Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUP 07-03; South Coast Materials Quarry; Special Use Permit (SUP)The City of Carlsbad Planning Division A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: January 19, 2011 Application complete date: November 9,2010 Project Planner: Van Lynch Project Engineer: Tecla Levy SUBJECT: SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01/HMP 07-06 - SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY - Request for the consideration of a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report previously certified by the City of Oceanside, adoption of responsible agency environmental findings and adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the Amended Reclamation Plan for the Former South Coast Materials Quarry, and request for approval of a Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Habitat Management Plan Permit for the grading of 42.1 acres to implement the Amended Reclamation Plan for the Former South Coast Materials Quarry generally located south of Highway 78 and west of College Boulevard in Local Facilities Management Zone 25. I.RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6743 adopting responsible agency environmental findings and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 6744, 6745, and 6746 APPROVING Special Use Permit 07-03, Hillside Development Permit 07-01, and Habitat Management Plan Permit HMP 07-06 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II.INTRODUCTION The development applications being sought are for the implementation of the Amended Reclamation Plan for the Former South Coast Materials Quarry project located south of Highway 78 and west of College Boulevard. The Reclamation project is to reclaim the previous mining site to a safe, usable condition that is readily adaptable for future land uses. The grading for the reclamation plan creates shallow sloped development pads on the north and south sides of the Buena Vista Creek channel. The creek channel is substantially widened as compared to the existing condition. The Reclamation Plan and Subsequent Environmental Impact Report were reviewed and approved by the City of Oceanside. The City of Oceanside was designated the lead agency as they have an adopted reclamation ordinance in accordance with the State of California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) where the City of Carlsbad does not. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The amendment to the Former South Coast Materials Quarry Reclamation Plan addresses the reclamation of the remaining quarry site yet to be reclaimed, retention and reclamation of the Buena Vista Creek channel alignment, and modifies grading limits and pad elevations related to SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01/HMP 07-06 - SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY January 19, 2011 PAGE 2 the channel realignment and hydrological conditions. The Amendment also includes updates in environmental conditions and conformance requirements of local and state reclamation laws for reclamation plans. The previous Reclamation Plan proposed to move the Buena Vista Creek channel north of its present location. Input from the Wildlife Agencies during environmental review has resulted in keeping the alignment of the creek in its present location. The proposed development applications are for the grading and implementation of the Amended Reclamation Plan for the Former South Coast Materials Quarry. The grading will create gently sloping sheet graded pads on the north and south sides of Buena Vista Creek channel. The northern side will have elevations ranging from 100 to 116 feet above mean sea level (MSL) and the south side from 104 to 114 feet above MSL with a pad in the southeasterly corner from 123 to 140 feet above MSL. The Buena Vista Creek channel will be widened from its existing average width of 10 feet to a bank to bank width of approximately 100 feet. The sides of the channel will be graded to 2.5:1 with an overall top of bank to bank width of approximately 300 feet. The creek channel will be revegetated with native habitats and a conservation easement placed over the creek, providing a permanent open space amenity associated with Buena Vista Creek. The amended reclamation project design maintains the alignment of the existing creek with a wider channel, preserves the El Salto Falls, and continues to preserve the higher quality riparian habitat in the western portion of the site. Adjacent graded areas available for future uses will be located outside the 100-year flood zone, removing floodplain restrictions for areas outside the reclaimed creek channel. The grading occurs in areas that have been previously disturbed by the past rock quarry operations and other concrete and asphalt processing operations. All existing structures will be removed and material recycling uses will cease upon the beginning of the reclamation grading. The grading design includes provisions for three separate desiltation basins to control runoff from the site before it enters Buena Vista Creek, along with two water quality bio-filter swales. The interim desiltation basins are associated with the reclamation grading and are designed to be easily modified to accommodate permanent drainage facilities for the area which will be constructed in conjunction with future site development. As part of the creek improvements, outlets from the basins are proposed to be constructed as permanent facilities within the rip-rap drop structures, in conjunction with the construction and revegetation of the creek area. The drainage design accommodates the existing drainage flows from offsite areas, as well as projected onsite flows. High intensity runoff coefficients were used in the calculations to establish pipe sizes, to assure that the facilities proposed can accommodate future flows from any type of development, and avoid the need to modify these outlets in the future. While no development is proposed as part of this Reclamation grading plan, and the type of use has not yet been determined, there are certain items known to be needed for any use of the property. A preliminary evaluation was conducted in order to anticipate necessary improvements and address them as part of this reclamation grading plan. A goal for the reclamation design, particularly related to Buena Vista Creek, was to address the ultimate requirements as best they can be determined at this time, to avoid or minimize future need to disrupt the creek area. This includes consideration of and provisions for major infrastructure such as streets, drainage facilities and sewer mains. As part of the reclamation grading, the intent is to create limits of disturbance adjacent to Buena Vista Creek and the falls zone, providing revegetation to form an "edge" to the habitat areas. This will allow the revegetated areas to reestablish after planting and minimize the need for future disturbance within the creek SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01/HMP 07-06 - SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY January 19, 2011 PAGES channel. Some of the specific items anticipated for this reclamation plan include the following items. Streets Current access into the property is from College Boulevard westward to Haymar Drive which is located immediately south of and parallel to State Route 78. Access for future development may also be provided from Haymar Drive. The future extension of Matron Road from the east to the west is shown on the General Plan Circulation Element across the project site, which could provide a primary access for future development. Roadway alignments are however not being determined or fixed as part of site reclamation. Precise alignments shall be evaluated at the time of future development. However, this reclamation plan is designed to provide a suitable elevation to enable the connection with Marron Road from the east to west. The site grading will accommodate a short access ramp extension from the existing western terminus of Marron Road into the site, to provide interim fire and emergency access to the property areas south of the creek. This access is needed because the three existing bridge crossings of Buena Vista Creek will be removed as part of the creek reclamation work, thereby limiting access to the areas south of the creek. The proposed reclamation grading could accommodate future street construction in the area between the creek and the south slope, and the proposed plan does not preclude meeting City criteria for design and alignment of the future Circulation Element roadway. It is recognized that there may also be a potential need for a future road crossing of the creek, though there is no proposed location or design as part of this Reclamation grading plan. Drainage Facilities The permanent storm drain outlets and rip-rap areas at Buena Vista Creek are sized for ultimate conditions so that they do not have to be reconstructed after revegetation in the creek is installed and established. As part of the sizing calculations for ultimate conditions, high runoff coefficients were used to assure that sufficient capacity is provided. Sewer Sleeve Location A sewer line is likely to be needed for any type of future use at the site, and the City of Carlsbad sewer master plan also calls for eventual construction of a gravity sewer line to replace existing pump station facilities located south of the site. However, the location for any future line has not been determined. It is unknown whether and when any new sewer line might be constructed on the south side of Buena Vista Creek, therefore a provision to access the existing sewer line on the north side of the creek has been incorporated into this reclamation plan. No new sewer line will be installed with the reclamation plan, but placing a sleeve underneath a drop structure could accommodate a future sewer connection for the pad area south of the creek and to serve the removal of existing pump stations southerly of the site with a gravity sewer line, in the event such a crossing is needed. Locating a sleeve as part of the reclamation work is intended to minimize the potential for future disruption within and adjacent to the revegetation areas adjacent to the creek. If the sleeve is never needed, it can remain in place without affecting the creek design. A sewer line may also be installed on any future bridge crossing. Background The Amended Reclamation Plan area encompasses a total of 104.23 acres of the original 162.17- acre quarry. The site is located south of State Route 78 and west of College Boulevard. The City boundaries of Oceanside and Carlsbad bisect the site in a north-south direction, SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01/HMP 07-06 - SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY January 19, 2011 PAGE 4 approximately 1,600 feet west of the College Boulevard and Lake Boulevard/Marron Road intersection. A total of 4.10 acres of the site are within the City of Oceanside, and a total of 100.13 acres are located in the City of Carlsbad. A total of 57.94 acres within the City of Oceanside have been reclaimed and developed with a community shopping center along with a revegetated slope along the "south wall" of the former quarry. The City of Oceanside is the lead agency for purposes of site reclamation under the State of California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA). Land uses surrounding the site include State Route 78 to the north, residential uses to the south, commercial (auto sales and retail) to the east, and undeveloped land to the west. The entire project is within the Buena Vista Creek drainage basin and the creek traverses the site. El Salto Falls, a designated sacred site, is located in the eastern portion of the project site. Slopes on-site range from moderate near the creek to moderately steep at the southern portion of the site. The "South Wall" of the property is the highest slope on-site and provides a large buffer between the site and the residential uses south of the property. The on-site operations associated with the quarry included three types of activities: 1) quarrying of the hard rock material from the site; 2) the manufacturing of asphalt and concrete products and; 3) site reclamation work. All mining on-site is complete. The South Coast Materials Company operated a hard rock quarry at this site between 1961 and 1995, with extraction generally moving from the western site areas to the east. Early quarry activities operated under a use permit from the City of Carlsbad (CUP #9) issued by the City in 1961 which remains in effect. Beginning in 1977, the quarry operated subject to the provisions of City of Oceanside