Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLCPA 98-09; Roesch Property Residential Subdivision; Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA)L The City of Carlsbad Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIO~ Item No. @ P.C. AGENDA OF: October 6,1999 Appljcation complete date: June 2 1. 1999 Project Planner: Anne Hysong Project Engineer: Mike Shirey SUBJECT: ZC 98-12hCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION - Request for: a) a recommendation of approval for a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, a Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change zoning from Limited Control (L-C) to One-Family Residential. 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-Q) and Open Space (0-S); and b) approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, Hillside Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit for 2 1 single family lots and residences and one open space lot on a 27.7 acre parcel located to the north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road within the boundaries of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Local Facilities Management Plan and the Coastal Zone. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4626,4627, and 4628 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, ZC 98-12 and LCPA 98-09, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions 4629, 4630, 4631 and 4632 APPROVING CT 98-19, SDP 99-05, HDP 98-21 and CDP 98-86 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. 11. INTRODUCTION The proposed project consists of a Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment to rezone the property to R-1-7500-Q (Qualified Overlay Zone) and 0-S (open space) and various permits to enable the subdivision and grading of the 27.7 acre vacant parcel into 21 standard single family lots and one open space lot. The project site is located north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road in the southwest quadrant. The proposed single family lots occupy approximately 6.5 acres in the Southeastern portion of the parcel and the remaining 21+ acres would be preserved in open space. In accordance with the Hillside Development and Coastal Development Ordinances, architectural elevations and floor plans are provided for the single family homes. The applicant proposes to satisfy the project’s inclusionary housing requirement through the purchase of 3.7 affordable housing credits in the Villa Loma Affordable Housing Apartment project. As designed and conditioned, the project is consistent with the General Plan, Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203), Mello I1 LCP, Subdivision Ordinance and relevant Zoning Chapters of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the City’s Draft Habitat Management Plan. ZC 98-lYLCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTJ. SUBDIVISION October 6, 1999 111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The project site consists of 27.7 acres of vacant, partially cultivated land which is bounded on the north and east by the Mariano and Ocean Bluff subdivisions and to the west by the Sambi subdivision. The southeastern comer of the site is approximately 500 feet north of the newly completed segment of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road. The parcel falls in elevation from east to west fi-om approximately 316’ to 180’ along the northern boundary and from 290’ to 230’ along the southern boundary. The site drains to the north through a north-south natural drainage course created by steep slopes that form a canyon within the western portion of the site. A major 150’ wide north-south power line easement is also within the canyon. The site contains native habitats including native grasslands and southern willow scrub, as well as coastal sage scrub and southern maritime chaparral on steep slope areas. Two California gnatcatcher pairs occupy the site. All of the native habitats would be preserved by the proposed development except for 1.37 of the 4.16 acres of southern maritime chaparral. The property is designated by the General Plan for RLM (Residential Low-Medium) density development and OS (Open Space) and zoned Limited Control (L-C). The parcel is regulated by the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Mello I1 LCP which require the site to be rezoned to One Family ResidentiaVQualified Overlay Zone (R- 1-7500-4) to implement the RLM General Plan designation. Therefore, the portion of the site proposed for development would be rezoned to R- 1-7,500-4 and the remainder of the