No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLFMP 10; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 10; Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP)CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (C I I Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit I | Administrative Variance [~] Coastal Development Permit O Conditional Use Permit I I Condominium Permit | | Environmental Impact Assessment Ffc General Plan Amendment I | Hillside Development Permit I j Local Coastal Plan Amendment 0t Master Plan u 0 Q Non-Residential Planned Development [~] Planned Development Permit :HECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) hp&mf|p "TB-oi I | Planned Industrial Permit I | Planning Commission Determination Q Precise Development Plan Q| Redevelopment Permit [~] Site Development Plan [~l Special Use Permit I I Specific Plan I | Tentative Parcel Map Obtain from Engineering Department O Tentative Tract Map I | Variance £fl Zone Change XX- List other applications not specified (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) *?&-&/ LFMP-zonelO LFMPA-zonellf 2) 3) 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: PROJECT NAME: MPramend-149(/$() Villages of La Costa BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:General Plan Amendment and related approvals to implement HCP/IA 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) Real Estate Collateral Management Attn: Jim Jackson MAILING ADDRESS 450 "B" Street, Ste 620 CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE San Diego, CA 92101 619-515-5653 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT /O THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE^ / ^^./1^/J^ •' \>j i^:; jjrf ^\\^'H SIG^/TU^E *•*'" // DATE 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) Morrow Development Attn: Fred Arbuckle MAILING ADDRESS P. 0. Box 9000-685 CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE760 Carlsbad, CA 92018-9000 929-2700 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND GQRBffVrevTHE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. 7W(/ 11 i ujl w Q-.'\2~° vo SIGNATURE ^fOSlP^Vlt"' DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL^ESCRIPTION i/ See attached copies of PTR legal NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form 16 DlLi PAGE 1 OF 2 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE La Costa Master Plan Area East STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) BETWEEN Camino Vida Roble AND (NAME OF STREET) El Camino Real (NAME OF STREET) Southern City Limit (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE Zone 10 & 11 * SEE ATTACHED APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT*** 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 1 3) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 1 9) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 23) PROPOSED ZONING e e. 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 24)IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT 3R THIS PURPOSE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE n LFnP 10 TOTAL FEE REQUIRED FEE REQUIRED \Oc?0 - lOiOo RECEIVED FEB 1 3 1998 CITY OF CARLSBAn PLANNING DEPT DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: DATE FEE PAID 9-B RECEIPT NO. Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2 APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT 10. PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 11. NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 12. PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 13. TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 14. PROPOSED IND OFFICE / SQUARE FOOTAGE 15. PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 16. PRECENTANGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 17. PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT 18. PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 19. GROSS SITE ACREAGE 20. EXISITNG GENERAL PLAN 21. PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 22. EXISTING ZONING 23. PROPOSED ZONING TBA 0 2236 TBA 128,000 121,500 43% (808.4 AC) 37,880 2375 1866 RL/RLM N, PI, OS, RL, RLM, RMH, RM PC R-l.RD-M PM, Cl.OS 01/28/98 CITY 1200 CARLSBAD LLAGE DRIVE CARLSBAD,^ LIP 434-2867 92008 REC'D FROM , l/M/». DATE, ACCOUNT NO.DESCRIPTION 01 02 0 ft* 35, \/ ris ro RECEIPTNt). 47225 Printed on recycled paper. NOT VALID UNLESS VALIDATED BY CASH REGISTER TOTAL 1200 CARLSBAD LLAGE DRIVE CARLSBAD, \ L1FORNIA 92008 434-2867 REC'D FROM.DATE /3 ACCOUNT NO. P'PM.nuJb RECEIPT^*: 47243 DESCRIPTION 'Pff- f}ohoL. -^- - -•* r fnp />)4*} (Q *094 02/13/98 ' • • • '-'.-.' NOT VALID UNLESS VALIDATED BY TOTAL AMOUNT •5<9 - ^i /ff\ -• *^^•>*^_V C^ f , * ^r^)- ^ 0001.01 02 U-PRffi 77-0.00 :-• • . ..' 7700 Printed on recycled paper.CASH REGISTER PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME; Villages of La Costa - Master Plan APPLICANT NAME: Morrow Development Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation. The approval of the Arroyo La Cosia Plan in 1990 established the process for updating the La Costa Master Plan by creating new master plan documents for vacant areas and removing those areas from the original master plan via a master plan amendment so that the original provisions would only apply to already developed areas. The Arroyo La Costa Master Plan was the first area to be removed from the old master plan. This application will remove the remaining portions of the original holding or those areas referred to as the northwest and southeast as envisioned in the Arroyo La Costa approval. The 1994 Implementation Agreement for the Habitat Conservation Plan envisioned that the La Costa Master Plan and General Plan designations on the affected property would be revised to delineate the areas of habitat slated for perservation. The proposed project will result in a reconfiguration of land uses in a manner that formalizes the areas to be perserved by applying Master Plan and General Plan Open Space designations while clearly delineating areas available for development and establishing related development intensities. Approximately 43% of the area or 808 acres is proposed as Open Space. All development proposed is consistent with that permitted under the provisions of the existing La Costa Master Plan and the provisions of the City's Growth Management Program. The proposed Master Plan divides the ownership into 3 Villages: the Oaks, the Ridge (formerly the southeast) and the Greens (formerly northwest). These areas are addressed in a single Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Master Plan provisions common to all three Villages are addressed as Master Plan Development Standards and Guidelines with separate sections addressing matters unique to each Village. In addition to overall Village development standards each Neighborhood has unique development standards related to product type and physical character. The Greens (formerly northwest) is divided in 17 separate Neighborhoods. Two of the Neighborhoods are proposed for non residential uses and three are proposed for higher intensity residential use in the 8-15 dwelling unit per acre range. One Neighborhood is designated as a school site. The area is currently planned for 1038 residential units, 15 acres of commercial/planned industrial, a 5 acre school site, a 22 acre community parks site and 206 acres of open space. The former southeast area is now made up of two Villages. The La Costa Ridge Village (formerly the northern portion of the southeast, or Rancheros) is divided into 6 separate Neighborhoods and the La Costa Oaks Village (formerly the southern portion of the southeast) is divided into 15 individual Neighborhoods. These two Villages are anticipated to accommodate 2236 dwelling units, 5 acres of commercial and 602 acres of open space. Facilities needs associated with these new land use configurations will be established through the requested amendment to the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan and the requested approval of the Zone 10 Local Facilities Plan. In order to implement the new Villages of La Costa Master Plan, the applicant is requesting the following discretionary approvals: 1. Master Plan Amendment to the existing La Costa Master Plan to delete all reference to the areas previously known as La Costa Northwest and La Costa Southeast. 2. A new Master Plan, in compliance with all current ordignances and standards for the areas previously known as La Costa Northwest and La Costa Southeast 3. A General Plan Amendment to revise land use designations within the Villages of La Costa Plan Area 4. Zone Changes as necessary to implement the Master Plan and General Plan Amendment 5. Environmental certification STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CITY OF CARLSBAD The Subdivision Map Act and the Carlsbad Municipal Code sets a fifty (50) day time restriction on Planning Commission processing of Tentative Maps and a thirty (30) day time limit for City Council action. These time limits can only be extended by the mutual concurrence of the applicant and the City. By accepting applications for Tentative Maps concurrently with applications for other approvals which are prerequisites to the map; i.e., Environmental Assessment, Environmental Impact Report, Condominium Plan, PlannedJUnit Development, etc., the fifty (50) day time limits and the thirty (30) day time limits are often exceeded. If you wish to have your application processed concurrently, this agreement must be signed by the applicant or his agent. If you choose not to sign the statement, the City will not accept your application for the Tentative Map until all prior necessary entitlements have been processed and approved. The undersigned understands that the processing time required by the City may exceed the time limits, therefore the undersigned agrees to extend the time limits for Planning Commission and City Council action and fully concurs with any extensions of time up to one year from the date the application was accepted as complete to properly review all of the applications. Date Name (Print) Relationship to Application (Property Owner-Agent) FRM0037 2/96 10/06/1999 16:38 7604380981 HENTHORN PAGE 06 VILLAGES OFA COSTA July 31, 1998 Alfonsa Paziura 1248 Heatherview Drive Agoura, CA 91301 Subject: Zone 10 Local Facilities lyianagement Plan Dear Alfonsa: The Villages of La Costa has been in Plan for Zone 10 in conjunction with \ 1995, the predecessor to the Villages and local governmental agencies for Zone 10. This agreement and the cc changes to the original La (iosta Mas accommodate these changes, the C< facilities management plan for Zone granted to any property owner. he process of preparing a Local Facilities Management ie preparation of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. In of La Costa entered into an agreement with federal, state he conservation of environmentally sensitive land within responding Habitat Conservation Plan necessitated er Plan. In order to amend the master plan to rlsbad Municipal Code requires the preparation of a local 0 before any additional development approvals can be The local facilities management plan the phasing of public and community development within the City and the; allows all property owners whose pro zone to jointly prepare a local faciiitie City approved land use designations those approvals. Since your property is located within is requested, and will benefit you by Please execute the attached form MORROWTJEVELOPMENt, INC. Fred Arbuckle President attch FMA:dlc P. O. Box 9000-685 • CAIUSBAO. CAUFOKN serves to manage growth within the zone by ensuring that acilities will be adequate to meet the needs of projected one. Section 21.90.120 c of the Carlsbad Municipal Code erties are located within a local facilities management management plan. The plan will be based upon existing or your property and will not propose modifications to Jone 10, your concurrence with the preparation of the plan emoving one of the obstacles to future development, sic nifying your concurrence and return by August 15th. If you have any questions regarding fiis process, please fell free to contact me at (760)929-2701. Sincerely 92013-9000 • Tum-HONt 17601 929-2701 • FACSIMILE 1760) 929-2705 Villages of La Costa, LFMP Zones 10 & 11 - Property Owners First Name Alfonsa Anthony Ruth Daniel Last Name Paziura Bons -7^ Budlon^ Shelley Company/Ownership Mary E. Bressi Trust Mag Properties Address 1248HeatherviewDr. 