Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.87.17; LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT 4 LOT 673; Engineering Application5 Building Permit Plan Check No. Application for Grading Permit CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1200 Elm Avenue 438-954T 3S" PE NO. WZA126, ,? &~ — I - Validation by Finance Department 0003 05/21 0101 Misc. 205-00 FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN Site Address (DL Surety Company Bond No. t A, Legal Description u rety dress ,4 Map No. s4 T., Subdivision Name Date Filed Rec'd by 0 er Phone Cash deposit Rec'd by Date tiled Z? $ /z) -A -7 Owner's Addr r5 3, Loa The following documents are required and shall become a part 6_41 of the grading permit when they are approved. .Plans ivil Engine& e 'A 4-L9 4AW 77 J; R. C. E. -3,722-0 Grading plans Specifications ' Address Phone Soil report Geologic Report - 15 3 5 5 6-.s coA/v /,so ~Lua c_.;co,1,91va 711 Drainage structures Other Engineer R.C.E. Pbone Compaction report 37.20 9 LIS 0 544 Grading Contractor Phone SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH AREVADE 'A,—e? P 600t 4~-_h A) 742, A 2. -Z A PART OF THIS PERMIT Address' 1 Authorized hours of operation: 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday. P t responsible'f6r overall supervision ~Wt & P- M S-3—a . ~ 2. Haul routes are to be approved by City, Engineer. Proposed use of grade site S.F _~~ R (5? Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation Number of cubic yards control. Cut. F ill Import Waste All slopes shall be planted per City Code. Proposed Schedule of Start Finish All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum Operations (dates) density unless noted otherwise. I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading, Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: and the provisions and conditions of any permit issued pursuant to 0 REGULAR GRADING ~ City inspector will make inspections this application. listed below. XCONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall Signature of Permittee observe work, coordinate tests, make reports. INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURfq Owner or authorized agent Initial - site prep. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE - Date Rough - prior to drains EIA Log No. Final - slopes planted K V,4 By V G Plan check fee $ Compaction reports rec'd. JA r~~Permit - fee $ S 6p, r;0,(1's-Fu_ed_ Private engr. cert. rec'd. V iq!5)by 7 Date 7 Copies: White-Office; Green-Building; f/ _11A Permit Expiration Date 1 —2- Yellow-Inspector; Pink-Permittee; Goldenrod- F i nance THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IS A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED 2? THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD 9to -zwy ow --ozoge 41 FEE $f75.,00 RECff'_~ "NO: P T ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM Part (To"-Be Complet'e'd by APPLICANT), CASE NO: P7 DATE: I z Applicant: lq,414e Address of Applicant: Q ck A Phone Number: Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): GENERAL..INFORMATION: Description,,of Project:' FA R I I ti~3 /-jo 4 Project Location/Address-. ob.,disca As.sessor Parcel Number: Zone of Subject Property: Proposed Use of Site:* S F- - AD /,f List all-other,applicable applications related to this project: P_ PE 2. 01. /1 I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A I nswer the following questions by placing a,check in the appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as necessary.)* YES NO Could the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity 'f the activity? 0 Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? AVE>- Could the activity affect-the functioning of-an established communilty or neighborhood? Could,the activity result in t-h'L- displacement of community ,residents? Could the.activity increase the number.of low and .modest ..cost housing units in the city? Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? Are any of the natural or man-made-features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation?. Could the activity significantly affect an historical its or archaeological site or settings? Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? Does the activity significantly affect' the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? -Could the activity change existin g features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or.tidelands~? Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's beaches? Could the activity result in the erosion or ' elimination of agricultural lands? 'Could the activity.serve to encourage develo pment ' of presently undevel.oped areas or intensify develop- -ment of already developed areas? -3- a YES NO Will theactivity 'require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)? Will the activity require-certification, authoriza tion or issuance 7 of a permit by any *local, state or federal environmental control agency? 119) Will the Activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? 20) Will theactivity involve the application,''use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? 21), Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood.plain? 22).'Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? 23) Will the activity involve-construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? 24) Could the ac ' tivity result in the generation of significant amounts of noise?. 25) Could the activity result—in the generation of significant amounts of dust? 26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush f trees, or other materials? 27) Could the activity resu,lt in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air .or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.)- 28) Will.the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? 