site is proposed to be rezoned to OS. The proposed project would disturb approximately 6.5 of the 27.7 acres to enable the development of 21 standard single family lots ranging in size from 7,534 square feet to 16,274 square feet and one 21.87 acre open space lot. The site consists of 18.4 net developable acres, and the proposed project density including the 3.7 dwelling unit affordable housing requirement for a total of 24.7 units is 1.34 dwelling unitslacre. In accordance with the Zone 20 Specific Plan and the Zone 20 EIR preferred biological mitigation, the proposed development would preserve the northern and western portions of the site in open space due to biological constraints and the need for open space connectivity through the Zone 20 Specific Plan area. The site is also designated as a standards area by the City’s Draft Habitat Management Plan which requires that 67% of the site be preserved to enable the connection of habitat preserve areas to the east and north. The open space includes a 150’ wide SDG&E easement in which an existing access road would also function as a public trail through the property. The proposed single family lots are located in the southeastern portion of the property where they would receive vehicular access from Brigantine Drive, a local street that intersects Poinsettia Lane and also provides access to the adjacent Ocean Bluff subdivision (Cantamar). As shown on Exhibit “B”, the subdivision design consists of a dual cul-de-sac at the terminus of Regatta Road. Lots along the eastern property line abut single family lots in the Ocean Bluff project, and the remaining lots abut open space to the north, south, and west. Drainage from the development would flow through storm drains to the southern boundary of the site where a riprap energy dissipator would reduce the rate of flow to existing levels. .’ Four single family two-story floor plans are proposed, each with three different facade treatments and a maximum height of 30 feet. Units range in size from 2,720 square feet to 3,353 square I .- Land Use ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05MDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTJ' SUBDIVISION October 6, 1999 Proposed residential density of 1.34 dwelling unitdnet acre in the RLM designation is within the allowed density range of 0 - 4 ddacre and consistent with the growth control point of 3.2 ddacre. Project density is based on 24.7 total units (affordable and market rate)/18.4 net developable acres. feet. Plan 1 is proposed with a two car garage, Plan 2 with a three car garage, and Plans 3 and 4 with a two car garage plus an optional one car tandem garage. The proposed project is subject to the following land use plans, ordinances and standards: A. Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) and Open Space (OS) General Plan Land Use Designations; B. Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP203); C. Mello I1 Segment of the Local Coastal Program D. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 20 (Subdivision Ordinance) E. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 2 1 (Zoning Ordinance) including: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Chapter 2 1.10 - One Family Residential Zone Chapter 21.06 - Qualified Overlay Zone Chapter 21.33 - Open Space Chapter 21.85 - Inclusionary Housing Chapter 2 1.95 - Hillside Development Regulations; Chapters 2 1.201, 2 1.202 - Coastal Development Permit Procedures and Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone F. Growth Management - Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan. IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation of approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses compliance with each of the regulations/policies utilizing both text and tables. A. General Plan The proposed project is consistent with the policies and programs of the General Plan. The table below indicates how the project complies with the elements of the General Plan which are particularly relevant to this proposal. - *- ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05MDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTJ- SUBDIVISIOh’ October 6, 1999 Page 4 Housing Circulation Park & Rec Public Safety Project includes a request to purchase 3.7 affordable housing credits in the Villa Loma Affordable Apartment project to satisfy the inclusionary housing requirement. 