HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.83.65; PARK PLACE APARTMENTS; Engineering ApplicationApplication for Grading Permit
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1200 Elm Avenue
438-5541
PE NO. 2_8 3 & 6-_56
Validation by Finance
Department
Building Permit Plan Check No.
I RR; no MC I
FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN
Site Address Surety Company Bond No.
Legal Description Map No.
5,4" S8 (3 ~4
Surety Addres s
Subdivision Name C-,t- 7
I PN -,( k e I ^ ~_ i~,_
Date Filed Rec,d by
Owner Phone
. )<, P~ e 6 -4 0
Cash deposit Rec!d by Date filed
$
Owner's Address
ILI UL C L,
The*following documents are required and shall become a part
of the grading permit when they are approved.
— Grading plans Specifications
Soil report Geologic Report
Drainage structures Other -
Compaction report
Plans by Civil Engineer R.C.E.
H F, : 1 8 S_.~ Z 1 V1 i V) ) —5
Address" C/ Phone
1 ~ 4 j V (61.9) 44 L
Soil Engineer R.C.E. Phone
Grading Contractor, Phone SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE
A PART OF THIS PERMIT
Address Authorized hours of operation:
7-00 AM to.Sunset, Monday - Friday.
Part f r overall supervision respons 0
'DTC, - jA~' Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. Proposed use ~5f grade site
A`IA~ , I -)r Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation
control. NumbePof cutAc yards vr—
Cut Fill Import Waste All slopes shall be planted per City Code.
,5-0 o C) 0 1
Proposed Schedule of Start Finish
operations (dates) Fk - eq 40,,;( 0-4
All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum
density unless noted otherwise.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that ADJA(~~C_MT_ Pea. 0VWek_--,
LETTEA /CER5111-7 OfAINAOF-) the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply With
all City ordinances and State laws regulating, excavating and grading,
and the provisions and conditions of any permit issued pursuant to Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is:
E) REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections
this application. listed below.
Signature of Permittee J9 C" A' c-- V
tl—
EJ CONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall
observe Work, coordinate tests, make reports.
Owner or authorized agent rl j I--- INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE
Initial - site prep. 3104lb
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE -
Date Rough - prior to drains
EIA Log No.
By Final - slopes planted
Compaction reports rec'd. Grading permit fee /94. 0-9~ Plan c hec,k fee $ _16"ado
Private engr. cert. rec'd. Permit Issued ' I ,-- 1 , /q
t
Dy -1 f r__ LiaTe Copies: White-Officel; Green-Building;
Permit Expikua/hltate /or Yellow-inspector,; Pink-Permittee; Goldenrod-Finance
THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IS APERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED
THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD
8.3. 6S"
0
JOHN VERNON & ASSOCIATES
1859 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD.
ESCONDIDO, CA 92015
TEL - (7141743.86(*
00
OP.ERT" DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS
-%G - Sol%$ TCST,Pi-. - %U&VFVl%C.
Agene Zll;lel e~~_ 1.5-
~ VeA~11__r-v 004 Project Location
GRADING REPORT
Name of Permittee
Grading Permit No,
A* COMPATIBILITY'VITH GRADI'NG PLAN AND PERMIT
1,~. Was the compac,ted fill placed only in the approximate lo- Yes k." No
cation
- 9
designated-on the grading plan As areas to be
filled'?
2. Di d the quantity of fill material placed approximately Ye:sA,.- No
conform to the grading plan? —
30 Did the toe of,fill.or the top of cut appear t,o meet the Yes No
prescribed property line setback (1.5' for fill; 3.0' for cuts )?
Were the finished fill slopes equal to or less than 21 hor- Y e s to-" Nc
- izontal to 1 vertical?
.5. If the fill material was obtained by cuts on the site, Yesto-o"'No
were the ctifs'_ -the -p-ro*-p ---- eir location and*t:o the prop . er
slope ap~roximatelyas shown on the approved grading plan?
6. Were Vrow'ditches 6onstructed approximately as shown on Yes~-~ No
the grading plan?---
B. LOCATION AND AMOUNT OF COMPACTION TESTS.
l. -Have you attached a sketch -and data showing the locaticyn Y e, s N o
and. relative elevation for all compaction tests?
Was a compaction test made -so that there is at lea,st one Yes N,..
test in each 21 thick lens of compacted material.
As indicated by inspections, observations and compaction Yes_Lf No
test results, was the fill, excluding the top 1.01 , compacted
to at least 90fo of maximum dry density?
C . QUALITY OF FILL COMPACTION OPERATION
I . Was the area to receive f ill properly prepared in terms of Yez._1e!::~:N.;o_
brush removal, benching, wetting, removal of noncompacted
fill or debris and related. items?
2. Was all detrimentally expansive soil placed in the fill at -Yes_J::f No
3' or more below finish grade?
Duplicate of DPL #73
Rev. 3-7-79
3. Have you attached a copy of your curve showing the re.18- Yes- L~-~ No-,— tionship between optimum -moistumcontent and maximum
density?
-4..--Was all material -used~as-fill (earthi rocks, gravel) Yesk.--"- No
smaller than 12" in size?
Are all areas of the fill suitable for support of Yest,---, No
structures9
Were all existing fills on the s1te recompacted. in accord- Yest0000' No
ance with the provisions of the-grading ordinance?
D. STATISTICAL DATA
Dates the grading work was performedt Apa z6 — 7-0
Date~s your representative ,was on site and number/of hours,on,site for
each date, and name of representative 47 An., Z'6 — '75
E. AS-BUILT DATA
1. Iff'the fill placement was
ap~proved grading plan, di y
was di y
obtain approval for devi i
ceed,ing with addit,l-onal i 1
2s If the approved gr~d 1 a
,! a 0
location, depth 0
re : view '. and-appro.-I. an a ss - 4b
ccordance with the
otify the-permittee to
om the plan before pro-
cerrent?
~does not reflect the actual
fill. have you submitted for
I :It plan? -
Yes No
Yes - No
.REMAR-KS:
9 ne,
!g 52 e-
CERTIFICATION
T hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the*ifformiati.,"n
-provided in this. certification is true to the bes~t M".r
and belief.
~Esslo r Vp a . ..... 4,u e a 1: e
R.C.E. '-A'211
107A
PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS
JOHN VERNON & ASSOCIXrES
1859 S. Ewondido Blvd.
't (JF 00-~ FA=xHdo, CA 92025
743-8808
Duplicate of DPL #73 Rev. 3-7-79
IN