The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLFMP 09; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 09; Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP)LFMP 87-09 SAMMIS PROPERTIES APN No. None Description: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 9 Status: APPROVED Application date: July 12,1988 CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 438-5621 REC'D FROM ACCOUNT NO.DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 7ECEIPT NO.TOTAL c) November 6, 1986 TO: THE .GROWTH MANAGEMENT TEAM - ZONE 9 SAMMIS PROPERTIES SUBJECT: Draft submittal of the Local Facility Management Plan We have received in the draft plan for Zone 9 Sammis Properties. At this time the Growth Management Team assigned to Zone 9 should begin to review their draft and to make comments in regard to: 1. The completeness of the plan in relation to the Guidelines for Preparing a Local Facility Management Plan. 2. The specific acceptability of the analysis provided for each of the eleven public facilities. Following todays meeting to discuss the overall strategy to be used in completing the Local Facility Management Plans for Zones 1 through 6, I believe we should have "-a brief meeting to determine the appropriate timeline for completion of our review of this draft submittal. Attached is the draft Local Facility Management Plan for Zone 9. If you have any questions, please see me. Thanks, PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 Citp of Cartebab November 26, 1986 Randt Coopersmith 9605 Scranton Road, Suite 202 San Diego, California 92121 Dear Mr. Coopersmith: Please find enclosed staff's comments concerning your first draft of the Local Facility Management Plan for Zone 9. It is important to understand these are initial comments and are not intended to be a complete critical review of the draft Plan. However, we believe these comments will be useful in preparing an acceptable plan for the City to review. Let me start out by reviewing your draft plan on a point by point basis: 1. Format - For the most part the format is fine however it would important in preparing their final to be more quantifiable with the language that you've utilized with regard to facility adequacy. We would also suggest the maps be prepared in a clear and more readable fashion. 2. Constraints Map - It has been determined that the Zone 9 group will be required to prepare a 200'scale constraints map similar to that which we are requiring for the other zones. Initially we felt this requirement would not be necessary although after reviewing your draft plan we feel it is important to see a complete 20U1 scale constraints map for the entire zone. We have discussed this several times previously but if you have any questions as to how to prepare the map please call me. 3. On page 6, you begin to break out those facilities which should be considered on Citywide basis and those which do not have Citywide impact. It is important to note the Parks facility must be addressed on a quadrant basis; the other 7 facilities are addressed on zone basis, while at the same time assessing the impact on certain facilities from the development potential of outside zones. Mr. Randi Coopersmith November 26, 1986 Page 2 4. In the second to the last paragraph on page 6 you have a sentence that says, "A phasing schedule establishing the timing for installation of the facilities in relationship to the amount of development activity projected for the zone and a financing plan establishing proposed methods to fund all the needed facilities." It needs to be emphasized that the facilities need to be addressed as to their Citywide impact, quadrant impact or zone impact depending on which facility you are discussing. The words establishing proposed methods to fund all needed facilities" is insufficient for the purposes of the Growth Management Program. It is the responsibility of the plan preparers to guarantee financing for needed public facilities which have not been identified to be funded from other guaranteed sources such as the adopted Capital Improvement Program or similar special district budgets. 5. Exhibit No. 1, on page 7, needs to be corrected. The southern boundary of the Local Facility Management Zone 9 follows along the southern shore of the Batiquitos Lagoon. We would also suggest for the purposes of delineating the zone boundary that you include a written description of the Zone 9 boundaries. 6. Exhibit No. 3 entitled, "Ownership Boundaries" should include the acreage figure for each one of the separate ownerships shown on the map. 7. Exhibit No. 4 entitled, "General Plan" should show the General Plan designations within the Batiquitos Lagoon Educational Park as approved in Master Plan No. 175. This map should also include the net acreage and gross acreage for each one of the land use categories. 8. On page 13, you begin to discuss the buildout projections for the Southwest Quadrant. It would be important to include the assumptions utilized by your team which established that the quadrant will develop at a constant rate of 395 units per year over the next 27 years. It would also be important to add your rationale and discussion of why the Sammis project should be allocated over 507» of that assumed building rate for the entire quadrant. Mr. Randi Coopersmith November 26, 1986 Page 3 9. On page 14, you should insert under Zone 9 Developable/ Constrained Areas, the Master Plan listing of approved uses well as those of the all other existing developed areas of the zone. For the purposes of all buildout assumptions you should utilize those uses which have been approved in the Master Plan. 10. On page 16, the Developable/Constrained Area Map needs to be substituted with the 200" scale constraints map as previously discussed. 11. On page 18, where you discuss facilities having a Citywide impact, the analysis that has been provided is not sufficient enough to be acceptable. Under both City Administrative Facilities and Waste Water Treatment Capacity it will be necessary for the Zone 9 plan preparers to include a separate table for each facility which shows a year by year demand for each of these facilities based upon the proposed development schedule within the zone. The analysis which has been provided for the Library is not acceptable. The performance standard for library states there must be 800 sq.ft. of library space per 1,000 population or scheduled for construction within a five year period. Your analysis seems to indicate that your only providing the library space needed for that demand within your zone exclusive of any other development within the City. This analysis needs a great deal more attention and should focus on the realization that the performance standard is Citywide. 12. Under Parks on page 20, there are several mispellings and typo's that should be corrected. (I'm sure you ve noticed these already.) Under point 2, Inventory, the plan indicates there is an appendix which includes an agreement between the Batiquitos Lagoon Educational Park and the City to provide 10 acres of offsite land for park purposes, although this appendix was not included with the plan. Further down in the analysis there is a discussion regarding the 25 acre credit to the Southeast Quadrant for the undeveloped Macario Canyon Community Park. It is important to note this undeveloped park acreage does not count as usable park land within the southwest quadrant. It will not count for usable park land until the Macario Canyon Community Park is developed by the City and at this time development of this park is not included in the City's Capital Improvement Program Mr. Randi Coopersmith November 26, 1986 Page 4 Under the discussion of phasing it should be pointed out there is a discrepancy in the number of years it will take to buildout Zone 9 (26 years or 27 years?) The sentence on page 21 which states, "since the park performance standard allows a period of 5 years before park development must occur" is inaccurate. What the park standard does say is 3 acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per 1,000 population within the park district must be scheduled for construction within a 5 year period. This doesn't mean it would allow a five year period for a park to develop, but the key phrase is that it must be scheduled for construction within a 5 year period. It appears your phasing schedule is in the right format, however, it lacks accuracy and would need to address the issue of the park's inadequacy prior to building as well as the need to address growth projections for the entire quadrant and not just that of Zone 9. This must be done because the adequacy of the parks standard is determined on a quadrant basis. The analysis of financing is incomplete. The Growth Management Program requires that public facilities shall be guaranteed prior to allowing development to occur. Three sentences for the analysis on how financing parks in the Southwest Quadrant will be guaranteed is simply not adequate for our purposes and needs to be greatly enhanced. 13. Exhibit 7 entitled, "Parks" should include a different symbol where the 10 acres of park land your agreeing to buy or purchase for the City will be located. 14. On page 23, under circulation, it needs to be mentioned that we have not reviewed the streets which are highlighted as being "impacted" to be either correct or incorrect. Under subsection (c), you should add these technical reports referenced in an appendix to the plan. On page 24, under subsections (d) and (e), it should be noted that the improvements listed have not all been approved by the City. Lastly, on page 25, subsection (f), this paragraph is incorrect because of the word "relocation." Mr. Randi Coopersmith November 26, 1986 Page 5 15. On page 26, under phasing for circulation, the analysis shown is not clear and needs to be revised. What we need to see on a year by year basis is the dates in which these improvements need to occur relative to the development phasing schedule within Zone 9 i.e, shown service levels over time based on the development phasing plan for the zone. 16. On page 27, financing for circulation is inadequate. If you are going to indicate there will be participation in an assessment district you need to detail specifically what that assessment district is being formed to do and highlight each project that will be financed from the assessment district. It needs to be shown that the assessment district has been formed and is operating legally before it will be acceptable as a guaranteed financing mechanism. You also indicate that if no assessment district is approved for these portions of these facilities, then the developer or subsequent developers will fund all of the necessary traffic improvements. This sentence leads us to believe that the assessment district has not been formed and may not be formed. It would be important to note that a sentence of this nature would need to be backed up by some guarantee or letter of credit assuring financing of the facilities before the Local Plan could be recommended for approval. 17. On page 28, Exhibit 8 is incomplete. We are not sure we understand this exhibit and there either needs to be more information included or an explanation to explain to us how to read it. 18. Exhibit No. 9, on page 29, which shows circulation is unclear and probably should be made easy to read. 19. The work done on drainage appears to be the best of all. Although, it is important for you to indicate the desiltation basin and bluff erosion relative to the state drainage information. Ponto Bluff is also important and needs to be added to the analysis. On page 31, under Section iii, you should expand on what the State's drainage system will entail. Mr. Randi Coopersmith November 26, 1986 Page 6 20. Again, under phasing it is important to show on a year by year basis when the facilities will be needed relative to demand. If its all upfront, then say so. 21. Under the financing section for drainage the same comments that were given previously also apply here. 22. Exhibit No. 10, should be blown up and made a little clearer. 23. The analysis on Fire appears to be adequate although we would recommend making your map a bit clearer on Exhibit No. 12. 24. The open space analysis is a bit difficult to follow and we are still in process of reading this section and will be giving you comments at a later time. 25. We belive this section is incomplete. Information concerning future enrollment and capabilities should be included in your analysis. As well as distributing school demand on a grade or school basis. We would also need to know your sources for school information similar to your other facility sections. 26. Under the analysis for the Sewer Collection System it would be important to add in an appendix the studies that are referenced in the plan. It would also be important to address reclamation issues or to identify that there is no area able to use reclaimed water. It will also be necessary to include a discussion in your analysis of upstream capacity and what the impact is of out of zone development. Again, it should also be noted that staff has not done a detail technical analysis of your work, but have reviewed this on the surface to indicate whether or not it would be acceptable as a submittal. The discussion of phasing which includes the sentence "phasing figures can be based on development of the B.L.E.P. project without regard to the remaining zones" is inaccurate. Zone 9 is not an island unto itself and will need to assess the impact of out of zone development which will flow through Zone 9 to the Encina Mr. Randi Coopersmith November 26, 1986 Page 7 Treatment Plant. Again, the phasing schedule needs to be made on a year by year basis showing demand and the specific times in which facilities will need to be installed. The financing section here is too brief and is not sufficient. See other finance comments. 27. Exhibit No. 15, should also be blown up and made a little easier to read. 28. The same points can be made with Exhibit No. 16, Sewer Collection System. This is extremely difficult to read and if possible should be made clearer. 