The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMCUP 07-11x1; Callaway Verizon Wireless; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (2)^ CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION P-1 Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov APPUCATIONS APPUED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) Development Pemits (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) Leaislattve Permits CH Administrative Permit Q Coastal Development Pennit (*) Qj Minor (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) tnal Use Perm||U*) linor -^^fedension Q Environmental impact Assessment CD Habitat Management Permit Q Minor • Hillside Deveiopment Pemiit (*) CD Planned Development Pemiit CD Residential CD Non-Residential CD Planned Industrial Permit CD Planning Commission Determination Q Site Development Plan [[D Special Use Permit CD Tentative Tract Map CD Variance FD Administrative CD General Pian Amendment CD Local Coastai Program Amendment (*) CD Master Pian CD Amendment CD Specific Plan CD Amendment CD Zone Ctiange (*) CD Zone Code Amendment Soutfi Carfstocf Coastal Review Area Permits CD Review Permit CD Admin CD Minor CD Major Village Review Area Permits D Review Permit I I Admin £2 Minor CD Major n= eligible for 25% discount NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED PfOOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPUCATION MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: PROJECT NAME: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: BRIEF LEGAL I DESCRIPTION: fg^'h^^.f lojs ^Ka^ctlD,^!! |PfS A I STREETiADDfiESS . LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE: BETWEEN (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) (NAME OF STREET) SIDE OF AND ITT (NAMED (NAME OF STREET) ME OF STREET) p-1 Page 1 of 5 Revised 05/12 OWNER NAME (Print): CALLAtAjAU GTOLF MAIUNG ADDRESS: UTTH-TL^fg^ CITY, STATE, ZIP: CA4j^ 6/VO CA ^tOt)ii TELEPHONE: "7(^0-^3/'/7 T f EMAIL ADDRESS: mmejte'STojcfx&^fr I CERTIFY THAT I AM^'HE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY APPLICANT NAME (Print): MAILING ADDRESS: ) .^/)^ TAW^ .A^^^jh CITY, STATE, ZIP: Xjl^i\l C\ miX TELEPHONE: (^ \C\Z - j EMAIL ADDRESS: jfiPWAl^i^ VA\ flf DATE I CERTIFY/HAT J AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT AL/ "mt ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BBSrjOfjm KNOWLEDGE. SIGl BATE APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE (Print): \k A Atjj-/ IMOlO^ 1^-' Pj^tK^" MAIUNG ADDRESS: '^^^ iSW_A^ f^^^b CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL ADDRESS: TP I CERTIFY THAT APPUCANT AND CORRECT TOTI SIGNATURE IE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE E ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND KNOWLEDGE. ^5 IN THE PROCESS OF R|^EWING THIS APPUCATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. NOTICE OF RESTRICTION: PROPERTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES AND CONSENTS TO A NOTICE OF RESTRICTION BEING RECORDED ON THE TITLE TO HIS PROPERTY IF CONDITIONED FOR THE APPLICANT. NOTICE OF RESTRICTIONS RUN WITH THE LAND AND BIND ANYSUCCESSQBS.IN INTEREST. ^ PRO^fWo^RERSiaJCTURE FOR CITY USE ONLY RECEIVED JUL 0 9 2012 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: P-1 Page 2 of 5 Revised 05/12 ?))) FiTihc r— laking leiecom lo new heights (ax 949 852 8115 City of Carlsbad Attn: Chris Garcia 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Verizon Wireless Site Name: Callaway Carlsbad MCUP Renewal Application # 07-11 Site Address: 2180 Rutherford Rd, Carlsbad CA 92008 Dear Chris, This letter is to request an extension of the existing MCUP# 07-11 for the Verizon Wireless site Callaway. Per the Notice of Pending Permit Extension included along with this letter: -Written request for an extension (this letter) -Completed disclosure statement -Land Use Review Appiication -Development Permits form -A check in the amount of the application fees -One complete set of plans (already approved copy) -300' radius noticing package -RF Study (existing, no changes) This is for a permit extension request only there are no changes to the existing site. If you should need^^ything else please advise, Thankyou, Jennifer Now; jnowak@fmhc.com 619.846.5201 SENIOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY 2180 Rutherford Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 Prepared June 29, 2012 Name Title Brewer, O.G. President and Chief Executive Officer Holiday, Bradley J. Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Carroll, Christopher Senior Vice President, Human Resources Hocknell, Alan Senior Vice President, Research & Development Le pesky, Mark Senior Vice President, Global Operations Lynch, Brian P. Senior Vice President, General Counsel Rousseau, Christine Senior Vice President, Global Information Technology Urzetta, Joseph Senior Vice President, Americas DISCLOSURE Development Services STATEMENT Planning Division ^ CITY OF P-1(A) 1635 Faraday Avenue CARLSBAD P-1(A) (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social dub, firatemal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.' Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) /- . \ Person, Title Address . , , 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) C^Z^^Z^^^ Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% ofthe shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN IVIORE THAN 10% OF THE SHAREg^LEASE INDICATE j^ON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a (^jbliclv-owned corporation^ include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate Offiuiib. (A Separate page may be attached if necessary.) I k "0^^ -7 Person Se^^ CCHflCKA^ Corp/Part_ Title Titte Address Address, p-1 (A) Pagel of2 Revised07/10 NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non- profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary ofthe. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust Title Title Address Address Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Comprtissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? I i Yes / No If yes, please indicate person(s):_ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above in^jmat[on is tme and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of oWher/date / Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant M SignatCTre jOTowner/applTcartt's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicanfs agent p-1 (A) Page 2 of 2 Revised 07/10 ^ CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT DESCRIPTION P-1(B) Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT NAME: Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: P-1(B) Page 1 of 1 Revised 07/10 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 1219101-1 07/09/2012 98 Mon, Jul 09, 2012 10:12 AM Receipt Ref Nbr: R1219101-1/0014 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 121910101 0014 0017 Trans/Rcpt#: R0090268 SET #; MCUP0711X1 Amount: 1 6 $322.65 Item Subtotal; $322.65 Item Total: $322.65 1 ITEM(S) TOTAL: $322.65 Check (Chk# 035817) $315.00 Credit Card (Auth# 011313) $7.65 Total Received: $322.65 Have a nice day! ;):*************CUSTGMER COPY************* City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: VERIZON WIRELESS Description Amount MCUPOTllXl 322.65 Receipt Number: R0090268 Transaction ID: R0090268 Transaction Date: 07/09/2012 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 322.65 Transaction Amount: 322.65 200 North Glebe Road, Suite 1000, Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 . 703.276.1169 fax info@sitesafe.com • www.sitesafe.com compliance experts Verizon Wireless Site ID - 116830 Site Nome - Calloway Site Compliance Report 2180 Rutherford Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 San Diego County Site visit date: May 7, 2010 Site survey by: Mohamed Frej Latitude: N33-7-54.50 Longitude: Wl 17-16-40.87 Structure Type: Rooftop Report generated date: June 23, 2010 Report by: Scott Hoy Customer Contact: Arlet Vargas Verizon Wireless is Conditionally Compliant based on FCC Rules and Regulations. © 2010 Sitesafe, Inc. Arlington, VA David Charles Cotton, Jr. Registered Professional Engineer (Electrical) State of California, 18838, Expires 2011-Jun-30 Date: 2010-Jun-23 BZnnSIBEZSOE BIB BBBBBBBBBBI rf compfiance experts Verizon Wireless 116830 - Calloway Radio Frequency (RF) Site Compliance Report 2180 Rutherford Road, Carisbad, CA 92008 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • lnfo@sltesafe.com ^site rf compliance experts Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 2 REGULATORY BASIS 3 2.1 FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS 3 2.2 OSHA STATEMENT 5 3 SITE COMPLIANCE 6 3.1 SITE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT 6 3.2 ACTIONS FOR SITE COMPLIANCE 6 4 SAFETY PLAN AND PROCEDURES 8 5 ANALYSIS 9 5.1 RF EMISSIONS DIAGRAM 9 5.2 SITE MEASUREMENTS 11 6 SITE AUDIT 12 6.1 SITE ACCESS PROCEDURES 12 6.2 ANTENNA INVENTORY 13 6.3 SITE PICTURES 15 7 FIELD TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATION 20 8 ENGINEER CERTIFICATION 21 APPENDIX A - STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS 22 APPENDIX B - ASSUMPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS 23 GENERAL MODEL ASSUMPTIONS 23 USE OF GENERIC ANTENNAS 23 DEFINITIONS 24 APPENDIX C - RULES & REGULATIONS 26 EXPLANATION OF APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS 26 OCCUPATIONAL ENVIRONMENT EXPLAINED 26 APPENDIX D - GENERAL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS 27 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 28 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com rf complionce experts 1 Executive Summary Verizon Wireless has contracted v\/ith Sitesafe, Inc. (Sitesafe), on independent Radio Frequency (RF) regulator/ and engineering consulting firm, to deternnine wtiettier the proposed communications site, 116830 - Collov/ay, located at 2180 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad, CA, is in compliance with Federal Communication Commission (FCC) Rules and Regulations for RF emissions. Sitesafe's field personnel visited 116830 - Calloway on May 7, 2010. This report contains a detailed summary of the RF environment at the site including: • site compliance determination; • photographs of the site; • diagram of the site; • inventory of the moke / model of all transmitting antennas found on the site (where possible); • record of any Maximum Permissible Exposure ("MPE") measurements token on the site, as applicable; and • theoretical MPE based on modeling. This report addresses exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields in accordance with the FCC Rules and Regulations for all individuals, classified in two groups, "Occupational or Controlled" and "General Public or Uncontrolled." This site is conditionally compliant with the FCC rules and regulations, as described in OET Bulletin 65. During our field visit, Sitesafe documented the presence and location of signs and barriers. This document specifically addresses compliance of Verizon Wireless transmitting facilities independently and in relation to all collocated transmitting facilities, which together constitute the RF environment at the site. If you have any questions regarding RF safety and regulatory compliance, please do not hesitate to contact Sitesafe's Customer Support Department at (703) 276- 1100. