, branches and root systems of the vegetation on the adjoining Lot shall be maintained, trimmed and pruned in a manner to prevent any damage or interference with the said foundations, footings and structures. -20- PRELIMINARY REPORT 1130 PAGE NO. 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. 9405300-A PARCEL 1: Lot 192 of CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 83-21 UNIT NO. 3, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 11476, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, on April 1, 1986. PARCEL 2: A non-exclusive easement on, over and across that portion of Loc 193 of CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 83-21 TRACT NO. 3, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 11476 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, April 1, 1986 described as follows: A strip of land 5 feet in width, the Easterly boundary of which is the common boundary line between Lot 192 and Lot 193, extending from the Northerly to the Southerly boundary lines of Lot 193. The easement is for the purposes and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in Article X of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions recorded April 24, 1986 as File No. 86-158392 of Official Records. 03/16/94 rmp 1 .29. 1998 14:38 P. 1 Hofman Planning Associates Coiporata Office: 2386 Faraday Avanue, Suite 120 Carisbad, CA, 92008 Tel: (760) 438-1465 Fax: (760) 438-2443 Dale: Project: FAX: No. Pages: Attention: If all pages are not received, please call (760) 438-1465. Message: FAX Transmittal January 29,1998 UDC/PA8 438-0894 2 Dee Landers Per your request, following is a copy of Larry Case's exhibit outlining conformance with the Small Lot Single Family Guidelines. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 438-1465, From: Mike Howes; (SF) POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA 8 SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY GUIDELINES 12/17/97 GUIDELINE 1. Z 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Where (3) two-story units occur m a raw and they are situated less than 15 feet apart, at least (1) unit must have a single story building edge not less than 10 feet in depth. Where (3) two-story units occur in a raw and they are situated 15 to 20 feet apart, at tease (1) unit must have a single story building edge not tess than 5 feet in depth. Per project 33% of all units shalt have a single story edge a minimum of 40% of the total perimeter. Per project. 50% of all units with a lot frontage greater than 45 feet must have (4) separate building planes on the front elevation. Per project. 50% of all units with a lot frontage greater than 45 feet must have (4) separate building planes on the front elevation. Per project 50% of all units shall have one side elevation with a 7 feet average side yard setback. Tftree-car garages limited to 75% of the total units where average lot size is 5,000 SF or less. Three-car garages shall incorporate a mixture of 2 door, 3 door and offset 2 door designs. 50% of exterior door and window openings shall be projected or recessed a mini mum of 2 inches. The predominant roof framing for each floor plan in a project shall exhibit directional variety to the cither floor plans and to the street. MINIMUM STANDARD 1of3 1of3 33% 50% 50% 50% 75% 50% 100% HOf COMPLIANCE 100% 100% 33% 100% 100% 100% N/A 100% 100% COMMENTS Plans 2. 3 & 4 all have single story roof edge; Plan 1 has single story edge at front and rear. Plans 2. 3 & 4 all have single story roof edge Plan 1 has single story edge at front and rear. Ml plans have single story edges, but only Plan 2 complies with 40% of the perimeter being single story. Occasionally, when the rear yard set-back on Plan 3 is greater than 15', a single story porch roof will be added to the rear, and the front second story deck will become a single story roof to accommodate the 33% requirement All elevations comply. . All elevations comply. Plans 1, 3 & 4 always have average one side yard set-backs of 7' or more. No 3-car garages used. White vinyl windows will be used with exterior trim. All elevations have directional and design variety £ required. L fcitv of Carlsbad Planning Department April 14, 1998 Mike Bingham UDC Homes 11512 ElCamino Real, Suite 110 San Diego, CA 92130 Issues Letter, Poinsettia Properties - Planning Area 8, CT 97-22/PUD 97-18/CDP 97-55 Yesterday, I sent you a letter addressing issues related to Planning Area 8. Upon further review of the architectural and landscape drawings, I .discovered that Issues #5 and #6 of my previous letter had already been provided. However, other issues have become evident which I wish to outline in this letter. For future easy reference, I am going to continue with the numbering I used in my earlier letter. 19. Demonstrate how the 15 foot average front yard setback will be provided. 20. Front porch areas are permitted to be located 10 feet from the front property line; however, this area may not be utilized to support either a second story deck or livable space. No livable space, including foyers, are permitted to extend to the 10 foot line. It appears that Plan 1 and 4 do not comply with this requirement. 