HomeMy WebLinkAboutPIP 94-02; Carlsbad Airport Centre Lot 36; Planned Industrial Permit (PIP) (20)V
r
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT OF ROUGH GRADING
Airport Business Centre, Unit 2
Carlsbad, California
Prepared For:
Sumitomo Bank of California
South San Pedro Street, Suite 500
Los Angeles, California 90012
Prepare^ By:
ICG Incorporated
2992 La Palma, Suite A
Anaheim, California 92806
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
April 21, 1993
SEP 0 2m^
CITYOF
PLANfC
ICG
W 2992 La Palma, Suite A
Anaheim, CA 92806
714/632-2980
fax: 714/632-9209
'i'yiC/'WtlfyVYltC'/i other Offices in Irvine, San Olego, U jjyjl L^l^l/V San Bernardino, and Palm Desert.
April 21, 1993
Sumitomo Bank of California Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
South San Pedro Street, Suite 500 Log No. 3-1063
Los Angeles, California 90012
Attention: Mr. Richard Y. Hirota
SUBJECT: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT OF ROUGH GRADING
Airport Business Centre, Unit 2
Carlsbad, California
Gentlemen:
1.0 INTRODUCTION
a. This report summarizes the results of our geotechnical
testing and observation services performed between August
24, 1989 and April 2, 1990 for the rough grading of
Airport Business Center, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California.
b. The grading contractor for the project was Astleford
Construction, Inc. of San Marcos, California. Civil
engineering and field grade staking was provided by Bodas
Engineering of Carlsbad, California. The 80-scale
grading plans were prepared by Bodas Engineering. Sheets
3, 4 and 5 of 6 were utilized as the base map for our
Geotechnical Maps, Plates 1 through 3.
c. The accompanying As-Graded Geotechnical Maps (Plates 1
through 3) show the as-built geotechnical conditions at
the site and the approximate locations of the field
Geotechnical Services, Construction Inspection and Testing
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 2
density tests. The field density test results are
provided in Table 2.
d. A summary of the as-graded conditions, the grading
operations, and the testing performed are presented
below. Based on our geotechnical evaluation of the as-
graded conditions at the site, we have presented
preliminary recommendations for future development of the
site.
1.1 Authorization
Preparation of this report has been accomplished
approximately 3 years after completion of the grading
operations for the new owner of the property, Sumitomo
Bank of California. The work was authorized by our
contract (P-SD-3-6200) dated February 26, 1993.
1.2 Scope of Services
Our geotechnical services for this project involved the
following:
a. Site reconnaissance to evaluate existing site
conditions.
b. Compilation of field and laboratory test data.
c. Preparation of As-Graded Geotechnical Maps.
d. Preparation of the As-Graded Geotechnical Report.
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 3
2.0 SITE LOCATION/DESCRIPTION
a. Unit 2 of the Carlsbad Airport Centre occupies a 70 acre
parcel of irregular shape located in Carlsbad, California
(See Location Map, Figure 1) . The site was graded to
prepare 21 industrial lots, 2 open space lots, and
associated streets and other improvements.
b. Prior to grading, the topography was characterized by
ridges and associated small drainages which generally
flowed south and west. The lower portion of the main
drainage course, parallel and adjacent to Palomar Airport
Road, has been preserved as open space. Maximum relief
for the site is about 240 feet, with elevations ranging
from about 90 to 330 feet above mean sea level.
c. Portions of the site were graded in 1986 in conjunction
with grading of Unit 1, Palomar Oaks Way and Camino Vida
Roble (Reference 17). The locations of fills placed
during this grading are indicated on the Geotechnical
Maps, Plates 1 through 3.
d. Grading of the site during this phase of grading
generally consisted of cutting along the ridges and
filling in the canyon areas to provide roadways and
sheet-graded pads for future industrial development. The
project also involved remedial grading for:
slope buttresses and stabilization fills adjacent
to lots 31, 32, 34, and 49.
ICG incorporatad
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 5
ii. removal of compressible alluvium and portions of
previously placed landfill adjacent to the airport.
e. The site is generally in a similar condition to that when
grading operations were completed in 1990, except as
follows:
i. A building and associated improvements have been
constructed on Lot 37.
ii. Monitoring wells have been placed on Lots 28, 29,
30, 34 and 36 by another geotechnical/environmental
firm. These wells were presumably placed to
monitor/collect the presence of gases/leachate from
previous landfill on or adjacent to the site.
iii. Partially backfilled backhoe pits are present on
Lots 39 and 41.
iv. Erosion has damaged the fill slope on the southwest
corner of Lot 39 adjacent to Kellogg Avenue.
V. All the lots have a light growth of annual
vegetation and minor erosion gullies.
vi. The slopes have been landscaped and are generally
performing well. Wet areas on some of the pads
indicate that watering of the slopes may be
excessive.
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 6
3.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING
3.1 Geotechnical Conditions
a. Geologic conditions prior to grading of the site
are described in the referenced reports (References
12, 15, 16 and 17).
b. Geotechnical conditions present at the conclusion
of grading operations are shown on the Geotechnical
Maps, Plates 1 through 3.
c. A brief description of the soil and bedrock units
at the site is presented below.
3.2 Bedrock Units
a. Santiago Peak Volcanics (Map Symbol Jsp)
The Jurassic Age Santiago Peak Volcanics Formation
was encountered in the northwestern portion of the
site. The Santiago Peak formation is a series of
mildly metamorphosed volcanic rocks. Regionally,
the Santiago Peak Volcanics vary in composition
from basalt to rhyolite. On the site they are
predominately andesite.
The Santiago Peak Formation, as observed during
grading, was highly jointed, with variable joint
spacing. Clay in-filling was usually present in
joints near the surface, where weathering is more
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 7
pronounced. Weathering was found to extend to
depths of 12 feet in some areas.
b. Santiago Formation fMap Symbol Tsa)
The Eocene Age Santiago Formation underlies most of
the site. During grading this formation was
observed to consist of interbedded claystones,
siltstones, and fine grained sandstones.
3.3 Soil Units
a. Alluvium/Colluvium (Map Symbol Qal)
Alluvial and colluvial soil on-site consisted of
light to dark brown, silty to clayey, fine to
medium grained sand with some organics. Alluvium
was located in canyons and drainage bottoms, with
depths ranging from approximately 1 to 26 feet
within the graded area. Colluvium, ranging in
depth from approximately 2 to 6 feet, mantled the
upland areas and slopes. The alluvium and
colluvium were considered to be unsuitable and were
removed to expose dense bedrock materials within
the graded area.
3.4 Fill Soils
a. Fill soils consisted of on-site materials,
excavated during grading, which comprised alluvium,
colluvium and bedrock. Blasting and heavy ripping
of the Santiago Peak Volcanics produced a
V.
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 8
significant quantity of rock which was placed as a
rock fill in the canyon area below Lots 39, 40, 44
45 and 46, as well as below Kellogg Avenue.
Oversize rock material was placed in a non-
structural fill area north of Lots 39, 40 and 41.
The soil fills generally consisted of silty sands,
silty clays, and sandy clays.
b. Fills up to approximately 50 feet in thickness were
placed during grading operations concluded in 1986
(Reference 17) . The location of these fills are
indicated on the Geotechnical Maps, Plates 1
through 3. These fills are similar to the soil
fills placed during this grading operation.
3.5 Geologic Structure
a. The geologic structure encountered during grading
operations was generally as anticipated in the
referenced reports and can be characterized as
gently tilted Eocene sedimentary rock
nonconformably overlying Jurassic metavolcanics.
b. Bedding attitudes taken throughout the site suggest
a 3 to 9 degree, west to southwest regional dip,
although steeper bedding was encountered in
localized areas.
c. No evidence of faulting was observed by our field
geologic mapping during grading.
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 9
3.6 Surface and Subsurface Water
a. Prior to grading, the major drainage adjacent to
Palomar Airport Road contained a small stream,
apparently fed by seepage from nearby developments.
A subdrain installed during grading below Lot 29
was designed to intercept this seepage. The
subdrain discharges into the natural area below the
toe of the newly constructed fill slope on Lot 26.
No other seepage was observed during grading.
b. Surface drainage within the graded site is designed
to flow into desilting basins and storm drains.
Brow ditches direct surface water on perimeter
slopes to the storm drain system or dissipators at
the toe of slopes.
4.0 GRADING OPERATIONS
4.1 General
a. The site grading is shown on the 80-scale plans
developed by Bodas Engineering Incorporated.
Copies of these plans serve as a base map for our
As-Graded Geotechnical Maps, (Plates 1 through 3).
b. Site grading was performed using conventional
cut/fill mass grading techniques with heavy earth-
moving equipment. The grading operation began with
alluvium and colluvium removals in canyon areas.
Once alluvium was removed, subdrains were
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 10
constructed in canyon or removal bottoms. Bedrock
cuts, including removals of surficial colluvium,
were then performed, with the material generated
being placed as compacted fill in the canyons. The
mass grading generally progressed from the
southeast toward the northwest portion of the site.
c. Drilling and blasting was recjuired in the northeast
portion of the site where hard metavolcanic rock
was encountered.
4.2 Preparation of Natural Ground
The site was first cleared of subsurface obstructions and
stripped of vegetation. Topsoil, colluvium, alluvium,
and existing uncompacted fills were removed to bedrock
prior to placing fill. The exposed subgrade was
scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 inches, moisture
conditioned, and compacted.
4.3 Soil Types
The representative soil types used as fill material are
tabulated in Table 1, "Laboratory Test Results". The
maximum density and optimum moisture of the soils was
determined by ASTM D1557-78 (Modified Proctor Method).
All fill material was derived from on-site or immediately
adjacent sources. The fill generally consists of silty,
fine to medium sand (SM), sandy silt (ML), and silt-clay
mixtures (CL-CH).
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 11
Rock fill, derived from blasted Santiago Peak
metavolcanics, consisted of fairly well graded angular
shot rock ranging up to occasional 24-inch maximum
dimension rocks. The rock fill also contains fine
grained sand and clay.
4.4 Fill Placement and Testing
a. Fill soils were typically placed in 6 to 8-inch
lifts, brought to approximate optimum moisture
content, and compacted. The compaction eguipment
consisted of self-propelled rubber-tired
compactors, scrapers, sheepsfoot rollers, and other
heavy earthmoving equipment.
b. Density tests were conducted in accordance with
ASTM D2922-86 and ASTM 3017-78 (Nuclear Methods).
Results of the density tests are tabulated in
Appendix C, "Field Density Test Results".
Approximate test locations are shown on the
accompanying "As-Graded Geotechnical Maps", Plates
1 through 3. The test elevations and locations
were estimated from field grade stakes and
extrapolated from the project plans; further
accuracy is not implied.
Rock fill generated by cuts in the area of Lots 37,
38, and 39 was placed as structural fill under Lots
39, 40, 44, 45, and 46. A performance standard for
rockfill compaction was established based on a
testfill in accordance with the recommendations in
References 6 and 7.
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 12
4.5 Cut/Fill Transitions
At the conclusion of mass grading, several of the pad
areas had cut/fill transitions (contact between bedrock
and fill) exposed at the surface. These lots include Lot
28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46,
47, 48 and 49. The approximate locations of the cut/fill
transition is indicated on the Geotechnical Maps, Plates
1 through 3.
4.6 Slopes
4.6.1 Fill Slopes
Fill slopes were generally constructed at
slope ratios of 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) or
flatter, to a maximum height of about 65 feet.
Fill keys were excavated at the toe of the
slopes prior to filling. Fill slopes were
built either by overfilling, then cutting back
to grade, or by backrolling with a sheepsfoot
roller at intervals as the fill was brought
up. Finishing was done by track-walking the
slope face with a dozer.
4.6.2 Cut Slopes
Cut slopes were generally graded to a slope
ratio of 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) or flatter,
with a maximum height of about 30 feet. Cut
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 13
slopes were mapped by the project geologist to
document geologic conditions.
4.6.3 Buttress Fills
The cut slope between Lots 33 and 34 was
constructed as a buttress fill to stabilize a
clay seam found during grading operations.
The buttress was constructed in accordance
with the recommendations provided in
References 11, 12 and 14. The approximate
location of the key and backdrain is indicated
on the Geotechnical Maps, Plates 1-3.
4.6.4 Stability Fills
Slopes designed as cut slopes adjacent to Lots
31, 32, 34 and 49 were constructed as
stabilization fills to replace materials
particularly susceptible to erosion and
surficial instability. The fills were
constructed with keys and backdrains in
accordance with the recommendations provided
in References 11, 12 and 14. The approximate
locations of the keys and backdrains are
indicated on the Geotechnical Maps, Plates 1-
3.
4.6.5 Natural Slopes
Off-site natural slopes where potential
instability could directly affect the design
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 14
slopes and building pads constructed for this
development were evaluated prior to the
grading. During the grading, our field
personnel verified that no adverse geologic
conditions were encountered which would
require additional remedial measures.
