HomeMy WebLinkAboutPUD 06-06A; La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.7; Conditional Use Permit (CUP)The City of Carlsbad Planning Department
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: My 16, 2008
Application complete date: March 3, 2008
Project Planner: Shelley Esteybar
Project Engineer: Jeremy Riddle
SUBJECT: PUD 06-06fA) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7 -
Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously
certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately
describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and approval of a Planned
Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting
for the development of 43 single-family detached homes and one recreational lot
within the Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.7, generally located
east of Rancho Santa Fe Road at the terminus of Avenida Soledad in Local
Facilities Management Zone 11.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6438
APROVING Planned Development Permit Amendment PUD 06-06(A) based on the findings
and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
The proposed project includes approval of architecture and plotting for 43 single-family dwelling
units and the development of an open-space recreational lot located in the Villages of La Costa
Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.7. The lots for these neighborhoods were created through
Tentative Map (CT 06-06) and Planned Development Permit (PUD 06-06), approved by the City
Council on November 20, 2007. The approved project consists of 43 residential dwelling lots, 3
private driveway lots, 2 open space lots and one recreational lot all on 13.76 acres. A Planned
Development Permit was required for Neighborhood 3.7 because the minimum lot sizes are less
than 7,500 square feet. Architecture and plotting for the units were not proposed at that time and
pursuant to Section 5.2.8 of the Master Plan and PUD 06-06 Conditions of Approval No. 7, the
architecture and plotting could be processed at a later date through a Planned Development
Permit Amendment. The applicant is now proposing architecture and plotting for the subject
neighborhood. At less than 50 units the project does not require City Council approval. The
proposed two-story homes consist of three separate and distinct floor plans with living areas
ranging in approximate size from 1,913 to 2463 square feet. The project incorporates three
distinct architectural elevation styles and nine color schemes to provide variation throughout the
project. The recreational lot is proposed to include a tot lot and play structures, turf area,
landscaping, a sidewalk and park benches. The project complies with City standards including
the Villages of La Costa Master Plan and all necessary findings can be made for the approval
being requested.
PUD 06-06(A) - LA COSTA OAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7
JULY 16, 2008
PAGE 2
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Background
On October 23, 2001 the City Council certified the Final Program EIR, approved the Master
Plan, a Master Tentative Tract Map and related applications for the Villages of La Costa project.
The Villages of La Costa Master Plan establishes the permitted uses, development standards, and
design criteria for each neighborhood as well as the development review process to be utilized.
Master Tentative Tract Map CT 99-03 subdivided the area into open space areas and established
the neighborhood development area boundaries. Tentative Tract Map CT 06-06 and Planned
Development Permit PUD 06-06 created the residential lots for Neighborhood 3.7. A final map
has recorded for The Oaks; grading and improvement plans have been approved, and
construction is presently ongoing.
Project Description
The project site, consisting of Neighborhood 3.7 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan's Oaks
Village, is generally located east of Rancho Santa Fe Road at the terminus of Avenida Soledad in
Local Facilities Management Zone 11. The subject neighborhood contains 43 single-family
residential lots that are a minimum size of 3,500 square feet. Pursuant to the Master Plan,
Planned Development Permits for neighborhoods with minimum lot sizes of less than 7,500
square feet require a common recreation area, which was approved under CT 06-06. This project
also includes proposed improvements for a 4,800 square foot common recreation lot which
includes: one tot lot and play structures, turf area, landscaping, sidewalk and park benches. The
recreational lot shall begin construction prior to the occupancy of the first unit and shall be
approved for use prior to the occupancy of 50% of the total units in this neighborhood. The
Master Plan provides for architectural review of the units through the processing of a Planned
Development Permit Amendment. Because architecture and plotting were not a part of the
previous approval, the applicant is now applying for review and approval of building floor plans,
elevations, and plotting. Pursuant to the Master Plan, three different floor plans are being
proposed with living areas ranging in size from approximately 1,913 to 2,463 square feet.
Proposed are 43 two-story units, each having an attached garage providing parking spaces for a
minimum of two cars. The project incorporates three distinct architectural elevation styles and
nine different color schemes to provide variation throughout the project. The following table
provides a summary of square footage and elevation styles:
PUD 06-06(A) - LA COSTA
JULY 16, 2008
PAGES
AO;AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.
TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF FLOOR PLANS
PLAN
NO.
1
2
3
1ST
FLOOR
SQ. FT.
974
964
1,151
2ND
FLOOR
SQ. FT.
939
1,154
1,312
LIVING
AREA
SQ. FT.
1,913
2,118
2,463
GARAGE
SQ. FT.
424
2 car
512
2 car
488
2 car
TOTAL
BLDG.
SQ. FT.
2,337
2,630
2,951
ARCHITECTURAL
STYLES
Spanish Colonial,
Santa Barbara,
Italian Tuscan
Spanish Colonial,
Santa Barbara,
Italian Tuscan
Spanish Colonial,
Santa Barbara,
Italian Tuscan
To determine compliance with the provisions of the Master Plan, a Major Planned Development
Permit Amendment is required for the development of homes in neighborhoods with minimum
lot sizes of less than 7,500 square feet.
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's
consistency with the standards contained within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. The
project's compliance with the Master Plan is discussed in detail in the section below.
Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 98-01(G))
The project is located within the Oaks North Village area of the Villages of La Costa Master
Plan. The Master Plan maps and text define the allowable type and intensity of land uses in each
village and provides detailed development and design standards, development phasing and
timing, and the method by which the Master Plan will be implemented.
The subject neighborhood was divided into residential lots through CT 06-06 and PUD 06-06,
approved on November 20, 2007, and compliance with the Master Plan standards relating to the
subdivision were analyzed at that time.
An overall goal of the Master Plan is to create a balanced, open space oriented residential
community. The development standards contained in the Master Plan support this goal by
describing the design elements that are shared by all neighborhoods within the three Master Plan
villages. The following Table 2 shows compliance of the proposed project with the
Architectural/Site Planning Design standards and guidelines contained in the Master Plan.
PUD 06-06(A) - LA COSTA
JULY 16, 2008
PAGE 4
AO;AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
Guideline
(VLCMP
Reference)Standard Comments
Front Yard
Setback
(4.6.2.D.2.a&
4.6.2. D.2.c)
All structures shall maintain a minimum 15-foot|Please
habitable area setback from public or private
streets and a 20-foot setback for garages
fronting on public or private streets.
refer to the attached
'Individual Lot Data' Table 1 for
compliance with the front yard
setbacks from private driveways.
All units comply.
Garages shall be setback a minimum of 5 feet
from motor courts, driveways, or if located at
the rear of a lot from private streets. Any
habitable space must maintain a minimum 5-
foot setback from private driveways unless
located above the garage where a minimum 10-
foot setback is required.
All garages comply with the required
setbacks.
Rear Yard
Setback
(4.6.2.D.2.C &
7.7.3.7.1)
Minimum rear yard setback is 10'
Minimum rear yard area is 15' by 15'
Please refer to the attached
'Individual Lot Data' Table 1 for
compliance with the rear yard
setbacks. All units comply.
All lots provide the required 15' x
15' usable rear yard area.
Side Yards
(4.6.2.D.2.d &
4.6.2.B.2.C)
Minimum of 5' for internal side yard setback
At least 50% of the units in each neighborhood
shall have one side elevation where there are
sufficient offsets or cutouts so the side yard
setback averages a minimum of 7'.
Please refer to the attached
'Individual Lot Data' Table 1 for
side yard setbacks. All lots comply.
Ian types 2 & 3 incorporate side
ard courtyards and offsets. These
Ian types are plotted on 31 lots or
172.1 % of the total.
Building
Separation
(4.6.2.D.2.b)
The minimum distance between dwelling units
shall be 10' excluding architectural feature
projections and wrap around porch
encroachments.
11 units are separated by a
minimum 10'.
Street Side
Setback
(4.6.2.D.2.d)
10' minimum setback.All units comply with the minimum
10' street side setbacks.
PUD 06-06(A) - LA COSTA
JULY 16, 2008
PAGES
AaiAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
Guideline
(VLCMP
Reference)Standard Comments
Slope Edge
Building Setback
(4.3.4)
All main and accessory buildings that are
developed on hilltops and/or pads created on
downhill perimeter slopes of greater than 15' in
All proposed units meet the required
slope edge setbacks. Please refer to
the Slope Edge Building Setback
height shall be setback so that the building does exhibits on Page 3 of the enclosed
not intrude into a .7' horizontal to 1' vertical plans for further details,
imaginary diagonal plane that is measured from
the edge of slope to the building.
For all buildings, which are subject to this slope
edge building setback standard, a profile of the
diagonal plane shall be submitted with all other.
development application requirements.
Lot Width
(7.7.3.7.g)
Minimum lot width: 40'All lots were previously approved by
CT 06-06 and have a minimum lot
width of 40'.
