No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.89.12; DONAHOE RESIDENCE; Engineering ApplicationApplication for Grading Permit CITY OF.CARL.SBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Drive '438-3550 Validation by Finance Department PE.NO., 14 Building Permit Plan Chec k No. FOR APPLICANT TO,FILL IN Site Address 3876.Althea Lane Carl,sbad, CA Surety Company Bond -No. Legal Description Map No. APN — 2 0 7— 12 0'— 6 4 Surety Address Subdivision Name* Date Filed Recd by. - Owner Phone Kenneth & Cathy DeDn.ahoe .43.4 6706 Cash deposit Recd by Date, f 1 led Owner's.Address 3 9 6,9 P a rlc Dr., Car.l,sbad, CA 92008 The following documents are required,and shall,be6ome a part of the grading permit when they are approved. Grading plans Specifications Soil report ~Geologic Report Drainage structures -Other Compaction report Pg&rHby)qigi4t~~'8erE~n-~,~in,erring. R.C.E. Address Phone 4407 Manchester Encintas Soil Engineer R~C.E. Phone Grading Contractor Phone SPECIAL'CONDITIONS WHICH AR'"EMADE. A PART OF THIS~PERMff Address Authorized hours.of operation' 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday; Party responsible: for overall supervision Haul routes are to be approved~ byCity Engineer. Proposed Use of. grade site Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation control. Number of cubic yards Cut Fill Import Waste All slopes shall be planted per City Code. 31 ()'-] Z6 n 7F j 'least 90% Al I f i I Is to be corripacted fd at of optimum density unless noted otherwise. Proposed Schedule of Start Finish Operations (dates) I hereby acknowledge that I have, read the application -and. state that the informati on 1have. provided is correct,and agree to comply with all.City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading, and the provisions and conditions of any permit issued, pursuant to this application. Signature of Permittee Owner or authorized agent 140 th'is grading I Under-City Code, Sec. 11.06 S. 0 REGULAR GRADING- City Inspector_wjII make. inspections listed below. 0 CONTROLLED GRADING grading engineer shall observe work, coordinate tests, mak6.'reportt... INSPECTION DATE INSP. 81ONATURE Initial - site-prep.. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE;- Date EIA Log.No. By Rough - prior to drains, Final - slopes planted Compaction reports rec'd. Grading permit fee $ Plan check fee $ 3's Private engr. cert. rec'd. Permit Issued by Uate. Copies- White-Off ice--. Green-Buildin- Permit Expiration Date Yellow-Inspedtor; Pink-,Permittee; Goldenrod~Fiqance THIS FO.RMWHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED ISA.PERMITTO DOTHEWORK DESCRIBED- THIS,PERMIT IS~VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH'PERIOD FEE:. $175.00 RECEIPT NO: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To Be Completed by.APPL-ICANT) CASE NO: DATE: Kenneth & Cathy,Donahoe Applicant: Address of Applicant: 3969 Park DR.. Carlsbad, CA 92008 619 434-6706 Phone Number: Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted'(i.f other than Applicant):.*- SAME GENERAL INFORMATI'ON: Description of Project: Two single-family residence Project Location/Address.-, 3660 Althea Lane, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Assessor Parcel Number: 207 120 65- Zone of'Subj Coastal ect Property.. single family residence Proposed Use of Site: List all othec applicable applications related to this project: N/A Describe thei .activity areap includi ' ng distiguishing-natural and man-m-ade.characteristic s; also provide precise slope analysis when appropriate. residential.nei.ghborhood containing therein two adjacent parcels Describe energy cons ervation measures incorporated into the design And/or .operation of the project-. structures to conform with-city and county energy standards' If residential,, -include the number of units, sched.ule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. number units- two single family homes size - 1900 sq.,ft. each s . a 1 e ]~'r rc e - 250,_&OO household size 2-6 occupants S. If commArcial,' indicate the type, whether -neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area., and loading facilities. N/A 16. If industrial.,, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,.and. loading facilities. N/A 7. It institutional,'ind,i,cai,e the major function,, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benef.its to be derived from the project. N/A I. -ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (Disd.uts all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as necessaryi) YES NO .1) Could the project significantly change present X land uses in the vicinity of the activity? 