HomeMy WebLinkAboutHDP 89-23; St. Tropez West; Hillside Development Permit (HDP)City of Carlsbad
PlanHlrtct Department
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF DECISION
July 25, 1989
Charles Rowe
California Builders
P.O. Box 142
Carlsbad, CA 92008
PUD 89-2/CT 89-10/HDP 89-23/V 88-3
At the Planning Commission meeting of July 19, 1989, your application was
considered. The Commission voted 5-1 to deny your request. The Planning
Commission's decision will become Final on July 29, 1989, 10 days after the
rendering of its decision unless within the ten-day period an appeal in writing with
the required fee of $450.00 is filed with the City Clerk. If you have any questions
regarding the final dispositions of your application, please call the Planning
Department at 438-1161.
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
MJH:DN/af
Enclosures: Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2886, 2887, and 2888
2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (619) 438-1161
APPLTCATION COMPLETE DATE-
JUNE 21. 1989
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 19, 1989
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: CT 89-10/PUD 89-2/HDP 89-23/V 88-3 ST. TROPEZ WEST/CALIFORNIA
BUILDERS - Request for approval of a 6 condominium unit Tentative
Tract Map and Planned Unit Development, Hillside Development Permit,
and Variance for building height and setbacks, tandem garage parking,
reduced interior garage width, and reduced building setbacks from
open parking areas, located at the southwest corner of Ocean Street
and Grand Avenue, in the R-3 Zone, and in Local Facilities Management
Zone 1.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2886, 2887
and 2888 DENYING CT 89-10/PUD 89-2/HDP 89-23/V 88-3 based on the findings
contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit
Development, Hillside Development Permit, and Variance to construct 6 attached
condominium units on a 15,400 square foot (.354 acre) lot located along the west
side of Ocean Street south of Grand Avenue. The proposed project is subject to
the following standards and policies:
a. High Density Residential (RH) General Plan Designation.
b. Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) Zone.
c. Beach Area Overlay (BAO) Zone.
d. Hillside Development Regulations and Guidelines.
e. Planned Development Ordinance.
f. The Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Plan.
g. Local Facilities Management Zone 1.
The project site consists of two lots. Four apartment units with no off street
parking exist on the northern most lot, parcel 1. The southern lot, parcel 2
is undeveloped. A 40 foot wide coastal pedestrian access with a 5 foot wide
public stairway exists immediately adjacent to the site on the north.To the south
is a 21 unit condominium project. To the east is a variety of 1 and 2 story
multi-family residential units. To the west is the beach and Pacific Ocean.
The proposed 6 units would have a density of 20.40 du/acre. This exceeds the
sites Growth Control Yield of 19 du/acre. The project exceeds the maximum
density allowed for the site due to the application of the Hillside Development
Regulations which reduce the total site area that can be used for calculating
density from .354 acres to .294 acres.
CT 89-10/PUD 89-2/HDP 89-23/V 88-3
ST. TROPEZ WEST/CALIFORNIA BUILDERS
JULY 19, 1989
PAGE 2
As shown on Exhibit "H" and "I", the project's architecture is reminiscent of
the St. Malo project in Oceanside. The units range in size from a low of 2,352
square feet to a high of 2,943 square feet. Each unit has at least one deck on
the west side of the building with four of the units also having a deck on the
east side. All of the units have a storage area exceeding a minimum of 480 cubic
feet as required by the Planned Development Regulations. The applicant proposes
garage tandem parking for each unit which does not meet the requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance. Common recreational facilities are proposed which include
passive open areas as well as a spa and permanent barbecues.
A total of 3,367 cubic yards of fill is proposed to create numerous floor levels
and to raise the western area of the site approximately 10 to 12 feet so as to
be above the established 100 year flood line which is at the 8 foot contour.
A seawall is also proposed which will have a height of 10 feet above beach level.
The building height proposed is 24 feet above Ocean Street on the east side and
51 feet above existing grade on the west side as measured pursuant to the
existing building height definition.
III. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1. Does the proposed project comply with the development standards and intent
of the Beach Area Overlay Zone?
2. Is the project in conformance with the intent as well as the development
and design standards of the Hillside Development Regulations?
3. Does the proposed project conform to the development standards and design
criteria of the Planned Development Ordinance?
4. Is the proposed project consistent with the Hello II segment of Carlsbad's
Local Coastal Program?
