The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCUP 04-16; Bressi Pump Stations; Conditional Use Permit (CUP)0 ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) USE ONLY) D Administrative Permit D Planned Industrial Permit D Administrative Variance D Planning Commission Determination D Coastal Development Permit D Precise Development Plan [I] Conditional Use Permit . f?tf --lh D Redevelopment Permit 0 Condominium Permit D Site Development Plan D Environmental Impact w Special Use Permit OCf--o-6 Assessment ECR Corridor D General Plan Amendment D Specific Plan D Hillside Development Permit D +eAtati•.•e PaFsel Ma13 Obtain from Engineering Department D Local Coastal Program D Tentative Tract Map Amendment D Master Plan D Variance D Non-Residential Planned D Zone Change Development D Planned Development Permit D List other applications not specified 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 213-120-03 3) PROJECT NAME: Bressi Recycled and Potable Water Pump Stations 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Pump stations for the conveyance of recycled and potable water 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) Carlsbad Municipal Water District Carlsbad Municipal Water District Contact: William E. Plummer Contact: William E. Plummer MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS 1635 Faraday Avenue 1635 Faraday Avenue CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE Carlsbad CA 92008 (760) 602-2768 Carlsbad CA 92008 (760) 602-2768 I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND KNOWLEDGE. CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. .a/~ r:·P~4~~ S-Zv.-01::_ 4dt'~~~ 5-ZtJ~tZI I eo 7 SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Easement within APN 213-120-03 NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. D£V ocfOS53 Form 1 6 Rev, 04/04 PAGE 1 OF 2 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: STREET ADDRESS ON THE I East SIDE OF El Camino Real (NAME OF STREET) BETWEEN (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) Palomar Airport Road (NAME OF STREET) AND Gateway Road (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 17 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS ~11) NUMBER OF EXISTING EJ12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF QJ RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION ~14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ [;;] 15) PROPOSED COMM GJ SQUARE FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED ~17) PROPOSEDINCREASEIN ~ 18) PROPOSED SEWER GJ PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE ADT USAGE IN EDU 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE B20) EXISTING GENERAL ~21) PROPOSED GENERAL ~ PLAN PLAN DESIGNATION 22) EXISTING ZONING ~23) PROPOSED ZONING 0 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. 1/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE Atl~L.P~~ SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED cu {J f ('U/) v I TOTAL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID I Form 1 6 Rev. 04/04 JUN 0 4 2004 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT. DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: RECEIPT NO. I w!A • PAGE 2 OF 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) USE ONLY) D Administrative Permit D Planned Industrial Permit D Administrative Variance D Planning Commission Determination D Coastal Development Permit D Precise Development Plan [I] Conditional Use Permit D Redevelopment Permit D Condominium Permit D Site Development Plan D Environmental Impact w Special Use Permit Assessment .ECR Corridor D· General Plan Amendment D Specific Plan D Hillside Development Permit · D +eRtati•.•e PaFael Ma~ Obtain from Engineering Department D Local Coastal Program D Tentative Tract Map Amendment D Master Plan D Variance D Non-Residential Planned D Zone Change Development D Planned Development Permit D List other applications not specified 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 213-120-03 31 PROJECT NAME: Bressi Recycled and Potable Water Pump Stations 41 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Pump stations for the conveyance of recycled and potable wate 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) Carlsbad Municipal Water District Contact: William E. Plummer MAILING ADDRESS 1635 Faraday Avenue CITY AND STATE Carlsbad CA ZIP 92008 TELEPHONE (760) 602-2768 I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND KNOWLEDGE. :=z-~ ~ / coRREc; r~ THE •:sr oF ~WLEOGE. (! ~~t£.i(P'(_ .A1/4i//AnaZ:7~e~ G-JcJ~ tf. SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE . DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Easement within APN 213-120-03 NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00P.M. ·~ •... ) 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: STREET ADDRESS ON THE East SIDE OF El Camino Real (NAME OF STREET) BETWEEN (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) Palomar Airport Road (NAME OF STREET) AND I Gateway Road (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 17 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS ~11) NUMBER OF EXISTING @]12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION ~14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ ~15) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE 16) PERCENT AGE OF PROPOSED ~17) PROPOSEDINCREASEIN ~ 18) PROPOSED SEWER PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE ADT USAGE IN EDU 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE ~20) EXISTING GENERAL ~21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN PLAN DESIGNATION 22) EXISTING ZONING EJ23) PROPOSED ZONING EJ Q] GJ G ~ 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. 1/WE CONSENT T~E Sl NATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: TOTAL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: BRESSI RECYCLED AND POTABLE WATER PUMP STATIONS APPLICANT NAME: CITY OF CARLSBAD Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: The Bressi Recycled Water Pump Station will supply recycled water from the 550 zone to the 680 zone. The Bressi Potable Water Pump Station will supply potable water from the 490 zone to the 700 zone. The work to be performed includes the furnishing of all labor and equipment and furnishing and installing all materials necessary for the complete and satisfactory construction of the Bressi Recycled and Potable Water Pump Stations. The work shall consist of installing temporary fencing; all utility location and verification (excavating, exposing, and verifying top, bottom, and side of utility facilities); all earthwork (including trenching, shoring, bedding, backfilling including select imported material or select native material); furnishing, installing, and testing all piping and appurtenances; connecting to existing pipelines; constructing two pumping stations; furnishing and installing two hydropneumatic tanks; protecting in place or removing and replacing all existing utilities and improvements; constructing asphalt concrete pavement; fencing; constructing all Portland Cement concrete; constructing masonry block walls; furnishing and installing ornamental steel fencing and gates; testing all equipment, pipe, and appurtenances; performing all related electrical work (including coordination with SDG&E); disposing of excess soil and rock material and restoring all areas and improvements to preconstruction conditions. Project Description 1 0/96 Page 1 of 1 DISCLOSURE" STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require I discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission ()r Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. · 1. · APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) 2. Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the· names, title, addresses of all individuals owning. more than 10% of the shaies.~IF-.NO. INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE TIIAN 10% OF TilE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A} IN TilE SPACE BELOW If a publicly-owned comoration. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Wi 11 i am E. P 1 ummer Corp/Part. _____________ _ Title Deputy City Engineer Title _____________ _ Address 1635 ·Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Address·--------:-------- Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corooration or partnership, include the names, title, addresses· of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF TilE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned corporation. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Pg~n 13rw~ .16~/h::JL Title \(tc€ r{?BtQe.tT: Address !&>fib 2-~f?h/ Ad/G .:::F/?-'{IN ? J t-4'i 'i U,t '1- Title ______________ _ Address _____________ _ 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organizatfdrt or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. · Non Profit!frust ________ _ Non Profit!frust. __________ _ Title. ___________ _ Title ______________ _ Address ___________ _ Address ---------------- 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12)1months? D Yes '[X] No If yes, please indicate person(s): __________________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of applicant/date ~-,s1 12M& Y&vea;fH ~NI, LU!- Print or type name of owner 1 Print or type name of applicant Stgnature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date William E. Plummer Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent ... -· •••n--• .... ...-r-n\r"\1~,.. City of Carlsbad I il ifi II II I .1. I •I§ ·Ei j I I .I§ II I DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defmed as "Any individual, fmn, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county,, city and,,county; city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit" Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity or-the applicant and, property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a comoration or partnership, include the ·· names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares .. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publicly-owned comoration. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person William E. Plummer Corp/Part. ____________ _ Title Deputy City Engineer Title _____________ _ Address 1635 Faraday Avenue Address. ____________ _ Carlsbad, CA 92008 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a comoration or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned comoration. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person William E. Plummer Corp/Part. ____________ _ Title c/o CMWD, Deputy City Eng Title ______________ _ Address. ___________ _ Address _____________ _ 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 G) 3. I'*' NON-PROFIT ~ANIZATION OR TRUST 0 If any person identified pursuant to ( 1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organizati:6n or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust. ________ _ Non Profit/Trust. __________ _ Title ____________ _ Title. _____________ _ Address ___________ _ Address _____________ _ 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12)1months? DYes D No If yes, please indicate person(s): _____________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant 42//~/#4~ ~c;/t>d Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date / William E. Plummer Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 City of Carlsbad l:;)fiJ,J,II.t.l•l¥1·Fi3 i .. t§ ,J 1 HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT Consultation OfLists of Sites Related To Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of California Government Code Section 65962.5, I have consulted the Hazardous Wastes and Substances Sites List compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): l2t] The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. D The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name:. 8~s 1 _{?~A f>enraoP u-I?NT i.L(! . ~~ I Address: fV S All.e"S ~ l2.f?Ur..S. ~/Lou-[> Name:Willjam E. Plummer c/o CMWD Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue I ff D L. f3tt-ap£EN A v~, .:t7.. i/1 Af€ r zi1f tf!/Z.~/z Phone Number. CJt/1.. 1st.~ S 9 s;l:j Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone Number: 7">-(QQ2, -27&,8 Address of Site:-------------------------------~ Local Agency (City and County): City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego A~~~·s~~~~~F~n~er.~2~1~3_-~12~0~-~0~3 _________________ _ Specify list(s): DTSC' s Hazardous Waste· and Substance Site List Regulatory Identification Number:~N:.:..I.:....:A _______________________ _ Date ofList:__:5'!...J./....!:2:..:::0.L./~04.:...._ __________________________ _ / './//:~-_¢" ~ {ly::;3t?~t?f ~VI/V~h~" / ~--t:t:L-=. _, Appucant Signature/Date . Ptoperty Owner Signature Admin!Counter/HazWaste 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad. CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX f7Rm ~n,~ot::c:l"ll ~ The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Co11ese List' 1s a plannrng ac==~~~-: used by the State, local agencies and developer~ :o comoi~' w1tti tne Calibrr.;2 Environmental Quality Act requirements in providrng rritorrr.atron aoour t:---~ :.:.:at::-~ :· hazardous matenals release sites. Government Code se:::on 65962.5. re.JUires tne California Environmental Protection Agency to develop at 1east annuall~· an updated Cortese List. Below is a list of agencies that maintain information re;JardmG Ha.::ar.J~~s Waste and Substances Sites. Department of Toxic Substances Control www.dtsc.ca.aov/database/catsites Calsites Hotline (91 6) 323-3400 State Water Resources Control Board www. swrcb. ca. aov/cwphomellustis County of San Diego Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) Mike Dorsey Chief, Hazardous Materials Division Department of Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials M~nagement Division Mailing address: P.O. Box 129261 San Diego, CA 92112-9261 (619) 338-2395 Call Duty Specialist for_ General Questions at (619) 338-2231 fax: (619) 338-2315 www.co.san-diego.ca.us ,-:-· ···· Integrated Waste Management Board www.ciwmb.ca.gov 916-255-4021 Environmental Protection Agency National Priorities Sites ("Superfund" or "CERCUS") www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/cursites (800) 424-9346 National Priorities· List Sites in the United States www .epa. gov/superfund/sites/npl/npl.htm 5/19/03 .. ·•···. . ..... .. . ... -. .... " ....... . . . City of carlsbad I ill E'·'·''·'· I •l§.fi#i I .t§ ,j I HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT Consultation Of Lists of Sites Related To Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of California Government Code Section 65962.5, I have consulted the Hazardous Wastes and Substances Sites List compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): IKJ The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. D The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application m contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name:William E. Plummer c/o CMWD Name: Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone Number: 7'0-(b02. ·27f,8 Phone Number: ____________ _ Address of Site: _______________________________ _ LocalAgency(CityandCounty): City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego Assessor's book, page, and parcel number:_2_1_3_-_12_0_-_0_3 _________________ _ Specify list(s): DTSC • s Hazardous Waste and Substance Site List Regulatory Identification Number:--'-N~A'------------------------- Date ofList:___;5~2~0~0..!..4 ___________________________ _ .~4cr /(~-?1~/f1-1.z ,/i-2r)-0f A4~7t, /,~4t&W.., 5-?rJ-04 Applicant Signature/Date Property Owner Signature/Date I Admin/Counter/Haz Waste 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 @ The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese Listlrs a plannrng crc:~~~-· used by the State, local agencies and develooer~ ro comoi~' w1tt'i tne Calit::r.;;: Environmental Quality Act requirements in prov1c:irng mtorrr.atron aoou: t:--~ :::at::-:-::· hazardous matenals release sites. Government Code se:::on 65952.5 reJUires rne California Environmental Protection Agency to develop at 1east annuall~· an uooated Cortese List. Below is a list of agencies that maintain information re~ar~,n~ Ha:ar~o~s Waste and Substances Sites. Oepanment of Toxic Substances Control www.dtsc.ca.aov/database/calsites Calsites Hotline {9 1 6) 323·3400 State Water Resources Control Board www. swrcb. ca. oov/cwphome/lustis County of San Diego Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) Mike Dorsey Chief, Hazardous Materials Division Department of Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Division Mailing address: P.O. Box 129261 San Diego, CA 92112-9261 (619) 338-2395 Call Duty Specialist for General Questions at (619) 338-2231 tax: (619) 338-2315 www.co.san-diego.ca.us :. · Integrated Waste Management Board www.ciwmb.ca.gov 916-255-4021 Environmental Protection Agency National Priorities Sites ("Superfund" or "CERCUS") www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/cursites (800) 424-9346 National Priorities List Sites in the United States www .epa. gov/superfund/sites/npl/npl.htm 5/19/03 "-"' Notice of Determination To: Office ofPlanning and ~ar<;jl Fr P.O. Box 3044 r. U . /Js, ~ .• regorvJ.Sm•th.Recorder/GountvCf Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 · · cg:j County Clerk County of San Diego Attn: Karen Hernandez, Rm. 260 1600 Pacific Highway San Diego, CA 92112-1750 D Project No: CUP 04-16/SUP 04-08 Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Bressi Pump Stations Project Title n/a City of Carlsbad, Elaine Blackburn (760) 602-4621 State Clearinghouse No. Lead Agency, Contact Person Telephone Number southeast comer of El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road, County of San Diego Project Locations (include County) Name of Applicant: Carlsbad Municipal Water District Applicant's Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92009 Applicant's Telephone Number: 760-602-2736 Project Description: a water pump stations facility This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above-described project on October 6, 2004, and has made the following determination regarding the above described project. 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment 2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. Date received for filing at OPR: Revised December 2004 '-,! CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME PO BOX 944209 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2090 CERTIFICATION OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding Project Title/Location (Include County): BRESS! PUMP STATIONS-CUP 04-16/SUP 04-08 on the southeast comer of El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego Name and Address of Applicant: Carlsbad Municipal Water District, 1635 Faraday Avenue; Carlsbad, CA 92008 Project Description: a water pump stations facility Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The City of Carlsbad Planning Department has completed an Environmental Initial Study for the above referenced property, including evaluation of the proposed project's potential for adverse environmental impacts on fish and wildlife resources. 2. Based on the complete Environmental Initial Study, the City of Carlsbad Planning Department finds that the proposed project will not encroach upon wildlife habitat area, will have no potential adverse individual or cumulative effects on wildlife resources, and requires no mitigation measures to be incorporated into the proposed project which would affect fish or wildlife. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. EB:aw Section 711.4, Fish and Game Code DFG: 1/91 MIC~~ Planning Director Lead Agency: CITY OF CARLSBAD Date: __ L-!ol 04 1-'-1 "2-~/~0'---l+..