HomeMy WebLinkAbout; CARLSBAD OVERHEAD; CARLSBAD OVERHEAD STATE BRIDGE REPORTS; 1984-06-060149-
-I
STATE OF CA_rORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT
OH-OS MIS (REV. I/741
Bridge No- .......................... ?..i-.:3.4.............................................
Location .............11—SD—FAU .SlO1Cbd
Dist -Co-Rt..PM.city
Date of Inv.stigat Ion .........................
Name ......... ...... ... .9YED (.Jc ....Ld.....Q.,..6 mile noz.thw.es.ter1y ... of ... Elm Av
CONDITION RATING: .
. APPRAISAL RATING:
7 7 7 4
Deck Superstructure Substr. & Pipes Overall
Channel & Channel Protection
N Retaining Walls N
PRIORITY
Widenable? Yes No Conditional G A - Immediate Action
Action Required by. City Yes B - Early Scheduling No D C - Routine Maint.
0 - Por Record Only
WORK DONE:
The erosion at the wingwalls has been repaired.
WORK NOT DONE:
The erosion at the northeasterly abutment slope has not been
repaired.
CONDITION OF STRUCTURE:
The concrete baluster bridge railings have numerous concrete
spalls with bar reinforcing steel exposed. There are small
concrete spalls throughout the structure.
Otherwise ,the structure is-'in fairly good condition.
WORK RECOMMENDED:
Repair the erosion at the northeasterly abutment slope. B
Repair or replace the concrete baluster bridge railings. C:
RECOMMENDED POSTING:
None
FJW: pdh
cc: DRHiggins (2) Frank J. 7alliser
City of Carlsbad (2) C-19767
A
z4. . - -* I - .. - - - - - -- --•-.- - - - -.S----- . •_ .._..._ _..__ 4
c-' - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
- .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Bridge No
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT Location _!_P !9_._____.____..._._._
0(4.05 MIS (REV. '/741 01st Co - me - PM - City -
Oats of Investigation July 07, 1982
- -,. .• L . - -. -
N CARLSBAD OVERHEAD (Carlsbad Blvd. - 0.6 mile northwesterly of i Name — _____--S. .
LILI pV.)
CONDITION RATING APPRAISAL RATING
Deck superstructure Substr. & Pipes Overall
Channel & Channel Protection N Retaining Walls N
-
Widenabie? Yes No 0 Conditional 0
* City •
Action Required by)cJfJL*tX Yes No 0
S Si
SEISMIC RETROFIT:
This is a multiple simple span bridge and should be considered
for seismic retrofitting. •
CONDITION OF STRUCTURE:
The concrete baluster bridge railings have numerous.. concrete
spalls with bar reinforcing steel exposed. There is erosion
at the northeasterly abutment slope and Pt the northerly and
southerly wingwalls. There are small concrete spalls through-
out the structure.
RECOMMENDATION:
Repair the erosion at the northeasterly abutment slope and the
northerly and southerly wingwalls.
RECOMMENDED POSTING:
None -
. 4
eCi'.
Frank J. Walliser
C-19767 ..
FJW: pdh
cc: DRHiggins (2)
S
city of Carlsbad (2)
S •• .
l Ain
__: -. -•-.
- . • - S • -•
.)_.
-•. --
__ •• .•-- - --•
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OEP1RTMENT OF TRANSPO 10N
BRIDGE REPORT
O5.M59JREV. 1175)
REVISED
Bridge No .......................................................
Old State ..............................................................
P.U.C. No. ..........................................................................................
Location ...........
DI$t - Co - Rte - PM - Clty
Date of Investigation .... Qatober....8. ..... i98i ...........................
Name .... CaRLS. .E0t0J ....
Elm Avenue) Lat. .JT330- Long.
STRUCTURAL DATA AND HISTORY
Year Built..1925_ ...... By ......Contract No. ....M.]13-
Date of Revisions ........L936.......................................................................................
Designedby: B.D. 91 ......................................................................................... ... Plans Avail. @
Description: Reinforced concrete T-beam girder (7) spans on
reinforced concrete column (5) bents.
