HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 87-12; THE JEFFERSON BUILDING; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (3)FEE: $175.00
RECEIPT NO: fi| (^T^O
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I
(To Be Completed by APPLICANT)
CASE NO: '^P *B7-
DATE: id^/5y
Applicant: jfiBUlhJ P. iCEU^O
Address of Applicant: E.\O^C£JB^l^ Dig,. ^ CAl2.L^e>/^ ^ /J^
Phone Number: ( <^l^ ) 17S\
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than
Applicant):
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Description of Project: 2 f^TZX^Y OPdCE./P0OfB^LouAL, eTJiLDIKX:^ (AfPeaC.
Project Location/Address: ^g>i^ J£PPF££^yO ^T. ^ ^J^^^^U^/yn ^ /J^.
Assessor Parcel Number: ~ ( \0 ~ ZP\
Zone of Subject Property:
Proposed Use of Site: OFRCE ^ 1 CD/ jUg?
List all other applicable applications related to this project:
2. Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man
made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when
appropriate. ^ iUPi[)lDUA!L. OFHCE. ^UlTte uu/ 2>m\kaMH^ OlJ
3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design
and/or operation of the project.
io/A
4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes,
range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected.
5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or
regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities.
6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and
loading facilities.
If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per
shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits
to be derived from the project.
-2-
I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate
space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as
necessary.)
1)
YES NO
Could the project significantly change present /
land uses in the vicinity of the activity? v
7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the
activity area unique, that is, not found in other
parts of the county, state or nation?
8) Could the activity significantly affect an
historical or archaeological site or its settings?
13) Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands?
J 2) Could the activity affect the use of a recreational
area, or area of important aesthetic value?
3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an
established community or neighborhood?
4) Could the activity result in the displacement of / (puj^£te)
community residents? ^ ^ /2£^IR^J7^
5) Could the activity increase the number of low and /
modest cost housing units in the city? ^
6) Could the activity decrease the number of low and /
modest cost housing units in the city?
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a ^
scarce natural resource?
10) Does the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource?
/
11) Could the activity significantly affect fish, /
wildlife or plant life?
12) Are there any rare or endangered plant species /
in the activity area?
14) Could the activity change existing features of /
any of the city's beaches? ^
15) Could the activity result in the erosion or /
elimination of agricultural lands?
16) Could the activity serve to encourage development /
of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- /
ment of already developed areas?
-3-
YES NO
17) Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water,
noise, etc.)?
18) Will the activity require certification, authoriza-
tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or
federal environmental control agency?
21)
28)
29) Will there be a significant change to existing /
1 ;an(^ fnrm'? v/ land form?
(a) Indicate estimated gradino to be done in
cubic yards: ^ ^^OO C7X'
(b) Percentage of alteration to the present
land form: .
(c) Maximum height of cut^or fill slopes: height of cut or fill slopes:
^ Or CAJT CfOfl- eAn£JiU(J\ .
19) Will the activity require issuance of a variance /
or conditional use permit by the City?
20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or /
disposal of potentially hazardous materials? ^
Will the activity involve construction of /
facilities in a flood plain?
22) Will the activity involve construction of /
facilities in the area of an active fault?
23) Will the activity involve construction of /
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? ^
24) Could the activity result in the generation of /
significant amounts of noise?
25) Could the activity result in the generation of /
significant amounts of dust?
26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush, /
trees, or other materials?
27) Could the activity result in a significant change
in the quality of any portion of the region's air .
or water resources? (Should note surface, ground
water, off-shore.)
Will the project substantially increase fuel ^
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)?
30) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets?
31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger /
project or series of projects? ^
-4-
II. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section
I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental
effects, indicate your reasons below:
/JOT htp^^ A^v" Bff£^ 01^ /Jr^<^^t^€v&e? TkhJ^ 0^ H+e ^izy/wuoitj^
III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach
additional sheets as needed.)
Signature
(Person Completing Report)
Date Signed /^^/^7
-5-
NOTICE COMPIETION A.NO ENVIHONMEXTAL DOCUMEHT FORM
I. Projtct Title:, Jefferson Building
iee ,10. c
SCH f
City of Carlsbad 2. Ltid Agency:.
3«. Street ^rmtn 2075 Las Palmas Drive
3c. r^n^v. San Diego 3^. zip:.
PROJECT Loa7::;< A. county: San Diego
3. Contact Person:
3b. City: Carlsbad
Nancy Rollman
92009 3e. Phone: 619-U38-1161
4b.(optional) Assessor's Parcel No..
