HomeMy WebLinkAboutZC 206; EIA 586 Zone Change; Zone Change (ZC)•
INITIAL STUDY SUMMARY
DATE: December 28 1 1979
TO: James Hagarr.an 1 Planning Director
FROH: Brian Hilich 1 Assistant Planner }1j£v
SUBJECT: EIA NO. 586; ZONE CI-l:l-1.NGE AND MASTER PLAN AHENDMENT
CASE NO: ZC-206/MP-149(0)
DISCUSSION
The proposed project involves an application for both a Master
Plan Amendment and Zone Chanqe for land located in the north-
east La Costa area. Specifically, the applicant is requesting
that an approximately 45 acre tract of land be removed from
the La Costa Master planned area. The Master Plan currently
designates this property for both high (20 du/ac) and medium-
high (14 du/ac) density residential development. In addition,
the applicant is requesting that this property and the area
to the southwest (approximately 67 acres) be rezoned from
P-C (Planned Communi-t:y) to RDH--Q (Resident.ial Der:.sity-
Multiple Zone, with a qualified develo~m~nt overlay zone).
If the property is removed from the Master PJ.an area and
rezoned,.a Master Plan would no longer be required prior to
developing the property. However, the proposed RDM-Q zoning
would require a Site Development Plan and public hearing
prior to any development of the site. This would be in
addition to any discretionary approvals required as part
of a tentative tract ma.p or Planned Unit Development.
It appears that a major impetus in removing this area from
the Master Plan is due to the fact that La Costa Master
Plan has not been approved in its final form. Thus, without
the need for Master Plan approval, development can proceed
more expeditiously.
~he General Plan currently designates the property for both
medium (4-10 dujac) and medium high density (10-20 du/ac)
residential development. Any development under the RDM-Q
zoning would be required to be consist~nt·with the General
Plan land use designations. Based on a comparison between
the allowable densities under both the Master Plan and
General Plan, it is evident that for a portion of the
property, the General Plan permits a density somewhat less
than that pr~posed by the Master Plan.
An environmental impact report, EIR-307, was certified for
all of the property covered by the La Costa Master Plan.
In addition, this EIR also covered portions of the subject
property not covered by the Master Plan. The EIR required,
as a mitigation measure, supplemental environmental review·
prior to the processing of any.applications for development
in this area.
Since the proposed zone change and master plan amendment
are entirely·ad~inistrative in nature, no significant environ-
mental imracts are anticipated directly from the project.
In addition, any potential indirect impacts from this project
as a result of physical development of the site would be
subject to an environmental impact assessment as each
discretionary action (i.e. , . site development plan, t.entati ve
map, PUD, etc) is processed by the City. At that time, ·
mitigation measures necessary to reduce potential negative
impacts could be applied on a project-by-project basis.
Recommendation
It is recommended that a declaration of negative environmental
impact be issued with regard to the project based on the
following justification:
Justification
1) The project is administrative in nature and would not
directly result in any significant environ~ental
impacts to any flora, fauna, or any unique or
historical features.
2) Any future proposals for development on the property
\'lOuld be subject to an environmental impact assessment
as each discretionary action (i.e., site development
plan, tentative map, PUD, etc) is processed by the City.
3) Mitigation measures necessary to mitigat~ potential
impacts could be applied to future development of the
site on a project-by-project basis.
4) The City's General Plan (which, based on this project,
would guide future development of the subject property)
designates the site for .residential densities equal
to or less than densities proposed by the master plan.
BM:ar
1200 ELM AVENUE
·CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
NEGATIVE DEC! .. ARATION
CHANGE OF -'ONE PRO.JEGr TITIE : ~..
TELEPHONE:
(714) "129-1181
PROJECT LCCtiTION: West of Rancho Santa Fe Road, r.orth of La Costa Avenue and south
of the future Alga .Road extension.
PROJEC:f DESCRIPTION: The proposed project involves an application for both a Master
Plan Amendment and Zone Change. Specifically, the applicant is requesting that an
approxrmately ·45 acre tr.:;ct of land be removed from theTa Costa f.1aster plannec_a_r_e_a-.-
ln ·addition, the applicant is requesting that this property and the area to the
southwest-(approxiniately 67 acres) be rezoned from v=G"(Planned Community) to ___ _
RDM-Q (Residential Density Multiple Zone, with a qualified development overlay zone).
AnEnvtronmental fmpactReport,_1TIK-307), vJas certified tor all of the property
covered by the La Costa Master Plan. Since the proposed zone change and master plan
amendment are enttrely administrative 1n nature, no---sT§nTITcant envtronfllentaTirripacrs---
~--~nticl_!:ate~. directly from the project.
PROJECT PROPONENT: LA COSTA LAND COMPANY
LCG NO: 586 PEHl-ITT/Filli NO: ZC-206/MP-149 (D)
The City of Carlsbad h8.s conducted ar.. environ ... 'Tffttal revie\v of the above described project
purur;ant to the GuideLines fer Jmplerr:r:ntati.on of the California Environmental Quality
.l .. .ct and the Environmental Protc~tion. O·..:dinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of
said reviev1, a draft Nee;ative Declaration (Dec] a.c;ltion of Non-Significcnt ImpacL:) is
hereby issued for the subject project. Justificatioi1 for this actior1 is on file in the
Planning Department o •
A copy of the Negative D2claration w.i.th supportive doc:t.IDit:>nts :is on file in th2 Plarming
Dep<:Itrnent, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Ca:.clsbad, C'A. C.AXnr::.::nts frc-m th~~ public are
· i.'1vited, Please submit conrrents in writing to the Plmming Carmission \dthin five (5)
days of dar.e 0f publication JANUARY 9, 1980
DA1ED:. fz z, {?-7 f
-
NOTICE OF DECL.7\RA'I'ION
NONSIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
NOTICE IS IIEREBY GIVEN that ·the City of Carlsbad has
issued Negative Declarations for the following projects:
LOG NO. 586: The proposed project 'involves an application for both
a Master. Plan Amendment and Zone Change. Specifically, the applicant
is reque~ting that an approximately 45 acre tract of land be removed
from the La Costa Master planned area. In addition, the applicant
is requesting that this property and the area to the southwest
(approximately 67 acres) be rezoned from P-C (Planned Community) to
RDM-Q (Residential Density Multiple Zone, with a qualified
development overlay zone). ·An Environmental lmpi~t Report, (EIR-307),
was certified for all of the property covered by the La Costa Master
Plan. Since the proposed Zone Chang~ and Master Plan amendment are
entirely admn~istraiive in nature, no significant environmental
impacts are anticipated directly from the project.
APPLICANT:
CASE NO:
LA COSTA LAND COMPANY
ZC-206/MP-149(0)
A copy of the subject Negative Declar?tions with supportive
information is available for public review at the Planning
Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad. Comments
from the public are invited. Please submit comments in
writing to the Planning Department within five (5) days from
the date of this notice. ·
PUBLISH: JANUARY 9, 1980
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: ZC-206/MP-149(D), CHANGE OF ZONE FROM P-C TO
RDM-Q AND AMENDMENT OF THE LA COSTA MASTER PLAN
DELETING THAT PORTION IN THE MEADOWBROOK AREA.
Location and Description
The subject property is 134 acres located in northeast La
Costa. The property is west of Rancho Santa Fe Road and at
the present easterly terminus of Alga. As indicated in
Exhibit A dated October 2, 1979, there are five parcels
of which parcel 2 through 5 are part of this application.
Parcel 1 is Rancheros, which is not a part of this application.
Parcels 2 and 3 are on a relatively high ridge sloping down-
ward to valleys to the east and south. Development in much
of this area require grading. Parcels 4 and 5 are in a
relatively flat valley running generally north and south.
The property within this requested Master Plan amendment is
only a portion of the land within the zone change application.
The Master Plan amendment is for the removal of Parcel 2 and
a little over half of Parcel 3 from the La Costa Master
Plan. This encompasses approximately 45 acres. See Exhibit
A, dated October 2, 1979, of Master Plan 149(D).
On this exhibit there is a 2* notation. It represen~s the
area without a landuse designation. Although part of
La Costa Land holdings, it is not part of the La Costa
Master Plan.
The remaining portion of the zone change is not in the
Master Plan Amendment because it is not presently a part of
the Master Plan.
Land Use
Subject Property:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant, except for one old barn.
Vacant
Vacant, SMCWD wastewater treatment facility
Single family residential development in
the County area and industrial park toward
the southwest.
Vacant, and single family and multiple
family development along El Fuerte and
Alga.
