Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.87.29; LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT 4 LOT 743; Engineering ApplicationApplication for Grading Permit PE No. 2.87,29 tA.E>p LL CITY OF, CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Drive Validation, by Cashier Project Engi al near Initi 438-3634, 4b64 04/0'9/90 (A),01i 0/1 0 c5 S C '~40 00 Assessors Parcel No. 215-400-02 Oil- 2 k1 FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN FOR DEPARTMENT USE Site Address DATE INITIAL 2704 Cazadero Dr. La Costa, CA Secured Agreement Rec'd. March 30, 1990 Legal Description #4 Map No. Cash Deposit Receipt No. Lot 743 La Costa Meadows Map 7367 $6,120.00 Project Name , Drawing No. Permit Plancheck No. PE 2.87.29 281-4 Owner Phone General Permit, Requirements: Mr. Bart Billings 6107438-2788 1; 11 grading and erosion control work shall be done in accordance with ®r Owner's Address 2767 Vista Del Oro City Ordinances, Authorized hours of operation: 7:00 a.m. to Sunset, Monday through QFriclay, Plans.by Civil Engineer Phone Ken Long 619-49.1-7866 excluding city recognized holidays. 03 Grading work,shall not commence until after the pre-construction Address Phone 527 No. Hwy 101 conference has been held with the City Inspector 4 IAII off-site haul routes require separate approval by the City Engineer Soil, Engineer R.C.E. Phone I 24Hr.Phone 753"15572) Hetherington Engr 30488 619-931-1017 '( . 5 A right-of-way permit is required for all woTk. done in the city right-of- way. Grading Contractor Phone 753-0980 Denbar Const. Special Requirements: Address- 2382 Camino Vida Roble Party responsible for overall supervision Denis N-. Hobson Proposed use of grade site Single Family Residence Number of cubic yards Cut Fill Import Waste T 0 29-30 ?930 1 Ce 0 Under City Code Sec. 11.06.170 this gradi ng is: El Regular Grading - CAty Inspector will make inspections listed below. Proposed Schedule of Stan Finish Operation &(dateii) . Xcontrolled Grading - private grading engineer shall observe work, coordinate tests and make reports 'I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have provided is correct and agree to I comply with Inspection Date Insp. Initial all City, ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading, and the provisions and conditions of any permit issued pursuant to Initial - Site Prep. this application. Rough - G rade . Signature of:Permittee Owner or authorized ag Final -.Slopes Planted 6 Compaction Reports Read ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE - Date EIA Log No. Private Engr. Carl. Rec'd. /-Ojo 7,7 By O.K. For Release Grading permit fee s 240.00 Plan check feer $ 50. 00 Copies: White - Office; Yellow - Inspector; Pink - Permittee Perm "it Issued' a Z~~Fkli'on 13~te Golden Rod - Finance; Green - Building JHIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IS A PERMIT TO DO T,HE WORK DESCRIBED THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD OR UNTIL THE EXPIRATION DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE. APM -Building. Permit Plan Check No. FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN Applica - tion fat Gridirig. Permit PE MO. CITY - OF,CARLSBAD.. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1200 Elm, Avenue Validation by Finance 438p6W ZISSD Department 'Site Address Z70,f 4AZA615w Xkg'- Surety Company Bond No. Legal Description Map No. Surety Address Subdivision Name Date Filed Recd by Owner Phone Cash deposit Recd by~ Date filed Owner's Address S74,7 11151A The follov, Ag documents.are requirej and shall become a part of the gradi ng* permit when tk ey are _oved.' X4_ O/Zo &.0to dding plans Specif ications Sdi report Geologic Report, p i Other Com p t_ Plans by Civil Engineer R.C.E. Address Phone \Draige structures Comp tion report ic ort Soil Engineer R.C.E. Phone Grading Contractor Phone SPECIAb~CADITION_S WHICH.ARE MADE A PART-OF THIS PERMIT Address I Authorized hours of operation: 7:00 AM to Sunset," Monday - Friday. Party responsible for overall supervision 2\ Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer.. Proposed use of grade,,site Adequate provisions shall be,made for erosion and siltation Number of cubic yards controL Cut Fill -import waste All slopes shall big planted per City Code. Proposed Schedule of Stait Finish 5-. All.f ills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum- Operations (dates) .-density unless noted otherwise. I hereby acknowledge the 1, have read ation,and st that qr ply w the information I have pri ivided is:correct and~agr ply with all City ordinancesandISt itelaws regulating excavating,and grading,- Underpity Code'Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: EJ REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make insp6ctio*ns and ihe provisions and co itioris of any permit issued pursuant to this app tion. listed below. Signaturle-of ittee .4 [3 CONTROLLED.GRADING - Private grading engineer shall. 'o 3 or observe work, coordinate tests, make reports. Itt Owner or authorized nt INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE 4 Initial - site prep. