The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPUD 06-14A; Robertson Ranch PA 18; Planned Development - Major Subdivision (PD) (2)• • CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION FORM FOR CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION APPLICATION CITY USE ONLY Project Number: CJ:) 11--1 I PROJECTNAME: LAfl#eL@ tl{t? n,1ll/u5; _A-KA ~~.v ~ ~(. Asse•or'sParceiNumber(s): »J-!Yt?.e ,.=-1#.4--t-11fA? Cro-/-¢;u J?l/.iJ. O'te-t..Yl/4) Description of proposal (add attachment if necessary): ,J? C?/tJ €.iL_ ,4~tet'I,Fre.<:-rvd-6 11'1 -svBsfivvrttrv C<?Nf??~A-tfrd; ~n?t ?~ZeV/Ou">l...'1 APPvb. Ar'l.Yff t rcc.:[V.LE:- v '# tt::-0'-/~t?ll..IVIA e.G w . "i??Ltc't 44., (,& .... rA&u::-._:· ALfcJ I'1A o IH#Vd/L 'l..4fJ7iN~ .y £.{.,61/_A-11?/1/ "f:,V/S/C:W) · Would you keto orally present your propos81 to your assigned staff planner/engineer? Yes 0 No ~ Please list the staff members you have previously spoken to regarding this project. If none, please so state. C.rHL\~ (~!L(LtA, DoN Neu <l-Ctt&s Dt;:.e__~ OWNER NAME (Print): ·1)"'-"S..-.~..~tW~tt ..... Tnu.NDL------------ MAILINGADDRESS: z.z..WtJ.4rtVl/JO CittCL£;, 5~ /C() CITY, STATE, ZIP: C..ot-o~A-, CA q')....ytQ TELEPHONE: Cft"}-2-i-)-.-"[ 006 EMAIL ADDRESS: t;::A tfl$J?&~DRrto\2..'1orJ. ~M *Owner's signature lndlcat.M pennlssion to conduct a preliminary review for a development proposal. I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ~6/ll DATE APPLICANrS REPRESENTATIVE (Print): MAILING ADDRESS: APPLICANT NAME (Print): IG;tt-r /fv~?J6BtA< MAILING ADDRESS: .... fc_'tl.;;.~...:.t_.n:..o.I4_.Vi_'()....:.C.._.'f.~· ------ CITY, sTATE, ZIP: 51-lcl MA~tc.os. 01 q;wJK > TELEPHONE: "tfgo-ts:<l (p-LJ O(f EMAIL ADDRESS: ;:A lfv.~'Qy?__ t/po_I()AJ. ~V'"\. ----------~--~~~--------------------------------------CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL ADDRESS: I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND COV5TTOTH~DG~./ ~~~ =1/t/ic SIGNATURE ..,..DA,;..:,TE~-- JUL 0 5 2011 CITY OF CARLSBAD FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEEP~: _,(,0c pi) RECEIVED ev: Gbr/..L.s~i£:;;..,;oo~.,...;;,__"'_i_d-..-_______________________ _ P-16 Page2 of2 Revised 07/10 e e CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPT. USE ON\. Y) (FOR DEPT. USE ONL Yl D Administrative Permit [] Planned Development Permit PUD o'tt!A Amendment D Administrative Variance D Planned Industrial Permit D Coastal Development Permit D Planning Commission Determination D Conditional Use Permit 0 Precise Develop~ent Plan D Condominium Permit D Redevelopment Permit D Environmental Impact Assessment 0 Site Development Plan D General Plan Amendment 0 Special Use Permit D Habitat Manag·ement Plan Permit ·o Specific Plan D D +eRlalitJe PaR~el Map Hillside Development Permit Obtain from Engineering Department D Local Coastal Program Amendment D Tentative Tract Map D Master Plan 0 Variance D Minor Conditional Use Permit 0 Zone Change '· D Non-ResidenUal. Planned Development D List other appll9atlons not soecified 2) 3) 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 168-050-47 PROJECT NAME: PA 18 Robertson Rcinch PUD 06-i 4 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 6) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) Calavera Hills II, LLC MAILING ADDRESS 2750 Womble Road CITY AND STATE ZIP San Diego, CA 92106 EMAIL ADDRESS: 110 lots on Planning Area 18 within Robertson Ranch 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) Calavera Hills II, LLC MAILING ADDRESS 2750 Womble Road TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE (619)794-1286 (619)794-1286 DATE ' San Diego, CA 92106 EMAIL ADDRESS: · ates@mcmillin. com I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATNE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ASOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ! j t:7;o7 N : A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLIC ONS FILED, MUST BE SUBMmED PRIOR TO 3:30P.M. / PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPUCATION E F , MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00P.M. Form 14 Rev. 06101 PAGE 1 OF 4 I, • 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Portions of Lots D & E of Rancho Agua Hedionda, City of Carlsbad County of San Diego, State of CA, Map No 823, November 16, 1896 6) LOCATION OF PROJECT: Robertson Ranch Planning Area 18 9) STREET ADDRESS ON THE l North I SIDE OF I Cannon Rd. (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) INAME OF STREETI BETWEEN r El Camjno Real (NAME OF STREET) AND I College' Blvd. !NAME OF STREETI IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. 1/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. 10) PROPERTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES AND CONSENTS TO A NOTICE OF RESTRICTION FILED ON THE PROPERTY TITLE IF CONDITIONED FOR THE APPLICANT. CERTAIN APPROVALS (SUCH AS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) RUN WITH THE LAND AND SINO ANY SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. WNER SIGNATURE FOR Form 14 Rev. 06107 AUG 3:12007 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING OI==PT DATE STAMP APPLICATIOJrnECEIVEO RECEIVED BY: PAGE 2 OF4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: PA 18 PUD Amendment APPLICANT NAME: Calavera Hills II, LLC Please d~scribe fully the proposed project by application type. lnciude any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: The proposed project involves the approval of architectural design for 110 existing single family lots within Planning Area 18 of the Robertson Ranch East Village. The architecture proposed involves four floor plans. Plan One contains a 1,992 sf floor area in a single story plan. Plan One X is 2,504 sf, with a primarily single story, plus partial bonus second story. Plan Two contains 2,822 sf in a two story design. And Plan Three contains 2,932 sf in a two story design. All four product types allow for a Spanish, Province or Tuscan elevation style. Project Description 1 0/96 Page 1 of 1 ·. e City e of Carlsbad IQFI.i ,Ji.C.M •A§ ·till, .t§ hi DISCLOSURE.STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, flilll, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a cm:poration or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS 0\VN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publicly-owned corooration. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) ~~E. A'TTACH(.D Person Corp/Part See attached Title ___________ _ Title ______________ _ Address __________ _ Address _______________ _ 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned corporation. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) ~ ~af~O Person ___________ _ Corp/Part ___ s_e_e_a_t_t_a_ch_e_d _______ _ Title, ___________ _ Title. _______________ __ Address __________ _ Address _________________ _ 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 @ e 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a l:n.!st, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. NonProfiVTrust ______________ __ Non ProfiVTrust _________ _ Title. _____________ _ -Title ______________ _ Address __________ _ Address. _______________ _____ 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twel~~ (12) months? D Yes ~No If yes, please indicate person(s): ____________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my lmowledge. L___ Printorcypenmneofown~ Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 1. Applicant 2. Owner Disclosure Statement Calavera Hills ll, LLC 2750 Womble Road San Diego, CA 92106 N/A McMillin Companies, LLC 2750 Womble Road San Diego, CA 92106 N/A Brookfield Tamarack, LLC 12865 Pointe Del Mar Del Mar, CA 92014 N/A Calavera Hills ll, LLC 2750 Womble Road San Diego, CA 92106 Joint Venture between McMillin Companies, LLC and Brookfield Tamarak, LLC N/A McMillin Companies, LLCI, LLC 2750 Womble Road San Diego, CA 92106 Joint Venture with Brookfield Tamarak, LLC N/A Brookfield Tamarack, LLC 12865 Pointe Del Mar Del Mar, CA 92014 Joint Venture with McMillin Companies, LLC N/A ..... ·. ····-·.·.· • _(l __ £....;:;;.._.;...i ....;t;;...,y,__o~· ....;fl•millrzPa1a•l•·mffa.ltr!l•o!t~,in.smP~:am•·a~,~;m~m• DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership inter8st8 on al appDcalfona which wil require • di actlon on the part of the Councll or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following Information MUST be disclosed at the time rl application submiUal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this Information Is wmpleted. Please print. 1. APPUCANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addreasea of & persons havk1g a financial k1terest In the application. If the applicant Includes a corporation or oartnersiJip. Include the names. tllle, addresses d all lndlvlduals owning more than -10% of the shares. If NO INDMDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THe SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPliCABLE (NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a oublcly-owned corporation. Include the names, titles, and addresses d lhe corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached If necessary.) Person B~ookfield Tamarack LLC Corp/Part. __ N_/ A _______ _ n~ ~----------------------Addrase Address. __________ _ ~ o~~~·~·~~Q Provide the COMPbETE. LEGAb names and addresses of & persona having artJ ownerahip· Interest In the property invoiY&CI. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (I.e, partnership, tenants In common, non-profit. corporation, etc.). If lhe ownenshfp Includes a comoratlon or oartnerahip. Include lhe names, title, acfdresees of afJ Individuals owning more Ulan 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE 1liAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPUCABLE (NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW. Jf a oubJic!y-owned corporation, lnc:lude the names, tiUes, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A .separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Calavera Hills II LLC N/A ~m·------------------True~-----------------n~---------------------- ~~·----------------Add~·-------------------- 1&35 Faraday Av11nUe • C.rlablld, CA 92008-7314 • (760)602-4&00 • FAX (760) B02-aSS8 • www.cl.carllbacl.ca.us * •• • 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZA TJON OR TRUST lf any person Identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust. 1st the names and addresses of MJ! person serving as an officer or cr.-ector of the non-profit organization or as trustee or benefiCiary of Uie. Non Prof&t/Trust Non ProfiVTrust.__ ______ _ TWe T~·---------------------- ~ Addn.s~------------------- 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of businesa tranaacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Courd within the past twelve (12} months? 0 Yes ~No If yes, please lncicate person(s):. _______ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets If necessary. I certify that al the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ateE.Dale G eed, VP By: okfield Tamarack LLC, Member Calavera Hills II LLC Print or type name of owner Print or type name of appflcant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if appRcableldate Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMINICOUNTER\OSURE STATEMENT 12106 Page2of2 • • CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION (Calavera HiJls II LLC) . WHEREAS, Brookfield Tamarack LLC, a Delaware limited liability 'company e'Brookfield"), and McMillin Companies, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("McMillin"), were the members of the Company, and WHEREAS, McMillin was the managing member of the Company and has been executing any and all documents, agreements and any addenda and amendments thereto ("Documents"), and WHEREAS, it is the best interest of the Company for McMillin to transfer management and to sell its membership interest in the Company to Brookfield; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Company authorizes Brookfield to execute all Documents including any addenda and amendments thereto, which shall bind the Company in all such respects. RESOLVED FURTHER, that the officers of Brookfield are, and each officer individually is, hereby authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Company as the Managing and sole member of the LLC, to take or cause to be taken, any and all actions not inconsistent with these resolutions, including without limitation, the approval, negotiation, execution, acknowledgment, filing, amendment and delivery of any and all papers, certificat-es, agreements and documents as such officer may deem necessary or advisable to carry out the purposes and intent of the foregoing resolutions. RESOLVED FURTHER, that all actions taken and all instruments, documents and agreements executed by the officers or authorized representatives of the Company prior to the date of adoption of the foregoing resolutions are, in all respects, authorized, approved and ratified as acts and deeds of this Company. The undersigned Member hereby certifies that the execution and delivery by the Company of the transactions described in these Resolutions will not result in any breach, violation or default under, or be in· conflict with, any of the terms and provisions of the governing documents of the Company, or any other contracts, agreements or other obligations of the Company. The undersigned Member hereby certify that no consent, approval or authorization of any governmental authorities is required in connection with the execution and delivery of the documents relating to the transactions described in the Resolution. • • This is to certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by Calavera Hills II LLC, a California limited liability company, on the 22nd day of April, 2008, and that such resolution is still in ful1 force and effect unamended. In witnC1SS whereof, I have hereunto signed my name as Secretary of Brookfield Tamarack LLC, managfug and sole member ofCalavera Hills II LLC, this 22nd day of April, 2008. • • CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION (Brookfield Tamarack LLC) ELECTION OF OFFICERS {; RESOLVED, that the following persons are duly elected to serve as the officers of the Company by the Board of Managers or until the election and qualification of their respective successors or their earlier resignation or removal: STEPHEN P. DOYLE LARRY N. CORTES E. DALE GLEED DAVID R. POOLE ELIZABETH ZEPEDA WILLIAM B. SEITH R. CASEY SCHNOOR President Chief Financial Officer and Vice President Vice President Vice President Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Acceptance of each Officer is attached hereto as EXHIBIT "A". RESOLVED FURTHER, that except when otherwise authorized or directed by the Board of Managers, or by law, the officers of the Company are authorized to execute, acknowledge and deliver any and all instruments of writing, including but not limited to, subdivision maps, contracts, agreements for purchase and sale, leases, deeds, notes, security instruments and such other documentation necessary or appropriate in the ordinary course of business ofthe Company. Unless specifically authorized by the Board of Managers to the contrary, any and all subdivision maps, contracts, agreements for purchase and sale,. leases, deeds, notes, loan agreements, partnership agreements and security instruments, other than contracts involving amounts of Jess than $100,000 and deeds for the sale of a single family residence, shall require the signature of two officers of the Company. RESOLVED FURTHER, that no contract or obligation involving the transfer of a substantial right in any major asset of the Company shall be signed without prior approval of the Board of Managers or any committee thereof duly authorized to give such approval. This is to certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Managers of Brookfield Tamarack LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on the 14th day of March, 2008, and that such resolution is still in full force and effect unamended. In witness whereof, I have hereunto signed my name as Secretary of Brookfield Tamarack LLC, this 22nd day of April, 2008. )') .. ~~~ Elizabeth Zepeda, Secretary j ' ' I • City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 I ~111111 ~~1111~~1 ~II 11~11~11111~~ ~I! 1111 ~~ Applicant: CALAVERA HILLS II L L C Description Amount PUD0614A 2424 CANNON RD CBAD Receipt Number: R0066274 Transaction ID: R0066274 Transaction Date: 08/31/2007 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check Transaction Amount: 7,200.00 .. PROOF OF PUBLICATION {2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times- Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: September osth, 2008 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at OCEANSIDE, California Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising This space is !llounty Qerk's Rling Stamp Proof of Publicatioil of 1Nv5 !. Olli4ENS10NS AU:)I :&. OIST. SEE S.Jll. M,>P 1 . ! I AC ~ SHT1 POR LOT L RECEIVED SEP 0 2 2008 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT I • City ~a •0 O(or·t'l.. FILE COPY of 3·11·0~ Carlsbad IQfbhhlb~I•J§.fblllel§bl EARLY PUBLIC NOTICE PROJECT NAME: Robertson Ranch PA's 16, 17 and 18 PROJECT NUMBER: PUD 06-12(A)/PUD 06-13(A)/PUD 06-14(A) This early public notice is to let you know that development applications for the plotting and architecture of 314 single-family residences near your neighborhood were submitted to the City of Carlsbad on August 31, 2007. The project applications are undergoing initial review by the City. LOCATION: North side of Cannon Road, west of College Boulevard and east of future Wind Trail Way. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The development proposals are for the plotting and architectural review of 314 single-family residences located within a 73.45 acre site identified as Planning Areas (PA) 16, 17 and 18 of the East Village of Robertson Ranch. The tentative tract map for the site (CT 04-26), which was previously approved, created 314 residential lots that have a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf, with the exception of lots adjacent to Cannon Road which may have a minimum lot size of 4,500 sf. Each Planning Area includes four unique floor plans and three architectural styles as outlined on the following page. The conceptual plotting plan and floor plans of the residences are available for review at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department. Please keep in mind that this is an early public notice and that the project design could change as a result of further staff and public review. A future public hearing notice will be mailed to you when this project is scheduled for public hearing before the Planning Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION: If you have questions or comments regarding this proposed project please contact Barbara Kennedy, Associate Planner at bkenn@ci.carlsbad.ca.us, (760) 602-4626, City of Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. I 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • {760) 602-4600 • FAX {760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!} CITY OF CARLSBAD • REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE : JULY 6, 2011 PROJECT NO(S): _.::\Cc::__··o:t_l_l_-1.-:1 _____________ REVIEW NO: c l _l PROJECT TITLE: LAUREL@ THE FOOTHILLS PA 18 APPLICANT: KURT HUBBELL/DR HORTON TO: ~ and Development Engineering-Terie Rowley D Police Department-J. Sa sway D Fire Department-Greg Ryan 0 Building Department-Will Foss 0 Recreation -Mark Steyaert 0 Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque 0 Water/Sewer District 0 Landscape Plancheck Consultant-PELA 0 School District 0 North County Transit District-Planning Department 0 Sempra Energy-Land Management 0 Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) D Parks/Trails-Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM : PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the NNINGTRACKING DESK in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 7Z6711. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Thank you COM M ENTS: __ ----""~C!..:'V74fi~n=at:::IL-L-/ !..!!O~J---~..:..=~-"'nQ~---=Ce:;;._;:_;_~_;__.:..;_:_:........:...• ------ Signature Date PLANS ATIACHED Review & Comment 03/10 • city of Carlsbad Engineering Development Services August 7, 2008 To: Barbara Kennedy, Project Planner From: Jeremy Riddle, Project Engineer SUBJECT: ROBERTSON RANCH PA 18, PUD 06-14(A) The Engineering Department has completed its review of the project. The Engineering Department is recommending that the project be approved, subject to the following conditions: Engineering Conditions NOTE: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the approval of this proposed development, must be met prior to approval of a building or grading permit whichever occurs first. General 1. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. 2. Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections and driveways in accordance with City Engineering Standards and City Landscape Manual. Grading 3. Supplemental grading plans are required for precise grading associated with this project. Developer shall prepare, and submit for approval, grading plans for the precise grading as shown on the Site Plan all subject to City Engineer approval. 4. Developer shall apply for and obtain a grading permit from the City Engineer. Developer shall pay all applicable grading permit fees per the City's latest fee schedule and shall post security per City Code requirements. 5. Developer shall comply with the City's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices C:\DOCUME-1\Bkenn\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\Conditions-of-Approval PUD 06-14Adoc Page: 1 • include but are not limited to pollution treatment practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements. 6. Developer shall complete and submit to the City Engineer a Project Threat Assessment Form (PT AF) pursuant to City Engineering Standards. Concurrent with the PTAF, Developer shall also submit the appropriate Tier level Storm Water Compliance form and Tier level Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as determined by the completed PTAF all to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. Developer shall incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) design techniques, on all final design plans submitted to the City, to reduce the amount of run-off by mimicking the natural hydrologic function of the site by preserving natural open- spaces and natural drainage channels, minimizing impervious surfaces, promoting infiltration and evaporation of run-off before run-off leaves the site. Developer shall incorporate LID techniques using current County of San Diego Low Impact Development Handbook (Stormwater Management Strategies). LID techniques include, but are not limited to: vegetated swale/strip, rain gardens, and porous pavement, which can greatly reduce the volume, peak flow rate, velocity and pollutants. Code Reminders The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the following: 9. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section 13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor area contained in the staff report and shown on the Site Plan are for planning purposes only. C :\DOCUME-1 \Bkenn\LOCALS-1 \Temp\XPgrpwise\Conditions-of-Approva1 PUD 06-14A.doc Page: 2 • May 11,2008 TO: Barbara Kennedy, Associate Planner Michele Masterson, Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist • FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review -Conceptual Review -1st Review Robertson Ranch PA 18, PUD06-14A Robertson Ranch PELA file: 332 -Robertson Ranch PA18 -Coni Landscape Architect: GMP, Phone: (858) 558-8977 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. 1. Architectural plans provide for 3 themes (Mission, English Country and Italian Tuscany) on each of the different architectural plans. Landscape plans provide one theme plan for each of 4 architectural house plans. It is recommended that the plants proposed for each of the 3 themes be used to coordinate with the particular architectural theme as appropriate. It is assumed this is the applicant's intent. Please clarify the intent with a note on the plans. See comment number 5 below. If to be maintained by an HOA, concept plans are needed per the Landscape Manual. 2. Please indicate where the accent vines are to be used. 3. Please relocate note as appropriate. 4. Please show the planting bed outline edge below the tree. 5. Please indicate who will be responsible for maintenance of the front yards. Is this to be homeowner or HOA maintained? 6. Please provide general notes for the irrigation design. Address hydrozones, provide a written description of water conservation features including addressing xeriscape principles, overspray, weather controls, etc. 7. RETURN RED LINES and provide 2 copies of all plans for the next submittal PROJECT NAME: Date: ----·-------- CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Protection Services PLAN REVIEW REPORT Robertson Ranch PA 18 05/28/08 Project Number: Planning: PUD 06-14A Staff Planner: B. Kennedy Engineer: Initial review: (Note: This commentary identifies fire protection issues associated with the project, and/or prescribes specific corrections or information needed to achieve Fire Department approval.) Fire department has reviewed this project submittal and has no comments or conditions for approval. GR July 14, 2008 TO: • Barbara Kennedy, Associate Planner Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist • FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review -Conceptual Review -2nd Review Robertson Ranch PA 18, PUD06-14A Robertson Ranch PELA file: 332-Robertson Ranch PA18-Con2 Landscape Architect: GMP, Phone: (858) 558-8977 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. REPEAT COMMENTS 1-6 Completed. 7. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans for the next submittal. NEW COMMENTS 1A. Please revise mulch to a 3" layer (typical all notes). • • Memorandum Date: June 25, 2008 To: Barbara Kennedy City of Carlsbad's Planning From: James Reviczky -Project Manager Gillespie Moody Patterson, Inc. Re: Robertson Ranch East Village P A-18 Job No. 08-058 (PUD 06-14(A)) Planning a.) Consolidate the conceptual landscape plans on fewer sheets, if possible, by deleting the colored photographs and reducing the size of the site plans. It would be helpful to see the conceptual site plans arranged as a typical street scene. Per your request we have consolidated the plans on fewer sheets and arranged a typical street scene shown on sheet L-1. b.) Include a typical corner lot condition for each Plan. Please refer to sheet L-3 for a typical corner lot condition for Plan 1 and 2. Please note there are no corner lots for Plan 3. c.) Specify a concrete mow edge between the turf and shrub areas. Per our phone conversation and e-mail the client will install a shovel cut mow curb for the front yard delineation between turf and shrub areas. d.) Specify a minimum of 2" layer of shredded bark mulch in all planter areas. We have included a note to the planting legends. e.) Please avoid using turf in areas less than 5 ' in width or depth (for example on Plan IX and Plan 3 between the driveway and front walkway). Per your request we have removed the turf in areas less than 5' in width or depth. f.) Please include a concept plan for the Plan 1 courtyard option. Please see sheet L-3 for a Plan 1 courtyard option. Include concept plans for all three alternatives for Plan 2 and show low entry walls where provide (see Architect's plans). Please see sheet L-2. For Plan 3B, please coordinate the location of decorative entry walls and the sideyard walls with the Engineer and Architect. It was anticipated that these would enclose courtyards for seating rather than planting. These courtyards have been revised. Please specify if the courtyards will be developer or owner installed. A note has been added to the plans that the courtyards will be developer installed. page 1 I I \ . ,· • • Memorandum Date: June 25, 2008 To: Barbara Kennedy City of Carlsbad's Planning From: James Reviczky -Project Manager Gillespie Moody Patterson, Inc. Re: Robertson Ranch East Village PA-18 Job No. 08-058 (PUD 06-14(A)) Landscape Plans(PELAl 1.) Architectural plans provide for 3 themes (Mission, English Country and Italian Tuscany) .... We have clarified on the plans that each planting style is to be used for its corresponding Architectural style. The architect has clarified that the styles are Mission, California Bungalow and Italian Tuscany. 2.) Please indicate where the accent vines are to be used. We have indicated locations of accent vines. Please refer to plans. 3.) Please relocate note as appropriate. Please refer to plans. 4.) Please show the planting bed outline edge below the tree Please refer to plans. 5.) Please indicate who will be responsible for maintenance of the front yards. Is this to be homeowner or HOA maintained? All front yards are to be privately maintained. We have included a note to plans. 