Existing Zoning
Subject Property:
North:
South:
East:
West:
P-C
P-C
P-C and L-C
County, Residential & San Marcos Industrial
P-C, R-1, C-1 and RO-M
History and Related Cases
MP-149: Master Plan No. 149 was adopted and last amended on
November 2, 1976, by City Council Ordinance No. 9469, (MP-
149(8). The master plan included only the northwesterly
portion of the subject property. The land use on the present
master plan is residential with a density of 14 and 20
du/ac. The remaining portion of the subject property were
purchased by La Costa Land Company after the adoption of the
initial master plan and therefore are not part of Master
Plan 149. Master Plan 149 is considered lawfully non-
conforming since it was adopted prior to the revision of the
P-C zone. Since this is a lawfully existing non-conforming
master plan the property may only be developed by one of the
following:
1) By a Planned Unit Development.
2) Amend the Master Plan to bring it into conformance with
todays requirements and include all of the property
within the Master Plan boundary.
Environmental Impact Information
A declaration of negative environmental impact has been made
for the project based on the justification that:
1) The project is administrative in nature and any future
development of the property would be subjected to an
additional environmental impact assessment.
2) An environmental Impact report has been certified for
that portin of the property located within the master
planned area, finding that any potential adverse impacts
could be mitigated through the master plan and/or on a
project by project basis. These same mitigation measures
could still be applied to the subject property as
development of the property is subjected to discretionary
review by the City.
3) The City's General Plan designates that portion of the
property covered by the master plan for residential
densities equal to or less than densities proposed by
the master plan.
4) The project would not have a significant impact on any
flora or fauna, nor any unique or historical environmental
features.
2
c 0
General Plan Information
A. Land Use
The general plan designates parcels 3, 4 and 5 as
Medium Density Residential (4-10 du/ac). Parcel 2 is
designated as Medium High Residential (10/20 du/ac).
The density requirements of the RO-M Zone are those
assigned by the General Plan. The General Plan also
indicates an elementary school on Parcels 4 and 5.
Although the site is indicated on Exhibit A of ZC-206,
it is not proposed for open space zoning (as other
school sites are) since the property is not yet owned
by the district.
The General Plan circulation element indicates the
continuation of Alga Road as a major arterial through
to Melrose, which is to be a prime arterial. Melrose
will intersect Palomar Airport Road to the north and
connect with Rancho Santa Fe Road to the south.
B. Public Facilities
Sewer: Sewer service is not available for this development
as of the date of this report. However, sewer service
may be available in the near future. Sewer will be
provided by San Marcos County Water District. To
provide this service, the district will reactivate
their facility immediately south of the subject project,
west of Rancho Santa Fe Road. The City Council has
directed the processing of subject applications since
sewer service has been guaranteed by San Marcos County
Water District. See attached letter dated August 17,
1979, from San Marcos County Water District. Application
for reactivation are presently being processed. The
Planning Staff has by appropriate suggested conditions
to this application insured that development
may not occur unless the City Council finds that sewer
service is in fact available to serve this property.
Therefore the staff is satisfied that the requirements
of the public facilities element of the general plan
have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service.
Schools: This area is served by the San Marcos Unified
School District. This application is not a residential
development as defined in the school facility require-
ments of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Therefore
determination of dedication of site or fees is not
needed at this time.
Water: Water service will be provided by the San
Marcos Water District, and the applicant is required
to comply with their rules and regulations.
Gas and Electric: Gas and electric service will be
provided by SDG&E.
3
--------------------------------------·------------
c
On-Site and Adjacent Public Improvements: Public
imprments will be required per the City Public Improvement
Ordinance and/or as conditions of approval.
Other Public Facilities: Staff has determined that they
are not prepared to find that all other public facilities
necessary to serve this project will be available
concurrent with need. However, the Planning Commission
may, by inclusion of an appropriate condition require
that the project contribute to the costs of such
facilities according to City Council Policy No. 17.
Since the development would pay its appropriate share
of the public facility it would require, the Planning
Commission could be assured that the requirements of
the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan would
be satisfied. In addition park-in-lie fees would be
assessed at the time of building permit issuance.
C. Other Elements of the General Plan
The project is consistent with all other elements of
the City•s General Plan.
Major Planning Considerations
1) Removal of subject property from the PC Zone deletes
the requirement for master planning. Should this area
be master planned?
2) The La Costa Master Plan contains a portion of subject
property. What effect will the removal of this property
from the Master Plan have on La Costa?
Discussion
The major reason the request for rezoning and deletion from
the Master Plan is that before the property can be developed
the Master Plan must be updated. This may take a relatively
long time. Since this area is served by San Marcos Sewer
District (whereas most of La Costa is served by the Leucadia
District), and the San Marcos District is pr~pared to provide
sewer, the property could be developed soon if taken out
of the P-C Zone and La Costa Master Plan.
The issue to be decided is, is it beneficial to have the
subject property included in a Master Plan, or is this
property not an integral part of the La Costa Master Plan?
The PC Zone requires a master plan prior to development
(except PUD 1 S maybe approved). A master plan requires
public facility planning such as major streets, parks,
schools, fire station, libraries, etc. Planning of these
public facilities involve determination of location, financing
and timing of construction. The larger the area of a master
planned community the more extensive the public facility
planning.
4
The master plan also provides for special development program
to encourage community identity within the City. This will
provide diversification of housing types and neighborhoods.
The master plan provides for a measure of growth control.
Presently the potential for unrestrained growth in the La
Costa area (except for sewer availability), is that the
master plan is nonconforming and must be updated. Also, the
updated master plan may contain growth restraints as conditions
of approval. The City Council is presently discussing the
benefits of growth control, but as yet no definitive position
has been taken.
The subject property is at the periphery of the La Costa
area being at the northeast corner. Therefore there is
limited continuity with the major areas of La Costa. In
fact the adjacent properties are to be built out as estates
(Rancheros) on property generally physically separated from
most of La Costa.
The only major public facilities to be built in the subject
area are the extensions of Alga and Melrose Avenues and the
expansion of Rancho Santa Fe Road and an elementary school
The San Marcos Creek Park site is adjacent to the south of
the subject projects.
Most of the site to be rezoned is presently not in the La
Costa Master Plan, but would be included if the application
for rezoning was denied.
The subject site is peripheral to the major facilities and
center of the La Costa area. Removing it from the Master
Plan would have little impact on the master plan. For this
reason staff has recommended approval of the request, but
there are also obvious reasons to retain the area in the
P-C Zone.
The General Plan and Master Plan indicates an Elementary
School site on the south side of Alga Road. The rezone
application includes this site. However, the amendment
to the Master Plan does not request the deletion of the
site. The school site is contiguous with the Rancheros
area, which will remain in the P-C Zone. For consistency
between the zoning and Master Plan the school site should
remain in the P-C Zone (contiguous with Rancheros). The
school site is part of parcel 3 and therefore would have
to be resolved at time of submittal of the Site Development
Plan.
Recommendation
I. ZC-206
It is recommended that ZC-206 be APPROVED, except
that the area noted as school site on parcel 3 shall
remain in the P-C Zone for the following findings and
conditions:
5
c
1) The proposed project is consistent with the General
Plan since the RD-M-Q density range is based on the
current general plan land use designation.
2) The Qualify Overlay Zone requires a Site Development
Plan approved by the Planning Commission appealable to
the City Council. Conditions may be placed on the site
development plan to meet requirements of the general
plan or any other needs.
3) The site is physically suitable for the type of density
of the development since the site is adequate in size
and shape to accommodate residential development at the
density allowed by the RD-M Zone.
4) The project is consistent with all City public facility
policies and ordinances since:
a) The San Marcos County Water District has assured
the City that sewer service will be available after
the reactivation of their facility immediately
south of the subject project.
b) The Planning Commission finds that sewer service
is not available for this development as of the
date of this approval. However, sewer service
may be available in the future. The Planning
Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate
condition to this application, insured that
development will not be approved unless the
City Engineer finds that sewer service is available
to serve the project. Building cannot remain
occur within the project unless sewer service
remains available, the Planning Commission is
satisfied that the requirements of the public
facilities element of the general plan have been
met insofar as they apply to sewer service fr
this condominium permit and tentative map approval.
c) School sites aquisition or fees will be determined
at time of submittal of the required site
development plan.
d) Water service will be provided by the San Marcos
County Water District, and the applicant is required
to comply with their rules and regulations.
e) Gas and Electric service will be provided by San
Diego Gas and Electric.
f) Park-in-lieu fees are required at time of develop-
ment.
g) All necessary public improvements have been either
provided or will be required at time of development.
6
h) At this time, the City Council is not prepared to
find that all other public facilities necessary to·
serve project will be available concurrent with
need. The Planning Commission has, by inclusion_
of an appropriate condition, required that the
project contribute to the costs of· such facilities.
Since the development will pay its proportionate
share of the public facilities which it will
require, the City Council is satisfied that the
requirements of the public facilities element of
the general plan have been satisfied.
5) The proposed change of zone will not cause any substantial
environmental impacts, and a declaration of negative ~
environmental impacts has been made finding that:
a) The project is administrative in nature and any
future development of the property would be subjected
to an additional environmental impact assessment.
b) An environmental impact report has been certified
for that portion of the property located within
the master planned area, finding that any potential
adverse impacts could be mitigated through the
master plan and/or on a project by project basis.
