HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 196B; Crisman Montessori School; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (2)DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES
• Assistant City Manager
(714)438-5596
• Building Departmant
(714)438-5525
• Engineering Department
(714) 438*541
• Housing & Redevelopment Department
(714)438-5611
• Planning Department
(714) 4384591
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CAUFORNIA 92008
Citp of Carlsibab
January 21, 1981
Fred Parker
14088 Rue Monaco
Del Mar, CA 92014
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION,
CASE NO: CUP-196.
We have reviewed your application and have determined that
it is not complete. Before processing your application,
we need the following information:
1) Reduced 8?5" x 11" site plan and elevations.
2) Public facility secured agreement.
If this information is received by February 13, 1981, this
item will be placed on the March 11, 1981, Planning Commis-
sion Agenda. If you have any questions, please call me at
438-5591.
Sincerely,
BILL HOFMAN
Planning Department
ER: jt
1/27/81
DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES
• Assistant City l^f^yat
(714)438-5596
• Building Dopaittnefnt
(714) 43D-5525
• Engineering Department
(714) 438-5541
• Housir.g & Redevslopment Department
(714) 438-5611
n Planning Department
(714) 438-553Ft
Jzuauary 23, 1981
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Citp of Carlsbab
tJeff Crisman
P.O. Box 624
Cairlsbad, CA 92008
JSE: Proposed Montessori School on the east side of Madison Avenue,
CUP-196.
ISiis letter is to cjonf irm our conversation concerning the proposed
:i3chool and to outline the city*s concerns. As I have menidoned to you
before tlie city lias the following concerns with the proposed project:
1. There is a potential traffic cx)nflict due to the site's close
proximity to Elna Avenue, "Hiis could be aggravated by the number of
trips generated by droppii^ off and picking up 64 students. Staff
has concerns v,t5ether the unpaved alley to the rear of the property
wDuld be suitable for the anount of traffic that would be generated
by this use.
2. As menidoned previously the two existing parking spaces to the rear
of the existing duplex would have fco be paved all the way to the
alley. Also no parking would be allowed in the front yard setback.
3. The city also has concems as to v^ether the subject property is a
suitable site for a pre-school due to its proximity to major streets
and comnercial developnents.
4- The Engineering Department has indicated that they plan to do a
traffic count at the interseciJ.on of Elm and Madison in the next
few weeks. The results of this study would make it much easier to
determine whether the proposed use would be compatible with the
existing traffic situation.
Fuirther study may reveal additional concerns about the subject property. ^
At this time staff can not recomiend approval of this project because of
the above mentioned concerns.
Sincerely
MIKE HOWES
Assistant Plcumer
A
MH: jt