The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHDP 90-03; Leigh Residence; Hillside Development Permit (HDP)CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM PAGE 1 OF 2 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (For Dept. Use Only) (For Dept. Use Only) • • • • • • • • Master Plan Specific Plan Precise Development Plan... Tentative Tract Map , Planned Development Permit Non-Residential Planned Development Permit Condominium Permit, Special Use Permit, I—^ Redevelopment Permit ' Tentative Parcel Map ' Administrative Variance. ^ General Plan Amendment Site Development Plan Zone Change I—' Conditional Use Permit Hillside Development Permit. Environmental Impact Assessment • • • • Variance Planned Industrial Permit,. Coastal Development Permit. Planning Commission Deter.. '3 2) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE SIDE OF Lt^ C^-Srn^ bt^/BStW,^ BETWEEN (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) AND (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 3) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: WO, CPWI 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S). 5) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 6) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 7) PROPOSED GENERAL kAN DESIGNATION 8) EXISTING ZONING 9) PROPOSED ZONING 10) GROSS SITE ACREAGE II) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS I 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS I 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 14) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS ki^fe. (RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTIRAL) 15) PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL OFFICE/SQUARE FOOTAGE 16) PROPOSED COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE HA ARFN0008.DH 4/89 CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM PAGE 2 OF 2 17) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS 20) PROJECT NAME: 19) PROPOSED INCREASE IN AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 1 21)BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: | ^t^U. U^Mg C^^^T(ZUC^\OfA 22) OWNER 23) APPLICANT NAME WlLA^l^M NAME ^iAU.^ITUQ4^tw^S5gfe>,Iac:. MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE -T:*^ CA^C,"^ 74-1-^^ C^r2i>ip^M>, CU. ZIP TELEPHONE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE ^ X\ DATE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER'S REPRE- SENTATIVE AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFOitM^TION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO MY KNOWLEDGE. DATE ********4r****4r*****.<ir*** FOR CITY m ONLY FEE COMPUTATION: APPLICATION TYPE **;*************************************tlr*]l>f ******* k******/**ll FEE REQUIRED //l:^/^ 97^-3> »««. JT--^., ^« p? -i! p KXK "!»^ DATE ^Wi^mdMi'^vi^ RECEIVED BY: TOTAL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. ARFM0008.DH 4/89 APPLICANT: AGENT; MEMBERS: DISCLOSURE FORM ame (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication) Name 6>^-3 ^Ata?v/ HILLS , t>>to:oS' ^ <::A a^*zoc^ Business Address " Telephone Number gpgiZi^M 'SMITH fe.M^i>4g<gTg.'^, m<c> Name Business Address Telephone Number Name (individual, partner7 joint Home Address venture, corporation, syndication) A ^ Business Address f Telephone Number ' ^ i eiepnone numoer Name ^ ^ Home Address . A Busmess Address \ ^ ^^^tSuQ-* Telephone Number Telephone Number Telephone Number (Attach more sheets if necessary) I/We understand that if this project is located in the Coastal Zone, I/we wili apply for Coastal Commission Approval prior to development. I/We acknowledge that in the process of reviewing this application, it may be necessary for members of City Staff, Planning Commissioners, Design Review Board memtiers, or City Council members to inspect and enter the property that is the subject of this application. I/We consent to entry for this purpose. I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this disclosure is true and correct and that it wilt remain true and correct and may be relied upon as being true and correct until amended. BY ^ CITY OF CARLSBAD ^ 1200 ELM HENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFOMA 92008 438-5621 »Pn.nP«OM L).S- '.^^C^k hiO- HAT. ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT /OO . 4987 04/24/9( 0001 01 05 Misc 1 )0.00 RECEIPT NO. 97288 TOTAL /DO —— • Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of Son Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to North Coast Publishers, Inc. corporate offices: P.O. Box 878, Encinitas, CA 92024 (619) 753-6543 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 55 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter, i am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: NEGATIVE DECLARATION • ' ' ••'11 - ; ' •'• PROJECT Ai>t>«B8S/L0CA- TION:Lot»o<UC«ft»80MthUnitl OB the nMtlMlde'of Ik CoMa Ave- nua aa«t «£E1 dtdwlM. PROJECT SEadpN^: Qrad- Ingto accttlfalwaiitiiijftillt fiunily reaid«nce4W4l kitl^lKtit. The Cfi^VoSS^ttis icon, ducted aftBMNIjljaiMMU i«Mew of mentation «f the CaMHajdmla En-vironmental «{a^ity Act and the EnvirOBm'«itta}-Pr«UctMii Ordi- nance ef 9MtG{$r «r<;fjrM«Bd. Aa a result of uM T«vto«, a NegaUve Declaration <declin|ti«n tfatt the proiect will paH impact on'tKi: hereby iuaaidi ject Juitlfici oil file ih the A copy of Uon with 11. on flle in the a07S Laa Pali California the public are mit comn;! Planniifti ] daysofdfite „ CaleKo;JB^ AppheaM:'BtM^ SUtii liiulneen PUMlngl^reetor C; 9030: March 20,1990 !int it) is ptXh tiWl is *rit Atdara- imts is IrUiMt, tbadi Comaenta trom Please sub- tp the "ll* 9E1 March 29 19 19 19. 