5. Can the required findings for the requested variances be made?
6. Is the project in conformance with the Local Facilities Management Plan
for Zone 1?
DISCUSSION
Beach Area Overlay Zone
The Beach Area Overlay (BAO) Zone has several intents and purposes. The two that
the proposed project does not comply with are to provide for adequate parking
as needed by residential projects and to protect the aesthetic quality of the
area. In addition the project does not meet a number of development standards
of the BAO Zone.
CT 89-10/PUD 89-2/HDP ss/V 88-3
ST. TROPEZ WEST/CALIFORNIA BUILDERS
JULY 19, 1989
PAGE 3
In order to meet the required parking requirements for the project the applicant
is proposing tandem parking in a 10 foot wide by 37 foot long garage for each
unit. The Zoning Ordinance allows tandem parking only on lots with a width of
less than 50 feet. The project site has a width of 110 feet. The parking
regulations also require a single car garage in multiple family zones to have
minimum dimensions of twelve feet by twenty feet measured form the interior wall
edges of the garage. Visitor parking is required at the rate of 1 space for every
2 dwelling units resulting in the need for 3 spaces. The applicant is proposing
4 spaces which exceeds the standard. However, no building setback from open
parking areas is being proposed for those 4 spaces. This does not comply with
the BAO Zone and Planned Development Ordinance requirement of not less than a
5 foot building setback from open parking areas. The applicant has requested
a variance form all of the parking related standards mentioned. This will be
discussed under the variance section of this report.
The other BAO Zone issue for this project is the impact on the aesthetic quality
of the area. The project as viewed from the beach will reach a height of 51 feet
as measured pursuant to existing standards, and will appear as four stories.
Retaining wall heights ranging from 5 to 18 feet above existing grade would be
visible along the north and south building elevations. The extensive length and
height of the proposed walls would be directly adjacent to the public access
stairway. Screening of the walls would be difficult as they come right up to
the property line. The building does not step down the slope resulting in a
building with a large mass and strong vertical appearance as viewed from the
beach level and public access stairway. A variance has been requested to exceed
the height 1imit.
Hillside Development Regulations
The project is in conflict with two of the specified intents of the Hillside
Development Regulations. The first is to encourage creatively designed hillside
development requiring a minimal amount of grading. The project design proposes
grading 9,524 cubic yards per acre which is in the potentially acceptable range.
While staff recognizes the need to raise the western portion of the site a design
that stepped the building down the slope utilizing the existing topography could
reduce the amount of fill required. This would also serve to reduce the height
of the building and proposed retaining walls. The second intent which is an
issue for this project is to reduce the intensity of development on hillside
areas to ensure that all development that does occur is compatible with the
existing topography. As stated earlier the density calculations under the
Hillside Development regulations allow only 5 units while 6 are proposed.
Redesigning the project to 5 or fewer units would allow the applicant the ability
to reduce the intensity of the project to be compatible with the site so that
fewer variance requests would be necessary.
Planned Development Ordinance
The project complies with all but one of the development standards of the Planned
Development Ordinance. The standard not met is the required building setback
of not less than 5 feet from open parking areas which was discussed under the
CT 89-10/PUD 89-2/HOP 89-23/V 88-3
ST. TROPEZ WEST/CALIFORNIA BUILDERS
JULY 19, 1989
PAGE 4 _____
BAO Zone Section. Common active and passive recreational facilities are proposed
including a spa, barbecues, and a common outdoor area. Two stairways are
proposed from the site down to beach level. Balconies are proposed for each unit
with 4 of the 6 units having two balconies. A separate storage space of at least
480 cubic feet is required for each unit and has been provided.
Local Coastal Program
As proposed the project is not consistent with all policies of the Mello II Local
Coastal Program. Policy 7-12 relates specifically to development seaward of
Ocean Street. The policy requires new development to observe, at a minimum, an
ocean setback based on a "stringline" method of measurement. While the proposed
building and decks appear to comply with the stringline setback, the seawall does
not. Because of the potential beach erosion caused by wave deflection it is
important that the seawall follow the stringline so as not to"redirect and
concentrate wave energy onto adjacent properties.
Variances
The applicant is requesting a total of five variances. The variances requested
are as follows:
1. Allow building height greater than two stories or 25 feet in height,
whichever is less to permit four stories at a height of 51 feet.
2. Reduce side yard building setbacks from the required width of 10 feet
from property line to a minimum of 6 feet.
