HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 196B; Crisman Montessori School; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (3)FEE $100 00
TvEC-:iPT IJO- / / ^4^7
FWIRONMEMT^L WS>\Cl A.SS£SS?>IENT F-OTOvI - Part I
CTo be Completed by APPLICANT;
CAGIi NO:
DA'^E: 10,_198L
Applies- Q^^i shad.^dioal4-J^ic. DBA Capl^bad 41errtessOri -School
Adfirecs of .kpplicarit: 740 Pine Avenue, Carlsbad
N^Liber: (714) __434^4i^
Nams, address and phone numbe"^ of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant)
--Jeff.ilmmaD.^O.Rnx 624. Xa^L&Jjad, (71^1) 729 4082
GENEHAL INFORMATION:
Dv---^p-ija cf Projccr: Montessori School with extended Day Care
Pr2P9sedJJse_not_ to invQlyg any .atfartiiral chajiges in building and will utilize—
existing buildings ±
Project Location/Address:. 3070'[-^adison Stroot> Carls
Assessor Parcel x\umber: "351 " ^ h b
Zone of Subject Property: g£
Proposed Use of Site: Operate a Mflpt.pssnri School with extended day care
Proposed use to be for classrooms and playgrn.md f.mrtinns
List all other applicable applications related to this project: None
ND 1
2. Descrih^e the acti.vity area, including- distinguishing
natural and manmade characteristics; also provide precise
slope analysis when appropriate.
Property is a level 14,000 Sq. Foot lot which fronts on Madison Street and
has alley dfcess to rear of property.
3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into
the design and/or operation of the project. (For a more
' specific discussion of- energy conservation requirements
see of the City's EIR Guidelines).
. Proposed use will be for existing buildings and will^necessitate the
construction of other facilities.
4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of
unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of
household size expected.
^ .N/A
If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood,
city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area,
aid loading facilities.
N/A
6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per
shift, and loading facilities.
N/A. . "
7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading
facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the
project. . ^
Private School with extended Day Care , Occupancy is set at 64 Students
total personnel will be 6, there will be 3 dropoff locations none of which
will be on public roads (2 in alley and one on property).
-2-
ENVIRONMgNTAT> TMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the follov/ing questions by placing a check in the
appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked yes. Attach
additional sheets as necessary)..
YES NO
1) Could the project significantly change present
'land uses in the vicinity of the activity?
2) Could the activity affect the use of a rec-
reational area, or area of important •
aestheii-ic value?
3) Could the activity affect the functioning of
an established community or neighborhood?
6) Could the activity decrease the number of low
and modest cost housing units in the city?
7) Are any of the natural or man-made features
in the acti'vity area unique, that is^ not'
found in other parts of the County, State,
or Nation?
8) Could the activity significantly affect a
historical or archaeological site or its
settings?
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation
of a scarce natural resource?
12) Are there any rare or endangered plant
species in the activity area?
13) Could the activity change existing features
of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or
* tidelands?
-3-
4) Could the activity result in the displacement
• of community residents? *
5) * Could the activity increase the number of low
•and moderate cost housing units in the city? x
10) Does the activity area serve as a habitat,
food source nesting place, source"of water,
etc. for rare or endangered wildlife on fish
species? X
11) Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life? • X
14) Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches?
15) Could- the activity result in the erosion or
elimination of agricultural lands?
16) Could the activity serve to encourage develop-
ment of presently undeveloped areas or intesify
development of already developed areas?
17). Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water,
noise, etc)?
18) Will the activity require certification,
authorization or issuance of a permit by any
local, state or federal environmental control
agency? ^
19) Will the activity require issuance of a
variance or conditional use permit by the city? j(_
20) Will the activity involve the application, use,
or disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
21) . Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain?
22) V7ill the activity involve construction of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
23) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault? .
24) ' Could the activity result in the generation
. of significant amounts of noise? '
25) Could the activity result in the generation
of significant amounts of dust? '
26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees, or other materials?
27) Could the activity result in a significant
change in the quality of any por-tion of the
region's air or water resources? (Should note,
surface, ground water, off-shore). ' ; '
28) Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.) ?
29) Will there be a . significant change to existing
land form?
-4-
(a) indicate estimated grading to be'done in
• cubic yards —M9NE-
(b) percentage of alteration to the present ^ ^QME
land form . :. - - ' — '
(c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes N/A
30) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drams, or ^
streets? ~. A
31) Ib the activity carried out as part of a larger ^
project or series of projects? . . . ^
Classrooms as established will be an increase needed by the main School
Location at 740 Pine Ave., Carlsbad
-5-
ST^TB-IENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIROIMIENTAL EFFECTS
I£ you have answered yes to one or more of the questions
in Section I but you think the activity will have no
significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons
below:
19) Conditional Use Permit is the reason for this application
III. COMMENTS OR EL^ORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions
attach additional sheets as may be needed).
