The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3172; Carlsbad Library Parking Lot; Carlsbad Library Parking Lot; 1986-03-24oo Testing Engineers-San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138(619)225-9641 2948 Industry Street, Suite B, Oceanside, Ca. 92054 (619) 757-0248 LABORATORY NUMBER DATE Job No. 5024 086-167 March 24, 1986 O City of Carlsbad-Engineering Dept. Attn: Mr. Harold Johnson 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Project: Annual Material Testing Services Capital Improvement Programs P.O. B-14426 Carlsbad Library Parking Lot MAR 2 81986 c CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Subject: Material sampled by Testing Engineers personnel and submitted to the laboratory on March 17, 1986, identified as: M/D No. 2 - Class II base material, secured from Carlsbad Library Parking Lot. Procedure: Moisture density relations of soil, tested in accordance with ASTM- D 1557, Method C. Results:M/D No. 2 Dry weight per cubic foot Percent moisture Maximum dry density, Ibs./cu. ft, Optimum moisture content, % #1 136.3 4.7 #2 139.9 6.5 #3 134.8 8.8 140.0 6.5 TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO Reviewed by: Kenth M. Rowe North County Branch Manager 2) City of Carlsbad O Qo Testing Engineers-San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467KurtzSt., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138(619)225-9641 2948 Industry Street, Suite B, Oceanside, Ca. 92054 (619) 757-0248 FORM 7 JP LABORATORY NUMBER Job No. 5024 086-167 DATE March 24, 1986 O City of Carlsbad-Engineering Dept. Attn: Mr. Harold Johnson 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Project: Annual Material Testing Services Capital Improvement Programs P.O^jS-14426 Carlsbad Library Parking Lot Subject: Material sampled by Testing Engineers personnel and submitted to the laboratory on March 17, 1986, identified as: M/D No. 2 - Class II base material, secured from Carlsbad Library, Parking Lot. Procedure: Moisture density relations of soil, tested in accordance with ASTM- D 1557, Method C. Results:M/D No. 2 Dry weight per cubic foot Percent moisture Maximum dry density, Ibs./cu. ft. Optimum moisture content, % #1 136.3 4.7 #2 #3 139.9 134.8 6.5 8.8 140.0 6.5 TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO Reviewed by: Kenth M. Rowe North County Branch Manager jc 2) City of Carlsbad O .9 . N O CO COCO :O Cc'ICL W CO >- h inz LJ Q LJ U J 0. 0)hJ D to LJ K < Q c< CO o Q. fe CJ) Z 0p o 3 OC L.o LIh 00cn CM cn oo S- rO CM Q U.a 1 2 UJ K. O.Q:PERCENTREL. COMP.REQUIRED\x. DRYENSITY<>t _J Q; Ifl fl«O ^* z D OPTIMUMMOIST.0-2 0 H o 0 IAQUl7 oi CO roCO S-(OQ. Co CO CO incn cn O • 0 roro in 10 o> COroJD LU 4-o CO U. S cn cn o o ro <£> cn O 00cn Lncn o o cn in CO <DCO ro S-O) S-oo UJoo oo o CM cn CE- O CO oCO rocn Lncn o • o cn CM uo Ln QJ COroJD QJUsrro S- <D UJ o CTl OLn ffi O O cn o in o • o CM 10ro Ln 01 JD O>e s- Q. 5- O) Ci-ou CM :€ inen 01 o •o LT> CO 10 boundryo oo oCM oCO en OO ro Lnen Lnen O • o co ro CO ID 01c o ID S-•oc o JD CM Q 0. Q • U. Q °O c,-^ ugg'.Z Z C < Z Z (cLJ r LJ I- 5 LJ D 0 Z S 0 Z 2 U. LJ O - in in LJ Q 05K O U) 1--! K Z <" ^LJ W<Z }f I- .in >LJ CO UJ Q w > < LJ0 s rrm < U) Ll I- OL] (fl LJ1 LJ I I- H H TJ C CO O JD CO CO C S- O 03 rO O O >> c C_> «C S^ O) CD