Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHDP 89-51; Kreid Remodel; Hillside Development Permit (HDP)r CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM •9 PAGE 1 OF 2 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (For Dept. Use Only) O Master Plan I—' Specific Plan Precise Development Plan.. Tentative Tract Map Planned Development Permit (For Dept. Use Only) • • • • Non-Residential Planned Development Permit • • • • • Condominium Permit Special Use Permit Redevelopment Permit — Tentative Parcel Map — Administrative Variance. / General Plan Amendment. Site Development Plan., • • ' Zone Change ^ Conditional Use Permit ^ Hillside Development Permit. • Environmental Impact Assessment • • • • Variance Planned Industrial Permit.. Coastal Development Permit. Planning Commission Deter.. 2) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE Nb"rth/East SIDE OF Marmol Court (2548) BETWEEN El Fuerte Street (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) AND (NAME OF STREET) Acuna Court (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 3) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 80 Tract 75-4 Map 8302 May 1975 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S) 215-491-05 5) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 6) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION RL 7) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION N/A 8) EXISTING ZONING PC 9) PROPOSED ZONING N/A 10) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 1 .05 11) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS guest house 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS N/A 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION N/A 14) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS one (RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTIRAL) 15) PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL OFFICE/SQUARE FOOTAGE N/A 16) PROPOSED COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE N/A ARFM0008.DH 4/89 "W CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM PAGE 2 OF 2 17) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS 20) PROJECT NAME: N/A 19) PROPOSED INCREASE IN AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC none N/A Kreid Remodel (Garage) 21)BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: New 3700 sq. ft. vehicle garage with 1100 sq. ft. guest suite above with terrace and deck. 22) OWNER 23) APPLICANT NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) Tom Kreid NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) Jo^n S. Berry MAILING ADDRESS 2548 Marmol Court MAILING ADDRESS 5315 Avenida Encinas, #K CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE La Costa, CA 92009 438-3442 CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE Carlsbad, CA 92008 931-0555 I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE DATE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER'S REPRE- SENTATIVE AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE-BESTJt MY/KNOWLEDGE. SfGNATURff/ y y DATE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION: APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED //DfS9'5/ TOTAL FEE REQUIRED KKCEIVBD NOV 8 1989 CITY OF CARLSBAD DEVELOP. PROC. SERV. DlV. DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. 977(^^ ARFM0008.DH 4/89 DISCLOSURE FORM APPLICANT: AGENT: MEMBERS: Mr. Tom Kreid Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication) 185 Vallecitos De Oro, san Marcos, CA 92059 Business Address 744-1770 Telephone Number John S. Beery, Architect, AIA Name 5315 Avenida Encinas #K, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Business Address 931-0655 Telephone Number Mr. Tom Kreid Name (individuai, partner, joint venture, corporation, syndication) same 2548 Marmol Court Home Address La Costa,' CA 92009 Business Address same 438-3442 Telephone Number Telephone Number Name Home Address Business Address Telephone Numtjer Telephone Number (Attach more sheets if necessary) I/We understand that if this project is located in the Coastal Zone, I/we will apply for Coastal Commission Approval prior to development. (N/A) I/We acknowledge that in the process of reviewing this application, it may be necessary for members of City Staff, Planning Commissioners, Design Review Board members, or City Council members to inspect and enter the property that is the subject of this application. I/We consent to entry for this purpose. I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this disclosure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be relied upon as being true and correct until amended. BY Preliminary Report Order No. 6911941-61 GATEWAY TITLE COMPANY Title officer: Candy Church PolicY(ies) contemplated: A California Land Title Association Standard Coverage Policy. JOHN BERRY ARCHITECT SUITE K Our No.: 6911941-61 5315 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD, CA. 92008 Your Ref: KREID ATTN: TERRY Date : October 26, 1989 at 7:30 A.M. SCHEDULE A The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this schedule covered by this report is: a fee Title to the said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: J. Thomas Kreid and Irena L. Kreid, husband and wife as community property The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of San Diego, and is described as follows: DESCRIPTION CONTAINED IN "EXHIBIT A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Preliminary