The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3184; CANNON ROAD WEST; INVESTIGATION REPORT; 1985-04-01- 4- -, -:. I . M71 -f i I I ,.. I I CITY OF CARLSBAD I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 - (COLLEGE /CANNON), I INVESTIGATION REPORT I - Pursuant to Special Assessment Investigation, I Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 - - I - April 1985 - I I . • S • : -•• - - Engineer of Work: • • I • S NESTE, BRUDIN.& STONE INCORPORATED Engineers -- Planners - Diego, California i San I I.. . AGENCY: CITY OF CARLSBAD .. I PROJECT: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (COLLEGE/CANNON) .. TO: CIT.Y COUNCIL - CITY OF CARLSBAD I INVESTIGATION REPORT "Special Pursuant to the provisions of the, Assessment Inves tigàtion, Limitation and Majority Protest-Act of 1931," being Part 2, Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code. of. the I State of California, and in accordance with an order of the legislative body. of. the CITY OFCARLSBAD, adopted on the :day of •1 , 198.5, Isubmit ..herewith _the.. following I Report I DATED this:. day of , 1985 NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE INC I ENGINEER OF WORK .CITY OF CARLSBAD STATE OF CALIFORNIA..... I Reportapproved the. day àf . 1985, by the City Counbil- and filed in the Office of -the City Clerk of- the City - Council on the day of .. 1985. I I .... . . . . . CITY CLERK. . CITY OF CARLSBAD . -. .... STATE OF CALIFORNIA I.. I Page lof3 • REPORT SECTION 1. That the works, of improvement proposed herein are to be constructed in a special wassessment district known:and designated as ASSESSMENT' DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (COLLEGE/CANNON) . (hereinafter referred, to as the "Assessment District"). '• .. . . , SECTION .2. The following Report is made and filed herein pursuant to the order of the legislative body by the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK SECTION 3. The boundaries- of the, District showing ,the lands to be assessed to pay any part of the cost thereof, are as shown and described in . Resolution No. adopted on the', day of '- , , 1985, and on a. plat or diagram entitled "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO 85-1" which Resolution and map are on file in the Office of the Clerk and made a part of this Report by reference as though fully set forth herein SECTION 4.' The estimated cost of,"thë' proposed improvements is as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 5. ' The assessed value of each parcel to be specially assessed as shown on the last equalized, assessment roll available on the date this' ' Report was commenced, the 'total assessed value of 'said lands, the :,true value of said lands, the estimated amount of. the assessment to be ievied'upon each parcel of land -.to 'be:assessed for' said -improvements, and the as near 'as may. 'be determined of the total ,amount principal sum- of all unpaid special' assessments and special assessments required or proposed to' be levied under, any completed .or pending ,assessment proceeding', other than contemplated in the ,'that instant proceedings, whether -direct or ad valorem, ,upon each parcel to be' assessed herein, if any, is as 'shown upon the list , thereof hereto attached, - marked Exhibit "B", and 'by reference made a part hereof as ,though set forth fully herein. Page 2 of 3 SECTION 6. The total assessed value of the lands and improve- ments, as well as the true value of said parcels, is totalled and set, forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto,. The true value of the parcels 'means the fair market value fo, both the land' and improvements, as defined by—Article XIIIA of 'the California 'Constitution, and., as ' shown upon the las equalized assessment roll of the County. SECTION 7. The total estimated amount of assessment tinder this proceeding is $35,922,250. SECTION 8. Serial bonds: shall be 'issued in accordance with Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915'),'to represent all' upaid"assëssments, and the "last. installment of said bonds' shall mature' a 'maximum of -TWENTY FOUR (24)-YEARS- from the '2nd day of July next ..succeeding ten (10) months from.-their' date. 'Said'bonds, shall. bear interest at rate not to exceed the durrent legal maximum rate of, twelve. percent (12%) per annum SECTION 9. 'A copy of said Resolution No. adopted pursuant to 'Section,, 2821. of .-the Streets and Highways, Code of the State of California, is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "C", and:by reference is made a,,part hereof. : SECTION 10. The redemption : proi'sions ' of 'said .bànds shall provide for payment of 'a premium of 'five percent * (5%) of the unmaturedprincipal of "said. bonds for redemption prior to maturity 'SECTION 11. Said. proceedings are proposed to be conducted pursuant to the terms and provisions ,of the "Munici- pal Improvement Act of , 1913," being Division 12 of the Streets "and Highways .Code 'of 'the State of' California. SECTION .'12.. '' That the 'generalnáture, location and extent of the proposed., wo'r'k-s of -ithpro'veme'nt 'for,, this,Assessment District, 'together' with appurtenance's , and appurte- nant".work, is as set" forth" in Exhibit; "D!' attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 13. That a statement and explanationof the method and formula of the assessment' spread for these proceed- ings and this Assessment District is attached hereto as Exhibit "E", and by reference made a part hereof . I I I I I I I I 0 Ffl V _l x V..... ..:' . • r I I U I I I I U I 1. V V 'V 'V ,• V I 1 V V'V V,• V '"V V I.. I COST ESTIMATE EXHIBIT "A" OF CARLSBAD : I CITY - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (COLLEGE/CANNON) I PUBLIC WORKS OF CONSTRUCTION Construction Item Quantity Unit Cost Item Cost Street Improvements -. - - - Medians w/Median Landscaping 433,300 1 50 SF 649,950 I 12' Paving (each side of median)..618,000 3.00, SF 1,854,000 Type B-i Curb 51,500 11 00 LF 566,500 Street Signs/Mon./Misc.. . LS 24,019 l Grading - Full 382,237 3.00 CV 1,146,711 (Export or Import) 687,770 6 00 CY 4,126,620 Subtotal . $ 82367,800 20' Paving (on each side) 586,450 MO SF 1,759,350 I Type G Curb 31,700 12 00 LF 380,400 Street Lights 79 3',000.00 EA 237,000 Sidewalks 158,500 3-.O0 SF 475,500 I Parkway Landscaping 6342000 0 70 SF 443,800 Subtotal 3,296,050 Underground Utilities 152850 40 00 LF 634,000 I Water - ACP/Valves 15,850 45 00 LF - 713,250 Storm Drain Storm Drain Pipe/Cleanouts 25,750 30 00 LF 772,500 Energy Dissipator/Rock Slope Protection LS 177,000 I Subtotal 949,500 Traffic Signal 8 100,000 00 EA 800,000 I Bridge Sewer LS 4,160,000 8", 10,' & 12" Sewer 14,750 30.'00 LF 442,500 18" Sewer LS 351,100 24" Sewer LS .. 