The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCUP 01-07; SPRINT PCS LAS PALMAS; Conditional Use Permit (CUP)f \,.. ~ ... . CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) USE ONLYI D Administrative Permit -2nd D Planned Industrial Permit Dwelling Unit D Administrative Variance D Planning Commission Determination D Coastal Development Permit D Precise Development Plan [if"' Conditional Use Permit CuPrll-o7 D Redevelopment Permit j D Condominium Permit D Site Development Plan D Environmental Impact D Special Use Permit Assessment D General Plan Amendment D Specific Plan D Hillside Development Permit D =Ferrteti•ote PeFeel Mel' Obtain from Engineering Department D Local Coastal Plan Amendment D Tentative Tract Map D Master Plan D Variance D Non-Residential Planned D Zone Change Development D Planned Development Permit D List other applications not specified 2) 3) 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: PROJECT NAME: 5W-/C?L>Lt3,~~ cf"Eitc?t1,.,JN'16117.,3 Muturf/ BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: QX ~J~ l)~G~ ffi~j LerJ'Et1.:= 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT LL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. 5---/ -o I DATE 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print r Type) -Jee. MP.So~ C!oM~$"> ~~l.Gf.~ MAILING ADDRESS . I \ 1 B 10 '5t;>/ftrrz.(_ Cnz.c.l6 ~ Io '2- CITY AND ST ATE \1z:J t ,JC. , CA ZIP 4'ZL. '~ ~~TELEPHONE ~_:J(,-Zo 13 I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND '-f z. I /:J.) CORREC BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. 0e . DA E I 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION -':[A';;__...:...\ ---=-+-1~~~..1--~-1.--L------""""--.:------- ~ {) j Q 40 NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTE~IORTO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2 £. . .. 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE BETWEEN I (NO~T~~~. EAST, WEST) I I L/-\i'1 l.rlD ~li'.!A ~6LC. I INAME OF STREET! 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE --? STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF I U5 ~AS 0{21-J::;: (NAME OF STREET) AND CA<-, r ~o \Ji D+ ?-c i3 u=, (NAME OF STREET) 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS If' 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING i-=--J 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF ~ L.!_j RESIDENTIAL UNITS ~ .. RESIDENTIAL UNITS t::::f 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION Hkl,41 PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ 1™15) PROPOSED COMM Qh] SQUARE FOOT AGE SQUARE FOOTAGE 16) PERCENT AGE OF PROPOSED ~17) :~POSED INCREASE IN ~ 18) PROPOSED SEWER QI] PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE USAGE IN EDU 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE I j.z.+ 120) EXISTING GENERAL ~ 21) PROPOSED GENERAL ~ PLAN PLAN DESIGNATION 22) EXISTING ZONING j?M 123) PROPOSED ZONING ~ 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENT THIS PURPOSE FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED TOT AL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID Form 16 M1'.Y 1 0 2001 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT. DATE ST AMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: g I YauO · A RECEIPT NO. PAGE 2 OF 2 e City e of Carlsbad 1#.1F1.1.11.1.1 •X§ ·t• a 1. ;14;11 HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT Consultation Of Lists of Sites Related To Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of California Government Code Section 65962.5, I have consulted the Hazardous Wastes and Substances Sites List compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): ~ The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. D The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. APPLICANT l'l.. PROPERTY OWNER j 6.::iM p·t ~ > Name:_Joz: t'1 P.s0 ..} /~W.01'1 ~t$ · Name: Vi ~(I '-'E , A,,14-t Lrt .~ ~ I ·---"-'--'---'-'---......_..L...L.""-'-"-<--L..l.---- Address: t'7{--?o ~'t:-iP~ yfU.L£-J:.1nl-Address: lLf 32 .<eA i3 iZ-W .'.V"-' 1 U::. l12-J1r.1S, CA-'1~14 :f2M4Jo fAt(;)> J~, CPr-CfoZ-!S' PhoneNumber: {j--.l~ t,,J(,.--zo13 PhoneNumber: ~1:;:,) ~'-ll -~c.