HomeMy WebLinkAbout; 3313 Fosca Street; Soils Report Final; 1989-09-14MV ENGINEERING, INC.
2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102
Escondido, California 92025-l 330
6191743-l 214 Fax: 739-0343
-
,-
-
Job #1164-88
September 14, 1989
Mr. Mickey Christian R.C. Construction 3317 Fosca Street Carlsbad, California 92008
Final Compaction Report, Transition Undercuts for Pads A,C,E, & F, Wall Backfills and Pool Pad Enlargement for 3313 Fosca Street Site, Carlsbad
Pursuant to your authorisation, this compaction report was prepared for the above-mentioned project. We have completed engineering observation and testing services in conjunction with the grading operation. This report summarises the results of our tests and observations of the compacted fill. The compacted fill in the subject areas was placed during the period of August 23, 1988 and July 12, 1989.
-
-
-
FILL PLACEMENT
Fill was placed in six- to eight-inch lifts and compacted by means of heavy construction equipment. Field density tests
were performed in accordance with ASTM Method D-1556-82 as the fill was placed. The approximate locations of the field density tests are shown on the enclosed drawing.
The locations of the tests were so placed to provide the best possible coverage. Areas of low compaction, as indicated by the field density tests, were brought to the attention of the contractor. These areas were reworked by the contractor and retested. The test locations and final test results are summarized on the compaction test result table. The results of our field density tests and laboratory testing indicate that the fills at the site were compacted to at least 90% of the maximum dry density at the tested locations.
ENGINEERING DEPT. LIBRARY City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carfsbad, CA92009-4859
-
-
R.C. Construction September 14, 1989 Page 2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
APPROPRIATE LABORATORY TESTS
1 - The maximum dry density and optimum moisture contents of the different soil types used as compacted fill were determined in accordance with ASTM Method D-1557-78.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Site preparation and grading were in substantial conformance with the Grading Ordinance for the City of Carlsbad and our Preliminary Soil Investigation Report dated May 28, 1987.
A. Swimming Pool
The swimming pool must be designed by a qualified contractor familiar with moderately expansive clays (6% to 10%).
B. Slopes
All slopes should be landscaped with types of plants and planting that do not require excessive irrigation. Excess watering of slopes should be avoided. Slopes left unplanted will be subject to erosion. The irrigation system should be installed in accordance with the governing agencies.
Water should not be allowed to flow over the slopes in an uncontrolled manner. Until landscaping is fully established, plastic sheeting should be kept accessible to protect the slopes from periods of prolonged and/or heavy rainfall. Berms should be constructed along the top edges of all fill slopes.
Brow ditches should be constructed along slopes sufficient to guide runoff away site and adjacent fill slopes prior completed.
C. Drainage
the top of all cut from the building to project being
The owner/developer is responsible to insure adequate measures are taken to properly finish grade the building pad after the structures and other improvements are in place, so that the drainage waters from the improved site and adjacent properties are directed away from proposed structures. A
MV ENGINEERING, INC. l 2450 VINEYARD AVENUE, X102 . ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA 92025-1330 . 6191743.1214
SOILS TESTING PERC TEST OOlL IN”EslmmwNs GEOECH*cAL lN”Enlw.nOM
-
-
-
-
-
R.C. Construction September 14, 1989 Page 3
minimum of two percent gradient should be maintained away from all foundations. Roof gutters and downspouts should be installed on the building. All discharge from downspouts should be led away from the foundations and slab. Installation of area drains in the yards should also be considered. In no case should water be allowed to pond or flow over slopes. The property owner should be made aware that altering drainage patterns, landscaping, the addition of patios, planters, and other improvements, as well as over irrigation and variations in seasonal rainfall all affect subsurface moisture conditions, which in turn affect structural performance.
GENERAL INFORMATION
It should be noted that the characteristics of as-compacted fill may change due to post-construction changes from cycles of drying and wetting, water infiltration, applied loads, environmental changes, etc. These changes can cause detrimental changes in the fill characteristics such as in strength behavior, compressibility behavior, volume change behavior, permeability, etc.
The homeowner should be made aware of the possibility of shrinkage cracks in concrete and stucco materials. The American Concrete Institute indicates that most concrete shrinks about l/8-inch in 20 feet. Separation between construction and cold joints should also be expected.
This office is to be notified no later than 3 P.M. on the day before any of the following operations begin.to schedule appropriate testing and/or inspections.
