HomeMy WebLinkAboutHDP 00-13; Summit at Carlsbad; Hillside Development Permit (HDP)-de City of Carlsbad Planning Departmek-
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Application complete date: July 9, 2001
P.C. AGENDA OF: May 1,2002 Project Planner: Anne Hysong
Project Engineer: Bob Wojclk
SUBJECT: ZC 00-11/SDP 00-17IHDP 00-13 - THE SUMMIT AT CARLSBAD - Request
for a recommendation of adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and a recommendation of
approval for a Zone change from R-l-10,000 to RD-M, Site Development Plan
and Hillside Development Permit for a 143 unit apartment project located north of
Marron Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 2 in the northeast quadrant.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5 170, 5 171,
5 172 and 5 173 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of ZC
00-1 1, SDP 00-1 7 and HDP 00-13 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein.
11. BACKGROUND
This item was continued from the April 3,2002 meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5 170 (Mitigated Negative Declaration)
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5 171 (ZC)
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5 172 (SDP)
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5 1.73 (HDP)
5. Staff Report dated April 3,2002 with attachments
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
P.C. AGENDA OF: April 3,2002
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Application complete date: July 9, 2001
Project Planner: Anne Hysong
Project Engineer: Bob Wojcik
SUBJECT: ZC OO-ll/SDP 00-17/HDP 00-13 - THE SUMMIT AT CARLSBAD - Request
for a recommendation of adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and a recommendation of
approval for a Zone change from R-1-10,000 to RD-M, Site Development Plan
and Hillside Development Permit for a 143 unit apartment project located north of
Marron Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 2 in the northeast quadrant.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5 170, 5 171,
5 172 and 5 173 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of ZC
00-1 1, SDP 00-1 7 and HDP 00-13 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein.
11. INTRODUCTION
The proposed project consists of a zone change fi-om the One Family Residential, R-1-10000,
zone to the Residential Density - Multiple (RD-M) and Open Space (0-S) zone to allow multiple
family units, and a site development plan and hillside development permit to allow a 143 unit
apartment project including 29 units affordable to families with incomes at 60% of the Area
Median Income (AMI). The applicant is requesting a 91% density increase as an incentive to
enable the reservation of the 29 affordable units and in exchange for the preservation of over half
of the site as open space. The 20.65 acre parcel, located north of Marron Road between El
Camino Real and Avenida de Anita, is a proposed hardline area in the City’s draft Habitat
Management Plan (HMP); therefore, 55% of the property is proposed for preservation as an open
space wildlife habitat corridor. The project complies with City standards and all necessary
findings can be made for the approvals being requested.
111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The project site is an undeveloped, but previously disturbed, 20.65 acre parcel located to the east
of Marron Road, approximately $4 mile east of El Camino Real. The property is bordered to the
north by Haymar Road, to the south by Marron Road, to the east by undeveloped land and a golf
driving range, and to the west by an existing commercial center. High tension power
transmission lines extend approximately northwest to southeast through the northern portion of
the site. Numerous dirt roads provide access to most of the site. Topographically, the property
slopes moderately to steeply down to the north, south and west from a relatively flat mesa
located along the eastern site development boundary. Two small canyons drain to the west
- -
ZC 00- 1 1 /SDP 00- 1 7/HDP -- J- 1 3 - THE SUMMIT AT CARLSBAL
April 3,2002
Page 2
within the northwestern and southern portions of the site. An abandoned reservoir exists in the
central portion of the site along the eastern boundary. Approximate elevations across the site
range from a high of 1 10 feet above mean sea level (MSL) to a low of 40 feet MSL. A 60 foot
high 1 %:l manufactured cut slope easement exists along the western property boundary. The
slope is covered with dry grass and many eucalyptus trees. Vegetation on the site consists
primarily of disturbed habitat and ornamental plantings; however, plant communities onsite that
are considered environmentally sensitive include coastal sage scrub, southern willow scrub,
herbaceous wetlands and unvegetated stream channel.
The site is identified as a standards area in the City’s draft Habitat Management Plan (HMP).
The HMP calls for preservation of approximately 75% of the site as a wildlife habitat corridor.
