Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP 144B; SDG&E Wastewater Facility; Specific Plan (SP)SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT DATE: September 15, 1981 TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: San Diego Gas & Electric - Report of compliance regarding conditions of approval of a single stack at the Encina Power Plant on property generally located on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard between Cannon Road and the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. I. BACKGROUND As required by Specific Plan Amendment; SP-144(B), a five year report was forwarded to the Planning Commission on August 26, 1981. This report pertained to the compliance of SDG&E with the conditions of approval of SP-144(B) and all applicable air quality standards and regulations. At the meeting on August 26th, two (2) residents of Carlsbad expressed concern regarding other air pollution issues. The issues and questions addressed: 1. The use of natural gas at Encina: a) What percentage of all fuel currently being used at Encina is natural gas? b) How much natural gas will be used in the future? 2. The use of a new fuel oil at Encina: a) Request for information regarding this fuel oil. b) What percentage of all fuel will this new oil comprise? c) What is the sulfur content of the oil? How does this compare with oil currently being used? 3. Acid Rain: a) What are the amounts and quantities of acid rain? b) What are the specific pollutants contained in acid rain? c) Where is the acid rain going when it leaves Carlsbad? d) Request for updated information regarding acid rain. In response to these public concerns, the Planning Commission directed staff to contact SDG&E to obtain additional information. SDG&E has replied to our request with the attached articles and letter dated September 1, 1981. Also in responce to public input, the Planning Commission requested staff to obtain a copy of the Reasonable Further Progress Report. This is an annual progress report, prepared by the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, on the implementation actions taken to achieve and maintain the National Ambient Air Quality Standards in the the San Diego Air Basin. A copy of the report is available for your review in the Planning Department. II. ATTACHMENTS Letter from San Diego Gas & Electric Dated September 1, 1981 Misc. Articles and Graphs Fact Sheet - testing medium sulfur fuel CN/BH/nar 09/04/81 San Diego Gas & Electric September 1, 1981 FILE NO. MUC 100 Ms. Catherine Nicholas City Planner Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Ms. Nicholas: Recently you telephoned and asked several questions concerning the San Diego Gas & Electric annual report on En- cina powerplant. These questions were asked by interested citizens at the Wednesday, August 26 Planning Commission meeting. Below I've attempted to answer the generic questions plus have included a couple of articles about acid rain. 1. What percentage of total fuel at Encina is natural gas versus residur al fuel? In 1980 76.78% of the total fuel used at the Encina plant was residu- al oil, and 23.22% was natural gas. We expect continued natural gas availability. Please see the attached graph indicating the fu-.". ture expected natural gas availability as compared to re- sidual oil for the entire SDG&E generation system. 2. What is the expected sulfur content for SDG&E proposed medium sulfur fuel oil test burn at Encina? We expect to obtain 1.25% sulfur fuel oil for the test burn opera- tion. Please note the actual test burn period is only six weeks in duration. Attached is a fact sheet concerning the test burn proposal. POST OFFICE BOX 1831 -SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 9211 2 • TELEPHONE: 714/232-4252 Ms. C. Nicholas -2- September 1, 1981 How much acid rain is there in San Diego County? We don't have that answer but I've attached two arti- cles concerning acid rain. We don't believe our test burn of medium sulfur fuel will affect the acidity of rain. What direction does the wind blow at Encina Powerplant for disper- sion of pollutants? Encina is located in a coastal environment and is subject to the normal sea breeze circulation. Thus one expects great variations in wind flows with heights. How- ever, surface wind data from on- site monitor, nearby Palomar Airport and Oceanside Weather i station all indicate that for most of the day, winds from the southwest through northwest domi- nate. And easterly through northeasterly winds prevail at night. Average wind speeds are approximately 5-7 mph. Since this report goes to City Council on September 15, 1981, and there might be questions, SDG&E will have rep- resentation at the meeting. Sincerely, / E.M. Gabrielson Supervisor Licensing & Environmental /dc Attach STAFF REPORT DATE: August 26, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC - Report of compliance re- garding conditions of approval of a single stack at the Encina Power Plant on property generally located