The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRP 88-01; Lubin Chiropractic Office; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (3)HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT 0>9K^H REDEVELOPMENT OFFICE 2965 Roosevelt Street Suite B Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 434-2811 (EttQ of OlarlBbab December 15, 1988 Marshall Lubin, DC 2562 State Street, Suite C Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: INTENSIFICATION OF USE/REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT When there is a change of use on a site that results in an intensification of use, a Redevelopment Permit is required. A change from general office to a medical office is an intensification of use. Parking for medical office is one (1) space for every 200 square feet of gross floor area, for other professional offices the required parking is one (1) space for every 250 square feet. A real estate office at the 3021 Jefferson Street 'site would not be an intensification of use. A medical office at that site would be an intensification of use and would require a Redevelopment Permit. If you need additional information or clarification, please call. Gi Sincerely, K CHRIS SALOMONE ' / Housing and Redevelopment Director CS:PAC:ec CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR. (619) 434-2891 CITY ATTORNEY RONALD R. BALL ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY July 5, 1988 Dr. Marshall Lubin 3021 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, California 92008 RE: VIOLATION OF CHAPTERS 18.12, 21.35 21.81 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3021 JEFFERSON STREET, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA (APN 203-351-15) Dear Dr. Lubin: This confirm our conversation of Friday, July 1, 1988 in which you informed me that you have located different office space and will be quitting the premises that are the subject matter of this action on or before July 16, 1988. I am sending a copy of this letter to Gene Siegel, the property owner, so that he can ensure that this property conforms to the requirements of the Carlsbad Municipal Code before it is reoccupied. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, RONALD R. BALL Assistant City Attorney rmh c: Gene Siegel Code Enforcement Officer VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR. CITY ATTORNEY RONALD R. BALL ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 (619) 434-2891 June 30, 1988 Dr. Marshall Lubin 3021 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, California 92008 RE: VIOLATION OF CHAPTERS 18.12, 21.35 21.81 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3021 JEFFERSON STREET, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA (APN 203-351-15) Dear Dr. Lubin: This matter has been referred to my office since you have failed to comply with the above referenced chapters of the Carlsbad Municipal Code for the real property located at 3021 Jefferson Street, Carlsbad which you lease and occupy. As you may know, no development, building or rebuilding may occur in the redevelopment area without first obtaining a redevelopment permit from the Design Review Board pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.35.070 which states: "No development, redevelopment, building or rebuilding shall occur in the area subject to this chapter without a redevelopment permit first having been issued by the housing and redevelopment commission or, for minor projects defined in Section 21.35.080, by the design review board." Please be further advised that your development requires a coastal development permit from the Design Review Board pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Section 21.81.070. No development shall occur in the redevelopment zone without a permit having first been obtained as required by CMC Section 21.81.020. You applied for a minor redevelopment permit and coastal permit which were issued conditionally on the condition, among others, that you comply with the terms of Condition 14 requiring electrical service to meet current adopted codes. You appealed this condition and others to the City Council which appeal was denied on June 21, 1988. That decision is now final and you must comply with that condition. In that regard, following the "Notice of Municipal Code violation and Order to Remove" dated May 13, 1988 requiring you to correct the violations of Chapter 18.12 no later than May 27, 1988, you wrote a letter to Mr. Tony Mata of the Building Department -2- indicating that you would move from this location should your appeal be denied. From