29. Under your analysis of the Water Distribution System, the same comments can be made here as were made under the Sewer Collection System section. Again, these comments are intended to be specific enough to enable you to prepare an acceptable Local Facility Management Plan. That means, acceptable in terms of having all of the appropriate pieces of the plan. After these are assembled we will begin the detailed process of verifying your specific figures and assumptions. We have scheduled a meeting for December 8 at 10:00 A.M. to discuss your plan. If you have any questions, need more clarification or anything else, prior to this meeting please call me. Sincerely, PHILIP '0. CARTER Senior Management Analyst POC/arb cc: Michael Holzmiller Charlie Grimm Gary Wayne Chris DeCerbo John Briggs Pat O'Day AUSTIN H A N S E N F E H L/M A N -GROUP- December 23,1987 ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN LAND PLANNING URBAN DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Philip 0. Carter Planning Department City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 9. Dear Phil, Enclosed for your review are ten copies of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 9. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me. I look forward to your response. Sincerely, Bill Carpenter Associate Planning Department AUSTIN HANSEN FEHLMAN/6ROUP BC/nc Enclosure: DOUGLAS AUSTIN.AIA DONALD HANSEN.AIA MARK FEHLMAN, AIA RANDY ROBBINS, AIA RANDI COOPERSMITH ASSOCIATES: DON PENNINGTON, AIA BILL CARPENTER 9605 SCRANTON RD. SUITE 202 SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 (619)458-1361 - S'TS, -V -A«H:£e~ s , .Vf «*£**«'* -Tiv^k1 x u s T. I N .... May 21,1987-„**>, 1% , * H /I N S E N -« < •*• — ' '••""""•"'--*-••"**""• - F E H L/l/M N \ „, Vc -GROUP- : ARCHITEaURE Mr. Phil Carter *City of Carlsbad INTERIOR DESIGN ;";; Planning DepartmeotJiEMLAND PLANNING % ^ 2075 Las Palmes «• .CarlsbadJ^aQOaTJ.aS; STRUCTURAL*, r: ^fte: Local Facility. Management Plans^ ENGINEERING < J ' i'i»^M.^^^^M^\5feCrf'»-**-(*,"W' ' ^ ^ «. ..^!)s3BB«»^tV»Dear PhlU •** * l The purpose of this letter is to confirm our intention to complete the revised draft-^ t of the Local Facility Management Plan - Zone 9, as soon as posslbla After " , ,.;. reviewing the staff-prepared Local Facility Management Plan -Zone 3, it apt;:. ., ^ the Cjty-s requirements may h^e changed somewhat sir ^ ^ initial draft plan in your letter of Novembo^ 26,1986^ To be sure that we are proceeding with the revised draft In a mutually agreeable ^ manner, Ranch Coopersmith and I would like to meet with you at your earliest ; convenience. Two subjects which may require discussion are open space and : . schools. As yet, staff has not provided written comment on our treatment of open space. Regarding schools, you suggested you might be able to assist us In gaining "'' ,Information from Mr. Blair of the Carlsbad Unified School District •' : •- •"- , >*• / ' f I look forward to hearing from you. ' '' v. „*'.•;.';' . •» ^ "it 4, v Sincerely, '' , , 4.* Bill Carpenter >k~ ^ ', Associate ^'-t" AUSTIN HANSEN FEHLMAN/OROUP, INa^rawS^*' •»'* * ."'".- • v i. » BC/tp DOUGLAS AUSTIN.AIA DONALD HANSEN. AIA MARKFEHLMAN. AIA RANDY ROBBINS, AIA RANDI COOPERSMITH ASSOCIATES: DON PENNINGTON. AIA BILL CARPENTER 9605 SCRANTON RD, SUITE 202 SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 (619) 458-1361 DECEMBER 26, 1986 TO: MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER GARY WAYNE CHRISTOPHER DE CERBOV CLYDE WICKHAM FROM: Philip 0. Carter ZONE 9 - SAMMIS FOLLOW-UP We received a summary of our meeting from December 8 prepared by Bill Carpenter of the Austin-Hansen-Fehlman Group. These notes appear fine, but if you think there is anything which needs to be addressed further, please let me know by January 2nd. I will be sending a reply to Randi Coopersmith and need your comments, if you have any. Thanks. POC:bn Attachment AUSTIN H A N S E N F E H IMA N -GROUP- ARCHITECTURE LAND PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN DOUGLAS AUSTIN, AIA DONALD HANSEN, AIA MARK FEHLMAN, AIA RANDY ROBBINS, AIA JOHN VREDEVELD. AIA RANDI COOPERSMITH 96O5 SCRANTON RD. SUITE 2O2 SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 (619) 458-1361 December 15,1986 Mr. Philip Carter City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmes Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 R» Local Facility Management Dear Phil: This letter Is a follow up to the meeting heW at City offices on December 8,1986 to discuss the first draft of the local Facility Management Plan for Zone 9. Present at the muting were Michael Hotemllter, Clyde Wlckham, Chris De Cerbo, Gary Wayne and yourself representing the City, Jon Brlggs of Sammfs Properties, Pat 0*Day Consultants, Randl Coopersmlth and myself. The meeting was a result of your letter of November 20,1986, to Randl Coopersmlth which presented Initial comments to the Zone 9 Plan first draft The first point of the letter seems to summarize your overall comments suggesting that the Plan should contain Information to a more quantified manner. Most of your comments were clear and we are proceeding with appropriate text and exhibit changes. However, our understanding of several of the points was unclear and required additional explanation. These points are described below and refer to the numbering sequence of your November 20,1986, letter. 2. A 200' scate constraints map will be prepared and included 1n the plan. This map will be compatible with the maps being prepared for all of the other zones. 4. It will be necessary to demonstrate a guaranteed method of financing all needed public facilities described In the Plan. This comment Is repeated under several of the later comments. One method to guarantee facilities would be via subdivision map conditions of approval. 5. A metes and bounds tegol description will be prepared for Zone 9. 8. BulWout assumptions will be described In more detail. The Semmls Properties portion of the early allocation will also be Justified. 11. Under the categories of Administrative Facilities and Waste Water Treatment, Zone 9 facility demands will be shown on a year-by-year basis as they relate to the city-wide demands. You also indicated further explanation 1s necessary for Library Services. It was suggested that alternatives could be provided in case the initial method to provide additional library space is not successful. You Indicated you would assist us in drafting a letter to the Library Director which would request the Director's input on our proposed plan to provide library space within Zone 9. Philip Carter December 15,1986 Page Two 15. Circulation phasing will be detailed in a table which Illustrates the relationship of phasing to allowable development on a year-by-year basis. You noted that Information provided throughout the report should be clear and understandable to the "average reader". 17. Exhibit 8 shall Include a narrative description. 24. Staff has not yet completed review of the Open Space section. Chris De Cerbo will contact us shortly with comments upon completion of the review. 25. Staff was not satisfied with the school Information provided. We stated that this was the limit of Information Mr. Blair of the school District could provide to us. You said you will speak with Mr. Blair. We appreciate your help on this point. The final discussion was related to Plan processing. To facilitate accurate communication, it was agreed that you would be the City Staff contact person and Randi Coopersmith will act as contact person for the Plan preparers. Certain consultant reports and other related Information was to be Included in the final Plan document. Since most or all of these documents are already on file at the City, it was agreed that instead of Including a bulky appendix with the Plan, a reference volume could be submitted which would contain all the necessary backup information. You also explained that when a revised draft which incorporates the information requested in your letter of November 26,1986, is revelwed and deemed complete by City staff, a final Zone 9 Plan could be submitted with the required fee for review by the Planning Commission and City Council. It was suggested by Randi Coopersmith and agreed to that all staff comments should be presented in written form to assure accurate communication and precluded any future confusion. We are grateful for your letter of comments and to discuss the draft Plan. It is our desire to present the revised draft of the Zone 9 Plan in a timely manner and the cooperation of all the staff members is appreciated. Philip Carter December 15,1986 Page Three If you have any questions regarding the draft Plan or this letter, please contact Randi Coopersmith at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, AUSTIN HANSEN FEHLMAN/GROUP cc: Michael Holzmiller Clyde Wlckham Chris DeCerbo Gary Wayne Jon Briggs PatO'Day Randi Coopersmith A U S T N H A N S E N F E H L/H A N -GROUP- ARCHITECTURE LAND PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN DOUGLAS AUSTIN, AIA DONALD HANSEN. AIA MARK FEHLMAN. A!A RANDY ROBBINS, AIA JOHN VREDEVELD. AIA RANDI COOPERSMITH 96O5 SCRANTON RD. SUITE 2O2 SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 (619) 458-1361 December 15,1986 Mr. Philip Carter City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmes Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 Re: Local Facility Management Dear Phil: This letter is a follow up to the meeting held at City offices on December 8,1986 to discuss the first draft of the Local Facility Management Plan for Zone 9. Present at the meeting were Michael Holzmiller, Clyde Wickham, Chris De Cerbo, Gary Wayne and yourself representing the City, Jon Briggs of Sammis Properties, Pat O'Day Consultants, Randl Coopersmlth and myself. The meeting was a result of your letter of November 20,1986, to Randl Coopersmlth which presented initial comments to the Zone 9 Plan first draft. The first point of the letter seems to summarize your overall comments suggesting that the Plan should contain information in a more quantified manner. Most of your comments were clear and we are proceeding with appropriate text and exhibit changes. However, our understanding of several of the points was unclear and required additional explanation. These points are described below and refer to the numbering sequence of your November 20,1986, letter. 2. A 200' scale constraints map will be prepared and included in the plan. This map will be compatible with the maps being prepared for all of the other zones. 4. It will be necessary to demonstrate a guaranteed method of financing all needed public facilities described in the Plan. This comment is repeated under several of the later comments. One method to guarantee facilities would be via subdivision map conditions of approval. 5. A metes and bounds legal description will be prepared for Zone 9. 8. Buildout assumptions will be described in more detail. The Sammis Properties portion of the early allocation will also be justified. 11. Under the categories of Administrative Facilities and Waste Water Treatment, Zone 9 facility demands will be shown on a year-by-year basis as they relate to the city-wide demands. You also indicated further explanation is necessary for Library Services. It was suggested that alternatives could be provided in case the initial method to provide additional library space is not successful. You indicated you would assist us in drafting a letter to the Library Director which would request the Director's input on our proposed plan to provide library space within Zone 9. Philip Carter December 15,1986 Page Two 15. Circulation phasing will be detailed In a table which Illustrates the relationship of phasing to allowable development on a year-by-year basis. You noted that information provided throughout the report should be clear and understandable to the "average reader". 17. Exhibit 8 shall include a narrative description. 24. Staff has not yet completed review of the Open Space section. Chris De Cerbo will contact us shortly with comments upon completion of the review. 25. Staff was not satisfied with the school Information provided. We stated that this was the limit of information Mr. Blair of the school District could provide to us. You said you will speak with Mr. Blair. We appreciate your help on this point. The final discussion was related to Plan processing. To facilitate accurate communication, it was agreed that you would be the City Staff contact person and Randi Coopersmith will act as contact person for the Plan preparers. Certain consultant reports and other related Information was to be Included In the final Plan document. Since most or all of these documents are already on file at the City, it was agreed that Instead of Including a bulky appendix with the Plan, a reference volume could be submitted which would contain all the necessary backup information. You also explained that when a revised draft which Incorporates the information requested in your letter of November 26, 1986,1s reveiwed and deemed complete by City staff, a final Zone 9 Plan could be submitted with the required fee for review by the Planning Commission and City Council, it was suggested by Randi Coopersmith and agreed to that all staff comments should be presented in written form to assure accurate communication and precluded any future confusion. We are grateful for your letter of comments and to discuss the draft Plan. It is our desire to present the revised draft of the Zone 9 Plan in a timely manner and the cooperation of all the staff members is appreciated Philip Carter December 15,1986 Page Three If you have any questions regarding the draft Plan or this letter, please contact Randi Coopersmith at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, AUSTIN HANSEN FEHLMAN/GROUP cc: Michael Holzmiller Clyde Wickham Chris DeCerbo Gary Wayne Jon Briggs Pat O'Day Randi Coopersmith 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 PLANNING DEPARTMENT WTOL/M (619)438-1161 Cttp of Cartebab January 22, 1988 Bill Carpenter Associate, Planning Department Austin Hansen Fehlman/Group 9605 Scranton Road, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92121 Dear Mr. Carpenter: Please find enclosed staff's comments regarding the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 9, submitted December 23, 1987. It is important to understand that these are initial comments and are not intended to be a complete technical review of the plan. Listed below are items that were not included in the plan as submitted and which make it unacceptable for technical review by the City. These items include: 1. A 200' scale constraints map. 2. An Environmental Impact Assessment form is required as part of this application. Provide all E.I.R.s and other pertinent environmental documents relating to these properties. 3. Provide map of natural drainage areas. 4. Provide 200' scale circulation map with vertical/horizontal cross sections. 