The proposed project would dedicate and preserve approximately 55% (1 1.27 acres) of the site
along the eastern boundary and within the northern half of the site as an HMP hardline
conservation area, linking offsite adjacent lands to the east of the project site with areas of
biological value to the north. This portion of the property also provides a suitable link for
possible gnatcatcher and other avian dispersal between the Cities of Oceanside and Carlsbad.
The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from the One Family Residential, R-1-
10,000, zone to the Residential Density - Multiple (RD-M) zone to allow multiple family units,
and a site development plan and hillside development permit to allow a 143 unit apartment
project consisting of 114 market rate units and 29 affordable units. The infill parcel is
designated for Residential Medium (RM) density development by the General Plan. The
permitted density yield for the property is 75 units based on the Growth Management Growth
Control Point (GCP) dwelling unit allowance of 6 ddacre; therefore, the proposed 143 unit
project requires approval of a 91% density increase for an additional 68 units above the
permitted density. City Council approval of the SDP is required pursuant to Section 21.53.120
of the Zoning Ordinance which requires the processing of a site development plan for multi-
family projects with more than 4 units and for multi-family affordable projects of any size.
The 143 unit apartment project requires 136,766 cubic yards of balanced cut and fill grading to
create a building pad for 13 separate three-story apartment buildings, one recreationallleasing
office building, and a pool area. Each apartment building consists of 3 one-bedroom units, 7
two-bedroom units, and 1 three-bedroom unit for a total of 11 apartment units, 7 single car
garages, and 5 storage closets ranging in size from 368 - 396 cubic feet. A total of 143 covered
parking spaces in either garages or carports is provided: 90 single car garages and 53 carport
spaces. Additional parking is provided by uncovered spaces located adjacent to the interior and
perimeter vehicular circulation aisles in proximity to all of the apartment buildings. Units range
in size from 685 square feet to 1,275 square feet. All units are provided with a balcony or deck
that range in size fiom 69 square feet to 170 square feet. A 2,988 square foot single story
recreation facility that will also house the leasing office is proposed close to the project entry.
The recreation facility includes game rooms, an exercise room and outdoor swimming pool.
The proposed craftsman architectural style offers a great deal of wall and roof line articulation
(hip roofs), and exterior detailing. Buildings are enhanced with wood siding, stone veneer trim,
divided light vinyl windows with plaster trim, and rough sawn timber brackets, railings and facia
facings. The buildings include two story elements over the garages. Buildings are separated by
15 to 20 feet of landscaped courtyards with a central courtyard that provides pedestrian access to
units on both sides. Accent paving is provided between garages and to delineate pedestrian
ZC 00-1 1/SDP O0-17/HLA uO-13 -THE SUMMIT AT CARLSL- A
April 3,2002
Page 3
crosswalks. The project includes a pedestrian circulation system throughout the development
that is separate from vehicular circulation aisles. Accent paving is provided to enhance the main
entry and circulation aisles and to delineate pedestrian crossings and garage entries. A single
ingress is provided to the project at the intersection of Avenida de Anita and a gated egress is
located approximately 340 feet to the west of the entry. Emergency access will be available at
this gated egress. A 5’ tubular steel fence with stone pilasters will surround the perimeter of the
project and a 3 foot high hedge will be planted and maintained adjacent to parking spaces located
at the top of slope for screening.
The proposed project is subject to the following plans, ordinances, standards, and policies:
A. General Plan
B. Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance)
1. Chapter 21.24 - RD-M Zone
2. Chapter 21.44 - Parking
3. Chapter 21.53 - Multiple Family/Affordable Housing
4. Chapter 21.85 - Inclusionary Housing
5. Chapter 21.90 - Hillside Development Regulations
C. Draft Habitat Management Plan
D. Growth Management
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s
consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project’s compliance with each of
the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below.
A. General Plan
The project is consistent with the following elements of the General Plan as indicated by the
following table:
- h
ZC 00-1 1/SDP 00-17/HDP 1-13 - THE SUMMIT AT CARLSBAL
April 3,2002
Page 4
ELEMENT
Land Use
Housing
USE, CLASSIFICATION,
GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OR
PROGRAM
GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
OS - Open Space
RM - Residential Medium
Density:
4 - 8 ddacre
GCP: 6 ddacre
Zoning consistency with
General Plan
Ensure all qualified projects
provide a range of housing for
all economic income ranges.