4.6.6 Subdrains and Backdrains
Subdrains were placed in the major canyon
bottoms after alluvial removals had been
completed. The subdrains consisted of
perforated PVC pipe surrounded by 3/4"
open graded crushed rock and wrapped in
geofabric, consistent with the
recommendations in our referenced
geotechnical reports (References 11, 12
and 14). Approximate subdrain locations
are shown on the As-Graded Geotechnical
Maps (Plates 1 through 3). The subdrains
are outletted into storm drain systems or
discharged to surface grades.
b. Backdrains were installed along the heal
of the keyways for the buttress and
stability fills constructed adjacent to
Lots 31, 32, 34 and 49. The approximate
locations are shown on the Geotechnical
Map, Plates 1-3.
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 15
5.0 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 General
a. We consider that the grading and earthwork
operations carried out under our observation and
testing were performed in general accordance with
the intent of the recommendations presented in our
referenced geotechnical reports (Appendix A) and
with the requirements of the City of Carlsbad. The
conclusions and recommendations contained herein
are based on our observations and testing services
performed from August 24, 1989 through April 2,
1990.
b. Plans for subsequent development of the site should
be forwarded to the Geotechnical Consultant for
review and comment with regard to specific grading
and foundation design criteria as these plans
become available. A geotechnical investigation
will be required for each lot to develop specific
grading recommendations and foundation criteria for
proposed structures.
5.2 Slope Stability
Cut and Fill Slopes
Based on our observation and testing, cut and fill
slopes at the site were constructed in general
conformance with our recommendations and the
grading requirements of the City of Carlsbad.
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 16
Previous slope stability analyses (see Referenced
Reports) indicate that cut and fill slopes within
these lots have factors of safety in excess of
generally accepted minimum design criteria (Factor-
of-Safety = 1.50). Both cut and fill slopes are
expected to perform favorably with respect to
surficial stability if drainage devices are
maintained and slope maintenance is implemented.
5.3 Settlement
Based on the fill thickness placed during this and
previous grading operations, it is our opinion that
development of commercial/industrial structures at the
site is feasible, provided that potential fill
settlements are evaluated and incorporated in the design
of the proposed structures. In particular, building
locations on Lots 28 through 31, 33, 36, and 40 through
46 should be evaluated during the early planning stages
due to considerable differential fill thicknesses. It is
recommended that the Project Soils Engineer, Civil
Engineer, Structural Engineer and Architect should review
and evaluate the location and type of all structures with
respect to the potential settlement of the fill
materials.
5.4 Foundation Design Criteria
General
Geotechnical considerations that will influence
foundation design among other things include:
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 17
a. The bearing capacity characteristics of the
soil and bedrock materials on-site.
b. The expansive nature of the on-site soils.
c. The consolidation characteristics of the
underlying soils and bedrock.
A site specific geotechnical investigation is
recoinmended for all future development planned for
the subject mass graded lots. Plans for subsequent
development of the subject lots should be forwarded
to the geotechnical consultant for review to
evaluate the proposed grading and construction with
respect to the geotechnical features of the site
and to provide recommendations for specific
structural foundations and associated improvements.
5.5 Transition Building Pads
Where building pads are located such that they span
across a transition from cut to fill, remedial grading
and/or appropriate structural design may be required to
mitigate the potential adverse effects due to non-uniform
bearing characteristics of the underlying materials.
When the fill portion of such pads is shallow, remedial
grading consisting of overexcavation of the cut portion
of the pad to a minimum depth of three feet below finish
pad grade and replacement as compacted fill is generally
sufficient to provide uniform bearing characteristics for
most structures. We recommend that the Soils Engineer
evaluate transition areas and provide appropriate
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 18
recommendations as plans for future development become
available.
5.6 Drainage and Slope Maintenance
a. Surface Drainage
Pad drainage should be designed to collect and
direct surface waters away from proposed structures
to approved drainage facilities. For earth areas,
a minimum gradient of two percent should be
maintained and drainage should be directed toward
approved swales or drainage facilities. Drainage
patterns approved at the time of fine grading
should be maintained throughout the life of
proposed structures. Even when these measures are
taken, a shallow groundwater or surface water
condition may develop in areas where no such water
condition existed prior to site development; this
is particularly true where a substantial increase
in surface water infiltration results from
landscape irrigation. We recommend that landscape
planters either not be located next to buildings
and pavement areas, or be properly drained to an
appropriate outlet.
Slope drainage devices have been constructed in
accordance with applicable standards. On-going
maintenance is necessary to allow proper
performance of these devices.
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 19
b. Subsurface Drainage
Subsurface drainage devices, including canyon
subdrains and drains in stabilization and buttress
keys were installed in accordance with our
recommendations. The locations and types of drains
installed are presented on the Geotechnical Maps,
Plates 1 through 3. All drain outlets should be
maintained to prevent burial or blockage.
c. Maintenance of Slopes and Drainage Devices
liaintenance of slopes and drainage devices is
important to their long-term performance. The
following is a list of suggested procedures
provided as a guide for slope maintenance.
i. Drainage Devices
Graded berms, swales, area drains, and
slopes are designed to carry surface
water from pad areas and should not be
blocked or destroyed. Water should not
be allowed to pond in pad areas, or
overtop and flow down graded or natural
slopes.
Sources of uncontrolled water, such as
leaky water pipes or drains, should be
repaired if identified.
Devices constructed to drain and protect
slopes, including brow ditches, berms,
terrace drains and down drains should be
maintained regularly, and in particular,
should not be allowed to clog such that
water can flow unchecked over slope
faces.
Sumitomo Bank of California Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
April 21, 1993 Log No. 3-1063
Page 20
Subdrain outlets should be maintained to
prevent burial or other blockage.
ii. Slopes
Slopes in the southern California area
should be planted with appropriate
drought-resistant vegetation as
recommended by a landscape architect.
• Slopes should not be overirrigated.
Heavy ground cover combined with
overwatering is a primary source of
surficial slope failures.
Animal burrows can serve to collect
normal sheet flow on slopes and cause
rapid and destructive erosion, and should
be controlled or eliminated.
Modification to slopes, including all
placement of fill materials or
excavations that steepen or otherwise
modify designed slope angles should not
be attempted without direction or
approval of the Soils Engineer.
5.7 Subsequent Grading Operations
Prior to the commencement of additional grading
operations on-site, including precise grading and
backfilling of trenches and retaining walls, the Soils
Engineer should be notified to provide appropriate
recommendations and observation and testing services as
required.
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 21
5.8 Plan Review
As foundation and grading plans are completed, they
should be forwarded to the Geotechnical Consultant for
review for conformance with the recommendations herein or
to provide additional recommendations as necessary.
9.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION
a. Our investigation was performed in accordance with the
usual and current standards of the profession, as they
relate to this and similar localities. No other
warranty, expressed or implied, is provided as to the
conclusions and professional advice presented in this
report.
b. i. The samples taken and tested, and the observations
performed are considered to be representative of
the subject site; however, soil and geologic
conditions can vary significantly between sample
locations.
ii. The test location elevations shown in Table 2 are
based on surveys done by others.
c. Any changed conditions revealed during construction
should be brought to our attention immediately for our
evaluation.
d. This report is issued with the understanding that it is
the responsibility of the Owner, or of his
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 22
representative, to ensure that the information and
recommendations contained herein are brought to the
attention of the Architect and Engineer for the project
and incorporated into the plans, and that the Contractor
and Subcontractors implement such recommendations in the
field.
e. Our grading observations and test results presented in
this report are limited to those grading operations
performed between August 1989 and April 1990, The
findings of this report are considered valid as of the
later date. However, changes in the conditions of a site
can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due
to natural events or to human activities on this or
adjacent sites. In addition, changes in applicable or
appropriate codes and standards may occur, whether they
result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge.
Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalid
wholly or partially by changes outside our control.
Therefore, this report is subject to review and revision
as changed conditions are identified.
This report is subject to review by the local regulating
agency.
3
Sumitomo Bank of California
April 21, 1993
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01
Log No. 3-1063
Page 23
The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If there are any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Very truly yours,
ICG Incorporated
Hantoro Walujond, G.E
Registration Expires: 3-31-95
Chief Engineer
PAT/HW/TGH/lh
Thomas G. Hill,
Registration Expi
Vice President/Chie
Distribution: (6) Addressee
Attachments: 1. Appendix A
2. Table 1
3. Table 2
4. Plates 1-3
Compaction Test
References
Laboratory
Results
Field Density Test Results
As-Graded Geotechnical
Maps/Test Location Plans
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063
Page A-1
APPENDIX A
References
1. ICG Incorporated, August 3, 1990, Discontinuance of
Geotechnical Services, Carlsbad Airport Centre, Unit 2,
Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-016-01-(10,30,40),
Log No. 0-2203.
2. ICG Incoi^jorated, April 25, 1990, Letter Regarding Well
Abandonment, Palomar Airport Centre, 1921 Palomar Oaks
Way, Carlsbad, Califomia, Job No. 05-4879-016-00-00, Log
No. 0-1535.
3. ICG Incorporated, December 4, 1989, Revised Recommendations
for Soil Cap on Soil/Rockfill, Carlsbad Airport Centre,
Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-016-01-10,
Log No. 9-2454.
4. ICG Incorporated, November 17, 1989, Soil Corrosivity Tests
for Hilfiker Wall, Palomar Airport Centre, Unit 2,
Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-016-00-10, Log No.
9-2403.
5. ICG Incorporated, November 15, 1989, Geotechnical
Recommendations for Retaining Wall, Palomar Airport
Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-
016-01-10, Log No. 9-2394.
6. ICG Incorporated, November 9, 1989, Rock Testfill, Carlsbad
Airport Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-
4879-016-01-10, Log No. 9-2363.
7. ICG Incorporated, October 27, 1989, Compaction Testing in
Rockfill, Carlsbad Airport Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad,
California, Job No. 05-4879-016-01-10, Log No, 9-2310.
8. ICG Incorporated, October 26, 1989, Soil Corrosivity Tests for
Hilfiker Wall, Palomar Airport Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad,
California, Job No, 05-4879-016-00-10,
9. San Ditego Geotechnical Consultants> September 27, 1989,
Recommendations for Placing Oversize Rock in Offsite
Fill, Carlsbad Airport Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad,
California, Job No. 05-4879-016-00-00, Log No. 9-2160.
Job No. 05-9065-001-00-01 Log No. 3-1063
Page A-2
APPENDIX A
References (Continued)
10. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, August 30, 1989, Soil
Parameters for Retaining Wall Design, Palomar Airport
Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-
016-00-10, Log No. 9-2041.
11. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, August 9, 1989, Addendum
to Additional Geotechnical Investigation, Airport
Business Centre, Unit 2, Carlsbad, California, Job No.
05-4879-016-00-00.
12. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, August 7, 1989, Additional
Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Airport Centre, Unit
2, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-016-00-00, Log
No. 9-1868.
13. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, July 13, 1989, Well
Abandonment Pemnit, 1921 Palomar Oaks Way #300, Carlsbad,
California, Job No. 05-4879-016-00-00.
14. San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, July 3, 1989, Supplemental
Recommendations for Grading, Airport Business Centre,
Units 2 and 3, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 05-4879-016-
00-00, Log No. 9-1818.
15. San Diego Geotechnical consultants, July 29, 1988,
Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Airport
Centre, Unit 2, and Offsite Fill Area, Carlsbad,
California, Job No. 05-4879-011-00-OtO.
16. H.V. Lawmaster & Company, Inc., 1980, Preliminary Geotechnical
Investigation, Proposed Palomar Business Park, North San
Diego County, California: Unpublished Report No. 79-
9394/654G to Palomar Business Park, January 15, 1980
(includes grading plan review letters dated June 8, 1982
and September 27, 1982).
17. Moore & Taber, 1987, Report of Geotechnical Services, Carlsbad
Tract No. 81-46, Airport! Business Center, Unit No, 1,
City of Carlsbad, California: Unpublished Report to
Centre Development Company, February 25, 1987,
-
TABLE 1
LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST RESULTS
JOB NO: 05-9065-001-00-01 DATE: Aoril 1993
PROJECT NAME: Sumitomo Bank of California
TEST
NO.
