No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 86-03; Jefferson House II; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (2)MAY 22, 2000 TO: HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT ANALYST RUIZ>/ FROM: City Attorney JEFFERSON HOUSE II, SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT This memo is in response to your recent emails related to the City's equity position in the above referenced project. Specifically, the project's developer is in the process of refinancing the project loan and has asked the City to subordinate its position to the refinanced loan. You have asked whether the City Council must approve the subordination agreement. I have had the opportunity to review the documents that you provided and have discussed the matter with the City Attorney. He indicates that the issue is similar to one raised with Jefferson House I, which was recently brought to the City Council for approval. At the time the Jefferson House I subordination agreement was approved, I am informed that the City Attorney suggested that future agreements of this sort contain language which delegates to staff, the ability to subordinate the City's position. Staff delegation authority would need to be narrowly defined and would require that the matter be brought to the City Council should all ofthe specified criteria not be met. In this regard, I would be happy to assist you in drafting appropriate language for future agreements. With regard to Jefferson House II, as the matter was originally approved by the City Council, and there is no evidence that staff has been delegated the power to approve future subordination agreements, the agreement should be brought to the City Council for approval. In addition to the Council approval question, included among the documents that you provided was a draft subordination agreement. I have assumed that this document is identical to that already approved for Jefferson House I (with, perhaps, a different lender). Please let me know if this is not the case. In addifion, I have assumed that the City is only subordinating its position to the refinanced loan. Are we subordinafing to any other loans? Finally, regarding the Owner's signature line, two partnerships are referenced. The names below the two partnerships do not indicate to which partnership each person belongs. Prior to approving this document as to form, I will need the identity issue clarified. I believe that the individuals are partners in Pacific Growth Properties, which is the General Partner of PGP Carlsbad Seniors, Ltd. II, but would like my assumption confirmed. I hope that this information is of some assistance. Please contact me should you have any questions or if you wish to discuss these matters further. in DAMIENfB. BROWER Deputy City Attorney afs c: Housing & Redevelopment Director lAY, 3. 200C" 9:214 CHICAGO TITLE 10. 355 Chicago Title Company - Park Camino Branch 3703 Camino Del Rio So,, # 100, San Diego, CA. 92108 Phone (619) 282-3200 ^AXTRA/VSMITTAL May 2,2000 To: City of Carlsbad Attn; Craig Luiz Fax# qigO^T^O'X^^^l From: Joyce Schrum Chicago Title CompaBy Phone #(619) 282-3200 Fax #(619)282-5282 RE: Escrow No. 203048009'^N77 2848 Jefferson St., Carlsbad, CA Subordination Agreement/PGP Carlsbad Seniors, Ltd II Being transmitted are the following: Draft of Trust Deed to be recorded Draft of Note Draft of Subordination Agreement/With Exhibit "A" attached Draft of Use of Document Instruction PLEASE ADVISE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE OF THE TIME FRAME FOR APPROVAL. •lllUOi FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERS MORTGAGE COMPANY, LP Advance copy via facsimile 760-720-2037 Tuesday, April 11, 2000 Mr. Craig Ruiz City of Carlsbad 2965 Roosevelt, Suite B Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: PGP Carlsbad Seniors Ltd. II 2848 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Craig: Enclosed at the request of Mr. John Drummond of our client Capital Growth Properties, please find the executed Commitment Letter and Appraisal forthe subject property. We are ready to complete a first trust deed refinance of the property in the amount of $2,805,000.00. Please commence the process for approval and execution ofthe subordination of your enforcement lien. John tells me that this one does not need to go before the City Counsel, but can be approved by the City Manager. Please coordinate all further details with Mr. John Drummond, at 858-454-8857. If we can assist on this end, please do not hesitate to call either me orthe loan processor (Gundy Cruz, at 949-585-7500). Best regards, lan S. Stuart Director of Loan Production 619-283-1300 Office 619-884-6329 Cellular CC: Mr. John Drummond, Capital Growth Properties David S. DePillo, Managing Principal & President