HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 04-08; Alga Norte Community Park; Conditional Use Permit (CUP)• CITY OF CARLSBAD • LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION
1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES)
!FOR DEPARTMENT !
!FOR OEPARH.1Er-..!T I
USE ONLY! USE ONLY\
0 Administrative Permit -2nd 0 Planned Industrial Permit
Dwelling Unit
0 Administrative Variance 0 Planning Commission
Determination
0 Coastal Development Permit 0 Precise Development Plan
~ Conditional Use Permit ()lf-0?< 0 Redevelopment Permit
D Condominium Permit 0 Site Development Plan
0 Environmental Impact 0 Special Use Permit
Assessment
0 General Plan Amendment 0 Specific Plan
D Hillside Development Permit D TeAtative i>aFsel Ma~
Obtain from Engineering Department
D Local Coastal Plan Amendment D Tentative Tract Map
0 Master Plan D Variance
0 Non-Residential Planned
Development D Zone Change
D Planned Development Permit 0 List other applications not
specified
2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: ft"P/1/-rr e::::--ts O.iR -o / 4-.-.r ~ 2-13 -J/o~
3) PROJECT NAME: A-e-64--/VO,tZ-.75 C'e/?-7/?1£/#r d PAT-2--fc'-
4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Co-?71-??L!A//T:/ e~
5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type)
CIT
MAILING ADDRESS
/UO CA#0?64::J VI~#///,
CITY AND STATE ZIP
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE
INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE DATE
6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type)
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE .
OWNER AND AT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
CORRECT T 1 E BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
o/e/o1
DATE
7) BRIEF LEGAL DEscRIPTioN tJ-Poa nod t21= Gif2.L.etL 3 q=: ~
m~ .NVm/58'J<Z !15f3.
NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30P.M.
A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00P.M.
Form 16 Rev. 05/03 PAGE 1 OF 2
• •
8) LOCATION OF PROJECT:
STREET ADDRESS
ON THE /VOr<T/7 SIDE OF I /'O;N$7Ttlt ~G
!NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST! {NAME OF STREET I
BETWEEN -/+-UC/'l7VTE AND 1 EL-Wo'b711No ~£
I NAME OF STREET! I NAME OF STREET!
9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 17-o/1/b /0
1 0) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS ~tJ 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING ~ 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF r-:~0 ~ RESIDENTIAL UNITS ~ RESIDENTIAL UNITS ~
13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION ~14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ ~ 1 5) PROPOSED COMM lA/AI SQUARE FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE
16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED v{lJPA 17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN D 18) PROPOSED SEWER D PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE ADT USAGE IN EDU
19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE jJz.'Jj 201 EXISTING GENERAL ~ 21) PROPOSED GENERAL ~ PLAN PLAN DESIGNATION
22) EXISTING ZONING j&s. 123) PROPOSED ZONING jt:?sj
24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY
STAFf, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. 1/WE CONSENT
TO E Y FOR THIS PURPOSE
FOR CITY USE ONLY
FEE COMPUTATION
AP,RLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRE,D
()If' ¢.
I
I
TOTAL FEE REQUIRED
DATE FEE PAID
Form 16 Rev. 05/03
RECEIVED
FE9 0 S 2004
CITY OF CARLSBAD
DATE Sl(;i.~~tfltr40"@HIR!ft;EIVED
RECEIVED BY: 1
RECEIPT NO.
PAGE 2 OF 2
• •
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION
PROJECT NAME: Alga Norte Community Park
APPLICANT NAME: City of Carlsbad, Parks and Recreation Department
Description/Explanation:
This is a thirty-three acre master planned active use community park project.
The site was identified in the master plan for The Villages of La Costa as a future
park site and the project master plan received City Council approval in 2003.
The expanded scope of the planned aquatics complex was subsequently
approved and the Council adopted the resultant master plan.
The park site is a sloping, north-south trending valley within the The Greens area
of The Villages. It is bordered on the south and east by the improvements for
Poinsettia Lane and the extension of Alicante Road. To the north and west the
site is surrounded by preserved habitat. Access to the proposed park will be via
two access/egress points along Alicante Road.
The park will contain a number of different venues serving numerous segments
of the active recreation community. The focal facility will be the five-acre
aquatics complex located in the northern half of the site. The facility includes
provision for a long-course competition pool suitable for Olympic length swim
training as well as water polo. Additionally there will be a twelve-lane
instructional pool for swim lessons. Recreational swimmers will be able to take
advantage of several play pools -one for very young children, one for pre-teen
and teenage children, as well as a large moving river with waterslides. The
entire facility will be served by an approximately 14,000 square foot, single story
building with locker rooms, staff support space for both aquatics and parks staff,
large and small meeting rooms, a concession/catering kitchen area, weight room,
and numerous storage spaces. The 3,000 square foot mechanical building will
house pumps and gas chlorine for the pools as well as a workshop and storage
spaces. Areas of the roofs of both buildings will employ solar panels to augment
the heating of the higher temperature instructional pool.
Alga Norte Community Park will also be the site of the City's newest skatepark.
To be designed by California Skateparks, the skatepark will accommodate a
variety of ages. Separated by a linear "street course" area, the younger children
will have an opportunity to skate in an area suitable for those just learning the
sport while the opposite end of the park will provide more challenging elements
as skaters become more adept. The more elementary elements will be located
proximate to the children's tot-lots in the northern portion of the site-in response
to the community desire to have both types of play spaces near to one another.
• •
The southern portion of the park site will be comprised of three ballfields -one
300' field and two 275' fields to meet the ongoing demand for programming of
softball and baseball in the City.
In the most southernly area of the park, adjacent to connections to the City-Wide
Trail System will be located a half-acre off-leash area for dogs. Pet owners will
have several access points to this fenced off space -from the parking lot, from
the walking trail within the park, and from the pedestrian path along Poinsettia
Lane.
In addition to the myriad of facilities within the aquatics complex, there will be
several additional buildings on site. Two satellite restrooms will serve the more
passive play and green space areas of the park, as well as the skatepark and
half-court basketball spaces. A third satellite restroom/concession building will
serve the southern ballfields.
As is City policy for facilities of this nature, provision for emergency generator
support will be provided. The emergency generator will be located adjacent to
the chlorine air scrubber enclosure at the aquatics support building. A full park
maintenance yard and maintenance building is located in the far southwestern
corner of the site and is accessible by way of a paved road along the southern
limits of the ballfields.
• •
City of Carlsbad
• q e'. •. •' .t.'., 4. t, a',,, J., ,
DISCLOSt'RE STA TE\lE:\T
: .~ppiicant"s statement or disclosure of cenam ownershtp tr.terests or: all appll.:.1~10n~ \\ Il:.:-:-: \\ :l: rt'JGJ:-c
: d1screuonaf\ actwr. on the pan o:-the Cnv Councli or anv apoomtec Boarc. Comr:o:s;1on or Cc'~'"'"'"''
Tne iollowmg miormauon !\IVST be dtsciosed at the ume of appilcauon s~bm:r.a: Your ~,,,_,eo: coc.c.,,:
be re\'lewed until thts mformauon 1s completed. Please pnnt.
!'iote:
Person IS defmed as "Any individual, fum. co·parmershlp. joint venrw-e. associanon. soc1ai .:iub. ir.Jh:mJI
orgamzauon, corporation. estate. trust. receiver. syndicate. m tbts and any other counry. CIT) and counr;. . .:'It)
mumcipalny. dismct or other political subdivisiOn or acy other group or combmanon acting as a una.··
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.
I. APPLICA.l'oOT (Not the applicant's agent) ·
Prov1de the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons havmg a financ1al
mterest m the apphcatton. If the apphcam mcludes a cornoratton or parmershtp. mciude the
names, tilie, addresses of all individuals ownmg more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
f.\"DI\'IDUALS OWN MORE lliAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE INDICATE NON-
.AJ'PLICABLE (N/A) !1\ THE SPACE BELOW If a pubhclv-owned cornorat1on. mciude the
names. lilies. and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person c;;{.q;L M~l e/t?Ric:-e{d(W,(/8;1Z_ Tille
Address ___________ _
OWJI.'ER (Not the owner's agent)
Corp/Pan C{l'jpe ~~
Tale 8 r?JVA/f?I~A<... .c..ote.~
Address 1'2a? ~40 Yt~PR,
~.&4z:?, Cfi-"12a>8
Provtde the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons havmg any ownershtp
mterest m the propeny mvolved. Also. provtde the nature of the legal ownershtp (t.e,
parmershtp, tenants m common, non-profit, corporation. etc.). If the ownership mcludes a
comoration or parmership, include the names, tttle, addresses of all mdtviduals ownmg more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN I 0% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a pubhciv-
owned cornorauon. mciude the names. mles. and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be anached if necessary.)
Person ___________ _
Title ___________ _
Address __________ _
Corp/Pan C/7'/ c:F~.tiA-z:;J
Title ;4 J?li/Aitcn"'AC CO,.e ~
Address /ZOo C...~Mz::n'l~,
CAZU-S.Mq cA-q:z..as
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 f*ll
·:
• • '.'0'.'-PROFIT ORGA:"'1ZA TIO'.' OR TRl'ST
If any persor. 1dent1f1ec pursuam to ( l) or 1:1 a·~o,·e IS a ~onrroin orp~:za:10c 0·: :---.;'
names and addresses of A'\1. person sercm~ 3; ar. C':·:·::e: ~: ci:re:tor of :::: ~ .': .~·
orgamzatton or as trustee or benef1c1ar-. o:· :h:
'-;o;; PToi:~!T"USl ~or. Proiitl:-c;·------------
Tale Tnle ______________ _
Address Address·---------------
Have you i1ad more than S250 wanh of busmess transacted w1th any memoer of C1" su:":.
Boards. CommiSSIOns. Commmees and or Council w1thm the past rwei,·e ( ::1 month;''
i l Yes ~ l"o If yes, please mdJcate'person(s) _____________ _
'.'OTE: Anach addmonal sheets if necessary.
lithe above informatiOn is trUe and correct to thebes
Gcc:ff~S~
Prmt or type name of owner Pnnt or type name of apphcant
S1gnarure of ownwapphcant's agent if applicable/date
Pnnt or type name of owneflapplicant's agent
'
California Land Title Association •
Your Ref: SCHEDULE A
COMM. PARK SITE
Amount oflnsurance: $4, 163, 750. oo
Date of Policy: February 14, 2003 at 4:16 prn
1. N arne oflnsured:
CITY OF CARLSBAD, A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this policy is:
A FEE
3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in:
CITY OF CARLSBAD, A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows:
•
PolicyNo. 23066074
Premium: $1,873.80
Owner's Policy
U50
LOT 5 OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 99-03 LA COSTA GREENS, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY
OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 14543, FILED IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 12, 2003.
This Policy valid only if Schednle B is attached.
CLTAOA88 -10/13/95AA CffiCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
, California Land Title Association • • Owner's Policy
Your Ref: SCHEDULEB
COMM. PARK SITE PolicyNo. 23066074 U50
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses)
which arise by reason of:
PART I
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes
or assessments on real property or by the public records.
Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings,
whetheror J:IOt shown by the records of such agency or by the public records.
Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by
an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records.
Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct
survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance
thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are
shown by the public records.
PART II
D 1 . AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET
FORTH IN A DOCUMENT
GRANTED TO:
PURPOSE:
RECORDED:
AFFECTS:
AFFECTS LOT 5
SAN MARCOS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
AN EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION,
OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, REPLACEMENT, AND
RECONSTRUCTION OF SEWER PIPELINES AND/OR MAINS, MANHOLES
AND APPURTENANT STRUCTURES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES
JANUARY 27, 1969 AS FILE NO. 15564 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS
MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT.
E 2 . AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN
DATED:
BY AND BETWEEN:
RECORDED:
REGARDING:
JUNE 9, 1983
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND DAON
CORPORATION
JULY 29, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83-263566 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
REIMBURSEMENT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS.
CLTAOB88··10/13/95M CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
'
Policy No.
Page 1
23066074 -u' •
SCHEDULE B (CONT.)
Part II
F 3 . AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN
DATED:
BY AND BETWEEN:
RECORDED:
REGARDING:
JULY 20, 1984
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORORATION AND DAON
CORPORATION
AUGUST 13, 1984 AS FILE NO. 84-307193 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS
CONTRACT FOR FUTURE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS.
s 4 . AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN
DATED:
BY AND BETWEEN:
RECORDED:
JUNE 4, 1993
FIELDSTONE/LA COSTA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A
CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 AS FILE NO. 1993-0599440 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS
REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS.
T 5. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE COMMUNITIES FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
1, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 16, 1996 AS FILE NO.
1996-0020168 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
A PENDING ASSESSMENT FOR THE DISTRICT SHOWN BELOW. WHEN NOTICE OF THE
ASSESSMENT IS RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER THE ASSESSMENT SHALL BECOME
A LIEN ON SAID LAND.
DISTRICT:
DISCLOSED BY:
RECORDED:
BOUNDARY MAP ANNEXATION NO. 01/02-01 COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY
JUNE 28, 2002 AS FILE NO. 2002-0547701 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS
AMENDMENT TO THE NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN (NOTICE OF ANNEXATION) ,
RECORDED JUNE 28, 2002 AS FILE NO. 2002-0547779 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS.
u 6 . AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS
SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT
GRANTED TO: CITY OF CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
PURPOSE: AN EASEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, REPAIR
CLTA88C -12/16/88
r-------------------------------------------
Policy No. 23066074 -u' • J Page 2
SCHEDULE B (CONT.)
Part II
RECORDED:
AFFECTS:
AFFECTS LOT 5
RECONSTUCTION AND ALL ACTIVITIES NECESSARY TO
CONSTRUCT, RECONSTRUCT, OPERATE, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR
FACITLITIES DESIGNED FOR THE GENERAL PURPOSE OF
COLLECTING, STORING, TRANSPORTING, PUMPING AND
TREATING ALL WASTEWATER, INCLUDING SURFACE WATER,
STREAM WATER, FLOOD WATER AND GROUND WATER FLOWING
INTO SAID FACILITIES, AND ALL NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL
DRAINAGE DITCHES AND STRUCTURES OF ANY KIND, WHETHER
ABOVE OR BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE GROUND AND
INCIDENTAL PURPOSES
FEBRUARY 13, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998-0077512 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS
THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND
IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT.
v 7. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS
SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT
GRANTED TO:
PURPOSE:
RECORDED:
AFFECTS:
AFFECTS LOT 5
VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT
AN EASEMENT FOR A PERMANENT EASEMENT IN GROSS FOR THE
INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE,
REPAIR, REPLACEMENT, AND RECONSTRUCTION OF SEWER PIPE
LINES AND THEIR NECESSARY FIXTURES AND AFPURTENANCES;
AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT ADJOINING THE PERMANENT
EASEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF INITIAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE
LAND OUTFALL INTERCEPTOR SEWER LINE WITHIN THE
PERMANENT EASEMENT AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES
MARCH 20, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998-0151414 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS
THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND
IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT.
x 8. A DOCUMENT ENTITLED "A 1996 PARK AGREEMENT", DATED FEBRUARY 3, 1997
EXECUTED BY CITY OF CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA AND REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, A DELAWARE
CORPORATION, SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN
CONTAINED, RECORDED MARCH 20, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998-0152412 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
AC 9 . AMENDMENT TO NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN AND ANNEXATION NO. 6A TO COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 OF THE CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, RECORDED
OCTOBER 19, 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001-0758808 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
AD SAID DOCUMENT RECITES IN PART AS FOLLOWS : NOTICE -THIS DOCUMENT SHALL ACT
TO SUPPLEMENT THE NOTICES OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN PREVIOUSLY RECORDED FOR
CLTA88C -12/16/88
i
Policy No.
Page 3
23066074 -u' •
SCHEDULE B (CONT.)
Part II
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 OF THE CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
RECORDED ON APRIL 26, 1994, JULY 27, 1995, NOVEMBER 21, 1997, MARCH 16,
1999 AND JANUARY 28, 2000 IN THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AS
INSTRUMENT NOS. 1994-0277976, 1995-0322359, 1997-0590892, 1999-0169086 AND
2000-004620, RESPECTIVELY.
NOTICE -THIS DOCUMENT SHALL NOT SUPERSEDE THE ABOVE REFERENCED DOCUMENTS.
AE SAID DOCUMENT RECITES IN PART AS FOLLOWS: REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE BOUNDARY
MAP OF ANNEXATION NO. 6A TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 RECORDED ON
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001 IN BOOK 35 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT AT PAGE 41, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2001-0696815 IN THE
OFFICE OF THE RECORDER FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
WHICH MAP DEPICTS THE TERRITORY ANNEXED INTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 3 AND WHICH ANNEXATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
AI 10. A DOCUMENT ENTITLED "INITIAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT IMPOSING
RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY", DATED JANUARY 11, 2002 EXECUTED BY CITY OF
CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT
COM!? ANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, PROVISIONS AND
CONDITIONS THEREIN CONTAINED, RECORDED MARCH 1, 2002 AS FILE NO.
2002-0176734 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
AJ 11 . AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS
SHOWN OR AS OFFERED FOR DEDICATION ON THE RECORDED MAP SHOWN BELOW.
MAP OF:
EASEMENT
PURPOSE:
AFFECTS:
PUBLIC TRAIL; GENERAL UTILITY AND ACCESS
LOT 5 AS SHOWN ON MAP NO.
AK 12. THE FACT THAT THE OWNERSHIP OF SAID LAND DOES NOT INCLUDE RIGHTS OF ACCESS
TO OR FROM THE STREET OR HIGHWAY ABUTTING SAID LAND, SUCH RIGHTS HAVING
BEEN RELINQUISHED BY THE MAP OF SAID TRACT.
AFFECTS: POINSETTIA LANE .AND ALICANTE ROAD, ADJACENT TO LOT 5,
EXCEPT ACCESS OPENING AS SHOWN ON MAP
SAID LAND HOWEVER, ABUTS UPON A PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE OTHER THAN THE ROAD
REFERRED TO ABOVE, OVER WHICH RIGHTS OF VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS HAVE
NOT BEEN RELINQUISHED.
AF END OF SCHEDULE B
AL JP
CLTASI!C --l2fl6/8S
• ® CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY •
RECEIVED
Date: October 17,2003
FEB 0 9 2004
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPT
STEPHANIE HATIEN
WYAC
3067-5TH AVENUE
SAN DIEGO, CA 92103
Order No.: 23066074-U50
Property: ALGA NORTE PARK, CARLSBAD, CA
RE: COMM. PARK SITE
In response to a request for our issuance of a Policy of Title Insurance, we enclose herewith
our Preliminary Report for your review.
Should you have any questions in connection with this or any other matter concerning the
above referenced order, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Thank you for choosing Chicago Title Company.
Title Department: @ Escrow Department: --------------~---------------------------~-------------CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
925 "B" STREET 925 "B' STREET
SAN DIEGO, CA. 92101 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
(619)544-6.233 fax: (619)544-6279 (619) 239-0081 fax:
TOM VOTEL / KEN CYR
TITLE OFFICER
01 PEL -cJ9/16/97bk
Lori Brandt
ESCROW OFFICER
• CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
Reference: COMM. PARK SITE
Regarding: ALGA NORTE PARK
CARLSBAD, CA
SECOND AMENDED
•
PRELIMINARY REPORT
Dated as of: January 23, 2003 at 7:30 AM
Order No.: 23066074-U50
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY hereby reports that It Is prepared to Issue, or cause to be Issued, as of the date
hereof, a Polley or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or Interest therein hereinafter set forth,
insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as
an Exception in Schedule B or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Condlttons and
Stipulations of said Polley forms.
The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Polley or Policies are set forth In the attached list.
Copies of the Polley forms are available upon request.
PIBBaa rBBd the excaptlona shown or rafarred to In Schedule B and the exceptions and exclusions set forth In the
attached list of this repon carefully. The exceptions and exclusions ara mBBnt to provide you with notice of mattera
which ara not covered under the terms of the title Insurance policy and should be carefully conaldered. It Ia
Important to note that this preliminary repon Is not a written rapreaantatlon as to the condition of title and may not
list all liens, defacls, and encumbrances affecting title to the land.
THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF
FACIUTATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POUCY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO UABIUTY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS
DESIRED THAT UABIUTY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POUCY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER
OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED.
The form of policy of title Insurance contemplated by this report is:
CAUFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POUCY
Vlsh Us On The WBb: WBStsrndivision.ctt.com
Title Department: ® --------------~-----------------------------------------CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
925 'B' STREET
SAN DIEGO, CA. 92101
{619)544-8.233 fax: {619)544-8.279
TOM VOTEL / KEN CYR
TITLE OFFICER
PFP -oB/08/asbk
• • SCHEDULE A
Order No: 23 066074 USO YourRef: COMM. PARK SITE
1. The estate or interest in the land hereinafter descrihed or referred to covered by this report is:
A FEE
2. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:
REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION
3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of SAN DIEGO
and is descrihed as follows:
LOT 5 OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 99-03 LA COSTA GREENS, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 14543,
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 12,
2003 0
PREA ·10/31/87blt
• SCHEDULE B •
Page 1
OrderNo: 23066074 U50 YourRef: COMM. PARK SITE
At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in the policy
form designated on the face page of this Report would be as follows:
D 1 • AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS
SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT
GRANTED TO:
PURPOSE:
RECORDED:
AFFECTS:
AFFECTS LOT 5
SAN MARCOS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
AN EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION,
OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, REPLACEMENT, AND
RECONSTRUCTION OF SEWER PIPELINES AND/OR MAINS,
MANHOLES AND APPURTENANT STRUCTURES AND INCIDENTAL
PURPOSES
JANUARY 27, 1969 AS FILE NO. 15564 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS
THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND
AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT.