Conditional Use Permit C-2-77. Following adoption of the initial Reclamation Plan for this quarry, the Oceanside City Council granted CUP C-9-92 to continue quarrying operations, and the quarry operated under this permit until 1995. Other uses on-site included a rock plant, a concrete batch plant and an asphalt products facility, along with concrete recycling, shop building, scale house and associated office areas. The rock plant and asphalt plant have been dismantled and removed from the site. The concrete batch plant was closed in March 2005, dismantled in December 2005, with all plant remnants completely removed from the site by September 2006. The office building was demolished and removed from the site in June 2006. The recycling operations are continuing at the site and anticipated to remain in operation until reclamation grading is initiated. The recycling operations are to be terminated prior to the commencement of grading related to the proposed reclamation plan to avoid any potential conflicts between these two activities. The termination of the recycling uses and removal of the remaining shop building and scale house structures are included as part of the final phase of the reclamation plan. Quarry operations are subject to the SMARA, as administered by the State Mining and Geology Board. The original Reclamation Plan for this site was prepared in accordance with the City of Oceanside Reclamation Ordinance (86-32) and ultimately approved by the State Mining and Geology Board in September, 1991. The City of Carlsbad does not have a local reclamation ordinance, and recognizes the City of Oceanside as the state-designated lead agency for purposes of reclamation under SMARA. The City of Oceanside adopted a Subsequent EIR and approved an Amended Reclamation Plan for the Former South Coast Materials Quarry on July 26, 2010. SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01/HMP 07-06 - SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY January 19,2011 PAGES The Amendment, Refined Alternative 3, made changes in the prior Reclamation Plan to address the retention and reclamation of the Buena Vista Creek channel alignment, modify grading limits and pad elevations related to the channel conditions, hydrological conditions and designated land uses. The Amendment also included updates in environmental conditions and conforms to requirements of local and state laws for Reclamation Plans. Limited reclamation activities began for some of the areas in 1987, with reclamation activities continuing since extraction of the rock material at this site were completed in 1995. Reclamation has been completed for portions of the original quarry property, which have been sold and developed with commercial uses and permanent slope open space. IV. ANALYSIS The proposed project is subject to the following plans, ordinances and standards as analyzed within the following section of this staff report: A. General Plan Land Use and Open Space and Conservation Element; B. Floodplain Management Regulations -Special Use Permits, Chapter 21.110 of the Municipal Code; C. Hillside Development Ordinance, Chapter 21.95 of the Municipal Code D. Habitat Preservation and Management Requirements, Chapter 21.210 of the Municipal Code; and E. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 25; The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below. A. General Plan The existing General Plan Land Use designation of the project site is Residential Low-Medium Density on both sides of the Buena Vista Creek channel with the channel designated as Open Space. The General Plan Housing Element recently allocated 500 dwelling units to the Quarry Creek site to partially fulfill the Regional Housing Needs Assessment for Carlsbad. Future development projects will reflect the appropriate land use changes. The grading for the Reclamation plan will preserve Buena Vista Creek channel in its present location which is shown as Open Space on both the General Plan Land Use and the Open Space and Conservation Maps. Overall, the project complies with the various Elements of the General Plan as outlined in Table 1 below. SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01/HMP 07-06 - SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY January 19,2011 PAGE 6 ; TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT Land Use Land Use Circulation Housing Open Space & Conservation Public Safety USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM Buena Vista Creek channel is designated as Open Space. Public Facilities A city with adequate circulation to serve the projected population. Allow development of sufficient new housing to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment. Minimize environmental impacts to sensitive resources within the City. A City which minimizes injury, loss of life, and damage to property resulting from the occurrence of floods. PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS The project restores and enhances the natural environment and minimizes impacts to sensitive biological and cultural resources of the Buena Vista Creek and El Salto Falls. The project makes accommodations for future infrastructure in the form of a sleeve under the Buena Vista Creek to accommodate a future sewer line if needed. The grading plan does not bias the future alignment or construction of Marron Road, a Circulation Element roadway. Project grading prepares site for future development of the site. The project restores and enhances the natural creek environment and minimizes impacts to sensitive biological and cultural resources of the Buena Vista Creek and El Salto Falls. The project is processing a Floodplain Special Use Permit to review the grading plan to ensure that flood flows are contained and will not adversely impact other properties. COMPLY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes B. Floodplain Management Regulations -Special Use Permits, Chapter 21.110 of the Municipal Code The project site is identified as being within Zone AE of the Flood Insurance Rate Map 06073C0766 F, dated October 16, 2009. Zone AE is a special flood hazard area inundated by the 100 year flood with base flood elevations determined (ranging from roughly 86 feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL) at the western end of the site to 146 feet MSL at the eastern end of the site) and SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01/HMP 07-06 - SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY January 19,2011 PAGE 7 requires the processing of a Special Use Permit. The permit is required to review the project for protection of public health, safety and welfare and to minimize public and private losses due to flooding. One of the goals of the reclamation plan is to: Retain the existing Buena Vista Creek alignment through the site, preserve the El Salto Falls, and enhance the habitat values of the creek, while meeting requirements for control of erosion and sedimentation, and accommodating current hydrological conditions of the creek. In order for this to happen the proposed Buena Vista Creek channel cross section will be widened substantially from its current condition, which is an average bottom width of approximately 10 feet (range of 5-25 feet) and a bank to bank width of approximately 100 feet (range of 80-110 feet). The proposed design will widen the creek to include a 15 0-foot-wide bottom, overbank terraces on both sides of the channel expanding the width to approximately 194 feet, and 2.5:1 (horizontal to vertical) side slopes with an overall bank to bank width of approximately 300 feet. This will result in a wider creek channel compared to what has historically existed on the project site. A thalweg (the line defining the lowest points along the length of a river bed) will be established in the channel bed with a gentle curvature, and meandering benches will be constructed along the channel banks. The bench widths will vary along the length of the channel, but the total width of both benches (one on either side of the channel) at any given point will be 24 feet. The benches will be constructed approximately four feet above the channel bed to allow inundation during low to moderate storm events. The total width subject to inundation during these events is approximately 194 feet just above the benches. The channel will be at less than a 0.2 percent longitudinal gradient, using a series of drop structures and pools created by riprap elements of varying sizes of gradation, to avoid erosive flow velocities. The design flow velocities will be below 6 fps to avoid erosive conditions, but will allow for sufficient flooding/scouring to maintain a dynamic riparian system. The design provides for a minimum of seven feet of freeboard (the vertical distance between the top water level and the crest of a bank, dam or similar structure) in the proposed channel above the 100-year flow rates, which is well in excess of the standard one foot of freeboard typically required. The overall channel length being modified is roughly 800 feet. The existing southern willow scrub and natural stream channel above El Salto Falls (which is not within the project boundary) will remain in its current state. Existing riparian vegetation in some sections of the channel through the project site also will remain. The drop structures, which are discussed below in more detail, will be planted with willows. Riparian vegetation will be planted within the channel and will naturally allow the water course to form and adjust its flow • and design gradient. Above this riparian vegetation, a transitional bench will be vegetated with Diegan coastal sage scrub, and above the bench will be a riparian buffer with upland (Diegan coastal sage scrub) creation on the channel side slopes, and native buffer plantings within the 100-foot biological buffer where it extends beyond the channel side slopes. Level areas outside the biological buffer will be hydroseeded for erosion control. The transitional bench and upland riparian buffer will typically be sloped at a 2.5:1 ratio. Boulders will be sporadically placed throughout all levels of the channel. Seven rock drop structures ranging from one to three feet in height will be constructed at irregular intervals along the channel. Each structure will extend across the channel bottom and up the adjacent banks to at least one foot above the 100-year water surface elevations. The structures will behave as rock riffles that form a stepped channel bed profile. The stepped profile will allow the 100-year flow velocities to be maintained below an erosive threshold throughout SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01/HMP 07-06 - SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY January 19, 2011 PAGES much of the proposed channel. The locations and heights of each structure vary and were selected to allow portions of the existing channel bed to remain undisturbed. As shown in Cross-Section C-C on Figures D and E, the drop structures will be constructed with rocks of varying gradation including emergent boulders in order to create a channel with a step- pool-step profile. The step-pool-step will consist of level reaches separated by the drop structures (step). The area immediately upstream of a step can contain a pool, which is sometimes referred to as a pool riffle. Pool riffles will be created upstream of some structures. The structures will be constructed with naturally occurring on-site rock to the extent available. The rocks will be of varying gradation and emergent boulders will be incorporated to mimic more naturally occurring rock riffles. A filter material will be placed under the structures to prevent piping and maintain stability. Grouting only will be used where necessary to maintain the integrity of the structures under high-flow events. The design will allow the creek to flow uninterrupted during normal and low-flow periods. Overall, the channel is designed to contain the 100 year storm event and there is more than adequate protection of private and public property from potential flood damage. Within the area east and north of El Salto Falls, a portion of the channel improvements will function as a levy to contain the creek during high storm flows. FEMA regulations require the levy to be maintained in accordance with an approved maintenance plan under agency jurisdiction. The responsible agency is to be determined and specified with the maintenance plan. C. Hillside Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) The site has a grade elevation change greater than 15 feet and slopes greater than 15% gradient, therefore the project requires a Hillside Development Permit (HDP). Hillside conditions have been properly identified