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Ariington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • lnfo@sitesafe.com Page 2 o rf compliance experts 2 Regulatory Basis 2.1 FCC Rules and Regulations In 1996, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) adopted regulations for the evaluating of the effects of RF emissions in 47 CFR § 1.1307 and 1.1310. The guideline from the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology is Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65"), Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01, published August 1997. Since 1996 the FCC periodically reviews these rules and regulations as per their congressional mandate. FCC regulations define two separate tiers of exposure limits: Occupational or "Controlled environment" and General Public or "Uncontrolled environment". The General Public limits are generally five times more consen/otive or restrictive than the Occupational limit. These limits apply to accessible areas where workers or the general public may be exposed to Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Occupational or Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed OS a consequence of their employment and where those persons exposed hove been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and con exercise control over their exposure. An area is considered a Controlled environment when access is limited to these aware personnel. Typical criteria are restricted access (i.e. locked or alarmed doors, barriers, etc.) to the areas where antennas ore located coupled with proper RF warning signage. A site with Controlled environments is evaluated with Occupational limits. All other areas ore considered Uncontrolled environments. If a site has no access controls or no RF warning signage it is evaluated with General Public limits. The theoretical modeling of the RF electromagnetic fields has been performed in accordance with OET Bulletin 65. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits utilized in this analysis ore outlined in the following diagram: FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (iVIPE) Plane-wave Equivaient Power Density 1000 ~~ 100 u 3 E. 10 1 a S. 0.1 0.01 Occupational General Public 10 100 1,000 10,000 Frequency (MHz) 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@site$afe.com Page 3 rf compfiance experts Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time |E|\ Range Field Field Density |H|^ or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (S) (V/m) (H) (A/m) (mW/cm^) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/^)* 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1500 --f/300 6 1500--5 6 100,000 Limits for General PopulationAJncontroUed Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time |E| , Range Field Field Density |Hp or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (S) (V/m) (H) (A/m) (mW/cm^) 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f^)* 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1500 — — £'1500 30 1500-— — 1.0 30 100,000 f = frequency in MHz *Plane-wave equivalent power density 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 4 ste rf compliance experts 2.2 OSHA Statement The General Duty clause of the OSHA Act (Section 5) outlines the occupational safety and health responsibilities of the employer and employee. The General Duty clause in Section 5 states: (a) Each employer- (1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or ore likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees; (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act. (b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations, and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct. OSHA has defined Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiation safety standards for workers who may enter hazardous RF areas. Regulation Standards 29 CFR § 1910.147 identify a generic Lock Out Tag Out procedure aimed to control the unexpected energization or start up of machines when maintenance or service is being performed. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 5 rf compiiance experts 3 Site Compliance 3.1 Site Compliance Statement Upon evaluation of the cumulative RF emission levels from all operators at this site, and a thorough review of site access procedures, RF hazard signage and visible antenna locations, Sitesafe has determined that: This site is conditionally compliant with the FCC rules and regulations, as described in OET Bulletin 65. Verizon Wireless is predicted to contribute greater than 5% of the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) based on theoretical modeling using parameters supplied by the client. A detailed explanation of the 5% rule can be found in the Definition section of Appendix B. The compliance determination is based on General Public MPE levels due to theoretical modeling and/or physical measurements, RF signage placement, proposed antenna inventory and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. Any deviation from the Verizon Wireless proposed deployment plan could result in the site being rendered non-compliant. Measurements have also been performed to validate the assumptions used in out theoretical modeling of this site. Modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution. Measurements provide a view of MPE percentage levels at the site at the time of Sitesafe's visit and are used to validate modeling results. 3.2 Actions for Site Compliance Based on common industry practice and our understanding of FCC and OSHA requirements, this section provides a statement of recommendations for site compliance. RF alert signage recommendations have been proposed based on existing measurements and theoretical analysis of MPE levels. Sitesafe has documented the locations of any RF signs and barriers that are required for compliance. Barriers can consist of locked doors, fencing, railing, rope, chain, paint striping or tape, combined with RF alert signage. This site is conditionally compliant with the FCC rules and regulations. However, because Verizon Wireless is predicted to contribute greater than 5% of the maximum permissible exposure (MPE), shou/d the site be subsequently deemed non-compliant for any reason, any wireless operator(s) who contribute greater than 5% of the maximum permissible energy would be jointly liable for bringing the site into compliance. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 6 ste rf compliance experts Sitesafe found one or more issues that led to our determination. The site will be made compliant if the following changes are implemented: Site Access Location No action required. Verizon Wireless Proposed Alptia Sector Location Install antennas in accordance with proposed Verizon Wireless deployment plan. Verizon Wireless Proposed Beta Sector Location Install antennas in accordance with proposed Verizon Wireless deployment plan. Verizon Wireless Proposed Gamma Sector Location Install antennas in accordance with proposed Verizon Wireless deployment plan. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@site$afe.com Page 7 rf compUance experts 4 Safety Plan and Procedures The following items are general safety recommendations that should be administered on a site by site basis as needed by the carrier. General Maintenance Work: Any maintenance personnel required to work immediately in front of antennas and / or in areas indicated as above 100% of the Occupational MPE limits should coordinate with the wireless operators to disable transmitters during their work activities. Training and Qualification Verification: All personnel accessing areas indicated as exceeding the General Population MPE limits should have a basic understanding of EME awareness and RF Safety procedures when working around transmitting antennas. Awareness training increases a workers understanding to potential RF exposure scenarios. Awareness can be achieved in a number of ways (e.g. videos, formal classroom lecture or internet based courses). Physical Access Control: Access restrictions to transmitting antennas locations is the pnmary element in a site safety plan. Examples of access restrictions are as follows: • Locked door or gate • Alarmed door • Locked ladder access • Restrictive Barrier at antenna (e.g. Chain link with posted RF Sign) RF Signage: Ever/one should obey all posted signs at all times. RF signs play an important role in properly warning a worker prior to entering into a potential RF Exposure area. Assume oil antennas are active: Due to the nature of telecommunications transmissions, an antenna transmits intermittently. Always assume an antenna is transmitting. Never stop in front of an antenna. If you have to pass by an antenna, move through as quickly and safely as possible thereby reducing any exposure to a minimum. Mointain a 3 foot cleargnce from all gntennas: There is a direct correlation between the strength of an EME field and the distance from the transmitting antenna. The further away from an antenna, the lower the corresponding EME field is. Site RF Emissions Diggram: Section 5 of this report contains an RF Diagram that outlines various theoretical Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) areas at the site. The modeling is a worst case scenario assuming a duty cycle of 100% for each transmitting antenna at full power. This analysis is based on one of two access control criteria: General Public criteria means the access to the site is uncontrolled and anyone can gain access. Occupational criteria means the access is restricted and only properly trained individuals can gain access to the antenna locations. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 8 rf compliance experts 5 Analysis 5.1 RF Emissions Diagram The RF diagram(s) below display theoretical spatially averaged percentage of the Maximum Permissible Exposure for all systems at the site unless otherwise noted. These diagrams use modeling as proscribed in OET Bulletin 65 and assumptions detailed in Appendix B. The key at the bottom of each diagram indicates if percentages displayed are referenced to FCC Occupational or General Public Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. Color coding on the diagram is as follows: • Areas indicated as Gray are below 5% of the MPE limits or below. • Green represents areas predicted to be between 5% and 20% of the MPE limits. • Yellow represents areas predicted to be between 20% and 100% of the MPE limits. • Red areas indicated predicted levels greater than 100% of the MPE limits. General Population diagrams are specified when an area is accessible to the public; i.e. personnel that do not meet Occupational or RF Safety trained criteria, could gain access. If trained occupational personnel require access to areas that ore delineated as Red or above 100% of the limit, Sitesafe recommends that they utilize the proper personal protection equipment (RF monitors), coordinate with the carriers to reduce or shutdown power, or make real-time power density measurements with the appropriate power density meter to determine real-time MPE levels. This will allow the personnel to ensure that their work area is within exposure limits. The key at the bottom also indicates the level or height of the modeling with respect to the main level. The origin is typically referenced to the main rooftop level, or ground level for a structure without access to the antenna level. For example: Average from 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin and Average from 20 feet above to 26 feet above origin The first indicates modeling at the main rooftop (or ground) level averaged over 6 feet. The second indicates modeling at a higher level (possibly a penthouse level) of 20 feet averaged over 6 feet. Abbreviat ons used in the RF Emissions Diggrgms PH=##' M## Penthouse at ## feet above main roof Measurement ## token during a site visit As discussed in Section 5, site measurement locations for spatial average measurements collected at the time of Sitesafe's visit have been added to the RF 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 9 rf compliance experts emissions diagram. While the theoretical modeling represents worst case MPE levels based on the assumption(s) detailed above, the measurement data is a snapshot of MPE levels at the time of our visit, and dependent on transmitter duty cycle, system implementation and emissions from other RF sources at nearby antenna sites. AdditiongI Informotion in the RF Emissions Diggrgms Key The RF Emission Diagram provides indications of RF signage, barriers and locked doors. The table below lists the abbreviations used to indicate locked doors, signs and barriers: Table 1: RF Signage and Barrier Key RF Signa( je Barriers Type Existing Location Recommended Locgtion Type Existing Locotion Recommended Locotion Notice NE NR Locked Door LE LR Caution CE CR Fencing RE RR Warning WE WR Rope Chain RE RR Info Sign IE Paint Stripes RE RR As discussed in Section 5, site measurements collected at the time of Sitesafe's visit have been added to the RF Emission diagrams. While the software modeling represents theoretical MPE levels based on the assumptions detailed above, the site measurement data is a snapshot of MPE levels, and dependent on transmitter duty cycle, system implementation and emissions from other RF sources at nearby antenna sites. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 10 RF Emissions Diagram for: Calloway Main Level ACCESS NE IV129 VERIZON WIRELESS M27 u M25 ... I— i_ V 1— 7 > ^ste www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 58301 Site Name: Calloway % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Average fi"om 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin • 100 <=X • 20<=X< 100 • 5 <= X < 20 • X<=5 Feet nj-LnjTJTj 60 0 60 Grid Size is 10.0 120 RF Emissions Diagram for: Calloway Main Level ACCESS NE M29 VERIZON WIRELESS M27 1 •iJioc I 1 VI Alt vl LEVEL mm „ VI Alt LEVEL • & 75:1 1 .rivnr \/i2: is '• ' I' I' 1 r%\i VER 1 R\/I=l 7 VER > ^sife vww.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 58301 Site Name: Calloway % of FCC Occupational Exposure Limit Average from 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin • 100 <=X • 20<=X< 100 • 5 <= X < 20 X<=5 Feet rLTLTUUTJ" 60 0 60 Grid Size is 10.0 120 RF Emissions Diagram for: Calloway Detail View Main Level- West Side ^ste www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 58301 Site Name: Calloway % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Average from 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin • 100 <=X • 20 <= X < 100 • 5 <= X < 20 X<=5 Feet ruiruinj 1 i 10 0 10 20 Grid Size is 10.0 RF Emissions Diagram for: Calloway Detail View Main Level- West Side 1 M26 VERIZON WIRELESS §?lsit:e www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 58301 Site Name: Calloway % of FCC Occupational Exposure Limit Average from 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin • 100 <=X • 20<=X< 100 • 5 <= X < 20 • X<=5 0 rtspOTB'bilify Iv modelinQ r« jia nol v*M<M Dy Sii Feet ruuiruu 1 10 0 10 20 Grid Size is 10.0 RF Emissions Diagram for: Calloway Detail View Main Level- East Side M23 www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 58301 Site Name: Calloway % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Average from 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin • 100 <=X • 20<=X< 100 • 5 <= X < 20 X<=5 SilaulsTC Vwixyi UnivnWM 5215010 CM nenfied by Siies»l« nenc Feet nrLnjuu 1 i 5 0 5 10 Grid Size is 10.0 RF Emissions Diagram for: Calloway Detail View Main Level- East Side www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 58301 Site Name: Calloway % of FCC Occupational Exposure Limit Average from 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin • 100 <= X • 20<=X<100 • 5<=X<20 • X<=5 Feet imruiai i i 5 0 5 10 Grid Size is 10.0 rf comp»iance experts 5.2 Site Measurements This section provides a summary of the measurements collected at the site. Actual measurements locations at which these data points were collected are included in the RF emission diagram provided in Section 6 of this report. Two types of measurements were collected at each measurement location: maximum (peak) and spatial average. The spatial average measurement consists of a collection of ten (10) measurements within a ten (10) second time inten/al taken from zero (0) to six (6) feet in height. The purpose of this measurement technique is to identify the average power density over the dimensions of a typical human body. Table 2 below contains all the measurements collected from accessible areas located at the site at the time of Sitesafe's visit. Whenever possible, measurements are taken in front of the antenna in the transmitting direction. However, because of the antenna configuration at this site, specific emissions could not be discerned from nearby facilities, and no attempt was made to determine power density levels from a specific transmitting antenna. Highest Measured Occupational Level: 4% This value is equal to: Highest General Public Level: 20.00%. Table 2: Spatial Average and Maximum Occupational Measurements Measurements Spatial Maximum Measurements Spatial Maximum Points Average Points Average Ml 2% 4% M16 <i % <i % M2 4% 10% M17 <i % <i % M3 2% 3% M18 <i % <i % M4 1 % 1 % M19 <i % <i % M5 1 % 2% M20 <i % <i % M6 1 % 1 % M21 <i % <i % M7 <1 % 1 % M22 <i % <i % M8 <1 % 1 % M23 <i % <i % M9 1 % 2% M24 <i % <i % MIO <1 % <1 % M25 <i % <i % Ml 1 <1 % <1 % M26 <i % <i % M12 <1 % <1 % M27 <i % <i % M13 <I % <1 % M28 <i % <i % M14 <1 % <1 % M29 <i % <i % M15 <1 % <1 % MSO 4% 8% RF meters and probes hove been calibrated and used according to the manufacturer's specifications. Measurements provide a view of the MPE percentage levels at the site at the time of Sitesafe's site visit and are used to validate modeling results. Theoretical modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contributions. An RF Emission diagram has been included in section 5 of this document. All measurement locations are identified in this diagram. The locations of measurements in the RF Emission diagram con be cross referenced with Table 2 (above) to determine the actual spatial average and maximum measurement value per location. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 11 rf compliance experts Site Audit 6.1 Site Access Procedures A site visit was conducted on May 7, 2010 at approximately 11:00 AM. The weather conditions were Sunny with a temperature of 70 degrees. At that time, a diagram of the site was verified, obtained or produced containing the locations of all visible antennas, RF signs and access points on site. These antennas were recorded and photographed. The antenna make(s)/model(s) and centerlines were verified where possible. The following information was gathered regarding site access at the facility. Site access hatch was unlocked/unrestricted at the time of the site visit. Call Ed Salinas at 760-930-8315 for access. RF Advisor/ signage was posted at all site access points. Figure 1: Site Access Hatch 200 N. Giebe Road • Suite 1000 • Ariington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 12 rf compfiance experts 6.2 Antenna Inventory The Antenna Inventory shows all transmitting antennas at the site. This inventor/ was verified on site, and was utilized by Sitesafe to perform theoretical modeling of RF emissions. The inventory coincides with the site diagrams in this report, identifying each antenna's location at 116830 - Calloway. The antenna information collected includes the following information: • Licensee or wireless operator name • Frequency or frequency bond • Transmitter power - Effective Radiated Power ("ERP"), or Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power ("EIRP") in Watts • Antenna manufacturer moke, model, and gain For other carriers at this site, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model, or "Unknown" for an operator means the information with regard to carrier, their FCC license and/or antenna information was not available nor could it be secured while on site. Equipment, antenna models and nominal transmit power were used for modeling, based on past experience with radio service providers. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 13 siteb rf compliance expert 'if"c The following antenna inventory and representative photographs, on this and the following page, were obtained or verified during the site visit and were utilized to create the site model diagrams: Table 3: Antenna Inventory Ant # Operated By TX Freq (MHz) ERP (Watts) Antenna Gain (dBd) Az (Deg) Antenna Model Ant Type Length (ft) Horizontal Half Power Beamwidth (Deg) Location Ant # Operated By TX Freq (MHz) ERP (Watts) Antenna Gain (dBd) Az (Deg) Antenna Model Ant Type Length (ft) Horizontal Half Power Beamwidth (Deg) X Y Z 1 Verizon Wireless (proposed) 850 2180 13.00 100 Antel BXA-80063-4CF Panel 4 63 628' 241' 8' 2 Verizon Wireless 1900 1063 12.96 80 EMS RR65-15-04DPL2 Panel 2 65 628' 239' 8' 3 Verizon Wireless (proposed) 746 504 13.00 100 Antel BXA-70063-4CF Panel 4 63 628' 234' 8' 4 Verizon Wireless (proposed) 850 2180 13.00 180 Antel BXA-80063-4CF Panel 4 63 98' 205' 8' 5 Verizon Wireless 1900 1063 12.96 180 EMS RR65-15-04DPL2 Panel 2 65 96' 205' 8' 6 Verizon Wireless (proposed) 746 504 13.00 180 Antel BXA-70063-4CF Panel 4 63 91' 205' 8' 7 Verizon Wireless (proposed) 850 2180 13.00 300 Antel BXA-80063-4CF Panel 4 63 90' 206' 8' 8 Verizon Wireless 1900 1063 12.96 300 EMS RR65-15-04DPL2 Panel 2 65 90' 208' 8' 9 Verizon Wireless (proposed) 746 504 13.00 300 Antel BXA-70063-4CF Panel 4 63 90' 213' 8' o NOTE: X, Y and Z indicate relative position of the antenna to the origin location on the site, displayed in the model results diagram. Specifically, the Z reference indicates antenna height above the main site levei unless otherwise indicated. ERP values provided by the client and used in the modeling may be greater than are currently deployed. For other carriers at this site the use of "Generic" as an antenna model or "Unknown" for a wireless operator means the information with regard to carrier, their FCC license and/or antenna information was not available nor could it be secured while on site. Equipment, antenna models and nominal transmit power were used for modeling, based on past experience with radio sen/ice providers. u 200 N. Glebe Rood • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 14 ^^^^ visits rf compliance experts 6.3 Site Pictures Figure 2: Verizon Wireless Proposed Alpha Sector Antenngs #1 through #3 (behind) Figure 3: Verizon Wireless Proposed Alpha Sector Antennas #1 through #3 (front) 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 15 ^site rf compliance experts Figure 4: Verizon Wireless Proposed Betg Sector Antenngs #4 through #6 (behind) Figure 5: Verizon Wireless Proposed Betg Sector Antenngs #4 through #6 (front) 200 N. Glebe Road . Suite 1000 • Ariington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 16 ^site rf compliance experts Figure 6: Verizon Wireless Proposed Gammg Sector Antenngs #7 through #9 (behind) Figure 7: Verizon Wireless Proposed Ggmmg Sector Antennos #7 through #9 (front) 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Ariington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 17 ^site rf compliance experts Figure 8: Rooftop Overview Focing Egst Figure 9: Rooftop Overview Facing Northwest 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 18 ^sife rf compliance experts Figure 10: Rooftop Overview Focing Southeast Figure 11: Lower Level Overview Focing Northeost 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 19 m rf compJiarsce experts 7 Field Technician Certification I, Mohamed Frej, state: That I am an employee of Sitesafe, Inc., in Arlington, Virginia, which provides RF compliance services to clients in the wireless communications industry; and That I hove successfully completed RF Safety Awareness training, am aware of the hazards and, therefore, can be exposed to RF fields classified for "Occupational" exposure; That I am familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio-frequency Radiation; and That I have been trained in the proper use of measurement equipment, and have successfully completed Sitesafe training in policy, procedure and proper site measurement and modeling; and That I performed survey measurements of the RF environment at the site identified as 116830 - Calloway on May 7, 2010 at 11:00 AM in order to determine where there might be electromagnetic energy that is in excess of both the Controlled Environment and Uncontrolled Environment levels; and That the survey measurements were performed with measurement equipment, model Holodoy HI-2200 field intensity meter (serial number 00109415) and model C300 field intensity probe, (serial number 00109413) calibrated on 4/24/2009; and That I have prepared this Site Compliance Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and based on data gathered. By: Mohamed Frej 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 20 site •kl rf compiiance experts 8 Engineer Certification The professional engineer whose seal appears on the cover of this document hereby certifies and affirms that: I am registered as a Professional Engineer in the jurisdiction indicated in the professional engineering stamp on the cover of this document; and That I am on employee of Sitesafe, Inc., in Arlington, Virginia, at which place the staff and I provide RF compliance services to clients in the wireless communications industry; and That I am thoroughly familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio-frequency Radiation; and That survey measurements of the site environment of the site identified as 116830 - Calloway have been performed in order to determine where there might be electromagnetic energy that is in excess of both the Controlled Environment and Uncontrolled Environment levels; and That I hove thoroughly reviewed this Site Compliance Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge as assembled by and attested to by Scott Hoy. June 23, 2010 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 21 o rf compliance experts Appendix A - Statement of Limiting Conditions Sitesafe field personnel visited the site and collected data with regard to the RF environment. Sitesafe will not be responsible for matters of a legal nature that affect the site or property. The property was visited under the premise that it is under responsible ownership and management and our client has the legal right to conduct business at this facility. Due to the complexity of some wireless sites, Sitesafe performed this visit and created this report utilizing best industry practices and due diligence. Sitesafe cannot be held accountable or responsible for anomalies or discrepancies due to actual site conditions (i.e., mislabeling of antennas or equipment, inaccessible cable runs, inaccessible antennas or equipment, etc.) or information or data supplied by Verizon Wireless, the site manager, or their affiliates, subcontractors or assigns. Sitesafe has provided computer generated model(s) in this Site Compliance Report to show approximate dimensions of the site, and the model is included to assist the reader of the compliance report to visualize the site area, and to provide supporting documentation for Sitesafe's recommendations. Sitesafe may note in the Site Compliance Report any adverse physical conditions, such as needed repairs, observed during the survey of the subject property or that Sitesafe became aware of during the normal research involved in performing this survey. Sitesafe will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because Sitesafe is not an expert in the field of mechanical engineering or building maintenance, the Site Compliance Report must not be considered a structural or physical engineering report. Sitesafe obtained information used in this Site Compliance Report from sources that Sitesafe considers reliable and believes them to be true and correct. Sitesafe does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. When conflicts in information occur between data provided by a second party and physical data collected by Sitesafe, the physical data will be used. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Ariington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 22 0^ sits rf compliance experts Appendix B - Assumptions and Definitions General Model Assumptions In this site compliance report, it is assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at g|| times. Software modeling was performed for all transmitting antennas located on the site. Sitesafe has further assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated power. The site has been modeled with these assumptions to show the maximum RF energy density. Sitesafe believes this to be a worst-cose analysis, based on best available data. Areas modeled to predict emissions greater than 100% of the applicable MPE level may not actually occur, but are shown as a worsf-case prediction that could be realized real time. Sitesafe believes these areas to be safe for entry by occupationally trained personnel utilizing appropriate personal protective equipment (in most cases, a personal monitor). Thus, at any time, if power density measurements were mode, we believe the real- time measurements would indicate levels below those depicted in the RF emission diagram(s) in this report. By modeling in this way, Sitesafe has conservatively shown exclusion areas - areas that should not be entered without the use of a personal monitor, carriers reducing power, or performing real-time measurements to indicate real-time exposure levels. Use of Generic Antennas For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as on antenna model, or "Unknown" for an operator means the information about a carrier, their FCC license and/or antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industr/ specific knowledge of equipment, antenna models, and transmit power to model the site. If more specific information con be obtained for the unknown measurement criteria, Sitesafe recommends remodeling of the site utilizing the more complete and accurate data. Information about similar facilities is used when the service is identified and associated with a particular antenna. If no information is available regarding the transmitting service associated with an unidentified antenna, using the antenna manufacturer's published data regarding the antenna's physical characteristics mokes more conservative assumptions. Where the frequency is unknown, Sitesafe uses the closest frequency in the antenna's range that corresponds to the highest Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE), resulting in a conservative analysis. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 23 site rf complionce experts Definitions 5% Ru/e - The rules adopted by the FCC specify that, in general, at multiple transmitter sites actions necessary to bring the area into compliance with the guidelines are the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters produce field strengths or power density levels at the area in question in excess of 5% of the exposure limits. In other words, any wireless operator that contributes 5% or greater of the MPE limit in an area that is identified to be greater than 100% of the MPE limit is responsible taking corrective actions to bring the site into compliance. Compliance - The determination of whether a site is safe or not with regards to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation from transmitting antennas. Decibel (dB) - A unit for measuring power or strength of a signal. Duty Cyc/e - The percent of pulse duration to the pulse period of a periodic pulse train. Also, may be a measure of the temporal transmission characteristic of an intermittently transmitting RF source such as a paging antenna by dividing average transmission duration by the average period for transmission. A duty cycle of 100% corresponds to continuous operation. Effective (or Equivalent) Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) - The product of fhe power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to an isotropic antenna. Effective Radiated Power (ERP) - In a given direction, the relative gain of a transmitting antenna with respect to the maximum directivity of a half wove dipole multiplied by the net power accepted by the antenna from the connecting transmitter. Gain (of an antenna) - The ratio of the maximum intensity in a given direction to the maximum radiation in the same direction from on isotropic radiator. Gain is a measure of the relative efficiency of a directional antennas as compared to an omni directional antenna. Genera/ Population/Uncontrolled Environment - Defined by the FCC, as on area where RFR exposure may occur to persons who ore unaware of the potential for exposure and who hove no control of their exposure. General Population is also referenced as General Public. Generic Antenna - For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model means the antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industry specific knowledge of antenna models to select a worst case scenario antenna to model the site. Isotropic Antenna - An antenna that is completely non-directional. In other words, an antenna that radiates energy equally in all directions. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 24 mpliance experts Max/mum Measurement - This measurement represents the single largest measurement recorded when performing a spatial average measurement. Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) - The rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane-wove equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with acceptable safety factor. Occupational I Controlled Environment -Det\ne6 by the FCC, as on area where Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) exposure may occur to persons who are aware of the potential for exposure as a condition of employment or specific activity and con exercise control over their exposure. OET Bulletin 65-Technical guideline developed by the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology to determine the impact of Radio Frequency radiation on Humans. The guideline was published in August 1997. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administrgtion) - Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing a safe and healthy workplace for their employees. OSHA's role is to promote the safety and health of America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards; providing training, outreach and education; establishing partnerships; and encouraging continual process improvement in workplace safety and health. For more information, visit vww.osha.gov. Radio Frequency Radiation - Electromagnetic waves that ore propagated from antennas through space. Spatial Average Measurement - A technique used to average a minimum of ten (10) measurements taken in a ten (10) second interval from zero (0) to six (6) feet. This measurement is intended to model the average energy an overage sized human body will absorb while present in an electromagnetic field of energy. Transmitter Power Output (TPO) - The radio frequency output power of a transmitter's final radio frequency stage as measured at the output terminal while connected to a load. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 25 rf compliance experts Appendix C - Rules & Regulations Explanation of Applicable Rules and Regulations The FCC has set forth guidelines in OET Bulletin 65 for human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. Specific regulations regarding this topic are listed in Port 1, Subpart I, of Title 47 in the Code of Federal Regulations. Currently, there are two different levels of MPE - General Public MPE and Occupational MPE. An individual classified as Occupational con be defined as an individual who has received appropriate RF training and meets the conditions outlined below. General Public is defined as anyone who does not meet the conditions of being Occupational. FCC and OSHA Rules and Regulations define compliance in terms of total exposure to total RF energy, regardless of locafion of or proximity fo the sources of energy. It is the responsibility of all licensees to ensure these guidelines ore maintained at all times. It is the ongoing responsibility of all licensees composing the site to maintain ongoing compliance with FCC rules and regulations. Individual licensees that contribute less than 5% MPE to any total area out of compliance ore not responsible for corrective actions. OSHA has adopted and enforces the FCC's exposure guidelines. A building owner or site manager con use this report as part of an overall RF Health and Safety Policy. It is important for building owners/site managers to identify areas in excess of the General Population MPE and ensure that only persons qualified as Occupational ore granted access to those areas. Occupational Environment Explained The FCC definition of Occupational exposure limits apply to persons who: • ore exposed to RF energy as a consequence of their employment; • hove been mode aware of the possibility of exposure; and • con exercise control over their exposure. OSHA guidelines go further to state that persons must complete RF Safety Awareness training and must be trained in the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. In order to consider this site on Occupational Environment, the site must be controlled to prevent access by any individuals classified as the General Public. Compliance is also maintained when any non-occupational individuals (the General Public) are prevented from accessing areas indicated as Red or Yellow in the attached RF Emissions diagram. In addition, a person must be aware of the RF environment into which they are entering. This con be accomplished by an RF Safety Awareness class, and by appropriate written documentation such as this Site Compliance Report. All Verizon Wireless employees who require access to this site must complete RF Safety Awareness training and must be trained in the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Ariington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 26 ^site rf compiianci X p e r t s Appendix D - General Safety Recommendations The following are general recommendations appropriate for any site with accessible areas in excess of 100% General Public MPE. These recommendations ore not specific to this site. These ore safety recommendations appropriate for typical site management, building management, and other tenant operations. 1. All individuals needing access to the main site (or the area indicated to be in excess ot General Public MPE) should wear a personal RF Exposure monitor, successfully complete proper RF Safety Awareness training, and hove and be trained in the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. 2. All individuals needing access to the main site should be instructed to read and obey all posted placards and signs. 3. The site should be routinely inspected and this or similar report updated with the addition ot any antennas or upon any changes to the RF environment including: • adding new antennas that may have been located on the site • removing of any existing antennas • changes in the radiating power or number of RF emitters 4. Post the appropriate NOTICE, CAUTION, or WARNING sign at the main site access point(s) and other locations as required. Note: Please refer to RF Exposure Diagrams in Appendix B, to inform everyone who has access to this site that beyond posted signs there may be levels in excess of the limits prescribed by the FCC. The signs below are examples of signs meeting FCC guidelines. NOTICE (('A')) 9VfmM p»i^t *»pfimm ttnirft. A CAUTION f sir fmm u*Mit. iM-'f Mi M|m MI ^WARNING Br^orKj ifw* po- nr. axecM me FCC ruicft tof tii^itr« usp«4b)*e 5. Ensure that the site door remains locked (or appropriately controlled) to deny access to the general public if deemed as policy by the building/site owner. 6. For a General Public environment the four color levels identified in this analysis con be interpreted in the following manner: • Areas indicated as Gray ore at 5% of the General Public MPE limits or below. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. • Green represents areas predicted to be between 5% and 20% of the General Public MPE limits. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Ariington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 27 rf compliance experts Yellow represents areas predicted to be between 20% and 100% of the General Public MPE limits. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. Red areas indicated predicted levels greater than 100% of the General Public MPE limits. This level is not safe for the General Public to be in. 7. For on Occupational environment the four color levels identified in this analysis con be interpreted in the following manner: • Areas indicated as Gray ore at 5% of the Occupational MPE limits or below. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. • Green represents areas predicted to be between 5% and 20% of the Occupational MPE limits. This level is safe for a worker to be in at any time. • Yellow represents areas predicted to be between 20% and 100% of the Occupational MPE limits. Only individuals that hove been properly trained in RF Health and Safety should be allowed to work in this area. This is not on area that is suitable for the General Public to be in. • Red areas indicated predicted levels greater than 100% of the Occupational MPE limits. This level is not safe for the Occupational worker to be in for prolonged periods of fime. Special procedures must be adhered to such as lock out tog out procedures to minimize the workers exposure to EME. 8. Use of a Personal Protective Monitor: When working around antennas, Sitesafe strong recommends the use of a Personal Protective Monitor (PPM). Wearing a PPM will properly forewarn the individual prior to entering on RF exposure area. Keep a copy of this report available for all persons who must access the site. They should read this report and be aware of the potential hazards with regards to RF and MPE limits. Additional information Additional RF information is available by visiting both vAvw.Sitesafe.com and vyAvw.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety. OSHA has additional information available of: http://www.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/radiofrequencyradiation. 