·s,5: Address of Site: z1~0 LAt @LM.A~ 014 ve. Local Agency (City and County):_-=~'-'-'--'--_.:;._B""'-/}_...Q"'------------------- Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: __ =Z'--1_3_-_6"""~----7=~'°-------------- Specify Iist(s): ~ c:F-~ ~ 1A J/Je,/tµ)oJ;) ..JAsm Mo £.J'.6'_jTQfl6 l-1 r}: Regulatory Identification Number=---~--------------------- Date of List: c;.../ /, ) IC, B ----------,1r--r1--------------------- Admm.rCounier'HazWaste 1635 Faraday Avenue• Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 •FAX (760) 602-8559 @ CITY LIST 04/15/98 STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST DTSC PGM: CALEPA5 PAGE 37 FACILITY INVENTORY DATA BASE HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST SORT BY CITY, ST NAME, ST NBR STREET NBR STREET NAME CITY ZIP FACILITY NAME -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5600 1044 1044 571 920 2100 2500 2545 2545 2590 7654 3701 405 2160 2210 2210 850 B50 899 5335 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD VILLAGE CARLSBAD VILLAGE CARLSBAD VILLAGE CARLSBAD VILLAGE COSTA DEL MAR 5434 801 2615 2779 April, 1998 EL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL HAYMAR OAK PALOMAR AIRPORT PALOMAR AIRPORT PALOMAR AIRPORT PALOMAR AIRPORT PALOMAR AIRPORT PALOMAR AIRPORT PASEO OEL NORTE PASEO DEL NORTE PINE STATE STATE CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD 920080000 92008 92008 93164 92008 92009 92008 92008 92008 920080000 92008 920080000 92008 92008 92008 92008 92008 920080000 9~008 920080000 92008 UNISYS CARLSBAD CHEVRON SERVICE STATION CARLSBAD CHEVRON ITT CONTINENTAL BAKING C GASCO SERVICE STATION LA COSTA HOTEL &.SPA CHEVRON SERVICE STATION N FIRESTONE J.C.PENNYS AUIO CENTER SHELL OIL SERVICE STATION WALTS ARCO SERVICE STATIO SOUTH COAST MATERIALS PUBLIC WORKS YARD PALOMAR AIRPORT MCCLELLAN-PALOMAR AIRPORT FLIGHT INTERNATIONAL PEASOUP ANDERSON/UNION S/ CARLSBAD PROPERTIES, LTD MOBIL OIL STATION WESELOH CHEVROLET NORTH COUNTY LINCOLN MERC CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL PAUL'S AUTOMOTIVE NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT CO REG BY -REG ID 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 WBC&D LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA L TNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA LTNKA 9 000084N94 9UT1000 9UT2801 9UT2611 9UT2724 9UT242 9UT685 9UT1813 9UT 117 9UT2241 9UT1503 9UT3452 9UT1950 9UT2041 9UT2227 9UT846 9UT394 9UT1953 9UT1498 9UT1183 9UT3254 9UT1080 9UT3043 9UT3065 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM -PART I (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT) CASE NO: ________ _ DATE RECEIVED: ________ _ (To be comp/e1ed by stajf) BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: , 2. APPLICANT: __J~ ::PjoM P.so,,I /&M ('A-s $ --r a.c~ Saur 1<.6-$ I 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: l, ~-, o ~i.;f~ CtfU'.,lE I SJ,1t; J:. lo·z.. , I ~(,lC. 1 04 4 Z.& t4 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: -----=-S1J5~;..__.,L~~L..:....:.-~~----1,.;~-'..)~t:0=,.....:;,..i.,;;-____i:::~=-=~tTJ..LL.=~~=-- Lent5/L ~ MA-'f -,, 'ZD:>l . SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: Please check any of the environmental factors listed below that would be potentially affected by this project. This would be any environmental factor that has at least one impact checked "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" in the checklist on the following pages. D Land Use and Planning D Population and Housing D Geological Problems □water D Air Quality D Transportation/Circulation D Biological Resources D Public Services D Utilities & Service Systems D Energy & Mineral Resources D Aesthetics OHazards ONoise D Cultural Resources D Recreation D Mandatory Findings of Significance 1 Rev. 03/28/96 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. • Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. 2 Rev. 03/28/96 • If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does Q.Ot agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to detem1ine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the fom1 under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. 3 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Infom1ation Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #(s): ( ) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ( ) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ( ) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations ( e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible . land uses? ( ) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? ( ) II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ( ) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly ( e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( ) c) Displace ex1stmg housing? ( housing, ) especially affordable Ill. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? ( ) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( t) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) h) Expansive soils? ( ) i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ( ) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ( ) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality ( e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? ( ) 4 Potentially Significant Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Less Than No Significan Impact t Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ( ) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ( ) f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ( ) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) d) Create objectionable odors? ( VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features ( e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses ( e.g. farm equipment)? ( ) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( ) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation ( e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ( ) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? ( ) b) Locally designated species ( e.g. heritage trees)? ( ) 5 Potentially Significant Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Less Than Significan t Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ No Impact Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? ( ) d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? ( ) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal? a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) b) Use non-renewable resources m a wasteful and inefficient manner? ( ) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? ( ) IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? ( ) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? ( ) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ( ) e) Increase fire hazard 111 areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ( ) X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) b) Police protection? ( c) Schools? ( d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) e) Other governmental services? ( XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for· new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) b) Communications systems? ( 6 Potentially Significant Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Less Than Significan t Impact □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ No Impact Rev. 03/28/96 ,,.-~ Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be refer,red to and attached) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? ( ) d) Sewer or septic tan.ks? ( ) e) Storm water drainage? ( ) f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? ( ) b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? ( ) c) Create light or glare? ( ) XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) c) Affect historical resources? ( d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( ) XV.RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? 7 Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significan Impact Impact Unless t Impact Mitigation Incorporated ~ □ □ □ ~ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ tf □ □ □ □ □ □ [0' B □ □ □ □ □ □ ~ ~ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ ~ □ □ □ □ □ □ ~ □ □ □ [Lf' □ □ □ cr- □ □ □ Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting lnfonnation Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial ad".erse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Potentially Significant Impact □ □ Potentially Less Than No Significant Significan Impact Unless t Impact Mitigation Incorporated 0/ □ □ □ □ Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. 8 Rev. 03/28/96 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Please use this area to discuss any of the environmental factors that were checked "No impact" yet lack any information citations and any factors that were checked "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." The City has adopted a "Statement of Overriding Consideration" with regard to air quality and circulation impacts resulting from the normal buildout according to the General Plan. The following sample text is intended to guide your discussion of the impacts to these environmental factors. AIR QUALITY: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) paiiicipation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. CIRCULATION: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway · interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. 