HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 196B; Montessori School; Conditional Use Permit (CUP)I
3485 Valley S,. eet Carlsbad, California 92008 October 23, 1985
P1 anning Conmission
Ci ty of Carl sbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
RE: CUP 196-8
Sirs:
We the undersigned concur with the Staff's findings in that the two uses, Residential and Day Care, are not compatible.
as an information item that the property at 3062 Madison Street is occupied by the daughter of the owners and a non-related male adult. It has also been observed that Mr. and Mrs. Fred Parker have resided on the property during the Del Mar racing season.
The proposition that the daughter assume a caretaker position would make an impossible task of enforcing the moral and legal residency requirements
even if the Commission chose to enact regulations. assume a caretaker position there would be no way to set standards and have them apply to future tenants.
Parkers are able to sell either property to any individual without any change required of the CUP. A required lot consolidation could insure both parcels remain together.
following:
It should be noted
If the daughter was to
The current situation is made even more precarious in as much as the
It is our opinion that the Planning Commission should impose the
1. The Parkers are imnediately to adhere to the current requirements of the existing CUP 196-A, this to include: a. The vacating of 3062 Madison Street as a residence - Item 6.
b. Construct the trash receptacle - Item 13. c. Obtain Planning, Building and Fire Department clearance before occupancy - Item 7. d. The Day Care occupant is to obtain a Business License before further use of the facility.
e. Remove all debris from property - Item 9. f. Removal of large RV unit and car storage on property.. The Parkers are to perform a lot consolidation to insure both
parcels will remain together as long as the CUP is in force.
2.
It is our hope that these items will be accomplished as soon as possible in order to protect the few children who now occupy the Day Care. Our reason for this correspondence is not to force the day care tenant
out but to preserve the existing CUP in its present status as we have a lawsuit pending to acquire the two parcels in question. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Pam Crisman t
J PC/dg