on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard between Cannon Road and the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND On May 4, 1976, the City Council approved Specific Plan Amend- ment, SP-144(B), for the construction of a single smokestack to replace four existing stacks at the Encina Power Plant. Condi- tions of approval included the filing of an annual report with the City Council regarding improvements in plant and operating procedures which reduce the emission of air pollutants resulting from the operation of the Encina plant. This condition has been complied with on a yearly basis in the past and this year's re- port, Exhibit A, has been attached for your review. In granting approval, the City Council also directed that SDG&E obtain a report of compliance from the city staff regarding the conditions of approval of SP-144(B) and from the San Diego County Air Pollution Control Officer regarding compliance with the ap- plicable conditions of air quality standards. This report was to be forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council five years from the date of adoption of the Specific Plan Amendment. The approving ordinance with conditions, Exhibit B, has been at- tached for your perusal. II. DISCUSSION As directed by condition of SP-144(B), the Air Pollution Control District has supplied the attached report, Exhibit C, regarding the compliance of SDG&E with all conditions under its jurisdic- tion. The most significant of the Specific Plan conditions, as they apply to the continued operation of the Encina plant, are discussed in the APCD report. As required by the City Council and discussed in the APCD report, SDG&E has substantially eliminated the acid fallout as required by the Air Pollution Control Hearing Board; financially supported the installation, operation and maintenance of three ambient air quality monitoring stations; and operated the boilers (with six exceptions) in compliance with all applicable emission standards and permit conditions required by district regulations. The APCD report does indicate that operation of all monitoring stations will continue through February 1982 and a final report will be made by April 1982. Conditions regarding positioning of lighting and screening of rooftop equipment were satisfied shortly after approval of the Specific Plan Amendment. Additionally, SDG&E has complied with the abatement order issued by the Air Pollution Control Hearing Board and no further fallout complaints have been received since recommended control measures were instituted. All other pertinent conditions concern compliance with any future pollution control measures and regulations. Review by the Air Pollution Control District should ensure compliance with future regulations and the continued monitoring and operation of the plant in compliance with existing requirements. Overall, San Diego Gas and Electric appears to have satisfied all conditions of Specific Plan 144(B) and to be operating the Encina plant in general compliance with all applicable emission control regulations. III. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Planning Commission accept this report as satisfying the conditions required by SP-144(B) and forward it to the City Council reccommending its acceptance with the stipu- lation that the final APCD report which will be completed in April 1982 be reviewed by the City Council at that time and that SDG&E continue to submit the required annual report. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A, Fourth Annual Report from SDG&E, dated June 1981 Exhibit B, City Council Ordinance 9456 Exhibit C, APCD Report, dated August 7, 1981 -2- FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT TO THE CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING EMISSION REDUCTION AND OPERATING IMPROVEMENTS AT THE ENCINA POWER PLANT SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC June, 1981 In compliance with the City o-f Carlsbad Ordinance No. 9456, Section 3, 14(j), San Diego Gas & Electric is submitting this fourth annual report to the Carlsbad City Council. The report was required to relate "improvements in plant and operating proce- dures during the preceding year which reduce the emission of air pollutants resulting from the operation of Encina Units 1, 2, 3, and 4." As a preface, subsequent to completion of Unit 5 and tall stack, the plant has returned to a routine operating mode that has been characteris- tically clean from an air quality viewpoint. The operation approaches the optimum in terms of effi- ciency and few significant changes are still occurring in either the plant or operating procedures. At the same time, the contribution of the emissions from the Encina Power Plant to local air quality concentrations has been substantially reduced. Further, there have been no fallout claims filed in over a year. INCREASED COMBUSTION EFFICIENCY A primary ongoing goal of the SDG&E operations divi- sion is to squeeze more electricity generation from each unit of