Robert Williams, Principal & Chief Underwriter Robert Noble, Underwriter Gundy Cruz, Loan Processor Randy Gorman, Assistant 3838 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 116 • San Diego, California 92108 • 619-283-1300 • 619-283-1399 Fax • E-mail: fip@fipllc.com PLANNING DEPARmENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161 Citp of CarliSbab November 20, 1987 Mr. Robert Ladwig Rick Engineering Company 365 South Rancho Santa Fe Road Suite 100 San Marcos, California 92069 SUBJECT: JEFFERSON HOUSE II/<jif^'^%^^ Dear Bob: I agree with your explanation of Condition No. 13 which was applied to the above-referenced project. Unless an annual inspection reveals that there is a problem with the project or a certain condition is not being complied with then it is not necessary for you to extend the Conditional Use Permit. The condition was poorly worded and should just have referenced the yearly review for compliance. If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, CITY OF CARLSBAD ^ MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director arb JEFFERSON HOUSE II 5620 Friars Road San Diego, California 92110-2596 (619) 291-0707 April 16, 1986 Mr. Chris Salomone Redevelopment Agency City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear Chris: Thank you for your clear and direct support of our Jefferson House II project before the City Council. Without your encouragement and guidance over these past months, I am quite sure we would not have been able to achieve the approval from the City Council. Sincerely, ^Jjl^^l^^am^, Rick WBR:1ms MEMORANDUM DATE: MARCH 26, 1986 TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: RP/CUP 86-3 - JEFFERSON STREET - Request for a Major Redevelopment Permit and Conditional Use Permit to develop a 57-unit senior citizen apartment project at the southeast corner of the Jefferson Street/Home Avenue intersection in Sub-area 6 of the V-R zone. RECOMMENDATION That the Design Review Board recommend APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution No. 067, recommending APPROVAL of RP/CUP 86-3. DISCUSSION At their March 5, 1986 meeting, the Design Review Board heard the above project. As discussed in the attached Memo dated March 14, 1986, two issues of concern regarding this project were identified during this hearing; (1) adequate parking standards for senior citizens housing projects and (2) the setback of the proposed project from Jefferson Street. In accordance with the conclusions of this study, the project applicant has submitted a revised plan which responds to its findings and to the concerns of the Design Review Board. The revised project (see Exhibits "A" - "G" reduces the number of dwelling units to 57 by eliminating two 2-bedroom units on the ground floor at the south end of the project, and increasing the number of onsite parking spaces from 21 to 29 by providing 8 additional tuckunder parking spaces and driveway along the southern terminus of the structure. The overall project density is reduced to 72 du/ac (down from 75 du/ac) and the parking ratio is increased from 1 space/2.68 du's to 1 space/1.96 du's. In order to accommodate these revisions, the structure's length has been reduced by six feet (1 foot/dwelling unit) and the rear yard has been converted to a driveway. It is staff's opinion that this project redesign has responded to the concerns of the Design Review Board in that the parking ratio has been increased to 1 space/2 du's. Since Jefferson Street is not likely to be widened as discussed in the attached memorandum, the project's 10-foot street sideyard setback from Jefferson Street will actually be 26 feet from structure-to-curb when the 16-foot parkway is included. Staff recommends approval of this revised project. The project Resolution No. 067 has been revised to reflect these changes. ATTACHMENTS 1. Revised Design Review Board Resolution No. 067 2. Memorandum dated March 14, 1986 - Parking Study 3. Staff Report, dated March 5, 1986 4. Revised Project Exhibits "A" - "G" dated March 21, 1986 5. Reduced Exhibits CDD:ad 3/14/86 -2- MEMORANDUM DATE: MARCH 14, 1986 TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: RP/CUP 86-3 - JEFFERSON HOUSE II - Parking and setbacks study On March 5, 1986, the Design Review Board heard this project. During the hearing, there were several concerns raised by Board members regarding the project's design. One issue centered around the proposed project's parking ratio of one space per 2.68 dwelling units. It was the concensus of the Board members that this parking ratio appeared to be low. In accordance, staff was requested to undertake a parking study for seniors housing projects to evaluate what parking ratio would be appropriate. Board members also expressed concern over the proposed