HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 82-05; Weber Office Building; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (2)wii $100.00 ^
RECEIPT NO: iTX ^
• ENVIRQNIvlCNT/vL IffPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I
(To be Completed by APPLIC^XNT)
CASE NO:
DATC: /^^/^.^J^
Applicant: \ J^yVIj^^ kV^/^J^je ^ ^ ^
Address of Applicant: ,^^1^^h^^^^-(CT' ST". JZZ/T^ ' C
Phone Number: C ) ;^f-'r^/^<^
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant):
GENERAI. INFOmTION:
Description of Project: ^.^^^Zl /^^/^X^t^ y^^-'y^//^
Project Location/Address: y/^^ ^^^^^^^^EZy^dT^ Sr.
Xssessor Parcel Number: -/(P/ -
Zone of Subject Property: \ _L__________
^.^~y^^iyc y ^ p
Proposed Use o£ Site: ^^.^y2^^ (^L ^y^y=^yC^ yS?Cjy^^/
y^
List all other applicable applications related to this project:
NI) 1
EIR 1
2. Describe the activity area, including distinguishing natural
and man-made characteristics; also provide precise slope
analysis v;hen appropriate.
3. ' Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the
design and/or operation of the project. (For a more specific
discussion of energy conservation requirements, see
of the city's EIR Guidelines).
^9^.^ yc^ >^^yy^ . ,
y-yl^ i^^T^^^*^ /^^ /&^j^^^^<^
4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit
sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household
size expected.
5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city
or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and
loading facilities.
yyk ^ ^ £7^y7y ^t:y^
6. If,industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,
and loading facilities.
7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading
facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the
project.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the
appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked "yes".
Attach additional sheets as necessary.)
YES NO
1) Could the project significantly change present
,r land uses in the vicinity of the activity?
2) Could the activity affect the use of a recre-
ational area, or area of important aesthetic
value?
3) Could the activity affect the functioning of
an established community or neighborhood?
4) Could the activity result in the displacement
of community residents?
5) Could the activity increase the number of low
and modest cost housing units in the city?
6) Could the activity decrease the number of low
and modest cost housing units in the city?
7) Are any of the natural or man-made features
in the activity area unique; that is, not
found in other parts of the County, State or
Nation?
8) Could the activity significantly af,fect a
historical or archaeological site or its
settings?
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation
of a scarce natural resource?
10) Does the 'activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation
of a scarce natural resource?
11) Could the activity significantly affect
fish, wildlife or plant life?
12) Are there any rare or endangered plant
species in the activity area?
13) Could the activity change existing features
of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or
tidelands?
-3-
14) Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches?
15) Could the activity result in the erosion or
elimination of agricultural lands?
16) Could the activity serve to encourage develop-
ment of presently undeveloped areas or intensify
development of already developed areas?
17) Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water,
noise, etc.)?
18) Will the activity require certification,
authorization or issuance of a permit by any
local, state or federal environmental control
agency?
19) Will the activity require issuance of a
variance or conditional use permit by the city?
20) Will the activity involve the application, use,
or disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
21) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain?
22) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
23) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault?
24) Could the activity result in the generation
of significant amounts of noise?
25) Could.the activity result in the generation
of significant amounts of dust?
26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees, or other materials?
27) Could the activity result in a significant
change in the quality of any portion of the
region's air or water resources? (Should note,
surface, ground water, off-shore).
20) Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.)?
29) Will there be a significant change to existing
land form?
(a) indicate estimated grading to be done in
cubic yards y<0 C., y,
(b) percentage of alteration to the present
land form
(c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes
y:^'- ./<n :
3,0") Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains, or
streets?
31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger
project or series of projects?
II. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions
in Section I but you think the activity will have no
significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons
below:
(!yy^^/2L -:Z^c^/^^u:^ y=zy2z>^^ 7^^^
III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE OUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions,
attached additional sheets as may be needed.)
