HomeMy WebLinkAboutPUD 93-07A; Rancho Carrillo Village O; Planned Unit Development - Non-Residential (PUD)City of CARLSBAD Planning DepartmeBK
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: June 3, 1998
SUBJECT: PUD 93-07(A)
Application complete date: March 25, 1998
Project Planner: Van Lynch
Project Engineer: Ken Quon
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O" MINOR
I.
AMENDMENT - Minor amendment to a Planned Development Permit for the
delayed architectural review of the building elevations and floor plans of 49
single-family homes, on property generally located in the southeast quadrant of
the city, west of Melrose Drive and south of Poinsettia Lane in the Rancho
Carrillo Master Plan in Local Facilities Management Zone 18.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission determine the requested amendment is minor and ADOPT
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4299, APPROVING the building elevations and floor
plans.
II. INTRODUCTION
This application was originally scheduled to be heard at the Planning Commission meeting of
May 20, 1998, which was canceled, due to lack of a quorum.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Staff Report dated May 20, 1998, with attachments.
2. Errata sheet dated June 1, 1998.
e City of CARLSBAD Planning Departmeem
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: May 20, 1998
SUBJECT: PUD 93-07(A)
Application complete date: March 25, 1998
Project Planner: Van Lynch
Project Engineer: Ken Quon
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O" MINOR
I.
AMENDMENT - Minor amendment to a Planned Development Permit for the
delayed architectural review of the building elevations and floor plans of 49
single-family homes, on property generally located in the southeast quadrant of
the city, west of Melrose Drive and south of Poinsettia Lane in the Rancho
Carrillo Master Plan in Local Facilities Management Zone 18.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission determine the requested amendment is minor and ADOPT
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4299, APPROVING the building elevations and floor
plans.
II. INTRODUCTION
This application is for the delayed architectural review of the single-family homes located within
Village "O" of the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan. This application is only to review the building
elevations and floor plans. Pursuant to the Master Plan, all other Village design components are
to be reviewed by staff during the building permit process.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Rancho Carrillo Village "O" consists of 49 single-family residential lots and 3 open space lots on
a 19.3 acre site located south of Poinsettia Lane and west of Melrose Drive. The original
approval was for 51 units with a condition that two lots not be developed so as to comply with
the planned development building separation requirements. Lots 7 and 42 are being restricted
with open space easements on the subdivision map. Lot sizes for this Village range from 5,690
to 13,500 square feet, with an average lot size of 7,859 square feet. CT 93-08 and PUD 93-07
were approved by the Planning Commission on January 4, 1995 and by the City Council on
February 21, 1995. The project was approved with the condition that the building elevations
and floor plans were to be reviewed by Staff and presented to the Planning Commission as a
minor planned development amendment per Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.45.160.
As shown on Exhibits "A" through "V", the applicant is proposing four different floor plans.
One plan is 2,116 square feet and is single story. The other three plans range in size from 2,335
to 2,797 square feet and are two story units. The project consists of three different architectural
PUD 93-o?(A) - RANCHWARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
May 20, 1998
PageJZ
styles, which are Craftsman, Prairie and Spanish Eclectic. The three styles selected are from the
eight approved styles in the design guidelines of the master plan.
The plotting of the homes will be reviewed for compliance with approved development standards
during the building plan check process. The applicant has been conditioned to submit a matrix
with the building plans which shall show compliance with Sections 3 (Plotting), 5 D,E, and G
(Architecture), 6 C (Garages) and 10 (Lot drains) of the design guidelines. A sample matrix is
attached to the design guidelines of Village "O".
IV. ANALYSIS
Staffs recommendation of approval for this minor amendment was developed by analyzing the
project's consistency with the Rancho Carrillo Village "O" design guidelines, the Park Design
District standards and Section 21.45.090(1) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (storage
requirements).
A. ARCHITECTURAL STYLE
Conformance of architectural styles were reviewed against the architectural descriptions found in
the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, Community Development Standards.. Excerpts of the Master
Plan describing the three architectural styles can be found on Exhibit "F" (Sheet 2.2 of the
architectural plans). Following are the three styles proposed and some typical design elements
that identify these styles.
1. CRAFTSMAN - The proposed design contains the elements of a low-pitched roof,
wide overhanging eaves, false beams and exposed rafters. The units do not have
porches, but have dormers supported by upper square columns resting on massive
columns. These dormers are projections in front of bedrooms/living rooms and are
incorporated into the projections in front of the garages. This gives the appearance
typical of the Craftsman style. The materials used are concrete tile roofs and stucco
wall surfaces.
2. PRAIRIE - The Prairie architecture is similar to the Craftsman with low pitched
roofs; wide overhanging eaves; eave, cornice, and facade detailing emphasizing
horizontal lines. Other characteristics in common with the proposal are geometric
patterns of window glazing and contrasting wall materials.
3. SPANISH ECLECTIC - This design is typified by low-pitched roofs, multiple roof
lines, red tile S or half cylinder shaped roof materials, little roof eaves, arches and
stucco surfaces. The proposed architecture incorporates these elements as well as
arched doorways, balconies, ornamental iron and wood treatments that further
identify the Spanish Eclectic style.
The proposed architectural designs are compatible with the styles proposed in the adjacent
villages as well as the structures within the Carrillo Ranch Park.
PUD 93-07(A) -
May 20, 1998
Paee 3
RANCH™,ARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
B.UNIT MIX AND SIZE
The unit sizes proposed conform to the requirements of the design guidelines as shown in the
table below:
Unit type
One story unit
Two Story unit
Maximum Size allowed
2,300 Sq. Ft.
3,500 Sq. Ft.
Size proposed
2,1 16 Sq. Ft
2,797 Sq. Ft.
Maximum size w/options
2,1 16 Sq. Ft.
2,994 Sq. Ft.