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
OPTIMUM
MOISTURE
CONTENT
(%)
MAXIMUM
DRY
DENSITY
(LB/FT')
1 Medium Brown Silty Sand 12.9 119.1
2 Medium Grey Brown Silty Clay 16.8 121.6
3 Light Grey Brown Tan Silty Clayey
Sand
14.5 113.5
4 Weathered Santiago Peak Volcanics 15.1 116.6
5 Brown Clayey Silty Sand 13.0 115,3
6 Yellow Tan Clayey Sand 14.5 114,5
7 Grey Blue Silty Sand 12.8 118.0
8 Class 2 Base 6.1 138,0
9 Light Brown Sand (Shade Sand
for Storm Drain Backfill)
7.6 134.9
10 Class 2 Base 7.4 137,2
11 Class 2 Base 7.2 134,7
12 Dark Brown Silty Clay 12.4 122,0
13 Green Tan Sandy Clay 15.7 111,0
14
1
J
Class 2 Base 6.4 138,6
Pre- icct NsHs; Hi FL'Sfi^lESS CENTER, U^IT £
TABLE 2 Pace # 1
Field Density Test Results
EievcT iori Curve No. Fill Fill
Test Te5t_ . Test or I'lC'isture Dry Relative
Date Lucatiori Depth Dry I erisity Coi'itErit Density Coicpacticn ftefiiarks
1989 (feet) ipcf) (oercent) (pcf) (percent) (see legeno)
1 09/12 SEE MAP 132 1 119 15.3 107 31 (90) NU
E 05/12 SEE mp 193 4 116 17.1 106 92 (90) m
3 05/15 SEE KftP 195 3 113 17.9 104 53 (90) m
4 OS/15 SEE «HP 137 113 15,1 104 32 (90) NU
5 09/15 SEE MAP 199 4 116 16.5 105 91 (90) MJ
6 09/13 SEE mp 200 4 116 16,0 105 91 (90) NU
7 09/13 SEE MAP £02 4 116 18,2 108 93 (90) Ml
n
a OS/H SEE MP 204 1 116 17,6 106 9£ <90) m
3 09/14 SEE ffir-206 4 116 16.1 106 92 (90) m
10 05/14 SEE MfiP £07 1 115 17,5 106 91 (90) . m
09/14 SEE MfiP £0S 1 119 14.1 107 90 (90) m
12 05/15 SEE «HP £03 3 113 15.8 103 5£ (90) m 13 09/15 SEE MAP 210 4 116 16.7 107 93 (90) m
14 09/15 SEE MAP 212 4 116 16.1 105 91 (90) • m
15 09/15 SEE MAP 152 4 116 15.1 105 51 (90) m
IS 05/15 SEE KAP £14 3 113 15.1 103 92 (90) m
17 09/15 SEE MAP 194 4 116 15.5 106 52 (90) m
Ifi 09/15 SEE MAP 195 4 116 16.3 106 9£ (50) m
19 09/IS SEE mp 137 C 121 18.1 109 •91 (50) m
20 09/le SEE «flP 193 4 116 17,6 107 93 (90) m
dl 09/18 SEE MAP 201 4 115 17.8 106 92 (90) m
2E 09/16 SEE PifiP 205 4 116 17.2 106 91 (90) m
CO 09/18 SEE MA? 202 4 116 10.7 103 90 (90) ft-24
£4 09/18 SEE r,P;5 - 202 4 116 15.6 105 9! (90) m
25 03/18 SEE MAP £04 3 113 15.7 102 91 • (30) m
2£ 03/16 SEE SlftP 207 3 115 lb. 2 102 31 (90) NU
27 03/19 SEE m'-i 211 113 16.4 102 30 (90) NU
28 05/15 SEE mp £0b 113 15.5 102 31 (50) m
; ' 09/20 SEE MSP 207 5 113 16.5 104 32 !30) NU
30 09/20 SEE MAP £13 3 115 18.0 102 51 (30) m
31 03/20 SEE mp 217 113 18.1 103 92 (30) m
52 03/20 SEE 205 3 115 18.0 102 51 (30) m
53 05/20 SEE m'^ 218 3 113 17.6 102 91 (30) NU
24 05/2! SEE «AP 220 .li 113 19.5 102 90 (30) NU
35 09/21 SEE !^ap 211 3 115 18,3 102 91 (30) NU
36 05/21 SEE MAP 219 3 113 17.1 102 51 (30)
57 09/2i SEE !<ap 222 1 119 13.7 107 90 (50) NU
36 05/2: SEE mp • 213 L 116 16.2 51 (90) HU
3S 09/22 SEE .''.Q- • 215 4 116 16.0 IOS 51 (50) m
Reidarhs Legpndi
(##> = Required Percent Cocipact i ori, R-## = Rete sted on Test 5S, SC=Sarid Corie, Nli-Niiciear, DC-Dri ve Cyi., OT=Other
Pi-oiect NCISE; AIRPORT BUSINESS CE.NTER. UrilT
TABLE 2
Field Density Test Result!
Paos fi
Elevation Curve No. Fill Fill
'St Test Test or S Maxiifuic "ioisture Dry Relative
•ber Date Location Dept.n Dry Density Content Density CoBiDaction Refrtarks
1SB5 (feet .5 <ccf) (cercent) (pcf) (percent) (see legend}
40 05/22 SEE mp 225 4 116 15.5 107 32 (50) tin
41 03/22 SEE .MAP 221 3 115 18.0 102 51 (90) m
OS/22 SEE m.p 218 3 113 18,5 102 90 (90) m
43 05/25 SEE l»!.AP 224 5 115 15.3 103 92 (90) m
4^ 03/25 SEE MAP 226 4 116 17.3 104 SO (50) NU
45 03/25 SEE MAP 227 5 115 15.2 102 91 (90) NU
46 09/25 SEE KAP 223 3 115 17.2 103 91 (SO) sc
47 03/25 SEE m 252 5 115 17,0 104 32 (90) sc
46 09/25 SEE MAP 225 5 113 17,5 104 92 (90) NU
43 09/25 SEE KAP 254 4 116 18.1 105 91 (90) NU
50 09/25 SEE MAP £55 4 115 16.1 106 92 (50) SC
51 og/££ SEE mp 235 4 115 15.5 105 92 (90) SC
09/26 SEE MAP 257 A 115 .16.2 106 92 (50) SC
53 09/25 SEE KAP 255 5 115 17,3 104 9! (90) sc
54 09/26 SEE KftP £57 c J 115 15.3 104 91 (90) sc
09/26 SEE MAP 238 115 17.9 103 % (90) •SC
55 03/25 SEE t!AP 239 4 115 15.4 104 SO (30) NU
57 03/27 SEE !".AP £23 A 116 i J. u 104 50 (90) NU
55 09/27 EES MfiP 233 3 113 15.7 103 92 (50) NU
55 09/27 SEE .f^AP 240 2 121 109 90 !30> SC
.'"j'l DV 05/27 SEE f^AP 241 4 116 14.3 106 52 (90) NU
Bi 05/27 SEE MA? h : 16 15.5 105 91 (30) SC
£z 03/27 SEE KAP C: !13 lb. 6 104 S3 (30) EC
£Z 05/27 SEE MAO lib 17.0 104 SO (90) ... SC
64 03/26 SEE MfiP 211 3 il3 17.0 103 32 (50) £C
03/23 SEE hAP 21 y c. 116 16.1 106 92 (90) SC
09/2S SEE KAP £30 4 ; 16 •• r C iC. -J 106, 52 (90)
£7 03/26 SEE !>1AP T it- c 106 Jc' •50) a-i
•P-.i-03/26 SEE MAP 3 ; 13 15.3 104 qp (30) Nu
05/23 SEE MfiP 224 i U5 17.3 107 51 (50) 5C
70 05/29 SEE MAP 232 J) 1 l^t 16. 2 103 •:50) NU
71 09/29 SEE mp £12 4 116 16.5 106 92 (90) NU
"E 09/25 SEE MAP 4 116 17.5 106 94 (30) NU
?5 CS/23 SEE IIAP 4 i 16 105 51 (90; SC
74 or/£:9 SEE MAP 225 £ 121 16.6 no 31 (50) SC
1 u 10/02 SEE ."!AP 236 4 U5 L !-'« 1-104 30 (90)
TA 10/02 SEE MAP £14 3 ;i5 16,1 10£ 31 (90)
77 •0/0£ SEE !^SP £58 -i 115 14.3 105 31 (30) NU
-7.-. 10/02 SEE MAP 236 lib 14.6 106 52 (SO) BC
75 10/02 SEE PiftP 252 i 15 103 5i (SO) SC
Reiiiar)<5 Lenend;
(55) = Recuirsc Percen!; Corspcct-on, ft-iS ietesteci on 'est SC^Sand Co.ne, i\U=Nuciear, DC=Dr!ve Cy Lii=Or.ner
Project fe-e: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, mU 2
TABLE £
Field Density Test Results
Pane «
Elevation L'urve No. Fill Fill
Test Tesi Test or & Man: mutii Moisture Dry fieifitjve
N'uistiEr Date Location Deoth Dry DeriSity Content Density Zompaction fier.iiarks .
1389 (feet) pc^'j (percent) i.vcf) (cercent) (see iecend)
60 10/02 SEE MAP 217 r
,J 115 10.4 100 67 (50) R-ei NU
81 10/02 SEE 217 c J 115 13.9 105 52 (SO) Ml
22 10/03 SEE mp £3i c: •J 115 15,5 104 51 (50) NU
83 10/03 SEE MAP 227 3 J 1 J •5.2 103 31 (30) NU
64 10/03 SEE MfiP 240 c 115 13.5 104 91 (30) NU
85 10/03 SEE MAP 242 4 115 it.E 105 91 (30) SC
66 10/03 SEE MAP 236 4 116 14.1 104 90 (30) SC
87 10/05 SEE MAP £35 4 116 15.2 10 J 91 (90) NU
88 10/04 SEE MAP 226 1 119 16.1 106 91 (90) SC
83 10/04 SEE MAP £43 2 121 15.3 109 50 (90) sc
30 10/04 SEE MAP £50 4 116 15.2 105 31 (90) NU
• 31 10/04 SEE MAP £35 4 116 13.3 105 92 (90) NU
32 10/04 SEE MAP £3£ 1 119 13.6 107 90 (90) NU
33 10/04 SEE MAP 245 5 115 14.1 105 90 (90) NU
94 10/04 SEE MAP 237 c U 115 15.4 103 90 (90) NU
95 10/05 SEE MAP £42 4 116 15.5 105 91 (90) SC
96 10/05 SEE MAP 232 4 116 15,0 104 90 (90) NU
97 10/05 SEE ,MAP ' 234 4 116 16.0 IOS 92 (90) SC
96 10/05 SEE MAP 250 4 116 14,5 104 90 (SO) NU
95 10/05 SEE MAP 237 4 115 17.2 104 90 (90) ' NU
, 100 • 10/05 SEE MAP 245 4 115 15.6 105 91 (90) l«J
101 10/06 SEE MAP ££1 5 115 13.2 105 31 (3C)) NU
102 10/OS SEE fijCD £44 c
J 115 H.O 105 52 (90) SC
103 . 10/05 SEE MAP 248 >i 115 17.5 31 (30) MJ
104 10/05 SEE Mfi= 2^5 1 115 14.5 107 Si (90) SC
105 10/05 SEE MAP £45 1 119 14.0 207 90 (90) NU
105 10/05 SEE MAP 247 4 116 106 92 . (90) NU
107 10/05 SEE MAP 233 4 lis ^ *. 1 10£ 52 (30) NU
106 10/05 SEE MAP 250 4 1 It 0 ' T'S
J V*.'
Sl (90) SC
103 10/05 SEE M-.P ££7 5 115 :£.£ lO'i 90 (90) NU
110 10/05 SEE MAP £47 4 lib J6.4 105 31 (90) NU
Ul 10/03 SEE MA? £46 5 115 iS.O 103 90 (50) NU
112 10/05 SEE .MA3 115 13,4 103 90 (SO) SC
113 10/03 SEE M.pP £46 5 115 14.7 105 52 (50) NU
114 10/05 SEE MfiP '•jfC
CUJ 115 14.5 !04 91 (90) SC
115 10/10 SEE i-^AP £52 3 113 ;5.0 102 31 (90) NU
116 10/10 SEE MfiP 251 3 113 ^ c ,
J !.•• J 102 91 (50) NU
117 lO/lO SEE Mfi? •-•cr 3 113 15.9 103 31 (90) NU
lie lO/iO SEE MfiP £iO 3 113 14.7 102 31 (50) NU
ns 10/10 SEE ^fiP 5 11J : - 1 104 31 (90) NU
Remarks Lppend}
m> = Reouired Pc •' :r.-.it Corspaction, R-#?i = Rat ested or: 'est if*. SC=S3nD Co ':e, NU=Ni!C'Bar, DC=Dri ve Cyi, , DT=Other
Project Narfs: AIRPORT bJSINESS CENTER, UI^JlT £
Field Density Test Results
Elevation Curve No. Fill Fill
Test Test Test or MaxHsiKn Moisture Dry Relative
Nuuber Date Location Deoth Dry Density Content Density Compact ion Reif.arKS
156'-* (feet) (DCf) (percent) (pcfi (percent) (see Iecend)
120 10/10 SEE MAP 256 3 113 17.2 103 92 (50) SC
121 10/10 SEE MAP 25b Jl 113 15.0 103 52 (30) SC
122 lo/i: SEE MAP •'.CC 4 116 14.5 106 52 (50) NL!