Signature /'^Hu.
Jef^ t^smrf^^^^ conipieting report)
Date Signed jan. 10, 1981
-6-
]-NVina\MrNTAL TMIWCT ASSESSMUNT FORM - Part II
(To C;oniplcL,c(l By Tlie
PUN!^J].NG DlilVvR'JMIiNT)
CASE NO. cup-1^^
DATE: l/ZT/?/
X. BAC.KGiy)UND
1. APPJJCANT:
2. .ADDItf>SS m) PHONIS .WIBER OF APPLICAivTr: ^S^A <^ ^
C^r/s ^^^j * T 'XoaZ
3. a^vTE Ci-IECKLIST SUBMITIED: ^ /^ f /d'/
JI. BK^/TROX^.IJINT/J. IMPACTS
'[]!)aM:AKmQ^:s"QF A1.L AFPIRMAnVE ANSl'/ERS TO BE IVRFJILN UNDER
Section JTl - DISCUSSION OF ErAaR0N:41£NTAL I^VALUATiaO
Yes Maybe Mo
3 , Bfi^-'i ^^'^^^ the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substiucturos? '
b. Disruptions, displaceinents, com-
paction or overcovering oi: the soil? ____ • /N
c. C]->ango in topography or ground ^
surface relief features?
d. 'Jhe destruction, covering or * .
jnodificntion of any unique geologic "
or pliysical features? /\
e.. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or off • - ,
thc site? .... ^
f. Cbnng,cs in dcposi.tion or ero-
sion of bcacli sands, or clianges
in siltation, deposition or erosion
whicli mny modi i.'y the clinnnoi of a
river or stream or tbe bed oC tlio y
ocean or any bay, Inlel: or lal:c? ^ ' ' ' ' iX^.
Kin ')
Yes Maybe No
2, Air: Will thc proposal liave signi-
results in:
a. Air omissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
X
V
c. Alteration of air movement,
mositure or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
.or regionally?
3; Ifatej^: V/ill the proposal have sigi-
Iicant results in:
a. Changes in currents, or the
course or direction of water move-
ments, in either marine or fresh
waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate and
ariioimt of surface water runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of sur-
face v.'ater in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
f* Alteration of the direction
pr rate of flov/ oj: groimd waters?
g.. Change in the quantity of
ground waters, either through
' direct additions or witiidrawals,
or through interception 0.1: an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Reduction in thc rmioimt of
water otherwise available Tor
public watcj' supplies?
X
JL
JL.
X
-2-
Yes Mavbe No
4, Plant Life. Will tlic proposal have signi
: Ticant results in:
5,
a. Change in the diversity of
species, -or numbers of any species
of plants (including trees, shmbs,
grass, crops, microflora and
aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of thc numbers of
any unique,
species of plants?
rare or endangered
c. Introduction of new species
of plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the nomial replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will 'the proposal have signi-
Jicant results in:
JL
JL
6.
7.
8.
a. Changes in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of animals O^i-^'t]^, land ari imal s
including reptiles, fish and shell-
.fish, benthic organisms, insects or
microfauna)?
b. Reducti.on of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endajigered
.species of animals?
c. Introduction of new .species
of airijiials into an area, or result
in a barrier to thc migration or
movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing
fi.sh or Avildlife habitat?
Noise, Will the proposal signi-
I^cantly increase existing noise
levels?
Light and Glare. Will tho pro-
posal s j]',n i iMcantly produce new
light or glai'c?
LancMlse. Will the proposal h:ivc
sig^iii rfcajit res ults in the alteration
of the ])resenl" or planned huid use of
an area?
X
-I
Yes Maybe No
^* Natural Resources. Will the pro-
posal have significant results in
a. Increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
e. Alterations to watcrbornc,
rail or air tra.rfic?
11. Population. Will the proposal
significantly alter the location,
distribution, density, or gro^v1:h
rate of the liuman population of
an area? " ' " '
Housing. Will the proposal signi-
ficantly affect existing housing,
01 create a demand for additional
• liousing? • '
13. • Transportation/Circulation. Will •
the proposal have significant re-
sults in:
a. Generation of additional ,
. vehicular movancnt? ''''" X
f s Inci'case in traTCic hazards
to motor vehicles^ ])icyclists or
pedestr.ians? . /
Upset. Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an . •
ex]5losion or the release of haz-
ardous .substances (including, but
not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or -radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset
conditions? \' __ )C
1
Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new ,
parking? . ' X
c* Impact upon existing trans-
portation systems? ' ' ' ' ' ''' '' *'' X
d. Alterations to present
patterns of circulation or move-
jiicnt of people ajid/or goods? ' \ ' ' ' X
#
Yes Maybe No
14• M)lic Services. Will the pro-
posal liave a significant effect
upon, or have significant results
in the need for new or altered
governmental scrv^ices in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection? • .
b. Police protection?
c\ Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
jfacil ities?
e. Maintenance of public facili-
ties, including roads?
f. Other govemmental services?