4«. Clty/Coffirunity:
4c. Section
Carlsbad
Twp. Jlanga
5a. Craxsz^trntx'^ 7R^^ Jefferson St.
6. Within 2 ailes of: a. State Hwy No. I-5
7. DOCUMENT HPE
Sb. For Rural,
Nearest Conmunity;
b. Airports c. Waterways Pacific Ocean
CEQA
01 .NOP
02 ^Early Cons
03 X Weq Dec
04 Draft EIR
05 Supplement/
Subsequent EIR
(if $0, prior SCH *
)
NEPA
06 Notice of Intent
07 Envir. Assessment/
^FOHSI
08 Draft EIS
OTHER'"
09 ^Information Only
10 Final Oocument
11 Other
11. PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN OOCUMEWT
3. LCCAL ACTION TYPE
01 General Plan Updacc
02' New Element
03 General Plan Amendment
OA Master Plan
05 Annexation
06 Specific Plan
07 X Redevelopment
08 Rezone
09 land Division
(Subdivision, Parcel Map,
Tract Map, etc.)
10 Use Permit
11 Cancel Ag Preserve
12 Other
10. Or/ELOPMENT TVPE
01 Residential: Units
02 Xoffice: Sq.Ft. 8,800
Acres - Employees
03 Shopplng/Comnercial: So.Ft.
Acres Ewploveei
04 Industrial: Sq.Ft.
Acres
OS Sewer: MGO
06 Water: MGD
07 Transportation; Type
03 Mineral Extraction: Mineral
09 Power Generation: Wattage^
Type:
10 Other:
Acres
Enployi
9. TOTAL ACRES: .30
01 Aesthetic/Visual
02 Agricultural Land
03 Air Quality
04 Archaeological/Historical
05 X Coastal
06 Fire Hazard
07 Flooding/Drainage
12. FlJfiOING(approx.) Federal $_
13. PRESENT LANO USE ANO ZONING:
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
Jieologic/Seismic 15
Jobs/Housing Balance 16
_Minerals
Jioise
_Public Services
JSchools
Septic Systems
17
18
19
20
21
Jewer Capacity 22
_Soil Erosion 23_
Jolid Waste 24
_Toxic/Hazdrdou$ 25
Jraffic/Circulation 26
J/egetation 27
Water Quality 23
_Watcr Supply
_Wet1and/Riparian
J/iildlife
_Growth Inducing
_lncompatible Landuse
JTuraulative Effects
Other
State S Total S
Existing single family house.
Zoning is Village Reclevelopment
14. PROJECT 3gSC.^I?TI0N:
Two-story office building with underground parking. Located in Subarea 1
of the Village Redevelopment Area, which allows the proposed use.
15. SICNATURE CF LEAO AGSriCY REPRESENTATIVE:. Oate 2-22-88
NOTE: CTearingnous* -ill assign identification numbers 'or all new projects. If a SCH Number already exists for a praject
(e.g. from a Notice of ?<-eoarat1on or previous draft oocument) please fin it in.
KtVitWlNli A(ihNCfEb'
Resources Agency
Air Resources Board
Conservation
Fish and Game
Coastal Co.nniission
Caltrans District
Caltrans - Planning
Caltrans - Aeronautics
California Highway Patrol
Boating and Waterways ~
Forestry
State Water Resources Control
Board - Headquarters
Regional Water Quality Control
Board, Region
Division of Water Rights (SWRCB)
Division of Water Quality (SWRCB)
Departinent of Water Resources
Reclamation Board
Solid Waste Management Board
Colorado River Board
. CTRPA (CalTRPA) - • •
. TRPA (Tahoe RPA)
, Bay Conservation & Dev't Comm
. Parks and Recreation
, Office of Historic Preservation
, Native American Heritage Comm
State Lands Comm
Public Utilities Comm
Energy Comm
, Food and Agriculture
, Health Services
Statewide Health Planning (hospitals)
Housing and Community Dev't
Corrections
General Services
Office of Local Assistance
Public Works Board
Office of Appropriate Technology (OPR)
Local Government Unit (OPR)
Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy
Other
FOR SCH USE ONLY
Date Received at SCH
Date Review Starts _
Date to Agencies
Date to SCH
Catalog Number
Proponent '
Clearance Date
' Notes:
Consultant
Contact
Address
Phone
EXHIBIfPII"
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. RP 87-12
DATE: 2-17-88
I. BACKGROUND
1. APPLICANT: Kevin Kelso
2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 3350 Ridgecrest Dr,
Carlsbad, CA 92008
3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED:
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
December 9. 1987
(Explanations of all Affinnative Answers are to be written
under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Unstable earth conditions
or in changes in geologic
substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering
of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering of
modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or
off the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel or a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
X
X
X
X
X
YES MAYBE NO
2. Air - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? X_
b. The creation of objectionable
odors? X_
c. Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally? X_
3. Water - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters? X_
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patters, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff? X_
c. Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters? X_
d. Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body? X_
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to, temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? X_
f. Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters? X_
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations? X_
h. Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies? X_
-2-
YES MAYBE NO
4. Plant Life - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X_
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants? X_
c. Introduction of new species of plants
into an area, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species? X_
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop? X_
5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles,
fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)? X_
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? X_
c. Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of
animals? X.
d. Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly
increase existing noise levels? X_
7. Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig-
nificantly produce new light or glare? X_
8. Land Use - Will the proposal have
significant results in the alteration of
the present or planned land use of an
area? X
-3-
YES MAYBE NO
9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources? X_
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource? X_
10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident
or upset conditions? X_
11. Por)ulation - Will the proposal signif-
icantly alter the location, distribu-
tion, density, or growth rate of the
human population of an area? X_
12. Housing - Will the proposal signif-
icantly affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? X_
13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the
proposal have significant results in:
a. Generation of additional vehicular
movement? X^
b. Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking? X_
c. Impact upon existing transportation
systems? X_
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? X_
e. Alterations to waterbome, rail or
air traffic? X_
f. Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? X
-4-
YES MAYBE NO
14. Public Services - Will the proposal have
a significant effect upon, or have signif-
icant results in the need for new or
altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection? X_
b. Police protection? X_
c. Schools? X_
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities? X^
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? X_
f. Other governmental services? X_
15. Energy - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy? X^
b. Demand upon existing sources of
energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy? X_
16. Utilities - Will the proposal have
significant results in the need for new
systems, or alterations to the following
utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? X.
b. Communications systems? X_
c. Water? X_
d. Sewer or septic tanks? X_
e. Storm water drainage? X^
f. Solid waste and disposal? X_
17. Human Health - Will the proposal have
significant results in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health
hazard (excluding mental health)? X_
-5-
YES MAYBE NO
18. Aesthetics - Will the proposal have
significant results in the obstruction
of any scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal result in
creation of an aesthetically offensive
public view?
19. Recreation - Will the proposal have
significant results in the impact upon
the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
20. Archeological/Historical - Will the
proposal have significant results in
the alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site,
structure, object or building?
21. Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed proiect such as:
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter-
nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative.
a) The project is too small to be phased.
b) The design is consistent with the guidelines of the Village
Design Manual.
c) The scale of the project has been reduced.
d) There are other office buildings in the vicinity.
e) N/A
f) N/A
g) N/A
-6-
YES MAYBE NO
22. Mandatory findings of significance -
a. Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, or curtail the diversity
in the environment?
b. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
c. Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (A
project may impact on two or more
separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? X_
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The project will not result in any significant, environmental
impacts because:
(1) The site is developed already with a residence and
associated buildings.
(2) There are no sensitive resources on or adjacent to
the site.
(3) The project is located in an urban, developed area
with structures of similar sizes and uses.