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAUNCE - Date Rough - prior to-drains EIA'Log.No. Final - slbpes,olanted By Compaction.' reports rec.'d-. Grading permit fee $ Plan check fee $ Private engr. cart. rec,d. Permit Issued. Liate. Copies: White-Office; Green-Bu I ild - ing; Permit Expiration Date Yellow-Inspecfor; Pink-Perrnittee; Golden,rod-Finan6e THIS FORM,WHEN P, ROPER LYVALI DATED IS A.PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED....' -THIS PERMIT ISVALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 Office of the City Engineer TELEPHONE (619)438-1161 TO: DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES FROM: ENGINEERING INSPECTION DIVISION DATE: ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL FOR PROJECT NO. (P. E. or 9FRAG:F 2705Z eAt-04-", (Proiect Name and Address (lieveloper's Name and Address) We have ins - pected the grading for LoV //bl, 74/3 or Phase of the above mentioned proj ct. In addition, we have received rough g~ ing certification from 4~~x, the Soils Engineer, dated JVJJ-'U_ and from 0 - -1 - ,~R 4 the Supervision Grading Engineer, dated _1,jLV-Z,6, /53&, and are satisfied that the rough grading has been completed in accordance with City Standards. Based on these . certifications and our observation, we take no exception to the or PhaseX/Zt — of issuance of a building permit for Low project from a grading standpoint. This release, however, is not intended to certify project from other engineering concerns including site development, water or sewer availa- bility, or final grading. We will need to be advised prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy so that we can verify that final grading and landscaping has been completed in accordance with the approved plans for the project. APPROVED: Project Grading Inspector Construction Inspector 0. 0 CITY OF CARLSBAD GRADING INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR PARTIAL SITE RELEASE PROJECT INSPECTOR: f/70,4L),k- 4V~~4*vj DATE:—E~~ L,5;7,d PROJECT Wi&LWJ~ GRADING 'PERMIT NO.-.A-1~,7, LOTS REQUESTED FOR RELEASE: N/A = Not Applicable / = complete 0 = Incomplete or unacceptable Site access to requested late adequate and logically grouped Site erosion control measures adequate Overall site adequate for health, safety and welfare of putrlic Letter of request for partial release submitted 50 8-1/2" X 11" site plan showing requested lots submitted Compaction report from soils engineer submitted Engineer-cf-work certification of work done and pad elevations S. Geologic engineer's letter if unusual geologic or subsurface conditions exist Project conditions of approvel.chocked for conflicts Can water service be installed prior to bringing building combustibles on site. Partial release of grading for the above stated lots is approved for the purpose of building.permit issuance. Issuance of building permits is still subject to all normal City requirements.required pursuant to the building permit process. Partial release. of the site to denied for the following reasons: PROJECT ENGINEER DATE S-1419Y 1 DXTE- FEE: $175.00 AECEIPT NO: 71"W3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To -Be Completed by APPLICANT) CASE NO: -2- DATE: Applicant: Address of Applicant: WA Phone Number: Name, address and phone number of,person to be contacted (if other than - Applicant): T/4-M GENERAL INFORMATION: Description of Project: x Project Location/Address: 7,,) 1v dw e Assessor Parcel Number: Zone of Subject Property: Proposed Use of Site: List all other applicable applications related to this project: Describe'the activity area, including distiguishing natur al and man- made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when .appropriate. AY16 r- rJ Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design .and/or operation of the project. 16 #- d 414,~ 4 V. r 0 4W 3 If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale price's or rents, and type of household size expected. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented,.square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. IJ44 If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. AIA If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. -2- W 0 0 I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriat'.- space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as nec~essaryi) YES NO Could the project significantly change present land uses in'the vicinity of the activity? Could. the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? Could the activity increase the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? Are any of the natural-or man-made featu res in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? Could the activity significantly affect an historical or archaeological site or its settings? Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce,natural resource? Does the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, orconservation of a scarce natural resource? Could the activity significantly affect fish., wildlife or plant life? Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? Could the.activity change *existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands-? Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's beaches? Could the activity -result in the erosion or elimination of agricultural lands? Could the activity serve to encourage development of pres'ently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment of already developed areas? -3- I !