HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 86-14; Bizieff; Redevelopment Permits (RP)APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE:
JULY ^9, Jt^8 6
STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 1, 1987
TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: RP 86--14 - BIZIEFF - Request for approval of a
Redevelopment Permit to allow construction of two
commercial buildings at the intersection of Lincoln
Street, Oak Avenue, and Carlsbad Boulevard in Subarea 5
of the V-R Zone.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Design Review board ADOPT Resolution No. 098 DENYING
RP 86-14 based on the findings contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to construct two commercial buildings
on a triangular shaped piece of land formed by the intersection
of Carlsbad Boulevard, Oak Avenue, and Lincoln Street. The site
is presently occupied by a commercial business, known as
Katmandu.
Properties to the west, north, and south of the subject site are
commercial properties also in Subarea 5. Property to the east
consists of 30 condominium units which are not located in the V-R
area Zone and are zoned R-3.
The two proposed buildings would consist of a one story structure
(1528 square feet) and a two story structure (1785 square feet).
The proposed architectural elevations are similar to the Carlsbad
Inn across the street. To provide adequate parking, the
applicant is requesting a street vacation and closure of Lincoln
Avenue. A traffic study was done to determine the feasibility of
this request.
Ill. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1. Does the proposed project conform to the goals of Subarea
5 of the Village Redevelopment Area?
2. Does the proposed project comply with the development
standards of the Village Design Manual?
3. Will the vacation and closure of Lincoln Street be
compatible with the entire project area?
Discussion
As stated, the project site is located in Subarea 5 which has
traditionally functioned as the north/south thoroughfare for the
downtown area and was envisioned to serve "as the major
tourist/tourist commercial center for the Redevelopment Project
Area. Travel service types of uses were encouraged. The
proposed project does meet this goal as well as all development
standards regarding height and landscaping.
The project as proposed offers a number of positive features to
the area as well as a number of negative ones. The positive
features include the elimination of the existing buildings and
replacement with structures that will be similar in architecture
to the Carlsbad Inn. The architecture would be a major
improvement and would be more in line with the architecture
anticipated in the Redevelopment Area. Another positive aspect
of the project is that the existing driveway along Carlsbad
Boulevard would be eliminated, eliminating a hazardous
situation. In addition, more landscaping would be provided than
exists on site.
The major problem with the application as proposed involves'
access. Access to the project would be from Oak Street into a
parking lot which was formerly Lincoln Street. The western half
of Lincoln would be vacated and given to the applicant to help
provide enough parking and driveway space to meet regulations.
The eastern half of Lincoln Street would not be vacated but would
be "closed" and would also help the proposed project meet
parking, setback, and driveway standards. Some parking would be
left over (above standard) for use by other buildings in the
area. A traffic study was done that showed the closure of
Lincoln Street to be feasible.
In providing the proposed project with the extra amount of land
area needed, the closure of Lincoln has a number of associated
problems that go with it. The major impact is on the condominium
project located on the east side of the proposed closure of
Lincoln Street. The condominiums would lose approximately 12 on-
street parking spaces which are important, as the project was
approved with a parking ratio of only one space per unit (1:1).
Some of these spaces could be reclaimed in the parking lot
created by the Lincoln Street closure if they were not utilized
by shoppers in the project or by the Carlsbad Inn.
-2-
Another problem is that the condos would no longer have frontage
on a public street, but would front on a parking lot. In
addition, a number of residents would have to go through a
parking lot to get to their carports. At least 63% of the condo
residents have expressed opposition to the project as they feel
circulation to the project would be worsened. They also
expressed concern over view and breeze blockage and the
deterioration of property values.
In addition, the Fire Department has stated that the proposed
parking lot would provide poor accessibility for fire engines
and has recommended a 38 foot turn-around at the north end of
the parking lot. The turn-around, if included, would
substantially reduce the parking.
Although the site is difficult to develop, it is staff's opinion
that the proposed project is too intense for the site as
proposed. It requires the use of a large area of public land to
make the project parking and access work. Staff feels that this
bonus to the applicant frora the City would come at the detriment
of the surrounding property owners. For these reasons and others
outlined earlier, staff cannot support the project.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined the project will not cause
any significant environmental impacts and, therefore, has issued
a Negative Declaration on March 21, 1987.
Attachments
1. Design Review Board Resolution No. 098
2. Location Map
3. Background Data Sheet
4. Disclosure Form
5. Environmental Document
6. Reduced Exhibits
7. Exhibits "A" - "F", dated July 18, 1986
AL: dm
3/10/87
-3-
GENERAL PLAN
Rl.
RI.M
R.M R.MH
RH
RRI
RRE
RS
C
N
TS ()
CBD
RESIDINTIAL
low DENSITY (01 ^)
LOW MEDIL M DENSITY'(0-4)
MEDII M DENSITY'(4-8)
MEDIl'M IIIGH DENSITY (81?)