1,044,000 - • .21" and 30" Sewer . -. LS -. 580,000 . Pumping Station . .. LS 1,400,000 -- Force Main LS 240,000 I Subtotal 4,057,600 Subtotal Construction Cost $22,978,200 . Escalation to 1986 Construction S -- 2,297,800 I Construction Contingency 2,528,000 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS OF CONSTRUCTION. - - . $27,804,000 II RIGHT-OF-WAY 1,401,600 II INCIDENTAL EXPENSE 5,283,000 I I Subtotal $34,488,600 IV. LESS CASH CONTRIBUTION - -. - : 3,720,500 Subtotal ., $30,768,100 V FINANCING COST 5,154,150 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED $35,922,250 I I A-i I. ICOST ESTIMATE REACH A CONSTRUCTION COST • EXHIBIT "A-i" I.. .. CITY OF CARLSBAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (COLLEGE/CANNON) I Construction Item Quantity Unit Cost Item Cost Street Improvements . . . . . -. Medians w/Median Landscaping 40,935 1.50 SF 61,403 I 12' Paving (each side of median) 60,000 3.00 SF 180,000 Type B-1 .Curb 5,000 11 .'00 LF 55,000 Street Signs/Mon /Misc LS 3,097 1 Grading - Full 3.00 CY 0 (Export or Import) 170,000 6 00 CY 1,020,000 Subtotal $ 1,319,500 20' Paving (on each side) 92,500 3.00 SF 277,500 U Type G Curb 5,000 12 00 LF 60,000 Street Lights : 5 3,000.00 EA 15,000 I Sidewalks Parkway Landscaping 25,000 100,000 3 00 0.7.0 SF SF 75,000 70,000 Subtotal 497,500 Underground Utilities 2,500 40.00 LF 100,000 I Water— ACP/Valves 2,500 45.00 LF 112,500 Storm Drain Storm Drain Pipe/Cleanouts 2,500 30 00 LF 75,000 Energy Dissipator/Rock Slope Protection LS 17,000 I Subtotal 92,000 Traffic Signal 1 100,000 00 EA 100,000 I Bridge Sewer. 2$00 30.-00 LS LF 0 75,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $ 2,296,500 I I I I I I I 1. 0 , 1 .COST ESTIMATE ' REACH B CONSTRUCTION COST EXHIBIT "A-2" I .. . . - CITY OF CARLSBAD . S ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (COLLEGE/CANNON) 1 Construction Item S Quantity. Unit Cost Item Cot Street Improvements . . . . . -• Medians w/Median Landscaping . 53,215 . 1.50 SF . I 12' Paving (each side of median) 78,000 1.00, SF 234,000 Type B-i Curb . . . ' , ' •6,500 .11 .00 LF.: . .., 71 ,500 Street Signs/Mon./Misc. - LS 2,962 I. Grading- Full .5 . . '182,237 .. 3.00'-CY 546,711. (Export or Import) .. . 167;770 . ... : 6.00 CV, 1,006,620: Subtotal '5 . . S . S , S . ', $ 1 2941,616 120,250. 3.00 SF '. 360,750 I , ' 20' Paving (on each side) ."' Type'G Curb , ' S , , . 6,504 .12.00 , LF . '78,050 - 'Street Lights - . . S . . 5 7 3,000.00 EA . - ' 21,000 ' S I . Sidewalks . . S Parkway Landscaping - '5 0 , ' . 32,500. .' 130,000 - 3.00 . ' •. 0.70....-. SF SF . - 97,500 ::• 91,000 ' Subtotal 648,300 Underground Utilities 3,250 40'.00 LF 130,000 Water — ACP/Valves:. . ' 3,250 '. ,. ' .. , . 245.00 LF ,', . ' . S ' 146,250 , Storm Drain Storm Drain Pipe/Cleanouts ' : , . . 3,250 ' ' "30.00'LF . -97500 . . 0 . Energy Dissipator/Rock Slope Protection ' LS, - 203000 I Subtotal 117,500 Traffic Signal .• S , 05, , , o 1-1/3 -100,000.00 EA Bridge Sewer, S ' - 3 250 . 2 ' :30.00..LF LS : . . , , S , — '. 0 . 97,500 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION -COST , - $ 3,214,500 I I 1•. I I 1 - '.A-3 2 I. I . . COST ESTIMATE . REACH C CONSTRUCTION COST EXHIBIT "A-3" I : CITY OF CARLSBAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (COLLEGE/CANNON) . . I Construction Item Quantity Unit Cost Item Cost Street Improvements Medians w/Median Landscaping 16,830 1.50 SF 25,245 I 12' Paving (each side of median) 24,000 31.00 SF 72,000 Type B-i Curb 2,000 ii 00 LF 22,000 Street Signs/Mon /Misc LS 955 I Grading - Full 40,000 3.00 CY 120,000 (Export or Import) .6 .00 CV 0 Subtotal $ 240,200 20' Paving (on each side) 37,000 3.00 SF 111,000 I Type G Curb 2,000 12.00 LF 24,000 Street Lights 7 3,000 00 EA 21,000 Sidewalks 10,000 3.100 SF 30,000 l Parkway Landscaping 40,000 0.70 SF 28,000 Subtotal 214,000 Underground Utilities 1,000 40.00 LF 40,000 I Water - ACP/Valves 1,000 45.00 LF 45,000 Storm Drain Storm Drain Pipe/Cleanouts 1,000 -30.00 LF 30,000 Energy Dissipator/Rock Slope Protection LS 20,000 I Subtotal 50,000 Traffic Signal 1 100,000 00 EA 100,000 I Bridge Sewer 1,000 30 00 LS LF 0 30,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST : . .: . . $ 719,200 I I I I I I I COST ESTIMATE REACH D CONSTRUCTION COST EXHIBIT I!A_4II I ' CITY OF CARLSBAD ' ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 I . .(COLLEGE/CANNON) I ' Construction Item .. ' . . . . •. Quantity . Unit Cost 'Item Cost ' Street Improvements Medians w/Median Landscaping ' ' ' . '' 67,320' .. ' '1.50 SF' ' 100,980 I ". 12' Paving (each side of median) ' .' ' 96,000 ,' .'' 3.00 SF' . -288OOO ' Type B-i Curb ' ' , :. , . ' ' .' 8 2000 . :1i.oOLF,, 88,000 .. Street Signs/Mon./Misc. LS 42000 I Grading - Full ' . '' 160,000 ..' ' 3.00 CY . 480000 (Export or Import) ., .' ' ' ' . '•, 6.00 CY .. ' 0' ' S,btotal " ' . .. .: .: '' .: . ' . s.. :960,980 20' Paving (on each side) , ' , 11+8,000 . ' ' 300 SF 444,000 . '. Type C Curb , ' ' . ' , . ' 8,000 ' ;. 12.00 LF ' 962000 Street Lights , . ' ' 29 ' ' 3,000.00 EA . 87,000 Sidewalks . .. " . , .' '. ' ' 40,000 ' : 3.00 SF . . 120,000 I •' Parkway Landscaping , ' : ' 160,000 . '. . 0.70SF 112,000 . Subtotal 859,000 Underground Utilities 4,000 1+0 00 LF 160,000 I - ACP/Valves . ' . . . ,Water ' , '. ' '.' 4,000 .'. 45.00 LF, . . . . 180,000 Storm Drain Pipe/Cleanouts 4,000 30.00. LF 120,000 Traffic Signal '2-1/3 ' ' , , 100,000.00 LS '. ", ' 233,333 Bridge ' , ' ' . . . . . . ' . . . . .'. ' LS . . . , '. 1,260,387 I' Sewer ' ' . . . . . ' ,000 ' ' . 30.00 LF "' . . ... '' 1203000 I TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $ 3,8932700 I I .' "'.;.:... 1 I. .' A-S . ': I I COST ESTIMATE REACH E CONSTRUCTION COST EXHIBIT "A-S" I CITY OF CARLSBAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 I (COLLEGE/CANNON) I Construction Item Quantity Unit Cost Item Cost Street Improvements Medians w/Median Landscaping 68,000 1 50 SF 102,000 I 12' Paving (each side of median) 96,000 3.00. SF 288,000 Type B-i Curb 8,000 11 00 LF 88,000 Street Signs/Mon./Misc. LS 4,667 I Grading - Full 3.00 CV 0 (Export or Import) 50,000 .6 .00 CV 300,000 Safety Lighting 8 3,000 00 EA 24,000 Subtotal $ 806,667 I Underground Utilities 0 Water 0 Storm Drain I Storm Drain Pipe/Cleanouts 4,000 30 00 LF 120,000 Energy Dissipator/Rock Slope Protection LS 20,000 Subtotal 140,000 I Traffic Signal 1-1/3 100,000 00 EA 133,333 Bridge LS 0 Sewer 4,000 30 00 LF 120,000 I TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $ 1,200,000 I I I I I I I I '.. ••.. ... . I . . . COST ESTIMATE • REACH F CONSTRUCTION COST EXHIBIT "A-6" I . .CITY OF CARLSBAD . ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 8571 (COLLEGE/CANNON) I Construction Item Quantity Unit Cost Item Cost Street Improvements . . Medians w/Median Landscaping . . . . 86,700 . . . . . 1.50 SF . 130,050 I 12' Paving. (each side of median) 122,1+00 .. . . 101200..........11.00.LF 3.00 SF; . . . 367,200 Type B-i Curb . •. . ..... 112,200 . Street Signs/Mon./Misc. . . .. . . LS 5,050 . 0 I Grading - Full . 200,000 3.00 CV (Export or Import) Subtotal • • .. • .6.00 . CV . . . 1,200,000 • . . $ 1,811+,500 . ... . . . . . .. 3.00 566,100 • . 20' Paving (on each side) .188,700 . . .:. . 10,200 SF . LF . . I Type Curb . •. 1.1 . 12.00 122,1+00 . . 33,000 Street Lights . Sidewalks • • . . 3,000.00 EA : . , 51,000. . •3.00 . . 0.70 SF . 153,000 I . Parkway Landscapi . ng Subtotal . .. - , 201+,000 . SF : ..... 11+2,800 . .,. .' . . Underground Utilities • . ' '- : 5,100 . . ,. . kO.00LF . .. . ., . . . 1,017,300 - ACP/Valves , . k5.00 LF , .. . . . 204,000 . 229,500 I . Water .• . Storm Drain • . . •' ' 5,100 . . • . • . '. 5,100 . . '30.00LF . : . . Storm Drain Pipe/Cleanouts Dissipator/Rock Slope Protection/ • • • 153,000 . •• • .. Energy Retaining Walls . . . • . ., . . 100,000 . • I Subtotal • . . . . . '•• . .. ,. LS •• . Traffic Signal •, . . . . . , • : 253,000 .100,000 I . Bridge • . •. . , . . . . . . . . 'H' .LS' LS . . . . 1,400,000 , Sewer . . . • • LS . '. • 719,200 I . TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . , . . . . .• $.5,737,500 I I '. , •., : ,, , .• . I I . . ., •. .: • ,.. I . . ••'A-7 I I COST ESTIMATE REACH G CONSTRUCTION COST EXHIBIT"A-7" CITY OF CARLSBAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1.. I (COLLEGE/CANNON) I Construction Item Quantity Unit Cost Item Cost Street Improvements Medians w/Median Landscaping 100,300 1 50 SF 150,450 I 12' Paving (each side of median) 141,600 3.00 SF 424,800 Type B-i Curb 1,111,800 11.00 LF 129,800 Street Signs/Mon /M,sc LS 2,950 I Grading - Full 3.00 CV 0 (Export or Import) 100,000 ' .6 .00 CY 600,000 Safety Lighting 12 3,000 00 EA 36,000 Subtotal $ 1,344,000 I Undergrou nd Utilities 0 Water 0 Storm Drain Pipe/Cleanouts 5,900 30.00 LF 177,000 I Traffic Signal LS 0 Bridge LS 1,500,000 Sewer 1 Force Main LS 240,000 Pump Station LS 1,400,000 Subtotal 1,640,000 I TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $ 4,661,000 I I I I I I 1 I A-B 1,. . COST ESTIMATE. . REACH H CONSTRUCTION COST EXHIBIT "A-8" I : CITY OF CARLSBAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. .85-1 I S (COLLEGE/CANNON) . S I Construction Item Quantity Unit Cost Item Cost Street Improvements :. . S $ . Underground Utilities -. S S .: 0 I Water 0 Storm Drain I Traffic Signal Bridge 0 0 Sewer LS 324,800 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $ 324,800 I I I I I S . 555 I I S S A-9 . S I.. I ' COST ESTIMATE S • REACH I CONSTRUCTION COST EXHIBIT "A-9" I • S. CITY OF CARLSBAD . ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 I (COLLEGE/CANNON) I Construction Item Quantity Unit Cost Item Cost Street Improvements • . - - S S 0 Underground Utilities 0 I Water 0 Storm Drain 0 Traffic Signal 0 I Bridge .• 2 . 0 '• ' - 0 Sewer LS 580,000 I TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $ 580,000 I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I • 0 ', A-b S I COST ESTIMATE REACH J CONSTRUCTION COST EXHIBIT "A-b" . I CITY OF CARLSBAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 : 1 (COLLEGE/CANNON) I Construction Item Quantity Unit Cost Item Cost Street Improvements $ o Underground Utilities 0 I Water 0 Storm Drain.0 ' Traffic Signal 0 Bridge 0 Sewer LS 351,000- TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $ 351,000 I' I I - I I 1 I 1 I '_ I S - a A A-il _ _ - - _ - _. U •. __ - _ _ COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY BY BENEFIT ZONE EXHIBIT "A"-ll" CITY OF CARLSBAD - - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (COLLEGE/CANNON) Area Benefit Frontage Benefit Grand Total Zone 1 Zone 2 'Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 7 Zone 5 Zone 6 1. Construction Items Reach A $ 2,296,500 $ 1,724,000 $ 75,000 $ 497,500 Reach B 3,214,500 2,468,700 97,500 648,300 Reach C 719,200 4752200 30,000 214,000 Reach D 3,893,700 2,374,700 120,000 1,399,000 Reach E 1,200,000 1,080,000 - 120,000 Reach F 5,737,500 2,967,500 719,200 433,500 1,617,300 Reach C 4,661,000 3,021,000 1,640,000 Reach H 324,800 324,800 Reach I 580,000 580,000 Reach J 351,000 351,000 Subtotal Construction Cost $22,978,200 $ 7,042,600 $ 1,080,000 $ 5,988,500 $ 4,057,500 $ 433,500 $ 2,758,800 $ 1,617,300 Escalation to 1986 Construction:,2,297,800 704,000 108,000 599,000 406,000 43,000 275,800 162,000 Construction Contingency 2,528,000 ' 775,600 119,000 658,000 ' 446,500 ' 48,000 303,200 177,700 Total Construction $27,804,000 $ 8,522,200 $ 1007,000 $ 7,245,500 $ 4,910,000 $ 524,500 $ 3,337,800 $ 1,957,000 II Right-of-Way 1,401,600 734,200 281,000 386,400 III Incidental Expense 5,283,000 1,619,000 248,000 1,376,000 933,000 100,000 635,000 372,000 Subtotal ' $34,488,600 $10,875,400 $ 1,836,000 $ 9,007,900 '$5,843,000 $ 624,500 $ 3,972,800 $ 2,329,000 I.V. Less Cash Contribution - 3,720,500 ' 820,500 - ' 0 - 2,900,000 - Subtotal - $30,768,100 $10,875,400 $ 1,015,500 $ 9,007,900 $ 2,943,000 $ 624,500 $ 3,972,800 $ 2,329,000 V. Financing Cost 5,154,150 1,920,600 179,200 1,314,150 - 519,000 - -110,000 700,200 411,000 - Total Amount Assessed -' $35,922,250 $12,796,000 $ 1,194,700 $10,322,050 $ 3,462,000 - $ 734,500 $ 4,673,000 $ 2,740,000 ,_._ .. iIU1U:1Uj..4 :• U CITY OF CARLSBAD I' . ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (COLLEGE/CANNON) . . ASSESSMENT NO. ASSESSED LAND - . .. ASSESSMENT. ASSESSMENT COMBINED AND ASSESSOR'S VALUE (COUNTY ASSESSED VALUE TRUE VALUE LIABILITY THIS ASSESSMENT -.-.--.PARCEL .,NUMBER -_..---AS-~30--S.-.R.E.CORDS.)--. OF_._lMPRO.VEMEATS____. OF PARCEL. OUTSTANDING 'PROCEEDING OUTSTANDING 163-040-03 359458 0 359 458.00 .00 319002.56 31,002.56 163-050-01 2609044 0 260,044.00 .00 1,210,693.85 1,210,693.85 163-050-02 2189650 . . 0 2189650.00 .00 277,867.78 277,867.78 168-050-03 339005 . 0 339 005.00 .00 155 9 968.79 155,963.79 ..168-D50-O5 2.''86'512._..