123 10/11 SEE MfiP 254 4 116 15.4 107 33 (90) Ml
10/10 see loap 220 c .J 115 13.4 10£ 65 (50) R-l 25 NJ
125 10/11 see map 220 J 115 13.2 104 51 (30) NU
125 10/11 see Kap 243 3 113 13,6 103 51 (30) NU
127 10/11 see map 233 4 116 15.0 104 90 (30) SC
126 10/11 see map 240 2 113 14.5 102 31 (50) NU
129 10/11 see mao 257 3 113 14.5 103 52 (50) SC
150 10/12 see nap 252 t: 115 15.5 104 51 (90)
131 10/12 see reap 250 1 113 13.0 107 90 (90) NU
13£ 10/12 see map 220 C
u 115 15,0 104 91 (SO) NU
133 10/12 see map 223 i 113 13,5 107 90 (90) sc
134 10/12 see Biap ^ 226 I 115 14,2 107 51 (50) SC
135 10/12 see mas £•£3 I 115 14,8 109 9£ (90) NU
136 10/12 see see ££5 \ lis 16.6 107 90 (90) NU
• 137 10/12 see .Tiap £30 t lis 14,8 108 91 (5CI) NU
138 10/13 see isap 253 c
J 115 15.6 104 91 (90) NU
133 10/12 see .'liac 254 4 115 105 92 (90) Nu
140 10/15 see nan £57 4 116 15,1 108 53 (50) sc
141 10/15 see K5D £32 4 lib 15,3 105 91 (90) NU
14£ 10/13 see Kap 245 1 115' 13,5 107 90 (90) NU
145 10/13 see siap £51 115 14.2 104 90 (30) NU
14-* 10/13 see t^ac 240 c 115 13.5 103 90 (90) sc
145 10/16 see fi;ap £46 5 115 13.1 103 30 (90) NU
146 10/15 see iiicc £52 tj 115 12.7 103 90 (50) m
147 10/15 see -ssp 25tJ p 115 15.2 104 90 (30) m
148 10/15 see KcD 261 4 115 15.3 105 51 (SO) sc
145 I0..'l£ see r.iac 250 4 115 15,0 105 92 (30) sc
150 10/15 see (rac-251 r 115 16,1 104 91 (SO) Nu
10/15 see raap 254 5 115 15,2 104 31 (50) NU
15£ 10/15 see i;;ari £56 3 113 16.0 103 91 (90) sc
153 10/15 see fiias £5!J 115 15.4 104 31 (90) NU
154 10/15 see ran £65 4 115 14.7 105 32 (90) NU
155 10/17 see map 4 115 15.8 105 31 (30) sc
155 . 10/17 see rsaa 259 1 115 17.4 10? 31 (90) NU
157 10/17 see wap £64 J 115 13.1 108 31 (30) NU
15S 10/1? see ;.-ap 267 1 119 13.4 107 91 (90) SC
153 10/17 see ;saD 256 1 115 15.6 107 95 (30) NU
Remarks Leqend:
m) = Requirsd Percent Co.MDact i on. R-ftf = Retesteo on Test SC=Sand Cone, ^•Li=Nuc!ear, DC-Drive Cyl. , OT=Other
Project Kaiiie: AIRPORT BUSif^ESS CENTER, UMT 2
Field Density Test Results
Test lest
NursDer Date
13S3
Test
Location
Elevation
or
Deoth
(feet)
Curve Ho.
i MaMiffiuii:
Dry Density
(pcf)
t-ili
f^oist^i'E
Content
(percent)
Density
(pcf)
«.eiat jve
CoMCiact jon
iDercent) (see iecend)
ISO 10/17 see i.iao
151 10/17 see isap
152 10/17 see i£ap
163 10/17 see
154 10/1/ see 1,-ap
165 10/18 see tiiaa
155 10/16 see Itcu
167 10/16 see map
168 10/18 see uap
165 10/18 see map
170 10/16 see f,ap
171 10/18 see map
172 10/16 see map
173 10/18 see map
174 10/16 see lap
175 10/16 see mec
175 10/13 see maD
177 10/19 see mao
178 10/19 see map
175 10/19 see map
180 10/19 see Kap
181 10/19 seB map
iS£ 10/15 map
163 10/19 see meo
164 10/13 see itap
10/19 see map
165 10/20 see 6:ap
187 10/20 see i.iaj
186 i {.'.' c-J see i-iac
189 10/20 see iiiap
130 10/20 see Keo
151 •0/20 see map
132 10/20 see map
193 iO/20 see rsap
134 10/20 see man
155 10/25 '~ee map
156 10/23 see mas
197 10/23 see mao
196 10/23 see map
159 10/25 see map
253 4 116 13.6 105 91 (50) NU
253 1 113 14.3 107 50 (30) m
265 1 115 15.6 107 50 (50) m 251 i 113 15.3 103 31 (30) m
£66 1 119 13.5 107 30 (50) m
265 5 115 14.4 104 91 (90)
266 4 116 14.6 105 9£ (90) sc
270 4 116 14,3 105 91 (90) NU
£48 4 116 16.4 105 91 (30) NU
£4£ 4 116 14.9 105 91 (90) NU
£35 4 116 17.0 105 51 (90) 8C
£50 1 113 17,6 106 91 (90) iflJ
252 1 115 17.3 105 9£ (90) ?c
240 4 116 15.9 105 91 (90) m
250 4 116 14.5 105 91 (90) m
250 4 115 14.2 105 91 (90) NU
255 i 119 15.4 108 92 (90) NU
£59 1 119 15.8 109 9£ (30) • • SC
£50 4 116 15.7 105 91 (90) m 262 4 116 15.5 104 30 (30) m
£70 5 115 15.4 103 90 (50) NU
271 5 115 15.0 103 30 (SO)
256 1 119 1£.5 107 SO (50) ' • .t&l
257 4 116 11.6 103 SO (30) NU
£50 4 116 14.3 105 51 (50)
236 4 116 14.5 105 51 (50) NU
£57 1 119 13.6 107 50 (50) NU
£65 4 116 13.1 iOfa 92 (30) NU
£55 1 113 14.1 106 31 (50) SC
CJJ 1 113 14.3 lOS 91 (50) sc
252 1 115 13.3 105 S£ (30)
255 j> 113 13.9 108 91 (30) NU
£56 4 116 15.1 105 31 (90) NU
£56 4 116 15. £ 104 30 (90) 1^"
268 1 119 14.5 107 51 (90) NU
267
259
£70
£62
254
119
115
115
115
113
13.6
12.1
15.6
15.1
13.0
107
107
107
107
111
90
91
30
30
54
(50)
(90)
(90)
(90)
(90)
NU
NU
NU
SC
NU
SBji!8rJi8j,Bgefidi
(Ifti) = Requiree Percent C jmaactjon, R-#* = Retested on Test 5C=5and Cone, NU=Nuclear, DC=Drive Cyl., OT=Dtner
Project Name: fiI«PO.»T BJSIf€SS Ct«iTER. UMI
Field Density Test Results
Pate #
EievatiC'n Curve Ho. Fiil Fiii
est Test Test cr 4 ,';a)iimum Moisture Dry Relative
(,'iiber p-'te Location Deotn Dry Der sity Content Density Compaction Remarks
1583 (feet; '4 icf! (percent) (ccf) (petxent) (see ieoend)
200 10/23 see mao £63 i 115 15.3 108 91 (30) NU
20: 10/23 see mac 255 1 119 14.5 11! 94 (30) NU
£02 10/23 see map £6'^ tr iJ 115 1£.4 105 92 (30) NU
203 10/23 see ma^ 270 I 119 13.0 ill 94 (30) SC
204 10/£4 see mao 2i'£ i 113 16.£ 107 90 (50) NU
205 10/24 see map 271 1 113 16.3 106 91 (90) NU
205 10/£4 see map 266 cr iJ 115 14,0 105 91 (50) NU
207 10/£4 see map 253 C" 115 15,0 104 31 (90) NU
£06 10/£4 see map £70 c-
xJ 115 14.3 104 51 (90) NU
209 10/£4 see map £53 cr 115 13.9 104 91 (90) NU
210 10/24 see map 271 zr 115 13,4 104 51 (50) NU
211 10/24 see map 270 116 15.0 106 91 (90) SC
£12 10/£4 see sap 233 4. 116 15.1 105 91 (SO) NU
£13 10/24 see map ' 255 3 113 15. £ 103 51 (90) Mi
£14 10/££ see map ^ 250 tJ 115 13,2 104 91 (90) Mi
£15 10/26 see map 245 5 115 13.5 104 91 (90) SC
£16 10/25 see nap 270 5 115 12.5 104 51 (90) m
217 10/25 see map 272 5 115 13,5 104 31 (90) •NU
£18 10/£5 see maij 257 4 115 14,7 107 55 (90) Mi
2l5 10/26 see map 270 J 115 14.4 103 90 (90) NU
££0 10/£5 see map £65 115 1£.7 104 31 (90) Mi
221 10/£5 see map 274 5 115 13,8 105 92 (90) Mi
222 10/27 see i
map £70 U 115 13.3 103 50 (90) Mi
225 10/27 see maD £75 U 115 15.5 104 ,51 (90) SC
224 10/27 see map £77 5 115 14.5 104 31 (90) NU
225 10/27 see mao £79 5 115 13,'5 105 32 (90) m
2£5 10/27 see mao £61 C 115 15.0 106 3£ (90) NU
£27 10/27 see map £69 5 113 12,4 105 3£ (90) NU
£26 10/27 see map 237 C •J 115 15,3 105 51 (90) NU
£29 10/27 see meu 272 5 115 13.0 104 50 (90) NU
250 10/£7 see map CiJw C ul 115 12.7 103 30 (50) NU
£31 10/£7 see map 254 5 115 13.3 106 3£ (90) NU
£3£ 10/30 see map £68 1£1 14,2 113 54 (90) NU
10/50 see maD 255 113 15.0 105 31 (90) NU
254 10/50 see man £56 2 121 15,4 114 94 (90) NU
235 10/31 see mao _^ 5 115 16.0 105 90 (90) NU
£35 10/31 see mao -3 P 115 15.6 104 91 (90) NU
237 10/31 see map -b P 115 i 105 51 (90) NU
£3B 10/51 ses map -4 c 115 15.4 105 SO (SO) NU
233 10/31 5e° mao £70 J 115 15.1 107 95 (90) NU
Remarks Legend!