Report - Schedule A Gateway Title Company - San Diego County 619-299-7892 1^1 Gateway Order No.: TJ511941-61 ^ Reference No.: KREID EXHIBIT A Lot 80 of Carlsbad Tract No. 75-4 La Costa Estates North, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 8302, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May 5, 1976. EXCEPT THEREFROM l/16th of all coal, oil, gas and other mineral deposits contained in the East half of the Southeast quarter of Section 25, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, as reserved by the State of California in patent recorded April 22, 1954 in Book 5212 Page 490 of Official Records the right to the use of the surface, including its right to enter such lands to a depth of 500 below the surface was released and was quitclaimed by the State of California to La Costa Land Company by a quitclaim recorded June 30, 1971 as File/Page No. 141047 of Official Records. ALSO EXCEPT one-half interest in all oil and mineral rights, for a period of 20 years from date of recommendation to be continued if oil or minerals shall be developed within five miles of the property, otherwise to revert to the land. Rights of exploration shall not be included, however, slant drilling may be made from an adjoining property, provided that this drilling be at least 100 feet in depth measured anywhere on the above described, in Lots 3 and 4 West half of the Southwest quarter of Section 30, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian according to the official plat thereof, as reserved by Germain M. Graef, Horace L. Graef and Robert W. Graef in deed recorded June 27, 1960 as File/Page No. 129955 of Official Records. ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM herein said lot all crude oil, petroleum, gas, brea, asphaltum and all kindred substances and other minerals under and in said land, as reserved by the La Costa Land Company by instrument recorded May 19, 1976 as File No. 76-152036 of Official Records. Preliminary Report - Schedule A Gateway Title Company - San Diego County 619-299-7892 SCHEDULE B Preliminary Report GATEWAY TITLE COMPANY Order No. 6911941-61 At the date hereof Exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed exceptions and exclusions contained in said policy form would be as follows: 1. Property taxes, Including any personal property taxes, and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1989-1990: First installment Amount: $2,548.44 Penalty: Current status: Open Second installment Amount: $2,548.44 Penalty: Current status: Open Homeowners exemption: $7,000.00 Code area: 09052 Assessors Parcel No.: 215-491-05-00 2. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed according to provisions of the statutes of 1983 of the State of California. 3. An easement for the purposes shown below and rights incidental thereto as shown or as offered for dedication on the recorded map of said Tract. Purpose: Sewer Affects: The Southeast 10 feet of said land 4. Covenants and restrictions (deleting therefrom any restrictions based on race, color or creed) as set forth in the document Entitled: Covenants, conditions and restrictions Recorded: May 19, 1976 as File No. 76-152036, Official Records Said Instrument includes a provision that a violation thereof shall not defeat the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value. 5. A Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other obligations secured thereby. Amount: $360,000.00 Dated: October 02, 1985 Trustor: J. Thomas Kreid and Irena L. Kreid, husband and wife as community property Trustee: Cal-West Mortgage Co., a California corporation Beneficiary: San Dieguito National Bank, a national banking association Recorded: October 07, 1985 as Instrument No. 85-372019 Preliminary Report - Schedule B PAGE 1 Gateway Title Company - San Diego County 619-299-7892 SCHEDULE B Preliminary Report GATEWAY TITLE COMPANY Order No. 6911941-61 6. A Deed of Trust to secure an Indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other obligations secured thereby. Amount: $500,000.00 Dated: August 17, 1989 Trustor: J. Thomas Kreid and Irena L. Kreid, husband and wife Trustee: San Marcos National Bank Beneficiary: San Marcos National Bank, a national banking association Recorded: August 18, 1989 as Instrument No. 89-445466 7. We will require a STATEMENT OF INFORMATION from ALL PARTIES in order to complete this report, based on the effect of documents, proceedings, liens, decrees, or other matters which do not specifically describe said land, but which, if any do exist, may affect the title or Impose liens or encumbrances thereon. 8. There is located on said land a single family residence, known as 2648 Marmol Court, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, California. 9. There are NO conveyances affecting said land, recorded within six (6) months of the date of this report. NOTE: The charge for a policy of title insurance, if issued through this title order, will be based on the short-term rate. CC:tt Plats enclosed Preliminary Report - Schedule B PAGE 2 Gateway Title Company - San Diego County 619-299-7892 c 215-49 SHT 1 OF 2 m r«2oo' CHANGES 108 ® .•5AN DIEGO COUNTy ASSESSOfrS MAP . B0OK2.I5..PAG£.49.SHT I MAPPED FOR ASSESSMEN7.PURP0SES ONLY BLK OLD NEW YR c. z •• . •• •• 1 ' 1 • i -1 -i 1200 ELM /(fENUE CITY OF CARLSBAD ^ /I^NUE CARLSBAD, CALIFOlill CARLSBAD, CALIFORVflA 92008 438-5621 REC'D FROM U • / 0/^WW^3 /-•/C..