Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 232; Theodore Vallas; Conditional Use Permit (CUP)DATE : July 13, 1983 TO : Planning Commission mt"l STAFF REPORT FROM : Land Use Planning Office .I L SUi3JECT: SGP 83-6/CUP-232 - VALLAS - Request for approval of a site. development plan for a recreational/cornmercial development and a Conditiozal Use Permit to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages on property lpcated on the southwest corner of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino . Real in 'the CT-Q zone. I. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE TflE Negative Declaration issued by the Land Use Planning Manager and ADOPT Resolution 140s. 2148 and 2149 APPROVING SDP 83-6 and CUP-236, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, 11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting approval of 1) a site development pian for a recreational/commercial development consisting of a 64 unit motel, club house, restaurant, swimming pool, tennis courts and an Olympic golf course driving range; and 2) a . conditional use permit to serve liquor on the premises, The property is owned by the County of San Diego and is being leased to the applicant. A site development plan, canditional use permit and zone change were previously approved on this property by the Planning Commission in Elarch, 1981. The site development plan and Conditional Use Permit have since expired and the applicant is resubmitting a similar project with several changes. The applicant's original approval included a 48 unit motel, heliport and raquetball courts. This project consists of 64 motel units but no heliport or raquetball courts. Also,'this project is providing substantially more parking than the original. 111. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1.' .Is the golf course driving range adequately buffered from 2. 3. Is the serving of alcoholic beverages suitable at this Palonar Airport Road? Arc the driveway Locations adeqdate in terms of traffic safety. locat ion? The design of the Olympic golf course driving range is the same as that previously approved. The applicant is proposing a thick landscape barrier along Palomar Airport Road to prevent errant shots fron landing in the street. Staff is also recommending that fencing be placed along the inside of the landscape barrier (not in view from Palomar Airport Road) to provide a further barrier from mis-hit golf shots. With -respect to driveway entrances, their location was one of the primary issues of the original project. At that time, the applicant was proposing, against staff's recommendations: 1) a driveway entrance of€ Palomar Airport road in close proximity to the El Camino Real intersection, and 2) a left turn in and out driveway entrance on El Camino Real A traffic report addressing these issues was conducted and, through the public hearing process, a compromise was reached allowing: 1) a driveway .entrance on Palomar Airport Road 500 yards from the El Camino * Real intersection, and 2) a driveway entrance on and a median along El Camino Real whi-ch would allow left turns into the project but only right turns out. The applicant is now proposing the same driveway locations as were approved by the Planning Commission in 1981. Staff believes that the elimination of access onto Palomar Airport'Road would be preferable, however, staff can live with the project as proposed. The conditional use permit would allow the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages in the restaurant and club house. Staff feels that alcoholic beverages are a normal part of a club house .and restaurant use. The serving of alcoholic beverages at this site would not create detrimental impacts to surrounding properties and would not be injurious to the public health and welfare. Staff can make all the required findings for a conditional use permit and, therefore, recommends approval, - . IV . ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that this project willnot have a significant impact on the environment and, therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration on June 21, 1983. - ATTACHMENTS 1, . Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2148 and 2149 2, Location Map 3. Background Data Sheet 4. Disclosure Statement 5. Environmental Documents BH:cs 6/28/83 -2- EACI<C-m\TD DATA SHEET WE NO: SDP 82-3/cuP-232 APPLImT: VALLAS FZQUEST AND LOCATION: Site Development Plm- for a recreation/commercia1 facility, and a conditional use permit for alcoholic beverages. LEwlL DESCRIPTIOIU: That prtion of Palomar Airport in Lot 6 of Rancho Agua ., Rediorda, county of San Diego, Map No. 852. ApN:213 -010-10 Acres 17 Proposed. No. of Lotsflnits .l Lad Use Designation R-C Density Allowed WA Density Proposed N/A Existing Zone CT-@ Propwed Zone CT-Q Surrounding Zoning an3 Lad Use: Zoning North M South P-M East C (County Wet P-M Land Use Palamar Airport Light Industrial Vacant Liqht Industrial PUBLIC FACILITIES School District N/A Water Carlshad Sewer Carlsbad EMI's N/A . Public Facilities Fee Agr-nt, dated May 25, 1983 ENVIROlWE"~ IMPACT PISSESSMENT - X Negative Declaration, issued . .. June 21, 1983 E.I.R. Certified, dated - . Other, .-. .- -. .. .. 'I . . : -. . 1. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. , . I. .. .. .. .. VALLAS -- I .%hat further infobmatian - - yeqtired, you will be so ad. -4, A - -- . ,‘ .* .. . .- -, . .- ?G’PLICAr”JT : Na-e (in3ividua1, partnership, joint venture, corpration, syndicatiort) ... .. ._ - - . .. . . . . ... .. .. A.4 2sl= .- .. -- Eome kc?dress .. : .-’ .. . . .. _. .._ . .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. . -. .. .. .. .. . . .. ._ . . _. - . . ’. . . 3xsinsss’ Bdjrsss . .. .. .* .. . .*- . .. . -. . _- .. .. . , .. .. .. ..:. .. ... .. ._. . . ._ . .- .. .. - .- Te1ep;lone Xuzber . ,... ....- .’ ’ .. x Sels;?itor.o N&=r .. . -. .. . ..a ’ .. .. ..I .. .C : a. .. ’ ... . . .. .:: ’ -. .. . .. -. .- - .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .e. -. . 0. . .. .. . .. .-. 1‘. . .- .. .. . .. . .. .. . .. ... . .. .. .. .* * .. . .L_