The mix of floor plans provided is four, with three different floor plans being a minimum and
eight different floor plans being the maximum per the design guidelines. Again, the plotting of
the units will be determined during the building permit review. The plotting criteria of the
design guidelines will be verified with the matrix provided during the plan check procedure.
Second dwelling units are not proposed for this Village.
Each of the units garages is served by a two car garage door. The third space in the three car
garage units is provided by an interior tandem space. The garage areas provide the storage
requirements as described in the Planned Unit Development Ordinance.
C.ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENTS
The master plan design guidelines call for varied design features of the units to create diversity
and interest within the Village. There will be six different color schemes for the stucco portions
of the units, with three being the minimum per the design guidelines. Some of the units will
have brick or rock veneer treatments to help create the varied streetscape. The roof materials are
flat and S-shaped concrete tile with three different colors proposed, two being traditional red tile
and the other an earth tone. There are single chimneys proposed on all but one plan, which will
have two chimneys.
The table below is a summary of architectural treatments that are listed in the design guidelines
and whether compliance is met. Although some plan types may show non-compliance, these
units are not essential in meeting the minimum percentage of units needed to satisfy the design
guidelines.
Architectural
Components
Single story edge of 3
feet minimum for
40% of perimeter (for
3 3% of total units)
Four separate front
building planes (for
50% of total units)
Planl
Compliance
Yes
No
Plan 2
Compliance
Yes
Yes
Plan 3
Compliance
No
Yes
Plan 4
Compliance
No
Yes
PUD 93-07(A) - RANCHQ
May 20, 1998
Page 4
ARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
Four separate rear
building planes (for
50% of total units)
One side elevation
w/offsets and cutouts
to provide 7' average
Recessed or projected
front exterior
openings
Compatible and
complimentary
building materials
Two chimney
maximum
Number of Garage
doors -
less than 15% three
door garages allowed
Garage doors recessed
minimum 3"
No
Possible
with greater than
5' minimum yard
Yes
Yes
Yes
1
2
Yes
No
Yes
with greater than
5' minimum yard
Yes
Yes
Yes
1
2
Yes
Yes
Yes
with 5' minimum
yard
Yes
Yes
Yes
2
2
Yes
Yes
Yes
with 5' minimum
yard
Yes
Yes
Yes
1
2
Yes
D.SPECIAL DESIGN PARK DISTRICT
The northwesterly portion of Village "O" falls within the Special Design Park District. The Park
District was formed to ensure that the development of land adjacent to the Carrillo Ranch
Community Park would not clash with the existing architecture and landscape of the Park.
Compliance is met by the separation of Village "O" from the Park by a sixty foot street right-of-
way and by graded up-slopes. The Spanish architecture proposed with this project should
complement the architecture found within the Park.
V.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts from the future development of the
Rancho Carrillo Master Plan were previously analyzed by the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan
Environmental Impact Report (EIR 91-04). The project also qualifies as being within the scope
of both the City's Master Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan and Final EIR 91-04
in accordance with Section 21083.3 of the California Environmental Quality Act; therefore, the
Planning Director issued a Notice of Prior Compliance on April 1, 1998. With regard to air
quality and circulation impacts, the City's MEIR found the cumulative impacts of the
implementation of projects consistent with the General Plan are significant and adverse due to
regional factors, therefore, the City Council adopted a statement of overriding considerations.
The project is consistent with the General Plan and as to those effects, no additional
environmental document is required.
RANCH^ARRILLOPUD 93-07(A) - RANCHGTARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
May 20, 1998
PageS
VI. SUMMARY
Because the proposed elevations and floor plans are consistent with the Village "O" design
guidelines of the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
adopt the attached resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4299
2. Location Map
3. Disclosure statement
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3676 without Exhibits
5. Reduced Exhibits
6. Village "O" Design Guidelines
7. Full size Exhibits "A" - "V" dated March 25, 1998
Vl:kc:mh
RANCHO CARRILLO
VILLAGE "O"
PUD 93-07(A)
&itv of Carlsbad
Planning Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all
applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City
Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information must be disclosed:
1. APPLICANT
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the
application.
Hofman Planning Associates
2386 Faraday Ave., Ste. 120
Carlsbad, CA 92008
OWNER
List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the
property involved.
Continental Ranch, Inc.
12636 High Bluff Dr., Ste. 300
San Diego, CA 92130
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership,
list the names and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares
in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a
trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of
the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust.
2O75 Las Paimas Dr. -Carlsbad. CA 92OO9-1 576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-O894
rrSR5. Have you had mire than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of
City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve
(12) months?
j~~| Yes [x] No If yes, please indicate personls):
Person is defined as 'Any individual, Tirm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club,
fraternal organization, corporation,.estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city
and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or
combination acting .as a untt."
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
Signature of owner/dafe> Signature of applicant/date
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Disclosure Statement 10/96 Page 2 of 2
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3676
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
3 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED
4 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND DESIGN GUIDELINES
TO DEVELOP 51 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON PROPERTY
5 GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST
QUADRANT OF THE CITY, WEST OF MELROSE DRIVE
6 EXTENSION AND SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE
EXTENSION, IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE
7 RANCHO CARRILLO MASTER PLAN, IN LOCAL
8 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 18.
CASE NAME: RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
9 CASE NO: PUD 93-07
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Portion of Section 24, Township 12 south, range 4 west, and a
12 portion of Sections 18 and 19, Township 12 south, range 3 west,
San Bernardino Meridian, City of Carlsbad, County of San
13 Diego, State of California.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
15
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
16
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and17
1 g WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of November,
19 1994, the 30th day of November, 1994 and on the 4th day of January, 1995 hold a duly
20 noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
91 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
22 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
23
factors relating to the Planned Unit Development.