15, ' Energy. Will the proposal have'
signiricant results in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of
fuel or energy?
b. Demand upoi; existing sources
of energy, or require the develop-
ment of new sources of energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal have,
s'ignificant results in the need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. . Stonn v/ater drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
17^ Human Hcajth. Will the proposal
navirTsli'JiiyTcant results in the
crcatio'n of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
menial health)?
21
-1
X
Yes Maybe No
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal hnve
significant results iu thc obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view
open to the public, or will the pro-
posal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
19. Recreation. Will the proposal have
significajit results in the impact
upon the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
Archcological/Mistorieal. Will the
proposal have significant results
in the alteration of a significant
' archeological or historical site, v/
structure, object or building? . X
21. AJNIALYZF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO Tl-IE PROPOSFD PROJECT SUCH AS:
^ a) PHASED 13H\/jiL0PMhN'{' OF illE PRaJECi; b) AlJEl^iA'lE SITE
DESIGNS; c) ALTEIINATE SCALE OF DEVELOPNe^IT; d) ALTEP^M^TE
IJSl-S FOR ITIE SITE; e) DE\'T10PME>n' AT SOME FIJTURE TIME PvATT'ER
'nm NOW; f) ALTERROT. SITES FOR TTIE PROPOSED USE; g) NO
PROJECT i\LTEllNATI\T£.
y<^/-/ W/f. //^•^'i^^r ^"^''^.t^'^^^T
,^,r^/^ /<SS y.^.A^-^' """"^
-fv-
Yes Maybe No
22. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE THE POTEN-
TIAL TO DEGRADE THE QUALITY OF
WE ENVIRONMENT, OR CURTAIL TOE
DIVERSITY IN TOE ENVIRONMENT? X
III.- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUTION
b) DOES TOE PROJECT HAVE TOE POTEN-
TIAL TO ACHIEVE SHORT-TERiM, TO
TOE DISADVANTAGE OF LONG-TERM,
ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS? (A SHORT-
TERM IMPACT ON THE ENVIR0>4MENT
IS ONE WHICH OCCURS IN A RE-
LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE
PERIOD OF TIME WHILE LONG-TERM
IMPACTS WILL ENDURE IVELL INTO
TOE FUTURE.) . X
c) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE IMPACTS
WHICH ARE INT)IVIDUALLY LIMITED,
BUT CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE?
(A PROJECT MAY IMPACT ON -RVO
OR ^DRE SEPARATE RESOURCES
IVHERE TOE IMPACT ON EACH RE-
SOURCE IS RELATTVELY SMALL,
BUT WHERE THE EFFECT OF THE
TOTAL OF TOOSE IMPACTS ON THE
ENVIRONMENT IS SIGNIFICANT.) ' X
d) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE ENVIRON-
MENTAL EFFECTS WHICH WILL
CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE
EFFECTS ON HUMAN BEINGS,
EITOER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY? X
DISCUSSION QF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued)
^v^ f/l)S USf, i"/^// -f^f/s /A/ //f^ ^f/0//C^Ajf c/!,/u
^/S)^/UA/C j-A^/A^/ //^/y^. ^^f>^ '^ff ^^c^/z^y^^
nz/i/i/^i-z^c ^ ^/ cc/nz-f/ic/s u///^^ h"^^//'s/s cy
IV. DETEP^MTNAITON.^ ^ GTO BE CONrPLETED BY Illli PLANNING DEPARTl^lF^NT)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NT.GAITVE DECL\RA1'I0N will
be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not be
a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
mea.sures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. A conditional negative declaration will
will be prepared.
I find the proposed project li\Y have a significant effect
on the environment, and an ENVIRON.^er^AL IMPACT REPORT
is required.