5. Exhibit 9, page 27; retail and office square footage do not match approved (See CT 81-6B and SDP 82-3A) . SDP 85-15 states there are 456 student dorms with 21 of those considered dwelling units. Change all numbers throughout accord ingly. 6. Phasing is unrealistic: Total residential buildout by 1989 without a final map, and non-residential numbers in 1988 without a final map. Bill Carpenter January 22, 1988 Page Two Listed below are comments of a more minor nature; however, the: must be addressed in the final text. 1. Exhibit 7: P=Private School, General Plan for Railroj is TC (Transportation Corridor). 2. Exhibit 8: Railroad is TC Zone, too. 3. Page 16 = Construction is underway, therefoi development is occurring at both approved projects Provide CT/SDP numbers on Poinsettia Village. 4. Exhibit 10: Is existing population real or projected Reference Exhibit 5 for subareas. 5. What is City facility south of Elm, west of 1-5 (Pac 24)? 6. Page 33 - Existing Citywide population/required squar footage as of 1/1/87 inaccurate. 7. Exhibit 14 - 1991 City terminates leased space. 8. Page 37 - Supply number inaccurate. 9. Page 47 - Zone 19 acreage inaccurate. 10. Demonstrate open space via constraints map. 11. Provide plan in three-ring binder with tabbed dividers This will facilitate corrections as well as review. 12. Title page - Date of preparation required. Again, these comments are not meant to be a complete critica analysis of the plan, but are intended to enable you to prepar an acceptable Local Facilities Management Plan. Please call m if you need any clarification of staff's comments. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:af 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 PLANNING DEPARTMENT WNL#M (619)438-1161 ^MCc"K'"'^^y ^_^ City of Cartebab February 24, 1988 Katrina Butts Sammis Properties Camino Del Rio North #100 San Diego, CA 92108 Dear Katrina: This letter will serve as a synopsis of our meeting of this date. Our common goal is to have the Zone 9 Local Facilities Management Plan meet the adopted guidelines so that we may accept it for processing. By addressing the comments in the January 22, 1988 letter such a goal is attainable. I am responsible for review of the non-technical items in the Plan (city administration, library, parks, fire, open space, and schools) while Mr. Jantz is responsible for the remainder. Mr. Carter will schedule all future meetings. It is our understanding that you will coordinate the various consultants work on the Zone 9 Plan. You will also be providing the City with a list of specific contacts within each consultants office in order to expedite the processing of the Plan. If I may be of any further assistance in addressing your concerns do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BHraf PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619)438-1161 Cttp of Cartebab March 16, 1988 Jon Celling Sammis Properties 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92108 RE: ZONE 9 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Mr. Delling: It is correct that at this time a constraints map analysis would not reduce existing or previously approved dwelling units (by means of the control yield multiplied by the net developable acreage) as long as the Master Plan approving those dwelling units was not brought back to public hearing for amendment. If for some reason the Mater Plan was brought before a public hearing for amendment, all aspects of the Growth Management Program including the constraints map analysis would be applied. If I may be of any further assistance, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, PHILIP O. CARTER Growth Management Manager POC:BH/af SAM MIS Building Better Environments TELEPHONE CONVERSATION March 8, 1988 BETWEEN: Phil Carter - Zone Plan Administrator City of Carlsbad Jon Celling - Sammis Properties RE: ZONE 9 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBJECT: APPROVED D.U.'S VERSUS D.U.S. GENERATED BY CONSTRAINTS MAP ANALYSIS QUESTION TO PHIL CARTER; Since Zone 9 consists of existing and approved D.U.'s an analysis of allowed D.U. based on the constraints map would not reduce the approved D.U. we are allowed to build (505 D.U.)? PHIL CARTER'S RESPONSE; This is correct. The constraints map analysis would simply go on record at the city as having been done, but could not be used to reduce D.U.'s by means of the control yield for the Batiquitos Lagoon Educational Park Master Plan. cc: Roger Anderson Brian Hunter Tom Hageman 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100, San Diego, California 92108 (619) 298-7112 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 PLANNING DEPARTMENT WFf4vU/m (619)438-1161 Cttp of Cartebab April 4, 1988 Katrina P. Butts Sammis Properties 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92108 Dear Katrina: The City has completed its review of the Local Facilities Management Plan submitted March 8, 1988. It is important to understand that these are initial comments and are not intended to be a complete technical review of the plan. Listed below are items that were not included in the plan as submitted and which make it unacceptable for technical review by the City. These items include: 1. Traffic study and methodology used to analyze circulation impacts not provided. 2. Wastewater uses outdated information. 3. Please provide hydrology analysis of upstream impacts on existing and proposed facilities. New criteria adopted in current San Diego County hydrology manual may change sizing of proposed Master Plan facilities. 4. Phasing is unrealistic (1/22/88 comment), since parks standard nonconformance is not mitigated. 5. Provide E.I.R. on BLEP (1/22/88 comment). This is necessary to verify constraints. 6. Provide letter of authorization from "Exten Ventures" to process facilities plan. Update assessor parcel numbers (page 13) and ownership. This is a possible violation of Subdivision Map Act and the Carlsbad Municipal Code (See enclosed assessor's map (216.140.33)) . 7. All facility analysis sections should analyze the impacts of existing development within the zone as well as the proposed phasing of future development. Many of your sections only deal with future development, however, they must include the impacts of all development. Katrina P. Butts April 4, 1988 Page 2 Listed below are comments of a more minor and/or specific nature; however, these must be addressed in the final text: 1. Title Page - Date of preparation required (1/22/88 comment) . 2. y Provide scale on constraints map. 3. / 16 RM 68.9 acres per constraints map or 69.5 acres per Exhibit 7, page 14? 4. Type - "Drainage", page 3. 5. Type - "Lagoon", page 6. 6. "Approved, yet undevelopable" should read "approved, but undeveloped". TUB-94 should read PUD-94, page 16. 7. S Page 17, Exhibit 9; SDP 82-3A should show 169,462 square feet retail and 21,233 square feet office. Show here and revise throughout document. SDP 85-15 states 21 of the 456 student dorms are to be considered dwelling units by Growth Management. Show here and revise throughout document (1/22/88 comment) . •3&SJ 8 .'"^ Redevelopment = 3,200 square feet. 9. v/ Page 26, Construction is '92- '97, not '89- '90. 10 .r?£. Exhibit 12, use total from adopted zone plans (see Zone -''""" 11) , however, staff will be providing 1/1/88 numbers to be inserted later. 11. 7 Provide copy of park development agreement between BLEP and City in Appendix. 12 .A <° Provide school letter stating ability to meet demand in Appendix. Wastewater 13. Graphic - Pg. 39 - 2) Show sewer district boundaries of adjacent sewer districts b) Overlay zone boundaries on graphic Katrina P. Butts April 4, 1988 Page 3 14. Explain and show all six sewer agencies percent ownership of Encina and permitted treatment capacity along with existing flows. Use Zone 11 as a guide. 15. Phasing and service demand - This portion is outdated and should be updated. Use Zone 11 as a guide. 16. Describe ocean outfall line. 17. Exhibit 16 - Note that Calavera Hills is currently not operational and will only be used if interim treatment capacity is necessary. Drainage 18. Who will be responsible to construct the proposed 54" storm drain through Area A. 19. Are the existing 24" pipes in Carlsbad Boulevard adequate to drain basin area. Indicate material type and location on graphic. 20. Indicate type of material for existing and proposed storm drain pipes. 21. Indicate sizes of existing and proposed desilting basins (in cubic yards). 22. Phasing - Break out proposed improvements by drainage sub-basins. - Add estimated cost for these facilities by drainage basins. 23. As a note, the current Master Drainage Plan is being up-dated. The revision may indicate additional facilities which will be required of future developments. 24. Mitigation should read - The developer shall pay or agree to pay any drainage fees that may be established in the revised Drainage Master Plan at the time of issuance of building permits. 25. Revise mitigation and financing by development phases. Circulation 26. ^ Submit traffic study justifying conclusions. Katrina P. Butts April 4, 1988 Page 4 27. Revise text and charts to conform to circulation guidelines manual. If your traffic consultant does not have a manual, please have them call to get one. 28. \/ Show ADT generation by land use. 29. Show phasing as established in guidelines manual. 30. Indicate effects of circulation generated from adjacent zones. 31. v/Show trip distributions. 32. ^ Present graphic of existing and proposed circulation element roads. 33. Submit graphic of each intersection within Zone 9 and impacted by traffic generated from Zone 9 (existing and proposed conditions). 34. If USA conducted counts to determine road segment volumes, submit copy of tapes. 35. Is phasing scenario reasonable? Will all improvements be completed by 1990? 36. /^ Phase III improvement of Poinsettia at 1-5 - check cost > estimate ($120,000). 37. Investigate adequacy of Carlsbad Boulevard/Avenida Batiquitos overpass. Sewer 38. List existing facilities by size, type and location under inventory. 39. Indicate existing and proposed sewerage by: a) Land use b) Appropriate sewer generation rate c) Total sewage generated by zone 40. Include mobile home park and commercial site. 41. List all proposed facilities. Katrina P. Butts April 4, 1988 Page 5 42. Indicate which phases will require additional facilities and estimated costs. 43. List all existing facilities within Zone 9 including pump station and force main owned by LCWD (also sizes). 44. Show adjacent sewer districts on Page 84. Water 45. Show adjacent water districts on Page 90. 46. Inventory list existing facilities by size, type and location. 47. Indicate existing service demand by: a) Use or size of buildings b) Current generation rate c) Total existing demand 48. Use generates rates by land use from CRMWD Master Plan. Again, these comments are not meant to be a complete critical analysis of the plan, but are intended to enable you to prepare an acceptable Local Facilities Management Plan. Please call me if you need any clarification of staff's comments. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:af Enclosure c: Ray Patchett Marty Orenyak Michael Holzmiller Phil Carter Steve Jantz APRIL H, 1988 TO: CITY MANAGER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT MANAGER LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGMENT PLAN ZONE 9 (SAMMIS) Staff today has delivered to Sam mis Properties a letter which indicates their Local Facilities Management Plan is not acceptable. This Plan was submitted on March 8th and staff has completed its review. For the most part the Plan appears to be out of date. The more critical items include the failure to include a traffic study and the failure to include an analysis of the entire zone, not just the Sammis Master Plan. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me. PHILIP O. CARTER bjn c: Brian Hunter Steve Jantz SAM MIS Building Better Environments May 27, 1988 Mr. Brian Hunter CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: ZONE 9 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Brian, Attached you will find 3 sets of the Zone 9 Facilities Plan and 2 copies of the drainage study for Steve Jantz' use as he requested. Per your letter of April 4, 1988 I wish to identify the location of items you requested. Major Items: 1. Traffic study is Appendix "C". 2. Wastewater information updated. 3. Hydrology analysis provided to Steve Jantz (2 copies) for his review, but not include in zone plan at this time per his instruction. 4. Parks standard will be brought into conformance. See Appendix "E" for parks agreement. We are ready to furnish letter of credit to cover parks requirement. 5. For E.I.R. see Appendix "D". 6. Letter from "Exten" provided see Appendix "F". Assessor's parcel number updated see ownership map. 7. Impacts of existing development incorporated into all facility sections. 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100, San Diego, California 92108 (619) 298-7112 Mr. Brian Hunter CITY OF CARLSBAD May 27, 1988 Page 2 Minor items No. 1 thru No. are 48 shown in specific textual sections as appropriate. Sincerely, S PROPERTIES I KatTrina Butts < Zone 9 Coordinator Enc. KB/dac cc: Don Sammis Roger Anderson Michel Barton Jon Delling Hank Fletcher 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE m^tfWIJm TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 Wr*vJW (619)438-1161 of Otarlabafc PLANNING DEPARTMENT June 29, 1988 Katrina Butts Sammis Properties 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92108 Dear Katrina: The City is prepared to begin the technical review of the Zone 9 Local Facilities Management Plan upon receipt of the $10,000 processing fee. Per our telephone conversation of 6/27/88, although the content review allows the plan to be accepted, there are a number of format and data revisions that will be required. Upon completion of our technical review, we will be contacting your office to schedule a comment summary meeting. At that time we will be requesting a date specific turnaround on the revisions to enhance staff's ability to schedule the plan for public hearing. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:af c: Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Steve Jantz, Associate Civil Engineer Zone 9 Property Owners 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE MJwljB TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 WJ^J/M (619)438-1161 (Etta of PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 26, 1988 Katrina Butts Sammis Properties 2650 Camino Del Rio North #100 San Diego, CA 92108 Dear Katrina: On July 15, 1988 City staff met with you regarding initial technical comments on the Zone 9 Local Facilities Management Plan. At that time a follow-up meeting was scheduled for August 1, 1988 with the understanding that a resubmittal addressing our requirements would be made on July 25, 1988 allowing review time prior to the meeting. No such resubmittal has been received. Staff's ability to respond in a timely and concise manner to allow the plan to proceed forward in an expeditious fashion is predicated upon maintaining agreed upon schedules. Due to the intricate and complex nature inherent to these plans, logic dictates a time specific focused approach to processing. As the timetable is agreed upon mutually, it is important to allow for "unforeseeable" contingencies. It is better to allot an extra week now, than lose three times that at a later date due to a rushed review and corresponding corrections. All of us are working toward the same goal, the ultimate adoption of the plan. Our experience indicates accurate communication is a prerequisite to the process. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Associate Planner BH:af c: Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Steven Jantz, Associate Engineer Zone 9 Property Owners 1200 ELM AVENUE TOLrHllJr& TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 V^r'^Sr (619) 434-2821 Office of the City Manager Olttg of Carlsbad August 2, 1988 Mr. Roger Anderson SAMMIS PROPERTIES, INC. 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92108 Dear Mr. Anderson: It has come to my attention that you have allowed several families to move into homes at your Batiquitos Lagoon project prior to receiving final occupancy permits from the city. As you are well aware, the city will not release those homes to be occupied until all of your conditions have been satisfied as required under the Master Plan. I am surprised that this was allowed to happen because we have been working closely to resolve all of your outstanding conditions. Please do not allow any other homes to be occupied until you have received final occupancy permits from the city. In the meantime, I am referring all phone calls to you so that you may take appropriate action so these people will not be inconvenienced. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 438-1161. Sincerely, MARTY ORENYAK Community Development Director saf City Manager City Attorney Assistant to the City Manager Planning Director City Engineer VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR. CITY ATTORNEY RONALD R. BALL ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 (619) 434-2891 July 19, 1988 Mark Tagwerker Vice President and Manager Bank of America Real Estate Industries Group 450 B Street, Suite 650 San Diego, California 92101 RE: BATIQUITOS LAGOON EDUCATIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN AGREEMENT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FOR PARK PURPOSES Dear Mr. Tagwerker: This will confirm our conversation of Monday, July 18, 1988 regarding the above referenced matter in which I told you that the City will be in a position to issue certificates of occupancy for the first 75 units in Phase I in the above referenced project provided the developer has satisfied all of the requirements of law, the conditions of the master plan and filed with the City a letter of credit acceptable to it in the amount of $1 million. This letter, however, does not vary or change any of the other remaining conditions of the agreement between the City and Sammis Properties dated August 20, 1986 by which Sammis Properties is obligated for the full amount of all costs of the acquisition of ten acres of land for park purposes. As we further discussed, you will forward your letter of credit in the sum of $1 million which shall reference the agreement mentioned above and allow the City to call on it when it sends you its written statement that the funds are necessary to acquire the said ten acres by agreement or condemnation. -2- Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me. rmh yours, RONALD R. BALL Assistant City Attorney Roger Anderson Assistant City Manager Director of Community Development Assistant to the City Manager 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE mJfW-AM TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 WHI^M (619)438-1161 (Earlabafc PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 10, 1988 Costa Real Municipal Water District 5950 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 ATTN: Robert Greaney, District Engineer RE: ZONE 9 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Mr. Greaney: The City of Carlsbad is currently undertaking the second phase of its Growth Management Program. This phase includes the preparation and review of Local Facilities Management Plans for each of the 25 Local Facilities Management Zones within the City. As part of the formal preparation and review process, your district is being asked to review the buildout and phasing assumptions of the plans to determine whether the information is consistent with your district's planning and programming of water facilities. Specifically, the City's Growth Management Program requires the adopted performance standard for water facilities be continually met as growth occurs in Carlsbad. Attached, you will find for your review: 1. The adopted performance standard and adequacy analysis for water facilities 2. Draft buildout assumptions for Zone 9 3. Draft phasing assumptions for Zone 9 Could you please review this information to determine three things. First, is the information correct? Second, can your district provide water facilities according to the phasing assumptions presented in the plan and consistent with Carlsbad's adopted performance standard? And third, what means of monitoring demand for and supply of water facilities would be appropriate to establish between your district and the City of Carlsbad? We would appreciate a letter indicating your findings and any comments regarding the processing of Local Facilities Management Plans. Mr. Greaney August 10, 1988 Page Two Your review and comments are part of an overall plan preparation which needs to be completed by August 19, 1988. If you need further information or assistance, please call me at 438-1161. Thank you very much for your assistance. STEVEN C. JANTZ Associate Engineer SCJ:af Enclosure c: Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Brian Hunter, Associate Planner 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE M^JW-jB TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 W^HU^M (619)438-1161 0f PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 16, 1988 Mr. John Blair, Superintendent Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: ZONE 9 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Mr. Blair: The City of Carlsbad is currently undertaking the second phase of its Growth Management Program. This phase includes the preparation and review of Local Facilities Management Plans for each of the 25 Local Facilities Management Zones within the City. As part of the formal preparation and review process, your district is being asked to review the buildout and phasing assumptions of the plans to determine whether the information is consistent with your district's planning and programming of school facilities. Specifically, the City's Growth Management Program requires the adopted performance standard for school facilities be continually met as growth occurs in Carlsbad. Attached, you will find your review: 1. The adopted performance standard for school facilities 2. Draft buildout assumptions for Zone 9 3. Draft phasing assumptions for Zone 9 Could you please review this information to determine three things. First, is the information correct? Second, can your district provide school facilities according to the phasing assumptions presented in the plan and consistent with Carlsbad's adopted performance standard? And third, what means of monitoring demand for and supply of school facilities would be appropriate to establish between your district and the City of Carlsbad? We would appreciate a letter indicating your findings and any comments regarding the processing of Local Facilities Management Plans. Mr. John Blair August 16, 1988 Page Two As you presently have Zones 20 and 22 in your possession and have previously reviewed Zones 4 and 19, this submittal provides you with everything in the Southwest Quandrant undergoing review at this time. Your review and comments are part of an overall plan preparation which needs to be completed by August 30, 1988. If you need further information or assistance, please call me at 438-1161. Thank you very much for your assistance. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Senior Planner BHraf Enclosure c: Phil Carter SAMMIS Building Better Environments November 18, 1988 Mr. Phil Carter CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008-4859 RE: SOUTHWEST QUADRANT DWELLING UNIT CAP Dear Phil: In a meeting a couple of weeks ago which we had with Marty Orenyak, Michael Holtzmiller and Charlie Grimm, an issue concerning B.L.E.P. Planning Area A reverting to residential came up in the meeting. Michael Holtzmiller spoke up and said that the southwest quadrant dwelling units had all been spoken for, and that we had no more dwelling units in which to place in that ringroad if education did not come through and residential was seen to be the only compatible use for this area. During the past week, I have been discussing this cap rate in the southwest quadrant with several planners there at the City, including Brian Hunter. With the information he has given me and the Zone 9 information that we currently have, it looks as though there are 771 units (approximately) that are not spoken for, and even if Zone 21 and Zone 23 come in and increase the amount of dwelling units that your city wide research had originally shown, even if they increase it may be 5% to 10% that there are still going to be approximately 623 left unspoken for. Some of these units could be units placed in our project, and in our discussions with planning staff, we would like to bring this issue to bear and see if the concerns the Planning Staff have about building out Area A as residential without affecting our other planning areas could be considered. 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100, San Diego, California 92108 (619) 298-7112 Mr. Phil Carter Page Two Would you please look into this and respond? I would appreciate any help you can give me in this matter. Thank you. Please see attached sheet for southwest quadrant dwelling unit analysis with respect to dwelling unit capacity. Sincerely,\wm Jonathan W. Delling cc: Don Sammis Roger Anderson Michel Barton Bob Breunig Marty Orenyak Michael Holtzmiller Charlie Grimm Brian Hunter CITY OF CARLSBAD DWELLING UNIT ANALYSIS SOUTHWEST QUADRANT VS. CITY ACREAGE SUMMARY AND YIELD CONTROL CALCULATIONS Citywide Growth Management Program Southwest Quadrant D.U. Cap: 12,859 Current Zone Facility Management Plans (Adopted or Almost Adopted) ZONE 4 9 19 20 21 22 23 D.U. 3,065 910 3,272 2,491 * 860 + * 10,604 *21 *23 885 599 1,484 * Calc. based on City of Carlsbad acreage summary and yield control factor (See attached sheets). - 12,088 + 771 unspoken For D.U. in this Southwest Quadrant + 10,604 12,088 -"_ „ Prepared Sept. 1986 by: i-f ,*"*"'""' "71 - - "" , ' Research/Analysis Group i ,* x%'>lV-^% ' * '« • *. „,_ t (619) 438-5618 • v --CECITY 'OF CARLSBAD """ "' - V > '^r.^<V^r>nt A?%ZONE 21s- *"' " v, - V > GENERAL PLAN f< \ \ *" "' <--^' 100% " 25%-40% LAND USE DESIGNATION ^ "- ^" GROSS CONSTRAINED SLOPE- NET RESIDENTIAL:- ~ '^ " ' - RL RLM RM RMH RH : Low Density (0-1.5) ^Low-Med Density (0-4) Medium Density (4-8) Med-Hi Density ( 8-15 ) High Density (15-23) - -127.8 . 116.4 „ - .___ — — — -S _ 244.2 ,t > ^ *•* ""* * J. S, ™* 8.3 x ,~ ' 12.1 26.6-1 5.8 ™" "* f — — -3 A Q "'"I *7 OO *» • «7 X / • 17 _ i i -a c *^'z sufc^ 86. 9x-6»<> - «<Zf-' - f AM- 200.4^-— .. -rf"**^ _ K.COMMERCIAL: " - \ ; ' CBD , Central Bus. District '• • - •:;,-- C Community ' V 3,2 0.0 y 3.2 N .,•'=: Neighborhood . ~ > " - - " - RC ;.•• Recreation .'....','•.;"" "•' :.•'."•"'•:..:'^ :: ; ,• • .- -:T.. ':•• -"--•:• ."-. - ; TS '; Travel Services ••:"'- . i~ - ••••.- '''•'";-:':--'-:•..- ^, , * 0 Professional & Related v - , ;v-. y : RREV Extensive Reg11 .Retail; i --• ;-V:- - - " - ~" :':RRI ^Intensive Reg'1 Retail'-: .- - _- "/_ ^ , • ^ ' '•^'RS.^^.' Regional:" Service'.. • .:.',;.^%- x .",'..•'.-. ,-,-•:.': :.:-'-r.^-..'•-• --«, - .-. ~ ::' -- ;' :•> ,V-/.:V- •'.:,• . . I-/"/' ••-••;...; '-^ 3.2 0.0 . • " - - 3.2 INDUSTRIAL: .••-.. . / • •-. •.-'•. ; PI :;;• Planned Industrial '0.0 0.0 - ' 0.0 : Elementary School . : : 10.0 ; - ^x 1.2 ,' * 8.8 ;:;junior High School - ^;:;" , -' : ;--;^: - ' *" * - /H r/^'High' School;-:/:': •":;S;'"^;-^-r-:;j'v--r V;'~/\--;-:~";'o./:::./;":.- . . »v ' _ ;HC ^continuation School>:;;^ ;,!-" 7? ^ - ^~ ~ '"7 _ --". :P:-;-. Private School" '" ; •';.-; f'v '/-,--.'• -7 '::'';' -''"'-' :- " ' ~ , G 'Governmental Facility - - ' - U 'T Public Utilities --•'; - NRR Non-Resid11 Reserve OS Open Space ' ,. - - RR Railroad - " ., "- , "-FW..;,-;'• Freeway AJ Major Arterial IN. Minor Arterial /- OL Collector Street ''.;'-' ''''•' ' ' " ' : AL -."" ::: .= .,,.-.1.0. •.•'..'•;",;';.• : 20.8, ; 268.2 , i.o 9 .8 ' ' V--':- ' '12.0 . ' 1, 46.9 0.0r, ; ~: . o.o ** -t w • / ' 8.8 212.4 ASSUMPTIONS: ., .1) 100% constrained acres include Riparian areas, transmission lineeasements, slopes greater than 40%, and major Broadways. ;:;-, - ,' / . 2) . Residential: Net acres - assumes City Council '•adopts Hillside Ord.~ , y/ (Net * Gross - 100% Constrained - 1/2 of 25-40%j^lope).^4-v^: ' - C" 3) Non-Residential: Net acres = Gross acresl-f, 100% 'Constrained." ^ GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CITY OF CARLSBAD ZONE 23 ACREAGE SUMMARY Prepared Sept. 1935 by. Research/Analysis Group (619) 438-5518 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION GROSS 100% 25%-40% CONSTRAINED SLOPE NET RESIDENTIAL: . ~ . RL Low Density (0-1.5) RLM Low-Med Density (0-4) RM Medium Density (4-8) RMH Med-Hi Density.(8-15) RH High Density (15-23) COMMERCIAL: CBD Central Bus." District C Community N Neighborhood RC Recreation TS Travel Services O Professional & Related ,RRE Extensive Reg'l Retail RRI Intensive Reg'l Retail RS Regional Service INDUSTRIAL: PI Planned Industrial OTHER: E "Elementary School J Junior High School H ; High School HC Continuation School P Private School G Governmental Facility U Public Utilities NRR Non-Resid'l Reserve OS Open Space RR Railroad FW Freeway MAJ Major Arterial MIN Minor Arterial COL Collector Street TOTAL 96.1 96.1 92.3 94.2 186.5 0.0 0.3 0.3 282.9 34.7 34.7 33.3 34.0 67.