24
oti NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning£D
26 Commission as follows:
27 A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
28 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of the Village "O" Design Guidelines (Exhibit "P"),
on file in the Planning Department.
1 on file in the Planning Department.
2 C) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of PUD 93-07 based on the following findings and
3 subject to the following conditions:
4 Findings;
5
1. The granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with
6 Chapter 21.45 of Title 21, the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, the General Plan, and
all applicable adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies as
demonstrated by the project's consistency with all provisions of these documents.
8 2. The proposed single family residences at the site location are necessary and desirable
9 to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well-
being of the neighborhood and the community because the area is designated for
1 ° residential low medium and residential medium high uses in the General Plan and
development is necessary to continue the balance of land uses in the City.
12 3. Such single family residential use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or
general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property
13 or improvements in the vicinity since the project meets all required City standards
and ordinances, all public facilities and services shall be provided and adequate
setbacks and buffers from the proposed nearby community park, multiple family
15 residential and single family residential uses and Melrose Drive have been
incorporated into the project design.
16
4. The proposed planned development will meet all of the minimum development
17 standards and design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.090 and 21.45.080 of the
18 Carlsbad Municipal Code, and will be designed in accordance with the concepts
contained in the Design Guidelines Manual as demonstrated by features such as 51-
1 9 60 foot wide public streets, adequate guest and recreational vehicle parking, and a
spacious and accessible common recreation area.
20
5. The proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natural
topography of the site by providing a variety of setbacks, varying roof line
22 orientations, and landscaping to screen structures as well as enhance slopes.
23 6. The proposed project maintains and enhances natural resources on the site through
the preservation of over 1.6 acres of coastal sage and chaparral habitat on the site.
25 7. The proposed project's design and density of the developed portion of the site will
be compatible with proposed surrounding development and would not create a
26 disharmonious or disruptive element to the neighborhood because the proposed
single family residential units at a low-medium density range are similar to those
proposed in neighboring areas such as that proposed in Villages "M", "Q" and "R"
28
PC RESO NO. 3676 -2-
, and the proposed residential uses will be designed compatible with the Carrillo
Ranch Community Park to the north.
2
8. The proposed project's circulation system is designed to be efficient and well-
3 integrated with the project and does not dominate the project as demonstrated by its
conformity to all City standards and the development standards of the Planned
Development Ordinance as shown on the site plan exhibits.
5
Planning Conditions;
6
1. Approval is granted for PUD 93-07, as shown on Exhibits "A" - "J", dated September
7 7, 1994, (except that within 60 days of Final approval of this project, Exhibit "E",
g Architectural Data Sheet, shall be revised to reflect all applicable requirements of
the approved Village "O" Design guidelines) incorporated by reference and on file
9 in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless
otherwise noted in these conditions.10
11 2. Approval of PUD 93-07 is granted subject to the approval of CT 93-08 and SDP 94-
01. PUD 93-07 is approved subject to all conditions of approval of CT 93-08, HDP
12 91-17, EIR 91-04 and SDP 94-01, Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3675, 3506,
3503, and 3682, incorporated herein by reference and on file in the Planning
13 Department.
3. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
15 Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance.
16
— |4. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the Zone 18 j
17 Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on March 13,1993,
1g incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and any future
amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits.
19
5. Elevations, floor plans and building layouts shall be submitted in compliance with
20 the delayed architectural review standards established in the Carrillo Ranch Master
21 Plan, and shall comply with the Village "O" Design Guidelines as shown on
Attachment "P". After reviewing these plans and determining that they are in
22 conformance with the approved Village "O" Design Guidelines, staff shall present the
floor plans and architecture to the Planning Commission pursuant to the process
23 described in Title 21.45.160.
24
6. Prior to occupancy of the first unit within Village "O", the eastern .28 acres of Lot
25 52 shall be developed as a recreation/open space area with amenities as outlined in
the Village "O" Design Guidelines (Attachment "P"). This shall include development
of the community trail linkage through Lot 52. Open Space Lot 52, as depicted on
27 Exhibits "C" - "D", shall be retained as permanent open space as dedicated in
easement as required pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 3675. The
28
PC RESO NO. 3676 -3-
1 southern portion of Lot 52 shall be maintained in a natural state by the Village "O" ,
Homeowner's Association. Disturbance of natural habitat shall be avoided.
2
7. The floor plans and elevations submitted during the Delayed Architectural Review
process shall implement the special Park Design District standards as outlined in
4 the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan and the Village "O" Design Guidelines (Attachment
"P").
5
8. The floor plans submitted during the Delayed Architectural Review process shall
indicate compliance with Planned Development Ordinance storage requirements
7 pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.45.090(1).
8 9. Prior to final map, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the
Planning Director, an agreement which will establish the timing and phasing of
9 construction for the Recreational Vehicle storage facility. Prior to occupancy of the
first unit within Village "O", at minimum, 1,020 square feet of recreational vehicle
storage space shall be provided on Lot 104 of Village "Q", unless an on-site
temporary recreational vehicle storage facility has been approved by the Planning
Director.
12
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
1 O
14 Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 4th day of January
15 1995, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Welshons; Commissioners Compas, Erwin,
Monroy, Nielsen, Noble and Savary.
18 NOES: None.
19 ABSENT: None.
20 ABSTAIN: None.
21
22
23 KIM WELSHONS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION24
25 ATTEST:
26
27 PLANNING DIRECTOR
28
PC RESO NO. 3676 -4-
TOTAL 2116 S.F.
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
FIRST FLOOR
2116S.F.