Signature
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (11^ >\PPLICABLE)
-9
^tITIGATlNG ME/\SUR1:S (Continued)
VI APPLICANT CONCURRENCE IVITH MITIGATING ME'vSUlUiS
TOIS IS TO CERTIJ^T' TOAT I IAVE RRaB\T3D TOE ABOW: MITIGATIONG MEA-
SUI^S ANT) CONCUR IvITll THE ADDITION OF TIIESE ^E/\SURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date:
Signature of Applicant
-10-
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFOnNIA 92008
Ci'tp of Cark&ab
TELEPHONf:
(714) 729-1181
County of San Diego
220 West Broadway
San Diego, CA 92101
NOTICE OF DETEPvMINATION
1416 Ninth Street _ *
Room 1311 ' -
Sacramento, CA 95814
This is to advise tliat the City of Carisbad on
approved the following project:
Project Description: '•
project adaress/Location:
Tiie. City made the follov/ing detenninations regarding the environmental
impact of the above described project:
1. .The project will,
the environment."
2.
5.
will not, have a si.gnificant effect on
An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation meaj^urcs were; }\'ere not, made a condition of
the approval of the project.
4. A statement of Overriding Considerations }\'as,"
adopted for this project.
was not,
'Die Project went through prior environmental reviev\' or was
part of a larger project which went tiu-ough prior enviroimiental
review.
Nl) 5
PC 2
NOTICE OF DI-TEP^JINATION (Continued)
1200 blm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. ' ^ '
rnJlB:
CASE NO:
PC 2
SIGNED:
APPLIC/\NT- "^^^^ ^' ^^^^^^^
—— — Planning Director
City of Carlsbad
> STATt CALIFORNIA—HEALTH AND WELFARE AGFJ DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
REPORT OF FIELD VISIT
The State Department of Social Services and delegated agencies are required
under the California Health and Safety Code to provide facilities with a written
report of the results of the licensing visit. Code references below ore from
Title 22, California Administrative Code. For further explanation see other side.
Reply to:
Facility.
Address.
Date__MG-^^l— Facility No._3l0l£L2M.
Facility Type.
COMMENTS/DEFICIENCIES RECOMMENDATIONS/CORRECTIONS
"P(VVW AJ C?.
Tr_7V ^^1 u .J)
\——-/ ' (/
I y
> ' - / 7.Qltn tO C z^,--^ ^t^^ ^ fi^/(/L UA A ^
^ rru^ O'. 7 >/ .-I'. .
T /{ ; • ;
yZ-^X /i/\0 ,
. 7^f'<7
0 ir>f.'; /
I
f . K A
-- / c^ -A-i7/C(j't n n .r
UT
Licensing EValuator Date
1= ^ Page i of i=^Page(s)
Facility Representative Date
l/l-7/
Lie 809 (9-78) 3. Review Copy
C4SS2-S80 9-7» 100M TRIP ® HW OSP
STAJF ^ • CALIFORNIA—HEALTH AND WELFARE AC^^jf
REPORT OF FIELD VISIT
The State Department of Social Services and delegated agencies ore required
under the California Health and Safety Code to provide facilities with a written
report of the results of the licensing visit. Code references below are from
Title 22, California Administrative Code. For further explanation see other side.
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Reply to:
Facility-
Address^
Date- . Facility No..
Facility Type.
COMMENTS/DEFICIENCIES RECOAAMENDATIONS/CORRECTIONS
1 L
/
KA /-')
J
/ 5
0'
Licensing Evaluator Date Facility Representative Date
/
LIC 809 (9-78) 7 Page c ^ of. .Page(s) 3. Review Copy
64552-BBO 9-78 100M TRIP 0 liW OSP
Carlsbad Schools, Inc.
Arrival and Departure Times
Estimate for New School Facility
Arrival Times: 7:30 a.m. to 12:45 p.m.
Staggered arrivals - % per existing school
7:30 - 7:45 6
7:45 - 8:00 8
8:00 - 8:15 7
8:15 -8:30 10
8:30 - 8:45 8
8:45 - 9:00 7
9:00 - 9:15 6
9:15 -9:30 6
9:30 - 9:45 4
9:45 -10:00 2
11:15 -11:30 2
11:30 -11:45 2
11:45 -12:00 1
12:00 -12:15 2
12:15 -12:30 2
Departure Times: 11:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m,
11:30 -11:45 3
11:45 -12:00 1
12:00 -12;15 2
12:15 -12:30 3
3:00 - 3:15 2
3:15 - 3:30 3
3:30 - 3:45 8
3:45 - 4:00 6
4:00 - 4:15 6
4:15 - 4:30 5
4:30 - 4:45 6
4:45 - 5:00 4
5:00 - 5:15 6
5:15 -5:30 6
5:30 3
Staggered departures - % per existing school
CUP-196
Carlsbad Montessori School-Classroom Diagram
,
on-;
lac-: rcy'^jrv"
-XT'
r—
Received
MAR 0 5 1981 ^
CIIY OE CARLSBAD