These same mitigation measures could still be
applied to the subject property as development of
the property is subjected to discretionary review
by the City.
c) The City's General Plan designates that portion of
the property covered by the master plan for residential
densities equal to or less than densities proposed
by the master plan.
d) The project would not have a significant impact on
any flora or fauna, nor any unique or historical
environmental features.
Con·di ti on s
1) This approval is granted for that portion of land
described in the application, ZC-206, and further
described on Exhibit A dated 10/2/79.
2) The property to be rezoned is as shown on the attached
legal map.
3) The applicant will provide school fees to mitigate
conditions of overcrowding as part of building permit
applications.at time of development. These fees shall
be based on the fee schedule in effect at the time of
building permit application.
7
c
4) This zone change is approved upon the express condition
that building or grading permits will not be issued for
development of the subject property unless the City
Engineer determines that such sewer facilities are
available at time of application for such permits and
will continue to be available until time of occupancy.
If the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities
are not available, building permits will not be issued.
5) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant
shall pay a public facility fee as established in City
Council Policy No. 17.
II. MP-149(0)
It is recommended that MP-149(0) be APPROVED based on
the following findings and conditions:
Findings
1) This area need not be a part of a Master Plan Community
because:
a) It is at the periphery of the La Costa Community
and the City boundaries and therefore not an area
centrally important.
b) The public facilities needed in this area will be
required at time of development.
2) Removing this project from the La Costa Master Plan
will not have a detrimental effect on that Master Plan
because:
a) The property is on the periphery of the La Costa
Master Plan Community.
b) The property is separated from most of the La
Costa area by a canyon and open area of a future
proposed estate development.
3) The proposed master plan will not cause any substantial
environmental impacts, and a declaration of negative
environmental impacts has been made finding that:
a) The project is administrative in nature and any
future development of the property would be sub-
jected to an additional environmental impact
assessment.
b) An environmental impact report has been certified
for that portion of the property located within
the master planned area, finding that any potential
8
adverse impacts could be mitigated through the
master plan and/or on a project by project basis.
These same mitigation measures could still be
applied to the subject property as development of
the property is subjected to discretionary review
by the City.
c) The City's General Plan designates that portion of
the property covered by the master plan for residential
densities equal to or less than densities proposed
by the master plan.
d) The project would not have a significant impact on
any flora or fauna, nor any unique or historical
environmental features.
4) Sewer will be provided in this area by San Marcos
County Water District. A letter has been submitted
from the District assuring sewer availability. The
City Engineer will not permit grading or building
permits unless he determines sewer service is available.
Conditions
1) The property to be deleted from the La Costa Master
Plan is as shown on Exhibit "A 11 dated 10/2/79 for MP-
149(D).
2) The applicant shall submit reproducible copies of the
amended Master Plan prior to acceptance of any requests
for development.
3) This zone change is approved upon the express condition
that building or grading permits will not be issued for
development of the subject property unless the City
Engineer determines that such sewer facilities are
available at time of application for such permits and
will continue to be available until time of occupancy
If the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities
are not available, building permits will not be issued.
ATTACHMENTS
Location Map (MP-149(D)
Legal Map (ZC-206)
Exhibit A (MP-149(D) dated October 2, 1979
Exhibit A (ZC-206) dated October 2, 1979
Letter dated August 17, 79, San Marcos County Water District
BP/ar
9
... u
---·----\ '\ :.;:-, \
' \,. '· ( \ \ \
\ \
!
' I
-I
I
1
I
I
P-d
t-·--------------:----l
i ;
CASE NO.,MP-149(0) Date Rec'd q/7/79
I I
MP-14ct (D)
ME'At:>OvJBROOK-LA CQslj
DCC Date: lt/(R/79 PC Date 11114/79
Description of Request: DE=:! E E.. AP~~INA.I Fl ::i. .47 ...O.CBE!:J FFVJM -n-n::.
NOKI f-\EA..:SI 'PoRnnN. nFJBE LA 1"'"/f.7TA. t:;jA"SI E5 DEVE! DPb1Ebtr: P~ AN
Address or Location of Request: 11-lc E..,A6T SiOE.... rJF ·~1 i=UE.R IE 51., NDB! t\ :!
~lmi OF Al./a6 R06-D
Applicant: I..A ~af5TA LA~D C:.Q.
Engr. or Arch. 61Cb EW:a!NF.EBINI'::a CfJ,
Brief Legal: 8., ~:Q())....\ QF nfX':(1QN<?? 19 ~ -;::.:y) IJF --rnW~H)P )? €::{)vn-\ ~ "Pvb..NC:!E..
?J Wffil~ 5AN 13t;Bt:lADl NLJ MEf3\DlA.b\ ~ IN T}-\E.. ~rry' OF CA5).;2'BAp
Assessor Book: C.2:3-Q\()-)()~ e2..2.-D)2.-Q4 1 ~ce-Ol2.-Q6
General Plan Land Use Description: Bt=1 .t BMH ·
Existing Zone: P(~ . . . .. Proposed Zone: ~o~·· Acres : 4{a 1 7Cl No. of Lots: ~ pus NLA DU/Acre N/A
School District: ~AN l'---iABCI)S llNIEl~i2
water District: ~ tvt6~ c..w.o Sanitation District:~fSi ~
Coast Permit Area: NO
I
', ---. \
I·
1
P-C
• 0 • ~.
l __ ----------D: ·. __ -",..~~ ~\
... •:" -' . -
_/ . \ \
. ; \ \
I \ '-_ __. ·-~~,..-·· ; ~-~1' ...
i .-
ZC-21Jb
M'CADDWBFOOK-· LA COSTA
BA~EO ON DATA COMP\LED FMM Ol='F\C..IAL l :500 CSCAl.E
ZDNlN~ ~ 4 U·et:JU;, E.Xt-\lSt\ A, DATe.O ~17 e, l9"1CI
CASE NO. ZG-21Jt..o Date Rec 'd:.___CJu/_7w/:.._7 ...... 9_.__ ___ DCC Date: 11/w/79 PC Date I \ 114/71
PRESIOENT
OBY ULANCHARD
VICe: PRESIDENT
STANLEY A. MAHR
DIRECTORS
HARRY B. KEEBAIJGH
MA!l<OARET E. FERGUSON
LEO P.SMJTH
Gfi:NEftAL MANAGER
JAMES F. McKAY
ATTOP'tNEY
VERNON A. PELTZER
<.... ' san marcos county \-Vater district
PHONE (714) 744-0460 • 788 SAN MARCOS f.IUULEVARD • SAN MARCOS, CALIFORNIA 92069
August 17, 1979
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Attention: !'1r. James Hagaman
Director of Planning
Gentlemen:
Re: Sewer Service -La Costa Northeast
RICK ENG.
Date Received
AUG 2 2 1979
The La Costa Land Company (Applicant) the fee owner of the land
shown on Exhibit 11A11 marked Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 has requested
the San Marcos County Water District (District) to provide a
sewer service availability letter for the referenced property.
Subject property is located within the District and within the
sewer service improvements as follows:
A portion of Parcels 1, 2, 3
All of Parcels 4 & 5
To be eligible for sewer service, applicant will be required to
meet the following conditions:
1. Complete the annexation to sewer Improvement Districts
1, 2 & 6 those portions of Parcels 1, 2 & 3 lying out-
side of the improvement districts boundary.
2. Construct all on-site and off-site sewer facilities
to connect the proposed project to District's facilities
and dedicate the faciliites to the District in accord-
ance with the District's Standard Rules and Regulations.
3. Pay all fees required by the District on demand by the
District.
WAl EF< ·--BASIC TO ... LIFE ... HEALTH ... ANO PROGRESS.
san'Tnarcos county. wafer district
City of Carlsbad -2-August 17, 1979
4. Perform the terms of the 11 Agreement for Design and
Construction of the Reclamation Facilities Between
La Costa Land Company and the San Marcos County
Water District .. with effective date of March 19,
1979, (Reclamation Agreement), to provide the fac-
ilities and capacity to handle sewage for this
project.
Subject to the foregoing conditions this District will provide
the project up to and including 750 Dwelling Unit Equivalents
(D.U.E.'s) (computed at the rate of 250 gallons per day per
D.U.E.) as follows:
Parcel 1 ( (JA~c.K £~' ) 92 D.U.E.'s
Parcel 2(.r.\~A~""~ C."i.NTE"-J l 00 II
Parcel 3(~ ~AOt>c.J 6Jtoo!'-} 220 II
Parce 1 4 (·1"\I(..AQtw~wl\n"') 300 II
Parcel 5 (.Sourll-1"\li.Aoew'-'llak.) 38 II
Actual connections to the system will be scheduled and provided in
accordance with the terms of the Reclamation Agreement.
It is understood by Applicant that this letter is based upon exist-
ing conditions and is issued for planning purposes and that the
conditions precedent specified above must be satisfied before service
will be provided.