the information that has been provided to me, you have neither corrected these violations nor ceased occupancy as you stated. The purpose of this letter is to schedule an office hearing for you in my offices on July 14, 1988 at 9:00 a.m. to allow you to show cause why this office should not file a criminal or civil action in order to obtain your involuntary compliance. If you do not show cause why such action or actions should not be filed or if you fail to appear for this hearing, then this office will feel free to pursue any and all legal, equitable and administrative remedies available to it in order to obtain your involuntary compliance. Please let me know immediately if, for any reason, you will be unable to attend this hearing so we may reschedule it. I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter. Veryvtruly yours. RONALD R. BALL Assistant City Attorney rmh c: Code Enforcement Officer Gene Siegel JUNE 28, 1988 TO: ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 3021 JEFFERSON STREET, MARSHALL LUBIN Originally a permit to upgrade the service at the above address was obtained on December 12, 1987. A copy of the permit is attached. Please see note on the rear of the permit dated January 29, 1988 "not for use as a commercial building" written by Building Inspector Pat Kelly. Mr. Lubin was told that the electrical service was not sufficient for the commercial use proposed. The permit was pulled by Marshall Lubin. A letter (copy attached) was received by Pat Kelly from Mr. Lubin stating that he would rent the house out instead of going through proper channels to get everything approved. Mr. Lubin then proceeded to open his chiropractic office at 3021 Jefferson Street. Mr. Lubin has applied for and received a Redevelopment Permit, however, Mr. Lubin was not satisfied with the conditions of approval and applied for an appeal of the permit to the City Council. His appeal was denied, and he is bound by the original conditions of the Redevelopment Permit. The Design Review Board wanted to have Mr. Lubin comply immediately to the electrical code requirements of his approval. When Mr. Lubin was informed by letter to comply with the conditions of approval by May 27, 1988, he called my office for an extension. I referred him to Tony Mata and he requested an extension in writing. Mr. Mata denied his request. Mr. Lubin has not yet complied and is still operating his chiropractic practice from 3021 Jefferson Street. A. HARRINGTON 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE M'kfW J M TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 mSS^^Jm ^^^^^ 438-1161 (Ettg 0f (Earl0ba2i BUILDING DEPARTMENT May 24, 1988 Dr. Marshall B. Lubin 800 Grand Avenue, Suite B4 Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: ELECTRICAL CHANGES - 3021 JEFFERSON STREET Dear Dr. Lubin: Your request for an extension of the written notice to comply with the conversion of electrical systems at the address referenced above is DENIED by the Building Department. The Building Department advises you to cease any type of commercial business at the above-referenced address until all approvals have been granted by all departments of the City of Carlsbad that are concerned with this project. If you need any further information, please contact this office. TONY /MATA Principal Building Inspector bjn c: Community Development Director Community Redevelopment Manager Code Enforcement Officer dr. marshall b. lubin chiropractic physician May 21, 1988 To: Mr. Tony Mata City of Carlsbad Building Dept. 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, Ca 92008 Re: 3021 Jefferson Street Dear Mr. Mata: ^^^iog 9^"^ On May l8th I received a notice from Martin Orenyak giving me until May 27th to convert the electrical changes at the above noted address from residential to commercial and meet municipal codes, I would like to request an extension of that date to coincide v/ith the City Council decision on my appeal. The design review board has mandated a parking lot be con- structed at this address, and I don't feel that it is necessary. I have appealled that decision and v/ill probably move from this location should I lose the appeal. If I do move, it v/ould mean that the electrical conversion was wasted time and money on my part. Should I win the appeal then I would happily make the changes requested by the design review board at that time. My thanks in advance. Sincerely, Marshall B. Luoin ML/sc 800 gror^d avenue, suite b4 • carlsbad, ca 92008 • 619/434-4743 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE M^ilW M TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 WXS^Jm 438-1161 Cttp of CarliBibab ^ CERTIFIED BUILDING DEPARTMENT May 13, 1988 Dr. Marshall B. Lubin 3021 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 NOTICE OF MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATION ORDER TO REMOVE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: As the owner or occupant of the property located at 3021 Jefferson Street, APN: 203-351-15, you are hereby notified that you are in violation of Carlsbad's Municipal Code: Section 18.12, National Electrical Code Section 230-65, Maintaining service gear for a commercial use with a rating less than that required by code. Requirement is a minimum rating of 42000AIC. Section 18.12.240, Conduit and switchgear mounted on the surface of the building exterior. Section 18.12.255, The use of non-metallic sheathed cable (Romex) when adding new wiring to a building utilized for the type of commercial use of a Chiropractic office. You are hereby ordered to be in full compliance with the provisions of the Carlsbad Municipal Code not later than May 27, 1988. This matter will be referred to the City Attorney's Office for legal action if you fail to comply by the above-referenced date. May 13, 1988 Page Two If you have any questions regarding this notice, contact Michael A. Harrington at 438-1161. MARTIN ORENYAK Community Development Director City Attorney Principal Building Inspector Nancy Rollman Eugene H. Siegel : HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT (EttQ 0f (Earl0ba6 MAY 12, 1988 REDEVELOPMENT OFFICE 2965 Roosevelt Street Suite B Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 434-2811 CERTIFIED IVIAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED MARSHALL B. LUBIN, D.C. 3536 Woodland Way Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 RE: APPEAL OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DECISION OF MAY 4, 1988 RP 88-1/CDP 88-4 We are in receipt of your Notice of Appeal regarding above referenced project, notice dated May 11, 1988. A decision on a minor redevelopment project, by the Design Review Board, may be appealed to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission (Carlsbad Municipal Code, Section 21.35.110) In accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code, the Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Commission shall hold a public hearing on a redevelopment permit which has been appealed. In order to comply with public hearing requirements, notice shall be given as provided for in Sections 21.54.060 and 21.54.064. Excerpts from the Carlsbad Municipal Code are listed below in order to meet requirements for compliance of said public hearing: Section 2.35.115 Housing and Redevelopment Commission Action. The housing and redevelopment commission shall hold a public hearing on a redevelopment permit which has been appealed or for which the design review board has filed a report with the city clerk Section 21.54.060 Notices, (c) Notice of the hearing shall be mailed or delivered at least ten days prior the hearing to all owners of real property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll within six hundred feet, or three hundred feet for variance applications, of the real property that is the subject of the hearing Section 21.54.064 Applicant's responsibilities. (a) The applicant for any action requiring a noticed public hearing shall provide the city with a list of persons or entities to whom notice must be given and the addresses of such persons. The applicant shall also provide MARSHALL B. LDBIN, D.C. Notice of Appeal May 12, 1988 Page 2 stamped, addressed envelopes, for mailing notice. The list and the envelopes, if required, shall be provided to the city not more than forty-five nor less than thirty days prior to the time the matter is scheduled for hearing. If the number of persons to whom notice would be mailed exceeds one thousand the applicant may, in lieu of providing the stamped, addresed envelopes, provide an appropriate display advertisement. The applicant shall verify the accuracy of the list and the addresses. The secretary of the planning commission or the city clerk shall be responsible for informing the applicant of the date a matter is scheduled for hearing, (b) The applicant shall pay the cost of providing the notice required by this chapter. Please provide this office with items needed for public hearing notice. When items are received we will proceed with the processing of notice of appeal to be forwarded to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission. CHRIS SALOMONE CS:al c: City Clerk dr. marshall b. lubin chiropractic physician To: Carlsbad City Council May 10, 1988 From: Dr. Marshall B. Lubin Re: 3021 Jefferson St, Dear Council Members, On Wednesday, May 4th, the design review board mandated that a parking lot be built at the location noted above. This decision was based mainly on the point that a doctors office was an intensification of traffic at this address. I propose to show that this is not the case, and furthermore, that sufficient parking in the area is available for the needs of this office. 