__.....L.. ...............0 2,186,512.00 ..00 - 3,914,255.52 3,9149 255.52 163-050-06 49,619 0 499619.00 .00 189,264.25 189,264.25 163-050-07 2439224 0 248,224.00 .00 6389 365.85 638,365.85 168-030-08 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 168-050-17 1,499206 .- 0 1,4799 206.00 .00 86230898 862,30898 168-050-19 . 0 . . 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 168-050-23 2089301 81,625 2399926.00 .00 7759 107.10 775,107.10 163-050-25 1989578 0 198,578.00 .00 19025,571.99 19 0259571.99 168-053-26 10071,820. 0 190719820.00 .00 1,543,722.86 1,543,722.86 208-010-32 .1,5139294 47,278 195609572.00 .00 751,074.99 751,074.99 .208-020-17 29,543 T545a 65,006.00 0 0 7 4939j35• 49,391•35 - 208-020-28 1,337,250 ......82,851 1,420,101.00, .00 6,8629 325.90 69 8629 325.90 208-020-30 49,732 . .. . . 0 49,732.00 .00 . .00 .00 209-040-02 359458 59,Z09 209-040-15 719030 809509 151 9539.00 .00 11,715.55 11,715.55 209-060-23 87,216 0 ______ 879 216.00 .00 3,310.65 3,310.65 209-040-24 9131 99,131.00 00 .............. 149 39095'140 390.95 209-060-27 . 163,200 . . . .,..163,200.00 .00 55,303.08 . . 55,308.08 209-040-28 689 873 - . 969153 . 165,026.00 .00 57,962.87 57,962.87 20 9-04 0-29 98,461700 700 11935683 11935483 209-040-33 369057 368,708 404,765.00 .00 8,038.41 . 8,039.41 209-060-06 355,052 0 355,052.00 .00 1,244,629.71. 19 244,629.71 I,-209-060-10 -.5,209 209 11841800-.00 - 71236;81 - 71,236.81 209-060-11 44 9 938 . 679462 112,400.00 . .00 . 39,379.36 39,379.36 209-060-14 479278 15,386 62,664.00 .00 324,659.48 3249 659.48 209-060-23 . 519293 2,338 53,631.00 .00 55930308 559308.08 209-060-25 29,548 39565 33,113.00 .00 379 941.34 37,941.34 -Th 209-060-26 7629883 0 762,883.00 .00 377,201.10 377,201.10 147,97500 .00 383,129.81 333,129.81 209-060-37 14,160 0 . 149 160.00 .00 219 791.39 219 791.39 209-060-43 189,144 :739556 ..- 262 9700.00 .00 277,382.21 277,382.21 209-060-44 .525 0525.00 ..Q0 -0O - - .00 209-060-48 124,222 539301 1779 523.00 .00 1259 549.36 125,549.34 209-060-50 19145,376 0 19145,376.00 .00 431,181.79 431,181.19 - 209-060-53 7,134 - . 7,134;oo ...608389 -6,083.89 209-060-54 179 728 . 29,548. 47,276.00 .00 6,526.35 69 526.35 209-060-55 149,980 . 0 1499 980.00 .00 - 480,589.95 4809 539.95 209-060-56 ............20,627 . 339451 54,078.00 _.00 29418.85 - 29413.85 Th .- : . . - -.. -J-Y WED, APR 179 1985, 11:35 AM NESTE, BRUDIN AND STONE INC DEBT LIMIT REPORT EXHIBIT "8" PAGE 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD TSSESSMENT DISTRICT NO851T (COLLEGE/C ANNON) ASSESSMENT NO. ASSESSED.LAND . AND ASSESSOR'S VALUE (COUNTY ASSESSED VALUE TRUE VALUE LIABILITY THIS ASSESSMENT PARCEL NUMBER ASSR'S RECORDS) OF IMPROVEMENTS OF PARCEL OUTSTANDING PROCEEDING OUTSTANDING 209-060-57 129 822 0 129822.00 .00 1,473.19 1,478.19 20-060-58 1339322 34,547 2179869.00 .00 3489 219.67 348,219.67 209-070-01 7634 . 5908 680,442.00 ;OO - -I-,861,259.37'- 1,861,259.37 209-070-02 14,828 0 14,828.00 .00 349 512.24 34,512.24 209-070-03 64,284 0 64,234.00 .00 42,476.61 42,476.61 209-070-04 130,132 - 0 130,132.00 .00 -------------'2349838.11"-' '"2349838.11 209-070-05 2189673 53,189 271,862.00 .00 3529 312.47 352012.47 209-070-07 3,151,072 0 3,151,072.00 .00 2,064,761.20 2,064,761.20 --- 203-070-08 1219546 3565 125,11100 211-010-05 179728 . 0 17,728.00 .00 .00 .00 211-010-11 146,916 5,520 152,436.00 .00 1,126,013.39 19 126,013.39 211-010-19 0 0 - .00 .00 ..................._•-.•ØØ ----------------.00 211-010-20 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 211-010-22 . 0 0 .00 .00 48,865.69 48,865.69 211-021-21 567~1 'T 47931.................36115000 _---.-.' ;00 2;878375;70-------------2,878,375.70---- 212-010-03 0 0 .00 .00 269 876.13 269876.13 212-010-05 . 0 . . 0 .00 .00 677,216.84 . 677,216.84 212-010-07 0 0 00 - 00 - 00 -------------- -.00 -j 212-010-11 0 0 .00 .00 884033.16 834,133.16 212-010-12 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 21.-010-13 --0 00 00 - - 00 212-010-14 . 0 . 0 .00 .00 00 .00 212-020-22 979869 1519 386 2499 255.00 .00 1,160..56 19160.56 212-020-23 970, ~46 0 - 9T0,866;00 ;0Ô'659553;33 ------65553.33 212-020-25 1319350 0 1319350.00 .00 69144.86 69144.86 212-020-26 391399190 0 3,189,190.00 .00 1269330.03 126030.03 212-020-27 448446 448446.00 -------------------.00 ---------- 7520430 75,204.30 212-020-28 8669913 0 866,913.00 .00 . 26086.08 269 985.08 212-020-29 693,530 .. 0 6939 530.00 .00 229 666.00 229 466.00 212-020-30 -- 5,988,685 - 0 - 5,938,685.00 ---------.00 ...............235,862.48 235 9 862.48 212-030-06 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 212-030-15 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 212-050-13 - 41368 - --41,36900 00 - - 6;108;2r - 6,108 21 212-050-14 477,751 477,751.00 .00 28,122.21 28,122.21 .' 212-050-15 448,233 0 - 449,233.00 .00 269 326.39 . 25,326.39 - .........- 212-050-22 - 4,123 4,123;00 .00 - 17,993.35 -- 17,993.35 212-050-29 4679456 659121 532,577.00 .00 19015,699.05 1,015,699.05 212-050-30 177,524 0 1779524.00 .00 - 29,954.67 29,954.67 -- 212-050-32 - 13,601 _ 10034 23,635 00 00 - -- - 1,026.18 1,026 13 212-050-33 106,492 - 0 106,492.00 .00 119630.03 11,630.03 212-050-34 289,930 0 2899 930.00 .00 8879 055.05 837,055.05 212-050-35 .........10,701 -, 10,701.00 --.00 - 189329.67 189329.67 : .. J -. . ...... - 1 35 AM DEBT LIMIT REPORT PAGE 3 NESTE, BRUDIN AND STONE INC*EXHIBIT "3" 1 CITY OF CALSBA0 4 1 . . . ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 . . (COLLEGE/CANNON) . .•. . . . - ASSESSMCNTNO - ASSESSED LAND ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENf COMBINED I ' AND ASSESSOR'S VALUE (COUNTY ASSESSED VALUE TRUE VALUE LIABILITY THIS ASSESSMENT LI _____ PARCEL.. NUMBER OF PARCEL UTST DING PROCEEDING OUTSTANDING - 212-050-36 429872 0 42 9 872.00 .. .00 - 1,465.97 1,465.97 LL...L_..212..O5O7 .i,JJ? ._42 ,872.O.9 ____•_O __L.. _P 8 1,698.08 SS. 212-050-38 42,872 0 42,872 00 0O 1,575 92 1,575 92 212-050-39 42,872 0 42,87200 00 1,368 24 1,368 24 212-050740 1489 342 0 148,342 00 00 17,616 08 - 17,616 03 * - I 89 PARCELS 2,54O,173 00 1,565,283 00 34,105,461 00 00 35,922,250 00 3599229250 00 ,- 4 t . .. .,. '4 • • .4 -. .. ... ., -4 - :- ._..',•.;k;4:\ . -- -.-•----------- ----------S---- ----.------S-- -4 ...............................-.-.---.---.- ........ - -- Tj -5- -5- 5- - - --- -- 5-.