200 N. Giebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203-3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 28 r MiLeiiBj\ji9-- V (CARLSBAD i_j r i i-i- Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov August 1, 2012 FMHC Attn: Jennifer Nowak 3303 Harbor Boulevard, Suite E-6 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 SUBJECT: IVIINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. MCUP 07-11x1 - CALLAWAY VERIZON WIRELESS - Request for approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit extension (MCUP 07-11x1); to allow the continued operation and maintenance of an existing Wireless Communications Facility (WCF) at 2180 Rutherford Road, in the C-M Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 5. Dear Ms. Nowak, The City Planner has completed a review of your application for a Minor Conditional Use Permit MCUP 07-11x1 for the continued operation and maintenance of a Wireless Communications Facility at 2180 Rutherford Road. A notice was sent to property owners within a 300' radius of the subject property requesting comments regarding the above request. No comments were received within the ten day notice period (ending on July 20, 2012). After careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding this request, the City Planner lias determined that the four findings required for granting a Minor Conditional Use Permit can be made and therefore, APPROVES this request based on the following findings and conditions. Findings: 1. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, and is in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, including, if applicable, the certified local coastal program, specific plan or master plan In that (a) the use is necessary and desirable for the development of the community because of the benefit and demand for digital communications and data transmissions for businesses, individuals, public agencies and emergency service systems in this part of the City; (b) the existing use is consistent with the General Plan in that the Planned Industrial (PI) Land Use designation does not preclude the provision of Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) uses. The existing WCF is consistent with City Council Policy No. 64, Wireless Communication Facilities, in that it is in a preferred non-residential location (Industrial zone) and has a stealth design. The project's location and stealth design comply with General Plan objectives that seek to maintain and enhance Carisbad's appearance. 2. That the requested use Is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located in that the existing WCF is located within a preferred non-residential location (Industriai zone) as listed in Location Guideline A.1.a. of City Council Policy Statement No. 64, and all aspects of the WCF exhibit stealth design and are completely hidden behind existing equipment screen walls which are constructed of radio frequency (RF) transparent screen material that is painted to match the existing building, as well 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 1760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 © IVKiUPU7-11X1 - CALLAWAY VERIZON WIRELESS August^, 2012 Page 2 as the equipment cabinets are located on the roof in an area not visible from the ground. The WCF use is not precluded by the project site's underlying C-M Zoning. Furthermore, the placement of the antennas behind the RF transparent screen and the equipment cabinets located on the roof of the building are located in an area not visible from the ground and do not visually impact the existing site or building design and do not interfere with nor are visible to other surrounding uses, and will nbt result in any additional building coverage. The project has been conditioned to comply with FCC RF Exposure Guidelines. 3. That the site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this code and required by the City Planner in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood in that all of the existing antennas are located behind RF transparent screen walls that are painted to match the existing building and the equipment cabinets are located on the roof of the building in an area not visible from the ground and thereby exhibiting stealth design techniques. As all of the antennas and associated WCF equipment are existing and no additional antennas or equipment are proposed, the appearance of the building will not change. 4. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use in that the existing unmanned WCF use would require, on average, only monthly maintenance visits and occasional visits in response to operational problems. 5- That the existing WCF is consistent with City Council Policy No. 64 in that it Is located in a preferred location (Industrial zone) as listed in Location Guideline A.l.a. of City Council Policy Statement No. 64 and exhibits stealth design, as the antennas are completely hidden behind RF transparent screen walls and existing equipment is located on the roof in an area not visible from the ground. 6. That the City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15301 - Existing Facilities of the state CEQA Guidelines. In making this determination, the City Planner has found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines do not apply to this project. 7. The City Planner has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for MCUP 07-11x1 as shown on Exhibits "A" - "E" dated August 1, 2012 on file in the Planning Division and incorporated herein by reference. MCUP 07-11XI - CALLAWAY VERIZON WIRELESS August 1, 2012 Paqe 3 Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 2. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor In interest by the City's approval of this Minor Conditional Use Permit extension. 3. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the MCUP 07-11x1 documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval shall require an amendment to this approval. 4. The Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Minor Conditional Use Permit extension, (b) City's approval or Issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. 5. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures, which are required as part of the Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. MCUP 07-11x1 shall be reviewed by the City Planner on a yearly basis to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a substantial negative effect on surrounding properties or the public health, safety and general welfare. If the City Planner determines that: 1) the minor conditional use permit was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation; or 2) the use for which such approval is granted is not being exercised; or 3) the conditions of approval have not been met; or 4) the minor conditional use permit is being or recently has been exercised contrary to any of the terms or conditions of approval; or 5) the use for which such approval was granted has ceased to exist or has been suspended for one year or more; or 6) the use is in violation of any statute, ordinance, law or regulation; or 7) the use permitted by the minor conditional use permit is being or has been so exercised as to be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or so as to constitute a nuisance, the City Planner MCUP 07-11X1- CALLAWAY VERIZON WIRELESS August 1, 2012 Page 4 shall hold an informal public hearing and after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, the City Planner may revoke and terminate the minor conditional use permit in whole or in part, reaffirm the minor conditional use permit, modify the conditions or impose new conditions. 8. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of ten (10) years from August 16, 2012 through August 15, 2022. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use has a substantial detrimental effect on surrounding land uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed ten (10) years upon written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. The City Planner may not grant such extension, unless it finds that there are no substantial negative effects on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare. If a substantial negative effect on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare is found, the extension shall be denied or granted with conditions which will eliminate or substantially reduce such effects. There is no limit to the number of extensions the City Planner may grant. 9. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this residential housing project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. 10. Developer/Operator shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's guidelines on limits for human exposure to radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Within six (6) months after the issuance of occupancy, and with any time extension or amendment request, the Developer/Operator shall submit to the City Planner either (1) verification that the project is categorically excluded from having to determine compliance with the RF exposure guidelines per 47 CFR §1.1307(b)(1); or (2) a project implementation report which provides cumulative field measurements of RF emissions of all antennas installed at the subject site. The report shall quantify the RF emissions and compare the results with the exposure limits established by the FCC guidelines. Said report shall be subject to review and approval by the City Planner for consistency with the Project's preliminary report on RF exposure submitted with the initial project application and for consistency with the FCC guidelines. If, on review, the City finds that the Project does not meet the FCC guidelines, the City may revoke or modify this minor conditional use permit. 11. Developer shall report, in writing, to the City Planner within 30 days, any address change from that which is shown on the permit application. Engineering: 12. Developer shall comply with the City's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are not limited to pollution treatment practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water MCUP 07-11X1 - CALLAWAY VERIZON WIRELESS August 1, 2012 Page 5 or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements. Code Reminders: 13. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. 14. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.04.320. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required Information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. This decision may be appealed by you or any other member of the public to the Planning Commission within ten days of the date of this letter. Appeals must be submitted in writing to the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue in Carlsbad, along with a payment of $1,011 plus noticing fees. The filing of such appeal within such time limit shall stay the effective date of the order of the City Planner until such time as a final decision on the appeal is reached. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Chris Garcia at (760) 602- 4622. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:CG:sm c: Don Neu, City Planner Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner David Rick, Project Engineer File Copy DMS/Data Entry irmiiiih -7/43)0 <%c,TvoP QFILE V'CARLSBAD i-rii-i- Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov July 23, 2012 FMHC Attn: Jennifer Nowak 3303 Harbor Boulevard, Suite E-6 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 SUBJECT: 1ST REVIEW FOR MCUP 07-11x1 - CALLAWAY VERIZON WIRELESS Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed your Minor Conditional Use Permit Extension, application no. MCUP 07-11x1, as to its completeness for processing. The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. In addition, you should also be aware that various design issues may exist. These issues must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a hearing. The Planning Division will begin processing your application as of the date of this communication. In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Chris Garcia, at (760) 602-4622, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: • Land Development Engineering Division: David Rick, Associate Engineer, at (760) 602-2781. • Fire Department: Greg Ryan, Fire Inspections, at (760) 602-4661. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:CG:sm c: Callaway Golf Co., c/o Donald H. Dye, 2285 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Don Neu, City Planner David Rick, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® <^c,.vo. FILECOPY V (CARLSBAD Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov July 24, 2012 Jennifer Nowak FMHC 3303 Harbor Blvd. #E-6 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 SUBJECT: MCUP 07-11X1 - CALLAWAY VERIZON WIRELESS - CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) APPLICABILITY/PROCESS DETERMINATION This is to advise you that after reviewing the application for the project referenced above, the City has determined that the following environmental review process (pursuant to CEQA) will be required for the project: 17- ^ The project is exempt from the provisions of CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Categorical Exemption for Existing Facilities - State Guidelines Section 15301. No environmental review is required for the project. ^ A Notice of Exemption will be filed after approval of the project with the San Diego County Clerk's Office which involves a filing fee. Please submit a check to the project planner in the amount of $50.00 made out to the San Diego County Clerk. The check should be submitted approximately one week prior to the City Planner's decision date. For additional information related to this CEQA applicability/process determination, please contact the project planner, Chris Garcia, at (760) 602-4622 or chris.garcia@carlsbadca.gov. Sincerely, DON NEU, AICP City Planner DN: CG:bd c: Chris DeCerbo David Rick, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Memorandum July 19, 2012 To: Chris Garcia, Project Planner From: David Rick, Project Engineer Via: Glen Van Peski, Senior Civil Engineer Re: SUBJEa: MCUP 07-11x1 CALLAWAY VERIZON WIRELESS COIMDITIOIMS Land Development Engineering has completed its review of the above referenced project for application completeness and has determined that the application and plans submitted for this project are complete and suitable for continued review. Engineering staff does not have any comments to add to the project. Please add the following conditions to the approving resolution/letter: 1. Developer shall comply with the City's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are not limited to pollution treatment practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants ofthe above requirements. If you or the applicant has any questions regarding the above, please either see or call me at extension 2781. David Rick Associate Engineer - Land Development Engineering Community & Economic Development 1635 Faraday Ave. I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-2710 I 760-602-8560 fax I www.carlsbadca.gov ' .Ar. F'LE COPY %,^W CITY OF 7./0./^ V CARLSBAD Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Notice is hereby given that a Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP) has been applied for to allow the continued operation of an existing Wireless Communications Facility (WCF) on property generally located at 2180 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad, California, and more particularly described as: Portion of Lots 38 & 40, and all of lot 39 of Carlsbad Tract #81-10, unit #2-A, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego If you have any objections to the granting of this MCUP or wish to have an informal hearing to discuss the requested MCUP, please notify the Planning Division, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, in writing within 10 days of the date of this notice. If you have any questions, please call Chris Garcia in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4622. CASE NO.: MCUP 07-11x1 CASE NAME: Callaway Verizon Wireless DATE: July 10, 2012 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION Planning Division MM' 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® r GmO: 0-2 i / / THOIAS GUIDE ^SAN DIEGO COUftTT; PAGE NO: 1177 2180 RUTMERFORD ROW VICINITT MAP - N.T.S. VenJOnwireless CALLAWAY 21 BD RUTHERFORD ROAD CARLSBAD, CA 92DGB DIRECTIONS TO SITE HEAD SOUTHEAST T(MM!D SAND CANTCN SIDE PATH TRAIL TURN KOn ONTO SAND CANTON AVE. MERGE ONTO \-M3a S VIA THE RAMP TO SAN DIEGO. MERGE ONTO 1-5 S. TAKE EXrr -f? TOR PALOMAR AIRPORT RD. TURN LEFT ONTO PALOMAR AIRPORT RD. TURN LEFT ONTO COLLfiJE a.VD. TAKE TVE 3RD RIGHT ONTO ASTON AVE. TAKE THE WD RIGHT ONTO RUTHERFORD RD. DESTINATION HILL BE ON THE LEFT. DRIVING DIRECTIONS m NEW AHT9MA EXISTING ANTENNA GROUND ROD GROUND BUS BAR MECH. GRND. CONN. CADMELD GROUND ACC. WELL ELECTRIC BOX TELEPHONE BOX UGHT POLE o FOUNDATION SPOT ELEV. A SET PONT REVISION ® GRID REF. DETAIL REF. ELEVATION REF. SECTION REF. PROPAEASE UNE Q MATCH vm 9 WORKPOHfr GRND. CONDUCTOR —T— TELE. CONDUrr E —— ELECT. CONDUrr COAXIAL CABLE a/mm) %RV. CONDUCTORS CHAIN LINK FENCE CENTERLINE WOOD CONT. WOOD BLOCKING PUSTER (£) MASONRY T] CONCRETE KiffiBjliiiBiiffii EARTH Ki5.5;»;»i5ia GRAva PLYWOOD iiSs'a^^jgfejgi SAND Tzzaazzzzzi STEEL SYMBOLS, LINETYPES AND MATC^ PATTERNS PIAN VERIFICATiON CONTRACTOR SHAU. VERIFY UX PLANS AND EXISTING DBIENSIONS AND CONDmONS ON THE JOB STTE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NCrriFr THE ARCHITECT IN WRTFING OF ANY DISCRH'ANaES BEFORE PROCEEDING wrrn THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES AC. ASPHALT CCNOErE GVL GRAVa AKT. AKTmiAfs; HC. HANDICAPPED Ba BELOW HORIZ. HORIZONTAL B.6. BELOW GRAIX HT. HEIGHT BLDiG. BUILDING HVAC. HTGy VENT7 A/C B.M. BENCH MARK INa. INCLUDE BHC BRICK LBS. POUf«)S CAE CABINET LPT. LOW POINT C£. aTCH BASIN MAS. MASONRY CEM. CEMENT MAX. MAXIMUM CFT. CUBIC FOOT VET. METAL C.I.P.C. CAST-IN-PLA^ CONC. MFR. MANUFACTURE C.LL CONTTMCT LIMIT UNE MN. MINIMUM CIS. CLOSURE C.M.U. CONC. MASONRY UNIT N NORTH CONC. CONCRETE N.I.C NOT IN CONTRACT CONN. CONNECTION N.T.S. HOT TD SCALE CONST. CONSTRUCTION P.P. POI-ffiRPOLE CTR. CENTER PX. PROPaJTY LINE CYD. CUBIC YARD PAC. POINT OF COtW. DBL DOUBLE PROP. PROPER n* DB10. MMOUTION PT. POINT DIM. DIMENSION PVMT. PAVEMENT DRWG. DRAWING RESD. REQUIRED DTL DETAIL RFH. ROOF WATCH (E; EXISTING RFG. ROOFING E EAST R.O>l. RIGHT-OF-WAY E.L ELEVATION S SOUTH ELEC. ELEcnac (AL; Ta. TELEPHONE ENCL ENCLOSURE T.O.P. TOP OF PARAPET EP. ELECT. PANELBOARD T.O.S. TOP OF SLAB EQUIP. EQUIPMENT ^SURFACE; EX. EXISTING T.OX TOP OF WALL EXT. EXTERIOR TYP. TYPICAL FS. FINISH SURFACE m. UtflNISHED FT. FOOT OR FEET U.N.O. UNLESS NOTED FLrr. FUTURE OTHERWISE G.C. GENERAL CONTR. VB!T. VERTICAL G.F. GROUhD FACE W WEST GND. GROUND W/ wnH GR. GRADE OR GRADING WP. WATERPROOF GV. GAS VENT WT. WEIGHT ABBREVIATIONS Aa WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PB^FORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WOH VS. CURRENT EDTTIONS OF TXE FOLLOWING CODES AS ACCEPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNMG AUTHORmES. NOTHING IN THES PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PHBirr WORK NOT CO(«=ORMING TO TME LATEST EDTTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES. 1. 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, VOLS. 1 % 2 2. 2010 CALIFORNIA RESIDB4TIAL CODE 3. 2010 CAUFORNIA PLUTBING CODE A. 2010 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE S. 2010 CAUFORNIA EL£CT1!1CAL CODE «. 2010 BIBRSr CODE 7. 2010 GREEN BUILDING CODE e. 2010 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE 2010 CALIFORNIA REFERENCE STANDARDS CODE CODE COMPUANCE ?ITFPARrfn, HC-212-070-25-00 JURISDICTION: cmr OF CARLSBAD ZONE: C-M OCCUPANCr' UNMANNED TELECOMMUNiaTHWS FACIUTY UTITUDE. ^ or SS^iP N ur B' 53.18' W 280' A.M.SL. LEGAL DESCRIPTION. REFER TO A-1 SHEET. PROJECT DATA aTE ACIPRESS: 2180 RUTHERFORD ROAD CARLSBAD, a <Q00e CALLAWAY GOLF CO. 2285 RUTMERFORD ROAD CARLSBAD, CA <C00e «!NTAa= f7*o; "Bi-rni APPLICAKr: VERIZON WIRELESS 15605 SAND CANYON AVE. BUILDING 'D* IST FLOOR IRVINE, CA<Qit8 PHONE, cm) 28*-7000 PRCLffCT REPRESENTATIVE. FMHC PROJECT MANASER. JENNIFER NOWAK «»0 CAMPUS DRIVE, STE 200 NEWPORT BEACH CA <t2M0 MOBILE. (tW; 8.44-5201 /«cHrreCT. ACO ARCHITECTS, INC. 2tl7D ENTERPRBE WAY WOO LAKE FOREST, Ck <t2eO PHONE. (W; Ttt-WO FAX. m-KttA CONTACT. ANTHONY ORTALE fW) 716-WO PROJECT DIRECTORY THIS IS A REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT OF LAND USE EhTnTLEMENTS UNDER FOR MCUP NO. 07-ll-CALLAWAY VERIZON WIRELESS FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION ANTENNAS AND REUTED EQUIPMENT INSTALLED ON THE ROOFTOP OF AN EXISTING BUILDING. PROJECT DESCRIPTION T-l TTTLE SHEET A-1 SITE PLAN A-2 DETAILED STPE PUVN A-3 ARCHrTECTURAL ELEVATIONS A-4 ARCHrTECTURAL ELEVATION CITY OF CARLSBAD Administrative Permit E-diibit No_ Mi Date. SHEET INDEX REV. DATE/BY. 05-17-12 JY REVISION DESCRIPTION. ZONING SET CONSULTANT. 4 FmriQ taking telecom to new heignts 4060 CAMPUS DRIVE, STE 200 HEWPOI?r BEACH CA 92660 OFFICE. «V«^B2.<M00 - FAX. <V«.852.81I5 STTE BUILDSi. wireless 15505 SAND CANYON AVE. BUILOm 'D' 1st. FU»R I1?VINE, CA. 12618 PMONE cm) 286-7000 M£ DEVELOPTENT. ACQ ARCHITECTS - INC. 26170 ENTERPI?ISE WAY «600 LAKE FOREST, CA Viao ra. 'M«i-7i6-<n4o FAX. <VW-2<17-47B8 BtGINEER. SITE INFO. SrrE NAME. CALLAWAY SITE ADDRESS. 2180 RUTHEI5F0RD ROAD CARLSBAD, CA 1200& St«ET TITLE. TITLE SHEET DRAWING INFO. DWG. NAME. DRAWN BY. DATE. ^ JT 05-15-12 SHEET NUMBER. NOTES: (?) BASTING VERIZON WIRELESS B'-O" X 25'-0' f325 SQ. FT.; LEASE AREA ^ LOCATED ON ROOFTOP OF EXISTING BUILDING. REFER TO SHEET A-2. (2) EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS (A) PANa ANTENNAS PER SECTOR AT (3) ^ SECTORS, LOCATED ON EXISTING BUIUMNG ROOFTOP MOUNTED BEHIND EXISTING RF TRANSPARENT SCREEN WALL. (3) EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS ROOF ^ MOUNTED COAX CABLE TRAY. (7) EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS WALL ^ MOUNTED COAX CABLE TRAY. 0 EXISTING PSmiOUSE. 