B 2 • AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN
DATED:
BY AND BETWEEN:
RECORDED:
REGARDING:
JUNE 9, 1983
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND
DAON CORPORATION
JULY 29, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83-263566 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS
REIMBURSEMENT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS.
F 3 • AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN
DATED:
BY AND BETWEEN:
RECORDED:
REGARDING:
JULY 20, 1984
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORORATION AND
DAON CORPORATION
AUGUST 13, 1984 AS FILE NO. 84-307193 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS
CONTRACT FOR FUTURE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS.
s 4 • AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN
DATED: JUNE 4, 1993
PF1EB ·10/31/&7bk
• Page 2
SCHEDULE B
(continued) •
Order No: 23066074 U50 YourRef: COMM. PARK SITE
BY AND BETWEEN:
RECORDED:
FIELDSTONE/LA COSTA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A
CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 AS FILE NO. 1993-0599440 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS
REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS.
T 5. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE COMMUNITIES FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
1, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 16, 1996 AS FILE NO.
1996-0020168 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
A PENDING ASSESSMENT FOR THE DISTRICT SHOWN BELOW. WHEN NOTICE OF THE
ASSESSMENT IS RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER THE ASSESSMENT SHALL BECOME
A LIEN ON SAID LAND.
DISTRICT:
DISCLOSED BY:
RECORDED:
BOUNDARY MAP ANNEXATION NO. 01/02-01 COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY
JUNE 28, 2002 AS FILE NO. 2002-0547701 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS
AMENDMENT TO THE NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN (NOTICE OF ANNEXATION) ,
RECORDED JUNE 28, 2002 AS FILE NO. 2002-0547779 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS.
u 6 • AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS
PREUMBC-9/23/93bk
SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT
GRANTED TO:
PURPOSE:
RECORDED:
AFFECTS:
AFFECTS LOT 5
CITY OF CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
AN EASEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, REPAIR
RECONSTUCTION AND ALL ACTIVITIES NECESSARY TO
CONSTRUCT, RECONSTRUCT, OPERATE, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR
FACITLITIES DESIGNED FOR THE GENERAL PURPOSE OF
COLLECTING, STORING, TRANSPORTING, PUMPING AND
TREATING ALL WASTEWATER, INCLUDING SURFACE WATER,
STREAM WATER, FLOOD WATER AND GROUND WATER FLOWING
INTO SAID FACILITIES, AND ALL NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL
DRAINAGE DITCHES AND STRUCTURES OF ANY KIND, WHETHER
ABOVE OR BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE GROUND AND
INCIDENTAL PURPOSES
FEBRUARY 13, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998-0077512 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS
THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND
IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT.
• Page 3
SCHEDULE B
(continued) •
Order No: 23066074 U50 YourRef: COMM. PARK SITE
v 7 • AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS
SET FORTH IN A D0C0MENT
GRANTED TO:
PURPOSE:
RECORDED:
AFFECTS:
AFFECTS LOT 5
VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT
AN EASEMENT FOR A PERMANENT EASEMENT IN GROSS FOR THE
INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE,
REPAIR, REPLACEMENT, AND RECONSTRUCTION OF SEWER PIPE
LINES AND THEIR NECESSARY FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES;
AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT ADJOINING THE PERMANENT
EASEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF INITIAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE
LAND OUTFALL INTERCEPTOR SEWER LINE WITHIN THE
PERMANENT EASEMENT AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES
MARCH 20, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998-0151414 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS
THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND
IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT.
x 8. A DOCUMENT ENTITLED •A 1996 PARK AGREEMENT", DATED FEBRUARY 3, 1997
EXECUTED BY CITY OF CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA AND REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, A DELAWARE
CORPORATION, SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN
CONTAINED, RECORDED MARCH 20, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998-0152412 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
AC 9. AMENDMENT TO NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN AND ANNEXATION NO. 6A TO COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 OF THE CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, RECORDED
OCTOBER 19, 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001-0758808 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
AD SAID DOCOMENT RECITES IN PART AS FOLLOWS: NOTICE -THIS DOCUMENT SHALL ACT
TO SUPPLEMENT THE NOTICES OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN PREVIOUSLY RECORDED FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 OF THE CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
RECORDED ON APRIL 26, 1994, JULY 27, 1995, NOVEMBER 21, 1997, MARCH 16,
PAEUMBC-a/23/93bk
1999 AND JANUARY 28, 2000 IN THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AS
INSTRUMENT NOS. 1994-0277976, 1995-0322359, 1997-0590892, 1999-0169086 AND
2000-004620, RESPECTIVELY.
NOTICE -THIS DOCUMENT SHALL NOT SUPERSEDE THE ABOVE REFERENCED DOCUMENTS •
SAID DOCUMENT RECITES IN PART AS FOLLOWS: REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE BOUNDARY
MAF OF ANNEXATION NO. 6A TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 RECORDED ON
SEPTEMBER 28, 2001 IN BOOK 35 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT AT PAGE 41, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2001-0696815 IN THE
OFFICE OF THE RECORDER FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
WHICH MAF DEPICTS THE TERRITORY ANNEXED INTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 3 AND WHICH ANNEXATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
• Page 4 SCHEDULE B
(continued) •
Order No: 23066074 U50 YourRef: COMM. PARK SITE
AI 10. A DOCUMmlT ENTITLED "INITIAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT IMPOSING
RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY", DATED JANUARY 11, 2002 EXECUTED BY CITY OF
CARLSBAD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT
COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, PROVISIONS AND
CONDITIONS THEREIN CONTAINED, RECORDED MARCH 1, 2002 AS FILE NO.
2002-0176734 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
JW 11. AN EASEMJmT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS
SHOWN OR AS OFFERED FOR DEDICATION ON THE RECORDED MAP SHOWN BELOW.
MAP OF:
EASEMENT
PURPOSE:
AFFECTS:
PUBLIC TRAIL; GENERAL UTILITY AND ACCESS
LOT 5 AS SHOWN ON MAP NO.
Alt 12 • THE FACT THAT THE OWNERSHIP OF SAID LAND DOES NOT INCLUDE RIGHTS OF ACCESS
TO OR FROM THE STREET OR HIGHWAY ABUTTING SAID LAND, SUCH RIGHTS HAVING
BEEN RELINQUISHED BY THE MAP OF SAID TRACT.
AFFECTS: POINSETTIA LANE AND ALICANTE ROAD, ADJACENT TO LOT 5,
EXCEPT ACCESS OPENING AS SHOWN ON MAP
SAID LAND HOWEVER, ABUTS UPON A PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE OTHER THAN THE ROAD
REFERRED TO ABOVE, OVER WHICH RIGHTS OF VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS HAVE
NOT BEEN RELINQUISHED.
AF END OF SCHEDULE B
AL JP
PAEUMBC-9/23/93bk
• •
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies' Privacy Statement
July 1, 2001
We recognize and respect the privacy expectation of today's consumers and the requirements of applicable federal and
state privacy laws. We believe that making you aware of how we use your non-public personal information iPersonal
Information"), and to whom It Is disclosed, wtll form the basis for a relationship of trust between us and the public that
we serve. This Privacy Statement provides that explanation. We reserve the right to change this Privacy Statement from
time to time consistent with applicable privacy laws.
In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources:
* From applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representatlva;
* From your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates, or others;
* From our Internet web sites;
* From the public records maintained by governmental entitles that we either obtain directly from
those entitles, or from our affiliates or others; and
* From consumer or other reporting agencies.
Our Policies Regarding The Protection Of The Confidentiality And Security Of Your Personal Information
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized
access or Intrusion. We limit access to the Personal Information only to those employees who need such access In
connection with providing products or services to you or for other legitimate business purposes.
Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information
We may share your Personal information with our affiliates, such as Insurance companies, agents, and other real estate
settlement service providers. We may also disclose your Personal information:
* to agents, brokers or representatives to provide you with services you have requested;
* to third-party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform marketing or other
functions on our behalf; and
*to others with whom we enter Into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we
believe you may find of interest.
In addition, we wtll disclose your Personal Information when you direct or glva us permission, when we are required by
law to do so, or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may dlsdose your Personal Information
when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure Is needed to enforce our
rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you.
One of the important responsibilities of some of our affiliated companies is to record documents In the public domain.
Such documents may contain your Personal Information.
Right To Access Your Personal Information And Ability To Correct Errors Or Request Change Or Deletion
Certain states afford you the right to access your Personal information and, under certain circumstances, to find out to
whom your Personal Information has been disclosed. Also, certain states afford you the right to request correction,
amendment or deletion of your Personal Information. We reserve the right, where permitted by law, to charge a
reasonable fee to cover the costs Incurred In responding to such requests.
All requests must be made in writing to the following address:
Multiple Products or Services:
Privacy Compliance Officer
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
4050 Calle Real, Suite 220
Santa Barbara, CA 93110
If we provide you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more than one privacy notice from
us. We apologize for any Inconvenience this may cause you.
PRIVACVT -06/29/01bk
PACIFIC
OCEAN
•
POINSETTIA
PARK
*
LOCATION MAF
NOT TO SCALE
•
RECEIVED
Ft3 0 9 2004
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPT.
_'/ ~~~ ALC:sA
NORTE
FARK
ST AC:sECOACI-I*
FARK
•
PLEASE NOTE:
Time limits on the processing of discretionary projects established by state law
do not start until a project application is deemed complete by the City. The
City has 30 calendar days from the date of application submittal to determine
whether an application is complete or incomplete. Within 30 days of submittal
of this application you will receive a letter stating whether this application
is complete or incomplete. If it is incomplete, the letter will state what is
needed to make this application omplete. When the application is complete, the
processing period will start R n the date of the completion letter.
Applicant Signature:
Staff Signature:
Date: ---------=~+-~~~------------------------------
To be stapled with receipt to application
Copy for file
of • Carlsbad • RE'·'·''·'·'·,A·E•a' ··'4·''
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT
Consultation Of Lists of Sites Related To Hazardous Wastes
(Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 65962.5)
Pursuant to State of California Government Code Section 65962.5, I have consulted the Hazardous
Wastes and Substances Sites List compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency and
hereby certify that (check one):
~ The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on
the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code.
0 The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the
lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code.
APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER
Name:
Address:
6CC!;L ~~ Name:_....::Q::;;.L...<7;'-'Y"---"OE::.L...-_~;;....:.;;_____:;__c_Mo:;.....-<f;O __
P~ PLA-z>-V~ Address: /2-00 ~$./:?A£? Vt~P~ '
Phone Number: (7tP,.)1-z3f-zf3~0 Phone Number: ( 7&o) 4?4--2.82-b >
Address of Site: NCJI!<71ft<..£!;T Co~ ~p 77-/B //l!~S&=:.;T?o.A./ 6F
r'N/1./t;;.c---mA-~c: A-N.c? A-<-tc::.A7<-JT5
Local Agency (City and County): __ ___,c.._2A-.rf?::uo .... /.;;$;o.d=<:Az2""'"""----------------
Assessor's book, page, and parcel number:_--'4-r}..::..!<._,'N~::-#-:-2.1-"';?t:c.::t?.c..:~::....c.I_-_.O"'-"'z--"fl~#::--"2--'!'-51"-'D::::..:3:..~.1_-_,_13::___
-A-JCb~iTo/V or P~ce.c:_ "S> or P..r?-7 n: IIBB Specify list(s): __________________________ ' _____ _
Regulatory Identification Number: ________________________ _
Date of List=--------------------------------
Admin!CounteriHazWaste
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad. CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 @
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURC.GENCY
Da¥\IRTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH REC T
er oo 67
Date: 3 6 -t/'{u
Document No.: /3tfH
C[bO) f; 2'., -P e Number: }31-"~ b
Project Applicant Address: ..!..:.~:=..Sd![fl~~~!li~~ft.[._~~'!J::.'fl.~&:!.!:.~'i!Ef.:lf{i!~ilh"l:...----------
Project Applicant (check appropriate box):
CHECK APPLICABLE FEES:
( ) Environmental Impact Report
( ) Negative Declaration
( ) Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only)
( ) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs
( ) County Administrative Fee
~ Project that is exempt from fees
$850.00 $
$1,250.00 $
$850.00 $
$850.00 $
$25.00 $
$ a
Signature and title of person receiving payment· (/_~~eLSL~~::===========-------------
WHITE-PROJECT APPLICANT GOLDENROD-STATE AGENCY OF FILING
.·Notice of Dete~ination
To: D Office of Planning and Research
P.O. Box 3044
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044
From:
[F~ [L~ [D)
County Clerk Gregory J. Smith, Recorder/County Cieri<
County ?f San ~iego MAR 0 6 2006
Attn: Rita Garcia, Rm. 260 .
San Diego, CA 92101 BV"-'-~~-;z/.-::; ___ --=:=:
CITY OF CARLSBADAfli-
Pianning Department 'R 200[
FLA.I'IfilrrC D'P 1635 Faraday Avenue " ~ 'AfrlMttrT '-II}' Uf Carlsbad, CA 92009 Carlsbad
(760)' 602-4600
1600 Pacific Highway ~-J
DEPUTY Project No: CUP 04-08
Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public
Resources Code.
Alga Norte Community Park
Project Title
NIA City of Carlsbad, Michael Grim (760) 602-4623
State Clearinghouse No. Lead Agency, Contact Person Telephone Number
North of Poinsettia Lane, West of Alicante Road, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego
Project Locations (include County)
Name of Applicant: City of Carlsbad Recreation Department
Applicant's Address: 1200 Carlsbad Village Dr, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Applicant's Telephone Number: 760-434-2856
Project Description: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction and
operation of a 32.11 acre community park on a vacant site within the La Costa Greens
portion of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan.
This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on March 1,
2006, and has made the following determination regarding the above described project.
1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment
2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of
CEQ A.
3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval ofthe project.
4. A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was not adopted for this project.
5. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project.
6. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQ A.
claration with comments and responses and record of
Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD.
Date
Date received for filing at OPR:
Revised December 2004
e
City
CASE NAME:
CASE NO:
PROJECT LOCATION:
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Alga Norte Community Park
CUP 04-08
North of Poinsettia Lane, west of Alicante Road, City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction and
operation of a 32.11 acre community park on a vacant site within the La Costa Greens portion of the
Villages of La Costa Master Plan area.
DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above
described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) did not identify any potentially significant impacts on the
environment, and the City of Carlsbad finds as follows:
[8] The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
0 The proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but
at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. (Negative
Declaration applies only to the effects that remained to be addressed).
0 Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a)
have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided
or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed
upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required.
A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the Negative Declaration is
on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008.
ADOPTED: Commission Resolution No. 6039
MARCEL
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK
San Diego County on ~. MAR 0 6J~~~ ~ 6 !Mil
Posted MAR 0 6 20~.1 Removed -----
ATTEST:
:~': ro agen~~;/;'-
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.c i.carlsbad.ca.us @
e . e
Cit of Carlsbad
CASE NAME:
CASE NO:
--------~------~~~P.P.
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Alga Norte Community Park
CUP 04-08
PROJECT LOCATION: North of Poinsettia Lane, west of Alicante Road, City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction
and operation of a 32.11 acre community park on a vacant site within the La Costa Greens
portion of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan area.
PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental
review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of
Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) identified potentially
significant effects on the environment, but (1) revisions in the project plans or proposals made
by, or agreed to by, the applicant before the proposed negative declaration and initial study are
released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly
no significant effect on the environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in
light of the whole record before the City that the project "as revised" may have a significant
effect on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration will be recommended for
adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission.
A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad,
California 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to
the Planning Department within 20 days of the date of this notice.
The proposed project and Mitigated Negative Declaration are subject to review and
approval/adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. Additional
public notices will be issued when those public hearings are scheduled. If you have any
questions, please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623 .
PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD February 10, 2006 through March 1. 2006
PUBLISH DATE February 10, 2006
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK
San Di~ County on FEB 1 1 ..,~OE
Posted ~ EB 11 Z006 Removed MAR 1 .3 2006
:;:wage~
FEB 1 3 2006
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad , CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • WWVIaii.I~BIItjllSIIlca.us @
• Cit of
[F~[Lg[Q)
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Gregory J. Smith, Recorder/County Clerk
CASE NAME:
CASE NO:
Lake Calavera Reservoir Remedial Improvements
CUP 04-I 1/HMPP 05-03
~ ~1005
DEPUTY
PROJECT LOCATION: In and around the Lake Calavera Reservoir. approximately 900 to
1,200 feet south of the intersection of Tamarack Avenue and
Knoll wood Drive. Citv of Carlsbad. County of San Diego.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Repairs to the existing Lake Calavera Reservoir intake and outlet
works, spillway and access road, and outlet piping; construction of a new dam operations control
building and security fencing. Repairs will require utilization of a small temporary water-tight
structure with an inflatable gasket which will be placed around the upper section of the existing tower in
order to pump out the water between this tower and the temporary structure for demolition and
construction access. Once repaired, the normal operations of the reservoir will result in water level
fluctuations between 190 and 208 feet elevation in accordance with an overall water management
program.
PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review
of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As
a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) identified potentially significant effects on the
environment, but (I) revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the
applicant before the proposed negative declaration and initial study are released for public review
would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the
environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before
the City that the project "as revised" may have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a
Mitigated Negative Declaration will be recommended for adoption by the City of Carlsbad
P!ar..ning Commission.
A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration are on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad,
California 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the
Planning Department within 30 days of the date of this notice.
The proposed project and revised Mitigated Negative Declaration are subject to review and
approval/adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. Additional
public notices will be issued when those public hearings are scheduled. If you have any questions,
please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623.
PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD December 12,2005 through January II, 2006
PUBLISH DATE December 12.2005
. :\ i
\
·i. •'
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!}
I
rF 0 [L ~ [Q)
Gregory J. Sm~h. Recorder/County Clerk
DEC 1 3 2005
BY I\ fiZ:) J DEPUTY
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK
San Diego County on DEC 1 3 200S
Posted DEC 1 3 7tlffi Removed JAN 1 7 2006
Returned ~on JAN 1 7 ZOO'J
Deputy~
.........
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
PO BOX 944209
SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2090
CERTIFICATION OF FEE EXEMPTION
De Minimis Impact Finding
Project Numberffitle/Location (Include County):
1:-
APR 2008
!I.A'YIII/'1! CtrAk MEIIT
.,rry Of
Ca•tsba~
CUP 04-08 -Alga Norte Community Park -north of Poinsettia Lane, west of Alicante
Road, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego
Name and Address of Applicant:
City of Carlsbad Recreation Department, 1200 Carlsbad Village Dr, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Project Description:
Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction and operation of a 32.11
acre community park on a vacant site within the La Costa Greens portion of the Villages
of La Costa Master Plan.
Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary):
1. The City of Carlsbad Planning Department has completed an Environmental Initial Study
for the above referenced property, including evaluation of the proposed project's
potential for adverse environmental impacts on fi sh and wildlife resources.
2. Based on the complete Environmental Initial Study, the City of Carlsbad Planning
Department finds that the proposed project will not encroach upon wildlife habitat area,
will have no potential adverse individual or cumulative effects on wildlife resources, and
requires no mitigation measures to be incorporated into the proposed project which would
affect fi sh or wildlife.
Certification:
I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project
will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse tl life res r s, as
defined in Section 711.2 ofthe Fish and Game Code.
'l
ITY OF CARLSBAD
MG:aw
Sec1ion 711.4, Fish and Game Code
DFG: 1/91
e
Cit of
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the Planning Commission of the City of ~~ad will
hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Driv~~"c,a~Jst>~ti .
California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 1, 2006, to consider a request for ... a'p~~['ti'lal of a
Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction and operati'~ij of a
32.11 community park on a 34.4 acre vacant site, generally located north of Poinsettia Lane and
west of Alicante Road, within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, in Local Facilities
Management Zone 10 and more particularly described as:
Lot 5 of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-03 -La Costa Greens, according
to Map No. 14543, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of the
County of San Diego on February 12, 2003, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available online at
http://www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us/pdfdoc.html?pid=295 on or after the Friday prior to the hearing
date. If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (760)
602-4623.
If you challenge the Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described
in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the
public hearing.
CASE FILE: CUP 04-08
CASE NAME: ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK
PUBLISH: FEBRUARY 17, 2006
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FEB 1 7 2006
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK
San Diego County on FEB 1 7 7L 11
Posted FEB 1 7 2 " Removed ~M 1 7 2006
MAR 1 7 I~'
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!}
•
SITE MAP
• N
NOT TO SCALE
•
Alga Norte Community Park
CUP 04-08
• Cit of
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will
hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 1, 2006, to consider a request for approval of a
Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction and operation of a
32.11 community park on a 34.4 acre vacant site, generally located north of Poinsettia Lane and
west of Alicante Road, within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, in Local Facilities
Management Zone 1 0 and more particularly described as:
Lot 5 of Carlsbad Tract No. 99-03 -La Costa Greens, according
to Map No. 14543, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of the
County of San Diego on February 12, 2003, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public
hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available online at
http://www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us/pdfdoc.html?pid-295 on or after the Friday prior to the hearing
date. If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (760)
602-4623.
If you challenge the Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described
in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the
public hearing.
CASE FILE: CUP 04-08
CASE NAME: ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK
PUBLISH: FEBRUARY 17, 2006
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us <i)
•
SITE MAP
• N
•
NOT TO SCALE
Alga Norte Community Park
CUP 04-08
PROOF OF PUBLIATION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the
printer of
North County Times
Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of San Diego,
State of California, for the City of Oceanside and
the City of Escondido, Court Decree number
171349, for the County of San Diego, that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set
in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
February 101\ 2006
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at SAN MARCOS California
This lOth Day of February, 2006
Signature
Jane Allshouse
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
This space i-the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
9 MIN8l'K'hft:'BlHilimiho N
g~~~ ~~~ei#IW ~ ~ fw!l
PROJECT COC~: ~ 21.~~~ ~Qly 21~1&lmlYQI.~:Ql§g.Q.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for a Condttional Use Permit to allow the construction and opf!ration of a 32.11 acre community park on a vacant site within the La ~~~~~~ens portion of the Villages of La Costa Master
PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The Citv of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above de-scribed project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implemen-tation ofthe California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance ol the Citll of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) Identified potentially significant effects on tf\e en-vironment, but (1) revisions Iii the project plans or pro-posals made byj or agreed to by, the applicant before the proposed nega ive aeclarallon and inilial study are re-leased for public review would avoid the elfects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no s!gnificant effect on the environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record be· fore the C1tv that the projecl 'as revised' may have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Neg-aflve Declaration will be recommended for adoPtion 15y the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission.