25709 HtlkrestAve. P.O. BOK 1666 PO Box 230895 5075 Federal Blvd. City Agoura Escondido Carlsbad Encinitas San Diego Las Vegas State CA CA CA CA CA -~WJ~ ZIP Code 91301 92026 920 18 92023 92102 89U9 Zone 10 50 10 It (I 11 Amendment ~ — — Amendment Amendment *Note: Also, Mary Persic and Elizabeth Wiegand, Co-Trustees of the Mary E. Bressi Trust Updated 4/6/99 Jack Hcrrthorn & Associates 04/08/99 D:\VLaCosla\Memos\LFMP Owners.doc City of Carlsbad Planning Department December 27, 1999 Mr. Jack Henthorn Jack Henthorn & Associates 5375 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Jack: This letter transmits the Planning Department's comments on the draft Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11. The marked-up documents are being provided to you to address typos and similar corrections. No Engineering comments are provided at this time. The following general Planning comments are offered at this time. 1. Executive Summary. The formatting of the Executive Summaries for the two LFMPs is not at all similar. Because these two plans will be reviewed by the public and decision makers at the same time, they should follow the same formatting as much as possible. 2. General Conditions. The General Conditions for the two LFMPs are not the same, and some conditions are missing from each one. Please refer to the adopted Zone 13 LFMP for the correct General Conditions. 3. Buiidout Projections. Please ensure that the tables of acreages and dwelling units matches the draft Master Plan exactly. Because the LFMPs and the Master Plan will be reviewed at the same time, it is important that they be fully consistent with each other. The Zone 11 plan includes estimates for non-residential development but does not include any discussion of the anticipated non-residential uses. 4. Dwelling Unit Transfer. This topic has the potential to generate a lot of confusion in the public. An expanded discussion is needed describing how this was anticipated in the earlier Zone 11/12 LFMPs, and explaining why it is still necessary. Provide references to pages in the other plans, including the old Zone 11 and 12 plans. The role of affordable housing and the HCP in the transfer should be described. 5. Phasing. The phasing tables need to be updated to Jan. 1, 2000. The "Existing" line needs to reflect all building permits issued in Zones 1 through 16 and 18 through 24. The proposed phasing for Zone 11 is presently shown as beginning in 1998. This needs to be made more realistic, perhaps showing development beginning in 2001 as in the Zone 10 plan. 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009-1576 *:*(760)438-1161 6. City Administrative Facilities. Existing Demand needs to be updated to 1/1/00. Existing and Planned facilities need to be updated to add Faraday Building and delete Las Palmas building and City Hall modulars. The future City Hall cannot be counted toward meeting the standard at this time because its construction is more than five years away. 7. Library. Existing Demand needs to be updated to 1/1/00. Existing and Planned facilities need to be updated to reflect the opening of the new South Carlsbad Library. All discussion of the La Costa branch must be deleted. The appendices relating to site selection and design of the South Carlsbad Library can be deleted. The status of the warehouse on Corte de Nogal needs to be clarified. 8. Wastewater. The two LFMPs have very different formatting for this section. It should be exactly the same for both plans. 9. Parks. Existing Demand needs to be updated to 1/1/00. Carrillo Park should be included in the Existing Supply of parkland because it will be available to the public within 5 years. Veterans Memorial Park cannot be included in the Existing Supply because the timing of its construction is well beyond 5 years. Veterans Memorial Park needs to be shown on the map of park locations. The appendices should include the 1996 Park Agreement, not thel 988 version. 10. Drainage. Again, the formatting for the two LFMPs is very different. Although the two plans should not be identical for drainage, they should be sufficiently similar to allow the reader to compare the two readily. For example, the Zone 11 plan includes a map (Exhibit 38) of Sewer District boundaries, which does not belong in the drainage section. 11. Circulation. Same as for Drainage. For example, the Zone 10 plan includes 3 graphics showing trip distribution percentages. The Zone 11 plan includes none. The Circulation section will be particularly important for the public and decision makers, and a special effort should be made to ensure that the discussion is accurate, consistent, and understandable. NOTE: The Engineering Department may have additional comments on this section. 12. Fire. The Zone 11 plan needs to discuss the relocation of Fire Station #6 from its current temporary location to a permanent location. 13. Open Space. Minor comments noted in the documents. 14. Schools. Same as Circulation in regard to formatting. Again, this is an important facility to the community. Extra care should be taken with this section so that people in different districts can compare the two plans. The Mitigation for both plans needs to be the City's standard conditions for schools. It is not acceptable to state, as is stated in Zone 10, that no mitigation is required. In Zone 11, Exhibits 50 and 51 appear to show very different lines for the boundary between SMUSD and EUESD. Also in Zone 11, some tables have been left blank (Pages XIV-7 and XIV-11). These sections need to be in good shape before they can be sent to the respective districts for comment. 15. Schools - Zone 10. The school condition on Page 1-12 states that if CUSD does not need a school site, the area reserved for the school will become open space. However, on Page III-6 it states that dwelling units could be placed on the school site if it is not needed for a school. This inconsistency needs to be clarified and addressed in both this section and the Buildout section. 16. Sewer and Water. The next version of the documents will be 'given to CMWD for their comments. At this time, we would note that the Water sections in the two plans are formatted very differently. For example, Zone 11 has a very minimal discussion of the use of reclaimed water, while Zone 10 has a fairly complete discussion. In Zone 1.1 on Pages XVI-5 and XVI-6, the tables showing yearly projections for OMWD and VCWD have been left blank. 17. Financing. The next version of the Zone 10 plan should include a draft Financing Section for review. The Zone 11 plan should include the already adopted Zone 11/12 Financing Plan. The next submittal of these documents should be done in highlight/strikeout format so Planning staff can ensure that all necessary changes have been made. If that submittal appears to be complete, it will be sent to the other departments and districts for their review. Thank you. Sincerely; Don Rideout c: Don Neu City of Carlsbad Planning Department December 8, 2000 Jack Henthorn 5375 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Consolidated Departmental Comments of Draft Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11 Attached are comments from the Planning, Engineering, Finance, Library, and Fire Departments. Additional Parks comments will be submitted separately. The format of these comments is primarily marginal notes in various copies of the documents. Please note that some comments are noted by more than one reviewer. All marked copies are being returned to you for your use in making the revisions. In addition, a summary is attached which identifies each comment by page number or section. The summary includes a column for you to indicate your response to each item. Please return this summary with the response column fully completed when you resubmit the revised documents. Many of the comments are minor in nature and will involve minimal efforts to correct. However, some issues involve major policy issues or will require discussion with staff before you can make the necessary revisions. These items are listed below: 1. Dwelling Unit Transfer from Zone 10 to Zone 11 - In the Planning Department's previous comments dated December 27, 1999, it was indicated that this proposal requires further justification and explanation. In the current draft, it is still unclear why this transfer is being proposed and what effects it may have. A meeting needs to be scheduled to go over the buildout numbers and resolve whether or not this transfer is needed. 2. Consistency between the two LFMPs and with the draft Master Plan and EIR - All documents must use the same base information regarding acreage and number of units, with the understanding that the LFMPs address other properties in addition to the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. 3. Citywide and Quadrant phasing projections - Dwelling unit projections for Zone 17 (Bressi Ranch) must be included in the phasing tables. This will affect related sections of the plan, such as Parks. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (76O) 6O2-4600 • FAX (760) 6O2-8559 4. School Adequacy - Written comments have been received from the San Dieguito High School District and Encinitas Union School District. These comments are included with this letter. Other districts have indicated that their comments are forthcoming. It is recommended that you meet with each of the school districts to discuss their comments regarding the school section of the LFMP. 5. Sewer District Boundaries and Adjustments - Sewer service as proposed may require LAFCO approval of boundary adjustments and/or inter- agency agreements. The sewer section will need to include a special condition requiring that these approvals be obtained prior final map, grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first. Be advised that septic systems will not be allowed under any circumstances (Zone 11 pg. XV-17). 6. Drainage and NPDES - Drainage facilities must be described in more detail and not deferred to later design. Required NPDES facilities must be identified. 7. MAG Properties - Are the assumptions used in the LFMP for development of this property consistent with the MAG developers current proposal? 8. Traffic Study - Additional comments on traffic will be provided separately. 9. Notice to other property owners - After these revisions have been made and a new draft produced, the LFMPs will need to be provided to the other owners of undeveloped property in the zones for their review and comment. Staff is available to meet with you to discuss any of the issues identified above. We look forward to working with you on the completion and adoption of these Local Facilities Management Plans. Sincerely; Don Rideout Principal Planner DR:cs c: Assistant Planning Director LFMP Review Team Zone 10 and 11 Consolidated Comments Zone 11 Page Comment Response VI-4 through VI-8 XV-16 XV-19 XV-13 XVI I-9 XVII-14 1-13 1-16 11-1 111-1 III-3 III-5 III-7 111-11 111-12 1-13 1-14 IV-1 IV2-5 VIII-1 VIII-2 VIII-3 VIII-4 VIII-5 VIII-6 VIII-7 thru VIII-10 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Changes to dollar amounts, funding sources and timing for City Admin. Facilities. Clarify financing of LCWD sewer facilities Include Phase F sewer facilities Include financing for Phase E water facilities Text revisions Include CFD No. 1 funding for Rancho Santa Fe Road ENGINEERING PLANNING AND PROGRAMS Wastewater must be adequate for more than the current year Parks standard applies to entire quadrant Numbering problem Text changes Add exhibit number Typos and text changes Provide further detail on approved land uses Address MAG parcel Provide justification for proposed dwelling unit transfer from Zone 1 0 to Zone 1 1 Wastewater treatment must be adequate beyond the current year Provide additional justification for proposed dwelling unit transfer from Zone 10 to Zone 1 1 Clarify additional 457 dwelling units Citywide and quadrant Phasing tables need to include projected Zone 17 phasing. A non- residential phasing table must be provided addressing MAG development. Text revisions Exhibit numbering problem Update sewer flow data Update sewer facilities and capacity data Text changes Various changes Printing problem. Also, revise Adequacy Findings to evaluate with LCWD and VWD X-8 Section XI XII-1 and 2 XV-2 ii in iv I-7 I-8 1-13 1-15 1-16 1-17 1-18 1-19 1-21 I-22 Exhibits 8 &9 111-1 Exhibit 10 III-5 III-7 III-9 111-12 111-13 111-14 111-15 IV-2 IV-5 VI-4 Include Financing Matrix for drainage facilities. Comments on Circulation section not provided at this time Text and map revisions Listed facilities do not match Fig. 46 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Add Engineering staff Wastewater Treatment Facilities Add References, Appendices and Full-size constraints map to table of contents Significant riparian or woodland habitats. Also, reference previous Zone 11 LFMP Text changes Various revisions Title 21 Various revisions to Special Conditions Revisions to condition for Rancho Santa Fe/Melrose Reference HCP exclusion for open space Zones 10 and 11 should use consistent format for schools. Also see other school comments Text changes and typo Typo Revise General Plan and zoning maps as noted Various text changes Various comments noted Section describing HCP should also be included in Zone 10 LFMP Clarify existing Dus Zones 1 0 and 1 1 should use consistent format for Developing Land Uses. Also see other comments. Clarify Affordable Housing reference on Exhibit 14 Various formatting