6.) Please provide general notes for the irrigation design. Address hydrozones, provide a written description of water conservation features including addressing xeriscape principles, overspray, weather controls, etc. Irrigation notes have been added to plans. page2 • DATE: MAY 8, 2008 • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO REVIEW NO: 3 TO: [8J Engineering, Development Services-Terie Rowley 0 Police Department-J. Sasway FROM: [8J Fire Department -Greg Ryan [8J Building Department -Will Foss 0 Recreation -Mark Steyaert 0 Public Works Department (streets)-Thomas Moore 0 Water/Sewer District [8J Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA 0 School District 0 North County Transit District -Planning Department 0 Sempra Energy-Land Management 0 Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) 0 Parks/Trails -Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): PUD 06-14A PROJECT TITLE: ROBERTSON RANCH PA 18 APPLICANT: CALAVERA HILLS II LLC PROPOSAL: 110 LOTS ON PA 18 Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to MEGHAN JACOBSON, Senior Office Specialist in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 05/29/2008 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. If you have any questions, please contact BARBARA KENNEDY , at X4626 . Thank you COMMENTS :----'J!...:......;...tJ_...i.oo&n,:::....!o!. ~.LI.m.LCJ&¥~-4-~-=-----..8:::::>""""'-----"0--"-IH"---'-"".S:,..___,;,.T_..:...fl-l,____;,_;e--_;;;;..__,_:,...__ __ PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 09/07 DATE: • • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO JANUARY 7, 2008 REVIEW NO: 2 TO: [gl Engineering, Development Services-Terie Rowley D Police Department-J. Sasway FROM: [gl Fire Department-Greg Ryan [gl Building Department -Will Foss D Recreation -Mark Steyaert D Public Works Department (streets)-Thomas Moore D Water/Sewer District D Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA D School District D North County Transit District -Planning Department D Sempra Energy -Land Management D Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) D Parks/Trails -Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): PUD 06-13(A) PROJECT TITLE: ROBERTSON RANCH PA 17 APPLICANT:___:.:.M.:....::C=M=IL=L=IN~-------------------- PROPOSAL: ___________________________________ _ Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to MEGHAN JACOBSON, Senior Office Specialist in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 01/24/08 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. If you have any questions, please contact BARBARA KENNEDY , at X4626 . Thank you COMMENTS: fig:;;= f/-As %GJA~ Tth$ S k"'f'5uA.fr"CAt..-A-l.,ft\ ·JAhUu'J c,)t&tMarr mAr -m£ ara; th/M"-AJ-C SPAc-'AJL:i ttll..ll\ [P>eATt ~MS. Ae.£ tJa-r P.el4c zzcA'== FRotM A ReS PaNs£ I / Wra.xta-N $Tt4A)A -tP1;JT AND S<.K:zc7-e.::>z I'Ht4-T Tid£ APi'uc.AA.tr At2ct44Nl3"12 4 K£tMse:D ?LAAJ. PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 09101 • • DATE: JANUARY 3. 2008 TO: ~ Engineering, Development Services-Terie Rowley D Police Department-J. Sasway ~ Fire Department-Greg Ryan 'j"C\lTf'~rM1~ro>~1] ~ Building Department-Will Foss &rt }3)10& 1J)} FROM: D Recreation -Mark Steyaert D Public Works Department (streets)-Thomas Moore D Water/Sewer District D Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA D School District D North County Transit District -Planning Department D Sempra Energy-Land Management D Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) D Parks/Trails -Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE: ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA 1 EY APPLICANT:___:.:.M=C=M=IL=L=IN~------------------- PROPOSAL: 85 LOTS ON PA 16. 110 LOTS ON PA 18 Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to MEGHAN JACOBSON, Senior Office Specialist in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 01/24/08 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. If you have any questions, please contact BARBARA KENNEDY , at X4626 . Thank you COMMENTS: • 06e (t.Wwf-~ • [Ze.vcoe BM P ~e_ PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 09/07 • • City of Carlsbad October 2, 2007 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM TO: Barbara Kennedy, Planning FROM: Jeremy Riddle, Engineering SUBJECT: FIRST REVIEW ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE, PA 18 [PUD 06-14 (a}] Engineering Department staff has reviewed the application as to its completeness for processing. Based on staff review, the application is complete, as submitted. Below we have identified the issues: 1. Revise the exhibits to include the current the application number in the upper right hand corner (typical). Refer to red lines for clarification. 2. Revise the legal description to list the recently recorded map no for CT 02-16. 3. Revise the water quality note to specify PA 20 contains the vegetated swale. 4. Revise the exhibits to address the discrepancies in driveway locations as compared to driveways shown on CT 04-26. Refer to redlines for clarification. Staff hopes to understand which location is correct. 5. On sheet 4, add street names for clarity. 6. On sheet 5, the driveway for lot 264 should be a 12-ft driveway as shown on recent construction changes for drawing 433-6. The exhibits do not match 12-ft. Please address this discrepancy. 7. On sheet 5, the pedestrian connection with Cannon just east of lot 286 does not match recent configurations shown on CT 04-26. Please address this discrepancy. 8. Revise the TM to address the discrepancy in lot line configuration as compared to CT 04-26. Which is correct? Refer to red lines for clarification. 9. Address redlines as noted on the returned exhibits. Please be advised, this check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. If you have any questions regarding the engineering issues, please contact me at 760-602-2737. • • CITY OF CARLSBAD DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2007 D TO: iZI ENGINEERING, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES -TERIE ROWLEY 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT-J. SASWAY [8J FIRE DEPARTMENT-GREG RYAN [8J BUILDING DEPARTMENT-WILL FOSS 0 RECREATION -MARK STEYAERT 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (STREETS)-THOMAS MOORE 0 WATER/SEWER DISTRICT 0 LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT· PELA 0 SCHOOL DISTRICT 0 NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT· PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 SEMPRA ENERGY-LAND MANAGEMENT D CAL TRANS (send anything adjacent to 1-5) 0 PARKS/TRAILS-LIZ KETABIAN *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): PUD 06-14(A) PROJECT TITLE: PA 18 ROBERTSON RANCH APPLICANT: CALAVERA HILLS II LLC PROPOSAL: 110 LOTS ON PA 18 Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to MEGHAN JACOBSON, Senior Office Specialist in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 09/21/07 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. If you have any questions, please contact Barbara Kennedy , at x4626 . THANK YOU COMMENTS: PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 01/07 _df~_A CITY OF VcARLSBAD Planning Division July 19, 2011 DR Horton Attn: Kurt Hubbell 1037 Pavo Court San Marcos, CA 92078 • SUBJECT: CD 11-11-ROBERTSON RANCH PAlS • \1\A.oA-tid 1 I \ ~ \ \ FiLE COP~1 I \ www.carlsbadca.gov The Planning Director has completed a review of your Consistency Determination application for modifications to the Planned Development Permit (PUD 06-14(A)) for Robertson Ranch Planning Area 18 generally located north of Cannon Road and west of College Boulevard in local Facilities Management Zone 14. The proposed modifications include minor changes to elevations, floor plans, building footprints and plotting. No changes to the overall mix of product are proposed. The proposed plotting and elevation modifications include: • lot 203: Replace Plan 2C with 1XA; • lot 204: Replace Plan 1XA with 2C; • lot 230: Replace Plan 2B with 2A; • lot 231: Replace Plan 3A with 3B; • lot 234: Replace Plan 3C with 3A; • lot 235: Replace Plan 2A with 2C; • lot 241: Replace Plan 2BR with 3BR; • lot 242: Replace Plan 3BR with 1XBR; • lot 251: Replace Plan 3AR with 3CR; • lot 252: Replace Plan 2CR with 2AR; • lot 253: Replace Plan 3BR with 3CR; • lot 255: Replace Plan 1XB with 1B; • lot 256: Replace Plan 1CR with 1AR; • lot 258: Replace Plan 2BR with 2CR; • lot 262: Replace Plan 3BR with 3B (Model Home); • lot 263: Replace Plan 2AR with 2CR (Model Home); • lot 264: Replace Plan 1B with 1A (Model Home/Sales Office); • lot 267: Replace Plan 1C with 1XC; • lot 300: Replace Plan 1BR with 2BR; and • lot 302: Replace Plan 2BR with 1BR. In order for a Discretionary Permit Consistency Determination to be approved, all of the following findings must be made: 1) No project condition, feature, facility or amenity is changed or deleted that had been considered essential to the project's design, quality, safety or function. T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 • • CD 11-11-ROBERTSON RANCH PA18 July 19, 2011 Page 2 2} The request represents an upgrade in overall design features and or materials and improves upon the project's compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. 3) The proposed revision does not change the density or boundary of the subject property. 4} The proposed revision does not involve the addition of a new land use not shown on the original permit. 5} The proposed revision does not rearrange the major land uses within the development. 6} The proposed revision does not create changes of greater than ten percent provided that compliance will be maintained with the applicable development standards of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 7} The proposed change will not result in any significant environmental impact, and/or require additional mitigation. 8} The proposed change would not result in any health, safety or welfare impacts. 9} There were not any major issues or controversies associated with the original project which would be exacerbated with the proposed change. 