The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutV 305; GROSSE, MARY; Variance (V)- -. Receipt No, j3 /ffr- APP ICATION 140, VARIANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD (Please Type or Print) Date : 4/1 1 REQUEST: Variance to Section 21.16.030 (Eefly explain and indicate section of Zone Front yard setback F1Tih cFefed'r 2, LOCATION: The subject property is generally located on the coin,er southwest -- of Maple Ave. -t - and Garfield St. and 30 ASSESSOR'S NUMBER: Book 204 Page 142 Parcel 21 Book 204 Page 142 Parcel 22 (If more, please list on bottom of this page). 4, OWNER(S) : Name Address _City Z Phone Mary E. Grosse, et al 439-0052 2233 El Camino Real, Suite E, Oceanside, CA 92054 5, PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARATION OF APPLICATION: • Name Add ress t.Zi p Phone Robert Ardent 5850 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, CA 92008 438-2164 6, APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: I hereby declare that all information contained within this application is true; and that all standard conditions, as indicated on the attachment have been read, understood and agreed to. Name Address . City Zip Phone Mary E.Grosse2233ElCaminoReal, _hE, Oceanside 92054 439-0052 Repres en tinq any or Co rpora tion) Relatj2E~ to Propert Owner(s) The City of Carlsbad Planning Department would appreciate the opportunity to work with the applicant throughout the Planning Stages of the proposed development. In an effort to aid the applicant, the Planning Department requests that it be given an opportunity to evaluate and discuss the application and plans prior to submittal,. This request is not a requirement; however, it may avoid major redrafting or re - vision of the plan which only serves to lengthen the processing time, ATTACHMENTS: Supplemental Information Form - Planning 23 Standard Conditions - Planning 27 Preparation Check List - Planning 32 Procedures - Planning 36 Date of Planning Commission Approval FORM: Planni nq 6/11/79 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM VARIANCE 1) Gross Acres (or square footage if less than acre)16f380 sg.ft. 2) Zone.. .R-2 3) General Plan Land Use Designation________ fligh density (20-30/acre) - - 4) By law a Variance m-ay be approved only if certain facts are found to exist. Please read these requirements carefully and * explain how the proposed project meets each of these facts. Use additional sheets if necessary. a) Exlain why there are ex.cept-onal or extraordinary circum- stances or conditions applicable to the property or to the intended u.ë that do not apply generally to the other property, brçTass 6f use. in the same vicinity and zone: This project provides enclosed parking beneath the living units. Double the required ericiosed pdrldng spaces will serve the reidents. The "undrground" parking yaye-.-w±thTote-contro±1drrtygatrdther .security g entrances prOVid fltr-protect±cxr -to-the residerrt Other rementiaI units in this area of Carlsbad h-civt provided paved areafor off-street park1iigr±vewys within _their setback 'arJ.s. The -iuLeuded use for the large area in th -bCk- cONT )ER...) • b) Explain why such variance is necessary for the preseation • and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other propi-ty in the same vicinity and zone but which is 1, denied to the p -,.prooerty in question: i-n this older developed aeabf Carlsbad, many existing- uses are in-violaiön at the e back requirerents, or a • aS..J .L. *'..J).aAb_I L.%..¼& V L.A..L...L.L4J. £¼.. VVJL1.a.L4. CLSS¼JVV 1.4 ISO ttyjd b7y many in the area. •c) Explain why the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located: In this area where there are many exi sting examples in violation of the setback requiremants already, granting thiäce would not be detrirrental to the public welfare nor iniurious to the poperty- in the vicinity. This developrrent will enhance the general - appearance of the area. d) Explain why the grantinq of such variance will not adversely jffect the çorprehensive general plan: The recreational value-of tnis property is indicated in the zoning. The comprehensive general plan ot its close_proxithl€j to th otean-and State beach. A reduced aTiiiYement iSöIIE h±gh-density zoililly. / FORM Planning LDate of Planning Commission Approval_ 4. 0 0 4(a) Cont'd... setbacks would be landscape. With the large areas of landscaping and the lack of paved areas for off-street parking and driveways, this residential conpiex will enhance the overall appearance of the neighborhood. I O If after the information you have submitted has been reviewed, it is determined that further information is required, you will be so advised. APPLICANT: Mary E. Grosse, et a? Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication) 2233 El Camino Real, Suite E, Oceanside, CA 92054 Business Address 714 439-0052 Telephone Number Name Business Address Telephone Number 5850 Sunny Creek Road MEMBERS Mrs. Mary E. Grosse Carlsbad, CA 92008 - Name (individual, partrrer-,-jc±nt-- Home Address -venture--i - cc rstor - syudi at±rm- Dr. Herbert S. Mooney, Jr. 1207 Collyer St. Longmont, CO 80501 -Bus Dr. Charles S. Mooney P.O. Box 315 Lexington, KY 40584 Te±1ione -Nimther - Mrs. Jane E. Carter Name Mrs. Elizabeth E. Rorick - ±ephtn Nrrther - Te1eithorre- -Nmbet- R. Rte. #5 Marshalltown, Iowa 50158 flame- *rss- 4023-1/2 Corliss Ave. North Seattle, WA 98103 -T±phxe- Nturtbet- (Attach more sheets if necessary) I/We declare under penalty of perjury-that the information contained in this dis- closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be - relied upon as being true and correct until amended. Appl4'can/ BY Agent, Owner, Partner 0 40 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1680 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A REDUCTION OF THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO TN FEET GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GARFIELD STREET AND MAPLE AVENUE IN THE R-3 ZONE. APPLICANT: GROSSE CASE NO: V-305 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit: Lots 15, 16, & 17 in Block fDT! of Palisades in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, according to the Map Thereof No. 1747, filed in the Office of the County Recorder February 5, 1923 jhas been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 2Iof the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 13th day of 'August, 1980, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to V-305. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: - A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends DENIAL of V-305, based on the following findings: Findings 1) There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property that do not apply to other property in the same vicinity and zone since the property is very similar to the majority of lots in the area being relatively flat and regular in' its rectangular shape and size. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 is 16 17 18 :1.9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 I 1 2 3 4 '5 6 7 8 9 10 ii 12 13 14 15• 16 17 18 19 2) Other properties in the same vicinity and zone do not share a property right denied to this property since approval of the variance is not necessary to develop the lot at the requested density and designs It appears that all other development in the area complies with setback requirements. 3) Approval of the variance could set a precedent in a high density, sensitive beach area which could then adversely affect the General Plan and be detrimental to the public welfare. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 13th day of August, 1980, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Schick, Friestedt, Rorubotis, Marcus, Leeds and Jose NOES: None ABSENT: Larson ABSTAIN: None 'EDWIN S. SCHICIç, •JR. CARLSBAD PLANNING CC SSION ATTEST: C. }rAGA2AN, /ëcretary AD PLANNING'/COMMISSION 2]. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO #1680