A copy of the Initial study (EIA Part 2) documentin.ll rea-sons fo supl)9rt the proOoSed M1tigated Negative Decla-ration Is on file In the Plannin_g Department, 1635 Fara-day Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Comments from the public are Invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of the date of this notice.
The propos~1d project and Mitigated Negative Declara-tion are sub ect to review and approvaVII"dOPtlon by tl]e City of Cans ad Planning Commlsslon and City Council.
Adi:litional public notices will be Issued when those p~blic hearings are scheduled. If you have any quest1ons, P.lease call Michael Grim In the Planning Department at {760) 602-4623.
PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD ~ .1Q. ZQQ§ lllr.2!.!9b ~domf•02/10/06
CASE NAME:
CASE NO:
• Cit of
e · FILE COPY
Carlsbad
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Alga Norte Community Park
CUP 04-08
PROJECT LOCATION: North of Poinsettia Lane. west of Alicante Road, City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego. State of California
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction
and operation of a 32.11 acre community park on a vacant site within the La Costa Greens
portion of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan area.
PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental
review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of
Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) identified potentially
significant effects on the environment, but (I) revisions in the project plans or proposals made
by, or agreed to by, the applicant before the proposed negative declaration and initial study are
released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly
no significant effect on the environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in
light of the whole record before the City that the project "as revised" may have a significant
effect on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration will be recommended for
adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission.
A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad,
California 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to
the Planning Department within 20 days of the date of this notice.
The proposed project and Mitigated Negative Declaration are subject to review and
approval/adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. Additional
public notices will be issued when those public hearings are scheduled. If you have any
questions, please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623.
PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD February I 0, 2006 through March I, 2006
PUBLISH DATE February 10.2006
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • wwwan~BII;Ilailtca.us ®
CASE NAME:
CASE NO:
•
Cit of
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Alga Norte Community Park
CUP 04-08
PROJECT LOCATION: North of Poinsettia Lane, west of Alicante Road, City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction
and operation of a 32.11 acre community park on a vacant site within the La Costa Greens
portion of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan area.
PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental
review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of
Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) identified potentially
significant effects on the environment, but (I) revisions in the project plans or proposals made
by, or agreed to by, the applicant before the proposed negative declaration and initial study are
released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly
no significant effect on the environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in
light of the whole record before the City that the project "as revised" may have a significant
effect on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration will be recommended for
adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission.
A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad,
California 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to
the Planning Department within 20 days ofthe date of this notice.
The proposed project and Mitigated Negative Declaration are subject to review and
approval/adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. Additional
public notices will be issued when those public hearings are scheduled. If you have any
questions, please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623.
PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD February 10,2006 through March 1, 2006
PUBLISH DATE February 10,2006
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • wwwaDUBj>.llll;llootca.us @
• •
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM-PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO: CUP 04-08
DATE: February 2. 2006
BACKGROUND
I. CASE NAME: Alga Norte Community Park
2. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: ~C.!-"itv.t..!Lof~C""ar~lsb!l.!a.,dc........ _________ _
3. CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Michael Grim 760-602-4623
4. PROJECT LOCATION: North of Poinsettia Lane, west of Alicante Road. City of Carlsbad
5. PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS: City of Carlsbad Recreation Department
760-434-2824
6. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: _,O,!Jp,e"'-n-"SC!!;pa..,c"'e_.~:CO""'-S)L-___________ _
7. ZONING: Open Space CO-S)
8. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (i.e., permits, financing
approval or participation agreements): gno,n.,e'--------------------
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND
USES:
Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction and operation of a 32.11 acre
community park on a vacant site within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan area. The 34.4
gross acre site is located on the northeast comer of Poinsettia Lane and Alicante Road, and within
the La Costa Greens portion of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. North and west of the park
site are natural open space areas. East ofthe site, across Alicante Road is natural open space and
to the south, across Poinsettia Lane, is the La Costa Resort and Spa Golf Course. The site has
been cleared of vegetation in association with the Villages of La Costa Master Plan development.
The major components of the park would include baseball fields, basketball courts, tot lots,
aquatic complex, passive recreations areas, and various administration, operations and.
mmntenance, concessions, and restroom buildings. The Alga Norte Park Master Plan was
approved by the City Council on January 14, 2003 and the proposed park development is
consistent with the approved Master Plan. An environmental analysis of the potential impacts
associated with the Alga Norte Community Park was conducted by the certified Program
Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01/EIR 98-07).
With the exception of grading, sewer demand, and traffic generation, the proposed community
park conforms with the project described in the Program EIR and, therefore, is within the scope
of the Final Program EIR and no additional environmental documentation is necessary. As such,
this environmental assessment only evaluates the potential impacts associated with geology and
soils (site grading), utilities and service systems (sewer), and transportation (vehicular traffic
generation),
I Rev. 01/11106
• •
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
0 Aesthetics
0 Agricultural Resources
0 Air Quality
0 Biological Resources
0 Cultural Resources
0 Geology/Soils 0Noise
0 Hazards/Hazardous Materials 0 Population and Housing
0 Hydrology/Water Quality
0 Land Use and Planning
0 Mineral Resources
0 Mandatory Findings of
Significance
2
0 Public Services
0 Recreation
0 Transportation/Circulation
0 Utilities & Service Systems
Rev. 01/ll/06
• •
DETERMINATION.
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
IZ;J I fmd that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
0 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGA TJVE DECLARA TJON will be prepared.
0 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
0 I fmd that the proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant impact I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis
as described on attached sheets. A Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects
that remain to be addressed.
0 I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL
NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION
pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
e imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required.
Date f I
Date
3 Rev. 07/03/02
• •
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental
Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental
Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical,
biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information
to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or
to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
• A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported
by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to
projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source
document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
• "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not
significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies.
• "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation
measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact."
The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a Jess than significant level.
• "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significantly
adverse.
• Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could ljave a potentially significant adverse effect on the
environment, but!!!! potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier
EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a
supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior
environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental
document is required.
• When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR
if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable
standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made
pursuant to that earlier EIR.
• A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or
any of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the environment.
• If!)lere are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there
are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to Jess than significant, and those mitigation
measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially
Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration
may be prepared. ·
4 Rev. 01/11/06
• •
• An EIR J!!.!!B be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to
the following circumstances: (I) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or
mitigated in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation
measures that reduce the adverse impact to Jess than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding
Considerations" for the significant adverse impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3)
proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to Jess than significant; or (4) through the
EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect,
or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a
level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing
mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined significant.
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
I. AESTHETICS -Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a State scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light and glare,
which would adversely affect day or nighttime views
in the area?
II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES -(In determining
whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model-1997 prepared by the California
Department of Conservation as an optional model to use
in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would
the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or
a Williamson Act contract?
5
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
D
D
D
D
D
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
Rev. Ollli/06
• Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment,
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use?
III. AIR QUALITY -(Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied
upon to make the following determinations.) Would the
project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people?
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by California Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on .any riparian,
aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural
eommunity identified in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations or by California Department
ofFish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filing, hydrological interruption, or other means?
6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
• Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Less Than
Significan.t
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
.No
Impact
[g]
Rev. 01/11106
• Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Sources).
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species
or with ~stablished native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat cortservation plan?
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES-Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined in
§15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the signifi-
cance of an archeological resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontologi-
cal resourc,e or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside offonnal cemeteries?
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS-Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of Joss, injury or
death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
• substaBtial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground fai1ure, inc1uding
Jiquef~ction?
iv. Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
7
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
• Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Less Than
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
No
Impact
~
Rev. 01/11/06
• Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,
or that would become unstable as a result of ·the
project, and potentially result in on-or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction,
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soils, as defmed in Table 18
-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use,. or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or
environment?
e) For a project within an airport land use plan, or
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with
an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
8
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
• Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Less Than
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
No
Impact
~
Rev. 01/11/06
• Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury or death involving wildland frres,
including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized
areas or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY-Would the
project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with ground water recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local ground water table
level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby
wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-
site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or substantially increase
the flow rate or amount (volume) of surface runoff in
a mall)ler, which would result in flooding on-or off-
site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water, which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide -substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially de grad~-water quality?
g) Place housing within a I 00-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation
map?
h) Place within I 00-year flood hazard area structures,
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss injury or death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or darn?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
9
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
• Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Less Than
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
.No
Impact
~
Rev. 0!111/06
• Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING-Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including but not limited to the general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation
plan or natural community conservation plan?
X. MINERAL RESOURCES -Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region
and the residents of the State?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site delineated
on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land
use plan?
XI. NOISE-Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels
in excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundbourne vibration or groundbourne noise
levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
'
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise levels?
10
Potentially
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Rev. OJ/I 1/06
• Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING-Would the project:
a) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly
(for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered government facilities, a
need for new or physically altered government
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or
other performance objectives for any of the public
servic.es:
i) Fire protection?
ii) Police protection?
iii) Schools?
iv) Parks?
v) Other public facilities?
XIV. RECREATION
a) Would the project
neighborhood and
recreational facilities
cleterioration of the
accelerated?
increase the use of existing
regional parks or other
such that substantial physical
facility would occur or be
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities, which might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?
II
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
• Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Less Than
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
No
Impact
Rev. 01111/06
--
•
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
XV. TRANSPORT A TIONffRAFFIC-Would the projeci:
a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level
of service standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated roads
or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
f) Result in insufficient parking capacity?
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turn-
outs, bicycle racks)?
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS -Would the
project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or exp3nsion of
existing facilities, the construction of which would
cause significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
12
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
•
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Rev. 01/11/06
• Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider, which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
irnportant examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumula-
tively considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects?)
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which
will cause the substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
• Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
0
0
0
0
0
0
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
0
0
0
0
0
0
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or
more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section
15663(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refmed from the earlier document
and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
13 Rev. 01/11/06
• • DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The proposed project involves the construction and operation of a 32.11 acre community park. An erivironinental
analysis of the potential impacts associated with the Alga Norte Community Park was conducted by the certified
Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01/EIR 98-07). With the
exception of grading, sewer demand, and traffic generation, the proposed community park conforms with the project
described in the Program EIR and, therefore, is within the scope of the Final Program EIR and no additional
environmental documentation is necessary for potential impacts associated with aesthetics, agricultural resources, air
quality, biological resources, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral
resources, noise, population and housing, public services, and recreation. As such, this envirorunentaJ assessment
only evaluates the potential impacts associated with geology and soils (site grading), utilities and service systems
(sewer), and transportation (vehicular traffic generation).
No site-specific grading was evaluated in the Program EIR, therefore potential impacts to geology and soils must be
evaluated. The sewer demand for the park was estimated at 20 EDU in the Program EIR, however primarily due to
the aquatic complex, the projected sewer demand is now I 04 EDU. Traffic generation also exceeds that reviewed
by the Program EIR, mostly due to the aquatic complex. The total projected traffic generation is 3, !50 ADT; the
generation reviewed by the Program EIR was 1,720 ADT. As described below, the proposed grading, sewer
demand, and traffic generation do not create any significant adverse environmental impacts.
GEOLOGY AND SOILS:
The project site is located within a north-south trending valley and has been cultivated for agricultural purposes in
the past. According to the project-specific geotechnical evaluation, conducted by Ninyo & Moore and dated
September 29, 2002, the site is dominated by alluvium, thus the grading operation may involve overexcavation and
removal and/or recompaction of these alluviums. Groundwater was encountered on the site, however due to its
depth, it is not expected to a constraint in construction. No active faults cross the project site and there is a low
potential for gro1md rupture due to faulting. By removing and recompacting the upper 12 or more feet of alluvium
in areas designated for a structural load, the potential for liquefaction is low.
The proposed park development would involve grading volumes of 143,500 cubic yards (cy) cut, 221,500 cy fill,
and 92,350 cy of import. All grading operations must follow the City of Carlsbad Engineering Standards and
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit requirements, including but not limited to, erosion control
and slope stability. Therefore, no substantial soil erosion or geologic instability is expected to occur. Given the
above, no significant adverse environmental impacts to geology or soils are anticipated with the Alga Norte
Community Park project.
TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC-Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity
of the street system?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project will generate 3,150 Average Daily Trips (ADT) and 216 peak hour
trips. This traffic will utilize the following roadways Alicante Road and Poinsettia Lane. Buildout traffic on
Alicante Road is 9,000 ADT and 18,000 ADT on Poinsettia Lane (SANDAG 2020 Forecast). The design capacities
of the arteril!l roads effected by the proposed project are 10,000 and 40,000 vehicles per day, respectively. The
project traffic would represent 35% and 31% of the buildout traffic volume and the design capacity respectively.
While the increase in traffic from the proposed project may be slightly noticeable, the street system has been
designed and sized to accommodate traffic from the project and cumulative development in the City of Carlsbad.
The proposed project would not, therefore, cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing
traffic load and capacity of the street system. The impacts from the proposed project are, therefore, Jess than
significant.
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?
Less Than Significant Impact. SANDAG acting as the County Congestion Management Agency has designated
three roads (Rancho Santa Fe Rd., El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Rd.) and two highway segments in Carlsbad
as part of the regional circulation system. The Existing and Buildout average daily traffic (ADT) and Existing LOS
on these designated roads and highways in Carlsbad is:
14 Rev. 01/11106
•
Rancho Santa Fe Road
El Camino Real
Palomar Airport Road
SR 78
1-5
Existing ADT*
17-35
27-49
10-57
124-142
199-216
*The numbers are in thousands of daily trips.
LOS
"A-D"
"A-C"
"A-D"
"F"
"D"
•
Buildout ADT*
35-56
33-62
30-73
156-180
260-272
The Congestion Management Program's (CMP) acceptable Level of Service (LOS) standard is "E", or LOS "F" if
that was the LOS in the 1990 base year (e.g., SR 78 in Carlsbad was LOS "F" in 1990). Accordingly, all designated
roads and highways are currently operating at or better than the acceptable standard LOS.
Note that the buildout ADT projections are based on the full implementation of the region's general and community
plans. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan and, therefore, its traffic was used in modeling the
buildout projections. Achievement of the CMP acceptable Level of Service (LOS) "E" standard assumes
implementation of the adopted CMP strategies. Based on the design capacity(ies) of the designated roads and
highways and implementation of the CMP strategies, they will function at acceptable level(s) of service in the short-
term and at buildout.
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change
in location that results in substantial safety risks?
No Impact. The proposed project does not include any aviation components. The project is consistent with the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the McClellan-Palomar Airport. It would not, therefore, result in a change of air
traffic patterns or result in substantial safety risks. No impact assessed.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses?
No Impact. All project circulation improvements will be designed and constructed to City standards; and, therefore,
would not result in design hazards. The proposed project is consistent with the City's general plan and zoning.
Therefore, it would not increase hazards due to an incompatible use. No impact assessed.
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
No Impact. The proposed project has been designed to satisfy the emergency requirements of the Fire and Police
Departments. No impact assessed.
I) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
No Impact. The proposed project is not requesting a parking variance. Additionally, the project would comply
with the City's parking requirements to ensure an adequate parking supply. No impact assessed.
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus
turnouts, bicycle racks, etc.)? ~
No Impact. (Note whether the project is near public transportation. If not, then state that the project is not served
by or not located in an area conducive to public transportation.) (Note bike racks are not necessary for a single-
family residential project. Otherwise, condition the project to install bike racks and note here that the project has
been so conditioned.)
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS:
The project site is served by a 12 inch sewer main in Alicante Road and a 12 inch force main in Poinsettia Lane.
The proposed sewer demand of 104 EDU was reviewed by the City of Carlsbad Public Works division with regard
to service systems and treatment capacity. According to this analysis and the Sewer Master Plan Update Final
Report, dated March 2003, the existing sewer system and wastewater treatment capacity at the Encina Water
Pollution Control Facility are adequate to accommodate the project sewer demand. Therefore, no significant
15 Rev. 01/11/06
• • adverse environmental impacts due to sewer demand are anticipated to occur as a result of the Alga Norte
Community Park.
EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning
Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008.
I. Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-0 I).
City of Carlsbad Planning Department. March 1994.
2. Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (EIR 98-07), T&B
Planning Consultants. July 2001.
3. Alga Norte Community Park Traffic Letter Report, LOS Engineering, Inc. July 2004.
4. Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report for Alga Norte Community Park, Carlsbad, California, Ninyo
& Moore. September 2002.
5. Sewer Master Plan Update Final Report, City of Carlsbad, Dudek & Associates, March 2003.
16 Rev. 01/11/06
• •
December 19, 2005
TO: MIKE GRIM, SENIOR PLANNER
From: William Plummer, Deputy City Engineer
SUBJECT: ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK, CUP 04-08
ENGINEERING CONDITIONS
PROJECT NUMBER 3837-2 and 3925-2
We have reviewed the subject project and have the following conditions:
Engineering:
General
I. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed
construction site within this project, Developer or his Contractor shall apply for
and obtain approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route.
2. Developer shall install sight distance corridors (see below for types) at all street
intersections in accordance with Engineering Standards and shall place the
following statement on the grading and landscaping plans for this project.
Type I
"No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, or other object over 30-inches above the
street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a
sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standard Public Street Design
Criteria, Section 8.B.3. The underlying property owner shall maintain this
condition."
Type II
"No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object shall be placed or
permitted on the subject property within the Caltrans corner sight distance
corridors. No obstructions shall impede nor conflict with the line-of-sight which is
established in accordance with City Standard Public Street Design Criteria,
Section 8.B.l. The sight line is depicted on the Site Plan."
The limits of these sight distance corridors shall be reflected on any improvement
plan, grading plan, or landscaping plan prepared in association with this
development.
Grading
3. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs
first, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that a Notice of Intention
for the start of work has been submitted to the State Water Resources Control
Board.
• •
4. Upon completion of grading, Developer shall file an "as-graded" geologic plan
with the City Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the geology as exposed by
the grading operation, all geologic corrective measures as actually constructed
and must be based on a contour map, which represents both the pre and post site
grading. The plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and the engineering
geologist, and shall be submitted on a 24" x 36" mylar suitable for a permanent
record.
Dedications/Improvements
5. Developer shall construct the following improvements including but not limited
to: Public improvements shown on the Site Plan (Sheets Cl.l, Cl.2, and C1.3),
paving, base, signing & striping, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, medians, driveway
entrances, grading, clearing and grubbing, sewer, water, recycled water, fire
hydrants, street lights, water quality treatment devices to City Standards to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
A. Remove interfering portions of existing curb and gutter at proposed
driveway entrances on Alicante Road.
B. Extend portion of paving, curb, gutter and sidewalk in accordance with City
Standards along west side of Alicante Road for the proposed driveway
entrances.
C. Extend pipelines for water, sewer and recycled water pipelines from
Alicante Road by removing and replacing interfering portions of the existing
pavement and curb and gutter. All cuts to existing pavement shall be saw cut
neat.
6. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs
first, Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP)." The SWPPP shall be in compliance with current
requirements and provisions established by the Regional Water Quality Control
Board, San Diego Region and City of Carlsbad requirements. The SWPPP shall
address measures to reduce to the maximum extent practicable storm water
pollutant runoff during construction of the project. At a minimum, the SWPPP
shall:
a. include all content as established by the Regional Water Quality Control
Board, San Diego Region requirements;
b. include the receipt of "Notice of Intent" issued by the State Water
Resources Control Board;
c. recommend source control and treatment control Best Management
Practices (BMP's) that will be implemented with this project to avoid
contact or filter said pollutants from the storm water to the maximum
extent practicable before discharging to City right-of-way or a natural
drainage course; and
d. establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean up.
Special considerations and effort shall be applied to employee education
on the proper procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants.
• • •
7. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs
first, Developer shall submit for City approval a "Storm Water Management Plan
(SWMP)." The SWMP shall demonstrate compliance with City of Carlsbad
Standard Urban Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Order 2001-01 issued by the
Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region, and the City of
Carlsbad's Municipal Code. The SWMP shall address measures to avoid contact
or filter said pollutants from storm water, to the maximum extent practicable for
the post-construction stage of the project. At a minimum, the SWMP shall:
Water
a. identity existing and post-development on-site pollutants-of-concern;
b. identity the hydrologic unit this project contributes to and impaired water
bodies that could be impacted by this project;
c. recommend source controls and treatment controls that will be
implemented with this project to avoid contact or filter said pollutants
from storm water to the maximum extent practicable before discharging to
City right -of-way; ·
d. establish specific procedures for handling spills and routine clean-up.
Special considerations and effort shall be applied to resident education on
the proper procedures for handling clean up and disposal of pollutants;
e. ensure long-term maintenance of all post construction BMP's in
perpetuity; and
f. identity how post development runoff rates and velocities from the site
will not exceed the pre-development runoff rates and velocities to the
maximum extent practicable.
8. Prior to approval of improvement plans or final map, Developer shall meet with
the Fire Marshall to determine if fire protection measures (fire flows, fire hydrant
locations, building sprinklers) are required to serve the project. Fire hydrants, if
proposed, shall be considered public improvements and shall be served by public
water mains owned and operated by the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
9. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and
charges for connection to public facilities owned and operated by the Carlsbad
Municipal Water District. Developer shall pay the San Diego County Water
Authority capacity charges prior to issuance of Building Permits.