DECORATIVE WOOD TRUSS
BMNTED.WOOD QATE
NTEGHAL COUOR STUCCO
PANTED WOOD KNEE BRACES
VNYLWNXJWS—/WNTED METAL GARAGE DOCfl
•lEDGESTONEVBtEH
(REVEBSH3)
PfiARE
RANTED llETAL.GATE—I
(REVB1SH))
SPAMSHEOECTC
CONCRETE-S1 TLE ROOFNG
FRONT ELEVATIONS
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
O
o js:a
T—I—I—I—1—It—I—I—1—1—1—I—I—J—I—1—I—i—|—IK—»
LEFT
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK COMPLIANCE .
SINGLE-STORY EDSE.COMPUANCE.
w <Mr ant of IB U1U* altd hm a Bngta auy «
S55*5* T*"™"™"*«™
SWGLE STOTY_ EEKE: -1W
+'TOWL P
TOTAL 2116 S.F.
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
FIRST FLOOR
3116 SJ=.
MINIMUM SIDE-YARD SETBACK COMPUANCEGL Atm*50%otHwunilibtlittpRijaaitialh»«raia«tUietov»Ul»
TOTAL 2335 S.F.
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
SECOND FLOOR
482 SF
FIRST FLOOR
18S3 S.F.
PANIHJ WOOD RM.
KtKHl (.on. Km* I«M until (he euiy 1930'.. Tha 14enitfyla» fcjwrci of daC«ftiHBji home tie low-pilclud, fiblej ami (neauiDuUf iafftO) nil* wide.uiWKloted ait ovubuiti; loof refteii uaulJy eipotcd; dtcurnlvc (I.bc) burnt
intruces commonly iiUed under jihlcl; porclra, eiihet Oil) or {WlUI-wuMi, wilk
ID pound Itvd wlfliouL i breik 11 Ihe level of Ita pan* Uoor.
MdaUdl UKd tbi pkn, colunuu 10! (oto twluHruk. un vitlnl tnl coniiil of_rta», elifboifJ, itinile trick, COCKKK btiKk ot IDKZO.
(REVERSED)
CHAF1SMAN
. ,
• ilw clwncieriiiK bxtomaJ ifcgxiiiiie emjhub u Khlnwi by tutli ttv'iap*uiini cip> vn poreh »nd b*w tilling); coaraiLuig wwd itim ta
Idtuib 'inctuk wbdj« bi.tti o, fliiujcj ^eiaal urra lor (k>*cn; JCOpKBitu uf men pane *iodow (taing; broad flu cbininiyt; Cuniiiuiliii- pattriiltor Him eqiphuliint iheiipperp.il of ihtun»r not}; uul ilcuni''- '" ' Bslolnj ol bunto o( cin«l jcnoicUk: m Uyliiul U
(REVERSED)
FRARE
ne Spaeth Bcteik ny
On enllii blBoiy of Sjamih i.
tilUi or A Uve Dwbang Mi«ioalil«,»lJLli»niiluipal likoOU, *Uch bin in Sturye Jupt, „, Of typical ..»reo
tplnl catoma. piiidun, cu.cd ntnwuth ur pw
Dot»i Idulia* ID tnerioi iwteni, pales. iod talco
tfil »iUi imilUulcpuno
niak- Tl» *UI
of ihipo ind sko. Oitei typicd de
SPANSH ECLECTIC
RANTED WOOD SHUTTERS
FRONT aEVAHONS
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
SINGLE-STORY EDGE COMPLIANCE
f B. Whanftr^ or ftBrei23to(YU<iiI»«™ BIB row stored lwsth«i 13 toei apart, altoast on* of ttw tnrga un«8 sh* hswe a singM slmy bufefrg Mga with • oupn ofnot Ml* tftBi 10 fsot sdlawnt to on* of lh» o(hw unM, The roof cowing DMsinnM stay efenwrt stiaH OB «ontanttB«y lower man tha tort for ttw 2 stay
efam*m w *^2IliI? * "* fnt~ld*a to f™*"1" """O «B*Wn» "»t« WBngw
*nt of tfunte (Ml Mn a singfe story edj» for 40% of th>
=ggT perfcMtat of th* building. For Be pmjjoM o* 8* guMeftw, tt* jfciQj» rt*Y «»g"•=~' «»iaJl»*mi™nnjBnitp(not3fBi Tin unit quKtyng undtr *• 33» sflal b»S^ dmd UMi
SWGLE STORY EDGE: 11ff
* TOTAL PERIMETER; 228
-52% (40% MtN.)
MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK COMPLIANCE ,
21.46.090(bnai[At.
TOTAL 2335 S.F
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
SECOND FLOOR
402 S.F
FIRST FLOOR
IS53 S.F.
(REVERSED)
(REVERSED)
(REVCTSGD)
FWNTED WOOD SHUTTERS
FRONT aEVATIONS
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
MINIMUM FRONT BUILDING-PLANE COMPLIANCE
plsnw on am* tlda olavatkra. 'Trie minimum offset In pttnm thai! bo IBfnchwf end «h*fl induda, Cut not be bnteJ ia taHOaa weUi, irindowt end roal*.The minimum cUipth batwaan the fecw of tha tuwant-mOM (Hone ind *e rowtfant on the front elevation dial bs 10 tout. A plant rnuit b* • mlnimuni ul 30iquon fMt U> racetvl OBdM unlHr thB icclkMi.
OPT. RETREAT - \"!/S V<J
TOTAL 2483 S.F.
OPT. BR.5 164 S.F.
OPT. RETREAT 176 S.F.
TOTAL W/ OPTS. 2823 S.F.
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
SECOND FLOOR
1193 S.F.
FIRST FLOOR
1290 Sf.
SWMSH ECLECTIC
FRONT aEVAHONS
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
MINIMUM FRONT BUILDING-PLANE COMPLIANCE
E. A! Iwt 50% of ffM urttt m »b prafcct Uu« hava at leal kw MfiHv)
Incter ant thai -nduo*. but not 0* Bruited to buMing «**>. wnOowt and nrati.Th» mWmum d*ptn ban«n IM (acaa of Ihe tc*w«-moa ptan* ant Ih* ra*t
plane on the hoot gMvabon shall b* 10 fset. A plans must be a mtnunjm of 30•quare to«t lo r»cw« cr«M und*t 1N» wtttoo.
