HomeMy WebLinkAbout; Lake Calavera Golf Course; Rippability Analysis; 1990-06-07RIPPlwLITY~YsIS
PIumxEDmsL13pE
-LAlzE~~ooLF~
-,-
PREPAREDFOR:
cityofcarlsbad
Comnunity Developnent Department
2075 Las Palms Drive
Carlsbad, California 92007
PREPARED BY:
EbutkmCalifomiaSoiland~ting,~~raW
Post Office Box 20627
6280 Riverdale Street
San Diego, California 92120
-
-
--
-
4% T
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC.
6280 RIVERDALE ST. SAN DIEGO, CALIF. 92120 ’ TELE 280-4321 l P.O. BOX 20627 SAN DIEGO, CALIF. 92120
678 ENTERPRISE ST. E 8 c q N D I D m. (: A L I F. 9202.5 * TELE 745-4544
June 7, 1990
City of Carl&ad
CcmnunityDevelo~DeparQent
2075 Las Palmas Drive SCSEiT 8921130
Carl&ad, California 92007 ReportNo. 2
EXJBJJICT: Rippability Analysis for Proposed Cut Slope, Lake Calavera Golf
Course, Carl&ad, California.
REFERENCE: "Report of Gectechnical Investigation, Calavera Lake Golf Course,
Carl&ad, California," Southern California Soil and Testing,
Inc., Report No. 1, October 4, 1989.
Gentlemen:
In accordance with your request we have perfo& four seismic refraction
traverses within the area of the proposed cut slope. The findings of our
survey and the locations of the seismic traverses are presented herewith.
If you should have any questions regarding this report, or if wa IMY be of
further service, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This
opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated.
Respectfully subitted,
P R. High, C.E.G@237
JRH:ItlW
cc: (6)
(1)
sulanitted
SCS&T, Escondido
--
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING. I N C.
-
-
-
Introduction ............................................................... 1
Findings ................................................................... 1
General ........................................................... 1
Seismic Traverses No. S-l through Traverse No. S-2R ............ ...2
Seismic Traverse No. S-3 through Traverse No. S-4R ............. ...3
Rippability Characteristic of Granitics ........................ ...3
Riple Condition (O-4,500 Ft./SW.) ..................... ...3
Marginally Rippkble Condition (4,500 Ft./&c.-5,500 Ft./Set ..4
Nonrippable Condition (5,500 Ft./Set. & Greater) .......... ...4
Seismic Traverse Limitations ...................................... 5
-
Plate 1 Plot Plan
Plates 2-5 Seismic Traverses
Plates 6-7 Rippability Charts -
-
--
-
-
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC.
6280 RIVEROALE ST. SAN DIEGO, CALIF. 92120 ’ TELE 280-4321 ’ P.O. BOX 20627 SAN DIEGO, CALIF. 92120
678 ENTERPRlOE ST. E 9 e D N D I D 0, c * L 1 F. 92D23 - TELE 745-4544
sEIsMIcsuRvEpmRIPP~ILITY-srIcs
L?%JZCAL?WERACOL,FCOURSE
The intent of the seismic refraction survey was specifically to facilitate
the project planning by determining the variation in seismic velocity of the
underlying materials and to determine a reasonable approximation of the
depth from the surface to the boundaries between rippable, marginally
rippable, and nonrippable bedrock.
Four seismic traverses were performed by our firm in May 1990. These
traverses were positioned within the area of the proposed cut slope as
indicated by Mr. Dan Clark.
The seismograph's depth of investigation is closely related to the length of
the seismic traverse. For a particular length of traverse, e.g., 100 feet,
using a ratio of 3:l between length and depth, hi conclude that this length
of survey line will detect the boundaries between materials of varying
density and velocity to depths ranging to approximately 33 feet. The maxinnun
length of traverse in this survey is 100 feet, which should reach a depth of
approximately 33 feet.
FIMJIXS
QZWW,: The results of our seismic traverses indicate that the nWerials
are nonrippable to the proposed depths and blasting may be necessary. The
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING. I N C.
SCE&T 8921130 June 7, 1990 Page 2
results of the seismic traverses are presented below and on Plate Nurbrs 2
through 5 and the locations are indicated on Plate Number 1. The apparent
velocities were measured at both ends of the seismic traverses, and the
seismic traverse performed in the opposite direction is designated as Nmber
R.