Density Increase Policy
Minimum inclusionary
housing requirement of 15% of
all units approved shall be
affordable to lower income
households.
To be dedicated as HMP Open
Space
Proposed density = 1 1.4 ddacre
(75 units + 68 unit density
increase = 143 units).
The project exceeds the growth
control point of 6 ddacre
however the findings required by
the City’s Growth Management
Plan can be made to exceed the
GCP.
Proposed RD-M Zone:
Multiple Family Units are
permitted by RM designation.
The project will provide 143 one,
two and three bedroom rental
apartment units in proximity to
mass transit and commercial
services.
Project provides 29 units
affordable to families with
incomes that are 60% of AMI
The project satisfies the 15%
inclusionary housing requirement
by providing a minimum of 2 1
units to be constructed and
restricted both as to occupancy
and affordability for lower
income households. The
maximum income of the
households shall not exceed 80%
of the AMI, adjusted for
household size, and the rent shall
not exceed 70% of the AMI,
adiusted for household size.
COMPLY
?
Yes*
Yes*
Yes
Yes
P -
ZC 00-1 1/SDP 00-17/HL ULJ-13 - THE SUMMIT AT CARLSL. _3
April 3,2002
Page 5
GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE, continued
ELEMENT
Circulation
Open Space
Noise
Public Safety
USE, CLASSIFICATION,
GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OR
PROGRAM
Require new development to
dedicate and improve all
roadways, utilities, and
drainage facilities
Preserve open space consistent
with the wildlife habitat
preserve and linkage areas
identified in the HMP.
Implement BMPs to avoid
degradation of water quality
that are necessary to serve
development.
Residential interior noise
standard of 45 dBA CNEL
Review new development
proposals to consider
emergency access, fire hydrant
locations, and fire flow
requirements.
CONSISTENCY
The project is conditioned to
improve Marron Road to full
street width and to install the
necessary utilities and drainage
facilities required for the project.
Project is consistent with the
provisions of the HMP in that it
preserves 11 27 acres in open
space that will link offsite
adjacent lands to the east of the
project site with areas of
biological value to the north.
The project is also conditioned to
prepare and implement a Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) plan that will ensure
BMPs are imposed.
The apartment project is
conditioned to comply with the
45 dBA CNEL interior standard.
Project has two points of ingress
and egress, buildings are required
to be sprinklered, fire 'suppression
zones are provided, and the
necessary hydrant locations are
provided.
COMPLY
?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
*A finding of compliance with the RM land use designation is contingent upon approval of the
91% density increase requested as an incentive for preserving 29 inclusionary units affordable to
families with incomes at 60% of the AMI. The project is consistent with the provisions of the
Growth Management Ordinance and General Plan Residential Implementing Policy C.3 for
density increases in that there are excess dwelling units available in the northeast quadrant and
the project is compatible with surrounding development, adequate public facilities are provided,
and a major roadway, commercial center, transit center, employment opportunities are in
proximity to the development.