MINIMUM REAH-8UILDING-PLANE COMPLIANCE
MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK COMPLIANCE
IS ftn ™. nvng* tcont vml (attack with •
21.4S.090(bH2>fA}. , _
MINIMUM SIDE. YARD SETBACK COMPLIANCE
TOTAL SIDE, VAHD AREA: 691 87 SQ. FT.
*VSOE'YARD iENGTH:' er
-10.64' Ava SttlE YAW WIDTH
(r-OTAVG. MM.)
TOTAL 2483 S.F.OPT. BR.5 164 S.F.OPT. RETREAT 176 S.F.TOTAL W/ OPTS. 2823 SP.
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
C.[£COND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
1290 S.F.
f'*a
FRONT ELEVATIONS
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
MINIMUM FRONT BUILDING-PLANE COMPLIANCE
At tkMI 60% of Ow unto in Hiii flrO(*a than have at teas! (ow wpwsta bukdlnpplanM an itreat *kl* «lBv»ltoni, Ttw mtinum oflitt In pUno ihU be IItidied Bhd «haa indudi, but ml b* errAud to bUkUng walli, wtoidawi end rout*.
11 it i n -ri
ra a au
RIGHT
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
MINIMUM REA.R BUILDING-PLANE COMPLIANCE
F. • Roar tkwaltoiw Dial «ttuni to Va um tntoda ouBKwO In piragrapti E for tramBlBV«tte». •KQgpi fli»t In* minimum depth bet«wan front and tack pUiw* MI tt»real alavaUon thfUl b« 3 teat
TOTAL 2797 S.F
W/OPT. 2994 S.F,
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
SECOND FLOOR
1346 S.F.
FIRST FLOOR
1451 S.F.
SFAMSHECLECTIC
FRONT ELB/ATIONS
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
-t—I—i—i—i—i—f—t—t—I—t—fr—it—ii—i—I
LB=T
/I
VILLAGEO
CONTINENTAL HOMES
.o
^MINIMUM REAR BUILDING-pL'ANE COMPLIANCE
MINIMUM.SIDE-.YARD.SETBACK.COMPUANCE
a At Ssust 60% oJ Uw urets in 0* pmjact 3flHB tuve on* sid»
TOTAL SIDE YARD AREA: 617.7 SO, FT
i' SIDE YARD LEGNTK 71 iff
-6.r AVa SIDE YARD WIDTH(r-tr AVG. UN.)
=1/11/11 =2 sa/iii/ifel P= vw s=s=iiin=si rzr
MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK COMPLIANCE
A wWl a 1O fHI min. ID dwM
PV OltbMTI Mul^Mt CMI*
BR.2
f-V
OPT. RETREAT
BONUS ROOM
]z»*l?*
/OPT. BR.4
TOTAL 2797 S.F,
W/OPT. 2994 S.F.
VILLAGE OMINIMUM FRONT BUILDING-PLANE COMPLIANCE,
E. AHeasSO%ofihauralsin1WsDreTOastiaHnav93i Jess* four separata Ouilding
CONTINENTAL HOMES
FIRST FLOOR
1451 S.F.
SECOND FLOOR
1346 S.F.
FRONT ELEVATIONS
VILLAGE O
CONTINENTAL HOMES
MINIMUM FRONT BUILDING-PLANE COMPLIANCE
>n stoat vO* •tovatton*. Tn* nterum offsst In planM ttat toInched «nd *lut indufe, bul not tw ttmttod k> tnjIWog walM, windows and rajTh* mintaum itspth b*twMn «w ficee of (h* torword-mon plans •.«) »w r
pinna on lb« Irbnl elavaikm •hall b* 10 teal. A plans muil b* • rnJninnan ofcquai* fe«t 1° receive credit under ttite wdion.
/I
VILLAGEO
CONTINENTAL HOMES
MINIMUM REAR BUILDING-PLANE COMPLIANCE
VILLAGE O
DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. INTRODUCTION
Village O consists of 51 residential and 1 open space lots in the southern portion of the
Rancho Carrillo Master Plan (MP 139E). The lots range in size from 5,690 to 13,500
square feet, with an average lot size of 7,859 square feet.
2. UNIT MIX & SIZE
The project shall include a mix of floor plans and elevations as follows:
Minimum Maximum
Number of floor plans 3 8
Number of front elevation
treatments per floor plan 3 4
Single Story Units - Maximum Size - 2,300 sq.ft. (including the area of a
second dwelling unit)
Two Story Units - Maximum Size - 3,500 sq.ft. (including the area of a
second dwelling unit)
Village O Design Guidelines 1 January 12, 1995
PLOTTING
All units shall be plotted within the prescribed building envelope as shown on the
architectural data exhibit approved as a part of the tentative map for Village O.
Plotting shall alternate floor plans so that no individual floor plan is plotted for more
than 60% of the total units on any individual street. No two units with identical front
facades shall be plotted closer than 100 feet of each other on the same street. Units
may be plotted hi phases or sequences as long as they are plotted in conformance with
the requirements of the Village O Design Guidelines. The units plotted on these lots
may not utilize the entire building envelope. Future homeowners shall have the ability
to construct a room addition within this envelope, as long as the overall building
coverage does not exceed 50% of the lot area. Room additions or accessory structures
that are within the building envelopes will not require an amendment to the Planned
Development Permit for this project.
