The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutV 96-01; Sea Bisquit; Variance (V)I- h ".> -".-."-.-. -. . .- &a A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION P.C. AGENDA OF: MAY 7,1997 Application complete date: February 2 1, 1997 Project Planner: Teresa Woods Project Engineer: Ken Quon SUBJECT: SDP 96-16/HDP 97-02N 96-01/CDP 96-19 - SEA BISOUIT - Request for approval of a Negative Declaration, Site Development Plan, Hillside Development Permit, Variance and Coastal Development Permit to construct two new condominium units on a .16 acre site located south of Cypress Avenue on the west side of Ocean Street, in the R-3 Zone, the Beach Area Overlay Zone, the Coastal Zone and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 4087 APPROVING the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4088, 4089, 4090 and 4091 APPROVING SDP 96-16, HDP 97- 02, V 96-01 and CDP 96-19 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. 11. INTRODUCTION The applicant proposes to construct two new condominium units on a .16 acre site and to demolish an existing unit on the site. The project is located on the west side of Ocean Street south of Cypress Avenue within the appeal area of the Coastal Zone. The applicant has requested three variances on the project. The requested variances are similar to those approved previously on the west side of Ocean Street and can be supported by staff. Except for the variances, the project does comply with all City ordinances including R-3 zoning, Planned Development Ordinance for condominiums, Hillside Development regulations, Beach Area Overlay Zone and the Mello I1 Segment of the City's Local Coastal Program. 111. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant has requested approval of a Site Development Plan, Hillside Development Permit, Variance and Coastal Development Permit to construct two new condominium units on the site. The applicant is also processing separately an administrative condominium permit (CP 96-01) and minor subdivision (MS 97-01) to create the two airspace condominium units. The Condominium permit is being processed administratively pursuant to the standards of the Planned Development Ordinance, Chapter 2 1.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The parcel contains .16 gross acres and has been previously disturbed by development including an existing single family residence (proposed to be demolished), paving and landscaping. This is an in-fill lot in which the surrounding properties have already been developed with residential uses. The site is c h SDP 96- 16/HDP 97-02N h-Ol/CDP 96-1 9-SEA BISQUIT MAY 7,1997 PAGE 2 zoned R-3, has a General Plan designation of Residential High (RH), and is located within the Beach Area Overlay Zone. The applicant has requested three variances: (1) increased building height on the west portion of the structure; (2) a tandem parking garage with reduced interior dimensions; and, (3) a reduced front yard setback. The proposed structure would be two stories with a basement and mezzanine and be a maximum of 32-feet in height as measured on the west portion of the building (30-feet permitted with a 3/12 pitch and 24-feet permitted with less than a 3/12 pitch of roof). Five parking spaces are provided, two in a standard 20’ X 20’ garage, two in a tandem two-car garage with interior width dimensions varying fiom 10-feet to 12-feet (12-feet required), and one standard covered guest parking space. The units have been designed with contemporary architecture consisting of white stucco exterior, tiled roof, glass block treatments, balconies and tiled accents. The proposed two condominium units have been designed as stacked flats and contain 2,957 and 2,936 square feet of area. The units have a height of 21-feet and two-stories as measured fiom Ocean Street and a height of 32-feet (with flat roof) and two-stories with basement as measured at its highest point along the western portion of the structure facing the ocean. A portion of the roof has been designed with a roof deck. Architectural roof facade treatments have been added to the building design so that the flat roof deck appears to have a 3/12 roof pitch, except as viewed fiom the ocean (see height variance discussion in Section E, below). Recreational amenities provided on the project include balconies, a roof deck, ground level patio with showers, barbecue and planter areas and a %foot deep sandy beach area. There is an existing revetment on the western portion of the site protecting the property from wave erosion. The development provides minimum 5-fOOt side yards and a 25-foot useable rear yard. The