revisions Provide justification for proposed dwelling unit transfer from Zone 1 0 to Zone 1 1 Comments on Exhibit 1 6 Exhibit 17 Revise phasing as noted Refer to 1 999-2000 CIP VI-5 and Vl-6 VII-6 VI 11-4 VIII-5 VIII-6 and VI 11-7 Vlll-10 VIII-11 IX-3 IX-4 IX-6 IX-7 IX-8 IX-9 X-5 Exhibit 34 X-8 XI-1 Traffic Exhibits XI-9 Table 4 Exhibit 35 Table 10 XI-36 XI-37 Exhibit 39 XIII-4 XIV-1 XIV-2 thru XIV-9 XIV-1 0 XV-1 XV-3 and XV-8 XV-1 2 XV-1 4 Do not delete reference to Public Facilities Fee Check dates Check Encina capacity Why is discussion of Carlsbad Sewer Service District included? Same as above comments Show existing as of 1/1/2000 Make consistent with Zone 10 LFMP Comments noted Make consistent with Zone 10 LFMP El Camino Creek Elementary School is existing Park financing question Make consistent with Zone 10 LFMP Check against park agreement Text changes Minor revisions Question re: Batiquitos Lagoon enhancement plan Text change Numbering of all figures and tables in this section must be changed to fit into LFMP sequence. Text changes Question about park noted in trip generation table Change street name When are commercial uses added to trip generation? Questions re: traffic mitigation Address intersections outside Carlsbad analyzed by LLG Exhibit formatting problems Address HCP open space Clarify school district boundaries Various text changes Clarify dates Sewer district boundary issue Typos Reconcile text with exhibits Make unit count consistent with Master Plan - - XV-17 XVI-5 and XVI-8 XVI-10 XVI-1 1 XVI-13 XVI-1 5 XVI I-4 XVI I-6 XVII-12 XVII-36 XVII-43 Septic systems are not acceptable Typos Include appendices Make consistent with page XVI-5 Typos Changes to water financing table Typos Formatting question Clarify funding for parks Clarify school financing for each district Clarify water facilities ENGINEERING LAND USE See Attached FIRE DEPARTMENT See Attached LIBRARY See Attached SAN DIEGUITO HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT See attached ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT See attached Zone 10 Page li lii Iv 1-1 I-2 I-9 1-10 1-11 1-12 1-13 II-2 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 111-1 III-6 III-7 III-8 Exhibit 13 IV-5 VII-1 and 5 VII-7 VIII-1 IX-1 IX-3 IX-8 and 9 IX-1 0 and 11 XI-1 Circulation XI-10 XI-38 Exhibit 36 XIV-1 XIV-2 Exhibit 37 XIV-5 XIV-7 Comments PLANNING DEPARTMENT Add Engineering staff Wastewater Treatment Facilities Add References, Appendices and Full-size constraints map to table of contents Significant riparian or woodland habitats Address zone buildout per submitted Master Plan Title 21 Add text as indicated Clarifications needed Text changes Text change Text change Acreage correction Map revisions per Master Plan Map revisions Text changes Clarification of buildout total Comments on buildout calculations Comments on buildout calculations Check accuracy of existing DU numbers Clarification of buildout total Formatting problem Text change Include discussion of LCWD Formatting problem Text changes Text changes Provide analysis of Parks supply/demand as noted Text change Numbering of all figures and tables in this section must be changed to fit into LFMP sequence. Other changes also noted. Text formatting problem Question regarding Alga/ECR intersection Problem with formatting of legend Text change Provide demand for affordable housing based on Master Plan Several problems with school map. Check with appropriate school district for accurate information. Text change Address SMUSD Mello-Roos XV-1 XV-5 XV-10 XVI-1 and 3 XVI-5 and 8 and 12 XVI-1 3 XVII-1 XVI I-4 XVI I-5 XVII-1 2 XVII-23 XVII-24 XVII-30 Sewer clarification needed Address park site and industrial acreage Check accuracy of EDU figures Text changes Make land uses and buildout assumptions consistent with Master Plan Text change Clarify financing sub-areas Text changes Various comments Clarify funding for parks Text changes Include a separate section for CUSD and SMUSD. Address required financing, fee or CFD. Typo ENGINEERING LAND USE See Attached FIRE DEPARTMENT See Attached LIBRARY See Attached SAN DIEGUITO HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT See attached ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT See attached City of Carlsbad Planning Department December 12, 2000 Jack Henthorn 5375 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attached are comments from the Recreation Department regarding the Parks section of the LFMPs for Zones 10 and 11. The comments are self-explanatory, but if you have any questions please call me or Ken Price. Sincerely; Don Rideout Prinicipal Planner Assistant Planning Director LFMP Review Team 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us December 11, 2000 TO: PRINCIPAL PLANNER, DON RIDEOUT FROM: RECREATION DIRECTOR PARK ANALYSIS FOR ZONE 10 & 11 LFMPS As per your request, Recreation staff has reviewed the Parks sections for the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). The attached documents include our comments and are identified in red. In review of this information, I would be interested in knowing who prepared this document? If you could let me know I sure would appreciate it. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free and let me know. Thankyou, KEN PRICE Attachment c: Park Development Coordinator Senior Management Analyst - Recreation Local Facil s Management Plan Zone 1 IX. PARK FACILITIES PERFORMANCE STANDARD Three acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per 1000 population within the park district must be scheduled for construction within a five vcarfive-year period. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS Park facilities are addressed on a Park District basis. There are four park districts which correspond to the four quadrants of the City. Zone 11 is located in Park District 4 as shown on Exhibit 5430. INVENTORY a. Existing and Build Out Park Demand: The projected population for Park District 4 comes from Exhibit 17. Existing (1/1/98) Park District 1— Projected Population 26.750 Zone 11 Park District 4 4.35213.06(1/1/00) 30,226 Zone 11 4.369 Build Out Park District 4 (2020) Zone 11 (2020)8.562 Performance Standard Demand (acre) 90.68 13.11 133.02 25.69 uJune. 2000 IX-1 CityofOceanside City of 1 Vista C i t y o f E n c i n i t a sLegend 3 District Designation District Boundary C i t y o f E n c i n i t a s City of San Marcos IF4 Park Districts * I! Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan Exhibit 30 Local Faci. :s Management Plan Zone 11 Inventory of Existing Park Facilities In Park District 4: The inventory of existing parks listed below was approved on September 1991 by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The location of these parks are shown on Exhibit 5-?r3_l_. These are the following: Community Parks La Costa Canyon Stagecoach *arir- Type Active Active Act./Passive Ownership City City -Gw^ Acres 12.34 28.0 Subtotal Active >^4Leo Citv 26.9 Subtotal 67.24 Special Use Areas Type Ownership Cadencia Active City El Fuerte Active City La Costa Heights Elementary" (Levante Elem.) Active EUESD La Costa Meadows Elementary13 (Fuerte Elem.) Active SMUSD Subtotal Acres 2.0 3.6 5.4 2.0 13.0 TOTAL EXISTING PARK FACILITIES 3&O480.24 In addition, the adopted 1996 Parks Collateral .Management and the City ._ „ P f* (^ T^ fitelrV-bti. 0v- dedication ^32.9 acres of parkland for Alga Norte Park located within Zone 10. This dedication/6f land will allow the park supply to conform with the adopted performance standard. "An existing joint use agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the Encinitas Union Elementary School District (EUESD) is contained in Appendix A-4. i:An existing joint use agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the San Marcos Unified School District (SMUSD) is contained in Appendix A-4. lauoJune. 2000 IX-3 Local Fac. .es Management Plan Zone 11 c. Inventory of Approved Future Park Facilities An inventory of projected park facilities was approved by the Parks and Recreation Commissionton October 16. 1Q9Q. The location of these parks are shown on Exhibit 54r31. The following parks are listed in the inventor.' but are scheduled for construction within five years in the adopted Capital J^ Improvements Plan: — i^_ Future Community Parks \ ^ Alga Norte Park "^N. I en Tarrilln PnH- " \^f* 1 '^^'X \ f 1 T» 1^T^jX) — y Memorial Park.v\)«/ y * Type Active Do c1 m ^ 7£* rr\ •Act./Passive Ownership City Citv Acres 32.9 25.0 TOTAL FUTURE PARK FACILITIES d. Projected Build Out Adequacy/Inadequacy of Park Facilities: 78. 3480.24 acres of existing park facilities can be applied toward meeting the adopted parks performance standard. The acres of projected future park facilities are proposed as part of the 1997- Assuming these proposed facilities are scheduled and funded for construction prior to build out, the projected build out adequacy/inadequacy of park facilities in Park District 4 is as follows: Existing Facilities Proposed Future Facilities Total Build Out Park Facilities Park District 4 Build Out Demand 7^480.24 acres 57.90 acres 138.14 acres -125.21-133.76 acres Projected Park District 4 Adequacy-foimJiquacy) + 12.904.38 acres Ftfhruiin u. luuuJune. 2000 IX-4 CityofOceanside City of San Marcos C i t y o f E n c i n i t a sLegend B Community Park (Existing) Community Park (Future) • Special Use Area O Future Special Use Area C i t y o f E n c i n i t a,s IF4 District 4 Park Locations Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan Exhibit 31 Local Fac les Management Plan Zone 1 PHASING Exhibit ^632 shows Park District 4 supply and demand based on Park District 4 population projections. Exhibit ^732 shows that existing park facilities conform to the performance standard in Park District 4 until build out with the proposed mitigation. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Park District 4 conforms with the adopted performance standard through build out with the proposed mitigation. C. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS If at any time the parks performance standard is not complied with within Park District 4, no further residential development will be allowed in Park District 4 or Zone 11 unless actions have been taken by the City to provide additional park facilities. D. POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF PARK ACREAGE: In addition to the community parks and special use areas listed in the existing and projected inventory, the following schools could possibly enter into joint use agreements with the City of Carlsbad when the schools are constructed: • r *^ J Potential Special Use Areas Type Ownership Acres ^ Elementary School No. 3 Active EUESD 2.5 Camino De Los Coches Elementary Active EUESD 2.5 La Costa High Active SDHSD 10.0 La Costa J. H. Active SDHSD 7.0 TOTAL 22.0 It is not proposed that these schools be used towards fulfilling the parks requirement in the southeast quadrant. It is however, acknowledged that these schools, when operational, could become^ special use areas upon written joint use agreements between the respective school district and the City of Carlsbad. .A Local Faci ;s Management Plan Zone 1 FINANCING - o The City's approved Capital Improvements Program for the 1007 Qg4 000-3090 fiscal year contains the following funding for park facilities in Park District 4: Park Project Aloa N ] 997 9% ^001 ''00"' ^002 ''OO? (19 acres)-S4M nnn 4Sr4-nnn Maa None Si 6"? OOP Alga Norte Communitv Center S3.535.000 Leo Carrillo Park S700.000 $•1.300.000 (18.78 acres) 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-09 2009+ Alga Norte ; (Land Dedication) Alea None S250.000 S250.000 S3.742.000 (Phase I) Alga None $5.300.000 (Phase II) Leo Carrillo S375.000 S3.389.000 Park (Phase II) Leo Carrillo SI.622.000 Park (Phase III) The 19 acres od acres of Phase I for the Alga Norte Park scheduled for 2002- 20072001-2002 can be used to meet the adopted performance staqdard because it is scheduled within five years in the adopted 1997 98 CIP. Theset999-200(£ciP. The above improvements will be financed by means of a combination of the existing Parks Agreement for the_Alga Norte Park and the_Public Facilities Fees for the Leo Carrillo Park. The Parks Agreement was first entered into between the City and RECM's predecessor in 1982, prior to the initiation of the Growth Management Program. The agreement was amended in 1988 to ensure that Park District 4 would meet the adopted Parks Performance Standard (C.C. Resolution No. 88-52). The current version of the agreement was entered into in 1996. The park site shown on the constraints map is the adopted and approved Alga Norte site pursuant to the current 1996 RECM/City Carlsbad Parks Agreement. uar, u. mugJune. 2000 IX-7 Local Faci. .es Manasement Plan Zone 1 .The agreement guarantees the dedication of 32.9 acres of park land. This dedication of land will allow the park supply to conform with the adopted performance standard. The parks agreement defines the specific park-in-lieu credij^nd other, if any. reimbursements to be received by RECM. The 4£9?