-- -- - _Ll I 1.17 ; -- -----5--' -5 ------------- 77- -----5---- -_-_---_-_A_--_-------. ----- - * ... -___ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RESOLUTION EXHIBIT "C" I CITY OF CARLSBAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 I (COLLEGE/CANNON) I TO BE INSERTED AT THE ADOPTION OF THE INVESTIGATION REPORT I, I I * I I I I I I I I I I I S I I I I I I I I I I I :1 H I I I I I I I DESCRIPTION OF WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT EXHIBIT "D" I CITY OF CARLSBAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (COLLEGE/CANNON) The proposed improvements have been identified by reaches as follows Reach A, B, C, D and F Full street improvements (right-of-way to right-of-way), sewer, water, gas, telephone, electric,: drainage, traffic control, landscaping and street lighting I Reach E Half street improvements to include median and one I sewer travel lane each side of -median.,with safety lighting, and drainage Reach G I Half street improvements to include median and one travel lane each side of median with safety lighting, I sewer, drainage and bridge Reach H, I and J I Construction of sewer pipeline Reference is made to the map entitled "Map of; Improvements, I . Assessment District. No. 85-1 ,-(College/Cannon)" and on file-in ,.- the Office of the Clerk of the City of Carlsbad of the County of San Diego and attached hereto, for .a description of the ... general nature., location 'and extent' of' the 'proposed improve I, rnentsinAssessrnent District No. 85-1. S I I I I I MAP OF IMPROVEMENTS- ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.. 85 -1 (COLLEGE / CANNON) CITY OF CARLSBAD SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" 1000" KELLY AO TR REACH "B"CARLSE~Ad~ HIGHLAND R E A C H "A" I t KELLY OT 0 IsoJ SCHOOL \ ROBERTSON VK TR PROPERTY REACH "E"I \\ \\ / * ..•'. KELLY WA AMINO \ REACH REACH "G" REACH "F" ERN MEN DE NOT A PART CANTARIN t, \\REA CH "I" / IT & T /KELLY A6\'1R I i REACH H1" - _L ETAL Ji 'MANDANA. CORP CT 83-9 1 4'&KL G\ REACH "J" TF-.-. \ - / / _J-— REACH "C 00 LEGEND: FOX PUMP STATION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROPOSED FUTURE STREETS FULL WIDTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS(ROW-ROW) SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO. CA 0 / CAR BAD RES,/ARCH CYJTER /1 1 CARLTAS 1 CITYk\CARLSBAD .\ . HALF WIDTH IMPROVEMENT (MED IAN,ONE LANE EACH WAY). 'CURB TO CURB STREET IMPROVEMENT UG . UNDERGROUND UTILITIES (TEL,ELEC,GAS) PALOMAR W WATERLINE S SEWERLINE ROAD PROPERTY LINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL BRIDGE r I I I I I U U I I 1 I 1 I I 1 m - rn Zc5 METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD EXHIBIT "E" CITY OF CARLSBAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (COLLEGE/CANNON) . . ' The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of' the "Municipal Improvement Act of '1913," must be based on the benefit that the. properties receive from the works of improvement. ' The, statute does' not specify the. method of formula that should be used' in any special assessment district proceedings. The responsibility rests with the 'Assessment Engineer,' 'who is retained for the purpose' of making an analysis' of the facts -and. determining the correct apportiOnment of the assessment obligation. For these 'proceedings, the City has retained the services , of Neste, Brudin & Stone 'Incorporated. See Attachment I' for. a statement of their qualifications and experience The. Assessment Engineer then makes his recommendation at, the 'public' hearing on the Assessment District', and the 'final authority and action rests with the City , after hearing all testimony and evidence presented at that public ,hearing. Upon 'the conclusion of 'the public hearing, the City must make the final action in determining whether; or not the assessment spread has been, made in direct proportion to the benefits received. ' Analysis City of Carlsbad policy Statement No. 33, effective May 29, 1984 sets the policy for use of Assessment Districts, to finance Public Improvements. The improvements include arterial streets identified on the circulation element' of the Carlsbad General Plan. It further permits certain improve- ments 'within' the arterial 'street 'right-of-ways to be financed and, t'o' include, sewers, water lines, -drainage and public utilities. • The arterial streets to be constructed and financed by this assessment district are College Boulevard and Cannon Road. These two streets permit only limited access to adjoining property and in general point access is limited at 1300 feet 'intervals. Improved El Camino Real is a prime arterial that traverses the assessment district and limits access . to intervals of 2600 feet. ' A master •sewer plan has been prepared for the City of Carlsbad.and will be presented to the City Council for formal adoption in the near 'future. A part of the sewer plan E-1 defines the . sewer facilities to the Agua Hedionda Drainage Basin. The City Engineer has determined that existing sewer 'lines now serving a portion of the Agua. Hedionda Basin are at or near capacity. The City Council and Planning Commission -have given approval to several tentative maps., general plan amendments and specific plans. .'These approvals.- incorporate approximately 41% of the land. ownership area of the assessment district. . Specific conditions for approval of the above planned projects are found to be similar for the 'total area or subareas. The similarities are: 1. The projects are approved 'upon the express condition' that the final map shall not be approved unless the City - "Council finds as of the time of such' approval that sewer service is. available to. serve the subdivision. 2.. Full width right-of-way and full width improvement of the arterial road. through the subdivision in' accordance 'with city, standards, ,'including median.,.. island is required. Full, width right-of-way,, full width grading and 'half width improvement (excluding sidewalks and median landscape ..treatment). of the arterial road from the subdivision boundary to an existing arterial, road is required Installation of traffic signals at intersections with arterial roads is required. On and offsite water' and sewer lines adequate to serve the proposed development are required. . • .' ' Drainage facilities for the protection of the arterial I roads are required. , ' . • ' The City .of Carlsbad has established a sewer facilities U . construction.. fund 'which receives revenue from sewer connec- tion fees... A Public'. Facilities Fee is also. collected and a portion 'of said fee .' is used to finance specifically designated arterial streets and traffic signals. The major sewer line and pumping station to be constructed