B1/2. RD-M Zonemarking Ordinance
The project includes a request to rezone the property from its current One Family Residential, R-
1-10000, zone classification to the Residential Density- Multiple (RD-M) zone. The purpose of
- ZC 00- 1 1 /SDP 00- 1 7/HDP - J-1 3 - THE SUMMIT AT CARLSBAL
April 3,2002
the rezoning is to enable multiple family units that can be clustered onto a smaller development
pad than single-family lots with full width public or private streets. The RD-M zone enables
more zoning flexibility in that it allows both single family and multiple family units. The project
is consistent with the RD-M zone standards as indicated by the following table:
RD-M ZONE STANDA
Standard Requirement Uses
Setbacks:
Single Family/ Multiple
Family Units
Front:
Side:
10’ if no garages face the
street
5’ Minimum
Rear:
35’ Maximum Height
10’
Building Coverage 60% Maximum
Parking 1 bedroom
1 ‘/z spacedunit
213 bedrooms
2 spacedunit
Guest Parking
5 spaces 110 units
>10 units = .25 spaceshit
DS
Provided
Multiple Family Apartment
Units
15’ Minimum (Accessory
Structure)
23’ Minimum
(Main structure)
Minimum 20’ fiom adjusted
property boundaries (limits of
grading)
Minimum 50’ from adjusted
boundaries
Three-story elements: 35’
Maximum
Two-story elements:
30’9” Maximum
24.4%
39 units = 59 spaces
104 units=208 spaces
. 5 spaces
33 spaces
Total: 305 maces
B3/4. Inclusionary HousingMultiple Family/Affordable Housing
The City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requires that a minimum of 15% of all approved
units in any qualified residential project be constructed and restricted both as to occupancy and
affordability for lower income households. At a minimum, this project is required to provide 21
units with rents set to be affordable to households at 70% of the area median income (AMI),
adjusted for household size. In exchange for additional density within the project, the applicant
is proposing to reserve 29 of the 143 total units as affordable units to lower income households at
60% of AMI, adjusted for household size. In addition to restricting more units than required by
the Inclusionary Ordinance and making those restricted units more affordable, the developer has
also agreed to participate in the City’s Section 8 Rental Assistance Program and accept subsidy
vouchers as a portion of the rent if made available to the tenant. This means that extremely low
and/or very low income households, those at 30-50% of AMI, may also benefit from the project.
+ h
ZC 00-1 1/SDP O0-17/HLA uO-13 - THE SUMMIT AT CARLSE- 3
April 3,2002
A minimum of ten percent (or 3 units) of the total affordable units will be three bedroom in size
in accordance with the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.
Section 21.53.120 of the Zoning Ordinance requires approval of a site development plan for
multi-family apartment projects exceeding 4 units and affordable housing projects of any size
based on findings that the project is consistent with the underlying zoning and in conformance
with the General Plan policies and goals and in accordance with the provisions of the Qualified
Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.06 of the Zoning Ordinance). Findings required by the Qualified
Overlay Zone ensure that the use is consistent with the General Plan and will not adversely
impact the site or surrounding uses, and that the site and street system are adequate to
accommodate the use. Incentives such as development modifications and density increases to
enable the reservation of affordable units are permitted. The proposed project is requesting a
91% density increase in exchange for reserving 29 of the 143 total units as affordable units to
families with incomes that are 60% of the AMI. Approval of the proposed site development plan
therefore involves both the overall apartment project and the 29 unit affordable housing proposal.
Based on an analysis performed by staff, the proposed 91% density increase to enable the
provision of 20% of the total units (29 affordable units) is a necessary incentive to offset the
subsidy necessary to reserve the affordable units at 60% AMI. The project complies with
General Plan policies requiring that projects requesting density increases above the density range
satisfy the following criteria: the project is compatible in density and design with surrounding
development; the infill project is served by or conditioned to construct adequate public facilities;
the site is in proximity to SR 78 and a NCTD transit center; and commercial services and
employment opportunities are provided by nearby neighborhood and regional shopping centers.
Since the proposed density increase requires the allocation of 68 units fiom the City’s “Excess
Dwelling Units”, findings that the project is consistent with City Council Policy 43 must also be
made. Policy 43 establishes priorities for the allocation of excess dwelling units existing in each
quadrant of the City to avoid exceeding the Growth Management maximum dwelling unit caps.
A finding that excess units are available must be made prior to granting density increases and the
project must qualify as a priority project. There are excess dwelling units available in the
northeast quadrant, and the project satisfies criteria established by Policy 43 for first, second and
third priority projects: 29 units are reserved for lower income households (first priority); it is a
transit oriented development located in close proximity to major transit facilities and commercial
support services (second priority); and it is an infill multi-family project that meets all
development standards and does not exceed the density of adjacent, existing multi-family
projects (third priority).
