HomeMy WebLinkAboutPIP 99-01; Carlsbad Oaks Lot 7; Planned Industrial Permit (PIP) (13)TO: Assistant Planner, Greg Fisher
FROM: Assistant Engineer, David Rick
DATE: July 7, 1999
PIP 99-01 : Carlsbad Oaks Lot 7
COMPLETENESS & ISSUES REVIEW
Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the above-referenced project for
application completeness. The application and plans submitted for this proposed project are
considered complete. Additionally, staff has conducted a review of the project for engineering
issues of concern. Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior
to staff making a determination on the proposed project are as follows:
1. Remove the parking spaces located directly in front of the driveway. Conflicts will occur
between vehicles entering and existing the driveway and the vehicles backing out of the
parking spaces.
2.
3.
On the site plan, provide “top of wall”, “bottom of wall”, and “finished surface for lower
grade” on the proposed crib wall. This information must be provided at a minimum of
eight locations along the crib wall. Also, provide several cross sections of the wall.
Draw the cross sections to scale and show existing grade in relation to proposed grade.
In addition, it appears that the wall’s footings may encroach into the storm drain
easement located on the adjacent property. Please provide detail showing that the
footing does not encroach. The aforementioned information is needed unless the crib
wall cannot be supported by the Planning Department at any height.
Provide spot elevations at the dock. Since a dock is proposed, the project needs to
provide for semi-tractor trailer circulation and loading in accordance to the turns
established by the California Department of Transportation Highway Design Manual
Figure 407D. The project does not comply with this standard. One way to improve
circulation for the trucks would be to relocate the driveway further west in alignment with
the aisle extending along the western portion of the property. At this location, one less
turn is required. Other areas would still need to be modified, however, in order to fully
comply with the standard.
4. The “storm drain note” on the grading plan states that filters will be installed only for
“low” runoff filtration. on-site inlets which collect driveway and parking lot runoff must
be installed with filters and the note needs to be revised accordingly.
5. Show the relocation of the “No parking “ sign currently located where the driveway is
proposed .
6. Relocate the refuse enclosure to an area that will not impede motorist’s vision when
turning the corner on the driveway aisle. Locating it at the northwest corner of the site
would be acceptable.
7. Indicate type of inlet to be used at the northwest corner of the property. Also, indicate
flow line grade in the on-site storm drains. The minimum grade permissible is 0.5%.
8. Indicate the area of each proposed use in the building (i.e. projected square footage of
office, warehouse, research and development).
If you have any questions, please either see or contact me at extension 4324.
DAVID RICK
Engineering Technician
Land Development Division
C: Robert J. Wojcik, P.E., Principle Civil Engineer