____ __ _ I ' ' . City of Carlsbad IQFIIIIIIII·i•X§.tliil.i§.il CASE NAME: CASE NO: PROJECT LOCATION: NEGATIVE DECLARATION BRESS! PUMP STATIONS CUP 04-16/SUP 04-08 THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A water pump stations facility DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above- described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) did not identify any potentially significant impacts on the environment, and the City of Carlsbad finds as follows: [g] The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. D The proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. (Negative Declaration applies only to the effects that remained to be addressed). D Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMP ACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required. A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the Negative Declaration is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday A venue, Carlsbad, California 92008. ADOPTED: October 6, 2004, pursuant to PC Resolution No. 5728 ATTEST: . f}M.~~ MICHAE~~~ILHR Planning Director 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!) City of Carlsbad IQ@iillllll·i•i§.tijii•l§lll CASE NAME: CASE NO: PROJECT LOCATION: NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION BRESS! PUMP STATIONS CUP 04-16/SUP 04-08 on the southeast comer of El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION: a water pump stations facility PROPOSED DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above-described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the initial study (EIA Part 2) did not identify any potentially significant impacts on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration will be recommended for adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission. A copy of the initial study (EIA Part 2) documenting reasons to support the proposed Negative Declaration are on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of the date of this notice. The proposed project and Negative Declaration are subject to review and approval/adoption by the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission and City Council. Additional public notices will be issued when those public hearings are scheduled. If you have any questions, please call Elaine Blackburn in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4621. PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD August 23,2004 through September 13,2004 PUBLISH DATE August 23,3004 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us <!) January 30, 2003 PROOF OF PUBLI fiON (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 1 71349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: September 23rd, 2004 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS California This 23rd Day of September, 2004 Signature Jane Olson NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising This space is p, ·the County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of ---..,., OTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commis· sion of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public nearing at the Council Chambers 1200 Carlsbad Village Dnve, Carlsbad California, at 6:00p.m. on Wednesday, Octo· ber 6 2604, to consider a request for adopt1on of a Negat\ve Declaration, and approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Scenic Corridor Special Use Permit to allow development of a water pump station facility on prope_rty generally located at the southeast corryer of El Camll}() Real ana Palomar Airport Road and w1th1n t,ocal Fac1h· ties Management Zone 17 and more particularly de· scribed as: An approximalf/YNo2~"j"~~6-6~sement :'ithin Those persons wistiing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after September 29 2004. lf you have any questions, please call Elaine Blackburn in the Planning Department at (760) 602·4621. If you challenge the Conditi()nal Use Penmit and $CE!nic Corridor Spec1al Use Permit 1n court, you may be hll]lted to raising only those issues you or someone else ra1sed at the puolic hearing desGribed in lhis notice or in written correspondence de1ivere<l to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. '-" City l#lJ@I.IIIIII·i•A§.tlill•l§lll NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 6, 2004, to consider a request for adoption of a Negative Declaration, and approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Scenic Corridor Special Use Permit to allow development of a water pump station facility on property generally located at the southeast corner of El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road and within Local Facilities Management Zone 17 and more particularly described as: An approximately 0.27-acre easement within APN 213-120-03 Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after September 29, 2004. If you have any questions, please call Elaine Blackburn in the Planning Department at (760) 602- 4621. If you challenge the Conditional Use Permit and Scenic Corridor Special Use Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: CUP 04-16/SUP 04-08 CASE NAME: BRESSI PUMP STATIONS PUBLISH: SEPTEMBER 23, 2004 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!) ~·, ' '!'· t ' SITE BRESSI PUMP STATIONS CUP 04-16/SUP 04-08 PROOF OF PUBLI ION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 1 71349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: August 23rd 2004 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS California This ___,2=3=rd=---_Day of August, 2004 Jane Olson NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising This space is f' the County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor S T A T E OF C A L I F 0 R N I A Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit Jan Boel Acting Director October 20, 2004 Elaine Blackburn City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7 314 Re: Notice of Determination Bressi Pump Stations SCH#: 2004109051 Dear Elaine Blackburn: The State Clearinghouse has received and posted your Notice of Determination (NOD) for the above project. For each NOD filed with the State Clearinghouse, we attempt to match the NOD to our record of the prior draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Negative Declaration that was submitted for state level review. In the case of the subject NOD, we can find no record of a prior draft EIR or Negative Declaration having been submitted to the State Clearinghouse. Please let us know if the prior EIR/Negative Declaration was, in fact, submitted to the State Clearinghouse for state level review so that we may correct our records. Please refer to the CEQA Guidelines for EIR/Negative Declaration submittal requirements (Public Resources Code Sections 15205 and 15206) and NOD filing requirements (PRC Sections 15075 and 15094). If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-0613, or send an e-mail to state.clearinghouse@opr.ca.gov. Sincerely, ~~ TeiTy Roberts t . Director, State Clearinghouse cc: file 1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 TEL (916) 445-0613 FAX (916) 323-3018 www.opr.ca.gov 249100 Project Title: -----"""--'---=:.=::~--+.--'OL...!'-'-:::...L.--.>..J-+----"'-+"'--=-t-lPiP-----:,...,.,-,-----...-rr-:-;-""'""',.,.---t--N~::-;-.,-------,=-- Project Applicant Name: ----l~~~~=~::...._~~~~~=---t'fL~~_j~~:C:~___::~:IJll~ ~ Project. Applicant Address: ~t.';D.-+~~~~~~~"!.__:_:::_ _ ____\,._k~~~E~~:.::.::__J,..!:.Jtd~~~ld~'J_--- CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: ( ) Environmental Impact Report ( ) Negative Declaration Local Public Agency D Schoo StateAgency 0 ( ) Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) ( ) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs ( ) County Administrative Fee ~Project that is exempt from fees $850.00 $ ------ $1,250.00 $ ------ $850.00 $ ------ $850.00 $ ------ $25.00 $ ------ Signature and title of person receiving payment: ---q:7"--41'-i::b-\;:-/-'-I....L\::::;;""""Io:::o-~~J...--::-1'="'-F-~-------.P....--¥r wHITE·PROJECT APPLICANT STATE AGENCY OF FILIN SCH# 2004109051 Project Title Bressi Pump Stations Lead Agency Carlsbad, City of Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Bal. Type NOD Notice of Determination Description A water pump stations facility. Filing Agency Contact Name Agency Phone email Elaine Blackburn City of Carlsbad (760) 602-4621 Fax Address 1635 Faraday Avenue City Carlsbad State CA Zip 92008-7314 Project Location County San Diego City Carlsbad Region Cross Streets Parcel No. Township Approved by City of Carlsbad Range Section Acting as [l!l Lead Agency 0 Responsible Agency Determinations Base Approval Date 1 0/06/2004 1. The project O will [!] will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. 0 An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. []! A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures 0 were [XI were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A Statement of Overriding Considerations 0 was [XI was not adopted for this project. 5. Findings [l!l were D were not made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. Final EIR Available at City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 Date Received 10/15/2004 Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM-PART II BACKGROUND (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO: CUP 04-16/SUP 04-08 DATE: August 16, 2004 1. CASENAME:~B=r=es=s~i~P=um~p~S=ta=t=io=n=s ________________________________________ _ 2. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: City of Carlsbad, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 3. CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Chris Muehlbacher, City of Carlsbad-Public Works, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008, 760-602-2736 4. PROJECT LOCATION: on the southeast corner ofEl Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road 5. PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS: Carlsbad Municipal Water District, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad CA 92008 6. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: """'P.;_I-'-'(P'-.!l=an=n=e=d=In=d=u=st=ri=al'-.J-) ___________ _ 7. ZONING: P-C (Planned Community) 8. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (i.e., permits, financing approval or participation agreements): ~n/~a:....__ __________________________________ _ 9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: __________________________________________________ _ Project Description The Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) is proposing to construct two water pump stations (one for recycled water and one for potable water) in a 0.27-acre easement granted for that purpose within the Bressi Ranch Master Plan (MP 178) and tract map (CT 00-06). The easement is within Planning Area No. 3 of the Master Plan located on the southeast corner of El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road. The 0.27-acre pump station site will contain two independent subterranean pumping stations totaling 2,136 square feet (1,068 sf each). The project requires City approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and a Scenic Corridor Special Use Pennit (SUP) for the El Camino Real Corridor. The proposed recycled water pump station (RWPS) will be capable of supplying recycled water to the upper pressure zone. The pumping capacity is 2,160 gallons per minute (gpm). The primary components of the proposed pump station includes: a 22-foot by 46-foot subterranean building, suction and discharge piping, a flow meter, bypass piping, an electrical switchgear, and three vertical turbine pumping units (two duty, one stand-by). The Bressi RWPS will have a 2,800-gallon cylindrical hydrologic surge tank. The surge tank will be contained in the subterranean structure and will have a 6-foot diameter and be 15- feet long. 1 Rev. 07/03/02 0 The proposed potable water pump station (PWPS) will be capable of supplying potable water from Maerkle Reservoir ( 490 pressure zone) to the 700 pressure zone during emergencies and during routine maintenance of the San Diego Water Authority's imported water aqueducts. The pumping capacity is 1,600 gpm. The primary components of the proposed pump station includes: a 22-foot by 37-foot subterranean building, suction and discharge piping, a flow meter, bypass piping, an electrical switchgear, and three vertical turbine pumping units (two duty, one stand-by). The Bressi PWPS will have a 2,100- gallon cylindrical hydrologic surge tank. The surge tank will be contained in the subterranean structure and will have a 6-foot diameter and be 11-feet long. Both subterranean pump station structures will house the pumping units and ancillary electrical and mechanical equipment. The electrical equipment needed will include distribution switchgear, motor control center, variable frequency drives, and a main control panel. The subterranean buildings will be cooled using roof-mounted exhaust fans equipped with roof-mounted gravity ventilators. Roof-mounted equipment hatches will be provided over each pumping unit for pump removal through the roof. There will also be roof hatches to access the pump houses. These various roof hatches, vent caps, and other equipment protrusions may project up to 18 inches above the roofs of the pump houses. An electric transformer, service meter, and circuit breaker will be located above ground adjacent to each pump station. The size and height of these components is controlled by SDG&E. Transformers/circuit breakers are typically 3 ft x 3 ft in size and approximately 4 feet high. Service meters are typically 3 ft x 2 ft in size and up to 6 feet in height. Therefore, these components would be expected to project no more than 6 feet above ground. Finally, a total of two light poles (with two lights on each pole) will be placed on the interior side of the pump station facility (one pole adjacent to each pump house). These poles will be approximately 10 feet high above grade. These lights are necessary in the event of an incident requiring work to be done at night. However, the lights would not otherwise be on, and routine maintenance work and inspections would be done during daylight. In order to maintain the high aesthetic consideration necessary, the pump stations will be accessed from a future parking area (for the future industrial building) on the interior of the site. A gate is proposed on the interior side of the project area (adjacent to the future industrial development parking area) to allow for access by CMWD staff. No screening of the project is being proposed at this time, but will be provided by the Master Plan developer as the anticipated industrial project progresses. As described, the proposed facility is almost completely underground. The only components which would be above-grade would be small and would be at an elevation approximately 20 feet above the adjacent roadways. Thus, these components would not be strikingly visible to drivers on El Camino Real or Palomar Airport Road. The developer of the Bressi Ranch industrial project will be installing and maintaining landscaping and an entry treatment on the site, including the area surrounding the proposed project, as the development progresses. However, the design of the entry treatment and landscaping has not yet been finalized. Environmental Setting The site of the proposed project (the 0.27-acre easement) is within a 47-acre pre-graded site to be developed with planned industrial uses. The industrial lot, in turn, is part of a much larger area (approximately 485 acres) being graded for approved residential, commercial, and industrial development pursuant to the approved Bressi Ranch Master Plan. The area to the west of the project site contains the existing Olympic Resort. To the north (across Palomar Airport Road) is undeveloped land belonging to the County of San Diego -Airport Division. The area east of the project site will be developed with planned industrial uses. The project site contains no vegetation or other resources and has already been mass-graded as part of the on-going development activities occurring on the site. 2 Rev. 07/03/02 ... ) Previous Environmental Documents Relevant to the Project EIA 99-09 -Carlsbad Water Recycling Facility In December 1999, City staff completed an initial study for the City's Water Reclamation Program Phase II. The City Council then adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the project (EIA 99-09). The Phase II project included construction of a new tertiary water recycling plant, installation of recycled water lines, upgrades and other improvements, and construction of three booster stations. One of the three booster stations analyzed in that document was the currently proposed project. EIA 99-09 concluded that, for this pump station, the only potentially significant impact was to aesthetics. (The location is a highly visible intersection in the City.) The adopted MMRP included a mitigation measure that required this pump station to be a subterranean facility. The currently proposed project has been designed to be a subterranean facility. Therefore, the project design satisfies the mitigation requirement to reduce potential aesthetic impacts to less than significant. EIR 98-04 -Bressi Ranch Master Plan and EIR The proposed water pump stations facility was anticipated by and included in the Bressi Ranch Master Plan and related EIR approved in June 2002. In June 2002 the City Council certified an EIR (EIR 98-04) and approved a Master Plan (MP 178) for development of the Bressi Ranch project. The Master Plan covers approximately 485 acres and provides for residential, commercial, and planned industrial uses as well as preservation of open space. The site of the currently proposed water pump stations is within Planning Area 3 of the Master Plan. Planning Area 3 is located on the southeast comer of two prime arterial roadways (El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road) in an urbanized area. Future use of the lot will be one or more planned industrial developments. The Master Plan recognized the planned water pump facility as an anticipated use to be located in Planning Area 3. The Final Map associated with the industrial development (CT 00-06) also recognized the planned construction of the proposed water pump stations and, therefore, included an easement to accommodate the project. 3 Rev. 07/03/02 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. D Aesthetics D Agricultural Resources D Air Quality D Biological Resources D Cultural Resources D Geology/Soils 0Noise D Hazards/Hazardous Materials D Population and Housing D Hydrology/Water Quality D Land Use and Planning D Mineral Resources D Mandatory Findings of Significance 4 D Public Services D Recreation D Transportation/Circulation D Utilities & Service Systems Rev. 07/03/02 DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency) ~ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. D I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. D I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. D I fmd that the proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. A Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. D I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required. Planning DirectOf'S'Ilatll Date 5 Rev. 07/03/02 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significantly adverse. • Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant adverse effect on the environment, but all potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required. • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the environment. • If there are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR ifthere are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. 