The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3172; Carlsbad Library Parking Lot; Carlsbad Library Parking Lot; 1986-03-24 (2)Testing Engineers-San Diego 2/7^ A Division of United States Testing Company. Inc. 3467 KurtzSt., P.O. Box80985, SanDiego, Ca. 92138 (619)225-9641 2948 Industry Street, Suite B, Oceanside, Ca. 92054(619)757-0248 LABORATORY NUMBER Job No. 5024 086-167 DATE March 24, 1986 ^^^^^^^^^ City of Carlsbad-Engineering Dept. Attn: Mr. Harold Johnson 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Project: Annual Material Testing Services Capital Improvement Programs P.O. B-14426 Carlsbad Library Parking Lot MAR 281986 ciry Of CARLSBAD ENGINEERINS OEPARTMENr Subject: Material sampled by Testing Engineers personnel and submitted to the laboratory on March 17, 1986, identified as: M/D No. 2 - Class II base material, secured from Carlsbad Library Parking Lot. Procedure: Moisture density relations of soil, tested in accordance with ASTM- D 1557, Method C. Results: M/D No. 2 Dry weight per cubic foot Percent moisture Maximum dry density, Ibs./cu. ft Optimum moisture content, % #1 136.3 4.7 #2 139.9 6.5 #3 134.8 8.8 140.0 6.5 TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO Reviewed by: Kenrvfeth M. Rowe North County Branch Manager JC 2) City of Carlsbad Testing Engineers-San Diego A Division of United States Testing Conipany, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 2948 Industry Street, Suite B, Oceanside, Ca. 92054 (619) 757-0248 LABORATORY NUMBER DATE Job No. 5024 086-167 March 24, 1986 City of Carlsbad-Engineering Dept. Attn: Mr. Harold Johnson 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Project: Annual Material Testing Services Capital Improvement Programs P.O.^B-14426 Carlsbad Library Parking Lot Subject: Material sampled by Testing Engineers personnel and submitted to the laboratory on March 17, 1986, identified as: M/D No. 2 - Class II base material, secured from Carlsbad Library. Parking Lot. Procedure: Moisture density relations of soil, tested in accordance with ASTM- D 1557, Method C. Results: M/D No. 2 Dry weight per cubic foot Percent moisture Maximum dry density, Ibs./cu. ft Optimum moisture content, % #1 136.3 4.7 #2 #3 139.9 134.8 6.5 8.8 140.0 6.5 TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO Reviewed by: Kenheth M. Rowe North County Branch Manager JC 2) City of Carlsbad Testing Engineers-San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company. Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 2948 Industry Street, Suite B, Oceanside, Ca. 92054 (619) 757-0248 RECEIVED DATE OF TEST DAILY RESULTS- IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS March 18,19,24/1986 APP0T19 FILE NO.. LAB. NO.- 5024 LOCAT.ON CityofCarlsbad P.O. B-14^^ ^.^..^^ Library Parkinq Lot ENGINEERING DFPAPTAAFMT 086-172 DATE OF REPORT— -,-3/31/86 CONTRACTOR. :sT o. LOCATION IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS All tests on Parkinq Lot Base 60'N of E entrance ^ base 4.7 6.5 133.5 140.0 95.0 95.0 OONFORM 20'N, 100'W of SE corner (? base 4.9 6.5 127.3 140.0 95.0 91.0 DOES NOT CONFORM ) 80'N, 30'E of E entrance 0 base 6.8 6.5 137.9 140.0 95,0 98.0 CONFORM 150'W, 90'N of E entrance @ base 6.5 6.5 129.5 140.0 95.0 93.0 DoaNorooNronM W corner of parking lot base 4.5 6.5 136.2 140.0 95.0 97.0 CONFORM 9 J 180'W of E entrance, 20'S of N boundry 4.6 6.5 135.0 140.0 95.0 96.0 CONFORM M \ 20'S of N boundry, 60'E of existing 4.7 6.5 133.3 140.0 95.0 95.0 CONFORM boundry City of Carlsbad Attn: H. Johnson THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS - SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO REVIEWElb BY jntreth M. Rowe, NoAth Cou County Branch Manager Testing Engineers-San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 2948 Industry Street, Suite B, Oceanside, Ca. 92054(619) 757-0248 KECEIVED m. 0 T1985 DAILY RESULTS- IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST. FILE NO LAB. NO March 18,19,24/1986 LOCATION City of Carlsbad P.O. B-1 5024 086-172 DATE OF REPORT ppo..rf-T Library Parking Lot CONTRACTOR „ _„ CITY 0? CAR113AD ENGINEERlfIG DEPAP.TME.