21.87 acres of open space would be preserved which includes a se-ment of the future Citywide trail system through the SDG&E easement Required roadway and intersection improvements of local public streets in accordance with City standards as shown on the tentative map and included as conditions of approval. Project is required to pay park-in-lieu fees. Project is required to provide sidewalks, street lights, and fire hydrants as shown on the tentative map or included as conditions of approval. Additionally, single family structures on lots proposed with less than 60’ fire suppression zones must be constructed in accordance with the ignition resistant standards of the Urban Wildland Interface Code. B. Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203) The Zone 20 Specific Plan provides a framework for the development of the vacant properties within its boundaries to ensure the logical and efficient provision of public facilities and community amenities for future residents. The Zone 20 Specific Plan requires project compliance with all applicable land use plans, policies, and ordinances, except as modified by the Specific Plan. The following discussion describes the proposed project’s conformance with the relevant Specific Plan regulations which include Affordable Housing, Land Use (General Plan, Zoning, Development Standards, and the Mello I1 LCP), and Open Space preservation. Affordable Housinq The Zone 20 Specific Plan requires compliance with the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (Chapter 21.85) requiring that 15% of the total number of proposed units are made affordable to low income households. The inclusionary housing requirement for the proposed 21 lot subdivision is 3.7 dwelling units. When feasible, the affordable units are required to be constructed onsite, however, the purchase of housing credits in an offsite combined inclusionary project within the same quadrant may be approved by the City Council. Since it would not be feasible to construct inclusionary units onsite due to the limited number of lots proposed, the project is proposing to purchase 3.7 affordable housing credits in the Villa Loma Affordable Apartment project located in the southwest quadrant. Ci rcul ati on/ODen SDace/Trails/Land Use The project is located within Area C of the Specific Plan. Projects within Area C are required to receive vehicular access from local streets intersecting with Poinsettia Lane, a recently completed two lane roadway, at specified locations. In conformance with the Zone 20 Specific Plan, the proposed project would receive access fiom Poinsettia Lane via Brigantine Drive, an approved intersecting street, which also provides access to the adjacent Ocean Bluff project. The Zone 20 Specific Plan requires the project to preserve the constrained lands, including the SDG&E ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTI’ SUBDIVISION October 6. 1999 easement and 25% - 40% slopes, in open space. The proposed project exceeds this requirement through preservation of 76% of the site in open space. The Specific Plan requires that the site be rezoned from L-C to R-1-7,500 allowing single family development at the density permitted by the IUM General Plan designation (0 - 4 dwelling unitdacre). Since 21.87 acres of the site are proposed for open space, the proposed zoning also includes the 0-S Zone. The Q (Qualified Overlay) zone is proposed to be added to the R-l- 7,500 zoning consistent with previous Zone 20 approvals. The Q zone requires approval of a site development plan which includes arclutectural elevations, floor plans, and building footprints. The proposed zoning, preservation of open space including a trail segment, structures and architecture is consistent with the Zone 20 Specific Plan architectural guidelines as specified in the following table: Zon STANDARD Zoning Open Space Arc hi tectural Guidelines 20 Specific Plan Requirements REOUIRED R-1-7,500 1. Preserve areas constrained by steep slopes and SDG&E easement 2. Trail segment through SDG&E easement Variety of: 1. Roof, wall and accent materials and colors 2. Roof heights and masses 3. Window and Door enhancement 4. Garage designs, facades, and orientations 5. Articulated building forms C. Mello I1 Local Coastal Program (LCP) PROPOSED 5.83 Acres - R-1-7,500-Q 21.87 Acres - 0-S 1. Preserve 2 1.87 acres including all constrained lands, i.e. steep slopes, SDG&E easement, sensitive habitats and HMP wildlife comdor 2. Dedication of public Trail Se.gment 3 1. 