6 Rev. 07/03/02 • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant adverse impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; or (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined significant. Rev /03/ 2 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). I. AESTHETICS-Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light and glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTRAL RESOURCES -(In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model-1997 prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY -(Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.) Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? 8 Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant No Impact Impact D D D D D D D D D Rev. 07/03/02 . ..._. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES-Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by California Department ofFish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? g) Impact tributary areas that are environmentally sensitive? 9 Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D """'\ ...._,. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant No Impact Impact D D D D D D D D D D Rev. 07/03/02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). V. CULTURAL RESOURCES-Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the signifi- cance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS-Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? 1v. Landslides? b) Result m substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Table 18 -1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? 10 Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant Impact D D D D D D D D No Impact D D D Rev. 07/03/02 ......... Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Significant Impact e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the D use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS- Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or environment? e) For a project within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, InJury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? 11 D D D D D D D D D ~ 'owl Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant No Impact Impact D D D D D D D D D Rev. 07/03/02 """" Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Significant Impact b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or D interfere substantially with ground water recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local ground water table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the D site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off- site? e) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the flow rate or amount (volume) of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off- site? f) Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? g) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? h) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map? i) Place within 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? k) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 1) Increased erosion (sediment) into receiving surface waters. m) Increased pollutant discharges (e.g., heavy metals, pathogens, petroleum derivatives, synthetic organics, nutrients, oxygen-demanding substances and trash) into receiving surface waters or other alteration of receiving surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? D D D D D D D D D ~ ......, Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant No Impact Impact D D D D D D D D D Rev. 07/03/02 '-" Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Significant Impact n) Changes to receiving water quality (marine, fresh or D wetland waters) during or following construction? o) Increase in any pollutant to an already impaired D water body as listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303( d) list? p) The exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING-Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES-Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? XI. NOISE-Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbourne vibration or groundbourne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase m ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 13 D D D D D D D D D D """"'· .....,; Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant No Impact Impact D D D D D D D D D D D Rev. 07/03/02 ._ Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Significant Impact e) For a project located within an airport land use plan D or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING-Would the project: a) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result m substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, a need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, m order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools? iv) Parks? v) Other public facilities? XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project neighborhood and recreational facilities deterioration of the accelerated? increase the use of existing regional parks or other such that substantial physical facility would occur or be 14 D D D D D D D D D D ""'"\ ......., Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant No Impact Impact D D D D D D D D D D Rev. 07/03/02 ....... Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC-Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change m location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in insufficient parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus tum- outs, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS -Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 15 Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D D D ""'} ...., Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D No Impact D D Rev. 07/03/02 ~ Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects?) c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D ......, Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D Less Than Significant Impact D D D D D D No Impact Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 16 Rev. 07/03/02 ~ ......., DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION I. AESTHETICS a, b) No Impact. The project site is a pre-graded lot that will be developed with a planned industrial use. The site is an intersection of two prime arterial roadways in an urbanized area. The project site does not contain any protected scenic vistas or viewpoints. One the roadways (El Camino Real) is a designated scenic corridor, which requires special landscaping, signage, and other treatments. However, the project site itself is to be developed with an industrial building. The site contains no protected vistas, viewpoints, or scenic resources. The proposed project would not damage scenic resources. c) Less Than Potentially Significant Impact. The development of a typical (i.e., above grade) pump station on this site could have a potentially significant aesthetic impact. The site (the southeast comer of El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road) is a highly traveled and visible corridor in the city. Further, El Camino Real is a Scenic Corridor. Development along El Camino Real is subject to special requirements and restrictions to ensure adequate consideration for aesthetics in grading, building placement, architecture, and landscaping along the street. Because of these requirements and restrictions, the two proposed pump stations have been designed to be entirely subterranean. They will be hidden within a slope at the intersection. Vehicular access to the pump stations will be from the interior of the site (from an adjacent future parking lot). Thus, the vehicular access area will also not be visible from the two prime roadways. A few small accessory components of the facility (electrical boxes and two light poles) will have to be located such that they either project above the roof of the pump houses or are placed above-grade in order to function properly. However, these components will be small in size and their maximum height will be no more than approximately 6 feet. The two light poles will be 10 feet high. (The height of these components will be minimized as much as possible.) Further, these components will be located on the top of the slope, which will be approximately 20 feet above the grade of the adjacent roadways. Thus, these components will be minimally visible to passing drivers. The inclusion of these design considerations into the proposed project result in the visual impact being less than significant. d) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will include two light poles (with two lights per pole) on the interior side of the pump houses above grade. The pole heights will be approximately 10 feet. These two pole lights are necessary in the event of an incident requiring nighttime repair activities. The lights would not be on at any other time since routine maintenance and inspection visits are scheduled during daylight hours. Because of the limited use of these lights, they will not create a new source of substantial light or glare. II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES a-c) No Impact. The proposed project would not convert any farmland (of any kind) to non-agricultural use and would not involve any other changes that could result in such conversion. The project site is part of a pre- graded lot already approved for planned industrial uses as part of an approved Master Plan (the Bressi Ranch Master Plan-MP 178). The zoning of the project site is P-C (Planned Community), which allows planned industrial uses and implements the approved Master Plan. The site is not the subject of a Williamson Act contract. III. AIR QUALITY a) No Impact. The project site is located in the San Diego Air Basin which is a federal and state non- attainment area for ozone (03), and a state non-attainment area for particulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter (PM 10). The periodic violations of national Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) in the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB), particularly for ozone in inland foothill areas, requires that a plan be developed outlining the pollution controls that will be undertaken to improve air quality. In San Diego County, this attainment planning process is embodied in the Regional Air Quality Strategies (RAQS) developed jointly by the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). A plan to meet the federal standard for ozone was developed in 1994 during the process of updating the 1991 state- mandated plan. This local plan was combined with plans from all other California non-attainment areas having serious ozone problems and used to create the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP was adopted by the Air Resources Board (ARB) after public hearings on November 9th through lOth in 1994, and was forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. After considerable analysis and debate, particularly regarding airsheds with the worst smog problems, EPA approved the SIP in mid-1996. The proposed project relates to the SIP and/or RAQS through the land use and growth assumptions that are incorporated into the air quality planning document. These growth assumptions are based on each city's and the 17 Rev. 07/03/02 County's general plan. If a proposed project is consistent with its applicable General Plan, then the project presumably has been anticipated with the regional air quality planning process. Such consistency would ensure that the project would not have an adverse regional air quality impact. Section 15125(B) of the State of California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines contains specific reference to the need to evaluate any inconsistencies between the proposed project and the applicable air quality management plan. Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) are part of the RAQS. The RAQS and TCM plan set forth the steps needed to accomplish attainment of state and federal ambient air quality standards. The California Air Resources Board provides criteria for determining whether a project conforms with the RAQS which include the following: • Is a regional air quality plan being implemented in the project area? • Is the project consistent with the growth assumptions in the regional air quality plan? The project area is located in the San Diego Air Basin, and as such, is located in an area where a RAQS is being implemented. The project is consistent with the growth assumptions of the City's General Plan and the RAQS. Therefore, the project is consistent with the regional air quality plan and will in no way conflict with or obstruct implementation of the regional plan. b) Less Than Significant Impact. The closest air quality monitoring station to the project site is in the City of Oceanside. Data available for this monitoring site through April, 2002 indicate that the most recent air quality violations recorded were for the state one hour standard for ozone (one day in both 2000 and 2001) and one day in 2001 for the federal 8-hour average for ozone and one day for the 24-hour state standard for suspended particulates in 1996. No violations of any other air quality standards have been recorded recently. The project would involve minimal short-term emissions associated with grading and construction. Such emissions would be minimized through standard construction measures such as the use of properly tuned equipment and watering the site for dust control. Long-term emissions associated with travel to and from the project will be minimal. Although air pollutant emissions would be associated with the project, they would neither result in the violation of any air quality standard (comprising only an incremental contribution to overall air basin quality readings), nor contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Any impact is assessed as less than significant. c) Less Than Significant Impact. The Air Basin is currently in a non-attainment zone for ozone and suspended fine particulates. The proposed project would represent a contribution to a cumulatively considerable potential net increase in emissions throughout the air basin. As described above, however, emissions associated with the proposed project would be minimal. Given the limited emissions potentially associated with the proposed project, air quality would be essentially the same whether or not the proposed project is implemented. According to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15130 (a)(4), the proposed project's contribution to the cumulative impact is considered de minimus. Any impact is assessed as less than significant. d) No Impact. As noted above, the proposed project would not result in substantial pollutant emissions or concentrations. In addition, there are no sensitive receptors (e.g., schools or hospitals) located in the vicinity of the project. No impact is assessed. e) No Impact. The construction of the proposed project could generate fumes from the operation of construction equipment, which may be considered objectionable by some people. Such exposure would be short- term or transient. In addition, the number of people exposed to such transient impacts is not considered substantial. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a-g) No Impact. The project site is at the intersection of two prime arterial roadways in an urbanized area. The project site is a 0.27-acre easement within a larger pre-graded planned industrial lot. The project site (and the larger lot) contain: no habitat; no candidate, sensitive, or special status species; no riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat or any other sensitive natural community; no federally protected wetlands; no resident native fish or wildlife species; not wildlife nursery sites; no other biological resources; no trees; and no tributary areas. The site does not serve as a wildlife corridor. Development of the proposed project would not conflict with the provisions of any adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved habitat conservation plan. The proposed use is consistent with the approved Master Plan of development for the site (the Bressi Ranch Master Plan-MP 178) which allows planned industrial uses and the proposed water pump stations. The project is also consistent with the City's Habitat Management Plan (HMP) in that the project site is outside of any proposed core or linkage preservation areas and is not a special resource area. 18 Rev. 07/03/02 CULTURAL RESOURCES a-d) No Impact. The proposed project site is a 0.27-acre easement located at the outer perimeter of the 485- acre Bressi Ranch Master Plan. A Cultural Resource report was prepared for the Bressi Ranch Master Plan and was utilized in the preparation of the Bressi Ranch Master Plan EIR (EIR 98-04). The Bressi Ranch Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program included a requirement that an archaeological resource monitor be on site during grading of the Bressi Ranch development area. That rough grading has been completed in the area of the proposed pump station facility, and no cultural or paleontological resources were found. Therefore, the proposed water pump station facility will have no impact on cultural resources. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS A Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation was prepared for the proposed project in January 2003 by Krieger & Stewart, Inc. That study concluded that the proposed development of the project site is feasible. The study further concluded that the most significant geologic hazard at the property would be related to potential ground shaking during periodic earthquakes generated along distant active faults. The study included several recommendations that will be incorporated into final plans and implemented during the construction phase of the project. ai) No Impact. The project site is not within a fault-rupture hazard zone quadrangle map indexed in the Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. aii) Less Than Significant Impact. The project site will likely be subject to ground shaking in response to either a local moderate or more distant large-magnitude earthquake. Seismic risk at the site is comparable to the risk for the San Diego area in general. The closest source to the site for ground motion, and the source that would produce the greatest ground acceleration at the site, are the Julian and Temecula segments of the Elsinore fault zone, about 24 miles to the northeast, and the Del Mar segment of the Rose Canyon/Newport-Inglewood fault zone, about 5 miles west of the project site. Project design will meet or exceed existing earthquake design standards, including the Uniform Building Code guidelines currently adopted for seismic safety standards in California. aiii) Less Than Significant Impact. The Geotechnical Study concluded that liquefaction and seismically- induced settlements would not be a factor in the development of the proposed project. The project site involves a fill condition from CT 00-06 and project specific fill with acceptable material. aiv) No Impact. The soils report indicates a need to over-excavate andre-compact the soil in the vicinity of the improvements due to the loose nature of the surface soil. The proposed site involves a fill condition. Any adverse conditions exposed during the grading effort for this project would be remedied prior to construction of the recycled water pump station. b) No Impact. The pump station structures are subterranean and the site is paved with asphalt concrete. The site will require fill materials to match the existing grade. Grading will follow best management practices for the control of erosion, such as straw bale or sandbag barriers, and outlet protection. Finished grades will be matted or promptly planted at the end of construction according to the landscape plan prepared by the developer of CT 00-06. c) Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is a fill location that does not have the soil conditions associated with a potential for geologic instability. Additionally, standard engineering practices for recompaction, fill placement, etc., will be utilized during construction. d) No Impact. Expansive soils will not be utilized for fill of the subject site. e) No Impact. The proposed use is two subterranean water pump stations. No septic tanks or alternative disposal systems are proposed. The proposed pump stations will not generate or discharge wastewater on-site. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS a-d) No Impact. The operation of the proposed pump stations does not involve the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The proposed pump houses do not include the storage of any hazardous chemicals (e.g., chlorine) and the equipment does not include any injection points for the introduction of chemicals. The site is not included on a list of hazardous materials site compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. e) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project site is within the Runway Protection Zone for McClellan-Palomar Airport. According to the McClellan-Palomar Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the 19 Rev. 07/03/02 Runway Protection Zones (RPZ) are mostly protected from private development except for open space/recreation areas, public rights-of-way, and some storage facilities, all typically low intensity uses characterized by a low number of employees and/or customers and no hazardous materials. In addition, all structures must comply with a 35-foot height limit that will not penetrate either the approach surfaces at the runway ends of the transitional surfaces along the length of the runway. The proposed project is consistent with all of these restrictions. The proposed facility is a very low intensity use in that it would have no on-site employees and no customers. CMWD employees would visit the facility on a regular basis for routine inspections and maintenance activities. The proposed facility would not involve any storage of flammable, explosive, or corrosive materials. Finally, the proposed facility would involve no above-grade structures. The pump station enclosures would be entirely below grade. The few above-grade components (two light poles and various electrical components) would be well within the allowed height limit. The light poles would be 10 feet high. The other components would be less than I 0 feet high. f) No Impact. The project site is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. g) No Impact. Neither construction of the pump stations nor operation of the proposed facilities will significantly affect, block, or interfere with traffic on public streets, including any streets that would be used for emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. h) No Impact. No activities including the use of highly flammable products or materials will be conducted on-site. The pump stations will be housed in a subterranean structure not readily susceptible to damage by fire. No people will reside, or work, on-site with the exception of brief site visits for maintenance and inspections. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY A preliminary SWPP was prepared for the proposed project and provides the basis for the following responses. a) Less Than Significant Impact. The project is designed to include a catch basin filter system and erosion control measures. Therefore, the project will not result in potentially significant impacts to water quality standards. b, c) No Impact. The project will not withdraw any groundwater or discharge into the existing groundwater. d, e, f) Less Than Significant Impact. The construction of the pump stations will decrease the adsorption rates and increase the amount of surface runoff compared to existing conditions. Impervious surfaces at the pump stations will incrementally increase runoff from the site. However, the additional runoff will be contained in existing storm drains provided by adjacent development. Storm drainage filters will reduce polluted runoff. g) No Impact. See previous responses. h, i) No Impact. The project site is not within the 100-year flood hazard area and does not propose any housing. j) No Impact. The project does not propose construction of flood control facilities or risk danger of failure of such facilities. k) No Impact. The project site is two miles from the coastline and the project soils condition would not support liquefaction. I) No Impact. The project is designed and conditioned to provide erosion control during the construction phase of the project. Gravel bags, filters, and erosion control will prevent sediment from draining off-site. m) Less Than Significant Impact. The project is designed and conditioned to filter pollutant discharges prior to drainage off-site. n) No Impact. See response VIII.i. o) No Impact. The downstream water body is not listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d). p) Less Than Significant Impact. The project runoff will not degrade beneficial uses downstream because the project design includes a basin filter system and erosion control measures which will reduce any potential impacts to less than significant. 20 Rev. 07/03/02 -IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING a-c) No Impact. The project site does not contain any established community. The site is a pre-graded lot which will be developed with a planned industrial use. The proposed project is consistent with all applicable land use plans, policies, and regulations over the project site, including those adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental impact. The project site is a 0.27-acre easement in a pre-graded lot which will be developed with a planned industrial use. The site is within Planning Area 3 of the Bressi Ranch Master Plan. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan designation of the site {PI -Planned Industrial) and the zoning of the site (P-C -Planned Community) and the regulations contained in the approved Master Plan for the site (MP 178). See also Response IV.f. above. X. MINERAL RESOURCES a, b) No Impact. The site does not contain any known mineral resources. XI. NOISE A Noise Study for the proposed project was prepared by DHK Engineers, Inc. in May 2004. That study concluded that, based upon the City's 60-dBA noise criteria, the proposed pump station facility would have no potentially significant noise impacts to adjacent receptors. a) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed pump station facility will be located within an industrial site of the Bressi Ranch Master Plan. The City's General Plan Noise Element and Noise Guidelines establish that 60 dB(A) Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is the maximum exterior noise level to which residential units should be subjected (with exceptions up 65 dB(A)). There will be no residential units in the general area of the proposed project. Surrounding uses include a resort/golf practice facility and planned industrial buildings. The Noise Guidelines establish a maximum allowed exterior noise exposure level for office buildings (including planned industrial buildings) at a range from 60 dB(A) CNEL (acceptable) through 80 dB(A) CNEL (normally unacceptable). The proposed project would be constructed so that the sound level from the project at the anticipated locations of the industrial buildings will be less than 60 dB(A) CNEL Typically, the features of a pump station that could produce potentially significant noise levels that would affect nearby receptors would be the operation of the pumps and the motors that drive them. This pump station facility is designed so that the pumps and motors will be contained in subterranean enclosures, thus drastically reducing the potential for noise from those sources. The only remaining potential source of noise would be the supply fans on the roof of each enclosure. The Noise Study concluded that the project's noise impacts to the future adjacent non- residential structures would be well within the City's allowed noise levels. The proposed project will result in some increased noise during construction. However, the Municipal Code (Chapter 8.48) prohibits construction activity that would create disturbing, excessive, or offensive noise after sunset of any day, and before 7 a.m. Monday through Friday, and before 8 a.m. on Saturday, and all day Sunday and specified holidays. Construction of the pump stations will be limited to the hours allowed by the Municipal Code. b) No Impact. The project will not produce groundboume vibration or noise outside the project site boundaries. c) Less Than Significant Impact. See also Response Xl.a. The pump station projects will result in an incremental permanent increase in noise in the vicinity of the site. Since this increase will not exceed levels stated in the Carlsbad General Plan, the increase is not considered substantial or significant. d) Less Than Significant Impact. During construction, a temporary increase in the ambient noise levels in the project vicinity is anticipated. Construction will be scheduled to conform to the limitations specified in the Municipal Code; thus, the increase is not considered substantial or significant. e) Less Than Significant Impact. The project is located within the area of Comprehensive Land Use Plan for McClellan-Palomar Airport. However, the project will not expose people residing or working in the area to a significant increase in noise levels. Operations and maintenance personnel will be exposed to aircraft noise levels ranging from 60 dB(A) to 65 dB(A) CNEL as indicated by noise contours mapped in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. f) No Impact. The project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. 21 Rev. 07/03/02 '-" XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING a-c) No Impact. The proposed pump stations are needed to serve the existing and anticipated build-out population of the City. Therefore, it would not be growth inducing. The proposed project would not displace any housing or people since the site contains no housing and would not in the future contain any housing. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES ai-av) No Impact. The proposed project would not result in adverse impacts associated with new or altered government facilities and would not result in the need for new or altered facilities to meet acceptable service standards. The proposed water pump stations are being constructed in order to meet current and anticipated future build-out requirements for potable and recycled water. The project would result in no measurable increased demand on fire and police services and no new demand on school, park, or other public facilities. XIV. RECREATION a-b) No Impact. The proposed water pump stations project would not affect the use of existing recreational opportunities and would not trigger the need for additional recreational opportunities. XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC a) Less Than Significant Impact. The project will generate I Average Daily Trips (ADT) and 0 peak hour trips. This traffic will utilize the following roadways El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road. Existing traffic on these arterials are 33,148 ADT (El Camino Real) and 53,603 ADT (Palomar Airport Road) (2003) and the 2003 peak hour level of service at the arterial intersection(s) impacted by the project are "A" (both). The design capacities of the arterial roads affected by the proposed project are 40,000 or more vehicles per day. The project traffic would represent an immeasurably small (i.e., less than 1) % of the existing traffic volume and the design capacity respectively. While the increase in traffic from the proposed project may be slightly noticeable, the street system has been designed and sized to accommodate traffic from the project and cumulative development in the City of Carlsbad. The proposed project would not, therefore, cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system. The impacts from the proposed project are, therefore, less than significant. b) Less Than Significant Impact. SANDAG acting as the County Congestion Management Agency has designated three roads (Rancho Santa Fe Rd., El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Rd.) and two highway segments in Carlsbad as part of the regional circulation system. The Existing and Buildout average daily traffic (ADT) and Existing LOS on these designated roads and highways in Carlsbad is: Rancho Santa Fe Road El Camino Real Palomar Airport Road SR 78 I-5 Existing ADT* 17-35 27-49 10-57 124-142 199-216 *The numbers are in thousands of daily trips. LOS "A-D" "A-C" "A-D" "F" "D'' Buildout ADT* 35-56 33-62 30-73 156-180 260-272 The Congestion Management Program's (CMP) acceptable Level of Service (LOS) standard is "E", or LOS "F" if that was the LOS in the 1990 base year (e.g., SR 78 in Carlsbad was LOS "F" in 1990). Accordingly, all designated roads and highways are currently operating at or better than the acceptable standard LOS. Note that the buildout ADT projections are based on the full implementation of the region's general and community plans. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan and, therefore, its traffic was used in modeling the build-out projections. Achievement of the CMP acceptable Level of Service (LOS) "E" standard assumes implementation of the adopted CMP strategies. Based on the design capacity(ies) of the designated roads and highways and implementation of the CMP strategies, they will function at acceptable level(s) of service in the short- term and at buildout. c) No Impact. The proposed project does not include any aviation components. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the McClellan-Palomar Airport. It would not, therefore, result in a change of air traffic patterns or result in substantial safety risks. No impact assessed. 22 Rev. 07/03/02 d) No Impact. All project circulation improvements will be designed and constructed to City standards; and, therefore, would not result in design hazards. The proposed project is consistent with the City's general plan and zoning. Therefore, it would not increase hazards due to an incompatible use. No impact assessed. e) No Impact. The proposed project has been designed to satisfy the emergency requirements of the Fire and Police Departments. No impact assessed. t) No Impact. The proposed project is not requesting a parking variance. Additionally, the project requires no parking spaces. No impact assessed. g) No Impact. The proposed project would not conflict with any adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. The proposed pump station use will not generate any measurable traffic since it will only be accessed by CMWD staff for routine inspection purposes and occasional maintenance and repair activities. XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS a) No Impact. The proposed water pump stations will not generate wastewater. b) No Impact. The proposed recycled water pump station is a component of a system-wide expansion of which approval for the recycled water treatment plant was approved under separate action. c) No Impact. No new storm drains or channels are required for the proposed project. d) No Impact. The project will not impact local or regional water supplies. However, additional treated potable water would be made available since the recycled water pump station project will produce recycled water for irrigation and industrial purposes. e) No Impact. The proposed projects and the existing site facilities will not require wastewater treatment services. t) No Impact. The projects will not ordinarily generate any appreciable volume of solid waste, and solid waste collection from the site will not be required. Any solid waste generated during maintenance will be taken off the site for appropriate disposal. g) No Impact. Any solid waste generated on the site during construction or operation would be removed and disposed of in an appropriate facility in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations. XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE-Does the project: a-c) No Impact. See previous responses. As explained in the responses to the above series of questions, the proposed project will not result in potentially significant impacts. The proposed project is a necessary part of the City's potable and recycled water system and is necessary to serve already existing and anticipated development in the City. It will not have impacts that are cumulative in nature and will not result in environmental effects with adverse effects on human beings. 23 Rev. 07/03/02 ,........, ·"""" ,..._.., . ..., EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department located at 1635 Faraday A venue, Carlsbad, California, 92008. 1. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Recycled Water Pump Station Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real City of Carlsbad. Vinje & Middleton Engineering, Inc. January 20, 2003. 2. City of Carlsbad Bressi Potable and Recycled Water Pump Station Noise Impact Report. DHK Engineers. January 5, 2004. 3. City of Carlsbad Bressi Potable and Recycled Water Pump Preliminary SWPP. City of Carlsbad, Public Works. August 2004. 4. EIA 99-09 for the Encina Basin Water Reclamation Program Phase II. City of Carlsbad Planning Department. December 1999. 5. Carlsbad Municipal Water District Encina Basin Water Reclamation Program Phase 2 Project Biological Assessment. Merkel & Associates, Inc. July 11, 2001. 6. Preliminary Design Report for the Encina Basin Water Reclamation Program, Phase II Recycled Water Pump Stations. Krieger & Stewart, Inc. 2002. 7. City of Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan. City of Carlsbad Planning Department, 1999. 8. Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Bressi Ranch Master Plan (EIR 98-04). Cotton/Bridges/Associates (CBA, Inc.). April2002. 9. Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01). City of Carlsbad Planning Department. March 1994. R v. 07/03/02 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM-PART 1 (Carlsbad Municipal Water District) cvPo4-(£ 5u polf-o8 b-ct:-or BACKGROUND 1. Case Name: Bressi Recycled & Potable Water Pump Stations 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 3. Contact Person: Christopher Muehlbacher (760) 602-2736 4. Project Location: South-east corner of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Carlsbad Municipal Water District 5950 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 6. General Plan Designation: P1 7. Zoning: P-C 8. Other Public Agencies whose Approval is Required: None. 9. Project Description/Environmental Setting and Surround Land Uses: The Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) proposes to construct the Bressi Recycled Water Pump Station (Bressi RWPS) and the Bressi Potable Water Pump Station (Bressi PWPS) within an easement granted with Bressi Ranch Carlsbad Tract CT 00-06. This easement site is located within Planning Area No. 3. The 0.27-acre pump station site will contain two independent subterranean pumping stations. The CMWD requests approval from the City of Carlsbad (City) of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and a Special Use Permit for the El Camino Real Corridor for the construction and operation of the recycled water and potable water pump stations. The proposed Bressi RWPS will be capable of supplying recycled water to the upper pressure zone. The pumping capacity is 2,160 gpm. The primary components of the proposed pump station includes: a 22-foot by 46-foot subterranean building, suction and discharge piping, a flow meter, bypass piping, an electrical switchgear, and three vertical turbine pumping units (two duty, one stand-by). The Bressi RWPS will have a 2,800-gallon cylindrical hydrologic surge tank. The surge tank will be contained in the subterranean structure and will have a 6-foot diameter and be 15-feet long. The proposed Bressi PWPS will be capable of supplying potable water from Maerkle Reservoir {490 pressure zone) to the 700 pressure zone during emergencies and during routine maintenance of the San Diego Water Authority's imported water aqueducts. The pumping capacity is 1 ,600 gpm. The primary components of the proposed pump station includes: a 22-foot by 37 -foot subterranean building, suction and discharge piping, a flow meter, bypass piping, an electrical switchgear, and three vertical turbine pumping units {two duty, one stand-by). The Bressi PWPS will have a 2,1 00-gallon cylindrical hydrologic surge tank. The surge tank will be contained in the subterranean structure and will have a 6-foot diameter and be 11-feet long. Both pump station structures will house the pumping units and ancillary electrical and mechanical equipment. The electrical equipment will include distribution switchgear, motor control center, variable frequency drives, and a main control panel. The electric transformer, the service meter, and circuit breaker will be located above-ground adjacent to each pump station. The subterranean buildings will be cooled using roof- mounted exhaust fans equipped with roof-mounted gravity ventilators. Roof-mounted equipment hatches will be provided over each pumping unit for pump removal through the roof. A three foot wrought-iron fence and gated is proposed to delineate the pump station site. The developer of Bressi Ranch development will complete adjacent landscaping. II. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS B. Environmental Impact Discussion 1. AESTHETICS a. No Impact. No scenic vista will be impacted by the project. b. No Impact. The site is not within the viewshed of a state scenic highway or any state highway that is designated by Caltrans as eligible for listing (http://www.dot.ca.gov:80/hq/LandArch/scenic/cahisys.htm). c. No Impact. The majority of the structural components are subterranean. d. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed pump station facilities are subterranean with no exterior lighting proposed. II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES a. No Impact. The easement site is contained within Planning Area No. 3 of the Bressi Ranch Carlsbad Tract No. 00-06. b. No Impact. The site is not zoned for agricultural use. c. No Impact. The site is included within CT 00-06 and does not contain protected farmland. Ill. AIR QUALITY a. No Impact. The Air Pollution Control District (APCD) regulates emissions controls for construction equipment and procedures such as dust control during construction. The project will comply with all APCD Rules and Regulations. Any air emissions produced during construction would be temporary. Operation of the pump station would not be a source of air pollutant emissions since electric motors ordinarily would be used to power the pumps and would produce no air emissions. The proposed project is in the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB) within the jurisdiction of the San Diego APCD. The SDAB is a federal and state non- attainment area for ozone (03), and a state non-attainment area for respirable particulate matter less than or equal to 1 0 microns in diameter (PM10). The applicable attainment plan for these criteria pollutants is the Regional Air Quality Strategy, which is prepared and administered by the San Diego APCD. Short-term air quality impacts during construction would occur from heavy equipment exhaust emissions, construction-related trips by workers, delivery trucks, and material hauling trucks, and from associated fugitive dust generation. Heavy construction equipment is usually diesel-powered. In general, emissions from diesel-powered equipment contain more nitrogen oxide compounds (NOx), sulfur oxide compounds (SOx), and PM10, and less carbon monoxide (CO) and reactive organic compounds (ROCs), than emissions from gasoline-powered engines. NOx compounds and ROCs are precursors to ozone formation. Construction equipment anticipated for this project could typically include a tractor, compactor, scrapers, backhoe, cranes, grader, dump and concrete trucks, and miscellaneous tractor-trailer delivery trucks. The equipment that may be found at any one time at the construction site will vary. Short-term sources of construction-related air emissions include: (a) fugitive dust from grading activities, (b) construction exhaust, and (c) construction related by worker commute, delivery trucks, and material hauling trucks. The APCD does not have specific significance thresholds for air pollutants generated during construction. However, the APCD does specify Air Quality Impact Analysis (AQIA) Trigger Levels for review of new stationary sources. Although these trigger levels are specified for stationary sources, they are used here to assess the potential impacts due to air emissions during project construction. The AQIA Trigger Levels are: NOx 250 pounds per day SOx 250 pounds per day CO 550 pounds per day PM10 100 pounds per day No AQIA Trigger Levels specified for ROCs have been adopted. If anticipated project emissions exceed any of these Trigger Levels, a more detailed Air Quality Impact Analysis may be required by the APCD. For this evaluation, project construction air emissions were estimated using the California Air Resources Board Urbemis7G version 3.2 air emission estimation program. The Urbemis7G program does not include em1ss1on factors for SOx compounds. The equipment emission factors used in Urbemis7G are the same as those found in the South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook, and the Handbook does include emission factors for SOx compounds. A comparison of the CEQA Air Quality Handbook NOx and SOx compound emission factors reveals that the SOx emission factors are consistently less than the corresponding NOx emission factors for the same types of equipment. Therefore, it can be c concluded that the total SOx emissions from a project will be less than the total NOx emissions from that project. The San Diego APCD Trigger Levels for NOx and SOx compounds are the same (250 pounds per day). Consequently, for this assessment it can be concluded that if the total NOx emissions projected by Urbemis7G are less than the AQIA Trigger Levels, then the total SOx emissions will also be below the Trigger Levels. As indicated, the amount and types of equipment on-site at any one time will vary. This assessment conservatively assumes that all of the projected equipment could be working on-site simultaneously. Under this assumption, the maximum projected daily air emissions during construction would be: NOx 158 pounds per day SOx <158 pounds per day CO 92 pounds per day PM1o 26 pounds per day Thus, the maximum projected daily air emissions due to construction of the proposed project would be below all AQIA Trigger Levels. Dust control during grading operations is regulated by the APCD and must conform to APCD Rules and Regulations. All project construction is required to incorporate best management practices that include the following measures to reduce fugitive dust impacts: 1. All unpaved construction areas shall be sprinkled with water or other acceptable San Diego APCD dust-control agents during dust- generating activities to reduce dust emissions. Additional watering or acceptable APCD dust-control agents shall be applied during dry weather or windy days until dust emissions are not visible. 2. All trucks hauling dirt and debris shall be covered to reduce windblown dust and spills. 3. On dry days, dirt or debris spilled onto paved surfaces shall be swept up immediately to reduce re-suspension of particulate matter caused by vehicle movement. Approach routes to construction site shall be cleaned daily of construction-related dirt in dry weather. 4. On-site stockpiles of excavated material shall be covered or watered. Given the small amount of grading and construction overall, air emissions associated with this project are not anticipated to result in any significant impacts. b. No Impact. See response to II I.a. c. No Impact. See response to II I.a. d. No Impact. See response to II I.a. e. No Impact. See response to II I.a. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES v. VI. a. No Impact. The proposed site is located Planning Area of Bressi Ranch CT 00-06. This planning area is part of the Bressi Ranch Master Plan. b. No Impact. See previous response. c. No Impact. See previous response. d. No Impact. See previous response. e. No Impact. See previous response. f. No Impact. See previous response. g. No Impact. See previous response. CULTURAL RESOURCES a. No Impact. See previous response IV .a. b. No Impact. See previous response IV.a. c. No Impact. See previous response IV .a. d. No Impact. See previous response IV.a. GEOLOGY AND SOILS a.i. No Impact. The project site is not within a fault-rupture hazard zone quadrangle map indexed in the Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. c a.ii. Less Than Significant Impact. The project site will likely be subject to ground shaking in response to either a local moderate or more distant large-magnitude earthquake. Seismic risk at the site is comparable to the risk for the San Diego area in general. The closest source to the site for ground motion , and the source that would produce the greatest ground acceleration at the site, are the Julian and Temecula segments of the Elsinore fault zone, about 24 miles to the northeast, and the Del Mar segment of the Rose Canyon/Newport-Inglewood fault zone, about 5 miles west of the project site. Project design will meet or exceed existing earthquake design standards, including the Uniform Building Code guidelines currently adopted by for seismic safety standards in California. a.iii. Less Than Significant Impact. Liquefaction, or related ground rupture, failures are not anticipated. The project site involves a fill condition from CT 00-06 and project specific fill with acceptable material. a.iv. No Impact. The soils report indicates a need to over-excavate and re-compact the soil in the vicinity of the improvements due to the loose nature of the surface soil. The proposed site involves a fill condition. Any adverse conditions exposed during the grading effort for this project would be remedied prior to construction of the recycled water pump station. b. No Impact. The pump station structures are subterranean and the site is paved with asphalt concrete. The site will require fill materials to match the existing grade. Grading will follow best management practices for the control of erosion, such as straw bale or sandbag barriers, and outlet protection. Finished grades will be matted or promptly planted at the end of construction according to the landscape plan prepared by the developer of CT 00-06. c. Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is a fill location that does not have the soil conditions associated with a potential for geologic instability. Additionally, standard engineering practices for recompaction, fill placement, ect. will be utilized during construction. d. No Impact. Expansive soils will not be utilized for fill of the subject site. e. No Impact. The proposed pump stations will not generate or discharge wastewater on-site. No septic tank, or alternative wastewater disposal system, exists or is proposed as part of the project. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS a. No Impact. The operation of the proposed pump stations does not involve the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. b. No Impact. See response to VI I.a. c. No Impact. See response to VI I.a. d. No Impact. The site is not included on a list of hazardous materials site compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. e. Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is located approximately one-quarter miles south-east of McClellan-Palomar Airport and is within the area covered in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for that airport. The site is within the 60 dB (A) CNEL contour, the Flight Activity Zone, and the Airport Influence Area designated in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The proposed project does not present a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. f. No Impact. The project site is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. g. No. Impact. Neither construction of the pump stations nor operation of the proposed facilities will significantly affect, block, or interfere with traffic on public streets, including any streets that would be used for emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. h. No Impact. No activities including the use of highly flammable products or materials will be conducted on-site. The pump stations will be housed in a subterranean structure not readily susceptible to damage by fire. No people will reside, or work, on-site with exception to temporary site visits for maintenance and operations. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY a. No Impact. The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. b. No Impact. The project will not withdraw any groundwater or discharge into the existing groundwater. No existing water quality conditions will be adversely affected. c. No Impact. The project will not withdraw any groundwater or discharge into the existing groundwater. No existing water quality conditions will be adversely affected. c d. Less than Significant Impact. The construction of the pump stations will decrease the adsorption rates and increase the amount of surface runoff compared to existing conditions. Considering the small surface area of the subterranean buildings and on-site paving, the impact is expected to be less than significant. e. Less than Significant Impact. The construction of the pump stations will decrease the adsorption rates and increase the amount of surface runoff compared to existing conditions. Considering the small surface area of the subterranean buildings and on-site paving, the impact is expected to be less than significant. f. No Impact. Impervious surfaces at the pump stations will incrementally increase runoff from the site; however, the operational sectors of the site will be enclosed and isolated from runoff. No substantial additional pollutant loading of runoff is anticipated due to the low level of activity associated with the site. g. No Impact. See previous responses. All transport, handling, use, and disposal of substances such as petroleum products, solvents, and paints related to construction, operation, and maintenance of the facilities will comply with all federal, state, and local laws regulating the management and use of hazardous materials. h. No Impact. No housing is proposed. i. No Impact. Project site is not within a 1 00-yr flood hazard area. j. No Impact. No construction of a dam or construction in an area within the flood limits downstream from a dam is proposed. k. No Impact. The project would not result in, or expose people, to a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. I. Less Than Significant Impact. See response to Vl.b. m. No Impact. See response to Vlll.f. n. No Impact. See previous responses. o. No Impact. See previous responses. p. No Impact. See previous responses. IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING a. No Impact. The proposed pump station will be located at the northwest corner of Planning Area No. 3 of CT 00-06 and will not divide said improvement. b. No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of any agency with jurisdiction over the project. c. No Impact. The City of Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad (HMP), December 1999, does not identified the project site as a conservation area in the HMP. No other habitat conservation plans specific to this site encumber the property. X. MINERAL RESOURCES a. No Impact. Due to the nature of the proposed pump stations, there will be no loss of availability of a known mineral resource. b. No Impact. Due to the nature of the proposed pump stations, there will be no loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. XI. NOISE a. No Impact. The proposed pump station is located within an industrial site of Planning Area No. 3 of CT 00-06. The Noise Element of the Carlsbad General Plan states that the City's policy is that 60 dB(A) Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is the maximum exterior noise level to which residential units should be subjected, except that 65 db(A) is the maximum for residential units subject to noise from McClellan-Palomar Airport. The Municipal Code (Chapter 8.48) prohibits construction activity that would create disturbing, excessive, or offensive noise after sunset of any day, and before 7 A.M. Monday through Friday, and before 8 A.M. on Saturday, and all day Sunday and specified holidays. The Noise Ordinance does not set a defined noise level standard for construction activities, but simply limits the hours of construction. Construction of the pump stations will be limited to the hours allowed in the Municipal Code. The features of the pump stations that could produce significant noise levels that would affect nearby receptors include the operation of the pumps and motors that drive them. The pump stations are designed so that the pumps will be enclosed in a subterranean. The facilities will be designed and constructed so that the sound level at the presumed locations of the industrial buildings will be less than the City of Carlsbad General Plan standard of 60 dB (A) CNEL for residential areas. b. No Impact. The project will not produce groundbourne vibration or noise outside the project site boundaries. c. Less Than Significant Impact. See response to Xl.a. The pump station projects will result in an incremental permanent increase in noise in the vicinity of the site. Since this increase will not exceed levels stated in the Carlsbad General Plan, the increase is not considered substantial or significant. d. Less Than Significant Impact. During construction, a temporary increase in the ambient noise levels in the project vicinity is anticipated. Construction will be scheduled to conform to the limitations specified in the Municipal Code; thus, the increase is not considered substantial or significant. e. No Impact. The project is located within the area of Comprehensive Land Use Plan for McClellan-Palomar Airport. However, the project will not expose people residing or working in the area to a significant increase in noise levels, and operations and maintenance personnel will be exposed to aircraft noise levels in ranging from 60 dB (A) to 65 dB (A) CNEL as indicated by noise contours mapped in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. f. No Impact. The project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING a. Less Than Significant Impact. In addition to the general resource conservation, a primary goal of the proposed recycled water phase II project is to reduce the city's reliance on imported water sources provided by the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). The proposed recycled water pump station is a component in the systemwide expansion project. Carlsbad's anticipated reduced need for imported water could, in theory, mean that additional water resources are made available to other MWD customers, which could have growth inducing impact either directly or indirectly. The amount of water that could be made available is 4 MGD that is based on the capacity of the previously approved water recycling facility. Given that relatively small amount of water within the diverse context of the MWD market (i.e. customers such as agriculture, industry, residential and a service area covering all of Southern California), the potential for growth induction is less than significant. At the local level, ··....,; additional water resources are not expected to induce growth. Growth in the City of Carlsbad is regulated and numerically capped by the City's Growth Management Program. b. No Impact. The proposed water pump stations will be sited on a designated easement site within Planning Area No. 3 of CT 00-06 and will not displace any housing. c. No Impact. The proposed project will be sited on a designated easement site within Planning Area No. 3 of CT 00-06 and will not displace any substantial numbers of people. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a.i. No Impact. No additional impacts to the City of Carlsbad fire protection services will result due to these projects. a.ii. No Impact. No additional impacts to the City of Carlsbad police protection services will result due to these projects. a.iii. No Impact. No additional impacts to schools will result from the water pump stations with exception that recycled water will be made available for irrigation water at some of the schools. The water quality will meet or exceed the requirements of the State Health Services for unrestricted use of the recycled water. a.iv. No Impact. No additional impacts to parks will result from the proposed projects. a.v. No Impact. No additional impacts to other public facilities will result from the proposed projects. XIV. RECREATION a. No Impact. The projects Will not result in the need for additional parks or other recreational features. b. No Impact. The projects does not include recreational facilities or require the construction, or expansion, of recreational facilities. XV. TRANSPORTATION a. No Impact. The amount of projected daily traffic anticipated as a result of the project, short and long term, is minimal. Therefore traffic impacts are expected to be less than significant. To minimize short-term impacts relating to construction traffic, the project is subject to the City's haul permitting procedure. In the long term, a minor amount of additional traffic is anticipated due to the project. The pump stations will likely require a daily site visit for operation and maintenance of the each facility. b. No Impact. See previous response. Levels of service are predicted on normal weekday traffic and do not include temporary effects such as construction traffic. Normal traffic to the pump station site will not affect levels of service on roads and intersections. c. No Impact. The projects will not generate or require air traffic and would not physically interfere with air traffic patterns. d. No Impact. The projects will not change the geometry of public roads. The very low level of traffic using the pump station sites will have virtually no effect on normal traffic on Palomar Airport Road, El Camino Real, or the interior streets of Planning Area No. 3. e. No Impact. Emergency access separate from the ordinary access is not required. The projects will not affect any public, or private, access to other property. f. No Impact. Sufficient space to park operations and maintenance vehicles will be provided on-site. There is not effect on public parking. g. No Impact. Because of the restricted access to the site and its limited and specialized uses, there would be no effect on or demand for alternative transportation programs, facilities, or equipment. The projects will not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS a. No Impact. The proposed water pump stations will not have an effect on wastewater treatment by exceeding wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Quality Control Board. b. No Impact. The proposed recycled water pump station is a component of a systemwide expansion of which approval for the recycled water treatment plant was approved under separate action. c. No Impact. No new storm drains or channels are required for the existing facilities or the proposed project. d. No Impact. The project will not impact local or regional water supplies. However, additional treated potable water would be made available since the recycled water pump station project will produce recycled water for irrigation and industrial purposes. e. No Impact. The proposed projects and the existing site facilities will not require wastewater treatment services. f. No Impact. The projects will not ordinarily generate any appreciable volume of solid waste , and solid waste collection from the site will not be required. Any solid waste generated during maintenance will be taken off the site for appropriate disposal. g. No Impact. Any solid waste generated on the site during construction or operation would be removed and disposed of in an appropriate facility in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations. XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a. No Impact. The proposed projects are located on a designated easement site within Planning Area No. 3 of CT 00-06 and do not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment. No habitats for fish or wildlife species are known to exist at the developed site. b. No Impact. The proposed projects are located on a designated easement site within Planning Area No. 3 of CT 00-06 and do not produce cumulatively considerable impacts. c. No Impact. The proposed projects are located on a designed easement site within CT 00-06 and does not have environmental effects that cause directly, nor indirectly, substantial adverse effects on human beings. XVII. EARLIER ANAL VSES The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008. 1 . Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01 ), City of Carlsbad Planning Department (March 1994). 2. Preliminary Design Report for the Encina Basin Water Reclamation Program, Phase II Recycled Water Pump Stations by Krieger & Stewart, Inc. 2002. 3. Initial Study and Environmental Checklist for the Encina Basin Water Reclamation Program Phase II Project. 1999. 4. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Recycled Water Pump Station Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real City of Carlsbad Vinje & Middleton Engineering, Inc., 01/20/03, Job #02-203-P). 5. City of Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan. City of Carlsbad Planning Department, 1999. 6. City of Carlsbad Bressi Potable and Recycled Water Pump Station Noise Impact Report (DHK Engineers, 05/2004) MCUP & CUP ANNUAL REVIEW SHEET ~ INSTRUCTIONS ~ 1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY. 2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS). 3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE, FIRE, ETC.). 4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR THE REVIEW. 5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW. 6. HAVE SENIOR PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN. 7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE (ADMIN WILL FILE). PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NAME: BRESSI PUMP STATIONS CASE NUMBER(S): -=C-=U-=-P-=-04=---=-16;:;,...._ ________________ _ APPROVING RESO NO(S). =57:....::2=8.:.....=5:...:....72=9:......:&=57:.....:::3-=-0 ____________ _ PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: "'-PA::...=.:..M:;....;D:;_;R=E::::,_W;....;._ __________ _ PROJECT HISTORY Does project have a code complaint history? If yes, check those that apply and explain below. 0 Code Enforcement 0 Police 0 Yes Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained): [ZI No 0 Fire Prevention Q:\.CEO\.PLANNING\.AOMIN\. TEMPLATES\.MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 03/13 .E REVIEW INFORMATION 3 l ;Jermit expired? 0 Yes IZJ No Permit expires: Per12etuity: •II of view: October 20,2016 Name: Carlsbad MuniciJ2al Water District (CMWD} 0 Applicant ~ Owner 0 Other If other, state title: *CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: CMWD Phone: 760-438-2722 ext. 7138 Contact name (if different): Don Wasko Address: 5950 El Camino Real1 Carlsbad1 CA 92008 Mailing (if different): Same E-mail: don. wasko@carlsbadca.gov (optional) *CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION: Name: Same as above Phone: Contact name (if different): Address: Mailing (if different): E-mail: (optional) Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans? ~Yes 0 No If no, list below the condition(s) and/ or plan aspects the project is not in compliance with per resolution number or exhibit. Corrective action(s) to be taken: None D~er complet~ follow-up review a~onf"J)'med project compliance: ~. '})A /2 ./J ) ./ j Planner Signature Senior Planner *Applicant and owner information must be updated for annual review to be complete. Q:\.CEO\.PLANNING\.AOMIN\. TEMPLATES\.MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 03/13 CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Protection Services PROJECT CONDITION REPORT PROJECT NAME: Bressi Pump Stations Date: 081004 Project number: Planning CUP 04-16/SUP 04-08 Project conditions: (Note: The following identifies specific conditions necessary to achieve Fire Department approval.) FIRE -shall condition that the access road to the site be designed to accommodate vehicles in excess of 60000 GVW, and have an all weather surface of either asphalt or concrete. Fire shall also ask that the two pump 'pits' be signed indicating that these are permitted confined spaces in accordance with Cal-OSHA requirements. Fire would also ask that the electrical disconnects for each pump or series of pumps be clearly labeled and be above finished grade. July 1,2004 TO: FROM: City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM Elaine Blackburn, Planning Clyde Wickham, Engineering SUBJECT: COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND INITIAL ISSUES STATEMENT BRESSI RECYCLED AND POTIBLE WATER PUMP HOUSE: CUP 04-16 The Engineering Department has completed its review of the above project for application completeness. The application and plans submitted for this project are considered incomplete and unsuitable for further review due to the following missing or incomplete items: 1 . The elevations shown represent a grade different than the approved rough grading plan per CT 00-06 (Bressi Ranch). Please provide existing and proposed contours to demonstrate the proposed changes. 2. The driveway gradient and elevations of the proposed pad are not provided. Please clarify. 3. Provide a preliminary drainage study that identifies the development discharge flows and preliminary recommendations on the anticipated storm drain infrastructure required as part of the proposed project. The "catch basin" shown on sheet 2 of the site plan should include the outfall or extension of pipe. Pipe size should also be shown. 4. The legal description of the proposed project should be provided on the cover sheet along with the current assessors parcel number. In addition the following are issues of concern that should be addressed prior to staff support of the application: 1. Provide a preliminary storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) that identifies "pollutants of concern" that could be generated by this type of project. The preliminary SWPPP shall address what structural and non-structural best management practices BMP's are (or will be} implemented to capture and treat storm runoff to ensure compliance with new NPDES regulations. The Site plan shall show the tentative location of proposed BMP's necessary to capture and treat storm runoff. The preparation of a final SWPPP will be required before grading permits are issued for this project. The Ribbon Gutter along the east side of the project should be designed as a Grass- Lined bio filter to reduce pollutants from this site. Staff supports this type of a filter system in lieu of expensive maintenance related improvements. 5. The driveway and improvements to the corner pressure reducing station, retaining wall and corner facility should be clarified. Will the retaining wall be removed? Will the existing driveway on El Camino Real (show it) remain or be removed? 6. The 20' wide access easement will be a "Public Utility and Access Easement" please clarify if this (has been or,) will be obtained. 7. Will there be underground power and utility service to this project. Please clarify. This review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project and additional items of concern, as well as comments on technical and design issues, will be identified upon submission of the above items. If you or the applicant has any questions, please either see or call me at 760-602-2742. C:\Documents and Settings\eblac.OOO\Local Settings\Temp\Issues Ltr 1st review.doc MCUP & CUP ANNUAL REVIEW SHEET FILE COPY INSTRUCTIONS 1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY. 2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS). 3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE, FIRE, ETC.). 4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR THE REVIEW. 5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW. 6. HAVE SENIOR PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN. 7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE (ADMIN WILL FILE). PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NAME: BRESS! PUMP STATIONS CASE NUMBER(S): ~Cc.!:::::U.:....P..:::..04.:....-.=.:16~---------------- APPROVING RESO NO(S). =57-=2:.:::::.l8 ~5..:....:72=9....::&:::..;5:::...:..7..::::..30:::___ ___________ _ PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: ~P:...:.A=M~D::::..:R~E~W:..!..._ __________ _ PROJECT HISTORY Does project have a code complaint history? If yes, check those that apply and explain below. 0 Code Enforcement 0 Police DYes Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained): [8:1 No 0 Fire Prevention Q:'\.CED'\.PLANNING'\.ADMIN'\. TEMPLATES'\.MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 03/13 \! "1\f'\: ii~ ',\Jv .. w REVIEW INFORMATION Has the permit expired? 0 Yes [gl No Permit expires: =-P~er~p::.!:e"'-!tu:!.!i~ty:.__ _______ _ Dateofreview: /t:>-18',13 Name: Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) 0 Applicant [gl Owner 0 Other If other, state title: ---------------------------- *CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: CMWD Phone: 760-438-2722 ext. 7138 Contact name (if different): .=:D:..!:o:.!.!n:....:W~as:!.!:k::.:::o:.__ ___________________ _ Address: 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Mailing (if different): ::::;Sa=m=e ________________________ _ E-mail: don.wasko@carlsbadca.gov (optional) *CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION: Name: Sameasabove Phone:-------------- Contact name (if different): ------------------------- Address: --------------------------------- Mailing (if different): ---------------------------- E-mail: (optional) Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans? [gj Yes 0 No If no, list below the condition(s) and/ or plan aspects the project is not in compliance with per resolution number or exhibit. Corrective action(s) to be taken: Date P.lanner completed follow-up review and confirmed project compliance: ~~~) b£:2---(O•Z-j•f> Planner Signature Senior Planner *Applicant and owner information must be updated for annual review to be complete. Q:'\CED'\PLANN!NG'\ADM!N'\ TEMPLATES'\MCUPANNUALREV!EWSHEET 03/13 MCUP & QP ANNUAL REVIE~:' SHEET FiLE CG?·j~ INSTRUCTIONS 1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY. 2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS). 3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE, FIRE, ETC.). 4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR THE REVIEW. 5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW. 6. HAVE PRINCIPAL PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN. 7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE (ADMIN WILL FILE). PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NAME: BRESS! PUMP STATIONS CASE NUMBER(S): ~C..::::U.!;..P....::::.04.!;..-.:.:16;;:__ _______________ _ APPROVING RESO NOS. =57c...:2=8z....:.,5::....:..7-=29::....L.-=.5..:....;73:::....::0'----------------- PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: =PA=-=M=-=D=R=E=W'-'------------- PROJECT HISTORY Does project have a code complaint history? D Yes ~No If yes, check those that apply and explain below. D Code Enforcement D Police D Fire Prevention Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained): H/ ADMIN/TEMPLATE/MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET 03/09 ,...,, REVIEW INFORMATIO~ lio"-..;-'# . __ ,,.,/ Has the permit expired? DYes [8J No Permit expires: Valid as long as facilitr: is in use. Dateofreview: 10/19/12 Name: Carlsbad MuniciJ2al Water District (CMWD) [8J Applicant [8J Owner D Other If other, state title: *CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: CMWD Phone: 760-438-2722 x 7151 Contact name (if different): lase Warner Address: 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Mailing (if different): E-mail: jase.warner@carlsbadca.gov (optional) *CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION: Name: Same as above Phone: Contact name (if different): Address: Mailing (if different): E-mail: (optional) Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans? ~Yes D No Datez completedfollow-up review and coZi~:roject compliance: /~::J L£2, ~ y -- Planner Signature :JSriil:cipal Planner Signature *Applicant and owner information must be updated for annual review to be complete. H/ ADMIN/TEMPLATE 03/09 MCUP & ~JP ANNUAL REVIry.' SHEET FiLE COPY INSTRUCTIONS 1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY. 2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS). 3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE, FIRE, ETC.). 4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR THE REVIEW. 5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW. 6. HAVE PRINCIPAL PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN. 7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE (ADMIN WILL FILE). PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NAME: BRESS! PUMP STATIONS CASE NUMBER(S): =C-=U"'-P~04"'--..:::..:16"------------------ APPROVING RESO NOS. .::...:57'-=2=8<-=5:..:....72=9~57....:::3..;:;..0 _____________ _ PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: ~PA=-=-"M:....:D=-=R=E=W:....:...._ __________ _ PROJECT HISTORY Does project have a code complaint history? If yes, check those that apply and explain below. 0 Code Enforcement 0 Police 0 Yes Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained): H/ ADMIN/TEMPLATE/MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET [8:1 No 0 Fire Prevention 03/09 () REVIEW INFORMATIO~ Has the permit expired? D Yes IZ! No Permit expires: Valid as long as facility is in use. Date of review: 10/11/11 Name: Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) 1Zl Applicant 1Zl Owner D Other If other, state title: ---------------------------- *CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: CMWD Phone: 760-438-2722 x 7151 Contact name (if different): .l!:Ia~s"'-e...!.W.!..!a"!:.r~n""'er,__ ___________________ _ Address: 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Mailing (if different): --------------------------- E-mail: jase.warner@carlsbadca.gov (optional) *CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION: Name: Same as above Phone: -------------- Contact name (if different): ------------------------- Address: -------------------------------- Mailing (if different): --------------------------- E-mail: (optional) Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans? [g) Yes 0 No If no, list below the condition(s) and/ or plan aspects the project is not in compliance with per resolution number or exhibit. Per Bill Plummer and Dave de Cordova the project is in compliance with Condition No. 9 of PC Reso No. 5726, which requires the installation of landscaping to provide screening of the above grade elements of the pump facility. Date pl~ompleted follow-up review and confirmo;Jl.,Project compliance: --~~~-~~-~~2~ ~A~·~~~~?