21. Demonstrate where a minimum 15 feet by 15 feet private rear or side yard will be provided on each lot. This should take the form of a shaded area on the separate site plan. 22. Provide the building height of each unit. 23. Per page 153, each building facade must incorporate a minimum of four design elements to create character and interest to the home. Please list the elements that have been selected for each design and list on the appropriate plan elevations. 24. Please provide maximum lot coverage of each lot. Maximum permitted is 50%. 25. Please provide the average distance between structures at the street frontage. The minimum is 10' with a 15' average. Although that figure is exceeded, it would be beneficial to know what the average distance is. 26. Provide other examples of developments in Carlsbad utilizing either a zero lot line project, exclusive use, or Z lots. Thank you for providing information on the Knolls. 27. Provide details of all proposed walls and fencing. Please feel free to call me at 438-1161, extension 4451, if you have any questions. I apologize for sending these issues in a two-letter format. It would be very helpful to me if all the needed information is provided at the same time with the corresponding above number notated. Sincerely, ADRIENNE LANDERS Principal Planner AML:mh 2O75 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 City of Carlsbad ^^ Wat^ ,^4K^ *f ^••^^^^^•M^^HPi^^^^^^HMMM^MHPlanning Department January 16, 1998 Rick Schroeder 438 Camino Del Rio South San Diego, CA 92108-3546 SUBJECT: CT 97-22, PUD 97-18, CDP 97-55, HDP 97-, POINSETTIA PROPERTIES, PLANNING AREA 8 Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your tentative map, planned unit development permit, Coastal Development Permit, and Hilliside Development Permit application nos. CT 97-22, PUD 97- 18, CDP 97-55, HDP 97 , as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, December 17, 1997, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Adrienne Landers, at (760) 438-1161, extension 4451, if you have any planning questions or Ken Quon at extension 4380, if you have any engineering questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH: amhkc c: Gary Wayne File Copy Ken Quon Data Entry Bobbie Hoder Planning Aid 2O75 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED A TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION • Planning: 1. £/On constraints map, please indicate those views of the project site occurring from properties located to the east , namely Harbor Pointe and SeaCliff. 2. *-xS^te plans should include a note on the commercial site that this area will be developed at a future time as a Site Development Plan. 3. is ,Indicate the projected traffic counts expected for the commercial site. 4. ^/Provide a plotting analysis indicating building footprints, setbacks, 15' x 15' required rear yard, and lot dimensions. Provide lot coverage for each lot. Engineering: Engineering items will follow at a later date. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Staff would like to reserve review of the proposed architectural elevations until we have the opportunity to view the project in Orange County which appears to provide more architectural plane variety. A "streetscene" type of elevation might better convey the overall appearance of the project. Please indicate which of the three architectural styles from the specific plan you have selected and provide detailing accordingly. 2. Please lower proposed grade elevations along Carlsbad Boulevard to the minimum necessary to achieve gravity flow sewer and drainage to existing facilities. Retaining walls along railroad are very high; lower walls to reflect revised grades. Provide cross-section of fence above wall. How are visual impacts from railroad proposed to be mitigated? 3. Provide documentation demonstrating compliance with small lot architectural guidelines. Proposed designs do not appear to comply. 4. When landscape plans area submitted, ensure that 75% of all trees on site are canopy type species. Eucalyptus and similar tall, vertical trees should not be included. Provide two street trees per home. Please provide data on plan indicating average mature tree height. 5. Increase parkway width to four feet minimum and plant one street tree per home in the parkway. 6. Please indicate how the required 15' x 15' rear yard requirement will be met. t • 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Introduce more canopy trees on Lots 116 and 117 to provide shade opportunities Provide more small concrete tables (or alternatives) with benches on Open Space Lots. Small and more tables are preferable to larger and fewer &g£j£is&eF-tab\es. Group tables and benches into conversation areas rather than a linear alignment. Provide moveable tables and benches in gazebo area. Add two more benches at basketball half-court. Create more of a conversation area at the fountain on Lot 115. Include "rough timber" or an alternative type of large play equipment for children. Expand size of overhead entry trellises to a minimum of TO' x 6'. Provide a few benches near