1. Fill placed under any conditions 12 inches or more in depth, to include:
a. building pads,
b. street improvements, sidewalks, curb and gutters,
c. trenches,
d. wall backfills:
-
MV ENGINEERING, INC. l 2450 VINEYARD AVENUE, HO2 l ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA 92025-1330 l 619/743-1214
-
MILS TEmNG PER2 TEST SOIL Iw”EsTKumcus GEOTEC”NlCAL I”“EsTlGATKINS
- .-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
R.C. Construction September 14, 1989 Page 4
2. subgrade and basegrade preparation and testing;
3. moisture testing;
4. foundation inspections;
5. any operation not included herein which requires our testing, supervision, and inspection for certification to the appropriate agencies.
LIMITATIONS
Our description of grading operations, as well as observations and testing services herein, have been limited to those grading operations performed between August 23, 1988 and July 12, 1989. The conclusions contained herein have been based upon our observations and testing as noted. No representations are made as to the quality or extent of materials not observed and tested.
The attached drawing details the approximate locations of cuts, fills and locations of the density tests taken, and is applicable to the site at the time this report was prepared. This report should be considered valid for permit purposes for a period of six months and is subject to review by our firm following that time.
If you have any questions or need clarification, please contact this office at your convenience. Reference to our Job #1164-88 will help to expedite our response to your inquiries.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you.
I
MV ENGINEERING, INC.
Ralph M. Vinje GE #863
RMV/jm
- Distribution: Addressee (4) Mr. Tim Fennessy, City of Carlsbad (2)
MV ENGINEERING, INC. l 2450 VINEYARD AVENUE, #IO2 l ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA 92025-1330 l 619/743-1214
- SOILS TESTING PERC TEST SO& IWEsTIGmONS GEOTECHHICAL lN”EsnGlTlONS
-
-
-
-
-
JOB #1164-88
NAME R.C. CONSTRUCTION
TEST RESULTS
LABORATORY COMPACTION TESTS:
SOIL TYPE 1 - BROWN CLAYEY SILTY SAND*
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY 117.3 PCF
OPTIMUM MOISTURE 14.3 %
SOIL TYPE 3 - LIGHT TAN SILTY SAND (IMPORT)
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY 118.9 PCF
OPTIMUM MOISTURE 13.4 %
son TYPE 4 - ~GRAY SAND (IMPORT)
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY 108.3 PCF
OPTIMUM MOISTURE 10.7 %
SOIL TYPE 5 - LIGHT TAN SANDY SILT (IMPORT)
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY 111.3 PCF
OPTIMUM MOISTURE 16.0 %
*FROM OUR PRELIMINARY SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT DATED MAY 28, 1987.
-
MV ENGINEERING, INC. l 2450 VINEYARD AVENUE, X102 l ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA 92025-1330 l 6191743.1214
- SOUS TESTlNG PERC TEST SOIL IYVESTIGATK)~ EEOlEc”wclL lW”EsTlGATlONS
-
-
-. -.
JOB NO. 1164-88
NAME R.C. CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION 3317 FOSCA STREET, CARLSBAD -
LEGEND - FIELD DENSITY TESTS RESULTS
-
-
-
-
-
-
WATER: SEWER:
W.M. = Water Main S.M. = Sewer Main
W.S.O. = Water Service Outlet S.L. = Sewer Lateral
F.H. = Fire Hydrant S.M.H. = Sewer Man Hole
W.T.I. = Water Tie In S.T.I. = Sewer Tie In
STORM DRAIN:
S.D. = Storm Drain
S.D.L. = Storm Drain Lateral
S.D.C.O. = Storm Drain Clean Out Box
COMMON OR JOINT TRENCH:
C.T. = Common Trench
C.T.L. = Common Trench Lateral
C.T.B. = Common Trench Box
-
-
-
-
PAVING:
S.G. = Subgrade
B.G. = Basegrade
S.W. = Sidewalk
P.L. = Parking Lot
C/G = Curb & Gutter
-
MISCELLANEOUS:
F.G. = Finish Grade
U.C. = Undercut
STA = Station
H.W. = Head Wall
W.W. = Wing Wall
MV ENGlNEERING, INC. . 2450 VINEYARD AVENUE, X102 l ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA 92026-1330 l 619/743-1214
SOILS TEmNO PERC TEST SOIL IN”ESTKIAllOY* GEOIECnnlCAL IWNEFTIOATIONS
I I I , I I I I
JOB NO. 1164-88
NAME R.C. CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION: 3317 FOSCA STREET, CARLSBAD
Field Density Tests:
Date Test 1988 No.