~-~------ Planner Signature Principal Planner Signature *Applicant and owner information must be updated for annual review to be complete. H/ ADMIN/TEMPLATE 03/09 MCUP & <OJP ANNUAL REVI~J4' SHEET FILE COPY -. ., INSTRUCTIONS 1. COMPLETE PROJECT INFORMATION BELOW AND PRINT COPY. 2. DOWNLOAD (DMS) RESOLUTIONS AND REVIEW ALL CONDITIONS AND APPROVED PLANS (COORDINATE WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS). 3. REVIEW CODE COMPLAINT HISTORY (CODE ENFORCEMENT, POLICE, FIRE, ETC.). 4. CONTACT APPLICANT (OR OWNER) AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR THE REVIEW. 5. COMPLETE REVIEW INFORMATION SECTION DURING REVIEW. 6. HAVE PRINCIPAL PLANNER REVIEW AND SIGN. 7. PLACE COMPLETED REVIEW SHEET IN ADMIN IN-BOX FOR PROJECT FILE (ADMIN WILL FILE). PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NAME: BRESSI PUMP STATIONS CASE NUMBER(S): -=C-=U..;:....P-=-0-=-4--=-16.::......_ ________________ _ APPROVING RESO NOS. =57-=2=8,'-=5~72=9..~....5=7-=3..:::..0 -------------- PLANNER COMPLETING REVIEW: =-=PA=-=M::..;.;;:....::D=RE:..=..:.W....:...,_ __________ _ PROJECT HISTORY Does project have a code complaint history? If yes, check those that apply and explain below. D Code Enforcement D Police DYes Comments (include corrective actions taken and date compliance obtained): H/ ADMIN/TEMPLATE/MCUPANNUALREVIEWSHEET ~No D Fire Prevention 03/09 I", REVIEW INFORMATIOI\Q 't Has the permit expired? 0 Yes [gl No Permit expires: Valid as long as facility is in use. Date of review: 10/8/10 Name: Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) [gl Applicant [gl Owner 0 Other If other, state title: ---------------------------- *CURRENT APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: CMWD Phone: 760-438-2722 x 7151 Contact name (if different): ""'Ia=s..;;;..e..:...W.;...;ar=n=er::....._ ___________________ _ Address: 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Mailing (if different): --------------------------- E-mail: jase.wamer@carlsbadca.gov (optional) *CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION: Name: Same as above Phone: --------------Contact name (if different): ------------------------- Address: -------------------------------- Mailing (if different): --------------------------- E-mail: (optional) Does project comply with conditions of resolution(s) and approved plans? D Yes IZ! No If no, list below the condition(s) and/or plan aspects the project is with resolution number or exhibit. Corrective action(s) to be taken: CMWD is not in compliance with Condition No.9 of . PC Reso No. 5729. CMWD was suppose to install planting materials to screen the above grade elements of the pump facility and they have not. I have e-mailed Don Wasko, Steve Plyer, and Jase Warner with CMWD to inform them about the condition. No one has e-mailed me back yet. I will follow up with CMWD when I get back to work in November. ner completed follow-up review and confirmed project compliance: L' ~~ Planner Signature ~cipal Planner Signature *Applicant and owner information must be updated for annual review to be complete. H/ ADMIN/TEMPLATE 03/09 SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY P.O. BOX 82776. SAN DIEGO, CA 92138-2776 619.400.2400 WWW.SAN.ORG October 28, 2004 City of Carlsbad Mr. Chris Muehlbacher Associate Planner, Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Airport Land Use Commission Consistency Determination ~ Water Pump Stations within the Bressi Ranch Master Plan Area, City of Carlsbad; APN #213-120-03; McClellan-Palomar Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan -P AL-04-0 I 0, Resolution No. 2004-0108 C Lt f 6 l/ -J lo Dear Mr. Muehlbacher: This letter is to notify the City of Carlsbad ("City") of the October 4, 2004, consistency determination that was made by the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority ("Authority" or "SDCRAA"), acting in its capacity as the San Diego County Airport Land Use Commission ("ALUC"), for the referenced project. The ALUC has determined that the proposed project is conditionally consistent with the McClellan-Palomar Airport ("Airport") Comprehensive Land Use Plan ("CLUP"). A copy of Resolution 2004-0108, approved by the ALUC on October 4, 2004, and memorializing the consistency determination, is enclosed for your information. The ALUC's determination that the water pump stations within the Bressi Ranch Master Plan Area project is conditionally consistent with the Airport CLUP was made consistent with the· ALUC Policies and the State Aeronautics Act provisions (Cal. Pub. Util. Code §21670-21679.5), and was based on numerous facts and findings, including those summarized below: (1) The proposed project involves a Conditional Use Permit and Scenic Corridor Special Use Permit to construct two subterranean water pump stations within the Bressi Ranch Master Plan Area. The proposed project is located within the 60-65 dB CNEL noise contour. (2) The McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP Noise/Land Use Compatibility Matrix (Category 1 0) allows low intensity land uses with minimal human activity within the 60-65 dB CNEL noise contours including: agriculture, extractive industry, fishing, utilities, public right-of- way (R-0-W) and golf courses. Since the project seeks to build two subterranean water pump stations and associated electrical components (utilities), the proposed project is compatible with the McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP. (3) The proposed project is located outside the Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) for McClellan- Palomar Airport. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP. SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - Mr. Chris Muehlbacher October 25,2004 Page2 (4) The proposed project is located within the Flight Activity Zone (FAZ) for the Airport. The McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP requires development within these areas to be held free of intensive development (more than ten dwelling units per acre) and all uses which involve the assembly oflarge groups of people (more than 100). ( 5) The proposed project calls for the construction of two subterranean water pump stations and associated above ground electrical components (no taller 10 feet above the grade). Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with suggested F AZ land uses and development guidelines found in the McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP. ( 6) The City must include as a condition of project approval that all assembly areas within the FAZ of the proposed project be limited (as defined by California Building Code Group A occupancy) to no more than one hundred (100) people per area in order to be consistent with F AZ guidelines in the McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP. (7) If the proposed project contains the above-required condition, the proposed project would be consistent with the McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP. (8) This Board action is not a "project" as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pub. Res. Code Section 21065; and is not a "developmenf' as defined by the California Coastal Act Pub. Res. Code Section 30106. Please contact Ms. Linda Johnson at (619) 400-2463 if you have any questions regarding the issues addressed in this letter. Very truly yours, Thelia F. Bowens President/CEO TFB/LMJ/arw Enclosures: Resolution 2004-0108 cc: Amy Gonzalez, SDCRAA -General Counsel Ron Bolyard, Caltrans -Division of Aeronautics Peter Drinkwater, Director-County Airports . ' RESOLUTION NO. 2004-0108 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY DETERMINING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SCENIC CORRIDOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT TWO SUBTERRANEAN WATER PUMP STATIONS WITHIN THE BRESSI RANCH MASTER PLAN AREA, CARLSBAD) IS CONDITIONALLY CONSISTENT WITH THE MCCLELLAN-PALOMAR AIRPORT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. WHEREAS, the Airport Authority, acting in its capacity as the Airport Land Use Commission for San Diego County, was requested by the City of Carlsbad to determine the consistency of a proposed project (Conditional Use Permit and Scenic Corridor Special Use Permit to construct two subterranean water pump stations within the Bressi Ranch Master Plan Area in the City of Carlsbad) located within the Airport Influence Area (AlA) for the McClellan-Palomar Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP), adopted in April 1994; and WHEREAS, the site plans indicate that the proposed project site is located within the 60-65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) noise contour for McClellan- Palomar Airport; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is located outside of the Runway Protection Zones (RPZ) for the Airport; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is located within the Flight Activity Zone (FAZ) designated and described in the McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP; and WHEREAS, development within the FAZ should be held free of intensive development (more than 10 dwelling units per acre) and all uses which involve the assembly of large groups of people (more than 100); and WHEREAS, the height of all structures must be reviewed by the City of Carlsbad to ensure that they conform with the Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77 Guidelines, using the site development plan review procedure. Any use found to be an "obstruction" by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) should be determined not to be in conformance with the CLUP; and WHEREAS, this Airport Authority has considered the information provided by staff, including information in the staff report and other relevant material regarding the project; and I • Resolution No. 2004-01 08 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, the Board has provided an opportunity for the City of Carlsbad and interested members of the public to present information and arguments regarding this matter. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Airport Authority, serving as the ALUC for San Diego County, pursuant to Section 21670.3 of the Public Utilities Code, determines that the proposed project (Conditional Use Permit and Scenic Corridor Special Use Permit to construct two subterranean water pump stations within the Bressi Ranch Master Plan Area, Carlsbad) is conditionally consistent with the adopted McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP, which was adopted in 1994, based upon the following facts and findings: (1) The proposed project involves a Conditional Use Permit and Scenic Corridor Special Use permit to construct two subterranean water pump stations within the Bressi Ranch Master Plan Area. The proposed project is located within the 60-65 dB CNEL noise contour. (2) The McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP Noise/Land Use Compatibility Matrix (Category 1 0) allows low intensity land uses with minimal human activity within the 60-65 dB CNEL noise contours including: agriculture, extractive industry, fishing, utilities, public right-of-way (R-0-W) and golf courses. Since the project seeks to build two subterranean water pump stations and associated electrical components (utilities), the proposed project is compatible with the McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP. (3) The proposed project is located outside of the Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) for McClellan-Palomar Airport. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP. (4) The proposed project is located within the Flight Activity Zone (FAZ) for the Airport. The McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP requires development within these areas to be held free of intensive development (more than ten dwelling units per acre) and all uses which involve the assembly of large groups of people (more than 100). (5) The proposed project calls for the construction of two subterranean water pump stations and associated above ground electrical components (no taller 10 feet above the grade). Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with suggested FAZ land uses and development guidelines found in the McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP. (6) The City must include as a condition of project approval that all assembly areas within the FAZ of the proposed project be limited (as defined by California Building Code Group A occupancy) to no more than one I • Resolution No. 2004-01 08 Page 3 of 3 hundred (1 00) people per area in order to be consistent with Flight Activity Zone guidelines in the McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP. (7) If the proposed project contains the above required condition, the proposed project would be consistent with the McClellan-Palomar Airport CLUP. (8) This Board action is not a "project" as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pub. Res. Code Section 21605; and is not a "developmenf' as defined by the California Coastal Act Pub. Res. Code Section 30106. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the Board of the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority at a regular meeting this 4th day of October, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: Board Members: NOES: Board Members: ABSENT: Board Members: APPROVED AS TO FORM: BRETON K. LOBNER GENERAL COUNSEL Craver, Jacobson, Johnson, Lynch, Nieto, Peterson, Reynolds, Sessom None lnzunza ATTEST: TONY R. USSELL DIRE R, CORPORATE SERVICES/ AUTHORITY CLERK SAN DIEGO CWNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY P.O. BOX 82776, SAN DIEGO. CA 92138-2776 6 19 .400.2400 \v"w"w'.SAN.ORG September 8, 2004 City of Carlsbad Mr. Chris Muehlbacher Associate Planner, Planning Department 163 5 Faraday A venue Carlsbad, CA 92008 / "' \ ~t~ \.""' ' ).-'~\ I ~ "~ ·~ RECEIVED SEP 10 2004 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Re: San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) Determination-Bressi Pump Stations. City of Carlsbad; Conditional Use Permit and Scenic Corridor Special Use Permit to construct two subterranean water pump stations within the Bressi Ranch Master Plan Area; APN #213-120-03; McClellan-Palomar Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) Dear Mr. Muehlbacher: The San Diego County Regional Airport Authority has received your application for a consistency determination by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). This proposed project is located within the Airport Influence Area (AlA) for the McClellan-Palomar Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) and, according to State Public Utilities Code Section 21670, is required to be submitted to the ALUC for a consistency determination. We have reviewed the application and other materials that you sent, and we find that this project information meets our requirements to complete a consistency determination. The ALUC will proceed to review your project and will complete its review within sixty (60) days of the date of this letter. Thank you for your submission to the ALUC. If you have any questions, please e-mail me at ljohnson@san.org. Sincerely, ~~k .~ Linda M. Johnson, RLA, ASLA Airport Planner, Airport System Planning San Diego County Regional Airport Authority LMJ/arw cc: Amy Gonzalez, SDCRAA-General Counsel R. Austin Wiswell, Caltrans -Division of Aeronautics SA~· ~~DCRAA-Director, System Planning INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT """" """""' SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY TRELLA BOWENS PRESIDENT/CEO ATTACHMENT "B" SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY ATTN: LINDA JOHNSON, AIRPORT PLANNING P.O. BOX 82776 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92138-2776 Airport Land Use Commission For Staff Use Date: _______ _ Fee: _______ _ App#: _____ _ APPLICATION FOR DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY Project Location: on the southeast corner of El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road Assessor's Parcel No. a 0.27-ac easement within APN 213-120-03 Applicant (include name, address, telephone number, fax number and email address for all applicants):Carlsbad Municipal Water District; Chris Muehlbacher, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008; 760-602-2736 Local Jurisdiction (include contact person, address, telephone number, fax number and email address for local jurisdiction): Carlsbad Municipal Water District; Chris Muehlbacher, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008· 760-602-2736 1. Provide a detailed project description, including, but not limited to, the nature of the proposed development, including the proposed density and intensity of use, the present use of the property, if any, the height of the project, number of floors in the building, gross structural areas, lot area, lot coverages, and utility extensions: See attached. 2. Owner(s) of Record (as vested): =B:..o.r.=::es""s~i~R:=a~n'-"c==-h_,D'-'e'""'v_,.e=lo"'p""m'""e""n=t.J..., L=L'-"C"---------------- 3. Area of Parcel in Square Feet: approximately 47 acres-area of easement is 0.27-ac {approx. 12,000 sO 4. Status of Local Agency Review: under review by staff for Conditional Use Permit {CUP) and Scenic Corridor Special Use Permit {SUP) San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Consistency Determination Application Admin/Templates/Application for Determination of Consistency Approved April 3, 2003 Page I of2 """' "'-" 5. CEQA Compliance (provide status of any environmental review required by the California Environmental Quality Act or the National Environmental Policy Act and copies of any environmental documents, where applicable); 0 Categorical Exemption 0 Negative Declaration 0 Mitigated Negative Declaration 0 Environmental Impact Report 0 Environmental Impact Statement 0 Environmental Assessment 0 Finding of No Significant Impact Date Completed: expect adoption ofND and approval of permits in October, 2004 6. Provide the following as attachments to this Application Form: (i) verification of applicant's interest in property; (ii) assessor parcel map; (iii) documentation of all required permits and approvals from local, state and federal agencies; (iv) copies of required local approvals; (v) location map; (vi) project plans, including site plans, floor plans, elevations, and landscaping plans. I hereby certify that the foregoing information is a true and correct statement of fact to the best of my knowledge. dfat~ ;cr) ~lX!