on the constraints map which show existing and proposed conditions and slope percentages. The slopes that are over 15 feet in height with a minimum 15% gradient are only located on the northern side of the project and cover a total of 1.3 acres. These slopes are existing manufactured slopes as a result of the mining operation and are proposed to be removed or reworked as part of the reclamation plan grading. The newly created slopes are for an interim period until future development plans are prepared. The new manufactured slopes outside of the creek channel will be planted and irrigated for erosion control purposes. The creek channel slopes will be planted and irrigated to establish a native upland habitat (Diegan coastal sage scrub). As stated in the project description, the grading will create gently sloping sheet graded pads on the north and south sides of Buena Vista Creek channel. The northern side will have elevations ranging from 100 to 116 feet above MSL with a few 2:1 manufactured slopes to transition from pad to ungraded areas. The southern side will have pad elevations ranging from 104 to 114 feet above MSL with a pad in the southeasterly corner from 123 to 140 feet above MSL with transition slopes of 6.1:1 from pad to natural ground area. The Buena Vista Creek channel will be widened from its existing average width of 10 feet to a bank to bank width of approximately 100 feet. The sides of the channel will be graded to 2.5:1 with an overall top of bank to bank width of approximately 300 feet. According to the proposed grading plan, approximately 39.7 acres (or 40 percent) of the 100.13 acre project site will be graded. Implementation of the grading plan will result in a total of SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01/HMP 07-06 - SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY January 19,2011 PAGE9 274,000 cubic yards of grading (6,901 cu yds/acre which is an acceptable range for relative sensitivity of Hillside Grading Volume). No new manufactured slopes exceed 40 feet in height and no slopes are substantially visible from a circulation element roadway. Graded cut and fill slopes are planned at gradients of 2:1 or less. The Reclamation plan was approved with a 50 foot planning buffer from the creek channel which will preclude structures from encroaching within the top of slope setback for the Buena Vista Creek channel. Overall, the project complies with the Hillside Development Ordinance and Design Guidelines. D. Habitat Preservation and Management Requirements, Chapter 21.210 of the Municipal Code The Amended Reclamation Plan lies within Core 2 of the HMP, which comprises approximately 352 acres of the north-central portion of Carlsbad. The parcel also lies within Local Facilities Management Zone (LFMZ) 25, which shows a hardline preserve boundary on site along with an offsite parcel further west that was never disturbed by mining activity and is not a part of the Amended Reclamation Plan. Some other off site areas in LFMZ 25 are considered a standards area under the HMP, in which specific conservation goals and planning standards are applied to those portions of a given LFMZ that are not already hardlined. Because the property within the boundaries of the Reclamation Plan are hardlined, these LFMZ 25 conservation goals and planning standards, therefore, do not apply to the property. Note that subsequent to the adoption of the HMP, the properties in the "standards" area of LFMZ 25 are now a part of the Buena Vista Creek Ecological Preserve. As noted previously, the Carlsbad HMP shows the hardline preserve to the north of the existing alignment of Buena Vista Creek. This hardline preserve was based on the previously approved reclamation plan that showed the realignment of the creek to the north. It is necessary to revise the design and preserve boundaries based on input from the USFWS, Corps, and CDFG, and direction to retain the existing alignment of Buena Vista Creek as part of the prior Reclamation Plan amendment. The objective of the revised hardline preserve configuration is to provide for the restoration of Buena Vista Creek and adjacent upland buffers, providing habitat values for riparian-dependant wildlife species. The Amended Reclamation Plan still meets the objectives of the hardline preserve in this area by maintaining and restoring Buena Vista Creek and adjacent upland buffers within the existing creek channel location. The existing HMP hardline boundary would have resulted in the development limits as well as the existing creek channel being completely impacted, with the realigned channel subsequently revegetated. The realigned channel is therefore assessed based on the habitats anticipated to have been restored within that realigned channel. This results in 3 categories being created: 1) Preserved; 2) Impacted; and 3) Impacted and Restored. The Amended Reclamation Plan hardline boundary adjustment only modifies the hardline boundary where there are changes as a result of the creek realignment, with the hardline boundary representing the development footprint permitted under the HMP. The Amended Reclamation Plan only represents an interim step in the final determination of future uses of the site. As a result, the HMP consistency analysis provides an assessment of the relocation of the creek channel as an interim condition within the context of the ultimate use of the site, and to confirm that the Amended Reclamation Plan would not preclude implementation of the HMP by the reconfiguration of the hardline boundary. The Resource Agencies have reviewed and approved of the determination of equivalency for the new alignment of the hardline boundary (letter attached). SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01/HMP 07-06 - SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY January 19,2011 PAGE 10 Table 2 provides a summary of the acres of habitat that would have been conserved and restored by the approved reclamation plan consistent with the HMP hardline, compared to conserved and restored habitat proposed based on the Amended Reclamation Plan. The HMP hardline would conserve/revegetate a total of 42.1 acres on site. The Amended Reclamation Plan would conserve/revegetate 44.2 acres, including individual sensitive habitat categories, in excess of the 42.1 acres under the current HMP hardline. The area available for future use within the City of Carlsbad would be the remaining 55.8 acres of the site. Thus, while the Amended Reclamation Plan does not match the boundaries of the hardline preserve Areas under the Carlsbad HMP, due to the change to retain the current Buena Vista Creek alignment the Amended Reclamation Plan is considered consistent with the Carlsbad HMP because it meets the goals and objectives of the HMP for this portion of the plan, providing equivalent type and quantity of habitat areas within the study area, as shown below. Wetlands All projects that impact wetlands must demonstrate that: • Impacts cannot be avoided by a feasible alternative. • Impacts have been avoided to the maximum extent practicable. • Impacts will be mitigated to assure no net loss of habitat value or function. The 2001 Reclamation Plan showed the existing channel being realigned to the north, which would have eliminated the entire length of the creek channel. Although the current creek channel configuration was substantially modified during site mining activities, the Amended Reclamation Plan significantly reduces impacts to existing riparian habitat over the 2001 Reclamation Plan by 1.4 acres. Based on the hydrological analysis of the creek channel, it has been determined that avoiding all impacts to the existing channel is not feasible if the objective of providing a stable channel that minimizes downstream sedimentation is to be achieved. As a result, impacts have been avoided to the maximum extent feasible. Impacts to wetlands are being mitigated with at least a 1:1 creation component to ensure that no reduction in wetland acreage occurs, and the resulting creation of high quality habitat and enhancement of existing degraded habitat would result in no net loss of functions or values. The existing HMP hardline boundary would have resulted in riparian habitat being restored within the realigned channel. Similar to the proposed project, drop structures would still have been required. The Amended Reclamation Plan results in 1.4 acres of riparian habitat avoidance not provided for by the existing HMP hardline boundary while creating, restoring and enhancing an additional 2.88 acres of habitat. The Amended Reclamation Plan is therefore consistent with the HMP for wetland mitigation requirements. Uplands Impacts to upland habitats must be mitigated consistent with the HMP. The mitigation ratios proposed for the Amended Reclamation Plan are consistent with, or in the case of unoccupied coastal sage scrub, are higher than the ratios in the HMP. Additionally, the revised hardline boundary results in no change in impacts to upland habitats. The Amended Reclamation Plan is therefore consistent with the HMP for upland mitigation requirements. SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01/HMP 07-06 - SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY January 19,2011 PAGE 11 Consistency with HMP Species Requirements The HMP states that "the primary mitigation for impacts to HMP Species under the Plan is the conservation and management of habitat for species in the preserve system" (City of Carlsbad 2004). It also states that incidental take must be minimized and mitigated to the maximum extent practicable. The HMP provides specific minimization and mitigation measures for covered species. The three species that occur on site are the least Bell's vireo, coastal California gnatcatcher, and yellow-breasted chat. Conservation goals for the least Bell's vireo include: • Conserve approximately 495 acres (86 percent) of riparian habitats. • Assure no net loss of riparian scrub within the City. • Conserve 95 percent of known point locations for least Bell's vireos within preserve areas. Impact avoidance/minimization measures for the least Bell's vireo include: • Manage preserve areas to minimize activities that would degrade riparian habitat. • Restrict activities in vireo-occupied habitat during the breeding season. • Where appropriate, restore or enhance riparian habitat suitable for vireos. In addition, there are several species-specific measures identified for the vireo, including: • Conduct surveys by a qualified biologist. • For areas adjacent to occupied vireo habitat, construction noise levels at the riparian canopy edge shall be kept below 60 dBA Leq (measured as Equivalent Sound Level) from 5 a.m. to 11 a.m. between February 15 and September 15. For the remainder of the season, the noise levels shall not exceed 60 decibels, averaged over a one-hour period on an A-weighted decibel (dBA; i.e., 1 hour Leq/dBA). • If new projects adjacent to the preserve create conditions conducive to cowbirds, jurisdictions shall require monitoring and control of cowbirds. • Biological buffers of 100 feet shall be maintained for occupied vireo habitat. TABLE 2 - HMP CONSERVATION COMPARISON IT A DTT ATrlArJl 1 A 1 GROUP CATEGORY Coastal Sage Scrub Chaparral Riparian Marsh Grassland ADOPTED HMP Acres per HMP 1995 Vegetation Categories1 4 9 10 1 12 Acres per dirrpnt Vegetation2 with 1991 Restoration3 17.05 4.84 11.78 0.31 4.48 PROPOSED HMP WITH PROPOSED PROJECT Acres per Current Vegetation2 with Proposed Restoration 17.37 4.84 12.68 0.46 4.57 COMPARISON Difference Proposed - Adopted 0.32 0.00 0.90 0.15 0.09 SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01 /HMP 07-06 - SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY January 19, 2011 PAGE 12 TABLE 2 - HMP CONSERVATION COMPARISON CONTINUED HABITAT GROUP CATEGORY Eucalyptus Disturbed Developed TOTAL ACRES ADOPTED HMP Acres per HMP 1995 Vegetation Categories 0 6 0 42 Acres per dirrpnt Vegetation2 with 1991 Restoration3 0.04 2.70 0.44 41.64 PROPOSED HMP WITH PROPOSED PROJECT Acres per Current Vegetation2 with Proposed Restoration4 0.04 2.77 1.48 44.21 COMPARISON Difference Proposed - Adopted 0.00 0.07 1.04 2.57 11995 Vegetation categories used in Carlsbad HMP 2Vegetation based on HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. mapping 3Restoration within the realigned creek channel 4Restoration within proposed project channel The Amended Reclamation Plan is consistent with these goals and measures by having completed focused surveys for the vireo, mitigating with at least a 1:1 creation component to ensure no net loss of riparian habitats, enhancing additional riparian habitat at a 2:1 ratio, avoiding all of the known vireo locations on site, providing