required front yard is 20-feet which has been reduced to zero feet (see variance fiont yard setback discussion in Section E, below). This project is subject to the following regulations: A. RH (Residential High) General Plan designation; B. Beach Area Overlay Zone, Condominium Permit and R-3 Zoning Requirements (Chapter 2 1.82,2 1.16 and 2 1.45 and of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); C. Hillside Development Regulations (Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); D. Variance Regulations (Chapter 21.50 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); E. Coastal Development Permit Regulations, Mello I1 Segment of the City’s Local Coastal Program (Chapters 21.201,21.203, and 21.204 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); and F. Growth Management Regulations (Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1) . r- SDP 96- 1 6/HDP 97-02N 40-0 l/CDP 96- 19-SEA BISQUIT MAY 7,1997 PAGE 3 IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation of approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project’s consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies. A. GENERALPLAN LAND USE ELEMENT The proposed project is consistent with the policies and programs of the General Plan. The discussion below indicates how the project complies with the elements of the General Plan which are particularly relevant to this proposal. The Property has a Residential High (RH) General Plan land use designation. The RH designation allows the development of multiple family residential units in a density range of 15 to 23 du/acre with a growth management control point of 19 du/acre. The project contains two condominium units developed at a net density of 17.99 du/acre, therefore, the project is below the growth management control point and is consistent with the allowed density and land use designation of the General Plan. HOUSING Program 3.6b of the Housing Element states that, “A minimum of fifteen percent (15%) of all approved units in any residential specific plan or qualified subdivision shall be made affordable to lower income households.” The inclusionary requirement for this project would be .3 units. Section 21 35.050 of the Inclusionary Ordinance specifies that residential projects of six or fewer dwelling units may satisfy lower-income inclusionary requirements through the payment of an in-lieu fee or other in-lieu contribution. The project has been conditioned to pay an in-lieu fee equivalent to the inclusionary requirement on two units as provided for in Section 21.85.050 of the Inclusionary Ordinance. This project would therefore be consistent with the General Plan. California Government Code Section 65590 requires the replacement of low and moderate income housing within the coastal zone, when units are demolished. The applicant is proposing to demolish one unit and to construct two new units. The unit proposed to be demolished is vacant and the owner proposes to occupy one of the new units. The applicant has owned the property for approximately 8 months. The previous owner was not a low or moderate income household and the unit was not rented. The house was used by the previous owner as a vacation home. Consequently, the proposed residential unit demolition is not subject to the requirements of Section 65590 of the California Government Code. Therefore, this project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and the State coastal housing requirements. B. BEACH AREA OVERLAY ZONE, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND R-3 ZONING REQUIREMENTS The site is located within the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ) which requires the processing of a Site Development Plan to ensure consistency with the BAOZ standards. The BAOZ is intended to supplement the underlying residential zoning by providing additional development SDP 96-1 6/HDP 97-02N %Ol/CDP 96-1 9-SEA BISQUIT MAY 7,1997 Rear Yard PAGE 4 N/A 45-feet (25’ useable) regulations to ensure that: adequate parking is provided; developments are compatible with surrounding uses; and, adequate public facilities are provided. As proposed, the project is consistent with the resident and guest parking requirements for the project (four covered resident spaces and one on-site guest parking space provided). The applicant has requested variances to meet required parking with a tandem garage with reduced interior dimensions, to exceed maximum building height and to provide a reduced front yard setback (see section D, Variance Requests, below). Visitor Parking Storage Space The proposed two unit condominium project is also subject to