9 Rev. 03/28/96 To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include 1) measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestlian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) 10 Rev. 03/28/96 \ -C Tele S COMPASS Telecom Services• 17870 Sk-ypark Circle• Suitel02 •Irvine, CA 9261.: ------- May7, 2001 Planning Department City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ph: 949-475-8950 • Fax: 949-475-8949 RE: 2160 Las Palmas Drive (Proposed Sprint PCS Wireless Telecommunications Facility). To Whom It May Concern, Compass Telecom Services is pleased to submit on behalf of its client, Sprint PCS, an application for an unmanned telecommunications facility at 2160 Las Palmas Drive in Carlsbad. Sprint PCS is a nationwide wireless telephone service and is continuing the buildout of its wireless telephone network in the San Diego area. This proposal for installing, operating and maintaining the wireless cell site by Sprint PCS includes nine (9) panel-type antennas arranged in three (3) arrays of three (3) antennas each plus related equipment cabinets. The antennas are proposed to be fac;ade-mounted and covered by architecturally integrated screening, which will be painted and textured to match the existing fac;ade. The seven (7) related equipment cabinets would be located within an 11' x 50' enclosure built on to the north side of the building. The enclosure will be made of split-face CMU block to match the existing building. The top of the enclosure will be covered by a awning and \Vill match the color of the building. An eight-inch (8') ·wide cable tray will connect the ground-mounted equipment to the fac;ade-mounted antennas. When running on the outside of the building, the cable tray will also be painted to match the exiting building color. The site is zoned PM in the City of Carlsbad and is primarily used as a Sprint switching station. The proposed project site is a total of 1.24 acres. This site was selected due to its strategic location and the ability to provide needed wireless coverage for the area. Please contact me at (949) 475-8950 X122 or (949) 636-2013 if you have any questions concerning this project. Sincerely, Joseph Thompson Senior Land Use Planner 2160 Las Palmas -Carlsbad 2160 Las Palmas -Carlsbad 2160 Las Palmas -Carlsbad 2160 Las Palmas -Carlsbad -. . PROPOSED (3) 4'-4" LONG PANEL ANTENNAS SECTOR "C" 0 260" PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING COLOR & TEXTURE (E) DRAINAGE DITCH (E) WALL MOUNTED _ _j==~.- L!GHT (TYP.) PROPOSED TEST EQUIPMENT COMPOUND ±275'-D" SQ. FT. PROPOSED (3) 4'-4" LONG PANEL ANTENNAS SECTOR "A" 0 10· PAINTED TO M,OTCH EXISTING COLOR & TEXTURE PROPOSED (3) 4'-4" L_ (E) ±15'-Q" LONG PANE!. ANTENNAS HIGH PINE TREE (E) ROOF A•:CESS HATCH (E) TELCO EACKEOARD IN TELCO RM O:~ FIRST FLOOR ' ~----PROPOSED LANDSCAP1NG W/ PALMS &: SHRUBS TO MATCH EXISTING ,.-----PROPOSED SPRINT EQUIPMENT COMPOUND :±275' -D" SQ. FT. ,.-----(E) LANDSCAPlNG (E) ±B-0" r<tGH TRASH ENCLOSURE PPOPOSED W.INTENANCE PARKING i----.-PROPOSED UG I POWER TELC=0-------11 1 RUN ±135'-o" \: .. SECTOR "!3" 0 16(!' (TYP.) ----------------------------tt~NDG rgo~t:ct _____ -------------------------------------TRA -~R__ -------------------- TEXTURE L A S P/!i.LM/i.S R 0 /.. D Sprint. 4683 CHABOT DRIVE. SUITE lOD !?LEASANTON, CA 94588 PROJECT INFORMATION: CARLSBAD SWITCH SD40XC317C 2160 LAS PALMAS DR. CARLSBAD, CA 92009 SAN DIEGO COUNTY f ""' ·s;; ;;1/01 11 f "D FOR. ZONING ~ ::REv .. =Dl'TE.=DESCRIPTiCiN:=BY:- 03/21/01 so::; Z.D. DB ::PLANS PREPARED BY: VeldciTel~ ArCHITECTUPE AND B>tGiNEERl!-tG t.7'/l!!C~ .cm 'JIJ.JRf"HY'CAN'tOh io.-..o.:;ior1320 ~DtfGO. CAL..~~921:3 f!Si!J:244-1026 ;::coNSULTl'.NT: ~RAWN ey, I DB ,::ENSURE:- 1!58124-4-l.cl2FAY www.veioc:te.iie.t t=~sjJi1TE[iP~LA~N~------------------------------------------1-...ous~SHEET~s~~~[!TOC}!~~ ..... :-nr~.~. ~.:,.~,.~--CJIT m, I A 1 140XC31~1 ,/ VICINITY MAP 2160 Las Palmas / I / r I , , I ------------· --1 ~~,~~ \_ ----;;;."" --------,.;_..--~-\I ,..,, I ,,..-\'---~" I \~ U COSTA COONTRY . CUB + ... I I .r I/ t I \ . AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY 1111 EAST KATELLA AVE. , SUITE #120 ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92867 (714) 289-7100 * Fax (714) 289-7105 PRELIMINARY REPORT ONLY To: Compass Telecom Services 5465 Morehouse Drive #265 San Diego, CA 92121 Attn: Michael Bealieu EFFECTIVE DATE: January 26, 2001 at 7:30 AM Your Ref: SD40XC317C Our No.: 811299-12 Title Officer: Cindy Fern PROPERTY ADDRESS: Carlsbad, CA In response for the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, American Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrances not shown or ref erred to as an Exception in Schedule B or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are set forth in the attached cover sheet. Copies of the Policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. THIS REPORT, (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to below and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Exhibit A of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to the land. ORDER NO.: 811299 -~ EXHIBIT "A" Lot 10 of Carlsbad