Building
Coverage
(4.6.3.B.2)
1-story units: 50% of net pad area
2-story units: 40% of net pad area
Includes:
Garages and the perimeter area of a
basement.
Excludes:
Exterior structures such as covered
porches
Permanent structural elements protruding
from buildings such as overhanging
balconies that project less than 8' from the
building
Porte cocheres not exceeding a length of
22'and a width of 8'
Roof eaves extending less than 30" from
the face of any building
Awnings
Open parking areas
Structures under 30" in height
Masonry walls not greater than 6' in
height (wing-walls, planter walls, grade
separation retaining walls).
Dlease refer to the attached
'Individual Lot Data' Table 1 for
juilding coverage.
All plan types are two-story
structures and do not exceed the
maximum 40% of net pad area as
required.
All units comply.
PUD 06-06(A) - LA COSTA
JULY 16, 2008
PAGE 6
AO;AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
Guideline
(VLCMP
Reference)Standard Comments
Building Height
(7.7.3.7.J)
Maximum of 35' and 3 stories.Plan 1 = 24'-l" max and 2 stories.
Plan 2 = 24'-9" max and 2 stories.
Plan 3 = 25'-l" max and 2 stories.
Front Building
Planes
(4.6.3.B.4.e &
4.6.3.B.4.f)
50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18
inch offset planes with a minimum of 10'
between front and rear planes.
Each plane is 30 SF minimum.
3 separate building planes for lots with 45' of
frontage or less.
4 separate building planes for lots with a
frontage greater than 45'.
33% of the above 50% building plane
requirement may reduce the limit from 4
separate building planes to 2 if a fully
landscaped front courtyard is substituted.
Please refer to the architectural plans
for the building plane exhibits.
# of planes
Plan*SC SB IT
Plans 2 (all elev.) & 3 (all elev.)
blotted on 31 lots or 72.1% of the
unit mix meet this requirement.
All units comply.
Rear Building
Planes
(4.6.3.B.4.g)
50% of units in the neighborhood must have 18
inch offset planes with a minimum of 3'
between face of the forward-most plane and
rear planes.
Each plane is 30 SF minimum.
3 separate building planes for lots with 45' of
frontage or less.
4 separate building planes for lots with a
frontage greater than 45'.
Please refer to the architectural plans
for the building plane exhibits.
# of planes
Plan*SC SB IT
All units or 100% of units have 18
inch offset planes with a minimum
of 3 planes and a minimum 30
square feet for each plane. All units
are located'on lots with 45' of
frontage or less.
All units comply.
* SC- Spanish Colonial, SB- Santa Barbara, IT - Italian Tuscan
PUD 06-06(A) - LA COSTA
JULY 16, 2008
PAGE?
AD;AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
Guideline
(VLCMP
Reference)Standard Comments
Front Building
Elevations
(4.6.3.B.6)
Front building facades shall incorporate a
minimum of 4 varieties of design elements to
create character and interest to the home. ThesefTable
elements vary depending on the architectural
style used.
Please refer to the attached
"Building Design Element Matrix"
4 and the architectural plans
that detail the various design
elements incorporated for each front
elevation type. All plan types and
elevation styles comply.
Side & Rear
Elevations
(4.6.3.B.7)
Minimum of 2 elements of enhanced
architectural detailing incorporating good
design is required for side & rear elevations
adjacent to public/private roads.
Please refer to the "Building Design
Element Matrix" Table 4 and the
architectural plans that detail the
various design elements incorporated
for each side and rear elevation
types. All plan types and elevation
;tyles comply.
Elevations
Fronting
Circulation
Element Roads
(4.6.3. A.I.a)
Homes adjacent to circulation element roads are
required to receive special attention to detailing
on the elevation fronting the roads. This will
include window detailing equal to or better than
that of the front elevation. The introduction of
additional wall planes and balconies, where
noise standards allow, is encouraged.
Please refer to the enclosed
architectural plans that detail the
various design elements incorporated
for each of the proposed elevations.
All plan types and elevation styles
comply.
Floor Plans
(4.6.3.B.5.C&
4.6.3.B.5.d)
Minimum of 3 floor plans per neighborhood.
Minimum of 3 front elevations shall be
provided for each floor plan.
The proposed project includes three
floor plans with three distinctive
elevation types for each plan. Please
;
sfer to the enclosed architectural
lans.
Single-Story
Units
(4.4 &
4.6.3.B.4.1)
For neighborhoods on ridgelines/hilltops that
are visible from a circulation element roadway,
at least 20% of the units shall be single-story.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline
maximum of 15' (10' preferred).
Not applicable within this
Neighborhood. All units are two-
story.
Two Story Units
(4.6.3.B.4.n&
4.6.3.B.5.b)
Must include some single-story features.
The second-story must not exceed 80% of the
first-story square footage, including all garage
area.
Please refer to the enclosed
architectural plans that detail the
ingle story features provided. All
>roposed plans comply.
Planl: 67.2%
Plan 2: 78.2%
Plan 3: 80.0%
PUD 06-06(A) - LA COSTA
JULY 16, 2008
PAGE 8
AD;AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
Guideline
(VLCMP
Reference)Standard Comments
Where (3) Two
Story Units occur
in a row with less
than 15 ft
between homes-
(4.6.3.B.4.b)
One of the units must have a single-story
building edge at least 10' deep and shall run the
length of the building.
Single-story shall be defined as a plateline
maximum of 15'.
Plan 1 incorporates a single story
milding edge that is at least 10'
wide and runs the length of the
building. This plan type is plotted
where there are three (3) 2-story
units with less than 15' between
them.
Single-Story
Elements
(4.6.3.B.4.d)
33% of units within a Neighborhood must have
a single-story element, with a minimum depth
of 3', that is 40% or greater than the front
elevation width. Porches and porte cochere
elements qualify.
Plan type 3 incorporates a single
story building element that is greater
than 40% of the front elevation
width and a minimum of 3' deep.
Plan 1:33.0%
Plan 2: 18.6%
Plan 3: 75.8%
Plan type 3 is plotted on 15 lots, or
34.9% of the unit mix, meeting this
requirement.
PUD 06-06(A) - LA COSTA
JULY 16, 2008
PAGE 9
AO,AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
Guideline
(VLCMP
Reference)Standard Comments
Entries, Front
Porches,
Courtyards, &
Balconies
(4.6.3.B.9,
4.6.2.B.2.f&
4.6.2.B.3)
25% of the units must have either a porch at
least 5' deep, across 33% of the width of the
dwelling, or a courtyard or balcony, whichever
is consistent with the architectural style.
Porches require a minimum front yard setback
of 10'.
37.2% of the elevations incorporate
front balcony (all elev. styles of the
Plan 2).
Please refer to the enclosed
architecture and site plan for
compliance.
Porches shall have a minimum depth and length [All
of5'.
A variety of roof elements (gables, shed, etc.)
shall be provided over porches. A balcony
above a porch may also serve this purpose.
The front and sidewall of porches shall be open
except for required and ornamental guardrails.
These features shall qualify as a plane for the
purposes of the architectural guidelines.
Buildings on corner lots should consider having
the porch wrap around the side of the building.
Non-enclosed and non-habitable porches and
balconies may encroach up to 5' and 8'
respectively into the required front yard
setback.
Courtyard walls with a maximum height of 42
inches may intrude up to 2' into the required
etbacks.
units with front balconies
comply.
Octagonal or
Round Entry
Tower
(4.6.2.B.3.a)
May encroach into the required side setbacks a
maximum of 2'. The total length of the
encroachment may not exceed 8' and shall be
located within the larger side yard. The roof
eave may encroach a maximum of an additional
12" into the required setback.
A minimum 5' setback must be maintained.
None are proposed within the
•equired side yard setback.
PUD 06-06(A) - LA COSTA
JULY 16, 2008
PAGE 10 '
AD,'AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
Guideline
(VLCMP
Reference)Standard Comments
Projections
(4.6.2.B.3)
Fireplace structures not wider than 8', cornices,
eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, and other
similar architectural features projecting from
the building may intrude up to 2' into the
required setbacks.
No projections extend into the side
or front yard setback more than 2'
nor are any projections greater than
8' in length. All plans comply.
Recreation
Parking
(4.6.2.B.4.b)
Common recreation areas:
. Less than 8,000 SF - Do not require off-
street parking
. "Pocket Parks" - Not required to provide
parking
• Within a 1/4 mile radius of the units for
which they are required to serve shall
include 1 space for every 20 units.
. More than a 1/4 mile radius from any of
the units for which it is required to serve
requires parking for those additional units
at a rate of 1 space per 15 units.