The matrix included as Exhibit A of these conditions shall be attached to the plot plan
for each building phase of this tentative map. This matrix shall show how each phase
and the overall project complies with the percent requirements of Sections 3 (Plotting),
5 D, E, & G (Architecture), 6 C (Garages) and 10 (Lot Drains) of these guidelines.
This matrix may be modified subject to the approval of the Planning Director when the
floor plans and elevations for this tentative map are approved.
SETBACKS
Melrose
Front
Rear
Side
All units shall maintain a 50' minimum setback from Melrose ROW
In accordance with Section 21.45.090(b)(2)(A) of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code. Zoning Ordinance, the front yard setback shall be
JMW icvi}no\VvVci Hie irom yi*m striDavtv iiicij' DC vaiicci 10 <* jo 1001
average with a 10 foot minimum to the livable portion of the unit or
to §<u~d^£s till iicd "u QC§I*CC$ 110111 tiie street*
All units shall have a minimum 15' deep, flat usable rear yard.
5' minimum
10' minimum for corner lots from street ROW and large slopes (Per
grading ordinance). Building separation should range from 10' - 20' as
shown on the Architectural Data Exhibit.
Village O Design Guidelines January 12, 1995
Building Separation All units in Village O shall comply with the building separation
requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance, Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 21.45.090(5). If the applicant decides to
develop all of the lots along Streets O-B & O-C with two story
units, without a 20" building separation, then 10 or fewer units in
a row shall be constructed. In such a case Lots 6 & 49 shall be
restricted so as not to permit the construction of a dwelling unit.
The applicant shall decide whether Lots 6 & 49 will be
developable lots prior to approval of Final Map.
5. ARCHITECTURE
A. The architectural theme of this project shall be selected from one or more of the
following styles that have been approved as a part of the Rancho Carrillo Master
Plan:
Spanish Colonial Revival Craftsman
California Mission Bungalow
Monterey Prairie
Spanish Eclectic California Ranch
Whichever style or combination of styles is used in Village O, it shall be
compatible with the surrounding Villages and the structures within Carrillo
Ranch Park as determined by the Planning Director. Architectural styles are
described in the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, General Community
Development Standards pages 31-35.
B. When three or more 2 story units are hi a row situated less than 15 feet apart, at
least one of the three units shall have a single story building edge with a depth
of not less than 10 feet adjacent to one of the other units. The roof covering the
single story element shall be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story
element to the unit (this is not Intended to preclude long shed-type roofs falling
to a single story element).
C. When three 2 story units in a row situated between 15-20 feet apart, at least one
of the three units shall have a single story building edge with a depth of not less
than 5 feet adjacent to one of the other units. The roof covering the single story
units shall be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story element to the unit
(this in not intended to preclude long shed type roofs falling to a single story
element).
Village O Design Guidelines 3 January 12, 1995
D. Thirty-three per cent of all units shall have a single story edge for 40% of the
perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline, the single story
edge shall be a minimum depth of 3 feet. The units qualifying under the 33 %
shall be distributed throughout the project.
E. At least 50% of the units in this project shall have at least four separate building
planes on street side elevations. The minimum offset in planes shall be 18
inched and shall include, but not be limited to building walls, windows and
roofs. The minimum depth between the faces of the forward-most plane and the
rear plane on the front elevation shall be 10 feet/ A plane must be a minimum
of 30 square feet to receive credit under this section.
F. Rear elevations shall adhere to the same criteria outlined in paragraph E for
front elevations, except that the minimum depth between front and back planes
on the rear elevation shall be 3 feet.
G. At least 50% of the units hi this project shall have one side elevation where
there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so that the side yard setback averages a
minimum of 7 feet.
H. 50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) hi the front of each unit shall be
recessed or projected a minimum of 2" and shall be with wood or colored
aluminum window frames (no mill finished).
I. The building materials for each unit shall be compatible and complementary to
one another as well as being compatible with surrounding villages.
J. The design of the units shall be varied to create variety and interest within the
village.
K. A maximum of two chimneys shall be permitted on any on residence.
L. At least three color schemes shall be provided for the stucco portions of the
units within this village.
M. Windows shall be phased to maximum privacy. Windows shall be located so
that they are offset from windows in adjacent units, where that is not possible
landscaping or opaque windows shall be used to provide privacy.
N. At least three different roof colors shall be used on this project.
O. A combination of the following materials may be used in the front elevations of
these units to create a varied streetscape: vinyl, brick or brick veneer, wood
Village 0 Design Guidelines 4 January 12, 1995
trim, stucco and stone.
P. At least 15% of the units in Village O shall be one story.
6. GARAGES
A. All garages shall have a minimum interior dimension of 20* by 20'.
B. All garages that face on to the street shall provide a minimum of 20' between
the face of the garage and the ROW to allow for driveway parking.
C. No more than 15% of the units in this village shall have three door garages.
Units with three car garages shall be distributed throughout the project. Three
car garage units shall be a mix of units with three separate one car garage doors
all on the same plane and units with a two car garage door and a one car garage
door combination. The doors shall be offset a minimum of 12". Driveways
serving three car garages shall have a maximum width of 24' at the back of the
sidewalk and have a curvilinear side flaring to its greatest width at the entrance
to the garage.
D. Garage doors shall be designed to set into the walls a minimum of 3" rather than
being flush with exterior walls.
7. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Accessory structures shall be permitted as allowed by section 21.10.050(1)(D) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code (R-l Zone). Accessory structures constructed in
conformance with this standard shall not require an amendment to the Planned
Development Permit for this project unless the lot coverage as provided for in these
guidelines would be exceeded.
8. WALLS AND FENCES
Walls and fences shall be provided as shown by the Village O Landscape Exhibit.
9. SIGNAGE
Signage will be provided to identify the Village and provide directional information. All
Signage will be developed in accordance with the Village O Landscape Exhibit. The exact
location of these signs will be determined prior to issuance of the first building permit.