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 102.3 18.7 18.7 52.1 y//.£= P,V.52.1 59.0 60.2 119.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 :====== 171.3 ASSUMPTIONS: , J . ...1) 100% constrained acres include Riparian areas, transmission lineeasements, slopes greater than 40%, and major roadways. 2) Residential: Net acres - assumes City Council adopts Hillside Ord.V; (Net - Gross - 100% Constrained - 1/2 of 25-40% Slope). "' ,">' l ' - -~3) Non-Residential: Net acres = Gross acres - 100% Constrained. 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE mJfW~A • TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 ' - (619)438-1161 PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 28, 1988 Jonathan W. Del ling Sammis Properties, Inc. 2650 Camino Rio North, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92108 Dear Mr. Del ling: The purpose of this letter is to respond to your November 18, 1988 correspondence regarding the Southwest Quadrant residential dwelling unit cap. Let me begin by explaining how the residential dwelling unit caps were established in the City of Carlsbad. On November 4, 1986 the citizens of Carlsbad voted for a City Council sponsored ballot measure Proposition E. This measure locked in the ultimate number of residential dwelling units which could be constructed in each of the City's four quadrants. The measure also established for each residential land use designation a corresponding Growth Control Point. These Growth Control Points are to be used in determining the ultimate amount of residential development to be allowed after excluding environmentally and sensitive lands from density calculations. The net average in each residential land use designation is multiplied by the Growth Control Point to establish the maximum potential residential dwelling units allowed. Finally, the measure also formally put in place the City's Growth Management Program and Public Facilities Performance Standards. As a result of the adoption of Proposition E, City staff is now required to make specific findings for all residential projects in the City so as to ensure they comply with the provisions of this measure. The Southwest Quadrant cap was established at 12,859 dwelling units. As part of the Growth Management Program, Local Facilities Management Plans are required to be prepared and adopted in each Local Facility Management Zone before any new development projects may be approved. Each Local Facilities Management Plan addresses the maximum development potential, both residential and nonresidential, of the zone. This is required to ensure that the ultimate residential development within the zone can comply with the dwelling unit caps established within that quadrant. It is also required as an extra measure to ensure that an adequate level of public facilities can be provided as growth occurs to maintain conformance with the City's adopted Public Facilities Performance Standards. During the establishment of the Growth Management Program, staff utilized the Batiquitos Lagoon Educational Park Master Plan to establish the ultimate amount J. Del ling November 28, 1988 Page 2 of development which could occur within Zone 9. Similar residential and nonresidential buildout projections were made for all other zones within the Southwest Quadrant and the remainder of the City. At the present time there are two management zones that do not have confirmed residential buildout numbers within the Southwest Quadrant. Until such time as the Local Facilities Management Plans are prepared and adopted for these areas within the Southwest Quadrant and their subsequent residential buildout numbers are confirmed, staff is unable to recommend that additional residential units be allocated to any management zone within the Southwest Quadrant. It is premature to assume that there will be additional residential units available once all of these Local Facilities Management Plans have been prepared and adopted. In your letter of November 18, 1988 you referenced the potential for 600 available dwelling units within the quadrant assuming that Zones 21 and 23 buildout as projected on the City's current land use information. However, your calculations did not include that portion of Zone 6 which is in the Southwest Quadrant. At the present time there are 407 existing dwelling units within that area as well as a projected future buildout of an additional 192 units. In total there could be an additional 599 units which were not included within your calculations. In other words, the assumption that additional residential units will be available in the Southwest Quadrant cannot be confirmed at this time. In fact, it appears that the residential dwelling units which could be available in the future will be extremely small. Again, under the provisions of the City's Growth Management Program and to ensure that the provisions of Proposition E, concerning the residential dwelling unit caps established within each of the four City quadrants, staff cannot at this time recommend increasing residential density or assuming additional residential units will be available in the Southwest Quadrant. Staff will be unable to make any recommendation regarding available units until such time as each Local Facilities Management Plan has been prepared and adopted within the quadrant. It should be noted that under the provisions of Proposition E and the Growth Management Program, the City is not obligated to allocate the ultimate residential dwelling unit cap projected within the Proposition. Once all of the Local Facilities Management Plans have been adopted then staff will be able to determine if additional units may be available within the quadrant. It has been staff's intent since the establishment of the program that should additional residential dwelling units become available in any quadrant of the City that these units only be utilized if a significant public benefit could be gained or provided by the developer requesting additional dwelling units above that allowed by the City's Growth Control Points. J. Dell ing November 28, 1988 Page 3 In conclusion, I apologize for the length of my response, however, a great deal of background and information was necessary to accurately address your inquiry. Again at this time staff is unable to determine whether or not additional units will be available within the Southwest Quadrant of the City. Based upon our present calculations the numbers are extremely tight in the Southwest Quadrant. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, PHILIP 0. 'CARTER Assistant to the City Manager cc: Ray Patchett Marty Orenyak Michael Holzmiller Brian Hunter * SAM MIS December 12, 1988 Building Better Environments Mr. Brian Hunter CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Zone 9 Processing - Request for extension Dear Mr. Hunter, We wish to request a 90 day extension to the 6 month plan processing limit for our Zone 9 Facilities Management Plan. Sincerely, SAMMIS PROPERTIES Jonathan W. Delling CC: Roger Anderson 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100, San Diego, California 92108 (619) 298-7112 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE •JJ'TB7 J)M TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 wHf/^M (619)438-1161 of PLANNING DEPARTMENT December 19, 1988 Jon Gelling Sammis Properties 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100 San Diego, Ca 92108 Dear Mr. Del ling: City staff have completed the department head review of the Zone 9 Local Facilities Management Plan. Generally the comments generated regarding the plan are of a format nature. Completion of the following corrections should allow the plan to move forward toward public hearing: 1. Compare your plan's format on a page by page basis to Zone 8. 2. Include addresses/phone numbers of persons responsible for preparation of zone plan as second page. 3. Delete 12/21/88 hearing date. 4. Page 1, page number exhibits. 5. Pages 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etc. have typos, misused words, and words left out or repeated. Please read the plan and compare to Zone 8 for corrections. 6. Page 7; delete 2nd sentence in 6 starting with "For example, commercial..." 7. Exhibit 1 does not identify Zone 13. 8. Exhibit 2; change "proposed" to "future" in circulation - Revise to Zone 8 format. 9. Exhibit 3; line up yes's and no's. Delete verbage after yes for 7, 8 and 9. 10. Page 11; make General Conditions an exhibit. Correct #6 to read as in Zone 8. 11. Page 13; make Special Conditions an exhibit. Wastewater should read "...through the year 2000." 1. Separate and/to. Delete 3 through 5. 6 then becomes 3. 12. Page 14; use conditions from drainage and circulation section. 13. Page 15; use conditions from sewer and water sections. 14. Page 16; Finances should read "Financing". Add "...and a discussion of the LFMP's impact on City finances." 15. Exhibit 4; see comment #7. 16. Page 19; page number for exhibit, please. Poinsettia Village is TS/C = Travel Service/Commercial. J. Dell ing December 19, 1988 Page 2 17. Page 22; see comment above. 18. Page 24; first paragraph, colon rather than period at end. Under existing land uses, delete third sentence. Use another designation rather than parentheses for inclusion of Avenida Encinas. 19. Page 25; Ac should read acres. 20. Page 26; DU's should read Dwelling Units. Floor area should indicate square feet. 21. Page 26; explain nonresidential square footage. 22. Page 28; line up phasing purposes format. 23. Page 32; Zone 22 adopted December 13, 1988, City Council Resolution No. 88-428, expect Zone 24 adoption date of 12/20/88. 24. Page 36; see comment #7. 25. Page 37; format same as Zone 8. *Year to year. 26. Page 38; typo "administrative". 27. Page 39; "if" should read "of". 28. Page 41; "general" should read "generate". 2006, not 2005. Special Condition "...until the performance standard is achieved". "Tis" should read "is". 29. Delete Exhibit 16, page 43. 30. Page 45; see comment #7. 31. Page 46; format same as Zone 8. 32. Page 47; 1992, 1 should be I. 33. Page 48; line up Council actions. Appendix H - 58,000 square foot. 34. Center Exhibit 19, page 49. 35. Delete Exhibit 20, page 50. 36. Page 52; "by" should read "at". Note 1 belongs next to 1.20. 2 belongs under capacity adjusted. 3 under existing flow. 37. Page 54; $360,000. 38. Page 55; phasing 1992. Adequacy in 1988. 39. Exhibit 23, page 56; Encina expansion 1992. Type "assumed". Carlsbad flow at 220 gal/edu confusing. 40. Page 57; delete first two sentences second paragraph. 41. Page 58; change "Plans" to "Funds". 42. Parks; If the CIP is revised prior to plan going to public hearing, parks section will reflect those changes. 43. Exhibit 26, page 61; see comment #7. Where is dot for Stagecoach? 44. Page 64; parentheses (inadequacy). Park District 3, last sentence, third paragraph. 45. Page 65; mitigation, capitalize Zone and transposed park land. 46. Drainage, Circulation, Sewer, and Water corrections to be provided by Mr. Jantz. 47. Page 102; reword mitigation similar to Zone 8. 48. Open Space; reword similar to Zone 8. Delete inventory, phasing, exhibit, etc. 49. Exhibit 49, page 107; see comment #7. 50. Page 109; second paragraph, fourth sentence, delete "the". 51. Page 110; second paragraph, third sentence, sites. 52. Financing; reformat similar to Zone 8. 53. Plan will be updated 1/1/89 to reflect 1988 building activity throughout City. 0. Del ling December 19, 1988 Page 3 With your next resubmittal, please provide a WordPerfect (Version 5.0) compatible disk of the plan. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding our comments, do not hesitate to contact Don Rideout at 438-1161. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Senior Planner c: Zone 9 Property Owners Philip 0. Carter - Assistant to the City Manager Don Rideout - Senior Management Analyst Seven C. Jantz - Associate Civil Engineer City of Carlsbad Community Development January 19, 1989 Robert J. Greaney Costa Real Municipal Water District 5950 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. Greaney: Attached for your review is the Zone 9 Local Facilities Management Plan Water section. Please comment on the information contained in this section and return to City staff so that the Districts conditions can be incorporated into the final Zone Plan document. Your review and comments are part of an overall plan preparation which needs to be completed by January 27, 1989. If you need further information or assistance, please call me at 438-1161. Thank you for your time and effort. STEVEN C. JANTZ Associate Civil Engineer bjn c:Brian Hunter, Senior Planner Don Rideout, Senior Management Analyst 2075 Las Palmas Drive-Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859»(619) 438-1161 SAM MIS Building Better Environments January 16, 1989 Don Rideout CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, CA 92008 Don, For your committee's review I am sending you three final draft copies of the Zone 9 Local Facilites Management Plan with the following two revision yet to come: 1) O'Day Consulting has been notified that several of their Exhibits are unacceptable. The proper revisions are being made by their office. 