This commitment to provide service has been made by the Board of
Directors and is subject to the Applicants• compliance with the
applicable rules, regulations, ordinances, procedures and policies
of the District, including those relating to fees and charges, the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the
applicant's agreement to construct any on-site and off-site fac-
ilities, together with the applicant's providing security as required
by the District for such construction.
This letter of availability pertains solely to the proposed project
and is not transferable to any other project, is not transferable
to any other parcel of land, and is not transferable to any other
applicant. Any act in violation of this provision, whether or not
WAH.P --AASIC TO ... LIFE •.. HEALTH ... ANO PROGRESS.
~ ,..,,
san\..1arcos county w~r district
City of Carlsbad -3-August 17, 1979
legally effective to accomplish a transfer, automatically renders
this letter null and void.
This letter is void and of no further force and effect on or
after June 1, 1982.
Sincerely,
~~??~ ~~~~-F. Me General Ma · er
JFM/mds
Encls.
cc: La Costa Land Company
Rick Engineering~
Vernon A. Peltzer
File
WATER-BASIC TO ... LIFE ... HEALTH .•. AND PROGRESS.
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of Son Diego County
3088 PIO PICO AVENUE e P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 e 729-2345
Proof of Publication R ~ c _..; -.
FEB 13 1980
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
CITY 0:= C/\RLSB/,1)
Flanning Dcp3rtment
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year
2M/5-79
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING zc.a
. .
---""'--next preceding the date of publication of the =::;=:.~:..,Alp~ notice hereinafter referred to; and thatthe notice
=Ja.aad-putkalariJ of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
. "Aportloaotllectioallt.»ud30or published in each regular and entire issue of said T-blp 12 Soutb, RaDII J Welt, SaD
Dlepllerldlu,iatbeettrotcarbbed. newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on ;:uc:=,~o::,.es.• the following dates, to-wit:
Applieellt: LA COSTA LAND
COIIPANY ' CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
.. f.~ l?:r\l?-.r:Y. . 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 .. S.Q
................................. 19 ....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 ....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 ....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 ....
~ . . . . ZC,-'CJ)b .
~. . ~K-LACOSIA
e.oeeo ~ 0)1;1).. GCMf'U.a> Fi'IDI"I O'FF'IC.IAI.. 1:~ ~
CJ .5888: February 9, 188l
/ Clerk of the Prmter
Carls ad Journal
Decreed A Legal New spaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
3088 PIO PI CO AVENUE e P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345
Proof of Publication R E CEI VED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
\o \~~ l~q'G
f;o.
~/
'1J
JAN 1 0 1980
CITY OF CA RLSBAD
Planning Department
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the co unty aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year
2M /5-79
NOTICE OF DECLARATION
NONSIGNIFICANT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
NOTJCIJI HlADY OIVIN tllattlle City or Clrllbld lila lllllld Nlllllvt
Dtelaratlona rorllltlbllowlll proJtdl: LOG NO. &II: Tilt propoatd projttt Involve• an applleallon lbr llatba Mu-
ter Plan Amtndmentand Zotlt CIIIJIII. lpeclncaUy. the applloant It l'lflutll·
Inc thatanapproxlmattly41 am 1r1e1
or land Ill removed from tilt La COlli
Muter planned area. In addition, tile applleant lt requtttln,thatthlt prop.
trty and the area IO the IOUihWIII (l p. proximately 8'1 aertl) bt retoned from
P·C <Planned Communi!)') to RDII·Q
(Realdenllal Dtntll)' Multiple Zone, with a quallned development owerla)'
aone>. o\n lavlronmeattl llnpaet ftt.
port. <EJIWO'I), w11 cenlned lbr 111 or the property eovertd b)' the La Cotlt · Muter Plan. llnee the propoatd Zoae
Chlftll aad Miller Plan llllllldiiiDI
are enllreb admlnlalrtllvt In nature, no •llnlneant envlronmenlll llftpaett
are anllclpaltd dlrttlb ftoomlbt proj. Itt.
Applicant: LA COlT A LAND
COli .. ANY C... No: zc.ar•MII(D)
A copy of tile tubjttt Nllltlwe Dttla· NIIODI with IUpportlvt Jllf'DI'IDitloD ll nallable tor public review at the Plan-
nlnl Dtpertment, Cltr Hall, JJOO lim
Avenue, Carlabacl. Commeatt ftoom tbe
public IN Invited. PI-tublllll tom• meDII In wriiiiiiiO the l'llllnllll Dt· partmeat within nve IS> d..,. n-om t!ae • date or thla notice.
CJ W413: January e. 1880
next preceding the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice
of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
.... JAI.lYP..:r:Y . 9 ................... 19 .. ~Q
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California on the 9th
dayof~~~~~~~~L---~+----------
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
3088 PIO PI CO AVENUE • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intell igence of a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona f ide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and w hich newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year
2M/5-79
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING
ZC.206
SOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the
Pl1nn1nC CommiiSIOD or the C11Y or
Culsbad will bold a pubht helriJIIIt
the C11J Council ehamben. lJIIO Elm
Avenue. Carlsbad. Cllifomil. 11 7 00
P.M. on Wednesday. November 14th,
1!179, to tonsider a Zone Chance from
Exiltllll PC Zone to the RD-11-Q zone on
property p ner1lly lotated on the n at
side or El Fuerte St .. north od south of
Alp Road.eaattofuture llelroae Drive.
tnuthtoflltureCoriDihiL fiiCI-par·
tlt~&~rly clelulbed •: A portloa ttl Sediolllll. a ud 30 or
Towulllp l21io416. ..... 'w-. San
Benal rdiDO lleridiu. ia the CIIJ or C~rhbed.ICtOrdiiiCIOIIap No. 'IO'Non
Rle t•llleOfllceoftbeColllllr Retont.r
or San Dteco Coun!J. k Th-,.,_ dellrb4 10 1p11 on
the propolllllft tordiiU, Invited to II·
tend the publle hearlnc.lfJOu hlvt any
quelllODI. pleue tall '7»1181 and 11k
for the Pl1nnit11 DePirtment.
Applitant: LA COSTA LAND
CARLSBAD PLANNING
COIOIISSJON
r--r--~:-,-.,....-:-----::-:---:-:-:-..J-__ J \ ;,.. \
\ '\
I \( •.'i
\\
I' -:'\~! I t II II II •I I
I • "-\
. ··~-... /·_\ n _.>'~\ ~ -~~~
ZL-ZDb ~ ~-LA~ ~ _, Otl ~ """"I.I!D I"NM ()A"IGIAL. 1:~ ~ --.v. ...,., 4 u.·~. ~ ..... ~. ~ z.. !'!!"_
CJ S~78: November 3. 19'19
next preceding the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice
of which the annexed is a print~d copy, has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
. . .N.oY~lfl.~~r:. 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 .. 7.9
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at Carl$bad, ~unty of San Diego,
State of California on l:he rd
day of N 0v ember 1979
(-)-~.a~-. <... _.} &/4
C:oTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ZC-206
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the
City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council
chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 7:00 P.M.
on Wednesday, November 14th, 1979, to consider a Zone Change.
from Existing PC Zone to the RD-M-Q zone on property
generally located on the east side of El Fuerte St., north
and south of Alga Road, east to future Melrose Drive, south
to future Carinthia, and more particularly described as:
A portion of Sections 19, 29 and 30 of Township 12
South, RAnge 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the
City of Carlsbad, according to Map No. 7076 on file
in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County.
Those persons desiring to speak on the proposal are cordially
invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions,
please call 729-1181 and ask for the Planning Department.
APPLICANT:
PUBLISH:
La Costa Land
November 3, 1979
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
.·
I ' ' i ..
!
P-Q
,,
\
L._ ---·· . ---·-... --· ..... ---·-----··--
•· .. , .. ,.
; i . -. ::... -·
ZC-2.0b
. . . .. M~OK-·LACOS1A.
. SA'OEO 0~ DATA. COMP\LE.D FPIOM C>t='FlGtAL ) : 5a1 ~
_,......_,,.._, ,_ ""'-"' A"r'OO A _, _ -::>"'1-c::va..ltt:l.t.,.-A. f""'>ATJ::.,-, ,..,-r-~ lQIQ
[_ ______ _
I.
I !
P-C
' \ . I -____________ \ '.
:;.. \
I ·, \..
\ \
\ ' \· \ \
\ \
I
I ---·-· ------·----'-I
.: I
I I.
I I
-1 r
I I
I I
I
\
\
' .\...--
.. l ---
[J .,. . ..;~· . -
_.•;"'.-
__ ,-
' . . '
I _ __,
<
-...
ZC-Z.Ob
tv'\~DK-·LACOSTA
BA'OED ON D.AJ"A COM'P\LED F'~M C>A==l GlAL l : 500 ex::A1.,E.