Spans (W.).1J ..c/.e....()......................
Length ...... L55.. ........... Skew .................. .5..... .............................. Design LL ...............................
Ratings: Inventory .....1.1ip. ............ -Operating .............. Permit ... PP!PJT..'.......................
DESCRIPTION — ON STRUCTURE
Bridge Width J.&!i ;.... ..... .... l.!Jr. ... .)...............................................
TotalWidth ................... .4.3.. .............................................................................. Lanes .......... . .............. ..TracksjNLOfle...........
Median ........... .U......LDi.xJ.n). ........................................ .Rail Type ..... x±r........ (0000) Vert. Clearance over deck Appr. Rdwy. Width .................1.O..........................
Wearing Surface ........................................................ Deck Seal .......... .'T.c!1e.............................................................
Alignment ..............
DESCRIPTION — UNDER STRUCTURE
RoadwaySection .Eoi2e............................................................................................................................................................
O I Clearances: Vert...22.'-2.!!........................Hortz.;..........- ........................ U. .................. Rt.
- Tracks ........... 2... Pumpplant: None See Br. No.
Facilities Crossed ...........I,T.&.S..F..I.R.V
cc:
(1) CON'T.
STATf'JP CALIFORNIA
(ICOARTMLNTOF TRAN1SPOF
BRIDC- REPORT
D5.M58b REV I 75
ON
Bridge No. ..............7C4 .
.
Date ......................188Q .
DESCRIPTION - HYDRAULICS
Channel NoDe. ............................ ..... ... .................................................................. ............................................
Navigable: Yes 0 No FX Clearances: Vert. ................. .NHoriz. ...........N
MAINTENANCE
Custodian .....City of . Owner e
ORIGINAL
CONDITION RATING
Deck 7
Superstructure . -7
Substructure & Pipes 7
Channel & Channel Protection N
Retaining Walls N
Approach Rdwy. Alignment
- (9)
Estimated Remaining Life 40
Widenable' Yes j No Conditional
ORIGINAL
APPRAISAL
Overall __(4L
Deck Geometry
Underclearances Vert.
Horlz. (4)
Spfo Load Capcity 7.
Waterway Adequacy N.
Approach Rdwy. Alignment (9)
City Action Required by Disttt: Yes No E
AVERAGE IILY TRAFFIC — 20,000 (Estimated 1980)
BYPASS DETOUR LENGTH — 4 miles.
ENCROACHMENTS -. 4" .0 pipe attached to the westerlyside of the structure.
CONDITION OF STRUCTURE
— The easterly approach pavement is cracking. There is erosion at the ends of both easterly wingw
a
l
]
.
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
A
C
pavement has been slightly undermined. The concret
e
b
r
i
1
d
g
e
r
a
i
l
i
n
g
has many concrete spalls. with bar reinforcing ste
e
l
e
x
p
o
s
e
d
.
T
h
e
r
e
is erosion at the easterly abutment slope and of t
h
e
e
m
b
a
n
k
m
e
n
t
between the 2nd and 3rd bents from the westerly en
d
o
f
t
h
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.
There is a concrete spallwith bar reinforcing st
e
e
l
e
x
p
o
s
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
north column of the 2nd bent from the easterly en
d
o
f
t
h
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.
LOAD CAPACITY — The. inventory, operating and permit ratings shown were obtained through the "Frame Rate" program using
t
h
e
l
o
a
d
f
a
c
t
o
r
(LF) method of analysis.
(2)
/ BM ro._57C-134
SHL._ 3of3 ,•
DATE 10-8-80
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Repair the erosion and the AC pavement at the ends of the
easterly wingwalls.
Replace the bridge railings.
.3. Repair the erosion of the easterly abutment slope and the
erosion between the 2nd and 3rd bents from the westerly
end of the structure.
4. Repair the concrete spall at the north column of the 2nd
bent from the easterly end of the structure.
RECOMMENDED POSTING - None. .