^Jr EST MO. LOCATION IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS All tests on Parkinq Lot Base 60'N of E entrance I? base 4.7 6.5 133.5 140.0 95.0 95.0 CONFORM 20'N. 100'W of SE corner (? base 4.9 6.5 127.3 140.0 95.0 91.0 DOES NOT CONFORM 0 80'N. 30'E of E entrance base 6.8 6.5 137.9 140.0 95.0 98.0 CONFORM 1 150'W, 90'N of E entrance (? base 6.5 6.5 129.5 140.0 95.0 93.0 DOES NOT CONFORM 2 W corner of parking lot base 4.5 6.5 136.2 140.0 95.0 97.0 CONFORM 19 3 180'W of E entrance, 20'S of N boundry 4.6 6.5 135.0 140.0 95.0 96.0 CONFORM 24 4 20'S of N boundry, 60'E of existing 4.7 6.5 133.3 140.0 95.0 95.0 CONFORM boundry ) City of Carlsbad Attn: H. Johnson THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGI NEERS • SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO REVIEWER) BY kth M. Rowe, Nonth Coun ty Branch Manager Testing Engineers - San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company. Inc. I'sf |; i" , 3467 KurtzSt., P.O. Sox 80985, SanDiego, Ca. 92138(619)225-9641 >CM3? 2948 Industry Street, Suite B, Oceanside, Ca. 92054 (619) 757-0248 LABORATORY NUMBER Job No. 5024 086-164 DATE March 13, 1986 City of Carlsbad, Engineering Dept. Attn: Mr. Harold Johnson 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, Ca Project: City of Carlsbad Library Parking Lot RECEIVED. MAR 211986 CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Subject: Material sampled by Testing Engineers-San Diego personnel and submitted to the laboratory on March 7, 1986, identified as: M/D No. 1 - Red brown silty fine to medium sand, secured from parking lot fill. Procedure: Moisture density relations of soil, tested in accordance with ASTM- D 1557, Method A. Results: M/D No. 1 Dry weight per cubic foot Percent moisture Maximum dry density, Ibs./cu. ft, Optimum moisture content, % #1 125.0 11.3 #2 #3 131.6 131.1 9.3 7.3 - 132.5 8.0 TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO Reviewed by: Kenneth M. Rowe ^ North County Branch Manager jc 2) City of Carlsbad Testing Engineers-San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company. Inc. 3467 KurtzSt., P.O.Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 2948 Industry Street, Suite B, Oceanside, Ca. 92054 (619) 757-0248 LABORATORY NUMBER Job No. 5024 086-164 DATE March 13, 1986 City of Carlsbad, Engineering Dept. Attn: Mr. Harold Johnson 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, Ca Project: City of Carlsbad Library Parking Lot Subject: Material sampled by Testing Engineers-San Diego personnel and submitted to the laboratory on March 7, 1986, identified as: M/D No. 1 - Red brown silty fine to medium sand, secured from parking lot fill. Procedure: Moisture density relations of soil, tested in accordance with ASTM- D 1557, Method A. Results: M/D No. 1 Dry weight per cubic foot Percent moisture Maximum dry density, Ibs./cu. ft Optimum moisture content, % #1 125.0 11.3 #2 #3 131.6 131.1 9.3 7.3 - 132.5 8.0 TESTING ENGINEERS-SAN DIEGO Reviewed by: Kenneth M. Rowe ^ North County Branch Manager JC 2) City of Carlsbad Testing Engineers-San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company, Inc. 3467KurtzSt., P.O. Box 80985, SanDiego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 2948 Industry Street, Suite B, Oceanside, Ca. 92054 (619) 757-0248 DAILY RESULTS- IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS DATE OF TEST. FILE NO LAB. NO March 7, 1986 5024 086-159 DATE OF REPORT. 