ZONlr46t lVIAP 4 ZG·ZCJI.t;, E.Xt-\lBt\ A, DATE.O OGT: e, 19"19
CASE NO. ZG-2.0{p Date Rec • d;___CJ..u/~7-L..L-./_,7~....9...._ ___ DCC Date: 11/(.o /79 PC Date 1\ /14/79
..
JOB NO.
6g87
RICIIC.£NGINEERING COMPANY I ~-~~~Lc~~~~~rtEN,l~
3088 PJO PICO DR. • SUITE ?02 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008
TELEPHONE • AREA CODE 714 • 729-4987
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR: BY DC
ZONE CHANGE CHK'D.
---·-. ·---·-·---·-..
DATE SHEET
g/6/7g 1 OF 2.
A parcel of land being a portion of Sections 1g, 2g, and 30 of Township 12
South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of carlsbad, County
of San Diego, State of California described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Northeasterly corner of La Costa Meadows Unit No.3, accord-
ing to Map thereof No.7076 on file in the Office of the County Recorders
of said County and State; thence South ago 46' 50" East, along the Northerly
line of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 1g for
1248.83 feet to the Northwest corner of the South Half of the Southeast
I
Quarter of said Section lg; thence South ago 46' 10" East, along the Northerl'
line of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 1g for
1064.gg feet to a point on the Westerly Right of Way line of proposed Melrose
Avenue; thence along said Westerly Right of Way line the following courses:
South 17° 50' 30'' East, 868.85 feet to the beginning of a tangent 3263.00
foot radius curve concave Northeasterly; thence Southeasterly along the arc
of said curve through a central angle of 17° 35' 14", a distance of 1001.5g
feet; thence tangent to said curve South 35° 25' 44" East, 1453.13 feet;
thence leaving said Westerly Right of Way line South 66° 54' 00" West,
965.51 feet; thence North 23° 06' 00" West, 660.00 feet; thence North
77° 00' 00" West, 2go.oo feet; thence North 28° 00' 00" West, 1605.g7 feet;
thence South 78° og• 30" West, 300.10 feet; thence North 11° 50' 30" West,
34g.oo feet to a point on the Southerly Right of Way line of proposed Alga
Road; thence along said Southerly Right of Way line the following courses:
South 78° og• 30" West for 350.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent 1g4g.oo
foot radius curve concave Southerly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of
said curve through a central angle of 06° 00' 00" a distance of 204.10 feet
thence tangent to said curve South 72° og• 30" West, 25g.ss feet; thence
leaving said Southerly Right of Way line South 17° 50' 30" East, 450.33
feet; thence South 52° 42 1 00" West, 533.02 feet; thence North ago 42' 58"
West, a distance of 351.51 feet to a point on the arc of a 1542.00 foot
radius curve concave Southwesterly, a radial line to said point bears South
ago 42' 58'' East, said point also being on the easterly boundary of La Costa
Meadows Unit No.2, according to Map thereof No.6go5 on file in the Office
of the County Recorder of said County and State; thence Northerly along
the arc of said 1542.00 foot radius curve through a central angle of 18°
07' 32" a distance of 487.81 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 17°
50' 30" West, along said Easterly boundary of La Costa Meadows Unit No.2
a distance of go.82 feet to the Southeast corner of said Map No.7076; thence
leavinq said Map No.6go5 and alonq the Easterly boundary of said Map No.7076
the followinq courses: North 17° 50' 30" West, 145.41 feet to the beginninq
of a tangent 1042.00 foot radius curve concave Southwesterly; thence North
westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 12° 07' 30"
a distance of 220.51 feet to a point of reverse curvature, of a 20.00 foot
radius curve concave Northeasterly, aradialline to said point bears North
60° 02' 00" East; thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve throuqh
a central anqle of 77° 32' 3g" a distance of 27.07 feet to a point of reverse
curvature of a 330.00 foot radius curve concave Northwesterly, a radial line
to said point bears North 42° 25' 21" West; thence Northeasterly along the
arc of said curve through a central angle of 2g" 22' 3g" a distance of l6g.2o
feet; thence tangent to said curve North 18° 12' 00" East, a distance of
68g.32 feet to the beginning of a tangent 630.00 foot radius curve concave
TITLE CO.
REFERENCE
COMPANY
ORDER NO. I DATE
DESCRIPTION REVISIONS
BY I DATE
I FORM 468 DAWCO PRESS ''''"\
RICCENGINEERING COMPANY I ~~~~1Lc~~~~~Y'::~
3088 PIO PICO DR. • SUITE 202 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008
TELEPHONE • AREA CODE 714 • 729-4987
JOB NO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR: BY DC
6987 CHK'D.
DATE SHEET
9/6/79 2 OF 2
Westerly; thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve through a cental
angle of 13° 44 1 44" a distance of 151.14 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said parcel of land containing 128.353 acres more or less.
TITLE CO.
REFERENCE
COMPANY
ORDER NO.
DESCRIPTION
BY
REVISIONS I DATE
DATE: January 30, 1980
TO: Frank Aleshire, City Manager
FROM: Bud Plender, Principal Planner
RE: ZC-206, Ref: AB 6094
The subject tract map has been continued to the February 5,
1980, meeting because the Planning Commission has not yet
forwarded their resolution on this matter. The Planning
Commission is holding approve:! pending the applicant entering
into a secured agreement guaranteeing public facility fees.
In addition staff wishes to prEpare further report on this
ma~ter pertaining to school and park site issues.
It is not possible to determine at this time when the applicant
will enter into the secured agreement or if the City Council
wishes to modify the process. Therefore staff:
RECOMI-1ENDS that ZC-206 , be CONTINUED to an
uncertain date and that the item be renotic0d when such new
hearing date 1s determined.
BP:ar
Council Action: ----------
2-5-80 Counci 1 withdrew the item from the agenda and directed it be
renoticed at appropriate time.
HEMORA.NDUM
DATE: February 8, 1980
TO~ Frank Aleshire, City Mananger
FRru~: ~ames Hagaman, Planning Director
SUB.JECT: Zone Change and Haster Plan Amendment
(ZC-206/MP-149(D), La Costa Land Company
REF: Agenda Bill Nos: 6094 and 6095
These applications are for property in the northeast La
Costa area, which is served by the fan Marcos County Water
District for both water and sewer sGrvice. San Marcos
County Water District provided a letter dated August 17,
1979, indicating sewer service will be available with the
reactivation of the existing sewer plant. The Planning
Commission processed the application in the anticipation
th~t all permits, including the applications for a change
of zone and precise development plan for the sewer plant
expans~on would be approved.
However the applications have been continued by the City
Council pending approval of the sewage treatment plant.
These applications for the sewer plant (PDP-3 & ZC-207) were
approved by the City Counc:Ll on February 5, 1980. The City
Council can now make a finding that sewer service is available
for the subject applications and process the subject applications.
The City Council also continued these cases pending disposition
of the public facility fee agreement process. The City
Council directed modification of the process, which appears
to be to the applicant's satisfaction. It is anticipated
that the agreement will be entered into prior to the hearing.
During the previous discussions on continuing these
applications staff noted that further reView of th~ school
and park sites in the area would be necessary. A 15+ elementary
school site in the San Marcos District and a 14.7 acre
city park are indicated on both the ~eneral Flan and the
La Costa Master Plan. The school is located at the future
southwest corner of Alga and Melrose, the park site is to
be west of Rancho Santa Fe Road adjacent to the San Marcos
County Water District Treatment Plant.
Both of these sites were established based on needs for
the entire La Costa master planned area .. The removal of
the subject property from the P-C zone and Master Plan does
not reduce the needs for the sites. The applicant
Memorandum
Frank Aleshire, City Manager
February 8, 1980
Page 2
recognizes this and has indicated they will cooperate in
their ~:uture dedication and development.. The only
question is how to accomplish this.
The park site is incorporated in the Parks Agreement between
the City of Carlsbad and the La Costa Land Company. This
park will be dedicated with the first final subdivision in
the area as delineated in the agreement. The City is
presently processing the Rancheros tentative subdivision
which will require this dedication.
There is no agreements however for school site dedication.
The present agreement the City has with the San Harcos
School District as per SB 201 State legislation, is to pro-
vide fees for temporary facilities. There are no provisions
at this time to provide land in lieu of fees.
The school district has indicated a need for the site and
the Public Facilities Element requires guarantee of public
facilities prior to approval. The Planning Co1rrmission has
recommended that the school site be retained in the P-C
zone, so that its disposition vlill remain in the r.l[aster Plan
process.· Also the Q Overlay on the property to be rezoned
will require future site plan approval. At that time the
school site could be resolved. Hmvever, the issue of the
school site should also be considered at this time since a
Change of Zone and Master Plan applications are development
permits. This is especially true in this case since the
school site is sho~m on the La Costa Master Plan.
If the City Council wishes to assist the San Marcos School
District in acquiring the school site with the subject
application, staff suggest the following condition be added
to ZC-206 and MP-149(D).