~ 4 0 0 YES NO 17)~ Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)? Will the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of noise? Could the activity -result in the,generation of significant amounts of dust.? Will the activity involve the burn,ing of brush, trees, or other materials? 27) Could theactivity result in a significant change in the quality of -any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) 28) will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? 29) Will there be a significant change to existing land form? Indicate estimated-grading to be done in cubic yards: I om 4_0 - - Percentage of alteratioh to the present land form: Maximum h.eight.of cut or fir"ll slopes: 30) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? 31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger Lll~ project or series of projects? -4- I ~ 4 a Ii. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFicANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered ye:s to one or more of the questions in Section I but you think the activity will have no significant envir-onmental effects, indicate your reasons below: f level- Alk~~4 #'V elj~& P iA S4-*A- COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUtSTIONS IN SECTION I. (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.) Signature (Person CompAit-Ing Report) Date Signed (!~'- — /Y -- 1,1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE -PLANNINGDEPARTMENT) CASE NO. I-S-76 DATE: /zBtF7 --J - I I. BACKGROUND APPLICANT: ~ _T~M(_l ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2X37 V(stit 10 ro 3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I - (Explanations of all AffirmativeAnswers are to be written under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in.: Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? Change in topography or ground surface relief features? The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in s iltation, deposition or erosion. which may modify the channel or a rivet or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? E YES MAYBE NO 2. Air - Will the proposal have 'significant results,in: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odors? Alteration of air.movement, moisture or temperature, Or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water - Will the proposal have sig-nificant results in: Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? Changes in absorption rate,s, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water ,runoff? Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved. ..oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception ,of an aquifer by cuts or excavations'? Reduction-in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies'? -2- I YES MAYBE NO 4. Plant Life - Will the proposal have signi-F1'cant results in: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an-area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment,of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life - will the proposal have significant results in: Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?- 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? 7. Light and Glare - Will the proposal.sig- nificantly produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use 7 Will the. proposal have significant res'ults in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? -3- r YES MAYBE NO Natural Resources - Will the proposal have signific results in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b-. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Risk of Upset - Does the.proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to., oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Population - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Housing - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or, create a demand for additional housing? Transportation/Circulation - Will the proposal have, signifTc-ant results in: Generation of additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing.parking facilit- ies, or demand for new parking? C. Impact upon existing transporation systems? Alterations to present. patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffi-c hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? -4- r YES MAYBE 14. Public Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for.new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? Police protection? C. Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Other governmental services? 15. Energy - Will the proposal have signif- icant results in: Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities - Will the.proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: Power or natural gas? Communications systems? Water? Sewer or septic tanks? Storm water drainage? Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? NO -5~- F YES MAYBE NO Aesthetics - Will the proposal h ' ave signi'ficant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view? Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Archeological/Historical - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed-project such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site .designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at,s*Ome future time rather than now, f) alternate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. '-0 ec, -QIY~J/ U C't F YES MAYBE NO 22. Mandatory Findings of Significance - ,a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or-curtail the diversity in the environment? , Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively bri.ef,,definitive period of time while long-term impacts-will endure well into the future.) Does the project have, impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on twoor more separate resources where the impact, on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts -on the.environment is .significant.) Does the project- have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,. either directly or indirectly? III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 9D7ZO 'O.Y. (McnN S~b C-e- -7- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) IV. DETERMINATION(To Be Completed by the Land Use Planning Office) On the basis of this initial evaluation.: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that -although the proposed project could have -a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. . Date Signature V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable) 0 0 p MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued) VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT'I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE-ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature -10- 0 P CQ COU61TY OF SANDIENGO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND LAND USE CODES DIVISION SAN DIEGO OFFICE NORTH COUNTY OFFICE RETURN TO: El 5201 Ruffin Road, Suite B3 . 0 334 Via Vera Cruz San Diego, CA 92123 San Marcos—CA 92069 565-5920 70 -4236 Project.Location tZZ12014 C-AZARE:Tx-1t) bR-11115 Name of Permittee. BAGL_r 191LUM(rS c/o V 1c.-rara galaea-rs CAM"S^D A1P1r4q11zIs--y0o-'P2, Grading Permit No. This report form,for a "minor" grading project is to be completed and s . igned by the Registered Civil Engineer (or Architect) who has been designated on the Grading Plan and Permit as the Engineer who will furnish the compaction report for work authorized by a grading permit issued by the Department of Planning and Land Use; The intent of thelformat is to provide information to the Department of Planning a nd Land U se as to grading compliance with t he approved Grading Plan and Permit. Where the questions below refer to location,, configuration or quantity of cut and/or fill areas, it is understood that your response will inot normally be based on an actual land survey or detailed earthwork quantity calculations. It should be noted, however, that the Department is particularly concerned where there are possible infractions with respect to over-steepened slopes, encroachments of -req4ired setbacks, uncompacted fills placed', or where the quantity of fill placed differs substantially from that authorized. The Department of Planning and Land Use requires that all fills authorized by a Grading Permit.be compacted to a minimum of 90% of maximum density with the exception that not more than 12" of uncompacted and untested fills may be dispersed over the land parcel. The need to.compact all fills that are beyond the present limits of the present proposed construction is to insure thi t future proposed construction of room additions or swimming'pools or similar structures will not require that uncompacted fills be removed or recompacted, or that extensive foundation work.be installed. Compaction reports will not be accepted unless this form is completed and signed by the registered person. A. COMPATIBILITY WITH GRADING, PLANAN D PERMIT Was the compacted fi 11 placed only in the' approximate locations designated on the grading plan as areas to be filled? Yes No- Did the quantity of fill material placed approximately conform to the grading plan? Yes No Did fhe toe of fill or the top of cut appear to meet the prescribed . property line setback (1.5' for rill; 3.0' for cuts)? Yes No'- Were -,the finished fill slopes equal to or less than 2. horizontal to I vertical? Yes No If the fill material was obtained by cuts on the site, werethe cuts made in the proper location and to the proper slope approximately as shown on the approved. grading plan? Yes No Were brow ditches constructed approximately as shown on the grading plan? Yes No B. LOCATION AND AMOUNT OF COMPACTION TESTS Have~you attached aisketch and data showing the location and relative e . levation for all compaction tests? Yes No- Was a compaction test made so that there is at least one test in each 2' thick lens of compacted material? Yes No As indicatedby inspections, observations and compaction test results, was the fill, excluding the top 1.0', compacted to at least 90% of maximum dry density? Yes No C. QUALITY OF FILL COMPACTION OPERATION Was the area to receive fill properly prepared in terms of brush removal, benching, wetting, V removal of noncompacted fill or debris and related items? Yes No- Was all detrimentally . expansive soil placed in the fill at 3' or more below.finish grade? Yes No Have you attached a copy of your curve showing the relatio- nship between optimum moisture content. and maximum density? Yes L/ No Was all material used as fill (earth, rocks, gravel) smaller'than 12" in size? Yes No- Are all areas of the fill suita ble for support of structures? Yes No- Were all existin' rills on the site recompacted in accordance with the provisions of the grading ordinanc Yes No—