are sized for the total contributory area both in and outside of the assessment district. A portion of the proposed sewer 'construction will be funded from the , sewer facilities construction fund. . The sewer line within •existing Cannon Road from the Santa Fe Railroad to easterly of I-S is of inadequate' size and requries a parallel sewer. This parallel sewer will be funded partially by the City. I I The City will pay for the following improvements from the Public Facilities -Fees.., 1. Traffic signal at the intersection of El Camino Real with Cannon Road. 2.. The southerly -one-half street improvement of Cannon' Road from El Camino Real to college Boulevard including a proportionate share of right-of-way cost and a portion of the traffic signal cost of the ' intersection of College-Boulevard and Cannon Road. 3. City portion of street construction ''costs for Cannon Road to serve Macario Park In addition credits, to 'the payment of' Publid 'Facilities Fees may be given for other street' work 'now being funded by the assessment district as subdivision maps are recorded Benefits and Assessment Criteria , The AguaHedionda Land Use Plan defines wetlands'or'riparian areas '•within the assessment district. These' areas are defined as permanent open space, even though in private ownership. These areas have not.been. assessed for any of the improvements to be 'constructed by the assessment district. Where area is used to determine an assessment, the area of• any prime and major arterial right-of-way, either existing or proposed has been subtracte,d from gross 'area for any given parcel of land.' Noother deductions have been made 'for'area calculations. Direct benefits will accrue to the lands within the assessment district as follows Sewers. The sewer facilities ' being . constructed, including sewer 'lines and pump station, provide' sewage transport capacity for "that portion of the assessment district within the ' Agua. Hedionda. Drainage Basin. Additional'. capacity.' not. . requried by the.. assessment district, is 'being paid for .b.y.the City'..'' These facil- ities provide 'a direct benefit 'of capacity to a gross area and therefore the benefit is assessed equally on a per acre basis. Land use and land planning approvals are not sufficient at this time to calculated specific sewage flows from individual parcels of land. See Benefit Zone'No. 4 'on the attached Benefit Zone Map. Streets, Drainage, Water, Utilities and Bridges. Two distinct and separate direct benefits have been identi- fied as accruing to the lands within the assessment district for these improvements. Giving consideration to the existing approvals of tentative maps, it can be E-3 concluded that other properties under the same condi- tions would have conditions of approval similar to or the same as existing approvals.:' Therefore street improvements and related utilities' have been divided into two direct benefits. In- a given geographic area all parcels of'land applying for a - map approval would be required to dedicate full width right-of-way, construct full width grading, half street-. improvements and offsite utilities (excluding sidewalks and median- landscape -treatment). These improvements, have been -determined to -be: a Medians b 12 feet of paving on each side of median c Water line d Street drainage e Traffic signals, signing and striping - f. Bridges (approximately. 57%) - - - - g. Full grading of ultimate.right-of-way h Acquisition of full right-of-way The above improvements provide the needed access and backbone utilities to all lands in a.., given area. This -direct --benef-it is assessed, equally- on a--per acre basis. - -: - Three distinct, areas are identified'and are -shown as. - - .Benefit Zones. 1,: 2 and. 3 on. -the -attached. Benefit Zone . Map The second direct street benefit relates to, the remain- ing street improvements of a 20 feet of paving, each side b Curb and gutter, each side - - c Sidewalk, each side d. - Landscaping of parkways and median - e-. Street lighting - f. Fire hydrants - - -. - g Bridges (approxmiately 43%) -- The. .- City- - requires in .the approval process full street improvements and utilities to arterial roads -that pass through a planned subdivision. Therefore the remaining street improvements provide a - direct benefit to the adjoining parcels. of land and the benefit is assessed on - a frontage. basis. Water. lines and underground 'utilities are installed in only a portion of Cannon Road within Benefit Zone 3. Therefore, these two improvements have been separated from other improvements in Benefit Zone 3 and assigned to Benefit Zone 7 as an area benefit. I -of-way acquisition 3. Right-of-Way Costs. Cost of right has been included in the construction item for which the I . right-of-way is required. Street. right-of-way is applied to the area. benefit. I . Incidental costs were prorated to' each of the benefits in accordance with each benefit's share of the total construc- tion costs I Financing costs were prorated to each of'.the benefits in accordance with each benefit's share of the total construc- tion, acquisition and incidental costs I In conclusion, it is my opinion that' the assessments fOr the above-referenced Assessment District have been spread in direct proportion with the benefits that each parcel receives I from the works of improvement I DATED , 1985 NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE INCORPORATED I ENGINEER OF WORK CITY OF CARLSBAD STATE OF CALIFORNIA I I 1 I I I U I I I E-5 MAP O-F BENEFIT ZONES ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85 -1 (COLLEGE / CANNON) CITY OF CARLSBAD SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ................ . . ........ ............. ........... . ........ . . . . . . KELLY AO TJ REACH "B" H I G H L A N D \ \—REACH "A" I H SCALE: 1"=1000' BENEFIT ZONE LEGEND: BENEFITZ O NENO . 1 ww.w.w.w.w BENEFIT ZONE NO. 5 00000000000000000 BENEFIT ZONE NO. 6 .........................e. BENEFIT ZONE NO. 7 REACH "J" REACH op "C" \ KE no PPI TR / 101 SCHOOL VK TR \ / PROPERTY ROBERTSO N \ REACH "E" REACH "G" DE MEN RE ACH "I R E A NOT A PART REACH "D" mv CT FRAk w0101 TR REACH:- H SAN DIEGO GAS & ELEC o PUMP STATION \ KELG 83-9 \\\ - •••••:..•.•..