(4) The project is lower than the allowed maximum height
limit of 35' (Coastal)
-7-
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued)
-8-
IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date Sigp^ture
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)
-9-
MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued)
VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
-10-
AP.5>UCK-L£
HOME
X
0 u in
&RAMO
J
>
0
21
c m n •n m
0
z
>
2
(^
ELM
GENERAL PLAN
RL
RLM
RM
RMH
RH
RRJ
RRE
RS
C
N
TS
O
CBD
PI
G
L'
RC
E J
H
P
RISIDENTIAL
LOW DENSITY(0-L5)
LOWMEDILM DENSirV(0-4)
MEDIUM DENSITY(4-8)
MEDIL M HIGH DENSITY (8-15)
HIGH DENSITY (K-23) COMMERCIAL
INTENSIVE REGIONAL RETAIL (eg. Plaza Camino Real)
EXTENSIVE REGIONAL RETAIL (eg Car Country Carlsbad)
REGIONAL SERVICE
COMMUNITY COMMERCLAL
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCLAL
TR.AVEL SERVICES COMMERCLAL
PROFESSIONAL RELATED
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
PLANNED INDUSTRIAL
GOVERNMENT FACILITIES
PUBLIC UTILITIES
RECREATION COMMERCUL
SCHOOLS
ELEMENTARY
JUNIOR HIGH
HIGH SCHOOL
PRIVATE
ZONING
OS OPEN SPACE
NRR NON RESIDENTLAL RESERVE
RESIDENTIAL P C PLANNED COMMLTVITY ZONE
R-A RESIDENTLAL AGRICULTL RAL ZONE
R E RUR.AL RESIDENTLAL ESTATE ZONE
R-l ON-E FAMILY RESIDENTUL ZONE
R-2 TaO-FAMlLY RESIDENTLAL ZONE
R 3 Ml LTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTUL ZONE
R-3L LLMITED MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTLAL ZONE
RD M RESIDENTLAL DENSITV MULTIPLE ZONE
RD H RESIDENTLAL DENSITY-HIGH ZONE
RMHP RESIDENTUL MOBILE HOME PARK ZONE
R P RESIDENTLAL PROFESSIONAL ZONE
RT RESIDENTUL TOURIST ZONE
RW RESIDENTLAL WATERWAY ZONE
COMMERCIAL
O OFHCE ZONE
C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE
C-2 GENERAL COMMERCLAL ZONE
C-T COMMERCLAL-TOURJST ZONE
C M HEAVY COMMERCLAL-LLMITED INDUSTRLAL ZONE
M INDUSTRLAL ZONE
P M PLANNED INDUSTRLAL ZONE
OTHER
F- P FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY ZONt
L-C LIMITED CONTROL
OS OPEN SPACE
P-U PUBUC UTIUTY ZONE
/
City of Garlsbad
JEFFERSON BUILDING RP 87-12
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: RP 87-12
APPLICANT: Jefferson Building
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Maior Redevelopment Permit for a two-story
office building with underground parking at 2815 Jefferson Street.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1: The southeasterlv 50 feet of the
northwesterly 241 feet of Lot 48 of Seaside Lands, except the
southwesterly 120 feet and Parcel 2: The southeasterly 15 feet of the
northwesterly 191 feet of Lot 48 of Seaside lands, both parcels
according to the Map thereof No. 1722. filed in the Office of the
Countv Recorder of San Diego. Julv 28. 1921. APN: 203-110-29
Acres .30
Land Use Designation
Density Allowed
Existing Zone _
Proposed No. of Lots/Units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
RMH/O
n/a
n/a
V-R
Density Proposed
Proposed Zone
n/a
V-R
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning
Site
North
South
East
West
V-R
V-R
V-R
R-P-O/R-3
V-R
Land Use
SF Residence
Office/Residential
Office/Residential
Office/Residential
Office/Residential
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Water*Costa Real Sewer Carlsbad EDU's 5
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated 12-3-87
(*The City of Carlsbad will provide water service to all projects in
Carlsbad except those located in the Olivenhain and San Marcos Sewer
Districts.)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
JC Negative Declaration, issued 2-26-88
.E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other,
DISCLOSURE FORM
APPLICANT
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
Business Address
Telephone Number
AGENT
Name
Business Address
Telephone Number
MEMBERS:
Name (individual, partner, joint
venture, corporation, syndication)
Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
Name Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/We understand that if this project is located in the Coastal Zone, 1/we will apply
for Coastal Commission Approval prior to development.
I/We acknowledge that in the process of reviewing this application, it may be
necessary for members of City Staff, Planning Commissioners, Design Review Board
members, or City Council members to inspect and enter the property that is the
subject of this application. I/We consent to entry for this purpose.
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this disclosure
is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be relied upon
as being true and correct until amended.
BY
Agent, Owner, Partner
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859
(619) 438-1161
Citp of Carlfifaab
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: 2815 Jefferson Street, Carlsbad
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Two story office building, 8800 square feet
with underground parking. Located in Subarea 1 of the Village
Redevelopment Area.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the
above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for
Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad.
As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration
that the project will not have a significant impact on the
environment) is hereby issued for the subject project.
Justification for this action is on file in the Planning
Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is
on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive,
Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are
invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning
Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance.
DATED: February 26, 1988
CASE NO: RP 87-12
MICHAEL J. JiOtZMlliiER
Planning Director
APPLICANT: JEFFERSON BUILDING
PUBLISH DATE: February 26, 1988