The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPUD 94-02A; Sea Country at Aviara; Planned Unit Development - Non-Residential (PUD) (5)CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FOR PAGE 1 OF 2 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPT USE ONLY) [~~| Master Plan | [ Specific Plan [ | Precise Development Plan | [ Tentative Tract Map \D( Planned Development Permit [ [ Non-Residential Planned Development [~] Condominium Permit | | Special Use Permit | | Redevelopment Permit Q Tontative Parcel Map Obtain from Eng. Dept [ [ Administrative Variance | [ Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit General Plan Amendment Local Coastal Plan Amendment | [ Site Development Plan [ | Zone Change | | Conditional Use Permit | [ Hillside Development Permit [ | Environmental Impact Assessment I I Variance | | Planned Industrial Permit | | Coastal Development Permit | | Planning Commission Determination | | List any other applications not specificed (FOR DEPT USE ONLY) 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S). 3) PROJECT NAME: 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:E/2?, -5"V >AV DESCRIPTION: 6) APPLICANT NAME (PRWT OR TYPE MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND STATE/%/ZIP TELEPHONE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATtnU*DAT NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING THAT ^RJLTIPLE APPUCATIONS BE HLED MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FO PAGE 2 OF 2 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT : ON THE BETWEEN STREET ADDRESS (NORTH, SOUTHEAST, WEST) (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) AND (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION (RES/ COMM/ INDUS) 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL OFFIC/SQUARE FOOTAGE 17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 22) EXISTING ZONING 23) PROPOSED ZONING 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS, OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE/SlJBJECB OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE ********************************************************************************** FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION: APPLICATION TYPE TOTAL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID FEE REQUIRED 5, 5<t?. o-o 2,2.0 ,GU 06 , 2-3 .o O APR 1 2 1996 DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: RECEIPT NO. FRM0016 3/96 3J REC'D FROM _ - Jl CITY OF CARLSBAD A iD™LLAGE DRIVE CARLSBAD, 8H-I CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 CARLSBAD^ILLAGE DRIVE CARLSBAD, Cl?LlFORNIA 92008 434-2867 DATE ACCOUNT NO. RECEIPT NO. 27553 DESCRIPTION NOT VALID UNLESS VALIDATED BY TOTAL AMOUNT \ fS-PRMT Printed on recycled paper.CASH REGISTER I PLEASE NOTE: i Time limits on the processing of discretionary projects established by state law do not start until a project application is deemed complete by the City. The City has 30 calendar days from the date of application submittal to determine whether an application is complete or incomplete. Within 30 days of submittal of this application you will receive a letter stating whether this application is complete or incomplete. If it is incomplete, the letter will state what is needed to make this application complete. When the application is complete, the processing period will start upon the date of/^he completion letter. Applicant Signature: Staff Signature: Date: fy/ ///? To be stapled with receipt to application Copy for file. APR 12 1996PROJECT DE3CRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: SEA COUNTRY - AVIARA PLANNING AREA 15 __^ APPLICANT NAME: SEA COUNTRY HOMES. INC. L_ Please fully describe the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: The applicant is requesting approval of a major amendment to PUD 94-02. The project was originally approved for 54 townhome residential units on 9 lots as CT 94-03/PUD 94-02 on February 7, 1995. The Major Amendment to the P.U.D. reflects minor revisions to the approved project layout resulting from the Sea Country Homes, Inc. new product and a reduction in the number of townhomes to 51. The proposed residential units are one and two story single-family attached units of three types and sizes: Plan 1 (One story, 1,797 square feet, 2-bedroom/2-bath), Plan 2 (Two story, 2,111 square feet, 3 bedroom/2.5 bath) and Plan 3 (Three story, 2,260 square feet, 3-bedroom/3-bath). The units will be designed in three and four-plex structures. Building facades will be of stucco, and roofs will be of concrete tile. The project will have a gated entry area and a common recreation facility (swimming pool). The site of the proposed development is a pre-graded pad located at the southern end of the proposed Black Rail Court in the Aviara Master Plan Area. The planning area is a 23.3 acre site of which 7.09 acres constitute the developable area. It is on a terrace with up-slopes to the east and down-slopes to the west and south. The site is surrounded on the west, south, and east by the Aviara Golf Course. Alga Road is just north of the site. The Major Amendment also reflects minor revisions to street alignments and building pad configurations, which result in a very similar layout to that shown on the approved T.M. and P.U.D. Building pad elevations on the Major Amendment show minor variances to the approved T.M./ P.U.D. These changes are due to the new product and result in equal or greater separation between buildings, and in a more open feeling. The new layout also creates approximately 15% more recreation area (private yards and common recreation areas). The Major Amendment drainage configuration is substantially the same as the T.M. as are the water and sewer systems. The grading as shown on the Major Amendment results in fewer retaining walls and more daylight grading adjacent to the golf course, which will enhance the projects' appearance from the golf course. The following data reflects the conformance to the approved Tentative Map/P.U.D.: Approved T.M. No. of Dwelling Units Bldg. Coverage ADT Recreation Area Excavation Fill Total Parking Spaces Parking Ratio 54 1.97 432 39,600 23,400 23,400 140 2.59:1 ; Major Amendment 51 2.15 400 45,500 23,300 23,300 130 2.55:1 iff Carlsbad Unified School District .801 PUm AvHtiut;, Carload, OaJiforcln 9200S-243S "All Students Can Learn" BOAJRJ) OP TRU3TBB3 JAME8 MoCOHMICK : Pferident JULIAWE 1* NYGAARD JOE ANfifcL Clerk : j. EDWARD 8WITZER, Ja. Membrr DONALD M. JOHNBON Mtmber DWTniCT ADMINISTRATION THOMAS K. BBJEBLEY, Superintendent ' EdJ> InsVrurtional Seivicea JOHN H. BLAIR t 8\)p<rin Berv\c*» GERALD C. TARMAN .A«i«rt*nt Sup«rint<ndcnt Peraonnel Service n CHERYL EBN8T Director ' Elementary Exlucabon DEWAVNt L. FEASEL Manager Operation* August 14». 1990 : .- • . : . ::.. ' •• Mr, Michael Holzmiller- : . Planning Director City of Carlsbad . 2075 Las PaTmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 . SUBJECT: LFMP Zone 19 (CUSO CFD 1) School Fee Status Dearer, Holzmlller, ' With the recent adoption'by the Board of Trustees of a Mello Roos GFD in the Zone 19, local Facilities Management Plan area, the requirement .for developers to pay school fees has been modified. The formulation of a CFD within this area supersedes previously mandated fees payed by new development. Within the Zone 19 area, developer fees are no longer necessary to offset impacts of nev< development on school facilities. The CFD establishes a long term funding source received 1n the form of an'assessment against Individual new residential units. Because this alternative source of revenue is now established, it is not necessary to require developers requesting permits^ within this geographic area to .show proof ' of commitment to pay school fees. If you have any questions regarding District CFD-1 (same boundaries as Zone 19)» please call Georglana Kirby at 434-0637 or Tom Hageman at 931-0780'. Sincerely, . John BlairAs/istart Superintendent, Business Services APR 1 2 1996 i L v 'f-1 •] "*'; f* f' I'-E*&~to'a <s u\j ti a\a 4au £> fcu APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR APR 1 2 1996 TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS (AND REVISIONS) /MW «* TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPS ^'J^ yf CONDOMINIUM PERMITS K^».!wJ*.^ . PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMITS (FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS ONLY) A proposed, project requiring that multiple applications be filed must be submitted prior to 3:30 p<t»< A proposed project requiring that only one application be filed must be submitted prior to 4:00 p.m. All joint application exhibits (i.e., Tentative Map and Pfaaned Development Site Plan shoald be prepared at the smm scale (use a scale no smaller than P - 40)* la addition all pla»s shall be My dimensioned (i.e., setbacks, height, mad widths, parking spaces, planters, yards, etc.) The following materials shall be submitted for each application except as noted in "III. OTHER REQUIREMENTS" K and L under Property Owner's list and address labels. I. REQUntED PLANS (folded and delivered in complete sets) A. SITE PLAN: ten (10) copies on a 24" x 36" sheet(s) folded to 8 1/2" x 11" size. Fifteen (15) copies of the site plan shall be submitted by the applicant upon request of the project planner prior to approval of the project. Each site plan shall contain the following information: 1. General Information: [""I a. Name and address of owner whose property is proposed to be subdivided and the name and address of the subdivider; I I b. Name and address of registered civil engineer, licensed surveyor, landscape architect or land planner who prepared the maps; EH c. North arrow; LJ d. residential, commercial, industrial or other uses; EH g. Tentative Map number in upper right hand corner (City to provide number at time of application). l~~l h. Number of units to be constructed when a condominium or community apartment project is involved; Total number of lots proposed. I I i. Name of sewer and water district providing service to the project. f~l j. Average Daily Traffic generated by the project broken down by separate uses. CH k. Name of School District providing service to the project. l~l 1. Proposed density in lots or dwelling units per acre. |~l m. Existing Zone and General Plan Designation. CH n. Site acreage. FRM0003 2/96 Page 1 of 7 2. Site a. General CD 1) Approximate location of existing and proposed building and permanent structures; C] 2) Location of all major vegetation, showing size and type; CH 3) Location of railroads; LJ 4) Legal description of the exterior boundaries of the subdivision (approximate bearings, distances and curve data); L~] 5) Lot lines and approximate dimensions and number of each lot; EH 6) Lot area for each proposed lot. CD 7) Setback dimensions for the required front, rear and side yard setbacks for all structures; CH 8) Indicate top and bottom elevations for all fences, walls, and retaining walls. Show these elevations at each end of the wall and in the middle. Also show the worst condition elevation. C3 9) Show site details for all recreation lots or areas (when applicable). D 10) Total building coverage for lots with proposed structures. b. Streets and Utilities LJ 1) The location, width and proposed names of all streets within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision, show proposed street grades and centerline radii. Provide separate profile for all streets with grades in excess of 7%. Streets should be in conformance with City Standards and Engineering Department Policies. LJ 2) Name, location and width of existing adjacent streets and alleys. CU 3) Typical street section for all adjacent streets and streets within the project. O 4) Width and location of all existing or proposed public or private easements. CH 5) Public and private streets and utilities clearly identified. CH 6) Show distance between all intersections and medium and high use driveways. [~l 7) Clearly show parking stall and isle dimensions and truck turning radii for all parking areas. CH 8) Show access points to adjacent undeveloped lands. Q 9) Show all existing and proposed street lights and utilities (sewer, water, major gas and fuel lines, major electric and telephone facilities) within and adjacent to the project. [~~l 10) Show all fire hydrants located within 300 feet of the site. FRM003 2/96 Page 2 of 7 c. Gradin^nd Drainage LJ 1) Approximate contours at 1' intervals for slopes less than 5%; 2' intervals for slopes between 5% and 10%; and 5' intervals for slopes over 10% (both existing and proposed). Existing and proposed topographic contours within a 100 foot perimeter of the boundaries of the site. Existing onsite trees; those to be removed and those to be saved. LJ 2) Earthwork volumes: cut, fill, import and export. CH 3) Spot elevations at the corners of each pad. CH 4) Method of draining each lot. Include a typical cross section taken parallel to the frontage for lots with less than standard frontage. CH 5) Location, width and/or size of all watercourses and drainage facilities within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision; show location and approximate size of any proposed detention/retention basins. 6) Clearly show and label the 100 year flood line for the before and after conditions for any project which is within or adjacent to a FEMA flood plain. LANDSCAPE PLANS: for all condominium and planned development projects, ten (10) copies (four (4) copies for projects with four or fewer units) on a 24" x 36" sheet(s) folded to 8 1/2" x 11" size. Fifteen (15) copies of the landscape plans shall be submitted by the applicant upon request of the project planner prior to approval of the project. The scale should be consistent with all other exhibits. Each landscape plan shall include the following information: 1. Landscape zones per the City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual. 2. Typical plant species, quantity of each species, and their size for each planting zone in a legend (Use symbols). 3. An estimate of the yearly amount of irrigation (supplemental) water required to maintain each zone. 4. Landscape maintenance responsibility (private or common) for all areas. 5. Percent of site used for landscaping. 6. Water Conservation Plan. BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS: for all condominium and planned development projects, ten (10) copies (four (4) copies for projects with 4 or fewer units) on a 24" x 36" sheet(s) folded to 8 1/2" x 11" size. Fifteen (15) copies of the building elevations and floor plans shall be submitted by the applicant upon request of the project planner prior to project approval. Each building elevation and floor plan shall include the following information: 1. Floor plans with square footage included. 2. Location and size of storage areas. 3. All buildings, structures, walls and/or fences, signs and exterior lights. FRM003 2/96 Page 3 of 7 elevation^^4. Include a sc^rc on all floor plans and building 5. Indicate on all building elevations, compliance with Carlsbad Height Ordinance 21.04.065. CONSTRAINTS MAP: at the same scale as other exhibit (i.e., Tentative maps, Site Plan, etc.). (24" x 36") folded to 8 1/2" x 11" shall include the following information: (Note: this information is not required for previously graded sites and the conversion of existing structures.) If the constraint does not apply to the property, list it on the map as not applicable. LJ 1. Major ridge lines LJ 2. Distant views CD 3. Internal views LJ 4. Riparian or woodlands I I 5. Intermittent drainage course D 6. 