horseshoe area. Provide benches facing sand volleyball court. Provide benches in parkways. Reduce size of entry sign to a more pedestrian scale. The scale of the interior portion of the sign is more in scale to a pedestrian-oriented residential development. Tabulate required guest parking and number on site plan. How will maintenance of garage walls be provided in 0' lot line situations? Indicate a parking/circulation plan for the RV area, the required number of spaces and how these will be provided. Provide a cross section from east to west at three locations on the site including the eastern retaining walls and the 40' open space area and wall along Carlsbad Boulevard. Please provide berm where possible to reduce the visual impacts of the wall heights. Council mentioned that they would like to see a 50/50 wall/berm combination. Indicate how the visual impacts of the wall will be mitigated and include wall designs and materials samples. Include design details and locations of any access gates. Fencing plan on this site must be compatible with fencing on Planning Area 8. Please indicate how this will be ensured. Illustrate trail connection at northeast corner of PA 8 and how your trail will connect with a connection at the Railroad R-O-W t~j t ( Provide in tabular form the percentage of homes which will have front porches or second story balconies facing the street. Also include in tabular format how a 15' ft average will be provide by calculating the closest point of the structure (not including porch) to the front property line on each lot and calculating the average on \ a project level basis. Engineering: Engineering issues of concern will follow at a later date. t PACIFIC POINSETTIA PROPERTIES PLNG AREA 8 SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY GUIDELINES 8/25/98 GUIDELINE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. In projects where there are three 2-slory units in a row situated less than 15 feel apart, at least one of the three units shall have a single story building edge. The depth of the single-story edge shall not be less than 10 feet and shall run the length of the building pad, except thai courtyards set back a minimum of 15 feet from the properly line and which are a minimum 5 feel wide are not required to have a single story building edge. The roof covering the single story element shall be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story element to the unit (this is not intended to preclude long shed-type roofs falling to a single-story element). In projects where there are three 2-story units in a row situated between 15 and 20 feel apart, at least one of the three units shall have a single story building edge with a depth of not less than 5 feet running the length of the building pad. The roof of the single story element shall be substantially lower than the roof for the two story element of the building (this is not intended to preclude long shed-type roofs failing to a single story element). On a project basis, thirty-three percent (33%) of all units shall have a single story edge for forty percent (40%) of the perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline the single story edge shall be a minimum depth of three feel (31). The units qualifying under the 33% shall be distributed Ihroughoul the project. The main purpose of this guideline is lo ensure some building relief on (he front and sides of each unit. For at least 50% of (he units in a project, there shall be at least three separate building planes on street side elevations of lots with 45 feel of frontage or less, and four separate building planes on street side elevations of lots with a frontage greater than 45 feel. The minimum offset in planes shall be 18 inches and shall include but not be limited lo building walls, windows and roofs. The minimum depth between (he faces of the forward-most plane and the rear plane on (he front elevation shall be 10 feel and a plane must be a minimum of 30 sq. ft. to receive credit under this section. Rear elevations shall adhere lo the same criteria outlined in number 4 above for front elevations except that the minimum depth between front and back planes on the rear elevation shall be 3 feet. At least 50% of the units in a project shall have one side elevation where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so thai the side yard setback averages a minimum of 7 feel. Projects with an average lot size of 5,000 sq. ft. or less shall limit Ihe number of units wilh Ihree car garages to 75% of the plans in Ihe project. Project units with three car garages shall be a mix of two door garages, Ihree door garages, and offset (2 planes min. 12") Iwo door garages. Fifty percent (50%) of exierior openings (doorsMndows) shall be recessed or projected a minimum of 2" and shall be wilh wood or colored aluminum windowframes (no mill finishes). The predominant roof framing for each floor plan in a project shall exhibit directional variety lo Ihe other floor plans and to Ihe street. MINIMUM STANDARD 1 of3 1of3 33% 50% 50% 50% 75% 50% 100% % OF COMPLIANCE 50% 2 of 4 100% 33% 100% 73% 100% N/A 100% 100% COMMENTS P lans 2 & 4 have a si ngle story bui Idi ng edge which is interrupted by a 30' x 13' courtyard. The average building separation between 1 & 2 and 3 & 4 is approx. 