-0>ru ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 3582 02/23/9( 0001 01 05 -Mise 2})0..QQ RECEIPT NO. 95345 TOTAL CITY OF CARLSBAD ^ 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFOmiA 92008 438-5621 REC'D FROM. DATE ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 1243 11/08/89 0001 01 05 •Mi«€ i RECEIPT NO. 97763 TOTAL rc ' PLEASE NOTE: Time limits on the processing of discretionary projects established by state law do not start until a project application is deemed complete by the City. The City has 30 calendar days from the date of application submittal to determine whether an application is complete or incomplete. Within 30 days of submittal of this application you will receive a letter stating whether this application is complete or incomplete. If it is incomplete, the letter will state what is needed to make this application complete. When the application is complete, the processing period will start upon the date of the completion letter. Applicant Signaturej^o '^pAj2^^ ^ Staff Signature: Date: To be stapled with receipt to application Copy for file Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to North Coast Publishers, Inc. corporate offices: P.O. Box 878, Encinitas, CA 92024 (619) 753-6543 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and o resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitied matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspoper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of Son Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCA- TION: 2648 Marmol Court, Carl- sbad. PROJECT DESCBIPTION: Pro- pojed adaiUon t« <n cxlittift ling- le-famfy retlih^et pt • m»l iquare (tottarajt* aiid 1,064>qlare foot guest quuten. TheCHy«riC«rlsMkilliCf<i^<!t- ed an environmental review ofthe above described project pursuant to the GUidiellne* for In|liiliia- tion of th*GiMn7>UjB«Vt#tBii*n- Ul Quality Act and «Mi IMtaB- menUl 9t«iaetbm^mtlitwm*f»e City of Carlsb«A)A»^MSiWtMid review, a KegatMk :D«Wlia*ttbn (decUration tkat tte.»MiW *iU not have a signlfleMtt iiaiMi«tbBibe environment) i« jheMsylUlnM -for the subject pnpliCob JinMfieMlon for this action it «nA)Mstll4 naB> ningDcpartmeiAii>v ' A copy of tb»-]itilMM IMKtlM-tion with s«Hi«im»dMi;i(tMf is on fUe in th«|q{MtiiM^tvaltili«nt, 2075 Las Palm* IMvtt.^ibad. Califomia 9a09B. >CloliuB«its from the public are invited. Pleaae sub- mit eommenta la wvittac ts the Planniag Department within ten (10) if$t.»t Mte of tasunce: Dated: March IS, 1S«0 Case No: HDE fllMH Applicant: John Baeiy, A.LA. IDCHAKL i. HOLZMIUJIR Planning Director CJ 4S86: March IS, IOM • March 15 ] 99O 19. 19 19 1 certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on the 15th day of March. 1990 Clerk of the Printer #202-2M-12/87 Citv of, Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: 2648 Marmol Court, Carlsbad PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed addition to an existing single-family residence of a 3,691 square foot garage and 1,064 square foot guest quarters. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described prqject pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: March 15, 1990 MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER CASE NO: HDP 89-51 Planning Director APPLICANT: John Beery, A.I.A. PUBLISH DATE: March 15, 1990 MJH:AH/af 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. HDP 89-51 DATE: February 28. 1990 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Kreid Residence Garage Addition and Guest Quarters 2. APPLICANT: John Beerv. A.I.A. 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 5315 Avenida Encinas. Suite K. Carlsbad 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: February 23. 1990 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed addition of a 3.691 square foot garage and 1.064 scfuare foot quest cfuarters to an existing single- family residence on an infill hillside lot. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Enyironmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may haye a significant effect on the enyironment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. * A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked to indicate this determination. * An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a significant effect on the enyironment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings "YES-sig" and "YES-insig" respectively. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 1. Result in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards? X_ 2. Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? X_ 3. Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site? X_ 4. Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X_ 5. Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality? X. 6. Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? X_ 7. Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? X_ 8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water or public water supply? X_ 9. Substantially increase usage or cause depletion of any natural resources? X_ 10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X_ 11. Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure or object? -2- BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic plants)? X_ 13. Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X_ 14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local importance? X_ 15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects? X_ 16. Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X_ HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area? X_ 18. Substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services? X_ 19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems? X_ 20. Increase existing noise levels? X_ 21. Produce new light or glare? X_ -3- HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? X_ 23. Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area? X_ 24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X_ 25. Generate substantial additional traffic? X_ 26. Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking? X_ 27. Impact existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X_ 28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? X_ 29. Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X_ 30. Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans? X_ 31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view? X_ 32. Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X_ -4- MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE YES^ YES , NO (sig) (insig) 33. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. X_ 34. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) X_ 35. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) X_ 36. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X_ -5- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION This project entails 900 cubic yards of grading on a hillside lot to accommodate the construction of an additional 3,691 square foot garage and 1,064 square foot guest quarters adjacent to an existing single-family residence. The topography is relatively steep, containing areas of slope that exceed 40%. The parcel is surrounded by existing single-family developments. The proposed addition encroaches into 2:1 manufactured slopes not higher than 15 feet. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Grading to create a building pad will modify the topography of the slope, however, hillside development architectural standards will be applied to minimize the impact. In addition, development on the steep portions of the slope higher than 15 feet will be prohibited. Drainage and erosion control facilities will be incorporated into the project by conditions of approval and no unstable earth conditions or unique geologic features are located on the project site or in the general vicinity. Development of the project would create impervious surfaces onsite which reduce absorption rates and increase surface runoff and runoff velocities, however, drainage facilities will be provided. Construction of accessory structures to an existing single-family residence will not contribute to the depletion of fossil fuel and other natural resources, or increase local and regional air emissions. Residential development on this site at the appropriate density has been accounted and planned for in the City's General Plan, as well as the Zone 6 Local Facilities Management Plan, therefore, the above-mentioned impacts to physical resources have been anticipated. The project is an addition to an existing single-family residence on a previously graded infill lot. There are no significant archaeological/ paleontological/historical sites in the area. BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT The small scale size of the area being graded to accommodate development and isolation of the area created by surrounding single-family residences limits the biological value of the site. The site is adjacent to existing development so there is no threat of introducing new species into a natural area or limiting the movement of native animal species. -6- HUMAN ENVIRONMENT Traffic impacts, increase to population, increased public facility demands and the planned use of the area have all been accounted and planned for in the City's General Plan and Zone 6 Local Facilities Management Plan. The project will be required to pay public facility fees that will be used to adequately mitigate any impacts upon utilities and public facilities. The proposed project will incrementally increase noise levels in the area due to traffic and contribute to light and glare in the project vicinity, however, these impacts are considered insignificant due to the small nature of the project. The development will be compatible with surrounding land uses, and the project is required to meet City standards, ordinances, and policies; therefore, no safety impacts are anticipated. -7- ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES The small nature of this single-family addition infill project limits any phased development, nor does it lend itself to alternative site design or scale of development. The property is zoned for single-family residential uses and the project conforms to the adopted residential density for the area; therefore, consideration of alternative uses or sites is not appropriate in this case. Development of the site at some future time or the no project alternative is not of benefit and only postpones the site's inevitable development. -8- DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date H Dat Signature Plannin LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM fIF APPLICABLE) -9- APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature -10- DATE: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I (To be Completed by APPLICANT) Applicant: Mr. and Mrs. Tom and Irena Kreid Address of Applicant: 2648 MarmoI Court JollQ.