25 - 40% slopes I I 7. Slopes 40% and above [H 8. Major rock outcroppings CH 9. Easements D 10. Floodplains I I 11. Archaeological sites I I 12. Special planning areas - type of special planning area I I 13. Biological Habitats. Indicate the location of coastal sage scrub and chaparral plant communities existing on the site [H 14. Beaches I I 15. Permanent bodies of water D 16. Wetlands I I 17. Land subject to major power transmission easements I I 18. Railroad track beds. E. COLORED SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION PLAN: (Not required with first submittal and not required for tentative parcel maps). It is the Applicant's responsibility to bring one (1) copy of a colored site plan and one (1) copy of a colored elevation to the Planning Department by 12:00 noon, eight (8) days prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Do not mount exhibits. FRM003 2/96 Page 4 of 7 0G F. REDUCED SITE^AN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS: ^(1) copy 8 1/2" x 11" . These plans must be oflP»lity that is photographically reproducible^Riese are not required with first submittal but will be requested at a later time by your project planner. . LOCATION MAP: one (1) copy 8 1/2" X 11" (suggested scale 200" - vicinity maps on the site plan are not acceptable). II. DOCUMENTS A. Environmental Impact Assessment Form (separate fee required). Required for tentative parcel maps only where significant grading is proposed. Check with Planning staff to determine if required for your application. \f/N vil B. Public Facility Agreement: Two (2) copies: One (1) notarized original and one(l) reproduced copy. (Separate fee required). D | v*< *^ / s 0D C. Disclosure Statement. (Not required for tentative parcel maps.) . Three (3) copies of the Preliminary Title Report (current within the last six (6) months). Af fO E. Proof of availability of sewer if located in the Leucadia County Water District or the Vallecitos Water District. X L4 F. School District letter indicating that school facilities will be available to the project. y\/D G. Statement of agreement to waive tentative parcel map time limits. Required for tentative maps only when project requires concurrent processing of planning application, or environmental review. H. All projects must evaluate their potential impacts on the regional transportation system, including the costs of mitigating the associated impacts, as required by the SANDAG Congestion Management Program (CMP). For projects with an average daily traffic (ADT) generation rate greater than 500 vehicles per day or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips: Submit two (2) copies of a Circulation Impact Analysis for the project. The analysis must be prepared by a Registered Traffic Engineer or Registered Civil Engineer. The analysis must show project impacts to all intersections and road segments identified as impacted within the included Local Facilities Management Plan or as otherwise determined in discussions with staff. The following minimum information should be included with the study: 1. 8 1/2" x 11" or 8 1/2" x 14" plats showing zone impacted roads, background and project AM and PM peak hour impacts and traffic distribution. 2. Project traffic generation rates and traffic assignment. 3. Necessary calculations and/or analysis to determine intersection and road segment levels of service. 4 Any proposed mitigation requirements to maintain the public facility standards. 5. On Collector streets and above, an analysis of the need for a traffic signal will be required. "Large" projects: Any project which, upon its completion will be expected to generate either an equivalent of 2,400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle FRM003 2/96 Page 5 of 7 trips, including ^re projects that may have already been ragfcwed under CEQA but require additional local ^Bcretionary actions, is defined as a "largw^project" under the SANDAG Congestion Management Program (CMP) and will be subject to enhanced CEQA review as specified in the CMP. Depending upon the complexity of the project, the City of Carlsbad reserves the right to require a traffic study on any project. /VrO I. Noise study consistent with City of Carlsbad Noise Guidelines Manual. J. Two copies of preliminary soils/geologic report for all project with cut or fill depths exceeding 5 feet. K. For all condominium conversions, a signed statement by the owner stating Section 66427J of the State Map Act will be complied with. L. For all condominium conversions, a letter from San Diego Gas and Electric company stating that plans to convert the gas and electric system to separate systems have been submitted and are acceptable. III. OTHER REQUIREMENTS / A. Preliminary Hydrology map and calculations for lots exceeding one acre. Show before and after discharges to each including drainage basin. B. For all condominium conversions, one copy of a compliance inspection performed by the Building Department. (Separate fee required.) "7 D C. SUBMIT ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY IF APPLICABLE (SEE COUNCIL POLICY NO. 44 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL LOTS, AS ATTACHED.) 0D Photographs of the property taken from the north, south, east and west. E. Construction materials board and color samples (i.e., roofing, exterior walls, pavement, glass, wood etc.) F. Pursuant to Section 21.45.040(6) of Title 21 applications for planned developments on properties designated or zoned for single family development shall be accompanied by a preliminary tentative map. This map shall illustrate how many standard lots conforming to applicable zoning and subdivision standards served by public streets could fit on the site. The design of this preliminary tentative map shall comply with all applicable City Ordinances and Standards except for the design standards of the Planned Development Ordinance. The applicant shall also submit maps, diagrams, plans and a report showing that the proposed planned development will result in superior residential development consistent with the purpose and intent of the Planned Development Ordinance. The density on the developed portion of the planned development site shall be similar to and compatible with surrounding development. G. Signed "Notice of Time Limits on Discretionary Applications". Q'^ H. Completed "Project Description/Explanation" sheet. CH I. Deposit for Publication Notices - See Fee Schedule for amount. FRM003 2/96 Page 6 of 7 If your project wnPmclude signage at some time in the future,^Ri must submit a proposed sign program as part of this application. The program should be provided as separate exhibits and should include the following informtion: Proposed sign location, dimensions, area, materials, sign copy and colors. | | K. Property Owner's List and Addressed Labels NOTE: WHEN THE APPLICATION IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD BY THE DECISION MAKING BODY, THE PROJECT PLANNER WILL CONTACT THE APPLICANT AND ADVISE HIM TO SUBMIT THE RADIUS MAP. TWO SETS OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS. THE APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SIGN A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REPRESENTS THE LATEST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLLS FROM THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. THE PROJECT WILL NOT GO FORWARD UNTIL THIS INFORMATION IS RECEIVED. A typewritten list of the names and addresses of all property owners within a 600 foot radius of subject property (including the applicant and/or owner). The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest assessment rolls. Two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property. The list must be typed in all CAPITAL LETTERS, left justified, void of any punctuation. For any address other than a single family residence, an apartment or suite number must be included but Apt., Suite, and BIdg. # must NOT appear in the street address line. DO NOT TYPE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ON LABELS. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes -PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Swiss 721, Enterprise TM, Courier New (TT) no larger than 1 Ipt. Sample labels are as follows: UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Mrs. Jane Smith Mrs. Jane Smith MRS JANE SMITH 123 Magnolia Ave,. Apt #3 123 Magnolia Ave. APT #3 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Apt. #3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE Carlsbad, CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 L. 600 Foot Radius Map A map to scale not less than 1" = 200' showing each lot within 600 feet of exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots shall be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owner's list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical. For tentative parel maps, a map to scale on an 8 1/2 x 11 inch sheet, showing each lot within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject project. FRM003 2/96 Page 7 of 7 City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OR CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE (Please Print) The following information must be disclosed: 1. Applicant List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. Owner List the names and addressees of all person having any ownership interest in the property involved. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust. DISCLOS.FRM 2/96 PAGE 1 of 2 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1 576 • (619)438-1161 (Over) Disclosure Statement Page 2 5. Have you had more than $250.00 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s) Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary) Signature of Owner/date Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant DISCLOS.FRM 2/96 PAGE 1 of 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT NAME: Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation. R«v. 4/91 ProjDwe.trm STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CITY OF CARLSBAD The Subdivision Map Act and the Carlsbad Municipal Code sets a fifty (50) day time restriction on Planning Commission processing of Tentative Maps and a thirty (30) day time limit for City Council action. These time limits can only be extended by the mutual concurrence of the applicant and the City. By accepting applications for Tentative Maps concurrently with applications for other approvals which are prerequisites to the map; i.e., Environmental Assessment, Environmental Impact Report, Condominium Plan, Planned Unit Development, etc., the fifty (50) day time limits and the thirty (30) day time limits are often exceeded. If you wish to have your application processed concurrently, this agreement must be signed by the applicant or his agent. If you choose not to sign the statement, the City will not accept your application for the Tentative Map until all prior necessary entitlements have been processed and approved. The undersigned understands that the processing time required by the City may exceed the time limits, therefore the undersigned agrees to extend the time limits for Planning Commission and City Council action and fully concurs with any extensions of time up to one year from the date the application was accepted as complete to properly review all of the applications. Signature Date Name (Print) Relationship to Application (Property Owner-Agent) FRM0037 2/96 City Engineer CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 PROPOSED MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. I (We), the undersigned owner(s), do hereby state that I (We) have read Section 66427.1 of the Subdivision Map Act and I (We) will make the notifications to the tenants required therein. DATE OWNER DATE OWNER 66427.1 ESTABLISHES REQUIREMENTS FOR NOTICE TO TENANTS AND RIGHT OF TENANTS TO EXCLUSIVE CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE IN CONDOMINIUM, COMMUNITY APARTMENT OR STOCK COOPERATIVE PROJECTS The legislative body shall not approve a final map for a subdivision to be created from the conversion of residential real property into a condominium project, a community apartment project, or a stock cooperative project unless it finds all of the following: (a) Each of the tenants of the proposed condominium, community apartment project or stock cooperative project has received, pursuant to Section 66452.9, written notification of intention to convert at least 60 days prior to the filing of a tentative map pursuant to Section 66452. There shall be a further finding that each such tenant, and each person applying for the rental of a unit in such residential real property, has, or will have, received all applicable notices and rights now or hereafter required by this chapter or Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 66451). In addition, a finding shall be made that each tenant has received 10 days' written notification that an application for a public report will be, or has been, submitted to the Department of Real Estate, and that such report will be available on request. The written notices to tenants required by this subdivision shall be deemed satisfied it such notices comply with the legal requirements for service by mail. (b) Each of the tenants of the proposed condominium, community apartment project, or stock cooperative project has been, or will be, given written notification within 10 days of approval of a final map for the proposed conversion. (c) Each of the tenants of the proposed condominium, community apartment project, or stock cooperative project has been, or will be, given 180 days' written notice of intention to convert prior to termination of tenancy due to the conversion or proposed conversion. The provisions of this subdivision shall not alter or abridge the rights or obligations of the parties in performance of their covenants, including, but not limited to, the provision of services, payment of rent or the obligations imposed by Section 1941,1941.1, and 1941.2 of the Civil Code. (d) Each of the tenants of the proposed condominium, community apartment project, or stock cooperative project has been, or will be, given notice of an exclusive right to contract for the purchase of his or her respective unit upon the same terms and conditions that such unit will be initially offered to the general public or terms more favorable to the tenant. The right shall run for a period of not less than 90 days from the date of issuance of the subdivision public report pursuant to Section 11018.2 of the Business and Professions Code, unless the tenant gives prior written notice of his or her intention not to exercise the right. (e) This section shall not diminish, limit or expand, other than as provided herein, the authority of any city, county, or city and county to approve or disapprove condominium projects. [Amended, Chapter 1128, Statutes of 1980] P :\docs\misf or ms\condocon.f rm POLICY NO. 20 EFFECTIVE DATE:9/5/89 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY PARKING - OVERHANG Administrative Policy No. 11 made the standard provision for non-compact car spaces to have a minimal paved area of 8-1/2' x 17-1/2' with 2-1/2' overhang into adjacent landscaped area. The widespread application of this policy has led to a general deterioration of landscaped setback areas in most projects. As a result, the following policy shall be applied: 1. No parking overhang will be allowed into any required setback area. 2. Parking overhang will be allowed only in special, specific situations as reviewed and approved by the Planning Director on a case by case basis. 