Siqnature ~~y
(Person completing report)
Date Signed yr:^ ^/—
-6-
•>:NV'IR0N.MENTAL B>IPACT ASSESSMIZNT FORM - Part II
(To Be Completed Bv Tl^.e
. PLANNING DEP.M^TMENT)
• CASE NQ. /g-p SZ-^
DATE: iTyjzjB^ .
I, BACKGROUND
1. APPLICANT: ^ pr-s (/J e^^1>-^
2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT:'
3. DATE QiECKLIST SUBMITTED: /X/3/Bt
II. • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
TECPlMAriONS OF .^L AFFIRMATIVE ANS^A'ERS ARE TO BE imiTTEN UNDER
Section III - DISCUSSION OF ENVIR0NMEMI7VL EVALUATION)
Yes >{aybe No
1. Eartii Will the proposal have signi-
ficaixL results in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, com- . \y
paction or overcovering of tlie soil? ______ ' A
c. Cliange in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or . *
modification of any unique geologic v /
or pliysical features? ^ ' ' ' ' " ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '\
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils; either on or off
tlie site?
f. Changes in deposition or ero-
sion of beach sands, or changes
in siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify thc channel of a
river or stream or the bed of.the
ocean or nny bay, inlet or lake?
m 2
Yes Maybe No
2. Air: Will the proposal have signi-
results in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration ^
of ambient air quality? • • ____ /A
b. The creation of objectionable . ' . '
odors? ^ . y\
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage pattems, or the rate and
ainount of surface water runoff?
h, * Reduction in the amount of
water.otherwise available for
public water supplies?
X
c. Alteration of air movement,
• mositure or temperature, or any
• change in climate, either locally
or regionally? ^
3, Water: Will the proposal have sigi-
'ficant results in: ' ' •
a. Changes in currents, or the
course or direction of water move-
ments, in either marine or fresh ' v^"
waters? ^. / • ' y\
K
c. .-Mterations to the course or . .
flow of flood waters? • /\
d.. dhange in the am.ount of sur-
face water in any water body? ^ '' ' " /\
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved y^
oxygen or turbidity? ^ ' ' . y\
f. Alteration of the direction
or rate of flow of gi-ound waters?
g.' Change in the quantity of ' . •
ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals,
or tiirough interception of cin ' ^ \/
aquifer by cuts or excavations? • ' ' '' ' . '' '' yy^
-2-
Yes Maybe No
^' Plant Life. Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species •
of plants (including trees, shrubs,,
grass, crops, microflora and
aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of
any-unique, rare or endangered
• species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species
of plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a. Changes in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of animals (birds, land anijnals
including reptiles, fish and shell-
. fish, benthic organisms, insects or
microfauna)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of -
any unique, rare or endangered \<
species of animals? ' " ' ' ' Z
c. Introduction of new species
of animals into an area, or result • .
in a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing
fish or wildlife habitat?
^^^^^ ^^^^ proposal signi-
ficantly increase existing noise
levels?
7« L^r.^^t- and Glare. Will thc pro-
posal signi i. icant ly produce new
light or glare?
^* Land Use. Will thc projx^sal have
significant results in thc alteration , , ^
of thc present or planned land use of • * " \/
nn area? • ' / ^'*
Yes Maybe No
9. Natural Resources. Will the pro-
posal have sigaiticant results in;
a. Increase in the rate of use
of.any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
, 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an
explosion or the-release of haz-
ardous substances (including, but
' not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the
'event of an accident or upset
conditions?
11. • Population. Will the proposal
significantly alter the location,
distribution, density, or groAvth
rate of the human population of
an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal signi-
ficantly affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional
housing?
13. • Transportation/Circulation. Will
. . the proposal have significant re-
sults in:
a. Generation of additional
vehicular movement?
b* Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new
parking?
c. Impact upon existing trans-
portation systems?
d. Alterations to present
patterns of circulation or move-
ment of people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to watcrbornc,
rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic, hazards
to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
•A
X
14. Public Scrv^ices. Will the pro-
posal have a significant effect
upon, or have significant results
in the need for new or altered
govemmental services in any of
the following areas:
<
a. Fire protection? .
b. Police protection? ^
. c. Schools? . -
d. Parks or other recreational •
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facili-
ties, including roads?