B5. Hillside Development Regulations
A Hillside Development Permit is required for the property because the property contains slopes
of 15 percent and greater with elevation differentials greater than 15 feet. The project consists of
a grading design to create a landform that is consistent with the City’s Hillside Development
Regulations. As shown on the following table, the proposed project is consistent with the
applicable Hillside Development regulations for development of steep slopes, slope height,
grading volumes, and slope screening. The project will not disturb natural slopes exceeding 40%
except along the Marron Road frontage. Marron Road is an existing partially improved
circulation arterial roadway located along the property’s southern property line. The project is
required to dedicate and construct improvements for the full width right-of-way of Marron Road
ZC 00-1 l/SDP 00-17/HDP -4-13 - THE SUMMIT AT CARLSBAL
April 3,2002
along its frontage. Grading required for circulation arterial roadways is excluded from Hillside
Development regulations. The following table indicates compliance with the applicable
development standards:
STANDARD COMPLIANCE
Development prohibited on 40%+ Slopes Exempt due to construction of Marron Road
Exceeding 10,000 Square Feet
Grading Volumes: Acceptable - 7,999 cubic 7,942 cubic yarddacre yd/acre-
Slope Height: 40 Feet Maximum
Landscaping of manufactured slopes consistent
Landscaping consists of a combination of trees, Slope Screening:
Slope Height: 34 Feet Maximum
structure where slope heights exceed 15 feet.
diagonal plane measured from edge of slope to
0.7 foot horizontal to 1 foot vertical imaginary
50 feet from top of slope to structure Slope Edge Building Setback: 24.5 feet slopes. with the City’s Landscape Manual
shrubs, and groundcover on all perimeter
C. Draft Habitat Management Plan (HMP)
The City’s December 1999 Draft HMP identifies the proposed project site as a standards area for
the purpose of establishing, enhancing and maintaining a habitat linkage from Core Area 2 to the
City limits with Oceanside to ensure Carlsbad’s portion of regional connectivity for gnatcatchers.
Standards for this area require the avoidance of coastal sage scrub and grasslands removal and no
net loss of any riparian and other wetland habitats. Since approval of the draft HMP, the City
and wildlife agencies have negotiated a proposed hardline area which comprises all of the area
delineated as open space on Exhibit “A”. The project is consistent with the HMP standards in
that no coastal sage scrub will be impacted and wetland habitats disturbed by the Marron Road
alignment will be recreated onsite.
D. Growth Management
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 2 in the northeast
quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, &d its compliance
with the adopted performance standards are summarized in the following table.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
ZC 00-1 1/SDP OO-l7/HLx* W-13 - THE SUMMIT AT CARLSb- AI
April 3,2002
GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE, continued
STANDARD
Yes CUSD Schools
COMPLIANCE IMPACTS
Elementary: 36 Students
Middle School: 96 Students
High School: 20 Students
Sewer Collection System
*The project is 68 units above the Growth Management dwelling unit allowance
Yes 3 1,460 GPD Water
Yes Basin
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Staff has conducted an environmental impact assessment to determine if the project could have a
potentially significant effect on the environment pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and the
Environmental Protection Ordinance (Title 19) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The project
falls within the scope of the City’s MEIR for the City of Carlsbad General Plan update (EIR 93-
01) certified in September, 1994, in which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was
adopted for cumulative impacts to air quality and traffic circulation. MEIRs may not be used to
review projects if certified more than five years prior to the filing of an application for a later
project except under certain circumstances. The City is currently reviewing the 1994 MEIR to
determine whether it is still adequate to review subsequent projects. Although the MEIR was
certified more than five years ago, the City’s preliminary review of its adequacy finds that no
substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the MEIR was
certified. Additionally, there is no new available information which was not known and could
not have been known at the time the MEIR was certified. Therefore, the MEIR remains adequate
to review later projects. All feasible mitigation measures identified by the MEIR which are
appropriate to this project have been incorporated into the project.
Potentially significant environmental impacts were identified for water quality, circulation,
biological resources, noise, and paleontological resources. The developer has agreed to
mitigation measures to reduce identified impacts to below a level of significance in accordance
with CEQA. In consideration of the foregoing, the Planning Director issued a Mitigated
Negative Declaration for the project on February 28, 2002. No comments were received during
the 30 day public review.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5 170 (Mitigated Negative Declaration)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5 17 1 (ZC)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5 172 (SDP)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5 173 (HDP)
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form
Disclosure Statement
Exhibits “A” - ‘bR’’ dated April 3,2002
HIGHWAY 78
Sl,TE
SUMMIT AT CARLSBAD
ZC 00-1 I/SDP 00=17/HDP 00-13
.- -
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: ZC 00-1 l/SDP 00-17/HDP 00-1 3
CASE NAME: The Summit at Carlsbad
APPLICANT: All Phase Develoument, Inc.