I 0. The Developer shall prepare a colored recycled water use map and submit this
map for processing and approval by the District Engineer. A copy of the approved
exhibit shall accompany the landscape improvement plans and grading plans for
reference.
11. The Developer shall design landscape and irrigation plans utilizing recycled water
as a source. The recycled water shall be obtained from the existing 8-inch
diameter pipeline in Alicante Road. Said plans shall be submitted to the District
Engineer and the County Department of Environmental Heath for review and
approval.
• •
12. The Developer shall design and install potable water and recycled water facilities,
services and meters at a location approved by the District Engineer. The locations
of said facilities shall be reflected on the improvement plans. All facilities
including water meters shall be within public right-of way or a minimum 20-foot
wide easement granted to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District. All easements
for water and recycled water facilities shall be shown on the improvement plans
and shall indicate easement is granted to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District.
13. The Developer shall design and construct public water, sewer, and recycled water
facilities substantially as shown on the Site Plan (Sheets CI.l, Cl.2, and Cl.3) to
the satisfaction of the District Engineer. Proposed public facilities shall be
reflected on public improvement plans.
14. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not
be issued for the development of the subject property unless the District Engineer
has determined that adequate water and sewer facilities are available at the time of
occupancy.
15. The Developer shall employ adequate measures, approved by the District
Engineer of the Vallecitos Water District, to protect in place the existing 24-inch
diameter sewer forcemain and 12-inch diameter recycled water outfall, which are
owned and operated by the Vallecitos Water District. No structures shall be
constructed within the existing easements including light poles, catch basins or
storm drain pipes. Storm drain pipes are allowed to cross the easement provided
adequate clearance between existing and proposed pipelines is at least 12-inches
clear in the vertical. In addition, no trees or large bushes shall be planted within
the easement. The District Engineer for the Vallecitos Water District shall
approve the placement of additional fill within the easement, and a letter shall be
submitted by the District Engineer to the City Engineer indicating their
concurrence on the fill placement.
16. The Developer shall employ adequate measures approved by the City Engineer to
protect in place the existing 12-inch diameter PVC sewer forcemain owned and
operated by the City of Carlsbad. No structures including catch basins, inlet
structures, and light poles shall be constructed within the existing easement. No
trees or large bushes shall be planted within the easement. No fills shall be placed
within the easement unless written assurance can be provided by a licensed civil
engineer on the adequacy of the sewer forcemain pipe to sustain the earth loading
without settlement or remedial measures are submitted and approved by the City
Engineer.
June 6, 2005
TO: SENIOR PLANNER, GRIM
FROM: Park Planner, Bradstreet
RE: ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK CUP
As you will recall, on May 18, 2005, we met to discuss the final
outstanding CUP items for Alga Norte Community Park. The three items
discussed were the CLOMR, the Vallecitos Water District (VWD)
easement, and parking for extraordinary events.
CLOMR
I have contacted Glen Van Peski, who said he is going to be reviewing a
copy of the CLOMR. Attached is his email response to my inquiry.
VWD Easement
Susanne Parsons has reviewed our purchase agreement between the City
and the previous property owner. She has confirmed the law provides that
all of the easement rights have been transferred to the City as the new
property owner. This means VWD continues to have all rights and
obligations they were granted from the initiation of the easement. The City,
therefore, must comply with development requirements and with allowing
ingress and egress for maintenance. Attached is Susanne's email
response.
Regarding the placement of fill over the existing pipeline; once complete,
we will be submitting construction documents to VWD for approval.
Event Parking
You mentioned that we have provided you with enough information
regarding the event parking to cover the issue in the staff report.
Please let me know if you need anything else.
cott Bradstreet,
Park Planner
. "' ----·--·---~-------------·-
sc;ottBradstreet:HE:_P,I~.'I._f\I.O~e_Park .~~.---~-~~.~---
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Scott-
"Glen Van Peski" <gvanpeski@adelphia.net>
'"Scott Bradstreet'" <sbrad@ci.carlsbad.ca.us>
05/19/2005 5:25:49 PM
RE: Alga Norte Park
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I believe I obtained the CLOMR
info, but have not reviewed it yet. I have a box that I think is ready to
review, so I'll be looking it over next week.
--Glen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Bradstreet [mailto:sbrad@ci.carlsbad.ca.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 9:33AM
>To: gvanpeski@adelphia.net
> Cc: rick@bergengineering.net; John Cahill;
> rebengineering@sbcglobal.net
> Subject: Alga Norte Park
>
>
>Hi Glen,
>
>We are gearing up to resume design on Alga Norte Park. We
> have met with Mike Grim to discuss final issues and are going
> to try to take the CUP to the Planning Commission in early August.
>
> Questions for you ...
> 1) Where did we leave the FEMA issue? Does Rick berg have
> possession of the documents?
> 2) Since the park is the only property located on Alicante,
> we want to make sure the on street parking and bike lane is
>correctly laid out when the street is striped. Do you have
> access to the plans and can you help us give input for this?
>
>Thanks,
>Scott
>
> Scott Bradstreet, RLA
> Park Planner
>
> City of Carlsbad, Recreation Department
> 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
> Carlsbad, CA. 92008
> (760) 434-2856 Fax (760) 720-6917
> sbrad@ci.carlsbad.ca.us
>
> "Building Community in Carlsbad"
>
Page 1 ,
~~ . . . .. . . ~.... . . . . .. ·-----~
i Scott Bradstreet~-Fwd:Re:._E_aseme~~--· -··.
Hi Scott: Here is a brief rundown of the law as it pertains to easements ...
An easement is defined as an interest in land created by grant or agreement which confers a right on its
owner to some profit, benefit, or lawful use of the estate of another. California Civil Code Sections 801 and
802.
If a property is sold with an easement existing, the purchaser takes the property with all of the benefits and
burdens that appear at the time of sale to belong to it. So, any person who purchases property with an
easement recorded or existing on the property takes the property with the benefits or burdens associated
with the easement.
In order for the owner of an easement to perform the duties associated with the easement agreement,
easements include incidental rights to enter the property to make repairs or do other things as are
necessary for the full exercise of the easement rights. This means that the holder of an easement also
has those rights incidental or necessary to carry out the purpose of the easement i.e. entering property,
monitoring, maintaining, etc.
In your situation the Water District has an existing easement that burdens the City's property. The district
continues to have the easement rights and obligations no matter who owns the land. Incidental in the
easement may be certain rights to enter the property, inspect, maintain or service the easement and or the
appurtenances associated with it. In this case, it does not appear necessary to execute an additional legal
document to provide the District with the right to ingress or egress unless the City wishes to have that
access limited to a particular area, time, or manner.
Call me if you have any questions. Thank you.
-Susanne
Susanne M. Parsons
Deputy City Attorney
City of Carlsbad
NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail contains confidential Attorney-Work Product, and/or
Attorney-Client Information and is intended to be read only by the intended recipient. If you have received
this e-mail in error please destroy it and notify the sender at (760) 434-2891. Thank you.
• •
NOTE TO PROJECT FILE
Project Name: Alga Norte Park
Project identifier:
Date: Sept. 4, 2004
By: Karyn V audreuil -Fire Marshal
Automatic fire sprinklers will only be required in buildings exceeding 10,000 square feet.
Service roads outside of identified drive and park aisles will not be required to be capable
of supporting fire apparatus.
DATE:
TO: *
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
• •
• • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO
REVISED PLANS~
ENGINEERING -DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, ATIN: MARIE ASHE
POLICE DEPARTMENT· ATIN: J. SASWAY
FIRE DEPARTMENT-KARYN VAUDREUIL '--1'<t
BUILDING DEPARTMENT· PAT KELLEY
RECREATION· MARK STEYAERT
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (STREETS)-HEIDI HEISTERMAN
WATER/SEWER DISTRICT
,...LA_N __ D ...... S ...... C-A-::P-::E:-:Po-L-A-N-::C-:-H-::oE-:-C""K-::C"""'O-:-N.SUL T ANT -LARRY BLACK
SCHOOL DISTRICT
""'N-O-:-R ..... TH __ C...,..O-U-:N,.-TY__.T ..... RA_N_S,...,.IT::::-:::D-:IS"""'TRICT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SEMPRA ENERGY-LAND MANAGEMENT
CAL TRANS (send anything adjacent to 1-5)
PARKSfTRAILS-LIZ KETABIAN
Always Send Exhibits
FROM: Planning Department
REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. _,_""'-"'---'~'--..=::...:,....
NOTE: Please use this number on all correspondence.
PROJECT TITLE:
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to ..c.~
the Project Planner in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by ~p; il!:~~
(If you have "No Comments", please so state.) Jf not received by the date indica d, i will be
assumed that you h~ve no comment and the p~si! has your endorsement ~)lbllJl!led. If
you have any questions, please contact miT< at 602-.n~~ .
The request for conditions will follow at the appropriate time. . 1 ~~~o~tiQ~~ ~ .~ p-~: J~ ~~ ~ ~Q.
10
Review & Comment 08/04
•
WATER/SEWER DISTRICTS
Vallecitos Water District
William Rucker, General Manager
788 San Marcos Boulevard
San Marcos, CA 92069
(619) 744-0460
Olivenhain Municipal Water District
David McCollum, General Manager
1966 Olivenhain Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
(619) 753-6466
SCHOOL DISTRICTS
San Marcos Unified School District
Dr. Larry Maw, Superintendent
1 Civic Center Drive
San Marcos, CA 92069
(619) 744-4776
San Dieguito Union High School District
Peggy Lynch, Superintendent
710 Encinitas Boulevard
Encinitas, CA 92024
(619) 753-6491
(route plans for review to Eric Hall)
•
Leucadia Wastewater District
Tim Jochem, General Manager
1960 La Costa Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92009-6810
(619) 753-0155
Carlsbad Water District
Robert Greaney, Manager
(place in internal mail)
Encinitas Union School District
Dr. Douglas P. DeVore, Superintendent
101 S. Rancho Santa Fe Road
Encinitas, CA 92024-4308
(619) 944-4300
Carlsbad Unified School District
Cheryl Ernst, Superintendent
6225 El Camino Real
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(619) 331-5000
• When sending to one of the school districts, always include the other.
NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT
North County Transit District
Planning Department
810 Mission Avenue
Oceanside, CA 92054
SEMPRA ENERGY
Sempra Energy
Land Management
8316 Century Park Court
San Diego CA 92123-1582
Review & Comment
CAL TRANS
Bill Figge
Dev. Review & Transp. Branch Chief
CAL TRANS District 11
P 0 BOX 85406
San Diego, CA 92186-5406
08/04
• •
CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Protection Services
PROJECT CONDITION REPORT
PROJECT NAME: Alga Norte community park
Date: 3/4/04 08/30/04
Project number: Planning CUP 04-08
Mike Grim
Project conditions: (Note: This commentary identifies specific conditions necessary
to achieve Fire Department approval.)
Provide a site plan showing all proposed and existing fire hydrants within the park and on
Pointsettia and Alicante.
All buildings to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers
Show all paving areas to pools to insure access for medical aid.
All roads within the park need to be able to hold the weight of the fire apparatus.
All roads within the park to be minimum 20 feet wide and clear to a height of 13'6".
If pools are to be enclosed by fencing and the occupant load exceeds I 00 the gates must
be equipped with panic hardware.
Code reminders: (Note: This commentary is provided to assist the applicant, and
identifies minimum code requirements that are frequently overlooked.
Colleen Balch
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
*
*
*
*
*
* •
•
• • •
*
--------• • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO
7, ~t' ov REVISED PLANS-}(
ENGINEERING -DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Wi;'F$';#!;{:;~:~rKA;;t,:,n:~tzt y>
BUILDING DEPARTMENT-PAT KELLEY
RECREATION-MARK STEYAERT
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (STREETS)-HEIDI HEISTERMAN
WATER DISTRICT
,...LA..,.,N'""D"'"S,..C:-A:-:P:-::E""'P""'L-:Ac:-N:-:C,.,.H:-::E:-=C-:-::Kc-::C:-:O'""NSUL TANT-LARRY BLACK
SCHOOL DISTRICT
:-:N-=o-=R=TH=-=-=c=-=o-:-::U::-:N=TY=T=RA-:-::N:-::S=:I=T=-=D::-:IS==TRICT -PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SEMPRA ENERGY-LAND MANAGEMENT
CAL TRANS (send anything adjacent to 1·5)
Always Send Exhibits
Planning Department
REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. _____ ::...
NOTE: Please use this number on all correspondence.
PROJECT TITLE: ~~=~~....=.....!=..!==.___.::=~~~........~-'--=t...li::""'-
APPLICANT: -~p-o~---"IIE.L---
Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the
Project Planner in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by (If
you have "No Comments", please so state.) If not received by the date be
assumed that you have no comment and the P?!sal has your end~l5~~nt as submitted.
If you have any questions, please contact ~,e£ at 602-!llll..)The request for
conditions will follow at the appropriate time.
THANK YOU
COMMENTS: _____ ~-~-r-------------
}Lk.'
FRM0020 12/02
• • CITY OF CARLSBAD
Inter-Office Correspondence
TO: __ ~MMlY~e~G~~~t~ML_ ____________ _ OFFICE: ____________________ _
FROM: DATE: __ ~B~·/~B~·~Df~--------------
MESSAGE:
jllr/t ~ /o f»f(} Ji(t ;we~~?, I h!#~ /vi) '/k trti!Xts ~
%v;~-JI3 ~ vk ~~)1/~;CJ (oul~ .,t /?ldB~-£
l'd-r~·
Attachments: t) Reply Requested: t) ~'-----Signature: ~Lo/---~-----------------
REPLY:
DATE: ____________ _
• CITY OF CARLSBAD •
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
August 17, 2004
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MIKE GRIM, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
Glen Van Peski, Consultant Project Engineer
COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND ISSUES STATEMENT
CUP 04-08
ALGA NORTE PARK
The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject project. The following
issues need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to conditioning of the project.
ISSUES
1. Add a description of what appears to be some sort of structure, adjacent to the
maintenance building, that is over the top of the existing 12" sewer force main.
2. Provide letter of permission from Vallecitos Water District indicating their acceptance of
fill placed over their sewer force main.
3. Add note to sheet one indicating remedial grading is proposed under pavement areas.
4. Address comments in the Water Quality Technical Report (WQTR).
Attached are red lined check prints of the project (Site Plan/Landscape Concept Plan, Hydrology
Report/Water Quality Technical Report) for the applicant's use. The applicant must return
these check prints with the revised plans to assist staff in our continued review. Direct
the applicant to submit an extra copy of the site plan when they resubmit, so the Design
Division (Terry Smith) can be provided with a copy. I made Terry a copy of the Development
Services set, and he will be forwarding comments shortly. Please call me at 720-0500 if you
have any questions.
Glen K. Van Peski, P.E.
Consultant Project Engineer-Development Services
enc.
c: Jeremy Riddle, Acting Senior Civil Engineer, Development Services
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
• • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO
~Z'l 'tj.( REVISED PLANstJ.
*
*
*
*
* •
* •
•
*
* •
ENGINEERING -DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
POLICE DEPARTMENT-ATTN: J. SASWAY
iMkME~f~iit~Jt~n;w~
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (STREETS)-HEIDI HEISTERMAN
WATER DISTRICT .,..LA~N=""D=-s=-c=-A:-:P=-::E""'P""L-:A:-:-N:-::C:-:-H:-::E:-::C7:Kc-:C:-:O:-:-NSU L T ANT -LARRY BLACK
SCHOOL DISTRICT
.,..,N"""o.,....R-=TH---,C"""O.,...U-N ...... T.,..,.Y-=T.,....R-:-A.,..,.NS""I"=T"""D""'IS"=TRICT -PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SEMPRA ENERGY-LAND MANAGEMENT
CAL TRANS (send anything adjacent to 1·5)
Always Send Exhibits
Planning Department
REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO
NOTE: Please use this number on all correspondence.
PROPOSAL:
Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to Jl?,k i;-" ~ the
Project Planner in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 5Jt':= {If
you have "No Comments", please so state.) If not received by the date indicated, it will be
assumed that you have no comment and th~~sal has your endffsUent as submitted.
If you have any questions, please contact l!!Jie_ at 602 T request for
conditions will follow at the appropriate time.
FRM0020 12/02
• CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
•
July 13, 2004
TO: MIKE GRIM, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
FROM: Glen Van Peski, Consultant Project Engineer
RE: COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND ISSUES STATEMENT
CUP 04-08
ALGA NORTE PARK
The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject project for application
completeness. Please see list below for missing or incomplete items that must be submitted
before the application can be processed. In addition, the Engineering Department made a
preliminary review of the project for Engineering issues which need to be resolved or
adequately addressed prior to conditioning of the project.
COMPLETENESS ITEMS
1. Include the following information on the site plan:
a. Site Acreage
b. Districts providing services
c. Average Daily Traffic by use
d. Existing Zoning and General Plan designations
e. Earthwork volumes
f. Source of existing topography
g. Drawing number of stockpile plan
2. Dimension building setbacks as noted on the redlines.
3. Show proposed grades in parking areas.
4. Show proposed easements for public water lines.
5. Include a legend to explain the symbols used for proposed improvements.
6. Show access openings per recorded Map 14543 to compare to current proposed
entrances.
7. Clarify different retaining wall symbols used.
8. Dimension widths of adjacent streets.
9. Show and label existing trail easements per Map 14543.
10. Show existing and proposed utility easements on the preliminary landscape plan, and
remove proposed trees from all easements.
Alga Norte Park CUP 04-08 • Completeness Review and Issues Statement
Page 2 of 3
ISSUES
•
11. Show cross-section of proposed Keystone wall adjacent to Alicante Road, and delineate
limits of reinforcing grids.
12. Title report lists Real Estate Collateral Management as the property owner, but the plans
show the City of Carlsbad as owner. Clarify.
13. Show a landscape vignette/section for the riparian character bioswale. Is this going to
be open and grassy or overgrown? Coordinate with the Police Dept. regarding security
considerations.
14. Clarify the extent of the structure proposed over the top of the 12" sewer force main.
15. Clarify which of the existing sewer/effluent lines have been located, or are proposed to
be relocated by this project.
16. Check clearances between proposed sewer and water and existing sewer/effluent lines.
17. Provide letter of permission from Vallecitos Water District indicating their acceptance of
fill placed over their sewer force main.
18. Revise sewer connection location to provide enhanced clearances between the new
sewer and the existing storm drain and reclaimed water.
19. The soils report calls out differential settlement in non-structural areas of up to 5 inches.
Even though the pavement grades are substantial, a 5" settlement could cause potholes
and disrupt drainage. Clarify if any remedial grading is proposed under pavement
areas.
20. Provide a copy of the Greens CLOMR. This project will be conditioned to prepare a
LOMR to reflect the final grading and the resultant floodplain limits.
21. Revise assertion in the Water Quality Technical Report (WQTR) that the existing open
space has the potential to generate the same pollutants as the proposed hundreds of
parking spaces, dog park, etc, or provide justification.
22. If food services are proposed with the Water Park, this constitutes additional possible
pollutants that should be included in the WQTR.
23. Show proposed permeable pavement areas on the site plan.
24. Show proposed Storm Filter location on site plan.
25. The WQTR discusses dry wells, but no locations are shown on the site plan. Either
remove from the WQTR or show on the site plan. If dry wells are proposed, show that
the onsite soils are appropriate for dry wells.
Attached are red lined check prints of the project (Site Plan/Landscape Concept Plan, Hydrology
Report/Water Quality Technical Report) for the applicant's use. The applicant must return
these check prints with the revised plans to assist staff in our continued review. Direct
the applicant to submit an extra copy of the site plan when they resubmit, so the Design
Division (Terry Smith) can be provided with a copy. I made Terry a copy of the Development
Alga Norte Park CUP 04-08 • Completeness Review and Issues Statement
PaQe 3 of 3 •
Services set, and he will be forwarding comments shortly. Please call me at 720-0500 if you
have any questions.
Glen K. Van Peski, P.E.
Consultant Project Engineer-Development Services
en c.
c: Jeremy Riddle, Acting Senior Civil Engineer, Development Services
• • City of Carlsbad
ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
June 11, 2004
TO: Mike Grim, Project Planner
FROM: Clyde Wickham, Project Engineer
SUBJECT: SECOND REVIEW OF ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK,
CUP 04-08
The Engineering Department has completed another review of the above subject. We
have reviewed the application for completeness and offer the following engineering
issues that must be addressed before the public hearing for this project:
See memo from Planning Dept. regarding incomplete items.
I Engineering Issues
I will highlight the items that were identified on the previous review:
1. The Title Report submitted with the application (submitted Feb. 9, 2004)
indicates Real Estate Collateral Management Company as the vested owner.
Please correct and submit an updated title report to verify ownership.
2. On the cover sheet, Jist the average daily traffic (ADT) generated by this
proposed project. Separate traffic generation by use. Back up generation
information with traffic study. Consider if access will require signalization. Callout
the proposed dimensions of driveways, isles and parking stalls.
3. List the sewer (EDU) and water (GPO) generated or required to serve this project
on the cover sheet. Depict the location of all existing street lights along the
property frontage with Poinsettia Lane and Alicante Road.
4. Include cross sections for the 3 proposed driveways as well as for the travel way
and parking areas. Identify minimum sections and conditions from Soils Report
by Ninyo & Moore.
5. Include the grading quantities associated with this project (cut, fill, export, import,
remedial) expressed in cubic yards.
6. I cannot determine if this item has been resolved because of the absense of a
title report. Revise the exhibits to depict all existing easements listed in the
preliminary title report dated October 17,2003 (or subsequent revised title
report). The title report lists agreements and encumbrances that could affect
"clear title" please resolve. An example of encumbrances are: Item #2
reimbursement agreement, Item #3 Future Improvements, # 3, Affordible
Housing Agreement #10, and Access restrictions # 12. These issues affect
development and "clear title" of the property.