•••••••• ii ASSESSMENT I!; / CAR" L TDISTRICT BAD I IMPROVEMENT LEGEND: BOUNDARY \ CARLTAS CO / RES4ARCH / PROPOSED FUTURE STREETS I CITYCARLSBAD N 'TER FOX \\ I' I FULL WIDTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS(ROW-ROW) HALF WIDTH IMPROVEMENT (MEDIAN,ONE LANE EACH WAY) CURB TO CURB STREET IMPROVIEMENT UG UNDERGROUND UTILITIES (TEL,E LEC,GAS) W WATERLINE S SEWERLINE PROPERTY LINE jj TRAFFIC SIGNAL' '— ____ BRIDGE I- -\ ji PALOMAR ----- - 1ppo ~ ROA /Z TI Ii SHT.2 OF 2 I NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE Incorporated Engineers • Planners PC)-.) • • • •4-":jo I E68-015-007 MAP OF BENEFIT ZONES ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85 -i (COLLEGE / CANNON) CITY OF CARLSBAD SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA r -,", -~ i rr KELLY AO T F CARLSifkQ HIGHLAND I \ REACH "A" R E A C H "B" j • •• •• .z __ 11 \ -r II \ - REACH "F"'---- REACH "G" SCALE: 1'!=:1000' BENEFIT ZONE LEGEND: II II VI II II II BENEFIT ZONE NO. 1 BENEFIT ZONE NO. 2 BENEFIT ZONE NO. 3 IMPROVEMENT LEGEND: -- I li/1iIfIllhIJIIIJJ1iJI1I / '7 \' \ I N . PUMP STATION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROPOSED FUTURE STREETS FULL WIDTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS(ROW—ROW) HALF WIDTH IMPROVEMENT (MEDIAN,ONE LANE EACH WAY) -. CURB TO CURB STREET IMPROVEMENT UG UNDERGROUND UTILITIES (TEL,ELEC,GAS) PALOMAR W WATERLINE S SEWERLINE KEL LS' 'WA\ U' REACH 66 D" - ERN EN CANTARINIJ url J ETAL /\\ / • ."-----M AN DANA. COR CT 83-9 REACH "J" bow AR FOX \\ REACH "C" w TER fYCARLSBAD i1 , / / /pp ROAD PROPERTY LINE SHT.1 OF 2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL BRIDGE NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE Incorporated Engineers • Planners - C P,.& . ( ;- • q p E68-0 15-007 ATTACHMENT I TO EXHIBIT "E" NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE,INCORPORATED. STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE - - •- S -Construction.- - Number Project -. Project Contract of Title Client Cost Date Parcels Description Chino Hills County of San Bernardino Not Available 1987 Not Public works improvements Available 19,000 acres to be developed for residential and commercial use Improvements will include water storage and transmission, wastewater collection, treat- ment and reclamation, fire protection, flood control and drainage, streets and highways, underground utilities, and, other general improvement facilities (preliminary planning stage) AD 79-2 City of Corona 54,7002000 1983 121 Public works improvements for 1,460-acre residential, commercial, and industrial land development 56,200 LF 12"-30" water lines, 3 MG and 4 MG buried concrete reservoirs, 2,000 gpm water booster station, and 7,000 SF fire station, 46,000 LF 6"-18" sewer lines, 800 LF 411-6" laterals, chimney laterals, wastewater pump stations (2 MGD, 264 gpm, 120 gpm), and sewer capac- 3 ity rights to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor, 21,900 S S LF 18"-96" storm drain pipe- lines, 3,600 LF 8'x5' box culverts, 1,500 LF 8'x4' box ATTACHMENT I TO EXHIBIT "E" . S . NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE, INCORPORATED . . . STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE .. " .- . Construction Number. Project - .• .. -. . .• - ••Project Contract ' df • Title Client Cost Date Parcels Description AD 79-2 City of Corona . . culverts, 5 storm drain and (continued) . . . : 2 pipeline connections to Arlington Flood Control • . . Channel, transition struc- tures, concrete-lined' channels, and graded earth diversion channels; 5 miles of major and secondary streets, new bridges over . . . . . . . . S , - Riverside Freeway 91 and AT&SF Railroad, 2 freeway access ramps, widening 2 bridges over Arlington Flood Control Channel, and widening • • S ' S • • . - '. ' an existing railroad grade - S . . .• . . . S ' ' crossing; and, telephone, gas, and electric facilities in . S * . • . S S. ' . . all streets and hookups, to • -. . - .S • existing facilities. AD 20 Yucaipa Valley County - - 32,934,200 . - 1983 - : 11,000 . '. Regional sewage treatment Water District - system 3.0 MGD wastewater treatment plant; septage dis- posal system; 4 pump stations; S ' • ', • 155,965 LF 4"-24" sewer lines; . •. ' ' .. : ' : .• - 18,450 LF 4"-6" laterals. -- ADs Ramona Municipal S S 680,000 . . • 0 . • 19835 • . 178 Assessment engineering services Water District . , .' • • . only for two assessment • . - •: ' 0 • districts for water and sewer - . • - : . . 0 - - systems improvements: 9,300 LF S - -- S ' .1 •. JO water line; 11,600 LF 8" *Total project cost for sewer AD only. :• • • - 'O • - • - . 1-2. • 0 • _.,_ -,- ''• a a ,•a,a ' a . • . ATTACHMENT I TO EXHIBIT "E" ' • NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE, INCORPORATED. . STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE . Estimated Construction' Number .Project_'Project Cbntr ac .• of' ' ,'., .• . ' Title . ' ' Client Cost , . Date ' Parcels Description' ADs Ramona Municipal :• , . . " •' ' .. ' . . i ' . , '. ' seer, lines; 138'laterals; pay- (continued) Water District . ' ' •' ' . ,' ' ment of dwelling unit equivalent charges Peppertree Rainbow Municipal Water 2,212,144 1982 62 Tract map and grading and Meadows • District •. . . .. 4 ' '.' ' • ••.• improvement plans for public works improvements 62 acres to be developed for residential use Improvements will ,'include: 12,649 LF 8"-14" water lines, 11,237 LF 8"-12" sewer lines, 1,124 LF 18"-36" storm drain, 1,220 LF minor, drainage Channel, 2,075 LF brow ditches, inlets, 2 miles street improve- ments, 5260 ADs Yucaipa Valley County 35,593,200 103-'17,395 Thirteen assessment districts Water District- 1982 for sewer collection system 1981 Design features 581,265 LF 1980 8"-15" sewer lines, 179,442 LF 1978 4"-6" laterals 1977 ADs - Big Bear Lake • . '' ' ' 7,939,563' ' 1982.1966 ' 5,0431 Eleven assessment districts for Sanitation District . . '. • • • : 1975 • •' 1964 ' • . . sewer systems: 314,664 LF • '' 1974 ' 1963 , • . ' • 4"-18" sewer lines; 1,237 LF • . , . . ,•. • •. I ' 1973 1962 • .'" . 6" force main; 60,846 LF 41! . • • . . . ' • ' . .' ,. .laterals; 6 lift stations. • • 173.'' • ' •• ' : • • _.. - - . _ U. U. - - - • - - - • ATTACHMENT I TO EXHIBIT "E" . . NESTE, •BRUDIN & STONE, INCORPORATED . . . STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE . .. . Construction Number, Project - Project Contract of Title Client . Cost Date Parcels Description ADs Desert Hot Springs 2,126,400 ., 1982 3,247 Four assessment districts for County Water District . . 1975 water and. sewer systems:. 1972 0 Design features: 11,410 LF.16" water line; .95,490 LF 8"-15" sewer lines; . ., . . . . . . •; .. .