10} The proposed change would not be readily discernable to the decision makers as being substantially different from the project as originally approved. After careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding this request, the Planning Director has determined that the application qualifies for a consistency determination with the approved permit and therefore, approves the changes to the project based on Planning Division Administrative Policy No. 35. Please submit two (2) blueline copies (24" X 36") of all applicable exhibits for the project file and a reproducible 24" X 36" mylar copy of the amended site plan. The mylar must be submitted, stamped "Consistency Determination," and signed by the Planning Director prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. The Consistency Determination Title Block stamp, and other Title Block stamps, can be downloaded from the City's website at http://www.carlsbadca.gov/services/departments/planr:ting/Pages/applications.aspx. The Title Block (stamp) is located under "Resources" on the right side of the page. CITY OF CARLSBAD DON NEU, AICP Planning Director DN:CG:bd c: DR Horton, 2280 Wardlow Circle, Suite 100, Corona, CA 92880 Principal Planner, Chris DeCerbo Senior Planner, Van Lynch Project Engineer, Tecla Levy File Copy Data Entry S411 Avenlda Encinas, Suite 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008 760.931.0664 main 760.931.1741 fax www,urblliucroads.coin April 30, 2009 Jeff Rodgers BROOKFIELD HOMES 12865 Pointe del Mar, Suite 200 Del Mar, CA 92014-3859 SUBJECT: PROPOSED BUILDING ASSEMBLY CONFORMANCE-SOLANDRA PA 18 Dear Mr. Rodgers: Urban Crossroads Inc. have examined Brookfield Home's request to review of the most resent architectural plans provided by the Dahlin Group printed April 29, 2009 pertaining to the proposed Solandra PA 18 residential project in Carlsbad, CA. The architectural plans note on the title sheet that all previously identified window and door assemblies are required to meet a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 for all first second and third floor units and a minimum STC rating of 46 for all exterior wall assemblies. These requirements are consistent with the mitigation findings identified in the project acoustical report prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc. dated December 4, 2007 (Final Acoustical Analysis, Robertson Ranch PA 18-Carlsbad CA, UC Job Number 5400-03). Construction of the building assemblies should follow the identified report recommendations to ensure that interior noise levels would fall below the Title 24 threshold of 45 dBA CNEL. Should you have any questions regarding the above conclusions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 931-0664. Sincerely, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. Bill Lawson, PE, INCE Principal JN: 5400-03 December 16, 2008 e City Brookfield San Diego Builders Inc. Attn: Teri McHugh 12865 Pointe Del Mar Way #200 Del Mar, CA 92014 e RLE COPY l.,;ti,J7· 0 '5 of Carlsbad I R Fi a a I,,. I .,zg ·ih a I; ·'4" M SUBJECT: NOTICE OF RESTRICTION-PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH PA 18 Dear Applicant: Please find the enclosed Notice of Restriction that needs to be signed, notarized, and returned for recordation. This is to fulfill a condition of approval of the Planned Development Amendment. Please ensure the following items are addressed prior to returning the Notice of Restriction: ./ Correct Notary Acknowledgement Required (Effective January 1, 2008, all Certificates of Acknowledgement used by a California notary on a document that will be recorded in the State of California must NOT HAVE "PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME" in the acknowledgement. (Assembly Bi11866, Chapter 399)) ./ Document must be properly notarized . ./ Name on signature page and name on Notarial Acknowledgement must match . ./ Property owner's signatures/initials must be the same as on Notary Acknowledgement. ./ Notary Seal cannot be blurry/too light (County will not record the document if any portion of the Notary Seal is blurry or too light) ./ Include property owner's name in the designated space above the owner's signature . ./ Please pay particular attention to the signature requirements at the bottom of the signature page. It is our goal to assist you in getting the Notice of Restriction recorded expeditiously as possible. If you have any questions or need additional assistance, please call Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst at (760) 602-4615 or via email at mmast@ci.carlsbad.ca.us. S~elJLY.ICJ'A'Y'-' 6ri:;1E Assistant Planner c: Senior Management Analyst File Copy 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us {!) ·-·-City of Carlsbad I #l1 Fi; I; I I; I~ I •14. E I I I; I 14; I. June 27, 2008 Mr. Paul Klukas Planning Systems 1530 Faraday Avenue, Ste 100 Carlsbad,CA 92008 Rft£1VUt Jf, 2 4 2008 BROOKFIELD 1:u:,. SUBJECT: PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH PLANNING AREA 18-CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT {CEQA) APPLICABILITY/ PROCESS DETERMINATION This is to advise you that after reviewing the application for the project referenced above, the City has determined that the following environmental review process (pursuant to CEQA) will be required for the project: The project is subject to the prov1s1ons of CEQA; however, the potential environmental effects of the project were adequately analyzed by the previously certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Robertson Ranch Master Plan (EIR 03-03), dated April 2006, BRG Consulting, Inc. No additional environmental review is required. Please be advised that the City is required to file a Notice of Exemption form with the County Clerk's Office. The County requires a $50 filing fee, which the City collects from the applicant. Two weeks prior to the Planning Commission hearing , please submit a check for $50 payable to San Diego County Clerk to Barbara Kennedy, project planner. For additional information related to this CEQA applicability/process determination, please contact the project_ planner, Barbara Kennedy, at 760-602-4626 or bkenn@ci.carlsbad.ca.us. Sincerely, () )/.1 ~ ~leu DON NEU Planning Director DN:BK:sm c: Brookfield Homes, Mr. Norm Drury, 12865 Pointe Del Mar, Ste 200, Del Mar, CA 92014- 3859 Chris DeCerbo, Team Leader Jeremy Riddle, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ ,,~~· April28, 2008 Don Neu Planning Director CITY OF CARLSBAD 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 LAND USFICOASTAL PLANNING LANDSCAPEARCEITTECTURE•LA3~ POLICY AND PROCESSING ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION RE: ROBERTSON RANCH PLANNING AREAS 16 & 18 REQUEST FOR MASTER PLAN REVISIONS Dear Mr. Neu: fn my position as agent for Calavera Hills II, LLC, the developer of the Robertson Ranch East Village development, please consider this letter a request by the development applicant for official revisions to the Robertson Ranch Master Plan. These revisions would affect Planning Areas 16 and 18, and as a result of the requirement that PA 14 development with the" Alternative Use" comply with requirements of adjacent PA 16, they would also affect the Alternative Use development of PA14. vVe are requesting three minor revisions to the wording of the Master Plan. These revisions are listed, and justification provided for each, as follows; 1. lHcludc a Design Criteria zchich would climi11ate ally requirement for 25% of tile garages to be set back 3U- feet behind the frmzt property line: Justification: We are informed that the City is expected to eliminate this standard from the next iteration of the Planned Development (P-D) Ordinance due to the fact that the advantages which accrue from implementation of the requirement do not outweigh the disadvantages and costs associated with it. The proposed revision would bring the Master Plan into compliance with the proposed, new P-0 Ordinance. 2. Include a Design Criteria whidz would eliminate any requirement for 25% of the units to be designed with Pasade11a drivnrnys; Justification: Similarly to Request ,n above, we are informed that this requirement is also expected to be eliminated from the proposed P-D Ordinance, and thus the requested revision would bring the Master Plan into compliance with the new P-D Ordinance. 3. Revise the Master Plan design criterion which requires at least om elel'ationlplan to include a two-car garage with two separate garage doors facing the street. 1530 FARADAY AVENUE • SUITE 100 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • (760) 931-0780 • FAX (760) 931-5744 • info@planningsystems.net Don Neu April 28, 2008 Page2 Justification: This requirement of the Master Plan should be removed because; (a) substantial evidence exists that home purchase customers prefer a single door because the hvo, small-door alternative is more difficult to maneuver a vehicle into and out of; (b) the two, small-door alternative results in increased difficulty for homeowner pedestrian access into and out of the garage between cars; (c) the hvo, small-door alternative results in a need for increased garage width, which makes it more difficult to de-emphasize the garage portion of the architecture; (d) the perception by the homeowner customer is that the two, small door alternative adds cost without value to the house, and (e) neither the existing nor the proposed P-D Ordinance includes this provision. In consideration of the above justifications, we request your approval of the referenced revisions, and anticipate that the revisions can be considered an "Administrative Adjustment" per Section V(D) of the Master Plan, and thus will be assessed and approved administratively. Attached are specific revised pages of the Master Plan which we request to replace the existing referenced pages. Please let me know if you need any further information on this matter. VXwtJ(dV' Paul J. Klukas Director of Planning cc: Brian Milich David Poole Dale Gleed Don Mitchell Attachments-Proposed Amendment to Text Pages ilp=:t • • ROBERTSON RANCH MASTER PLAN PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO TEXT PAGES PLANNING AREAS 16 & 18 CALA VERA HILLS II, LLC APRIL 28, 2008 DELETE (Strike-Out) ADD (Bold) • • III. DEVELOPMENT AND Robertson Ranch REGULATORY