20' (see sideyard setback guideline 6). Plans 2, 3 & 4 all have single story roof edge. Plan 1 has single story edge at front and rear. All plans have single slory edges. Plan 2 has a 44% single slory edge and Plan 3-C has a 41% single slory edge. Lots 3, 4, 6, 8. 11, 34, 39, 45, 49, 54, 83, 84, 88, 98, 104, 106, and 110 will be plotled with a Plan 3-C which has a single slory fronl and rear porch to accommodate Ihe 33% requirement. All Plans/elevalions comply for 100%. Exceeds min. standard. Plans 1,2&4compryfor73%. Exceeds min. standard. All Plans exceed the 7' average setback: PL 1 = 12.1 ft, PL 2 = 7.3 ft, PL 3 = 11.5 fl, PL 4 = 9.2 ft. No 3-car garages used; all are 2 car garages. All windows have trim surround. Exceeds minimum standard. While vinyl windows will be used with exterior trim. All elevations have directional and design variety as required on the roof framing. .ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES PACIFIC SHORES SOUTH UUIULLINL •Kill K IDCiHIIKIIfJI CDMIIIANCI CHAW luHINIIKI lilllDI I Itll HI oCltll'HOW TYPICAL BUILDING ELEVATIONS nore (3) two-story units occur in a tow and they are situated loss than I!) at least (1) unit must have a single story building edge not less than 10 loot in depth & run the entire building pad, except that courtyards setback 15' from PL x 5' doos not require a single story edge. COMPLIANCE 2of4 Plans 2 & 4 have a single story building edge which is inlerupted by a 30' x 13' courtyard. The average building separation between 1& 2, and 3 & 4 Is approx. 20'.( see sldeyard setback guideline 6) PLAN 1 (27% mix)PLAN 2 (21% mix)PLAN 3 (27% mix)PLAN 4 (25% mix) STREET PROFILE MINIMUM CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CASEGROUP AicHiims w m^\LOT /TOHITECTURAL GUIDELINES PACIFIC SHORES SOUTH f i -4 1 Story Element .INI' 3 •HIFFR lOGUinilINt COMiniANCE CHANT KHUNIIHE GUIOtllHI l)f_l IION Per project, 33% of all units shall have a single story edge a minimum of 40% of iho total perimeter. COMPLIANCE All plans have single story edges. Plan 2 has a 44% single story edge and Plan 3-C has a 41% single story edge. Lots 7,17,19,21,40 and 42 will be plotted with a Plan 3-C which has a single story front and rear porch to accommodate the 33% requirement. r\ PLAN1 (27% mix) Total Perimeter = 200 FT. One Story = 48 FT. (24%) PLAN 2 (21% mix)PLAN 3 (27% mix)PLAN 4 (25% mix) Total Perimeter = 184 FT. Total Perimeter = 205 FT. Total Perimeter = 205 FT. One Story = 81 FT. (44%) One Story = 86 FT. (41%) One Story = 41 FT. (20%) ^ Lots with PLAN 3 additional front and rear porch: 7,17,19,21,40,42 SINGLE STORY BUILDING PERIMETER AKHIMdS TURAL GUIDELINES PACIFIC SHORES SOUTH I -4 1 PLAN1 (27% mix) C PLAN 2 (21% mix) GUIDEl •REFER 10 GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE CHART f OR ENURE GUIDELINE DESCUII'll! Per project, 50% of all units with a lot fronlage less than 45 feel must have (3) separate building planes on the street side elevation. Mln. depth of 10' & 30 sqll. COMPLIANCE C All Plans/elevations comply for 100%. PLAN 3 (27% mix) * -A (14»F) PLAN 4 (25% mix) BUILDING PLANE CRITEREA HKimLL L(^\IOITLCTURAL GUIDELINES PACIFIC SHORES SOUTH GUIULLINL 5 •REFER 10 GIIIDl I INC CUMI'UANCE CIIAR1 (OR ENURE CiU J L, l^-fc(toosF) (?OSF) c l__1 Per project, 50% of all units with a lol frontage less than 45 feet must have (3) separate building planes on the rear elevation. Min. depth of 3' & 30 sqlt. COMPLIANCE Pans 1.2, & 4 comply for 73%. PLAN1 (27% mix)PLAN 2 (21% mix)PLAN 3 (27% mix)PLAN 4 (25% mix) BUILDING PLANE CRITEREA .L^IAK(;i!lli;CTUHALGUIIJ[LINi;S PACIFIC SHORES SOUTH liUllJLLINL «•IU.HH KHMIUIIIIII UJMI'IIANU CIIAHI (OKINIIKI GUI^NI Per project, 50% of all units shall have one side elevation with a 7 feet average side yard setback. COMPLIANCE All Plans exceed the 7' average setback P11 = 12.1 ft, PI 2 = 7.3 ft, PI 3 = 11.5 ft. PI4 = 9.2 ft PLAN 1 (27% mix) 788SFf65FT.= 12.1 FT. Average PLAN 2 (21% mix) 415SFf57FT.= 7.3 FT. Average PLAN 3 (27% mix) 780SFf67.5FT.= 11.5 FT. Average PLAN 4 (25% mix) 620SFf67.5FT.= 9.2 FT. Average SIDEYARD SETBACK CRITERIA CASEGROUP H(HIU(n ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES PACIFIC SHORES SOUTH j. -4 2 Car Garage 2 Car Garage GUIUELINL 7 •REFER TO GUIOntNE COMPLIANCE CIIARHOR ENIIW GUIDElBPlJESCRII'IION Three-car garages limited lo 75% of the total units where average lot size is 5,000 SF or less. Three-car garages shall Incorporate a mixture of 2 door, 3 door and offset 2 door designs. r COMPLIANCE No 3-car garages used. All are 2 car garages. N/A r4= 2 Car Garage * 2 Car Garage 4Ui- PLAN1 (27% mix)PLAN 2 (21% mix)PLAN 3 (27% mix)PLAN 4 (25% mix) GARAGE DOOR CRITEREA iKHIUUS •m I AKCHII'LCTUKALGUIDtLINtS PACIFIC SHORES SOUTH UIDEUNi: 0 •KIFIM 10(-.1111)11 INI CnMI'IIANCf CIIAItl f 1)11 INIIKIW 50% of exteilor door and window openings shall be projected or recessed a minimum of 2 Inches. COMPLIANCE 100% All windows have trim surround. Exceeds min. stnd. White vinyl windows will be used with exterior trim. A 3060 A 4000 A 3060 JLJ. DD WINDOW TRIM CRITEREA AKHIUUS CASEGROUP E^AIOITLCTUML GUIDELINES PACIFIC SHORES SOUTH GUIDELINE 9 •RlffR lOGIIIDIIINl C.OMPlIANCI CHAR1 FOIUNIIKl GUIIlUINf DtSCRII'IION The predoniinanl roof framing for each lloor plan in a project shall exhibiHwcctional variety to the other floor plans and to the street. COMPLIANCE All elevations have directional and design variety as required on the roof framing. 