The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPE 2.84.75; LA COSTA VALE UNIT 3 LOT 481; Engineering Applicationx/a. zp4g,5 Building Permit Plan Check No. Application for Grading Permit CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1200 Elm Avenue 438-5541 0 PE NO. I Ll - 7,S7 ~W2/111969V FiNance 1111 0 a MC TT07000 %1 FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN Site Address Surety Company Bond No. Ve ticccjci 5 77 Oct , Js kir/ Legal Description Map NO. Surety Address /d LvQ 3 1-61- ~(y / I ilk , I Subdivision N.amt. Date Filed Rec'd by Owner Phone Cash deposit Rec'd by Date filed Nr)s 7;2-7 -.3 7 76 $ Owner's Address The following d uments are required and shall become a part C1.20 i , 93 ZM, Ao'hs-e4,, 4ve_ of -the gradiV permit When they are approved. - v" Grading plans — Specifications Plans by Civil Engineer R. C. E'. -.j L Vt,.,,m J. oil Soil report — Geologic Report Drainage structures Other Compaction report Address Ph VVY, .7315 Soil Engineer R.C.E. Phone 1/1? 01 14 0 Grad* Cont tor Phone Za T;c k AIL— SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE A PART!OF THIS PERMIT Address Authorized hours of operation: 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday 7 Friday. Party responsible for overall supervision 7,27-37' 4 Proposed use yf grade site Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. t Ir5 cle -c -e U k, Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation Number of cubic yards control. Cut Pill Import Waste All slopes shall be planted per City Code. j75-0 Proposed Schedule of Start Finish All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum Operations (dates) ~~/5% density unless noted otherwise. A/C e ~ e7l 4 01A / K5 r I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply With A2ml_ ZZ all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grad i ng, Under City Code Sec. 11.06-170 this grading.1s: and the provisions afid conditions of any permit issued pursuant to El REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make ifispections this application. listed below. El CONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall Signature of Permittee observe work, coordinate testsi make reports. INSPECTION DATE, INSP. SIGNATURE Owner or authorized agent Initial -,site prep. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE - -1 C___ Date ZoeJ Rough - prior to drains EIA Log No. By Final - sl6pes planted Grading permit fe Plan, check fee $ 00 —0 70 2_0 - Compaction reports rec'd. Permit I E3 Private engr. cert. rec'd. by Date Copies: White-Office; Green-Building; Permit Expiration Date Yellow-Inspector; Pink-PermitteJG61denrod-Finance THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IS A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED THIS-PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD Department of Planning and Land Use' 'I, 9150 Chesapeake Drive 325 South Melrose.Drive 200. L,East Main San Diego, CA 92123 Vista, CA 92083 El Cajon, CA 92020 565-5920 (Zenith 7-0888) 758-6711 (Zenith 7-2001) 579-4511 (Zenith 7-1398) Project Location -5341 Name of Permittee e'oVIII-S I/0.A/. 6,4441^1 CIA A L -3 0.4 0 Grading Forsilt3o.- This report form for a "winor" grading project Is to be completed and signe& by the Registered Civil Engineer (or Architect) who has been designated on the Grading Plan and Perml; as the Engineer who will furnish the compaction report for work authorized by a grading permit issued by the Department of Planning and Land Use. The Intent of the format is to provide Information to the Department of Planning and LAnd Use as to jrMing compliance with the approved Grading Plan and Permit. Acre the questions kelow refer to location. configuration or quantity of cut and/or fill areas. It is understood that your response will not normally be based an an actual Land survey or detailed earthwork quantity calculi trionl. It should be notedij however. that the Department is particularly concerned where there are possible infractions with respect to over- steepened slopes, encroachments of required setbacks, uncompacted fills placed, or where the quantity of fill placed differs substantially from that authorized. The Department of Planning and Land Use requires that all fills authorized by a Grading Permit be compacted to a minimum of 9191 of -saximum density with the exception that not more than L2" of uncompacted and untested fills may be dispersed over the land,parcel. The need to compact 311 fills that are beyond the present limits of the present prorosed construction Is to insure that future proposed construction of room additions or swimming a ad om ted or a ,00ls or similar structures will not require that uncompacted fills be rem v or rec pac th t extensive foundation work be Instakled. Compaction reports will not be accepted unless this form is completed and signed-by the registered person. A. COMPATIBLLITY WITH GWING PLA4 AM PERMIT was the compacted fill placed only in the approximate locations, designated an the grading Yes No— plan as areas to be filled? Did the quantity of fill material pieced approximately conform to the grading plant Yes Did the t6e of fill or the top of cut appear to most the prescribed property line setback Yes kf' Vo—(I.S1 for fill. 5.01 for cuts)? Were the finished fill slopes equal to or less than 1 horizontal to I vertical? Yes ioo, .40— S. If the fill material was obtained by cuts on the site, were the cuts made th the proper Yes P", 40 location and to the proper slope approxicately as shown an the approved grading plan? 6.' Were brow ditches constructed approximately as shown on the Irading plan? Yes .40 B. LOCATION AND MOUNT OF COMPACTION TESTS Have you attached a sketch and data showing the location and relative elevation for &It Yes %0—Compaction tests? Was a compaction test made so that there is at. least one test in each 21 thick tons of yest-~ No— compacted material? As indicated by Inspections. observations a-A compaction test results, was the fill. Yes No—excluding the top 1.01 . compacted to at least 90% of maximum dry density? C. QUALITY OF FILL Ca4PACTION OPERATION Was the area to receive fill properly prepared in terms of brush removal. benching. Yes No— . vatting. removal oi noncompacted fill or debris and related'items? Was all detrimentally expensive soil placed in the fill at J1 or core below finish grade? Yes 4 Have you attached a Cory of your curve showing between optimum mol.sture Yes No—~ content and maximin density? A. Was all material used 2s fill (earth, rocks. gravel) seat lor than t:*1 in st:9? Yes So- 3. Are all 2reis of the ill! sul.-.abL* for support of struc-cures! Yes N'a- 6. Nere ill eilsti-ij fills in the site ricospacted I-.1 accordAnce with the provisions oi the Yes %o ;-2ding ordinarce? *. I 0. STATISTICAL DATA Dates the grading work was performed: I/ - 2- V, 2 5-,. Z .294 -30 Dates your representative was on site and number of hours an site for each date. and 0=6 of representative: Z V, 2 5-, 30 S' AS-BUILT DATA I. It the fill placement was not in accordance with the approved qr2ding plan. did you notify yes_ mo_ the permittee to obtain approval for deviation from the plan before proceeding with additional fil't placement? IVA 2. If the ipproved grading plan does not reflect the actual location, depth and type of fill. Yes Na—have you submitted for review and approve& an.as-buLlt plan? REMARKS: el fl_c&4d _ LY 7-ao '607re"') IAI 4 Z C Cle,,V 77 At c/c) 4/ 5 400 rm- /6 5 A e- e;, Ala 'Ca '- 7-H ev, " 0A CERTIFICATION I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the Luf at a provided in th~~ertification Is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. ! ~--' '-, Si;nature Herald R, LkntiS Date (To be signed and dated by a Registered Engineer or Architect ) Registration or Certification Number C-33220 Address 1525 S. Escondido Blvd.y Es'Gondidol Ca. Telephone Number 619-741-0533 -92025 H L Land Devq1opment