1) During the past 4 years two businesses have occupied this location, a travel agency and a marketing firm. Neither of these business activities were required to make accommodation for parking. 2) On the property adjacent to mine, five businesses presently are open serving the public. A. Cliffs Pantry-sees over one hundred customers per day.' No additional parking required. B. Bradleys Janitorial Supply-services approx. 50 customers per day. No additional parking required. C. Vans Shoes-sees 20-40 customers per day. No additional parking required. D. Nexus Hair Salon-sees approx. 40 clients per day. No additional parking required. E. And finally, the Video Store-Sees approx. 30 customers per day presently and expects to see 60 per day in the near future. This store opened within the last three months and no additional parking was required. My office is open from 2-7PM on Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, and Saturday by appointment, I have an agreement with Cliffs Pantry to use the parking lot behind the restaurant during the hours that they are closed, i.e. after 2:30PM. I also have an agreement with Paster Webber, which allows my patients to use the church parking lot, located at Elm and Harding Streets, if needed, Jefferson St, itself is practically deserted after cliffs closes In the early afternoon, which leaves more than enough parking for my needs. Above I noted numerically the average clients per day of the businesses adjacent to my office. My office sees approx. 10 patients per day at present. Hopefully, that number will grow to 15 per day within the next year. Even with that number, I do not even come near to the traffic already generated by the existing businesses. None of those 800 gror^d avenue, suite b4.carlsbad, ca 92008•619/434-4743 dr, marshall b. lubin chiropractic physician enterprises have been required to add parking to the area, and I contend that it is both unfair and unnecessary to single out my office in this instance, I propose that this issue be reviewed and that the decision of the design review board be overruled to allow the existing parking to suffice for the needs of this of f i ce, My thanks in advance. Si ncere1y, Marshall B. Lub 800 grand avenue, suite b4. carlsbad, ca 92008 • 619/434-4743 ITEM 1 MAY 4, 1988 TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FROM: Redevelopment Office RP88-1/CDP 88-4 LDBIN This item was continued from the last Design Review Board meeting. At that meeting. Dr. Lubin stated that he does not want to make any improvements outside his leasable area. Staff was directed to contact the property owner to find out his interest in making the improvements with Dr. Lubin. Mr. Gene Siegel, the owner, has been contacted (see attached letter). His response is that he would be willing to pay half the cost of the parking lot improvements; at this time he does to want to remove the garage or pay for a block wall or the trash enclosure. He will be at the May 4th meeting to answer any questions the Board may have. The applicant's architect is out of town as of this writing (4/26). Staff will continue to try to contact him before the May 4th meeting. The Board discussed several other conditions at the meeting, including: using a block wall instead of a wood fence along the southern property line; installing a block wall around the trash container; removing the garage; providing adequate lighting in the parking lot area; and modifying the site plan to show regular sized parking spaces with 8 1/2 - foot widths. If it appears that Dr. Lubin and Mr. Siegel will agree to make the required improvements, staff will return with a Resolution with those conditions included. Dr. Lubin also requested that conditions #2,6,7,9,12 and 14 be dropped or modified. Staff continues to recommend inclusion of these conditions, as they are standard conditions, and/or necessary to ensure compliance of City requirements as part of issuing the Minor Redevelopment Permit and Coastal Permit. NANCY ROLUEAN NR:ec Attachment: DRB staff report dated April 20, 