(it#) = Required Percent Compaction, R-#H = Retested on Test SC"=Sand Cone, NU=Nuciear, DC=Drive Cyl., OT=Dther
;ect .Name; AIRPORT BuSINcE
T.ABLE Page it
Field Density Test Results
hievation carve Ho. Fill Fill
Test Test Test or i Max 1mum Moisture Dry Relative
Number Date Location Deoth Dry Density Content Density Compaction Remarks
19S5 (feet) (pcf) (percent) (pcf) (percent) (see iecend)
£40 10/31 see 272 c
vJ 115 15.3 105 95 (90) NU
241 10/31 see raap 252 c; 115 14.2 105 93 (90) NU
£42 10/31 see map ck^ c 115 15.5 106 94 (90) NU
245 11/01 see map 234 1 113 12.1 110 95 (90) NU
244 11/01 see map £65 I 119 12.7 103 9£ (50) NU
245 11/01 see map 5 115 13,5 105 91 (90) NU
£46 11/01 see map -5 C 115 13,0 101 68 (50) £5£ NU
247 11/01 see map -5 115 14.9 104 90 (90) NU
246 11/01 see map £62 115 17.1 107 93 (90) NU
245 11/01 see map 252 5 115 15,3 109 95 (90) NU
250 11/01 see map 262 1 lis 16.7 107 90 (90) NU
251 11/01 see map 254 1 113 17.8 109 9£ (90) NU
252 11/01 see map -6 c
VJ 115 13.6 103 90 (90) NU
253 11/0£ see map 72 D 115 18.1 103 90 (90) NU
£54 11/0£ see map 75 5 115 17.0 105 91 (90) NU
£55 11/02 see map 71 5 115 15.5 106 94 (90) SC
256 11/02 see nap 73 5 115 15.0 105 9£ (90) SC
257 11/03 see map • 71 5 115 14.7 106 9£ (90) SC
256 11/03 see map 74 C vJ 115 14,9 105 92 (90) NU
253 11/05 see map . 75 C 115 15.7 105 92 (90) NU
260 11/05 see map 75 •J 115 17,5 106 92 (50) NU
261 11/06 see map 272 4 115 16.0 104 90 (50) NU
£6£. 11/06 see map 273 4 116 17,6 105 91 (90) SC
£63 11/0-5 see map 274 4 115 15.3 105 92 (90) NU
£64 11/05 see map 276 4 116 16,1 106 92 (50) Nu
U/Ob see map £7fi c 121 15.0 109 90 (30) SC
£55 11/05 see map 260 4 115 13.5 106 91 (SO) NU
£6? 11/06 see map £62 4 :!5 15,4 105 91 (90) NU
£58 11/05 see map 266 4 116 15.5 105 91 (SO) NO
253 11/06 see map 2S4 4 116 15.1 106 32 (30) SC
£70 11/05 see nap 260 1 113 14.2 107 51 (50) NJ
271 11/07 see map 284 1 115 15.6 107 31 (30) NU
£7£ 11/07 see map 265 121 15.5 110 91 (90) NU
272 11/07 see map 2S6 •15 15,4 105 91 (90) NU
274 11/07 see map 288 1 113 16,6 107 90 (90) SC
275 11/07 see m-ap 283 1 119 14,5 108 92 (50) NU
275 11/07 see map 273 ,4 116 17.1 105 91 (50) NJ
277 11/07 see map 27b 1 119 17.3 109 92 (SO) NU
£76 11/07 see map £75 113 17,7 108 91 (30) NU
£73 11/07 see map £50 5 il5 15.5 104 31 (30) SC
Remarks Leqendi
(»#) = Required Percent Compaction, R-SS = Retestec or Test M, SC=Sand Cone, NU=Nuclear, DC=Drive Cyl,, OT=Uther
Pro ieet Narfe: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER. UNIT 2
TABLE Paoe # 6
Field Density Test Results
Elevation Curve No, Fiii Fill
Test Test Test or i, Maximum Moisture Dry Relative
iNiinber Date Location Depth Dry Density Content Density Ccirnpaction Remarks
15S3 (feet) (pcf) (percent) (pcf) (percent) (see legend)
2B0 11/06 see map 252 c J 115 14.3 107 93 (50) NU
261 11/03 see mac 234 5 115 15.1 104 91 (90) SC
262 n/oe see map £63 5 115 17.5 103 90 (30) NU
£63 11/OS see mao 270 r *J 115 17.7 106 93 (90) Mi
264 11/05 see map 260 c J 115 16.0 104 51 (90) SC
285 11/08 see map 264 4 116 13.6 105 91 (90) NU
265 11/06 see map 274 4 116 11.0 102 65 (90) £91 NU
£37 11/08 see map 296 5 115 17.1 104 91 (90) NU
286 11/06 see map 295 5 115 15.1 104 91 (90) SC
£69 11/08 see map £71 4 116 16.4 105 91 (90) NU
250 11/06 see map £75 1 115 15,0 109 92 (90) SC
251 11/08 see map £77 4 115 14,8 106 93 (90) NU
£52 IL'OS see man 298 4 116 13,8 105 92 (90) NU
£93 11/05 see map 297 4 116 14.2 105 91 (90) NU
£94 11/05 see map •' 275 4 116 15.5 105 92 (90) NU
255 11/05 see map ^ 259 4 116 15.7 105 91 (90) SC
£96 11/05 see map £77 4 116 17.5 105 91 (90) NU
£97 11/09 see map 276 4 116 18.5 104 90 (90) SC
£96 11/05 see mao £70 1 119 15.5 108 91 (90) NU
235 11/09 see map 271 4 115 15.6 106 92 (90) NU
300 11/05 see man 260 4 116 17,5 105 91 (90) NU
301 11/05 see raap 273 4 116 15.7 106 92 (90) NU
302 11/09 see mac £74 4 116 15.9 105 31. (90) NU
303 11/10 see map £7£ 4 116 15.8 106 91 (90) NU
304 11/10 see map £74 3 113 17,5 102 91 (50) NU
305 11/10 see map £75 c
vJ 115 16. J 1C>4 91 (90) NU
306 11/10 see E8d £75 c 115 15.6 104 90 (50) NU
307 11/10 sse mao £74 c u 115 16.3 103 30 (SO) NU
305 11/10 see map £73 3 113 17,1 103 91 (30) NU
305 11/10 see mao £76 5 115 15.6 103 90 (90) NU
3^0 11/13 see map 268 115 IS. 3 105 91 (90) NU
311 11/13 see map £69 5 115 17.5 104 31 (90) NU
312 11/15 see map 274 <J 115 15.5 105 32 (90) NU
313 ;i/15 see sap 274 c u 115 17,7 104 31 (50) SC
314 11/15 see map 275 c 115 !7.5 103 50 (90) SC
315 11/13 see mao £73 5 115 15.4 105 52 (90) ' NU
316 11/13 see map £76 c 115 15.5 104 90 (90) NU
317 11/14 see map 257 5 115 13.0 106 93 (90) NU
316 11/14 see map 274 J 119 12.5 106 91 (90) NU
313 11/14 see mail £53 D 115 13,4 105 92 (90) NU
Remarks Legend:
m) = Required Percent Comoaction, R-## = Retested on Test *#, SC=S£nd Cc ne, NU=Nucl6ar, DC=DrivB Cyl. , OT=Other
Project Name: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, UNli
TABLE £
Field Density Test Results
PapE it 9
Elevation Curve No. Fill Fill
Test Test Test or Maximum Moisture Dry Relative
.Niimber Date Location Deptn Dry Density Content Density Compaction .Remarks
1583 (feet) (ccf) (percent) (pcf) (percent) (see legend)
320 11/14 see map 273 c n5~ "'l577 '"l05 (90) SC
521 11/14 see map 270 115 16.2 105 5£ (90) SC
522 11/14 see map 272 c
Lf 115 12.1 105 S£ (90) NU
323 11/14 see map 277 5 115 15.2 104 51 (90) NU
324 11/15 see map £74 iJ 115 15.6 106 3£ (90) NU
325 11/15 see map £76 5 115 1£.8 107 34 (90) NU
326 11/15 see map £76 C iJ 115 15.1 107 53 (90) SC
327 11/15 see map £78 5 115 15.5 107 54 (50) SC
526 11/15 see nap £80 c O 115 13.7 103 90 (90) NU
329 11/15 see map 26£ 5 115 15.0 103 SO (90) NU
330 11/15 see «ap £63 5 115 11,9 105 52 (5<j) NU
331 11/15 see map ££5 5 115 14.9 105 S£ (90) NU
332 11/15 see map £55 c 115 15,6 109 55 (90) NU
355 11/16 see map ££3 5 115 15,3 104 51 (90) NU
334 11/15 see map ^ ££5 4 115 17,7 107 S3 (90) NU
355 11/16 see nap £££ 5 115 14.4 108 34 (90) NU
535 11/15 see nap ££5 5 115 13.9 no 35 (50) NU
337 11/16 see map ££4 5 115 14.1 • 109 95 (SO) NU
336 11/16 see map £77 4 116 17,1 107 93 (90) NU
333 11/15 see map 270 4 116 17.9 105 92 (90) NU
340 li/15 see Kap 276 1 113 12.3 110 93 (90) SC
341 11/16 see map 272 1 119 1£.9 uo 93 (90) SC
342 11/16 see map 275 1 119 13.4 no 93 (90) NU
343 11/15 see raap 274 119 14.6 110 93 (90) NU
344 11/15 see map 270 4 115 14.6 107 95 (30) NU
345 11/17 see map £73 1 119 12.5 109 92 (SO) SC
345 11/17 see map £75 1 113 12,4 106 91 (SO) SC
347 11/17 see ffiap 27E Cj 115 1-3.3 105 3£ (90) NU
346 11/17 see map 274 ,
J
il3 13.0 i07 91 (90) NU
343 11/17 see map 271 c 115 17.7 103 50 (30) NU
350 11/17 see map 280 C J 115 14. 3 105 93 (90) NU
351 11/17 see map 280 D 115 1£.5 105 9£ (90) NU
352 11/17 see map 222 c* hi 115 15.2 103 90 (30) NU
355 11/17 see map 225 c; 115 15.6 104 91 (30) NU
554 11/17 see map 222 c 115 13.4 103 55 (50) m
555 11/17 see map £25 5 '• \-14.1 105 55 (90) NU
555 11/17 see raap ££5 • r •J 1 lb 12.7 107 54 (30) NU
557 11/17 see map £28 b 115 13.5 108 34 (30) NU
558 11/17 see map ££7 D i J Ll 14.5 103 (90) NU
353 11/20 see map 273 lib 14.4 105 9£ (30)
1
NU
RewarH LiigiiMi
(tt*) = .Required Percent Comoaction, .R-j!# = Retested on Test ## , SC=Sand Cone, NU-NucIear, DC=Dr3ve Cvi, , OT=Other
Project Name: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, mi
TABLE Pace #
Field Density Test Results
Elevation Curve No. Fill Fiii
Test Test Test or & Maximum Moisture Dry Relative
Number Date Location Depth Dry Density Content Density CcnTipact ion Remarks
1969 (feet) (pcf) (percent) (pcf) (percent) (see legend)
360 11/£0 see map £55 3 113 17,0 102 91 (30) SC
551 11/20 see map £35 5 113 15.3 104 92 (30) SC
35£ 11/20 see mao £35 3 113 12,5 96 68 (50) 365 NU
365 11/£0 see map £35 5 115 14,0 103 91 (30) m
36't 11/£0 see map £66 tr O 115 14,3 103 50 (50) NU
355 11/20 see map £37 5 115 15.6 103 90 (30) Mi
355 11/£1 see map 259 5 115 12,5 1106 92 (50) sc 357 11/£1 see map 270 5 115 13.3 105 92 (50) SC
368 11/£1 see map £36 5 115 17.7 103 90 (50) Mi
355 11/£1 see map £50 5 115 17.4 103 90 (50) Mi
370 11/£1 see map £64 c-tJ 115 13.1 104 91 (SO) Mi
371 ll/££ see map £70 5 115 15.2 103 90 (SO) Mi
37£ 11/22 see map £35 5 115 17,0 103 90 (50) Mi
373 11/22 see map £6£ 5 115 14.2 106 92 (SO) se
374 11/22 see map 270 <J 115 12,9 105 92 (90) Mi
375 11/22 see map 154 5 115 11.3 105 92 (90) NU
375 n/££ see map 195 5 115 13,5 105 92 (90) sc
377 11/22 see map 264 5 115 12,5 104 91 (90) NU
376 11/22 see map 197 5 115 13.9 104 91 (50) NU
375 11/22 see map 199 b 115 12,9 105 9£ (50) Mi
560 11/27 see map £55 5 115 18,0 104 90 (90) sc
381 l!/£7 see map 257 3 113 15,5 102 90 (90) NU
36£ 11/£7 see map 201 5 lis 15.5 102 91 (90) sc
363 11/27 see mac 202 . 5 115 13.2 103 91 (50) NU
364 11/27 see map 203 3 115 12.6 102 90 (90) NU
335 11/27 see map £68 3 113 13.5 102 91 (50) NU
385 11,'27 see map 205 w 113 14.7 102 51 (50) NU
367 11/28 see mao £06 115 12.7 104 90 (SO) NU
388 11/28 see map 206 Cj 115 16.5 105 91 (50) sc
369 11/28 see aaa £63 4 115 14.0 107 9£ (50) SC
330 11/26 see map £70 4 115 14.4 •05 92 (50) NU
391 11/26 see map 210 3 115 12.7 102 91 (30) NU
352 11/28 see map 211 r 115 13,0 107 S3 (90) NU
333 11/26 see map 272 b lib 16,0 105 92 (90) NU
394 11/29 see mao 215 1 119 14.1 108 91 (90) SC
395 1I/E3 see map 214 5 114 17.0 104 91 (90) NU
396 11/£9 see map £13 5 114 18,1 104 32 (30) NU
357 11/29 see aao 273 3 115 17,0 102 91 (30) NU
398 11/25 see mao 215 4 115 15,1 105 91 (30) NU
393 11/23 see liir.D 275 115 15.8 105 31 (30) sc
Remarks Legend;
(#»; = Reouired Percent Compaction, R-U = Retest ed on Test SC=Sand Cine, NU=iMuclear, DC=Drive Cyl, , 0T=Other
Project Haute: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, UNIT 2
TABLE 2 Pace * 11
Field Density Test Results
Elevation Curve No. Fill Fill
Test lest Test or 4 Maximum Moisture Dry Relative
Number Date Location Depth Dry Density Content Density Compaction Remarks
1389 (feet) (pcf) (percent) (pcf) (percent) ee iecenc)
400 il/ii see map 276 1 ~ ' 119 14.7 106 92 '(%') NU
4010 11/30 see map 217 3 115 15. £ 103 52 (30) SC
402 11/30 see meo £13 3 115 15.4 105 31 (50) NU
405 11/30 see map 220 3 115 15.5 105 51 (90) NU
404 11/30 see sap 250 u 113 15,1 103 32 (50) NU
405 11 /30 see mao 222 5 115 15.1 107 34 (50) NU
405 11/50 see map 225 3 113 15.7 103 31 (90) SC
407 11/30 see map 227 3 113 13.5 104 5£ (90) NU
408 11/22 see map £30 c
LI 115 12.8 109 95 (90) NU
409 11/22 see map 225 5 115 13,4 111 97 (90) NU
410 ll/£2 see map 252 C tJ 115 15.1 105 96 (90) NU
411 11/22 see map £27 5 115 15.6 106 94 (90) NU
412 12/04 see map £26 c J 115 14,£ 106 9£ (90) NU
413 12/04 see map ££4 5 115 15.9 104 SO (90) NU
414 12/04 see map 226 c
vl 115 14,0 108 54 (90) NU
415 12/01 see map 22-3 5 115 12,9 104 91 (90) NU
415 12/01 see map 278 5 115 13.5 103 90 (90) NU
417 12/01 see map 230 b 115 13,0 103 , 90 (90) NU
416 12/0! see map 232 IT LI 115 12,3 106 93 (90) NU
413 12J'01 see map 234 C 115 12.0 106 95 (90) NU
420 12/01 see map 255 5 115 . 13.5 104 91 (90) SC
421 12/01 see map £38 5 115 14.0 105 92 (90) SC
4££ 12/01 see map £26 c xJ 115 15.4 105 32 (90) NU
4£3 1£/01 see I/rap £29 115 15.5 104 51 (90) NU
4£4 1£/01 see map 239 c: w 115 15.0 104 51 (50) NU
4£3 ie/01 see maa £30 5 115 17.9 105 91 (90) SC
425 12/01 see map 235 c 115 14.3 105 9£ (90) SC
427 12701 see rsap 243 115 15.0 105 91 (90) NU
426 12/01 see map £58 ET 115 15. £ 104 91 (90) NU
429 12/04 see 1:1 a 0 244 C J 115 15.7 105 9£ (90) SC
430 12/04 see map 256 cr 115 14.9 104 91 (50) NU
431 12/04 see map £39 5 115 15.7 104 91 (30) NU
452 12/04 see map CM 5 115 14.5 105 g£ (90) NU
433 12/04 see map 230 5 115 15.3 104 91 (*;•) NU
454 12/04 see map 234 t: 115 15.2 105 92 (90) SC
455 12/04 see mao 240 t; 115 15.1 104 91 (90) NU
455 12/05 see map 263 cr 115 13.2 105 92 (30) NU
457 12/05 see map 265 5 115 12.9 107 93 (90) NU
43S 12/05 see map 241 c 115 15.5 104 91 (SO) NU
433 12/06 see mao 257 b 115 13.5 107 94 (30) SC
Remarks Leqend;
(tiii) = Required Percent Coispactlon, R-fit = Retested on Test ##, SC=S3nd Cone, NLi=Nuclear, DC=Drive Lyi, , OT=Qther
Project Name: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER.