19 19, 90 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on the 29tj: day of March. 19^ Clerk of the Printer #202-2M-12/87 Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: Lot 9 of La Costa South Unit I on the northside of La Costa Avenue east of El Camino Real. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: hillside lot. Grading to accommodate a single family residence on a The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 21 days of date of issuance. DATED: March 29, 1990 CASE NO: HDP 90-3 APPLICANT: Brian Smith Engineers PUBLISH DATE: March 29, 1990 AH:lh MICHAEL J Planning Director 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. HDP 90-3 DATE: MARCH 22. 1990 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: LEIGH RESIDENCE 2. APPLICANT: BRIAN SMITH ENGINEERS 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2656 STATE STREET CARLSBAD. CA 92008 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: DECEMBER 13. 1989 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GRADING TO ACCOMMODATE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A HILLSIDE LOT, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. * A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked to indicate this determination. * An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a significant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings "YES-sig" and "YES-insig" respectively. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. PHYSICAL ENYIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES , NO (sig) (insig) 1. Result in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards? 2. Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? 9. Substantially increase usage or cause depletion of any natural resources? 10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? 11. Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure or object? Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site? X_ Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X_ 5. Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality? X_ 6. Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? X_ 7. Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? X_ 8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water or public water supply? X_ -2- BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic plants)? 18. Substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services? 19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems? 20. Increase existing noise levels? 21. Produce new light or glare? -3- 13. Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X_ 14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local importance? X_ 15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects? X 16. Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area? HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? 2 23. Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area? 24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 25. Generate substantial additional traffic? 26. Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking? X_ 27. Impact existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X_ 28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? X_ 29. Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X_ 30. Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans? X_ 31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view? X_ 32. Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X_ -4- MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE YES, YES NO (sig) (insig) 33. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 34. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) 35. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) 36. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? -5- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION This project entails 1,300 cubic yards of grading on a hillside lot to accommodate the construction of a single-family residence, and driveway. The previously graded lot consists of a small hilltop building pad and a 26 foot high slope exceeding 40%. Unstable soils and erosion have created the need to rebuild a 2:1 slope. The parcel is located on the north side of La Costa Avenue and is adjacent to existing single-family development to the west and east. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Grading to create a building pad and driveway will modify the topography of the slope, however, Hillside Development Permit standards will be applied. In addition, development on the steep portions of the previously graded lot have been designed to minimize the impact. Drainage and erosion control facilities will be incorporated into the project by conditions of approval and existing unstable earth conditions will be corrected. No unique geologic features are located on the project site or in the general vicinity. Development of the project would create impervious surfaces onsite which reduce absorption rates and increase surface runoff and runoff velocities, however, drainage facilities will be provided. Development of the proposed project will incrementally contribute to the depletion of fossil fuel and other natural resources, increase local and regional air emissions; however, this is not regarded as a significant impact in view of the limited scale of the project. Residential development on this site at the appropriate density has been accounted and planned