long-term management of project open space, and ensuring that clearing of riparian habitat occurs outside of the breeding season. The Amended Reclamation Plan would not create conditions conducive to cowbirds, and biological buffers would exceed 100 feet from existing occupied vireo habitat. The Amended Reclamation Plan is also establishing a 100-foot biological buffer from the edge of newly created riparian habitat, which would assure compliance with this measure in the future should vireo occupy these new habitat areas. The mitigation measure in the Subsequent EIR addresses potential noise impacts and would ensure compliance with noise requirements. Conservation goals for the coastal California gnatcatcher include: • Conserve approximately 2,000 acres of coastal sage scrub. • Conserve mapped gnatcatcher locations within conserved habitat. • Maintain regional linkages. Impact avoidance/minimization measures for the coastal California gnatcatcher include: • Manage preserve areas to minimize edge effects. • Prepare and implement a fire management program for preserve areas. • Where possible, enhance and restore sage scrub habitat within preserve areas. The Amended Reclamation Plan would conserve 17.37 acres of sage scrub habitat compared with 17.05 acres under the prior reclamation plan. The Amended Reclamation Plan would also provide long-term management of project open space. Finally, 5.17 acres of sage scrub habitat SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01/HMP 07-06 - SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY January 19,2011 PAGE 13 would be restored within project open space. For these reasons, the Amended Reclamation Plan is consistent with the goals and measures for the gnatcatcher. One conservation goal is identified for the yellow-breasted chat: • Conserve riparian habitat within preserve areas, and assure no net loss of riparian habitats within the City. Impact avoidance/minimization measures for the yellow-breasted chat include: • Manage preserve areas to minimize activities that would degrade riparian habitat. • Restrict activities in chat-occupied habitat during the breeding season. • Where appropriate, restore or enhance riparian habitat suitable for the chat. The Amended Reclamation Plan is consistent with these goals and measures by mitigating with at least a 1:1 creation component to ensure no net loss of riparian habitats, enhancing additional riparian habitat at a 2:1 ratio, providing long-term management of project open space, and ensuring that clearing of riparian habitat occurs outside of the breeding season. The authorization to impact sensitive habitats and take of species of concern, through the removal of 0.05 acre of southern cottonwood-willow riparian forest, 0.85 acre of southern willow scrub, 0.06 acre of freshwater marsh, 1.99 acres of Diegan coastal sage scrub, and 34.26 acres of disturbed habitat and take of two coastal California gnatcatcher pairs is subject to continuous compliance with all provisions of the Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad (HMP), the Citywide Incidental Take Permit issued for the HMP, the Implementing Agreement, the Terms and Conditions of the Incidental Take Permit, and the Biological Opinion. E. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 25, Growth Management Ordinance, Chapter 21.90 of the Municipal Code A Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) has not been prepared for Zone 25. The Reclamation Plan grading is not considered development as no other uses or entitlements other than grading are being approved. The project does provide for future sewer infrastructure in the form of a sleeve under the new creek channel to accommodate future sewer services if needed. The proposed grading does not bias the ability to accommodate the future Marron Road circulation element roadway. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The City of Oceanside is the public agency having principal responsibility for approving the Amended Reclamation Plan for the Former South Coast Materials Quarry project. As such, the City of Oceanside served as the Lead Agency for the project. The Reclamation Plan for the Former South Coast Materials Quarry project had previously processed an EIR and the City of Oceanside determined that an amendment to the Reclamation Plan required a Subsequent EIR (SEIR). In certifying the Final SEIR on July 26, 2010, the City of Oceanside determined that after implementing all feasible mitigation measures, the increase in the maximum daily Oxides SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01/HMP 07-06 - SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY January 19,2011 PAGE 14 of Nitrogen (NOX) emission would be significant and unavoidable. The City of Oceanside approved the project and prepared a Statement of Overriding Considerations in accordance with CEQA Guidelines § 15093(a). The City of Carlsbad is a Responsible Agency for the project because of its discretionary approval power over the permits requested within the City's jurisdiction. As a responsible agency the City complies with CEQA by considering the SEIR prepared by the Lead Agency, and by reaching its own conclusion on whether and how to approve the project involved. The City of Carlsbad must perform the following to comply with CEQA requirements as a responsible agency: • Decide on the adequacy of the SEIR for use by the City. • Consider the environmental effects of the project as shown in the SEIR. • Adopt feasible alternative or mitigation for the direct or indirect environmental effects of those parts of the project, which it decides to carry out, finance, or approve. • Prepare and submit mitigation monitoring and reporting programs where appropriate. • Make appropriate findings. • File appropriate notices. The City of Carlsbad has considered the Final SEIR certified by the City of Oceanside on July 26, 2010 for the Amended Reclamation Plan for the Former South Coast Materials Quarry project. The City finds that the SEIR adequately characterizes the project's potential impact on the environment and that mitigation measures were incorporated into the project that would reduce the potential significant adverse impacts, except for short term air quality impacts which are unmitigable. The City has determined that changes or alterations have been incorporated into the project to mitigate or minimize the potentially significant adverse impacts on air quality during the project grading. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6743 (SEIR) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6744 (SUP) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6745 (HDP) 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6746 (HMP) 5. Location Map 6. Background data sheet 7. Disclosure Statement 8. City of Oceanside Planning Commission Resolution No. 2010-P16 (Reclamation Plan) 9. Reduced Exhibits 10. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game HMP Equivalency Determination letter dated October 13, 2010 11. Exhibits "A" - "H" dated January 19,2011 12. Amended Reclamation Plan for the Former South Coast Materials Quarry (CD previously distributed). 13. Final Subsequent EIR for the Amended Reclamation Plan for the Former South Coast Materials Quarry (CD previously distributed) 14. Audio Recording of City of Oceanside Planning Commission hearing July, 26, 2010 (CD previously distributed) WOT TO SCALE SITEMAP South Coast Materials Quarry SUP 07-03 / HDP 07-01 / HMP 07-06 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: SUP 07-03/HDP 07-01/HMP 07-06 CASE NAME: SOUTH COAST MATERIALS QUARRY APPLICANT: Hansen Aggregates Pacific Southwest, Inc REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for the consideration of a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report previously certified by the City of Oceanside, adoption of responsible agency environmental findings and adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the Amended Reclamation Plan for the Former South Coast Materials Quarry, and request for approval of a Special Use Permit, Hillside Development Permit, and Habitat Management Plan Permit for the grading of 42.1 acres to implement the Amended Reclamation Plan for the Former South Coast Materials Quarry generally located south of Highway 78 and west of College Boulevard in Local Facilities Management Zone 25. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad. County of San Diego, State of California. accordinR to Partition Map 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San DieRp County, November 16, 1896 and also identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 167-040-21-00. APN: 167-040-21-00 Acres: 100.13 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: Q GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Existing Land Use Designation: RLM/OS Proposed Land Use Designation: RLM/OS Density Allowed: 0-4 Density Proposed: N/A Existing Zone: Manufacturing (M)/R-1-10,000 Proposed Zone: No Change Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: General Plan Current Land Use Site M/R-1-10,000 RLM/OS Rock Quarry North N/A . N/A Hwy 78 South PC RLM/OS Residential/Open Space East Limited Industrial/Open Light Industrial/Open Auto Space/Community Space/Community Dealership/Quarry/Open Commercial Commercial space/Shopping Center West R-l -10,000 RLM/OS Vacant/Habitat Preserve LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Coastal Zone: I I Yes 1X1 No Local Coastal Program Segment: Within Appeal Jurisdiction: I | Yes |~~| No Coastal Development Permit: I I Yes |~~1 No Local Coastal Program Amendment: | | Yes I I No Revised 01/06 Existing LCP Land Use Designation: Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: Existing LCP Zone: Proposed LCP Zone: PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Categorical Exemption, Negative Declaration, issued Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated July 26. 2010 (SCH 200511 1124) Other, _ Revised 01/06 City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on alt applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: - - Person is.defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit" Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below, 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Corp/Part HANSON AGGREGATES PACIFIC SOUTHWEST Title Title Address Address P.O. BOX 639069 SAN DIEGO CA 92163-9069 OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e. partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of ail individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person. Title Address Coro/Part HANSON AGGREGATES PACIFIC SOUTHWEST Title_ Address P o BOX 639069 SAN DIEGO CA 92163-9069 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.cartsbad.ca.us 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust Title Non Profit/Trust, Title Address Address 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s):_ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ' -^ -^ f *f jj& -^^ ' ^/0+ ^7 7/Wl ~^%^ ?' Signature of Print or type name of owner sTgnature of applet/date j^0 ™g ' Use, Planning &Permittingt Print or type name orapplicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADM!N\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 12/06 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 CARLSBAD6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2010- PI6 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A REVISED RECLAMATION PLAN ON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF OCEANSIDE AND CITY OF APPLICATION NO'S: RMA-1-01 Revision 05 APPLICANT: Hanson Aggregates Pacific Southwest Inc. LOCATION: South of Highway 78, west of College Boulevard, on site of former Rock Quarry 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 , . R application. WHEREAS, a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report was prepared by the Resource Officer of the City of Oceanside for this application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the State Guidelines thereto. 21 WHEREAS, the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report was also reviewed and 22 certified by the Planning Commission prior to taking action on the Revised Reclamation Plan; 23 and 24 WHEREAS, pursuant to Oceanside Zoning Ordinance §4603, this resolution becomes 25 effective 10 days from its adoption in the absence of the filing of an appeal or call for review; 26 " 27 28 29 THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, there was filed with this Commission a verified petition on the forms prescribed by the Commission requesting a Revised Reclamation Plan under the provisions of the City of Oceanside Ordinance No. 86-32 as updated by Ordinance 99-07 and the State Surface and Mining and Reclamation Act. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after giving the required notice, did on the 26lh day of July, 2010, conduct a duly advertised public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1.3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2. WHEREAS, studies and investigations made by this Commission and in its behalf reveal the following facts: FINDINGS: For the Revised Reclamation Plan: 1. That implementation of this reclamation plan is necessary to prevent and minimize adverse effects on the environment and protect the public heath and safety. The reclamation plan includes restoration of Buena Vista Creek and stabilization of all slopes, within the quarry. All impacts to sensitive biological resources will be minimized and mitigated to below a level of significance. That the reclamation plan provides for the protection and subsequent beneficial use of the mined and reclaimed land. Geologically stable pads and slopes will be created within the quarry to ensure that they are safe and available for future use of the property. The restored creek, including El Salto Falls and other site areas required for biological mitigation, will be protected by a conservation easement in perpetuity. The proposed mining site will be stable, free of drainage problems coordinated with anticipated future land use and compatible with the topography and general environment of the surrounding property. Restoration of Buena Vista -Creek will improve water quality and drainage through the project site and downstream areas, including Buena Vista Lagoon and the ocean. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve the Amendment to the Reclamation Plan subject to the following conditions: 3. inmnnin 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2. 3. CONDITIONS: 1 „ The Reclamation Plan shall retain the current alignment of Buena Vista Creek (Final Subquent Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR) Refined Alternative 3). Within three months following the approval of this revision, the applicant shall initiate consultation regarding permits for the creek restoration design (FSEIR Refined Alternative 3) with the Federal and State resource agencies including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) 404 Permit, Regional Water Quality control Board (RWQCB) 401, Certification, and California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) 1603 Agreement. An engineer's estimate of the cost of all grading and improvements, including environmental mitigation, will be required within 30 days of the approval of the revised reclamation plan. A bond will be required for the full amount of the engineers estimate and will have both the City of Oceanside and the State of California named on the bond. The bond will be filed and approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer. Bonds shall assure timely performance of the reclamation plan including the removal of the equipment in Carlsbad. An agreement shall be filed with the City, prior to approval of reclamation grading plans, to allow the City, following reasonable notice, to enter the property to correct any landscaping or irrigation system deficiencies, any unsafe conditions or any breach of the provisions of the Reclamation Plan where the City has determined that such action is necessary to protect the public health, safety or general welfare. A covenant or other recordable document approved by the City Attorney shall be prepared by the applicant and recorded prior to the approval of any reclamation grading plans for reclamation. The covenant shall provide that the property is subject to this Resolution, and shall generally list the conditions of approval. The applicant, permittee or any successor-in-interest shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Oceanside, its agents, officers or employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul an approval of the City, concerning this revised Reclamation Plan (RMA-1-01). The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly 4. 5. 6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 notify the applicant of any such claim action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify or hold harmless the City. 7. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any portion of the proposed construction site within Carlsbad, developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the Carlsbad City Engineer for the proposed haul route. 8. Prior to moving any contaminated soil materials, Developer shall obtain all required, approvals by the appropriate monitoring agencies. 9. Grading permit for this project is required for work within the City of Carlsbad. Developer shall prepare and submit plans and technical studies/reports, for Carlsbad City Engineer review, and shall pay all applicable grading plan review and grading permit fees per the City of Carlsbad's latest fee schedule. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, developer shall submit to the Carlsbad City Engineer receipt of a Notice of Intent from the State Water Resources Control Board. 11. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for work within the City of Carlsbad, developer shall submit for City of Carlsbad approval a Tier 3 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (TIER 3 SWPPP). The TIER 3 SWPPP shall be in compliance with current requirements and provisions established by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad. The TIER 3 SWPPP shall address measures to reduce to the maximum extent practicable stormwater pollutant runoff during construction of the project. 12. Buena Vista Creek and associated ponds shall be buffered by a 100-foot biological buffer, and an additional 50-foot planning buffer. The biological buffer shall be fully revegetated. Allowable uses, associated improvements and specific restrictions on uses/improvements within the planning buffer area (i.e. trails, parking, etc.) shall be established in conjunction with future land use/ development entitlement approvals or other applicable permits. Any/all applicable land use/development conditions and or restrictions shall be recorded against the property as a mechanism to assure their implementation. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 13. A final "as approved" version of the Reclamation Plan (Refined Alternative 3 in the FEIR) shall be prepared within 30 days of the approval of the revised Reclamation Plan that includes all of the changes outlined in the letter to OMR dated June 24, 2010. This final version shall also incorporate corrections from the errata as noted in the staff report. 14. The landowner, including successors in interest, subsequent landowners and/or conservation managers shall assure that Buena Vista Creek through the site, including El Salto Falls, has consistent and regular maintenance that is sensitive to cultural values,, including removal of graffiti, litter, and other refuse items that may find their way into the falls and creek. Such requirements shall be incorporated into the perpetual management, maintenance and monitoring plan associated with the conservation easement over Buena Vista Creek through the site, as litter and other debris impairs the importance and integrity of the sacred waters and culturally important areas around the falls and the creek. ' 15. A management plan for the area within 200-feet of El Salto Falls, within the project site, shall be approved and shall be in effect prior to issuance of the first grading permit for Reclamation Plan (RMA-1-01 Revision 05). The management plan shall address provisions for cleaning and securing said area. The property owner(s) and any successor(s) in interest shall comply with the management plan's provision's until/unless superseded by a development and management plan associated with any future use of the subject area or portion thereof. II III I I II I II I- it ii ii i nun 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 16. The conservation easement placed over Buena Vista Creek, including El Salto Falls, a sacred site, shall allow for access by Native American tribe members for ceremonial uses, traditional gathering and similar activities associated with the tribe's cultural values. The San Luis Rey Band of Luiseno Mission Indians shall be consulted regarding specific language to be included in the conservation easement regarding cultural values; the Wildlife Agencies and the Tribe shall agree to the easement language prior to recordation of the conservation easement over the Buena Vista Creek, including El Salto/ Falls, with ultimate authority of the easement language resting with the Wildlife Agencies. PASSED AND ADOPTED Resolution No. 2010-P16 on July 26,2010 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Neal, Martinek, Resales, Bertheaud and Scrivener NAYS: Troisi, Balma ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Bob Neal, Chairperson Oceanside Planning Commission Jefry Hittl^man, SecretaryJefry Hittl^ I, JERRY HITTLEMAN, Secretary of the Oceanside Planning Commission, hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 2010-P16. Dated: July 26, 2010 Applicant accepts and agrees with all conditions of approval and acknowledges impact fees may be required as stated herein: 81010 Applicant/Representative Date Address APNSite Acreage Existing Zoning Existing Gen Plan Existing Land Use 3701 Hoymar Drive, Carlsbad, CA 167-040-21100.13 M & R-1-10.000 RLM&OS Concrete & asphalt recycling at former quarry (all and vacant land Reclamation of former quarry including creek restoration. No end uses are proposed with this application. No subdivision or lot development proposed with this application.38.3 % of site - all disturbed areas to be planted. City of Carlsbad Carlsbad Unified School District Classification of Lots Percent Site Landscape Sewer/Water Services School Services Bearing and distance data shown on Grading Plan. DCS3-0: OtBQin CotaH Sage DEV: OewlofW) SCWftf: So. Cottonwood-Wfcw Rkwfcn Fowtl f'y'J'j SMC: aouttam Mnafl Chaparral Landscape Archnect The EJghtfoot Ranning Group 5750 Fleet Street, Suite 250 Carlsbad CA 92008 760-692-1924 Hanson Reclamation Project Site Plan Flood Plain Special Use Permit 0743 Hillside Development Permit 07-01 Habitat Management Plan Permit 07-06 Owner Hanson Aggregates Pacific Southwest, Inc. P.O. Box 639069 San Diego, CA 92163 858-277-5481 Ptanner/Representatiye The Lightfoot Planning Group 5750 Reel Street Suite 250 Carlsbad, CA 92008 760-692-1924 Civil Engineer Chang Consultants P.O. Box 9496 Rancho Santa Fe.Ca 92067 858-692-0760 Prepared: Jdyi7.2007. rev QUARRY CR^K II CARLSBAD PARCEL - SLOPE ANALYSIS MAP RANGE COLOR BEQN4MQ | | OX 15% j 2SX •J >40X RANGE END <16X < 2SX 4OX - TOTALS PERCENT 54S7. vax 13w6X 17.6X 100XIX Pg| EXBTHO SLOPES WITH HBOHTB GREATER AREA 5S.O AC 13J9AC 13.6 AC 17.6 AC 100.1 AC 13 AC - CAMJQBAD AIKA>200,100 CY / 007 GRADED ACPB8 - ftOOO CY/ACPE • RJLL. anB ONCUJOEB 4 AC M OCEANaDE)274^400 CY / 42.1 GRADED ACMBB • OOOB CY/ACRB • OTE ORADNOj ON 1MB EXWTT 18 FROMnECLAMAHON GRADMQ PI-AN BY CHANQCONBULTANra. PLEASE REFER TO THAT PLANFOR AEOmOMAL GRADNGi PLAN DETAL& • ELOPH ANAL.YGB AND SLOPE PROHLESPRBPAFED BY CHANQ CONSULTANTS AND HAWBEEN ACCURATELY CALCULATED AND PROJECT DCOQN CONSULTANTS PHOTOORAMMETHY DEPARThEVfTDATE) OBPTEhBER ». 2O(M DATUM MBL. 1964 ADJUSTED ELEV. BXIBTNa CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR DAYLIGHT LftE PROPOSED 8TORM DRAMCLEANOUT = = < OCTOBER 7, 2OK) 5rf 5«l:vJr' • » «• ,' »JA .*,,* ..„ 2L ,n<. ^S«J-.* "nafc.5*!?,; -jS, GBBW. NOTES ADDRESS:APNi 167-040-21 SIC ACREAGE:EXISTING ZONING: EMST1HG GEN PLAN: EXISTING UNO USE: PROPOSE) LAND USE CUS3FICATION OF LOTS: PERCENT SHE LANDSCAPE SEWER/WATER SERVICES:SCHOOL SERVICES: _ '- -N \ , VV '\ ^ \ \23.'i >V I ^ 3701 HAYMAR DRIVE, CARLSBAD, CA 100.13 ACRESU ft R-1-tO.OOO RLM ft OS CONCRETE * ASPHALT RECYCUNG AT FORMER QUARRY (ALL MINING COMPLETE)AND VACANT LAND RECLAMATION OF FORMER QUARRY NOUDINC CREEK RESTORATION. NO END USES ARE PROPOSED WTH THS APPLICATION.NO SUBDIVISION OR LOT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED WITH THS APPLICATION. 