8/23 24
8/23 25
8/23 26
8/26 27
8/26 28
8/26 29
8/26 30
8/26 31
8/26 32
8/26 33
8/26 34
9/16 35
9/16 36
11/2 37
11/2 38
11/2 39
11/3 40
11/3 41
11/3 42
11/3 43
11/8 44
11/8 45
Location
PAD E HOUSE
PAD C HOUSE
PAD A HOUSE
PAD C HOUSE
PAD E HOUSE
PAD E HOUSE
PAD A HOUSE
PAD A HOUSE
PAD F HOUSE
PAD F HOUSE
PAD E HOUSE
FRONT OF HOUSE RETAINING WALL
FRONT OF HOUSE RETAINING WALL
INNER HOUSE WALL
INNER HOUSE WALL
BACK YARD RETAINING WALL
BACK YARD RETAINING WALL
INNER HOUSE WALL
INNER HOUSE WALL
INNER HOUSE WALL
FRONT OF HOUSE RETAINING WALL
FRONT OF HOUSE RETAINING WALL
I ! I
Ht.of Field Fill Moist.
+2' 11.1
-1' 11.8
-1' 11.6
+O'FG 9.9
+2' 13.0
+4' 12.8
-1' 13.9
+O'FG 13.4
-1' 12.1
+O'FG 13.6
+5'FG 12.8
+O'FG 13.4
-1' 17.0
+2' 14.9
+4' 15.1
+O'FG 8.4
+O'FG 15.4
+6' 16.2
+2' 17.0
+4' 14.9
+2' 11.1
i-4' 11.7
I I
Field Dry Density Lab Dry Density
105.3 118.9
108.1 118.9
105.7 118.9
110.0 118.9
110.2 118.9
109.6 118.9
111.1 118.9
110.1 118.9
107.9 118.9
109.2 118.9
108.5 118.9
108.1 118.9
109.0 118.9
110.1 118.9
109.6 118.9
105.9 118.9
110.0 118.9
108.6 118.9
109.8 118.9
109.7 118.9
100.9 108.3
101.9 108.3
I I I I I
Rel.Comp. % of Max. Comments
88.6
90.9 3' UC
88.9 3' UC
92.5
92.7 RETEST 24 ,
92.2
93.4 RETEST 26
92.6
90.8 3' UC
91.8
91.3
90.9
91.7 BOTTOM OF FOOTING
92.6
92.2
89.1 1
92.5 RETEST 39
91.3
92.4
92.3
93.2
94.1
I I I I 1~ 1 I I I JOB NO. 1164-88
NAME R.C. CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION: 3313 FOSCA STREET, CARLSBAD
Field Density Tests:
Date 1989
6/5
6/5
6/5
6/6
6/6
6/6
6/6
6/6
6/7
6/7
6/7
6/7
6/7
6/8
Test No.
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
6/8 60
6/8 61
6/8 62
l/12 63
Location
Ht.of Fill Fie Id Moist. 'ield Dry Lab Dry Rel.Comp. Density Density % of Max.
POOL PAD ENLARGE SE 0' 19.0 102.7 117.3 87.5
POOL PAD ENLARGE SE 0' 12.6 113.0 117.3 96.4
POOL PAD ENLARGE SE 2' 15.1 108.4 117.3 92.4
POOL PAD ENLARGE SE 4' 11.3 111.8 117.3 95.4
POOL PAD ENLARGE CENTRAL 6' 13.6 110.2 117.3 93.9
POOL PAD ENLARGE CENTRAL 8' 16.0 108.0 117.3 92.1
POOL PAD ENLARGE CENTRAL 10' 11.1 111.2 117.3 94.8
POOL PAD ENLARGE NORTH 12' 16.0 107.8 117.3 91.9
POOL PAD ENLARGE SOUTH 11' 12.3 110.2 117.3 94.0
POOL PAD ENLARGE SOUTH 13' 13.1 95.8 111.3 86.1
POOL PAD ENLARGE SOUTH 13' 11.1 99.4 111.3 89.2
POOL PAD ENLARGE SOUTH 13' 12.7 98.7 111.3 88.7
POOL PAD ENLARGE NORTH 13' 15.3 107.2 117.3 91.4
POOL PAD ENLARGE CENTRAL 13' 18.8 100.2 111.3 90.0~
POOL PAD ENLARGE NORTH 15'FG 16.9 103.1 111.3 92.6
POOL PAD ENLARGE SOUTH 16'FG 17.6 98.5 111.3 88.5
POOL PAD ENLARGE SOUTH 16'FG 15.7 105.3 111.3 94.7
POOL PAD ENLARGE SOUTH EAST 8'FG 12.3 112.4 117.3 95.8
I I
F
I I I I I I
Comments
-2' UC FAILURE
RETEST OF #l
FAILURE
FAILURE
FAILURE
RETEST OF #55 56 & 57
I FAILURE
RETEST #61
13
13
12
12
11
111
10
10
Job No. 1164-88 '
Date: 5/23/88
Mickey Christian
3313 Fosca Street, Carlsbad
Visual Description; Light tan silty sand
(import)
Sample No. 3 Hole No.