&parent Velocities Cammks
ft/sec.
' No. S-l
ProposedCut: 35 feet
O'-11'
+ll'
Traverse ND. s-IR
O'-11'
+ll'
- No. s-2
Proposed Cut: 25 feet
O'-11'
+ll'
- ND. s-m
0 I, 6’
6'-21'
+21'
3,900 Rip@le Topsoils and Weathered Granite
with Ha&rock Floaters
12,000 Nonrippable Granitic Bedrock
4,000 Rippable Topsoils and Weathered Granite
with Hardmck Floaters
14,000 Nomippable Granitic Bedrock
2,800 RippAle Topsoils and Weathered Granite
with Hardrock Floaters
12,000 Nonrippable Granitic Bedrcck
4,000 Rippable Topsoils and weathered Granite
with Hardrcck Floaters
6,000 Nonrippable Granitic Bedrock
10,000 Nonrippable Granitic Bedrock
SCS&T 8921130 June 7, 1990 Page 3
Apparent Velocities Cmts
ft/hec.
TraveJcse ND. s-3
ProposedCut: 35 feet
0 I, 8’
8'-16'
+16'
- ND. S-3R
0 I, 9'
+ 9’
Traverse ND. s-4
ProposedCut: 20 feet
O'-13'
+13'
2,500 Rippable Topsoils and Weathered Granite
with Hardmck Floaters
8,000 Nonrippable Granitic EMrock
14,000 Nonrippable Granitic Bedrock
2,000 Rippable Topsoils and Weathered Granite
with Hardrock Floaters
12,000 Nonrippable Granitic Bedrock
3,500 Rippable Topsoils and Weathered Granite
with Hardrock Floaters
8,000 Nonrippable Granitic Bedrock
!bzmxse No. S-4R
O'-16'
+16'
3,300 Rippable Topsoils and Weathered Granite
with Ha&rock Floaters
12,000 NomAppable Granitic E&rock
RIPPABILITY UURACXZRISTIC OF GRANITICS: The following describes the
rippability characteristics of granitic reek materials in regards to the
velocity of soundwaves through the rock.
FUPPIWE aJJ!mTIm (O-4,500 Fl!./mc.): This velocity range indicates
rippable mterials which my consist of decoqosed granitics possessing
random hardmck floaters. These materials will break down into slightly
SCS&T 8921130 June 7, 1990 Page 4
silty, well graded sand. %te areas may contain localized hardrock areas
and may present utility trench problm. Further, large floaters exposed
at the cut surface may present additional problems with potential
hazards due to rocks protruding from cut slopes.
Materials within the velocity range of from 3,500 to 4,000 fps are
rippable with difficulty by backhoes and other light trenching
equipment.
MARGmy Rl.Pl?AELlE axaxcTIoN (4,500 FT./SEC.-5,500 Fr./?xc.): This
range is rippable with effort by a D-9 in only slightly weathered
granitics. This velocity range may also include numarous localized
hardrock floaters with the possibility of extensive areas of fractured
granitics. Excavations rray produce material that will partially break
down into a coarse, slightly silty to clean sand, but IMY contain a high
percentage of +1/4" material. Less fractured or mathered materials may
be found in this velocity range that would require blasting to
facilitate removal.
Materials within this velocity range are beyond the capability of
backhoes and lighter trenching equipnt. Difficulty of excavation
would also be realized by gradalls and other heavy trenching equipment.
NONRIPPABIE ~ITION (5,500 Fr./?sExz. & GI2lwIm): This velocity range
includes nonrippable material consisting primarily of moderately
fractured granitics at lower velocities and only slightly fractured or
unfractured rock at higher velocities. In its natural state, it is not
desirable for finish grade due to the lack of fines and the highly
fractured material resulting from cuts within this rock. Blasting in
granitics will produce oversize material requiring special disposal
consideration.
This upper limit has been based on rippability with a Caterpillar D-9
using a conventional #9 single shank ripper. However, thisupperlimit
SCS&T 8921130 June 7, 1990 Page 5
-
_-
-
of rippability may some times be increased to 7,000 to 8,000 fps
material using the D-9 mounted #9 Series D Ripper or other heavy
excavation equipment.