2) The copies submitted today have been reproduced in- house. Final presentation will be done by East Mission Valley Copy. Thank you for your continued support. We look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, SAMMIS PROPERTIES Jon Delling 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100, San Diego, California 92108 (619) 298-7112 SAM MIS Building Better Environments MEMO DATE: January 4, 1989 TO: Don Sammis Roger Anderson FROM: Jon Dellin RE: BLEP Education Extension Request Delay Implications on Zone 9 FMP Approval Phil Carter of the City of Carlsbad informed me that due to the expiration of our Master Plan with respect to education and our extension request for same not being approved as yet, the City Staff cannot bring the Zone Plan forward for approval to the Planning Commission until the extension request has been approved. It it is in our best interest to get the extension request resolved quickly due to the Zone Plan being ready to go to the Planning Commission by the end of this month. CC: Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Planner 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100, San Diego, California 92108 (619) 298-7112 City of Carlsbad Office of the City Manager January 27, 1989 Mr. Roger Anderson SAMMIS PROPERTIES 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92108 Dear Mr. Anderson: The purpose of this letter is to respond to your January 20, 1989 correspondence concerning park reimbursements. In your letter you indicated: " In previous conversations with city staff, we were informed that the City would reimburse us immediately upon collection of the Park-In-Lieu from other developers in the quadrant". To my knowledge no one from City staff has made this statement to you or any member of your staff. If you can document this statement, please do so. As indicated in my correspondence to you on January 17, 1989, numerous Sammis employees, including Michel Barton, Katrina Butts, Jon Dell ing and yourself as well as two other employees whose names I do not know over the last six months have called or met with staff regarding this issue and have been informed as to how Sammis would be reimbursed. The explanation provided by staff has remained consistent and was detailed to you in my letter of January 17, 1989, which is attached to this letter. The agreement entered into between Sammis Properties and the City does not specify a time schedule for reimbursement. Therefore, you have been informed that your reimbursement will be made in accordance with the policies adopted within the City's Growth Management Program and more specifically defined in the City's Capital Improvement Program. Based upon the proposed CIP, which will be considered for adoption by the City Council on February 7, 1989, this reimbursement will occur sometime after the year 1998. 12OO Elm Avenue • Carlsbad, California 92OO8-1989 • (619) 43-4-2821 January 27, 1989 ROGER ANDERSON/SAMMIS PROPERTIES Page 2 Again, staff has been consistently clear with all Sammis employees when asked how the parks reimbursement would take place. If you do not agree with this interpretation by staff, you have the ability to petition the City Council in writing to request them to make a determination regarding this issue. Sincerely, PHILIP 0. CARTER Assistant to the City Manager saf c: Ray Patchett, City Manager Marty Orenyak, Community Development Director Frank Mannen, Assistant City Manager Dave Bradstreet, Parks and Recreation Director Don Rideout, Sr. Management Analyst/Growth Management Division Brian Hunter/Growth Management Division Donald Sammis, Sammis Properties c:\wp\phil\sammis 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE mJwjm TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 W^i^W (619)438-1161 PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 17, 1989 Mr. Roger Anderson SAMMIS 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100 San Diego, California 92108 Dear Mr. Anderson: The purpose of this letter is to formally respond to your request concerning park reimbursements owed to Sammis. This information has been given to you and numerous staff members over the past few months. As discussed, the Parks Agreement executed between the City of Carlsbad and Sammis Properties on August 12, 1986 clearly identifies how Sammis will be reimbursed for its park funds paid above that required as part of the Master Plan. Section 3 of that agreement, Reimbursement, indicates: "Sammis shall be reimbursed for park-in-lieu fees collected in the Southwest Quadrant of the City for the amount of land dedicated which is in excess of the park land dedication requirement for the BLEP as determined pursuant to this agreement and the appropriate provisions of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, eg. 10 acres, (dedicated) minus 3.95 acres (obligation) equals 6.05 acres (reimbursable acreage). Reimbursement shall paid for park-in-lieu fees collected as follows: the City shall collect from subdividers within the Southwest Quadrant (except for subdividers within BLEP), fees in lieu of park land dedication pursuant to provisions of Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code in effect at the time fees are collected. Fees collected shall then be paid over to Sammis less 3% administrative charge which shall be retained by the City to cover the cost of administering this agreement. The amount of the remaining land for which Sammis receives reimbursement shall be reduced in an amount equal to the amount of land which otherwise would have been required to be dedicated for the subdivision paying the fees. The reimbursement shall continue until the balance of the land for which reimbursement is owed is zero acres. If after 15 years, Sammis has not been reimbursed out of park-in-lieu fees collected from the Southwest Quadrant of the City, the City shall then reimburse Sammis for park-in-lieu fees collected in the remainder of the City." Mr. Roger Anderson January 17, 1989 Page Two In accordance with this provision in the adopted Parks Agreement, the City shall reimburse Sammis Properties in accordance with its adopted Capital Improvement Program. This method of reimbursement is an integral part of the City's Growth Management Program and has been explained previously. Your request for interest to be paid on the funds provided in excess to the City were not discussed nor included in the Parks Agreement. Therefore, no time value of money will be included in the City's reimbursement to Sammis. The Growth Management Program clearly identifies how the City will reimburse developers who go ahead of our Capital Improvement Program. The program specifically identifies that no interest will be paid to property owners who advance funds to the City. Again, we have discussed this numerous times and I hope this letter clarifies the City's position concerning your request. Sincerely, PHILIP 0. CARTER Assistant to the City Manager c: Marty Orenyak Ray Patchett Jim Elliott Michael Holzmiller Dave Bradstreet Frank Mannen SAMMIS Building Better Environments November 9, 1988 Mr. Phil Carter CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Phil: In reviewing our agreement with the City, we recognize that we are to be reimbursed for park fees that were paid in excess of the park requirement by way of collections of subsequent developments in our quadrant. Although our fees are to be reimbursed as development occurs in our quadrant, there is no specific requirement of the City as to when they will pay Sammis after collection from subsequent developers. Although the City has indicated to us that they do not intend to hold our money, we believe there should be some clarification at this point that we would be reimbursed immediately upon the collection of funds from developers in our quadrant. Also, we feel since we are advancing approximately $605,000 in excess of our park fee requirement, that developers in our quadrant should not only reimburse us for the fees advanced but, also for time value of our payment. That $605,000 will cost Sammis approximately $60,000 a year in interest as long as it remains unpaid and it seems equitable that either we be paid interest on our dollars by subsequent devlopers or that the real estate delivered to the Park and Recreation Department acquired with our park fees be re-appraised and the developers be required to reimburse us for fair market value. Very truly yours, SAMMIS PROPERTI] Roger D. Anderson Project Manager cc: Jim Elliott 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100, San Diego, California 92108 (619) 298-7112 January 24, 1989 TO: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FROM SAMMIS, DATED JANUARY 20, 1989 It is my understanding that the City of Carlsbad has an obligation to reimburse Sammis for their portion of the $1 million letter of credit that was recently drawn down. Further, the amount to be reimbursed to Sammis will vary depending on the actual acquisition cost for land in the Alta Mira Park area. My understanding of the City's obligation to Sammis is as follows. The City has an obligation to collect park-in-lieu fees from developers within the southwest quadrant who have not dedicated adequate park land. These fees are used within the capital improvement program to pay for the acquisition of land in the Alta Mira area and development of parks in the Zone 19 area. To the extent that the City has funds available, the City may reimburse Sammis Properties for the amount due under the contract. In the current CIP, reimbursement in the amount of $540,000 is shown in 1992-93. Even at this time the estimated cash flow shows that the City may not have adequate funds to totally repay the amount due Sammis at that time. If by 1992-93 adequate funds are,not,.avail able, repayment to Sammis may be made in a series of payments as opposed to one single lump s'um payment. ;t t The contract itself stipulates no precise time for repayment of this loan. Therefore, our position that it is at the City's option based on the City's ability to pay rather than upon demand by Sammis. In addition, the City has no obligation to pay any interest or carrying costs associated with these funds. These additional costs are to be borne by the developer as a cost for developing in advance of the City's ability to provide parks that meet growth management standards. I'd be happy to meet with you and representatives of Sammis if necessary to clarify this issue. SAM MIS Building Better Environments January 20, 1989 Phil Carter Assistant to the City Manager 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 Dear Phil: Regarding you response to our request concerning park fee reimbursement owed to Sammis Properties, which amounts to roughly $605,000, you cited a section from our parks agreement to wit: "Reimbursement shall be paid for park-in-lieu fees collected as follows: the City shall collect from subdividers in within the Southwest Quadrant (except for subdividers within BLEP) , fees in lieu of park land dedication pursuant to provisions of Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code in effect at the time fees are collected. Fees collected shall then be paid over to Sammis less 3% administrative charge which shall be retained by the City to cover the cost of administering this agreement." In previous conversations with City staff we were informed that the City would reimburse us immediately upon collection of park-in-lieu from other developers in our quadrant. However, in our most recent conversation you informed me that the city felt that it was under no obligation to reimburse us immediately upon the collection of the fees and that it could take between ten and fifteen years for our reimbursement. This is certainly not acceptable to us and we do not believe it is within the spirit of our agreement for advancing these funds. 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100, San Diego, California 92108 (619) 298-7112 Mr. Phil Carter January 20, 1989 Page Two Please provide us with a more definitive response as to when we can expect reimbursement after your collection of park fees. Your immediate attention would be appreciated. Sine Roger Anderson Project Manager CC: Don Sammis Marty Orenyak Ray Patchett Jim Elliott Michael Holzmiller Dave Bradstreet Frank Mannen 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE •JwlsM TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 W^NMW (619)438-1161 Cttg of PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 17, 1989 Mr. Roger Anderson SAMMIS 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100 San Diego, California 92108 Dear Mr. Anderson: The purpose of this letter is to formally respond to your request concerning park reimbursements owed to Sammis. This information has been given to you and numerous staff members over the past few months. As discussed, the Parks Agreement executed between the City of Carlsbad and Sammis Properties on August 12, 1986 clearly identifies how Sammis will be reimbursed for its park funds paid above that required as part of the Master Plan. Section 3 of that agreement, Reimbursement, indicates: "Sammis shall be reimbursed for park-in-lieu fees collected in the Southwest Quadrant of the City for the amount of land dedicated which is in excess of the park land dedication requirement for the BLEP as determined pursuant to this agreement and the appropriate provisions of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, eg. 10 acres, (dedicated) minus 3.95 acres (obligation) equals 6.05 acres (reimbursable acreage). Reimbursement shall paid for park-in-lieu fees collected as follows: the City shall collect from subdividers in within the Southwest Quadrant (except for subdividers within BLEP), fees in lieu of park land dedication pursuant to provisions of Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code in effect at the time fees are collected. Fees collected shall then be paid over to Sammis less 3% administrative charge which shall be retained by the City to cover the cost of administering this agreement. The amount of the remaining land for which Sammis receives reimbursement shall be reduced in an amount equal to the amount of land which otherwise would have been required to be dedicated for the subdivision paying the fees. The reimbursement shall continue until the balance of the land for which reimbursement is owed is zero acres. If after 15 years, Sammis has not been reimbursed out of park-in-lieu fees collected from the Southwest Quadrant of the City, the City shall then reimburse Sammis for park-in-lieu fees collected in the remainder of the City." Mr. Roger Anderson January 17, 1989 Page Two In accordance with this provision in the adopted Parks Agreement, the City shall reimburse Sammis Properties in accordance with its adopted Capital Improvement Program. This method of reimbursement is an integral part of the City's Growth Management Program and has been explained previously. Your request for interest to be paid on the funds provided in excess to the City were not discussed nor included in the Parks Agreement. Therefore, no time value of money will be included in the City's reimbursement to Sammis. The Growth Management Program clearly identifies how the City will reimburse developers who go ahead of our Capital Improvement Program. The program specifically identifies that no interest will be paid to property owners who advance funds to the City. Again, we have discussed this numerous times and I hope this letter clarifies the City's position concerning your request. Sincerely, PHILIP 0. CARTER Assistant to the City Manager c: Marty Orenyak Ray Patchett Jim Elliott Michael Holzmiller Dave Bradstreet Frank Mannen SAMMIS