11 The applicant shall enter into an acceptable agreement \'lith
the San Marcos Unified School District to ensure that·necessary
school sites will be provided. Said agreement shall be
subject to the approval of the City Council prior to the
issuance of the site development plan for the project
area."
Staff has assumed that the City Council wishes to provide
for school site, if not staff should be so advised.
BP:ar
~/13/80'
!
' J r ~
(
I l I I
l
I j I
I
f
HEMORANDUM
DATE: January 30, 1980
TO: Frank Aleshire, City Manager
FROM: _({! Bud Plender, Principal Planner
RE: ZC-206, ~Ref: AB 6094
The subject tract map has been continued to the February 5,
1980, meeting because the Planning Commission has not yet
fo~1arded their resolution,on this matter. The Planning
Commission is holding approval pending the applicant entering
into a secured agreement guaranteeing public facility fees.
In addition staff wishes to prepare further report on this
matter pertaining to school and park site issues.
It is not possible to determine at this time when the applicant
will enter into the secured agreement or if the City Council
wishes to modify the process. Therefore staff:
RECOHMENDS that ZC-206 , be CONTINUED to an
uncertain date and that the item be renoticed when such new
hearing date is determined.
BP:ar
c
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 24, 1980
TO: James Hagaman, Planning Director
FROM:~ Bud Plender, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: SEWER SERVICE, SAN MARCOS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
REFERENCE~ ZC-206/MP-149(D)
The City accepted the above applications based on a letter
of sewer availability from the San Marcos County Water
District dated August 17, 1979. You may recall much of the
acceptance was done by the City Manager. After Planning was
directed to process the applications, we accepted the letter
at face value and started the hearings. The letter notes
that in some areas San Marcos County Water District allocates
sewer to areas that need to be annexed to the District. The
applications are now pending City Council hearing, waiting
for a secured agreement on public facilities.
Subsequently the City Council processed the San Marcos
County Water District expanded treatment plant (PDP-3).
After concluding their hearing, the City Council asked fo;
information on growth inducing impacts. To answer this I
drafted a sewer service map to find out what land will be
serviced. In my research I found that the areas noted in
the August 17th letter that will be annexed are not yet
annexed. In fact application has not been made.
Sharon Blanding, of Rick Engineering, indicated that this
should not be a problem and they plan to make request for
annexation after the approval of tentative maps. She suggests
conditioning the tentative on this annexation.
I don't think the Planning Moratorium will permit processing
applications until the areas are within the San Marcos
County Water District service area. In fact I question how
we even accepted the Change of Zone and Master Plan applications.
Maybe I'& wrong o~ ~y concern, since I assume the City
Manager and City Attorney were aware of the need of annexation
when t~ey discus~ed this matter.
Would you review this matter again with the City Manager and
City Attorney. I need direction before we can proceed with
ZC-206 or accept the pending tentative map applications.
BP:ar
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
c
November 9, 1979
(tCitp of (t(:arlsbab
TELEPHONE:
(714) 438·5621
Dr. Ralph Kellogg, Superintendent
SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
270 West San Marcos Boulevard
San Marcos, California 92069
SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE, MEADOWBROOK AREA
CASE NO: ZC-206/MP-149(D)
Dear Dr. Kellogg:
The City of Carlsbad·is processing a Change of Zone from
the P-C Zone to the RD-M-Q Zone and a Master Plan Amendment
to remove a portion of the Meadowbrook area from the La
Costa Master Plan. This area contains a proposed elementary school site. ····
As per the City Ordinance on dedication of land and fees
for school facilities, the applications are not considered
residential developments since the possible density is not
being modified. Therefore your findings for school site or
fees is not necessary with those applications. If you do not
agree with this finding please let me know.
Staff is recommending to the City Council that the zoning of
the school site itself not be changed and remain in the P-C
Zone. We anticipate that the applicant will be requesting
development permits relatively soon on this property.
Therefore, you should be considering if you need the site or
fees. If the site is desirable for a school you may wish to
make contact with La Costa Land Company.
The Planning Commission will hear the applications on
November 14, 1979, I anticipate that the City Council will
hear it on December 4, 1979. If you have any further questions
on this matter please contact me.
Sincerely,
td~
BUD PLENDER
Assistant Planning Director
BP:ar
cc: Dave Larson
• -----"
LRCDStA
EXECUTIVE OI"I"ICES
Mr. J. Wayne Demetz
City Manager
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
November 5, 1979
Subject: Attached Memorandum Regarding the Northeast La Costa area Project
Dear Wayne:
On this date, November 5, 1979, at noon, the attached memorandum was delivered
to me. For yaur information, Mr. Burton L. Kramer is a senior vice president of the
La Costa Land Company and I presume signed the applications for the Master Plan
Amendments and Zone Change for Meadowlark. I suppose this is the reason that
Mr. Bud Plender communicated with Mr. Kramer rather than Jim Goff or myself.
I presume that this matter has been reviewed with you and you are aware of the
situation.
I, of course, believe and always have believed that the wording of the existing
ordinance would allow the City to review and process this application. Apparently
the former City Manager originally also thought so.
I point out that had we been given more than 48 hours of notice concerning the delay .
outlined in the attached memorandum, we almost undoubtedly could have obtained an
· unconditional sewer letter from the San J.Aarcos County Water District, since they
· are making commitments to other developers in other parts of the District~
It is difficult to do business when the ground rules continually change.
FJM/eem
Encl.
Sincerely,
L?f:OSTArND COMPANY
Fred'i:4rey
Vice President-Governmental Relations
cc: Messrs. Roen, Roston, Zenoff, Kramer
COSTA DEL MAR ROAO • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • AREA CODE 714 • TELEPHONE 438•8111
WRITECT ... DON'T SA~ IT na~ __ l_l-_5_-_7_9 ______ _
Irv Roston TO---------------------------------------------Reply wanted------
;.. Burton L. Kramer LRCDS~ FMm------------------------------------No reply necessary __ _
URGENf
Bud Plender just called me about the Master Plan Amendment and
Zone Change for Meadowlark. As you remember, on October 16, I
received a letter from the City of Carlsbad which stated that
the item had been placed on the November 14, 1979, Planning
Commission agenda and the staff meeting (DCC) would be held on
November 6, 1979, starting at 9 a.m. A copy of the letter from
Plender went to both Fred Morey and Don Woodward. You asked me
if the subject was Meadowlark, and I told you "yes."
Plender called today to advise me that although the staff had
finished their work on the Master Plan and Zone Change, the
Planning Director had decided that the item was .. not ready .. to
be.sent to the Planning Commission. The Planning Director's
reasoning is that the amending of the ordinance to allow
acceptance of conditional sewer letters would not take place
until 30 days from tomorrow.
I suggested to Bud that as long as conditions are always attached
·to applications, why couldn't a condition of the acceptance by
the Planning Commission be that the acceptance would not take
place until one day after the condition took effect, which would
be December 6, 1979. Plender said that that was his position
with the Planning Director, but the Planning Director felt that
"he legally could not make that finding."
Your schedule now is a DCC meeting on the 4th of December, and a
meeting before the Planning Commission on the 12th of December 1979.
I have sent a copy of this memo down to Fred Morey's office by
messenger.
BLK:my
ff ,C: Fred Morey
P"RSIIi)S .. T
OilY BLANCHARD
VICC PII&StO&NT
STANLEY A. MAHrt
OIIII&CTOIIS
HARRY a. KEEBAUGH
MARGARET E. FERGU$0N
LI:O P'. SMITH
G llH&IIAt.. MA>tAG&A
JAMKS F'. M"KAY
ATTOIINIIV
VERNON A. PELTZER
. "'"""'
san marcos county water district
PHONE (714) 744-0460 • 7&8 SAN MARCOS BOULEVARD • SAN MARCOS. CALIFORNIA 92069
August 17, 1979
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
;·' . {·
Carlsbad, California 92008
Attention: ~tr. James Hagaman
Director of Planning .,
Gentlemen:
Re: Sewer Service -La Costa Northeast
The La Costa Land Company (Applicant) the fee m-mer of the land
shown on Exhibit 11A11 marked Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 has requested
the San Marcos County Water District (District) to provide a
se\'ler service availability letter for the referenced property.
Subject property is located within the District and within the
se\oJer service improvements as follows:
A portion of Parcels 1, 2, 3
All of Parcels 4 & 5
To be eligible for sewer service, applicant will be required to
meet the following conditions:
.1. Camp l ete the annexation to se\oJer Improvement Districts
1, 2 & 6 those portions of Parcels 1, 2 & 3 lying out-
side of the improvement districts boundary.
. . 2. Construct all on-site and off-site sewer facilities
to connect the proposed project to District's facilities
and dedicate the faciliites to the District in accord-
ance \tith the District's St.andard Rules and Regulations.
3. Pay all fees required by· the District on demand by the
District.
sa~ Cnarcos county wOer district
. .:·'
City of Carlsbad -2-August 17; 1979
, .... _
4. Perform the terms of the "Agreement for Design and
Construction of the Reclamation Facilities Beb1een
La Costa land Company and the San Marcos County ·
Hater District" with effective date of l.Jarch 19~
1979, (Reclamation Agreement), to-provide the fac-
ilities and capacity to handle sewage for this
project.