PROVISIONS Minimum Lot Size The minimum lot size shall be 5,000 square feet, except for lots within Planning Area 18 which abut Cannon Road where a minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet shall be permitted. Minimum Lot dimensions Setbacks Minimum lot width at the front setback line shall be 50 feet, except along cui de sacs where the minimum lot width shall be 35 feet, measured at the curb. Minimum lot depth shall be 90 feet as measured pursuant to section 21.04.255 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. A 40-foot structural setback shall be provided from the right-of-way on Cannon Road. A 40-foot structural setback shall be provided from the right-of-way on College Boulevard. A minimum of 75 percent of the required setback that is located closest to Cannon Road and 50 percent of the required setback that is located closest to College Boulevard shall be landscaped to enhance the street scene and buffer the homes from traffic on adjacent arterials. Project perimeter walls shall not be located in the landscaped buffer. RV Parking R V Parking shall be provided concurrent with development as required by the Planned Development Ordinance and shall be provided in either P A 2 or as provided for in Master Plan Section II.E.5. Affordable Housing The Inclusionary Housing requirements for Planning Areas 16, 1 7 and 18 shall be provided in Planning Areas 14 and/or 15, or in any other Planning Area approved by the City of Carlsbad, concurrent with the schedule established by an Affordable Housing Agreement for the East Village. Special Design Criteria 1. Planning Areas 17 and 18: A supplemental acoustical analysis shall be provided with the discretionary applications demonstrating compliance with the City's Noise Guidelines Manual for Interior and Exterior Noise Levels. 2. Each planning area shall have a separate Planned Unit Development Permit and shall be designed with unique floor plans and architectural design. Robertson Ranch Master Plan April 28, 2008 Page III-97 • • III. DEVELOPMENT AND Robertson Ranch REGULATORY PROVISIONS 3. At least 20 percent of the homes in these planning areas shall be designed as single- story. Single story is defined as a maximum plate-line of 15 feet and a maximum • building height of 20 feet. Lofts are permitted subject to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.04.330. Alternatively, a total of 25 percent of the homes in each neighborhood shall be designed as either single-story or modified single story homes, provided that no fewer than 15 percent of the of the homes in the planning area are designed as single-story homes. Homes designed as modified single story homes shall conform to the following criteria: • Modified Single Story. To qualify as a Modified Single-Story homes, the structure must comply with the following criteria: A minimum of 60 percent of the area of the roof shall be single story. A two-story element may be added in the central portion of the front and rear elevation. For modified single story, the livable space on the second floor shall not exceed 25 percent of the first floor lot coverage. The single story or Modified Single-Story units are intended to be strategically located in the lotting scheme, and distributed throughout the village. 4. Doors, porches, balconies and walkways should face the streets, to the extent possible, to promote social interaction along the streetscape. 5. Porches shall have a minimum depth of 6 feet and a minimum width of l 0 feet. 6. Building elevations visible from the surrounding roadways shall feature enhanced elevations. 7. Side-loaded garages are encouraged to vary the street theme. 8. Three-in-a-row car garages that directly face the street shall not be allowed. 9. (DELETE) Act least eae elevatiee,'fllaa shall inelade a w.'e ear garage 'i'lith Wle sef!arate garage dears faeiag tee street. 10. Single-story and modified single-story homes shall be considered as two separate floor plans. 11. The use of perimeter roadways which form a buffer between residential and open space land uses shall be encouraged. Where this situation occurs, a pedestrian trail is recommended along the open space side of the roadway. 12. Recreation facilities shall be integrated into the trail system and should be sited to take advantage of views where feasible. 13. Pedestrian connections shall be included to facilitate access to bus stops and adjoining neighborhoods. Robertson Ranch Master Plan April 28, 2008 Page Ill-98 • • III. DEVELOPMENT AND Robertson Ranch REGULATORY PROVISIONS 14. Traffic calming elements shall be incorporated into the design of internal drives within ; this Planning Area in order to reduce the speed of through traffic and enhance pedestrian safety. Examples of traffic calming elements that are appropriate for this planning area include the use of traffic circles at intersections, "T" intersections, reduced-width streets, and/or the incorporation of medians, enhanced paving, and/or landscape elements at pedestrian crossings (Figures IV-3 and IV-4, Traffic Calming Details). 15. A 5-foot wide landscape buffer area shall be provided between side or rear fences and adjacent roadways. 16. Planning Area 18: An enhanced 10-foot landscape buffer shall be provided along the east side of Street "0". This area shall be designed as a primary community sidewalk/trail for pedestrian use and will provide a connection between Street "0" and the Community Recreation area in PA 19. Building setbacks shall be measured from the edge of the landscape buffer closest to the residences. 17. Landscape focal points should be provided at the end of cul-de-sac streets and "T" intersections. 18. When noise walls over 6 feet high are required, a combination of berm and maximum 6- foot high noise wall shall be used to mitigate noise impacts. 19. Optional entry treatments, as depicted on Figure III-36, Conceptual Neighborhood Entry Plan, and Figure III-37, Conceptual Neighborhood Entry Elevation, may be provided at the entrances to Planning Areas 16, 17 and 18, as depicted on Figure III-30, Key to Entries, Signs and Edge Conditions. 20. Special monumentation may be provided at the intersection of Cannon Road and College Boulevard and/or at the northeastern corner of Planning Area 17, as depicted on Figure III-30, Key to Entries, Signs and Edge Conditions, and Figure III-31, Community Entry Feature. 21. The Master HOA shall maintain landscaping within the parkways, recreation areas, and fuel modification zones. 22. A Fire Protection Zone, as defined in Section III.B.4.(e) (Figure III-48, Fuel Modification Plan) of this Master Plan shall be provided. 23. Landscaping in areas adjacent to open space areas (Planning Area 230) shall be compatible with preserved native vegetation. 24. Lighting adjacent to the Open Space areas (Planning Area 230) shall be selectively placed, shielded, and directed away from conserved habitat. Robertson Ranch Master Plan April 28, 2008 Page III-99 • • III. DEVELOPMENT AND Robertson Ranch REGULATORY PROVISIONS 25. The 20 feet behind the face of curb on the north side of Cannon Road is designated as a pipe zone for the 84-inch storm drain and no planting of trees is allowed. However, the { planting of shrubs and the placement of the meandering sidewalk and an increase of grade of 2 feet above the top of curb will be allowed in the pipe zone. The project wall along the north side of Cannon Road is to be placed at 40 feet from the face of curb (30 feet from the right-of-way) and trees are allowed in the 20-to 40-foot zone behind the face of curb. 26. In addition to the standards listed above, the Design Guidelines provided in Section IIIB of this Master Plan also shall apply. 27. (ADD NEW WORDING AS FOLLOWS) Small lot single family development proposed in Planning Areas 16 and 18 shall comply with the applicable development standards of the Planned Development Ordinance (21.45.070) except as otherwise allowed in this Master Plan, including (a) no requirement that an additional 25 percent of all units include garages that are located a minimum of 30 feet behind the front property line, and (b) no requirement that 25 percent of all driveways must be designed as "Pasadena" driveways with grass or enhanced pavement in the middle. Robertson Ranch Master Plan April 28, 2008 Page III-100 • e FILE COPY City of Carlsbad June 27, 2008 Mr. Paul Klukas Planning Systems 1530 Faraday Avenue, Ste 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008 IQfhhh'"·'•'4·L'I'I·'4hM SUBJECT: PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH PLANNING AREA 18-CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) APPLICABILITY/ PROCESS DETERMINATION This is to advise you that after reviewing the application for the project referenced above, the City has determined that the following environmeRtal review process (pursuant to CEQA) will be required for the project: The project is subject to the prov1s1ons of CEQA; however, the potential. environmental effects of the project were adequately analyzed by the previously certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Robertson Ranch Master Plan (EIR 03-03), dated April 2006, BRG Consulting, Inc. No additional environmental review is required. Please be advised that the City is required to file a Notice of Exemption form with the County Clerk's Office. The County requires a $50 filing fee, which the City collects from the applicant. Two weeks prior to the Planning Commission hearing , please submit a check for $50 payable to San Diego County Clerk to Barbara Kennedy, project planner. For additional information related to this CEQA applicability/process determination, please contact the project_ planner, itlll'bart:t'"K&nnedy, at 760-602-4626 or bkenn@ci.carlsbad.ca.us. Sincerely, ~>~ DON NEU Planning Director DN:BK:sm c: Brookfield Homes, Mr. Norm Drury, 12865 Pointe Del Mar, Ste 200, Del Mar, CA 92014- 3859 Chris DeCerbo, Team