Building Better Environments November 9, 1988 Mr. Phil Carter CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, CA 92009 Dear Phil: In reviewing our agreement with the City, we recognize that we are to be reimbursed for park fees that were paid in excess of the park requirement by way of collections of subsequent developments in our quadrant. Although our fees are to be reimbursed as development occurs in our quadrant, there is no specific requirement of the City as to when they will pay Sammis after collection from subsequent developers. Although the City has indicated to us that they do not intend to hold our money, we believe there should be some clarification at this point that we would be reimbursed immediately upon the collection of funds from developers in our quadrant. Also, we feel since we are advancing approximately $605,000 in excess of our park fee requirement, that developers in our quadrant should not only reimburse us for the fees advanced but, also for time value of our payment. That $605,000 will cost Sammis approximately $60,000 a year in interest as long as it remains unpaid and it seems equitable that either we be paid interest on our dollars by subsequent devlopers or that the real estate delivered to the Park and Recreation Department acquired with our park fees be re-appraised and the developers be required to reimburse us for fair market value. Very truly yours, SAMMIS PROPERTIES Roger D. Anderson Project Manager cc: Jim Elliott 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100, San Diego, California 92108 (619) 298-7112 January 18, 1989 TO: DON RIDEOUT PHIL CARTER FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR ZONE 9 SEWER LIFT STATION I have spent some time considering the options available to us for having the homeowners in Zone 9 pay for the necessary sewer lift station. Although the three alternatives you list on your memo of January 6th are possibilities, each of these leaves the City of Carlsbad responsible for the maintenance of the lift station and for the collection of an unknown amount of funds from an unknown group of landowners. Another alternative might be for the City to assign maintenance of the lift station to the homeowners association or landowners of the area with the City Utilities/Maintenance Department providing supervision. This method would cause the bills for power and the maintenance to go directly to the homeowners association rather than to the City and then to the homeowners through an assessment or invoicing procedure. We should discuss this concept with Ralph Anderson to see if he sees any difficulty with a privately owned sewer lift station being operated within the City's sewer system. I am available at your convenience to discuss this with Ralph. AMES F. ELLIOTT January 6, 1989 TO; Jim Elliott, Finance Director FROM; Phil Carter ^7 T)^ SUBJ; Zone 9 Sewer Question Zone 9 will be required to pay operations and maintenance costs in perpetuity for a new sewer pump station to serve that zone. Annual costs are estimated to be $16,000. Your opinion is requested as to the best mechanism for collecting these funds from the property owners. Several alternatives come to mind, including: - Requiring the developers to provide guaranteed funding up-front (a trust fund) - Establishing an assessment district specifically for this purpose - Charging the individual homeowners via their monthly city utilities bills There may also be other methods which could be considered. Since this is the first time we have conditioned someone to pay operations and maintenance costs in perpetuity, we would like to establish a mechanism that could be readily applied to any future cases. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. PC:mh DECEMBER 13, 1988 TO: MARTY ORENYAK MICHAEL HOLZMILLER LLOYD HUBBS FROM: PHIL CARTER ZONE 9 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN The Zone 9 Plan was accepted July 12, 1988 for technical review. The Plan is almost complete and we need to discuss how to process it in conjunction with the Master Plan revision. A meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, December 20, 1988 at 11:00 a.m. in Marty's office to discuss this further. Call me if you have any questions. c: Don Rideout Brian Hunter Steve Jantz City of Carlsbad—j. ^^_____^^_|_^^^_^^_._^__._|->^___^^___|__^^^^^^^^^ Planning Department August 8, 1989 Fred G. Delaney Delaney Properties 2398 San Diego Avenue San Diego, CA 92110 RE: Poinsettia Village Dear Mr. Delaney: At the July 11, 1989 City Council meeting the Local Facilities Management Plan was adopted for Zone 9. While your project was exempt from the requirement to prepare a Local Facilities Management Plan prior to issuance of building permits, with the adoption of the Zone 9 plan all pertinent conditions must now be satisfied. Of specific concern to your project is the requirement for a comprehensive financing program guaranteeing the construction of circulation facilities prior to issuance of building permits. We will be scheduling a meeting in the near future to discuss with yourself and representatives of the Batiquitos Lagoon Educational Project the financing program. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Senior Planner BH:af c: Philip O. Carter - Assistant to the City Manager Adrienne Landers - Senior Planner Don Rideout - Senior Management Analyst Steven C. Jantz - Associate Civil Engineer 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (619) 438-1161 City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 2B, 1989 Dear Property Owner: On Tuesday, July 11, 1989, the Carlsbad City Council will consider the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 9. The meeting will take place in the Council Chambers, 12QQ Elm Avenue, beginning at 6:00 p.m. This Local Facilities Management Plan has already been heard by the Planning Commission, which recommended approval. This item will be a public hearing before the City Council. Any interested person may appear and speak on the item. If you have any questions prior to the hearing, please call me at 438-1161. Sincerely, DON RIDEOUT Senior Management Analyst DR:af 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (619) 438-1161 ±£d: * /^xL&iL; <j-*> City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 28, 1989 Mr. John Dell ing Sammis Properties 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92108 RE: MODIFICATION TO DWELLING UNITS UPON LOTS 20. 21 and 22 OF THE BATIQUITOS LAGOON EDUCATIONAL PARK. Dear Mr. Del ling: I have consulted with City Planning Staff regarding your proposed modifications to dwelling units on Lots 20, 21, and 22 of the Batiquitos Lagoon Educational Park. To summarize, the City is not willing to support either a basement addition to any of the dwelling units or a second story deck upon any of the bluff edge dwelling units. This decision is based upon the recent neighborhood and City controversy surrounding the overbuilt appearance and intensity of development already existing within the developed portions of this Planning Area. It is the City's opinion that any additional increase in building square footage (intensity of development), through the creation of a basement level or second story deck will compromise our efforts to mitigate the intensity of development and visual impacts along this sensitive lagoon bluff edge. Sincere \RTY ORENYAK Community Development c: City Manager Planning Director irector MO:CD/1h sammisl.ltr 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (619) 438-1161 City of Carlsbad Community Development April 24, 1989 Sammis Properties 2650 Camino Del Rio North Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92108 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 9 The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 9 was scheduled to be heard by the Planning Commission on April 19, 1989. However, it has been continued to May 17, 1989. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad at 6 p.m. If you have any questions regarding this item, please call me. Sincerely, DON RIDEOUT Senior Management Analyst bjn p-,inr,s,«5 Drive*Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859»(619) 438-1161 SAM MIS Building Better Environments March 31, 1989 Mr. Don Rideout CITY OF CARLSBAD Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: FINAL ZONE 9 FMP Dear Don: Per your conversation with Bonnie Hulsey of our office, we need only supply a total of 40 final copies for your use. I have also enclosed computer floppys of all text sections and a set of text originals. We understand that these are to be used for both the Planning Commission April 19, and City Council Hearing five weeks later. Thank you for your help in this matter. Sincerely, Jonathan W. Delling cc: Donald F. Sammis 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100, San Diego, California 92108 (619) 298-7112 Fax # (619) 296-0735 SAM MIS Building Better Environments February 24, 1989 BRIAN HUNTER City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 RE: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 9 Dear Mr. Hunter: Sammis Properties withdraws its Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 9 due to the lack of time to complete the plan under state law. It is our intention to resubmit promptly so that processing can continue. It is also our understanding that the plan, when complete, will be scheduled for the next available Planning Commission meeting. Sincerely, JONATHAN W. DELLING Project Manager JD:bh cc: Don Sammis Phil Carter Don Rideout Steven C. Jantz 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100, San Diego, California 92108 (619) 298-7112 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE • f&f j • TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 WT^WJrM (619)438-1161 (Eitg of PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 21, 1989 John Del ling Sammis Properties 2650 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92108 RE: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 9 Dear Mr. Dell ing: Staff review of your 2/16/89 submittal indicates the need for additional proof- reading and correction of the document before a technical analysis may be completed. Unfortunately, the State mandated time limits for processing preclude the completion of the technical analysis prior to scheduling for public hearing. Staff therefore suggests immediately withdrawing the plan so that a recommendation of denial can be avoided. Such a course would not hinder the successful completion of the plan which could be scheduled for the next available public hearing when it is correct. If you have any questions regarding this matter, do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, BRIAN HUNTER Senior Planner BH:af Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Don Rideout, Senior Management Analyst Steven C. Jantz, Associate Civil Engineer STATE OF CALIFORNIA—OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO. CA 95814 Brian Hunter City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 September 22, 1988 Subject: Loca] Facilities Management Plan Zone 9 - SCH# 88082406 Dear: Mr. Hunter: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named environmental document to selected state agencies for review. The state agency review period is now closed and none of the state agencies have comments. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please contact Keith Lee at 916/445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. When contacting the Clearinghouse regarding this matter, please use the eight-digit State Clearinghouse number so that we may respond promptly. Sincerely, ^^-rT/ David C. Nunenkarap Chief Office of Permit Assistance Hail to: State Clearinghouse, i400 ienth Street, Rm. 121, Sacramento, CA 958it -- 916/445-0613 NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FORM | See NOTE Below: | I SCH * I 1. Project Title LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 9 2. Lead Agency: CITY OF CARLSBAD 3a. Street Address: 2075 LAS PALHAS DR. 3. Contact Person: BRIAN HUNTER _ 3b. City: CARLSBAD 3c. County: SAN DIEGO 3d. Zip: PROJECT LOCATION 4. County: SAH DIEGO 92009 3e. Phone: (619) 438-1161 4a. City/Community: CARLSBAD 4b.(optional) Assessor's Parcel No.4c. Section: Tup.Range For Rural, 5a. Cross Streets: AVEN1DA ENCINAS/POINSETTIA 5b. Nearest Community: 6. Within 2 miles of: a. State Hwy No. 1-5 b. Airports PALOHAR/McCELLAN c. Waterways PACIFIC OCEAN 7. DOCUMENT TYPE CEQA 01 NOP 02 Early Cons 03 X Neg Dec 04 Draft EIR 05 Supplement/ Subsequent EIR (if so, prior SCH # ) NEPA 06 Notice of Intent 07 Envir. Assessment/ FONSI 08 Draft EIS OTHER 09 Information Only 10 Final Document 11 Other; 8. LOCAL ACTION TYPE 10. 01 General Plan Update 01 02 New Element 02 03 General Plan Amendment 04 Master Plan 05 Annexation 06 Specific Plan 07 Redevelopment 08 Rezone 05 09 Land Division 06 (Subdivision, Parcel Map. Tract Map, etc.) 07 10 Use Permit 08 DEVELOPMENT TYPE Residential: Units _ Office: Sq. Ft. Acres Employees Acres 03 Shopping/Commercial: Sq.Ft. Acres Employees 04 Industrial: Sq. Ft. Acres Sewer: MGD Water: MGD Employees Transportation: Type Mineral Extraction: Mineral 11 Cancel Ag Preserve 09 Power Generation: Wattage 12 X Other LOCAL FACILITIES Type: MANAGEMENT PLAN 10 X Other: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 9 TOTAL ACRES; 417.7 11. PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT 01 Aesthetic/Visual 02 Agricultural Land 03 Air Quality 10 Minerals 04 Archaeological/Historical/ 11 Noise Paleontological 12 X Public Services 05 Coastal 13 X Schools 06 Fire Hazard 14 Septic Systems 07 X Flooding/Drainage 08 Geologic/Seismic 15 X Sewer Capacity 09 Jobs/Housing Balance 16 Soil Erosion 17 Solid Waste 18 22 X Water Supply 23 Wetland/Riparian 24 Wildlife Toxic/Hazardous 25 Growth Inducing 19 X Traffic/Circulation 26 Incompatible Landuse 20 Vegetation 27 Cumulative Effects 21 Water Quality 28 Other 12 FUNDING (approx.)Federal $-0-State $-0-Total $-0- 13 PRESENT LAND USE AND 20NING:Present land use is agricultural and open space, single family, mobile home, and commercial. Zoning is planned community, open space, mobile home park and commercial. 