29) Will there be a significant change to existing land form? (a) Indicate estimated rading to be done in cubic yards: AD o Percentage of alterati n Fo--the,present land form: Maximum height of cut or slopes: 30) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the u I se of utilities, sewers, drains or streets?' 31) Is,the activity carried out as part of a larger project or series of projects? -4- ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT). CASE.NO. DATE: -P F7 I . BACKGROUND 1. APPLICANT: M1 2.. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: WA, 3. DATE-CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: Ii. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanationt of all Affirmative Answers are'to be written under Section III Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) YES MAYBE* NO' 1. Earth-- Will the proposal have significant results in: ,,a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions,.displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the.soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? The destruction, c overing or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f, Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in s iltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or'stream or the'bed of the .ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? CD YES MAYBE NO 2~' Air Will the proposal have * significant results in: Air emissions or deterioration' of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odor-s? Alteration of air movement,. moisture or temperature,,,,or any change in climate, either locally or-regionally~ 3.: Water -- Will the pr I oposal have significant results in: 'Changes in currents, or the course or direction,of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? Changes in absorption l rates, drainage.patternsi or the rate and amount of,.surface water runoff? Alterations to'the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e~.. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface .water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen -pr turbidity? Alteration of'the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through'. interception of an aquifer by cuts qr.-excavations? 'Reduction-in the -amount of water otherwise available for public' water supplies? -2- (Z YES MAYBE NO 4. Plant Life Will the proposal have significant results in: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops',,microflora and aquatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? Introduction of new speciesof plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing, species? Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have significanE results in: a.. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of ' any species.of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and.shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d., Deterioration to existing'fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase,'existing noise levels? 7.- Light-and Glare - Will'the proposal Sig' nificantly produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use - Will the proposal have significan t results in the alteration the present or planned land use of an area? -3- YES MAYBE NO 9. Natural Resources Will the proposal , -have significant results in:' Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? .10. Risk of Upset Does the proposal involve a s—ignificant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited. to-, oil, pesticides, chemicals or . radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Population - Will the proposal signik- 9 icantly alter the location, distribu- tion,,density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12-. Hou~_ - Will the'proposal signi ' f-' icantly affect existing hou.sing, or create a demand.for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation Will the proposal have significant results -in: a. Generation.of additional vehicular movement? b.. Effects on exi-sting.parking.facilit- ies., or demand for new parking? C. Impact ,upon existing transporation systems? .Alterations to present patterns of Firculation or movement of people and/or goods? Alterations to wAterborne, rail or air traffic? .,Increase in.traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or . pedestrians? -4- M,Ah,_ YES MAYBE NO 14. Public Services - Will the proposal have asignificant effect upon,- or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any.of the following areas:. Fire protection? Police.protection? C. Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of. public facilities, including roads? ~Other governmental services? 15. Energy - Will the proposal have signif-_ Tc-ant results in: Use of substantial amounts ,of fuel or energy? Demand.upon existing sources of,, energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities - Will .the proposal tiave. significant. results in the need for-new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b.' Communications 'systemsT Water? Sewer or septic' tanks?,- e.. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? -5- M YES MAYBE NO 18.. Aesthetics Will the propos.al have sigHl'ficant results in the obstruction of-any sce ' nic vista or view open*to the public, Pr will the. proposal result i n' creation of'an aestheticAlly-offensive public view,> 19'. .Recreation Will the -proposal.,have 1—flican sigF1 results in-the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational .opportunities? 20.~ Archeological/Historical Will the, proposal h ave signifi—cant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site,,: structure, object or building? 21. Analyze viable -alternatives to the pr . op os6d pro ject sUch~as: a) Phased.development, Of the'project, bY alternate, site designs, c) alternate scale of'—development, d)..al't6rnate',uses for the.site,. e) development at some future t-ime,*rather th'a'n,now, f) alternate sites'for the proposed, and g) -no project.alternative. 