HomeMy WebLinkAboutPIP 98-03; Cornerstone Corporate Centre Lot 7; Planned Industrial Permit (PIP) (3)TO: Senior Planner, Chris Decerbo
FROM: Associate Engineer, Clyde Wickham
DATE: June 9,1998
PIP 98 - 03, Cornerstone Corporate Centre ( Newport National )
COMPLETENESS 8 ISSUES REVIEW
Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the above-referenced project for
application completeness. The application and plans submitted for this proposed project are
considered complete with issues to be resolved prior to Engineering recommendation of
approval. The following items that need to be addressed are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0
0
0
The proposed adjustment plat (different than Adj. #504) should be shown. Will the
other portion of lot B have adequate trash, parking, circulation and utilities to serve
the approved use? Will the previous PIP be amended? The reciprocal easements for
circulation, access, and drainage must be shown / identified by note on the site plan.
This PIP application should identify exactly what is needed to provide circulation,
access, drainage and utilities to this project. The "not a part" should show / include
all requirements of the previous plans and applications. Retaining walls, grading, and
drainage improvements that are conditioned or supposed to be in place should be
shown.
The reference to parcel A, B, and C is confusing. This application is, if I am correct,
for only one of the parcels, with a proposed adjustment. The cover sheet and
application says this project is lot 7 of CT 8146. Technically it is Parcel "A of
Adjustment Plat # 504, (certificate of compliance recorded document # 98-29957).
Please show distance to any existing driveways and intersections which are located
within 300' of the proposed project. The Engineer or Architect can use broken / lines
to extend and provide distance information.
The Civil Plan / C-I has a few notes that are misleading:
Note #2 All grading shown per Dwg 355-2A. No additional grading is
Note #3 Existing lot line per Adjustment Plat #504, Certificate of
Note #8 Parcels A & B are proposed to be adjusted as shown.
proposed.
Compliance recorded Jan. 21, 1998 as file # 98-0029957 O.R.
6. Please clarify what is Future Improvements Not A Part of this PIP (note on lower
left)
7. The existing 24" RCP from the west of building B on sheet C1 is shown to be
removed on sheet A-I. The Drainage Study (rev. 11-3-97) identifies a capacity
problem at the inlet below and replacement conditions for pipe as well as a IO'
extension to inlet on Wright Place. There is a question that the proposed inlet
improvement is uphill from the bypass drainage from Palomar Oaks Way. Please
review the drainage study and revise or correct as necessary. Verify proposed
design to remove the storm drain and any redirected downstream drainage
system capacity.
Attached is a red-lined check print of the proposed project for the applicants use in
making the requested revisions. This check print must be returned with the
project revisions to facilitate continued staff review. If you or the applicant have
any questions, please contact me at extension 4353.
Associate Engineer
Land Development Division