The rippability index presented above is a mxlification of charts prepared
by the Caterpillar C!orrp?any and an article in "Road and Streets", September
1967. Also included as Plate Numbers 6 and 7 are rippability charts from the
October 1986 Caterpillar Performance Handbook. It has been our experience
that many of the local contractors cannot achieve the rippability levels as
indicated in the 1986 handbook. These charts are presented as potential
guidelines for planning the proposed project.
SEISMIC TRm?EsE L0ECZWIQG: The results of the seismic survey for this
investigation reflect rippability conditions only for the areas of the
traverses. Howsver, the conditions of the granitic materials appears to be
similar for the remainder of the area of the proposed cut slope and may be
assumed to possess similar characteristics.
Our reporting is presently limited in that refraction seismic surveys do not
allow for prediction for a percentage of expectable oversize or hardrock
floaters. Subsurface variations in the degree of weathered rock to fractured
rock are not accurately predictable.
The seismic refraction method requires that materials become increasingly
dense with depth. In areas where denser, higher velocity materials are
underlain by 1-r velocity materials, the 1-r velocity materials mid
not be indicated by our survey.
All of the velocities used as upper limits for rippability are subject to
fluctuation depending upon such local variations in rock conditions as:
a) Fractures, Faults and Planes of Weakness of Any Rind
b) Wthering and Degree of Decwsition
Cl Brittleness and Crystalline Nature
d) Grain Size
SCS&T 8921130 June 7, 1990 Page 6
It should be noted that ripping of higher velocity materials my became
totally dependent on the ti..m available and the economics of the project.
Ripping of higher velocity materials can be achieved but it my becom
economically infeasible.
-
-
r-
-
-
-
o 40 80 120
LEGEND
I
I 1 SEISMIC TRAVERSE LOCATION
c?!%’ EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY
&% PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHY
*OUTnlRu CALICORWIA SOIL & TIRTlWQ, INC. ,y JHlWDW DITt: 6-m-m
JOB IUYBtl: 6921130 PLAE 41
N: I ! I I I 1 1 I I 1
_ _
la0120 60
150 lo0 50
120 00 40
906030
604020
nil 1 I 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
DISTANCE d
10s Lake Calaveras GEOLOGIST JH/MH
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
SOIL &TESTING, INC.
JOB NO. 8921130 315 ELEVATION ~
S-l TRAVERSE NO. ~-~ _-~- .-~ SURFICIAL MAT’L.
TR !, lRSE TYPE _~~___ ROCK TYPE __
-u iif iif
oz: . T
w f I
DISTANCE d
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 20 40 60 00 100 120 140 160 180 200 _-- 1 30 60 90 120 150 100 210 240 270 300
0 4 FOlfTIfERN CALIFORNIA
SOIL &TESTING, INC.
JOB Lake Calaveras- GEOLOGIST JWMH .__ .._
JOB NO. 8921130
TRAVERSE NO. ‘-’ -
ELEVATION ~ 335 ft.
SURFICIAL MAT’L. Silty Sand
TRAVEKSF. TYPE Kqr ROCK TYPE
PlatP Nn ?
/ I f I ‘- / I -----r-r~--T- I 1
150 wo so
120 60 40
906030
604020
20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 100
40 60 80 loo 120 140 160 180 200 1 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300
DISTANCE ___)
JOB Lake Calaveras ..____ GEOLOGIST JWMH - _-_
"!ii~.~JIJTiTmTr! i / 4 ! 1 : ; f---i ! 1 : ; i z.tJ.j ! j ! ;; ; / ;&.&j 1 I 1 j i I 1 j j / Ft-~'-'~TfTttttttiJ.]
--+- tiiii+++-+tT I!li ir / '1,/l I,":" ,I --,I * 11 a1 1
(-u 8 I --* -- i-c
ib
18
---T*--- __-.-..- -
-ji!]l$!’ f..,:.
Qq---m .. *!I, j’ ,, >- . t-f t : I', I.' ; k+-+-~~--~ -++k I+~+ t-l-~~~-Lt-...ijllCttSi..'rit-it:-': :I:!! I I, ,,.,, ,..,,,.I, ,,. .~~~TI-&j i 1 ,, 'I, : I : : '+ ! 1 'I ,!/,I,/.( II ,1 -..*------
Ii l/!lI I: ‘!I/.! :I i: I, : I’IIII: IIIII,
_: :,: ~+i-I$&;,:~~ /I <,: A 1: ! II I ----- , :Q 1 i i ~~~~~~~~~~~~.