HIGH DENSITY ( H 23)
COMMERCIAL
INTENSIVE REGIONAL RET.ML (eg Plaza Camino Real)
EXTENSIVE REGIONAL RETAIL (eg Car Country Carlsbad)
REGIONAL SERVICE
COMML NITY COM.MERCLAL
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
TRAVEL SERVICES COMMERCIAL
PROFESSIONAL RELATED
( FNTRAL Bl SINESS DISTRICT
PLANNED INDI STRIAL
GOVERNMENT FACILITIES
PL BLIC L TILITIES
RECREATION COMMERCLAL .
SCHOOLS
ELE.MENTARY
J( NIOR HIGH
IIIC.H SCHOOL
PRIVATE
OS OPEN SPACE
NRR NON RESIDENTLAL RESERVE
ZONING
RESIDENTIAL
P C PLANTNiED COMMI ^NITY ZONE
R A RESIDENTTAL AGRICl.LTL RAL ZONE
R E RI R.\L RESIDENTLAL ESTATE ZONE
R I ONE FA.MILY RESIDENTLAL ZONE
R 2 TVKVFA.MILY RESIDENTLAL ZONE
R ? .Ml LI IJM J; FVMILY RESIDENTTAL ZONE
R-3L U.MI I LD .Ml LTI-F.A,MILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE
RD M RI SIDENTLAL DENSITY-MLLTIPLE ZONE
RD H RESIDENTLAL DENSITY-HIGH ZONE
RMHP RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HO.ME PARK ZON'E
R P RI :MnFM IM I ROFESSIONAL ZONE
RT RLSiDtMIAl lOl RISTZONE
RW RI.MI.iFM I KI \XATERWAY ZONE
COMMERCIAL
O OFHCE ZONE
C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COM.MERCLAL ZONE
0 2 GENERAL COMMERCLAL ZONE
CT COM.MERCLALTOLRISTZONE
C M HEAVY CO.M.MERCLAL UMITTD INDUSTRLAL ZONE
M INDL STTUAL ZONE
P M PLA.NN ED INDUSTRLAL ZONE
OTHER
F P aOODPLAlN OVERLAY ZONE
L C UMITED CONTROL
OS OPEN SP.ACE
P U PUBUC UTIUTY ZONE
BIZIEFF
City of Garlsbad
RP 86-14
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: RP 86-14
APPLICANT: Bizieff
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Approval of a Redevelopment Permit to allow construction
and Carlsbad Boulevard.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Block 15, Map 775, Town of Carlsbad
Amended APN: 203-261-01
Acres 116 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 1
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation CBD
Density Allowed N/A Density Proposed N/A
Existing Zone VR Proposed Zone N/A
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
Site VR TS
North VR CBD
South VR CBD
East R-3 RH
West VR CBD
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewer Carlsbad EDU's N/A
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated July 18, 1986
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
^Negative Declaration, issued N/A
E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other,
DISCLOSORB FORN
APPLICANT: ^ Maksut Inciyan
Nesne (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
44^4 VIest Point Loma Blvd #110
Business Address
San Dieqo, CA 92107
AGENT:
MEMBERS:
Telephone Number
^nrdnn M Ri 7i eff
Name
2892 Jefferson Street, Carlsbad 92008
Business Address
434-4554
Telephone Nimber
Husband & Wife same as above
Name (individual, partner, joint
venture, corporation, syndication)
Home Address
same
Business Address
same
Telephone Number Telephone Number
Name Eicroe Address
Business Address
Telephone Niinber
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
The aiqplicant is reqaired to ai^ly for Coastial CoHmission Approval
if located in the Coastal Xone.
I/Vfe declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this
disclosure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be
relied \xpon as being true and correct mtil amended.
APPLICANT
BY A/1 JAUUPLU
Owner, Partner
2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859
PLANNINGDEPARTMENT m^li^ JM (619)438-1161
Citp of €avl6hah
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: Intersection of Lincoln Street, Oak Avenue
and Carlsbad Boulevard.
PROJECT OESCRIPTION: Approval of a Redevelopment Permit to allow
construction of two commercial buildings.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the
above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation
of the California Environmental (Quality Act and the Environmental
Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not
have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the
subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the
Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on
file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA.,
92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments
in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of
issuance.
DATED: March 21, 1987
MICHAEL 3. HOnZMILLER
CASE NO: RP 86-U Planning Director
APPLICANT: Bizieff
PUBLISH DATE: March 21, 1987
ND^
11/85
•a If - u r
ir^ — h
Tr^ir~ir ^^^iS - ^ T^T^i':^' • ^ izi:r^--^GGf^ J I7~i ~JJ-
j^lG \|"t r^^r ^
yGi .i.^-Iiy:GrB.syIiy^
1^1
@ fi)
s