(See VLCMP for alternative recreation parking
options)
The parking proposed for the
common recreation area is located
on-street as approved with CT 06-06
and PUD 06-06. '
Resident Parking
(4.6.2.B.4.a)
Minimum 2-car garage with interior
measurements of 20' by 20'.
ti
Two (2) 1 -car garages each having interior
measurements of 12' in width by 20' in length
may be provided as an alternative.
All plan types include one 2-car
garage with a minimum interior
dimension measurement of 20' x
20'.
PUD 06-06(A) - LA COSTA
JULY 16, 2008
PAGE 11
/TO,AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
Guideline
(VLCMP
Reference)Standard Comments
Garage Criteria
(4.6.2.B.2.b,
4.6.3.B.4.h,
4.6.3.B.13 &
4.6.3.D.2.C)
20' minimum setback from the property line
where garage doors face a public or private street.
Garages shall be setback a minimum of 5 feet
from motor courts, driveways.
Side-loaded garages must maintain a 15' setback
from property line. They also must be designed
to appear as a livable portion of the home.
Three-car garages in a row facing the street are
permitted on 25% of the total number of lots in a
neighborhood with a minimum lot area greater
than 5,000 sf.
For neighborhoods with a minimum lot size of
5,000 sf or greater, an additional 25% of the units
may have three-car in a row garages facing the
street provided garages do not exceed more than
50% of unit's frontage. The maximum number of
units in a neighborhood with three-car in a row
garages facing the street shall not exceed a total of
50% of the units.
Projects with three-car garages shall be a mix of
two door garages, three door garages, and offset
two door garages (2 planes separated by at least
18 inches).
A variety of garage configurations should be used
All units face a private street. A 20'
or greater front yard setback is
maintained for all units.
There are no garages proposed from
motor courts or driveways.
There are no side-loaded garages
sroposed.
There are no three-car garages
proposed.
Minimum lot size for Neighborhood
3.7 is less than 5,000 square feet.
There are no three-car garages
Toposed.
garages are designed to fit the
within each neighborhood to improve the street
scene.
(See VLCMP 4.6.3.B.13.g for examples of garage [provide variety from street scene.
configurations)
proposed elevations. There are three
different garage designs proposed to
Roll-up garage doors are required.
Architectural projections may encroach into the
setback a maximum on 18" for garages.
However, the projection shall not extend to the
second story living space. (See VLCMP
4.6.3.B.13.d-f for more specifics about garages)
All units have proposed roll-up garage
doors.
All proposed architectural projections
do not encroach into setbacks.
PUD 06-06(A) - LA COSTA
JULY 16, 2008
PAGE 12
ACXAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
Guideline
(VLCMP
Reference)Standard Comments
Roofs
(4.6.3.B.4.k&
4.6.3.B.8)
Varied building roof heights and roof massing
shall be incorporated into unit designs for each
master plan neighborhood.
Changes in roof direction shall be provided to
create diversity and interest.
Roof planes of units located at the top of slopes
should attempt to parallel the slope.
A variety of roof colors shall be used within
each neighborhood.
Minimum roof pitch of 3:12.
A variety of roof forms and massing
are proposed with changes in
direction and pitches. See elevations
and roof plans for compliance.
Change in roof direction is provided.
Roof planes for units at the top of
slopes are in compliance.
There are a total of six (6) proposed
roofing tile colors, including: Los
Padres Blend, Albuquerque, Sunset
Blend, Carlsbad Blend, Santa Fe and
Winslow.
Vlinimum roof pitch proposed is
4:12.
Colors
(4.6.3.B.12)
Colors should be consistent with the
architectural style selected. Warm, earth tones
are preferred however other color combinations
are acceptable depending upon architectural
.tyle.
Within each neighborhood, a minimum of 3
different exterior color schemes shall be used
for each floor plan within the same architectural
styles.
In all master plan neighborhoods, adjacent units
within the same architectural style shall not
utilize the same color scheme. However,
imilar or same colors may occur within
different color schemes. "Adjacent" includes
units on either side of the subject unit as well as
those directly across the street.
Each plan type plotted on the site
plan includes a color scheme
designation to show compliance.
Please refer to the color and
materials boards for details on each
color scheme and to the site plan for
ipecific plotting.
Accessory
Structures
(4.6.3.B.3)
Patio and accessory structures shall comply
with development standards set forth in Section
21.10.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
All plan types comply.
PUD 06-06(A) - LA COSTA
JULY 16, 2008
PAGE 13
AKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD
TABLE 2 - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA COMPLIANCE TABLE
CONTINUED
Guideline
(VLCMP
Reference)Standard Comments
Architectural
Styles Permitted
(4.6.3.C & 7.6)
Each Neighborhood shall contain one or more
of the following Architectural Styles:
• Santa Barbara Mediterranean
• Craftsmen Bungalow
• Spanish Colonial
. Monterey Ranch
• Italian/Tuscan
» European Country
The elevation types included are as
follows:
Spanish Colonial
Santa Barbara Mediterranean
Italian/Tuscan
Design Standards
(4.6.3.B.4.1 &
4.6.3.B.5.e)
50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in
the front of each unit shall be recessed or
projected a minimum of 2 inches or shall be
trimmed with wood or raised stucco. Colored
aluminum window frames shall be used (no
mill finishes).
"Handcrafted" detailing, exposed rafter tails,
knee braces and columns shall be used when
appropriate to the proposed architectural style.
The windows and doors on the front
elevations are recessed a minimum
of 2" and are trimmed with either
wood or raised stucco. Please refer
to the enclosed elevations on the
architectural plans for compliance.
All plans comply.
Chimneys
(4.6.3.B.11)
The chimney and chimney cap shall be in scale
with the size of the structure.
2-chimney limit for dwelling units on lots less
than 7,500 SF.
please refer to the enclosed
elevations on the architectural plans
for compliance. All chimneys and
their caps comply with proper scale
and proportion.
Window
Detailing
(4.6.3.B.10)
The design of the windows shall include one or
more of the following features:
. Deeply recessed windows
• Paned windows
• Decorative window ledges
• Accent and varied shape windows
. Window boxes and planters with
architecturally evident supports
. Exterior wood trim surrounds
. Accent colors on shutters or other
elements
• Arched elements
Shutters
• Raised stucco trim around windows
• Window lintels
Please refer to the enclosed
levations on the architectural plans
for compliance. All plans comply.
PUD 06-06(A) - LA COSTAUAKS NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7
JULY 16, 2008
PAGE 14
The Master Plan requires that each front elevation incorporate a minimum of four (4) enhanced
architectural design elements and that each side and rear elevation incorporate a minimum of two
(2) such elements so as to create character and interest in the homes. The "Building Elevation
Design Elements" matrix has been included to show which elements are used for each elevation
and floor plan (see Table 4 - Attachment No. 8).
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 11 in the southeast
quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and the project's
compliance with the adopted performance standards were analyzed and evaluated at the time of
approval of CT 06-06.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Staff has analyzed the project and has concluded that no potentially significant impacts
would result with the implementation of the project that were not previously examined and
evaluated in the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Villages of La
Costa Master Plan (2000) MP 98-01 (EIR 98-07), dated July 16, 2001. EIR 98-07 evaluates the
potential environmental effects of the development and operation of the "Villages of La Costa
Master Plan (2000)" and associated actions inclusive of the proposed neighborhood project
reviewed herein.
The City Council certified EIR 98-07 on October 23, 2001. At that time CEQA Findings of Fact,
a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program from EIR 98-07 applicable to the proposed Villages of La Costa Oaks
Neighborhood 3.7 project have been completed, incorporated into the project design or are
required as conditions of approval for the project. The EIR 98-07 "Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the
Villages of La Costa Final Program EIR.
The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the program EIR, as they
are a part of the program analyzed earlier. This project is within the scope of Final Program EIR
98-07 and no further CEQA compliance is required. EIR 98-07 is available for review at the
Planning Department.
ATTACHMENTS;
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6438
2. Location Map
3. Background Data Sheet
4. Local Facilities Impact Assessment
5. Disclosure Statement
6. Table 1 - Individual Lot Data
7. Table 3 - Gross & Net Lot Acreage
8. Table 4 - Building Elevation Design Elements
9. Table 5 - Unit Summary Table
10. Reduced Exhibits
11. Full Size Exhibits "A" - "GG" dated July 16, 2008
NOT TO SCALE
SITEMAP
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7
PUD 06-06 (A)
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood - 3.7 CT 06-06(A)
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: H. GENERAL PLAN: RM
ZONING: PLANNED COMMUNITY (P-Q (RD-M in MP 98-01)
DEVELOPER'S NAME: Colrich Development
ADDRESS: 4747 Morena Boulevard Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92117
PHONE NO.: (858) 490-2300 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 223-810-13
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 13.8 acres
A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 149.49 sq. ft.
B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 79.73 sq. ft.