the regulations of the R-3 Zone and the Planned Development Ordinance (condominium standards). As illustrated in the table below, the project complies with all BAOZ, R-3 Zoning and Planned Development Ordinance requirements for two condominium units (except as discussed in section D, Variances, below). discussion below) r 1 space 1 space 480 cu. ft./unit Unit A 1,014 cu. ft. Unit B 1,224 cu. ft. BAOZ, R-3 ZONING AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE STANDARDS COMPLIANCE TABLE - STANDARD Lot Size Building Height Open Space Front Yard Side Yard BAOZ, R-3 & PD REQUIREMENTS 3,500 sq. ft. 30’1 2-stories 200 sq. ft. /unit (400 sq. ft. for proiect) 20’ 5 feet 32’/2-stories (see variance 0’ (see variance discussion below) I Resident Parking i 2 full-size covered spacedunit i 2-car garagehit (see variance 11 C. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT A Hillside Development Permit is required for any project site which contains a slope of 15% or greater and an elevation differential of greater than 15 feet. The proposed project complies with all requirements of the Hillside Development Ordinance. Only minor grading is proposed (500 cu. yds.) and the grading volumes are within the acceptable amounts permitted by the ordinance. The site slopes down from east to west with slopes 25% to 40% being located in the middle of the site. The project has been designed with a low-scale, 21-foot facade along Ocean Street to c. SDP 96-16/HDP 97-02N %-Ol/CDP 96-19-SEA BISQUIT MAY 7,1997 minimize visual impacts of the project as viewed from the street. The table below summarizes the requirements of the Hillside Development regulations and the way in which the proposed project design complies with the requirements. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT COMPLIANCE TABLE Grading Volume 0-7,999 CY/AC 5,000 CY/AC Contour Grading Provide a variety of slope directions and undulation. Grading limited to development area. Roadway Design Follow the site contours. N/A Hillside Architecture Use terraced pads and/or foundations. Maintain natural slopes with structures and roofs. Decrease building mass with increased steemess. Pad stepped down hillside. Building mass reduced as viewed from Ocean Street. D. VARIANCE REQUESTS As stated previously, the applicant has requested that three variances be granted: (1) increased building height on the west portion of the structure; (2) tandem parking garage with reduced interior dimensions; and, (3) a reduced front yard setback. Similar multiple variance requests have been previously approved on the west side of Ocean Street as illustrated on Exhibit “AA”. Below is a discussion of the variance requests. BUILDING HEIGHT The applicant is requesting increased building height on the west portion of the structure (to 32- feet with a flat roof). The proposed structure is two stories with a basement and mezzanine and is a maximum of 32-feet in height with a flat roof (30-feet permitted with 3/12 pitch and 24-feet permitted with less than 3/12 pitch of roof). The project has a height of 21-feet and two-stories as measured from Ocean Street and a height of 32-feet and two-stories with basement as measured at its highest point along the western portion of the structure facing the ocean. A portion of the roof has been designed with a roof deck. Architectural roof facade treatments have been added to the building design so that the flat roof deck appears to have a 3/12 roof pitch, except as viewed from the ocean. The variance is necessary as a result of site topography which slopes towards the beach. There have been several projects on the west side of Ocean Street with height variances with similar topography as the proposed development (including V 90-02 which was approved for a maximum height of four stories and 47 feet). Many other projects were SDP 96-16MDP 97-02N 9ti-O1/CDP 96-19-SEA BISQUIT MAY 7,1997 PAGE 6 approved with similar building heights under the City’s old building height standards which were less restrictive than the City’s current code, as illustrated on Exhibit “BB”. The proposed building height will therefore be compatible with surrounding development. Staff believes that the necessary findings can be made for the approval of this variance request as discussed in the table below. TANDEM PARKING The applicant is requesting two variances associated with parking (1) for a tandem two-car garage (a standard 20’x20’ garage required) and, (2) a tandem garage with reduced interior dimensions (12’ required and minimum 10’ provided). The proposed project has been designed with five parking spaces, two in a standard 20’ X 20’ garage, two in a two-car tandem garage with interior width dimensions varying from 10-feet to 12-feet (12-feet required), and one standard covered guest parking space. Due to the narrow width of the site (50 feet) and site topography, there is limited area to provide the required amount of parking on the site pursuant to ordinance standards. Due to constrained site conditions and narrow lot configurations, variances for tandem parking with reduced garage parking dimensions have been approved previously on Ocean Street. As designed, all required parking would be provided on site and out of the required side yard setback. Staff believes that the necessary findings can be made for the approval of this variance request as discussed in the table below. FRONT YARD The applicant is requesting a reduction in the required front yard setback. A 20-foot front yard setback is required in the R-3 Zone. The applicant has proposed a five foot front yard which would be reduced to zero feet because of the City’s requirement for dedication of five feet of the front yard for future street right-of-way. Other projects on the west side of Ocean Street have been approved with front yards reduced to zero feet because of site topography and the City’s street dedication requirement. An Engineering standards variance (previously approved by the City Engineer) is also required because the driveway exceeds 40 percent of the lot width. Staff believes that the necessary findings can be made for the approval of this variance request as discussed in the table below. VARIANCE FINDINGS The findings required for a variance are as follows: (1) that there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone; (2) that the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the property in question; (3) that the granting of this variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and, (4) that the granting of this variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. As illustrated in the table below, these findings can be made for each of the requested variances discussed above. SDP 96-1 6/HDP 97-02N %-Ol/CDP 96-19-SEA BISQUIT MAY 7,1997 FINDING RESPONSE Exceptional or Tandem Parking - The project site has sloping topography and a narrow lot width (50- extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to other property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. feet) which makes providing required parking to city standards (two 20’ X 20’ garages plus one 10’ wide guest parking space) impossible without approval of a variance for either reduced side yards or tandem parking with reduced dimensions. Front Yard - The site has a sloping topography which limits automobile access to the eastern third (approximately 50 feet) of the site, which makes it impossible (without a large amount of fill) to provide a street level garage without encroachment into the required front yard setback. Height - The project has sloping topography on the western two-thirds of the site which makes it difficult (without a large amount of fill) to design livable levels within the structure (as the structure steps down the hillside) while meeting building height requirements. Requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the property in question. Tandem Parking - Without the approval of a variance for tandem parking with reduced dimensions (or variance for reduced side yards which is not requested), the applicant could not construct two units on this site, which has a RH General Plan designation, permitting 2.147 units on this .113 net acre site. The property owner would, therefore, be denied a substantial property right (to construct two units) which is possessed by other property owners on Ocean Street who have been previously granted approval of multi-unit projects with variances for tandem garages with reduced interior dimensions, (or for variances for reduced side yards). Front yard - Without the approval of a variance for a reduced front yard setback, the applicant could not construct any units on the site, as construction of a garage at street level would not be possible, as the portion of the lot which is at street level is only 50 feet deep and, therefore, the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the substantial property right to construct two units, which is a right possessed by other property owners on Ocean Street who have been previously granted approval of multi- unit projects with variances for reduced fiont yards. Height - Without the approval of a variance for increased building height, the applicant would be required to substantially reduce the scale of the project, while