3. In no case shall parking overhang be allowed for compact car spaces. 4. This Administrative Policy repeals Administrative Policy No. 11. APPROVED BY: MICHAEL J. HOLZMILL1 Planning Director MJH:ENM/lh Policy No. 21 Effective Date 3/12/90 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Fences DEFINITIONS 4. 5. Fence • A vertical harrier or enclosure constructed of any material which supports no other load other than its own weight. Wall - A solid fence. Retaining Wall - A wall designed to resist the lateral displacement of soil or other materials; said materials being substantially equal to the height of the wall. The term "wall" in Section 21.46.130 of the Zone Code and other applicable sections of the code shall be interpreted to mean retaining walls in addition to solid fences. Safety Rnilinti - An open fence not to exceed 36" in height. The said openings, between the materials of which the fence is constructed must not represent less than 7U percent of the total surface of each five foot linear section when viewed perpendicular to the face of the fence. The total height of all walls, fences, retaining walls, and combination fence/retaining walls in a required setback shall not exceed the following limits: A. B. C. D. APPROVED BY: In a required front yard setback, the total height shall not exceed 42 inches. (Example - Two 42 inch retaining walls would not be permitted nor a 42 inch retaining wall and another 42 inch fence). In a required side and rear yard setback, the total height shall not exceed 6 feet, (Example - A 4 ft. retaining wall and a 5 ft. fence would not be permitted because the total exceeds 6 ft). Upon approval of the Planning Director, the total height shall not exceed 6 feet in a required street side yard. Otherwise, the total height shall not exceed 42 inches in a street side yard. (This includes all combinations of fences and retaining walls). A 36 inch safety railing is required on top of all retaining walls that exceed a height of 3 feet. The maximum height of the railing shall be 36 inches and must conform to the definition of a safety railing. MICHAEL J. HDLZMfLLER Planning Director JG:af Policy No.: 23 Effective Date: 6/26/90 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY 200 Square Foot Open Space in PDs Until the PD Ordinance is revised, Section 21.45.090(g)(i), regarding the open space requirement of 200 square feet per unit, shall be calculated as follows: 1. Roof decks can be counted towards satisfying this requirement. 2. Private yards with a minimum dimension of 15 feet can be counted toward the open space requirement. 3. Patios and balconies can be counted toward meeting the 200 sq. ft. requirement as a private passive area. 4. If a detached single family project is 4 units or less, and the lots are less than 7,500 square feet, and private yards of 15' x 15' are provided, a common active recreation area does not need to be provided, however common passive recreation area must be provided. 5. Where common active and private passive recreation areas are required, then 50% of the total recreation area shall be provided as a common active area. APPROVED BY: MICHAEL J. Planning Director BH:kd Pol.23 POLlW NO: 24 EFFECTIVE DATE: 8/24/90 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY DRIVEWAY DEFINITION The following administrative policy shall become effective immediately. However, it shall only apply to applications deemed complete on or after the effective date. Additionally, it shall apply to previously approved projects that seek an amendment if the application for said amendment is deemed complete on or following the effective date of this policy. Section 21.45.090 of the Planned Development Ordinance presently contains standards which distinguish between a driveway and a street. However, no definition describing the difference between a street and a driveway is provided. Until the Ordinance is amended and a more formal definition is prepared, the following definition of a driveway shall be used: DRIVEWAY - Provides access from a public or private street to parking spaces, garage(s) or similar structures. The purpose of a driveway is not to provide for vehicular through traffic between properties or projects or to provide the required street frontage for individual lots. Driveway for the purpose of implementing Section 21.45.090 (Carlsbad Municipal Code) and serving more than one dwelling unit is defined as having a minimum pavement width of 30 feet curb to curb and having access to a maximum of twelve (12) dwelling units. All units having direct and/or indirect access to a loop driveway shall be counted toward the maximum 12 dwelling units. For driveways that do not exceed 30 feet in width, guest parking per 21.45.090 would have to be "dispersed" in bays along the entire length of the driveway. "Dispersed" shall be interpreted to mean that the guest parking space shall be no more than 100 feet measured in a logical walking path from the entrance of the unit it could be considered to serve. In projects that have single loaded driveways, the driveway can be increased to a maximum of 32 feet to allow parking on the side away from the structures. Guest parking on driveways shall be supplied proportionally along the driveway to the number of units served on the driveway. If 12 or more dwelling units are contained in a single structure, it shall be considered to be served by a driveway for setback purposes if that driveway is primarily for providing access to parking spaces, garage(s), or similar structure(s). APPROVED BY: -lUu^ MICHAEL J. Planning Director arb fUU 'sis •5-e • 2 x x« O" H .. » S 5 E au C z «u J Nl tfl UU > n o < 11§•* O U KZ 1C O iJ . L T-l1 111• 1 X M Z in C TT 2< a, f-»u05 in o r*iQ 0 OS Q U < u aJ Uo wz enM UU5 UU(1 05 Tilf 7 1I1 1 L |1 i 1 i — — — ttiiiiiii OtO 0 — Q , M 05 Z H < Oc ao05 OO QOa o: 05 U 0 »fl « *a i• •t ff*- «a t«: A• O1 1 j iiS ^S5S«32g !!{(5'§S•s-f*• VM e OS ' 0 „<-Is.op?-5g | U) W U U W -J L.M O 0 £ W U U « gsS"SSa."J«u ?2siSf£°u ^ «l u 'SH'^Q'" u c ^ S *e;Sl3 11 "J °U MV~ z O W 3-3SU •• 2 J « Sx MM pi | 3GSC>2 •• U W 5 J o z u a a 5 JU [ULT fl [UU 1 ' T ™"_l_ _4 * | X 1\ | 1-i rJ11 r-4l1 X M £ a* P^ ^* Z< a. a: Ooa u z trt a ^n 00U OUo£ r*i at a:< OCJ§Q(N aSU M CO M-U QU Za. < 1I 1]o0Q 1 T111 ]" r !i L — a: S Is ^ ^H 0 Cfi -, ^ § wI : f|j ~a. <N *^ 'NIW ,, OOQ X O uu a. a:LUHccO h- ILL.' LLJ O <a:<a HIT 1 1 111 1 j (i 1 1 n v- 1T 1 1 — -j 1 11 1 1 i. .1 1l ,_. X M S Ofort-^ 1-1 Z «^J 0, a cc. u CO rH OSoQ 0u a co asu N Z £ a.1 < U. 2 w °* 2< 3i:.Q ?«• ftl52jg 0 •J < 3 a. o gj ^HU K £ wU X3i? oo Ci•z. tt uoO-1 0HO! U<: w U Eu- tM O uj O, X M £ cs OOa a•z <cc uo0-"%oi w o tu Cbrs O J ,J- z< ~- CE LU t DC O Ocr LL LU O <cc<o m T1U n UU1 fUU £2 -la "5 — a. aU) OK3 <J U >- H uu au< OS CJ adu o o •P n-•-- -ij e9 CJo 2 b]u<s CO in 99 X Mz < a. . ae-i oCK <orf> U VO ><• I- . & d, bino OJ •o o ^ -H m u -i- < in om ••m o> X Ms > < r~ aoJ cod^ n m cc LLJ H DC O <CO Lll CO Q CC S£-LUQ CO IUU1 IdJ [UUl U O o 00 WO w>< 'I..3 t-9 Z5a, . u H O b* <ce -H W ^0 > t, E-it/) CM Xn£ -Ia, U > (uto r-l O ^H • «. 00 s^ • UJ * fH O vTi M5 M— .|. ^t b, Z J MOH un DC 111h;cco *o<CD LJJ CO Q CC LU uu i'aiM::-•iipi^1 a*-> i^'ifr *n*„ • g « 5 52j «* * • m • . * * • c j *^*S WOfl4J-^rj»J*Ji1 • £ <-M• ^^HC-4^ C^ t*jQ*>*4c -< o • -« • o c « l a «-- fc-^ • 3 • £^1 ^ CTJ • ki c -H o a0 • V. 3 ki £ _fc. -t o JB v. • a a:* o if 2«2 « hJx *5« s:|kt W Hkl H z a xHUH [UU1 B § U. azouuU) Kl fa F o i —0 i~ fe- ll. OS Z b. -3 OD I/I r-— t •» "'^_j UU1 cr HI O LU < Q. O 5 CQ u m 9 m • o e i fUU .•2 . Ha'Jl!