,• • • C:\Documents and Settings\mgrim.OOO\Local Settings\Temp\CUP (Park) lssues2.doc
7. Plot all proposed easements for this project. Water easements are typically
considered public and should be plotted.
8. Please show the required spill way for the Drainage Dike along the northern
boundary. The drainage report appears complete for this phase of design. I will
follow up with specific comments in a few weeks.
9. The existing utilities in Alicante Road should be shown. The water line is shown
as a dead end at the northern boundary of this project. DWG 400-81 has details
of improvements, reclaimed water and sewer that should be shown on the
proposed development plans. Identify drawing numbers where appropriate. On
the precise grading and drainage plan, depict the proposed onsite fire hydrant
using the legend symbol. Maybe you missed my point on this issue there is a
new drawing that extends the improvements north of this project. Please show
these and call out the appropriate drawing number.
1 O.lt appears that grading is proposed over the existing sewer easements along the
southerly property line. Submit letters of support or acceptance from each
agency that is impacted with the proposed design. Show how maintenance
crews can access, maintain and repair these facilities.
11. The SWPP submitted appears to be satisfactory for this stage of design and
planning. I will follow up with specific comments on this plan. I believe the Dog
Park section of the site is missing BMP to separate and filter this area. It is
located at the end of the bio swale with no means for filter or pollution control.
12. Plot this information on the site plan. Please demonstrate how Fire, Trash and
service trucks will access, park, and unload on-site. Single unit trucks, using a
407E -turning template, should accomplish the maneuvers with no more than a
3 point operation to turnaround. If the pool chlorinator uses large (1 ton or
greater) cylinders of liquid chlorine, a Semi Truck turn template should be
considered (407-D). Check with Fire Dept. for specific access issues.
Again this is a cursory review of the CUP application and additional specific
comments relating to specific reports submitted will follow.
If you have any questions, please either see or call me at 760-602-2742.
c: Robert Wojcik, Deputy City Engineer
File
• • •
April 23, 2004
TO: PRINCIPAL PLANNER
FROM: Senior Planner
ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK CUP PROCESSING SCHEDULE
Thank you for the update from the PFROG meeting regarding the Recreation
Department's anticipated processing schedule for the Alga Norte Park. According to
that schedule, the Planning Commission would approve the Park Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) and environmental review by the end of July. Based upon a review of the
submitted CUP application materials (received February 9, 2004) and the Planning
Department's Critical Dates Calendar, this schedule is completely unrealistic. In
addition, as discussed below, due to the lack of information submitted with the original
CUP application, it is impossible to even offer an estimated Planning Commission
hearing date. This memo is intended to provide you with some background information
to assist in any further discussions regarding the processing timeline of the Alga Norte
Park CUP.
The last day to schedule a project for the July 21, 2004 Planning Commission hearing is
June 8; conditions from other departments are due June 1. Therefore, in order to make
the last hearing in July, the project must be complete, all issues identified and resolved,
and the staff report prepared by the beginning of June. In special circumstances, the
Planning Department management has allowed a modification to the Critical Dates
Calendar. In this case, that would extend the deadline to June 14.
As stated in the March 8, 2004 incomplete letter for the Park CUP (copy attached), the
application was extremely incomplete. The civil engineering plans did not include any
grading, earthwork volume, drainage, storm water treatment, or sewer demand
information and the only information provided, that being utility information, was
incomplete and/or incorrect. The landscape plans did not include any planting,
irrigation, or water conservation information; the only difference between these plans
and the site plan was the identification of turf areas. The site plan did not include
dimensions and many features were not labeled. In addition, there was no traffic
generation information provided, either in documents or plans.
In the interest of collaboration and team effort, the Planning Department staff has
attempted to identify potential issues early in the Park Master Plan process to facilitate
the subsequent CUP processing. For example, I have requested traffic generation
information on numerous occasions, beginning in June 2003, because this could have
an impact on the level of environmental review and the resulting duration of project
processing. In addition, the Villages of La Costa Master Plan EIR requires the
processing of a Special Use Permit (SUP) if the pre-existing floodplain boundary on the
site has not been revised through FEMA. The Planning Department has requested an
• •
update on this floodplain adjustment status several times in order to determine if an
SUP is needed however this information has not been provided.
No project resubmittals have been received as of the date of this memo. Since the
original submittal was lacking civil engineering and landscaping information, the next
submittal constitutes, in essence, a first submittal of these plans. Therefore, it is very
likely that the next submittal will take the full 30 days to review and may not contain all
necessary information and/or will reveal issues of concern. If a resubmittal were
received on April 26, it is likely that a response from Planning and Engineering would be
produced on or about May 24. It is theoretically possible that the next submittal will
meet all of the submittal requirements and be consistent with all of the applicable
regulations. The more likely scenario would be that the next submittal will identify some
incompleteness, project conformance, and/or design issues that need resolution. In that
case, it is unrealistic to expect that issue resolution, revisions and resubmittal of plans,
and staff report preparation would be completed by June 14.
Besides the incompleteness or lack of information submitted thus far, another area of
concern regarding project processing timelines involves the ability to resolve issues of
the project's conformity with applicable regulations. Since the original application was
so incomplete, the only area where issues could be identified were parking lot setbacks
and building architecture. Based upon Planning Department staff's review of the
Villages of La Costa Master Plan and the Alga Norte Park Master Plan, it was
determined that the proposed architecture was not consistent with these documents and
needed revision. The Assistant Planning Director and I conducted meetings with the
Park Development team requesting that alternative architectural styles be presented
however the team disagreed with our determination. This issue was originally raised in
the incomplete letter of March 8 and is still not resolved as of the date of this memo
(almost six weeks later). If this issue resolution process is an indication of the resolution
process for other issues, the project processing timeline will inevitably increase.
Once the next submittal is received, I would be happy to make a quick review of
completeness and any significant issues and meet with you to discuss (this would not
include any Engineering issues as their review is usually more involved). It might also
be helpful to have a meeting with the Park Development team and Recreation
management to discuss a realistic processing timeline for the permit and environmental
review. However, as discussed above, the ability to ascertain a timeline is purely a
function of the level of information provided in the next submittal. Thank you again for
the update and the opportunity to provide some background information on the
processing of the Alga Norte Park CUP. I'd be happy to provide additional information
or any answer any questions you may have.
MICHAELGRI
Senior Planner
Alga Norte Community Park-Parking Proforma
3131/2004
t Element
<Staffing
River Pool
Slides
South Slides
Aoua I
Tot Pool
i 1 Pool
~~:!cool
North Building
• Total Staffing 1
<Users
i tPool
i I Pool
[Therapy Pool
Total User
:Total , 1 Center
1300'
[275'
!75'
•
[Tot·Lot
jToi·Lol Nu
IToi·LOI
Dog Park
Picnic Areas
Total
Total
Net Excess
I Field
I Field
1 Field
I #1
1#2
1#3
Dally Use
• Accessible Stalls -2% of Total
*No Compact Reduction Taken
I Applied
I 3.5-4 ppv
I 3.5-4 PPV
I 3.5-4 ppv
• 3.5-4 ppv
I 3.5-4 ppv
I 3.5-4 PPV
I 3.5-4 ppv
• 3.5-4 ppv
I 3.5-4 ppv
I 3.5-4 PPV
• 3.5-4 ppv
I 3.5-4 ppv
• 3.5-4 ppv
spatial
Used 3.5 ppv
I 3.5-4 ppv 5x21 lanes
I 3.5-4 ppv 6Q-80 people -use
13.5-4 ppv
• 3.5-4 ppv
I of 3.5-4 PPV Used 3.5 ppv
Per City
Per City
Per Gity
Staff
'Provided
'Provided
'Provided
•I perking
1.5 people per 3000 s.l .
1.5 people per 3000 s.l.
1.5 people per 3000 s.l.
I No Known
jPer City I
I Per Cltv 1
[P~I
1 Per Glty 1
1 Provided
1 Provided
1 Provided
'Provided
'Provided
200 .. r 14,000 s.l
2681
6500
5260
39665
2. acres, so 1 , 3 per ppv
1 stall per 3 users
1 stall per 3 users
1 stall per 3 users
1 users Number of Parking Stalls
8
2
2
2
1
4
9
1
5
5
39
988
105
80
10_
1183
1222
70
2
0.89
2.17
.75
05
1C
10
10
Required
Provided
2.29
. 0.57
0.57
).57
l.OO
1.14
2.57
1.43
1.43
.14
282.29
30.00
22.86
2.86
0.00
336.00
349.14
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
2.00
7.60
18.42
14.90
15.00
_35.00
3.33
3.33
3.33
532.06
546.00
13.94
10.92
11.00
Alga Norte Community Park· Parking Proforma ~ bJSeJ j..Av ~Y
3/31/2004 :;...---::.-----r-
<iver Pool
II ides
Iouth llides
"ue Play F-re
·ot Poe
neraF')'
Pool
Pool
1 south Bulle "ng
I North Building
• Total Staffing I I
i 'ool
i Pool
Therapy Pool
Total Uaer I
Total. • Center
300' I I Field
~::::
• Building
•
Tot-Lot
Tot-Lot
[Tot-Lot
Dog Perk
Picnic Areas
t#1
t#2
Total' i 1 for Daily Use
Total
"Accessible Stalls-2% of Total
* No Compact Reduction Taken
I AI:
:~
I Per City
I Per City 1
I Peri
!Steff I
13.5-4 PPV
I Standard Of: .
enderd of 3.5-4 ppv
enc Ia" f 3.5-4 ppv
enc len 3. i-4 ppv
anc Ia" • 3.1-4 ppv
IIane Ia" "3. i-4 ppv
~Ia" '3.i-4ppv
I StanCIO" . ,-4 PPV
I Sta1 M
1 Standard of 3.5-4 ppv
I Standard Of .5-4 PPV
1 standard of 3.5-4 ppv
1 Standard of 3.5-4 ppv
1 Standard of 3.5-4 ppv
1 Standard of 3.5-4 ppv
~of3.5-4ppv
I 3.5-4 PPV
I Provided
1 Provided
I Provided
perking
1.5 people oar 3000 s.f .
16.5 people oar 3000 s.f.
1.5 people oar 3000 s.f.
jPerCity I Provided
; Provided
I Provided
1 Provided
• Provided
.... · , ...
Used 3.5 ppv
5X21 lanes
60-60 people -use ,
Used 3.5 PPV
2661
6500
5260
39665
14,000 s ..
2. acres, 50 per acres, 3 per ppv
I stall per 3 users
1 stall per 3 users
1 stall per 3 users
2
2
1
39
966
105
60
10
1163
1222
70
2
0.69
2.17
1.75
105
10
10
10
Required
Provided
2.29
0.57
0.57
l.57
.00
.14
2.57
143
.43
1' .14
262.29
30.00
22.66
!.66
1.00
l.OO
l.14
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
2.00
7.60
16.42
14,90
15,00
35,00
3.33
3.33
3.33
532.06
546.00
13.94
10.92
11.00
• •
April 15, 2004
TO: SENIOR PLANNER, GRIM
FROM: PARK PLANNER, BRADSTREET
RE: SPECIAL EVENT PARKING AND TRAFFIC MITIGATION
FOR ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK
As you are aware, Alga Norte Community Park is intended to serve the public
with many park activities, most of which will be normal operations, but some of
which are considered special events. This memo will outline how the Recreation
Department plans to accomodate parking and traffic for three different types of
scenarios; a primary plan for normal operations, a back-up plan where overflow
parking is required, and a worst-case-scenario plan for special events.
SOURCES FOR PARKING
1. On Site Parking
Based upon our analysis, the parking demand for this site is 532 stalls (see
appendix A, per WY AC). The proposed design provides 546 Parking stalls, an
excess of 14 stalls. This does not include a credit for compact stalls, which would
be an additional (546 x 50%)= (273' 7 9') = 30 stalls. This totals 44 stalls in
excess of the demand.
2. Overflow Parking on Alicante
The roadway on Alicante is designed to allow parking on one side of the street.
The Alga Norte Park frontage can support 53 parallel parked cars. In addition, the
roadway north of the park can support 21 parallel parked cars. This totals 74
overflow stalls. The numbers are derived using the following calculations:
Site Frontage
Total lineal feet 1480'
Less intersections (5 x 40') = 200'
Subtotal 1 ,280'
Feet per stall 7 24'
Total stalls 53
North of Site
Total lineal feet
Feet per stall
Total stalls
500'
724'
21
• •
3. Shuttled Parking
The City has the ability to shuttle guests from a remote location to the park using
rented buses. There are five potential locations for shuttle parking. Each of these
locations is within a 2-mile drive of the park. Without approaching capacity, staff
believes these sources could offer an additional 150 stalls.
1. The Dove Library
2. The Farmer's Insurance Building
3. The Safety Center
4. The Fleet Maintenance & Future Public Works Facility
5. Carlsbad Municipal Water District Headquarters
6. Carrillo Ranch Park
7. Aviara Community Park
PARKING PLANS
Primary Plan
The primary plan for parking will be implemented for normal operations. This is
the condition for which the parking lot has been designed. Under normal
operations, all park amenities are planned to be at capacity with the required
parking indicated in the demand study. Normal use would not include events like
regional softball tournaments, Little League Opening Day, Jazz in the Park, or
Carnivals.
In addition, the aquatics complex will be at capacity for normal use. Normal use
would not include events like high school or regional swim meets.
The demand for normal operations is 532 stalls. The supply of 546 meets this
requirement.
Non-Conflicting Special Events
For events like Little League Opening Day and weekly high school swim meets
that occur during non-operation recreation swim times, there will be 286 parking
stalls available for use.
Back-up Plan
Beyond normal operations, there will be times when semi-special events will
occur at the park. Semi-special events would be softball tournaments and high
school swim meets. Under normal scheduling conditions the on-site parking will
allow these events to occur. When the park is operating at capacity, semi-special
events will likely not be scheduled.
It is important to note that the aquatics recreation component will be closed
during a portion of the year. I will be open for operations from April 16th until
October 15th. This means between October l6'h and April lS'h, there will be 286
parking stalls available to the remainder of the park.
• •
In the case where a semi-special event is scheduled during the time when the
recreation component is open, overflow parking will be permitted on Alicante
Road. There would be no more than 5 softball tournaments per year during the
peak aquatics recreation time. The tournaments would require an additional 60
stalls. There would be no more than 3 high school swim meets during peak
recreation swim. The swim meets would require 50 stalls. Swim meets and
softball tournaments will not be scheduled for the same day. The 74 stalls
available on Alicante Road for overflow parking would be adequate to handle
either of these demands.
Worst-Case-Scenario Plan
In a worst case senario, there may be a need for shuttle parking.
Special Events
Special events like Jazz in the Park, a regional swim meet, or a carnival
could potentially occur during the peak recreation swim time. For special
events like these, shuttle parking will be arranged in advanced so that
guests may park at one ot the seven City locations and be shuttled in. The
park has adequate drop off and lane width in aisles to accommodate buses.
Multiple Semi-Special Events
In the rare case more than one semi-special event is scheduled, shuttle
parking will be arranged in advance.
Primary Plan
Normal operations
Little League Opening Day
Other non-conflicting events
Back-Up Plan
High school swim meet
Softball tournament
Worst-Case-Scenario Plan
Regional swim meet
Jazz in the Park
Carnival/other
Multiple events
ALGA NORTE AQUATICS COMPLEX
PARKING SUPPLY
April 14, 2004
On Site
en -"' c c (]) ~
en o en .Q ~ en en til
(.) ·-(.) -~ Ol:J "0 a.. :;::::;(tt ·--:Ern ~ en -(]) (]) (]) (]) til (]) ~ a. 0 -~ ;;:: .r:: en ::::1 ~ cro erE -til -=> = til 0 <( (]) <( 0 <( ::::1 Cil a: () 0" <( <(
286 31 32 60 137
0 31 32 60 423
0 31 32 60 423
286 31 32 60 137
286 31 32 60 137
286 31 32 60 137
286 31 32 60 137
286 31 32 60 137
286 31 32 60 137
Over-Shuttle TOTAL
flow SUPPLY
•
546
546
546
74 620
74 620
74 150 770 • 74 150 770
74 150 770
74 150 770
.. • •
City of Carlsbad
ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
March 5, 2004
TO: Mike Grim, Project Planner
FROM: Clyde Wickham, Project Engineer
SUBJECT: FIRST REVIEW OF ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK,
CUP 04-08
The Engineering Department has completed a review of the above subject. We have
reviewed the application for completeness and offer the following engineering issues
that must be addressed before the public hearing for this project:
See memo from Planning Dept. regarding incomplete items.
\.Engineerin9:•l$$U~,$·•,• ,•,::,:m::•:•·•• .... ,il.l. il.m,·.··•:,::•········
1. The Title Report submitted with the application (submitted Feb. 9, 2004)
indicates Real Estate Collateral Management Company as the vested owner.
Please correct and submit an updated title report to verify ownership.
2. Revise the site plan to list the bearings, distances and curve data of the property
boundary. On the cover sheet, list the average daily traffic (ADT) generated by
this proposed project. Separate traffic generation by use. Back up generation
information with traffic study. Consider if access will require signalization. Callout
the proposed dimensions of driveways, isles and parking stalls.
3. List the sewer (EDU) and water (GPO) generated or required to serve this project
on the cover sheet. Depict the location of all existing street lights along the
property frontage with Poinsettia Lane and Alicante Road.
4. On the site plan, include cross sections of all streets adjacent to this project
(Poinsettia Lane and Alicante Road). Include cross sections for the 3 proposed
driveways as well as for the travel way and parking areas. Identify minimum
sections and conditions from Soils Report by Ninyo & Moore.
5. Include the grading quantities associated with this project (cut, fill, export, import,
remedial) expressed in cubic yards.
6. Revise the exhibits to depict all existing easements listed in the preliminary title
report dated October 17,2003 (or subsequent revised title report). The title report
lists agreements and encumbrances that could affect "clear title" please resolve.
An example of encumbrances are: Item #2 reimbursement agreement, Item #3
Future Improvements, # 3, Affordible Housing Agreement #1 0, and Access
restrictions # 12. These issues affect development and "clear title" of the
property.
• • R:\Land Development\Pianners\Mike Grim\CUP (Park) lssues1.doc
7. Plot all proposed easements for this project.
8. The existing topography should be screened back a little to provide a clear view
of what is proposed. Proposed contours, grades, spot elevations and details
should be provided. A complete review of the civil plans is impossible, given the
missing detail and information.
9. A drainage report is necessary to review the proposed development and design.
10. The existing utilities in Alicante Road should be shown. The water line is shown
as a dead end at the northern boundary of this project. DWG 400-81 has details
of improvements, reclaimed water and sewer that should be shown on the
proposed development plans. Identify drawing numbers where appropriate. On
the precise grading and drainage plan, depict the proposed onsite fire hydrant
using the legend symbol.
11. Revise the exhibits to identify the 0 100 and the new established floodplain per
Villages of La Costa (LOMR). If this information is not available submit an
application for SUP to develop within the existing floodplain. The storm drain in
Poinsettia Lane could be flowing under pressure from previous design (Villages
of La Costa). Consider the impacts of adding an at grade inlet that could flood
the park.
12.11 appears that grading is proposed over the existing sewer easements along the
southerly property line. Submit letters of support or acceptance from each
agency that is impacted with the proposed design. Show how maintenance
crews can access, maintain and repair these facilities.
13. Revise the site plan to demonstrate how the SWPP and structural BMPs will
drain after a storm event has passed (Poinsettia Lane I Alicante Rd.).
14. Submit a preliminary SWPPP to clarify how 100% of the storm flows are being
treated ensile. The calculations for storm water filtration should satisfy numeric
sizing per the RWQCB. In general, it good practice to ensure that the post-
development flows or velocities do not exceed the pre-development flows or
velocities. Staff also suggests looking into a flow-based bmp, versus a volume-
based bmp.
15. Please demonstrate how Fire, Trash and service trucks will access, park, and
unload on-site. Single unit trucks, using a 407E -turning template, should
accomplish the maneuvers with no more than a 3 point operation to turnaround.
If the pool chlorinator uses large (1 ton or greater) cylinders of liquid chlorine, a
Semi Truck turn template should be considered (407-D). Check with Fire Dept.
for specific access issues.
16. Revise the site plan to demonstrate how the on-site fire hydrants will be served
with a public waterline. If a proposed 8-inch waterline is required to serve the
potable and fire flow needs, please depict an approximate alignment of the new
facility. Callout size, pressure zone and material of the existing public waterline
(in Alicante Road and Poinsettia Lane) that will be used to serve this project. If
this project will be protected with a sprinkler system (check with Fire
Department), show this fire service and backflow prevention location on the site
plan as well.
• • R:\Land Development\Pianners\Mike Grim\CUP (Park) Jssues1.doc
17. Revise the site plan to depict the proposed or existing sewer and water laterals
that will serve this project. Use "S" or "Sewer'' instead of SS on proposed
facilities. Include material (PVC) proposed.
18. Revise the site plan to callout the distance from the northern driveway to
Planning Area 1.6. Show or demonstrate that the proposed access is same as
approved location (recorded) per Final Map for CT 99-03. Show limits of
development including proposed pads and correct elevations for Villages of La
Costa Planning Area 1.6. El Camino Real.
If you have any questions, please either see or call me at 760-602-2742.
c: Robert Wojcik, Deputy City Engineer
File
•.
CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Protection Services
PROJECT CONDITION REPORT
PROJECT NAME: Alga Norte community park
Date: 3/4/04
Project number: Planning CUP 04-08
Mike Grim
Project conditions: (Note: This commentary identifies specific conditions necessary
to achieve Fire Department approval.)
Provide a site plan showing all proposed and existing fire hydrants within the park and on
Pointsettia and Alicante.
All buildings to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers
Show all paving areas to pools to insure access for medical aid.
All roads within the park need to be able to hold the weight of the fire apparatus.