2). Could the activity affect the use of a recreational X area, or area of important aesthetic value? Could the activity -affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? Could the activity result in.the displacement of community residents?- X Could the activity increase the number of low and X, modest cost housing units in the city? Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? X Are any of the~natural or man-made features in the X activity area unique,.that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? .8), Could the activity significantly affect an X historical, or archaeological site-or its settings? 9)* Could the ac,tivity~siqnificantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a X scarce natural resource? 10)..Does the~ activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction,-orconservatjon of a X scarce natural resource? Could the activity significantly -affect fish, X wildlife or plant life? Are there any rare or endangered plant species X in the activity~area? Could the acti vity change exi-sting features of. X ' any of the cityl,s lagoons, bays, or tidelands? Could the-activity change existing features of X any of the city's beaches?. Could the activity result in the erosion or X elimination of. agricultural lands?, Could the activity serve to encourage development X of presently undeveloped areas orAntensify develop-' ment l of already developed areas.? YES NO. 17) Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water X noise,, etc.)? is) Will the activity require certific.a tion, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit-by any local,, state or federal environmental control agency? 19) Will:the activity require issuance of a variance X or conditional use permit by the.City? 10) Will-the activity,il nvolve the application, Use, or X disposal of potentially'haz&rdous materials? Will tbe~activity involve const.ru.ctio"nl of X facilit-les in a flood plain? 22)~ Will the activity involve construction of X facilities in the area of an active fault? Will the activity involve construction of X facilities on a slope of 25 percent.or greater? Could the activity result. inthe generation of X significant amounts of noise? Could the activity re ' sult in the generation .of X significant amounts of.dust? Will the activity involve the burning of brush, X trees,.or.ot-,her materialls? Could the activity result in a significant change X in the qua ' lity of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface,ground water, off-shore.) 18) Will the project substantially increase..fue'l X 'consumption (electricity, oil t natural -gas,.etc.)? 29) Will there be a significant change to existing X land form? Indicate estimated grading-to be done in cubic yards: AL/19 C-1 k/ Percentage o lalterati,6n' to the present land form,: A~Ll) Maximum heigh of cut or fill Slopes: -41 30) Will the-activity result in substanti'al increases X in the use of ut-ilities, sewers, drains or streets? 31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger. project or series of projects? X STATEMENT OF-NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS I f you have answered yes to',One or more of the questions in Section I but YOU think the: actiVitY will have no signif icant environmental effectst indicate yourireasons below: N/A COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY-OF THE-QUESWONS IN SECTION I (if additional space is heeded for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as -needed.) Signature (Person Completing Report) Date Signed 01-~~F/ 0 mi ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORK PART Il (TO BE COMPETED BY THRPLANNINGDEPARTMENT) CASE NO.- R.E. 2.89.12 DATE: March 2. 1989 BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Kenneth and Cathy Donahoe ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 3969 Park Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 434-6706 DATE CHECK*LIST SUBMITTED: ADril 6. 1989, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in: Unstable earth conditions or in changes, in geologic substructures? Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? Change in topography or ground surface relief features7 The destruction, covering of modification of any unique geologic or physical features? Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or~the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X X — X - - X X - 0 YES - MAYBE NO X, X X 2. Air - Will the proposal have significant results in: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odors? Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or a I ny change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surface water in Any water body? Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or' through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Reduction in theamount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X — X X — X X X -2- YES MAYBE 140 4. Plant Life - Will-the proposal. have significant results in: Change in the diversity of species, .or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops,, microflora and aquatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique,, rare or endangered species of plants? X Introduction of new species of.plants into an area, or in a barrier to the' normal replenishment of existing species? X Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X 5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptilest fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X Reduction of the numbers,of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration.or movement of animals? X Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? X 7. Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare? X 8. Land Use - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X -3- YES MAYBE 140 9. Natural Resources - Will theproposal have significant results in:, Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X 10. Risk of URset - Does the proposal involve a significant ri ' sk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X 11. Por)ulation - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the . human population,-of an 'area? X 12. Housing - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the proposal have significant results in: Generation of additional vehicular movement? X Effects on existing parking facili- ties,- or demand for new parking? X Impact upon existing transportation systems? X Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X Alterations to waterborne, rail or air tra-flic? X Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X -4- YES- MAYBE NO 14. Public Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon,-or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? X Police protection? X Schools? X Parks or other recreational facilities? X Maintenance of public -facilities, including roads? X Other governmental services? X 15. Energy - Will the proposal have significant results in: Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X 16. Utilities - Will the proposal have' significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the.following utilities: Power or natural gas? X Communications systems? — X Water? — — X Sewer or septic tanks? X Storm water drainage? — — X Solid waste and disposal? X 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the. creation of any health hazard or potentialhealth hazard (excluding mental health)? X -5- 0 YES MAYBE NO Aesthetics - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view? X Recreation - Will the proposal have* significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X Archeological/Historical/Paleontological - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure, object or building? _X' Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. CM 0 0 YES MAYBE* NO 22. Mandatory findings of significance - Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining level - s, threaten-to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered,plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Does the,project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well,-into the future. Does the project have the possible environmental effects-which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the . effects of probable future projects.) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,, either directly or indirectly? X X — — X III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION, The proposed project consists of approximately 340 cubic yards of grading for development of a single family residence. The proposed project is harmonious with thezurrounding neighborhood of single family residences and will not have a significant impact on the environment. The site is one of two remaining undeveloped lots on Althea Lane. Rev. 12/88 -7- bISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION(Continued) The site is located in Local Facilities Management Zone 1, and the. approved Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 has guaranteed the adequacy of public facilities for proposed