38.3X Cf SITE - ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE PLANTED. CITY Cf CARIS8ADCARLSBAD UNFED SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADING PLAN ADDITIONAL NOTES: WATER SERVICE TO THE SITE WU BE LMTED TO IRRIGATION SEFHCE ONLY. NO DOMESTIC OR FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMIS PROPOSED WTH THIS APPLICATION. RECYCLED WATER IS NOT AVAILABLE TO THIS SITE ALL LANDSCAPE IS DESIGNED TO BECOME SELF-SUSTAINING. IRRIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED FOR ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF MANUFACTURED SLOPES. NATIVE REVEGETAT10N AREAS M1HN THE SITE AREDESIGNED AND INTENDED TO ULTIMATELY ELIMINATE DEPENDENCE ON IRRIGATION. RAH EARTHWORK QUANTITIES 274.000 CY CUT 0 CY BALANCED HANSON AGGREGATES PACIFIC SOUTHWEST, INC.P.O. BOX 639069 SAN DIEGO, CA 92163B58-277-5481 THE UGHTFOOT PLANNING GROUP 5750 FLEET STREET, SUfTE 250CARLSBAD. CA 92008 760-692-1924 423.000 CY (ESTIMATE BASED ON ^FORMATION IK SOLS REPORT) CHANG CONSULTANTS P. 0. BOX 9496RANCHO SANTA FE. CA 92067 858-692-0760 L/tNpSCAPE ARCHTECT THE UGHTFOOT PLANNING GROUP5750 FLEET STREET. SUITE 250CARLSBAD. CA 92008 760-692-1924 x \ V3-V\| \ ' \ y\rt -1-^ / \ 'I' V V fe1* ttfK> EWS11NG WA"7FENCE .(.9 K ! '^~ \\\. • \/ /^PROPOSED FENCING ••<'•• \ '.'• \ \ ,,-\, i XM PROPOSED FENCING " ~~( ,^--' ~ ~ ",--- f" "J/f JlkJiHTO EXISTING FENCE L/ ^H7.&'' , •;,.' ' .-- -j- -;-" ••: ,-' .T- xuVq'-'lHEaE.»,--.. ' 'f PROPOSED STORM DRAINS ONRj -- - THS DETAIL WLL BE PRIVATE xH^- ^ \ ^t [SEE SHEET 2 FOR SIZES. ___v_ BBMENCT ACCEBS DETAi- SC«E- T-W I' UN. OVER —*^& / ^.100-YEAR WAIF) ^V\SURFACE ELEVAWH T \ BdKfD-/ ^-1:1 NOTE SECTION C-C Ml FUNCDOH AS Ml ENGMERED STOCS«ESON STEP TO BC CT AM _GRADATION (ESTABLISHED BY DKMCBWG ANALYSES) PIACED OVER H.TER MATCTALGROUT TO ONLY BE UXE> WERE ICECD TORESET UGH FLOW vaoOICS. SECTION C-C 8UPO7-O3HDP 07-01HMP 07-06 LEGEND ITEM EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPERTY LINE EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATION DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PROPOSED WINGWALL PROPOSED STORM DRAIN OLEANOUT PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CtEANOUT/ DIVERSION STRUCTURE (SEE DETAIL) SDRSD D-34, D-35 SDRSO D-9. 0-10 SDRSD D-9. D-10 OVBaONSTBUCTlJHEDErAi- NOTTOSCAL£ ... TOW GROUTED RPRAP (T-141PER CM.TRANS STD. SPECS, OVERFLTER BLANKET PER SOLSENOMEER'S RECOUMEHDATON - 1/2 TON CROJIED RIPRAP (T-14')PER CALTRANS STD. SPECS. OVERRUER BLUMTPER SOLSEWKEFft RECOMMENDATION RISER (UAItH OUIFLOWPPE ~~ DIAUETER) WTH SUT5 TOPREWT POMWG. IWTl-VDRTEXPLATE, AND WAPFED WH 3/4'^ W*va. COKE OVER FITER FLOW VAHES 5' UK .T BASH PLAN OYPJ —3 CY CONC. ANCHOR '-RCP PER PLAN i_T BASH SECTION KOTt TRA94 COUEC1KN BUPS ML BE B#>L£UEKTEDFOR TRBUTARt Off-SnE FLOHS DURWC FW«.EHGMERMC PURSUANT TO REQUKEUEXTS ROM THE (JTY CF CARLSBAD. ) mo* orv <y acuitaot.REVISION DESCRIPTION PUNNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL PUKHIHG DDtKCTOB "» / / I CITY OP CARtS&AD II ENGINEERING DEPARTMCNT | HANSON AGGREGATES QUARRY CREEK APPROVED: MN K. VAN PESW B dvt ENMa ft Hint EMB 1 DECEMBER 7. 2010 PUNfflNG DEPACTMENT APPROTA1 out / / DECEMBER 7. 2010 PAD HULL. BE IFRGATED 4O PLANTED 1WTH tlWTERCCNSBWNi NCN-NVASIVE PUNTHj.MOT A PART Cf CARLSBAD AFH.ICATION FOR REfB^ICE ONLYHYPRQ5EEP OH PROJECT GRADEDS LESS THAN t,-\ TYPICAL 7 EROSION CONTROLHYPROSESD PLANNING SITEDESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ZONE 3 - NATURALIZHS/TRANSmONAJ. QWPATICHrBaLpeUA.LOUB OR TOTCN N TOP OF BLOFE (DOUH TO P-1DJ UPUM3 CFEATICN;COAST* 9A3B SCRJBRtFARWN BlRER-TTPICAtT&TTBOL ujrmV " VEXI9TN3 OPEN OUTER POND WTH SURROIICIN3 FRESHWATER EXI8TNG V6SETAT1CN TO REMAN POOLS USNS RIPRAP MiXED 5I2E QRiDATtONNTERPUKTEP IWTH IWU.OU6 IUTH6RCUTN3 TO BE USEP ON1.T WEF£ ,J\\ ~- --", \ NECE66ART TO RESIST HteH FLOUI- 41 vacates, ne SERIES OF STEPS i ':A\AMD POOLS ARS resia«p TO-ALLOUTO FUW DURN& BIO-R.TER SUUIE / pe&ILTBASM ZONE 3 - NATHMU2M3/TRANSITfOHAL NATIVfi BOULPBS SPAROLT PLACED BASED CN HELIX BIOLOGICAL HABITAT HAFPN3-JM ^8/0AMD PROPOSED MITIGATION PLFOR FULL LMITS OF WO' BIOLOGICAL BLFFER AMP50 PLAWN3 BUfER ONSFTE, PLEASE SEE HOJRE 4-6 OF THE AmOED RgaAtUTION PLANFOR FOF3-ER SOUTH COAST HATERIALa QUARRY STATE nie ID • y-y\-ew6, APPROVED BYim CITY OF OCEANSIDE JULY !6. SHEET INDEX L-t LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN L-I CONCEPTUAL PLANT PALETTES. SITE DATAAND NOTES FOR PLAHTH3 CAteOORES L-3 IUATERCCNSERVATICNPLAN CITY OF CARI5BAD HANSON AGGREGATES AMENDED RECLAMATION PLAN ZCNE 3hJATURALIZKi/TRANStnoMAL&43Q SF.5» CF LANDSCAPE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME OJANTITTMWrtn15HRJBPER 200SO.FT. (AFPSOX. tn 6HRJBSJ OWMIITY MWnil: 1C* COVERAGE AT MATURE SPREADtOTY. VARIES; B4J» SF. APPROX.B0* COVtRA&Enote TEAS COCEPTUAL SLOPE EROSICN CCNTROl PALETTE SLOPE 6FEATER THAN 6:1 OERQJS AQRFOLIAOJERCUS EHSELMAWII ARBUTUS XT1ARKA' EM3ELMANOAK EXCELSA >€U JEJUtD ORSTHASTREE . jCCriMCjj_NAME_ LARGE 6HRBS. ONE OR MORE Cf THE ARCTOSTAFMTLOS 'JOH OCURtET JOH4 DOURLET MANZANITA ARaoSTAFHYLOe D. «MCIWT MC M9WMANZANITA CEANOTHU9 CONCHA jgANOTHUS 'JOYCE COULTER' COPRO5MA REFEHS (BAUERIJ PLUHBAQO AUR1OJLATA fCAPcNSIS) j-Qll SF^READINQ jRCTOSTAPHrLOSFACFIC MIST' jEANOTHUS 'HEART'S DESIRE', J6ANOTHU5 Ct. R "YANKEE POINT' ^OTONEASTER k -LOUFAST'GROUMDCOVER MIRROR PLAHT CAPE PLUMBAGO COAST ROSEMARY ! HORE OF rg FOLL( PACFIC MIST MANZANITASUNSET MAHZANITA BEARBERRY COTONEA5TER ^OPROSMA X KJRKil JVA MAYE5IANA I SAN DIEGO MARSH ELDER L COVER CROP/KEWFORCED STRAU! MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED UJHEN PLANTING OCCURS BETUEENAUGUST 15, AND APRIL 15. TYPE AND MANUFACTURER SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND STAKED TO THE SLOPE AS SPECIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURERTHE COVER CROP SHALL BE A SEED MIX OF OUICK GERMINATING, FAST COVERING GRASSES, CLOVERS AND/ OR ULDFLOUER9 (IHICH SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR CITY APPROVAL PRIOR TO APPLICATION.COVER CROPS SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE AND MANNER SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE 90* COVERAGE IWTHING 30 DATS. 3. LOUJ SHRUBS: LCtti &PREADN3 UJOODY SHRUBS SHALL COVER A MINIMUM OF 10* CF THE SLOPE FACE (AT MATURE 8IZEJ. MNMJ1 SIZE I-J" LINERS OR AS NOTED. SL.Of5S_L£SS THAN_3' frj YERTJCALHEJ6HT AND ARE A SLOPES BETUEEN 3-8' N vFJeTICAL HEIGHT, STANDARDS 11 AND f3 APPLY. FOR SLOPE AREAS GREATER THAN B' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT. STANDARDS t, 1, *3 AND *4 APPLY. RO&A CAUFORNICA IONE3HATURALIZNS/TRANSITIONAL BOTANICAL NAME NATURALIINi/ TRANSiTICNAL46361 SF3J* CF LANDSCAPE PR5VATELT MANTAICD ER3SICN CCNTROL SLOPE LESS THAN 6:1 HYDROSEED MIXTURE COMMON NAME PLAXTAGO ERECTA PLANTAGO INSULARIS LASTHENIA CALIFORNICA JJPINU5 BICOLOR LUP1NUS SUCCULENTUS VULPtA MICROSTACHY6 DOT-SEED PLANTAIN COMMON GOLDFIELD9 ARRpYQ LUPINE , SLURRY: CCMIED BI30D FIBER MULCHECOLOGY CONTRCU M-BH^RAM 170 MYCOKRHIZAL NOOJ.UMHSTAU. FEB 9 ' 5 SEED SFECFCATCTS. MB-ea4^H3t BIOLOGICAL BlffER VEGETATION -LEVEL AREAS HYPROftEEP MIXTURE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME LASTHENIA CALfORNICA LOTUS SCOPARIUS LUPHIS B1COLOR NA&SEILAPULCHRA PLANT AGO ERECTA COMMON GOLDFIELDS FURP1E NEEDLEQRASS DOT-SEED PLANTAN SLURRY: CONOED U30D FIBER MJLCHECOL03Y COKTRaS H-BNDERAM C0 MYCORRHIIAL NOOIUM NSTAa FW 5 IS SEED SfKfl&iTICW, B»-fcW-W3* ( S^^^ ICNE3MURAL ffKi/TRANSITICNAL181,583 SF.I0.e»OF LANDSCAPE n &ENOJTm KE (Wt (Wt (UL <yj AAI <Ul (Ui SOI(yi OAtau »m ZOE3NATlRALIZKi/TRANSmCNAL16031 SF.1J*OFLAND3CAPE SUE 1 (M 1 (Man ON 1 <Ui ISA uRAND CREAT1CN DIEGAN COASTAL SAGE SCBB PLAVI PALETTE CONTAINER PLANTING BOTANICAL NAME ARTEMSIA CALFOWflCA ENCELIACALFORNICA EF3060KM FASCICULATiriSSPFASCIOJLATlhtETERTEUSJfranraLA K4LOSHA LAURKA RHJB NtKSRMLIA suirBuasrexi&WA RANTS FW UPPER SLOP ORKTIA LtTTORALIS OFWTIA PARRY1I CRNTUPK3LIFERA CCT1MCNNAME COASTAL SAGE BRU» CALFORNIA ENCELIA CALRJWSA EOCraWEAT TOYON LAUREL 5O1AC LEMCHADEBERRY BLACK SAGE BLtE ELMRBERRY E EDGES AS BARRIER RA COASTAL PRICKLY PEAR SNAKE CHOLLA COASTAL CHCUA &EED MIXTURE BOTANICAL NAME ARTEMISIA CALIFcmiCA BACCHARIS PIULARIS DEINANDRA FASCCULATA ENCELIA CALFORNICA EraOGONUM FASCICULATtH ERJOPHYLLUM CONFERTFLORUM ESCHSCHOLZIA CALIFOWICA ISCCOMA fB4ZCSIILASTMEKIA CALFORKICA fOWCILB) LOTUS SCOPARIUS LUPWU9 SUCCULENTUS MMULU3 AURANTIACUS NASSELLA FU.CHRA PLANTAGO ERECTA 6ALV1A MELLiFERA SISYRiNCHIUM BELLLM SSSff 5 5 & 1212 13 5 12 NTNi & & & SP*& 3 \0 5& & 10 5 & 10 10 cmr/AC 250 200 200 £>060 60 200 £>0 40 60 60 COMMON NAME COASTAL SAGEBRUSH COYOTE BRUSH FASCICLED TARPLAm CALFOWIA ENCELIA CALFORMA BUOCUWAT GOLDEN-TARRO1U CALFORNIA POPPT GOLDENBUSHCOTKN GOLDHELDS DEERHEED ARROYO LUPINE MONKEYFLOliER PURPLE MEEDLBGRA99 DOT-SEED PLAKTAN BLACK SAGE BLUE-ETED GRASS LB/AC 3 1 2 2 6 2 2 1 2 I 2 2 6 2 3 2 UFUt) CREATICNTftWSITlCNAL BBtH VBHATICN pLMPALEHE CONTAINER PLANTINO9 BOTANICAL NAME ARTEMISIA CALFORMCA ENCELIA CALFOBflCA ES3OJCHM FASCIOLATU1 LEYMJS OaCB6ATU& LOTUS SCCPARRJS SAMBUOlSMEXtCANA COMMON NAME COASTAL SAGEBRUSH CALFORNIA ENCELIA CALFORJIA BUCK3UHEAT ilANT OHLD-RYE DEERUEED 5LUE ELDERBERRT HCK<n & &&&& 12 r*& 3 10 10 10 5 OTY;AC 250 200 100 60 250 60 SEED MIXTURE BOTANICAL NAME ARTEMISIA DCU3LASIANA ARTEMISIA DRAONCULUS BACCHARfS PILULARIS EMCOOMUM FASCICULATIM I&GCOMA MENZIESII NASSELLA PULCHRA CCMMCN NAME MUGUIORT TARRAGON CALFORMA BUCKUtCAT CALFORNIA BUOCtWEAT GOLDENBUSHuujjtrl lAptmMi LB/AC S 5 I & Z 3 20 UWOSOPC ARCHITECT 0 $S8P 3flt 1 <M SOIL StiAl *"M3' <"W3 «<B 1 Wi . - ZONE3KATURALIZN&/TRANSITtCNAL13561 SF.0WCF LANDSCAPE PRIVATELY MANTAINED RIPARIAN CREATION RANT PALETTE CONTAINER PLANTING BOTANICAL NAME ARTB1ISIA pALMERI BACCHARIS SALICFOLIA ISOCOMA MENZIEStl PLATANU3 RACEMOSA POPULUS FREMONTII SALIX EXlGUA SALIX GOODDNSII SALIX LAEWiATA SAMBUCCUS MEXCANA SEED MIXTURE COMMON NAME SAN DIEGO SAGEIUORT •ULEFAT GOLDENBUSH 1ESTERH SYCAMora HESTEWCOnoNlCCD SANDBAR UJILLOUI GOODDING'S ILHLLCUI REDILHLLCUJ SLUE E.DERBERRY BOTANICAL NAME AMBROSIA PSILOSTACHTA ANEFIOPSIS CALFORNICA ARTEMISIA DOUQLASIANA BACCHARIS SALICFOLIA CYPERUS ERAGROSTIS ELEOCHARIS MACROSTACHYS EUTH4MW OCe/DENTALISISOCOMA HENZIESII JLUCUS ACUTUS SSP. LEOI JtflOS EFFUSU9 VAR PAC •CLDtl RQSOENOTHERA ELATA SSP. MOCKER! PLUCHEA ODORATA 8CIRPUS MARIT1MUSTYPHA LATFOLIA SPWCfTOQ 5e 5 15 15 12 12 12 10 KVW HE 5 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 OTY;AC 50 500 200 60 60 150 300 100 £.0 COMMON NAME UESTERN RAOUEED YERBAMANSA DOUGLAS MUGUIORT •ULEFAT TALL FLATSEDGE PALE SPIKE-RUSH IESTERN GOLDENROD GOLDENBUSH JOUTH1ESTERN 61aACFIC RUSH -OCKERS EVEN* NT RUSH SPRMRDS SALT MARSH FLEABANE 3ULRUSH CATTAIL *eS& 20/30 &0H0 EA0\sn0 <&!M> 90/10 30/30 40/30 30/80 3>/M9 3C40 W/&0 W«0 \fvtr 4 1 3 t 1 ) 3 Cb e>s05 ; 1 1 RCCK/Rip RAP STRUCTURESOF VARYN3 GRADATIONWTH EMERGENT BOULDERS AND LOCALLY HARVESTEDHHLLOUI CUTTNGS fRIPAWANJ OR TOYON LINERS (UPLAND; IN 6-0"EMBEDDED TUBES " MIN. SPACING OF 30' OC. VEGETATED 5EWLE5 AC DESUATICN BASMS SEED MIXTURE BOTANICAL NAME BRCMUS CARINATUS DISTICHLIS 6PICATA LEYMUS TRITICHOIDES MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS COMMON NAME CALFORNIA BROME SALTGRASS BEARDLESS IIILDRYE DEERGRASS LB/AC (J 4 6 I SLURRY, CCNiED WOOD FIBER MULCHECOLOGY CONTROLS M-BNDERAM Q0 MYCORRHIIAL INOCULUMWALL PER 9 ( 9 SEED SFKKMO& B2S-6M-M36 IftX-tK-tM-TKB) OR wfeueAeea • \D0 RIPARIAN BUFFER BA5ED ON HELIX BIOLO3CAL HABITAT MAPPING AND PROPOSED MITIGATION PLAN rt/«JFOR FULL LIMITS OF 100' BIOLOGtCAL BUFFER AND 60' PLANNING BUFFER ONSITE. PLEASE SEEFIGURE 4-5 OF WE AMENDED RECLAMATION PLAN FOR FORMER SOUTH COAST MATERIALS OJARRY STATE MffC ID • 91-31-0016, APPROVED BY T>€ CITT CF OCEANSIDE JULT Jfe. 2010 GENERAL NOTES: L ALL SQUARE FOOTAOES ARE APPROXIMATE BASED ON CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE AREAS. 2. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE TO BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED.3. ALL REVEGETATION AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE IRRIGATION AND PLANTING, AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS AND AS 3FECFIED PER BIOLOGY REPORT AND AS APPROVED BY THE RESOURCEAGENCIES. 4. PLAN INCLUDES ONLY AREAS U8THIN CARLSBAD JURISDICTION.5. THE CARLSBAD PORTION OF THE SITE 16 A TOTAL OF t0e>.Q ACRES.t>. TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA; 16*3,913 SF. • 383» OF SITE 1 ALL REVEGETATION ACREAGE, QUANTITIES, SIZES AND RATES SHALL BE PER PROJECT BIOLOGIST ANDARE SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL Cf RESOURCE AGENCIES, 8. FUEL MODFICATICN ZONES ARE NOT APPLICABLE OR PROPOSED IN OR OUTSIDE THE REVEGETATIONAREA REVISION DESCRIPTION SBEETII CITy OF CARLSBAD || PLANNING_OEPAHTUEMT I! HANSON AGGREGATES AMENDED RECLAMATION PLAN THE IIGNIFDOT PUNNING CROUP PUNNING SITE DESIGN LANDSCAPE IFIEHt!,1111, ClMil-Ill{1111 lit- Q\ 1-31-ei. 6/8/099, ins, 4yia, M9/ia CO L-2, WATER CONSERVATION INFORMATION TABLE sir-ecu iff ^— ^~ V ^ ZONE DESCRIPTION ZONE 3. NATURALfflNG TRANSITIONALSLOPE EROSION CONTROL LANDSCAPEfSLOFE GREATER THAN 6:1J ZONE 3= HATURiLSim TTWNSmCHii EROSION CONTROL LANDSCAPEf SCOPE LESS THAN «:|J 7Ct€3i NATURALIZINS TRANSITIONALNATIVE REvEGETATION LANDSCAPE MOT A PART AREA (90. Ft) 643B 1>23>60 i«j«3 * OF LANDSCAPE 5* T32* Bfft GAL PER TEAR 53J3I f * K>" PER TEAR; 633043 ( •&' PER 1CARJ l65fiW f • W TO! TEAR) SUMMARY HTDRO2QHE HTbROZtM AREA » Or LANDSCAPE ZONE h 0 0 *ZONE 2; 0 0\ ZONE 3t 1*669.322 9F. 100 *ZONE 4: 0 0k 1^61^6! SEE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN (L-D AND LEGEND AND NOTES (L-2) SEE PRELIMINARY CIVIL DWQS. FOR GRADING PLANS WATER CONSERVATION NOTES I TABLE ABOVE 15 BASED ON INFORMATION PROV1DB? IN THE LANDSCAPE M4MIAJ. FOR THE CITT CFCARLSBAD AND AFFTaOXlMATBD 3O1AFE FOOTAOES BASED ON CONCEPT PLAN. l GALLONS PER TEAR FOR THE SITE f REvEGETATICN AND. ^ SLOPE EROSION CONTROL. COMB-NEDA 3. MAIHTaiflMCE: ALL PLAHTED AREAS UHLL BE PRIVATELY MANTAINED. 