Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.91.50; SHELTER COVE LOT 4; Engineering Applicationp S pE2.q/,5 CITY OF CARLSBAD 10 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GRADING PERMIT APPLICATION SITE ADDRESS: 4:514- Cove_ Ir, ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER(S): Z77 /O — 0 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION:kt no. 9 - 5u/-t'- c c, 4 d' af Diey€, '5/i' ce/ez f,'-q' PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ID: OWNER: $Cz' T r ADDRESS l27('0 nYqI /wFf L7p-,v 5fe.3/ CA 92/30 PHONE NUMBER: -'9/ CIVIL ENGINEER: _ E/<cJJi/ PE NO.: _31(' 3 ADDRESS /13 --e-s Pr C/j4d C4 1700 PHONE NUMBER: 72- SOILS ENGINEER:, .MPie. PE NO.:L6 —7 82 ADDRESS 57/ /,-, Cai.chaç/, -,4 gz' PHONE NUMBER: 43 -' GRADING CONTRACTOR: _STATE LICENSE NO.:____________ ADDRESS CITY BUSINESS LICENSE NO.___________________ PHONE NUMBER: 24 HOUR PHONE NO.: PROPOSED USE OF GRADE SITE: M_-.j Cd'a'i/i,e-€,i-i (#i(/, () GRADING aUANTfliES:CUT340 FILL 110 IMPORT 0 WASTE /50 PROPOSED START DATE: FINISH DATE: hereby acknowledge The I have read the application and .ts that the informon I have provided is correct and agr.e to comply with all City ordinances and Stale Ls.vl r.quIatng .xcrng and grading, and thi provisions and conditions of any psnTht issued purluant to thi$ :z:t::e of Applicant_ DATE: ///2 FOR CITY USE ONLY Received by: CFJVED Entered Into Computer by Date: Permit No. PC Z. 9 1. Q Project Engineer: 1399 U-) Drawing No321o_9APlancheck Fee oe0;r-)40.'' crry OF CARLSBAD COUNTER LDA1ESrAMPRECEIVED Approved for Issuance: Oats: 07/25/90 TELEPHOrIE 2O75 LAS PALMAS DRIVE (619)438-1161 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 920094859 Office of the City Engineer Um IEERi (!ILtL! 11 Ott th1itit) 5 TO: DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES FROM: ENGINEERING INSPECTION DIVISION • DATE: I ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL FOR PROJECT NO. TP. E. or TRACT #) ••L0 ~h c0v Lf Cave (Project Name and Address) 3 e ft cs eli 7 a 8/ b,-. 3v/. 3 ~ (Developer Name and Address) We have inspected the grading 16r Lo ~f74e Phase or of the above mentioned project. In addition, we have receivdd rough grading ceitification fromf the Soils Engineer, dated 47g , 'd from . 4/ the Supervision Grading Engineer, dated •,.aiid are satisfied that the rough grading has been completed in accordance with City Standards.' Based on these.certifications and our observation, we take no exception to the issuance of a building pernit for Lot or Phase of project 2. . _- 4 e/%- Co v. froui a grading standpoint. This release, however, is not intended to certify the project from other engineering concerns including site development, water or sewer availa- bility, or final grading. ' -. We will need to be advised prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy so that we can veify that final grading and landscaping has •beer'i completed in accordance witft the approved plans for the project. • " APPROVED: Project rading Inspector ' • - Sr. C,,ónstruction Inspector I, -