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Zone change to RD-M and site development plan and hillside
develoument uermit to grade and construct 143 unit auartment project including 29 affordable housing
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 4838. in the Citv of Carlsbad, Countv of San
Diego. State of California. filed in the office of the Countv Recorder of San Diego Countv, June 18, 1976
as filehage no. 76-190384 of official records.
That uortion of Lot 3 of Section 32. Townshit) 11 South, Range 4 West, San Bemardino base and
meridian, according to official Dlat thereof being in the Citv of Carlsbad. Countv of San Diego, State of
Those Dortions of Lots 3 and 4 in Section 32. Townshiu 11 South, Range 4 West, San Bemardino
meridian. in the Citv of Carlsbad, Countv of San Diego, State of California.
APN: 167-030-52: -55: -71 Acres: 20.65 Proposed No. of Units: 143
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: RM
Density Allowed: 6 DU/AC Density Proposed: 1 1.4 DU/ACRE
Existmg Zone: R- 1 - 10000 Proposed Zone: RD-M
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Zoning General Plan Current Land Use
Site R-1-10,000 RM Vacant
North Open Space os Vacant
south P-c RM Multi-Family
East 0-s . os VacanVGolf Practice
West c-2 C Neighborhood
Range
Commercial Center
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: CUSD Water District: CMWD Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 143
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued Mitigated Negative Declaration
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
Other,
T h
\, CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: ZC 00- 1 1 /SDP 00- 1 7/HDP 00- 13
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 2 GENERAL PLAN: Rh4
ZONING: R- 1 - 10000
DEVELOPER’S NAME: ALL PHASE DEVELOPMENT, INC.
ADDRESS: 6060 SUNRISE VISTA DR. SUITE 1996, CITRUS HEIGHTS, CA 95610
PHONE NO.: 760-438-4090 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 167-030-51; -55; -71
QUANTITY OF LAND USEDEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 20.65 ACRES/143 DU
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: UNKNOWN
A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 497.16
B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 265.16
C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 143 EDU
D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .99
E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = ‘ ‘A”
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
F. Circulation: Demand in ADT = 858
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 3
H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = ’ 11.27
1. Schools: Elementary: 36 Students
Middle School: 96 Students
High School 20 Students
(Demands to be determined by staff)
J. Sewer: Demands in EDU 143
Identify Sub Basin = N/A
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
K. Water: Demand in GPD = 3 1,460
L. The project is 68 units above the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant’s statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will requi-e
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Comnlittee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be
reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as “Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and nn other county, city and county. city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.”
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporakn, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person Corp/Pa& Marron Road Ventures, LLC
Title Title
Address Address 629 South Rancho Santa Fe, Ste 43 1
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
San Marcos, CA 92069
2. OWNER (Not the owner’s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. . Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-
owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
Person Please see attached sheets. Corp/Part
Title Title
Address Address ‘\
I 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-731 4 (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559
?
A
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust. list the
names and addresses of ANy person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as a trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust Please see attached Non ProfiVTrust
Title sheets. Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $20 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct
Please see attached sheets.
