Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPIP 94-02; Carlsbad Airport Centre Lot 36; Planned Industrial Permit (PIP) (4)990 Highland Drive, Suite 202, Solana Beach, California 92075 (619) 792-8800 Fax (619) 792-1332 February 2, 1995 City of Carlsbad Ms. Terri Woods, City Planner 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: PIP 94-02/Lot 36 Dear Terri, Please find enclosed the signed and notaried Deed Restrictions and notice concerning Aircraft Environmental Impacts forms. We acknowledge that these forms must be recorded prior to the City of Carlsbad issuing a Certificate of Occupany for the subject building . Sincerely, Dave A. DuFour Partner Enclosures DAD/woods.ltr I h h U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration FAA, Airspace & Procedures, AWP-530 IN REptY REF& TO P.O. Box 92007, WWPC Los Angeles, CA 90009 AERONAUTICAL STUDY NO. 94-AWP-1337-OE DETERMMATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION CONSTRUCl7ON LOCATION cr: FOURSHER DEVELOPMENT, MC. PLACE NAME 990 Highland Drive Architect Bruce W. Steingraber Solana Beach, CA 92075 Carlsbad, California Ramona, CA 92065 / 242 12 Sargeant Road LATlTUDE LONGITUDE NAD 27 33-07-32 117-17-04.13 NAD83 33-07-32.14 117-17-01 CONSTRUCTION DESCrnTION HEIGHT (IN FEET) PROPOSED ABOVE GROUND ABOVE MSL Commercial Building 33 feet 345 feet An aeronautical study of the proposed construction described above has been completed under the provisions of Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations. Based on the study it is found that the construction would have no substantial adverse effect on the safe and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on the operation of air navigation facilities. Therefore, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, it is hereby determined that the construction would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following conditions are met: Conditions: See Narrative for conditions Supplemental notice of construction is required any time the project is abandoned (use the enclosed FAA form), or At least 48 hours before the start of construction (use the enclosed FAA form) Within five days after the construction reaches its greatest height (use the enclosed FAA form). This determination expires on August 28, I996 unless: (a) extended, revised or terminated by the issuing ofice; (b) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission and an application for a construction permit is made to the FCC on or before the above expiration date. In such case the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or on the date the FCC denies the application. NOTE: Request for extension of the effective period of this determination must be postmarked or delivered to the issuing office at least 15 days prior to the expiration date. This determination is subject to review if an interested party files a petition on or before February 18, 1995 . In the event a petition for review is filed, it should be submitted in triplicate to the Manager, Airspace and Obstruction Evaluation Branch, ATP-240, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. 20591, and contain a full statement of the basis upon which it is made. This determination becomes final on February 28, 1995 unless a petition for review is timely filed, in which case the determination will not become final pending disposition of the petition. Interested parties will be notified of the grant of any review. An account of the study findings, aeronautical objections, if any, registered with the FAA during the study, and the basis for the FAA's decision in this matter will be found on the following page@). If the structure is subject to the licensing authority of the FCC, a copy of this determination will be sent to that Agency. This determination, issued in accordance with FAA Part 77, concerns the effect of this proposal on the safe and eflicient use of the navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of any compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. SIGNED ISSUED IN k Alton Hawthorne. D. Scott lfornia WILE Acting ON Manager, January System 18.1995 Management Branch FAA Form 7460-9 (4-83) SUPERSEDES (AW REVISION 7/94) Rla 94-AWP-1337-OE Page 2 The proposed 33'AGL/345'AMSL building will be located off of airport property, approximately 575 feet south of the Runway 06/24 centerline at the McClellan-Palomar Airport, Carlsbad, California, the closest public-use landing area. The structure is identified as an obstruction by exceeding the standards of Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR), Part 77, Subpart C, as follows: 77.23(a)(5), by 7 feet, a height exceeding the Runway 06/24 7:l side transitional surface at McClellan-Palomar Airport, as defined by 77.25(e). An aeronautical study has been conducted by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to determine whether this identified obstruction would have a substantial adverse effect upon the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace by aircraft. The study results found that construction of the proposal to a height of 33'AGL/345'AMSL would have the following effects: VISUAL FLIGHT RULES (VFR): The structure height would not require a VFR operation to change from a regular flight course or altitude. INSTRUMENT FLIGHT RULES (IFR): The structure height would not require a change to an existing or planned minimum flight altitude for any IFR procedure utilized at McClellan-Palomar Airport. FAA NAVAIDS: The structure would have no physical or electromagnetic effect upon the operation of an air navigation facility or the signal used by aircraft. . CUMULATIVE IMPACT: The proposed structure combined with existing and other known proposed structures and natural terrain features in the area would have no greater effect upon aircraft operations. The proposal was not circularized for public aeronautical comment as there are existing structures of similar height in the area, and the construction of this proposal would cause no known additional adverse aeronautical effect. Although the structure has been identified as an obstruction, the study results conclude its construction would not have a substantial adverse effect on the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace by aircraft or upon FAA air navigation facilities and would not be a hazard to air navigation. 94-AWP-1337-OE Page 3 IN ORDER TO REMAIN ACCEPTABLE FROM AN AIRSPACE UTILIZATION STANDPOINT, THE TOTAL HEIGHT OF THIS STRUCTURE, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO: OBSTRUCTION LIGHTING, MICROWAVE DISHES, LIGHTNING RODS, ADDITIONAL ANTENNAS, SIGNS, SHALL NOT EXCEED 33'AGL/345'AMSL AT THIS SITE. The building should have red obstruction lights installed in accordance with the provisions of FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 70/7460-1H, Llehtlng, Chapters 5 and 13. The FAA is not a permitting agency. This airspace determination, issued in accordance with FAR, Part 77, concerns the effect of this proposal on the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of any compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local governmental body; or from any necessary coordination with other FAA Divisions that control real estate leases or access to FAA equipment sites. This airspace determination does not address land use compatibility, zoning, noise, neighborhood characteristics, or environmental issues; areis not under the purview of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). This airspace determination is not to be construed as either a permit or approval to build. Permits can only be issued by the local planing authorities; therefore, this airspace determination does not supersede any local provisions that may be more restrictive, including those provisions for determining environmental acceptability and appropriate land use. .This airspace determination does not include temporary construction equipment, such as cranes, etc., which may be used during the actual construction phase of this proposal. Such equipment which has a height greater than the proposed structure requires separate notice. The sponsor is requested to submit the appropriate portions of the enclosed FAA Form 7460-2 to this office both 48 hours before the start of the construction or alteration and within five (5) days after that construction or alteration reaches its greatest height.