HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.87.15; PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK LOT 8; Engineering Application. I
Applicatio n for Grading Permit 16 PE NO. 97'
/yw:
Building Permit'Plan Check No. 87—;Zsq
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1200 Elm Avenue
438-6&H 33~~Z)
—*"05
Validation by Finance
Department
0010110/05 0101 05Misc. 185-00
FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN
Site A 5'N OF TRACT 80-33 MAP 10061 Surety Company Bond No.
Legal IttfiWiO& TRACT 80-33 Map q?J061 urety Address
Su
bpkNAIIRPORT BUSINESS PARK D Rec'd by
Ow VERRA LAND GROUP INC. Pho r818) 247-3681 Cash deposit Rec'd by Datp f i I ed
I $ /,&V, — 9hL~~ 91014-47
OwNd' 'V'9AAND.BLVD. GLENDALE, CA 91203-1287 Th~ following documents fre required and shaVbeco"me ; part
of the rading permit when they proved.
Grading plans Specif ications
Soil report Geologic Report
Drainage structures Other
Compaction report
Plarp bvPTVjjnb*
RO MLOPMENT ENGRS. INO.'C"' 23.711.91
Add 09 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD. ESCONAVICA 74-3-F~~108
So nhineer 1hon e MH E. VERNON 743-630 '
-Contractor Grading Phone
BeL-16— 15A-C-V_"oe -SEEE—V. ' 4 ( 45 - S7 2-1
SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE
A PART OF THIS PERMIT
Address
.2'0(1_5q _'F'9~
1. Authorized hours of operation:
- 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday.
Part , responsible
PRRERTY
for overall supervision
DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS INC. '(619)743-8808
1 2. Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. Proposed use of grade site
COMMMICAL— WAILMIXIA, Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation
control. Number of cubic yards
Cut
1:
*1500 Fill 1500 Import Waste All slopes shall be planted per City Code.
1500 1 1 ";60.
Proposed Schedule of Start Finish
Operations (dates)
All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum
density unless noted otherwise.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that
the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply with
all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading,
and the provisions and conditions of any permit issued pursuant to
this application.
Signature of Permittee
Owner Pr authorized agent
Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is:
0 REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections
1jefed below.
[VCONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall
observe work, coordinate tests, make reports.
INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE
Initial - site prep. 7 44' ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE -
Date
EIALogNo. FEI.,STIS
By
OE
Rough - prior to drains / //got/y -7
Final - slopes planted / D_ -.~L
Compaction reports rec'd.
941 '00,
G.rading permit fee $ Plan check fee $
Permit s rivate engr. cert. rec'd. '3 / 6-7
Uy UdLt! _j Copies: White-Office; dreen-Building;
Dat Perm piration e Q4?~ eV~ Yellow-inspector; Pink-Permittee; Goldenrod-Finance
7, ee~d
TH IS FORM WHEN PROPER LY VAL[ DATED IS A PERM IT TO DO THE WOR K WESCR I BED
THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD
1200 ELM AVENUE TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 (619) 438-5541
Office of the City Engineer
Citp of Carlobab
TO: BUILDING
FROM: ENGIN EERING DEPARTMENT
DATE:
ROUGH GRADI NG APPROVAL FOR PROJECT NO.
(TRACT or P.E. #)
/oa,/'/
(PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS)
.,01 4e',',, , TZ4,- 4-710 et-f #,, ~,,, V. . -5,4,-b (9 Sa 6, &er, v
(DEVELOPER'S NAME AND ADDRESS)
We have inspected the grading for lotX or phase 0
of the above mentioned project. In addition, we have received rough
grading certification from J04.1 lee-klo&l 4'4z'.-'06' the Soils
Engineer, dated and from
the Supervising Grading Engineer, dated Alov. 2,0 1997 , an.d are satis-
fied that the rough grading has been completed in accordance with City.
standards.
Based on these certifications and our observation, we take no exception to
the issuance of a building permit for lot~ or phase
F7 , of project ? . from a grading
standpoint. This release, however, is not intended to certify the project
from other engineering concerns including site dev!e~lopment, water or sewer
availability, or final grading.
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, we need to .be advised
so that we can verify that final.grading and landscaping has been complet~-
ed in accordance with the approved plans for the project.
APPROVED:
Project frading Inspector Sr. Construction 01pector
cc: Developer
'~.l /1'
PEE: $175.00
RECEIPT NO:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM.- Part
(To Be Completed by 'APPLICANT)
CASE NO:
DATE:
Applicant:- SIERRA LAND GROUP, INC.