other property owners along the west side of Ocean Street enjoy the right (conveyed through previous height variances including V 301 and V 90-2 and under previous less restrictive height limitations) to construct similar-scale projects. Therefore, the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a development of similar size and scale to other approved projects on the west side of Ocean Street, which is a right possessed by other owners on Ocean Street, but which is denied to this property owner. The requested variances for increased building height, tandem parking with reduced The granting of this - - variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive general dimensions and a reduced front yard setback will not be a detriment to the public welfare in that the project height and front yard setback are similar to, and compatible with, nearby projects, the project is similar in intensity and scale to surrounding developments, and the parking is designed in a similar fashion as other approved developments on Ocean Street. Therefore, the proposed project is compatible with surrounding development. Additionally, the project is conditioned to construct curb and sidewalk improvements along its Ocean Street frontage thereby improving pedestrian and vehicular access in the area. These variance requests will not adversely affect the General Plan in that the proposal is consistent with the land uses designated for the area by the Land Use Element; the residential density range proposed is under the Growth Management density control point; and, the project is in compliance with the Housing Element policies as 11 I conditioned. Plan c SDP 96- 16/HDP 97-02N 40-01 /CDP 96- 19-SEA BISQUIT MAY 7,1997 E. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The project site is located within the appeal area of the Coastal Zone and within the Mello I1 Segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP). The appealable area of the coastal zone is generally located between the sea and the first public roadway paralleling the sea, or within 300 feet of the inland tide extent of any beach or the mean high tide line where there is no beach, whichever is the greatest distance. Within the appeal area of the coastal zone, a Coastal Development Permit is appealable to the California Coastal Commission within 10 working days of the Commission’s receipt of a written notice specifying the City’s final action on the matter. The proposed project is consistent with the Mello I1 segment of the LCP which contains land use policies for development and conservation of coastal land and water areas within the Segment boundaries. The property is designated Residential High Density (RH) in the LCP and is being developed consistent with this designation. Soils and geologic analysis of the project site were prepared in conformance with Mello I1 Segment requirements. These studies determined that with the existing revetment and soil type on the site, the proposed development will have a useable life span of at least 75 years and that the development will have no adverse effect on the stability of the coastal slope west of the building site. Further, consistent with Policy 7-12, the proposed structure, decks and balconies comply with the “stringline” method of measurement with adjacent and nearby structures, decks and balconies to the north and south. The project site is also subject to the special requirements of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapter 2 1.203) and Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.204) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The project complies with these special coastal overlay zones as discussed below. Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone The Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone is intended to supplement the underlying zone by providing additional resource protective regulations within designated areas to preserve, protect and enhance the habitat resource value of lagoons and sloping hillsides. This overlay zone requires that for steep slope areas not containing endangered plantlanimal species and or coastal sage scrub and chaparral plant communities, that development of steep slopes (25% or greater) may be permitted subject to specific findings. As illustrated in the table below, these findings can be made. A SDP 96- 16/HDP 97-02N 90-0 1 /CDP 96- 1 9-SEA BISQUIT MAY 7,1997 PAGE 9 11 FINDING I RESPONSE I Slope disturbance will not result in substantial damage or alteration to major wildlife habitat or native vegetation. In projects of less than 10 acres in size which are predominated