three story structure's 10-foot street sideyard setback from Jefferson Street. Staff noted in the hearing that the setback from Jefferson Street was really 26 feet, in that there was an additional landscaped 16-foot parkway between the property line and street curb. Staff was, however, directed to undertake a study to evaluate the potential of widening Jefferson Street in the future. In accordance with these requests, staff has undertaken the appropriate studies as discussed below. (^) Parking Study for Seniors Housing Projects In order to evaluate parking standards for seniors housing projects, staff conducted a twofold approach. The first aspect of the research involved personnel interviews with management of the Tyler Street Seniors project, which is acknowledged as having a serious parking problem. The Tyler Street project is parked at a ratio of one space/3 du's. The other two City Senior Citizen residential projects (Chinquapin and Jefferson House I) are parked at a minimum ratio of one space/2 du's and are not experiencing parking problems. Based on interviews with the complex manager and observation of onsite parking conditions, it is concluded by staff that there is a parking problem on the Tyler site. This was verified by the complex manager who indicated that approximately 75 percent of the residents own cars (a total of 56) and since there are only 25 existing onsite spaces, many residents must park on the street. Staff, however, believes that the relatively high percentage of senior citizen residents at Tyler Street who own cars is associated with the project's location further outside of the urban core and within the vicinity of a potentially unsafe neighborhood. The second aspect of the parking study included a random sampling of local cities for purposes of identifying what parking standards were utilized for senior citizens housing projects within surrounding jurisdictions. As shown on Exhibit "A", seven out of ten jurisdictions surveyed require a parking ratio of at a minimum, one space/dwelling unit for seniors housing. Of the other three jurisdictions, only one (San Marcos) required a parking ratio of less than one space per two dwelling units. Approximately 50 percent of the jurisdictions surveyed, have recently revised their parking standards for senior citizens housing to one space/du. Most of these revisions were based upon an extensive Seniors Housing Parking Needs Survey conducted by the San Diego Association of Governments for the City of San Diego (November, 1984). This survey concluded that the vehicle ownership rate for senior citizens is around .56 vehicles per unit. Based upon this finding of the San Diego Seniors Housing Needs Survey, and in view of the findings regarding parking standards for senior citizens housing projects within other local jurisdictions, staff concludes that a parking ratio of at least one space per two dwelling units should be required for senior citizens housing projects. (2) Jefferson Street Jefferson Street, in the vicinity of the project site, is a two- lane, super collector street with a curb-to-curb width of 48 feet and an 8 0-foot right-of-way. A 16-foot wide parkway runs along both sides of the street. According to the City of Carlsbad's 1985 Traffic Census, Jefferson Street currently has an ADT of around 7,400. This average daily traffic is projected to increase by 1,000 trips to 8,400 ADT at full buildout. It is staff's opinion that this number of daily trips is within the capacity of an urban two-lane collector street. Although there is a possibility that Jefferson Street could be widened in the future, based upon the other anticipated traffic signal improvements at Jefferson Street/Laguna Drive and at Jefferson Street/Las Flores Drive and the projected incremental increase in daily trips along Jefferson Street (1,000 ADT increase), the need to widen this street is not anticipated. In view of these findings, staff concludes that the proposed Jefferson House II street sideyard setback along Jefferson Street is adequate in property line that it provides 10 feet to the property line plus an additional 16 feet of parkway to the Jefferson Street curb. Overall, staff concludes that a parking ratio of 1 space/2 du's should be required for senior citizens housing projects and that since Jefferson Street is not anticipated to be widened, the proposed street sideyard setback for Jefferson House II along Jefferson Street would be adequate. CDD:ad 3/14/86 EXHIBIT "A' PARKING STANDARDS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING CITY PARKING SPACES/DWELLING UNIT San Diego 1/1 Escondido 1/1 Oceanside 1/1 Chula Vista 1/1 La Mesa 1/1 Poway 1.2/1 Vista 1.25/1 National City 1/1.5 El Cajon 1/1.85 San Marcos 1/3 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: RP/CUP 86-3 APPLICANT: JEFFERSON HOUSE II REQUEST AND WCMHOiH: Request for major redevelopment pennit and conditional use permit to develop a^7 unit senior citizen a^rtment project at the soiitE^ east corner of the Jefferson Street/Home Avenue intersection. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 of Schell and Sites addition to Carlsbad in the City of Carlsbad, in the County of San Diego, State of C:alifornia according to Map thereof 2145, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego, February 20, 1929. APN; 203-202-04, 05, 06 Acres .79 Proposed No. of Lots/tJnits 57 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation RMH Density Allowed 8-15 Density Proposed 72 du/ac Existing Zone R-P (V-R) Proposed Zone V-R (R-P) Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: Zoning Land Use Site V-R (R-P) SF Residential North RP-Q Multi-family South V-R (R-P) Office East V-R (R-P), R-3 Office West V-R (R-P) SF Residential PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewer Carlsbad EDU's Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated November 1, 1985 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT X Negative Declaration, issued February 22, 1986 ^E.I.R. Certified, dated Other, DEVELOPMENTAL IM B 1200 ELM AVENUE SERVICES ^L^mf^^^B CARLSBAD, CA92008-1989 LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE ^^gfe^T 438-5591 Citp of Carlibab v February 19, 1986 ^ RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY Jefferson House II Partnership 5620 Friars Road San Diego, CA 92110 SUBJECT: RP/CUP 86-3 JEFFERSON HOUSE II Preliminary Staff Report The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project will be available for you to pick up on Friday, February 21, 1986, after 4 p.m. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (D.C.C.) meeting which will be held on February 25, 1986. A twenty (20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 9:20 a.m. If you have any questions concerning your project, you should attend the D.C.C. meeting. It is necessary that yoo bring your required colored exhibit(s) with you to this meeting in order for yoar project to go forward to Planning Coaaission. If yoa do not plan to attend this meeting, please make arrangements to have yoar colored exhibit(s) here by the scheduled time above. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact the Planning Department at 438-5591. CITY OF CARLSBAD MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director By Planning Departm MJH:bn u r RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY I ^JW^SS 3088 PIO PICO DR. . SUITE202 . CARLSBAD.CA 92008 P.O. BOX 1129 . PHONE . AREA CODE 619 • 729-4987 Mr. Clyde Wickham Engineering Department CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 January 23, 1986 RE: JEFFERSON HOUSE II (JOB NO. 9586) ^y^>^ 0^^ ^i^^^^"^* Dear Clyde: Enclosed, per your request, are four prints of a recent enlarged photograph showing utility locations and sizes, along with drive- way locations, adjacent to Jefferson House. Yesterday, you received a letter from your Utility Department stating that there is sewer capacity in the existing 8-inch VC line in Jefferson Street. This should answer all of your concerns from our last meeting. Please review the attached exhibit at your next Engineering Staff meeting on Wednesday and give us any further comments you might have. We are anxious for this project to move forward and would hope that we could be before the Design Review Board on February 12th. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Robert C. Ladwig RCL:kd Enclosure cc: Chris Salomone, REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, CITY OF CARLSBAD Chris DeCerbo, PLANNING DEPARTMENT, CITY OF CARLSBAD Bill Rick, RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY Bill Dumka, RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY All with enclosure. A RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY I 3088 PIO PICO DR. . SUITE 202 . CARLSBAD, CA 92008 P.O. BOX 1129 . PHONE . AREA CODE 619 • 729-4987 March 20, 1985 Mr. Marty Orenyak Building & Planning Dept. CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 RE: JEFFERSON HOUSE Dear Marty: Not too long ago, you asked me to provide you with information about Jefferson House. I believe this information will be help- ful to you when considering future projects. It will certainly be helpful to us for future projects we may do. Jefferson House consists of 48 one-bedroom units with separate laundry facilities, a recreation room and storage. We opened August 1, 1984 and had our first move-ins on September 1, 19 84. As of December 1, 1984, we were 100% occupied. We currently have 41 people on our waiting list. The rent ranges from $365—$385 per month. The ages of