- CA 92009 Phone Nuinber: f 619^ 438-3442 Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): John S. Beerv, Architect A.I.A. & Associates 5315 Avenida Encinas #K Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 931-0655 GENERAL INFORMATION: (Please be specific) Project Description: To construct a detached garage of 3,691 S.F. and a detached guest guarters of 1,064 S.F. v/ith additional terrace of 758* S.F. Project Location/Address: 2648 M^rmnl Cnnrf Car I4^4^, CA 92009 Assessor Parcel Number: 215 - 491 - 05 General Plan/Zone of Subject Property: PC. Local Facilities Management Zone: Zone 6 Is the site within Carlsbad's Coastal Zone? iia. Please describe the area surrounding the site to the North: Low DGn.qihv Residential East: Lo¥ Density Rgsi<;enti<n. South: Low Density Residential West: Low Density Residential List all other applicable permits & approvals related to this project: Hillside development permit, grading permit building permit. INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR FILLING OUT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I This Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Form - Part I will be used to determine what type of environmental documentation (i.e. Environmental Impact Report, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration or Exemption) will be required to be prepared for your application, per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Title 19 of Carlsbad's Municipal Code. The clarity and accuracy of the information ^you provide Is critical for purposes of quickly determining the specific environmental effects of your project. Recent judicial decisions have held that a "naked checklist", that Is a checklist that is merely checked "yes" or "no". Is Insufficient to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Each "yes" or "no" answer must be accompanied by a written explanation justifying the "yes" or "no" answer. This Is especially Important when a Negative Oeclaratlon Is being sought. The more information provided in this form, the easier and quicker It will be for staff to complete the Environmental Impact Assessment Form - Part II* (Please be Specif. Attach Additional Paces or^iibits. if necesysary) 1. Please describe the project site, including distinguishing natural and manmade characteristics. Also provide precise slope analysis when a slope of 15' or higher and 15% grade or greater Is present on the site. The existing site consists of a manmade slope with a building pad area (exist.) of less than 5% slope with an uphill and downhill slope greater than 40%. Remaining site areas slope from 5% to 40%. (See slope analysis drawings provided.) 2. Please describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. The project is incorporated into the hillside reducing the exterior exposure to the elements minimizing heat loss. Also, the use of thermal mass as a heat sink is incorporated as a passive bi-product of the design concept. 3. PLEASE AHACH A PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET WHICH SHOWS THE FOLLOWING: a. If a residential project identify the number of units, type of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected, average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates). 1 guest dwelling unit - accessory structure (vehicle storage and guest house) Garage - 3,691 S.F./Guest House 1,064 S.F. Project is for private use not for sale or for rent. Average daily traffic generated does, not change for the existing S.F.R.use b. If a Commercial project, indicate the exact type, actlvlty(les), • square footage of sales area, average dally traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates), parking provided, and loading facilities. Not Applicable - (Not commercial) c. If an indttstrial project, indicate the exact type or industry(ies), average dally traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates), estimated employment per shift, time of shifts, and loading facilities. Not Applicable - (Not industrial) d. If an institutional project, indicate the major project/site function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. Not Applicable - (Not institutional) I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Please Answer each of the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. Then, fully discuss and explain why each item was checked yes or no. Provide supporting data if applicable. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Y£S NQ 1) Could the project significantly impact or change present or future land uses in the vicinity of the activity? X EXPLANATION: The intended use is low density residential and is consistant with the zone and future land uses within the area. 2) Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of aesthetic value? x EXPLANATION: The intended activity does not imnact recreational areas and the proposed structure j.s Ipc^ted so its visual impact to the neighboring coipmuaity is minimized. it. is weii screened from view by existing vegetation to remain. 3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? x EXPLANATION: No. The activity is storage of a private auto collection. No other activities are anticipated or projected which might affect or alter the neighborhood functioning. 4) Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? x_ EXPLANATION: LIOJ The use, nrrnpanpy. pind type of construction meet the planning requirements of the zone and the design has attempted to be harmonious with hillside development requirements. The location S< design as proposed worlts hard to minimize any- impact on the community. 