All roads within the park to be minimum 20 feet wide and clear to a height of 13'6".
If pools are to be enclosed by fencing and the occupant load exceeds 100 the gates must
be equipped with panic hardware.
Code reminders: (Note: This commentary is provided to assist the applicant, and
identifies minimum code requirements that are frequently overlooked.
Colleen Balch
•
August5,2003
TO:
FROM:
RE:
SENIOR PLANNER, GRIM
PARK PLANNER, BRADSTREET
ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK
•
We are attempting to develop a parking standard for dog parks that could
be applied to Alga Norte Community Park. Through extensive research we
have concluded that there is no know parking standard for dog parks in
San Diego County or elsewhere. We have therefore created a standard
using our experience with the existing dog facility at Larwin Park as a
guideline.
Based upon the following methodology, we have found that the dog park
at Alga Norte Community Park should have 16 parking stalls.
Larwin Park Standard
The existing Larwin Park dog facility is about .25 of an acre with 9 parking
stalls. During the first two years of operation, it was found that 9 stalls
were inadequate. For the development of the remainder of the park, we
are adding 5 more stalls to the dog park, so that the total will be 14. There
will be 14 parking stalls for a .25-acre dog park.
Parking Demand
The proposed dog park at Alga Norte will be a .50-acre facility. Since the
proposed dog park is twice the size of Larwin's facility, there should be
twice the number of parking stalls. Thus, there should be 28 stalls for
Alga Norte's .50-acre dog park.
Common Facilities Parking Credit
The proposed park design provides a large parking lot to serve the south
end of the park, of which 69 stalls are for the baseball fields and 14 stalls
• •
are for the dog park. This is a total of 83 stalls in the large parking lot to
serve these uses.
Planning Ordinance #21.44.050 allows a 15% reduction in parking for
common facilities, normally applied to adjacent properties. If we use this
same approach for determining parking demand for adjacent park uses, a
15% reduction of the 83 stalls required is a 12 parking stall credit.
The parking demand for the proposed dog park is 28 stalls. Subtracting
the 12-stall credit, we arrive at a total of 16 stalls required.
Parking Supply
Based upon the above method of reasoning, we have provided a total of
16 stalls to serve the Alga Norte Community Park dog park facility.
Scott Bradstreet
Park Planner
, • •
June 17, 2002
TO: MUNCIP AL PROJECTS MANAGER-JOHN CAHILL
FROM: Principal Planner-Don Neu
Associate Engineer-Clyde Wickham
SUBJECT: ALGA NORTE PARK MASTER PLAN CONCEPT PLANS
In order to avoid possible future problems with the design and approval of plans for the Alga
Norte Park we are providing Planning and Engineering comments on the concept plans shown on
the project website. We realize that these are conceptual plans for a master planning effort and
as such do not contain the level of detail that several of these comments address. However, in
order to avoid problems in implementing the eventual master plan we strongly recommend that
these comments be addressed at the master plan level. The following are the Planning and
Engineering comments on the first concept plans:
1. At a minimum the concept plans should demonstrate compliance with the standards of
the Villages of La Costa Master Plan that apply to Area 1.5 and the applicable overall
master plan standards. This includes building and landscape setbacks, height limits,
compliance with the landscaping requirements and palette of the master plan, providing a
link to trails identified in the master plan, lighting restrictions adjacent to the open space
area, and fire protection zone compliance along the site perimeter to list a few.
2. We are requesting the maintenance building be relocated from the southwest comer of
the site to another location that is less visible and does not require access from Poinsettia
Lane a major arterial. Park features that may have a negative visual impact should not be
visible from the perimeter of the site. Also at the proposed location the structure may
conflict with existing sewer easements.
3. Similar to item number 2 above we are also requesting that the off leash dog park not be
located at the northwest comer of the intersection of Poinsettia Lane and Alicante Road
or at the alternative location fronting Alicante Road at the northern boundary of the site.
Areas adjacent to project roadways will be very visible and this use would detract from
the visual quality of the area.
4. The conceptual layout of the parking Jot does not appear to be the most efficient use of
space or most desirable in regard to providing clearly defined routes of travel. In addition
this design results in a high percentage of the site's frontage on Alicante Road being a
parking lot. Further work on this component ofthe park design is needed.
5. The number of required parking spaces should be reviewed with the Special Projects staff
of the Planning Department. Should the number of required parking spaces need to be
modified this will have an impact on the area of the site available for park recreational
activities.
6. The orientation of the ball fields in relation to future roadways may create traffic hazards
with balls landing in travel lanes. It is recommended that the orientation of the fields be
revised.
, • •
7. The location, number and spacing of proposed access points on Alicante Road need to be
reviewed further. A hard copy of the plan drawn to scale is needed in order for this issue
to be reviewed further and some direction provided. The approved Tentative Map
indicates points of access for this site.
8. The access into each parking area needs to remain clear and unobstructed, consider this
project operating like an arterial. Consider queuing and a liberal design to maneuver into
the site. A Caltrans single unit truck (407E template) is required as a minimum to access
buildings, utility and trash enclosures.
It is recommended that future concepts plans be distributed for review and comment.
Specifically, the early consultation process should be followed to identify and resolve at the
earliest possible stage any potential design issues. Through the early consultation process input
from the Fire Department as well as the affected water and sewer agencies can be obtained.
Should you have any questions concerning these comments please feel free ither or
~th of us. ·~,,/k~r
DonNeu
c: Mark Steyaert
Scott Bradstreet
Bob Wojcik
Gary Wayne
Clyde Wickham
MCUP & WJP ANNUAL REVIFW SHEET
.------INSTRUCTIONS
1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY.
2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND
APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS).
3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE,
FIRE, ETC).
4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT
FOR THE REVIEW.
5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW.
6. HAVE PRINCIPAL PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN.
7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE
(ADMINWI_L_L_F_IL_E~)· __________________ ~
PROJECT INFORMATION
CASE NAME: Alga Norte Community Park
CASE NUMBER(S): -""C"""U"--P-"'04._-0""8'------------------
APPROVING RESO NO(S). ±..:PC~Ro=es~o~. ~N~o2:s.~6~03"-'9'--'a"'-n""d'-'6~04"'0'------------
PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: """B""ar'""b""ar""a'-'K""e""nn~e,.,dy:--_________ _
PROJECT HISTORY
Does project have a code complaint history?
If yes, check those that apply and explain below.
0 Code Enforcement 0 Police
0 Yes
Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained):
lSI No
0 Fire Prevention
Q:'-.CED'-.PLANNING'-.ADMIN'-. TEMPLATES'-.MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 02/11
• REVIEW INFORMATION •
Has the permit expired? DYes [8:1 No Permit expires: A££rDVed in 1Zer12etui!Y
Date of review: 3/29/12
Name: Patrick McCarn: D Applicant D Owner [8:1 Other
If other, state title: PEM Project Mana~:er
*CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name: Ci!Y of Carlsbad Parks & Rec. De12t. Phone: (760) 434-2855
Contact name (if different): Mark Stexaert, Park Develo12ment Manager
Address: 799 Pine Avenue Suite 200 Carlsbad CA 92008
Mailing (if different):
E-mail: mark.stexaert@carlsbadca.~:ov (optional)
*CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: Ci!Y of Carlsbad Phone:
Contact name (if different):
Address:
Mailing (if different):
E-mail: (optional)
Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans?
IZJ Yes D No If no, list below the condition(s) and/ or plan aspects the project is
not in compliance with per resolution number or exhibit.
N I A project has not been constructed.
Corrective action(s) to be taken:
NIA
Permits for grading and construction were obtained in 2007-2008 and are considered to
still be valid.
Construction is expected to commence in late May/ early June 2012.
Da~ COiljplj!ted fol;ow-up review and confirmed project compliance: ~ ..tl. '""~"'"·'h-/JIC?--=----
PI nner Signature / Principal Planner Signature
"Applicant and owner information must be updated for annual review to be complete.
Q:"\CED"\PLANNING"\ADMIN"\ TEMPLATES"\MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 02/11
--------------------------------,
MCUP &e::UP ANNUAL REV8W SHEET
INSTRUCTIONS
1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY.
2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND
APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS).
3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE,
FIRE, ETC.).
4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT
FOR THE REVIEW.
5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW.
6. HAVE PRINCIPAL PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN.
7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE
(ADMIN WILL FILE).
PROJECT INFORMATION
CASE NAME: Alga Norte Community Park
CASE NUMBER(S): ~C~U~P~04:!:-~08~----------------
APPROVING RESO NO(S). ±..:PC~R>=es~o!.:... ~N~o:!!:s . ..!!6~03"-'9~a~n~d~6~04,.,0,__ ________ _
PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: 2=B~ar~b~a~ra~K~enn~e~dJ-Y-----------
PROJECT HISTORY
Does project have a code complaint history?
If yes, check those that apply and explain below.
D Code Enforcement D Police
DYes
Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained):
[g) No
D Fire Prevention
Q:'\CED'\PLANNING'\ADMIN'\ TEMPLATES'\MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 02/11
.Ev'iEW' INFORMATION • Has the permit expired? DYes [:;;:;] No Permit expires: A1212roved in 12erj2etui\)'
Date of review: 3/26/13
Name: Patrick McGar!)' 0 Applicant 0 Owner 1:8] Other
If other, state title: PEM Project Manager
•CURRENf APPLICANf INFORMATION:
Name: Ci!J' of Carlsbad Parks & Rec. Dej2t. Phone: (760) 434-2855
Contact name (if different): Mark Stexaert, Park Develo12ment Manager
Address: 799 Pine Avenue Suite 200 Carlsbad CA 92008
Mailing (if different):
E-mail: mark.stexaert@carlsbadca.gov (optional)
•CURRENf OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: Ci!J' of Carlsbad Phone:
Contact name (if different):
Address:
Mailing (if different):
E-mail: . (optinnel\
Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans?
0 Yes D No If no, list below the condition(s) and/ or plan aspects the project is
not in compliance with per resolution number or exhibit.
Corrective action( s) to be taken:
None.
Permits for grading and construction were obtained in 2007-2008 and are considered to
still be valid.
Construction has commenced and is anticipated to be completed by Fall 2013.
CAGN monitoring began in February 2013.
Date planner completed follow-up review and confirZ::.::project compliance:
$w'J~ fvn~ 3}~C.Iz--13 ~;;/ ,-L---
Planner Signa re 1 1 "'Principal Planner Signature
*Applicant and owner information must be updated for annual review to be complete.
Q:'-CED'-PLANNING'-ADMIN'-TEMPLATES'-MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 02/11
MCUP & CtF ANNUAL REVIffittSHEET F 1 L~ CO'Y' I, ,.. . i
INSTRUCTIONS
1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY.
2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND
APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS).
3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE,
FIRE, ETC,).
4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT
FOR THE REVIEW.
5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW.
6. HAVE PRINCIPAL PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN.
7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE
(ADMIN WILL FILE).
PROJECT INFORMATION
CASE NAME: Alga Norte Community Park
CASE NUMBER(S): CUP 04-08
APPROVING RESO NO(S). 6039 6040
PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: Chris Garcia
PROJECT HISTORY
Does project have a code complaint history? D Yes I:8J No
If yes, check those that apply and explain below.
D Code Enforcement D Police D Fire Prevention
Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained):
H/ADMIN/TEMPLATE/MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 03/09
tJVIEW INFORMATION • Has the permit expired? DYes ['8J No Permit expires: Per12etuity
Date of review: 3/8/2011
Name: N/A D Applicant D Owner D Other
If other, state title:
*CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name: City of Carlsbad Phone: 760-434-2826
Contact name (if different): Mark Steyaert
Address: 799 Pine Ave. Carlsbad CA 92008
Mailing (if different):
E-mail: mark.steyaert@carlsbadca.!;OV (optional)
*CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: City of Carlsbad Phone: 760-434-2941
Contact name (if different): Kyle Lancaster
Address: 799 Pine Ave. Carlsbad CA 92008
Mailing (if different):
E-mail: kvlP l~n. ~ ~ . (option~ I\
Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans?
~Yes 0 No If no, Jist below the condition(s) and/ or plan aspects the project is
not in compliance with per resolution number or exhibit.
Corrective action(s) to be taken:
Da~ner ~ plet~d follow-up review and ?11med project crliance: ~ :., , .0;:2 ~ Ch
Planner Signature Principal Planner Signature
*Applicant and owner information must be updated for annual review to be complete.
H/ ADMIN/TEMPLATE 03/09
MCUP&~P ANNUAL REVIf~l SHEET
INSTRUCTIONS
1. COMPLETE PROJECT INF ORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY.
2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESO
APPROVED PLANS (COO
LUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND
RDINATEWITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS).
3. REVIEW CODE COMPLA INT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE,
FIRE, ETC.).
4. CONTACT APPLICANT (0 R OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT
FOR THE REVIEW.
5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFO RMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW.
6. HAVE PRINCIPAL PLANN ER REVIEW AND SIGN.
7. PLACE COMPLETED REV
(ADMIN WILL FILE).
lEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE
PRO JECT INFORMATION
munity Park
39 6040
lEW: Chris Garcia
CASE NAME: Alga Norte Com
CASE NUMBER(S): CUP 04-08
APPROVING RESO NO(S). 60
PLANNER COMPLETING REV
PROJECT HISTORY
aint history? Does project have a code compl
If yes, check those that apply an d explain below.
0 Code Enforcement D Police
DYes
Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained):
H/ ADMJN/TEMPLATE/MCUPANNU ALREVJEWSHEET
~No
D Fire Prevention
03/09
-n -; ..
C'> C>
'i!
• REVIEW INFORMATIOr-e
Has the permit expired? DYes ~No Permit expires: Peq2etui!Y
Date of review: 3 I 11 I 2010
Name: N/A 0 Applicant D Owner 0 Other
If other, state title:
*CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name: Ci!Y of Carlsbad Phone: 760-434-2826
Contact name (if different): Mark Steyaert
Address: 799 Pine Ave. Carlsbad CA 92008
Mailing (if different):
E-mail: mark.steyaert@carlsbadca.gov (optional)
*CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: Ci!Y of Carlsbad Phone: 760-434-2941
Contact name (if different): Kyle Lancaster
Address: 799 Pine Ave. Carlsbad CA 92008
Mailing (if different):
E-mail: kyle.Iancaster@carlsbadca.gov (optional)
Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans?
IZ] Yes D No If no, list below the condition(s) and/ or plan aspects the project is
not in compliance with per resolution number or exhibit.
Corrective action(s) to be taken:
Date ~l;~~ner complete~ follow-up review and confirm~nce:
,:MM,~ ,#./
Planner Signature Principal Planner Signature
*Applicant and owner information must be updated for annual review to be complete.
H/ ADMIN/TEMPLATE 03/09
MCUP &.UP ANNUAL REV'*W SHEET
INSTRUCTIONS
1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY.
2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND
APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS).
3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE,
FIRE, ETC.).
4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT
FOR THE REVIEW.
5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW.
6. HAVE PRINCIPAL PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN.
7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE
(ADMIN WILL FILE).
PROJECT INFORMATION
CASE NAME: Alga Norte Community Park
CASE NUMBER(S): ~C~Ue!..P...!!0:2:4-~0~8 -----------------
APPROVING RESO NO(S). !!:60~3z9~6~0~40,!__ _____________ _
PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: ~M.!2cik~e._G~ri.!2cm!...._ ___________ _
PROJECT HISTORY
Does project have a code complaint history?
If yes, check those that apply arid explain below.
0 Code Enforcement 0 Police
0 Yes
Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained):
H /ADMIN/TEMPLATE/ MCU PANNUALREVIEWSHEET
[8J No
0 Fire Prevention
03/09
-..... •..
·: ..
'
~EVIEW INFORMATION • Has the permit expired? DYes [8:1 No Permit expires: N I A
Date of review: 4/7/09
Name: Mark Steyaert [8:1 Applicant D Owner D Other
If other, state title: Parks Develo12ment Manager
*CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name: Cit)' of Carlsbad Parks De12artment Phone: 760-434-2826
Contact name (if different): Mark Steyaert-Parks Develo12ment Manager
Address: 799 Pine A v. Carlsbad CA 92008
Mailing (if different): same
E-mail: mark.steyaert@carlsbadca.gov (optional)
*CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: Cit)' of Carlsbad Phone: 760-434-2941
Contact narne (if different): Kyle Lancaster-Parks Su£erintendent
Address: 799 Pine Av. Carlsbad CA 92008
Mailing (if different): same
E-mail: J..· ,Jp lanr"' ~Q:OV . (vpuumt!J
Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans? D Yes [8J No If no, list below the condition(s) and/ or plan aspects the project is
not in compliance with per resolution number or exhibit.
Facilit):: has yet to be graded and constructed -no conditions of a1212roval aRRl):: at this
time.
Corrective action(s) to be taken:
N/A
1 D•~F~'"' ,.;jow·up <ovi•w •nd '""!''""d pwj"t <Ompli•nre' ~ I W1l /) {__ ~~ / ..-.... /' . ;:, (__., -&---
I'fanrler Signature V Principal Planner Signature
*Applicant and owner information must be updated for annual review to be complete.
H/ ADMIN/TEMPLATE 03/09
-·
--------------------------------
December 21, 2005
Scott Bradstreet
Recreation Department
City of Carlsbad
• Cit
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr
Carlsbad CA 92008
of • Carlsbad
SUBJECT: CUP 04-08-ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK
Your application has been tentatively scheduled for a hearing by the Planning Commission on
March 1, 2006. However, for this to occur, you must submit the additional items listed below. If
the required items are not received by February 7, 2006, your project will be rescheduled for a
later hearing. In the event the scheduled hearing date is the last available date for the City to
comply with the Permit Streamlining Act, and the required items listed below have not been
submitted, the project will be scheduled for denial.
1. Please submit the following plans:
A) Ten (1 0) copies of your site plans, landscape plans, building elevation plans,
floor plans on 24" x 36" sheets of paper, stapled in complete sets folded into
9" x 12" size.
B) One 8%" x 11" copy of your reduced site plan, building elevation and floor
plans. These copies must be of a quality which is photographically
reproducible. Only essential data should be included on plans.
2. As required by Section 65091 of the California Government Code, please submit the
following information needed for noticing and sign the enclosed form:
A) 600' Owners List -a typewritten list of names and addresses of all property
owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant
and/or owner. The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel
number from the latest equalized assessment rolls.
B) Mailing Labels -two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners
within a 600 foot radius of the subject property. The list must be typed in all
CAPITAL LETTERS, left justified, void of any punctuation. For any address
other than a single-family residence, an apartment or suite number must be
included but the Apartment, Suite and/or Building Number must NOT appear in
the street address line. DO NOT type assessor's parcel number on labels. DO
NOT provide addressed envelopes -PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable
fonts are: Arial 11 pt, Aria! Rounded MT Bold 9 pt, Courier 14 pt, Courier New 11
pt, and MS line Draw 11 pt. Sample labels are as follows:
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @
CUP 04-08-ALGA NOR' COMMUNITY PARK
December 21, 2005
Paqe2
UNACCEPTABLE
Mrs. Jane Smith
123 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3
Carlsbad, CA g2008
UNACCEPTABLE
Mrs. Jane Smith
123 Magnolia Ave.
Apt. #3
Cansbad, CA 92008
•
ACCEPTABLE
MRS JANE SMITH
APT3
123 MAGNOLIA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
D) Radius Map -a map to scale, not less than 1" = 200', showing all lots entirely
and partially within 600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property.
Each of these lots should be consecutively numbered and correspond with the
property owner's list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale
acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical.
MICHAELGRI
Senior Planner
MG:bd
Attachment
. ..
-· • •
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITTED TO
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE
INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES.
APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER
APPLICANT OR APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE
BY: -----------------------
DATE:---------------------
RECEIVED BY
DATE: ____________________ ___
• • Landscape Architecture
Environmental Planning
WIMMI'R YAMADA AND CAUGHEY
August 31, 2004
Mr. Michael W. Grim
City of Carlsbad, Planning Department
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314
Project:
Re:
Dear Mike:
Alga Norte Community Park
CUP Partial Resubmission
RECEIVED
srP o 1 2004
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPT
Joseph Y. Yamada, FASLA
Patrick W. Caughey, ASLA
Principals
3067 Fifth Avenue
San Diego, CA 92103•5840
619·232•4004
Fax 619·232·0640
CA Reg II 528,2895
AZ Reg II 22729
NV Reg II 280
In response the the Issues of Concern letter from your department dated August
19, 2004, the following responses correspond to the comments and the partial
plan submission of all amended drawings:
Planning:
1. Dimensions added to civil engineering plans, refer to sheets C1.1-C1.3.
2. Building coverage information provided on title sheet, refer to sheet T-1.
3. Comment was for information only. Slope analysis and sections provided on
sheet C1.4.
4. Comment was for information only. Special Use Permit is not required.
5. Parking during events to be discussed at meeting September 1, 2004.
6. Color rendering provided as part of submission. East elevation of aquatics
complex at 1/8" scale.
Engineering:
Engineering comments were also provided via redlines from Mr. Van Peski
directly to civil engineering consultant These amendments are also included in
attached plans.
1. Structure shown beside maintenance building is a portable Low-Boy dumpster
shown at the request of the Parks maintenace staff concerned with adequate
access. Dumpster will not conflict with sewer force main.
2. Letter to be provided under separate cover from Mr. Bradstreet in Parks and
Recreation.
3. Grading note added to plans.
4. Water Quality Technical Report modified to address comments and provided
under separate cover from civil engineer to Mr. Van Peski directly.
• •
Fire Department:
1. Comment for information only. Note added to sheet L-1.1 that all buildings
will be sprinklered.
2. Small graphic added to plan to show location of all three emergency vehicle
gates ensuring medical aid.
3. Comment for information only. Roadways within park will be sufficient to
support necessary fire apparatus.