E^^^gy* Will the^proposal have
signiTicant results in:
a* Use of substantial amounts of
fuel or energy?
b. Demand upon existing sources
of energy, or require the develop-
ment of new sources of energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal have'
significant results in the need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
C Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and'disposal?
•^''^ l^^mnn Health. Will the proposal
have signigicant results in the
creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
X
f,' Other govemmental services?
Yes Maybe No
Aesthetics. Will the proposal have
significant results in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view
open.td the public, or will the pro-
posal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
19. Recreation. Will the proposal have
significant results in the impact
upon the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
20', Archeological/Historical. Will the
proposal have significant results
' in the alteration of a significant
' archeological or historical site,
• structure, object or building?
21. ANALYZF VIABLE AI.TERNATIVES TO Tl-IE PROPOSED PROJFCT SUCH AS:
a) PHASED DI-A/ELOPMIiNT OF THE PROJECT; b) AL^ER^LA]'E SITE
DESIGNS; c) ALTERNATE SCALE OF DEVELOPN-IFM^-; d) A];rERN.ATE
USES FOR IHE SITE; e) DB^LCPMENI^ AT SOMI: FUTURE TIME RAIHER
THAN NOW; f) ALTERNATE SITES FOR THE PROPOSED USE; g) NO
PROJECT ALTERNATIVT:.
0
Yes Maybe No
22, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE HE POTEN-
TIAL TO DEGRADE TIE QUALITY OF
WE ENVIRON^ENT, OR CURTAIL THE
DIVERSITY IN TIE ENVIRON^ENT?
b) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE THE POTEN-
TIAL TO ACHIE\^E SHORT-TERM, TO
THE DIST^DVANTAGE OF LONG-TERM,
ENVIRON^ENTAL GOALS? (A SHORT-
• TERM IMPACT ON TIE ENVIROMNENT
IS ONE WHICH OCCURS IN A RE-
• 'LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE
PERIOD OF TBE WHILE LONG-TERM
IMPACTS WILL ENDURE 1\ELL INTO
THE FUTURE.)
c) DOES THE PROJECT HA\^ IMPACTS
WHICH ARE INDIVIDUALLY LIMITED,
BUT CUMUUTIVELY CONSIDERABLE?
(A PROJECT MAY IMPACT ON TIVO
- OR ^DRE SEPARATE RESOURCES
WHERE TIE IMPACT ON EACH RE-
SOURCE IS RELATIVELY SMALL,
BUT IMIEI^ TIE EFFECT OF TPE
TOTAI. OF IHOSE IMPACTS ON THE
ENVIRON^ENT IS SIGNIFICANT.)
d) DOES TIE PROJECT HAVE ENVIRON-
l»rrAL EFFECTS hHICH WILL
CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE
EFFECTS ON HUMAN BEINGS,
EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY?
III.- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONNENTAL EVALUTION
-7-
DTSaiSSTON OF EN^/IRONNENTAL EV^AJIJATION- (Continued)
rv, DETCRMINATICN. (TO BE COMPLETCD BY TIE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLAIUTION will
be prepared. • . .
I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not be
a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. A conditional negative declaration will
wiil be prepared.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect
on the environment, and an ENVIRONNENTAL IMPACT.REPORT
is required.
Date: /^^ ^.j
Signature
V. MITIGATING NEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued)
VX • APPLICANT CONCURPNENCE MTH MITIGATING NEA.SL^S ' • .
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIBvED IHE ABOVE mTIGATIONG NEA-
SURES AND CONCUR WTTH THE ADDITION OF IHESE NEASURES TO IHE PROJECT.
Date:
'"Signature of Appl icant