for in the City's General Plan, as well as the Zone 6 Local Facilities Management Plan, therefore, the above-mentioned impacts to physical resources have been anticipated. The property is an infill site surrounded by existing single-family residences. BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT The small scale size of the area being graded to accommodate development and isolation of the area created by surrounding single-family residences limits the biological value of the site. The site is adjacent to existing development so there is no threat of introducing new species into a natural area or limiting the movement of native animal species. HUMAN ENVIRONMENT Traffic impacts, increase to population, increased public facility demands and the planned use of the area have all been accounted and planned for in the City's General Plan and Zone 6 Local Facilities Management Plan. The project will be required to pay public facility fees that will be used to adequately mitigate any impacts upon utilities and public facilities. -6- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (CONTINUED): The proposed project will incrementally increase noise levels in the area due to traffic and contribute to light and glare int he project vicinity, however, these impacts are considered insignificant due to the small nature of the project. The development will be compatible with surrounding land uses, and the project is required to meet City standards, ordinances, and policies; therefore, no safety impacts are anticipated. -7- ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES The small nature of this single-family infill project limits any phased development, nor does it lend itself to alternative site design or scale of development. The property is zoned for single-family residential uses and the project conforms to the adopted residential density for the area; therefore, consideration of alternative uses or sites is not appropriate in this case. Development of the site at some future time or the no project alternative is not of benefit and only postpones the site's inevitable development. -8- DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Signature Datie LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) -9- APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature AH:lh -10- CASE NO. DATE: ENVIRONMENTAI IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I (To be Completed by APPLICANT) Applicant: iJli^i^it^^ Lg.l^M Address of Applicant: -^U^c^s^^ UIUJS Phone Number: l^^) lA\-'6^^ Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): AtZT KW:^J2^:.<&6> ^ '5'w\\'rvve4^lUeeg?S>. Iv^- GENERAL INFORMATION: (Please be specific) Project Description: S^t-^iiJ<a •^^cyj^aug ^=5^441LOT SM'tTH Project Location/Address: UPTO l^c::::^;?^/^ *ggtj-tu Z4iA\TA. M^<3?in Assessor Parcel Number: ^tt/' - - General Plan/Zone of Subject Property: f2L>KA / g-"l'-|g> 0> Local Facilities Management Zone: Is the site within Carlsbad's Coastal Zone? Please describe the area surrounding the site to the North: -^y^Lss East: ^^^iVi^^Lg- T^SwMrUf South: U>.oo-tnt^ Ave. (sTgggr) west: "^OiigLe. ^PP^\L^^ List all other applicable permits & approvals related to this project: BRIAN SMITH ENGINEERS, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 2656 STATE STREET • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • PHONE (619) 729-8981 PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET 1) PROJECT SITE: 2) NUMBER OF PROPOSED UNITS: 3) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 4) SIZE OF STRUCTURE (AREA): 5) ESTIMATED VALUE OF REAL PROPERTY AFTER CONSTRUCTION; 6) EXPECTED SIZE OF HOUSEHOLD: 7) AVERAGE TRAFFIC GENERATION: (PER CURRENT SANDAG RATES) Lot 9 of La Costa South Unit 1, Map No. 6117, La Costa, Calif. 1 Single family home Custom single family home 3540 S.F. $800,000.00 3.5 People 10 AM:df J. N. 6611 11-07-89 (Please be Special. Attach Additional Pages or exhibits, if necessary) Please describe the project site, including distinguishing natural and manmade characteristics. Also provide precise slope analysis when a slope of 15' or higher and 15% grade or greater is present on the site. Please describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. e»Jef^'-t' ^385=iJ*5e{2sA5ric?Ki Maxs^izB.'g, wiuu r2»e PB(Z COOS PLEASE AHACH A PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET WHICH SHOWS THE FOLLOWING: a. If a residential project identify the number of units, type of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected, average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates). If a commercial project, indicate the exact type, activity(ies), square footage of sales area, average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates), parking provided, and loading facilities. c. If an industrial project, indicate the exact type or industry(ies), average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates), estimated employment per shift, time of shifts, and loading facilities. H/A d. If an institutional project, indicate the major project/site function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Please "Answer each of the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. Then, fully discuss and explain why each item was checked yes or no. Provide supporting data if applicable. Attach additional sheets as necessary. YES NO 1) Could the project significantly impact or change present or future land uses in the vicinity of the activity? \^ EXPLANATION: XT \^ JA\ a^l-grf. "Se^L. 1=it^a. 2) Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of aesthetic value? EXPLANATION: EXPLANATION: e')(Hyr ^g*L.