WSLt Pace S 12
Field Density Test Results
Elevat ion Curve No. fill Fill
lest Test Test or S Maximum Moisture Dry Relative
Number Date Location Depth Dry Density Content tensity Compaction Remarks
1969 (feet) (pcf) (percent) (DCf) (percent) (s ee legena!
440 12/05 see map 255 115 15.5 107 53 (50) SC
441 l£/05 see map 242 5 115 15.7 104 31 (50) NU
442 l£/07 see map 265 u 115 17.0 105 52 (50; NU
^43 12/05 see map 254 5 til: Jl J 14.1 105 32 (50) Nu
A44 l£/05 see map £52 115 15.0 103 50 (30) NU
445 l£/05 see map ££9 c 115 15,5 107 33 (30) NU
445 12/08 see map ££7 5 115 12,9 103 55 (30) NU
447 12/06 see map £23 C
U 115 15.5 108 34 (30) NU
446 12/08 see Diap 231 c O 115 14.4 105 92 (90) NU
449 12/03 see map 253 tr 115 12.6 110 55 (50) NU
450 12/06 see map 255 IT 115 15,2 105 52 (50) NU
451 12/08 see mac 256 115 14.6 104 31 (50) NU
452 12/12 see map 236 5 115 13,6 106 54 (90) NU
453 I£/1£ see map 234 115 15.9 107 53 (SO) NU
454 12/12 see map r' 236 er
u 115 14.3 107 34 (SO; NU
45b 12/15 see map 235 5 115 12.4 IOS 54 (SO) NU
456 12/15 see map 240 c xJ 115 12.7 103 SO (90) NU
457 12/07 sse map 252 D 115 14.0 105 52 (90) NU
456 12/07 see map 248 c •J 115 13.7 105 52 (90) NU
459 12/15 see mao 236 E: 115 17,5 105 51 (90) SC
450 12/15 see map 275 r 115 14.5 107 54 (90) SC
45! 12/13 see map £76 5 115 15.5 105 52 (90) SC
462
*•:•/•'/.
see mao £35 c-»J 115 15.2 105 52 (90) SC
4b3 12/14 see mao / £40 5 115 13,7 105 32 (90) sc
454 12/20 see map 235 o 115 12.8 105 5c (30) NU
465 l£/£0 see mao 242 r u 115 12.6 104 51 (50) NU
465 12/20 see cap £44 IT 115 12.5 107 54 (30) .'•iu
45 ? l£/20 see fijcp £45 (T . 1 ^' 13.2 105 S2 mi NU
46.£ 12/2: see (.'ap 227 C liS 17.3 55 67 (5UJ 459 NU
465 12/2-see /i-ao 227 lib 14.6 105 31 (30) ?-lU
470 i£/£! see map til 3 tr 115 14.4 104 50 (50) NU
471 12/2£ sse •Tiap 271 13 in 16,9 100 51' (SO) NU
472 12/22 see map 256 i3 111 20,5 96 65 (SO) NU
-~3 !£/££ see f;;ao 253 l3 ill 17.5 lOl 52 (50) NU
4 12/22 see nap 265 111 £5.1 98 63 (50) Nu
475 see mao £65 lib 14.5 106 35 (30) KU
47E 12722 see map 281 13 111 21,4 105 35 (50) NU
477 1£7££ see map 258 13 lil 13.5 104 94 (50) H'J
472 12/14 see riiap 274 Cj -115 15.7 104 91 (30) SC
t' 'r i'Si.' i ^ see .'iiao £50 c
J 115 15. 3 104 91 (30; SC
Remarks Lepend;
.Rscuirec Percent Compaction, R-#* = Retest ed C' n Test H, 5C=Sarid. Cc ne, NU=Nuci ear, DC-Driv B Cyl. , OT=Gther
x: PlRPliW: BuSIIvEbS CENTER,
Field Density Test Results
Page s
,%umber
jest
cat 1 c^n
4 SO 22/14
12/15
see i:BO
462 12/15 see r;c
463 12/15 see meo
464 12715 see K-ep
465 l£/£5 see mao
465 12/25 see map
467 l£725 see map
4se. 12/25 see map
465 12/27 see map
450 12/£7 see
491 12727 SSE ivap
452 12/27 ESE map
493 12727 see map
494 12727 see map
455 12/28 see map
456 12/26 see map
i97 12/23 see fi'aO
496 12/25 see map
433 12/26 see map
500 12/25 sse map
501 12/23 see reap
502 12/29 see mao
503 12/25 see mao
504 12725 see map
505 l£./£5
1990
see msD
5(!5 01/05 see map
507 01/03 see map
bUS 01/03 see mao
503 Oi/u3 see mao
blO 01/03 see meo
C • X Oi/04 see
512 01/04 see map
513 01/04 see mao
514 01/04 see mao
515 01/04 see map
515 01/C4 sse !:'a 0
C 7 -I u i / 01/05 see Eap
518 01/05 ses Heo
evation Curve No. rili Fiii
or aximurfi Moisture Dry Relative
Depth Dry Density Content Density Cc'spaction Remarks
(feet) (ccf) (percent) tpcf) (percent) (s ee legend)
2i0 r 115 14.7 i04 31 (30) NU
lib 15.7 105 32 (30) sc
250 c-115 It. £ 103 50 (30) Mi
250 IT lib !£.£ 104 31 (90) SC
£52 0 115 15.0 104 31 (50) NU
263 4 116 17.5 105 31 (90) SC
284 6 114 18.3 104 32 (90) NU
270 15 111 13.1 102 52 (90) NU
273 4 115 13.5 105 51 (90) NU
276 5 114 18.3 103 , 51 (90) SC
230 6 114 17.5 103 5i (90) NU
234 13 111 13.1 102 33 (50) NU
£54 6 114 14.7 105 92 (90) SC
255 6 114 15,5 103 31 (90) NU
256 6 114 15.3 104 92 (50) NU
235 5 114 15,0 104 32 (90) SC
£88 15 111 17.1 -102 92 (50) NU
235 13 111 15.5 105 35 (90) NU
236 13 111 17.4 102 32 (90) 141
233 5 114 17.5 103 30 (90) NU
257 6 114 15.3 104 51 (90) SC
250 5 114 15.7 103 51 (90) NU
252 li2 111 18.9 102 93 (90) SC
254 6 114 15.5 104 31 (90) NU.
253 5 114 15.6 104 32 (90) NU
S54 6 ll-15.1 105 31 (50) NU
263 13 lll IB. 3 105 54 (30; SC
255 15 111 16.7 102 S£ (90) NU
256 13 111 15.1 102 33 (30) NU
£56 13 Hi 17.6 102 5£ (90) NU
£57 13 111 18.3 101 92 (90) NU
259 ill 17, £ 102 (90) NU
500 c 115 16.3 i05 32 (90) SC
501 13 111 17.5 101 52 (90) sc
233 13 111 18.5 103 33 (30) NU
502 15 111 16.3 103 33 (30) NU
501 13 111 13.0 100 51 (50; NU
£33 c 115 17.8 104 31 (30) NU
300 b 115 16. £ 105 30 (30; SC
(##) = ftequireo Percent Cornpaction, R-iit = Retested on Test 5#, SC=SanD Cone, NU=Nuclear, DC=Drive Cyl., OT=Other
Project Name: filftPi n
BUSINESS CEMER, UMT ^BLE 2 .C'ane « 14
Field Density Test Results
Elevation Curve No. Fill Fill
'est Test or k Ma .xiisur.'i Moisture Dry fieiative
imPer Date Locat 1 CTl Depth Dry Density Content Density Compact 1 on ReaarKs
1550 (feet; (pcf) (percent) (pcf) (percent) (see legend)
51? 01/05 see map 303 c 115 15.5 105 52 (90) 6C
520 01/05 see mao 304 13 ill 13.5 102 52 (90) NU
c: -_ • 01/05 see mac 305 111 20.0 102 52 (90; Nu
522 01/05 see mao 505 i J 111 16.3 102 52 (50) NU
523 01/05 see mac 503 5 114 17.5 104 52 (90) SC
524 01/06 map 301 5 114 15.7 103 51 (30) SC
tr oc: JilJ 01/06 see map 502 6 114 17.5 103 50 (50) SC
525 01/08 see map 500 6 114 15.7 103 90 (SO) NU
527 01/08 see map 507 c 115 15.0 104 SO (90) m
528 01/08 see nap 505 c 115 15.4 108 95 (50) NU
5£3 01/06 see map 502 c
J 115 16.5 105 92 (50) sc
530 01/05 see map 304 c-115 15.8 105 92 (SO) SC
531 01/09 see map 303 5 115 15.5 104 51 (SO) BC
532 01/03 see map 306 tz >J 115 15.8 105 33 (50) NU
533 01/09 see map ^ 309 c U 115 14,0 104 51 (SO) NU
534 01/09 see map 307 c 115 15.6 105 92 (30) NU
535 01/03 see map 309 f
xJ 115 16.9 104 51 (50) NU
535 01/09 see map 306 c J 115 18.0 103 SO (50) NU
537 01/09 see map 304 r U 115 16.7 104 51 (50) NU
536 01/03 see map 305 ^! 115 17,3 105 52 (50) NU
533 01/10 see map 311 5 115 16.1 104 91 (SO) sc
540 01/10 see map 310 5 115 13,1 103 50 (30) NU
541 01/10 see map 305 5 115 14.0 103 30 (30) Nu
542 01/10 see map 303 114 13.1 103 31 (90; NU
543 01/10 see map 313 c U 115 13.1 103 50 (90) NU
544 01/10 see map 306 r u 115 12.1 104 91 (90) NU
545 01/10 see map 507 115 13.5 103 90 (90) SC
545 01/11 see map 306 C 115 14.2 105 31 (90) SC
547 01/11 see map 307 c u 115 15.7 104 31 (90) SC
548 01/11 see map 246 6 114 15.7 103 31 (90) NU
549 01/11 see map 240 c-tJ 115 17.6 106 52 (90) SC
550 01/11 see map 303 5 115 15.1 108 34 (90) SC
551 01/11 see map 257 13 111 ,16.7 103 33 (90) NU
552 01/11 see map 254 13 111 15.1 102 52 (90) NU
553 01/11 see nap 255 13 111 17.7 102 52 (90) m
554 01/11 see eiap 313 5 115 14.2 106 92 (90) NU
555 01/12 see Bap 514 4 116 16.3 106 92 (90) sc
556 01/12 see map 503 4 116 17.3 105 91 (90) sc
557 01/12 see map 4 116 15.1 107 92 (90) NU
558 01/12 see map 506 13 111 17.9 102 92 (90) NU
Remarks Leqend;
(##) =^ Required Percent Compaction, R-#« = Retested on Test i*il, SC=Sarid Cone, NU=Nuclear, DC-Dnve Cyl., 0T=Othe
Proiect Name: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER. UNIT 2
TABLE 2 Page # 15
Field Density Test Results
Elevat ion Curve No. Fill Fill
Test Test Test or 4 Maximum Moisture Dry Relative
Number Date Location Depth Dry Density Content Density Compaction Remarks
1930 (feet) (pcf) (percent) (pcf) (percent) (see legend)
555 01/1£ see map £58 13 111 15.7 102 92 (50) NU
550 01/1£ see map £55 13 111 16.1 102 92 (30) NU
561 01/12 see map £59 15 111 15.1 101 92 (50) NU
552 01/12 see map 305 6 114 17.2 104 91 (90) NU
. 563 01/12 see map 311 6 114 15.0 104 92 (90) NU
554 01/12 see map 310 5 114 17,8 104 92 (90) SC
565 01/22 see map £6£ 15 111 16.5 100 91 (90) NU
as 01/22 see map £56 13 111 17.6 101 51 (90) NU
557 01/22 see map £55 13 111 16.4 101 52 (90) NU
568 01/22 see map £59 13 111 17.7 102 92 (90) SC
565 01/23 SEE MAP £61 3 113 17.1 102 91 (90) NU
570 01/25 SEE MA? 264 3 113 18.7 103 91 (90) NU
571 01/23 SEE MfiP 263 13 111 19.5 101 91 (90) NU
572 01/25 SEE MAP 266 3 115 17.0 104 92 (90) NU
573 01/23 SEE MAP £57 13 111 17.9 103 93 (90) NU
574 01/23 SEE .MAP £65 13 111 16.1 101 92 (90) BC
575 01/23 SEE MfiP 269 13 ill 19.1 103 93 (90) BC
575 01/23 SEE MAP 253 13 111 16.0 101 32 (50) NU
577 0!/£3 SEE MfiP 269 13 111 15.5 99 90 (90) NU
573 01/23 SEE MAP 271 13 111 18.4 100 90 (90) NU
579 01/25 SEE MfiP 272 13 111 19.3 100 91 (90) NU
530 01/25 SEE MfiP 273 13 111 19,5 100 91 (90) SC