4. Comment for information only. Roadways will meet necessary width/height
requirements.
5. Comment for information only. Aquatic center pedestrian exits and door will
be equipped with panic hardware.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns. Thank you
very much.
Sincerely,
Stephanie Hatton, RLA, ASLA
Senior Associate
cc: John Cahill/Scott Bradstreet, City Parks and Recreation
Brad Hilliker, WYAC
Rick Berg, REB Engineering (via fax)
File 03-002,4thCUP resp memo,6-31-04,1et,MG,sh
... • •
-· r.r:t~'r-':--nrrrrw-tHT
August 26, 2004
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Dear Mike,
SENIOR PLANNER, GRIM
Park Planner, Bradstreet
CUP 04-08-ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
This letter is to clarify the floodplain delineation for Alga Norte Community
Park and to address the Special Use Permit application required for
completeness review.
As you are aware, Planning Item #1 of the letter dated June 14, 2004
requests a clarification of the floodplain delineation and the processing of
a Special Use Permit concurrent with the Conditional Use Permit. In
addition, Item #20 of the supplemental letter dated July 13, 2004 refers to
this topic by requesting a copy of the Greens CLOMR.
We have tried to obtain a copy of the GreensNillages CLOMR from O'Day
Consultants (who originally did the CLOMR) but have been unsuccessful.
It is our understanding the City's engineering review consultant, Glen Van
Peski, has been successfully in obtaining a copy of the CLOMR from
O'Day. Please refer to that copy.
Our design consultants have performed some preliminary studies of the
hydrology and will be submitting them to help support the Greens/ Villages
CLOMR.
Findings
In short, our consultants have found that the floodplain no longer exists on
the project site. The Master Development has diverted the watercourse
once directed onto the project site into a headwall and 72" storm drain
before it reaches the site. The stormwater is then conveyed in an
underground storm drain system located in Alicante Road, which
discharges into the detention basin downstream of the site. This
essentially has removed the project site from the boundaries of the
floodplain.
• • •
We understand the project will be conditioned to prepare a LOMR at the
end of development. However, our proposed development will not alter the
existing GreensNillages CLOMR. We are working within its confines since
we are not altering it. When the GreensNillages have completed
development, the Master Developer will be required to file a LOMR to
cover the entire GreensNillages development, which will include our
project site. We therefore, do not see a need to file a LOMR for our
specific site in the future.
Please provide further direction if it is required.
Sincerely,
(
tZ/P~----
Bradstreet,
Park Planner
Cc: Municipal Projects Manager
Stephanie Hatton, WYAC
Rick Berg, Rick Berg Engineering
August19,2004
Scott Bradstreet
•
Cit
City of Carlsbad Recreation Department
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad CA 92008
of • Carlsbad
SUBJECT: CUP 04-08-ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK
Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department
has reviewed your Conditional Use Permit, application no. CUP 04-08, as to its completeness
for processing.
The items requested from you earlier to make your Conditional Use Permit, application no. CUP
04-08 complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning Department. It has been
determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing
of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by
the date of this communication.
Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that
could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review. Any issues should be
resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the City may request, in
the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise,
supplement the basic information required for the application.
Please contact your staff planner, Michael Grim, at (760) 602-4623, if you have any questions
or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
MJH:MG:vd
c: Don Rideout
Glen Van Peski
File Copy
Data Entry
Planning Aide
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @
• •
ISSUES OF CONCERN
No. CUP 04-08-ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK
Planning:
1. Please indicate the distances between all adjacent structures and/or buildings. Please
also dimension all required structural and parking area setbacks (where applicable).
2. Please provide the total building coverage in the summary table on the title sheet.
3. Based upon the information provided, a Hillside Development Permit is required for the
proposed grading on natural slopes with over 40% inclination.
4. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision, dated &*&*&*&*, states that the grading
conducted on the park site, if done as indicated, removes the property from the 100-
year floodplain. Therefore, a Special Use Permit is not required.
5. The parking amounts have been established using previous experiences with other
parks and estimates from specialists in aquatic complexes. Some operational and/or
physical provisions must be made for sporting events and tournaments, swim meets,
and other special events that would increase the parking demand above the typical daily
operating levels.
Any offsite parking areas used for such extra parking would need to possess parking
supply above that required by code for the uses which it serves. Most City facilities are
parked very close to the code requirements and, therefore, do not have extra parking
supply for overflow parking. In addition, some operational restrictions may not be in
keeping with the services anticipated for the park. It is suggested that a meeting be set
with Planning Department and Recreation Department staff to further discuss this issue.
6. The proposed architecture is being reviewed as to its conformance with the Villages of
La Costa Master Plan. A colored rendering of the some of the building elevations would
assist that review.
Engineering:
1. Add a description of what appears to be some sort of structure, adjacent to the
maintenance building, that is over the top of the existing 12" sewer force main.
2. Provide Jetter of permission from Vallecitos Water District indicating their acceptance of
fill placed over their sewer force main.
3. Add note to sheet one indicating remedial grading is proposed under pavement areas.
4. Address comments in the Water Quality Technical Report (WQTR).
Fire Department:
1. All buildings to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers.
2. Please show all paving areas and fencing access points to demonstrate how access for
medical aid is ensured.
3. All roads within the park need to able to hold the weight of the fire apparatus.
• •
4. All roads within the park must be a minimum 20 feet wide and clear to a height of 13
feet, six inches.
5. If pool areas are to be enclosed by fencing and the occupant load exceeds 100, the
gates just be equipped with panic hardware.
OPEN
SPACE
STRONG
COMMUNITY
LIFELONG
LEARNING
SAFE PLACES
TO GATHER
e
of Carlsbad
e
City
I ;lfid I*' I k·' .• •l§ ·t• a I I el§ ,, I
August 10, 2004
TO: SENIOR PLANNER, GRIM
FROM: Park Planner, Bradstreet
RE: ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK
This memorandum addresses the remaining issues of concern for Alga
Norte Community Park's Conditional Use Permit. The items from the
Planning Department's original letter are numbered and listed below.
Planning
Item Response
1. Special Use Permit-Application to follow.
2. Hillside Development Permit-Application to follow.
3. This item requests verification of the Constraints Map's accuracy
with regard to San Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub, Riparian
Woodland, and Floodplain Scrub. In response, the proposed site for
this park development is within the boundaries of the Villages of La
Costa EIR and HMP, which has been approved by the City
Planning Department. Prior to purchase of the property, Morrow
Development cleared this project site. The existing property
boundaries were surveyed and identified in the field with orange
fencing. As of today, the only plant material existing within the
entire site are erosion control grasses. Attached for reference are
photos taken after the site clearing.
Engineering
Item Response
13. A copy of the final Title Report with the City of Carlsbad named as
the owner was recently sent to your attention. Please confirm it has
been received.
18. Title for the property has been cleared and transferred to the City of
Carlsbad.
22. We are currently working with Vallecitos Water District and the City
of Carlsbad to obtain the necessary easements, but do not have
final approval yet. We request this item go forward as a condition of
approval.
30. Hazardous materials
www.ci .carlsbad .ca. us
1200 Carlsbad Village D rive Carlsbad, CA 92008-1989 (760) 434-2826 FAX (760)720-1967
• •
• The park maintenance building will require storage of typical
materials; fertilizer, pesticides, herbicides, etc. All materials will
be in conformance with governing codes and standards.
• The pool equipment building will contain two each, one ton
cylinders of compressed gas chlorine. One of the containers will
be connected to the plumbing system with a chrlorine scrubber,
the other will be in storage. There will also be an emergency
generator with a 50 gallon diesel tank. Mechanics of the
operation will be reviewed by the City Fire Marshall and Building
Department as a part of the Building Permit process.
With these items addressed, we are requesting a confirmation that the
only outstanding items are Planning Items #1 and #2. We also would like
confirmation it would be acceptable to include Engineering Item #22 as a
conditi f approval.
Scott Bradstreet,
Park Planner
Cc: Municipal Projects Manager
•
·--· .__, • ~ Environmental Planning
WIMME'PYAMADA AND CAUGHEY
M E
TO:
COMPANY:
FAX NO:
M 0 R A N D u
Mr. Michael W. Grim, Senior Planner
City of Carlsbad
M
RECEIVED
JUL 2 7 2004
FROM:
(760) 602-8559
Stephanie Hatton ~a-M~-__..,..,. . CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT: Alga Norte Community Park PLANNING DEPT.
SUBJECT: Plan Check Response Memo
DATE: July 27, 2004 Total Pages:
Comments:
Mike:
Attached please find the City's original completeness plan check memo. The
pages have been numbered to facilitate comparing responses as I do not have
the comments electronically for editing.
Responses:
Page 1:
1. Tables and information requested included on titlesheet (T1.1) .
2. Dimensions provided on civil engineering plans.
3. Fencing and wall schedule provided on landcape plan (L 1.1 ). Some further
consideration for fencing and walls will be part of the development of the art
program for the park.
4. Accessible paths of travel (minimum of 6' in all areas) are indicated on detail
plan (L 1.1 ). Currently all park walks and paths will be completely accessible, but
this exhibit delineates the critical paths from public right-of-way to all venues
within park.
5. Fire hydrants located on civil engineering plans.
6. Water demand information provided on utility table (T1.1 ).
7. Fire flow demand information provided on utility table (T1.1 ).
8. There are no planned pressure reducing stations on-site. Off-site per VOLC.
9. Water phasing plan provided (L 1.5).
10. Recycled water use map provided (L 1.5).
Page 2:
11. Information provided on utility table (T1.1 ).
12. Street light locations provided on civil plans.
13. Title report to be submitted under separate cover.
Joseph Y. Yamada, FASLA
Patrick W. caughey, ASLA
Principals
3067 Fifth Avenue
~n Diego, CA 92103 • 58
619•232•4004
Fax 619·232·0640
CA Reg I 528,2895
AZ Reg I 22729
NV Reg I 280
• •
14. Traffic information provided on titlesheet (T1.1) and in updated Traffic Letter
Report included.
15. Information provided on utility table (T1.1 ).
16. Typical street sections provided on civil engineering plans.
17. Grading quantity information provided on titlesheet (T1.1).
18. Easements depicted on civil engineering plans per current title report.
19. Easements plotted on civil engineering plans.
20. Drainage information shown on civil engineering plans.
21. Existing utilities shown on civil engineering plans.
22. Letters to be provided under separate cover by Parks and Recreation.
Page 3:
23. WQTR to follow under separate cover.
24. Truck access provided on civil engineering plans.
25-29: Information provided on architectural drawings.
30. Information to be provided by Parks and Recreation.
31. Information provided on architectural drawings.
Issues of Concern:
1. Glen Van Peske to provide copy of CLOMR. Developer of Villages of La
Costa will be responsible for processing LOMR for all work associated with
VOLC development including any field changes such as the addition of the berm
on park site. Any subsequent impacts due directly to park development will be
addressed by the park at final engineering.
2. Hillside development permit for any impacts of development to be processed.
Page 4:
3. See site conditions diagram and photographs on landscape plan (L 1.2). Site
was cleared under an approved H.C.P. by the Villages of La Costa in 2003.
4. Total parking space counts corrected for consistency.
Sa. City wide and local trails located on plans prepared by others (streetscape
plans for Alicante Road and Poinsettia Lane). Alga Norte Community Park will
provide accessible paths of travel from to/from these trails at three locations -the
park's two entries, and at the dog park on the southern edge of the project.
5b. Concur-light shall be directed away from open space and shielded as
necessary.
5c. Not used.
5d. Concur-final plant selection during final engineeringwill respect native
transition to provide adequate fire protection zone.
5e. Concur-streetscape provided by others in plans for Alicante Road and
Poinsettia Lane.
5g. No lighting will illuminate any residential areas past 10:00 pm due to grade
differential and lack of proximate residential development.
6. Plan check comments to be addressed when received.
.. • •
Pages 5-7 appear to be a photocopy of previous comments and have been
addressed elsewhere in current comments.
Pages 8-10 (Comments from Glen Van Peski):
COMPLETENESS ITEMS
1. Include the following information on the site plan: Agree-added
a. Site Acreage
b. Districts providing services
c. Average Daily Traffic by use
d. Existing Zoning and General Plan designations
e. Earthwork volumes
f. Source of existing topography
g. Drawing number of stockpile plan
2. Dimension building setbacks as noted on the redlines. Redlines not provided
3. Show proposed grades in parking areas. Agree-added
4. Show proposed easements for public water lines. Agree-added
5. Include a legend to explain the symbols used for proposed improvements.
Agree-added
6. Show access openings per recorded Map 14543 to compare to current proposed
entrances. Agree-added
7. Clarify different retaining wall symbols used. Agree-added to legend/notes
8. Dimension widths of adjacent streets. Agree-added
9. Show and label existing trail easements per Map 14543. Agree-added
10. Show existing and proposed utility easements on the preliminary landscape plan,
and remove proposed trees from all easements. Trees removed from
easements
ISSUES
11. Show cross-section of proposed Keystone wall adjacent to Alicante Road, and
delineate limits of reinforcing grids. This will be a emu wall per rsd.
12. Title report lists Real Estate Collateral Management as the property owner, but
the plans show the City of Carlsbad as owner. Clarify. City purchased
property-copy of current title report follows under separate cover.
13. Show a landscape vignette/section for the riparian character bioswale. Is this
going to be open and grassy or overgrown? Coordinate with the Police Dept.
regarding security considerations. Agree-added to both engineering and
landscape drawings.
' . • •
14. Clarify the extent of the structure proposed over the top of the 12" sewer force
main. Refer to letter from Scott Bradstreet to Engineering Dept.
15. Clarify which of the existing sewer/effluent lines have been located, or are
proposed to be relocated by this project. We are not proposing to relocate
and ex. sewer lines.
16. Check clearances between proposed sewer and water and existing
sewer/effluent lines. Agree-clearances ok accept for new sewer x'ing rw.
Will relocate rw as required and sleeve sewer if required
17. Provide letter of permission from Vallecitos Water District indicating their
acceptance of fill placed over their sewer force main. In progress (Scott
Bradstreet)
18. Revise sewer connection location to provide enhanced clearances between the
new sewer and the existing storm drain and reclaimed water. Agree-see #16
response
19. The soils report calls out differential settlement in non-structural areas of up to 5
inches. Even though the pavement grades are substantial, a 5" settlement could
cause potholes and disrupt drainage. Clarify if any remedial grading is proposed
under pavement areas. Agree-remedial grading will be required under pvmt.
areas
20. Provide a copy of the Greens CLOMR. This project will be conditioned to
prepare a LOMR to reflect the final grading and the resultant floodplain limits.
Disagree-Hunsaker is preparing LOMR. City should already have a copy of
the CLOMR.
21. Revise assertion in the Water Quality Technical Report (WQTR) that the existing
open space has the potential to generate the same pollutants as the proposed
hundreds of parking spaces, dog park, etc, or provide justification. Agree-
modified
22. If food services are proposed with the Water Park, this constitutes additional
possible pollutants that should be included in the WQTR. Agree-modified
23. Show proposed permeable pavement areas on the site plan. Removed-no
permeable pvmt. on site.
24.Show proposed Storm Filter location on site plan. Agree-added
The WQTR discusses dry wells, but no locations are shown on the site plan.
Either remove from the WQTR or show on the site plan. If dry wells are
proposed, show that the onsite soils are appropriate for dry wells. Removed-no
dry wells proposed
June 14, 2004
Scott Bradstreet
City of Carlsbad Recreation Department
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr
Carlsbad CA 92008
SUBJECT: CUP 04-08-ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK
Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department
has reviewed your Conditional Use Permit, application no. CUP 04-08, as to its completeness
for processing.
All of the items requested of you earlier have not been received and therefore your application
is still deemed incomplete. Listed below are the item(s) still needed in order to deem your
application as complete. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner
by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list
must be included with your submittals, including five (5) sets of plans. No processing of
your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required
materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the
application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be
initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was
initially filed, February 9, 2004, to either resubmit the application or submit the required
information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to
determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the
application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be
submitted.
Please contact your staff planner, Michael Grim, at (760) 602-4623, if you have any questions
or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application.
Sincerely,
~~R
Planning Director
MJH:MG:bd
c: Don Rideout
Clyde Wickham
Colleen Balch
File Copy
Data Entry
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008·7314 • (760) 602·4600 • FAX (760)602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @
• •
LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED
TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION
No. CUP 04-08-ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK
The following items were derived from comparing the submitted plans and documents to the
incomplete items listed in the previous correspondence, dated March 8, 2004.
1. Please provide a summary table on the title sheet of the site plan containing the
following information:
a. Assessor's parcel number for the site;
b. Site acreage;
c. Existing Zoning and General Plan Land Use designations;
d. Proposed land use;
e. Total building coverage;
f. Building square footage (broken down by building and use within the building);
g. Percent of site to be landscaped;
h. Number of parking spaces required and provided (broken down by use);
i. Average Daily Traffic generated by the project;
j. Name of sewer, water, and school district providing service to the project;
k. Earthwork volumes: cut, fill, import, and export (in cubic yards).
2. Please indicate the distance between all adjacent buildings and/or structures. Please
also dimension all required structural and parking area setbacks (where applicable).
3. Please show and label all proposed fencing and walls; please note materials and
provide illustrations.
4. Please show location and dimension of all accessways and pathways required for
compliance with Title 24 -State Accessibility Requirements.
5. Please show all existing and proposed fire hydrants associated with the project, and all
existing, off-site fire hydrants within 300 feet of the project boundary, including any
existing and proposed fire hydrants on Poinsettia Lane and Alicante Road.
6. Please show average and peak potable water demand in gallons per minute (gpm).
7. Please show fire flow demand in gallons per minute (gpm); calculate using table
attached to Land Use Review Application.
8. Please provide a map or diagram showing existing and proposed on-site and off-site
pressure reducing stations and fire hydrants.
9. Please show a water phasing plan.
10. Please provide a colored recycled water use area map (all areas proposed to be
irrigated with recycled water must be clearly indicated on the map in color). Also include
peak irrigation or industrial water demand in gallons per minute (gpm) and existing or
proposed recycled water pipelines, pressure reducing stations, reservoirs and pumping
stations.
• •
11. Please indicate the average sewer generation in million gallons per day (mgd) and
indicate all proposed sewer facility phasing.
12. Please depict the location of all existing street lights along the property frontage with
Poinsettia Lane and Alicante Road.
13. The Title Report submitted with the application (submitted Feb. 9, 2004) indicates Real
Estate Collateral Management Company as the vested owner. Please correct and
submit an updated title report to verify ownership.
14. On the cover sheet, list the average daily traffic (ADT) generated by this proposed
project. Separate traffic generation by use. Back up generation information with traffic
study. Consider if access will require signalization. Callout the proposed dimensions of
driveways, isles and parking stalls.
15. List the sewer (EDU) and water (GPD) generated or required to serve this project on the
cover sheet. Depict the location of all existing street lights along the property frontage
with Poinsettia Lane and Alicante Road.
16. Include cross sections for the 3 proposed driveways as well as for the travel way and
parking areas. Identify minimum sections and conditions from Soils Report by Ninyo &
Moore.
17. Include the grading quantities associated with this project (cut, fill, export, import,
remedial) expressed in cubic yards.
18. Revise the exhibits to depict all existing easements listed in the preliminary title report
dated October 17,2003 (or subsequent revised title report). The title report lists
agreements and encumbrances that could affect "clear title" please resolve. An example
of encumbrances are: Item #2 reimbursement agreement, Item #3 Future
Improvements, # 3, Affordable Housing Agreement #1 0, and Access restrictions # 12.
These issues affect development and "clear title" of the property.
19. Plot all proposed easements for this project. Water easements are typically considered
public and should be plotted.
20. Please show the required spill way for the Drainage Dike along the northern boundary.
The drainage report appears complete for this phase of design. Specific comments will
follow in a few weeks.
21. The existing utilities in Alicante Road should be shown. The water line is shown as a
dead end at the northern boundary of this project. DWG 400-81 has details of
improvements, reclaimed water and sewer that should be shown on the proposed
development plans. Identify drawing numbers where appropriate. On the precise
grading and drainage plan, depict the proposed onsite fire hydrant using the legend
symbol. Maybe you missed my point on this issue there is a new drawing that extends
the improvements north of this project. Please show these and call out the appropriate
drawing number.
22. It appears that grading is proposed over the existing sewer easements along the
southerly property line. Submit letters of support or acceptance from each agency that is
impacted with the proposed design. Show how maintenance crews can access, maintain
and repair these facilities.
• •
23. The SWPP submitted appears to be satisfactory for this stage of design and planning. I
will follow up with specific comments on this plan. I believe the Dog Park section of the
site is missing BMP to separate and filter this area. It is located at the end of the bio
swale with no means for filter or pollution control.
24. Plot this information on the site plan. Please demonstrate how Fire, Trash and service
trucks will access, park, and unload on-site. Single unit trucks, using a 407E -turning
template, should accomplish the maneuvers with no more than a 3 point operation to
turnaround. If the pool chlorinator uses large (1 ton or greater) cy~nders of liquid
chlorine, a Semi Truck turn template should be considered (407-D). Check with Fire
Dept. for specific access issues.
As noted on the title sheet of the submitted site plan, no building elevations were included in
this resubmittal. Listed below are the incomplete items noted for the original building plan
submittal as contained in the March 8, 2004 correspondence for your reference.
25. Please augment the submitted building elevations to show the location of any proposed
exterior lighting and the proposed color scheme.
26. Please provide elevations (with coloring scheme) for the proposed overhead shade
structures.
27. Please indicate the ceiling height or height of the underside of the roof in any building
areas intended for storage uses.
28. Please indicate the California Building Code occupancy classification of all building
uses.
29. Please indicate the type of construction of all buildings per the California Building Code.
30. Please disclose any building uses that will result in the presence of Acutely Hazardous
Materials, Compressed Flammable Gases in excess of 1 ,500 pounds, Flammable
Liquids in excess of 10,000 gallons, Hazardous Materials in excess of 500 pounds or 55
gallons, or compressed gas in excess of 200 cubic feet.