70 17 YES MAYBE NO 22.,,, Mandatory Findings'of Significance a,. Does the project have " the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment? b.. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term,*.to,the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A'short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while,long-term impa'ct-s will endure well into the future.) Does the project have impacts which' are-individually limited,.but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact,on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of thoseimpacts on the environment is s . i gnificant.) Does the project have environmental effects which-will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III. DISCUSSION OF)ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION co 61 YAW 5 VP3 -F11L1 014 -A At I ).. ~. A<- S&4es , ~ "..'C' V ivtolrj FISIL a?45-)6"J (~46L)+Y,6L adl,40,) 63 AA1 Il C_ Py 1 -7- (5 IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed-by. the Land Use Planning Office) On the.basis of this initial evaluation: I'find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on-. —the environment-,'and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.: I find that although the prPpose-d-,project-could have'a significant 9 effect on the environment, there will not be a.significant effect in this case because the mitigation meAsur.es de~cribed on an attached sheet have be~en added to,the project. A Conditional Negative Declarat,ion will beproposed. I find the proposed.proje6f- MAY have a'significant'effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is.required. DatL~r Signature V_ MITIGATING MEASURES (If .Applicable) -9- .MITIGATING MEASURES, (Conti.nued) VI. APPLICANT,CONCURRENCE WITH.MITIGATING'MEAsURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE, REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGAT ING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE. ADDITION Of THESE MEASURES TO THEPROJECT, Date Signa,ture -10- C,,OL#ITY OF SM DlWmO 7 1-1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND LAND USE CODES DIVISION SAN DIEGO OFFICE NORTH COUNTY OFFICE RETURN TO: El 5201 Ruffin Road, Suite B3 334 Via Vera Cruz San Diego, CA 92123 San Marcos, CA 92069 565-5920 741-4236 Project Location E 0 4~4v441~ Name of Permittee A-41K-e- C/01L11'0 41 J "n"y Grading Permit No. This report form for a "minor" grading project is to be completed and signed by the Registered Civil Engineer (or Architect) who has been designated on the Grading Plan and Permit as the Engineer who will furnish the compaction report for work authorized by a grading permit issued by the Department of Planning and Land Use. The intent of the format is to provide information to the Department of Planning and Land Use as to grading compliance with the approved Grading Plan and Permit. Where the questions below refer to location, configuration or quantity of cut and/or fill areas, it is understood that your response will not normally be based on all actual land survey or detailed earthwork quantity calculations. It should be noted, however, that the Department is particularly concerned where thereare possible i it fractions with respect to over-steepened slopes, encroachments of required setbacks, uncompacted fills placed, or where the quantity of fill placed differs substantially from that authorized.. The Department of Planningand Land Use requires that all fills authorized b a Grading Permit becompacted toa minimumof y .90% of maximum density with the exception that not more than 12" of uncompacted and untested fills may be dispersed over the :.,.-:land parcel. The need to compact all fills that are beyond the present limits of tile present proposed construction is to insurethat future proposed construction of room additions or swimming pools or similar structures will not require that uncompacted fills be removed or recompacted, or that extensive foundation work be installed. Compaction reports will not be accepted unless this form is completed and signed by tile registered person. COMPATIBILITY WITH GRADING PLAN AND PERMIT 1: Was the compacted fill placed only in the approximate locations designated oil the grading plan -as areas to be filled'? Yes No N o 2. Did the quantity of fill material placed approximately conform to the grading plan'? Yes 3.. Did the toe of fill or the top of cut appear to meet tile prescribed property line setback -0.5' for fill; 3.0' for cuts)? Yes No 4. Were the finished fill slopes equal to or less titan 2 ho'rizontal to I vertical'? Yes No If the fill material was obtained by cuts on tile site, were the cuts made in the proper location and to the proper slope approximately as shown oil the approved grading plan'? Yes No 6. Were brow ditches constructed approximately as shown on tile grading plan'? Yes No LOCATION AND AMOUNT-OF COMPACTION TESTS Have you attached a sketch and data showing the location and relative elevation for all compaction tests'? Was a compaction test made so that there is at least one test in each 2' thick lens of compacted material? As indicated by inspections, observations and compaction test results, was the fill, excluding the top 1.0', compacted to at least 90% of maximum dry density'? C. OUALITY OF FILL COMPACTION OPERATION Was the area to receive fill properly prepared in terms of brush removal, benching, wetting, removal of noncompacted fill or debris and related items'? Was all detrimentally expansive soil placed in tile' fill at 3' or more below finish grade? Have you attached a copy of your curve showing the relationship between optimum moisture content and maximum density? Was all material used as fill (earth, rocks, gravel) smaller titan 12" in size'? Are all areas of the fill suitable for support of structures'? .6. Were all existing fills on the site recompacted in accordance with the provisions of tile grading Yes "' N o Yes 0-1- N o Yes No Yes N o Yes No Yes I-- No Y e s No Yes No ve-Z &--- No