Original signed by
FRANKJ. WALLISER **
C 019767
FJW:11
cc:DRHiggins
Dist. 11 Local Assistance
City of Carlsbad (2)
FORM ON-OS Mia Bsr. 5167. 21701.500 2.74 SM OSP
S
41
STATE OF CLIFORNIA
BRIDGE REPORT
Sheet ..1 of ........3
Bridge No. ....... 5.7C-134......................
Date of Investigation ......4••273
Location .4-2P.7O
)IST-CO.-RTE. - CITY - P.M.
Name........Carlsbad Railroad.........................................................................
Location ...2' Blvd, 0.7 .mi .sly .ofVistaWay .
- ))O•
09.81 i -,O 'l1 -- -
Latitude Longitude . DOD Rd ..........................Br.........................
SECTION LETTER
Custodian .....COUflty Owner ........Co.wity..................
CLASSIFICATION
Federal Aid System .....].4 .............................. Administrative ----------------- 4 ................ .Functional ...........3.............
STRUCTURAL DATA AND HISTORY
Widened 1934 614vc10.
Year Built .125.........S.tte.............................Cont. No. ...NUJ.................FAP No.............-
Designed by $.tat. ....................................... Plans Avail ............ye.S at State (.D)..............................
Spans 2 ..1@29o8 .,•1@26 8... .. Length...5............Skew...45.RT
Description ........RC rn(.8)on .Rc(5.çnn.(5.column .
bents ]1 footings..
On Structure
Roadway Section .PY' ?1 3...4 StI'idth ............° 1 -101,
Conc.
Rail Type Lt. Rt.c9Thc.. Median ... QP. ....Lanes....! ...... tracks ...... P......
Clearances: Vert ....... Horiz.....PUC No
Design LL..... State .H15 Capacity Rating .............13
Under Structure
Roadway Section ................Lanes ...Q. ...... Tracks ..2.........
Clearances: Vert. .22..'.2 ........................... Horiz. ............. .. ..................... PUC No. ..27.2.2.8A.A .............
HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE
Report? Yes E No. E Nay. Control Yes J No. K] Clear. Diag. Yes [•J N3 0
Relief Structures .....W/A ........................................
APPRAISAL OF NON-STRUCTURAL FACTORS
DeckGeometry ....................... 7. ...................................... Approach Alig 1p7ent .........................................................
Waterway Adequacy .............. N/A .............................. Clearances: Vert . ........ 9. ................ Horiz.........7.............
cc: County (2) . HBO-%470 111/71)
1
She- ...... ............ of........
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Brfdge No........
BRIDGE REPORT Date of Investigation .4..
ADT.t....O 1973 Year .....
• -. RATING OF CONDITION: • -- - - - ---- .. • ... -
Deck 7 Substructure 7
Superstructure 7 Overall 7
HISTORY
This structure was formerly on a state route and was assigned No. 57-10.
The original structure consisted of 5-girders with.a left and right deck.
cantilever on 3 column bents. In 1934 the right cantilever was removed
and 3 additional girders and a sidewalk cantilever were constructed; the
bents were extended by. adding 2 columns. Girder 6 was constructed adjacent
to Girder S.
CONDITION OF STRUCTURE
The concrete window rails are cracked and spalled with reinforcement exposed.
There is approximately 1 inch of Ac on the deck; the AC is cracked trans-
versely at the deck joints and longitudinally at the widening joint.
The superstructure is offset about 1/2 inch laterally at the expansion
joints. . There are vertical hairline cracks at 1 foot centers in the girder
stems. Girders 7 and 8 Bent 6 are shimmed under the bearings. Girder 8
has a small spall caused by the shimming.
The caps have vertical cracks between the columns. The crash walls are
also cracked vertically between the columns.
Column 1 Bent 5 has a corner spall near ground line with the reinforcement
exposed and badly corroded. It is recommended that this condition be
repaired.
ENCROACHMENT
1 - 412-" OD wrapped pipe supported on the caps under the left cantilever.
FORM HBD.M70A
- Br—
DATE
CAPACITY
This structure is considered safe for legal loads and it will
carry a P-13 overload vehicle.
W. R. Schott
CE Lie. No. 13592
WRS/gs
EST. 4707. 32430.500 5-65 3M asp
FOAM H.BD Ni IS -