14 PROJECT DESCRIPTION; Project is a Local Facilities Management Plan which guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development to adopted performance standards. Facilities include City Administration, libraries, fire, parks, open space, schools, water, sewer, drainage and circulation. Date:15. SIGNATURE OF LEAD AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: __£L/±T± NOTE: Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects If a SCH Number already exists for a project (e.g. from a Notice of Preparation or previous draft document) please fill it in. REVIEWING AGENCIES .Resources Agency _Air Resources Board Conservation _X Fish and Game _X_Coastal Commission Caltrans District _X Caltrans - Planning Caltrans - Aeronautics California Highway Patrol Boating and Waterways Forestry State Water Resoruces Control Board - Headquarters Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region Division of Water Rights (SWRCB) Division of Water Quality (SWRCB) Department of Water Resources Reclamation Board Solid Waste Management Board Colorado River Board CTRPA (CalTRPA) TRPA (Tahoe RPA) Bay Conservation & Dev't Comm Parks and Recreation Office of Historic Preservation Native American Heritage Comm State lands Comm Public Utilities Comm Energy Comm Food and Agriculture Health Services Statewide Health Planning (hospitals) Housing and Community Dev't Corrections General Services Office of Local Assistance Public Works Board Office of Appropriate Tech. (OPR) Local Government Unit (OPR) Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Other Date Received at SCH_ Date Review Starts Date to Agencies Date to SCH FOR SCH USE ONLY Catalog Number Proponent Clearance Date Notes: Consultant. Contact Address Phone Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to North Coast Publishers, Inc. corporate offices: P.O. Box 878, Encinitas, CA 92024 (619) 753-6543 Proof of Publication 'APR 1989 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CITY OF CARLSBAD I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: April.7 19??.. NOTICE OP PUBLIC HEARING #20- : 19. 19. 19 19 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on the 7th day of April, 1989 /) /!/ Clerk of the Printer I » ft'ift Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to North Coast Publishers, Inc. corporate offices: P.O. Box 878, Encinitas, CA 92024 (619) 753-6543 -^ , - : Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principa clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Ca ifornia, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: August. 19 1988 .. CJMB7:A««B«tl», 19. 19. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on Tho 19th ^ day of August. WQQz Clerk of the Printer #202-2M-12/87 City of Carlsbad Planning Department County Clerk County of San Diego Attn: Mail Drop C-ll 220 West Broadway San Diego, CA 92101 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION July 12, 1989 Robert D-Zurawalt, Clerk 7/1989 DEPUTY This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad on July 11, 1989, approved the following project: Project Title: Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 9 88082406 Keith lee (916) 445-0613 State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Contact Person Telephone Project Address/Location: West of 1-5, south of Poinsettia Avenue Project Description: Local Facilities Management Plan This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the^ above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at: CITY OF CARLSBAD 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of this project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project. MICHAEL J. HOL1 Planning Director BH:af 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (619) 438-1161 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 TELEPHONE (61 9) 438'1 1 61 of <£arlaira& PLANNING DEPARTMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: Avenida Encinas and Poinsettia Avenue intersection and surrounding 417 acres. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 9 which guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concurrent with development to adopted performance standards. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: August 19, 1988 CASE NO: LFMP 9 APPLICANT: Sammis Properties PUBLISH DATE: August 19, 1988 MICHAEL J. HOC2WILLW Planning Director BH:af ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. LFMP 9 DATE:August 15. 1988 I. BACKGROUND 1. APPLICANT: Sammis Properties 2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: #100. San Dieao. CA 92108 2650 Caitiino Del Rio North (619) 298-7112 August 8. 19883. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) YES MAYBE 1. Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering of modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? NO X YES MAYBE NO 2. Air - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X_ 3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X_ b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X_ d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X_ e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X_ f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X_ g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X_ h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X_ -2- YES MAYBE NO 4. Plant Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X_ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X_ c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X_ d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? x_ 5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X_ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X_ c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? X_ 7. Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare? X_ 8. Land Use - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X. YES MAYBE NO 9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X 10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X 11. Population - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X 12. Housing - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X_ 13. Transportation/Circulation — Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? X_ b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? X_ c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? X_ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X_ e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X_ f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X_ -4- MAYBE NO 14. Public Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? X_ b. Police protection? X_ c. Schools? X_ d. Parks or other recreational facilities? £_ e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X_ f. Other governmental services? X_ 15. Energy - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X_ b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X_ 16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? -5- YES MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view? 19. Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeoloaical/Historical/Paleontological - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. a) The project is a public facility information and planning study. Phased planning will not efficiently or adequately address the need for public facilities. b) The project is a public facility information and planning study. c) The project is a public facility information and planning study. d) Uses for the area covered by the plan are based on the existing General Plan. e) The plan considers phased development. f) The project is a public facility information and planning study. g) As the project is a public facility information and planning study the no project alternative would not assure adequate public facilities to meet demand. The no project alternative would therefore cause the most detriment. -6- YES MAYBE NO 22. Mandatory findings of significance - a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment? ] b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 9 is a facilities planning document. The intent of the plan is to establish parameters and thresholds that assure public facilities are available when needed as determined by the City's adopted performance standards. To accomplish this purpose occasionally locations and costs of public facility improvements are estimated for informational purposes. These estimates may result in increased development fees. Traditionally the developer in maximizing their capital return passes such fees on to the home buyer or tenant. This results in higher priced housing which affects the availability of low and moderate income housing. However, as real estate value is determined primarily by location, without other market incentives, it is unreasonable to assume the subject property would be developed with either low or moderate income housing due to its view proximity to the Pacific Ocean. -7- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) It is not the development fee that will force low and moderate income families into other communities, but the existing nature of the market place. It is recognized that CEQA review for these public facilities estimates is general, and does not satisfy CEQA requirements for the specific project. The Zone 9 Local Facilities Management Plan requires complete CEQA review prior to initialization of any public or private project discussed in the Local Facilities Management Plan. -8- IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. •g^5 Date Signature tihtlm 1 Bate V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable) Planning[Director -9- MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued) VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature -10- APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE: March 24. 1988 STAFF REPORT DATE: MAY 17, 1989 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION'?oC~ SUBJECT: LFMP 9 - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 9 I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 2851 recommending APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution No. 2852 recommending approval of Local Facilities Management Plan 9. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND As shown on Exhibit "A" Zone 9 is located in the southwestern quadrant of the City adjacent to the northwestern edge of Batiquitos Lagoon. As shown on Exhibit "B" Zone 9 is a mixed use zone. While the major General Plan land use is open space (208.3 acres), residential uses total 101.6 acres and commercial uses total 51.8 acres. The remainder of the zone is private school (40.3 acres) and Transportation Corridor. III. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1. Does the proposed Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 9 fulfill the purpose, intent, and specific requirements of Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management Program)? 2. Is the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 9 consistent with and does it implement the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan? DISCUSSION The Growth Management Program requires that a Local Facilities Management Plan be prepared for each Management Zone in order to show how compliance will be maintained with the City's adopted public facility performance standards as development occurs. The first step in this process requires determining the buildout development potential in the zone. The buildout projection for this zone is consistent with the methodology contained in the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and the provisions of Proposition E which was approved by the citizens of Carlsbad on November 4, 1986. LFMP ZONE 9 MAY 17, 1989 PAGE 2 The determination of the buildout development potential is based upon the existing and developing land uses within the zone. All potentially developable land located within Zone 9 has been accounted for under the above categories. The plan phases the buildout development of the zone based on estimates of yearly development activity. The phasing estimate is consistent with generalized phasing assumptions used in the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. From these buildout and phased development projections, yearly phased demands for public facilities may be projected and buildout demands identified. The plan analyzes eleven (11) public facilities. This analysis compares the projected public facility demands with the available and planned supply of public facilities to ensure compliance with the adopted performance standards. Where demands for facilities exceed supply, the plan identifies the necessary mitigation to maintain conformance with the standard. This analysis is consistent with both the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and the Growth Management Program. The following chart provides a brief summary of the eleven public facilities analyzed in the plan. LFMP ZONE 9 MAY 17, 1989 PAGE 3 ZONE 9 PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY CHART As of 4/19/89 City Administrative Facilities Library Wastewater Treatment Capacity Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Water Distribution Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard until 2006. Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard until 2003. Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Park District 3 (southwest quadrant) does not meet the adopted performance standard. Drainage facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures. Circulation facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures. Fire facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Existing open space meets the adopted performance standard. School facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures. Sewer facilities meet the adopted performance standard through buildout of the zone. Water facilities meets the adopted performance standard through buildout of the zone. LFMP ZONE 9 MAY 17, 1989 PAGE 4 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 9 is a public facilities planning document. The plan establishes parameters that ensure Carlsbad's public facility performance standards are met and public facilities inadequacies mitigated to accomplish this goal. The plan for informational purposes occasionally estimates locations and costs of public facility improvements. The plan fully recognizes that complete environmental review will be necessary once specific public facility improvements are established. Therefore, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 9 will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on August 19, 1988. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 2851 and 2852 2. Exhibits - "A" - Citywide Map of Local Facility Management Zones Boundaries "B" - Local Facilities Management Plan - 9 General Plan Land Use Map "C" - Local Facilities Management Plan - 9 Zoning Map 3. Local Facilities Management Plan 9 Dated April 19, 1989 BH:af April 3, 1989