fuel combusted. Improvements in combustion efficiency trans- late directly into fewer barrels of fuel required and lower emissions to meet customer electricity demands. Due to its more design, Unit 5 is the most efficient unit on the SDG&E system; and it's addition to the Encina Plant resulted in a considerable improvement in overall Plant efficiency. During 1980, the several periodic maintenance activities at the plant were scheduled to optimize the increased efficiency that is often a primary purpose of those activities. The most important of these was the major overhaul of Unit 1. In addi- tion, the boilers in Units 1, 3 and 5 were chemically cleaned and a combustion instability in Unit 4 was eliminated. The high-intermediate pressure heater in Unit 2 was also replaced. The combined improvements in efficiency resulted in a savings of 329,532 barrels of fuel in 1980, over that which would have been required to generate the same electric power in 1975. This represents a considerable savings, especially when the present cost of a barrel of fuel oil is well over $30.00 per barrel. As described in the previous annual reports, the Elec- tric Production Performance Monitoring Program is still continuing. In review, the method by which the Performance Program is accomplished is the monitoring of performance for each unit so that it can be operated at its most efficient level under various loading conditions. This increased efficiency leads to reduced oil consumption and corresponding emission reduction. Operators make hourly comparisons of actual unit performance to the best attainable standards then take corrective action when appropriate. The operator can either adjust the control setting of the unit or request that maintenance be performed. INCREASED CONSUMPTION OF NATURAL GAS Due to a further increase in availability of natural gas for industrial use, the Encina Power Plant again consumed more gas in 1980 for its operations than it did in 1979. By the increased use of natural gas, less fuel oil is required, and therefore, emissions of nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and smoke are reduced. The 12,542,490 million cubic feet of gas burned at Encina represents a savings to the ratepayers of $22.7 million over the cost of oil, had that gas not been utilized. The gas availability for 1981 is projected to be 15% to 20% higher than the 1980 volume. CONTROL OF ACIDIC FALLOUT As mentioned earlier, no fallout claims have been filed with SDG&E in over a year. A single claim filed in early 1980 was questionable, and if even partially the result of power plant emissions, the causes were not recent at the time, and probably attributable to some past event. This success in controlling the acid fallout is due to the three procedures as identified in the last annual report: 1. Introduction of a fuel oil additive to neutralize acidic fallout that is created during boiler combustion. 2. Soot blowing in the boiler is done on a regular basis to reduce build up of material on walls of the boiler. 3. Use of viscosity controllers increase the breakup of fuel into very fine particles for more complete combustion of the fuel. The costs of these procedures were about $302,000 in 1980, with the major component being the additive itself at $288,000. CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORS Although recent emission testing by the California Air Resources Board confirmed Encina to be operating in compliance with the emission limits, SDG&E will be spending about $1 million in 1981-2 to install and operate continuous emission monitoring instrumentation at the Encina Plant. These instruments are re- quired by the Air Pollution Control District to continuously monitor nitrogen dioxide emission from each unit to prove com- pliance with the applicable regulations. These monitors will provide data for quarterly reports for the APCD. ' >#>.,.. o m o-"^l9° i«i£>£mo $ ri^Is 2 \» 8 0W £ "' 'S£S2 ! <mv> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21' 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c. ORDINANCE NO. 9456 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9279 BY THE AMENDMENT OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN ADOPTED THEREBY TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS, OF A 400 FOOT SINGLE STACK TO REPLACE FOUR EXISTING STACKS AT THE ENCINA POWER PLANT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF INTERSTATE 5 AND SOUTH OF THE AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON (SP-144(B)). APPLICANT: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY. The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That it does find and declare as- follows: 1. A verified application for an amendment to SP-144- to per- mit the construction of a 400 foot single stack to replace the four existing stacks at the Encina Power Plant has been received for the following described property: Those portions of Rancho Agua Hedionda, Map No. 823 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, together with that portion of Block W Palisades Number Two, Map No. 1803 in. the City of Carlsbad, County o'f. San Diego. Also being Parcel 6, Page 07, Book 206; Parcels 24, 25, 26, & 27, Page 01, Book, 210; Parcel 21, Page 21, Book 211 and Parcel 14, Page 01, Book 212 of the Assessor's Map of San Diego County. . -f — • //' -2. In accord with Titl'e 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, the natter was referred to the Planning Commission for public hearing. 