development within the zone. -8- 0 iV...DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I - find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the -envirorment,,and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although theproposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. April 10, 1989 Date iq little- 177 Date, A ' AMN ~T~ S, - Si4n,#-ure V.MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable) -9- 40 AITIGATING'MEASURES (Continued.) VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT IHAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature -10- CITY OF CARLSBAD - GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST CITY PROJECT NO& 2-- fty ;.- c.rry PROJECT NAME CITY DRAWING NO. A,9f,.r CITY PROJECT ENGINEER B. T FOLLOWING ITEMS MUST BE INCLUDED 'IN EACH, RESUBMITTAL: 17 TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM ENGINEER OF WORK LISTING ALL ITEMS BEING SUBMITTED. COPY OF PREVIOUS TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM THE CITY. X LA I ~—e THREE (3) SETS OF BLUEUNES OF THE CORRECTED GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL P NS SEALED AND S GNED JlY THE ENGINEER OF WORK AND THE SOILS ENIGINEEFL pamBuTION: I PLANCHECKEA, I FILE. I PLANNING). 4.,qAf4WC-(2) SETS OF BOUND DRAINAGE REPORT SEALED AND SIGNED By THE ENGINEER OF WORK CORRECTED AS ,,,NECESSARY. TWO (2) SETS OF BOUND SOILS REPORT SEALED AND SIGNED. BY THE SOILS ENGINEER CORRECTED AS NECESSARY. =6. TWO.(2) SETS ENGINEER'S qOST TE FOR BONDING PURPOSES CORRECTED AS NECESSARY SEALED AND SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER:OF 5 k-7, TWO (2) SETS OF THE. EA RK QUANTITY CALCULATIONS CORRECTED AS NECESSARY, SIGNED AND SEALED BY ENGINEER OF WORK Ei IMINAF ,Vr)k~~ SETS OF THE Ry TITLE REPORT. 9. ALL PREVIOUS CHECKPFIINTS OF PLANS, REPORTS, CALCULATIONS AND ESTIMATES. =lo. ITEMS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THE COPY OF tHE PREVIOUS TRANSM17TALfROM THE CITY. 111. ~ CONCURRENT RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING: FINALIPARCEL MAP_ IMPROVEMENT PLANS, LANDSCAPE AND 44~4 NTS L IRRIGATION PLANS, AND EASEMENT DOCUME CORRECTED AS NECESSARY WHEN SUCH MAP, PLANS, AND DOCUMENTS ARE,REQUIRED. PLAN BLUEUNES FOLDED TO 9 INCHES BY 12 INCHES. ADDITIONAL ITEMS REQUIRED C. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL OF THE PLANS: TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM ENGINEER OFWO,RK LISTING ALL ITEMS BEING SUBMITTED. COPY OF PREVIOUS TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM THE CITY. ALL PREVIOUS CHECKPRINTS OF PLANS, REPORTS, CALCULATIONS.AND ESTIMATES. TWO (~) SETS OF THE CORRECTtD BLUELINES OF THE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN. ORIGINAL MYLARS OR PHOTO MYLARS OF THE PLANS SEALED;AND SIGNED BY THEENGINEER OF WORK AND SOILS ENGINEER. THE MYLARS MUSTALSO BE SIPNEDBY THE OWNERAND OTHER SIGNATURES AS PREVIOUSLY REQUIRED. (NO STICKY BACKS ALLOWED AND AUL,SIGNATURES, MUST BE ORIGINAL AND IN PERMANENT BLACK INK) GRADING PERMIT APPLICATION COMPLETED, CURRENT AND SIGNED BY THE OWNEIVAPPLICANT. HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENTFOR DRAINAGE FULLY EXECUTED AND NOTARIZED. a. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL BOND,, CASH SECURITY, AND,AG,REEMENT. CONCURRENT APPROVAL OF THE EROSION CONTROL SHEETS WITH GRADING PLAN. CONCURRENT APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING: FINALIPARCtL MAP, IMPROVEMENT PLANS, LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS AND EASEMENT DOCUMENTS WHEN SUCH MAP, PLANS, AND, DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED. ITEMS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THE COPY OF THE PREVIOUS TRANSMITTAL FROM THE CITY. PLAN BLUEUNES FOLDED TO 9 INCHES BY 12 INCHES. PAYMENT OF THE BALANCE OF GRADING PLANCHECK FEE AND ANY FEE PREVIOUSLY REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL ITEMS SUB11111111TAL COMPLETE. CHECKED BY DATE COMMENTS: NOTE: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE REQUIRED AFTER C17Y ENGINEER APPROVAL OF THE PLANS AND ON OR BEFORE GRADING PERMIT ISSUANCE: THREE (3) SETS OF BLUEUNES OF THE APPROVED PLANS (DISTRIBUTION: I FILE. 2 INSPECTOR). APPROVED HAUL ROUTE APPUCAT16N (IF APPLICABLE). APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN AND A VAUD RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT (IF APPLICABLE). VAUD COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT IF WITHIN THE COASTAL ZONE. A COPY OF THE LETTER OF COMPLETION OF GRADING PLANCHECIV DATED., ITEMS,REQUIRED AND SHOWN ON THE *LETTER OF COMPLETION OF GRADING PLANCHECIC. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. a. GRADING PERMIT FEE (rO BE PAID AT PERMIT ISSUANCE) AND ALL OTHER FEES LISTED ON THE *LETTER:OF COMPLETION OF GRADING PLANCHECK! 9. ADDITIONAL ITEMS REQUIRED: SEE REVERSE SIDE PAGE: 2 OF 2 P:\DOC%CHKLST\GRAERO.CHK Revision Date 01/25/91 CITY OF CARLSBAD GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST CITY PROJECT NO. CITY PROJECT NAME CITY DRAWING NO. CITY PROJECT ENGINEER ,PLEASE NOTE: TO INSURE THE TIMELY PROCESSING OF PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE CITY THOSE SUBMITTING PLANS FOR CITY REVIEW SHOULD CHECK THEIR SUBMITTAL PACKAGti FOR COMPLETENESS AND COMPLIANCE TO THE FOLLOWING CHECKLIST. APPLICANTS ARE REQUIRED TO ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETENESS BY INITIALING THE SPACES PROVIDED FOR EACH ITEM. CITY STAFF WILL INVENTORY THESE ITEMS UPON SUBMITTAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY MARKED *NlAm (NOT APPLICABLE) AND INITIALED BY THE CITY PROJECT ENGINEER ALL ITEMS LISTED ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED. PLEASE Db NOT DETACH THIS CHECKLIST WHEN ATfAcHED To THE PLANS. THIS CHECKLIST IS A PART OF THE PLAN CHECK COMMENTS. SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY PROJECT ENGINEER AT 438-1161, EXTENSION A. THE FOLLOWING. ITEMS MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE INITIAL SUBMITTAL: TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM ENGINEER OF WORK LISTING ALL ITEMS BEING SUBMITTED. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (E.I.A.) FORM PART I COMPLETED AND SIGNED OR- COPY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE By CITY I.E. NEGATIVE DECLARAT16N ETC. (IF GRADING EXCEEDS 250 CY). SEE CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE FOR ACCOMPANYING FEE. GRADING PERMIT APPLICATION FORM COMPLETED AND SIGNED BY OWNERIAPPLICANT. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMMAPPLICATION COMPLErEDAND SIGNED OR PROOF OPHILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPROVAL (IF PROPERTY CONTAINS OVER IS% SLOPE OR ELEVATION DIFFERENCE OF IS FEET). THREE (3) SETS OF BLUELINE PRINTSOF THE GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLANS SEALED AND SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OF WORK AND THE SOILS ENGINEER. (D ISTRIBUTION: I PLANCHECKER, 1 FILE, 1 PLANNING). TWO (2) SETS OF BOUND DRAINAGE REPORT SEALED AND SIGNED BY ENGINEER OF WORK TWO (2) SETS OF BOUND SOILS REPORT SEALED AND SIGNED BY SOILS ENGINEER. (IF REPORT IS MORE THAN 6 MONTHS OLD, IT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BYA LETTER FROM THE SOILS ENGINEER STATING THAT (A) THE CONDITIONS ON THE SITE HAVE NOT CHANGED SINCETHE REPORT AND (B) ALL OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS MADE ARE STILLVALID AND IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CURRENT CITY CODE). S. TWO (2) SETS OF ENGINEERS COST ESTIMATE FOR BONDING PURPOSES SEALED AND SIGNED BY ENGINEER OF WORK TWO (2) SETS OF EARrHWORK QUANTITY CALCULATIONS SIGNED AND SEALED BY ENGINEER OF WORK TWO (2) SETS OF PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT DATED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF SUBMITTAL IF OFFSrrE GRADING IS PROPOSED A SEPARATE TITLE REPORT IS REQUIRED FOR THE OFFSITE PROPERTY. ONE (1) SET OF THE CrlYS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (IF APPLICABLE)., -12. ONE (1) SET OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT CONDITIONS IF WITHIN THE COASTAL ZONE. a ONE (1) SEr OF BLUELINtS OF THE APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP OR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP PREVIOUSLY SIGNED BY PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS WHEN SUCH MAP ARE REQUIRED -BY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ONE (1) SET OF REFERENCE MAPS OR DRAWINGS. A LETTER OF PERMISSION TO GRADE FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER (IF GRADING ENCROACHES INTO ADJACENT PROPERTY). INCLUSION OF THE EROSION CONTROL SHEETS WITH GRADING PLAN. CONCURRENTSUBMITTALOFTHE FOLLOWING: FINAL/PARCEL MAP, IMPROVEMENT PLANS,LANDSCAPEAND IRRIGATION PLANS AND EASEMENT DOCUMENTS (WHEN SUCH MAP, PLANS AND DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED). PLAN BLUELINES FOLDED TO 9 INCHES BY 12 INCHES. PLANCHECK DEPOSIT (SEE FEE SCHEDULE). BALANCE OF PLANCHECK FEE TO BE PAID PRIORTO SIGNING OF PLANS. SUBMITTAL COMPLETE. CHECKED BY DATE COMMENTS - SEE REVERSE SIDE - PAGE: I OF 2 P:\DOCS\CHKLS'T\GRAERO.CHK. RwAsion Date 01/25/91 Green Paper