C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 43 EDU
D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .29 acres
E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = 23 CFS
Identify Drainage Basin = Basin "D"
F. Circulation: Demand in ADT= 430 ADT
G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = Station No. 6
H. Open Space: Acreage provided = per HCP
I. Schools (San Dieguito Unified High/
Encinitas Union Elementary School Districts): Elementary: 17.6 Students
Middle School: 14.19 Students
High School: 14.19 Students
(Demands to be determined by staff)
J. Sewer: Demands in EDU 43 EDU
Identify Sub Basin = N/A
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
K. Water: Demand in GPD = 23.650 GPP
L. The project is 2 units under the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO:PUD 06-06(A)
CASE NAME: LA COSTA OAKS NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7
APPLICANT: Jack Henthorn and Associates. P O Box 237 Carlsbad. CA 92018
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a determination that the project is within the scope
of the previously certified Villages of La Costa Program EIR and that the Program EIR
adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and approval of a Planned
Development Permit Amendment for building floor plans, elevations and plotting for the
development of 43 single-family detached homes and one recreational lot within the Villages of
La Costa, Oaks North Neighborhood 3.7, generally located east of Rancho Santa Fe Road at the
terminus of Avenida Soledad in Local Facilities Management Zone 11.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 through 43 and lot 47 of the City of Carlsbad Tract CT 06-
06, Villages of La Costa - La Costa Oaks North - Neighborhood 3.7 in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15596 filed in the Office
of the County Recorder of San Diego County on December 3, 2007 as file no. 2007-0750674.
APN: 223-810-13-00 -Acres: 13.8 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 43 Units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Existing Land Use Designation: Residential Medium (RM)
Proposed Land Use Designation: Same
Density Allowed: 4-6 Density Proposed: 3.12 per CT 06-06
Existing Zone: Planned Community PC (RD-M) Proposed Zone: P-C (RD-M)
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Site
North
South
East
West
Zoning
P-C (RD-M in MP 98-
011)
P-C (OS/RD-M in MP
98-01)
P-C (OS in MP 98-01)
P-C (OS in MP 98-01)
P-C (OS in MP 98-01)
LOCAL
General
RM
OS/RMH
OS/RL
OS
OS/RL
Plan
COASTAL PROGRAM
Current Land Use
Vacant mass graded
pads and OS
Multiple-family
Res./Open Space
Open Space
Open Space
Open Space
Coastal Zone: | | Yes [X] No Local Coastal Program Segment: N/A
Within Appeal Jurisdiction: | | Yes ER] No Coastal Development Permit: [~] Yes
Local Coastal Program Amendment: I I Yes IXI No
No
Revised 01/06
Existing LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A
Existing LCP Zone: N/A Proposed LCP Zone: N/A
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: San Dieguito Unified High School/ Encinitas Union Elementary School District.
Water District: Vallecitos Sewer District: Vallecitos
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 43 EDU
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Categorical Exemption, N/A
Negative Declaration, issued N/A
I | Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
Other, within the scope of EIR 98-07 dated October 23. 2001
Revised 01/06
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note: . • . . •• • . . :'"''.''•'
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and an other county, city and county, city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other/group or combination acting as a unit."
-.'••• . » •;;«." •;•>.:•»•»; v^-,-•••• ••••;..<.;t*-^:: '•^f'.f'^'-'-^ ' -V. V .-'/, . , • -•••'•;.'•-
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below. ; ,
1.
2.
APPLICANT (Not the applicant' s agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the cprporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.) dv^-j CcW^A.
Person^^^ — H^==— - Corp/Part 1C Oaks 3.7, LLC _
Title M^v^^^r _ Title _ '. _ _
Address Address 4747 Morena Blvd. Ste 100
SanDieao, CA92117
OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-
owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)^ r t
CcPerson \
Title
-orp/Part LC Oaks 3.7. LLC
Title
Address 47HT Address 4747 Morena Blvd. Suite 100
SanDieao, CA 92117
1635 Faraday Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as a trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
I I Yes LXJ No If yes, please indicate person(s): '
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of owner/date . Signature of applicant/date
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATE
The undersigned, being the President and Chief Operating Officer of ColRich Residential,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("CRR"), hereby certifies that:
1. CRR is the Managing Member of LC Oaks & Greens Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company ("Holdings").
2. Holdings is the Managing Member of LC Holdings L2, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company ("L2").
3. L2 is the Sole Member of LC Oaks 3.7, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("LC
Oaks").
4. LC Oaks is acquiring the real property described in Exhibit A attached hereto by an
Assignment from SARE Investments, LLC, a California limited liability company of its interest as
Buyer under that certain Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions with Real Estate Collateral
Management Company, a California corporation dated as of October 12, 2007.
5. The following individuals hold the offices in CRR set forth next to their respective names:
Richard Gabriel Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Colin Seid Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Graeme Gabriel President and Chief Operating Officer
Danny Gabriel President and Chief Investment Officer
Barry Galgut Executive Vice President
6. Pursuant to Sections 6.09 and 6.10 of the Limited Liability Agreement of CRR, each of the
Officers of CCR are authorized to take any and all action on behalf of CRR and its subsidiary
entities.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certificate on December 6, 2007.
"" gs i^\ "*-*"Graeme Gabriel
Co-President and Chief Operating Officer
P:00401460.4:13001.011
Individual Lot Data
La Costa Oaks North
Neighborhood 3.7
Lota
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31 •
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
'.tv'-Mrv*'^
Plan
3
2
1 R
2
3
1
2
2
3
3
1
3
2
3
1
3 R
1 R
2 R
1 R
2
3 R
2 R
1 R
2 R
1 R
2 R
3 R
3
1
2
3
2 R
1
2 R
3
2
2
3 R
1 R
3 R
1 R
2 R
3 R
-.vsv*rv- .
Elevation
B
A
B
C
A
C
B
C
A
B
A
C
C
A
C
B
B
C
A
B
C
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
B
B
A
B
C
A
B
A
C
C
B
A
C
A
Color
5
4
1
8
2
9
3
7
1
3
1
9
8
5
7
6
1
9
2
6
8
3
9
5
4
8
2
3
7
4
1
2
3
9
4
6
3
7
8
5
1
9
6
Setbacks (ft)
Livable Side Yard
Front Rear Left Right Garage
15.6
20.0
14.3
20.7
16.9
18.7
19.7
21.5
15.9
15.6
16.5
14.8
19.7
15.1
16.7
14.4
15.0
20.0
16.0
20.0
15.9
20.0
19.8
20.8
15.8
21.1
15.0
15.2
19.0
19.5
13.9
20.2
15.0
20.0
16.8
19.3
20.9
28.4
26.8
18.3
18.4
20.0
14.5
*
15.5
22.1
28.3
23.2
19.5
28.9
24.5
44.7
35.2
11.6
20.5
10.4
17.4
13.8
20.6
10
18
12.9
18
12.7
36.9
36.7
27.8
23.3
28.9
23.8
18.4
10
30.5
52.5
32.8
16.5
18.5
12.9
15.3
22.9
30.8
21.7
17.7
11.8
23.5
17.8
10.3
' '
5.3
5
5
5.5
5
5.4
5.7
19.6
8.4
27.6
10.3
8.1
8.4
10
10
5
6
6
6
6
10.7
5.9
5.8
5.8
5.8
6.2
6.8
60.3
10.1
7.9
6.8
5
5
5
10.2
5
5
5.8
7
6.4
6.7
7
8.4
- •,., , •
7.4
7.6
7.7
7.4
6.9
6.4
8.1
12
31.6
7.2
7.9
6.6
6
6
5.8
14
12.8
5
5
5
6.3
6.7
5.6
5.7
5.2
7.6
20.6
7.2
7.8
8
7
6.8
6.8
5.5
5.8
5
5
5.1
5
5
5
5
18.3
. , , .