by steep 1 slopes, complete grading may be allowed only if no interruption of Slope disturbance will not damage or alter major wildlife habitat or native vegetation since the site was previously developed with a structure, ornamental landscaping and paving and there is no native vegetation located on this in-fill site. The site is not predominated by steep slopes in that only approximately 1/3 of the site contains steep slopes, nevertheless, no wildlife corridor would be interrupted by the proposed project. significant wildlife corridors occurs. I No grading or removal of steep slope 1 This project does not contain north facing slopes and the project site is areas will be permitted unless all environmental impacts have been mitigated. fully developed, therefore, this requirement does not apply to thk proposed project. As designed and conditioned, the proposed project with the existing revetment, complies with all other requirements of this overlay zone including provisions for proper drainage and erosion control. No development on the property is proposed within the one-hundred year floodplain and the project has been conditioned to limit grading to the period of April 1 to October 1 of each year. Coastal Shoreline D.evelopment Overlay Zone The Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone is intended to provide land use regulations along the coastline area to protect the public’s interest in maintaining the shoreline as a unique recreational and scenic resource. This overlay zone addresses use of beach area, beach access and shoreline development standards. No development of the beach is proposed with this project. The proposed project has been designed in conformance with the applicable requirements of this overlay zone as described in the table below. Bluff Top Access Applies to lots where no beach present or where beach is not Vertical Access Determine public need to gain access, constraints to access PROVIDED 25-feet of dry sandy beach seaward of existing revetment. Dedication of land seaward of revetment. Beach is accessible via existing stairway located within 100-feet of the subject site. Beach is present, therefore requirement does not apply to project. Vertical access exists within 100 feet of project site. The site is fully developed and there has been no historic use of site for vertical access. No vertical access warranted for this development based on ordinance criteria. 1 1 Geotechnical Report Analyze cliff erosion and geologic conditions Appearance Building developed on site with a general attractive SDP 96-1 6/HDP 97-02N %-0l/CDP 96-1 9-SEA BISQUIT MAY 7,1997 PAGE 10 A soils and geologic analysis of the project site was prepared in conformance with City requirements. The study determined that with the existing revetment and soil type on the site, the proposed development will have a useable life span of at least 75 years and that the development will have no adverse effect on the stability of the coastal slope west of the building site The structure has been designed with attractive architectural features which will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood ana natural environment to the west. appearance related to surrounding development and natural environment. Ocean Views Building designed to preserve to the extent feasible ocean views. Natural Features To extent feasible, retain natural features and topography. Grading Grading executed so as to blend with existing terrain. “Stringline” The project has been designed with a low-scale building facade on Ocean Street and the structure has been sited to preserve the required side yard setbacks which will, to the extent feasible, preserve views of the ocean from the street. The building has been designed with a low-facade along Ocean Street and the structure has been designed to step-down the hillside consistent with this requirement. Approximately 500 cubic yards grading proposed with project. Grading is designed to blend with existing and natural surroundings. The project adheres to coastal “stringline” setback measurements I I requirements for the placement of structures, balconies and decks. F. GROWTH MANAGEMENT The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1 in the Northwest Quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by this project and compliance with the adopted performance standards are summarized as follows: GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE SDP 96- 16/HDP 97-02N 9~0 1 /CDP 96- 1 9-SEA BISQUIT MAY 7,1997 PAGE 11 The project is .147 dwelling units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance of 2.147 dwelling units for