100% PLAN1 (27% mix)PLAN 2 (21% mix)PLAN 3 (27% mix)PLAN 4 (25% mix) ROOF FRAMING CRITEREA CASEGROUP AKHIIKH 'ACIHC SHOKLS SOUI'll AVniAGE FRONT YARD SETHACKS I'l AN I ( 27% mix)PI AN 2 (21% mix)'1 AN 3 (27% mix) / ^ PLAN 4 (25% mix) 15' minimum 15' minimum 15' minimum 15' minimum MINIMUM AVERAGE FRONT YARD SETBACK = 15 FT. CASEGROdP AKHIIKU City of Carlsbad Planning Department March 13, 1998 HSL/BP/Michan L. P., c/o Benchmark Pacific 2892 Jefferson Stteet Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: CT 97-10/CDP 97-1 6, Poinsettia Properties, Planning Area 8 Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your master tentative map and related applications as to their completeness for processing. All of the items requested of you earlier have not been received and therefore your application is still deemed incomplete. Listed below are the item(s) still needed in order to deem your application as complete. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. Although you had six months from the date the application was initially filed, May 13, 1997, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information, your application must remain incomplete until the Specific Plan and all associated discretionary applications have been approved by the California Coastal Commission. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Adrienne Landers, at (760) 438-1161, extension 4451 or Ken Quon, project engineer at extension 4380, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:AML:mh c: Gary Wayne Ken Quon Bobbie Hoder File Copy Data Entry Planning Aide 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-0894 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION No. CT 97-10/CDP 97-16 Planning: 1. Please submit a fully completed original notarized PFF agreement and one copy of the PFF agreement. Please note that a separate PFF agreement is required for each project submitted. 2. Submit a completed disclosure statement. 3. Please submit three copies of the Preliminary Title Report (current within the last six months. ISSUES OF CONCERN Engineering: 1. As proposed, Lots 2 and 8 are not fronting on a public street. We suggest either providing public frontage to each of the two lots; or eliminating these two lots from this map and placing them on a future map when the planning areas are further subdivided. 2. There are two concerns regarding Lots 6 and 7 of this map. First, the Carlsbad Municipal Water District requires the map is to indicate a 12' wide access road for maintenance to the 27" sewer line which parallels the railroad tracks, along the west side of the project site. Second, the map should identify the area within these Lots that to be irrevocably offered to the City as a public trail easement. 3. Please identify on both the typical street cross sections and on Sheet 3 those areas along Avenida Encinas that will be dedicated as public right-of-way as a condition of this map. Attached is a redlined check print set of the project. Please forward this plan set to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. The applicant must return this plan set with the corrected plans to assist us in our continued review. If you have questions regarding any of the comments above, please contact me at extension 4380. City o_f Carlsbad Engineering Department January 28, 1998 Mr. Rick Schroeder UDC Homes 1 1 51 2 El Camino Real, Suite 1 1 0 San Diego, CA92130 COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND INITIAL ISSUES STATEMENT POINSETTIA PROPERTIES - PLANNING AREA 8, CT 97-22/PUD 97-18/CDP 97-55 This letter is a follow-up to the City Planning Department's letter of January 16,1 998. As stated in that letter, the project application has been found to be incomplete. Additionally, the Engineering Department made a preliminary review of the project for Engineering issues. Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to conditioning of the project are as follows: 1. Please submit a Preliminary Title Report, current within the last 6 months. 2. 3. It appears that a portion of the storm drainage for this project has been designed to flow in a westerly direction. Please note that all storm drainage is to flow to the storm drain system east of the project. 4. tentative map indicates that the drainage area along the sideyards of several buildings will be less than 5' wide and hence, not meet the City standard, which requires that finish grading provide a positive drainage of 2% to swale a minimum 5' away from the face of building. This concern may be resolved by having the applicant's soils engineer provide a letter indicating their approval of the proposed drainage design. .