Address' of Applic - a'nt': 800 North Brand Blvd.
Glendale, CA 91203-1287
Phone Number: '808 247-3681
Name,.addressl and phone number of.person to be contacted (if other-than
Applicant): Property Development-Engrs.., Inc., 1859, S: Escondido.Blvd., Escondido.,CA
Phone: (619)743-8808 92025
GENERAL INFORMATION:
0 Description df Project:. Grading*& C nstruction of a 14*482.5 sq. ft.
Office/ Industrial Building.
Project Location/Address: Lot 8 of Map No. 10061 Tract 80-33
2019 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad CA 92009
Assessor Parcel Number: 213 061 16
zone of-Subject Property: (P.M) Planned Industrial
Proposed Use of, S.ite:. Office/Industrial
List all other' applicable applications related to this-project:
Building.Permi:t Application
k I -
2. Describe* th e
*
activity area, including.distiguishing natural and miah-
made characteristics;- also.provide. . pr . ecise ,slope analysis when
appropriate. This project is located in the Palomar Airport Industrial Park.
The natural characteristics-have been eliminated-b' 'revious subdivision grading.. y p
Man made characteristics consis
*
t of storm drain .with'pipe & headwall, concrete catch
basin with pipe_& a graded pad with a slope of 27.+.'with-2:1 cut & fill slopes at.
all boundaries of pad.
3.- Describe energy conservation measures.*incorporated into the design
and/or operation of the project. None.
If residential,. include the number of,units o, schedule of unit sizes,
range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected.
N/A
5.. Ifcommercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or
regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading
'facilities.,
N/A '
6.' If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,,and
loading facilities. Small -Industrial/office,48`/*.office, 52% industrial
25 person
*
s per shift, (total bldg.)
8-101 .wide roll 'up doors &A-8' wide roll up door' are,pr'ovided
along the West side.of the.proposed bldg.
The driveway is flush with-the finished.concrete of the building
on the West side, there are no loading docks.
7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per
shift,.es'timated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits
to be.derived from the project.
N/A-.
2
I ENVIRONMENTAL' IMPACT, ANALYSIS
Answer the-f011owing questions by placing a check in the appropriate'.
space. (Discuss all items,check.ed ,"yes". Attach additional-sheets as,
neces.sary.)*
YES NO.
Could the project significantly change present
land uses in the vicinity of thi_- activity? X
Could, the activity' affect the use of a recreational
area, or area of important aesthetic value? X
Could the
"
activity affect the functioning of an
,established community or neighborhood? X
4)' could the activity result in the displacement of
community residenta? A
Could the activity increase the number of low and
~modest cost housing units in the city? X
Could the activity decrease the number of low'and
modest cost housing units in the city? X
Are-any of the natural or man'-made features in the
activity area unique, that is, not found in,other
parts of the county, state or nation? X
Could the activity significantly affect an,
historical or archaeological site or its settings? X
9)- Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use,.extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource? X
Does the activity significantly affect the
'potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource? ~X
Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life? X
Are
'
there.any rare orendangered plant species
in',the activity area? X
Could the activity-change existing features of
- any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? X
14)- Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches? X
Could the activity result in the erosion or
e'l imination of agricultural lands?. X
Could the activity serve to encourage development
of -presently undeveloped areas'or intensify;develop-
ment of already developed areas? X
-3-
-4-
YES NO
17) Will the' ac
'
tivity,requirea variance from
established.cinvironmental .r~tandards,(ai.r, water l~l
noise, etc.)? X
181 ), Will the activity require certification, authoriza-
'by'any 'local, tion or -issuance of. apermit state or
federal environmental control.agency? X
19) will the activity require issuance.of a variance
or conditional use permit by the City? X
~20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or
disposal of potentially'haza.rdous materials? X
21) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain? X,
Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault? X
23.) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities.on a slope of 25 percent or greater? X
24) Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amouhts-of noise? X
25)- Could the activity result,in the generation of
significant amounts of dust? X
Will the activity involve the burning of brush,,
trees, or other materials? X
Could the activity result in a significant change
in the quality of any portion of the region's air
or water resources? (Should note surface, ground
water, off-shore.) X
.28) Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? X
29.). Will there be a significant change,to existing
land form? X
Indicate estimated grading to be done in
cubic yards: 1500
Percentage of alter
*
ation Fo the present,
land form:. 10%.
Maximum height of cut.or fill slopes:
Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers', drains or streets? X
Is the activity carried out as part,.of a larger
project or series of projects? X