Tract No. 79-1, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 9389, filed in the Office of the County recorder of San Diego County, September 26, 1979. - ORDER NO.: 811299 -· -- SCHEDULE A THE FORM OF POLICY OR POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THIS REPORT IS; NONE California Land Title Association Standard Coverage Policy - 1990 American Land Title Association Loan Policy (10-17-92) with ALTA Indorsem.ent Form 1 Coverage American Land Title Association -Residential Title Insurance Policy -1987 THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A Fee TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: The Anglin Family Trust, Virgil Anglin and Patricia Anglin, Trustees, UDT dated 1-31-89 THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT 11 A11 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION ORDER NO.: 811299-~~ SCHEDULE B AT THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: A. Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 2001-2002. B. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2000-2001, Assessor's Parcel Number 213-050-35-00 Code Area: 1st Installment 2nd Installment Exemption: 09018 $5,615.50, Paid $5,615.50, Open None C. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (Conunencing with Section 75~ of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California. 1. Any rights of the parties in possession of a por~ion of, or all of said land, which rights are not disclosed by the public record. 2. Rights of the public as to any portion of the land lying within the area commonly known as any lawful streets or highways. 3. Covenants, conditions and restrictions (deleting ~herefrom any restrictions indicating any preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin) as set forth in the document Recorded: October 1, 1974, as Instrument No. 74-263897, Official Records. Note: Section 12956.1 qf_ the Government Code provides the following: If this document contains any restriction based on race, color, religion, sex, familial status, marital status, disability, national origin, or ancestry, that restriction violates state and federal housing laws and is void. Any person holding an interest in this property may request that the county recorder remove the restrictive language pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 12956.1 of the Government Code. Said covenants, conditions and restrictions provide that a violation thereof shall not def eat the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value. ORDER NO.: 811299 .J.e SCHEDULE B (CONTINUED) Modification(s) of said covenants, conditions and restrictions Recorded: December 31, 1974, as Instrument No. 74-337587, June 1, 1977, as Instrument No. 77-212678, June 27, 1977, as Instrument No. 77-252978 and June 27, 1977, as Instrument No. 77-252979, all of Official Records. 4. Provisions, herein recited, of the dedication statement on the map of the subdivision shown below: Map No.: 9389 Provisions: This map is approved on the basis that the subdivider will be responsible for providing for the treatment of waste water utilizing a septic tank and sewage pit system. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to maintain their respective septic systems in accordance with county health standards and City of Carlsbad Ordinances. 5. Provisions, herein recited, of the dedication statement on the map of the subdivision shown below: Map No.: 9389 Provisions: No traffic circulation permitted across interior lot lines. 6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a document; Granted to: Purpose: Recorded: Affects: San Diego Gas & Electric Company underground electrical and corrununication systems July 27, 1982, as Instrument No. 82-229733, Official Records. A strip of land including all the area lying between the exterior sidelines, which sidelines shall be 3 feet measured at right angles on each exterior side of each and every facility installed. Restrictions on the use, by the owners of said land, of the easement area as set forth in the easement document shown hereinabove. Reference is made to said document for full particulars. ORDER NO.: 811299-.... SCHEDULE B (CONTINUED) 7. An unrecorded lease with certain terms, covenants, conditions, and provisions set forth therein. Lessor: Lessee: Disclosed By: Recorded: Virgil E. Anglin and Patricia L. Anglin, husband and wife as community property James L. Bartlett, Jr. and Shirley V. Bartlett, husband and wife as community property Memorandum of Lease; Option to Purchase January 10, 1983, as Instrument No. 83-008585, Official Records. The present ownership of the leasehold created by said lease and other matters affecting the interest of the lessee are not shown herein. 