^Please note that all lots are to drain towards the street, in accordance with City standard " drawing GS-15, and not towards the rear to the lot. 5. ^/£-Sewer should be maintained at a minimum 1% slope. Please provide on the plans a detail of the emergency access area that runs between Street "B" and Carlsbad Boulevard. The City recommends that this emergency access area be designed so as to be compatible with the proposed surrounding improvements. For example, rolled curb could be used for the portion fronting Carlsbad Boulevard, as opposed to a standard concrete driveway apron; "grass-crete" or a similar material could be used for the portion of the area that crosses the open space lot; and if necessary, gating of the emergency access should be done to blend in with surrounding walls and fences. 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 431-5769 7. Please indicate on the tentative map the location of future access points to lot 114. To minimize traffic conflicts, the City recommends these access points be located to line up directly across other access points, such as the Ponto Road/Street "A" intersection, or the Ponto Road/RV parking area intersection. 8. Please note on the tentative map sight distance corridors at all street intersections within the project. These sight distance corridors are to consist of a triangular area measured 25' back from the BCR, to form a triangle free of any obstructions in excess of 30" in height. 9. The required improvements to Carlsbad Boulevard are to include half-width major arterial improvements along the project frontage, including raised median with landscaping. It is possible that a portion or all of these improvements may be provided through a cash deposit. Clearly show on the plans, in plan view, the proposed improvements to Carlsbad Boulevard. 10. Rolled curb is not a standard improvement and not allowed on streets, public or private, except in special or unusual circumstances. 11. It appears that due to the proposed raised island in the street, vehicles will have difficulty backing out of lots nos. 14, 90, 91, 101, and 102. 12. It is expected that Ponto Drive will carry traffic volumes similar to a collector street, and therefore should be designed with collector street standards, i.e., replace the proposed street knuckle with a curve having a minimum centerline radius of 200'. 13. Overall, the grading scheme of the project is to be modified and lot elevations are to be adjusted, in accordance with the requirements established during final approval of the Poinsettia Properties Specific Plan. 14. Although not apparent from the tentative map, projects such as this one are usually designed with a privately gated entrance. If it is intended for this project to be gated, please note the City's engineering standards for gated entrances, especially with regard to turnaround areas. Attached is a redlined check print set of the project. Please return this plan set with the corrected plans to assist us in our continued review. If you have questions regarding any of the comments above, please contact me at (760) 438-1161, extension 4380. KENNETH W. QUON, P.E. Associate Engineer c: City Engineer Bob Wojcik, Principal Civil Engineer /Adrienne Landers, Principal Planner Mike Howes, HPA TO: FROM: NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD FOR BOARD ACTION AGENDA ITEM 1-1 November 20. 1997 North San Diego County Transit Development Board Members Martin Minkoff, Executive Director Leslie Blanda, Principal Planner SUBJECT: COASTAL RAIL TRAIL MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING STAFF'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:Thar the Board authorize the Executive Director to execute the Coastal Rail Trail Memorandum of Understanding and direct staff to cooperatively pursue resolution of Coastal Rail Trail issues following the Statement of Principles contained in this agenda item. BACKGROUND: In May of 1994, the City of Carlsbad sponsored a funding application through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act for the development of a feasibility study and preliminary engineering design for a 42 mile multi-use trail within the San Diego Northern Railway right-of-way. The City of Carlsbad acted as the lead agency on behalf of six coastal cities including Oceanside, Carlsbad, Encinitas, Solana Beach, Del Mar and San Diego. The funding application was successful and in January, 1994, the six cities embarked on the Coastal Rail Trail Project Study Report. A Coastal Rail Trail Committee was established in March, 1996 to guide the development of the planning and design of the Coastal Rail Trail. The Committee is comprised of members from the cities of Oceanside, Carlsbad, Encinitas, Solana Beach, Del Mar and San Diego, North County Transit District, Metropolitan Transit Development Board, SANDAG, Operation Lifesaver, MCAS Miramar and MCAS El Toro. Members of the Coastal Rail Trail Committee expressed an interest in developing a formal, cooperative agreement for the planning and design of the Coastal Rail Trail. The Coastal Rail Trail Memorandum of Understanding provides a framework to coordinate planning and design of the Coastal Rail