1988 ^ ^ ; Correspondence dated April 22, 1988 , " * MAY 4, 1988 TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FROM: Redevelopment Office RP88-1/CDP 88-4 LDBIN This item was continued from the last Design Review Board meeting. At that meeting, Dr. Lubin stated that he does not want to make any improvements outside his leasable area. Staff was directed to contact the property owner to find out his interest in making the improvements with Dr. Lubin. Mr. Gene Siegel, the owner, has been contacted (see attached letter). His response is that he would be willing to pay half the cost of the parking lot improvements; at this time ^ he does to want to remove the garage or pay for a block wall or the trash enclosure. He will be at the May 4th meeting to answer any questions the Board may have. The applicant's architect is out of town as of this writing (4/26). Staff will continue to try to contact him before the May 4th meeting. The Board discussed several other conditions at the meeting, including: using a block wall instead of a wood fence along the southern property line; • - installing a block wall around the trash container; removing the garage; providing adequate lighting in the parking lot area; and modifying the site plan to show regular sized parking spaces with 8 1/2 - foot widths. If it appears that Dr. Lubin and Mr. Siegel will agree to make the required improvements, staff will return with a Resolution with those conditions included. Dr. Lubin also requested that conditions #2,6,7,9,12 and 14 be dropped or modified. Staff continues to recommend inclusion of these conditions, as they are standard conditions, and/or necessary to ensure compliance of City requirements as part of issuing the Minor Redevelopment Permit and Coastal Permit. NANCY ROLIJCAN NR:ec PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161 Citp of Carl^bab April 22, 1988 Mr. Gene Siegel 4930 El Cajon Blvd. San Diego, CA 92115 Dear Mr. Siegel: Attached is the site plan and staff report associated with Marshall Lubin's redevelopment permit. As you can see from the map, the parking is proposed to be rearranged so that the 5 required spaces for Dr. Lubin and the 9 existing spaces for Cliff's and the other stores are accommodated. Several additional spaces are created by this layout. This layout is the 4th or Sth attempt to make the parking meet technical standards. A rough, estimated cost to make the parking lot improvements is $11,000. The Design Review Board also is requesting that the trash bin be enclosed in a standard concrete enclosure, and that a masonry wall be installed along the southern property line, which would add roughly another $10,000 to the cost. Finally, the Design Review Board would like the two-car garage removed. As I mentioned to you by phone, the Design Review Board would like you to be present at their next meeting (May 4, 5 p.m., 1200 Elm Avenue) to answer questions about your involvement or non- involvement with Dr. Lubin in making the improvements. Please call me after you have had a chance to review the enclosed materials. I can be reached at 483-1161, except on Tuesdays when I am at the Redevelopment office at 434-2811. Sincerely, NANCY E.^ROLLMAN Associate Planner NER:af Attachment PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161 Citp of CarlSbab April 22, 1988 Mr. Gene Siegel 4930 El Cajon Blvd. San Diego, CA 92115 Dear Mr. Siegel: Attached is the site plan and staff report associated with Marshall Lubin's redevelopment permit. As you can see from the map, the parking is proposed to be rearranged so that the 5 required spaces for Dr. Lubin and the 9 existing spaces for Cliff's and the other stores are accommodated. Several additional spaces are created by this layout. This layout is the 4th or Sth attempt to make the parking meet technical standards. A rough, estimated cost to make the parking lot improvements is $11,000. The Design Review Board also is requesting that the trash bin be enclosed in a standard concrete enclosure, and that a masonry wall be installed along the southern property line, which would add roughly another $10,000 to the cost. Finally, the Design Review Board would like the two-car garage removed. As I mentioned to you by phone, the Design Review Board would like you to be present at their next meeting (May 4, 5 p.m., 1200 Elm Avenue) to answer questions about your involvement or non- involvement with Dr. Lubin in making the improvements. Please call me after you have had a chance to review the enclosed materials. I can be reached at 483-1161, except on Tuesdays when I am at the Redevelopment office at 434-2811. Sincerely, NANCY E.