the ten- ants range from the early 60s well into the 90s and most of the units are occupied by a single person. Altogether our tenants total 53. The required parking, per ordinance, is 1 for every 4 units, or 12 spaces. We have provided 24 spaces, 22 of which are used by the tenants. Ten of the spaces are covered. We have compiled a list of where the people came from, which I think you will find interesting: Carlsbad - 11, Oceanside - 9, San Diego - 6, Solana Beach/Del Mar - 6, Orange County - 3, Los Angeles - 4, Riverside - 5, Chicago - 1, New Jersey - 1, Neb- raska - 1, Santa Cruz - 1. Everything seems to be going quite well even though we have had a few construction problems which now seem to be worked out: the hot-water system had some deposits which discolored the water; the elevator has gotten stuck a few times, as well as a few other Mr. Marty Orenyak March 19, 1985 RE: JEFFERSON HOUSE Page Two minor problems. Ricky, of my office, puts together a monthly newsletter for the tenants and they all seem to be very happy. If there are any other items that you would like me to pass on to you, please give me a call. I hope this information will be useful. Also, I would like to personally thank you for all the help you gave us in making this a successful project. Sincerely, Robert C. Ladwig RCL/ydm cc: Mike Holzmiller, CITY OF CARLSBAD DEVELOPMENTAL ijf ksSW 8 1200 ELM AVENUE SERVICES ^L^y^iM CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE ^^SS^F ^^^^^ 438-5591 Citp of CarliBibab January 27, 1986 RICK ENGINEERING CO. c/o Bob Ladwig 3088 Pio Pico, Suite 202 Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: JEFFERSON HOUSE II (RP/CUP 86-3) Dear Bob: The Jefferson House II seniors housing project elevations and model were presented to staff on January 24, 1986. Staff's comments on the elevations were unchanged. It is staff's opinion that"the structure is still too massive. The following structural changes are recommended in order to bring the project into more of a compatible scale with surrounding uses: (1) Reduce the elevation of the building (by 2-stories) at the center of the building along Jefferson Street. This change will function to effectively breakup the building into two halves instead of one massive facade. (2) Eliminate the third floor end units along Jefferson Street. This change will function to reduce the box- like appearance of the structure. Staff is also concerned over the lack of use of the recreation room at the Jefferson House I seniors project. While it is acknowledged that the residents of this complex perhaps don't use the recreation room because the Senior's Center is within easy pedestrian access, staff is of the opinion that the recreation room at Jefferson House I was simply not very inviting. In accordance, staff would like to suggest that a larger, more open recreation room be considered with Jefferson House II. January 27, 1986 Page Two With regard to the proposed projects balcony intrusion into the required setbacks, staff has indicated that this could be supported provided that exceptionally good landscaping is implemented. If you have any questions, concerns, or want to set up a meeting to discuss the project, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, QJIA/OO ^Cdo CHRISTOPHER D. DE CERBO Assistant Planner CDD:bn RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY PLANNING CONSULTANTS ANO CIVIL ENGINEERS 3088 PIO PICO DR. . SUITE 202 . CARLSBAD.CA 92008 P.O. BOX 1129 . PHONE . AREA CODE 619 • 729-4987 MEMORANDUM TO: BILL RICK, BOB LADWIG FROM: RICKI CLAVIER, PROPERTY MANAGER DATE: JANUARY 17, 1986 RE: JEFFERSON HOUSE I & II (JOB NO. 9586) Per our previous conversation, I have the following status report regarding traffic, parking, rents and overall impact of the cur- rent and future Jefferson House: 1. TRAFFIC/PARKING Currently, 16 of the 51 tenants at Jefferson House own a car (there are 24 parking spaces for the 48 units). From my most recent survey, there are approximately 10-12 cars in the lot during the day, and between 14-16 cars in the lot at night. A couple of the tenants have part-time jobs two to three days/nights per week. I spoke with several other tenants who own vehicles and all of them said they either take the bus or walk to the nearby busi- nesses and shops and drive their cars once or twice a week. Six or more tenants have sold their cars since moving into Jefferson House. Those who do not own a car have relatives who drive them when they need transporta- tion. I think the close proximity of the downtown shops and bus route, along with the age factor, has had an im- pact on the low vehicle use in and out of Jefferson House. Bill Rick, Bob Ladwig January 17, 1986 Page Two RE: JEFFERSON HOUSE I & II 2. RENTS/INCREASES I surveyed the rents for senior complexes in Carlsbad, results are: Tyler Court Apartments One Bedroom $410.00/month Two Bedroom $510.00/month Chinquapin Apartments One Bedroom $415.00 Jefferson House I One Bedroom $365 - $385.00/mo. The The rents have not increased at Tyler Court since it opened last year. The rent at the Chinquapin Apartments has increased twice since it opened in 1984; from $390.00 per month to $415.00 per month. 