3. A duly noticed public hearing was held before the Planning Commission at the time and in the place specified in said notice on January 28, 1976 and continued to March 24, 1976 at which time all interested persons were heard. •*. 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 CDen CO I I 15 16 •CE < S °""- ^ i 5°|g U f_ > Jr-Sc^ 17 "•'si cioiii5 is H c5 to >£ « 19 >- °t-o 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c 4. The applicant has complied with the Public Facility Element of the General Plan and has. provided the necessary information which ensures Public Facilities will be available concurrent with need. 5. The subject application has complied with the require- ments of the City of Carlsbad "Environmental Protection Ordinance ; of 1972" in that an Environmental Impact Report on the project was certified in 1973 and has been fully supplemented with additional current information which constitutes prior compliance. In addition, an EIR for the entire.related Encina 5 project as certified by the Public Utilities Commission acting as lead agency on the project has been considered. 6. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended the approval of the applicant's request. 7. That a duly noticed public hearing was held before -the City Council on April 20, 1976. " 8. At said public hearing, 'upon hearing and considering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desired to be heard, the City Council considered all factors relating to the Specific Plan Amendment and made the following findings of fact: (A) All conditions of City Council" Ordinance 9279 have been complied with and this amendment is consistent with said ordinance and the provisions of the P-U zone. (B) The 400-foot stack is necessary to provide an effective method of dispersing the emissions of the Encina Power Plant as required by the State Air Resources Board and because of its relationship with Encina 5, will improve the overall quality of air in this area. 2. z P £o EC O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 CO »J § 15 °- < o>~" ° <do." 5 °° i Je §>- >o- t < t 16 ^os_. 17 ^§65 S § § 18p 5 - S 19 20 21 22 23 24 • 25 26 27 28 (C) SDG&E has indicated that some of the corrosion damage, "fallout", in the vicinity of the San Diego Gas & Electric Company Encina Power Plant (more specifically the Terramar Area) is probably started or caused by- particles from the Encina Plant. SDG&E has accepted responsibility for such damage and further stated that they will meet with individual Terramar residents to resolve the damage claims and that they are also working with the San Diego County APCD staff to develop a work program that will assure the City and County that necessary corrective action will be taken by the Company. „ Unless this ordinance is amended, the "fallout" problem will be solved prior to the use of Encina 5 and the stack. (D) The approval of this amendment, with conditions, will improve air quality in the immediate vicinity of the plant. (E) To the extent there are adverse environmental effects to the project, they will be mitigated by the con- ditions of approval. (F) The identical project was approved in 1973 and the conditions surrounding that approval have not materi- ally changed and the applicant has relied on such approval. (G) The construction of the' stack will be accompanied by the removal of the four existing stacks and a screening of all duct work so that the aesthetic effect of the plant with the 400-foot stack will be no worse than the existing.four stacks. (H) The project is a logical extension of an existing use located in an area already committed to heavy public utility operations. (I) This amendment is consistent with the Carlsbad General Plan and all applicable specific plans. SECTION 2. That Ordinance No. 9279 is amended by the amendment of Section 2 of said ordinance to replace the Specific Plan Map attached thereto with a revised plan labeled SP-144B, Exhibit A, dated October-10, 1975, on file in the Planning Department and incorporated by reference herein,, which is hereby adopted. 3. » ^F. BIONDO, JR.' - CITY OF CARLSBAD;LM AVENUECALIFORNIA 920082 UI Q ~-— J O t— 1 i2~| > P cc X " G •''.•, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G SECTION 3: That Ordinance Mo. 9279 is amended by the amend- ment of Section 2 of said ordinance to add Condition No. 1.4 to read as follows: "14. In addition to the above conditions, the revised por- tions of the specific plan which permit the construction of the 400-foot stack and the removal of the four / existing stacks shall be accomplished in accord with the revised specific plan SP-144B and shall be subject to the following conditions: (A) All applicable requirements of any law, -ordinance or regulation of the State of California, City of Carlsbad, and any other governmental entity shall be complied with. (B) All ground lighting shall be arranged to reflect away from adjoining properties and streets. (C) Any mechanical and/or electrical equipment to be located on the roof of the structure shall be screened in a manner acceptable to the Planning Director. Detailed plans for said screening shall be submitted, in triplicate, to the Planning Director for approval. / (D) Air pollution equipment capable of monitoring ambient particulates, NOX and SC>2 concentrations, and other emissions from the Encina Plant as well as air quality in the Carlsbad area shall be placed in service not later.than six months fol~ 'lowing the effective date of this ordinance. The number of stations, type of equipment and loca- tion of stations shall be to the satisfaction of the APCD Control Officer and the City "of Carlsbad. Should the Air Pollution Control Officer of the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District require additional air quality or emissions monitoring equipment and funds for air quality analysis in connection with their current study of emissions from the Encina Power Plant, the applicant shall supply said equipment and funds as deemed necessary by the Air Pollution Control Officer. The cost of said equipment 4. 03 _CO *° • _: K 8n: < o ~" ° < O LL ^ ^Q O ? S O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 0^2 17 > s ° Z l" 8 Q TOUl Z CN rf J-O ° £ "~ oHO w 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G (E) (F) (G) (H) shall not exceed $150,000. The requested funds for air quality analysis shall not exceed $50,000 per year. Any future measure required by the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District to lessen 'or otherwise control emissions from the Encina Power Plant are hereby incorporated as a part of this Specific Plan. Amendment and SDG&E shall comply fully therewith. The costs of such measures shall be borne by SDG&E. SDG&E will obtain a report of compliance from the City staff regarding the conditions of this ordinance and from the San Diego County Air Pollution Control Officer regarding compliance with the applicable conditions of the ordinance and with air' quality standards, and forward it to the City Council five years from the date of this ordinance or as otherv/ise required by motion of the City Council, or the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission and City Council shall review the report with reqard to conformance to the conditions of this ordinance and to regulations required by other applicable regulatory agencies, including, but not limited to, the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, Public Utilities Commission and State Coastal Commission. The City reserves the right to amend this specific plan SP-14.4B as necessary to add conditions to ensure such compliance.. After the initial report is filed the City Council may, by motion, require additional reports as they deem necessary. In the event that the City of Carlsbad determines that the 400-foot stack is no longer necessary as a method 6£ air emission dispersion, the 400-foot stack shall be removed at the applicant's expense. The applicant may request an amendment to this specific plan to provide a reasonable extension of the period for such removal. The applicant shall make a formal commitment to conduct the studies necessary to determine what operating practices and/or emissions control devices are capable of eliminating the particulate "fallout" problem.' .A schedule for the completion of the studies shall be established which is satisfactory to the San Diego County Air Pollution 5. D i a S O £Z 0 o m^3cc -1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 §"S|i 16 *~ >• ^ O 5 t < £ -17O ^ —I J- i 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 G Control District Officer, the Air Pollution Control District Hearing Board or Court of Law. SDG&E shall fully comply with the abatement order entered in petition No.607. The applicant shall further agree to pay claims for property damage resulting from the "fallout" problem until compliance with the abatement order is achieved. The particulate "'fallout^ problem shall be con- trolled7 to- the satisfaction of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad and of the Air Pollution Control Officer prior to the final building permit clearance for Encina 5 and the single stack. (I) Not later than eight months after the Building Inspector signs the final- inspection for the 400-foot stack, the four stacks on the existing Encina Power Plant shall be completely removed, (J) SDG&E shall file an annual report with the City Council regarding improvements in plant and operating procedures during the preceding year which reduce the emission