21.1
20.7
20
20.8
21.8
22.9
20.1
20.8
21.4
21.1
20.8
20.2
20.7
20.6
21.4
20
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7
21.3
20.7
23.8
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.5
20.7
23.7
21.2
20
20.9
20.7
20.7
22.3
20
20.6
32.9
30.2
22.6
22.9
20.7
20
Porch
16.5
15.3
16.7
18.8
16.0
16.6
16.5
16.5
16.7
16.0
16.5
16.0
16.5
16.5
19.8
16.6
16.8
16.6
19.0
17.2
16.7
16.0
16.5
15.8
16.5
26.5
18.6
16.5
Net Pad
Area (SF)
5,186
4,227
4,299
4,571
4,528
4,246
4,614
5,330
6,625
4,668
4,735
4,784
4,525
4,421
4,305
4,344
3,998
3,689
3,689
3,705
4,778
4,218
4,024
3,824
3,908
4,044
4,793
7,265
5,598
6,589
5,747
4,232
3,783
3,795
4,213
4,519
5,068
5,618
5,047
4,410
4,104
4,022
5,015
'*» A •"•
Building
Coverage"
Sq. Footage % of Net Pad
1,687
,476
,477
,476
,687
,477
,476
1,476
1,687
1,687
1,477
1,687
1,476
1,687
1,477
1,687
1,477
1,476
1,477
1,476
1,687
1,476
1,477
1,476
1,477
1,476
1,687
1,687
1,477
1,476
1,687
1,476
1,477
1,476
1,687
1,476
1 476
1,687
1,477
1,687
1,477
1,476
1,687
••'•'" "-**C-
32.5%
34.9%
34.4%
32.3%
37.3%
34.8%
32.0%
27.7%
25.5%
36.1%
31.2%
35.3%
32.6%
38.2%
34.3%
38.8%
36.9%
40.0%
40.0%
39.8%
35.3%
35.0%
36.7%
38.6%
37.8%
36.5%
35.2%
23.2%
26.4%
22.4%
29.4%
34.9%
39.0%
38.9%
40.0%
32.7%
29.1%
30.0%
29.3%
38.3%
36.0%
36.7%
33.6%
w,,., y»< f
I/ "Building Coverage" = net pad area of a site occupied by the habitable area of any building or structure as measured from the outside of its surrounding external walls or supporting members. Includes
garages and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes exterior structures such as covered porches, permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less
than 8 ft. from the building, and porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22 feet and a width of 8 feet. Also excluded are roof eaves extending less than 30 inches from the face of any building, awnings, open
parking areas, structures under 30 inches in height and masonry walls not greater than 6 feet in height such as wing-walls, planter walls or grade-separation retaining walls.
6/17/2008
Neighborhood 3.7
Page 2 of 2
La Costa Oaks North
Neighborhood 3.7
Table of Lot Sizes
Lot No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Sq. Ft.
Gross
5,186
4,227
4,299
4,571
4,819 j
4,601
4,614
8,621
8,907
6,186
4,735
4,784
4,526
4,421
4,305
4,344
4,311
3,690
3,690
4,031
6,189
5,008
4,851
4,552
4,586
4,649
6,182
7,755
5,585
6,589
5,743
4,232
3,783
3,795
4,478
4,519
5,585
5,618
5,047
4,411
4,104
4,021
5,015
Net Pad*
5,186
4,227
4,299
4,571
4,528
4,246
4,614
5,330
6,625
4,668
4,735
4,784
4,525
4,421
4,305
4,344
3,998
3,689
3,689
3,705
4,778
4,218
4,024
3,824
3,908
4,044
4,793
7,265
5,585
6,589
5,743
4,232
3,783
3,795
4,213
4,519
5,068
5,618
5,047
4,410
4,104
4,021
5,015
La Costa Oaks North
Neighborhood 3.7
DESIGN ELEMENTS
a. Variety of Roof Planes
b. Deeply Recessed Windows and Doors
c. Paned Windows and Doors
d. Exposed Roof Beams or Rafter Tails
e. Decorative Window Ledges
Accent Materials such as Stucco, Wood,
Siding and Stone
g. Window and Door Lintels
h. Dormers
1. Accent and Varied Shape Windows
. Window Boxes and Planters with
Architecturally Evident Supports
k. Exterior Wood Elements
Variations in Colors of Stucco and Other
Elements
Accent Colors on Doors, Shutters or Other
Elements
n. Stucco Wainscoting
o. Covered Balconies
p. Arched Elements
q. Shutters
Raised Stucco Trim around Windows and
r' Doors
BUILDING ELEVATION DESIGN ELEMENTS
PLAN ONE
. Spanish Colonial
From i Side
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
S
s
/
'/
S
S
/
/ I /
/
/
S s
Rear
^
y'
s
s
s
s
s
s
Santa Barbara
Front
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
S
/
/
/
/
/
Side Rear
y'
/
•/
s
s
/
/
/
s
s
s
s
/
^
/
/•
/
</
Tuscan
Front
•/
•/
/
S
/•
^
s
s
•/
s
s
•/
•/
_ Side Rear
s
/
^
/
/
/
/
s
/•
•/
s
/
^
/
/
/
^
^
/
^
s
/
PLAN TWO
Spanish Colonial
Front
V
/
^
/
y^
/
v^
^
/•
^
S
S
S
s
Side
^
/
^
/
y^
vx
vx
vx
/
v'
Rear
/
v'
v^
v'
v'
v'
v'
vx
vx
y
Santa Barbara
Front
/
/
S
/
s
/
/
/
v^
vx
/
/
Side
/
/
v'
vx
vx
v'
vx
/•
/
Rear
y^
/
vx
y
v'
v'
v'
vx
y
Tuscan
Front
/
v'
/
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
vx
v'
Side
/
/
v'
/
/
/
v'
/
/
v'
Rear
/
v'
vx
/
v'
vx
v'
vx
vx
yx
PLAN THREE
Spanish Colonial
Front Side
v-j./
'
/
vx
s
s
s
s
V
s
/
vx
/•
/•
/
vx
/
y'
v'
v'
Rear
V
/
y'
/
yx
S
S
S
y' j yx
yx
yx S
Santa Barbara
Front 1 Side I Rear
/
yx
/
vx
/
/
yx
yx
/
y'
yx
/
/
yx
yx
y'
/
/
y^
y'
yx
/
y'
y^
yx
yx
I
//
Tuscan
Front 1 Side
/
/
/
/
./
/
/
V
S
V
vx
/
•/
/
y'
y^
y'
/
yx
yx
^
yx
y'
y'
/
Rear
/
^
yx
yx
/
yx
^
y'
yx
yx
^
S
RECEIVED
3/25/2008
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPT
Table
Unit Summary Table
1st Floor 2nd Floor Garage % of 2nd Floor Total Building Building
Area Area Area vs. 1st Floor 1/ Area Height2' Coverage3'
1
2
3
974
964
1,151
939
1,154
1,312
424
512
488
67.2%
78.2%
80.0%
2,337
2,630
2,951
24'-1"
24'-9"
25'-1"
1,477
1,476
1,687
1/ The 2nd story of any house does not exceed 80% of the 1st story square footage, including all garage area.
2/Building heights shown indicate the maximum building height for each proposed plan type.
3/Building Coverages for Plans 1 & 3 Include additional square footage for the 2nd story overhang (P1=79 SF & P3=48 SF)
4/30/2008
Neighborhood 3.7
Page 1 of 2
PUD 06-06(A)
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT NO. PUD 06-06(A)
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7
GENERAL NOTES
VtCINtTYMAP
PROPOSED PROJECT
BOUNDARY
PROPOSED PROJECT
BOUNDARY
TQTfL SITE AREA; APPRO*IUATELT 13.8 ACRES
EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT - ROUGH GRADED (PER DRAWING 4S1-8A)
HMPUSED LAND USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Atf} OPEN SPACE
TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS.' 43TOTAL HtGER OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS: *JASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUtOEft 22J-SIO-IJ
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LANS USE DESIGNATION:M (RESIDENTIAL IfDIlM DENSITY \4-6 OU/ACl)
HKftSa) GENERAL PLAN LMC USE DESIGNATION:RU (RESIDENTIAL tfDIUH DENSITY /4-fl OU/ACf)
EXISTING ZONING: PC'. mSTER PLAN WJERLYING ZONING: RD-M (RESIDENTIAL ECNSITY - tfDUM)
. CROSS OVERALL NEIGHBORHOOD DENSITY:}.2 DU/AC f«J OU'S/IJ.S AC) PER TU CT 08-06
'. LFIf Z&f: ZONE 11
L AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS: 430 (43 UNITS X 10 tRlPS/DAY)
'•. BUILDING COVERAGE- APPROXIMATELY 1.5 ACRES
i. PERCENTAGE LANDSCAPING: APPROXIUATELr SJ.2J
GENERAL DESIGN NOTES-SHE PLAN
ALL GRADING FOR PROPOSED AH) FUTURE STREETS SHALL CONFORM TO Tff
CITY OF CAO.SBAD DESIGN STANDARDS AND AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY ociffm
ALL CASfXNTS SHM.L BE PROVIDED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS REWIREDBY nf ctrr ENGINEER. PUBLIC UTILITIES AMD THEIR APPROPRIATE DISTRICTS.ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED LfOERCOOUNDSOURCES or TtPOGRfpm:
SAH-LO AERIAL SURVEYS FLOIN Ol-X-97
R.J. LUNG FLOIN OS-11-Q4
HUNSAKER * ASSICIATES UASS GRADING PLAN CJWG. 4S6-7C
AND HC HUHSAKEH * ASSOCIATES ROUGH CRAOlNC f\jM (DRAWING NO 451-gA)CONTOURED INTERVALS: I'/S' FEET
tUMUFACTURED SLOPE- RATIOS SHALL X VAX I ABLE (2: I HAX).FINISHED GRACES ARE PER ROUGH GRADING PLAHS 451-0*.