U o 1.2 N co 0 J3 to Li] >- h z 111 Q UJ U J Q. to h J D W hi < Q O c* tt0 h u0 <u & o za 0D. U CO CM CTl CO oS-03 LO J CO LJa: L. 0 LJh< Q too0 Z 2 S 3 ai< - <Q U. J (A U K (-U1 PERCENTREL. COMP.REQUIREDU v O I- 2£|z o PTIMUMOIST.fl-5 0 I- o 0 OJ to 03 CO aic s-03n. co tr tocu LO CTl LO CTl O O OO OO LO to 03 XJ ca CUo 03 S- ccu LU CO inen o•=1- oo Lf) en oo oo oCM co CTl Lf)en o o cn in 10 CO vo ooo o00 C£ou, i fe? CO CTl LO CT) o o CT> CM ID LO *vo cuto 03.o O)o c0) oCTl o LO o CTl inCTl o o 10oo ID ID O) 03.a enc: S-03 Q. J-OJci.o(J CM C c CTl IDCTl o o inoo ID •10 ID o JD o 00 o CM OCO CTl OO OO ID CTl LO CTl o o OO oooo LO ID S--oc3O CO CM CM OO •, uj o:Q a. O c< a:ooo D jf a.c S O LJ ^ OE o zz c LJ ^ LJI- > LJ D O Z §25 O „• mu§< l/l UJ Q D . LJ O U) H J C Z < LJ -u£uiO ± a S i- 3ii in oo: £ IH inHin -^ inUJ CD I- uJ r)ui a S)> < LJ gstc < U) HI(- U) LJ I 1- H 03 O.a toto c 5- O O3 r~D o >) C_) « CM S-O)CD 03 C03 u o o o Testing Engineers - San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 2948 Industry Street, Suite B, Oceanside, Ca. 92054 (619) 757-0248 LABORATORY NUMBER Job No. 5024 086-164 DATE March 13, 1986 O City of Carlsbad, Engineering Dept. Attn: Mr. Harold Johnson 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, Ca Project: City of Carlsbad Library Parking Lot RECEIVED MAR 211986 CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Subject: Material sampled by Testing Engineers-San Diego personnel and submitted to the laboratory on March 7, 1986, identified as: M/D No. 1 - Red brown silty fine to medium sand, secured from parking lot fill. Procedure: Moisture density relations of soil, tested in accordance with ASTM- D 1557, Method A. Results:M/D No. 1 Dry weight per cubic foot Percent moisture Maximum dry density, l.bs./cu. ft. Optimum moisture content, % #1 125.0 11.3 #2 #3 131.6 131.1 9.3 7.3 - 132.5 8.0 TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO Reviewed by: Keieth M. Rowe North County Branch Manager jc 2) City of Carlsbad O o.o Testing Engineers - San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138(619)225-9641 2948 Industry Street, Suite B, Oceanside, Ca. 92054 (619) 757-0248 LABORATORY NUMBER Job No. 5024 086-164 DATE March 13, 1986 City of Carlsbad, Engineering Dept. Attn: Mr. Harold Johnson 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, Ca Project: City of Carlsbad Library Parking Lot Subject: Material sampled by Testing Engineers-San Diego personnel and submitted to the laboratory on March 7, 1986, identified as: M/D No. 1 - Red brown silty fine to medium sand, secured from parking lot fill. Procedure: Moisture density relations of soil, tested in accordance with ASTM- D 1557, Method A. Results:M/D No. 1 Dry weight per cubic foot Percent moisture Maximum dry density, Ibs./cu. ft. Optimum moisture content, % #1 125.0 11.3 #2 #3 131.6 131.1 9.3 7.3 - 132.5 8.0 TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO Reviewed by: Keieth M. Rowe North County Branch Manager jc 2) City of Carlsbad O 0) | o oo CM 1 CO o Q- U) h ijJ 42 h- >- feo w £ o S- O|> fOc nr UJ O J Q. Whj D W UJ >- J Ito u<ITHT. 0u <£> 00 D oo CT1 u t-inuiI- ui 0 0Z Z o U) or U <o: jO LJIUU ERCENTL. COMP.REQUIREDPREAX. DRYENSITYN PLACEDRYDENSITY2 -31-Zin PO O2 INPLACEMOIST.z O 1- .v>0 CMcn