8. Covenants, conditions and restrictions (deleting therefrom any restrictions indicating any preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin) as set forth in the document Recorded: February 4, 2000, as Instrument No. 2000-0060543, Official Records. Note: Section 12956.1 of the Government Code provides the following: If this document contains any restriction based on race, color, religion, sex, familial status, marital status, disability, national origin, or ancestry, that restriction violates state and federal housing laws and is void. Any person holding an interest in this property may request that the county recorder remove the restrictive language pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 12956.1 of the Government Code. Said covenants, conditions and restrictions provide that a violation thereof shall not def eat the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and fo~ va~ue. The obligations and restrictions imposed are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. 9. The terms, provisions and conditions contained in a document entitled 11 Notice of Non-Responsibility11 , executed by and between Virgil Anglin and Patricia Anglin, Trustees of the Anglin Family trust, recorded March 14, 2000, as Instrument No. 2000-0128789, Official Records. ORDER NO.: 811299-~~ SCHEDULE B (CONTINUED) 10. An unrecorded lease with certain terms, covenants, conditions, and provisions set forth therein. Lessor: Lessee: Disclosed By: Recorded: ~irgil Anglin and Patricia Anglin, Trustees of the Anglin Family trust Sprint Spectrum LP Notice of Non-Responsibility March 14, 2000, as Instrument No. 2000-0128789, Official Records. The present ownership of the leasehold created by said lease and other matters affecting the interest of the lessee are not shown herein. 11. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a document: Granted to: Purpose: Recorded: Affects: City of Carlsbad, a Municipal Corporation public street and public utilities May 25, 2000, as Instrument No. 2000-0274270, Official Records. That portion of said land as shown thereon Reference is made to said document for full particulars. 12. An unrecorded lease with certain terms, covenants, conditions, and provisions set forth therein. Lessor: Lessee: Disclosed By: Recorded: The Anglin Family Trust, Virgil Anglin and Patricia Anglin, Trustees under Declaration of Trust dated January 31, 1989 Sprint Spectrum L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership Memorandum of Lease November 9, 2000, as Instrument No. 2000-0609530, Official Records. The present ownership of the leasehold created by said lease and other matters affecting the interest of the lessee are not shown herein. ORDER NO.: 811299 -~ SCHEDULE B (CONTINUED) 13. Any invalidity or defect in the title of the vestees in the event that the trust ref erred to herein is invalid or fails to grant insufficient powers to the trustee(s) or in the event there is a lack of compliance with the terms and provisions of the trust instrument. If title is to be insured in the trustee(s) of a trust, (or if their act is to be insured), this Company will require a Trust Certification pursuant to California Probate Code Section 18100.5. The Company reserves the right to except additional items and/or make additional requirements after reviewing said documents. 14. Any rights of the parties in possession of a portion of, or all of said land, which rights are not disclosed by the public record. END OF REPORT 09 0 al 0 W' 0 a • PAR. T S B.E MllP ?.79·37·43 EB.----------.. ® 1115 MIP WAS P!lEl'AAEll r-OR AS!'l:S9.IFM' PtmlSES 00.Y. Kl l"6UTY IS mwEO fOO THE ACCURACY Cf 11-E DATA Sl-Oll'll ASSES!Dl'S PA!lCELS "'T mr Cll.l'l.Y WllH LOCAL SU!O~ISOH Oii BUlDN'.i O!C<'lll«:ES. UN Ol[UO COUNTY A!![!ISOll'S HA, JK ;ir ~ PG 05 213-05 ~ , .. ,,.oo' ttJ 7 /20/00 D.JI CHANGES llK """ QET AIL "A,_" _ __,_1'_' =-'5""0~' MAP 10449-CARLSBAD TCT NO 81-38 (CONDM) MAP9389-CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 79-I OLD Z!J 2' fl#ll -, 1 ~ I 11 11 Ja NEW iJW•.,ll6 1m.11 11>1 • I#~ 47 IM,".i " ....... ~.!! Yi.' ~· MAP8418-CARLSBAD TRACT N0.73-49 UNIT NO. 2 MAP 823-RHO AGUA HEDIONDA ROS 6493 11u1-. i ·, 1oor 0 CUT llJ H~ II iUI ~I ,,, Ill! t•ll 1Z llP llJ H /If '"' "" -.. ~ 00 t7.:S 01 44118 ORDER NO.: 811299 -1.. To: Compass Telecom Services 17870 Skypark Circle #102 Irvine, CA 92614 Attn: Brian Ref: SD40XC317C 'Plat Map (GIF) • Page 2of4 §~ ~ !5 i~ " a ·~ ~ .,, ;: I~ ~ ;; :a :. g 11 11:11 r.u !~ !~~ " % ~" rn e ~ l'C i;. I z ~ 1i ;:t~ :I .. 41( "-~ -:!! :c v ~ 1 CJ) o o:zoto10-c;;r;r .. ./plat.asp?graphic=%2Faccounts%2Fdefault%2FcompanyBanner.gif&glink=&dqlogo=&dsub 12/21/00