3/13/86 JOB DATA City of Carlsbad P.O. B-14426 PROJECT_ Library Parking Lot CONTRACTOR. Attn: Harold Johnson TEST NO. LOCATION IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 1 East parking area, 15'W of E boundry, 18'N of S boundry, @ subgrade 7.7 8.0 122.3 132.5 95.0 92.0 DOES NOT CONFORM 2 East parking area, 20'E of main entrance @ subgrade 12.2 8.0 124.1 132.5 95.0 94.0 DOES NOT CONFORM 3 East parking area, 60'W of main entrance, 9'S of N parking boundry 7.9 8.0 119.8 132.5 95.0 90.0 DOES NOT CONFORM 4 East parking area, 210'N of main entrance, 20'S on N parking boundry 6.9 8.0 132.3 132.5 95.0 99.0 CONFORM 2) City of Carlsbad, Harold Johnson jc THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGINEERS - SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY Kenneth M. Rowe, Nortlh County Branch Manager Testing Engineers-San Diego A Division of United States Testing Company. Inc. 3467 Kurtz St., P.O. Box 80985, San Diego, Ca. 92138 (619) 225-9641 2948 Industry Street, Suite B, Oceanside, Ca. 92054 (619) 757-0248 DATE OF TEST, FILE NO LAB. No DAILY RESULTS- IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS March 7, 1986 JOB DATA City of Carlsbad P.O. B-14426 PROJECT— Library Parking Lot 5024 086-159 DATE OF REPORT. 3/13/86 .CONTRACTOR, Attn: Harold Johnson "EST No. LOCATION IN PLACE MOIST. OPTIMUM MOIST. IN PLACE DRY DENSITY MAX. DRY DENSITY PERCENT REL. COMP. REQUIRED PERCENT RELATIVE COMP. REMARKS 1 East parking area, 15'W of E boundry, 18'N of S boundry, 0 subgrade 7.7 8.0 122.3 132.5 95.0 92.0 DOES NOT CONFORM 2 East parking area, 20'E of main entrance @ subgrade 12.2 8.0 124.1 132.5 95.0 94.0 DOES NOT CONFORM 3 East parking area, 60'W of main entrance, 9'S of N parking boundry 7.9 8.0 119.8 132.5 95.0 90.0 DOES NOT CONFORM 4 East parking area, 210'N of main entrance, 20'S on N parking boundry 6.9 8.0 132.3 132.5 95.0 99.0 V CONFORM 2) City of Carlsbad, Harold Johnson jc THE ABOVE TEST RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS CONSTITUTE THE REPORTING OF FACTUAL DATA DERIVED FROM TESTS MADE BY TESTING ENGI NEERS - SAN DIEGO. FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS OR SPECIFIED PROCEDURES. THESE RESULTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ENGINEERING OPINION OR JOB CONTROL. TESTING ENGINEERS. SAN DIEGO REVIEWED BY Kenneih M. Rowe, North County Branch Manager Gold Coast Surveying, luC. . 19 M. CONTRACTORS. ATTENTION: _ , . , . ~T# nan* in feet and hundredths of a foot The term Sewer Grades refers to flow Grades are given from tops crf stakes or naiU.^ in ieet ana -^IH- ^VP* Three con«e«itive Doints on the hne same ported, at once, otherwise this office wiU not oe respwisiDie ior «ny ««« "V^rj" Eiy iMk of stakes must be reported to this office 3 days before they are required. ALL GRADE SHEETS ARE VOID AFTER 30 DAYS .Checked by. Stakes aet by_j2Ji;^_^LA-^^Computed by ^ md bool^_^^^^ Page ^^'^ Job Number Street stakes are set .Grades for. •TATION cucv. ORADE CUT FILL o/s •TATION CLCV. DRADE CUT FILL O/S ^ ^ • /ZS-44 Be- 7/6 -TV A'.fi.^ 0 - / ^Z. /ZS 4-7 /ZS.f4 /ts. 3^ /Z^-^7 // /^z ^ /^^ 3f )zseo' Jf /z^.c>^ /zc>/9 'f /zs•^^ J /-. c . " /Z9- <^o ^ C- c / " V /zi>-9'^ / ^ t. \ as //• 1 4 JZ9-7J •/ vi 1 j N .( X SURVEY OFA?^/^ /^/?