^ROLLMAN Associate Planner NER:af Attachment APRIL 21, 1988 TO: MAYOR CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT HEADS FROM: REDEVELOPMENT OFFICE SUMMARY OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING OF APRIL 20, 1988 ITEM 1: RP 88-1/CDP 88-4 - LDBIN Board continued item to meeting of May 4, 1988, with the exception that condition #14 be done immediately. This condition requires that electrical service meet current adopted codes and needs to be done because the applicant is currently using the building. ITEM 2. SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER Board commented that since Redevelopment Funds are being used, design of the building should be given the same architectural analysis as would be required of a private developer. ITEM 3. REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS Item continued to meeting of May 4, 1988. PATRICIA A. CRATTY PAC:ec 4-> o o o tim O a w o s g ^ m S < M 2 ^ ^ S fi § < 23 < s o a o o c 00 C3n r 1 CL < SO UJ QQ z 2 OS < c: O CU •P CL S- S-cu (U C o •*-> C7> O CU ro E fO 0) O) o s-to CU r— ro E X3 cu •r— to x: f-cu 13 > x: •r— E CU .xr ZJ +-> x: ns <: cn+j XJ s-jQ to •1- cu CJ c S-cu x: to OJ cu (J > CU f— x: n 1— CT> S-s-p— E JD C CL4J LJ S- ro (U 3 E •r" <c o to o to ro S-ro x: •r-tn 4-> CT? s-M-a. c O o ro 3 to to " 4-o O cu in •P x> OJ •r-cu o S- £1. i-CU s-L. e O S-c: •o C ZJ o cu O o (U to o i. rO rcj 1—1 o o E E <f-•r— (U Q. > s-•p->^ o ro x: o to CU •p-+J E r—-4-> $-XJ 1— Ol c: 1— • cu ro •1— 1— to 3 cu r— x: c o cn 3 >^x: O x: ro tn •r— in •1— o c o -p •r— O E •f— •f- CO TJ tn •p-<o 1— o cu cu •r-cu 3 to E JD > E S- E E to 4-> E •r-S_ •p-ro O o ZJ s- tn JC 3 cu JD +J 4-> o •I- o to •p • o . to o 4-> S-•r— •P -P (/) •u o XJ 4-C ro E CU •r— ^ fO > ro O CU x: o p- $- O o •r- 03 x: to O JD •p •p JD -P Q. .- S x: CU C tn 4-> ro CO to cu cu cu o in S-XJ cu X3 x: CU •p-cu E CU E to O S-(O fO Q. O x: CU XJ O • <c 4-> If-E to _j cu C tn •p +J to fO E ro •p-o X 1— i- • eu CU (U O CD • 'p-i- x: cu p— cu Q > x: S-JZ e S_ 4-> 3 h-tn •r- ^- >) O -M fCJ •r— IE; tn cu E S .% E cu tn r— ro cu •1— • E to to s-x: x: ro « •r-O •1— u cn to o *r-O) ro 4-> +J in XJ o o c: - S-JC lO D. •r— >> s-O 3 r— CD ca: S- .r-+J to c cu E O CU CM cn -J 23 ^ +-> (U H-ro 4-i O >, Q-O 2: CO O i. •r- CU c c O XJ •P •P O CO < • • <o •r— CU CU to ZS o I— -o ^-cu 1—1 ro OJ o •r-C x: S-JZ > CU JD •r-ro <+-CU >> •p c (U Irt to o ••-> <: to •<-> 4-> 1— o o E s-cr> u. %. E s-in M-to CU ro r— E fO 3 • E c o o (U <\i O E CU E e CU 13 4-> ro o XJ '1- CT) M-1— C (U +J I— c: O •r-> o S-S-o -•r— 4-5 •r- O LU •r-to E fO E 3 cu • •P r— 00 h-r— c: • to fO CU to •r-x: +J E to > o >, ro cu *-* (tJ > CL O o April 18, 1988 Mr. and Mrs. Frank Vitalie 3037 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, California 92008 To the Design Review Board: With regard to Dr. Lubin, our new chiropractor next door at 3021 Jefferson Street, my wife and I are certainly pleased he has set up his practice next door. He has iirproved the property 100% from what it has looked like in the past. His practice will be an asset and welcomed here in our area. We have lived at 3037 Jefferson Street for forty years. Dr. Lubin's chiropractor practice will not be any bother to us. We v^lcome Dr. Lubin as our next door neighbor. My wife and I would like to mention that prior to Dr. Lubin having his practice next door, we have had a travel agency for three years that was in business at 3021 Jefferson Street. Also for a year and one-half, a marketing and tool agency was in business at 3021 Jefferson Street. This market- ing and tool agency was also in the advertising business. None of the mentioned businesses were a bother to us. The people that did business with them always had plenty of parking on both sides of the street. At no time have we ever seen any congestion during the week-day parking or on the week-ends. In closing, may say that it is a privilege to have Dr. Lubin next door with his chiropractor practice. Sincerely yours. Mr. and Mrs. Frank A. Vitalie FAV/js MEMO March 28, 1988 TO: NANCY ROLLMAN FROM: PAT KELLY, BUILDING INSPECTOR RE: REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR 3021 JEFFERSON STREET The structure at the above location was, in its previous use, an office which created little more risk than a residential occupancy. However, the change in use to a doctor's office will introduce a great deal of sophisticated equipment (ie: x-ray, ultra-sound, sterilization equipment and other physical therapy equipment) to an electrical system installed for