the property V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The property is a previously developed, in-fill lot which slopes from east to west at an incline of approximately 15 to 30-percent from Ocean Street to the sea. The site contains no native vegetation, and as a result of past development, the site has no biological or cultural value. The environmental review for this project relied upon the MEIR for analysis of cumulative air quality and traffic impacts. Therefore, the project was determined to be in prior compliance with MEIR 93-01. The Planning Director has determined that based on the initial study and field review conducted by staff, no significant environmental impacts will result fiom this project, therefore, a Negative Declaration was issued on March 14,1996. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. TW:kr Planning Commission Resolution No. 4087 Planning Commission Resolution No. 4088 Planning Commission Resolution No. 4089 Planning Commission Resolution No. 4090 Planning Commission Resolution No. 4091 Location Map Background Data Sheet Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form Disclosure Statement Exhibit “AA” Partial Listing of Approved Variance Requests on Ocean Street Exhibit “BB” Building Heights Reduced Exhibits Full‘Size Exhibits “A” - “G” dated April 16, 1997. SEA BlSQUlT SDP 96-1 6/HDP 97-02/ V 96-0l/CDP 96-19 - h, BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: CP 96-01 /SDP 96- 16/HDP 97-02N 96-0 1 /CDP 96-1 9 CASE NAME: SEA BISOUIT APPLICANT: Patrick McGuire REQUEST AND LOCATION: To construct two new condominium units on a 0.16 acre site located on the west side of Ocean Street, South of CvDress Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3 and 4 of Block of MaD No. 2 of the Haves Land ComDany (incorporated) addition in Carlsbad, according to Map thereof No. 1221 filed in the Office of the Countv Clerk November 3,1909. APN: 203- 140-03 Acres: 0.16 acres Proposed No. of Units: 2 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: RH Density Allowed: 19 Existing Zone: R-3 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad’s Zoning Requirements) Density Proposed: 17.99 Proposed Zone: R-3 Zoning Land Use Site R-3 RH North R-3 RH South R-3 RH E& R-3 RMH West OS os PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 2 EDU Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: December 30, 1996 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued March 14, 1997 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated 0 0 Other, CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: Sea Bisauit - CP 96-01/SDP 96-1 6MDP 97-02N 96-0 1 /CDP 96- 1 9 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 1 GENERAL PLAN: RH ZONING: R-3 DEVELOPER’S NAME: Patrick McGuire ADDRESS: 2725 Jefferson Street, Suite 7. Carlsbad. California 92008 PHONE NO.: J619) 729-5200 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.: 203-140-03 QUANTITY OF LAND USEDEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 2 units ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: Unknown A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 6.95 Library: Demand in Square Footage = 3.48 Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) Park: Demand in Acreage = 0.33 2 EDU Drainage: Demand in CFS = N/A Identify Drainage Basin = N/A (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) Circulation: Demand in ADTs = 16 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 1 and 3 Open Space: Acreage Provided = N/A Schools: Carlsbad (Demands to be determined by staff) Sewer: Demands in EDUs 2 EDU Identify Sub Basin = N/A (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) Water: Demand in GPD = 440 The project is 0.147 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. APR-18-97 FRI 9:44 FLP'Z-18-97 FRI 09:32 PACIFIC VIEW LLC FAX NO, 7295260 CITY OF CARLSBAD COSIM DE FAX NO. 4380694 P. 02 P. 02 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT The foliowing Information mun be disclosed 1. APPLIC- List the names and addreme8 of al pcnons havina I financia! intomsf in the application. Patrick McGuire 2725 Jefferson Street Suite 7 Carlsbad, CA 92008 I) 2, OWNER Llsz the names and addresses of all perttons hwing any ownership irttsrest in rha property inwked. Patrick McGuire 2725 Jefferson Street ~ ~ Suite 7 Carlsbad, CA 92008 3. If any person iUenrMed pursuant to Ill OT (21 above is a carporation or partnership, fist the names and addresses of all individuals owning mare than 10% of the shares in the corporation or awning any prrtnrrship interest In the partnenhlp. '' 4. If any Person identified pursuant to (1) or (21 above is a non-ptofit orgonitcrtion or a trust, list the nornab and addrssscs of my person serving as offker or dhector of the nonprofit orgsnizrtian or as miwe or be_nefioiary of the rust. - .