II II IIII,, I!, II 4 t I ,
I I II 1; 11 1 II (I! I i 1 / I ( 2 I ‘L- f-i’ -+;‘j’:‘;i’,“,.“’ ,.I 1 I jLL+“.+ -+CL.L+Lyt 1 / 1 j t ,, ,,‘,‘I;‘, / / , ,, /
I : I I : 1 : _ -- I I -.- ~--Lb - :: I tIIi,I .&A+-+ I !! :, c; ;I!! :i; I.! I ,.j-
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA L
SOIL &TESTING, INC.
JOB NO. 8921130 320 ft. ELEVATION -_
TRAVERSE NO. s-3 SURFICIAL MAT’L. Silty Sand _.
TRAVERSE TYPE ROCK TYPE _ Kgr-
2-b. 1
n1-%+m r-In n
,I /, Iii,,, !/‘I, I’ ““]i,,’ ; ‘!I ji 1 ‘- I i j
; ; +&pJ...&/ / j i 1 1 ‘-+I j I / 1 I ~+q$&~ I I i/lJ~j1-i;~~::+LL~: +-I--+f +
i1!!‘:I:i-~~-C!-i-~,~j:“*L”’ I’ 1-1 I I 1 i~.-__I 1 --~- ‘; -I-d 2 I T I : i ? LIL: : ; 'i'"r-lij;:i!,-,ii,::jii;." "' il-Lm , .- 5 / I 1 : I I -_.L- I:TT11-:-1
ILILiLilL 1-Li-L-LL:_i~. 1 IlI!I!rYdlII’IIIIL.LL : j i rfr: I i I iii-z1 1
[fj I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I i I I -I I ! I I I I tt+wt-ti-m&t-t-1-1 I t#m F i i f i i j 1 i I ; i i j i..L.cec, *._ : I,,, , ,,1,,, ‘---F--++*~]~--Jysq ] I!.: ll....!l. ..,I.!. ., II ,*,
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 _-- 1 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300
DISTANCE d
JOB Lake Calaveras GEOLOGIST JH/MH _
SOUTHPRN CALlFORNIA
SOIL &TESTING, INC.
JOB NO. 8921130 ELEVATION ___ 300 ft.
TRAVERSE NO. s-4 ______ SURF ICIAL MAT’L. SM
TRb’!f [<SE TYPE ROCK TYPE Kgr.
Plate No. 5
D8L
CATERPILLAR
PERFORMANCE HANDBOOK
Edition 17
October 1986
Selsmlc Velocity
Foot Par Sooond x 1000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 i I I I 1 TOPSOIL
CLAY
IGNEOUS ROCKS
GRANITE
BASALT
SEDIMENTARY ROCKS
SHALE
SANDSTONE
SILTSTONE
CLAYSTONE
CONGLOMERATE
METAMORPHIC ROCKS
SCHIST
SLATE I / , / / 1
1
RIPPASLE MAROINAL NON-RIPPABLE 1 I
D8L Ripper Performance
l Multi or Single Shank No. 8 Ripper
* Estimated by Seismic Wave Velocities
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA . LAKE CALAVERAS GOLF COURSE
SOIL 8 TESTING, INC. BY: JH DATE: 6-13-90
JOB NUMBER: 8921130 Plate No. 6
D9L
CATERPILLAR
PERFORMANCE HANDBOOK
Edition 17
October 1986
Selsmlc Velocity
foot PW 800on4 x loo0 0123456789 10 11 12 13 14 16
IGNEOUS ROCKS
SEDIMENTARY ROCKS
SANDSTONE
SILTSTONE
CLAYSTONE
CONQLOMERATE
METAMORPHIC ROCKS
NON-RIPPASLE
D9L Ripper Performance
+ Multi or Single Shank No. 9 Ripper
+ Estimated by Seismic Wave Velocities
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAKE CALAVERAS GOLF COURSE
SOIL 8 TESTING, INC. “: JH DATE: 6-13-90
JOB NUMBER: 892 1130 Plate No. 7