3. Allow tandem garage parking for a lot that is not substandard in
width.
4. Reduce the interior garage width required from 12 feet to 10 feet
and allow a depth of 37 feet.
5. Reduce building setbacks from open parking areas from 5 feet to 0
feet.
The applicant has taken the position that the west side of Ocean Street creates
a unique set of circumstances not found anywhere else in the City; and therefore,
the variances requested are justifiable. The Planning Department records show
that a number of variances have been granted on Ocean Street. Those variances
approved have been primarily for building setbacks.
A height variance may be justifiable due to the slope of the property, however,
the building height near the center and western portion of the site is excessive.
This is a result of the amount of fill proposed and the design not stepping the
building down the slope. Staff cannot support the proposed height of 51 feet
on the western portion of the site which appears as four stories. By redesigning
to reduce the intensity of the project several of the proposed variances would
no longer be necessary. Given the proposed design staff cannot support the
CT 89-10/PUD 89-2/HDP 89-23/V 88-3
ST. TROPEZ WEST/CALIFORNIA BUILDERS
JULY 19, 1989
PAGE 5
requested variances which are needed largely as a result of self-imposed design
constraints.
Growth Management
The subject property is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1,
northwest quadrant. As identified earlier the project's density of 20.40 du/acre
is not consistent with the City's Growth Control Yield of 19 du/acre.
Summary
The project does not comply with the intent and development standards of the BAO
Zone and the Hillside Development Regulations. In addition, it does not comply
with all of the standards of the Planned Development Ordinance or with the Mello
II segment of the Local Coastal Program. A total of five variances have been
requested which demonstrates that the proposed project is to intense for the
subject site. Staff is not able to make the required findings necessary to grant
the variances. The project also exceeds the City's Growth Control Yield.
Therefore, staff recommends denial of CT 89-10/PUD 89-2/HDP 89-23/V 88-3.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to projects which
a public agency rejects or disapproves (Section 21080(b)(5) of the Public
Resources Code).
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2886, 2887 and 2888
2. Location Map
3. Background Data Sheet
4. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
5. Disclosure Form
6. Reduced Site Plans
7. Exhibits "A" - "J", dated July 19, 1989
DNraf
June 20, 1989
PLANNTNG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2886
1
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD
2 CALIFORNIA, DENYING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 89-10 AND PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT 89-2 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
3 CORNER OF OCEAN STREET AND GRAND AVENUE.
APPLICANT: ST. TROPEZ WEST/CALIFORNIA BUILDERS
4 CASE NO.: CT 89-10/PUD 89-2
5 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
6 Lot 1 of Block "B" of the Hays Land Company addition, in the City
of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according
7 to map thereof No. 1221, filed in the office of County Recorder of
San Diego County, November 4, 1909.
8
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning
9
Commission; and
10
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by
11
Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
12
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of July, 1989, hold
13
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request;
14
and
15
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
16
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said
17
Commission considered all factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map and
18
Planned Unit Development.
19 I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as
20
follows:
21
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
22
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the
23 Commission DENIES CT 89-10/PUD 89-2, based on the following findings:
24 Findings:
25 1. The proposed project is not consistent with the Zoning Code and General
Plan because the building height exceeds that allowed by the zone and
26 creates adverse visual impacts, required setbacks are not met, and the
allowed density for the site is exceeded.
27
28
1 2. The proposed Planned Development does not meet all of the minimum
development standards set forth in Section 21.45.090 as the building is
2 not set back a minimum of 5 feet from open parking areas.
3 3. The proposed Planned Development does not meet all of the design criteria
set forth in Section 21.45.080 as adequate useable off-street parking is
4 not provided because substandard tandem garages are proposed, and it is
not compatible with existing surroundings, specifically the public beach,
5 due to its mass and building height which creates adverse visual impacts
and does not relate to its environmental setting.
6
The proposed project is not designed to be sensitive to and blend in with
7 the natural topography of the site as the building design does not step
down the slope but rather utilizes a large amount of fill and an
8 I extensive amount of retaining walls ranging from 5 to 18 feet in height
above existing grade which will be visible.