31. Please show all screening for the proposed rooftop equipment. All roof-mounted
equipment shall be installed in accordance with Building Department Policy 80-6 (copy
attached).
ISSUES OF CONCERN
Planning:
1. Please clarify the status of the floodplain delineation. The Villages of La Costa EIR
indicates that a Letter of Revision is required prior to development of the site or a
Special Use Permit -Floodplain must be processed concurrent with the Conditional Use
Permit.
2. By comparing the Constraints Map and the civil drawings, it would appear that grading
and/or development is proposed on natural slopes with over 40% inclination. Therefore
a Hillside Development Permit is required. Enclosed are the specific materials required
for a Hillside Development Permit submittal.
• • •
3. The Constraints Map identifies areas covered by Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub, Riparian
Woodland, and Floodplain Scrub in the area proposed for development. Please verify
the accuracy of this mapping and, if correct, provide a biological report indicating the
extent of habitat removal and proposed mitigation.
4. According to the architectural site plan, there are 545 parking spaces proposed;
however, there are 553 parking stalls shown on the civil drawings. Please revise the
site plan(s) to be consistent.
5. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan contains General Design Criteria and Special
Design Criteria for Area 1.5. Given the information on the submitted plans, it is difficult
to ascertain if the proposal complies with these criteria therefore they are listed below.
Please incorporate these design criteria into the project design.
a. There are two trails located within Area 1.5: a City-wide Trail and a Local Trail.
The location, width, and surfacing of these trails should be identified on the site
plan. The design criteria require that landscaping be employed judiciously to
soften views of the structures and parking lots from pedestrians and bicyclists
using the Local Trail Link that passes through the area. Large expanses of
unarticulated structure or roof-line should not be viewable to passers-by.
b. Lighting adjacent to the natural open space areas shall be selectively placed,
shielded and directed away from the open space.
d. A Fire Protection Zone which separates developed areas and manufactured
slopes from HCP open space areas will be incorporated where necessary so as
to have limited, if any, impact on the open space areas.
e. Common streetscape and landscape areas shall conform to the community
requirements stated in the Master Plan (street trees, landscape zones, entries,
irrigation systems, walls, fencing, lighting, etc.) to provide consistency in design
and quality.
f. All walls and fences located within 15 feet of the public right-of-way shall provide
recesses for landscaping and variations in materials.
g. Any lighting for recreation areas that will illuminate a residential area past the
hour of 10:00 p.m. shall be clearly identified on the site plan. All lighting shall be
designed to reflect downward and avoid, to the greatest extent possible, any
impacts on adjacent homes or property.
6. The submitted landscape plans have been forwarded to the City's Landscape Plancheck
Consultant for a review of consistency with the City's Landscape Manual and the
Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Comments will follow under a separate
correspondence.
Engineering:
1. Engineering issues of concern to follow under a separate correspondence.
•
Stephanie Hatton
Wimmer Yamada and Caughey
•
RECEIVED
~·:1 ? I 2004
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPT.
RE: City of Carslbad-CUP Assessment Letter dated March 8, 2004
Please find our response to the City of Carlsbad's assessment of the Alga Norte
Community Park CUP submittal documents, regarding the application of architectural
character. (Item #7 of the assessment letter).
Description of design:
We believe that the proposed Architectural Design of Alga Norte Park is in keeping with the
spirit of the Villages of La Costa Mater Plan. Specifically we feel the building designs are
inspired by the Mediterranean and Mexican types referenced to in the residential guidelines,
such as Santa Barbara Mediterranean, Spanish Colonial, and Italian.
The overall planning and design of the proposed building structures are based upon the
simple elegant forms of buildings and villages in Italy, Greece, Morocco and Spain. These
are the same influences that shaped the design of the Mexico's Spanish Colonial style and
Santa Barbara's Mediterranean style.
Smaller scale park buildings will have a simple rural character appropriate to their location
within the greater park environment. While the main aquatics complex buildings are
arranged in small program groups that help form outdoor courtyards, patios and plaza
areas. In this way the main complex will act as a small village within the valley, separate
from other development; yet. built using the applicable goals stated within the architectural
controls section of the Villages of La Costa Mater Plan (see below).
The building are intended to draw from the indigenous color (a warm earth tone) of the soil
found on the slopes around the park site to form a consistent architectural design within this
small village and appropriate to the location within the valley.
The proposed design uses simple forms, highlighted by unique and special architectural
details. Pedestrian friendly scale is achieved around all of the major building edges and
access points with the use of covered arcades and accent colors. Landscape design is
integrated with the buildings to form pedestrian friendly courtyards, patio spaces and
plazas. These spaces will be ameliorated with water, color, shade trellises, and well-
organized plant groups.
In summary, we feel the building designs will co-exist within the Master Plan area due to the
use of unifying elements, such as regional style, color, material, massing and pedestrian
scale.
• •
Comments about the application of the Master Plan:
It should be stated that the language in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, Section 4.0
MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, Subsection 4.6
Architecture and Site Planning, Encourages the following:
Individual neighborhood Identities, that blends with the overall community character.
We strongly believe the location of the Alga Norte Park, while within the La Costa Greens
sub-area is a physically separate landform and as such should respond to the Site Planning
Standards stated in section 4.6.2
''The purpose of this section is to insure that the physical development of the Villages of La
Costa avoids monotonous, repetitive appearances within each neighborhood and
throughout the community as a whole. •
As such we feel that this civic complex of buildings should not look like the many recreation
centers designed as part of the individual homeowners association complexes. While a
residential scale and look might work for elements within a residential development, they
are not at all appropriate to a large civic environment such as the Alga Norte Park site.
Architectural style:
Further, it is our reading of the Master Plan, that the 8-predefined architectural styles are
clearly intended for residential application as indicated by both the language of Section
4.6.3 and by the images and diagrams shown in Section C-Architectural Styles.
Section 4.6.3 sets forth the architectural controls applicable to all residential development
within this Master Plan.
For reference we are providing response to the stated goals of section 4.6.3 as follows:
Section 4.6.3-Architectural Controls
A. GOALS
1. Overall Concepts
a. Refers to HOMES adjacent to roadways
b. Refers to the use of single story elements on RESIDENTIAL
design
c. Refers to RESIDENTIAL neighborhoods
d. Refers to varied massing of structures to create a high degree of
street scene variety. The proposed design has a great degree of
massing variation as scene from either street.
e. Allows for use of Unique Design Features and Special
Architectural Details in lieu of off-setting planes-The proposed
design has many unique design features and details, such as the
use of:
1. deep set door and window openings
2. pedestrian arcades
3. trellis structures
4. water features
5. accent colors
6. and a village-like building complex
• •
f. Encourage the use of special landscape design features-The
proposed plan features, courtyards, specimen trees and patio
spaces.
In closing we would like to state our support for the Villages of Ia Costa Master Plan and the
intentions it projects for a diverse yet harmonious community. We feel the proposed Alga
Norte Park plan and building designs will compliment these goals, while further enriching
the civic character of this wonderful community of Carlsbad.
With regards,
for ARCHITECTS hanna gabriel wells
James Gabriel, AlA
Principal
CC: file
March 8, 2004
Scott Bradstreet
• Cit
City of Carlsbad Recreation Department
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr
Carlsbad CA 92008
of
SUBJECT: CUP 04-08-ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK
Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department
has reviewed your Conditional Use Permit, application no. CUP 04-08, as to its completeness
for processing.
The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information
which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted
directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted
simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including
five (5) sets of plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is
determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When all required
materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the
application is determined to be complete, processing tor a decision on the application will be
initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was
initially filed, February 9, 2004, to either resubmit the application or submit the required
information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to
determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the
application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be
submitted.
Please contact your staff planner, Michael Grim, at (760) 602-4623, if you have any questions
or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
MJH:MG:bd
c: Don Rideout
Clyde Wickham
Data Entry
Pat Caughey, Wimmer, Yamada, and Caughey
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @
• •
LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED
TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION
No. CUP 04-08-ALGA NORTE COMMUNITY PARK
The following items were derived from comparing the submitted plans and documents to the
City of Carlsbad Application Requirements for Conditional Use Permit checklist (copy attached).
1. Please provide a summary table on the title sheet of the site plan containing the
following information:
a. Assessor's parcel number for the site;
b. Site acreage;
c. Existing Zoning and General Plan Land Use designations;
d. Proposed land use;
e. Total building coverage;
f. Building square footage (broken down by building and use within the building);
g. Percent of site to be landscaped;
h. Number of parking spaces required and provided;
i. Average Daily Traffic generated by the project;
j. Name of sewer, water, and school district providing service to the project;
k. Earthwork volumes: cut, fill, import, and export (in cubic yards).
2. Please show the legal description of the exterior boundaries of the site (approximate
bearings, distances, and curve data).
3. Please indicate the distance between all adjacent buildings and/or structures. Please
also dimension all required structural and parking area setbacks (where applicable).
4. Please show and label all proposed fencing and walls. Please dimension or indicate the
height and materials proposed and indicate the type of retaining wall construction
proposed.
5. Please show location and dimension of all accessways and pathways required for
compliance with Title 24 -State Accessibility Requirements.
6. Please show approximate contours at one foot intervals for slopes less than 5%; two
foot intervals for slopes between 5% and 1 0%; and five foot intervals for slopes over
10%.
7. Please show the method for draining each area within the project site.
8. Please show the location, width, and/or size of all watercourses and drainage facilities
within and adjacent to the site; show the location and approximate size of any proposed
detention/retention basins.
9. Clearly show and label the 1 00-year flood line for before and after conditions.
10. Please show all Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be used to reduce storm water
discharge during the "use" or existing development phase.
11. Please provide typical cross sections for all streets adjacent to the project.
• •
12. Please show the width, location, and use of all existing and/or proposed easements.
13. Please show the distance between all intersections and medium and high use
driveways.
14. Please clearly show the parking stall, aisle, and driveway dimensions as well as truck
turning radii for all parking areas.
15. Please show all existing and proposed fire hydrants associated with the project, and all
existing, off-site fire hydrants within 300 feet of the project boundary, including any
existing and proposed fire hydrants on Poinsettia Lane and Alicante Road.
16. Please show average and peak potable water demand in gallons per minute (gpm).
17. Please show fire flow demand in gallons per minute (gpm); calculate using table
attached to Land Use Review Application.
18. Please provide a map or diagram showing existing and proposed on-site and off-site
pressure reducing stations and fire hydrants.
19. Please show a water phasing plan.
20. Please provide a colored recycled water use area map (all areas proposed to be
irrigated with recycled water must be clearly indicated on the map in color). Also include
peak irrigation or industrial water demand in gallons per minute (gpm) and existing or
proposed recycled water pipelines, pressure reducing stations, reservoirs and pumping
stations.
21. Please indicate the average sewer generation in million gallons per day (mgd) and
indicate all proposed sewer facility phasing.
22. Please submit landscape plans with containing the following information:
a. Landscape zones per the City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual;
b. Typical plant species, quantity of species and their size for each planting zone in
a legend (use symbols);
c. An estimate of the yearly amount of irrigation (supplemental) water required to
maintain each zone;
d. Water Conservation Plan;
e. Any applicable fire suppression zones as required by the Landscape Manual.
23. Please augment the submitted building elevations to show the location of any proposed
exterior lighting and the proposed color scheme.
24. Please provide elevations (with coloring scheme) for the proposed overhead shade
structures.
25. Please indicate the ceiling height or height of the underside of the roof in any building
areas intended for storage uses.
26. Please indicate the Uniform Building Code occupancy classification of all building uses.
27. Please indicate the type of construction of all buildings per the Uniform Building Code.
• •
28. Please disclose any building uses that will result in the presence of Acutely Hazardous
Materials, Compressed Flammable Gases in excess of 1,500 pounds, Flammable
Liquids in excess of 10,000 gallons, Hazardous Materials in excess of 500 pounds or 55
gallons, or compressed gas in excess of 200 cubic feet.
29. Please show all screening for the proposed rooftop equipment. All roof-mounted
equipment shall be installed in accordance with Building Department Policy 80-6 (copy
attached).
ISSUES OF CONCERN
NOTE: Due to the incomplete nature of the plans only a minimal amount of project issues
could be discerned. Additional project issues will be identified once the above referenced
information is provided. Therefore, many of the following issues contain advisory notes as to
the regulations applicable to the proposed development.
Planning:
1. Please clarify the status of the floodplain delineation. The Villages of La Costa EIR
indicates that a Letter of Revision is required prior to development of the site or a
Special Use Permit -Floodplain must be processed concurrent with the Conditional Use
Permit.
2. Without the proposed grading being shown, it is difficult to ascertain if the project
proposes development on steep slopes. Once this information is provided, it can be
determined if the project requires a Hillside Development Permit.
In addition, the grading and retaining walls that are shown (behind the pool complex) do
not relate to the underlying topography (e.g. top of footing for a wall at elevation 150 feet
located near the 165 foot contour and proposed grading contours stopping without tying
into the underlying topography). It would appear that many more tall retaining walls
other than the one shown are necessary to accommodate the development. It should
be noted that all retaining walls over six feet in height must be of aesthetically pleasing
design, plantable, and irrigated. Every effort should be made to split tall retaining walls
to allow substantial planting at the base and top of each wall.
3. Without the proposed grading being shown, it is difficult to ascertain if the project
proposes development into Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS). No mention of CSS
encroachment is contained in the submitted Environmental Impact Assessment Part I.
Once this information is provided, it can be determined if the project is consistent with
applicable environmental regulations.
4. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan development standards for Area 1.5 require
parking lot and structural setbacks from Alicante Road and Poinsettia Lane. The
minimum setback for either feature is 30 feet from Alicante Road and 50 feet from
Poinsettia Lane. It would appear that the proposed parking area and the northernmost
proposed shade structure encroach into the Alicante Road setback.
5. No information regarding traffic generation was provided. The Villages of La Costa EIR
contains estimates as to the maximum amount of traffic generated by this use; any
substantial increase in traffic would necessitate additional environmental review.
• •
6. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan contains General Design Criteria and Special
Design Criteria for Area 1.5. Given the absence of information on the plans, it is difficult
or impossible to ascertain if the proposal complies with these criteria therefore they are
listed below. Please incorporate these design criteria into the project design.
a. There are two trails located within Area 1.5: a City-wide Trail and a Local Trail.
The location, width, and surfacing of these trails should be identified on the site
plan. The design criteria require that landscaping be employed judiciously to
soften views of the structures and parking lots from pedestrians and bicyclists
using the Local Trail Link that passes through the area. Large expanses of
unarticulated structure or roof-line should not be viewable to passers-by.
b. Landscaping adjacent to the natural open space areas shall be compatible with
existing natural vegetation.
c. Lighting adjacent to the natural open space areas shall be selectively placed,
shielded and directed away from the open space.
d. A Fire Protection Zone which separates developed areas and manufactured
slopes from HCP open space areas will be incorporated where necessary so as
to have limited, if any, impact on the open space areas.
e. Common streetscape and landscape areas shall conform to the community
requirements stated in the Master Plan (street trees, landscape zones, entries,
irrigation systems, walls, fencing, lighting, etc.) to provide consistency in design
and quality.
f. All walls and fences located within 15 feet of the public right-of-way shall provide
recesses for landscaping and variations in materials.
g. Any lighting for recreation areas that will illuminate a residential area past the
hour of 10:00 pm shall be clearly identified on the site plan. All lighting shall be
designed to reflect downward and avoid, to the greatest extent possible, any
impacts on adjacent homes or property.
7. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan contains specific architectural design criteria and
allows eight different architectural styles. Based upon discussions with Planning
Department management and the Villages of La Costa Master Plan planner, the
proposed architectural style does not incorporate a sufficient amount of the architectural
elements of any of the eight architectural styles. Please review the Master Plan
architectural criteria and incorporate more elements of one or more of the styles into the
project design. It may be helpful to also review the design of the Master Plan recreation
area {located east of the park site, north of Poinsettia Lane in Area 1.7) as an example
of the type and quality of architectural design expected in the Master Plan.
8. Without the proposed landscaping being shown, no comments as to the project's
compliance with the requirement of the City's Landscape Manual can be made. The
Manual also contains standards for parking lot landscaping. Please incorporate the
following standards into the project design:
a. Trees shall be provided at a minimum rate of one per every four parking stalls.
Trees pertaining to this requirement shall be located within the parking area,
exclusive of parking lot setbacks.
• •
b. Planting or any combination of planting, mounding, and decorative walls shall be
used to provide screening from adjacent streets of the parking area to a height of
three (3) feet.
c. Each unenclosed parking facility shall provide a perimeter landscape strip of at
least eight (8) feet on all sides. The perimeter landscape strip may include any
landscaped setback and shall be continuous except for required access points.
d. At all vehicular access points, landscape elements shall be less than 30 inches in
height (including plants measured at maturity).
e. Please see the attached "Parking Lot Diagram" for additional planting width
standards.
9. In addition to the requirements of the City's Landscape Manual, the Villages of La Costa
Master Plan contains design criteria for the community park site. Please refer to the
Master Plan and incorporate those design criteria into the project design.
10. There are numerous lines on the site plan that are not labeled and it is not readily
obvious what they indicate. Please clarify all markings on the site plan, preferably with
labels and/or clear symbology.
Engineering:
1. The Title Report submitted with the application (dated October 17, 2003) indicates Real
Estate Collateral Management Company as the vested owner. Please correct and
submit an updated title report to verify ownership.
2. Please provide the Average Daily Traffic generated by the use, in total and separated by
use. Back-up the traffic generation information provided with traffic study. Consider if
access will require signalization at the park entry driveways.
3. List the sewer (EDU) and water (GPO) generated or required to serve this project on the
cover sheet.
4. Depict the location of all existing street lights along the property frontage with Poinsettia
Lane and Alicante Road.
5. On the site plan, include cross sections of all streets adjacent to this project (Poinsettia
Lane and Alicante Road). Include cross sections for the 3 proposed driveways as well
as for the travel way and parking areas. Identify minimum sections and conditions from
Soils Report by Ninyo & Moore.
6. Revise the exhibits to depict all existing easements listed in the preliminary title report
dated October 17,2003 (or subsequent revised title report). The title report lists
agreements and encumbrances that could affect "clear title" please resolve. An
example of encumbrances are: Item #2 reimbursement agreement, Item #3 Future
Improvements, # 3, Affordable Housing Agreement #1 0, and Access restrictions # 12.
These issues affect development and "clear title" of the property.
• •
7. The existing topography should be screened back a little to provide a clear view of what
is proposed. Proposed contours, grades, spot elevations and details should be
provided. A complete review of the civil plans is impossible, given the missing detail and
information.
8. A drainage report is necessary to review the proposed development and design.
9. The existing utilities in Alicante Road should be shown. The water line is shown as a
dead end at the northern boundary of this project. DWG 400-81 has details of
improvements, reclaimed water and sewer that should be shown on the proposed
development plans. Identify drawing numbers where appropriate. On the precise
grading and drainage plan, depict the proposed onsite fire hydrant using the legend
symbol.
10. Revise the exhibits to identify the 0 100 and the new established floodplain per Villages of
La Costa (LOMR). If this information is not available submit an application for Special
Use Permit-Floodplain to develop within the existing floodplain (see Planning Issue #1 ).
The storm drain in Poinsettia Lane could be flowing under pressure from previous
design (Villages of La Costa). Consider the impacts of adding an at-grade inlet that
could flood the park.
11. It appears that grading is proposed over the existing sewer easements along the
southerly property line. Submit letters of support or acceptance from each agency that
is impacted with the proposed design. Show how maintenance crews can access,
maintain and repair these facilities.
12. Submit a preliminary Storm Water Protection Plan (SWPP) to clarify how 100% of the
storm flows are being treated onsite. The calculations for storm water filtration should
satisfy numeric sizing per the RWQCB. In general, it good practice to ensure that the
post-development flows or velocities do not exceed the pre-development flows or
velocities. Staff also suggests looking into a flow-based BMP, versus a volume-based
BMP. Revise the site plan to demonstrate how the SWPP and structural BMPs will drain
after a storm event has passed (Poinsettia Lane/ Alicante Rd.).
13. Please demonstrate how Fire, Trash and service trucks will access, park, and unload
on-site. Single unit trucks, using a 407E -turning template, should accomplish the
maneuvers with no more than a 3 point operation to turnaround. If the pool chlorinator
uses large (1 ton or greater) cylinders of liquid chlorine, a Semi Truck turn template
should be considered (407-D). Check with Fire Dept. for specific access issues.
14. Revise the site plan to demonstrate how the on-site fire hydrants will be served with a
public waterline. If a proposed 8-inch waterline is required to serve the potable and fire
flow needs, please depict an approximate alignment of the new facility. Callout size,
pressure zone and material of the existing public waterline (in Alicante Road and
Poinsettia Lane) that will be used to serve this project. If this project will be protected
with a sprinkler system (check with Fire Department), show this fire service and
backflow prevention location on the site plan as well.
15. Revise the site plan to depict the proposed or existing sewer and water laterals that will
serve this project. Use "S" or "Sewer" instead of SS on proposed facilities. Include
material (PVC) proposed.
• •
16. Revise the site plan to callout the distance from the northern driveway to Planning Area
1.6. Show or demonstrate that the proposed access is same as approved location
(recorded) per Final Map for CT 99-03. Show limits of development including proposed
pads and correct elevations for Villages of La Costa Planning Area 1.6. El Camino Real.
Fire Department:
1. All buildings to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers
2. Show all paving areas to pools to insure access for medical aid.
3. All roads within the park need to be able to hold the weight of the fire apparatus.
4. All roads within the park to be minimum 20 feet wide and clear to a height of 13'6".
5. If pools are to be enclosed by fencing and the occupant load exceeds 100 the gates
must be equipped with panic hardware.