&!li" ii;s |l|-l^| ss-^-^C^H^ c -« u 4 ** *^ *u^Oja*-«JWVi« C< C T3 • \\ *> •• ns. s II uu fUl-H nn un ssssH **s« §s as 3:S if a (t,U) Ci. Ul 1 £h fN T. J tfc, U) S ' L ^r - i? ..p X z Of • s O— <N cZ ui in ^ _ ^4 (N J -^ d. J Cu Ul•-[~ P Cu Iui ^ft^ u <--V X MS «§SZ cc LJJ t CCq 111' Qj Oz Q CQ ipa43• o e ,-?** • t* «*<i!i 3*3 «|i Msj!« liii -t 0 « -* * O3 ti £ 3 C L.a-w «J3 w^ !?-. [UU b 10 J 01 —rsin o -^a, CM ^ Z ^ Z; 5' 0, flJUl cc. HIt CCo UJ OJ o Q DCQ uu SS'.SS'* . .53§S8sS,!*;g§ Cl5ftlHiftl'i•Su'"^f 5 •• 3?»• g^.KL.j 3ss3:*s;;s|a ^s-:3.:u8al 55j5.-|2«irl s?5 Hl'JH'l I'!:»?S2 ..us .§=c. i- u J £ • r o « 4JOTJ*J-H^«-**« • £ ^• ^^C-H^ C -t hD^^• -- 0 * -^ • O C « • tL 4*X43U£3£b-H » " ?£-«o.av.«,a*jvi« at c tj • .X O ft. f, f! l 3s£ O. H • ~x ee xHUH ^-Hun «r A Chto :of» • -*. J-s^ *>m^ —< Z \ * \ J N\ 0"u•z. Z o CD Z Q_J D' DQ • • 4J TJ• £ C • • 0 £ O «*J «J A_ C £ nju J= u« "«-S3*=X Ql i^Ug .8v> at = H z! uW b <>.j a U VI> i M zPS SiXU »U Z b = I - ZX u0 U 01 >* K CU tb o =HUPS .. Z (J?;s i is Z *" CO « a =U < a- H aUa 1a * u H zU g <*>in Z< a. a. OPo <N Z Ja. t, — 0 kC 01 VO (N — W CT\S -iM CZ II U CM Xa:J o< £-1 z J in OPm o U a Hu a, EH U V£S r-IH .IX II Ma, >IX^ O < EHEH 02 O oc LU LU LU Q_ O c/5 (inr iz: "UL M tt Zi-h= . u; et o 8. « 5 o o S X M £ OP 1/1 T Z Q. X Mz Ja. XI—(z oIN z a. (N -I(N —t C6 EH U t IX IIun. >o:•J o E-[L, — O -(N E- U U -H S -H Ma n a, >exJ o < EH EH W O EH -I X M E <*>in-I Z a, O c*>rn in tN CM II 06 E-U U. U r-S int-H K IIUa. >IXJ O < EHE- 03 O E- -H EH b. o(N 06 E-U u. EH IX IIua. >OS J O< E- cc LU H LLJ CCLUQ. O•z. Q_J D CO DC O CO LU O CO :*•'-•asi: •IIIa, c il~ •• z o2 "-XO U Xt—i E #°m z b, — K bW t- •» CO O COa >< <EH 1J1J DO O 1a, (GL, fUU Ofr- r--H m (N — II • a t, IX IICOQ. XK J O < EHEH VI O EH -I X M £ OB Z EH — Cb 1» O -H O U E- -H CO vCs: INi— i K II Ua. ><a.j o< EH E- -H a:LUh-LU irLUa. O Q_j CD OC O C/) LU O • • 4>i jc e • — 3 U» 0»£ UU1 > k- -• ? 3S5?^S • -H O> ^5'_ga if • - b£ • J= n £• aw — ** ]J1J fUUl UU1 U) X z W)Z Kft) r Ku ^K | UKU Kok.5SSQ. K5Oh. U H h. ° £ K U03 Wl UJ E W iX Z Z uo u 56 § D UZ8 BEs o up z s(A U) o u H a uXu i Ka. U h X X J UE ft. O ^c uaiBE Z CLi u =t- auOE 1K •n H EH — d, <» Oin o •H ^H IN — X °?Ms EH in U -Hor>m Ua. >• Z < i" < EH U)J) O O. EH -I Q cc HI K LLJ DC UJQL O Q CQ DC O 00 HI GZ 00 i M3U § I- • t cIhi | hi ^| hiZ £ flEHto Q w§ i- I u « -hici ? X hi < ft ^"™ | i en p Sfc e H J • hi P hi 1-M 0e KH 3 ^ 2 hiUz iu iH u 1z z z Uzo S1 J iU s < G 1 DD uin 1JU1 * • ** • X • OO * O £-«-«*>h M F -* JS. ££ « U » •*? ."* ~<=ft J *J •« =255SS3 • W 3 2s:ssM$§S»5So§0 , 0*2 Xfrrjiii•^ "». • • V"9;r:i: -?§5&"£*>.n „ * o f £ij>.2<So .froSt™"b W • O ••finn m • ' T-> ** *^i»m«iizs.^:i5- 25J25S«*».i;.si0 & • !-S5" SSUS' = £S5«T^^c • * 5 J!T?**BO*lti'.l2 *> • o *i »^« •_ U 0 Cft 3 A> ** • C -HiJ -i *J 0 > •e -* c o o o * M • 3 *4 s»s 2 ft] M X SiiCS• a UH *" « J(fl = t- <• U M 3Is"s;isia X 5 ft.a <H UM (A BCZ J =5 a. u ji5ii M U Xw SZ-5SCi*"i2 "O J «to it ^ at AND STREET SCBHTO PLOT THIS PUM CRITERIA COHOH. THE riMM.z « 5dO Z Z * — O —CA M t hi3 H JJ ^ MU > ' fcSb hi oj z a suif IUU1 Qi CO O I LU LU O Q 5 CO g CL! nu fUUl I ft) JI) Z fcI) M Z• J H O iii.••83!:SSf"u 8 ju w u < tn & a §gu •§ §yi S H«X " J < < H S uill xvw XM£ *in < a. X M£ ofo J 0. •xvw O OJ Z x M S OP Z a. 0) O 1 LU_l LU O Q_J DCD g QJ o S <> * *" * ° ^ -C • 5 g> £ T3 ^ S ^ ZHu«l^§i o£^».il • • *»! lijJil!****•§ "•5 o "Ji "-"•"• g a 0 _ o g> a" >,*5 * 2 ' c*> • u «j • fl • - • ••= 3m 0*^ mu "* « c • e>o £ i:*:is£ • Og Kfl *Sfj c| ^ JC • > fi '— w « u *J* « «Z b 00-3 ** v. • C *J ••* U O 5 C- C 0 0 0 ••-< • a c i- -t •-* >* 1 • « o CONCLUSI1 ELEVATlfhi 5 J tlfelK J f- <U) 5 a V*hi U*• u< JK *.H hin a U "" Xto* « X HUB.O z3 < M OJ-* Q. «c. zO J M U < K»- U W Sip Sx» £§d- Z B THE ABII1 ONE. MlI PROFILE•Xvw IfD HIT LFU ~ OZ Q =! DCD a.1 > • b b c., * o tlv m "S3 it' " a.• m 't Z'- f2- • 5k. * * jj . •;In projectsituated 1unita »hal• 0•** u C mI'• . u ^022 IIe ". 7 e Er* 2?• O 21< u ** ** a S 0 ° • " • "£l!roof coverlower thanla not Inta axnqla-si CONCLUSION]u 2< kl «9 ISpSw C uO k)H • J 55 S= z cJ- 0 « x a Hki 0U H klU < JZ K k.< H kl— in «J 3 §*" J J M J M kl <JEH:§36 S$" i«- H U U & K 255 TUB ABILITYONE. MINIMPROFILE BEL•xvw JT ^J 1C\iCM >LU CC, ir§ S co D (/) UJ < ^J/fcQ. S OO ui Z J UJo D 0 J CC ^o UJ ARCHITPD 88-4 & 80(A)inH.j Dinua u inf- uo u3 < u.Q J - E > Q~ O inH U U G U - 85-10 J Xa M -a. > ca U in fcgg5o J u a> x" a in O J u.a; n - B. > a * incSg5°.0 J ZOS •-< -B. > £INIMUMTANDARD£ in GUIDELINEa Bu. zM Q Q D W2 D Q < O Kh a 4in B. Q ginl M C "Z D XM D H £ O *-»a zU B.z in M U Ua > M U) M »3u u. a.O £x u. ou o u CO LLO CO ^ LL O C\J CO LLo CO co u 0 CO CO LLO -r" CO LLO WHERE (3) TWO-STORY UNITS OCCURIN A ROW AND THEY ARE SITUATEDLESS THAN 15 FEET APART, ATLEAST (1) UNIT MUST HAVE ASINGLE STORY BUILDING EDGE NOTLESS THAN 10 FEET IN DEPTH.^ •• IT"! 1a. u o w • 1 u H uu o z O X W rH MH H Z Jo u. uQ H O Ou < in HZ X H X =O H O H OM S B.tn z Q u xU M O Q HQ C M u az * U W M ij 2 W Z B. in M £ £ OH >J u u U U £ <3 D U OO M J in inO 3 U < Ja u x <B. Xx a: u xJ H O > UJ " f- M X4 2 w u. H Z z z z z CO u_o "*" IX3 OU U Ho H tn ino 4 4 w inp u J uin P 3 o JH M ZM in t- M Hz < w o= u z •a -< xx < h u Ha K u u B.o x < > a u H U B> X M ^in LO 650o " 65in ^in CO CO CO PER PROJECT, 33% OF ALL UNITSSHALL HAVE A SINGLE STORY EDGEA MINIMUM OF 40% OF THE TOTALPERIMETER.r-imm j z Qa z *tn i z in £& U§£§Q a.uu uo >X MU U. 65O ^5 00T~ ^ LO 00 65in00 ^m 00 o xt-t PER PROJECT, 50% OF ALL UNITS WI1A LOT FRONTAGE GREATER THAN 45FEET MUST HAVE (4) SEPARATEBUILDING PLANES ON THE FRONTELEVATION.* ' 1 d M OIIHin g H ' 16DU OZ OS£uu uu >X Wu u. 65O ^0o T- ^ in00 65in CO ^LOoo 0m £ g PER PROJECT, 50% OF ALL UNITS WI'A LOT FRONTAGE GREATER THAN 45FEET MUST HAVE (4) SEPARATEBUILDING PLANES ON THE STREET SIELEVATION.in K- = ^ d zM Q | | H _. g M ''z in £fc «8 . ..z oH KQ B.U 82 X MU ft* 6500 ^ vjO OO T~ 65oo T— 65 LO CO 65oo bin d ' PER PROJECT, 50% OF ALL UNITS SH,HAVE ONE SIDE ELEVATION WITH A 7FEET AVERAGE SIDEYARD SETBACK.vomm r £ z M Mu z - J> M r- bjM £ w a U. U > MW Z H >-> D•J X n O I*, o JH JZ Min H u 2> Q J *f- J U U O XOl*t*ox:*la < 4 w B.U E- D £u K in u • o2° .«a°K in u. of. ffl wu H in o < H> C u. o b4 3 0 U w DO 0 K J Qu o o u a ox B -i o. a 6*bo N£ o O T~ 6500 65 Oo 65Oo 65inr- U. M ° H 4 THREE-CAR GARAGES LIMITED TO 75%THE TOTAL UNITS WHERE AVERAGE LOSIZE IS 5,OOO SF OF LESS.THREE-CAR GARAGES SHALL INCORPORA MIXTURE OF 2 DOOR, 3 DOOR, ANDOFFSET 2 DOOR DESIGNS.r-' •• d z 0 1 1 jlin £ 1 _ z in SBDU QZ OM Ka a.uU Mu > X H 65 00T~ 65U O 0 T— 65O0 " 65 0O 65Oo 65.Om 50% OF EXTERIOR DOOR AND WINDOWOPENINGS SHALL BE PROJECTED ORRECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES.CO E^I^^^^^^BJ TY OF CARLSBAD COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT General Subject: Specific Subject: Policy No. _ . , ,„,,„,„Date Issued 10/10/89 Effective Date 10/10/89 _ .. ^. _ .Cancellation Date Supersedes No. Copies to: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, Department and Division Heads, Employee Bulletin Boards, Press, File 5. Rear elevations shall adhere to the same criteria outlined in number 4 above for front elevations except that the minimum depth between front and back planes on the rear elevation shall be 3 feet. 6. At least 50% of the units in a project shall have one side elevation where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so that the side yard setback averages a minimum of 7 feet. 7. Projects with an average lot size of 5,000 sq. ft. or less shall limit the number of units with three car garages to 75% of the plans in the project. Project units with three car garages shall be a mix of two door garages, three door garages, and offset (2 planes min. 12") two door garages. 