Intermittent residential use. The Building Department's policy regarding these types of conversions is that all existing circuits may remain, as is. All new circuits and switch gear installed must comply with our current adopted code and ordinance (attached), Dr, Lubin drew a permit to add an electric circuit for the x-ray machine (attached), He then proceeded to change the entire electric service and add numerous other circuits without proper permits. At that time he was informed that the new service and additional work should conform as follows: 1, Service gear shall have a minimum AIC rating of 42000 AIC (Commercial Type) NEC 230-65 2, Conduit and switchgear mounted on the surface of the building exterior is not allowed by Ordinance (8104 Sec, 18,12,240), 3, Use of non-metallic sheathed cable (Romex) is not allowed when adding new wiring to commercial uses (8104 Sec, 18,12,255). 4, Office floor plan shall meet all requirements for Title 24, particularly handicap accesssibility requirements, 5, All other necessary permits and liscences were his responsibility, (Business, Redevelopment Permit, Coastal) Memo to Nancy Rollman March 28, 1988 page 2 He responded in writing that he was returning the business to its previous use and the Building Department accepted the work done without permits as it was. The Building Department reccomends that all conditions that remain above be contained in the Redevelopment Permit if this is possible and that Dr, Lubin, or his contractor, secure proper permits and pass inspection. PAT KELLY, BUILDING INSPECTOR PK:maw PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161 Citp of Carlsbab NOTICE OF EXEMPTION February 8, 1988 County Clerk County of San Diego 220 West Broadway San Diego, California 92101 Proiect Title Lubin, RP 88-1 Proiect Location—Specific 3021 Jefferson Street, Carlsbad Proiect Location—City Carlsbad Proiect Location—County San Diego Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Proiect Conversion of a business office to a chiropractor's office Name of Public Aqency Approving Proiect City of Carlsbad Name of Person or Aqencv Carrying Out Proiect Marshall Lubin Exempt Status (Check One) Ministerial (Sec. 15073) Declared Emergency {Sec. 15071 (a)) Emergency Project (Sec. 15071 (b) and (c)) x Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: 15301, Class 1(a) Reason Why Proiect Is Exempt: Minor alteration to existing structure Contact Person Nancy E. Rollman (619) 438-1161 MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director JANUARY 27, 1988 TO: MAYOR LEWIS FROM: Senior Management Analyst VIA: Housing and Redevelopment Director CHIROPRACTIC OFFICE ON JEFFERSON STREET - UPDATE Dr. Lubin spoke to you last about getting a permit to open a chiropractic office on Jefferson. Mr. Lubin had been told by our staff that he needed a Redevelopment Permit and that if Design Review Board met on February 3rd his plan could go for review. If there was no meeting on the 3rd the next meeting date would be February 17. (Design Review Board meets the first and third Wednesday of the month, if there are items for review). Dr. Lubin brought plans into our office on Friday, January 25. Based on those plans, Dr. Lubin was told there was not adequate parking and staff would recommend denial. He could redesign the parking lot to accommodate the required parking but there was not adequate time to prepare a staff report for a meeting on February 3rd. There are no other items scheduled for a meeting on February 3rd. After consideration staff has determined that Dr. Lubin's application will be scheduled for the meeting n February 17. Dr. Lubin is unhappy with this and is again calling you for assistance. Please call if you need additional information. PATRICIA A. CRATTY PAC:ec dr. marshall b. lubin chiropractic physician January 19, 1988 TO: City of Carlsbad Office of Redevelopment FROM: Marshall B. Lubin, D.C. RE: Parking at 3201 Jefferson Street To Whom it May Concern: The owners of Cliffs Pantry and myself have entered into an agreement allowing in joint participation of the parking lot located behind their restaurant on the corner of Elm and Jefferson Streets. The parking lot which adjoins the property at 3201 Jefferson Street contains nine parking stalls for cars. Ihe hours at Cliff's Pantry are 6:30 a.m. to 2:30 in the afternoon. My busiest hours are from 2-6 p.m., when Cliffs is closed. The aforementioned hours make it clear that no conflict should ever arise for parking. Respectfully Submitted Mai^^a^^l--^'. Lubin, D.C. 800 grand avenue, suite b4. carlsbad, ca 92008 • 619/434-4743