9
10 I PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
11 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of July,
12 1989, by the following vote, to wit:
13 AYES:
14 NOES:
15 ABSENT:
16 ABSTAIN:
17
18 MATTHEW HALL, Chairman
19 | CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
20 I ATTEST:
21
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
22 PLANNING DIRECTOR
23
24
25
26
27 PC RESO. NO. 2886 -2-
28
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2887
1
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
DENIES HDP 89-23, based on the following findings:
22
Findings:
23
1. The development proposal is not consistent with the purpose and intent of
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF OCEAN STREET AND GRAND AVENUE.
APPLICANT: ST. TROPEZ WEST/CALIFORNIA BUILDERS
CASE NO.: HDP 89-23
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Lot 1 of Block "B" of the Hays Land Company addition, in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California, according to map thereof No. 1221, filed in
the office of County Recorder of San Diego County,
November 4, 1909.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning
Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided
by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of July, 1989,
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission
considered all factors relating to the Planning Commission Determination; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as
fol1ows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
the Hillside Development regulations of assuring that development density
and intensity relates to the slope of the land because the project density
exceeds that allowed by the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, and the
building does not step down the slope resulting in a building with a large
mass and strong vertical appearance as viewed from the base of the slope.
The proposed project is not consistent with the purpose and intent of the
1 regulations of encouraging creatively designed hillside development
requiring a minimal amount of grading as the project proposes grading
2 which is not within the acceptable range, and the excessive use of
retaining walls ranging from 5 to 18 feet above grade which would be
3 visible to the public,
4 3. The 51 foot height and large mass of the proposed project is not
consistent with the purpose and intent of the ordinance to reduce the
5 intensity of development on hillside areas to ensure all development is
compatible with the existing topography, which is also evidenced by the
6 number of variances required by the project.
7 4. The project design does not substantially conform to the intent of the
concepts illustrated in the Hillside Development Guidelines Manual with
8 specific emphasis on the view of the hillside and hillside architecture
which suggests a multi-level terraced foundation fitting into the
9 hillside.
10 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
11 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of July,
12 1989, by the following vote, to wit:
13 AYES:
14 NOES:
15 ABSENT:
16 ABSTAIN:
17
18
MATTHEW HALL, Chairman
19 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
20 ATTEST:
21
MICHAEL J. HOL2MILLER
22 PLANNING DIRECTOR
23
24
25
26
27 PC RESO NO. 2887 -2-
28
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2888
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A VARIANCE FOR BUILDING
3 HEIGHT AND SETBACKS, TANDEM GARAGE PARKING, REDUCED
I INTERIOR GARAGE DIMENSIONS, AND REDUCED BUILDING SETBACKS
4 FROM OPEN PARKING AREAS GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OCEAN STREET AND GRAND AVENUE.
5 APPLICANT: ST TROPEZ WEST/CALIFORNIA BUILDERS
CASE NO.: V 88-3
6
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit:
7
Lot 1 of Block "B" of the Hays Land Company addition, in
8 the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California, according to map thereof No. 1221, filed in
9 the office of County Recorder of San Diego County,
November 4, 1909.
10
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning
11
Commission; and
12
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided
13
by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
14
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of July, 1989,
15
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said
16
request; and
17 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
18 testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said
19 I
Commission considered all factors relating to V 88-3.
20
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
21
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
22
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
23
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the
24 Commission DENIES V 88-3, based on the following findings:
25 Findings:
26 1. The conditions applicable to the property such as the slope to the west
is applicable to all properties on the west side of Ocean Street and the
27 height requested which is twice that allowed by the zone, has not been
28
granted for other properties and is the result of self-imposed design
1 constraints as are the other variances requested.
2 2. The project is located in the Beach Area Overlay Zone and must comply with
the height, building setback, and parking requirements of the zone which
3 apply also to other properties,
4 3. This property owner is not being denied a right enjoyed by other property
owners in regard to building height and parking requirements because this
5 and other lots in the area, similar in size, may be developed with fewer
units within the required standards.
6 4. The proposed project may be detrimental to the General Plan because
7 implementing ordinance requirements are not being met.