Signage shall be approved pursuant to Chapter 21.41 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Village 0 Design Guidelines 5 January 12, 1995
10 LOT DRAINS
Private lot drains are approved for lots fronting on steep streets. Lot drains allow pad
elevations to be lowered along steeper streets thereby increasing rear yards and setbacks
from the tops of slopes. The maximum number of lots using these drains shall be
limited as follows:
Street Maximum % of Lots
<2.5% 50%
<2.5-5% 75%
<_5-7.5% 90%
<7.5 - 12% 100%
11. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
All development in Village O shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 21.45
(Planned Development Ordinance) of the Carlsbad Municipal code, except as may be
modified for the approved affordable housing incentives package for the combined
affordable housing site.
12. COMMON RECREATION AREA
The common passive recreational area between Melrose Avenue and Street O-B shall
have turf, benches and one combination plan\y equipment system and two or three of
the stand alone play equipment from the following list:
Combination Play Equipment Systems
600-548 "S" Horizontal Ladder, 90 degree Crawl Tube, "S" Tube
Slide, Spiral Climber, Wood Arch Bridge, 3-Rail Slide,
Spiral Slide
600-0069 Horizontal Ladder, Swinging Bridge, Balance Beam,
2'x6' Wide Slide, 8' Single Slide
137-4 Don Mills Chain Net Climber, Tire Climber, Curved Tube Slide,
Horizontal Ladder, 3 Platforms
137-7 Belmont Open Super Slide, Chain Net Climber, Tire Climber, 2
Platforms
139-2 Madison 1/2 Tube, 1/2 Open Curved Slide, Chain Net Climber,
Balance Beam, Two Platforms
Village 0 Design Guidelines 6 January 12, 1995
140-1 Lakefield Tube Slide, Open Slide, Tire Swing, Horizontal Ladder,
Access Ramp, Two Platforms
139-1 Oakville Suspension Bridge, Tire Climber, Balance Beam,
Horizontal Ladder, Three Platforms
Note: Model numbers refer to Playworld Systems and Children's Playground, Inc. Models.
Others may be substituted if approved.
Stand-Alone Equipment
Platform Seesaw Wood Parallel Bars
6' Slide Wood Horizontal Ladder
8' Circular Slide Spring Mates
7' Climber Whirl
Spring Platform Tot Sand Box
Wood Swings Tire Swing
13. SENSITIVE LOTS
Lots 1-14
A. Lots 1-14 are located within the boundaries of the Special Parks Design District
established by the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan. These units shall be designed
and screened so that they are compatible with the existing buildings and
vegetation within the Rancho Carrillo Community Park. Where possible, units
shall be plotted to provide the maximum possible setback from the tops of
slopes.
B. Final Landscape Plans submitted for building plan check shall ensure that
special attention is given to the selection of the plant species selected for the
landscaping of these lots, especially the slopes adjacent to Carrillo Way. No
more than a maximum of 30% of each unit on lots 1-14 should be visible from
the historical building compound at a point five years after the initial planting.
Fast growing alders and/or eucalyptus in combination with California live oaks
will be planted on the slopes to screen these units from the park site.
Village O Design Guidelines 7 January 12, 1995
14. SECOND UNITS
Up to 10% of the lots in Village O may be developed with second dwelling units. A
greater number of second dwelling units may be allowed if approved under a Density
Bonus to be approved as a part of the Housing Agreement (required pursuant to SDP
94-01) between the applicant and the City. All second units shall be developed
pursuant to Section 21.10.015 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and processed hi
conformance with the requirements of the Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance, the
Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, and the Village O Design Guidelines. The developer of
Village O has the option to develop the second units concurrently with the primary
units . The units may be approved as part of the Minor Planned Development Permit
that approves the floor plans and architecture for Village O as long as they are
processed consistent with Section 21.10.015 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
15. MINOR MODIFICATIONS
A cumulative change to five or less of these provisions of these guidelines is considered
a minor modification and may be approved by the Planning Director. However, each
change must be determined to be in substantial conformance with the approved project.
Second dwelling units shall be processed pursuant to the requirements of Section
21.10.015 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Village O Design Guidelines o January 12, 1995
Exhibit A
Matrix for Compliance with Design Guidelines - Village O
Requirement
Single Story Units
1 5% of all units Shall be one story.
Single Story Edge
33% of all units to have a single story edge for 40%
of the building perimeter.
Building Planes - Front
50% of all units to have at least 4 separate building
planes on street side elevations.
Building Planes -Rear
50% of all units to have at least 4 separate building
planes on rear elevations.
Lot Drains
Street Grade Less than 2.5% - 50% of lots.
Street Grade Between 2.5% and 5% - 75% of lots.
Street Grade Between 5% and 7.5% - 90% of lots.
Street Grade Between 7.5% and 12% - 100% of lots.
Side: Elevations
At least 50% of the units shall have one side elevation
where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so that the
sideyard setback averages a minimum of 7 feet.
Garages
No More than 1 5% of the units shall have 3 car garages.
Number of Units
Complying to Date
Including This Phase
Units in
This Phase
Total Units
Plotted to date
Remaining
Units
Total Units Required
to Comply with This
Requirement
Matrix for Plotting Compliance - Village O
Requirement:
No individual floor plan shall be plotted for more than
60% of the total units on any individual street.
Street O - A
Floor Plan A
Floor Plan B
Floor Plan C
Floor Plan D
Proposed Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
to Date
Street O - B
Floor Plan A
Floor Plan B
Floor Plan C
Floor Plan D
Proposed Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
to Date
Errata Sheet
June 3, 1998
To: PLANNING COMMISSION
From: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PUD 93-07(A) - RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
Please modify Planning Commission Resolution No. 4299 for Planned Unit Development
Amendment 93-07(A) as follows:
1. On page one, delete lines 9 through 17, and replace as follows:
WHEREAS, Continental Homes, Inc., "Developer", has filed a verified application with
the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Continental Homes, Inc., "Owner", described
as
AH of Carlsbad Tract 93-08, in the City of Carlsbad, County of
San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No.