8. Fifty percent (50%) of exterior openings (doors/windows) shall be recessed or projected a minimum of 2" and shall be with wood or colored aluminum window frames (no mill finishes). 9. The predominant roof framing for each floor plan in a project shall exhibit directional variety to the other floor plans and to the street. Notes: a) For the purpose of these guidelines a single story element shall be defined as a plate line maximum of 12 feet (10 feet preferred). b) In addition, when a percentage of units is described in the guidelines the intent is to have that percentage spread throughout the entire project. c) "In a row" shall include curves and shall terminate at a 90 degree street intersection. OF CARLSBAD COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT General Subject: SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES Specific Subject: _ , , .Cancellation Date ESTABLISHING GUIDELINES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL LOTS Date Issued 10/10/89 Effective Date 10/10/89 Supersedes No. Copies to: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, Department and Division Heads, Employee Bulletin Boards, Press, File PURPOSE To provide guidelines to encourage the quality development of small-lot (less than 7500 sq.ft.) single family projects. The intent of the guidelines is to ensure that units have building articulation on all four sides and will not appear as "row" housing. They are primarily designed to apply to projects where there is a predominance of two-story units. POLICY Guidelines for Small-Lot Single Family Projects 1. In projects where there are three 2 story units in a row situated less than 15 feet apart, at least one of the three units shall have a single story building edge. The depth of the single-story edge shall not be less than 10' and shall run the length of the building pad. The roof covering the single story element shall be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story element to the unit (this is not intended to preclude long shed-type roofs falling to a single-story element). 2. In projects where there are three 2 story units in a row situated between 15 and 20 feet apart, at least one of the three units shall have a single story building edge with a depth of not less than 5 feet running the length of the building pad. The roof of the single story element shall be substantially lower than the roof for the two story element of the building (this is not intended to preclude long shed-type roofs falling to a single- story element). 3. On a project basis, thirty-three percent (33%) of all units shall have a single story edge for forty percent (40%) of the perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline the single story edge shall be a minimum depth of three feet (31). The units qualifying under the 33% shall be distributed throughout the project. The main purpose of this guideline is to ensure some building relief on the front and sides of each unit. 4. For at least 50% of the units in a project, there shall be at least three separate building planes on street side elevations of lots with 45 feet of frontage or less, and four separate building planes on street side elevations of lots with a frontage greater than 45 feet. The minimum offset in planes shall be 18 inches and shall include but not be limited to building walls, windows and roofs. The minimum depth between the faces of the forward-most plane and the rear plane on the front elevation shall be 10 feet and a plane must be a minimum of 30 sq. ft. to receive credit under this section. APR 12 5965 PACIFIC CENTER BLVD., SUITE 703 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121 (619) 450-1445 FAX 450-1094 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL JOBNO.: 122-01 DATE: 4-11-96 ATTENTION: Mike Grimm :V REFERENCE: 'Sea Country - Aviara P.A. 15 (CT94-03/PUD94-02Y TO: Citv of Carlsbad - Planning Dept. 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad. CA 92009 WE ARE SENDING YOU D U.S. Mail ;'-,''P Pick Up : H Fax ]$ Messenger , j H Federal Express WE ARE TRANSMITTING THE FOLLOWING: '$ Attached: Q Under Separate Cover 1 - NO. OF COPIES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 10 10 DATE NO. OF SHEETS 1 1 , 1 • • -'- . > • • " DESCRIPTION Project Application Project Description ; ? Disclosure Statement (2 parts) ' ; : . ;v • School Letter " ' 8*/2 x 11 Reduced Site Plan ; :X Styx 11 Reduced Landscape Plan 8l/2x 11 Location Map ; 8*/2 x 11 Reduced Building Elevations . EIAFee ($200:00) -' ' ; - ."";--• Planned Dev. Revision Fee ($5510.00) Project Photos : ! Preliminary Hydrology Report Preliminary Title Report Prelim. Soils /Geologic Report Environment Impact Assessment Major Amendment Plan Prelim. Landscape Plan NO. OF COPIES 10 1 1 1 DATE NO. OF SHEETS DESCRIPTION Building Floor Plans & Elevations Color Board Colored Landscape Plan Exhibit Colored Building Elevation Exhibit THESE ARE BEING TRANSMITTED AS INDICATED BELOW: • • . *• - % D As Requested D For Distribution JSf For Review D For Signature D For Your Use D For Your Approval D For Your Comment D Return w/ Corrections COMMENTS: CT 94-03/PUD 94-02 is hereby submitted for a Maior Amendment to the P. U.D. Copy to: Jim Devlin - Sea Country Homes Gres Surber/sw FOR LUNDSTROM & ASSOCIATES SEACOUNTRY HOMES, INC. 95 ARGONAUT, SUITE 210 • ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 February 16,1996 FEB i 6 1996 Mr. Michael Grim CiTV ©P ff$ P'l £• "3.tt II City of Carlsbad [ ~< A s-.n p ? n-'--\ "^.^,"""''J « ii^ifJVJ If^./:j,:','. /' : '2075 Las Palmas Drive ^ uu Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 Subject: Submittal of the engineered site plan for Sea Country's Aviara project. Dear Mike: On January 26,1996, Al Moreno, Paul Klukas and I met with you to discuss the processing of our site plan with the City of Carlsbad. Our purpose was to discuss the similarities of the proposed site plan with what had already been approved on the site. We discussed our need to begin grading on the project (in August approximately) in order to be completed prior to the rainy season. As we discussed, it is our desire to begin the grading design and preparation of grading plans for plan check. You mentioned that we probably wouldn't be able to process grading plans unless staff had an approved plan to begin plan checking against. This made it necessary to take the previous comments from the city back to the drafting boards and attempt to bring the proposed site plan more in conformance with the previously approved site plan. We have done much preliminary redesign to make this site plan more closely match the alignments and grades shown on the previously approved site plan. We have also gone to great lengths to match up the proposed lot lines more closely with the approved plan. We believe that we have accomplished our task and hope that the City in its review will agree with us. While we do have a different building footprint, the terraced grading, building locations and street layout are very close to the previously approved layout. Additionally, all retaining walls have been kept under 6 feet in height and located such that they will be screened with plant material to present a more pleasing view. Therefore, we are resubmitting the proposed site plan for continued review by the City under the same site plan review application and fee that was previously paid per your suggestion. Thank you for your continued help and assistance. Sincerely, James R. Devlin attachments Phone: (714)452-1180 Fax: (714)455-9367 OCTOBER 19, 1995 TO: ASSOCIATE PLANNER, ELAINE BLACKBURN ASSISTANT PLANNER, MIKE GRIM FROM: Associate Engineer, Davis VIA PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER FOR LAND USE PRE 95-34, AVIARA PA 15, CT 94-03 A review of the proposal was done at engineering staff meeting this