1 .Nine exterior color schemes for wall, trim and accent 2.Multiple roof linedone and two story elements 3. Recessed entries, doors, windows 4. Two and three car garages, single and dual door designs 5. Multiple building planes, multi-level roofs, one and two story elements, balcony decks The project is located within and subject to the Mello I1 LCP segment and is designated for residential low medium (RLM) density land use and Limited Control (L-C) zoning. Although the Mello I1 Land Use Plan is consistent with the subject parcel’s RLM General Plan ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-2 l/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTJ- SUBDIVISION October 6, 1999 designation, the implementing zone (L-C) specified by the Mello I1 LCP is not consistent with the proposed zone change to R-1-7,500-Q and Open Space. Since the California Coastal Act specifies that all rezonings related to land use regulation or administration within the coastal zone, which occur after the certification of a local government’s local coastal program, require a LCP amendment in order to be effective, the project includes a Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the implementing zone from L-C to R-1-7,500-Q for the proposed developed area and Open Space (0-S) for the preserve area. The project is consistent with Mello II LCP policies limiting grading to the summer season (April - October) and preservation of steep slopes (25%+) possessing coastal sage scrub and chaparral plant communities (dual criteria). The project is conditioned to restrict grading of the site to the summer season, and proposed grading avoids all of the coastal sage scrub habitat and encroaches into 6.6% of the chaparral habitat existing on dual criteria slopes. The Mello I1 LCP permits an encroachment of up to 10% to enable reasonable use of a property. Of the total 27.87 acres, the project proposes to disturb only 6.5 acres although there are other developable areas existing on the site. Approximately 16 acres contain sensitive habitat (coastal sage scrub, southern maritime chaparral, native grassland, and wetland) and the project proposes to disturb only 1.37 acres of southern maritime chaparral. The proposed density is 34 units below the density permitted by the General Plan and total avoidance of dual criteria slopes would result in the loss of 6 of the proposed 21 lots. An alternate design utilizing the developable acreage to the north would result in equal or greater impacts to sensitive vegetation than is proposed and disrupt the habitat comdor. Therefore, the proposed encroachment would enable reasonable development of the property with 21 single family lots on approximately 6 acres, while preserving 76% of the site (21.87 acres) containing the majority of steep slopes and sensitive habit existing on the site. This preserved area will be part of a habitat comdor that provides a linkage to open space through and adjacent to the Zone 20 Specific Plan area in accordance with the City’s draft HMP. Mello I1 hydrology standards require the drainage system to be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from a 10 year frequency storm of 6 hours and 24 hours duration under developed conditions, are less than or equal to the runoff from a storm of the same frequency and duration under existing conditions. The project has been designed so that the minimal additional runoff from the project beyond existing conditions is considered insignificant. D. Subdivision Ordinance The proposed tentative map complies with the requirements of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance, Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The subdivision will not conflict with any easements for access through or use of the property. The project is designed to take advantage of natural heating and cooling opportunities in that lots and structures are primarily oriented in an east-west alignment maximizing southern exposure and benefit of prevailing breezes. Primary access to the property would be provided by Brigantine Drive via Poinsettia Lane, a circulation arterial roadway. The proposed cul-de-sac conforms to the City’s cul-de-sac policy thereby negating a secondary access requirement. The proposed local public streets have adequate public right-of- way and would be constructed by the developer to full public street width standards with curb, gutters, sidewalks, fire hydrants, and underground utilities in accordance with City standards. ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-2 l/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTJ? SUBDIVISIOK October 6, 1999 -0 1 Pace 7 Use: Single Family Lots/Units Lot Area: Minimum 7.500 Sauare Feet The proposed street system is therefore adequate to handle the project’s pedestrian and vehicular traffic and accommodate emergency vehicles. To reduce drainage impacts from the project site, the developer is required to provide adequate drainage and erosion control. The drainage requirements of Specific Plan 203, City ordinances. and Mello I1 have been considered and appropriate drainage facilities have been designed and secured. In addition to City standards and compliance with the City’s Master Drainage Plan, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System ODES) standards will be satisfied to prevent any discharge violations. .. . E 11213. Chapter 21.10 - R-1 (One Family Residential Zone)/Chapter 21.06 - Q (Qualified Overlay Zone)/Chapter 21.33 - 0-S (Open Space) As shown on the following table, the project meets or exceeds the R-1 zone standards with regard to lot size, width, coverage, setbacks, and building height. Although the proposed project is a standard single family subdivision which would not require Planning Commission approval of the actual single family units, the Q zone requires the approval of a site development plan including building footprints and architectural elevations to ensure that the proposed units are consistent with the R-1 zone standards. This enables the Planning Commission to make the necessary findings that the project will not adversely impact the site or surrounding uses and that the site is adequate to accommodate the proposed use. II STANDARD 11 Lot Width: 60’ Minimd33’ Cul-de-sac 11 Lot Coverage: 40% .- (I Building Hiight: Maximum 30’ Setbacks : Front: Minimum 20’ Side: 10% of Lot Width Rear: 20% of Lot Width 11 Two Car Garage PROVIDED 21 Single Family Lots, 1 Open Space Lot 7,534 - 16,274 Square Feet 60734.1 ’ Cul-de-sac Less than 40% Maximum 30’ Minimum 20’ 5’ - 10’ Minimum 10’ - 20’- Minimum Two and Three Car Garaees Lot 22 of the proposed project consists of 21.87 acres to be dedicated as an open space easement that will be incorporated into the HMP, upon its adoption, as part of the City’s habitat preserve areas. The rezoning of this portion of Lot 22 to 0-S is consistent with the Open Space Zone (Chapter 21.33). The 0-S zone is consistent with the portion of the site already designated as General Plan Open Space and the future re-designation of the remainder of the open space lot to General Plan Open Space. E4. Chapter 21.85 - Inclusionary Housing See discussion under B. Zone 20 Specific Plan - Affordable Housing above. ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-2 l/CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTJ’ SUBDIVISION October 6, 1999 STANDARD City Administrati on Library E5/6. Chapter 21.95 - Hillside Development RegulationdChapter 21.203 - Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone IMPACTS COMPLIANCE 73 sq. ft. Yes 38.94 sq. ft. Yes The proposed project is consistent with the applicable Hillside Development Ordinance restrictions for development of steep slopes, slope height, grading volumes, slope screening and slope setbacks. The development is planned for areas of the site that are predominately 0 - 15 O/b slopes. The project will disturb small areas of natural slopes exceeding 40%, however, the area of disturbance does not meet all the criteria necessary to prohibit development by the Hillside Ordinance. Proposed grading volumes of 7,620 cubic yarddacre are within the acceptable range and manufactured slope heights are well below the 40’ maximum allowed. Manufactured slopes will be screened by a combination of trees, shrubs and groundcover and structures will be setback a minimum of 15’ from the top of slopes. . Parks Drainage Circulation Fire As discussed under Section C above, slopes exceeding 25% in the coastal zone possessing coastal sage scrub and chaparral habitats (dual criteria) are also protected from disturbance. The proposed disturbance consists of 6.6% of the southern maritime chaparral habitat existing on steep slopes. Disturbance of up to 10% is permitted to enable reasonable use of the property. The proposed development, which is limited to the southeast comer of the parcel, is reasonable since it utilizes the most developable and accessible area of the property preservation of 76% of the site including the majority of steep slopes and sensitive habitat existing on the site, would result from the proposed subdivision design. .15 acre Yes Basin C Yes 210 ADT Yes Station No. 4 Yes F. Growth Management Open Space Schools he proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 20 in the southwest quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table E below. 