Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.87.08; MELLGREN/HOOVER; Engineering ApplicationApplication for Grading Permit • PE NO. -51O 61 CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1200 Elm Avenue /2,4Wf,6 ,'o- 4384641 3S0 Building Permit Plan Check No - FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN Validation by Finance Department Site Address Hoover St. south of Adams St. SthetreY111pT1V '-,q - Legal Description Lot 2 C por. of Lot Map No. 3, Block A, 2152 /4 9I'6. '7AL ,3'fe'h Subdivision Name Minor _Subdivision _No. _736_I_PUD-101 Date i-iled ,4_ _axxeF4. 0.s= c__ -i; __________________________ Rec'd by t Owner Leonard P. Meligren Phone 434-4365 -Cash dcpo3t $ Rec'd by Date filed Owner's Address 3289 Westwood Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008 The following documents are r(quired and shall become a part of the permit when they ar7Pr oved. ZGradingplans Specifications _____ Soil report Geologic Report _V1'Drainage structures _____ Other V" Compaction report Plans by Civil Engineer R.C.E. Joseph K. Lukoski, P.E. 27542 Address Phone 729 -4340 P.O.Box 1733, Carlsbad CA 92008 Soil Engineer R.C.E. Phone Herald R. Lantis, 33220 741-0533 Grading Contractor . Phone SPECIAL CONDITIONS A PART WHICH ARE MADE OF THIS PERMIT Address e Authorized hours 7:00 AM to Sunset, of operation: Monday - Friday. Party responsible for overall sdpervision Brook D. Olsen ______________________________________________ Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. Proposed use of grade site Three (3) building pads Adequate provisions control. shall be made for erosion and siltation Number of cubic yards Cut Fill Import Waste All slopes shall be planted per City Code. 800 2,700 1,900 All fills to be compacted density unless noted to at least 90% of optimum otherwise. Proposed Schedule of Start Finish Operations (dates) I héeby acknowledge that I have read the information I have provided is all City ordinances and State laws and the provisions and conditions this application. Signature of Permittee Owner or authorized agent the application and state that correct and agree to comply with regulating excavating and grading, of any per ued pursuant to _____ _____ 0019 04/17 0101 051isc.. 200.00 Under City Code 0 REGULAR GRADING listed below. CONTROLLED GRADING 7 observe work, coordinate - -- Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: . City inspector will make inspections - Private grading engineer shall tests, make reports. INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE Initial . site prep. i(r7 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE EIA Log No. 21 .oB - /ji Date ________________________ By . 14-- Rough. prior to drains Final - slopes planted /170 da cc'i Compaction reports recd. ./777 Grading permit fee 00 Plan check fee ,,j Private engr. cert. rec'd. ,/y 7 Permit Issued . - -- Goldenrod-Finance L!J FEE: $175.00 RECEIPT NO: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To Be Completed by APPLICANT) CASE NO: DATE:, Jan. 28, 1987 - Applicant: Leonard P. Meligren Address of Applicant: 3289 Westwood Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone Number: (619 ) 43_4365 Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): GENERAL INFORMATION: Description of Project: 3 Lot PUD Project Location/Address: S. W. corner of Hoover and -Adams Street. 115' south of Adams Street. Assessor Parcel Number: ' 206 -,170 - 02 ' Zone of Subject Property: R-1-15000 Proposed Use of Site: 3 single family dwellings List all other applicable applications related to this project: Coastal Permit Application . a. Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man- made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when appropriate. Natural slope approx. 10% to 12% to be cut into 3 building pads. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. Dual glassing and insulation of building. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices Or rents, and type of household size expected. 3 D.U., approx. 3000 s.f. owner occupy, $350.000 , family size 4 to. 5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. N/A If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. '- If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. -2- . I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate. • space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as necessary.) YES NO Could the project significantly change present • land uses in the vicinity of the activity? X Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? Could the activity affect the functioning of an • established community or neighborhood? X Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? X Could the activity increase the number of low and • modest cost housing units in the city? X Could the activity decrease the number of low and • modest cost housing units in the city? X Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not foundin other parts Of the county, state or nation? Could the activity significantly affect an historical or archaeological site or its settings? I Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? Does the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a • • scarce natural resource? • Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? Are there any rare or endangered plant species • in the activity area? Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? • 14) Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's beaches? • Could the activity result inthe erosion or , • elimination of agricultural lands? Could the activity serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment of already developed areas? • -3- X I YES Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)? Will the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? Could the activity resul,t in the generation of significant amounts of noise? Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) rA X X X X 28) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? 29) Will there be a significant change to existing land form? Indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards:C_800F...2,700 Percentage of alteration to the present land form: 75% (C) Maximum height of cut or fill slopes: Cut 9' , Fill 8' 30) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? 31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger project or series of projects? -4- II. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: NONE III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I '(If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.) Signature /I7/ t / (Person Completing Report) Joseyz K. Lukoski, P.E. Date Signed Feb. 6, 1987. -5- 0 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPCT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. _ 2S7:Q DATE:' 1. BACKGROUND / APPLICANT: Leo ccd ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 32Sq e*JocI m. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED:, II. ENVIRONMENTALIMPACTS (Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in: Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features?. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,either on or off the site?. Changes in deposition or erosion . of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion 0 which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the .0 ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 0 YES MAYBE NO S 2.. Air - Will the proposal have significant results in: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable. odors? Cl. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface.water runoff? C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to,. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? -2- . .. .. YES MAYBE NO 4. Plant Life - Will the proposal have .significant results in: Change in the diversity, of species, or numbers of any species of plants • (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C'. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? . d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? . Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d.. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? ,< 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? 7. Light and Glare -.Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use - Will the proposal have • 0 0 significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an • area? . -3- l a .'. ... YES MAYBE NO 9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal have significant results in: Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset - Does the' proposal involve', a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Population - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the proposal have significant results in: Generation of additional vehiäular movement? Effects on existing parking facilit- ies, or demand for new parking? C. Impact upon existing transporation systems? Alterations "to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? -4- Hi .•. YES MAYBE NO 14. Public-Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered. governmental services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? Police protection? 0 C. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e.. Maintenance of public facilities, - 0 including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy,- Will the proposal have signif- icant results in: - Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems.,, or alterations to the following utilities: Power or natural gas? Communications systems? Water? . Sewer or septic tanks? . 0 e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid wa.ste,and disposal? 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of 0 0 any health hazard or potential health 0 , hazard (excluding mental health)? -5- . . YES MAYBE NO Aesthetics - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic 'vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of, an aesthetically offensive public view? ' Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the ,impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? ArcheOlogical/Historical - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical' site, structure, object or building? Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs-, .c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alternate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. jcac5 ecrvr I? Cree*e 4bc€e c3k A() '1StdQices. E'ria4ec '/b( cu-p I-s elCu. yd.i-ed 4-af ci 2.700 is €SeWaIk/ -c() his 'i MO's e1cih MS a h€h4 T+7o, 4 V4J' 6y\ a 4ef a k-~ Acec l(h1)c'J ma . . YES MAYBE NO 22. Mandatory Findings of Significance Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment? Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A-short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) 7 C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but • cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on. the environment is X' d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION € 4cY\J hc~ . yrcYs 2-700 cb yax)s o ( (U(h ±he ce pei) • rc 0 cuf- 744 (j A e le 6~ i 5i •• 9 f e ' (ue( çeS5e (ft i Th S'WJJ SkCUb5 eL (t -us bojv\ oceu\wj h-s rC dtsc • K~0~-Q) as a oq co+u 5U( \ ft+ brds ±3 * DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) coq -T o+ lod -+ —c eooccs chD crithci) (Por+oj h aFuc( }tLcF6rV (ksa, Lkc. P S / £ (@cei c,tk aid Qaqry A-fluV(OP\ w ht^ch Cou(e 1AJ(+ mg G-AOrrk pwn0 u A?o U L 0 rtt,-t (1 4 M, ? iD +o Lo C, J J QCPf / L) i tp 7 f 7 ' r4 J7/j7L7CAtL/ 4-eo. 3 o •P Q-y -rJ1'7oi-'J p;-_, f71J /1- ,' ,tJc I io o - • IV. DET•ERMINATION(To Be Completed by the Land Use Planning Office) On the basis of this initial evaluation: find, the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on V the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added:to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. • I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ie • __ nn sioifatCire V. MITIGATING.MEASURES (If Applicable) S MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued) VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. 3ignature MH to t41 LIerH1g(}OU5e, t'WU (er1tTTLree. Jfl. i.t, 5acramento, CA 95814-- 916/4.45-061.3 See NOTE Below NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND ENVIRONM'ff DOCUMENT FO S Rn SC . Project Title: MS736/PUD-101 Lead Agency:City of Carlsbad 3. Contact person:Edward Ruiz 3a. Street Address:. 2075 Las Palmas 3b. City: Carlsbad,CA San Diego 92009 (619) 438-1161 PROJECT LOCAT 3c. County: ____- 3d. Zip:______________________ 3e. Phone:_________________________________ Carlsbad San _Diego . CN 4. County: 60 4b.(optiona1).Assssors Parcel No. 90175 CZ. _..4c. Section Tup.Range_________________ 5a. Cross Streets: 5b. For Rural, Nearest Community: Within .2 miles of: a. State Hwy No.5 b. Airports c. Waterways________________________ . DOCUMENT TYPE 8. LOCAL ACTION TYPE 10. DEVELOPMENT TYE CEQA 01 _General Plan Update 01 X•_Residential: Units 4 Acres_____________ 01 NOP 02 New Element 02 Office: Sq.Ft. 02 _Early Cons 03 _General Plan Amendment Acres Employees_________________ 03 XNeg Dec 04 _Master Plan 03 _Shopping/Cowwercial: Sq.Ft._____________________ 04 _Draft EIR 05 _Annexation Acres Employees 05 Supplement/ 06 _peciflc Plan 04 Industrial: Sq.Ft.________________________________ Subsequent EIR (if so, prior SCM # 07 _Redevelopment Acres Employees_________________ 08 _Rezone 05 _Sewer: MGD______________________________________ NEPA . 09 Land Division 06 _Water: MGD______________________________________ TtBd1vis1on, Parcel Map. . 06 Notice of intent Tract Map, etc.) . 07 _lransportatlon: Type__________________________ 07 Envir. Assessment! 10 Use Permit 08 Mineral Exa.tIon: Mineral______________________ FONSI 11 Cancel Ag Preserve 09Power.,e-ttmt .ttage_________________________ 08 Draft EIS - 12 X Other PUD Type: OTHER ___________________________________________ -. . 10 Other:__________________________________________ 09 _tnf'rmation Only 0 9. TOTAL ACRES: 10 _Final Document 11 _Other_____________________ 11. PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT 01 _Aesthetic/Visual 08 _Geologic/Seismic 15 _Sewer Capacity 22 Water Supply 02 _Agricultural Land 09 Jobs/Housing Balance 16 _Soil Erosion 23__yetland/Riparian 03 _Air Quality 10 Minerals 17 Solid Waste 24 Wildlife ' - 04 XArchaeological/Historical 11 Noise 18 _Toxic/Hazardous 25 Growth Inducing 05 _Coastal 12 Public Services 19 _Traffic/Circulation 26 Incompatible Landuse 06 _Fire Hazard 13 _Schools 20 Vegetation 27 Cumulative Effects 07 Flooding/Drainage 14 Septic Systems 21 Water Quality 23 _Other 12. FUIIOING(approx.) Federal S State S Total S - 13. PRESENT LAND USE AND ZONING: . S 14. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A four unit minor subdivision requiring 3,700 cubic yards of grading (800 cubic yard cut, 2,700 cubic yards of fill. 15. SIGNATURE OF LEAD AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: . Date____________________________ NOTE: Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for il new projects. If a SCM Number already exists for a project (e.g. from a Notice of Preoaration or previous draft cccment) please fill It in.