morning. The results of this meeting are the following comments: A close review of the grading plan submitted is not possible due to the poor legibility of the plan; however since we are able to identify some serious issues we continued our review. s I understood it, at the meeting the applicant wanted an answer as to whether this amendment could be handled under substantial Conformance eview. The project, as proposed does not appear to be a candidate for an imendment through Substantial Conformance Review. One major reason for his assessment follows: Standards are not being met. Driveways for the first six units will intersect a street with an average 11 percent grade. Our standard for maximum cross fall of intersections is 6 percent. Another possible reason for the above assessment is: Changes to the existing grading scheme that would be needed for the changes around the recreation center and the units to the south, as shown, will most likely be more substantial than is within our ability to find for a substantial Conformance. The Plan Check Principal Civil Engineer did a preliminary review for substantial conformance. His comments were that the proposal is not in substantial conformance. A brief review of the differences he saw are: a.Elimination of sidewalks. b. Reduction of front yard set back. c. Clustering of parking at the recreation area. d. Elimination of "side streets" Land Use Engineering has an issue with the addition of the driveways on the main street for the first six units and being so close to the project's single entrance. In the existing approved project these units have no driveways on the entrance street and are on the above "side streets". Please remind the applicant: Review for Substantial Conformance is a part of plan check review. A mylar of the tentative map as it was conditioned is needed before plan check review can proceed. For a timely review, Substantial Conformance Exhibits should be at the same scale and show the same level of detail as the conditioned mylar. SEACOUNTRY HOMES, INC. AVIARA I I SEACOUNTRY HOMES, INC. Preliminary Review for Planning Area 15 . Parcel 6 of Parcel Map 16451 City of Carlsbad | October 18,1995 • Table of Contents I I. Assumption, Data and Direction | II. Vicinity Maps I III. Site Plan and Lot Sequence I I IV. Elevation V. Floor Plans I I I I I I I I I • ASSUMPTION • DATA AND DIRECTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY REVIEW FOR PLANNING AREA 15 PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP 16451 October 18,1995 City of Carlsbad Community Development Building 2075 Las Palrnas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 Participants: Ms. Elaine Blackburn, Planning Department Mr. Mike Grimm, Planning Department Mr. Jim Davis, Engineering Department Mr. Jeff Lundstrom, Lundstrom & Associates Mr. Robert Bennett, SeaCountry Homes, Inc. Mr. Alban Moreno, SeaCountry Homes, Inc. Mr. Curt Noland, Aviara Land Associates Assumption: Planning Area 15, Parcel 6 of Parcel Map 16456 presently consists of a 54 unit multi- family development. Most recently, a minor amendment to the Aviara Master Plan Tentative Tract Map and planned unit development was approved by the City of Carlsbad City Council with some conditions addressed. It is our understanding that building and improvement plans have been submitted, however, the plan check review process has been placed on hold per the developer. In addition, due to the changes, Planning Area 15 is scheduled for review and approval with the Coastal Commission in mid December of this year. Data and Direction: SeaCountry Homes, Inc. has reviewed much of the present information related to PA15 and desires to direct its energies to development of this parcel with your assistance. After careful analysis of the homebuyer market, it is the opinion of SeaCountry Homes and its consultants that different floor plans be substituted with the present footprint. A different mixture of units will improve the site, giving it more open space and affording more views. Additionally, an internal courtyard theme will give each unit more usable outdoor space. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Floor Plans/Mix/ Square Footages: Present Proposed Plan I Plan II Plan III Avg. 20 17 17 1665 Sq. Ft. 1925 Sq. Ft. 2197 Sq. Ft. 1929 Sq. Ft. Plan I Plan II Plan III Avg. 17 17 17 1800 Sq. Ft. 2060 Sq. Ft. 2150 Sq. Ft. 2003 Sq. Ft. Building Mix Present Proposed Duplex Triplex Fourplex Unit Totals 3 8 6 54 Duplex Triplex Fourplex Unit Totals 3 11 3 51 Recreation Area Proposed: .33 acres Present 57,700 Sq. Ft. Street Surface Area 52,707 Sq. Ft. Proposed I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Lot Area Tabulation Present Proposed Bldg. Bldg. Coverage Lot Coverage Lot Number Lot Area (Acres) Numbers Lot Area (Acres) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .25 .30 .94 1.17 1.09 1.71 1.05 .28 .30 .11 .11 .22 .33 .36 .47 .36 .01 .0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .60 .62 .27 .33 .48 .31 .31 .59 .31 .37 .09 .32 .26 .50 .22 .27 .23 1.01 .24 .12 Street Rec. .18 Street .15 .24 .12 .12 Street Street .12 .21 Street .12 .12 .30 Totals 7.09 1.97 7.09 2.04 We believe that this product in both exterior and interior design is an improvement allowing for views, yet privacy. With steps in the building we have attempted to soften the elevations. A curvilinear street as a main spine along with varied set backs will soften the streetscene while the use of outside courtyards where possible, especially in center units helps to open the units while providing for some private unit area. Balconies both in front and to the rear will take advantage of the views to the greenbelts and golf course. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Finally, as depicted in the new site plan, the identified slopes shall be landscaped and marked as common areas giving a more open, spacious feel to the project. We appreciate your time and welcome your comments in hopes that this new site plan and product will substantially complement the present site. Upon review of your comments we will direct our consultants to move forward with drawings with the intention of applying for a Substantial Conformance Review shortly thereafter. VICINITY MAPS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -PALOMAR AIRPORT RD. PACIFIC OCEAN ALGA ROAD—" BAT1QUITOS DRIVE --RANCHO SANTA FE RD. LEUCADIA VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE I I I tural Slopes be preserved) I I I I I I I I ILegend Entry Tim Wail/Fencing Trail Key Map Point Qtimntmtlam I i i esign Criteria - Planning Area 15 Exhibit V-16 I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I SITE PLAN AND LOT SEQUENCE to 2 5 8 s- ELEVATION FLOOR PLANS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I JENSVOLD ASS§CIATES • ARCHITECTURE/ PLANNING 2244 CARMEL VALLEY ROAD DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA 92014 619-481-2212 5SJ S t <N4 oI^05 P H CO E I 9 : ° g *] ^ p „ |p .1^ c& c5 5s fc ^t^ «s ^^ <l S o ^ •S1 51 6 !i 8 5 i* I!l| S'Q•SigB H S H § Q CSS&y »- ^ z h-H . 02 <! ° U. < J < ^>H U ^O< *— wO «, U j Ci ^ < W o OS f- 2 oo S ia ^cn=3 C3 Ot&a <3?S«i*£ CM hi1!<errp^ ffa.s%it£Z. _. jj ("•"'S' c ••tefc .ij <K± i>Je:. cf"»"5 if ^s '•; -' <*££, *--*I. ; E="- •"^" *•sai* • < f^-4 ^±' ^' /7C> '•—-1 Qj 0 B, O H - rt: -^ir-" r.-1 G 0 fco -2 H ^ O < O «, U j (HO CSJ ^1' ^ 2 ^,-i o o a: « o CQ <: if< H> o t|. H ' U*:i^»o^ U -" on a: h- Z ujO o z o< 1-1 ^H cu s °o Q« »<?-.'g> fi -- -1 CSJ «-> ^ «— G"--^ Li. H " < l U 00 f-z wO o o (N u-o> Q£ u. H - n~ o u 00 OS H Z p pjO HI> ESSam a 0:1 J QH pa H " O u t/5 CJIS ?M CS! O O Q J CQ 5°u_ H ~ O U 00 ujO 03 CSi ^J <!>•' *=? -..-. O z o J *^o- oa H - n:^ -j y H "^:p. U 00 H Z D ujO £••" 3 )i H ~ >HO H '*:3ffl U j t/2 Hz D