incn in CM CO CO CM CM o CO >> •oc::s OJD CU LU TD fO 4- S-O CD 3 =5- toin to >>Q) S- i- T3IO C cn oC JD •r"^ oo S-tO 4-D. O to - 10 00LU *— Cn IDcn ID • 00 CO CM O • 00 C\J• CM CM O) IO IO CU S- S- Cn tO _Q 3cn toc i. Q)tO (J Q. Cto 4J S- 10 +Jto c LU CU o o LD CTl CMro 00 o • CO to Q. to O) M- S- O cn-c cn S- O)to u Q. C IO to c LLJ CU O cn LT>cn CMoo CM CO O CO cn ID x;c (C M- O to c:cu o S-10 OO cnoc CM s- O)10 oCL cto-i-> S- 10 C LU <L> O iii cQn- oogz z m o ui - uj HSuD O Ztds l'S5 O .- tn u> ui Q Z X uiO Q H 3 . ujO 0) Hj o: z< u - 0 9 Ul Q ± 0 tc ^ I!~ U)HU) >• 0)Ul OJ I- ii Q a>> < ui02n:m< in m I ui X1- I- I- lO JD C(/) O r— tO S- C fO .E O O•-3 «4- O T3 4J S- •r- IO O ^ CM O o O) o 2 o Q3 o tn tniii h tn ui u u<J Q. tn j Dtnui >•j VO CM 1 CO o Q- CJ) < 1 E 0d ah 0u CO CO L.0 uH<0 co CO 10u u ... . lj J B Q il ^ CjO O!K ERCENTL. COMP.EQUIREDPEla AX. DRYENSITYIN PLACEDRYDENSITYz 3K 5<» VOS2 „ |N«PLACEMOIST.CMcn o •u~> CT> C\J CO CO CM CM o 00 oJO cuLU T3 (O M- S-O CO 3 =3to *- ca >> CO O C ^** .*: oo S-ro i»- O. O <0 CO LU *— O Ol O In CM CO O CO CM CM LU OCM CU ro ro CU S-S- cn O) to ••- <a S- CUro OCL cro ro c LU CU CM JS 843 OO1 o un CM CO CO CTl O CO ro O E -o 4- COo - S-O rOVD Q_ ro CU M- S- OrO OOCO- C CTl S- CUro OCL cro4J $-tO 4-)ro c LU CU CO k s^ " O cr> Ln CTi CM CO CO CM CO o •CO en ID -Dc c: •r- ^rO o E -Q M- O) - S- O ror- CLCM ro c CU O oo COO C CM S- CUro OCL C(O •4-> S- LU CU o ui o:an. ^§3 ^S§ O IT ^ . < K IHID g D.o: Si 0 iij ^ O JE 0 2H za:m r usis |S2 O _• tn tn u Q2 5 iu - uj < < £ D . uiO in H-J K z< iu - Q ? S in K Du in OE y i P u in ui I UJ IH H H T3ro JO C l/> O i— </) i- C O O +•> S-•r- rOO 3: CM o Q O 0) Sold Coast Surveying, CONTRACTORS, ATTENTION: Grades are given from tops of stakes or nails, in feet and hundredths of a foot The term Sewer Grades refers to flow line of pipe. The contractors shall observe the following rule in using these grade stakes. Three consecutive points on the same rate of grade or on a tangent alignment must be used in common, and when a discrepancy is found, it must be re-ported, at once, otherwise this office will not be responsible for any error in the grade or alignment of the finished work.Any lack of stakes must be reported to this office 3 days before they are required. ALL GRADE SHEETS ARE VOID AFTER 30 DAYS Stakes set by- Field 4 -Computed by_ _Page_££l__ -Checked by_ _Job Number. Stakes are set..Grades for. •TATIDN CLCV.GRADE CUT FILL O/S STATION ELCV.GRADE CUT FILL o/s J" Sf-C •/ZS.44 Be--TV 11 / XZ /?-- z. /Z6-76 x\ J r- V /2S-S3 >>* SURVEY OF JOB NO._ INDEX,o PAGB_ SURVEY NOTES FIELD PAGE \... . ..: f\v /... **. ...-. -V •- - GOLJ Coast Surveying, IQ 19 o CONTRACTORS. ATTENTION: Grades are given from tops of stakes or nails, in feet and hundredth* of a foot The term Sewer Grades refers to flow same rate of grade or on a tangent alignment must be used in common, ami when a discrepancy is found, it must be re- ported, at once, otherwise this office will not be responsible for any error in the grade or alignment of the finished work.Any lack of stakes must be reported to this office 3 days before they are required. ALL GRADE SHEETS ARE VOID AFTER 30 DAYS •TAT ION CLCV.ORAOC CUT FILL O/S STATION CLCV.GRADE CUT FILL.O/S J'tff / -2 7-^3 /•Z7-7f / S25.7I SZ6-I7 *,'••/• 5-7 / ^78 it • 5 if J30-&8 /?