HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 98-12; Magnolia Gardens; Tentative Map (CT) (32)May 19, 1999
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Senior Planner
ERRATA SHEET FOR THE MAGNOLIA GARDENS PROJECT - CT 98-12/SDP 98-22
The following revisions are proposed to the staff report and Planning Commission resolutions for
the above referenced project:
1. All references in the staff report to the affordable housing requirement for the project and
the fractional unit for which a fee must be paid shall be changed from 2.64 dwelling units
and a .64 credit to 2.55 dwelling units and a .55 credit. In addition, all references to the
proposed project density should be changed from 3.1 dwelling units per acre to 3.45
dwelling units per acre.
2. The following findings from Municipal Code Section 21.90.045 should be added to
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4549 (CT 98-12) to allow a project density of 3.45
dwelling units per acre:
20. The project is not required to provide additional public facilities for the density
in excess of the control point to ensure that the adequacy of the City's public
facilities plans will not be adversely impacted, in that public facilities are
adequate in Zone 1 to accommodate the additional 1.2 units above the
Growth Control Point.
21. There have been sufficient developments approved in the quadrant at densities
below the control point to cover the units in the project above the control point so
that approval will not result in exceeding the quadrant limit.
22. All necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance
will be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need
for them created by this development and in compliance with adopted City
standards.
3. The mitigation measure found on page 15 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Form
- Part II and on the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Form both attached to Planning
Commission Resolution No. 4548 should be revised by changing the last sentence to read
as follows:
"The Developer shall implement one or more of the mitigation measures identified in the
report prior to the issuance of building permits should mitigation be necessary so as to
reduce the impact below a level of significance."
4. Finding 10 (A) of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4549 should be replaced with the
following finding:
Land Use - The project is consistent with the City's General Plan since the proposed
density of 3.45 du/ac is within the density range of 0 - 4 du/acre specified for the site as
indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is above the growth control
point of 3.2 du/acre. Although the project exceeds the growth control point, it is
consistent with the General Plan provision allowing an infill subdivision located in
LFMP Zone 1 to exceed the density range and/or Growth Control Point in certain
circumstances. Public facilities are adequate in LFMP Zone 1 to accommodate the
proposed units and there are excess dwelling units in the northwest quadrant to
ensure that the maximum number of dwelling units in the northwest quadrant
would not be exceeded at buildout.
5. Finding 10 (C) of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4549 should be revised to
replace ".64" with ".55" .
6. Condition 20 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4549 should be revised to replace
".64" with ".55".
Don Neu