^^<'^'^<^ ^^-^ INDEX. JOB NO _ PASS, SURVEY NOTES FIELD PAGE 0 t H 0 t H V H > t) (0 H ID 0 0 Q 0 \ i-r /-^ 3i) .L. 2/. 3iS J 6i> Go:: Coast Surveying, I" \ 19 CONTRACTORS. ATTENTION: Grades are riven from tops of sUkes or nails, in feet and hundredths of a foot The term Sewer Grades refers to flow line TTif^tractOB^l observe the following rule n using these gr^e stakes. Three consecutive points on the si^e rate of grade or on a tangent alignment must be used in common, and when a d«crepancy is found, it must be re- ^d at ScirSherwise tWsoffice wifi not be responsible for any error in thegrade or ahgnment of the fimshed work. Any lack of stakes must bc reported to this offioe 3 days before they ar* required. ALL GEADE SHEETS ARE VOID AFTER 30 DAYS Checked by. stakes set by Computed by Field booi^-^^££^ P.g«L^i-^ lob Number street Stakes are set 3 ^i/^^ 'CJL -.Grades for. •TATION ELtV. DRADC CUT riLt O/S •TATION CLCV. ORADC CUT riLL O/S JS ^• A-C.- /ZS47 /ZC-ozl (TV i'/cf. /-27-33 /•27- 7f ec-/ZC».-'o' /ZS-^/ • 1 /Z5.7/ JZC, 17 /X C /T^ 5"7 II /^S.BS /Z6. 35' V / ^73 f^-CC-/Z^./7 1/ ^ /^/- S /Zf 95 /Z^'4/ '/ /30-^3 /SO-4-6 /•r /?/. jAj /y**.t; /ZS-7S /ZC '4.^ V o /J /^^--^^ // /P/7<^ /^7-/0 C> " /5 4.'i>(> DISTRIBUTION WHITE - Personnel YELLOW - Employee CiTY OF CARLSBAD ElVlPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REPORT Date Issued 11'^i^^ Date Due. 7/31/86 DEPT. NO. DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS! FICATION EMPLOYEE NAME soc. SEC. NO Engineering Constr. Insp. Reesman, C. PROBATION [ X ) ! ) [1 [ ] 1st Qtr. 2ncl Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Otr. RATING PERIOD i ] [ ] Regular Promotion E ] Other ( I Separation 7/86 , CHECK ITEMS [+1 -Strona M ^Standard H =WBak CIRCLE FACTOR RATINGS-) B^Performance BELOW Beauiremo"" M-Pertormancs MET ReauirementI e^PertormflncB EXCEEDED Baguiromi Uie space bolow for COMMENTS. EKamolos ot work well dona or itigoestions aboul now to imo'ov» work oe'^O'TtancK should be noted. Over all rating of OutsiandinH or Unsatisfactory must be lubitsniiHisd in writing. 1. QUANTITY' IH^mount of work performed +^ Completion of work on schedule B/^M) E 2. QUALITY uracv [t^''^atness of work product [^'thoroughness [l^ral ex presston 4^ Written expression 3. WORK HABITS +|f Observance of working hours Attendance 444-ObsGrvance of rules and regulations 4|4-Observance of Sa^Gtv Rules incompliance with work instructions [W'^'^KJerliness in work Application to duties •B IVl (!) 4. PERSONAL RELATIONS+B tfr Getting along with fellow emplovees HHMeeting and handling the public ^4- Personal Appe^arance 1> 5. ADAPTABILITY- ^j4"PerfDrmance in new situations [(.^'^rformance in emergencies [M''^'"f or mance with minimum instructions 6. SUPERVISORY ABILITY-+B I ] Planning and assigning [ I Training and instructing E ] Disciplinary control [ ] Evaluating performance [ ] Leadership [ ] Making decisions [ 1 Fairness and impartiality [ 1 Approachability 4 ///^y^ ^r/^.u/?A/rf>. di-//='/^ M/F£^ /f3£?u7 iAj/7jr/t /M3/r^ /:^^j^^^7jt/^/. JFje/^r/M<> 7, P/?/^^77c^ 4^77ai/^J^r/A/^ ^^JS2^f^///?tj^J: (Continue COMMENTS on Reverse Side) Unsaiisf actory Belov» StanOaro Standard Above Standard Outstanding OVER-ALL RATING • / (Over-ail rating should be consistant with lactor ratings) s. SIGNATURE OF HATER Thl» report ii bated iin mv observation and/or knowledge. It reprsMntl^/ iujjBmeni ol the employBfi'i performance Date Rater 1 EMPLOYEE'S'CERTI FICATION I herebv certifv I have revieiwed this report and request an appoinimenl with lhe Citv Manager lo discuss the reoort. Signature _ Date . — EMPLOYEE'S CERTIFICATION 1 hereby csrlifv ' have reviewed this report and concur in and approve the report. Signature —. Da's — DEPT. HEAD SIGNATURE FINAL PROBATION REPORTS ONLY This report ii baled on my obiervation and/or knowiede*. It repreienti my bejt judgment of the employee's perlormance. On the basis of this report: I ! I do 1 ] 1 do not recommend the probBtionor's permanent appointment. RATER'S SICNATURE DATE I have reviewed this report. It repreiante the fecti to the bett of my knowledge. On tha basis ot this report: I j I do I I I do not recommend the probationer's permanent appointment. SIGNATURE DATE . ACTION OF CITY MANAGER I concur in and approve thi* report of performance evaluation- StGNATURE DATE DISTRIBUTION WHITE - Personnel YELLOW - Employee CITY. OF CARLSBAD EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REPORT Date Issued Date Due __ 7/1/86 7/31/86 DEPT. NO. DEPARTMENT NAME Engineering CLASSIFICATION Constr. Insp. EMPLOYEE NAME Silva, Thomas SOC. SEC. NO. PROBATIO I Xl 1ST Qtr. [ 1 [ ] [ 1 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. [1 [1 11 f 1 Regular Promotion Other Separation RATING U/86 o M PERIOD 7/86 o CHECK ITEMS \+\ -Strong 'Standard 1—1 ^ weak CIRCLE FACTOR RATlNGS-j B'Performanee BELOW Requireman' M-Pertormance MET Requirement! E-Performanca EXCEEDED RoQuire 1. QUANTITY i Use space below for COMMENTS. Enamplei o* work well done or suggestion* about how to improve work performance should be noted. Over all rating of Outstanding or Unsatisfactory rnutt be lubttantiated in writing. Amount of work performed ^ Completion of work on schedule 2. QUALITY-•B M(E > (4^ Accuracy 4^^ Neatness of work product +ft-ThoroLjghnes5 [yr^ra\ expression [i+^ritten expression 3. WORK HABITS. ^4Ml>bservance of working hours •4f4-Attendance 44f-Observance of rules and regulations ||,.^^bservance of Satety Rules ^ Compliance with work instructions Iti'^rderliness in work ' Application to duties 1(E i t 4. PERSONAL RELATIONS+B TH* Getting along with fellow employees [H'^eeting and handling the public [jj^ersonal Appearance 5. ADAPTABILITY-•B M(E I ^ Performance in new situations tft"P5tformance in emergencies [^^^erformance with minimum instructions 6. SUPERVISORY ABILITY-+B M E Planning and assigning Trammg and instructing Disciplinary control Evaluating performance Leadership Making decisions Fairness and impartiality Approachability -L.^oMlTNmE To UA^^^/^Jr>r CiTf ^Fef^/^TiON, (Continue COMMENTS on Reverse Side) Above Standard OVER-ALL RATING. (Over-all rating should be consistant with -factor ratings) Unsatisfactory B i Standar Standard Outstanding SIGNATUHE OF RATER This repol^/'* based on my observation and/or knowledge. It represents >]Mf>1*t iijfigmant of tha employ"*'* performance. EMPLQVEE'p' CERTIFICATION I heraby certify I have reviewed this report and request an appointment witti the City Manager to discuss the report- Signature _ ______ Date _—.— EMPLOYEE'S CERTIFICATION I herebv certify > have reviewed this report and concur in and approve thi report. Signature — Date . DEPT. HEAD SIGNATURE FINAL PROBATION REPORTS ONLV This report Is based ori my obsarvation and/or knowledg*. It represents my best judgment of the employee's performance. On the basis of this report: [ n do I 1 I do not recommend the probationer's permanent appointment RATER'S SIGNATURE DATE have roviowod this report. It represents the facts to the best of my knowledg*. On tTia basil of thit report: E I 1 do [ 1 I do not recommend the probationer's permanent eppolntmant. SIGNATURE DATE . ACTION OF CITY MANAGER I concur in and approve this report of performance evoluotlon. SIGNATURE -DATE ^ —