4. THESE PLANTS HAVE BEEN SELECTED FOR THEIR AESTHETIC VAUC AS UELL AS FOR THEIR ABILITY TO THRIVE ON EXISTN3 SOUR, IUND, AND IUATER CCNPITIONS OF THE SITE. THESE PLANTS ARE HELL ADAPTEDTO THE CARLSBAD CLIMATE AND DO NOT DEMAND A HVM AHOlKT OF UlATER SUFnB^MTAL IUATER 19ESTIMATED TO E€ LESS THAN THE 1^62^61 QAL PER TEAR SHOUN N THE TABLE ONCE PLANTS AR? ESTABLISHED. 5. WE SOIL SHALL BE AMENDED TO MPROVE THE PUNT OMtLrTH ENVIRCM"Bff. QRCUNDCOVERS SHALLFILL W BETU&I THE SWRBS TO SHIELD THE SOIL FROM THE SIN AMD REDUCE EvAPOTRANSPIRATION. ALL THE FLOUER AND SHRLB BEDS SHAU BE MILCHED TO HELP CONSERVE UlATER, LOUER THE SOILTEHPERA1URE AND REDUCE HEED (3ROUm4. SHRUBS SHALL BE ALLOUED TO OROU TO THEIR NATURAL FORMS. THIS HULL WORK TOGETHER UTH THE QROUNDCOVERS AND MH.CHES TO RHXKE THEEVAPOTRANSPIRATICN RATES OF THE SOIL. 6. PROPER LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CAN CONSERVE ENERGY AND IUATER LUATER RECTCLINQ IS ALSO A MEANS TO CONSERVE WATER HOUCvER. NONE IS AVAILABLE TO THE SITE. i. crrr APPROVED BACKR.OUI PREVENTION DEVICE SHALL BE CERTFIED.THE PONT OF CONNECTtON. ALL MRtto, AU PIPE AND . SLEEvM3yALvES. EOJiFMENT, OPERATIH3 PRESSira AND VELCCfTT CONSTRANTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT CITT OF CARLSBAD LANDSCAPEMANUAL AND RESPECTIVE AGENCY GUIDELINES AND CODES. I. ALL SYSTEMS SHALL BE FROM A SEPARATE IRRIGATION METER AND CONTROLLED BY AN ET -BASED<SMART 1 CONTROLLER (LHW A RAN SHUTCfF DEVICE AND HOI) SENSING IN ORDER TO MPROVE IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY AND IUATER CONSERVATION. 4. THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER SHALL BE CAPABLE OF OVERDIN3 THE SYSTEMS BASED ON INFORMATIONFROM SENSORS SUCH AS H0ISTURE SENSOR H.OUJ S&BCR RAN SENSOR, ET SENSOR il«CH SHALL BEPLACED AT STRATEGIC LOCATIONS. REVISION DESCRIPTION || CITY OF CARLSBAD ||\[ PLANNING DEPARTMENT || AGGREGATES AMENDED RECLAMATION PLAN ISTSr—Jsi HwttJCCTMO. .uroj-oi™z 3—II ssa GROUP PUIININE SIIEDHIGN UNDSCAPE ABCHIIECIURE SI UJ i Jet# U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office 6010 Hidden Valley Rd. Suite 101 Carlsbad, California 92011 (760)431-9440 FAX (760) 431-5902 California Department of Fish and Game South Coast Region 4949 Viewridge Avenue San Diego, California 92123 (858)467-4201 FAX (858) 467-4299 In Reply Refer To: FWS/CDFG-SDG-06B0009-10TA0974 Mr. Van Lynch Senior Planner City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008-7314 ICiTY OF OCT 18 281 132010 Subject: HMP Equivalency Determination for the South Coast Quarry Creek Amended Reclamation Plan Project, City of Carlsbad, San Diego County, California Dear Mr. Lynch: The California Department of Fish and Game (Department) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), hereafter collectively referred to as the Wildlife Agencies, have reviewed the August 6, 2010, request for an Equivalency Determination for the South Coast Quarry Creek Amended Reclamation Plan Project, specifically Refined Alternative 3 (proposed project). Our review of the proposed project's equivalency with the City of Carlsbad (City) Habitat Management Plan (HMP) is based on: information provided in your request and the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR) dated February 2010 and certified by the City of Oceanside on July 26, 2010; project-related communications subsequent to our receipt of your August 6 letter; our knowledge of sensitive and declining vegetation communities in the County of San Diego; and our participation in regional conservation planning efforts. On September 7, 2010, the Department requested and you granted the Wildlife Agencies an extension until September 23 to respond to the City's request. On September 23, you granted an additional extension until October 15 to the Wildlife Agencies. We appreciate the extensions. The primary concern and mandate of the Service is the protection of public fish and wildlife resources and their habitats. The Service has legal responsibility for the welfare of migratory birds, anadromous fish, and endangered animals and plants occurring in the United States. The Service is also responsible for administering the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.}, including habitat conservation plans (HCP) developed under section 10(a)(l) of the Act. The Department is a Trustee Agency and a Responsible Agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Sections 15386 and 15381, respectively) and is responsible for ensuring appropriate conservation of the state's biological resources, including rare, threatened, and endangered plant and animal species, pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) and other sections of the Fish and Game Code. The Department also administers the Natural Community Conservation Planning (NCCP) Program. The City is currently participating in the Department's NCCP and the Service's HCP programs through its implementation of its approved HMP under the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program (MHCP). Since 2005, the Wildlife Agencies have participated in several meetings and submitted three letters regarding the proposed project. The letters were the: (a) December 14, 2005, letter to the City of Mr. Van Lynch (FWS/CDFG-SDG-06B0009-1OTA0974) 2 Oceanside on the Notice of Preparation of the draft SEIR1 (b) November 18, 2008, letter to the City of Oceanside on the draft SEIR; and (c) December 19, 2008, letter to the City of Carlsbad on the HMP equivalency of the proposed project. On October 27, 2009, the Department (Dave Lawhead and Libby Lucas) participated on a conference call regarding the HMP equivalency with the City (Van Lynch), and the applicant's representatives (Ann Gunter from The Lightfoot Planning Group, and Barry Jones from Helix Environmental Planning, Inc.). Subsequent to our receipt of your August 6 letter, we asked several project-related questions by electronic mail to which you, Ann Gunter, and Barry Jones responded in writing, and on October 6, 2010, we further discussed the project in a meeting with the same parties. We note that the City's request for an equivalency determination pertains only to the area covered by the South Coast Quarry Creek Amended Reclamation Plan, and that additional equivalency determinations would be required as a result of future development of the site if modifications of the HMP hardlines are proposed. We appreciate the attention to the concerns that we have raised about the project since 2005, the resulting improvements in the preserve configuration and reductions in biological impacts, and your and the applicant's continued cooperation in responding to our recent questions. Based on the following discussion of the proposed project, the Wildlife Agencies find the proposed hardlines equivalent to those in the HMP. Project Site Location The 104.2-acre site of the proposed project is located south of State Route 78 along Buena Vista Creek (Creek) immediately east of the Department's Buena Vista Creek Ecological Reserve; 4.1 acres are within City of Oceanside and 100.1 acres are within the City of Carlsbad. The project site is within the HMP's Local Facilities Management Zone 25, but not within that Zone's Standards Area. Project Description Compared to the historic 50 to 80-foot width of the reach of the Creek within the project site, the proposed project would provide an overall width of 194 feet, including a 150-foot wide bottom, transitional 2.5:1 (horizontal to vertical) side slopes or benches, and overbank terraces on both sides of the Creek. More specifically, the proposed project would provide: a. a less than a 0.2-percent longitudinal gradient along the Creek to avoid erosive flow velocities; b. a minimum of 7 feet of freeboard above the 100-year flow rates, exceeding the standard 1 foot of freeboard typically required; c. a thalweg with a gentle curvature; d. seven rock drop structures ranging from 1 to 3 feet in height at irregular intervals along the Creek, and built using rocks of varying gradation including emergent boulders, to create a step-pool-step profile; and e. transitional side slopes or benches constructed along the banks, with varying widths, but a total width of both benches (i.e., one on each side of the Creek) at any given point of 24 feet. 1. The draft EIR was subsequent to the EIR (SCH# 2000041003) certified by the City of Oceanside in 2001 for the Quarry Creek Project, which involved construction of a shopping center on a 58.7-acre site in Oceanside, an amendment to the South Coast Materials Reclamation Plan in Oceanside and Carlsbad, and widening of College Boulevard south of Haymar/Plaza Drive. Mr. Van Lynch (FWS/CDFG-SDG-06B0009- \ OTA0974) 3 The drop structures and other artificial hardscape (e.g., buried riprap revetment would be constructed behind the banks) are designed to prevent erosion within the Creek and along its banks and would planted with willows. Riparian vegetation would be created within the Creek and would naturally allow the water course to form and adjust its flow and design gradient. Because the Creek has been designed to convey the 100-year flow with a minimum 7 feet of freeboard assuming a densely vegetated channel with natural obstructions, the drop structures and other artificial hardscape and vegetation within the Creek would not require maintenance that would affect vegetation. Starting approximately 4 feet above the Creek bed, a biological buffer no less than 100 feet wide at any point (pers. comm., Ann Gunter and Barry Jones, October 6, 2010) would be vegetated with Diegan coastal sage scrub. The areas outside the riparian buffer north and south of the Creek would be hydroseeded for erosion control. A 10-foot wide planning buffer would extend beyond the biological buffer on both sides of the Creek. The proposed project would avoid areas within the 104.2-acre quarry site that are outside the footprint of the previous quarry operations. For example, the Diegan coastal sage scrub in the northwestern corner of the project site would remain unaffected by the project. Table 1 provides a summary of the acres of habitat that would have been conserved and/or restored by the approved reclamation plan consistent with the HMP hardline (42.1 acres) compared to the acres of habitat that would be conserved and/or restored by the proposed project (44.2 acres). The remaining acres (100.1 - 44.2 = 55.8) of the project site would be available for future development within the City of Carlsbad. Project Biological Impacts and Mitigation The proposed project would disturb 41.45 acres of the project site, as reflected in Table 2, and would result in the removal of habitat in which two coastal California gnatcatchers (Polioptila californica californica, "gnatcatcher'y and one yellow warbler (Dendroicapetechid) were observed. Impacts to the gnatcatchers would be mitigated by the onsite preservation and creation/restoration of 3.98 acres of CSS, and impacts to the yellow warbler would be mitigated by the preservation of created and restored riparian habitat. The project would not directly affect least Bell's vireo (Vireo beliii pusillus, "vireo"). The total DCSS creation/restoration within the biological buffer would be 5.17 acres, exclusive of the outside 20 feet of the biological buffer; this provides an excess of 1.49 acres beyond the 3.68 acres needed to meet the creation/restoration requirement. Of the 5.17 acres, 0.68 acre would be on the transitional bench areas. The maximum acreage of the 5.17 acres of CSS mitigation that would be removed from a road crossing that may be required in connection with future development of the property would be less than 0.2 acre (pers. comm., Barry Jones, October 12, 2010). Though not reflected in Table F-l (Mitigation Monitoring Checklist) in the FSEIR, the applicant would prepare a riparian and CSS restoration plan to be reviewed and approved by the cities of Oceanside and Carlsbad, Wildlife Agencies, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The restoration of the biological buffer would occur in two phases - the inside 80 feet (i.e., closest to the riparian vegetation; 80-foot wide area) would be restored in conjunction with the proposed project, and the outside 20 feet (20-foot wide area) to be restored upon final grading for a future end use (future development). The restoration of the 80-foot wide area would be subject to success criteria and 5 years of maintenance and monitoring (or, more or less depending on when the success criteria are met) Mr. Van Lynch (FWS/CDFG-SDG-06B0009-10TA0974) 4 as part of the proposed project, and the 20-foot wide area would be only hydroseeded as part of the proposed project and fully restored upon final grading for a future development. Table 1. Adopted Versus Proposed HMP Conservation Comparison (based on Table D-4 in the FSEIR) Habitat Group Riparian Marsh Chaparral Coastal sage scrub Grassland Eucalyptus Disturbed Developed TOTAL Adopted HMP Acres per HMP 1995 Vegetation Categories 10 1 9 4 12 0 6 0 42 Acres per Current Vegetation with 1991 Reclamation Plan1 11.78 0.31 4.84 17.05 4.48 0.04 2.70 0.44 41.64 Proposed HMP Acres per Current Vegetation with Proposed HMP Hardline 12.68 0.46 4.84 17.37 4.57 0.04 2.77 1.48 44.2 12 Comparison Difference (Proposed - Adopted) 0.90 0.15 0.00 0.32 0.09 0.00 0.07 1.04 2.57 . 