. .
Subject to the foregoing conditions this District will provide
the project up to and including.750 Odelling Unit Equivalents
(D.U.E.'s) (computed at the rate of 250 gallons·per day per.
D. U.E.) as follm'ls: ·
Parcel 1
Parcel 2
Parcel 3
Parcel 4
Parcel 5
92 D.U.E. 's
100 II
220. II
300 II
38 II
Actual connections to the system will be scheduled and provided in
accordance··\'lith the terms of the Reclamation Agreement.
It is understood by Applicant that this letter is based upon exist-
ing conditions and is issued for planning purposes and that the
conditions precedent specified above must be satisfied before service
will be provided.
This commitment to provide service has been made by the Board of
· Directors and is subject to the Applicants• .compliance with the
applicable rules, regulations, ordinances, procedures and policies
of the District, including those relating to fees and charges, the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the
applicant 1 s agreement to construct any on-site and off-site fac-
ilities, together \\lith the applicant's providing security as required
by the District for such construction. •
This letter of availability pertains solely to the proposed project
and is not transferable to any other project, is not transferable
to any other parcel of land, and.is not transferable to any other
applicant. Any act in violation of this provision, wh~ther or not
san ~arcos county wa?er district
City of Carlsbad -3-August 17 ~ 1979
:·'"...
legally effective to accomplish a transfer, automatically renders
this letter null and void.
This letter is void and of no further force and effect on or
after June 1~ 1982. ·
Sincerely~
~~~-~~~-f· He ' · General Ma er
JFM/mds
Encls.
cc: La Costa Land Company
Rick Engineering
Vernon A. Peltzer
File ·
1200' ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
October 16, 1979
Burton Kramer
Vice-President
La Costa Land Company
Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92008
SUBJECT: ZC-206/MP-149(D)
TELEPHONE:
(714) 438-5621
The subject applications have been determined to be complete
by the Planning Department. The items have been placed on
the November 14, 1979 Planning Commission agenda and a staff
meeting {DCC) will be held on November 6, 1979, starting at
9:00 A.M., to discuss the staff recommendation. I suggest
you attend this staff review as well as the Planning Commission
meeting.
If for any reasons these dates are modified you will be
notified.
BUD PLENDER
Assistant Planning Director
cc~ Fred Morey
Don Woodward
BP:ar
i I
'
~·· .,;
'
:
I
..
I ~-I i ~ ... "t, ,.,
'>,t
I I ;,~ 1i
I I
I ., :;'c ~t"~
·'
~-.~~·:~~
i-tA co$1-'A LA.~n: ~ ·
:: 14_ J. h.-~,;e:lol,ica..q_, , ; ' ~,f!;f~~£tlfo£t\'
-. J6S5 I"ow.-th Avel\lj•~ JJJIOI£ Clllllltv.caw,
';,.: ~-:'l;~u\ ~,!;~, Califo~i:iia 92lU:J ~· · ··~;C~.i;UCOIIIU .
--
.J ('>.
1_, __ _,.,.._,..,.._...,. ______ .lii;l.;;,._ -· AIICi"fll' ~ UNir Olrlt·· IIH ----
"· ".·~~,~~ ~ f 4,'.
!..A 00$1\t,:;~ C<)u~ -. a~ L .. :.'ti&m.Jr , ~·-t.,
.,::,),t:a <iel ~~ta1· Road·
"'"ncho ·x.a .. Co~u; Cal. • • .J ' noo,·J " _j
·• u" '"<'t~pot,-a~ea' A~:.:: ... ·------------------------. Corporation ·Gra~t Def:d ~,.,.,x_··~~-~
Ut .• AIKl'lf.
,.._ ·.,~ ,.vftt.u...,cO •-~ .'nTi.c .t.AAINCE ~ ;~u~-~ ......
. -:.•
fOil .4 VALU!\BU: (.0:\Sit>UB'tlOI\, .....,;pc ol whido '"""""'r od<"''"l~. f.z.IJiET, t hiorclio. . C<)rpor~t.ion: LOI"l'Y, lllC., a N<!'Vada corporation; .. ~vJ:.·_''ril,a ¢o~_-l'' ation ... ' .. _ ........... tj,. .... ,.,tu,.,....., .. , ... .....,~;pmt.;···. ' . .... , . ~ C~.TA :~ ,CQ'!PA7iY, an Illinois corpotation
~::, . . ~ ..
!loo fol~ .....,.iDN·,..! pt.,.rty "' 1"-
(..-y ~\' ·San' D{e<K'
.,
•'.
Parcell!.l 'tl\rough H inclusi'le, · 1\i. more pai:d:C:ularly
·· descri~ in Exhibil A atta.cheCI· hereto:>. :cbmprisfng 9 pages.
\ hdurf'" me>. th.-'JtHirr·
K' le aP<i (m •••4 ..... .,tf', \'f"l..,.ft.I!.HJ II.PJM'•irt<i
_ --, kM•,.. I
l ' I I
1'" Ill<",., br tlw __ ~--·---·· _________ I'N'l>i1!Wnt. •11d
-----.. ~------····-------..•• ___ -~ lr.ftown tU' llfl~' ,,, ~
~H~~Jt 'J;.:.;~ k-,.=~=~-! ~ f, .-::~-::: :::::::1 :t:
w1tl·tl'l l~t~tr'MJ~r'"AI 1.41 hc:half Iff dw Cm-pw thlln'in Mt!t<!!d. an6. ..-LH<,.~-..1..-d *'' ift«' that t<uda c...,JIO"•Iian ~x·. dw wnl1111 ln~tm
tt.w,., "''''"~ '"' 11" hv-1••., a r->lulil>R ••f "-' I ,f ,jll't'Cton.
'l: l 'I..., .. ,... i'>"nd ~:,..i rolicial '"L
,.
.,
l
... [ ze
• -
•A• T ~ I L II
A L •A ...
r AT ItO l lOIII 0' IMI rH!A$T QUAIIT ._, Q(TIOII Jto TOtlltWIIJ
U •OUT o eUIG( ' WilT. UN lfiiiiAitDI"O IUt ICitiii!O
AI ~Ol.LOII I
A C L • ''
" ..
' -
-
'If( IIITI .. tttllllf' .... TIIMT ~T ... T • 01 L'U• •
I"I.C N~·IT't•
• era 1 •• IO• at a
.. .. '"" ...
'
STATE OF CALlFOilNIA)
COlJinT OF SAI4 DIECO) SS.
On • ·!eril S. 1968 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public ln a
for eaid County and State, personally MDV ADJW • lr.DIIIIftl
to M to be the Prut.dent, and lmown ~ .. to be die
A .. btant Seer.tary of PI.AR&T, • , and LOrn', IIC.,
reap«tively, that executed the within inat~t, "-to • to tw tiM
penou who executed lbe within Inst1'\lllent on behalf of tla COI'pCJl'a\:ltlne
therein ~. and ec:il~~C~Wbdged to .ae that such corporatlo .. •-=utllll tl:ae
within inatruaent pursuant to it1 by-lave or re1ol~tiona of tJ:ae lo.,_..a of
Director•.
wtTIISS .y band and official 1eal.
stpacure;§: ·~ Jr r;;,_,. rton • -r • IUI1CN L. .. IIOfAI'f ......c.c.r.urear.U
IUICIPAL C!IIICIII we..-oOOUNI'l .,._ ............
• t b · t+-1 1 1 re·Tl. P•·red it .1.. s delermined If after the informat1on y~u 11~ve ~-ml ~cc ~35 Jeen ., -n. ,
that. furth<;r information is rcci1.1ired, you will be sc ad'7h;ed.
?\PPLICAN'r: ~a Cost~-La~d _C:Q!ll.~ ______ ..
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syadication)
AGENT:
MEMBERS:
Costa Del Mar Road, Carlsbad
Business Address
- ( 714_l___i}~-91:..:::1;..::;;1 ______ _
Telephone Number
Name
Business Address
Telephone Number
Name (individual, partner, joint
venture, corporation, syndication)
Business Address
Telephone Number
Name
Business Address
Telephone Nt>.mber
CA 920~0~8------------------
Home Address
Telephone Number
Home Address
!elephone Nuniller
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis-
closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be
relied upon as being true and correct until amended.
LA_Co5TA t4NtJ _C._~_. _____ _
Applicant
"sy fB~-l.~ ·fir
--.. Agent, Owner, Partner f.)ler'J:4a"'*•
Rec
. .
\l" \v. ---·,
~¥¥"'
APPLICATION NO. ZONE CHANGE r;:2tJ&
\ i
{P1ease Type or flt·int) Date : ____ . _e.-31_-:_7_9. _____ _
1.
2 .
? " .