Trail. Signatories to the Memorandum of Understanding include the six coastal cities, NCTD and MTDB. At present, the six coastal cities have signed the Memorandum of Understanding. NCTD and MTDB have yet to sign. -90- Through execution of the Memorandum of Understanding for the Coastal Rail Trail, the North San Diego County Transit Development Board would authorize NCTD staff to continue to work cooperatively with the six coastal ^cities and MTDB in the coordinated planning and design of the Coastal Rail Trail facility. The framework provided by the Memorandum of Understanding would guide NCTD staff in these efforts. In the cooperative planning and design of the Coastal Rail Trail project, there are a number of issues to be resolved. NCTD staff, NCTD General Counsel and City of Carlsbad staff have identified five unresolved issues which could affect the feasibility of the project and merit immediate attention. Additional issues will likely be identified through the course of the cooperative planning and design process. The five currently identified unresolved issues are as follows: 1. Liability Issues 2. Ownership/Trail Management Issues 3. Operations and Maintenance Funding Issues 4. Non-Motorized At-Grade Crossing Issues 5. Safety Issues and Physical Separation of the SDNR Facilities and Coastal Rail Trail In addition to the framework established in the Memorandum of Understanding for the coordinated planning and design of the Coastal Rail Trail, NCTD staff recommends that the Board direct staff to cooperatively pursue resolution of Coastal Rail Trail issues, both current and future, following the Statement of Principles presented below: Statement of Principles In pursuing coordinated planning and design of the Coastal Rail Trail and resolution of associated issues, North County Transit District will be guided by the principle that any identified resolutions will consider safety a primary concern, be fiscally neutral to North County Transit District, and be in compliance with applicable federal and state regulations as well as applicable North San Diego County Transit Development Board policies. At today's meeting, Steve Jantz, Associate F-ngineer with the City of Carlsbad, will provide the Board with a brief description of the Coastal Rail Trail and an update on the status of the project. Dwight Worden, NCTD General Counsel, will elaborate on the five unresolved issues listed above. Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Executive Director to execute the Coastal Rail Trail Memorandum of Understanding and direct staff to cooperatively pursue resolution of Coastal Rail Trail issues following the Statement of Principles -91- contained in thi^Renda item. A copy of the Coastal Rffil Trail Memorandum of Understanding is attached. FISCAL IMPACTS: There are no direct fiscal impacts associated with execution of the Coastal Rail Trail Memorandum of Understanding. Should the Board direct staff to follow the Statement of Principles, as contained in this agenda item, all identified resolutions to Coastal Rail Trail issues would be fiscally neutral to North County Transit District. -92- MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITIES OF OCEANSIDE, CARLSBAD, ENCINITAS. SOLANA BEACH, DEL MAR AND SAN DIEGO AND THE NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND SAN DIEGO METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD FOR COORDINATED PLANNING AND DESIGN OF A MULTI- MODAL, NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION FACILITY WITHIN THE SAN DIEGO NORTHERN RAILWAY FROM SAN LUIS REY RIVER, OCEANSIDE TO THE SANTA FE DEPOT, SAN DIEGO. WHEREAS, the Cities of Oceanside. Carlsbad. Encinitas. Solana Beach. Del Mar. and San Diego, are hereinafter referred as Public Agencies; and WHEREAS, the Public Agencies desire to develop a 42 mile multi-modal, non-motorized transportation facility primarily within the right-of-way of the San Diego Northern Railway, hereinafter referred to as SDNR, from the San Luis Rev River in Oceanside to the Santa Fe Depot in San Diego. hereinafter known as the Coastal Rail Trail; and WHEREAS, the Coastal Rail Trail will provide alternative transportation opportunities, reduce automobile trips, and thereby improve air quality; and WHEREAS, the Public Agencies also recognize the regional benefits that a continuous multi- modal, non-motorized transportation facility will have on recreation, tourism, quality of life, and health; and WHEREAS, the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) has designated the City of Carlsbad as the lead agency in coordinating the planning and design effort for the "Coastal Rail Trail" project and have formalized this action by designating the Coastal Rail Trail within the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan adopted by the S ANDAG Board of Directors; and WHEREAS, the North San Diego County Transit Development Board (NSDCTDB) and the San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) own the SDNR right-of way, with North County Transit District (NCTD), the operating entity of NSDCTDB, serving as the managing agency; and WHEREAS, the SDNR was purchased for use