Signature of owneddate
W James Fru, Managing Member of Marron FtMRDd (?om VEdflW; 4b Road Ventures, LLC
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant’s agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant’s agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
OWNER DISCLOSURES/SIGNATURES -
APN(S): 167-030-51 , 167-030-55,167-030-71
OWNER: Robert Patrick Kelly and Richard Carroll Kelly, trustees of the Declaration of Trust dated February 18,
ADDRESS: 11777 San Vicente Boulevard Ste. 600
1975, consisting of an undivided 113 interest for the benefit of Irene Alice Hendricks
Robert Patrick Kelly Richard Carroll Kelly
(print name) (print name)
Trustee Trustee
(title) (title)
APN(S): 167-030-51,167-030-55,167-030-71
OWNER: Robert Patrick Kelly and Richard Carroll Kelly, trustees of the Declaration of Trust dated February 18,
ADDRESS: 11777 San Vicente Boulevard Ste. 600
1975, consisting of an undivided 1/3 interest for efit of Richard Carroll Kelly
Robert Patrick Kelly Richard Carroll Kelly /
(print name) (print name)
Trustee Trustee
(title) (title)
APN(S): 167-030-51 , 167-030-55,167-030-71
OWNER: Robert Patrick Kelly and Richard Carroll Kelly, trustees of the Declaration of Trust dated February 18,
ADDRESS: 11777 San Vicente Boulevard Ste. 600 n 1975, consisting of an undivided 1/3 interest for the benef't of Robert Patrick Kelly
Robert Patrick Kelly Richard Carroll Kelly
(print name) (print name)
Trustee Trustee
(title) (title)
.
Page 1 of 2
- . - - - - - - . - - . . . .
OWNER DISCLOSURES/SIGNATURES - {continued) -~
APN(S): 167-030-51,167-030-55,167-030-71
OWNER: Azalea Partnership, A California Limited Partnership
ADDRESS: 11777 San Vicente Boulevard Ste. 600
Los Angeles, CA 90049
Trust under the Will of Bernard Citron
BY: &&&jj?&
(signatureldate)
Cecile Citron Bartman
print name) (print name)
Trustee Successor Trustee
(title) (title)
CJJ Limited PartnershiP, A California Limited
BY:
(signatureldate)
John W. Bartman
(print name) (print name)
General Partner
(title) (title)
Page 2 of 2
"""1
20.65Acres
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS
RM - Residential Medium
RMH - Residential Medium-High
R - Regional Commercial
C - Community Commercial
TR - TraveVRecreation Commercial
0 - Office & Related Commercial
OS - Open Space
ZONING CATEGORIES
R-I - One Family Residential
RD-M - Residential Multiple R-P - Residential Professional C-I - Neighborhood Commercial
C-2 - General Commercial P-C - Planned Community 0-S - Open Space
Q - Qualified Overlay
EXISTING LAND USE
VAC - Vacant
DEV - Developed
1
"
,
1ST FLOOR PLAN
p#uEcT DATA
OlUTM
13 BUILDINGS
A: 13 UNITS (1 ER UNIT) 1196 UNITS (1 ER UNIT)
E1:13 UNITS (2 BR UNIT) C: 13 UNITS (3 ER UNIT)
e: 78 UNITS (2 ER UNIT)
TOTAL: 143 UNITS, 144SW S.F. (LIVING AREA)
TOTAL WE AREA - 32.396 S.F.
1 ER UNIT: 27%
2 ER UNIT: 64%
3 ER UNIT: 9%
TOTAL PRNATE PATO/BALCONY AREA = 12.883 S.F.
TOTAL WES PER EUlLOlNG - 7 FOR BLDG'S 1.2.3.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12&13
TOTAL WES AREA PER EUILMNC - 2.492 S.F.
6 FOR BLOC 4
EUlLOlNG ARV; 121 FLWR: 5935 SF
2ND L 3RD FLOOR PLAN
ZNO FLWR: 5941 ST.
3RO FLOOR 3SlE SF,
TOTM 15,395 SF.
RMSION A : 3/12/02
@ &"-
-
ROOF PLAN
SIDE ELEVATION r
SIDE ELEVATION I
FLOOR PLAN 2988 SF.
BACK ELEVATION IT-
FRONT ELEVATION l7-
RMSION Q : 3/12/02
Q
I
CARPORT ELEVATION
I/.- . 1'4
SIDE CARPORT ELEVATION
If.' I I'C * c
0
0
TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN (TYPE I)
IN. 1°C
-
ENCLOSURE ELEVATION (TYPE I) -
0
0
TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN (TYPE II)
IN - 1'4
TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATION (TYPE I)
If.. I 1.4
-
I
1
I 1
\ ASSESSOR PAFICEL No. 167-930- 51, 55/:71
\ - 14
i -- i !
i 1
j
i !
i I
i
!I /.