- p=^vA. up-r 4) Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? EXPLANATION: 3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? m. NO 5) Could the activity increase the number of low and moderate cost housing units in the city? %^ EXPLANATION: 6) Could the activity significantly affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? EXPLANATION: ^^tai-Y UPK/fe 7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? EXPLANATION: P^te^>at>C^C? "^t^iV.. -F^Wl. L-«?T- 8) Could the activity significantly affect an historical or archaeological site or its settings? EXPLANATION: k:Nig>wt4 Ag^SU/sg^L^idiiaju 9) Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? %^ EXPLANATION: '^iTE- te> iL YES NO 10) Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant resources? • \^ EXPLANATION: -^ITB t^? A Vfc^^KlT 11) Are there any rare or endangered plant or animal species in the activity area? EXPLANATION: sig^ W^KiPW^i gtapCM^aeZep t^Lg'tZ^ AUp/g^ 1=^£^(4Z^ 12) Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's stream, lagoons, bays, tidelands ^ or beaches? EXPLANATION: ir^>exS^T '=S>tTE. 1^ 13) Could the activity result in the erosion or elimin- ^ ation of agricultural lands? EXPLANATION: P^^egT ^^ITE- 1^ f=^^42T 14) Could the activity serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment of already developed areas? EXPLANATION: y/sgiA^^-. — L-^p^• fpjt=^(2rX YES NO 15) Will the activity require a variance from estab- lished environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)? EXPLANATION: \^^'<^^J^\^ -sg.L.. UUPMS 16) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger project or series of projects? EXPLANATION: -e=<S*L. ^ \ U^a^E: 17) Will the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? EXPLANATION: ^^T<2^t»4<g» PfeeMlT ^M-C? 18) Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? EXPLANATION: 'XH'f^cJ^ -'^gaL. Wa^u c:k>^-x. \W \7^>CJ^\X'K "SiGiL. F^M. L-.c^. 19) Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? EXPLANATION: M^TgRi^L-e WILL tgg Y£i NO 20) Will the- activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? EXPLANATION: fe?=>6^T ^\rve> 1"=^ slQ-r 21) Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? \^ EXPLANATION: Ug? kii4gv/u A^-riv/e. Fz^jirr IU.-TUF^ 22) Could the activity result in the generation of ^ significant amounts of dust? ____ EXPLANATION: *^^L. \\O^^C£:P^-\WC^O ^ • 23) Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? EXPLANATION: €^t^UM^ WILL. |g€-<S?U\g4glg> 24) Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) EXPLANATION: ^^(gL. \Ao\A^ OtPM^T-^ M-^^ YES NO 25) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? EXPLANATION: Sl^ ^u^UlF=H<^taT 26) Will the activity involve construction of facilities ^ on a slope of 25 percent or greater? EXPLANATION: Awl ^'l ^St^^PB wtu^ ge 27) Will there be a significant change to existing land form? (a) Indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards: V^^e^ . (b) Percentage of alteration to the present land form: . (c) Maximum height of cut or fill slopes: W- . EXPLANATION: f^f?:>£^ Ugueg. WtLL fe- 28) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? EXPLANATION: Uc? -=s>W^t4<FAt^UT \\XC^2ist^=t^. YES NO 29) Will the project significantly increase wind or ^ water erosion of soils? EXPLANATION: KU? WiUP iMCgg&^e. g^g^-^iohl iPU'^vk^i cS^ktSTgqcTloU- "^TC WILL, 30) Could the project significantly affect existing fish or wildlife habitat? %^ EXPLANATION: \\r> ^laMIRCAKiT g:F=T=g<ST Wi^-ri^- 31) Will the project significantly produce new light ^ or glare? EXPLANATION: ffe^^^P-s^gg -U^ME. WILL 10 II, STATEMENT (II ^ IIIIIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFF III If you have answered yes to any of the questions in Section I but think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons"below: '—f'iyvy..* tic^v^ C^^MI V^^^^^-^-^^^ '^^'^ COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheetsJis needed.) Signature Date Signed (Person Completingrj Report) ^7 ^c>a^eie^ i'=2>g>s> Instruct.eia LBS:lh 11 ACCEPTABLE NOOFLINi UNOULATtD TO nr MITH NAIliHAI. CONTOliH Of I.ANO MULTI-LIVgl raWMCCO FOUNDATION •MAU. MHCauLAil MMM AM) UMoacAnNa MMMM Vt|||»» WKM Mum DATE: TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO V^^^^T^^ GROWTH MANAGEMENT (memo only) / ' . ' FIBE DEPARTMENT Q'^d^<>U4cei^t,i,^~^ BUILDING DEPARTMENT iy PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ^ NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT /^P^'VO COSTA REAL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ^ ^ FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT \///^ f^^'^ (^. ' ^5^ REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATldW-NOl ~//hP Qr^ PROJECT TITLE: C^^f^cf^t^ 'T^e^rz-e-U^^e^^ APPLICANT: 'S^U^^L^^ y .-d^^-Tc-ilZZ^ . ta^^ PROPOSAL: C'Tk^ AL^^ r^/=^ ?f3^ - /^.^.^^yl^W^ Project Planner: „ Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department by t^-/^-^'? . If not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. THANK YOU. COMMENTS: /^r^^/n^ cp^^r^T^h^.i ^///i^'/^ /4 PLANS ATTACHED ^/^/^• J 'y-:.::^^ CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM PAGE 1 OF 2 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (For Dept. Use Only) (For Dept. Use Only) • • • • • • • '-^ Special Use Permit ^ Redevelopment Permit ^ Tentative Parcel Map ^ Administrative Variance. Master Plan Specific Plan Precise Development Plan.., Tentative Tract Map Planned Development Permit Non-Residential Planned Development Permit Condominium Permit. ^ General Plan Amendment. • Site Development Plan. • Zone Change. Conditional Use Permit Hillside Development Permit. Environmental Impact Assessment • • • • Variance Planned Industrial Permit... Coastal Development Permit.. Planning Commission Deter... '3 2) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE SIDE OF BETWEEN a^\\^0 I2EAL (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) AND (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 3) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S). 5) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 6> 6) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 7) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 8) EXISTING ZONING 9) PROPOSED ZONING 10) GROSS SITE ACREAGE II) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS I 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 14) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS U^i^fe. (RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTIRAL) 15) PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL OFFICE/SQUARE FOOTAGE 16) PROPOSED COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE ARFM0008.DH 4/89 CITY OF CARLSBAO LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM PAGE 2 OF 2 17) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS 20) PROJECT NAME: 4^-11 19) PROPOSED INCREASE IN AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 1 21)BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 22) OWNER 23) APPLICANT NAME WlLLl/^M NAME ^ii>U'^lTUGU^(MS6g*=^,Xta^ MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE ^ /\ DATE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER'S REPRE- SENTATIVE AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE FOJiMAilON IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO MY KNOWLEDGE. DATE ************ **A**^*jMr***#iV*** A****** FEE COMPUTATION: APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED RECEIVED BY: TOTAL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. ARFM0008.DH 4/89 Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department April 24. 1990 William S. Leigh 523 Shadow Hills San Marcos, CA 92069 SUBJECT: HDP 90-3(A) - Hillside Development Permit Amendment The City has completed the review of your request for an amendment to an approved Hillside Development Permit to accommodate changes in the building floorplans and elevations. It is the Planning Director's Determination that the amendment is consistent with the City's Hillside Development Ordinance, Chapter 21.95 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code, and therefore APPROVES the requested amendment as shown on Exhibits "A2 - C2", dated April 24, 1990. All findings and conditions of HDP 90-3 still apply and are incorporated in this approval by reference. If you have any questions, please contact Mike Grim at (619) 438-1161, extension 4329. Sincere %tr^H ^ V tvnCHA^ J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:MG/n/o cc: Gary Wayne Anne Hysong Erin Letsch AngelinalCrystal Data Entry 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161 (ak) rmM "M^^-^ /^'^ APR 24 1990 CITY OF CARLSBAD DfiVELOP. PROC. SERV. DiV. ((yUAU<_^ ^^<^^il City of Carlsbad Planning Department March 26, 1990 Brian Smith Engineers, Inc. Attn: Art Macregh 2656 State Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - HDP 90-3 - LEIGH RESIDENCE Dear Mr. Macregh: The City has completed a review of the application for a Hillside Development Permit for grading for grading to accommodate a driveway and residence. It is the Planning Director's determination that the project is consistent with the City's Hillside Development Ordinance, Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Mimicipal Code and therefore APPROVES this request based on the following: Findings: 1. Hillside conditions have been properly identified on the constraints map which show existing and proposed conditions and slope percentages. 2. Undevelopable areas of the project, i.e. slopes over 40%, have been properly identified on the constraints map. 3. The development proposal is consistent with the intent, purpose, and requirements of the Hillside Ordinance, Chapter 21.95, because it limits development on a previously graded constrained lot. 4. The proposed grading and development will occur in areas of 40% or greater slopes which have been previously disturbed by authorized grading and are excluded from hillside requirements per Chapter 21.95.090. 5. The project design minimizes disturbance of hillside lands because the proposed grading to accommodate development restabilizes a previously graded slope and limits development on an extremely constrained hillside lot. 2075 Las Palnnas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161 Brian Smith Engineers, Inc. March 26, 1990 Paee 2 The project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concepts illustrated in the hillside development guidelines manual given the lot's constraints, ie., developable area and unstable soils as a result of previous grading. Conditions: 1. Approval of HDP 90-3, as shown on Exhibits "A" - "C", dated March 23, 1990, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed grading and/or development substantially different from this approval as determined by the Planning Director, shall require an amendment to this Hillside Development Permit. CITY OF CARLSBAD MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:AH:lh c: Erin Letsch Data Entry Angelina/Crystal