HomeMy WebLinkAboutLCPA 98-06; Manzanita Apartments; Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA) (4)my-03-2880 TUE 08147 IDiCOASTAL COMMISSION
I1
I mn oc OILKDIW.-WW maoumon
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMlSSlON
MMtOO*IUI
Slll emam DLL Rim m, um m wOM0,cA -17s *le) Ulios) May 8,2000
Eric Mwz
City of Carlsbad
Planning Depprtmtnt 1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008-73 14
Re: City of Carlsbad Locsl Coastal Program Amendment 1-2000
"his letter is ngarding the March 16,2000 submittal of tbc City of Carlsbad's first LCP
amendment packago for the ZOO0 calendar year, TIE packago includes five separate
ectione taken by the City to uncnd the City's Zoning ordinance and LCP Implementation
Plan. Section 13553 of the Califonria Code of Regulations
certified LCP M LRDP together with all ncco~sary attachments and exhibits shall be deemed "submitted" after having been nceivcd aud found by the executive dinctor of the commission to k in pmpei order and legally adequate to comply with Public R~ources Code Section 30510(b). Said dew shall bc complctcd within a reaaonablt
time, but unless them ue unusual chumatancts, no later than ten (10) working days aftcr
the date it ki nccivcd in the Commission ofices during normal working horn [. . J".
"[aln amcndmcnt to a
As you are aware, staff completed the initial nview of the LCP amendment package within tho initial 10 day time period and througb a letter dated 3/30/00 fbm Bill Ponder,
this offlce identified sovd items which the Executive Dircctor determines am necessary
to complete tho submittal and deem it suitable for filing. With your reprise lcttcr dutcd
4/13/00, you included several of th6 requested item, but asked that wo identify the legal
authority for requiring the biologid sump, fire supprcasion plans and mom agency
approvals associated witb the Manzanita, Roewh urd Stcincr cubmittah. Section 13552
of the Commission's administrative mplations titled
states in applicabk part:
The Lx3p or LRDP muldlneat nrbmfacrl shall include (a).. ..
(b) All policies, pluu, mtdards, objcctivw, diapum, drawin@, maps,
photographs, and rupplementuy data, related to the amendment in sufficient detail.
to allow review for conformity with the requinmGnts of the Coastal Act.....
(c). # 1
(d). .
(e) Any enviranmMlrrrl wiew documents, pursuant to -A, required for all or
any portion of thc unurdment to the Ixlp or LRDP .....
(f)....
AY-09-2000 TUE 08148 IDICOASTAL COMMISSION -
Mr. Eric Munoz
, May 8.2000 Page 2
I
TEL : 61952: 9672
,-
Staff has &termined the requested information is neassary in order to determine the
adequacy of the pposed LCP Implementation Plan amendments to carry out the policies
of the &fkd Mello n land u80 plan. We believe the above stated regulation gives
staff the authority to request this information and that thir infodon is necessary in
order to find the LCP package is ''in proper order and legally adequate to comply with Public Resources Code Swlion 3051O(b)" . That rection of the statute states:
Conahtent with this chapter. a propowl local coastal prom may be submittal to
thc cornmimion, if both of the following arc, met:
(a) It is submitted pursuant to a resolution adopted by the local govexnment, der public hewing that certifies the local coastal program ir intended to be carried out in
a manner fully in conformity with this division.
(b) It contains, in lKxordoIIcc with the guidelines wablisbod by thc commission, materials sufficient for thorough and complcta review.
The submittal involves an amendment to the LCP Implementation Plan and has been classified a major amendment. Aa a major amendment, the Coastal Commission has 60
days to review an implementdon plan modincation, Thcrefome, upon rtceipt of the
rtqucstcd information and completion of the subdttal, we wU1 schedule tbe UP
amendment for the appropriate Commission agenda. Due to workload constraints and the
fact that Commission stuff ia currently working on Carlsbad L€PA m99D Kelly Ranch,
we anticipate it will be difRcult to pto#sr the entirc submittal withfn thc required time period; themfore, a time exteasion may be neccrrary. Phe let up know If them is any order of priority for which pardom of the submittal should be prclcessed first, and/or If
the City Is intenstad in wgmenting the submittal in any way. At tbir the the entim
submittal is considered incomplete and not yet filed €or purposes of thc @day time limit.
If you have any quostions about the ptocessing or scheduling of this amendment, please
do not hesitate to call me or at this oftice.
cc: GaryWayne Bill Ponder
District Manager