Leader Jeremy Riddle, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us <!) .. •• FILE COPY City of Carlsbad • :;a F'; 1; • •; '· '•l4 ., 1 a,;. '4;' w June 4, 2008 Mr. Paul Klukas Planning Systems 1530 Faraday Avenue, Ste 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: 3'd Review for PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA 18 The items requested from you earlier to make your Planned Development Permit Amendment, application no. PUD 06-14(A), complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning Department. It has been determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review. Any issues should be resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the City may request, in the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. Please contact your staff planner, ~rpara Kennedy, at (760) 602-4626, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting' to discuss the application. [')t DON NEU Planning Director DN:BK:bk c: Brookfield Homes, Mr. Norm Drury, 12865 Pointe Del Mar, Ste 200, Del Mar, CA 92014- 3859 Chris DeCerbo, Team Leader Jeremy Riddle, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (i) . ' ' .... -· PUD 06-14(A)-ROBE~ON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA 18 June 4, 2008 Pa e 2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Please revise the conceptual landscape plan as follows: a. Consolidate the conceptual landscape plans on fewer sheets, if possible, by deleting the colored photographs and reducing the size of the site plans. It would be helpful to see the conceptual site plans arranged as a typical street scene. b. Include a typical corner lot condition for each Plan. c. Specify a concrete mow edge between the turf and shrub areas. d. Specify a minimum 2" layer of shredded bark mulch in all planter areas. e. Please avoid using turf in areas less than 5' in width or depth (for example on Plan 1 X and Plan 3 between the driveway and front walkway). f. Please include a concept plan for the Plan 1 courtyard option. Include concept plans for all three alternatives for Plan 2 and show low entry walls where provide (see Architect's plans). For Plan 38, please coordinate the location of decorative entry walls and the sideyard walls with the Engineer and Architect. It was anticipated that these would enclose courtyards for seating, rather than planting. Please specify if the courtyards will be developer or owner installed. Landscape Plans (PELA): Please make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. 1. Architectural plans provide for 3 themes (Mission, English Country and Italian Tuscany) on each of the different architectural plans. Landscape plans provide one theme plan for each of 4 architectural house plans. It is recommended that the plants proposed for each of the 3 themes be used to coordinate with the particular architectural theme as appropriate. It is assumed this is the applicant's intent. Please clarify the intent with a note on the plans. See comment number 5 below. If to be maintained by an HOA, concept plans are needed per the Landscape Manual. 2. Please indicate where the accent vines are to be used. 3. Please relocate note as appropriate. 4. Please show the planting bed outline edge below the tree. 5. Please indicate who will be responsible for maintenance of the front yards. Is this to be homeowner or HOA maintained? -------------------------------------------------------------- ·-·-PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA 18 June 4, 2008 Page 3 6. Please provide general notes for the irrigation design. Address hydrozones, provide a written description of water conservation features including addressing xeriscape principles, overspray, weather controls, etc. 7. RETURN REDLINES and provide.3 copies ofthe landscape concept plans for the next submittal. Engineering: No additional comments. Fire: No comments or conditions for approval. Building: No comments at this time. • VD'1 per< f~oK. tlf' O'd./J.lj<a Ff: f;QYY City of Carlsbad I ::;,1 Fi ''''I,,. I •I§ .,.,,; .t§ ,, M February 14, 2008 Mr. Norm Drury Brookfield Homes 12865 Pointe Del Mar, Ste. 200 Del Mar, CA 92014-3859 SUBJECT: 2ND REVIEW FOR PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA 18 All of the items requested of you earlier have not been received and therefore your application is still deemed incomplete. Listed below are the item(s) still needed in order to deem your application as complete. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including five (5) sets of plans. No proc_essing .of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, August 31, 2007, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Barbara Kennedy, at (760) 602-4626, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, ~)i, DON NEU Planning. Director DN:BK:sm c: Chris DeCerbo, Team Leader Glen Vari Peski, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!} • • PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA18 February 14, 2008 Page 2 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: (new comments are in BOLD) 1 1. 2"d request: Please submit drawings for the enhanced side elevations of the homes that face street sideyards and on side elevations facing circulation element roadways, recreation areas, or open space . ..f 2. 2"d Request: For each Planning Area, please provide a colored plotting plan showing how the various architectural styles will be plotted (provide a separate composite for each PA). J 3. 2"d request: The architectural design is required to comply with the Planned Development Ordinance, City Council Policy 44 and City Council Policy 66, except as modified by the MP (Please contact your staff planner for a template of these tables). Items that do not appear to meet the standards are as follows: A. Please provide documentation demonstrating compliance with the Planned Development Ordinance-Table D. 1. Please show compliance with the current Planned Development Ordinance requirement for 25% of the floor plans to have a garage that is setback a minimum of 30 feet from the property line. -' B. Master Plan: 1. Porches shall have a minimum depth of 6 feet and a minimum width of 10 feet (not including entryway to front door). Plan 1 and 1X do not qualify. Please change the word "PORCH" to "ENTRY" on the floor plans. 2. At least one elevation/plan shall include a two-car garage with two separate garage doors facing the street. None comply. -Please submit an application for a Minor MP amendment. C. City Council Policy 44 2"d request: Please provide documentation demonstrating compliance with City Council Policy 44 (Please contact your staff planner for a template of these tables). Areas of concern are as follows: 1. Demonstrate compliance with the "Single-story Requirements" (Items 7, 8, 9). 2. Demonstrate compliance with "Multiple Building Planes" (Items 10, 11 and 12). 3. Fifty percent (50%) of the homes shall be designed with a covered front porch, open courtyard (visible from the street) or balcony located at the front of the building (Item 15). Plans 1, 1X and 3 do not comply with this requirement. Plan 2 complies with this requirement, but results in only 36.4% of the homes which meet this requirement. D. City Council Policy 66 2"d request: Please provide documentation demonstrating compliance with City Council Policy 66 (Please contact your staff planner for a template of these tables). Areas of concern are as follows: 1. Building Facades, Front Entries and Porches -building entries and windows should face the street. Front porches, bay windows, courtyards and balconies are encouraged. • • PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA18 February 14, 2008 Page.3 4. New Comment: Please include landscape plans for the front yard landscaping. The fencing plans may need to be modified relative to the structures. Please coordinate between the Architect and L~ndscape Architect. En!Jineering: None. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. New comment: The plotting plan has been revised so now, two-story homes are located on a number of the corner lots. Please revise the site plan to a layout that is more consistent with the previous plan. Using one-story plans adjacent to the corner lots reduces the visual impact of the buildings along the street. It is recommended that the Plan 1 should also be used adjacent to the pocket park and Community Recreation area wherever possible. 2. 2"d Request: The proposed architectural designs do not appear to incorporate the design elements shown in the MP to a level of detail'which fully captures the architectural themes. Recommendations include the following: a. Incorporate the accent building materials (stone, brick, etc) into the rear elevat[on and as a more prominent part of the front fa9ade. b. Emphasize the front fa9ade by reducing the appearance of a flat, two-story wall and by adding additional features that are representative of each unique architectural style. c. Garage doors should be unique to each architectural style. d. Please refer to the 11 x 17 redlines plans for additional comments related to the architectural design. Please return all redlines with your next submittal. 3. 2"d request: Residences should be plotted so that rooms with exterior views and/or exterior access are oriented towards the larger sideyard or open space. In some instances it is recommended that the units should be shifted, reversed, or replaced with a different floor plan. This would also result in a public view of the "more enhanced" side elevation of each unit. Please see redlines for recommendations. Consider reversing the units on Lots 195, 225, 265, 286, and 293. 4. 2"d request: PA 16-Consider designing some of the units with a balcony option, especially for units that may be able to advantage of views. Engineer's Plan (new comments): 5. Please consider plotting the residences with more variation in the front setback. Most of the units are plotted with a 10 -11.7 foot front setback. There is adequate room in the rear yards to move the structures back which would result in more variety along the street frontage. 