8) Could the activity significantly affect an historical or archaeological site or its settings? YES NO 5) Could the activity increase the number of low and moderate cost housing units in the city? x EXPLANATION: No. This question does not apply to the proposed improvements because this is an accessory use to a S.F.R. and not a multiple housing improvement. 6) Could the activity significantly affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? x EXPLANATION: No. This guestion does not apply to the proposed improvements for the reasons stated in item No. 5. 7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? x_ EXPLANATION: There is no unique natural or manmade feature in the activity area. EXPLANATION: The activity area is not a setting consistant with the development of finding historical or archeoloqical^sites within the activity area. Prior to the existing development the activity area is not highly characteristic of environments conducive to human or 9) Could the activity significantly affect the animal habitation, potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? y EXPLANATION: No. There is no scarce natural resource(s) in the activity area which could be significantly affected. _ 1£S NQ 10) Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant resources? • x EXPLANATION: The activity is confined to a small portion of the existing manmade site which will not affect any fish, wildlife or plant resources because no such resource exists on or near the activity area. 11) Are there any rare or endangered plant or animal species in the activity area? x EXPLANATION: The site is totally man made as pyi .qti na.- Landscaping is man made. The site is fenced with no evidence of wildlife niches and there are no existing water resources to affect fish or foul. 12) Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's stream, lagoons, bays, tidelands or beaches? y EXPLANATION: The site is located on a west facing hillside significantly distant from any man made or natural water resources or watersheds. 13) Could the activity result In the erosion or elimin- ation of agricultural lands? x EXPLANATION: The activity is not located adjacent to or within an agricultural zone and all slope activity (grading) shall be within the perimeter walls of the proposed structure. 14) Could the activity serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment of already developed areas? x EXPLANATION: The intended use/activity can onlv hp rnn?!! dpred an accessory use & structure to a single family dwelling within this zone and by itself not affect the character or economics of this area to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas. Nor does the proposed improvements increase the occupancies of•the zone intfinsifying already developed areas 15) Will the activity require a variance from estab- lished environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)? ^ V EXPLANATION: The activity is compatable with current environmental air, water, noise, etc., standards, and does nob require a variance. 16) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger project or series of projects? x EXPLANATION: The proposed development is for only the items identified in the proiect description, and is not part of a larger development. 17) Will the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? _x EXPLANATION: A hillside development permit is required for this activity. 18) Will the activity require Issuance of a variance or conditional u?e permit by the City? EXPLANATION: No variance or conditional use permit is required for the accessory use of this structure. 19) Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? EXPLANATION: The proposed activity is fnr storage of antomohi 1 e.g only. No mainhenancQ nr repair i .g part nf thg prnpoBPrl activity. So the activity does not involve the use, or disposal of hazardous materials. _ Y£S NO 20) Will the-activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? y EXPLANATION: This is a hillside development and is not located within any designated flood Plane zgne. 21) Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? x EXPLANATION: There is no geologic evidence as part of the Geo Soils investigation to support the location of an active fault within the activity area. 22) Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? • x EXPLANATION: ppr thp HPO y^nilg Pppnrt; anticipatPrI . .«;nilc; arp primarily rncV wV. i will nnt gpnpratP ^i-gn-l Fi r';^nl- amnnnt-g nf ringj- . 23) Will the activity Involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? x EXPLANATION: The activity will require only the removal of several non-protected trees and man landscaped ground- cover. No burning is projected. 24) Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) EXPLANATION: The proposed nrniect win not siqnificahtlv change the quality of anv portion of the reqions air or water resources Activities are standard/typical construction methods for Type V residential construction regarding air and or water polution. 8 Y£S NO 25) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? EXPLANATION: nnP tn f.hP dP.Qign nf the structure and the proposed use no substantial increases in' fuel consumption are planned or anticipated. 26) Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? X_ EXPLANATION: See attached, 27) Will there be a significant change to existing land form? X_ (a) Indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards: Cut - 807 Fin -. 93 Waste - 714 CY. (b) Percentage of alteration to the present land form: 0 . (c) Maximum height of cut or fill slopes: 16'-0" cut. . . EXPLANATION: The existing land forms remain; minus excavation -ef the existing hillside "beneath" the proposed improvements. 28) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? x. EXPLANATION: The proposed activity will not result in a substantial increase on the public utility or transportation systems since the proposed activity is an accessory structure to an existing S.F.R. Y£S -NO 29) Will the project significantly increase wind or water erosion of soils? y EXPLANATION: Wind is not a factor due to the location of the proposed activity nor is water erosion due to the fact the area of excavation shall be covered with the proposed structure. Remaining slopes shall be undisturbed. 30) Could the prpject significantly affect existing fish or wildlife habitat? x EXPLANATION: There are no water resources on or in the vacinitv of the property to be affected nor is any wildlife habitat evident on or near the property to be affected. 31) Will the project significantly produce new light or glare? x EXPLANATION: The proiect is designed to harmonize "into" the hillside and the materials used are "traditional* non-glare products. 10 II. STATEMENT QC Mjjl-gTr.MTFICANT ENVIRnNMFMTfli FFgacK; If you have answered yes to any of the questions in Section I but think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons"below SEE ATTACHED III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.) Signature (Person Com^ting Report) Date Signed ?/fi/on Instruct.eia LBS:lh 11 ITEM NO. 26 Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25% or greater? Yes. Tha activity will involve a section of an existing man made slope which ranges from 25% to 40% on the top and bottom of the slope and a minor middle section of the same slope greater than 40%. As explained above, the minor area of slope greater than 40% is located between an upper and lower area of slope less than 40% which can be improved. This sandwiched area of slope into which we propose to develop, is not visible by any near or distant neighbor and is located where it will not impact any other property. The proposed activity is to remove only the portion of the slope beneath the building and leave the remainder of the slope intact. The soils report indicates the soil composition of the slope is laterally stable; minimizing back cutting and allowing for practically vertical cuts. The location' of the proposed improvements is such that it will not impact neighboring views of the site. The improvements are recessed into the hill behind the existing structure and the perimeter of the site is currently landscaped with vegetation which will screen the improvements from view. Although this project is developed over a slope of 25% requiring a hillside development permit, the design has sensitively and successfully addressed the issues of hillside develbpment and minimized the affect of the improvements on the hillside slopes. •RITE IT - DON'T SA\%! Date <H ^/ 19 /O / To rf / • Reply Wanted From I^QU^ Q// l^o Reply Necessary i ho-i-^:)/^ <p-f-ir/ ,^rS'& ^'"f AIGNER FORM NO. 55-032 L/ PRINTED i CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE DATE: ^'^-90 TO: I^Principal Civil Engineer l/^ilL.'flzJL /^rZocuiKy (ENG) I^LFM Zone Plan Engineer STEW JA>JT^ (ENG) •^Project Planner vJg v\H'f)C>v\^ "^Project Planning Engineer j^QjCfJL I—I '—'Electrical Operations Supervisor (U/M) I—I '—'Landscape Planchecker \ (PLNG) I—I '—'Parks Planner (PARKS) I—I 1—JFire Marshall (FIRE) (PLNG) (ENG) '—' Water and Sewer Ut11ity_ FROM: IDO (lO //el (Cr 73''4) PLANCHECK COORDINATION MEETING FOR pe ^'90-O3 (S£/?0/AJ6 PLA.I ^^^^^ 3/0-2> (I.D. NUMBER) (TYPE OF PLAN) (DWG NO.) OnlO'^i'^ ^/;4 at ^'i0^t>^ a Plancheck Coordination Meeting will be held at (Date) (Time) ^ ^ AJ A / fJkh I'i / i-Jf-i C3:s>U /^ /cm . , The purpose of the (Location) meeting is to provide an opportunity to you and other City representative to discuss corrections to the plan(s) listed above. The meeting will not be a forum to discuss change to the A/ / Ar . The meeting will (Type of Approval) give you the opportunity to provide input regarding the conformance of the plans to the conditions of approval and City Standards. If you have concerns regarding these matters it is important that you or your representative attend this meeting. We believe that both with efficiency and fairness demand that all plancheck Issues be resolved as early as possible in the plancheck process. This meeting will be the only one that we will schedule for discussion of this project. If you or your representative do not attend we will assume that you have no concerns regarding the plans for thi^s pn)ject. If you have any questions regarding this matter please call me at. (Extension No.) ^GINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION TRANSMITTAL To Project Planner : /TIVV //'/So^a Date ///^9/^9 , 1^ From : r^^yToTT 2^i^/^^S Project Id ffj-^l Via Assistant City Engineer : ^^G/j(/lif^" COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND INITIAL ISSUES STATEMENT The Engineering Department has completed its review of the siibject project for application