0 EXISTING BUILDING ROOFTOP. (7) EXISTING MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. ^ TYPICAL 0 EXISTING BUILDING LOWER ROOF. 0 EXISTING SKYUGHT. @ EXISTING P>WKING. TYPICAL. 0 EXISTING PROPSm" LINES. LEAGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCa. I: TI4AT PORTION OF LOTS 38 AND 40, AND ALL OF LOT 3<1 DF CARLSBAD TRACT NO 81-10, UNIT N0.2-A, IN THE CiTY OF CARLSBAD, COUhTFr OF SAN DiE&D, STATE OF CALlFOfSllA, ACCORDtNS TO HAP THEREOF MD.IHH RLED IN TWE OFFICE 0= THE COiWrr RECORDER CF SAN DfEGiJ COLftlTY, JWARY 3), M», BEINS MORE PARTJOJLfcRLY DESCRIBED AS FOUOWS; WINNING AT THE NORTHWrST CORNER O? J^X V\, BEIMS THE TRUE POlNr OF BEGINNINO; THENCE S0UTWEA5TERLT AU»1S THE NORIHERLT [JNE OF SAID LOT 3fi, SOUTH lCn\'22' EAST, aa 05 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3q AND THE K^THWST CORNER OF LOT 40; THENCE EASTERLY ALOWI THE NORTHERl.Y LINE OF SAID IJOT 40 SOJT^^ arCSW EAST, 33S to FEET; TH04CE LEAVING SAID WRTH UNE OF LOT 40 SOTTH TWS\' WEST, Atom FEFT TO A POINT OH THE NORTHERLY SIDELINE OF BJTWERFORD ROAD AND THE ARC OF A flM.OO FOOT RADIUS CUWrt, CONCAVE NORTHERLY A RADIAL TO 5AID POINT KARS SOUTH ra-BB'*' EAST; THENCE MESTERLT ALOKS TWE ARC OF SAID CURVE MD SAID NORTHERLY SIDaiNE THROU&H A CEhTTRAL ANGLE OF 2<rym' A DISTANCE OF +44 W FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 40 AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LCTT THEJJCE CONTlNUINt AUWfi THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY UhC CF LOT y\, THROUGH A CEMTTIAL ANGLE OF 3'45W A DISTANCE OF 66.67 FEET; TlffiNC^ TANGOrr TO SAID CURVE NORTH Tffe%r WEST, 2^.47 FEET TO THE HOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3q ANO THE MOST SOTrHcRLY CORNER OF LOT 36; THENCE CONTINUING NORTtWESTERLT Aa>iG THE SOimiERLY LINE OF LTrf 36, NCWTH 70-43'S7' 1«IEST, 3O.O0 REET TO THE KGINNING OF A TANGENT 5M.C0 HXXl RWJWS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLT; NOBrHW£5T0!lY ALONd TWE ARC CF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CE^^TRAL ANGLE OF 037*56* A DISTANCE OF 6 22 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POtNT BEARS SOim 1T53W WESTi THENCE LEAVING THE ARC OF SAID CURVE WD THE NORTHERLY S\DBJtE OF RLm4ERFi3?D ROAD, NORTH 23*28'06' EAST, iq442 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEfflNMNS. TSEETT ' THAT PORTKJM OF LOT 40 OF CARLSBAD TRACT N08!-KJ, LWJT ND 2~A, ACOMDM [TAP THEREOF NO.III34, AS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF TKE COUNTY RECOHOER OF SAN DIECt COUNTY JANUARY 31, HBo, AND ALSO THAT PORTION OF LJTT 1 OF CAW.SBAD TRACT NO.Bl-10 UNIT NO.1, ACCCRDINS TO MAP THERKIF NO.ICMO, AS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF TWE COUNTY RKORDER OF SAN DIECO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 19, 1162, BEING rXKL PARTICUURLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLCWS^ aSSfWINS A7' THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF MAP NO 1(H3C, BEING THE TRUE POir T OF BEGINNING, THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT « OF HAP N0.11!S4 AND A PONT DN THE NORTHERLY SIDELINE OF RUTHERFORD ROAD; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT « MD TVE NORTHERLY SIDEUNE RUTHERFORD ROAD, SOUTH 75-a»2' WEST, 74i.7A FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT &64.CC FOOT RADlU! CURVE, CONCAVE NORTWERLY; THENCE WESTHRLY ALONG TT4E AK; OF SAID CURVE THROW -I A CmHAL ANGLE OF nX/W A DISTANCE OF 15.12 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 13-58'*' EAST; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTHERLY LINE Cf LOT 40 AND THE NORTHERLY SIDELINE Of RmT€»=ORD ROAD NORTH 2V5I' EAST AtO.'V^ FEET TO A POIN" IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID UTT 40; THENCE EASTERLY ALONS SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 67TRW EAST 126 31 FEET TO THE NORTMEAST CORNER OF LOT 40 AND A POINT ON THE k€ST LINE OF SAID LOT 1: THENCE NORTHBiLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE NORTH B"43'3B' EAST 15U FEET TD A POMT DN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 AS ESTABLISHED PER CERTIFICATE OF COrffUANCE RECORDED NOlrtFIBER 11, IW AS FILE-^AGE N0A4-4M74 o(_^ OFFICIAL RECORDS AND MCORD OF SURVEY MAP NO.1002a; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG TWE NORTH LB^E OF SAID LOT NORTH BZ^aO" EAST 70M FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH IfSB'SB' EAST, m37 FEET TO A POINT ON TWE SOUTH UNE OF LOT AND ALSO BEING A POINT OF THE NORTHERLY SIDEUNE OF RUTHERFORD ROAD; THENCE SOUTHWSTmT ALCNG THE SOUTH L(W£ OF LOT 50U7W TSOPlW WEST, 7630 FEET TD THE TRUE POINT OF BElNNING, SAID LEGAL ASCRIPTIONS ARE SET CUT FOR THE RECORD IN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE APPROVED BY THE OTT OF CARLSBAD AND RECORDED NCVETBER 5, l«|B AS FILE/PAGE NO 86-415646 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS END OF SCHEDULE A (lase No. CITY OF CARLSBAD Administrative Pennit < CQ SITE PLAN I SCALE. I 1' m 40''0' I 0 DATE/ST: Jr REV15K3N r^SCRlPTlON! ZOMNG SET CONSULTAhfTi .))) FmriQ taking telecom to new heigHb 4060 cArms DRIVE, STE 200 NEV4P0RT KACH CA 12660 • OFFICE. 'W1.8S2.<MO0 - FAX. S4q.852.8115 STTE BUIUJER. 'wireless 15506 SAND CANYON AVE. BUILDING 'D' Ist. FLOOR IRVINE, CA. «a6t8 PHONE (<Vn) 286-7000 AIE DEVELOPTENT. ACD ARCHITECTS - INC. 26170 ENTERPRISE WAY «600 LAKE FOREST, CA IZMO TEL. «Mq-716-«n40 FAX. <M«l-2<17-4r86 ENGINEER. SITE INFO. STTE NAME: CALLAWAY STTE AraJRESS. 2180 RUTHERFORD ROAD CARLSBAD, CA 12008 SHEET TfTLE. SITE PLAN DRAWING INFO. DWG. NAME. DRAWN BY. DATE. L -JY 05-15-12 SHEET NUMBER. NOTES: © © © © © © © © ® © ® EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS H'-O* X 25'-0' f325 SO. FT.) LEASE AREA LOCATED ON ROOFTOP OF EXISTING BUILDING. EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS EOUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED ON STEa PUTFORM LOCATED ON EXISTING BUILDING ROOFTOP. EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS SUB-PANa MOUNTED ON EXISTING GUARDRAIL. EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS FIBER BOX MOUNTED ON EXISTING GUARDRAIL EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS TELCO BOX MOUNTED ON EXISTING GUARDRAIL. EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS STEa PUTFORM WITH STAIRS AND GUARDRAIL LOCATED ON ROOFTOP. EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS ROOF MOUNTED COAX CABLE TRAY. EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS WAU MOUNTED COAX CABLE TRAY. EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS 12'xl2N8' DTTV CABINET MOUNTED ON EXISTING GUARDRAIL EXISTING BUILDING ROOFTOP. EXISTING MECHANICAL EOUIPMENT. TYPICAL EXISTING PENTHOUSE. REV. DATE«Y. 05-r7-12 JY REVISION DESCRIPTION. ZONING SET CONSULTANT. FmnQ taking telecom to new heignts 4060 CAMPUS DRIV^, STE 200 NEV4P0RT BEACH CA 12660 OFFICE: 'W.852.'M00 - FAX. 'W.852.8115 STTE BUIUXR. V^er/ffiiii wireless 15505 SAND CANYON AW. BUILDING 'D' l9t. FLOOR IRVINE, CA. <G618 PHONE (<m) 286-7000 AIE DEmOPMENT. ARCHITECTS - INC. 26r70 ENTERPRISE l*^Y «600 LAKE FOREST, CA 92(30 TEL. «VM-716-<M40 FAX. 141-217-4788 SITE INFO. STTE NAME. CALLANAT SITE ADDRESS. 2180 RUTHERFORD ROAD CARLSBAD, CA 12006 SJffiET TTTLE. DETAILED SITE PLAN DRAWING INFO. DWG. NAME. DRAWN BY. DATE. L -JY 05-16-12 SteET NUMBER. A-2 ) CITY OF CARLSBAD Administrative Permit Case No.. \TJ. EXISTING SCREENWALL ^CM)" A.G.L a& EXCTNG BUILDING. 'W^ A.G.L. EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS (A) PANa ANTEhWAS PER SECTOR AT (3) KCTIORS, LOCATED ON EXISTING BUILDING ROOFTOP MOUNTED BEHIND EXISTING RF T1UNSPARENT SCREB4 WALL EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS EOUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED ON STEa PUTFORM LOCATED ON EXISTING BUILDING ROOFTOP. (BEYOND) EXISTING MECHANICAL EflUIPMENT. TYPICAL EXISTING FWTHOUSE. EXISTING raaZON WIRELBS (A) PANa ANTEWJAS ^Eft §ECTt!ir>rT (3) SECTORS, LOaTED ON EXISTING BUItDWffWmtJPT'KJUmHr BB4IND EXISTING RF TRANSPARENT SCREEN WALL Date. <> <> 'O^.O' A.G.L. SOUTH ELEVATION I SCALE: I 1/lt' . I'-O* I EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS (A) PANa ANTENNAS PER SECTOR AT (3) SECTORS, LOCATED ON EXISTWG BUILDING ROOFTOP MOUNTED BfflIND EXISTING RF TRANSPARENT SCREEN WAU. (BEYOND; EXISTING MECHANICAL EGUIPMENT. TYPICAL EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS (4) PAIffiL ANTENNAS PER SKTOR AT (3) SECTORS, LOaTED ON EXISTING BUILDING ROOFTOP MOUNTED BB^IND EXtSTING RF TRANSPARENT SCREEN WALL EXISTING VB?IZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED ON STEa PUTF0W1 LOCATED ON EXISTING BUILDING ROOFTOP. (BEYOND; •EXISTING PENTHOUSE. (BEYOND; l4-)T.O. BOSTINGJ:OWER_reiOF •'^'io'-d* A.G.L EXISTING BUILDMG. (4\EXIS EXISTING GRADE LEVa tf-O* A.G.L L EAST ELEVATION I SCALE. I O I/It' • I'-O' I -^^ REV. DATE/BY. 05-17-12 JY REVISION DESCRIPTION. ZONING SET CONSULTANT. ))) FmnQ taking telecom to new heignts 4060 CAMPUS DRIVE, STE 200 NEWPORT BEACH CA 12660 OFFICE: 141.852.1400 - FAX. 141.852.8115 STTE BUILDER. 'wireless 15505 SAND CANYON AVE. BUILDING 'D' Ist. FLOOR IRVINE, CA. 12618 PHONE (14i; 286-7000 AIE DEVELOPMSff. ARCHITECTS - INC. 26170 ENTERPRISE WAT «600 LAKE FOREST, CA 12M0 TEL. 141-716-1140 FAX. 141-217-4788 SITE INFO. SITE NAME. CALLAWAY SITE ADDRESS. 2180 RUTHERFORD ROAD CARLSBAD, CA 12006 SHEET TTTLE. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS DRAWING INFO. DWS. NAME. DRAWN BY. DATE. A3 JY 05-15-12 SHEET NUTBER. A-3 CiTY OF CARLSBAD Administrative Permit I Case No. .Date. EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS (4; PANa ANTENNAS - PEH SECTOR AT (3) SECTORS, LOCATED ON EXISTING BUILDING ROOFTOP MOUNTED BEHIND EXISTING RF TRANSPARENT SCREEN WALL (BETOND; EXISTING VERIZON WIRELESS EGUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED ON STEa PUTFORM LOCATED ON EXISTING BUILDING ROOFTOP. EXISTING PENTHOUSE. EXISTING VERIZON WIRELBS (A) PANa ANTENNAS PER SECTOR AT (3) SECTORS, LOCATED ON EXISTING BUILDING ROOFTOP MOUNTED BWIND EXISTING KF TRANSPARENT SCRHN WALL (BEYOND; EXISTING MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. TYPICAL T.O. EXISTING SCREENWALL <k Alf-O" A.S.L. T-^ T.O. EXISTING BUILPING <k 35'-0" A.G1. V _T.O^EXISTING U3WER ROOF/jt Stf-O" A.G.L V - EXISTING BUILDING. giSriNS GRADE LEVa /k O'-O' A.G.L WEST ELEVATION I SCALE. I Wf • I'-O* I REV. DATE/BY. 05-17-12 JY REVISION DESCRIPTION. ZONING SET CONSULTANT. f)) Fmng taking telecom to new heignts 4060 CAMPUS DRIVE, STE 200 NEWPORT BBAOA CA 12660 OFFICE: 141.852.1400 - FAX: 141.852.8115 STTE BUILDER. wireless 16505 SAND CANYON AVE. BUILDING 'D' 1st. FLOOR IRVINE, CA. 12618 PHONE (141; 286-7000 A*E DEVELOPMENT. ARCHITECTS - INC. 26170 ENTERPRISE WAY WOO LAKE FOREST, CA 12630 Ta. 141-716-1140 FAX: 141-217-4786 SITE INFO: SITE NAME. CALLAWAY SITE ADDRESS. 2160 RUTHERFORD ROAD aRL^AD, a 12006 SHEET TTTLE. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION DRAWING INFO. DWG. NAME. DRAWN BY. DATE. JY 05-15-12 SHEET NUMBER.