{ The San Diego County Regional Airport Authority (Authority), acting in its capacity as the local County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC), reserves its right to request additional information and documents regarding any proposed project submitted for a consistency determination and the payment of reasonable fees prior to making such a determination. The submittal shall not be deemed complete by the Authority until such time as all required documents and information, as determined by Authority staff, have been submitted and reviewed for completeness. FOR STAFF USE Date action required: __________________________________ _ Consistency determination: _______________________________ _ Conditions imposed: __________________________________ _ Finding of inconsistency: ________________________________ _ Applicant informed: _______________ Mailed to local agency: __________ _ Date local agency overruled ALUC consistency determination: ___________________ _ San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Consistency Determination Application Admin/Templates/Application for Determination of Consistency Approved April 3, 2003 Page 2 of2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION BRESSI PUMP STATIONS CUP 04-16/SUP 04-08 The Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) is proposing to construct two water pump stations (one for recycled water and one for potable water) in a 0.27-acre easement granted for that purpose within the Bressi Ranch Master Plan (MP 178) and tract map (CT 00-06). The easement is within Planning Area No. 3 of the Master Plan located on the southeast comer of El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road. The 0.27-acre pump station site will contain two independent subterranean pumping stations totaling 2,136 square feet (1,068 sf each). The project requires City approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and a Scenic Corridor Special Use Permit (SUP) for the El Camino Real Corridor. The proposed recycled water pump station (RWPS) will be capable of supplying recycled water to the upper pressure zone. The pumping capacity is 2,160 gallons per minute (gpm). The primary components of the proposed pump station includes: a 22-foot by 46-foot subterranean building, suction and discharge piping, a flow meter, bypass piping, an electrical switchgear, and three vertical turbine pumping units (two duty, one stand-by). The Bressi RWPS will have a 2,800-gallon cylindrical hydrologic surge tank. The surge tank will be contained in the subterranean structure and will have a 6-foot diameter and be 15-feet long. The proposed potable water pump station (PWPS) will be capable of supplying potable water from Maerkle Reservoir ( 490 pressure zone) to the 700 pressure zone during emergencies and during routine maintenance of the San Diego Water Authority's imported water aqueducts. The pumping capacity is 1,600 gpm. The primary components of the proposed pump station includes: a 22-foot by 37-foot subterranean building, suction and discharge piping, a flow meter, bypass piping, an electrical switchgear, and three vertical turbine pumping units (two duty, one stand-by). The Bressi PWPS will have a 2, 100-gallon cylindrical hydrologic surge tank. The surge tank will be contained in the subterranean stmcture and will have a 6-foot diameter and be 11-feet long. Both subterranean pump station stmctures will house the pumping units and ancillary electrical and mechanical equipment. The electrical equipment needed will include distribution switchgear, motor control center, variable frequency drives, and a main control panel. The subterranean buildings will be cooled using roof-mounted exhaust fans equipped with roof-mounted gravity ventilators. Roof-mounted equipment hatches will be provided over each pumping unit for pump removal through the roof. There will also be roof hatches to access the pump houses. These various roof hatches, vent caps, and other equipment protrusions may project up to 18 inches above the roofs of the pump houses. An electric transformer, service meter, and circuit breaker will be located above ground adjacent to each pump station. The size and height of these components is controlled by SDG&E. Transformers/circuit breakers are typically 3 ft. x 3 ft. in size and approximately 4 feet high. Service meters are typically 3 ft. x 2 ft in size and up to 6 feet in height. Therefore, these components would be expected to project.t no more than 6 feet above ground. Finally, a total of two light poles (with two lights on each pole) will be placed on the interior side of the pump station facility (one pole adjacent to each pump house). These poles will be approximately 10 feet high above grade. These lights are necessary in the event of an incident requiring work to be done at night. However, the lights would not otherwise be on, and routine maintenance work and inspections would be done during daylight. In order to maintain the high aesthetic consideration necessary, the pump stations will be accessed from a future parking area (for the future industrial building) on the interior of the site. A gate is proposed on the interior side of the project area (adjacent to the future industrial development parking area) to allow for access by CMWD staff. No screening of the project is being proposed at this time, but will be provided by the Master Plan developer as the anticipated industrial project progresses. As described, the proposed facility is almost completely underground. The only components which would be above-grade would be small and would be at an elevation approximately 20 feet above the adjacent roadways. Thus, these components would not be strikingly visible to drivers on El Camino Real or Palomar Airport Road. The developer of the Bressi Ranch industrial project will be installing and maintaining landscaping and an entry treatment on the site, including the area surrounding the proposed project as the development progresses. However, the design of the entry treatment and landscaping has not yet been finalized. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The site of the proposed project (the 0.27-acre easement) is within a 47-acre pre-graded site to be developed with planned industrial uses. The industrial lot, in tum, is part of a much larger area (approximately 485 acres) being graded for approved residential, commercial, and industrial development pursuant to the approved Bressi Ranch Master Plan. The area to the west of the project site contains the existing Olympic Resort. To the north (across Palomar Airport Road) is undeveloped land belonging to the County of San Diego_.:_ Airport Division. The area east of the project site will be developed with planned industrial uses. The project site contains no vegetation or other resources and has already been mass-graded as part of the on-going development activities occurring on the> site. PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS RELEVANT TO THE PROJECT EIA 99-09-Carlsbad Water Recycling Facility In December 1999, City staff completed an initial study for the City's Water Reclamation Program Phase II. The City Council then adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the project (EIA 99-09). The Phase II project included construction of a new tertiary water recycling plant, installation of recycled water lines, upgrades and other improvements, and construction of three booster stations. One of the three booster stations analyzed in that document was the currently proposed project. EIA 99-09 concluded that, for this pump station, the only potentially significant impact was to aesthetics. (The location is a highly visible intersection in the City.) The adopted MMRP included a mitigation measure that required this pump station to be a subterranean facility. The currently proposed project has been designed to be a subterranean facility. Therefore, the project design satisfies the mitigation requirement to reduce potential aesthetic impacts to less than significant. EIR 98-04 -Bressi Ranch Master Plan and EIR The proposed water pump stations facility was anticipated by and included in the Bressi Ranch Master Plan and related EIR approved in June 2002. In June 2002 the City Council certified an EIR (EIR 98-04) and approved a Master Plan (MP 178) for development of the Bressi Ranch project. The Master Plan covers approximately 485 acres and provides for residential, commercial, and platmed industrial uses as well as preservation of open space. The site of the currently proposed water pump stations is within Planning Area 3 of the Master Plan. Planning Area 3 is located on the southeast comer of two prime arterial roadways (El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road) in an urbanized area. Future use of the lot will be one or more planned industrial developments. The Master Plan recognized the planned water pump facility as an anticipated use to be located in Planning Area 3. The Final Map associated with the industrial development (CT 00-06) also recognized the planned constmction of the proposed water pump stations and, therefore, included an easement to accommodate the project. DATE: JULY 6, 2004 TO: ASSOCIATE ENGINEER CHRIS MUEHLBACHER FROM: Senior Planner Elaine Blackburn SUBJECT: BRESSI PUMP STATIONS-CUP 04-16/SUP 04-08 The Planning Department has reviewed your Conditional Use Permit/Special Use Permit, application no. CUP 04-16/SUP 04-08, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including five {5) sets of plans. The second list is issues of concern to staff. Please contact your staff planner, Elaine Blackburn, at extension 4621, if you have any ~h to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Elaine Blackburn c: Don Rideout Clyde Wickham File Data Entry Planning Aide LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION No. CUP 04-16/SUP 04-08 Planning: 1. Please add on Sheet C-1 CUP the Assessor's Parcel Number (for the property underlying the easement). That APN is 213-030-17. 2. On Sheet C-1 CUP, Summary Table, you have indicated that the site acreage is .62 acres. If this number reflects the size of the easement please add the word "EASEMENT" after the words "SITE ACREAGE" in the table. Please also add the word "EASEMENT" after the "PERCENT LANDSCAPING" further down in the table. 3. On Sheet C-1 CUP, Summary Table, please add the current zoning and General Plan designation of the site. The zoning is "P-C" (Planned Community) and the General Plan designation is "PI" (Planned Industrial). 4. On Sheet C-1CUP, Summary Table, please indicate the existing and proposed land uses. The existing land use is "undeveloped/future industrial office" and the proposed land use is the proposed water pump stations (not RLM as shown on the table). 5. Please indicate on Sheet C-1 CUP the total earthwork for the project. The total earthwork volume would be the larger of either the cut or fill (in this case) divided by the total area to be graded. That information should be added to the Summary Table before or after the cut and fill information. 6. Please add the project application numbers (CUP 04-16/SUP 040-08) to the upper right- hand corner of each plan sheet for your next submittal. 7. On Sheet C-5CUP the "stone faced retaining wall per HPA" and the "signage per HPA" need to be relabeled as "potential future ... "items. While those items may be approved in the future, this application will not approve any developer-proposed walls or signage. 8. Please add a section drawing (to Sheet C-5CUP?) to show the appearance of the proposed facility(ies) and access area from the nearest future building. 9. While the proposed project is subterranean, the plans still need to acknowledge/document that the area is required to be and will be landscaped. This might be in the form of one or more notes on the site plan sheet (C-1CUP). Please contact Planning staff to discuss the wording of these notes. Engineering: 1 . The elevations shown represent a grade different than the approved rough grading plan per CT 00-06 (Bressi Ranch). Please provide existing and proposed contours to demonstrate the proposed changes. 2. The driveway gradient and elevations of the proposed pad are not provided. Please clarify. 3. Provide a preliminary drainage study that identifies the development discharge flows and preliminary recommendations on the anticipated storm drain infrastructure required as part of the proposed project. The "catch basin" shown on sheet 2 of the site plan should include the outfall or extension of pipe. Pipe size should also be shown. 4. The legal description of the proposed project should be provided on the cover sheet along with the current assessors parcel number. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Planning has no issues of concern at this time. Engineering: 1 . Provide a preliminary storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) that identifies "pollutants of concern" that could be generated by this type of project. The preliminary SWPPP shall address what structural and non·structural best management practices BMP's are (or will be) implemented to capture and treat storm runoff to ensure compliance with new NPDES regulations. The Site plan shall show the tentative location of proposed BMP's necessary to capture and treat storm runoff. The preparation of a final SWPPP will be required before grading permits are issued for this project. The Ribbon Gutter along the east side of the project should be designed as a Grass- Lined bio filter to reduce pollutants from this site. Staff supports this type of a filter system in lieu of expensive maintenance related improvements. 2. The driveway and improvements to the corner pressure reducing station, retaining wall and corner facility should be clarified. Will the retaining wall be removed? Will the existing driveway on El Camino Real (show it) remain or be removed? 3. The 20' wide access easement will be a "Public Utility and Access Easement". Please clarify if this (has been or,) will be obtained. 4. Will there be underground power and utility service to this project. Please clarify. NOTE: A set of red-lined check-prints is being provided to you to assist you in revising the project plans. This set of red-lined check-prints must be returned to staff with your resubmittal to facilitate staffs continued review of the project. 0 City of Carlsbad Bressi Potable and Recycled Water Pump Station Noise Impact Report Prepared for: City of Carlsbad Prepared by: DHK Engineers, Inc. Escondido, California May2004 RECEIVED JUN 0 4 2004 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT. BRs;; POTABLE AND RECYCLED WATER PUMP STAO NOISE IMPACT REPORT 1be noise impact analysis from proposed industrial noise sources at the Carlsbad Municipal Water District Bressi Potable and Recycled Water Pump Station (BPRWPS) on nearby critical receptors is presented in this report. The proposed pump stations will be able to pump a maximum of 5 million gallons per day (mgd) of potable water and 4.5 mgd of recycled water to landscape features and other recycled water end-users. The two pump stations are located on the south east comer of the intersection of Palomar Allport Road and El Camino Real. Both stations are sub-terrain with minimal visual and/or noise impact. The surrounding area is commercial and the adjacent roadways are heavily traveled. 1be objectives of this analysis are to: 1. Evaluate the anticipated noise impacts at current and probable commercial receptors from industrial noise sources associated with the proposed BPRWPS in the design phase; and 2. Determine if mitigative measures such as acoustical sound-proofing are warranted. 1be methodology used in the analysis is as follows: 1. Establish regulatory noise impact goals at critical receptors in the area surrounding BPRWPS, including the adjacent planned commercial areas. 2. Determine the noise impacts associated with mechanical equipment at BPRWPS using acoustical simulation computer modeling in accordance with industrial stationary source standards. 3. Compare the incremental increase to the noise ordinance decibel requirement of60 dB(A). 1be City of Carlsbad Noise Ordinance limits the noise associated with construction activities to daytime hours only and restricts holiday activities. Non-residential (commercial) design criterion for the City of Carlsbad (Noise Guideline Manual, 1995) requires that the 60 dB(A) Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) not be exceeded. The BPRWPS may operate at any time to provide water to the surrounding area. Since operation of the BPRWPS is unrestricted in hours of operation, acoustical design criterion must be established for the late evening-early morning hours, where the not-to-exceed 60 dB (A) level is required. Prediction of future noise impacts within a region requires a series of very complex calculations to determine the areas and extent of potential acoustical problems. To properly assess complex systems of multiple noise sources, receptors and environmental factors; computer-aided simulation programs have been developed to assist in the calculation process. Due to the close proximity of commercial receptors, "potential" late-evening low-background ambient noise and project-specific environmental features (e.g. elevated terrain); a computer simulation program was selected to assist with this project. The computer model calculates the noise generated from proposed industrial noise sources at BPRWPS. Construction within the Bressi Ranch area has, and continues to add, traffic noise to the immediate area. Traffic noise associated with the Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real intersection is not incorporated into the computer model. Although the traffic along El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road is anticipated to be high [greater than 65 dB(A)], the BPRWPS as designed may operate on a continuous basis and is well below the regulatory criterion. May2004 BR& POTABLE AND RECYCLED WATER PUMP STAO The major noise source considered for this project is assumed to be the supply fans on the roof of each pump station_ Due to subsurface construction, the potable and recycled water pumps are not considered substation noise sources. The Design Engineers' preliminary engineering drawings were used to determine the approximate location of the mechanical equipment. The results of the noise prediction simulation are summarized in Table ES-1. The BPRWPS mechanical equipment will have no potentially significant noise impacts to the adjacent receptors. The conclusions are based on the predicted "noise impacts" to the adjacent commercial structures are below the criterion of 60 dB(A). Figure ES-1 provides a noise impact map within 200 meters of the BPRWPS based on the mechanical equipment and acoustical design enhancements. Table ES-1 Modeled Project Noise Impact at Current and Probable Future Critical Receptors Criterion: Project Incremental Increase < 60 dB(A) @ nearest receptor ReceptoriD Commercial Building #1 (North Wall and West Wall) (Pro~!!~le Location._§£_) --+- Commercial Building #2 (Probable Location) Commercial Building #3 __________ (Probable L_o~!!~_!!L_____________ _ Commercial Building #4 ctual Location) NOTES: *First floor/second floor Noise Incremental Increase by BPRWPS dB(A) 31.0/31.3* __ _:_:32_.2/32.5* 30.6/30.9* 30.7/31.0* Receptor Orientation relative to Noise Sources Southeast East North -------------------+-------- 25.5/25.7 Southwest 11 May 2004 0 12.525 50 75 100 125 m LEGEND • NOISE POINT SOURCE (FAN) e RECEIVER • COMMERCIAL BUI LDIN G ELEVATION LIN E (1 METER) ELEVATION POINT D CALCULATION AREA NOTES: 4x ROOF TOP FANS= 78 dB AT 5 FEET NO ACOUSTIC PANELING OR ENCLOSURES RC = RECYCLED PT =POTABLE SF= SUPPLY FAN NOISE LEVEL in <=15 <=20 <=25 <=30 <=35 <=40 <=45 45 < <=50 50< <=55 55< <=60 60 < CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT BRESSI RECYCLED AND POTABLE WATER PUMP STATIONS CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA CONCEPTUAL NOISE MODEL SCENARIO 1 160-METER GRID, BASE SITUATION DHK ENGINEERS MAY 2004 FIGURE ES-1 OHK ENGINEERS. INC Floor Name X y m m 1 Floor COMMERCIAL 1 33815 139 35 2 Floor 33815 13935 1 Floor COMMERCIAL 1 297.86 113 27 2. FlOor 29786 113 27 1 Floor COMMERCIAL 2 36895 21967 2 Floor 36895 219.67 1 Floor COMMERCIAL 3 159.95 37227 2 FloOr 159 95 372 27 1 FlOor COMMERCIAL 4 36.26 3.80 2. Floor 36.26 3.80 BRESSI RANCH PUMP STATION ASSESSED RECEIVER LEVELS BRESSI PUMP STATIONS z Re.::ept m 5 75 8.55 5.75 855 5 75 8.55 5.75 8.55 5.75 8.55 Terram Height m 335 3.35 3.35 3 35 3 35 3.35 3.35 3 35 3 35 3 35 LrD,max LrN.max LfD LrD.diff dB( A) dB(A) dB( A} dB( A) 69 59 31 0 -38 0 69 59 31.3 -37 7 69 59 32.2 -36.8 69 59 32 5 -36 5 69 59 30.6 -36.4 69 59 309 -38 1 69 59 30.7 -383 69 59 31.0 -38 0 69 59 25.5 ·43.5 69 59 25 7 -433 CiTY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RECYCLED AND POTABLE WATER PUMP STATIONS NOISE IMPACT PAGE 1 511212004 () 0