SOILS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE tfQATED CEOIECHVICAL INVESTIGA
PfiCPiWED BY: GEOCON INC.. OATH* 00-31-01 t LFOATE LETTERS DATED 06-25-06
GRACED SWALES SHALL HAVE A UIHIUUH OF I* FLOW LIME GRADE AND AS SHOWN
ON GRADING PLAN OK 451-SA.
. ALL STREET DESIGNS. SWEET LICHT. AND FIRE HYDRANTS TO CCffORM
TO CITY OF CARLSBAD DESIGN STANDARDS AND AS REWIRED BY CITY ENGINEER
AND PROVItfD AS SHDiN OH ttfOOVEIfNT PLANS DWG 451-0
. LANDSCAPING AtO TREE PLANTING SHALL BE PEP nf CARLSBAD LANDSCAPE MANUAL
AMD THE VILLAGES OF LA COSTA MASTER PLAN. (SEE T}f tWSIEff LANDSCAPE FLANFOR Ttf OAKS) . AND PER LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED BY GILLE5PIE DESIGN
'. OL-Cf-SAC CURB GKAOCS SHALL BE A MINIUM Or ft.
i. THE SLBD1VIOER/DEVELOPER SHALL PPOVIEE AND INSTALL APPROVED STREET
LIGHT STANDARDS AND FIXTURES IN THE TYPE AND NUHBER APPROVED BY THE
Ctrr OF CARLSBAD. THE PUBLIC HOOKS OEPARTICNT - TRAFFIC SECTION ANDPER THE CITY'S STREET LICHT COHSTfUCTIOH STANMOK
STREET LIGHTS AS SHOtN ON THIS UAf ARE TO BE USED AS A OJIOE ONLY.SJTfET LIGHTS AS SHOiN ON THIS HAP ARE PER OK. 451-0 AND 429-70.
. THIS PUD ASSUCS CERTAIN BACKBONE INFRASTOLcnRE IS EXISTING OR
APPROVED AN) BONDED FOR TO THE SATISFACTION OF TfC CITY ENSINEER.THEY INCLUDE RANCHO SANTA FE ROAO AND A PORTION OF AYENIOA SOLS3AD
. WCRE NECESSUrr IN ORDER TO ICET THE 3' HtHlU* POSITIVE DRAINAGE ON
SIOETAPOS, DEEPENED FOOTINSS HILL BE UTILIZED AS ALLOKD PER GEOCON INCLETTER DATED J*N-C8-O6.
. ALL HfGOVEIfNTS AND GRADING ARE EXISTING PER llfROVBfNT AND GRADINGPLAWS 446-S AND 446-5*. RESPECTIVELY.
-. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A PRECISE GRADING PEKUIT OK Am BUILDING
PEWITS. THE EXISTING MFRDVEMEOT DRAWINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTION
CHVCCD TO SHOW THE RELOCATION OF ANY ORIVEBAYS, SEKR AND *ATER
LATERALS fllCH HAY CONFLICT WITH ANY CITY STANDARDS OR PROPOSED
NCS'CCNTML UNITS/DHIfWAYS.
I. ANY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES OR PORTIONS OF THE STRUCTURE INCLUDED BJT
NOT LIMITED TO DECKS/PATIOS/BALCONIES THAT ARE WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION
XXtS SHHJ- BE riff RATED AND tMCT CT IGNITION RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION.
. ALL LOTS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE AUTOMATIC flff SPRINKLERS.
PROPOSED EARfHEH SWAIE
PmPOSED TEHRACf ORMN
PROPOSED EASEUfHTUHE
PfKPOSfO VAmABLE 3.CPC (2:1 MAI
PROPOSED XOFORAK
EJffSWG SHE* MAN mrH IMNHOtf
OWNER
SAN OlECa. CA 9
(OSe) 490-2X30
APPLICANT
LC OAKS J. 7, LLC4747 UOREHA BOULEViSUITE IOOSAN DIEGO. CA 0211.(KB) 49O-2XO
PROPOSED PROJECT
BOUNDARY
EBSnW NUIDTMAW WIN fJHF H1DRAHT f-5L-
PMPOSni IMTR MAW MIH Offi HH»«r ^JTL(8" <ALE5S OJWRWSE HOTEO)
BOSONG HfCLAMKO *At& R"
CDSWC S « MAM SY51EU
;rwu DRAM svsm
A. IHLCT OK CATCH BASHB HCAOVULLC OEAMCVT
O RIPRAP (EJffKY aSSPATORj
= &, = «.
EMS7WC SWEET CENfEBWC fUV/UONS C23S.3J
PTOPOSED STKCT CCHTTXJHE ELEVATIONS 235.3
PTOPOSEO CONTOURS "^^^^^^"
EOSITMC STREET LIGHT -tjj-
PMPOSfD PUBLIC STREET USHT *—o
PWPOSEO PSTVATE S7WE7 UWf Q °
PROPOSOJ COWOHEH: otoss GVTwt _^77~^^'
PROPOSfn PROJECT. SCUM) OH V£W WALL —o ° °—
DSIREErPAkWC •^^.^B
UN. IS'XIS' PfAff YARD AREA
PROPOSED RETAINING **LL
£USTNG BETtMNG WALL
BOUNDARY ANNOTATION CALLOUT
PLAN TTPE
ELEVATION AND COLOR SCHEME
ORE RATED STRUCTURE
PROJECT MAP
PUBLIC UTILITIES AND DISTRICTS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
* COSFA OMS HXTH YILUUf 3.7 (CT OS-OS)
LOTS 1-43 OF THT CITY OF OWJBW TOKT CT OS-OS. VILLAGES OF LA
COSTA - LA COSTA OKS NORTH - fflGH3OHXD 3.7 IH TV CITY OF
OO.SBM). CON7T OF SfW DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCOVIfC TO HIP
— 13649 FILED IH Ttf OFFICf: OF TW SW 0/ECO COUMTY flEOWB? ON
VTB .1 9007 AS FILE tO. 3OOJ-07SOS74.
ABBREVIATIONS
Q
m
<U>
(FR)
OMftlCATItXG (AT*T)IEOO OAS MO BJXTHIC cartta
SAH OIEOUITO UNIOH HlOt SCHOOL OIST
ICIPM. WATER DISTRICT
KOJJUfO WAIBt
PREPARED BY:
HUNSAKER
Si ASSOCIATES
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. OfrO6(A)
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7
(LOTS 1-43 OF C.T. 06-06)
VILLAGES OF LA COSTACity Of Carlsbad, California
SHEET
1
OF
PUD 06-06(A)
PORTION OF SmOMONTILLA
Jt TO SCALE
smo ARAoo. smo CASTANO. a A POITTION OF smo MOKTIUA
SSSSS"
PB» OK «8-l
MX WC
PORTION OF AVENIDA SOLEDAD
CSEF SWEET won i. SHT ij
PORTION OF AVENIDA SOLEDAD
AVENIDA SOLEDAD
EXISTING STREET SECTIONS
f. urun toujoHS **e rtnc*.
WtOS OWMBE SHWW W PLW
2. ACR1M. STKUCTUML SCIMN TO X OEJCTWC3 ftUED
M WE V MI.K fESr. AWWJVO) flr THE air EWWOT
TYP/CU DRAINAGE SWALE DETAILS
omiciMys. soeff * w/>rCT LATERAL LOCATIONS ARE TOPICALAND SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE Nfnf Off SI/tNOARDS
AND AS APPLICABIF. LfUCAUA WMSJFWAJtR OSrWCT STANDARDS.AS SHOHN P£» orr DWC. 4-46-5.
PEW SOffSO P-?7.
WVElMy SHALL INCLUDE CROSS-FALL
TO SDf Of LOr WITH 0-27 DRAIN
TYPICAL LOT DRAINAGEAND LATERAL LOCATION DETAIL
(SET MOTE It) HTS
•ALLOHEO PER GEOCON INC. SOILS LETTER DAKD JAN-08-08
SEE SHEET I GENERAL OKKW-SfF PLAN NOTE / 15.
SttKWALK UNOERDRAIH PCR RCCIONAL STANDARD DRAtmCS
m± BE PRQVItXD ON CWt LOT PCR KTAIL 0-27
PREPARED BY:
HUNSAKER
Si ASSOCIATES
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMPT AMEND. 06-06(A)
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7
(LOTS 1-43 OF C.T. 06-06)
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA. City Of Cartsbad, California
SHEET
2
OF
6
PUD 06-06(A;
LOT TO SETBACK
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION'A'-TYPICAL
SCALE: I' . 10'
NOTE: AS LONG AS * 6.8' UIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED,THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
TOP OF SLOPESETBACK
LINE OF SIGHT
TOP Of SLOPE SETBACK SECTIONS-TYPICAL
SCALE: 1' - 10'
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 6.8' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.
THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION *C--TYPICAL
SCALE: I" - 10'
NOTE: AS LONG AS A S.B' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION TT - TYPICAL
SCALE: 1" - 10'
NOTE: AS LONG AS A B.8' MM. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
TOP OF SLOPE ,
SETBACK \ /
LINE OF SIGHT X '
LOT 13 SETBACK
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "F • TYPICAL
SCALE: T • 10'
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 14.1' UIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED,
THE TOP Of SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
'100' ACTUALLOT 16 SETBACK
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION *P-TYPICAL
SCALE: I' - 10'
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 6.8' UIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED,
THE TCP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK
SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK INDEX
PREPARED BY:
ARCHITECTURE SUMMARY
BUILDING COVERAGE SUMMARY
PARKING SUMMARY
REQLflREO PARKS*
trtSJTQR PARKNO
0
«IFORISTHUMTTS)
iFOflNEMIHNOUNRIj
SUBTOTAL
K
J
• 75
13. M
100
ILL arWMKD SMCES
•PER LA COST* VE.LAOE MASTER PLAN DEV. STANDARDS 4.tlC.4.h.
PROWDEDPARWK
BWOLEFAMtY
tsSspS!^
1
-TT
MtrVEW
K
177
r SPACE PER UMT.
HUNSAKER
&ASSOOATES
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. Ofr06(A)
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7
(LOTS 1-43 OF C.T. 06-06)
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
City Of Carbtaad, California
SHEET
3
or
6
PUD 06-06(A)
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION "Q" - TYPICAL
SCALE: T - 10'
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 66' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED,TH£ TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
TOP OF SLOPE
SETBACK
LINE OF SKHT
LOT 33 SETBACK
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION TT-TYPICAL
.OT '34 "SETBACK
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION T-TYPICAL
SCALE: I" - 10'
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 6 B MJN DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.
THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE WET.
TOP OF SLOPE
SETBACK
LHE OF SIGHT
SCALE: 1' - 10'
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 6.8* UIN, DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.THE TOP or SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
LOT 42 SETBACK
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION tJT - TYPICAL
SCALE: f - Iff
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 6.B' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED,
THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE WET.
LOT 40 SETBACK
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION TO-TYPICAL
SCALE: I' - Iff
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 6.8' WIN. DISTANCE IS 1MJN TAMED.THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION tf-TYPICAL
SCALE: f - 10'
NOTE: AS LONG AS A B.fl' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED,
THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
f TOP OF SLOPE
\ / SETBACK
LINE OF SKHT
OT41 SETBACK
TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK SECTION V- TYPICAL
SCALE: 1" - 10'
NOTE: AS LONG AS A 16.8' MIN. DISTANCE IS MAINTAINED.THE TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK
SLOPE EDGE BUILDING SETBACK INDEX
HUNSAKER
&ASSOOATES
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. OW6(A)
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7
(LOTS 1-43 OF C.T. 06-06)
VILLAGES OF LA COSTACity Of Carlsbad, California
SHEET
4
OF
6
PUD 06-06(A)
ssizsgm?;
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7
(LOTS 1-43)
PLAN TYPE
1A
1B
1C
2A
28
2C
3A
3B
3C
ELEVATION STVLE
SPANISH
SANTA BARBARA
TUSCAN
SPANISH
SANTA BARBARA
TUSCAN
SPANISH
SANTA BARBARA
TUSCAN
PREPARED BY:
HUNSAKER&ASSOCIATES
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. Ofr06(A)
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7
(LOTS 1-43 OF C.T. 06-06)
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
City Of Carlsbad. California
SHEET
5
OF
6
PUD 06-06(A)
/// yi> /—wirtwirai ts^ivimivt-//// A / MAP BOUNDAm//, /7"°'"" ™~«'"Ze> /
' %7w%ffi7%%%fo%%%^^
PORTIONS OF AN IRREVOCABLE OtTTR Of DEDICATIONFOfl PUBLIC IR*L DEDICATED PO? 1W NO. 15318.
A PORTION Or AW CASCUCNT FOR 08AINAGC PURPOSCS TO THE
CITY OF C-WLSSA0 PER HAP NO. 15318.
A AN e»so*c«r nw iwns i/«£S. IHGRCSS AND CCRCSS flaw/C\ PURPOSES GRANTED TO S*W UMCOS COUWTY IMfn? DfSlMCrSCPTUEBCR 23, 1980, AS HIT *0- aO-J0850f.
nif wo. 81-^66030. BOTH or OFFICIAL RECORDS.
DISTRICT BY DOCUMENT RECORDED JUNE e. 1990 AS ru NO. X-SQJSSO or OFFICIALRECORDS.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMEND. OM6(A)
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7
(LOTS 1-43 OF C.T. 06-06)
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
AN CASEUENT or RIGHT OF WAY GRANTED TO SAN tweo c*s * ELECTRIC Bt OOCUUEHRECORDED OCTOBER 20. 1SS8 IN BOOK 7X7. PAGE X4 OF OFFKUL RECORDS.
i^tjWlST^7
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7
ELEVATION STYLES
(LOTS 1-43)
g|gj PLAN 1A-SPANISH
jaaj PLAN 1B- SANTA BARBARA
| | PLAN 1C-TUSCAN
| | PLAN 2A-SPANISH
|jg^3 PLAN 28- SANTA BARBARA
Eg PLAN2C-TUSCAN
| | PLAN 3A-SPANISH
Igjgj PLAN 3B - SANTA BARBARA
CaJl PLAN3C-TUSCAN
SPLIT FACE PILASTER
SPLIT FACE MASONRY MALL
TUBE STEEL FENCE
WOOD FENCE
FIRE RESISTANT WOOD FENCE
SPLIT FACE MASONRY WALL
fMASTER BUILDERJ
WOOD FENCE RETURN —
("APPROXIMATE LOCATION ONLY;
FIRE RESISTANT WOOD -.— —-—
FENCE RETURN
("APPROXIMATE LOCATION ONLYJ
NOTE:
ALL SIDE YARD FENCES SHALL NOT ENCROACH ONFRONT YARD SETBACK.
LOT NUMBER AND PAD ELEVATION
<SL> ELEVATIONS STYLE AND COLOR SCHEME
' , SETBACK DIMENSION TO OARAGE
SETBACK DIMENSION TO PORCH/PATIO
OR DECK
;-'•••! SETBACK DIMENSION TO LIVABLE
SITE SUMMARY
PLAN 1 -12PLAN 2 -16
PLAN 3-15
TOTAL-43
PREPARED BY:
HUNSAKERI Si ASSOCIATES
FENCING PLAN
LA COSTA OAKS NORTH
NEIGHBORHOODS 3.7
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
City Of Carlsbad, California
TOT LOT PLAY STRUCTURE.
« FALL ZONE, SEE DETAIL
ARMY <SREEN' RUBERIZED RESILIENT SURFACING
INTERLOCKING PAVERS
SITE BENCH
DECORATIVE BOULDERS
TREE 4 SHRUB PLANTINGS
ARE PER APPROVED
GUEST BUILDER PLANS
(DWGO-4SI-6LJ
PARKWAY PLANTINe
SEATWALL1
OTrTSTM.
ENHANCED CONCRETE
PAVING
KETMAP
GARDEN FOCAL POINT
SITE BENCH
INTERLOCKING PAVERS
RECREATION AREA
ENTRANCE
CONCRETE MOW CURB
TREE PLANTINGS ARE PER
APPROVED SUEST BUILDER PLANS
-PLANTINS GRAYED BACK PER APPROVED GUEST BUILDER LANDSCAPE PLANS
(VMS* 451-CU.
-LIMIT OF WORK INDICATES PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS TO APPROVED GUEST
BUILDER LANDSCAPE PLANS (DW6» 491-CU. WORK INCLUDES THE ADDITION OF A
CHILDRENS TOT LOT, SEATING AREA W/ ENHACED PAVERS, ADA ACCESS WALK,
DECORATIVE BOULDERS, ADDITIONAL PLANTING AND REVISED MOW CURB
LOCATION. ALL WORK OUTSIDE THE LIMIT OF WORK IS PER THE APPROVED SUEST
BUILDER LANDSCAPE PLANS.
SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING LEgENP
TREE PLANTIN6S
ARE PER APPROVED
SUEST BUILDER PLANS
<bws*45i-eu
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CORNER CLEAR
ZONE
PLAY STRUCTURE DETAIL
TREE 4 SHRUB PLANTINGS ARE PER
APPROVED SUEST BUILDER PLANS
-ENHANCED CONCRETE
PAVING
ARMY GREEN
-SLIDE, LADDER, ROOF 4
RAILINGS SHALL BE
•EVERSREEN'
PLAY STRUCTURE PERSPECTIVE
CORNER CLEAR ZONE
CALTRANS SIGHT-
DISTANCE LINE
- STRUCTURE POSTS 4
PLATFORMS SHALL
BE TAN'
SHKIJBS BOTANICAL NAfg/CATgi&ORTVPgSC. COMMON NAME SIZE SPACIKS
OSTUS X PURFWEU3
ROSMARJHB BOU.IN6HOOD IN6RAH
AS/WE ATTBtMA NOVA'
COUJNSMOOP ROSEMARf
eUC FOX TA1 ASAVE
5 SAL, I0« 3' 0£.
5 SAL. IOOX 6' 0£.
56AL.IOO* 3'0£.
5 SAL, ICO* S'0£.
COMMUNITY PAf^K SITE LA COSTA OAKS
NEIGHBORHOOD 3.7
PARK SITE, PUD 06-06 (A)
VILLAGES OF LA COSTA
City Of Carlsbad, California
LA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.7
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
'JUNE 3. loos
*
SECOND PLOOR PLAN 'A'
LA COSTA OAKS 3.7
PLAN ONE 1,913 SQ.FT.
COLR1CH COMMUNITIES
FIRST PLOOR PLAN 'A1
DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON RAIL
DECORATIVE TILE VENT
DECORATIVE RMM SHUTTER MY
IXSSGUTLOOKEHSSTUCCODFCORATIVF. WOOD TRFLLISMETAL ROLL UP GARAGE DOOR
LEFT felDB ELEVATION 'A1 SPANISH COLONIALPROMT BLBVATIOM 'A'
PLAN ONE - SPANISHLA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.7
COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
:>N 'Ap uIH HOA1ON DATED 1
SlfiHT 6IDB BLBVATIOM 'A'RSAg ELEVATION 'A'
-6BCOSP PLOOR PLAN 'B'PIB6T PLOOB PLAN '
W» ML fT.4M*A.rr.
LA COSTA OAKS 3.7
PLAN ONE 1,913 SQ.FT.
COLRICH COMMUNITIES
DECORATIVE CHIMNEY CAPDt-rORATIVE STUCCO CORBELDECORATIVE TILE VENTDECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON RAILPRE-CAST SURftOUNDCONCRETE TTLE ROOFDECORATIVE FOAM SHUTTER W/WI CUP2X RS OUTLOOKStSSTUCCO— I. ROLL UP O ARAOE DOOR
LEFT 6IDE ELEVATIOM 'B'PROMT ELEVATION 'B1
J'USE COLOR SCHRMES3ARDS PROVIDED BY
4
2l(SWT BIDB
PLAN ONE- SANTA BARBARALA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.7COLRICH DEVELOPMENT
F1B6T FLOOR PLAN
LA COSTA OAKS 3.7
PLAN ONE 1,913 SQ.FT.
COLRiCH COMMUNITIES
KJS"'iVVf
DECORATIVE CHIMNEY CAP
/ATIOM 'C1 JT ELEVATION 'G
VENEERSTL1CCODECORATIVE STUCCO CORBEL
BRICK VENEERMETAL ROLL UP GARAGE DOOR
4
RkSMT fetPB BLBVATIQM 'g'REAR ELEVATiOM
PLAN ONE - TUSCANLA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.7
COLKICH DP VFLGPJWEVT
PLANE ONE
PLANE THREE
- PLANE TWO
-PLANE THREE
ROOF PLAN 'C'ROOF PLAN 'B.'PLAN 'A'
PLAN ONELA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.7
COLRirH nrVFLOPMENT
BRAR BLR\xATlrtVl 'f" 111/REAR ELEVATION 'B,1 UJ/BBOK OPTlOKl
PLAN ONE - TUSCANLA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.7
OH.R1CH DFVHLOPMFNT
n
FLOOR PLAN 'A'
4
4
PlR&T PLOOR PLAM 'A'
•GewnecM- 1*4 ML FT.
LA COSTA OAKS 3.7
PLAN TWO 2,11850. FT.
COLRICH COMMUNITIES
DECORATIVE CHIMNEY CAP-
CONCRETE ROOF
DECOR VTIVE TILE SURROUND
STUCCO-EXTERIOR
1 AlDB ELEVATIOK1 'A1
4
Slai-IT -SlDB BLBVATlOW 'A1 REAR ELEVATION 'A'
PLAN TWO - SPANISH
n t
FLOOR PLAN! 'B'NR6T FLOOR PLAN 'B1
TOTAU. 30 •& PT.H3 ML PT.
V*» ML PT.
LA COSTA OAKS 3.7
PLAN TWO 2,118 SQ.FT.
COLRICH COMMUNITIES
LEFT SIDE BLBVATION 'B1
Rlfil-IT SIDE HLBVATlOKI REAR BLBVATION 'B,1
PLAN TWO - SANTA BARBARALA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.7COLRICH DFVF.LOPMFNT
n
n
n
-6BCOND PLOOR PLAM 'C'PLOOB PLAN 'C'
LA COSTA OAKS 3.7
PLAN TWO 2,118 SQ.FT.
COLRICH COMMUNITIES
UEPT 6IPB gLBVATIQM 'C'
FINISH GRADE
PLAN TWO - TUSCANLA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.7
FORELEVATTONTI7-9PER COLOR BOA—.,..ANN MATTESON DATED 1-:
RltSHT &IPB BLBVATlOM 'g'LA.B BLBN/ATlOM 'fi1
PLANE ONE
PLANE TWO
•PLANE THREE
KOOP PUMM 'C'ROOF PLAN '&'ROOF PLAN 'A'
D ruwn w. M A RKarr e^ nvr rue* *r..
PLANE THREE
PLANE TWO
SI_fe\yATlOM 'PV fiLEVATlOW 'A' UJ/
PLAN TWO-TUSCANLA COSTA OAKS
i i
CD C3
•SECOND FLOOR PLAN 'A'
*
PlRftT FLOOR PLAN 'A'
LA COSTA OAKS 3.7
Plan 3 2,467 Sq. FL
COLRICH COMMUNITIES
DECORATIVE TILE VENTDECORATIVE TILE SURROUNDCONCRETE TILE ROOFSTUCCODECORATIVE STUCCO RECESS W/ WROUGHT IRON' ~TAL ROLL UP GARAGE DOOR__'ORAT1VE FOAM SHUUTER W/ W.I. CUPIX HS OUTI.OOKERS
LEPT SIDE BLBVATlOM 'A1 6PASJI6H COLONIALPROMT BLBVATlOM 'A'
IDE BLBVATlOM 'A1 SAB BLBVATlOM 'A1
PLAN THREE-SPANISHLA COSTA OAKS
PLANNING AREA 3.7COLRICH DFVRLOPMRNT
u L
6BCOMD PLCOR PLAN 'B.1 BlBftT ZLOOS PLASJ
LA COSTA OAKS 3.7
Plan3 2,467 Sq. Ft.
COLR7CH COMMUNITIES
LEFT &1PB ELEVATION 'B'6ASJTA BARBARAPROSIT BLBVATIOM 'B1
TE TILE ROOFLJTLOOKERSMETAL ROI-L UP GABAOE POORDECORATIVE FOAM SHUTTER W/W.I.
DECORATIVE TILE VENT
LEVATlOM RBAR BLBVATlOM 'B'
PLAN THREE - SANTA BARBARA
PLANNING AREA 3-7COLRtCH DEVELOPMENT
i
n n
SECOND PLOOR PLAN 'C'
LA COSTA OAKS 3.7
Plan 3 2,467 Sq. FL
COLRICH COMMUNITIES
PlR&T PLOOR PLAN 'C'
*
4
LBPT SIDE BLBVATlOM TUSCANPROMT Bl
DfiCOR ATTVE niTMNEY CAPDECORATIVE STUCCO CORBELBRICK VENEER
METAL ROLL UP GARAGE DOORDECOR ATTVE STUCCO CORBEL
LEvATlOM
RiaHT -6IDB BLBVATIOM
PLAN THREE - TUSCANLA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.7COLHICH ORVRLOPMENT
ROOf FLAM 'C'
PLANE THREE
PLANE THREE
PLANE TWO I
PLANE TWO
PLANE THREE
PLANE THREE
PLANE TWO J
PLANE ONE
rnp*rnjeoK*r. •
ROOP PLAN '&'
PLAN THREELA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.7
COLRICH [>RVFU>PMENT
PLANE THREE
PLANE THREE
•
PLANE ONE
ROOP PLAN 'A'
5AS ELEVATlOM 'G1 U/DBCIi OPTIOM
PLAN THREE - TUSCANLA COSTA OAKSPLANNING AREA 3.7
COLRIC7H DEVfiLOPMl:NT