/. #5 //I/ Sl'tt.tZ 1 SI. 6 3 zo* <n !/27-/O -Z-7 DISTRIBUTION WHITE - Personnel . YELLOW - Employee CITY, OF CARLSBAD " "T EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REPORT o Date issued Date Due 7/1/86 7/31/86 DEPT. NO.DEPARTMENT NAME Engineering PROBATION -.: [ X ] •'< [ ; 1 . 1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr.3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. CLASSIFICATION Constr. Insp. EMPLOYEE NAME Reesman, C. soc. SEC. NO. RATING PERIOD Regular Promotion Other Separation a 4/86'7/86 •CHECK ITEMS [+] "Strong J [v! =Standard " [-) =Weak"f . . CIRCLE FACTOR RATINGS- B=Performance BELOW Bequiremi M^Performance MET Requirement! E-Performance EXCEEDED Regui Use space below for COMMENTS. Examples of work well done.or suggestions* about how to improve work performance should be noted. -•• - • - •-• -• Over-all rating of Outstanding or Unsatisfactory must be substantiated in writing. ' 1. QUANTITY- [I^TAmount of work performed •fft" Completion of work on schedule 2. QUALITY [^'Accuracy Et^Neatness of work product horoughness al expression r Written expression 3. WORK HABITS- " Observance of working hours Xttendance.,... . ,.,. ... , . . .:...„. 444-Observance of rules and regulations - „. .^•Observance of Safety Rules [P^Compliance with work instructions ^^•^ • --• •--:**.«-• ' .'.-,.'* ":• --"r^t-.--, - . *J?4~' EW^Orderliness in work*' - "' . : ffr*Application to duties - 4. PERSONAL RELATIONS*B •Ht'Getting along with fellow employees [•^••Meeting and handling the public i|4- Personal Appearance 5. ADAPTABILITY- ^Performance in new situations ormance in emergencies [l^f'erformance with minimum instructions 6. SUPERVISORY ABILITY-»B M E Planning and assigning Training and instructing Disciplinary control •• ~ Evaluating performance Leadership ] Making decisions ] Fairness and impartiality '•' ; ';,./• ] Approachability 72? P&0/T TV (Continue COMMENTS on Reverse Side) , OVER-ALL RATING (Over-all rating should be consistent with factor ratings) Unsatisfactory Below Standara Standard Above Standard Outstanding SIGNATURE OF RATER This report is based x>n my observation and/or knowledge. It represents^/ ^^) judgment of the employee's performance^ MRater Date EMPLOYEE'S'CERTIFICATION I hereby certify I have reviewed this report and request an appointment with the City Manager to discuss the report. Signature Date, FINAL PROBATION REPORTS ONLY -: r This report is based on my observation and/or knowledge. It represents my best judgment of the employee's performance. On the basis of this report: • *'•••• •'•,::'. [ 1 I do 11 I do not. recommend the probationer's permanent appointment. RATER'S ' " ' ' ' 'SIGNATURE— '. ' DATE ____J_. EMPLOYEE'S CERTIFICATION I hereby certify f have reviewed this report and concur in and approve the ' report. Signature . Date I have reviewed this report. It represent! the facts to the best of my knowledge. On the basis of this report: I 1 I do [ ] I do not .". ','., -~" . :^~^',-:.,:... recommend the probationer's permanent appointment. SIGNATURE DATE. DEPT. HEAD SIGNATURE ACTION OF CITY MANAGER I concur in and approve this report of performance evaluation. SIGNATURE DATE DISTRIBUTION WHITE - Personnel YELLOW - Employee o CITY. OR CARLSBAD EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REPORT o Date Issued. Date Due 7/1/86 7/31/86 DEPT. NO DEPARTMENT NAME. Engineering PROBATION) .