-08t99Q 2000 CIP $400,000 to be paid between 2002 and 2007 for reimbursement to RECM. and the remaining $2,145,000 to be paid in full after 2007+. V The following table shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing budgeted CIP moneys available for the facility and the future funding options. EXHIBIT 3632 Phasing of Park Facilities for District 4 Status Year Existing 2000 Proposed 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Build Out 2020 TOTAL Local Facilities Management Zones 6(SE) 10 11 8.144 36 50 50 113 113 133 93 93 93 73 73 73 73 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,256 0 0 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,07t 1.885 80 210 210 210 .209 166 166 166 166 168 16 15 15 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,694 12 2.266 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,266 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1« 746 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 122 0 0 0 0 2,136 Total! of Adopted LFMP's Total Total Yearly Adopted Adopted Adopted Phased Projected Population DU's DU's Increase 13.041 13.041 30.226 239 13.280 554 533 13.813 1.235 533 14.346 1.235 596 14.942 1.381 595 15.537 1.379 572 16.109 1.326 532 16.641 1.233 532 17.173 1.233 410 17.583 950 364 17.947 844 212 18.159 491 211 18.370 489 211 18.581 489 181 18.762 420 123 18.885 285 123 19.008 285 122 19.130 283 0 19.130 0 0 19.130 0 0 19.130 0 0 19.130 0 19.130 19,130 0 Total Adopted Population 30.226 30.780 32.016 33.251 34633 36.012 37.337 38.571 39.804 40.754 41.598 42.089 42.578 43.067 43.487 43,772 44,057 44.340 44.340 44.340 44.340 44.340 44,340 Adequacy Analysis SE Parks SE Parks Adequacy/ Demand Supply (Inadequacy) (Arces) (Acres) (Acres) 9068 92.34 9605 9975 10390 108.03 112.01 11571 11941 122.26 12479 126.27 12773 12920 13046 131.31 13217 13302 13302 133.02 13302 13302 133.02 80.24 8024 13814 13814 13814 13614 13814 13814 13814 13814 13614 13814 13814 13814 13814 13814 13814 13814 13814 13814 13814 13814 138.14 •1044 -1210 42.09 3839 34.24 VT» 3011 2613 2243 1873 1588 13.35 11.87 1041 894 768 6.83 597 512 512 512 512 5.12 5.12 iwoJune, 2000 Local Fac. Jes Management Plan Zone 11 EXHIBIT Jg33 Park District 4 Financing Matrix Facility Park Facilities - Park Restoration Alga Norte Park - Alga None Park Leo Carrillo Park Amount Estimated Cost Timing Park District 4 $565.000 2010+ Land Acquisition -_ »i. 698,098- 2000-2001 <2'130ac ' $4.242.000 2001-2004 N $5.300.000 2004-2009 / \rV<**e 31 26.9 ? »r\A*G iTC. TOTAL PARKS COSTS Notes: (1) Al credits and futu (2) The TOTAL PARC re rembursemene are pan ol foe Parks agreement win th >.S COSTS does not ndude the S2 241.265 to be pad by F l fti fft (wi jfflin^ i 1 REC 10\6 - 2.0 UH,§!l,uufl — t. ^^ 91 -7^-2. Funding Options First Second Third Notes PIL-SE PIL-SE City - PFF PFF RECM w/ future reimbursement X>»City-PFF City -PFF (1) >es ndude foe S2.241.265 c be rembursed to FeBstone Mjune. 2000 IX-9 Local Facilit: Management Plan • Zone 10 IX. PARK FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Three acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per 1000 population within the park district must be scheduled for construction within a five ycarfive-year | period. Z? l^ B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS Park facilities are addressed on a Park District basis. There are four park districts which correspond to the four quadrants of the City. Zone 10 is located in Park District 4 as shown on Exhibit 26. 1. INVENTORY a. Existing and Build Out Park Demand: The projected population for Park District 4 comes from Exhibit 14. Existing (1/1/98X1/1/00) Park District 4 Zone 10 Build Out Park District 4 (2020) Zone 10 (2020) Projected Population 26.750 0 41.710 Performance Standard Demand (acre) -80^30.226 0 125.2114,3401: 90. 3.02 7.5 January 19. IQQQJune. 2000 IX-1 Local Facil s Management Plan • Zone 10 b. Inventory' of Existing Park Facilities In Park District 4: » The inventory of existing parks listed below was approved on September 1991 by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The location of these parks are shown on Exhibit 27. These are the following: Communitv Parks La Costa Canyon Stagecoach Subtotal Type Active Active Active Ownership Citv City City 6^ vILeo Citv Acres 12.34 28.0 ->v Q Carillo 26.9 Subtotal 67.24 Special Use Areas Cadencia El Fuerte La Costa Heights Elementary10 (Levante Elem.) La Costa Meadows Elementary1 ' (Fuerte Elem.) Subtotal TOTAL EXISTING Type Active Active Active Active PARK FACILITIES Ownership City City EUESD SMUSD Acres 2.0 3.6 5.4 2.0 13.0 ^4480.24 In addition, the adopted 1996 Parks Agreement Real Estate Collateral Management and the City of Carlsbad guarantees the dedication of 32.9 acres of parkland for Alga Norte Park located within Zone 10. This dedication of land will allow the park supply to conform with the adopted performance standard. '"An existing joint use agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the Encinitas Union Elementary School District (EUESD) is contained in Appendix A-4. "An existing joint use agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the San Marcos Unified School District (SMUSD) is contained in Appendix A-4. ig. |999June. 2000 IX-3 Local Facil: ; Management Plan • Zone 10 c. Inventory of Approved Future Park Facilities An inventory of projected park facilities was approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission on October 16. 1990. The location of these parks are shown on Exhibit 27. The following parks are listed in the inventory but are scheduled for construction within five years in the adopted Capital Improvements Plan: Future Communitv Parks Alga Norte Park I en Cirrilln PirV Memorial Park Type Active Act./Passive Ownership City Cir ~>f Citv Acres 32.9 w-QVpt pran^ 25.0 TOTAL FUTURE PARK FACILITIES d. Projected Build Out Adequacy /Inadequacy of Park Facilities: 78.3-180.24 acres of existing park facilities can be applied toward meeting the adopted parks performance standard. The acres of projected future park facilities are proposed as part of the 1997- 1 999-2000 CIP. Assuming these proposed facilities are scheduled and funded for construction prior to build out, the projected build out adequacy/inadequacy of park facilities in Park District 4 is as follows: Existing Facilities 3&e480.24 acres Proposed Future Facilities ±$QM+57.90 acres Total Build Out Park Facilities 138.14 acres Park District 4 Build Out Demand - 1 25 .24 acres Projected Park District 4 Adequacy (inadequacy) + 12.90 acres January 19. 1999June. 2000 IX-4 Local Facil s Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 27 District 1 Park Locations January 10. 1999June. 2000 IX-5 Local Facili -> Management Plan • Zone 10 PHASING Exhibit 28 shows Park District 4 supply and demand based on Park District 4 population projections. Exhibit 28 shows that existing park facilities conform to the performance standard in Park District 4 until build out with the proposed mitigation. 3. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Park District 4 conforms with the adopted performance standard through build out with the proposed mitigation. iUune. 2000 IX-6 CityofOceanside City of Vista C i t y o f E n c i n i t a s City of San Marcos Legend • Community Park (Existing) C Community Park (Future) Special Use Area Future Special Use Area tageco|ch ark C i t y o f E n c i n i t a s IF4 District 4 Park Locations Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan Exhibit 27 Local Facili Management Plan • Zone 10 C. MITIGATION SPECIAL CONDITIONS If at any time the parks performance standard is not complied with within Park District 4, no further residential development will be allowed in Park District 4 or Zone 10 unless actions have been taken by the City to provide additional park facilities. D. POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF PARK ACREAGE: In addition to the community parks and special use areas listed in the existing and projected inventory, the following schools could possibly enter into joint use agreements with the City of Carlsbad when the schools are constructed: Potential Special Use Areas Type Ownership Acres Elementary School No. 3 Active EUESD 2.5 Camino De Los Coches Elementary Active EUESD 2.5 La Costa High Active SDHSD 10.0 La Costa J. H. Active SDHSD 7.0 TOTAL 22.0 It is not proposed that these schools be used towards fulfilling the parks requirement in the southeast quadrant. It is however, acknowledged that these schools, when operational, could become special use areas upon written joint .use agreements between the respective school district and the City of Carlsbad. E. FINANCING The City's approved Capital Improvements Program for the 4-W-9S 1999-2000 fiscal year contains the following funding for park facilities in Park District 4: Park Project 1997 9g _ ^QQl -">QQ') ^QO^-^OO? _ 2007+ Alga Norte (19 acres) - $100.000 - S2.H 5.000 Alga Norte (15. 52 acres) - SI. 697.000 Alga Norte January 19. 1 990June. 2000 IX-8 Local Faci .'S Management Plan • Zone 10 Community Center S3.535.000 Leo Carrillo Park S700 OOP SI 300 OOP ^ 1 "^00 OOP (18.78 acres)1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-09 2009- Alga None 52.800.000 (Land Dedication) Alga None S250.000 S2SO.OOO S3.742.000 (Phase I) Alga None S5.300.000 (Phase II) Park Project 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-09 2009* Leo Carrillo S375.000 S3.389.000 Park (Phase II) Leo Carriilo SI.622,000 Park (Phase III) The 4-9 acres of3Q acres of Phase I for the Alga Norte Park scheduled for 2002 SQQ72001-2002 can be used to meet the adopted performance standard because it is scheduled within five years in the adopted 1997 98 CIP. These 1999-2000 CIP. The above improvements will be financed by means of a combination of the existing Parks Agreement for the_Alga Norte Park and theJPublic Facilities Fees for the Leo Carriilo Park. The Parks Agreement was first entered into between the City and RECM's predecessor in 1982, prior to the initiation of the Growth Management Program. The agreement was amended in 1988 to ensure that Park District 4 would meet the adopted Parks Performance Standard (C.C. Resolution No. 88-52). The current version of the agreement was entered into in 1996. The park site shown on the constraints map is the adopted and approved Alga Norte site pursuant to the current 1996 RECM/City Carlsbad Parks Agreement. The agreement guarantees the dedication of 32.9 acres of park land. This dedication of land will allow the park supply to conform with the adopted performance standard. The parks agreement defines the specific park-in-lieu credits and other, if any, reimbursements to be received by RECM. The 4g»?-9S 1999-2000 CIP identifies $400,000 to be paid between 2002 and 2007 for reimbursement to RECM, and the remaining $2,145,000 to be paid in full after 2007+. The following table shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing budgeted CIP moneys available for the facility and the future funding options. January 19. 1999June. 2000 IX-9 Local Facili ., Manaaement Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 28 Phasing of Park Facilities for District 4 Local Facilities Management Zones Totals of Adopted Lf HP's Adequacy Analysis Status Year Extsung 2000 Proposes 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2016 2019 Build Out 2020 TOTAL 6(SE) 6144 36 SO 50 113 113 133 93 93 93 73 73 73 73 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.256 Total Total Yearly Adopted Adopted Adopted Total SE Parks SE Paru Adequacy Phaaed Projected Population Adopted Demand Supply (Inadequacy) 10 11 12 17 11 DU'a DU's Increaa* Population (Areas) lAcres) (Acres) 0 1.885 2.266 0 746 13.041 13.041 30.226 30.226 9066 BC24 .1044 0 80 0 0 123 239 13.260 554 30780 9234 8024 .1; 10 150 210 0 0 123 533 13.813 1.235 32 016 96 05 138 14 42 09 150 210 0 0 123 533 14346 1.235 33.251 9975 13814 3839 150 210 0 0 123 596 14842 1.381 34633 10390 13814 342' 150 209 0 0 123 595 15.537 1.379 36.012 10803 13814 30 11 150 166 0 0 123 572 16.109 1.326 37.337 11201 138 14 2613 150 166 0 0 123 532 16.641 1.233 38.571 11571 13814 1243 150 166 0 0 123 532 17.173 1.233 39804 11941 13814 1873 28 166 0 0 123 410 17.583 950 40.754 122.26 138 14 15 86 0 168 0 0 123 364 17,947 844 41.598 12479 13814 1335 0 16 0 0 123 212 18.159 491 42.089 12627 13814 118" 0 15 0 0 123 211 18.370 489 42.578 12773 13814 1041 0 15 0 0 123 211 18.581 489 43067 12920 13814 894 0 12 0 0 123 181 18.762 420 43487 13046 13814 768 0 0 0 0 123 123 18.885 285 43 772 131 31 136 14 6 83 0 0 0 0 123 123 19.008 285 44 057 132 17 138 14 5 97 0 0 0 0 122 122 19.130 283 44.340 133 02 138 14 5 12 00000 0 19.130 0 44.340 13302 13814 512 00000 0 19.130 0 44.340 133 02 138 14 5 12 00000 0 19.130 0 44 340 133 .02 138 14 5 12 00000 0 19.130 0 44.340 13302 13814 512 1,071 3,694 2,266 0 2,836 19,130 19.130 0 44.340 133.02 138.14 5.12 January 19. IPQOJune. 2000 IX-10 Local Facili. Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 29 Park District 4 Financing Matrix Facility Amount park Faculties - Pant District 4 Park Restoration Alga None Park - Land Acquisition Alga None Park - Phase 1 30.0 ac Alga None Park - Phase II (50 Meter Pool) Alga None Community Center 1 5.000 sf Leo Carrillo Park 26.9 Estimated Cost S565000 S2.800.000 S4.242.000 S5.300.000 S3.535.000 S3.764.000 $1.622,000 Timing 2010+ 2000-2001 2001-2004 2004-2009 2007+ 2010+ 2010+ 1 U 1 AL KAKIS5 UUS> 1 5 kZl,B20,UUU Mjnamg uptons First Second Third PIL-SE PIL-SE City - PFF PFF RECM w/ future reimbursement City - PFF City - PFF Notes ,„.,„ Notes: (1) Ml credits and future reimbursements are part at the Parks agreement with the RECM. (2) The TOTAL PARKS COSTS does not include the $2.241.265 to be paid by Fietdstm: however, the TOTAL PARKS COSTS does include me S2.241.265 to be reimbursed to Feldstone January 19. 1999June. 2000 IX-11 JACK HENTHORN & ASSOCIATES 5431 Avenida Encinas • Suite J Carlsbad, California 92008 Fax (760) 438-0981 (760) 438-4090 RECEIVED May 1, 1998 MAY 0 1 1998 CITY OF CARLSBAD DonNeu PLANNING DEPT City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Subject: Villages of La Costa Master Plan Resubmittal Dear Don: Enclosed are the revised Villages of La Costa Master Plan, Zones 10 and 11 Local Facilities Master Plans, and related materials in response to your comments on March 25, 1998. For your convenience, we have enclosed a matrix responding to each item on your comment letter. We will be contacting you in order to set up a meeting early next week to review our re-submittal documents. If you have any question or concerns, please contact us at (760) 438-4090. F:\Documents\LaCosta\resubmittal.doc -1- Villages of La Costa May 1, 1998 Page 1 of 3 1. 2. 3. 4. Please submit three copies of the Preliminary Title Report which is current within the last six months. Submit a reproducible 1" = 500' scale map of the subject property showing requested General Plan designations with the acreage involved and the surrounding General Plan, zoning and land use. Provide a location map at a scale of 1"= 200' on 8tt" x 11" size paper. The following information from the Master Plan application checklist is needed to evaluate the proposed land use plan: a. Approximate contours at 5' intervals for slopes over 10% (both' existing and proposed). Existing and proposed topographic contours within 100' perimeter of the boundaries of the site. Existing on-site trees; ;those to be removed and those to be saved. b. Earthwork volumes; cut, fill, import and export. c. Clearly show and label the 100-year flood line for the before and after conditions for the FEMA flood plain. 5. 6. 7. A constraints map is needed for the entire Master Plan area. The map should include the information listed on the Master Plan application checklist for a constraints map. A circulation impact analysis is required for the proposed project as noted on the application checklist. This analysis is also needed for the Local Facilities Management Plans and the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) which will be prepared for the proposal. A single analysis will be utilized for each of these documents to avoid inconsistencies. It is most efficient to meet with City staff to agree on the report methodology prior to its preparation. City staff can review and comment on the report so that a City- approved circulation impact analysis is available for use hi the Local Facilities Management Plans and can also be given to the environment consultant for inclusion in the EIR. A noise study is listed on the application as a required item to be submitted for the Master Plan. This item can be prepared as a part of the environmental impact report and does not need to be submitted at this time. Response: Per meetings with staff, this requirement will be included hi the June 26* revised plan submittal. Response: A 500' scale map reproducible is included in the enclosed submittal package. Response: Exhibit 1-3 of the Master Plan satisfies this requirement. Response: Conceptual Grading Plans for the three villages are now included in Appendix B of the Master Plan. Response: Earthwork volumes are now described for each village in Section 4.2 of the Master Plan. Response: The 100-year flood lines for the before condition are shown on the project constraint maps. The 100-year flood lines for the after condition are shown on the Conceptual Drainage Plans of the individual Village Public Facilities Plans, Exhibits 5-6, 6-6 and 7-6 of the Master Plan. Response: Constraint Maps were included with the Local Facilities Management Plans. Response: The Circulation Impact Analysis is currently being prepared, in accordance with the Staff comments regarding appropriate methodology. This item should be treated in the same manner as Item 7. Response: Per city comments, a noise study will be prepared at a mutually agreeable later date. 879/05.000 O:\CUENTS\MORROWUUP-APP2. WPD Villages of La Costa May 1, 1998 Page 2 of 3 Replacement text and exhibits showing the proposed changes to the existing La Costa Master Plan using a strikeout and highlighted system to not revisions is required to be submitted. Please refer to Zoning Ordinance Section 21.38.120. Response: The La Costa Master Plan replacements were previously submitted by Jack Henthom & Assoc. Section 21.38.020 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that the Master Plan area for a child day care center of reasonable size for a period of five years from the date of issuance of the first building permit. Other community use sites are also required pursuant to Policy C.12 on page 31 of the General Plan Land Use Element. Response: Day care and RV storage site locations have been added to the Village Development Plans for La Costa Greens and La Costa Oaks. Language addressing the 5-year reservation requirement for day care centers has been added hi Section 2.5.9, General Provisions, of the Master Plan. 10. Section 21.38.080 of the Zoning Ordinance contains a listing of the required contents of a Master Plan. Graphic plans of the proposed development are required that include the following: A map and legal description of the property with a north point scale not less than one inch equals two hundred feet, showing the date of preparation and the name and address of the plan's preparer. Response: Complete legal descriptions of the Master Plan area will be included in the Master Plan as Appendix A. Encumbrance maps will be individually submitted. b. Location of the various land uses indicated by the use of zoning designations. Response: Master Plan proposed zoning is shown on Master Plan Exhibit 2-2. c. The location of public and quasi-public facilities such as schools, fire stations, transmission lines and booster stations. Response: Public and quasi-public facilities are shown on the individual Village Public Facilities Plans, Master Plan Exhibits 5-6, 6-6 and 7-6. School and park locations are shown on Master Plan Exhibits 2-1, 2-2 and 5-1. The locations of major circulation systems and collector streets and their relationship to the circulation element shall be indicated. Bike ways, pedestrian paths, interconnecting open space areas and other special access means shall also be shown. Response: The classification of each roadway is indicated on the Village Circulation Plans, Master Plan Exhibits 5-4, 6-4 and 7-4. Trail locations and relationships of trails to open space areas are shown on the Village Trails and Recreation Plans, Master Plan Exhibits 5- 5, 6-5 and 7-5. Trail locations are also shown on individual Neighborhood Plans. Bicycle routes have been added to the Village Circulation Plans. e. Facilities for water supply and sewerage disposal, including sewer and water trunk lines, fire station sites, storm drainage and flood control structures and any other public facility needed to properly service the proposed community shall be indicated. Response: These facilities are all shown on the Village Public Facilities Plans, Master Plan Exhibits 5-6, 6-6 and 7-6. Phasing of development shall be indicated. Adequate pubic facilities, open space, recreation areas and street systems shall be provided for each phase. Response: Village Phasing Plans are shown on Master Plan Exhibits 5-46, 6- 22 and 7-36. The phasing of public facilities is now shown in color on the Village Public Facilities Plans, Master Plan Exhibits 5- 6, 6-6 and 7-6. 879/05.000 G:\CUENTS\MORROW\LUP-APP2.WPD Villages of La Costa May 1, 1998 Page 3 of 3 A map showing topographical contours at no less than twenty-five foot intervals. Existing trees and other natural features shall be indicated on such map. Response: Topographic contours, existing vegetation and other natural features are shown on the project Constraint Maps. h. Proposed development shall be consistent with the topography to reduce the amount of grading. The graphic is to indicate where significant grading is anticipated and for what reasons it is necessary. Response: These requirements are addressed by the new Conceptual Grading Plans located in Appendix B of the Master Plan. i. Section 21.38.060 (2) lists the required information to be included in the Master Plan text. The land use and public facility economic impact report listed hi this section will need to be prepared. It is advisable to delay preparing this report until all major Master Plan issues have been resolved and the proposed land uses are set. Response: Per city's advisement, the economic impact report will be prepared at a later date with the Environmental Impact Report. 11. The proposed zone change application is not necessary and should be withdrawn. Please submit a letter requesting that the application be withdrawn and that the fees paid for that application be refunded. Response: Per discussions with staff, the zone change requirement is still under consideration by the applicants. It is premature to withdraw at this time. This should not be an incomplete item. 12. Density calculations are required based on constraints mapping using the existing General Plan Land Use Designations. This will allow a base number of units to be established. Density calculations are also required based on constraints mapping and the proposed General Plan Land Use Designations. The purpose of this analysis is to establish how the number of units requested compares to the total number that could be permitted without amending the General Plan. Required constraints mapping must comply with the City's application checklist requirements and contain the required stamp and signed statement of the engineer of work. Response: Density calculations were previously provided to the City by Jack Henthom & Assoc, under separate cover. 13. Affordable housing provisions must be identified for the entire Master Plan. The proposal on page 2-8 of the Draft Master Plan is not acceptable as it does not identify a method of providing the required inclusionary housing. Response: Affordable housing requirements will be satisfied through participation in the Carlsbad Housing Assistance Program (CHAP). Affordable housing is now addressed in the Master Plan in Section 2.4.1.3 and on Pages 5-6, 6-5 and 7-6 of the individual Village Development Plan chapters of the Master Plan. 14. Please provide exhibits and justification for the required findings in the Open Space Element of the General Plan to allow for the adjustment of existing General Plan Open Space. Response: In addition to the HCP/OMSP areas, open space areas are identified hi the Open Space sections of each Village Development Plan chapter (Sections 5.2.2, 6.2.2 and 7.2.2). 879/Oi.OOO G:\CUENTS\MORROW\UUP-APP2.WPD MARY E. BRESSI TRUST P.O. BOX 1666 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92018 Don Rideout Senior Management Analyst Community Development 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 RE: Zone 10 - Mary E. Bressi Trust Ownership Dear Don, Thank you for discussing the planning status of Zone 10 with me when I stopped by the Planning Department last Thursday. Following your suggestion, I am enclosing a copy of the legal description of the 3.31 acre parcel which was incorrectly identified in the Draft Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 10. This acreage was part of an Option by Aviara that was assigned to the City of Carlsbad and purchased for the purpose of building the inclusionary housing, the Villas, in Zone 21. According to the Agreement of Sale, the City was to have returned the portion in Zone 10 at the close of escrow (1993) to the Mary E. Bressi Trust. The transfer was finally accomplished in April 1998. I understood you to say that you would advise Jack Henthorn of this change in ownership and that he would forward all information related to the planning of Zone 10 to the Trust at the above address. Thank you very much for your assistance in making this change. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (949) 675-3510. Sincerely, ^U^Z^L Ruth B. Budlong, Co-Trustee Enclosure cc: Mary B. Persic, Co-Trustee Elizabeth B. Wiegand, Co-Trustee EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION M.S. 93-07 All that portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 1188, recorded: December 20, 1972, as File No. 340334, being a portion of Fractional Section 23, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, being within the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of the above described Parcel 2; thence northerly along the easterly line of said Parcel 2, North 0°33'08" East, 685.23 feet (record: North 0°33'17" East, PM 1188), to an intersection with a line being 45.00 feet easterly and parallel to the centertine of El Camino Real, as shown on Road Survey 1800-1; thence southerly along said sideline, South 37°03'37" West, 171.99 feet, to the beginning of a tangent 1455.00 foot radius curve, concave southeasterly, thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 23°52'5r, a distance of 606.44 feet, to an intersection with the southerly line of said Parcel 2; thence easterly along said southerly line, South 89°32'2r East, 352.64 feet, (record: South 89°32'01" East, PM 1188), to the southeast comer of said Parcel 2, also being the point of beginning. This parcel contains: 3.31 acres March 8, 2001 TO: PRINCIPAL PLANNER, DON RIDEOUT FROM: ASSOCIATE ENGINEER, CLYDE WICKHAI Consultant Project Engineer, Glen Van Pes! RE: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MP COMMENTS ZONE 10 LFMP We have completed our second review of the June 2000 amendment of the Zone 10 LFMP. Many of the comments apply to Zone 11 LFMP as well for format and context. Our review was for corrections and for compliance with the engineering aspects of the Master Plan. We have noted general comments below. We can provide redlined pages with specific comments on request. Cover Update "June 2000" to a current date Responsible Individuals Glen VanPeski is miss-spelled delete the "y" Morrow Development, Fred Arbuckle is missing from the list of responsibility Table of Contents Please provide a complete, and approved copy of Append ice A-4. Page XIX-6 is blank and the section in my LFMP contained (ICU) intersection work sheets without text. Executive Summary There are inconsistencies in formatting of text. (This comment is a repeat from last review) No mention is made of required LAFCO approvals for out-of-basin sewer. The text exhibits are difficult to distinguish from the LFMP text. There is duplication and inconsistencies in wording. Examplo: Pago I 3 io ouppoood to bo a liot ef public facilities- lu seive Zone 10-. What park faiililieb die lequiied, what drainage faoil required, what Circulation facilitioa oro roquiroch-This is the type of "inconoiotencioo ond • -formatting that we have requested correction of. The statements we want to see are: Ar Acre park is required rpfpr tn Pnrlr Agr»»m»rrf attao.h^ri nn nvhihit _ A harldaARg- fjitainago system \Q required (as shown on exhibitj, Tho intorooctiono of: La Cocta & El ramiiin Pi .il, T ,ln IIi IV Mill Fl "imiiim Pi il fl Taminn Virln Rnhlf thp rnrarl link nf- ^omGottia Lane from D-Camino Roal to Mel rose Drive, is required, Traffic Signoh and Innn rftnnnntnirtinn nf Fl flnminn Rpnl. (see exhibit ) Spnnifir pnhli'- fninilitir"' thfflt nr° fequired should be listed. On exhibit 3, Wastewater the year identified is 2000 (and probably wrong). Drainage Facilities are vague, Circulation facilities are vague, Fire "planned" facilities are not identified, open space CFIP information is confusing, Sewer collection facilities and "proposed mitigation" is vague. Again, this comment is a repeat from last review. Exhibit 1 should show Alicante and should correct Faraday Ave. (not Safety Center Dr.). On the same exhibit, the Bressi MP road configuration should be shown from El Camino Real to El Fuerte. 9. Approval of this plan does not constitute prior discretionary review for projects within Zone 15. All future projects shall undergo review per Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The plan establishes the maximum allowable number of residential units for facilities planning purposes only. The plan does not guarantee any specific residential density. '\ 0. Approval of any discretionary permit within Zone 15 shall be contingent upon the provision of adequate public facilities to satisfy the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan. At this time a Community Facilities District (CFD) has been formed to finance the construction of several Citywide facilities necessary to serve new development. If the subject Zone 15 property is not a participant within that district, the required General Plan consistency finding cannot be made. Therefore, no discretionary approvals, building permits, grading permits, final maps or other development permits will be issued or approved unless the subject property annexes into the CFD or an alternate financing mechanism is provided by the developer and approved by the City Council to finance the facilities legally applicable to Zone 15 that are included in the Community Facilities District. The following activities are exempt from this: grading, minor planning entitlements or minor construction as a part of ongoing agricultural operations, minor subdivisions and lot line adjustments for financing purposes or a Planned Community Master Plan or a Specific Plan. Any exemption is solely at the City's discretion. Zone 15 LFMP Amendment 8 June 10, 1998 General conditions, exhibit 4, condition #10 discusses a Mellow-Roos district. This reference may not be accurate or should be clarified to what district is being discussed (ifCFD#1). Special Conditions Specific conditions that address sewer; water, circulation, drainage and all other facilities should be addressed. Compliance with Parks Agreement, Exhibit should be included. Drainage Condition needs to be specific. I believe a backbone system is required and is included in the Master Plan for this project. A piece-by-piece storm drain construction plan has not been presented. The Master Storm Drainage plan only identifies a few facilities and is only a small portion of Zone 10's obligation to construct. Poinsettia Lane from El Camino Real to Melrose Drive is projected and modeled to be in place by 2005. A Lesser road link in the 2005-year was never modeled nor agreed to. Poinsettia Lane & Alicante intersection improvements are also different than EIR Traffic report, figure 30 (#39, 40 & 16). Figure 16 of the EIR Traffic Report also shows the project influence on Melrose, El Fuerte and Poinsettia. The next intersections in the circulation section are almost correct. El Fuerte, delete from "with the number two.... Approach leg." Under 2010 include discussion about closing the Alga Road Estrella De Mar Median similar (exactly as) to the EIR wording. El Fuerte should already be constructed as modeled and included in traffic study for the 2005 scenario. Alga Rd. / El Camino Real signal phasing needs clarification for overlap phasing, i.e. Northbound ECR to eastbound Alga left turn. Sewer section should include changing boundaries, cost of Carrillo pump station, Trunk Line construction, Stub to adjacent properties (Bressi), and timing issues for facilities (prior to final map). Phasing There is specific and additional information regarding phasing of Zone 10. Adjacent development and facility phasing should be included in this section. Zone 17 (exhibit 3) is not a 0 residential LFMP Zone. Check with Hoffman Planning or the Bressi Development team for specific phasing information. Certain threshold years have been studied (traffic) with specific roadways in place, alternative phasing appears to be altering the planned roadway links. The proposed phasing must also accommodate adjacent development or City Wide phasing. Sewer, water, drainage, and circulation is all a part of the phasing plan. It appears that there are improvements required within Zone 10 that is proposed to be constructed "by others". This should be clarified and could be a serious issue. Wastewater Facilities Exhibit 23 should provide a more accurate boundary and location of districts. Existing and proposed streets could be included to better delineate limits of service. Drainage No exhibit of proposed master facilities. I have enclosed sections of the City Master Drainage Plan. Only a few facilities are identified on the City's plan with the understanding that the Villages Master Plan and the LFMP will provide the necessary detail. There is a minimal PLDA fee of $34.007 acre. I have also enclosed a copy of the section that explains the low fee and it should be reiterated in the LFMP for clarity. Water quality and pollutant basins are not adequately addressed per the new permit (NPDES). The proposed build out facilities within Zone 10 should include planning areas for which the facility is part of for reference and clarity. Please refer to comments on text sections that should be addressed Circulation The LFMP is missing the traffic report appendix. Certain roadway links were studied and modeled to provide a base for all projects to rely on and to develop with a certain guarantee of consistency. The partial construction of Poinsettia Lane in 2005 is a contradiction to that guarantee and is inconsistent with EIR and previous traffic reports approved to date. Inconsistencies between proposed mitigation in EIR and this document must be addressed. La Costa Ave / El Camino Real (SB ECR additional right turn lane) El Camino Real / Camino Vida Roble (NB ECR dual left turn lane - by City) Alga Road (signal modification) Estreila De Mar (close median in 2010) Poinsettia Lane Arterial link to Melrose Drive (in place by 2005) Other vital circulation elements must be consistent. Figures, text and mitigation summary are in need of correction. We have stopped 3rd party traffic review with Susan O'Rourke because of lack of funds from developer. Fire Facilities ^Exhibit 3, Zone "rQ~DTlTlci out hrublic"~Facililies Sunuiidiy Clidil indicates "planned- I facilities". If they exist-they-should bo described in this section. If Exhibit 3 is-wTSngir ^ .gpniilH hp rnrrarted Sewer This section should discuss sewer service out-of-basin more completely. Again, this comment is a repeat from last review. The proposal to sewer out of basin is a developer request that will require City, District and LAFCO approval. La Golindrina sewer pump station is supposed to drain (gravity sewer) thru Zone 10. This plan (LFMP) should address the La Golindrina sewer issue. The sewer mains to serve this project are similar to storm drains in that upstream service needs to be considered. Development or phasing plans, stub mains at boundary lines, capacity, pipe sizing, and a skeletal or backbone system needs to be considered. Water Show streets/ownerships/district boundaries as appropriate for reference on Phase Boundaries exhibit. Again, this comment is a repeat from last review. The recent schematic of water service prepared by Dexter Wilson indicates a detailed transmission system from Palomar Airport Road, El Fuerte, Poinsettia Lane and El Camino Real. This section should address this system and Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these LFMPs. If you have any questions, please contact us. Clyde Wickham, P.L.S. Glen K. Van Peski, P.E. Associate Engineer Consultant Project Engineer March 15,2001 TO: SENIOR PLANNER DON RIDEOUT FROM: Associate Engineer Steven Jantz LFMP REVIEW COMMENTS FOR ZONE 10 The following comments are submitted for your consideration and transmittal to the project applicant: • Exhibit 13 - City wide residential phasing projections do not include an assumption for Zone 17. Based on future development projections used by the City is this years budget preparation, it is suggested that the applicant assume the following development potential: > 500 SFR units spread over an 10-year period beginning in 2005 > 100 MF Affordable units in 2008 * 2,170,000 square feet of Industrial land uses beginning in 2003 * 10 acres of neighborhood commercial > 10 acres of community facility uses The above development assumptions also necessitate revisions to the Total Citywide DU's and Total Citywide Population projections on Exhibits 17 and 18. Most importantly, the status of the facility/capacity analysis in the LFMP for Zone 11 is questionable since no development in Zone 17 was assumed. The specific facility sections in the LFMP and facility adequacy must be re-analyzed assuming the increase in demands from adjacent areas. Wastewater Treatment - There are inconsistencies with text and references. Specifically, Existing Demand identified on Page VTfl-2 and data on Exhibit 24 is inconsistent with Exhibit 22. • Circulation - Refer to comments provided by the Engineering Land Use Division. It is my understanding that the City's third party traffic consultant has not reviewed the final traffic study, hi addition, the mitigation requirements are inconsistent with the provisions in the Village of La Costa Master Plan and