581 01/22 SEE Mfi? 275 13 111 15.2 103 95 (50) NU
58£ 01/23 SEE MfiP £77 13 111 17,9 102 92 (90) NU
565 01/23 SEE MfiP £73 6 114 17.5 104 92 (90) SC
564 01/23 SEE MAP 28! 6 114 15.6 104 92 (90) NU
565 01/24 SEE MAP £80 13 111 17.6 103 93 (50) SC
535 o J / c4 SEE mp 262 5 i J "T 14.2 104 51 (50; •VJ
567 01/24 SEE MhP CCh.' ill 15.7 102 53 (£0)
588 01..'24 SEE MAP £65 13 Hi :6.4 lOl 52 (SO) NU
5S5 01/24 SEE MfiQ £SS 13 111 17.5 102 52 (50)
530 01/24 SEE MA? £64 13 111 i£. 1 102 52 (50) K'j
531 01/24 SEE MA? 265 13 111 16.7 101 31 (50) NJ
552 01/£4 SEE MA? 264 1 vJ 111 i~! sr
^1 4 ^ 102 32 (30) NJ
533 01/24 BEE MfiP 286 13 111 16.5 102 52 (50) SC
594 01/25 SEE MAP 285 13 111 16.3 101 92 (SO) NU
555 01/25 SEE MAP 263 4 115 15.6 107 33 (90) SC
536 01/25 SEE MA? 239 4 116 17.4 104 30 (30) NU
537 01/25 SEE MA? 275 3 1 I 7 J Jbi 16. 4 102 91 (30) cr
533 01/25 SEE MAP 27a 1 i —' 17.7 105 32 (30) Nd
Remarks Lenend i
(#5) = Required Percent Compietion, R-S# = Rets steo on Test si;., 5C=Sand Cone, NU=Nuc!ear, DC-Driv s Cyl. , OT=Qther
Project Nawe: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, UNIT
TABLE c'ace # 16
Field Density Test Results
Elevation Carve No. Fill Fiil
est Test Test or 4 Ma.>;imum Moisture Dry Relative
mber Date Locat ion Deptn Dry Density Content Density Compaction Remarks
1590 (feet) (pcf) (percent) (OCT) (percent) (see iecenc)
599 01/£5 SEE MAP 260 5 114 J J. J 104 31 (90) NU
600 01/£5 SEE MAP £60 6 114 IS.O 105 32 (90) m I
601 01/£b SEE MAP £73 6 :K 17.3 105 32 (50)
602 ,-i i ,' -.c t'l/lU SEE Mfi? £81 5 114 •3.7 104 52 (50) NU
505 01/25 SEE MfiP 311 5 114 17.1 i04 ' J (SO) NU
604 01/25 SEE MfiP £83 3 113 15.0 105 52 (30) SC
505 01/26 SEE MfiP 264 5 115 15.7 100 63 (30) 505 NU
505 01/25 SEE MAP 284 3 113 15.3 102 91 (50) NU
607 01/26 SEE MAP 313 3 115 14.7 104 93 (30) NU
608 01/26 SEE MAP 286 3 115 17.4 105 92 (30) NU
509 01/26 SEE MfiP 269 3 lis 17.3 105 92 (50) SC
510 01/26 SEE MAP 268 3 115 15.3 103 91 (90) NU
511 01/25 SEE MAP £65 3 113 16.5 105 94 (90) NU
612 01/26 SEE MAP £79 3 113 17.1 102 91 (50) NU
613 01/26 SEE MAP £60 3 113 15.5 103 92 (90) SC
614 01/29 SEE MAP £50 5 115 14.5 •07 33 (90) NU
515 01/29 SEE MfiP £53 3 113 16.5 102 90 (50) NU
515 01/29 SEE MfiP 260 3 113 15.1 103 91 (90) NU
617 01/£9 SEE MfiP 273 5 lib 16.7 104 91 (90) SC
618 01/25 SEE MfiP 311 5 114 17.5 105 91 (90; SC
519 01/25 SEE MAP 512 6 114 15.2 105 31 (90) NU
620 01/25 SEE MAP 312 13' 111 17.6 10£ 93 (90) NU
621 01/30 SEE MAP 310 U I lu 15.5 104 31 (50) SC
622 01/50 SEE Mfi? 311 5 115 15.5 105 32 (50) NU
525 01/30 SEE MfiP 5 115 15.3 104 90 (SO) NU
624 01/30 SEE MAP 312 5 115 17.0 105 92 (50) NU
525 01/30 SEE MAP 311 5 115 15.4 103 90 (50) NU
525 01/30 SEE MfiP 311 5 lib 1 b, 5 l04 50 (90) .NU
527 01/30 SEE MfiP 311 c, lie: 16,3 104 3! (50) SC
628 02/01 SEE MAP 295 15 111 ' A =• Jij. J 10£ 52 (50) SC
529 02/01 SEE MfiP 234 13 J11 16.2 i02 CO (SO) fvj
650 02/01 SEE MAP 237 13 111 16.4 iO£ 52 (50) Nb
551 02/01 SEE MAP 235 13 ni 16.5 101 32 (50) NU
63£ 02/01 SEE .MfiP 232 5 :i5 17.5 :0£ 30 (30) NU
555 02/01 SEE .MfiP 293 3 li3 ia.O 102 51 (30) NJ
634 02/01 SEE m? 295 3 115 17.0 104 32 (50) NU
02/01 SEE MAP £55 3 113 16.1 103 52 (50) SC
635 02/01 SEE MAP 297 1^ I iji 17.3 102 31 (30) NU
657 02/03 SEE Mfi? 248 r - 1 c
ij - J 14,0 105 52 (30) NU
538 02/03 SEE MA? 5 lib 14,5 IOS 34 (30) NU
Remarks Leqend;
iirif) = Requireo .C'ercent Compsctjon, R-sr = Retesteo on 'est fiit, 5C=3ana Cone, NU-NucIear, DC=Drive Cyl,, CT=Othsr
Pro.jEct Name: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER,
TfiBLb
Field Density Test Results
Elevation Curve fe. Fill Fill
Test Test Test or d I'iaxid ijf.' Moisture Dry Relative
Number Date Location Dsoth Dry Der Content Density CompFcticn RemarKS
1350 (feet; (C cf) (percent) (pcf) (percent) see legend)
535 02/05 SEE MfiP 257 i ' 15.5 102 51 (50) NU
540 02/05 SEE MfiP 257 3 J i J 16.5 103 31 (30) NU
541 02/05 SEE MfiP 256 £• •. 1 c 14.5 r ^: (SO;
642 02/05 SEE .MfiP 283 J 18.0 104 51 (90) m
543 0£/05 SEE «flP 253 o 115 14.5 105 51 (50) m
644 0£/05 SEE MfiP 290 5 115 18.2 104 31 (50) sc
645 02/05 SEE MAP £66 3 115 15.4 103 52 (50) m
646 02/06 SEE MfiP £71 3 115 16.7 104 52 (90) NU
547 02/06 SEE MfiP £52 5 •13 16.0 103 31 (90) NU
646 02/05 SEE MfiP 272 5 115 15.5 104 53 (90) NU
649 02/05 SEE KAP 274 3 Hi!' 18,0 10£ 90 (90) NU
650 02/06 SEE MAP £78 5 114 18-5 104 92 (50) NU
65! 02/05 SEE MfiP £72 5 114 18.1 104 92 (90) NU
652 02/C6 SEE MfiP £94 6 114 16.0 106 94 (90) SC
653 02/05 SEE MfiP 274 5 115 15.3 102 91 (90)
654 02/05 SEE MAP 272 3 * \ * - * 15.5 102 51 (50) m
555 02/07 SEE MfiP 277 4 116 17,0 107 S3 (90)
655 02/07 SEE MfiP 264 4 115 17,5 107 93 (SO) 1^
657 02/07 SEE .MAP 266 3 113 16.5 103 51 (50) m
656 02/07 SEE MAP 280 -113 15.5 103 (SO) m
659 02/07 SEE MfiP 261 3 •:3 15.5 104 92 (SO) SC
650 02/07 SEE MAP 295 4 116 • 17.1 105 92 (50) NU
651 02/07 SEE MAP 274 3 113 16.9 104 32 (50) NJ
552 02/07 SEE MA? £75 .: 11J IS. 6 103 51 (50) NU
555 • 02/07 SEE MfiP 263 iii , 1^ Jk.'. 103 32 (50) NU
554 02/07 SEE MAP .-,1,-. 2 •13 15.5 104 92 (90) BC
665 02/08 SEE MAP £65 3 11.; 17.7 105 54 (50) NU
555 02/08 SEE MA? £5'; 3 1 i J 15,4 103 92 (SO) gr
557 02/06 SEE MfiP £56 13 111 17.4 lOl-31 (90) NU
568 02/08 SEE MAP 300 13 lil 15.4 101 31 (90) NU
653 0£/OB SEE Hfi? £57 5 15.1 104 31 (30) 6:
570 02/08 SEE MfiP £81 b 115 15.2 106 3£ (90) NU
671 02/06 SEE MAP £55 .. . c J J —' 104 (50) NU
572 02/08 SEE MAP 281 c 110 15.0 105 92 (50) •AU
573 02/CS SEE MfiP £75 115 14.3 107 94 (30) SC
574 02/08 SEE MAP 271 KT lib 15.2 104 31 (30) .vu
575 02/06 SEE MfiP 266 tl . " t:
i. XtJ 17,2 105 32 (30) sc
575 02/03 SEE Mfi? 272 5 15.1 104 31 •30) NU
£ /7 02/09 SEE MAP 267 0 105 'i-i (90) NJ
576 02/03 SEE MAP 255 5 105 52 (30) SC
Remarks Legend;
i##) = Recuirec Percent Compacti.on, R-# = .Retestec or; Test SC=Sand Cone, NU=Muclear, DC=r'rive Cy!., OT=Dther
Project Naice: ftlRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, UNI]
iHB:-h Pa.te
Field Density Test Results
Elev'at ion Curve No. Fill Fill
Test Test Test cir S Ma>:i ij.jrf. 1*0 ist ure-Dry Rsistive
Niiijfaer Date Location Depth Dry Dr-•sity Content Density Cofficaction ftersarks
1550 (feet) l' OCT) (cercent) ipCf) •percent) ( see legend)
575 02/05 SEE MAP 302 c
1j 115 14.3 104 51 (50) NU
580 02/03 SEE rifi? 232 J lib 15. a 104 31 (50) NU
56! 02/OS SEE MRP 266 U 1 ^ C X it.' !£.5 100 67 (SO) £62 NJ
562 02/05 SEE MAP 288 5 115 15.2 105 32 (50) NU
565 02/12 SEE MfiP 244 Zi 115 15.5 104 31 (SO) SC
564 02/12 SEE MAP 247 c J 115 17.7 103 30 (50) NU
665 02/12 SEE MAP 252 cr lib 15.5 105 32 (50) NU
585 02/12 SEE MAP 241 5 115 15.6 104 31 (50) NU
687 02/12 SEE MAP 243 3 113 17.9 102 31 (SO) SC
686 02/13 SEE MfiP 254 3 113 15.7 103 91 (50) NU
689 02/13 SEE MfiP 251 IT
o 115 14.5 104 91 (50) NU
690 02/13 SEE MfiP 251 c J 115 15.5 105 91 (90) SC
691 02/13 SEE MfiP 248 5 115 15.0 104 31 (90) NU
692 02/13 SEE MAP 247 3 113 16.5 103 32 (30) NU
593 02713 SEE MfiP 303 5 115 15.5 104 50 (90) SC
594 02/13 SEE MAP 243 5 115 15.2 104 31 (90) NU
695 02/14 SEE MfiP 247 6 114 17.0 104 51 (50) NU
635 te714 SEE MfiP 305 5 114 17.2 104 91 (90) SC
697 02/14 SEE MPP 248 5 114 15.3 104 92 (90) ffU
698 02/14 SEE Mfi? 251 6 114 15.1 105 91 (30) NU
659 02/14 BEE MfiP £55 5 114 15.7 104 91 (30) NU
700 02/14 SEE MAP 6 114 25.7 105 53 (90) NU
701 02/14 SEE .MAP £44 6 114 • 17.1 105 52 (90) . SC
702 02/15 SEE MfiP 247 5 114 17.3 104 'id (90) NU
703 02/15 SEE KAP 250 7 118 15.3 1 i-.n 1 OC 52 (90) NU
704 02715 BEE MfiP 251 7 116 15,1 108 32 (90) NU
705 02/15 SEE MfiP .:>ir.rr c 115 15,7 104 31 (30) NU
706 \.'c.' ID SEE .MA? C, bb4 5 * '. c l7.5 104 31 (30) NU
707 02/15 SEE m 255 115 ib.2 105 51 (SO) NU
70S 02/15 SEE Mflo 253 3 113 17.1 ;o£ 31 (50) SC
705 02/15 SEE MA? 250 3 115 lb. 6 103 31 (50) SC
710 0£/£l SEE MAP 252 3 115 18.3 102 31 (90) NU
711 A-:'/vi
vc/i_ J SEE MfiP 251 5 113 13.5 102 31 (90) NU
712 02/21 SEE MA? 254 3 113 16.7 '-'•jl 30 (90) 715 NU
7!3 02/21 EEE MAP 255 115 13.5 102 51 (90) NU
714 02/21 SEE .MAP 258 5 113 16.3 103 52 (90) NU
715 01/21 SEE MAP £70 i 113 17.3 lfj3 31 (90) SC
716 02/21 SEE MAP 272 5 115 15.3 105 52 (50) SC
717 02/22 SEE MfiP £22 c: 115 16.7 105 32 (SO) NU
715 02/22 SEE ,*;AP •"^'5 5 115 17,6 * 94 (90; NU
Remarks Legend;
(##) - Reouired Percent Coffpaction, R-*# Retested on Test ti#, SC=5and Cone, NU=Nsicie3r, DC=Drive Cyi., OT=Othsr
Project -Narfie: filRPO.RT BUSINESS CENTER.