Classification USCS:
I
Laboratory Compaction 5x25
b a ASTM 1557-70-A
Test Conducted by: TW
1 I 1 h
0 """'y Fercent Moisture I i i i i i i 5 0 15 20 25
35
30
25
20
15
IO
35
00
c
I.- 0
Job No. 1164-88
Dole: 11/2/88
Job Name: R.C. CONSTRUCTION
Localion: 3313 FOSCA STREET, CARLSBAD
Visual Descriplion: GRAY SAND (IMPORT)
Sample No. 4 Hole No. --
Depth: -- By: S.9
Clossilication USCS:
% + %” Malerials =
% + 4” Materials =
ASTM D-1557-78 n Method A 0 8
Maximum Dry Density 10 8 . 3 pcf
Optimum Mois!ure 10.7 %
Tesl Conducted by: TW
Hand 0
Machine q
Percent Moisture
5 10 15 20 25 30
Trial Sample + Wet Wt. Moist Wt. Dry Percent Dry
No. Mold Wt. Densitv Sample Sample Moisture Densitv
1 13.02 fbs. 114.3 Pcf 100 cm 93.7 CJms 6.7 % 107.1 Pcf
2 13.11 Ibs. 117.0 Pcf 100 gms 92.0 gms 8.7 % 107.6 Pc’
3 13.21 Ibs. 120.0 Pcf 100 gms 89.3 CJms 12.0 % 107.1 Pcf ___
Ibs. Pcf cm gms % Pcf
Ibs. Pcf cm gms % Pcf
( Mofd No.: 1 Volume: l/30 cu.fl. Weighf 9.21 Ibs.
No. of Blows: 5x25 Mold Dia. R 4” 0 6” +4 Material 0 Included Q Not Included
-
-
-
_.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
_ 140
.
135
130
125
20
1.5
10
05
00
-f--r-T-- Y II \A I I 1 l\J h [\I -
Job No. 1164-88
Dale: 6/2/89
Job Name: R.C. CONSTRUCTION
Localion: 3317 FOSCA STREET, CARLSBAD
Visual Description: LIGHT TAN SANDY SILT
(IMPORT)
Sample No. 5 Hole No. --
Depth: -- BY: BC
Classification USCS:
% + G” Materials =
I I I I I I rercenr r L I 5 10 15 21
% t 4” Moferials =
ASTM D-1557-78 a Method A m B
UC CID
Maximum Dry Density 111.3 pc!
Oplimum Moir!ure 16.0 %
Test Conducted by: TW
Hand u
Machine x7
25 30
Trial Sample + Wet Wt. Moist wt. Dry Percent Dry No. Mold Wt. Densitv Sample Sample Moisture Densitv
1 13.31 Ibs. 125.7 pcf 100 gms 87.9 cm 13.8 % 110.5PCf
2 13.16 Ibs. 121.2 Pcf 100 ms 90.2 gms 10.9 % 109.3pcf
3 13.44 ‘bs. 129.6 Pcf 100 cm 85.9 gms 16.4 % 111.3 pcf.
Ibs. Pcf cm gms % Pcf
Ibs. Pcf cm cm % Pcf
1 Mold No.: 1 1 Volume: l/30 cult. 1 Weight 9.12 fbs. 1
1 No. Of 6fOWS: 5x25 1 Mold Dia. a 4” 0 6” 1 +4 Material 0 Included IXI Not included