primarily as a rail transportation corridor, hosting a federally designated high speed passenger corridor, as well as rail freight operations and; WHEREAS, the Public Agencies desire to develop, maintain, and operate the Coastal Rail Trail within the SDNR right-of-way as an ancillary use subordinate to the primary use; and, WHEREAS, the Public Agencies acknowledge the importance of designing a trail that is safe and is separated from the railway; and. -93- WHEREAS, the Pujjt Agencies desire to develop the Coas^Rail Trail within the 5DXR npr.:- of-way. if feasible due to ra^way. legal, and land use limitations: ana WHEREAS, in those segments of the San Diego Northern Railway right-of-way not suitable or feasible for the Coastal Rail Trail alignment, the Public Agencies intend to explore alternative alignment utilizing city, state, or federal highway, utility right-of-ways, and private property: and WHEREAS, the Public Agencies intend to work closely hi a cooperative effort with NCTD. MTDB. and other affected local, state, and federal agencies to plan and design the Coastal Rail Trail in portions of the right-of-way not intended for railway and light rail use: and WHEREAS, the Public Agencies, agree to work cooperatively to develop implementing agreements for the Coastal Rail Trail with affected property owners and to pursue grant funding for construction, operation and maintenance of the Coastal Rail Trail facility. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Public Agencies and the Board of Directors of of NSDCTDB and MTDB as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the City Manager of the cities of Oceanside. Carlsbad. Encinitas. Solana Beach. Del Mar. and San Diego, and the General Manager of NSDCTDB and MTDB are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of each City or Board of Directors, the Memorandum of Understanding regarding the proposed "Coastal Rail Trail'"with the Cities of Oceanside, Carlsbad. Encinitas. Solana Beach. Del Mar. and San Diego and NSDCTDB and MTDB, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by this reference. -94- / c/TYOFOCEANSIDE Raymond PatcheiL CityManager CITY OF ENCINITAS uuiren Wassennan. Citv Manaeer Date: Date: Date: //* '3- fi CITY OF SOLANA BEACH Robert Semple. City Manager Date: Clli" OF DEL MAR ^v VQ ^v.Ji\P\l _CJ/_)f_; -\3 Laurame Brekke^EsparcaT City" Manager Date: SAN DIEGO Jack^lcGron'. Citv Manager Date: NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Richard Fifer. General Manager Date: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DEV. BOARD Thomas Larwin, General Manager O Data: -95- ^ Exhibit A ^CONCEPTUAL AGREEMENT F COORDINATED PLANNING AND DESIGN OF THE COASTAL RAIL TRAIL The railway from Oceanside to San Diego connect the jurisdictions of the Cities of Oceanside. Carlsbad. Encinitas. Solana Beach. Del Mar. and San Diego and offers the opportunity to create a 42 mile multi-modal, non-motorized transportation facility known as the Coastal Rail Trail. In order to develop the Coastal Rail Trail and provide a regional benefit a coordinated effort of the jurisdictions and NSDCTDB and MTDB is required. WHEREAS, the Cities of Oceanside. Carlsbad. Encinitas. Solana Beach. Del Mar. and San Diego border or lie within the boundaries of the San Diego Northern Railway right-of-way: and WHEREAS, the Public Agencies agree that it is their goal, if feasible, to create a continuous multi-modal, non-motorized transportation facility for the benefit of the Public: and WHEREAS, the Public Agencies are willing to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding to coordinate planning and design of the affecting the "Coastal Rail Trail" project in conjunction with NSDCTDB and MTDB. NOW THEREFORE, the Public Agencies hereby agree to study, research, coordinate, plan, and design the "Coastal Rail Trail" through coordinated funding, planning, environmental, and design effort to achieve a continuous 42-mile multi-modal, non-motorized transportation facility. This coordinated effort shall include the following: COORDINATION: The design and planning effort shall be coordinated between the Public Agencies. NSDCTDB. MTDB. and other affected property owners, as well as related agencies including, but not limited to, NAS Miramar. California Public Utilities Commission. California Transportation Commission. California Coastal Commission. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Game, and the U. S. Department of Fish and Wildlife. PLANNING: The planning effort shall consider issues related to the development of the Coastal Rail Trail within the railway right-of-way, from the San Luis Rey River in the City of Oceanside to the Santa Fe Depot in the City of San Diego and shall consider alternative alignments or temporary alternative alignments that might be necessary due to railway use, legal, liability, physical or funding constraints. DESIGN: The design effort shall result in a 30% preliminary engineering design to assist the Public Agencies in developing consistent design standards, and analyzing costs to construct and maintain the Coastal Rail Trail and related facilities. CRTMOU082996 -96-