^HfiLE £ Pane ? 19
Field Density Test Results
isst lest
Nurfiber Date
1550
Elevation Curve No. Fiil Fill
Test or k Marnmam Moisture Dry Relative
Location Depth Dry Density Content Density Compaction
(feet) (pcf.- (percent) (pcf) (percerii)
Remarks
(see ieqend)
719 02/22 SEE MfiP oU5 5 114 16. 4 •03 5l (90) NU
720 02/22 SEE MAP 6 114 i f ^ :• 103 90 (50) NU
721 02/22 SEE MfiP £24 6 114 103 91 (50) NU
722 02/22 SEE MAP ££S 13 11! 17.5 102 92 (90) SC
723 02723 SEE MfiP 226 5 114 17.4 103 3! (90) m
724 02/23 SEE NAP £57 6 114 16.5 1'05 91 (50) NU
725 02/23 SEE MAP 257 4 116 15.5 107 92 (50) SC
725 02/25 SEE MAP 259 4 115 17,5 107 93 (90) NU
727 02/23 SEE MAP 260 4 115 16,3 105 92 (90) NU
728 02/23 SEE NAP 251 4 116 15,5 105 91 (90) NU
7£9 02/23 SEE MAP 252 4 115 17.7 107 93 (90) SC
730 02/24 SEE MAP 279 4 115 15,1 105 9! (90) NU
731 02/24 SEE MfiP 275 4 115 15.5 106 91 (90) SC
732 02/24 SEE MAP 315 4 116 15.7 105 91 (90) SC
733 02/24 SEE MfiP 25£ 3 113 16.4 102 91 (90) SC
734 02/25 SEE MfiP £64 5 115 17.7 104 91 (90) NU
735 02/26 SEE MAP £65 tr
ul 115 18.9 104 91 (90) NU
736 0£/£5 SEE MAP 267 5 113 17.£ 103 92 (90) NU
737 02/25 SEE MAP 262 6 114 18.0 103 91 (90) NU
738 02/25 SEE MfiP 254 5 114 17,4 105 33 (90) NU
759 02/26 SEE MAP 266 4 116 18,0 105 91 (90) SC
740 02/25 SEE MAP 268 6 114 13,1 104 92 (50) NU
74! 02/26 SEE MAP 270 4 115 18,1 105 32 (50) NU
742 02/26 SEE MAP 272 5 114 17,3 103 30 (SO) NU
743 02/25 SEE MfiP £56 4 115 18.6 105 31 (90) SC
744 02/27 SEE MAP £70 6 114 18.7 105 32 (30) SC
745 02/27 SEE MfiP £68 6 114 19.5 103 31 (90) NU
745 02/27 SEE MfiP 272 4 115 17,0 107 53 (SO) NU
747 02/27 SEE MfiP 274 4 115 15.0 103 54 (50) NU
748 02/27 SEE MfiP 272 4 115 15.1 105 52 (90) SC
749 02/27 SEE MAP 276 4 115 15.0 105 51 (50) NU
750 02/27 SEE MAP 278 5 115 15.5 104 31 (90) NU
751 02/27 SEE MfiP 280 5 115 16. £ 103 90 (50) NU
752 02/27 SEE MAP 282 5 114 17. £ 103 31 (50) NU
755 02/27 SEE MAP 264 5 114 16.4 104 51 (30) NU
754 02/27 SEE MfiP £86 4 115 17,0 107 52 (90) SC
02/27 SEE MAP £74 4 115 16.9 106 . 53 (90) SC
755 02/28 SEE MAP £75 4 115 17.5 105 31 (90) NU
757 02/26 SEE MfiP £78 4 115 15.9 105 51 (90; N'U
758 0£/£8 SEE MAP £81 113 !7.£ 103 51 (50) NU
Remarks Leqendi
iU) = Required Percent Ccnpaction, R-## = Retested on Test ##, SC^Sanri Cone. NU=Nuclear, DC^Drive Cyl,, OT=Other
Proiect Name: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, UNIT 2
TABLE £
Field Density Test Results
Page S 20
Test Test
Number Date
1530
Elevation Curve No, Fill
Test or i Maximum Moisture
Location Depth Dry Density Content
(feet) (pcf) (percent)
Fill
Dry Relative
Derisity Compaction
(pcf) (percent)
Reifiarks
(see legend)
755 0£/£6 SEE MfiP
760 0£/2S SEE MAP
761 02/26 SEE MfiP
752 02/28 SEE MAP
753 02/26 SEE MAP
264
287'
265
230
232
115
115
115
115
115
16,6
17.8
17.5
14.3
14.3
105
104
105
104
104
92
91
92
91
91
(90)
(90)
(90)
(90)
(90)
NU
NU^
NU
l«J
SC
764 02/28 SEE MAP
765 05/01 SEE MAP
756 03/01 SEE MAP
767 03/01 SEE «flP
768 03/02 SEE MAP
253
255
£86
305
31£
J
5
5
5
5
115
115
115
115
115
16.7
15.1
17.3
17.7
16.2
104
103
104
105
105
91
90
91
91,
93
(90)
•(90)
(90)
(90)
(90)
SC
m
sc
NU
NU
•It
' ."It
769 03/03 SEE MAP
770 03/03 SEE MfiP
771- 03/03^;'SEE «fiP
772 03/05 SEE MAP
i 773 03/05 SEE «fiP
J|V;.03/0L,£E£ MAP ,
t77f'<'\03/b7^SEE «fl
ll7iBSf|/0^SEE ^
mm
*V'
765 05/08' SEE MAP
Rgwark? Legend» - -1 v^ww^
(9#) = Required Percent Compaction, R-## = Retested cr Test ?t#, 3r=S-nd C;3ne,-?^NIWlpar|"DC=Drive Cyl., OT=Other
4
firm
Pro.ject Name: carisbad airo^ort centre unit 2
TABLE £
Field Density Test Results
Page « 1
,'--;#i
Test Test
Number Date
1530
Test
Location
765 03/08 see map
787 03/08 see map
788 U3/08 see map
769 03/03 see mao
790 05/03 see map
791 03/03 see map
792 03/05 see map
793^ 03/03 see map
794' 03/09 see nap
795 03/09 see map
795 03/09 see nap
797 03/09 see nap
',798 03/09 , see' Bap
.^799 , 03/09.' see nap
Elevation
or
Depth
(feet)
204
206 „
208
210
£12
Curve No.
& Maximum
Dry Derisity
(pcf)
Fill
Moisture
Content
(percent)
Fill
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Relative
Compaction
(percent)
Remarks
(see leoend)
ti8C!^^3if
i
823^03/17 ^seKBapi;
(##).,= Required Percent Compaction, R-## = Retested on Test #iy SC=Sand Cope, NU^Nuclear, DC=Drivg Cyl., QT^O^her ^^if.^^ u^Jt^'^
TABLE age # 2
Fltld Dinsity Ttst Riiulti
Test Test
Number Date
1950
625
825
627
828
825
830
831
832
833
854
03/17
03/15
03/15
03/19
03/15
03/19
03/19
03/20
03/20
03/20
Elevation Curve No.
Test or & Maximum
Location Depth Dry Density
(feet) (pcf)
see map
see map
see map
see map
see mao
see map
see nap
see map
see map
see map
£63
240
£42
£45
£47
£50
253
£55
257
226
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
113
Fill
Moisture
Content
(percent)
""liTo
15.9
17.5
15,4
15,1
17.9
17.5
15.£
16.2
15.1
Fill
Dry
Density
(pcf)
~104
104
105
103
104 '
106
105 -
104
104
102
Relative :
Compaction
(percent)
"~91~
91
31
90
91
.^~92
9£
31
31
31
Remarks
(see'legend):
(90)
(90)
(90)
(90)
(90)
(30)
(90)
(30)
(30)
(90)
NU
NU
NU,
NU
NU
NU
iSC
NU
SC
NU
835
836''
837
838 :
633
640
03/20
03/20
03/20
03/20
03/21
see nap
see map
,see nap
see map
see Dap.
03/21
841 }03l2li'^'
842
8435/03/2
see'nap
2ia
215
217
213
£22
, £28 ,
: £30
, f220''^/-*5,
'^422u4to
850;5.^p3/2i
851;-
852 ;03/23
853 '03/23
854 03/23 see map
'-'2ei
tiw.^'
t
^' 22jf|f
228 "^
226.
££8
855,
856
857
858
853
860
851
852
03/23
03/23
03/£5
03/26
03/27
; U3/27 -V/see ^
i( (.13/27., .'see na
03/27
663^03/2i
a5?^03/28
Remarks Leqend; '
(?i5t) ,= Required' Percent Compaction, R-#i
92 • (90)
90 (90)
91 (90)
31 (30)
mm
iff
^9^^(90
51" ^
Retested on Test ##, SC=Sarid Co'ne, NU=NucIear, DC=Drive.Cyl
Ttff V V
* Pro,ject Name: carlsoaa airport centre uni TABLE £
Field Density Test Results
^ PaQB, # 3
Test Test
Nunber Date
1550
Test
Location
865
666
867
868
863
670
871
872
873
874
03/£8
03/29
03/29
03/29
03/30
03/30
03/30
03/30
03/30
03/30
see raap
see map
see nap
see map
see r«ap
see map
see map
see map
see map
see isap
Elevation Curve No. Fill Fill
or S Maximuin Moisture Dry Relative
Depth Dry Density Content Density Compaction Remarks
(feet) (pcf) (percent) (pcf) (percent) (see legend)
235 5 115 18.2 103 90" (90) NU
238 5 115 17.1 107 ,. 93 (90) NU
235 5 115 18.6 106 ; . 93 (90) NU
£53 5 115 17.5 104 ;• 91 (30) , BC
-234 5 115 15.9 104 91 (90) NU
242 5 115 16.2 104 . 91 (90) NU
226 ir %S 115 15.5 105 '<\: 92 (90) NU
£20 6 114 17.2 103 • . 91 (90) NU
230 3 113 16.6 103 92 (90) NU
£34 5 115 17.4 104 , 5^ (90) NU
rfM#«r=^SiS Percent Co»paction, R-«« = Retested'on Test #l,tSC=Sand Cone, NU=Nuclear, DC=Drive Cyl., OT=Other>
o
,. Project Name: AIRPORT BUS|NESS;C£N1RE, MASS GRADING
,.,|^^ife•4>^V''.>V.•^5
, TABLE 2 .'
Field Density Test Results
- •/Elevation Curve No. Fill : •..•.Fill^,w'
"•• ,•• • •. • Test Test . or i Maximum Moisture Pry Relative
.Number Date Location.. :'^ Depth Dry Density Content : Density Compaction . ' Remarks " / . //
1930 (feet) (pcf) (percent) (pcf) (percent) • • • (see lenend) ' :
"'875~ 04/02 SEE MAP • "r V £43
'rt i £25'.• 's
4 117 15.2 • "'108 - V ' g?' •>, • (90). 7 , • , 'NU •
' 676 04/02 SEE MfiP • ••K-•
"r V £43
'rt i £25'.• 's ^•\..y - 117... ;:.,lMr-;y: .100, .. ,^ (50)/.h.•SC.';y;vX(;'
^ . («<) = Required Percent Cof8^actio|j R-#.# = Retested on Test «#, SC=Sand Cone, NU=Nuclear,^ pC=DrivB Cyl,, 0T=Other;<^^^^^Sg
/. ».W'''.^V-*-->«lS^i.W'-'
• fl. t
• t:-
- ..'•f^^'v\;.;^•••
...•..' ,'...»•'%-•-'*-•••". •
r ', r-J••;'^•:;'•>
•'/«:5^s??i;- r >
: '•;i:^'*'.'"if':-
' '• ''.r, .•• '• i!f
V.ji".'>'i ••
;. • • . '• "^^^ -if '•'•I'.K .-i' ;