completeness. The application and plans siibmittted for this project are: Complete and suitable for continued review. Incomplete and unsuitable for further review. Please see attached checklist for missing or incomplete items. In addition the Engineering Department made a preliminary review of the project for Engineering issues. (See attached initial review and assessment checklist.) Najor Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to conditoning of the project are as follows: / f^CFlte of- PeilAEtOA^ <5MLXOWtf. i/&tTiCAL CurZUies, Also attached is a redlined check print of the site plan. This plan should be given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review. REVIEW AND CQMMy;MT MflM" rL,6r-^ DATE: TO: So:, ^77 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT (memo only) FIBE DEPARTMENT BUILOING DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT "5 ;^ COSTA REAL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ;^N APPLICATION NO: //j^/^ ^9' S/ PROJECT TITLE: -JSjijL/L^ '7\i^^ A^,y APPLICANT: ' ^ PROPOSAL: Project Planner: Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Departinent by // — ^ " • If not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. THANK YOU. COMMENTS: PLANS ATTACHED City of Carlsbad Planning Department April 1, 1990 John S. Berry, Architect 5315 Avenida Encinas, Suite K Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - HDP 89 - 51 - Kreid Garage and Guest House Dear Mr. Beery: The City has completed a review of the application for a Hillside Development for grading to accommodate accessory structures including garages and a guest house. It is the Planning Director's determination that the project is consistent with the City's Hillside Development Ordinance, Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and therefore APPROVES this request based on the following: Findings: 1. Hillside conditions have been properly identified on the constraints map which show existing and proposed conditions and slope percentages. 2. Undevelopable areas of the project, i.e. slopes over 40%, have been properly identified on the constraints map. 3. All development is designed to minimize grading. As per the Hillside Development Ordinance, Chapter 21.95.090 (a)(1) and (3), the Planning Director has excluded from hillside development standards a portion of the subject site. This area includes 1,296 sq. feet of previously graded 2:1 slopes (greater than 40%). The subject accessory structures are located in this area and comply with Hillside Architectural and Design Standards. 4. The grading design minimizes disturbance of hillside lands. 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carl6l5ad, California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161 John S. Beery, Architect December 28, 1989 Page 2 5. The project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concepts illustrated in the Hillside Development Guidelines Manual as follows: a) Cut slopes are screened from view behind buildings. b) Accessory structures are concealed from view behind the existing structure so that visual impact on the surrounding area is eliminated. Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for HDP 89-51, as shown on Exhibits "A" - "J", dated April 1, 1990, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed grading and/or development substantially different from this approval as determined by the Planning Director, shall require an amendment to this Hillside Development Permit. CITY OF CARLSBAD MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director AHrkd c: Gary Wayne Bob Wojcik Erin Letsch Data Entry Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department December 4, 1989 Mr. John S. Berry 5315 Avenida Encinas Suite K Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT HDP 89-51 Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Hillside Development Permit, application no. HDP 89-51, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. All list items must be submitted simultaneously at the Community Development Buildinq counter, and to ffie attention of Erin Letsch. A copy of this list must be included with your submittal. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When all required materials have been submitted as outlined above, the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initiallv filed, November 8, 1989, to either re- submit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Anne Hysong, at (619) 438-1161 extension 4328, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. J. HOLZMILLER Planhing Director MJH:AHIIh c: Gary Wayne CrystallAngelina Erin Letsch Bob Wojcik Data Entry 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161 UST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE APPUCATION: No. HDP 89-51 PLANNING: 1. Per Chapter 21.95.030, you must submit a grading plan showing percentage of lot graded (total volume of cut and fill), cubic yards of cut and cubic yards of fill. ENGINEERING: 1. A grading permit is required for proposed development. 2. Maximum allowable grade for the proposed driveway is 20%. Need to provide profile of driveway showing vertical curves. ISSUES OF CONCERN PL/U^NING: 1. Proposed garages cut into 40% slopes which are defined as undevelopable by Chapter 21.53.120 of the Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance. Submit plans showing another location or excluding proposed development from the 40% slope area.