•-• . .. .. • .83,970 LF, 4"-6" laterals. ADs Lake Arrowhead Sanitation 3,471,552 1982 2,703 Six assessment districts for District 1975 sewer systems Design features 1967 for ,5 ADs 145,463 LF 3"-8" 1966 sewer lines, 800 LF 6" force main, 16,971 LF 4" laterals, 2 lift stations, pump sta- tion One AD is in the pre- design stage AD 1 Baldy Mesa County Water . 3,000,000 • • .1982 • 1,047 • •• Water system: .2 MGD water District storage tank, 168,600 LF 0 • . .•. . . 6"-10" water lines; fire hydrants Jurupa Hills City Of Fontana 0 60,000 • 1982 ..........•. 26 Assessment engineering service (fee), • ., . only for various public works • .......•0 ., ' . improvements for 340 acres to be developed for residential and ' 0 • •• . . . commercial use. Improvements Will include:'26,490 LF 10"-24" • . - ,' . • •. water lines; 14,430 LF 8"-15" . •• • 0 0 0 ' • 0 . sewer lines, 11,300 LF 14" - 0 ' ••, 0 . force main, pump station; 0 0 • 0 • 0 • • ': . . 17,060 LF 48"-72" storm 0 0 I-4'''i ATTACHMENT I TO EXHIBIT'"E" NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE, ]NCORPORATED STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE - - - - Number------------ Construction Project - - --- Project Contract 6f Title Client Cost Date Parcels Description Jurupa Hills City of Fontana drain, 4 miles street (continued) improvements, 64'-126', and, 20,710 LF underground electric gas and telephone * lines I - North City City of San Diego 60,000 *•- - 1982 1107 Assessment engineering services West (fee) only for various public works improvements for 360 acres to be developed for residential use Improvements will include water transmission, wastewater collection, fire protection, flood control and drainage, siltation abatement structures, major perimeter and basic interior circulation streets, community park, public recreation facilities associated with school site improvements, acquisition of • -: sites and rights-of-way; and, other general improvement - facilities. ADs San Marcos County 8,844,700 1981 395 Four assessment districts for Water District -' -• 1978 water systems: Storage tanks - 1976 • (10 MG total); 120,500 LF 6"-30"-.water lines, pumping and chlorination facilities; pressure reducing, metering • and telemetry systems; fire • - hydrants. 1-5 ATTACHMENT I TO EXHIBIT "E" NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE, INCORPORATED STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE - Construction Number Project --Project--*---- Contract of - Title Client Cost Date Parcels Description Bradley County of San Diego 37,200 1981 130 Assessment engineering services Avenue (fee) S only for street and flood control improvements Investigative study. AD 80-1 City of Corona 10,000 1981 108 Assessment engineering services (fee) only for sewer system capacity rights to Santa Ana Regional Interceptor. AD 79-1 City of Corona 639,000 1980 101 Fire Station No 4 Coordina- tion of all architectural documents and drawings, and, the design of 350 LF 4" water lines, 350 LF of 4" sewer lines, parking lot AD 5861 City of San Bernardino 13,000 1980 200 Assessment engineering services (fee) only for various public works improvements for a 200-lot, low- - - cost housing project. Improve- - ments included: water and sewer lines; flood control and drain- age, street improvements, and, underground utilities. 1-6 ATTACHMENT I TO EXHIBIT "E" NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE, INCORPORATED STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE Construction Number' - Project - - Project— Contract of - Z. Title Client Cost Date Parcels Description AD 1978-2 City of Colton 7,000 1980 215 Assessment engineering services (fee) only for various public works improvements water transmission, wastewater collection, street improvements, flood control and drainage, and, other general - improvement facilities AD 78-1 Valley Center Municipal 5,500 1979 11 Assessment engineering services Water District (fee) only for domestic water system 1.0 MG water tank, 12,060 LF 8'-i6" water lines, pump station I modifications ADs Crestline Sanitation 59767,373 1976 2,680 Ten assessment districts for District 1975 sewer systems 317,483 LF 1973 6"-12" sewer lines, 41,400 LF 1967 4"-6" laterals, pump stations AD 1975-1 City of Colton 36,000 1976 48 Sewer system 1,000 LF 8" ' ' '' ' sewer lines; 320 LF 4" laterals 'AD A-83' County of Placer ' ' 1,085,000 1975 240 , Public works improvements: 12,217 LF 4"-12" water lines; 13,453 LF 6"-8" sewer lines; 791 LF 18't x40"x33" storm drain;' 5,085 LF 6" subdrain pipe; fire hydrants. 1-7 . _ N N H - -: • _ N N •N - W ATTACHMENT I TO EXHIBIT "E" NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE, INCORPORATED STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE Construction Number ..-.-- - - Proj ect - - - --Project-- Contract of Title Client Cost Date Parcels Description ADs Running Springs 3,797,000 1974 3,796 Seven assessment districts , Water District . . 1972 for sewer systems: 284,850 LF - 1971 6"-8" sewer lines; 550 LF . 1970 4'.' -force main; 39,292 LF laterals ADs City of Escondido - . 591,000 ¶ 1973 80 Five assessment districts for l971 public works improvements: - 5,571 LF 8" water lines; 10,712 LF 8"-15"-sewer lines; 3,034 LF 18"-48" storm drain; • . - fire hydrants; 4.45 miles . . - - - . - street improvements with - - 29,731 LF curbs and gutters, sidewalks and driveways. AD 130 County of Riverside - - - 675,707 1969 2,937 Gas pipe: 168,960 LF 2"-4" * natural gas pipelines. ADs - Lake Hemet Municipal 1,234,000 1969 1966 2,543 Six assessment .districts for Water District .. 1968 1965 • sewer systems: 218,865 LF . - 1967 - 4"-8" sewer lines. AD 5 Rubidoux Community Services District 186,000 - 1968 327 Sewer system: 21,093 LF 4"-8" sewer lines; 643 LF 4" force - main; lift station. 1-8 • - •: _ . - - • - ... - ATTACHMENT I TO EXHIBIT "E" NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE, INCORPORATED STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE Number Construction Project - - - - Project Contract of Title . Client Cost Date - Parcels Description AD 67-1 Loma Linda Sanitation 170,000. 1967 437 - Sewer system: 20,912 LF 8"-12" District . . sewer lines; 5,968 LF 4"-6" laterals. ADs City of San Jacinto 804,000 1966 .1,145 Four assessment districts for • 1964. public works improvements: 8,000 LF 4"-10" water lines, - 4,760 LF copper service lines, 2,313 LF 3/4t_1I polyethylene . ,. . . . . . • pipe; 42,604 LF.4"-1O"sewer . lines; fire hydrants; 8 miles . • ., . •. .. • street improvements with 63,254. LF curbs and gutters, drive- . . - . • ways, alley aprons, sidewalks. - . :. - ,• -'r' • • - • _•.-. 1-9 -