8
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
9
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of July,
10
1989, by the following vote, to wit:
11
AYES:
12
NOES:
13
ABSENT:
14
ABSTAIN:
15
16
MATTHEW HALL, Chairman
17 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
18 ATTEST:
19
20
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
21 PLANNING DIRECTOR
22
23
24
25
26
27 PC RESO NO. 2888 -2-
28
HDP 89-23
ST. TROPEZ WEST
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: CT 89-10/PUD 89-2/HDP 89-23VV 88-3
APPLICANT: ST. TROPEZ WEST/CALIFORNIA BUILDERS
REQUEST AND LOCATION: APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP. PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND VARIANCE TO
CONSTRUCT A 6 UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 2901 OCEAN STREET.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION; LOT 1 OF BLOCK "b" OF THE HAYS LAND COMPANY
ADDITION; IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 1221
APN; 203-234-01 AND 02
Acres .354 Proposed No. of Lots/Units_6 '
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation RH
Density Allowed 15-19 DU/AC Density Proposed 20.40
Existing Zone R-3 Proposed Zone N/A
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
Site R-3 4 UNIT APARTMENT & VACANT
North R-3 COASTAL PUBLIC ACCESS
STAIRWAY
South R-3 21-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT
East R-3 MULTI-RESIDENTIAL UNITS
West O-S PACIFIC OCEAN
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District CARLSBAD Water CARLSBAD Sewer CARLSBAD
EDU's 6 Public Facilities Fee Agreement, Date 3/24/89
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued ;
E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other, CEOA DOES NOT APPLY TO PROJECTS RECOMMENDED FOR DENIAL
SECTION 21080(b)(5)
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO.: ST. TROPEZ WEST
CT 89-10/PUD 89-2/HDP 89-23/V 88-3
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: _1 GENERAL PLAN: RH
ZONING: R-3
DEVELOPER'S NAME: CALIFORNIA BUILDERS
ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 142. CARLSBAD. CA 92008
PHONE NO.: 434-3125 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 203-234-01 & 02
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): .354 AC..
23.144 SO. FT.. 6 DU
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
A. City Administrative Facilities; Demand in Square Footage = 22.239
B. Library; Demand in Square Footage = 11.868
C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
D. Parks; Demand in Acreage = .044478
E. Drainage; Demand in CFS = N/A
Identify Drainage Basin = N/A
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
F. Circulation; Demand in ADTs = 36
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
G. Fire; Served by Fire Station No.
H. Open Space; Acreage Provided - N/A
I. Schools; -
(Demands to be determined by staff)
J. Sewer; Demand in EDUs - 6
Identify Sub Basin - 1G
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
K. Water; Demand in GPD - 1.320
DISCLOSURE FORM
APPLICANT:
AGENT:
MEMBERS:
St. Trooez Wg^i-. a Joint Venture
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)"
P.O. Box 142, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Business Address
434-3125 .
Telephone Number
Charles F. Rowe, dba California Builders
Name
P.O. Box 142, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Business Address
434-3125
Telephone Number
Dr. Earl Shultz, Karen Shultz
Name (individual, partner, joint
venture, corporation, syndication)
See attached
P.O. Box 2394, Rancho Santa Fe
Home Address CA y2Ub/
Business Address
942-9243
Telephone Number Telephone Number
Name Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/We understand that if this project is located in the Coastal Zone, I/we will apply
for Coastal Commission Approval prior to development.
I/We acknowledge that in the process of reviewing this application, it may be
necessary for members of City Staff. Planning Commissioners, Design Review Board
members, or City Council members to inspect and enter the property that is the
subject of this application. I/We consent to entry for this purpose.
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this disclosure
is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be relied upon
as being true and correct until amended.
APPLICANT
BY
Agent, Owner, Partner
ATTACHMENT 1
St. Tropez West - A Joint Venture
Robert and Linda Wueste
340 E. 64th St. Apt.20L, N.Y.,N.Y. 10021
Business Phone: 212-354-0528
Charles F. Rowe
P.O. Box 142, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Business Phone: 619-434-3125
Bill and Julie Been
4027 West G Street
Brawley, CA 92227
Business Phcne: 619-344-1177
Gloria J. Vanderlaan
P.O. Box 4351, Carlsbad,CA 92008
Business Phone: 619-729-2301
Robert L. and Lynda Cheek Erickson
730 Neptune Ave., Leucadia, CA 92024
Business Phone: 714-660-1096
Gary L. and Glenda J. Foster
444 W. G St., Brawley, CA 92227
Business Phone: 619-352-4171
Home:212-935-2985
Home:619-729-9545
Home:619-434-3567
Home:619-944-6479
Home: 619-753-6713
Home:619-344-0052
'(**••*)
•qf—f---v
a. u
.«»T» T/•/•«. I
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
CONSTRAINTS MAP
vir-t-<r