1 . In compliance with the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1 975 (SMARA), the State Mining and Geology Board adopted the first Reclamation Plan for the South Coast Quarry in 1991. In 2001, the City of Oceanside (in the context of the Quarry Creek project) approved an amended version of the 1991 Reclamation Plan with the condition that the Creek be retained within in its current alignment. 2. The 44.21 acres include the acreage within the biological buffer (22.13 acres) to the Creek (pers. comm., Ann Gunter and Barry Jones, October 6, 2010). Table 2. Summary of Pro Vegetation Community / Developed Land southern cottonwood-willow riparian forest southern willow scrub freshwater marsh Diegan coastal sage scrub (CSS) Disturbed habitat Non-native vegetation Developed land TOTAL posed Acreage Losses and Compensatory Mitigation Proposed Losses (acres) 0.05 0.85 0.06 1.99 34.26 0.31 3.93 41.45 Proposed Mitigation 3:1 ratio, with a minimum 1:1 (i.e., 0.96 acre) ratio of creation, resulting in 2.88 acres of mitigation; the mitigation would include 1 .45 acres of riparian creation, and the remaining 1.43 acres mitigation would occur with enhancement of preserved wetlands on site. An additional 1 1 .05 on-site acres of riparian vegetation would be avoided and preserved. 2:1 ratio (i.e., 3.98 acres), including 3.68 acres of CSS creation/restoration along the on-site slopes (i.e., within the biological buffer) and 0.30 acre of preservation of existing on-site CSS* 0.1:1 ratio with payment of a Habitat and Development Fee in an amount corresponding to 3.43 acres none none * Total CSS creation/restoration would be 5.17 acres, per Table 13 in the January 26, 2010, Biological Technical Report for the Former South Coast Quarry Amended Reclamation Plan. The project description provides more information. Mr. Van Lynch (FWS/CDFG-SDG-06B0009-1OTA0974) 5 Prior to grading (Table F-l in the FSEIR), the applicant would place a conservation easement over the acres in the hardline preserve that support the mitigation for habitat impacts associated with the proposed project; that is, the planting up to the top of the new Creek channel slopes plus the area beyond comprising the 100-foot buffer, and beyond the buffer boundary in areas where the CSS mitigation extends beyond it (e.g., the area depicted in Figure 5 in the project-related January 26, 2010, Wetland Mitigation Plan as a dip in the buffer north of the Creek at El Salto Falls).2 Prior to grading (Table F-l in the FSEIR), the applicant would (a) submit a perpetual management, maintenance, and monitoring plan (MMMP) for the conservation easement area to the Wildlife Agencies for approval at least 30 days prior to initiating project impacts, and (b) within 60 days of receiving approval of the draft plan, submit the final MMMP and contract with the approved land manager to the cities of Carlsbad and Oceanside (cities) and the Wildlife Agencies, and transfer the funds for a non-wasting endowment to a non-profit conservation entity. The MMMP would treat the entire 100-foot buffer as restored CSS even though the 20-foot wide area may not be restored until after the long-term management of the 80-foot wide area begins (pers. comm., attachment to 9-20-2010 electronic mail from Van Lynch), and the non-wasting endowment would be an amount approved by the cities and the Wildlife Agencies based on a Property Analysis Record (PAR; Center for Natural Lands Management 1998) or similar cost estimation method to secure the ongoing funding for the implementation of the MMMP. The Wildlife Agencies' Comments Based on the preceding description of the proposed project, the Wildlife Agencies find the proposed hardlines equivalent to those in the HMP. The following comments, unrelated to HMP equivalency, address our outstanding concerns about the proposed project. 1. As explained above, the applicant would place a conservation easement only over the acres that support the mitigation for habitat impacts associated with the proposed project. The easement would not include the 22.08-acre balance of the 44.21 acres to be conserved as hardline preserve. This makes sense because it is possible that the remaining hardline boundary would undergo minor adjustments when the future development is designed, though the total hardline acreage of 44.21 acres would remain the same. However, we are concerned about the conceivable eventuality of no future development which would render the remaining 22.08 acres within the onsite hardline preserve unprotected by an encumbrance. Therefore, similar to our approach in comment #3, we request that the City's project-related HMP Permit include a condition requiring that, if the City has not issued a grading permit for the future development upon the completion of the initial post- restoration 5-year maintenance and monitoring of the 80-foot wide area of the biological buffer, the applicant immediately commence the process to place a conservation easement over the remaining 22.08 acres at that time. 2. The FSEIR indicates that the proposed conservation easement would include a provision recognizing the potential need for the future road crossing, and explains that this provision would limit mitigation obligations to standard mitigation ratios rather than doubling of mitigation ratios as is typically required for impacts to mitigation areas. 3. Examples of this include (a) the measure prohibiting clearing and grading during the avian breeding season, and (b) the measure requiring that the applicant prepare and implement a perpetual MMMP for all on-site biological conservation easement areas, and establish a non-wasting endowment for the implementation of that plan. Mr. Van Lynch (FWS/CDFG-SDG-06B0009-10TA0974) 2. In'many instances, Section F (Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) of the FSEIR uses the word "should" in the measures to be implemented to avoid and minimize biological impacts, whereas Section C (Errata) of the FSEIR instead appropriately uses the word "shall."3 We request assurance that the project-related grading, HMP, and other discretionary permits will be conditioned with the measures as articulated in Section F of the FSEIR. 3. The Wildlife Agencies agreed to the phased 80/20 restoration of the biological buffer because it is likely that the 20-foot wide area would be disturbed during the construction of future development to the north and south of the Creek. During the October 27, 2009, conference call regarding the HMP equivalency, the Department discussed the need for financial assurance that the 20-foot wide area would be restored if the development of the site does not move forward. We understand that, under SMARA, the applicant is required to maintain financial assurances (bonds) in place for implementation of the reclamation plan, including the restoration planting, maintenance, and monitoring (pers. comm., attachment to 9-20-2010 electronic mail from Van Lynch, and page 4 of the January 26, 2010, Biological Technical Report for the Former South Coast Quarry Amended Reclamation Plan). We request that the City's project-related HMP Permit and/or the final restoration plan include conditions requiring that (a) the applicant put in place separate bonds for the restoration of the 20-foot wide area prior to final release of the reclamation bonds, (b) if, the full restoration of the 20-foot wide area has not begun upon completion of the initial post-restoration 5- year maintenance and monitoring of the 80-foot wide area, the applicant immediately commence the restoration of the 20-foot wide area, and (c) the completion of the initial planting for the restoration within the 20-foot wide area be followed by a 5-year maintenance and monitoring period to meet the same success criteria established for the 80-foot wide area. 4. We appreciate that the FSEIR contains the following two measures to address impacts on sensitive avian species, and we acknowledge that they are consistent with the Wildlife Agencies' November 18, 2008, comment in our letter on the DSEIR. The clearing and grubbing of sensitive habitats shall occur outside of the bird breeding season (February 15 through September 15), unless a qualified biologist demonstrates to the satisfaction of the cities of Carlsbad and Oceanside and the Wildlife Agencies that all nesting is complete. If project grading (other than clearing and grubbing of sensitive habitats) is necessary adjacent to preserved on-site habitat during the bird breeding season (February 15 through September 15), a qualified biologist shall conduct pre- construction surveys in the adjacent habitat for the gnatcatcher, vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) and nesting raptors. The survey should begin not more than three days prior to the beginning of grading activities. The Wildlife Agencies shall be notified if any of these species are observed nesting within 500 feet of proposed grading activities. No activities which would result in noise levels exceeding 60 dBA hourly Leq within this 500-foot buffer shall be allowed. Background noise (e.g., SR 78) shall be excluded from the 60 dBA calculation. If grading activities are not completed prior to the breeding season and any of these species are present, Mr. Van Lynch (FWS/CDFG-SDG-06B0009-10TA0974) 7 and noise levels exceed this threshold, noise barriers should be erected to reduce noise impacts to occupied habitat to below 60 dBA hourly Leg and/or the activities shall be suspended. Impacts resulting from noise for non-listed species other than raptors are not considered significant, and mitigation is not warranted. a. We generally consider the avian breeding season to be from February 1 5 through September 15. However, raptors may begin breeding as early as December. For example, in southern California, the earliest known egg dates for red-tailed hawk (Buteojamaicensis) and white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus), two non-HMP covered species observed on site, are early and mid- January, respectively. Therefore, if possible, we request that the duration of the implementation of the protective measures during the avian breeding season be adjusted accordingly. b. We recommend that yellow warbler be added to the list of species to be surveyed for per the second measure. 5. While the project-related stream bed alteration agreement with the Department and permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will address the specifics of the wetland and riparian plant palette, and the Wildlife Agencies will have an opportunity to review and approve the restoration plan, we now request either the removal of Ambrosia psilostachya from the riparian plant palette or specify in the success criteria in the restoration plan that the cover of this species is not to exceed 10 percent. The Wildlife Agencies appreciate the City's and the applicant's efforts to ensure that the proposed project demonstrates equivalency with the HMP. We look forward to working with you to resolve the issues we have raised in this letter. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Libby Lucas (Department) at (858) 467-4230 or David Zoutendyk (Service) at (760) 431-9440. Sincerely, Karen A. Goebel ^~"*<4^jf"/ /~C?A Stephen M. Juarez Assistant Field Supervisor ~"~~ Environmental Program Manager U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service California Department of Fish and Game cc: Jerry Hittleman, City of Oceanside Darren Bradford, Department of Fish and Game