4.15 acres Yes Carlsbad Unified Yes Sewer Collection System 1 Waste Water Treatment I21 EDU I Yes 5.5 eledl.5 jr hi/2.9 hi sch 21 EDU Yes I Water I 4620 GPD . I Yes * The project is 34 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. ZC 98-12kCPA 98-09/CT 98-1 9/SDP 99-05/HDP 98-2 1 /CDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTI’ SUBDIVISION October 6, 1999 Page - 9 V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The initial study (EIA-Part 11) prepared in conjunction with this project determined that some of the environmental effects which are peculiar to the property or to this project are considered significant and adverse impacts. The developer has agreed to add mitigation measures to the project to reduce those adverse effects to below a level of significance in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project’s direct significant effects include impacts to biological resources, paleontological resources, and traffic impacts. The wildlife agencies have reviewed the project and concur with proposed biological mitigation measures. The environmental documents for the project were sent to the State Clearinghouse for circulation in addition to being sent directly to the area offices of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game. The comments fiom the wildlife agencies have been incorporated into the required mitigation measures. Mitigation measures are also proposed for the other significant adverse effects and are also listed in the EM-Part 11. The project is within the scope of the City’s Master Environmental Impact Report which is utilized to address the project’s cumulative air quality and circulation impacts. The City has received its annual Growth Management Traffic Monitoring Report. The Report has recorded an unanticipated intersection “level of service” (LOS) failure at Palomar Airport Road (PAR) and El Camino Real (ECR) during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This potentially creates a changed circumstance negating reliance on previous environmental documentation. Pursuant to 51 5 162 of the CEQA Guidelines a lead agency must prepare a “Subsequent” environmental documentation if substantial evidence (i.e., the recorded intersection failure) determines that a changed circumstance exists. However, case law has interpreted this section of the CEQA Guidelines to not require the preparation of a “Subsequent EIR’ if mitigation measures are adopted which reduce the identified impacts to a level of insignificance. The project site possesses several sensitive habitats. A mitigation measure has been identified which, if implemented, will bring the peak hours LOS into the acceptable range. The mitigation measure involves construction of two dual right turn lanes-northbound to eastbound and westbound to northbound. This project has been conditioned to pay its fair share of the intersection “short-term improvements” thereby, guaranteeing mitigation to a level of insignificance. In consideration of the foregoing, on July 29, 1999 the Planning Director issued a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project. ZC 98-12LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05MDP 98-21ICDP 98-86 - ROESCH PROPERTJ- SUBDIVISION October 6, 1999 ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4626 (Mit. Neg. Dec.) Planning Commission Resolution No. 4627 (ZC) Planning Commission Resolution No. 4728 (LCPA) Planning Commission Resolution No. 4729 (CT) Planning Commission Resolution No. 4730 (SDP) Planning Commission Resolution No. 473 1 (HDP) Planning Commission Resolution No. 4732 (CDP) Location Map Background Data Sheet 10. Disclosure Statement 1 1. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 12. Reduced Exhibits 13. Full Size Exhibits “A” - “AA” dated October 6, 1999 AH:eh:mh ROESCH PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ZC 98-1 21LCPA 98-091CT 98-1 91 SDP 99-05lHDP 98-21lCDP 98-86 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: ZC 98-12/LCPA 98-09/CT 98-19/SDP 99-05kIDP 98-21/CDP 98-86 CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION REQUEST AND LOCATION: A Zone Change and Local Coastal Promam Amendment to change zoning from Limited Control fL-C) to One-Familv Residential, 7,500 sauare foot minimum lot size. Oualified Overlav Zone fR-1-7500-0) and &en SDace (OS): and a Tentative Tract MaD. Hillside DeveloDment Permit. and Coastal DeveloDment Permit to subdivide 21 single familv lots and one oDen mace lot on a 27.7 acre Darcel located in the north of Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkwav and Black Rail Road within the boundanes of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and Local Facilities Management Plan and the Coastal Zone. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Section 22, TownshiD 12 South. Range 4 West. San Bernardino Base and Mendian, in the Citv of Carlsbad. Countv of San Diego, State of California, according to official plat thereof. as descnbed in Certificate of ComDliance record March 11. 1997 as File No 1997-0106633 official. 0 APN: 215-070-27 Acres: 27.7 Proposed No. of LotsRJnits: 22 LotsR1 Units GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: RLM/OS Density Allowed: 0 - 4 Du/Acre - 3.2 Du/Acre GCP Density Proposed: 3.2 Du/Acre Existing Zone: L-C Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Proposed Zone: R-l-7.500-0/0-S Zoning Site L-c North R- 1-7500 General Plan Current Land Use RLM Vacant RLM Vacant South L-c RLM Vacant/Agric East R- 1 -7,500-Q RLM Single Family Residential West R- 1 - 10-0 RLM Vacant PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: CUSD Water District: CMWD Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 2 1 Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: September 30. 1998 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Mitigated Negative Declaration. issued July 29. 1999 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated Other, DISCLOSURE STATEMENT I Applicant‘s statement or disclosure of certain ownership.interests on all applications which \vi11 require I 1 discretionan action on the pan of the City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Committee I The following informarion MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. J’our prqiec~ caiiiim be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as “Any individual. fm, co-partnership, joint venture, association. social club. fraternal organization. corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate. in this and any other counly, ciry and counn.. cir! municipality. district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.” Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. I. APPLICANT mot the applicant‘s agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of persons having 3 financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a cornoration or uartnership. include the names. title. addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned cornoration. include the names. titles. and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page ma!’ be attached if necessaF.) Person Standard Pacific Corp Corp/PanJ/A Title npvpi appr Title INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE INDICATE NOK- a Delaware Corporation Address 9335 Chesapeake Drive Address San Diego, CA 92123 7 -. OWNER (Not the owner‘s agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of persons having any ownership interesr in the propen!’ involved. Also. provide the nature of the legal ownership (ix. partnership. tenants in common. non-profit. corporation. etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership. include the names. title. addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of die shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE fN/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation. include the names. titles. and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessar?’.) Person Title Owner, &la mar-ri-ed man Title Address 7~nn pi ~cnn WaV 870 8 Address Santa Monica CA 90405 CorpIPan N/A Ronald L. Roesch ._ 17 &-E 7-, .. 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad. CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-1167 - FAX (760) 438-0894 @ - NON-PROFIT OF JIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above IS a nonDr0fi.t oreanizarion or 3 vu<: 11s; ti:. names and addresses of ANJ' person serving as an officer or director o? rne non-mor'. organization or as trustee or beneficiv of the hon Profiflrusr N/A hon ProfitJTmsr Title Title Address Address 9 9 Have you had more than E50 worth of business transacted with any member of Cir! staff. Boards. Commissions. Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) monrhs? Yes Q NO if yes, please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I cenify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of owneddare Ronald L. Roesch Gregg Linhoff Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant For: Standard Pacific Corp. A Delaware Corporation rlapplicanr's agent if applicable/da> I Jack Hmorn & &ssociates for . Standard Pacific Corp. Print or type name of owneriapplicant's agenr --~DrVlIN'.COUNTER\DiSCLOSUR~ STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL, FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 20 GENERAL PLAN: RLM/OS DEVELOPER’S NAME: STANDARD PACIFIC COW. ADDRESS: 9335 CHESAPEAKE DRIVE. SAN DIEGO. CA 92123 ZONING: R-1-7500-0 PHONE NO.: (619) 292-2200 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 215-070-27 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 27.7 ACRES/21 DU’S ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: UNKNOWN A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. City Administrative Facilities: Library: Demand in Square Footage = 38.94 sa. ft. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) Park: Demand in Acreage = .15 acres Drainage: Demand in CFS = 54.88 CFS Demand in Square Footage = 73 sa. fl 2 1 EDU IdentifL Drainage Basin = Basin C (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) Circulation: Demand in ADT = 210 ADT (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 5 Open Space: Acreage Provided = 21.87 Acres Schools: CUSD (Demands to be determined by staff) Sewer: Demands in EDU 21 EDU Identify Sub Basin = N/A (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) Water: Demand in GPD = 4.620 GPD The project is 34 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. CT 98-WCDP 98-XX /HOP 98-XX /LCPA 98-XX/ZC 98-XX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ROESCH PROPERTY CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA * r 1 I VICINITY MAP CUI DESAC PET * KEY MAP ,. I ". I 1- I PIP LOT DRAINAGE TYP LATERAL LOCATIONS EASEMENT NOTES PHELIMINARV TITLE REPORT DIRAINAGE SWALE DETAIL GENERAL NOTES GENERAL DESIGN NOTES .I t , 111 . LEQAL DESCRIPTION PUBLIC UTILITIES AND Disinicis .. I, . /I * OWNER RFPHE'~EN1AIIVF II SUBDIVIDER CT 98-XX lCDP 98-XX /HDP 98-XX ILCPA 98-XX/ZC 98-XX SEE SHEET 3 .. . .-- MATCH LINE -- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ill '., \c t R (I \-.<x 1\11 1 ROESCH PROPERTY CT 98-XXICDP 98-XXIHDP 98-XXILCPA 98-WZC 98-XX _. I MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 2 i I I -1 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CITY or c.liiii SHAll i 01 II 1 wiifi SITE DEVELOPMENT PIAN ROESCH PROPERTY CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - VICINITY MAP ., , GENERAL DESIGN NOTES LEQAL DESCRIPTION I BUILDING COVERAGE SUMMARY 1 L SHEET 2 SUBDIVIDER PARKING SUMMARY KEY MAP i "'I " t I1 JNSAKER & ASSIY'IAIFS PRELIMINARY nTLE REPORT ROESCH PROPERTY^ TYPICAL LOT DWNAGE AND LATERAL LOCATIONS (5. . 1 ' LCPA98-09/ZC98-12/CT98-19/HDP98-2 1 lCDP98-86lSDPXX PREPAAEDRY tlllNYKER k ASS( I IA I Fk "",.-. ..... ._-_ , .~. ., ., ,... - ,. *.,.. ...* ,.,, ."~..." . SlIff1 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ROESCH PROPERTY sir 3 CIN or CAW snnri. mi ir nritdiA -- LCPA98-09/ZC98-12/CT98-19IHDP98-2 1 ICDP98-06lSDPI \ >\ . \ f I' I I 1' I I I I I I mpmonv 'llil SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN HIJN\AKLR h AW X IA I I ROESCH PROPERTY 11 ~ I REAR LEFT ISHOWN WITH OPTIONAL DBCC) REAR lSHOWN WITH OPTIONAL DecK) PLAN 2A ELEVATIONS _._ ._ ROESCH PROPERTY STANDARD PACIFIC ROOF PLAN on* 4 Ill I .,.. . lKs" - PLAN 2 2,817 SQ.PT. . - ~- __ ROESCH PROPERTY STANDARD PACIFIC wa r ... ,. PLAN 3A AMERICANA PLAN 3C COASTAL PLAN 3 BLBVATIONS - - __. - ROESCH PROPERTY STANDARD PACIFIC PLAN NANTUC 38 KeT l"l RIGHT (SHI~WH WITH OITlnNAI DUCK) . \#, 5 I. i PLAN 3C ELEVATIONS ROESCH PROPERTY S f A N D A R D P A C.1 F I C _.... ._. ROOF PLAN ijm. RETREAT LJ YY PLAN 3 3,323 SQ.FT ROESCH PROPERTY STANDARD PACIFIC I I I i I I I M' 0- y)'W 11 I I I I I I I ..... OFT. OFFICE . .. .. OPT. BEDRM.6, PLAN 4A AMERICANA PLAN 4C COASTAL PLAN 4 ELEVATIONS __ __ - ~~~ ~ ROESCH PROPER STANDARD PACIFIC TY PI NA 1 -AN NTUC 40 KET /-I I '* I* r7------------------+ , , 1. ,I , -. REAR LEFT isHoWu WITH OPTIONAL DecKl PLAN 48 ELEVATIONS ROESCH PROPERTY STANDARD PACIFIC I/ - I y . . -1 ._ ...- e. ROOF PLAN ROESCH PROPERTY STANDARD PACIFIC ..... I I PLAN 4 3.353 SQ.FT. mw 39 I' tn4 i I 012 III i PLAN IC CO A 5 T A 1. PLAN 1 ELEVATIONS ~ -. - __ ~- ROESCH PROPERTY STANDARD PACIFIC \ ----------I---- LEFT ROOF PLAN PLAN 1A ELEVATIONS .. - ___ - ROESCH PROPERTY STANDARD PACIFIC .. PLAN 2A AMERICANA PLAN 2C COASIAL PLAN 2 ELEVATIONS .. -- - - ~-- --~ ROESCH PROPERTY STANDARD PACIPIC PLAN 2B NANTUCKET I I I , .. ? c PLAN I 2.720 SQ.FT. 5 __ ROESCH PROPERTY STANDARD PAClPlC \ DlNlNU I UVINO 8,' . 2, t "O- WQ. I 4 k OP'I. DEN ._ .. t -- I . I I PLAN 1 2.120 SQ.PT. ROESCH PROPERTY STANDARD PACIFIC -. 1 I I I I , I. I I 71 c "*. 1 t ''Q- !no' I I b A UININIJ I I WINO _. .i . -* , . ,." . -,- .. , - *. ,H I IRUAHY . ,a .