- [X] « •'•• 1stO.tr 2nd Qtr [' - ] ' [" 1 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr CLASSIFICATION Constr. Insp. EMPLOYEE NAME. Silva, Thomas' SOC. SEC. NO. RATING PERIOD' 1 < } Regular [ Pro )f lotioa Other' Separation R4/86 -7/86- CHECK ITEMS [+1-Strong " , ',; M =Standard ~; [—I = Weak ,-. •.;;.. "."CIRCLE FACTOR RATINGS-j':'4-'- v; B= Performance BELOW Requirements .,!.'. " ' M = Performance MET Requirements " - - - .. E = Performance EXCEEDED Requirements Use space below for COMMENTS.1,- Examples of work well done.or suggestions! about how to improve work performance should be noted. Over-all rating of Outstanding or Unsatisfactory must be substantiated in writing. 1. QUANTITY- t Amount of work performed f Completion of work on schedule 2. QUALITY-^.B ^> Accuracy •f-jSgl Neatness of work product •^--Thoroughness l expression -?,-?;, .. ten expression 3. WORK HABITS t>B M , f. |1 f^-.Observance of working hours *" ' 4#- Attendance -,..s«+-~t, ^ ~ , , 4^— Observance of rules and regulations ,-t Wobservance of Safety Rules tfr Compliance with work instructions^ v- .1 • ,t.v" <i,ri~i;,' v- , . t[W^Orderliness in work Jjj* Application to duties - - »,., /f V - 4. PERSONAL RELATIONS-oB( etting along with fellow employees [W*fVIeeting and handling the public , [jj^Personal Appearance 5. ADAPTABILITY-M(E i^ Performance in new situations frt" Performance in emergencies [^? Performance with minimum instructions 6. SUPERVISORY ABILITY-+B M E Planning and assigning ' . Training and instructing Disciplinary control •.- •?!-••!:• -i.',-?- >:i-i ;•-,-<•:. ."_ ;• Evaluating performance ••' ' -? ''' Leadership Making decisions Fairness and impartiality Approachability A.c.c.erpyet> AMD -1-4-E5M IMTD J=L TlMg TQ-** (Continue COMMENTS on Reverse Side) OVER-ALL RATING— — . (Over-all rating should be consistant with •factor ratings) .rd Above Standard Outstanding SIGNATURE OF RATER This report/ irf based on my observation and/or knowledge,. It <. represents fffffffa5'1 jujagment of the employee's performance. Rater ^Da., EMPLOYEE'^CERTIFICATfON *'" " ' - ' ' * 1 hereby certify I have reviewed this report and request an appointment with • the City Manager to discuss the report. Signature Date EMPLOYEE'S CERTIFICATION I hereby certify I have reviewed this report and concur in and approve the" report. . ' • Signature : . Date DEPT. HEAD SIGNATURE FINAL PROBATION .REPORTS ONLY :'; ;. ;-^. -f ;;•;-. This report is based on my observation and/or knowledge, represents my best judgment of the employee's performance. On the basis of this report:' •'••'• - • - •.--;'- --. • - • ."' «• [ 1 I do { ] I do not. recommend the probationer's permanent appointment. RATER'S n ^ ^ ""."'" ,^ .''!!" SIGNATURE -IlJllill^lill--- '•'"-!'' " *• DATE _I—_i_ 1 have reviewed this report. It represents the facts to the best of r knowledge. On the basts of this report:[ 1 i do ' _•„. I ] i do not,. -:. :„?,;:;;\-?/;r:7 TV ".:::. recommend the probationer's permanent appointment. SIGNATURE ,DATE- ACTION OF CITY MANAGER;-. ; . . I concur in and approve this report of performance evaluation. SIGNATURE - : DATE