REQUEST: Zone Change from thE: present existing __ RC ----
zone(s) to the RDMQ zone(s)
LOCATION: The subject property is generally located on the
West
and
side of Rai1cho Santa Fe Rdbetwecn_J_f]J.ture{Alga)
La Costa Avenue
2:::-:2:::-:3::-----=o-=2-=-1------o-1------··--
Book 223 PageOlO Parcel 10 ---. ·--ASSESSOR'S NUMBER:
04 Parce1 __ Q5 ____ (If more~ please list
222 012
B.o o k-.£2£ Page _Q_l ~--
on bottom of this page).
4. PROPE"RTY OWl'lD 'S SIGtlATl!flt .O.cldress City Zip Phone
'P --·--~-===--
__ 'Burton KrameL-Yice Pres_ident
La Costa Land Company
Coata Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92008
:e .... 4-L~;.r
_ __,{~7. !.ll.. 4 3 8_--=-9=11=1=-------------
5. APPLICANTS SIGNATURE:
I hereby declare that all information contained within this
application is true.
Name _____ A_ddr_e_s_s ______ ~City~--------Z~i~P--~Phone
Same as above
Representing (Company or Corporation)
6. Is this request consi~tent with the General Plan and applicable
Specific Plans? --~Yue~s~------------
Please note: As per Section 21.52030 of the City Code, the
Planning Director must find that this request is consistent
with the General Plan or applicable Specific Plans, or the
application shall not be accepted. This determination may
be appealed to the Planning Commission and City Council.
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department would appreciate the oppor-
tunity to work with the applicant throughout the Planning Stages of
the proposed development. In an effort to aid the applicant, the
Planning Department requests that it be given an opportunity to
evaluate and discuss the application and plans prior to submittal.
This request is not a requirement; however, it may avoid major re-
draft i n g or rev i s i on of the p l a n w 1: i c h on 1 y serves to 1 eng then the
processing time.
ATTACHMENTS:
Supplemental Information Form -Planning 21
Preparation Check List -Planning 30
Procedures -Planning 35
FORM ....!:J~nin_g_} __ Date of Planning Commission ApprovtJ.l
AlJf);rnJ#AL 45SESsoe's #t/M/JeE: 22Z ~/50~ t:J5c1 2 2 2 ·I 5 tP -?'
) ) ..
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
CHANGE OF ZONE
1) Gross Acres (or square footage if less than acre) 128 acres
2) Present Zone PC Proposed Zone ;rt=D~M~Q~---------------------
3) General Plan Land Use Designation RM
4) Source of Water Supply San Marcos County Water District
5) Method of Sewage Disposal is Public-gravity (San Marcos County Water
District)
6) Types of Protective Covenants to be Recorded Not known at this t.i~e.
7) Transportation Modes Available to Service the Development
North County Transit District
8) School District Serving the Property San Marcos Unified School District
Palomar Community College District
9 l This application for a Change of Zone is supported by the
following reasons:
a} Such a Zone Change is warranted because
~ith .~be general pl~n.
jt is consjstent
bl Such a Zone Change will be in the interest of furtherance of
public welfare because it will lead to the develo'pment of
needed housing.
c) The permitted uses in this proposed reclassification will not be
detrimental in any way to surrounding properties because ______ __
· it is co~sisterit with the general plan.
d) The property in this application is more suitable for the
proposed zone than the existing zone because
it specifies an appropriate zone and densit-y~f~o-r--t~hr-e·--p-1-.o-p_e_r~t-y-.-
e) What were the original deed restriction, if any, concerning the
type and class of permitted uses on the subject property?
(Give expiration date of these restrictions} ·--~n~o~n~e~-------------
FORM PLANNING 21 DATE OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL
PREPARATION CHECK LIST
DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL:
1} Application with supplemental information sheet comple·ted.
2} Environmental Impact Assessment or Report with Fees (if required).
3) Photostatic copy of deed with complete legal description of
subject property or other form of description acceptable to the
Planning Director.
4} Fee: $100.00 plus $5.00 per lot.
5) 300 Foot Radius Map - A map to scale not less than 1" = 200'
showing each lot within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of
the subject property, and each lot wit.hin 300 feet of the
exterior boundaries of the subject property shall be consecutively
numbered to correspond with the property owner's list.
6} Property Owner's List -Two copies of a typewritten list on
self-adhesive (Avery} mailing labels of the name and address
of all property owners within 300' as noted on the property
owners map. This list must be accurate and taken from the
latest equalized assessment roll on file in the Office of the
Assessor of San Diego County, 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 103,
236-3771.
~/7) Disclosure Statement.
,·a) A written statement by the City Engineer that he finds there is
adequate sewer capacity available for the proposed use at the
site or that he finds that the proposed use and site can be
adequately served by alternative City approved onsite sewer
system. Applicant, please note, this determination must be
done prior to submitting application and it may require prep-
aration on your part to provide sufficient evidence to the
City Engineer. It is suggested you make early contact with the
Engineering Department for such determination.
9) For residential projects within Vista, San Marcos, Encinitas or
San Dieguito School Districts, the applicant shall indicate
whether he prefers land for school facilities, to pay a fee in
lieu thereof, or do a combination of these. If ·the applicant
prefers to dedicate land, he shall suggest the specific land.
For residential projects within the Carlsbad Unified School
District, the applicant shall submit written confirmation that
school facilities will be available and serve the project at
time of need.
FORM PLANNING 30
PROCEDUH.ES
1) Application to Planning Comntission: In a.n effort to aid the
applicant, the Planning Department requests that it be given an
opportunity to evaluate and discuss the application in its various
stages of development prior to submittal. It is more effective if
applicant mee·ts directly with staff; hovJever, written or telephone
communication is acceptable. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to make the initial contact for such meeting.
2) Submittal: Application will be accepted only if the application,
plans and other pertinent materials are included.
3) Review: After accepting the application staff will submit it to
the department review board (DCC) to ascertain if further information
is necessary. Staff will attempt to conclude this review within
two weeks, but in no case shall the review period be longer than
30 days from receipt of application.
4} Notice; Upon completion of the application review, the applicant
will be informed by letter if further information is required if
any, or if the application is complete what date it will be heard
by the Planning Commission.
5) Planning Commission Calendar: The Planning Commission adopts an
annual calendar that indicates application closing dates, staff
review dates, a staff recommended review dates as well as Planning
Commission hearing dates. The date your request will be heard is
selected from this calendar. You may acquire this calendar at the
Planning Department.
6} Staff Review: Staff prepares a report for the Planning Commission.
This report is reviewed by the Departmental Coordinating Committee
(DCC), which is made up of representatives from the departments of
Planning, Engineering, Fire, City Manager and other as may be
necessary. You are invited to this meeting to explain the project
and respond to staff recommendations. Upon completion of this
review, staff will prepare final staff recommendations to be sub-
mitted to the Planning Commission. The final report with rec-
ommendations wil~ be available at the Planning Department five days
prior to the Plc.; ning Commission hearing (Friday afternoon prior to
the Planning Cor :.ssion meeting date) .
7) Hearing: The Planning Commission meets every 2nd and 4th Wednesday
of the month at 7:00 P.M., or as indicated on the Planning
Commission calendar. Depending on the type of application, the
Planning Commission will either make a recommendation and forward
to City Council or take final action.
8) Appeals: Final actions by the Planning Commission may be appealed
to the City Council, provided such appeal is filed within ten
tlO) days after the Planning Commission action. The applicant
should review with staff the procedure on the various types of
applications.
9) Final Decision: The City will notify the applicant and property
owner of the final decision.
FORM: PLANNING 36 DATE OP PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL DEC. 6, 1978.
•
..
APPLICANT DISCLOSURE FORM
In order to assist the members of the Planning Commission and City Council
to avoid possible conflicts of interest, all applicants are required to
complete this disclosure form at the time of submitting their application.
When this form has been completed and signed, the information will be relied
upon by them in determining if a conflict may exist, so please ensure that
all of tlle information is completed and accurate_. If at anytime before a
final action on your application has been rendered, any of the information
required by this disclosure changes, an amendment reflecting this change must
be filed.
If the applicant is an individual, or a partnership (either general or limited)
or a joint venture, please state the full name, address and phone number of
each person or individual (including trusts) who own any beneficial interest
in the property which is the subject: of this application. Should one or more
parties to the application be a partnership or joint venture, then please
state the full legal name of the partnership or joint venture, its legal
address and the name and address of each individual person who is a general
and/or limited partner or member of the joint venture.
Should one or more of the parties be a privately held corporation (10 share-
holders or less) or a real estate syndication, then please state the state of
incorporation or syndication, corporate number, date of incorporation or
syndication, corporate or syndicate address, and the full names and addresses of
each individual shareholder or syndicate member. Should the corporat.ion be
a publically held corporation, then state the'full name and address of the
corporation, the place of its incorporation, number of shareholders, and the
name and address of the officers of the corporation.
Should you feel that additional information needs to be provided in order to
provide a full disclosure, please include it.
I