3. OCCUPANCY Tyler Court Apartments currently have no vacancies and have a small waiting list. At the last check. Chinquapin Apartments had three vacancies. At Jefferson House we have had no vacancies since November of 1984. There have been approximately nine tenants move out since we opened, and all these units were rented and occupied within 30 days of each vacancy. Most of these units were rented to people taken from my waiting list, which currently has approximately 70 names on it. I receive an avereage of two to three inquiries per month requesting a unit; 99% are seniors already living in the North County Area. I feel that the inquiries I receive along with the fact that two of the senior complexes in Carlsbad are full, with waiting lists, shows a definite need for this type of housing. I also surveyed four one-bedroom apartments in Carlsbad (not senior). The rents vary from $400.00 to $575.00 per month, with an average yearly increase of $20.00. Bill Rick, January 17, Page Three RE: JEFFERSON I Bob Ladwig 1986 & II In conclusion, I do not feel that the proposed Jefferson II will create any impact on traffic in the downtown area. The location of this project is ideal for the senior, who at the age of 62 and older, prefer to be able to walk or ride a bus to their destina- tion, which would be within blocks of whera they live. If you have any questions regarding this information, please let me know. RC:ds-l DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE PLANNINQ OFFICE 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 (619) 438-5591 Citp of CarliSbab December 23, 1985 Rick Engineering 5620 Friars Road San Diego, California 92110 RE: CUP-281 - Jefferson House II The Planning Director and the City Engineer have reviewed the application you submitted for the above-referenced project. Based upon this review, it has been determined that there are major problems associated with your application which must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a Planning Commission hearing. The problems or issues are listed below. Also, the name of the project planner and project engineer is provided. You should set-up a meeting to discuss the issues with the appropriate staff member. Once the problems/issues have been addressed, your application will then be scheduled for a hearing. Problems/Issues Length of building (break-up) Demand for senior housing Distance between buildings Turn arounds Project Planner Christopher DeCerbo Project Planner Clyde Wickham Costa Real VwV^ Municipal Water District ^^^^^1^ 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Telephone: (619)438-2722 DATE: December 23, 1985 TO: City of Carlsbad Land Use Planning Office Carlsbad, California 92008 ATTN: Chris Decerbo SUBJ: CUP 281 - Jefferson House II-CRMWD Project No. 85-601.157 (S.E. Corner Jefferson & Home) The subject project has been reviewed by the District's Engineering Department to determine the extent of District's involvement regarding existing and proposed water system to serve proposed project as follows: YES NO Are there transmission lines that affect project? ( ) (X) Are there existing facilities that will have to be reconstructed? (X) ( ) Are there new facilities that will have to be constructed? (X) ( ) Are there existing District agreements that have financial impact on the project? ( ) (X) We have the following specific recommendations: 1. The entire water system for subject project be evaluted in detail to insure adequate capacity for domestic, landscaping and fire flow demands are met including implementation of District Master Water Plan. 2. The developer and his engineer schedule a meeting with the District engineer and establish water system layout prior to the water system improvement plans being drawn• 3. The project currently has three (3) existing water services and meters providing service to each dwelling. Page 2 Chris Decerbo December 23, 1985 4. The developer shall be required to replace existing 4" water line in Home avenue with a larger diameter water main. Regarding fees and deposits: The developer will be responsible for the major facility charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit. Please contact Mr. Jerry Whitley if you have any questions regarding this project. William E. Blakesley Deputy District Engirfeer WEB:sja cc: Fire Marshal Jefferson House II, Partnership CRMWD 85-601.157