EIR. At issue are the future mitigation requirements at La Costa and El Camino Real, El Camino Real and Camino Vida Roble, Alga at Estrella del Mar, and the timing of construction for the Poinsettia Lane connection between El Camino Real and Melrose. Further review will be required. Sewer Facilities - This sections states that the sewer service providers are expected to adjust their boundary or enter into service contracts to serve the zone in accordance with this plan. The applicant must submit a letter of acknowledgement from the affected sewer districts, preferably then- Board of Directors, which expressly indicates their commitment to processing and adoption of the necessary boundary adjustment. The letter should also indicate the timing of such action in order to accommodate the affected development areas. The sewer section should also indicate a trunk line extension to accommodate property within Zone 17. > As indicated in the comment above, Rancho Santa Fe Road is project to fail the performance standard after 2005, therefore requiring to be widened from 4 to 6 lanes. The financing section indicates that these improvements are funded by CFD#3 which include for the construction of 4 lanes only. It is my understanding that the outside two lanes are not included in CFD#3 and would be funded by private development. A mitigation condition and financing requirement must be included in the LFMP. There appears to be a missing exhibit in the drainage section. The text refers to an exhibit showing existing facilities, but the exhibit doesn't call out which facilities shown are existing and which are proposed. The facilities shown on the exhibit need revised so that the LFMP, Master Tentative Map, Preliminary Hydrology Calculations and the EIR are consistent. The fire section indicates that all future development in the zone is within a five-minute response time. It needs to reflect that current Station No. 6 is temporary. The site originally planned for the permanent Station No. 6 is no longer acceptable due to the realignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road. A new site for the permanent Station No. 6 is required. Mike Smith indicated that Zone 11 is not entirely within the 5-minute response time of current stations. Exhibit 76 Existing and Proposed Water Facilities is missing. I understand from Dexter Wilson that he is going to get authorization from Tun O'Grady to prepare an exhibit similar to the one he prepared for the Greens Zone 10. Page XFV-7 indicates there are two options available to mitigate overcrowded conditions at Dieguito Middle School, but only describes one. Developer should provide a letter from the School Districts verifying that they have the school capacity to meet projected enrollment within the zone, and how they project meeting that demand within available budgets. Sewer Collection: > VWD - the text indicates that all major sewer lines are hi place and VWD does not foresee a need for any additional major sewer lines to serve this area. Developer must submit a letter from VWD confirmmg this assessment. »• LCWD - This section indicates that future master plan sewer facilities will be required and will be constructed by the district. Developer must submit a letter from LCWD identifying the master plan facilities needed to accommodate future demand from VLC and further indicate when and who will be responsible for the construction of the future sewer infrastructure. Water Distribution: * Develop shall submit a letter from each water district serving VLC indication the adequacy of the water system, and also identifying the timing of construction of any upgrades in the water system as required. May 25, 2001 TO: PRINCIPAL PLANNER, DON RIDEOUT FROM: ASSOCIATE ENGINEER, CLYDE WICKHAM Consultant Project Engineer, Glen Van Peski RE: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MP COMMENTS ZONE 10 LFMP We have completed our second review of (June 2000) amendment of the Zone 10 LFMP. Many of the comments apply to Zone 11 LFMP as well for format and context. Our review was for corrections and for compliance with the engineering aspects of the Master Plan. We have noted general comments below. We can provide redlined pages with specific comments on request. Table of Contents A-4 Traffic append ice needs correction and is inconsistent with approved report. A-5 Will Serve letters and conceptual approval (City of Carlsbad, Leucadia County Water District, Vallecitos Water district), of proposed district boundary adjustment(s) has not been provided. Traffic (The traffic comment is a continuation from last 2 reviews) The Traffic section is not consistent with previous traffic reports (EIR & Project), as approved by City's 3rd Party Review Team and needs correction. This comment was raised a few weeks ago. LL&G & RBF have addressed issue, correction needs to be submitted. Alga Road Estrella De Mar Mitigation (median closure) needs to be identified in text. Executive Summary I-3 Sewer. Add discussion about mitigation of offsite sewer trunk line provided by developer with reimbursement from (LCWD) district or by district, funded by connection fees. 1-11 Circulation Add: in addition to median and frontage improvements of Alga Road and El Camino Real: (for 2005) • Poinsettia Lane to western terminus (west of Melrose Drive) not to "El Fuerte". • Alicante from Alga Road to Northern boundary not to "school site". • El Camino Real / Poinsettia intersection - Add to end: Re-construct traffic signal mast arms, controllers, detection and interconnect in the ultimate / build-out location. 1-12 Estrella De Mar, Add: Turn restriction / closure of median at intersection Estrella De Mar and Alga Road. 1-13 Sewer remove "certification of occupancy" insert approval of any final map. Remove "request adjustments" insert, receive LAFCO approval of adjustments. The sentence will read: Prior to approval of any final map within the boundary adjustment area, as shown on exhibit 72, the developer will receive LAFCO approval of adjustments to the sewer service boundaries or as an alternative, ...(no change). LCWD add B. Discuss specific mitigation of trunk sewer, when it is needed, and financing mechanism. (A majority of t|\e;comments above are a repeat from last review) The Executive summary of the LFMP should answer questions like: How many acres of Park is provided? What is the issue with capacity in LCWD trunk line? What is the size of the upgrade vs. size of existing pipe? Who will construct and when will the NPDES / desiltation basins be constructed? The intersections of: La Costa & El Camino Real, Alga Road & Estrella De Mar, El Camino Real & Camino Vida Roble, the road link of Poinsettia Lane from El Camino Real to Melrose Drive. I believe are required to be mitigated. Traffic Signals and lane reconstruction of El Camino Real & Poinsettia Lane of Alicante Road & Alga Road, (see exhibit ) Specific public facilities that are required should be listed. Again, many of these comments are continued from last review. Exhibit 1 should correct Faraday Ave. (not Safety Center Dr.). Exhibit 8 should show the existing & future Flood Plain (north of Poinsettia Lane, across park site) or clarify developed condition. X-1 Drainage Facilities B. Add wording directly from City's Master Drainage Plan (another copy is provided) This explanation sets up exactly what is expected and what should be accomplished. X-3 g. Storm Drain in Alicante is necessary to prevent flooding of School and Park. Tentative Map shows a storm drain, Master Plan shows a 84" storm drain, the LFMP shows a 72" storm drain crossed out and no mention of any facility. A storm drain is required concurrent with development of the roadway, grading and school or park. g. New section (LFMP) says a 78" storm drain under Poinsettia Lane, exhibit 34 shows a 72", Tentative Map indicates a storm drain, but no size is provided, and the master plan shows (2) 3'X6' culverts. Please check the Hydrology Report and again, be consistent. X-5 I. Storm drain K is shown as (4) 8'X 12' culverts, Exhibit 34 indicates () no number, 8'X12' culvert and the master plan shows box (3) 6'X 12'culverts. n. Exhibit 34 shows 48" storm drain. Looks like a larger pipe would be flowing into a smaller pipe if you change it to 36" as shown. When you correct and resubmit this section, I will read the Master Plan, the TM, and the Hydrology report they should all be consistent. X-8 Use an exhibit to demonstrate the systems proposed. Include desiltation / NPDES basins and who or when they will be constructed. Identify the Alicante Road storm drain. X-10 Check storm drain size (consistency) and include cost estimate and capacity for de-silt basins associated with each facility. X-11 "" X-12 "" Add Storm Drain in Alicante Road. XI-1 Circulation The LFMP I reviewed had the old version of traffic report with inconsistent data as was resolved last week with Susan O'Rourke / RBF. I understand the concerns and will review the revised report when available. Comments from last review are repeated for your attention, please go over them again. La Costa Ave / El Camino Real (SB ECR additional right turn lane) El Camino Real / Camino Vida Roble (NB ECR dual left turn lane - by City) Alga Road (signal modification) Estrella De Mar (close median in 2010) Poinsettia Lane Arterial link to Melrose Drive (in place by 2005) Other vital circulation elements must be consistent. Figures, text and mitigation summary are in need of correction. Sewer Facilities XV-1 Revise sewer section to reflect recent discussion on LAFCO issues. This is a responsibility of the developer, not subsequent or merchant developers. Prior to approval of any final map in the area to be adjusted... see section 1-13 for consistent wording. Remove discussion about processing accordingly. XV-2 Are there sewer improvements in El Camino Real to serve the western portion of Zone 10? Exhibit 69 Add LCWD pump station to be removed and diverted through this project. XV-5 Include discussion about the LCWD pump station (name?) that will sewer through this project. PDC Engineering Consultants is also working on the La Golindrina pump station issue. It appears that draining through this project is less of an impact and a better design than to run further, across more open space and under the creek (siphon) adjacent to Poinsettia Lane. Again coordinate efforts to resolve this issue. XV-5 How does the (existing) La Costa Golf Course sewer? Might as well say it here. Exhibit 70 add sewer pump stations, correct Alga Road sewer, add sewer mains south of Alga Road. Any sewer systems in El Camino Real adjacent to Zone 10? XV-6 No comment Page is blank. Exhibit 72 add Trunk Line (south of Alga Road), add pump stations, correct sewer line in Alga Road, not continuous, show south of Alga Road alignments. XV-9 f. Carlsbad phasing is OK. No comment XV-10 b. Revise wording there is a capacity issue now. LCWD is working on a design and construction program, anticipates completion March 2003. XV-11 f. Revise section on phasing to address how sewer capacity can be provided. H. Mitigation can be developer designed and constructed with reimbursement from District, or monitor flows to permit a small number of units and wait until capacity is available (March 2003). XV-12 Revise to reflect issues. Reimbursement from LCWD for trunk line, from City for La Golindrina conversion and again from LCWD for LCWD pump station conversion. Water The water section has been revised and appears to be correct. The recent work of Dexter Wilson appears to be included in this plan. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these LFMPs. If you have any questions, please contact us. Clyde Wickham, P.L.S. Glen K. Van Peski, P.E. Associate Engineer Consultant Project Engineer Zone 10 I Page Comments I li lii Iv 1-1 I-2 I-9 1-10 1-11 1-12 1-13 II-2 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 111-1 III-6 III-7 III-8 Exhibit 13 IV-5 VII-1 and 5 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Add Engineering staff Wastewater Treatment Facilities Add References, Appendices and Full-size constraints map to table of contents Significant riparian or woodland habitats Address zone buildout per submitted Master Plan Title 21 Add text as indicated Clarifications needed Text changes Text change Text change Acreage correction Map revisions per Master Plan Map revisions Text changes Clarification of buildout total Comments on buildout calculations Comments on buildout calculations Check accuracy of existing DU numbers Clarification of buildout total Formatting problem Completed Completed Completed Completed Addressed in IV-1 Completed Completed Corrected per new traffic study Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Corrected per revised constraints map Corrected per revised constraints map Numbers were generated per building permit counts in conjunction with Dennis Turner's reports during the last revision of the LFMPs. Unit counts were agreed upon and used throughout supporting documents for LFMP and VLC Master Plan. Completed Completed VI 1-7 VIII-1 IX-1 IX-3 IX-8 and 9 IX-1 0 and 11 XI-1 Circulation XI-10 XI-38 Exhibit 36 XIV-1 XIV-2 Exhibit 37 XIV-5 XIV-7 XV-1 XV-5 XV- 10 XVI-1 and 3 XVI-5 and 8 and 12 XVI- 13 XVI 1-1 XVI I-4 Text change Include discussion of LCWD Formatting problem Text changes Text changes Provide analysis of Parks supply/demand as noted Text change Numbering of all figures and tables in this section must be changed to fit into LFMP sequence. Other changes also noted. Text formatting problem Question regarding Alga/ECR intersection Problem with formatting of legend Text change Provide demand for affordable housing based on Master Plan Several problems with school map. Check with appropriate school district for accurate information. Text change Address SMUSD Mello-Roos Sewer clarification needed Address park site and industrial acreage Check accuracy of EDU figures Text changes Make land uses and buildout assumptions consistent with Master Plan Text change Clarify financing sub-areas Text changes Completed Updated Completed Completed Completed LFMP analysis for parks are evaluated by district Completed Corrected per new traffic report Corrected per new traffic report Corrected per new traffic report Corrected Completed Completed Corrected Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed XVI 1-5 XVI 1-1 2 XVII-23 XVII-24 XVII-30 Various comments Clarify funding for parks Text changes Include a separate section for CUSD and SMUSD. Address required financing, fee or CFD. Typo ENGINEERING LAND USE See Attached FIRE DEPARTMENT See Attached LIBRARY See Attached SAN DIEGUITO HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT See attached ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT See attached Completed Over and above the scope of requirements for LFMP analysis Completed Completed Completed Completed on basis of relevance to LFMP scope of analysis. Detail information and breaking from format of LFMP was not addressed. Clarification of comments were discussed with Clyde Wickham and Jack Henthorn. Completed Completed Completed Completed June 18, 2001 TO: PRINCIPAL PLANNER DON RIDEOUT FROM: Senior Planner ZONE 10 LFMP FOURTH CHECK REVIEW COMMENTS Transmitted are my comments on the revised June 2000 Draft Zone 10 LFMP received on June 11, 2001. I have only a few very minor corrections that are noted on the attached pages. In addition, a will serve letter from the Leucadia County Water District is needed for the Greens. The copy provided in the appendices is for the Ridge and Oaks. Once these revisions are made, I can support the applicant printing copies of the LFMP for distribution to the Planning Commission. DONNEU DN:mh Attachments LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Zone 10 June 2000 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 10 Prepared For: City of Carlsbad Growth Management Division 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared By: Document Preparation: Jack Henthorn & Associates Engineering: O'Day Consultants Traffic: Linscott Law & Greenspan June, 2000 LIN SCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN ENGINEERS REV. 04/12/01 SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00) - Indicates Zone 10 Area NOTE: - ADT's are shown midblock Total if*)-13 NO SCALE I LG723U5.DWG F4 2005 Zone 10 ADT's Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 10 Exhibit 50 LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN ENGINEERS REV. 04/12/01 SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00) - Indicotes Zone 10 Area NOTE: - ADT's are shown midblock C ^Total = 121,100, ADT ^ ' /Co^ ^NO SCALE .LG723U5.DWGJ.LG7 k 2010 Zone 10 ADT's Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 10 Exhibit 56 LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN ENGINEERS REV. 04/12/01 SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00) - Indicates Zone 10 Area NOTE: - ADT's are shown midblock Total = V21,10QJ'ADT NO SCALE t LG723U5.DWG of fi 2020 Zone 10 ADT's 'o/ Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 10 Exhibit 62 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 67 School Facility Demand Table — Carlsbad Unified School District General Plan Land Use Sub- area RLM-3 RLM-4 RLM-9 RLM-10 RLM-11 RLM-12 RM-1C RMH-5 Totals Residential Dwelling Units Existing SF MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved SF MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future SF MF 223 0 107 0 8 0 9 0 15 0 8 0 44 0 96 180 510 180 Bulldout Projections SF MF 223 0 107 0 8 0 9 0 15 0 8 0 44 0 96 180 510 180 Student Generation Rates K-5 SF MF 0.244 0.214 0.244 0.214 0.244 0.214 0.244 0.214 0.244 0.214 0.244 0.214 0.244 0.214 0.244 0.214 6-8 SF MF 0.120 0.093 0.120 0.093 0.120 0.093 0.120 0.093 0.120 0.093 0.120 0.093 0.120 0.093 0.120 0.093 9-12 SF MF 0.148 0.153 0.148 0.153 0.148 0.153 0.148 0.153 0.148 0.153 0.148 0.153 0.148 0.153 0.148 0.153 Student Generation Totals Existing K-5 6-8 9-12 000 000 0 00 000 000 000 000 000 000 Approved K-5 6-8 9-12 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 Future K-5 SF MF 54.4 0.0 26.1 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 3.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 23.4 38.5 124.4 38.5 6-8 SF MF 26.8 0.0 12.8 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.8 0.0 1.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 11.5 16.7 61.2 16.7 9- SF 33.0 15.8 1.2 1.3 2.2 1.2 6.5 14.2 75.5 •la. If\ June, 2000 XIV-5 October 31,2000 TO: KEN PRICE, RECREATION DIRECTOR FROM: DON RIDEOUT, PRINCIPAL PLANNER PARKS ANALYSIS FOR ZONE 10 & 11 LFMPS Attached are the Parks sections for the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). These LFMPs are now being reviewed by City staff and other affected agencies. Your assistance is requested in reviewing and commenting on the Parks sections. Your comments will be transmitted to the developer, and the revised documents will be sent to you so that you can verify that appropriate revisions have been made. I would appreciate receiving you comments by November 17. If you have any questions, please call me at extension 4602. October 31,2000 TO; CLIFF LANGE, LIBRARY DIRECTOR FROM: DON RIDEOUT, PRINCIPAL PLANNER LIBRARY ANALYSIS FOR ZONE 10 & 11 LFMPS Attached are the Library sections for the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). These LFMPs are now being reviewed by City staff and other affected agencies. Your assistance is requested in reviewing and commenting on the Library sections. Your comments will be transmitted to the developer, and the revised documents will be sent to you so that you can verify that appropriate revisions have been made. I would appreciate receiving you comments by November 17. If you have any questions, please call me at extension 4602. October 31,2000 TO: DENNIS VANDERMAATEN, FIRE CHIEF FROM: DON RIDEOUT, PRINCIPAL PLANNER FIRE STATION ANALYSIS FOR ZONE 10 & 11 LFMPS Attached are the Fire sections for the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 10 and 11 (Villages of La Costa). These LFMPs are now being reviewed by City staff and other affected agencies. Your assistance is requested in reviewing and commenting on the Fire sections. Your comments will be transmitted to the developer, and the revised documents will be sent to you so that you can verify that appropriate revisions have been made. I would appreciate receiving you comments by November 17. If you have any questions, please call me at extension 4602. September 12,2000 TO: SKIP HAMMANN CLYDE WICKHAM STEVE JANTZ CARRIE LOYA HELGA STOVER FROM: DON RIDEOUT DISTRIBUTION OF LFMPS FOR ZONES 10 AND 11 As part of the review of the Villages of La Costa project, the applicant has submitted draft LFMPs for Zones 10 and 11. The Zone 10 is a new LFMP because there was never one approved previously. The Zone 11 LFMP is a revision of a previously approved LFMP. In accordance with our new procedure, I am distributing these documents to the LFMP Review Team to begin the process. We are going directly into the review process because there is no need for a Preliminary Review phase in this case. A project planner (Don Neu) and project engineer (Clyde Wickham) have been working on the project for some time, and it is now the appropriate time to begin integrating the LFMP review into the rest of the project review. Within the next couple of weeks, I will set up the Work Plan meeting so that we can develop a schedule for the completion of processing. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please call me at x4602. c: Don Neu Dee Landers Dave Mauser Gary Wayne Jack Henthorn & Associates 5365 Avenida Enemas, Suite A Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 438-4090 Fax (760) 438-0981 R F r PIVED Memorandum To: DON RIDEOUT CITY 0 ;•" C ARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT.FROM: BRYAN D. BENNETT SUBJECT.- LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 10 DATE: JUNE 11, 2001 The attached six copies of the Zone 10 LFMP are revised per the comments we received from the City of Carlsbad's Planning and Engineering Departments. All the comments were addressed in the revised plan except for the following: - Comments received for the traffic section in relation to additional intersections and special conditions from planning and engineering were not addressed. It was determined at the meeting on 6/08/01 that the document should be consistent with the traffic report for the LFMP and the additional intersections need not be addressed. The special conditions were modified per S. Jantz's comments to include the improvements of intersections into the overall roadway improvement condition. Also note that additional language, such as the median closure at Estrella De Mar and the extension of Alicante Road, was added at the request of C. Wickham but is not in the traffic impact analysis that was approved by the third party review. - The comment in regards to the storm drain in Alicante from the school site to Poinsettia Lane was not addressed for consistency with the EIR for the project. It was determined on 6/8/01 in a meeting with Hammann, Wickham, Neu and Henthorn that the LFMP needs to be consistent with the EIR for the project and the open drainage channel is acceptable. - C. Wickham's comment regarding the inclusion of the basins into the cost estimates was not included because the cost estimate only deals with those systems that included large facilities (Storm Drains G, H and L). The additional language throughout this section that was requested for the basins was included per his comments. - The comment that referred to the executive summary from C. Wickham was not addressed per the meeting on 6/8/01. It was found that Zone 10 and 11 LFMP would need to be consistent with the format of one another and previous adopted LFMPs. Therefore S. Jantz's comments were addressed in relation to the executive summary. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to call our office at (760) 438-4090. Page 1 of', arlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 729-9291 • FAX (760)729-9685 ...a world class district March 23, 2001 Mr. Don Rideout City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Local Facilities Zone 10 Document Review Dear Mr. Rideout: The District has reviewed the provided information in the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 10. The District will be required to provide a Elementary School Site Facility in this area as stated in the Plan. The acreage requirements for an Elementary School Site Facility is 10 net acres. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Sincerely CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Gaylen Freeman Assistant Superintendent, Business Services PROJECT PLANNER DON RIDEO'-'v NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbacrwnmold a hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, February 08,2000, to consider (1) a request to prepare the Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan and (2) a request to amend the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan. Both zones are located in the southeast quadrant of the City of Carlsbad as shown on the attached map. The proposed action only authorizes the preparation of the plan and does not approve the plans. Subsequent public hearings will be held to approve the plans. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after February 04, 2000. If you have any questions, please call Don Rideout in the planning Department at (760) 438-1161 extension 4212. If you challenge the authorization to prepare the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerks' Office at or prior to the hearing. CASE FILE: CASE NAME: PUBLISH: LFMP 87-10 AND LFMP 87-11 (B) ZONE 10 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ZONE 11 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT. JANUARY 28, 2000 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL ZONES 10 & 11 LFMP 87-10/LFMP 87-11 (B)