- 2075 a Palrnirs Or. - CariSbacI. GA BZM)S-'l!578'* (61 0) 438-1161 - FAX (679) 438-0884 @ APR-18-97 FRI 9:45 PACIFIC VIEW LLC FAX NO. 7295260 hPR-18-97 FRI 09132 CIm OF CllRLSBAD CONI DE FAX NOa 43808M P, 03 P. 03 NOT€: Attach additional 8heeta if nw6swTy. Signature of ormer?dote Patrick W. McGuire Mnt or type name of ownar Siture of oppliuamldate ~int or type name-of applicant Dbclesure Sratemem 10196 PagePot2 EXHIBIT "AA" c -4 ADDRESS REQUEST 2623 Ocean Street 2795 Ocean Street 2775 Ocean Street 2895 Ocean Street ~~~ ~ ~ V301 front yard to 4', north side yard to 7', building height to 40' (@ beach side) measured from top of slab to top of plate. V-143 front yard 20' to 5'' side 10' to 5', 20' to 5' rear vard. 0' front yard, 3'side yard, building 66'6" deep, 19' interior garage variance approved 7000 SF lot, 4200 SF building; 60% bldg coverage allowed. Resolution #579, reduction in front yard from 20'-5'; rear yard from 15'-10'; north side from 5' to 3'; south 811 5/86 #86-7 2747 Ocean Street 2650 Ocean Street 2651 Ocean Street 2687 Ocean Street 2729 Ocean Street 31 50 Ocean Street 3 100 Ocean Street 3021 Ocean Street 2977 Ocean Street 3083 - 3085 Ocean Street 2901 Ocean Street 2805 Ocean Street V-76 side yard 5' to 2' V-129 front yard 16' to lo', side yard intrusion 2' to 3' for stairway. V-91 front yard 20' to 6'' lots 21-22 V-197 front yard to 5'' side yards to 5', rear yard to 5', front and rear approved, side denied. 60% bldg coverage allowed. V-90 front yard 20' to 0'' side yard 5' to 3' V-148; 10' to 5' side, rear 12' to 5' V-141 - 5' side, 5' rear yard V-92 side yard 5'2,' to 2'5" V-13; north side to 5'' south side to 2-1/2', front yard to 5' AV 92-07; side yard 4'10" & 3'4" from 5' V-90-2, setbakcs 10' to 6'' bldg height from 25' to 47'6''' number of stories from 2 to 4, six unit condo Resolution #105, V174-Res#516 front yard 20 to 5, north side yard 6' to 3', south side 6' to 4'. 2479 Ocean Street 2679 & 2677 Ocean Street 2617 Ocean Street 2643 Ocean Street V-332 front yard from 20' to 17'5", side yards 7'5'' to 5' & permit tandem parking (looks like they're 9' wide spaces). V-375 0' front yard setback. (71 64 SF of bldg) 3 car enclosed garage & 2 guest parking in side yard setback AV 93-05 side yard 5' to 3', front yard 20' to 5'' reduced side yard for uncovered parking space from 5' to 2' V-373 tandem parking, compact parking . , EX H I BIT " B B " BUILDING HEIGHTS .- 203-234-01 203-234-02 (St. Tropez) FOTIADI ENCINEERIi I CUWSULTINC ENClNEERS & PLAHIa 'I40 l3lh SL Suit. 407 Sen Dlc(o. CA @2101 Id.: (010) 234-3115 10.0 sf. .. - -r 203--234-01 through 203--234-21 (Sea Slope) EXH I BIT " B B " BUILDING HEIGHTS FOTIADI ENGINEERIN CoNsuLTlNc ONCINEERI L PUNNI. EX H I BIT " BB " BUILDING HEIGHTS .. 2895 Ocean St. (The Mooring) 203-235-06 FOTIADI ENGINEERIN( COWULTlNC EMCINEWIS & PLA"EF 740 13th SL Sulle 407 Sen Olego. CA 92101 1.1.: (819) 234-3115 EX H I BIT " B B " BU I LDlNG HEIGHTS __ . - - ._ -_ _. .. 'I ,; , ,. '\', ' ..' s ,..' .. -. 2677-2679 Ocean St. 203-140-36 FOTIADI ENGINEERIN( I ~KpuLTlNC ENGINEERS I PMER 75.5. WP SOP .__- EX H I BIT " B B " BUILDING HEIGHTS .. 2641-2643 Ocean St. 203-140-09 I Ll' FOTIADI ENGINEERIN I CORULllNC ENGINEER3 & WNI 740 !3th SL Sulto 407 Son Disco. CA 02101 ToL: (010) 234-3775 I 2623 Ocean St. 203-140-06 EX H I BIT "6 B " BUILDING HEIGHTS 74.6. . -. I FOTIADI ENGINEERIN commc ENcmm & PUNNF' TU3 13lh SL Sull. 407 Sea DIe#o. CA WIOI Td' (010) 234-3775 EX H I BIT "6 6" BUILDING HEIGHTS .- 2599, 2601, 2603 Ocean St. 203-140-28-01 02 03 I FOTI A D I ENGINEER I CONSULTING ENCIXEERS & PLANf I 740 131h SL Sulte 107 Sen Dlrta. CA 02101 Tel: (010) 234-3775 ". \ \ 2729 Ocean St, 203-140-27 1'0' I , EAST ELEVATION =U I,... lY 4 5OUTH ELEVATION .e& 1,1.14 NORTH ELEVATION LU I,...< HE4T ELEVATION w *I..*< v) 31 .i 5 ROOF PLAN (I... vu MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN - UNIT .A. -a I,... 1'4 2ND. LEVEL PLAN - UNIT 'A. L*u (I.'. 14 1 W OCCU STRCCT -- - + -- - en OCCA" STRCCT-. BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN - UNIT 'e' .ill. I?. ., 0. STREET LEVEL PLAN - UNIT '8' LLE 1,w. 14 I-...- ..... ...'.,,. -..- m-ue.L-II1IL On.4 .rm,.y Lr- YP- UIIUI.ULT .................. YdW.U1 %aisr( .......... ULv.al. ........................ -. ............. ..... r( ... .I ... ... I *e er L.S..) L,.,., .,,.I ..a', n..aW.l'.' -uI. U'A' 8..*I.-..U..U..~ UwTaUl ..e.*. Yo.,- -. VICINITY HAP 1 .... _. .. ___