of air pollutants resulting from the operation of Encina Units 1, 2, 3 and 4. (K) SDG&E shall operate the plant in full compliance with all air quality standards as-are or may be established by the APCD. If the monitoring stations indicate the standards are being exceeded at any time, SDG&E-shall comply with all directions of APCD to reduce, through any reasonable means, pollutants from the plant. (L) In the event SDG&E .files for a variance or other form of administrative or legal relief from the requirements of APCD, they shall concurrently forward a copy of any such filing, or any sub- sequent communications in connection therewith, to the City of Carlsbad. SECTION 4. That the thirty-five foot height limit establish- ed by Condition No. 5 of Section 2, of Ordinance No. 9279, shall not apply to the 400-foot stack or the duct work and. screening to J'S. o to „3 § - CC CNSj < 01 OIL. * | i° 1?StS° u_ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Z £ 8 0 T Pui 2: cs <f J.O £o ~8 >£ 5 19 £ °200 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 be constructed on top of the main generation building in conjunc- tion with the construction of the stack and the removal of the four existing stacks." EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its adoption. an adjourned INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at / regular meeting of the • April , 1976,Carlsbad City Council held on the27thday of_ and thereafter PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 4th day of May , 1976, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmen Packard, Skotnicki and Councilwoman Casler NOES: Councilman Lewis ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: Councilman Frazee ATTEST: MARGAPJSi1 E. ADAMS, "cilty Clerk (J(SEAL) 7. c County of San Diego I? PI r*R. J. Sommerville°fficer •August 7, 1981 City Council Planning Commission City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 AUG121981 CITY OF CARLSBAD Planning Departrmt This is my five year report to you as required by the specific plan amendment authorizing San Diego Gas & Electric Company (S.D.G.&E.) to build a 400 foot stack at the Encina Power Plant. Since May 4, 1976, the date of the specific plan amendment, S.D.G.&E. has substantially eliminated the acid fallout as re- quired by The Air Pollution Control Hearing Board; financially supported in- stallation operation and maintenance of three ambient air quality monitoring stations, and; operated the boilers (with six exceptions) in compliance with all applicable emission standards and permit conditions required by District Regulations. Subsequent to the Abatement Order issued by the Hearing Board, S.D.G.&E. con- ducted a comprehensive study to determine the cause of and solution to the acid fallout problem. Upon completion of the study, the proposed control mea- sures were implemented. The control measures are additive injection into the fuel oil to neutralize acid formation, daily soot blowing to eliminate massive short term fallout incidents, and automatic viscosity controls to improve combustion and thereby reduce formation of soot particles. In conjunction with this, the tall stack has also aided in reducing fallout emissions. The Dis- trict has not received complaints of property damage from the Carlsbad area since the control measures were implemented. Since May 4, 1976, the District has issued six Notices of Violation for excess emissions at Encina. Five of the violations were for boilers exceeding the Oxides of Nitrogen emission standard and one was for exceeding the visible emission standard from the tall stack. All of these violations were of short duration and resulted in out of court penalty settlements. There were no per- mit condition violations. Three ambient monitoring stations were put into full time operation in March, 1977, to measure the impact from the power plant in Carlsbad, before and after the tall stack, and with and without Encina Unit 5. Units One through Four were tied into the tall stack by June 1978 and Unit 5 became fully operational in August. The monitoring stations are recording ambient levels of Nitrogen Dioxide, Oxides of Nitrogen, Sulfur Dioxide and Total Suspended Particulates. An interim report on the program was issued on February 20, 1980. Operation of the monitoring stations will continue through.February, 1982. At that time AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 9150 Chesapeake Drive. San Diego, California 92123 (714) 565-5901 City Council August 7, 1981 Page 2 funding from S.D.G.&E. to operate these stations will cease. A final report of the air quality will be completed by April 1, 1982. At that time an analy- sis will be made concerning the impact of Encina 5 and the tall stack on the Carlsbad area. If you have any questions about this report, or wish to obtain additional in- formation, you may contact Richard H.< Baldwin, Chief, Division of Surveillance and Enforcement at (714) 565-3909. R. J/S^I^RVILLE Air Pollution Control Officer RJS:RHB:glf