6. Delete the reference to PA 14 recreation area on the cover sheet. 7. Ori the cover sheet, please provide data specific to PA 18 as requested (see redlines). 8. Please include a separate sidewalk to the entrance on the Plan 1 and Plan 3 rather than using the driveway as the entrance to the residence. Consider providing a direct connection from the public sidewalk to the front entrance where possible. Please coordinate with the architect. • • PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA18 February 14, 2008 Page4 9. Coordinate with the architect to show the courtyard walls for Plan 1, 1X and 3, and the variations of the Plan 2 entries. The walkways for Plan 2 should be designed to complement the various entry styles. 10. Please show the rear yard setbacks for the units on Lots 291, 295, and 299. 11. Some of the dimensions on the plotting plans are difficult to read. Please see Engineering redlines for dimensions that are missing or are unclear. Please return all redlines with your next submittal. General (new comment): 12. The lot coverage for some of the two-story units approaches the 45% maximum.· Disclosers will need to be provided clearly stating that future additions may not result in a lot coverage that exceeds 45% of the net pad area for two-story structures and 60% of the net pad area for one- story and modified one-story structures. Engineering: 1. Use the current APN. 2. Revise the BMP table. 3. See redlines for additional comments. Please return with your next submittal. Fire: 1. Fire hydrant spacing and locations are not practical from a response/protection standpoint and a revised plan is suggested. Building: 1. Construction of the units shall comply with the 2007 California Building Code. .. January 2nd, 2008 Barbara Kennedy City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • .\\ • McMillin Land Development A Corky McMillin Company SUBJECT: POD 06-12(A) and 06-14(A) -ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PAs 16 and 18 (Amendments) RECEIVED The following list of items is in response to the staff comments in the City response letter of September 28, 2007. we have chosen to separate the process for PA 16 & 18 from PA 17 as these areas are anticipated to be built by different homebuilders and they also utilize different architects. Additionally, the architectural designs for PA 16 & 18 were completed utilizing the new PD Ordinance, which has yet to go into effect due to the pending approval by CA Coastal Commission. We understand that if these neighborhoods go to hearing prior to ordinance adoption, they will require a concurrent minor master plan amendment. Planning (Items needed to complete application): 1. Acoustical analysis for PA 18 is included herein. 2. Lot coverage has been adjusted to comply with the Master Plan allowance. 3. Sidewalks to front entrances added to PUD plotting plans. 4. Summary of average setbacks for PA 16 & 18 added to engineering plans. 5. Colored plotting plan showing plan-type by architectural style provided. 6. PA 17 item; does not apply here. 7. PA 16 & 18 now comply as detailed below: A. Master Plan 1. PA· 16/18 changed to reflect unique floor plan£ & design 2. Provence theme for PA 18 has been changed. 3. Italian style has been changed to include Tuscan detailing. 4. Plan-lX for PA 16/18 second-story element has been modified. 5. Calculation for 60% of single-story roof for Plan-lX provided. 6. Porch dimension of 6xl0' complied with. 7. Brookfield Homes has indicated they would like to ask for relief from this requirement. B. council Policy 44 1. Single-story compliance demonstrated. 2. Multiple building planes compliance demonstrated. 3. PA 16 & 18 modified to comply with 50% requirement for covered front porch, open courtyard, or balcony located at front of building. 4. PA 16 modified to comply with 75% requirement for front entry to building visible from street. C. Council Policy 66 1. This item has been complied with. Planning (Issues of Concern) : 1. While we understand staff's concern here, it is impractical from a construction cost standpoint to provide all five allowed architectural styles. The standard among builders and the most successful from a marketing aspect, when taking into account cost, is to provide no more than three styles of architecture. 2. Architectural designs modified to provide: a. Accent materials have been incorporated into rear elevations and enhanced in the front facades . .. \\ McMillin Realty .. \\ .. \\ .. \\ McMillin Mortgage McMillin Land Development McMillin Homes Mailing Address: P.O. Box 851b4 • San Diego, CA 92186-5104 2750 Womble Road • San Diego, CA 92106 TEL(619)477-4117 • FAX(619)336-3119 www.mcmillin.com .. \\ McMillin Commercial • • b. True porches have been added to PA 16 & 1B plans. c. PA 17 item; does not apply here. d. Recommendations for changes to English Country elevations have been incorporated. See elevations. Although Brookfield has provided English Country elevations, they may not have incorporated all of Ms. Kennedy's specific comments. e. Recommendations for changes to Mission (Spanish) style elevations in PA 16 & 1B have been incorporated. f. California Monterrey/Bungalow theme has been incorporated. g. Enhanced elevations on sides which face streets, roadways, rec areas, etc. will be included and are detailed as such on engineer's plans. h. Garage doors have been modified per request. i. Required 392 SF of storage space is now shown on all the plans which do not have a third-car garage tandem space. 3. Changes made per request. 4. Plotting revised per comment and per redline comments on PUD plans. 5. Some PA 16 units have been redesigned with a balcony option. Brookfield Homes has balconies on PA 16 Plan 2 (Italian) and Plan 3 (Mission & Italian). Brookfield has a balcony on the PA 1B Plan 2 (Mission) elevations. 6. PA 17 item; does not apply here. 7. PA 17 item; does not apply here. B. Dimensions on plotting plan revised to provide ease of interpretation. 9. Required useable rear yard open space dimensions now shown on all PUD plot plans. 10.All offsets and dimensions are now detailed on floor plans per Staff comments. 11. Redlines included herein. Engineering (Issues of Concern) : PA 16 1. Application number added. 2. Legal description revised to show recorded Master Final Map. 3. Water quality note on PA 20 revised. 4. Driveway location conflicts revised per CT 04-26. 5. Lot line discrepancy configuration revised per CT 04-26. 6. Redlines included herein. PA 17 -does not apply here 1. Application number added. 2. Legal description revised to show recorded Master Final Map. 3. Water quality note on PA 20 revised. 4. Driveway location conflicts revised per CT 04-26. 5. Street names added on sheet-4. 6. Lot 264 revised to correct driveway shown on 433-6. 7. Ped connection at Cannon east of lot 2B6 revised per CT 04-26 on sheet-s. B. Lot line discrepancy configuration revised per CT 04-26. 9. Redlines included herein. 2 • • / If you have any questions or wish to discuss further, please contact me at 619-794-1286. Thank you. 4<t-j/t..,....._ ___ _ ~h Gates //_/'Cal avera Hills II, LLC / _ . ..-The Corky McMillin Companies £_.,?'~ 3 0/-/o/L.f ~t: August 14, 2007 Mr. Don Mitchell MCMILLIN LAND DEVELOPMENT 2750 Womble Road San Diego, CA 92106 Subject: Robertson Ranch Planning Areas 171 18 & 21 Revised Supplemental Noise Letter Dear Mr. Mitchell: The firm of Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to submit the following supplemental noise letter for the on-site noise analysis of the proposed Robertson Ranch Residential Analysis. On-Site Mitigation Due to slight changes in the Robertson Ranch proposed project site plan and elevations on the site, minor changes in the on-site mitigation for Planning Areas 17, 18 and 21 are allowable. Mitigation will reduce to 6-foot high noise barriers in front of Lot 309, in front of the open space on Planning Area 21 and along the corner of Cannon Road and College Boulevard. This updated mitigation and receptor locations are provided as Exhibit 1-A of this report. With the mitigation shown, the project will meet the County of San Diego 60 dBA CNEL exterior noise standard, as presented in Table 1. The Sound32 input files and calculations are shown in Appendix A. --"' Mr. Don Mitchell MCMILLIN LAND DEVELOPMENT August14,2007 Page2 If you have any questions regarding this noise assessment, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (760) 931-0664. Respectfully submitted, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. Jeremy Louden Associate Principal BL:JL:AS JN:04143-14 EXHIBIT 1-A SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS LEGEND: -• NOISE BARRIER LOCATION 5' • MINIMUM NOISE BARRIER HEIGHT (IN FEET) ROBERTSON RANCH (PLANNING AREA 17 & 18) PRELIMINARY NOISE STUDY, Carlsbad, California-04143: 1A (REVISED 8-14-<17) TABLE 1 BUILDOUT CONDITIONS EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (dBA CNEL) UNMITIGATED MITIGATED SECOND THIRD FLOOR GROUND GROUND FLOOR BARRIER RECEPTOR FLOOR FLOOR W/BARRIER W/BARRIER HEIGHT NUMBER EXTERIOR EXTERIOR EXTERIOR EXTERIOR (IN FEET}1 NOISE LEVEL NOISE LEVEL NOISE LEVEL NOISE LEVEL 1 66.9 58.2 61.0 63.2 0.0 2 68.8 56.9 61.1 64.6 0.0 3 69.3 59.7 63.6 67.4 5.0 4 70.6 59.9 70.3 70.2 10.0 5 70.2 60.2 67.2 69.8 10.0 6 69.3 59.7 68.7 68.7 8.0 7 68.8 59.4 68.2 68.3 8.0 8 68.3 59.0 67.5 67.9 6.0 9 68.6 59.4 68.1 68.1 8.0 10 68.6 58.7 68.1 68.1 8.0 11 69.2 59.2 68.7 68.7 8.0 12 68.3 55.4 67.9 67.9 7.0 13 68.3 56.1 67.8 67.8 7.0 14 68.2 55.4 67.3 67.7 6.0 15 68.5 57.1 67.7 68.1 7.0 1 Barrier height in feet above pad or roadway elevation, whichever is greater to achieve maximum insertion loss. T:\Carlsbad_Jobs\_041 00\04143\Excel\[04143-08 Suppelemental Letter Table.xls]T1