13553 filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County, March 31,1998.
("the Property"); and
2. Modify Recital two, line 21, with the addition of the following:
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned Unit
Development Amendment as shown on Exhibits "A" - "V" dated May 20, 1998 ,on file in the
Planning Department, RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O" - PUD 93-07(A), as provided by
the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan (MP139) and Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code; and
3. Renumber findings 2.d and 2.e as findings numbers 4 and 5 as follows:
4. The building architecture is consistent with the Village "O" Design
guidelines as established by PUD 93-07; and
PUD 93-07(A) - RANCHOTARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
June3,1998
Page 2
5. The amendment meets all applicable design criteria set forth in the Village
"O" Design guidelines in that it is compatible with other development within
the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan and the Special Design Park District.
4. Add new finding number 6 as follows:
6. All mitigation measures in the Master Environmental Impact Report and the
Environmental Impact Report for Rancho Carrillo have been incorporated
in the design or imposed by conditions of Tentative Map CT 93-08 and
Planned Development Permit 93-07.
5. Condition Number 1 is modified by the addition of the following language:
Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections
and modifications to the Planned Unit Development documents, as necessary to make
them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project.
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed
development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
All other conditions and approvals of PUD 93-07 as stated in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 3676 not amended by this action shall remain in full force and effect.
6. Remove the "Notice" at the end of the resolution as no fees are imposed by this resolution.
Copy of revised Resolution No. 4299 is attached.
Attach. 1
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4299
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR
AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
4 PERMIT, PUD 93-07, FOR THE DELAYED ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW OF THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR
5 PLANS OF 49 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT
6 OF THE CITY, WEST OF MELROSE DRIVE AND SOUTH OF
POINSETTIA LANE IN THE RANCHO CARRILLO MASTER
PLAN IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 18.
8 CASE NAME: RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
CASE NO.: PUD 93-07(A^)
9
WHEREAS, Continental Homes, Inc., "Developer", has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Continental Homes, Inc.
12 "Owner", described as
13 All of Carlsbad Tract 93-08, in the City of Carlsbad, County of
San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No.
13553 filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego
15 County, March 31,1998
16
("the Property"); and
10 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned Unit
io
19 Development Amendment as shown on Exhibits "A" - "V" dated May 20, 1998 ,on file in the
20 Planning Department, RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O" - PUD 93-07(A), as provided
by the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan (MP 139) and Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal
22
21
Code; and
23
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 20th day of May, 1998 and on
24
the 3rd day of June, 1998, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider
£*•*)
26 said request; and
27
28
1 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
o and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Planned Unit Development Permit Amendment.
4
WHEREAS, on April 4, 1995, the City Council approved PUD 93-07, as
5
described and conditioned in City Council Resolution No. 95-65.6
7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
8 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
9 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
I! APPROVES RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O" - PUD 93-07(A), based
on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
12
Findings:
13
1 . 1. All findings set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3676 apply equally to this
amended project, and are incorporated by this reference.
2. The proposed Amendment qualifies as, and is hereby found to be, a Minor Planned
16 Development Amendment because:
17 a. The amendment does not involve a change to the densities or boundaries of
the subject property;
18
b. The amendment does not involve an addition of a new use or group of uses
not shown on the original permit, or the rearrangement of uses within the
2Q development in that the minor amendment consists only of architectural
review of the building elevations and floor plans of single family homes;
21 c. The amendment does not involve changes greater than ten percent in
22 approved yards, coverage, height, open space or landscaping;
23 3. The Planning Director has found that this Subsequent Project was described in the
previous Environmental Impact Report prepared for MP 139(F); and there will be no
additional significant effects, not analyzed therein; and that no new or additional
25 mitigation measures or alternatives are required; and that, therefore, this Subsequent
Project is within the scope of the prior EIR; and no new environmental document nor
26 Public Resources Code 21083 findings are required.
27
28
PC RESO NO. 4299 -2-
1 4. The building architecture is consistent with the Village "O" Design guidelines as
established by PUD 93-07; and
o 5. The amendment meets all applicable design criteria set forth in the Village "O"
Design guidelines in that it is compatible with other development within the Rancho
4 Carrillo Master Plan and the Special Design Park District.
5 6. All mitigation measures in the Master Environmental Impact Report and the
Environmental Impact Report for Rancho Carrillo have been incorporated in the
design or imposed by conditions of Tentative Map CT 93-08 and Planned
Development Permit 93-07.
Conditions:
1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and
modifications to the Planned Unit Development documents, as necessary to make them
10 internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development
shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development
11 different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. All other
conditions and approvals of PUD 93-07 as stated in Planning Commission Resolution
No. 3676 not amended by this action shall remain in full force and effect.
13 2. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local
14 ordinances in effect a the time of building permit issuance.
15 3. The Developer shall include, as part of the plans submitted for any permit plan check, a
reduced legible version of the approving Resolutions No. 3676 and 4299 on a 24" x 36"
blueline drawing.
17 4. Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the
, g District Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for
such sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy.
19 5. If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be
20 implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented
and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all
approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits;
deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of
approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with
23 said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer
or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this minor Planned Development Permit
24 amendment.
25 6. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as
part of the approved Planned Unit Development, as contained in Planning Commission
26 Resolution No. 3676.
27
28 PC RESO NO. 4299 -3-
1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the planning
2 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of June, 1998, by the
3 following vote, to wit:
4
AYES:
5
NOES:6
7 ABSENT:
8 ABSTAIN:
9
10
BAILEY NOBLE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
12
ATTEST:
13
14
15 MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RESO NO. 4299 -4-